RecordWell Data

Board of Adjustment Meeting — Agenda Packet

St. Croix County · St. Croix County · Board of Adjustment · meeting of Sep 24, 2026 · Agenda packets

Open the original document More from St. Croix County

Text

Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.

Board of Adjustment Agenda September 24, 2026 8:30 AM St. Croix County Government Center - Room 1400 Government Center - 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin Call to Order Roll Call Approval of Minutes 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting - August 27, 2026 Public Hearings 1. Continuation of Joseph and Natalie Weber - Request for Four Variances to Replace their Home and Deck in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, Town of Somerset Business 1. Weber Variance Request to Construct an Addition to a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the Ordinary High-Water Mark and Bluff Line Setbacks. 2. Weber Variance Request to Exceed 1500 Square Foot Footprint of a Non-conforming Principle Structure within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark Setback 3. Weber Variance Request to Reconstruct an Existing Non-conforming Deck 4. Weber Variance Request to Expand a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the 50-foot Road Right-of-Way Setback Request for Future Agenda Items Announcements Date of Next Meeting 1. Date of Next Meeting - October 22, 2026 Adjournment Reasonable efforts will be made to provide special accommodations for access to public meetings. To request a special accommodation, please contact the County Clerk’s Office at (715) 386-4600 at least two business days prior to the time of the meeting. For more information on St. Croix County's public meetings visit: sccwi.gov/meetings Page 1 of 53 Board of Adjustment Minutes August 27, 2026 8:30 AM St. Croix County Government Center - Room 1400 Government Center - 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin Call to Order Roll Call PRESENT: Kori Land, Joe Miller, David Peterson, Alicia Schneider, Greg Tellijohn ABSENT: Approval of Minutes 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting - July 23, 2026 Minutes were accepted as presented. Public Hearings 1. Joseph and Natalie Weber Request for Four Variances to Replace their Home and Deck in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, Town of Somerset Public Hearing opened at 8:32 AM. Business 1. Weber Variance Request to Construct an Addition to a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the Ordinary High-Water Mark and Bluff Line Setbacks. Motion: Motion to table a decision until the September 24, 2026, Board of Adjustment meeting for further information from the agent/applicant. Result: Passed Moved by: Greg Tellijohn Seconded by: Alicia Schneider Ayes: Kori Land, Joe Miller, David Peterson, Alicia Schneider, Greg Tellijohn Nays: None Abstain: None Notes: 2. Weber Variance Request to Exceed 1500 Square Foot Footprint of a Non-conforming Principle Structure within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark Setback 3. Weber Variance Request to Reconstruct an Existing Non-conforming Deck 4. Weber Variance Request to Expand a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the 50-foot Road Right-of-Way Setback Page 2 of 53 5. Discussion Regarding Proposed Changes to Rules Governing St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Request for Future Agenda Items Announcements Date of Next Meeting 1. Date of Next Meeting - September 24, 2026 Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 9:48 AM. Page 3 of 53 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that public hearings will be held before the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment at the St. Croix County Government Center, County Board Room, 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, WI 54016, on Thursday, August 27, 2026, at 8:30 AM to hear and consider the following requests: Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.2.d.1.g. to construct an addition to a non-conforming principal structure that is within the Ordinary High-Water Mark and bluff line setbacks, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. And Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. to exceed 1500 square feet total footprint of a non-conforming principle structure wholly or partially within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark setback area, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. And Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.3.b. to reconstruct an existing deck with a reduced overall footprint, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. And Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the R-2 Residential Zoning District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 15.405.2.a.2. to construct a structure within the 50-foot road right-of-way setback area to expand a non- conforming principal structure, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing or submit written comments to the St. Croix County Community Development Department at 1101 Carmichael Rd, Hudson, WI 54016. Additional information may be obtained from the Department via phone (715) 386-4680 or email CDD@SCCWI.GOV. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Page 4 of 53 Weber Variance Request to Construct an Addition to a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the Ordinary High-Water Mark and Bluff Line Setbacks. Cover Memo To: Board of Adjustment From: Ken Witt, County Administrator Jason Kjeseth, Community Development Director Date: September 24, 2026 Agenda Item: Weber Variance Request to Construct an Addition to a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the Ordinary High-Water Mark and Bluff Line Setbacks. Background Information: Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County ordinance section 17.I.2.d.1.g. to construct an addition to a non-conforming principal structure that is within the ordinary high-water mark and bluff line setbacks, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15/T30N/R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. A Class II notice was published in the Star Observer for the weeks of August 13, 2026, and August 20, 2026, establishing a public hearing at the August 27, 2026, St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Meeting starting at 8:30AM in the St. Croix County Government Center Board Room, 1101 Carmichael Rd., Hudson WI. Two weeks prior to the meeting landowners within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified of the hearing. This request was postponed from the August 27, 2026, Board of Adjustment meeting. Page 5 of 53 St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Variance Staff Report VAR-2026-0383 (4-Part Variance) Hearing Date: September 24, 2026 Applicant: Joe & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 6 of 53 Site Information Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber Agent: Auth Consulting & associates Site Address: 1488 Twin Springs Road Parcel ID(s): 032-2083-80-100 Site Location: SE ¼, PT GL 1, SEC 15 T30N R20W, Town of Somerset Zoning District: Lower St. Croix River Overlay District, R-2 Residential Site Size: 0.8 acres Exhibits: 1) Staff Report 5) Town Board of Somerset September Meeting Minutes 2) Application 6) September WI DNR Letter 3) August WI DNR Letter 4) August NPS Letter Exhibit 1 Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 7 of 53 Site Information (continued) Requests: 1. Variance to construct an addition to a non-conforming principal structure that is within the Ordinary High-Water Mark and bluff line setbacks, pursuant to Section 17.I.2.d.1.g. of the St. Croix Riverway Overlay District Ordinance 2. Variance to exceed 1500 square feet total footprint of a non-conforming principal structure wholly or partially within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark setback area, pursuant to Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. of the St. Croix Riverway Overlay District Ordinance 3. Variance to reconstruct an existing deck with a reduced overall footprint pursuant to Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. of the St. Croix Riverway Overlay District Ordinance 4. Variance to construct a structure within the 50-foot road right-of-way setback area to expand a non-conforming principal structure pursuant to Section 15.405.2.a.2 of the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 8 of 53 • The former principal structure and accessory structures were destroyed in a house fire in early 2024. • The remaining foundation and previous aerial imagery show the previous footprint of the principal dwelling and accessory structures. • The former principal structure was nonconforming to the 200-foot OHWM setback from the St. Croix River, being located only 127’ from the OHWM. • The former deck structure was nonconforming to the 40-foot bluff line setback, being located only 19’ from the bluff line. The former deck structure was also nonconforming to the 200-foot OHWM setback from the St. Croix River, being located only 112’ from the OHWM. • This property also has a scenic easement with the National Park Service. Background Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 9 of 53 Site Location Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 10 of 53 Surrounding Land Use Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Zoning Districts: = R-2 Residential = CON Conservancy Page 11 of 53 Site Conditions April 2022 Aerial Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 12 of 53 Site Conditions April 2026 Aerial Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 13 of 53 Slopes and Contour Maps from GIS Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 14 of 53 Existing Site Plan Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 15 of 53 Proposed Site Plan Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 16 of 53 Proposed Main Floor Plan Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 17 of 53 Proposed Lower Floor Plan Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 18 of 53 Existing/Former Square Footages: • House/Foundation = 1,934 SF • Driveway & Concrete = 1,380 SF • Deck = 756 SF Proposed Square Footages: • House/Foundation = 2,526 SF • Driveway & Concrete = 1,177 SF • Deck = 736 SF Updated Site Plan Information Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 19 of 53 • The proposed principal structure will be expanded by approximately 592 SF from the former nonconforming principal structure footprint. • The proposed principal structure will exceed the 1500 SF total footprint of a nonconforming principal structure within the 200-foot OHWM setback area by approximately 1,026 SF. • The proposed additions will add approximately 389 SF of impervious surface to this lot, which must be mitigated. • The proposed deck structure will be approximately 20 SF smaller in size than the former deck structure. Updated Site Plan Information Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 20 of 53 • The extent of proposed filling and grading will be approximately 9,810 SF. • An additional retaining wall is being proposed and the former retaining wall will be reconfigured to direct stormwater away from the dwelling towards the river. • If the variance request(s) are approved, two subsequent Conditional Use Applications will be required for: 1. Filling and grading within the 40’ bluff line setback 2. A new lift system Updated Site Plan Information Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 21 of 53 Photos of Existing Site – Taken by Staff Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 View From Twin Springs Rd View Facing Twin Springs Rd Page 22 of 53 Photos of Existing Site – Taken by Staff Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 View of Proposed Garage Addition Area View of Proposed Garage Addition Area Page 23 of 53 Photos of Existing Site – Taken by Staff Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 View Facing West View Facing East Page 24 of 53 Photos of Existing Site – Taken by Staff Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 View of Proposed Retaining Wall Removal and GradingView Facing North Towards St. Croix River Page 25 of 53 Agency Review Town of Somerset: The Town Board of Somerset met on September 2nd, 2026, where the Board “denied the request to build closer to the town road than the original house footprint, recommending the setback stay at the original 35 feet due to no hardship.” National Park Service: A letter from NPS was received on 8-26-26 prior to the August hearing where additional information was requested. The agency was sent the updated plans, and no additional comments have been received as of 9-15-26. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: A letter from WI DNR was received on 8-19-26 prior to the August hearing where additional information was requested. An additional letter was received on 9-14-26. Susan Vanden Langenberg with WI DNR noted three questions for consideration: 1. Does the deck need to expand east and west beyond the footprint of the former deck (500 SF) which was adjacent to the residence? 2. Is this deck expansion portion of the variance request for minimal relief? 3. Would the replacement of the residence within the same footprint (1,934 SF) which exceeds the 1,500 SF limitation within Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. considered minimal relief? Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 26 of 53 Applicable Statutes & Criteria Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 The Board of Adjustment may issue a variance to dimensional standards only when statutory criteria are satisfied. The Board of Adjustment may approve the variance if the property owner demonstrates that the application complies with the requirements of Wis. Stat. 59.694(7)(c): • The variance from the terms of the ordinance will not be contrary to the public interest; and • Owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship; and • That the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done. • That the property owner has demonstrated that strict compliance with the ordinance would unreasonably prevent use of the property for a permitted purpose or would render conformity with the zoning ordinance unnecessarily burdensome; and • The property owner has proven that the unnecessary hardship is based on conditions unique to the property, rather than considerations personal to the property owner, and that the unnecessary hardship was not created by the property owner. Page 27 of 53 Applicable Statutes & Criteria (continued) • Section 17.70(6)(e) of the Ordinance states that a variance shall not: 1. Grant, extend or increase any use prohibited in the zoning district. 2. Be granted for a hardship based solely on an economic gain or loss. 3. Be granted for a hardship which is self-created. 4. Damage the rights or property values of other persons in the area. 5. Allow actions without the appropriate amendments to this ordinance or its associated map(s). 6. Allow any alteration of an historic structure, including its use, which would preclude its continued designation as an historic structure. • Section 17.70(6)(f) of the Ordinance states that in granting a variance, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards which are in conformity with the purpose of this chapter. Violations of such conditions and safeguards when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted shall be deemed a violation of this chapter. Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 28 of 53 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended Action • A Draft Decision Document that includes the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and recommended action on this item will be presented to the Board of Adjustment at the September 24, 2026, meeting when this item is being considered. Applicant: Joseph & Natalie Weber VAR-2026-0383 Page 29 of 53 JUL 0 7 2026 St. Croix Sr. Cn NTY VARIANCE APPLICATION Offue U* Only Revised 1/2026 APPLICANT INFORMATION Propefty Weber Contractor/Agent: Mailing Address: 1353 Chatterton Court iling Address: Eagan, NIN 55123 a Daytime Phone: Daytime Phone: ( ) Cell: () Cell: () E-mail: E-mail SITE INFORMATION Site Address: 1488 Twin Springs Road Gov't Lot 1 Property Location: _1/4, _1/4, Sec. 15 f. 30 ru., R. 20 W., Town of Somerset parcet #: 032 - 2083 - 80 100 I.AND USE INFORTf,ATION ZoningDistrict(Checkone): trAG-1 trAG-2 trn-t [n-Z trR-3 trC-l OC_2 trC_3 trt-1 rJt-z overlay Dinrict (Ch eck dtt thot oppty): I sxonruuo ( nrvrnuv E FLooDpLAtN State the nature of your request =_=-....- 3 Variances - See attached Zoning Ordinance 17 .1.2 I qttest thtt the informotton contotned tn thts appticotlon b true corrxt to the Drist of my laowledge. Property Owner/Agent t'4ury 71S386-4680 cdd@sccwi qov St. Croix County Govemment Center 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wl 54016 L \ Fee Received: ll_ S_Q1o!_ aeceipt *: ([0 0 118? Scheduted Hearing Date: L...........-/_ OFFICE USE ONLY Approved By: File #: WzS oV77 www.sccwi.qov 2026-0383 Page 30 of 53 VARIANCE CRITERIA Pursuant to Wisconsin statutes and the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance, Section 1 5.715, the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has the authority to issue a variance only when all the following criteria are met: o An unnecessary hardship must be present meaning that literal enforcement of the Ordinance would unreasonably prevent the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or would render conformity with such restrictions unnecessarily burdensome. o The hardship must be due to unique physical limitations of the property rather than the circumstances of the property owner. . The hardship cannot be self-created. . The hardship cannot be based upon the financial gain or loss of the property owner. . The variance will not be contrary to the public interest. It is the applicanfs responsibility to prove that these criteria are met. Please answer the following questions and provide any additional information that you feel addresses these criteria in support of your request (ottoch additionol poper tf necessory|. 1) Describe the details of your request. 2) Explain how literal enforcement of the ordinance would unreasonably prevent you from using your Property for a permifted use and why the standards in the Ordinance should not apply to your property. 3) Describe the unique characteristics of your property with respect to lot size, shape, topography, and other physical limitations that make literal enforcement of the Ordinance impractical. Were any of these limitations created by you or by past property owners? 4) What other options have you considered and why were they not chosen? Page 2 of 3 2026-0383 Page 31 of 53 5) Explain how granting this variance is consistent with protecting the public interest; in particulal explain how it will impact sensitive public resources and/or adjacent properties. GENERAL VARIANCE APPLICATION PROCEDURE APPTICATION: The deadline for application submittals is the lst Monday of the month before the regularly scheduled St. Croix County Board of Adjustment (BOA) meeting. The BOA meets on the 4s Thursday of the month. The aPPlicant shall provide one copy ofthe entire packet including all supporting information, maps & diagrams, and tee (nonrefundoblQ before the application can be considered complete. Asiteplanshall include all property boundariet setbacks, drivewayt parking areas, sanitary system, well, wetlands, floodplains, blufflines, slope preservation zones, and existing buildings. REVIEW: The Zoning Administrator will review the application for completeness and may require additional information. Upon receiving a complete application and supporting documents, the Zoning Administrator will: ' Schedule a public hearing with the BOA and notiry the applicant by mail of the date and time. . Noti& adjoining property owners ofthe applicant,s request. o Publish a public hearing notice in the local paper. ' Send copies of the applications to the appropriate town and reviewing agencies for comment. . Conduct a site visit to the applicant's property to gather site photos for public hearing. . Prepare a staff report on the application. PUBLIC HEARING: At the public hearing, the applicant may appear in person andlor through an agent or an attorney. The applicant/agent/attomey may present testimony, evidence and arguments in support of the application. ACTION: Variances are granted at the discretion of the St Croix County Board of Adjustment Variances in the St. Croix Rivenray District must receive written consent from the DNR per statute. A variance must meet all the criteria listed above in order to be granted, and the BOA can conditionally approve a request if deemed necessary. NorE: All rnaps, plans, and engineerlng data shall be no targer than l lxl z. No cove15, binders. or envelopes Page 3 of 3 2026-0383 Page 32 of 53 Responses to Questionnaire 1) Describe the detaits of your request. A structure that was destroyed by a fire is being replaced with a new structure which includes a house, garage, deck and the required foundations. The proposed house and attached garage lie almost entire ly within the old footprint of the house, detached shed and concrete slab and walk. The proposed deck is slightlysmaller than the original deck. The proposed home is not any closerto the bluff line, nor any higher, than the original home. The proposed deck is approximately 12-feetfurther from the bluff line than the original deck was. The proposed impervious surtace is slightly expanded, but, that additional stormwater will be mitigated. 2) Exptain how literaI enforcement of the ordinance woutd unreasonabty prevent you from usingyour propertyfor a permitted use and whythe standards in the Ordinance shoutd not appty to your property? Literal enforcement of the Lower St. Crox Riverway District Ordinance would prevent the reasonable use of my property for a permitted use. The proposed project is consistent with the intended residential use of the property and is not intended to increase development beyond whatis otheruzise permitted on other properties in the area. The unique physical characteristlcs of my property make it impractical to comply with every dimensional requirement of the ordinance while still allowing reasonable use of the property. 3) Describe the unique characteristics of your property with respect to lot size, shape, topography and other physicat timitations that make literaI enforcement of the Ordinance impracticat. Were any of these limitations created by you or by past property owners? Twin Springs Addition was platted in 1941 prior to zoning codes and the creation of the LowerSt. Croix Riverway District. The /ots are small bytoday's standards. From the road to the bluff line is only 105 feet to 1 1 0 feet. Applying the respective road and bluff line setbacks leaves nothingto almostnothingto build upon.Ihis limitation is inherent to the plat and not caused by any owner. 4) What other options have you considered and whywere they not chosen? 2026-0383 Page 33 of 53 The only option available would be to construct a smaller home. The proposed home is under 2500 square feet. Ihis is certainly not a large house by any standards, particularly on the St. Crox River. While not large, it will reasonably serve the needs of our family. 5) Exptain how granting this variance is consistent with protecting the pubtic interest, in particutar, exptain how it witt impact sensitive pubtic resources and/or adjacent properties. lmpacts to public resources are minimal. Although the home and garage are slightly larger than what existed originally, the expansion is lateral and forward. The proposed deckis slrghtly smaller and is further away from the bluff line than the original deck. The proposed home is no higher above grade than the originat home, so there isn't additional home to be viewed from the river. ln addition, where there wasn't any mitigation of stormwater, there will now be some. Since the use of the property remains as it always was, there aren't any negative impacts to adjacent landowners with respect to traffic, noise or other circumstance typical of residential property. 2026-0383 Page 34 of 53 :flv0 :]NVN :r0trdrtp630 Norsl^lu gLZ-gOrL:ursnnN soi^ INlnncoo l1n8-sv selBrcossu/EurlpsuoJ . Inny ruoc'luqlnsuocqlnu l,/,4-r98-9la Pl 6ie-t8e-9ra Fl 0t0t9 It 'uF[ tga]f ll '.I[muI I(,I qlns V qF6 lxrls ilJu! 0?67 rrt qrq Oopuarg p1 ffi-mltr m-Elm lll HS lt1rl o ()oz F U d LO tdz ,$3h3U UOJ 03SV3]3U gLZ-gOlL :r]lJ Jlu NOUCnUTSNOC UOJ NlSNOCSl,tl 'AlNnOC XIOUC 'lS 'l3SU3nOS JO l.lilO] lslnolu lcNvruv^ ry lrr{uld lsn oNVt ]CN]CIS]U U]B]M tfllo'E:l'ru so lNlnncoo 0r8 9z/ Lz/zo :lvo r\]l^3u AcN:rJY x JdZ,As olxcaH3 illl^lU UlNiYtO 3UJf :8;1ttvuo 3SVHd CNUAVUO oF tItr& o UJ F oo -J@ l,u E)trl )-) LrJ Ioz @ UJ EJ F- :) lrFoz J -) TZ@9tl- ^< E*z>ozo< a ttl x. o TJ,J (D x.lFa o J ) z !o U) o- oF LrJ o -_l o- uJ uoz IU o J a JJ I a G. oFo tFzoo c.i LII IF lt o J oto(L to E. o- tIJ IF Fl o-F =o UJ o UJ t t! c0 oF at ro lt-auoo t-rJ uJtr(uJtzo3zo -i Fot!aot(L ozoJ E) co @ a u.J O C) It! TL sF z Fz J -J I U) to F. o d|-zo() v ci UJ (L JJ t l.lJ oz:) U) UJ Ioz uJ t F JJ la XE2< 8e>(I io<z96zJ<lrcoo^ U,J :J >e-{:is5fr 5qF Lr.J OF<uJdtFOzzoooo @ oul Lll -oE dd) JH f;t!o>9 p?dE HE=3 BESU e=33 EEHS ffPp=or-r€ P5#Z:,,;oE frsfia'd=Zt =6a9v3fiA9r.r.V 5B#H 355fr ,i Z J F uJ Y JAZ t35r9xqd3l "=5eE6o-uJrJJz 8{EE5O(:Su.t :*'#=5f<:our<>zoo t- tt, t l1 \t FI -.l.-\lz -a I l- z, h8f9 fl1 r o5zo I trx s8quo FF =2trh Hp IIJ IU fOoa abJZ =oF U , t UJ z3o tlJ IF tJ. o F t Lr-, o- ot(L LJ-l oo trJ d) oF U) -) x.tllF o LrJ (, J a 1r) tE' tir I o n \,, , ltlIttlttl UJ oz IJJ o I a UJ E tr ltJ m IJJ = o_ zoF O oJ trJ -J oa oF Foz aF C) Fzoo a u,F -<o -o*6aa $oEA)zA- P=uf-UU)i.zZia q8:firB F!6 Sirt otL 6 @ N N ooI u,z =F oI oEt!oIo zaFquoau,o F UJ u,Ia F Ll,l UIa UJ JF F J ( UJ rF 3 U' zo Eozoo [rJ F 6 oztra =I,IJ 5 E, TU oo UJ aoo- ot& If- 3azo Eozoo ul La(,ztrai TIJ z 1L IJJ o z sooz LU F @ z I [L J otFzoozo6o E. LU Lr' Fa aJ F tJJ o o0 U' UJ Foz J # LIJ zul(, F tU IU Ia c () 9 N O N o q (.) () c.j C) +oqto t $(o =I -.-r.-/ 1 = LI tl +J \ 1 11 IFtoz ,1 ri t l- 96, ( J1 t tu o ot Fz f o I )iuo Y lrvul dy\tvc lnocs NfsufoNV rl L<" o, _t, 1ttffi F C) t_U LJJ -FOat(L ! I t 1l i \ tq t I tt I{t ! { I IL i P@N./ IE !II i x $ I Ita w,n4vaa I Ia I 3 $ [!Fozzo EozoO TJJ F aoz Fax IU E3EEIEfi fr**aFraxizEPd6 EEEEEEE g aEEg E; HE$38Efi }r z 2i rE I tU,a0. lr o I E]Y xl r.xl olzl ;lrulrul -lal '-\ \,- \'-i I tt o. Fzl O Fa pt OIzl blzlol c.:l $ ( ll ) \ J tI!{ I ! $a 2026-0383 Page 35 of 53 :NOUdrUC6l0 r'lorshlu gLZ-gOlL:u3snnN s(r .INlnncoo l'lrn8-sv IV IU]V M SNOtItCNOC llrS CNrlsrxlez/eo/ Lo !dz ,r3h3u uol 03sY3-13u gLZ-AOIL :flu J3u NOUCnuISM)C UOJ 1Nlnn300 0r8el6 [HZJ:]]U cro 9z/ Lz/zo :frvo illl^lu cNl9v X r3t^fu uSN,lloJdZ :ls ol)orHc NlSNOCSl,tl 'AIN0OC XIOUC 'lS 'I3SU3HOS JO i.lfilOt lslnolu lcNV ruv^ ry Irr{uld lsn oNVl ]CN]CIS]U U]B]fu\ o NoO2 F H 63Ull :Agilsvuo :]SVHd CNI,IAVUO tuoc'tunlnsuocqlnu tlzg-tes-grl, Pl 6il-28?-9rr FI et0rc || !o3F8 t9ar9 L 'a|[oml r0r qF8 r 4!n8 1ailt6 rFf gZG rrt xt{ Itoprqsl gpt mffi ffi-Effi selBrcossu/EurlpsuoJ . rllnY "w") i{l{ 9 * ,@ * o t 8 \ ( \ t fa .52 \ r D ( i=- =eP-2E() --trI - =sEd =EAr trg()E* LU Fozzo EozoO IU ta (9 ztrax TJJ - ut =9; asc;kEf EEEE#E trEEEEE!<1-zEFoq EiE=EfrH Z::=YEEHg AaEEe E3 EE$3aH* oz LU o [UJ zotr LrJ J LrJ t tu dl ZZ =otrt LL luJ-\d'; o F I q o F I t , I I I I I I I I I t --l: l=I I? x. tgt r3 =l? ,= o l5 x lE L atloFzoo FIL oz F @ x IIJ atrloFzoO F LL rr) oz F @ x Li.J \ I I ov oc I ::IIVO u/lv 2026-0383 Page 36 of 53 \ t\ Jil I I I I I I + I It5 txT I 8l m _{ I =r;,o , v t =!t<z e Et *r 3 n T1 r- I Z -ni Ery H i;IfrI , rl-et;r =l i- Itai/2'or o'! I r\oo\zr-{rol f;tr(,3 I I \ \ I rm o m zo iEfl5rc= Z;iI3aq 3ifl9=EE i5Hr3i3oQ+Pz+> ilPB=!=3 EgiIIH! mxa-{ zoo =m oozo =ozzo-{m oBx =,=== C)IG7 =z;-=1 DRAWNG PHASE: DRAlttl BY: J\F RC otutER REvrEtv CHECxEO BY: lPf x AGENCY REVIEW DAIE: 02/27/26 BIO OOCUXENT 0$G nLE:C2t-Er 9t -ftq O *rbrn RESTDENCE LAND USE PERMIT &, VARIANCE REQUEST TOUiN OF SOMERSET, ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN FOR COI{STRUCIION REF FILE: 7108-276 RELEASED FOR REVIEVY ZPF o7 /06/26 9mh I z9o f., EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS W PROPOSED OVERLAY mlll c,ltr nricx otE (I lctlologl llrln lut lUO laloc Strtt &ilt I Sult l0l Iaodc, ll 5{?61 Budm, tl !{016 tcl ?15-eE-C4C, ld 715-tCl-!ez autlconaulting.com Auth. Consulting/associates AS-BUILT OOCUUENT JOB NUIIB€R:7108-276 REM9OTI DESCRIPIIOI{: NAME: DAIE: *rrn -+.& E 6L, I 2026-0383 Page 37 of 53 %it )) '?J 'f )ro b 7n E llt F o -{ oecel =o E2 arn o rn xB-{ ?o L =I! amm aI mm --{ o!o 'r"l oa c)m zm 7 t- zo -,tm I om zm 7 zo m @ Im xl I a-1 I zlor(Jl I j\ oo\z-{rolEfu6E I I \ m xa-izo 'T1 -l ooz-{oCvaN(D !noTo @ m E(,-n -t ooz-toC n U) NOl !vo-0 o6m o -Tl -{ ooz-loCna B Er 8r "-t Ht =r n ;ln 6r =l I t I I I Et Irfrl , I I t t 'T',l zaTlrl^mLJn <oon NB6m1A 24 om -l o (D il io! or] noz ul v mt-m --l oz 1lllnox on ozo t- =(t I I I I I I I i I I t !no!o U) m o m x! zIoz nm -0 7o! o U) m o -oCam m o m zo m x @ -{zooozo =oz U' =1' m n oCao roC F -l oz -i m --t -{oxoo l talt >:.i>>r -jf- (- -z-- = o#b fr =1; E asrbo*= 8bfli<>--z Efiie8=iI = iHQt 2Yo * o-{Iz ?o29! i-n<3 <O "lglsqgfq I5ue 3 ia " s (Jo il 5(, 6 3's c/) sTl -u no1l oamo =!m n oCao roCr + oz -{i--l{ooooli-l{ rr-r-r ==frqsr<i<<()456=> 66i= 8ifiif;g== B==E R=.'il =ztg-(JO " =8rgzIoE3oI<o-nU il rg*s 9=<B ^3 tt -r Y,, 3? =3F tt@a - (r'nr-n(, s zo-{II itr, s (rl s x r f' o€ @ rm =iroC-{ =o I oz =1lm N oCa =o -l ozo rocr _-{ oz +tu+TtmOqOnx HETE!=*ui=il'nr;THti='s ni, ZP Ni=dH! =qp6283I52q_6 5E3rlr i3r3 !=ilniffii="<=<zH =b= (,E qSqi; B.': B ?ci ll i! ll OJ-NN.T= zEE<OUl3 tt I 'Tl 11 -<r: a _<,:l **;q- :lltnn -oO(,)(, 1l!-nO 9xffiv Yo rddcD <= ?=6rNDfi-I 2g,Hvoz Am<Yao l-ocT< Srr --{ @ zoml,i J I -!o GiT E,=E= 3',i-==r1 DRAWNG PHASE: DRAlli,l 8Y: J\F RC OUNER REVIEW CHECI<ED BY: lPf x AGENCY REVIEW oA'tE: 02/27 /26 BIO DOCUYENT DwG nLE:Q]$tff PglN wrbrn RESTDENCE LAND USE PERMIT & VARIANCE REQUEST TOVJN OF SOMERSET, ST. CROIX COUNTY, WSCONSIN REF FILE: 7+08-276FOR CONSIRUCTIO{ RELEASED FOR REV]EW ZPF 07 /06/26 cmorlt cilct nll6 olilB (f tmlmloor Drlx lut 280 hlo. SlrEt gult I Suit l0l Icrudc, ll 6{75l Eudto, ll 5{0lt td ?lt-aP-c{m td 715-3il-5277 authconsulting.com Auth . Consulting/associates AS_BUILT OOCUYENT JoB NUnBER:7108-276 REVISION OE Scfl I P TIOT'I : NAME: OAIE: 9mdi z Io lrto SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN %* '6 I' / 2026-0383 Page 38 of 53 '6 ; %* a 'f 2) )t, H=!(^ ssn\ FI i; =Es{ (n mm aImm -lo5 b .Tt onomzmn -zo-tm U, om zm 7 zo-{ma I I I I I \ \ \ I R 7 I \ m xa-{ zo (,l 'T',l --{ ooz-{oC n @ m xa-{ zo l] -{ ooz-{ocn U)NtJr llnolloam o(, TI -{ oozioC 7 U) Nqt llno-o oam o 'T1 -{ ooz-loC va + Er Er *l *t =r v =lv 6r =l I t I I I Et Iril I , I t t .T.l z -ailrI^m !lo<6)gl *B6m1a 2a om I a I E al -lJI +Bmlzlolmla I a I EtraAed9oozrO hea= -V-t O<|_rozmt @i ffi €maaoL)og-.{ oozinE2_-{-a-Oir-u3m>>-l m omzo -!odI AeIEEBE= 3',i-=-=1 DRAWNG PHASE: DRAtr{ 8Y: J\F RC OIINER REVIEIV CHEO(Eo BY: ZPF x ^GENCY REVIEIV DAIE: 02/27/26 Bro ooc'uuENT onc nLE:CI1-SIE AG nf}{ wEbEn RESTDENCE LAND USE PERMIT & VARIANCE REQUEST TOVIN OF SOMERSET, ST. CROIX COUNTY, IUSCONSIN FOR CONSTRUCIIOil REF RLE: 710€-276 RELEASED FOR REVIETV ZPF 07 /06/26 JoB NUMBER:710A-276 REVISIOI'T DESCRIPIIfi : NATE: DAIE: oEilllt ctu f,lfl ctE |lI Tclrlry lHx lut 2&10 hhc Srt€t Soilr I Sultr l0l Iourb, ll 5{?61 [dru, tl t$16 t l ?15-2il1-l4Cl ?d 7t5-$l-!e?7 authconsulting.com Auth. Consulting/associates AS-8UILT OOCUMENT 9mr I z9o!I SITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN Ztt- @@-- in , I ?t \ \ \ E \ I !To!o ?t o @ rltx-t ilE \9 \ on"'tL "",. 2.oat T T tI8!x FI =ro =Idr T I ffi AC/a 2026-0383 Page 39 of 53 ::llv0 :litvN :r{oudrucslo r{orsl^lu gLZ-gOrL:ujsnnN gor rNSnncoo rlrn8-sv uroc tuqlnsuocqlnE az9-r00-gu, Pl lli0-?8?-9u Pl 9t019 ll 'uPql t%t9 Il 'rIE@@i I0l rltn6 v 4IIE INB qqt (}a!3 rn8 apo ltotmrDl iot ffiffiE ffi-ffi salurcosse/EuqpsuoJ . r{lny srvllc 78 slloN tvulNlc o+oOz F UU it sz/go/ to !az AT3[^3U UOJ O3SVT]3U gLZ-gOlL :r'rr rru NOUCnUSNOC UOI NlSNOCSl,tl 'AlNnOC XIOUC 'IS 'l3SU3nOS JO i,l,tlOl lslnolu lcNvruv^ ry lrnuld lsn oNVt ]CN]CIS]U U]B]M lplo(H)t0:jtu sf,o lNthncoo 016 sz/ tz/zo :3lvo X JdZ : g ol)rctrc n3u\lu u3nilo 3Ull :r,srtrvuo :3SVHd 9NI}\VUO atu oz J oE zoO zI U) oE tu J t TU z IU o (. TIJ F E}iu gr c6 Ei:?JLr<o a8 38No.-1 A FO)ar!o IE ef;FF z<aq sE F> dr.IOu>z i=Ful Hhnd =eug 8z9oruJ\atLf 3u@uJ <dr ft;t> za ed@J L 'aZ 6eIF@l)<l 3gg'6 i< 5uz.- 8E<5Z)aot-dZT <F ETi5isSF 2A : rLHoFNe bzwv oiw!-zr-Hd iFEgotErx:tu@zuFl-rl? ttt Z t-> 3fi;Euriltudao;=L +coOtlJ -i:HE IfrqETIJ<O. I6EH.allJ- E==HzU)lJuJ BH=5 FUJ-F G3e \2tzlil Hi;EE a;nil318'= Iff5?=,= =qqH2bE9=ftp2i#y =OO JaJ(JOJF $PEfiEttt-iu.to >9fi5sP-PB= EPEEE ;68sia=t'<zUJFUJF:+ta,, at <R6-r=YPPFoEUirrtu E Eifig ;pt5g>E .UJco Hfs;;IVAI -'o E;9q gY."-fr H B,'f E-TIU'A : o3tLUq LLlc)tL() f F()(/):FO H-'3k#io9.d ao- e=H3dS:qhEtrbdE6 =F-L(J1Z*:r- +949Gtr1rritr> r, i37'-o ilEE3H E#g=fi?L<>=1 EF=EE Ht;2tr:&H)xsE59<(/)roXo- ENuEc' ViiYE ;EE:$!.'r-o=o i!zF^F E;efi5 ffiEi!6OrY=" -'? - < Lll pfifr=: d9et=Eibr{ 6-,U=A-vtqlllZ4, FYonF *El":?lH6urEo2:t!FzrtrY;-^.<rSud26+roral Ery Hi;i E:3: EIEHENH#il8 a!rtl! -r=f;=ff6 3""92: ui ta uJ IF(,zt UJ ) ot TL zotrf)J o(L F U) lo LrJ N =z =o F F z xt 3 azItozoout!IF [! B oz zIFofEFazoo @ uJ o ) o- u.l Y F))-a o1t UJ F 3 L!F <J) o) (,zn UJ oo ozoz UJ Ll F!a F z9 @ ox. TU o =Io-Jl oz ,^ t-tJ z3 3etJJ '- e5e<ozt! ulhd H1 Lh 2\< t+o--atu LrJ coJF(LU)t 3gao- iPoEF-oz<Jrtr F -PdHo1>opZ Lr e5uzx..n<uJ -o6o =A3r- ?,,JO doYIc)F P3oa J tIJ AI r52r.<o @ soF. II o l =z 5 o UJ ra) d) Fa[! zult! d) (/) I trl tU' zozotr soFU' uJ t J trzl o LrJ zaFz oz u., o J 0- 1 FtL UJ J I,J,J dt JJ I @ a UJ t:) U) UJ J otFzooz,96a=o<tt-ul t!,(,f r.u F. At 9e o?o- t-l oV)rnZ uY( 3Hr EUE Y-3=g KPE tIt2n KPF 9cilUztgi<z= EX? *3strZuiB3 JJL 5ds =i: rr-F<ooo EEq tr93 rflq h d)J il-l( ? t<h -EE p {gH,r*,=<ziHor xEcu 12EZ 3E;; fr"'rEzd.-tOUJF'otqfi I,L=JL --tuirPANd tsHE fiEEE 99=< gfrHg fi=HEB6ffU >lLFL kau.z tet?o--V>>Evd. *'HHH zIF JJ FU' z ooJ Fz UJ =o lrJ a eoI F uJ LjJ ra J aF uJ o UJ ui U) FzulJ lot! o UJ oto(L to U) oo.J F z uJ o u.l U) IJJ d] oF uJ t aYo uJ I(J Io Eo JJ lr, JJ uiF 6 u..t IF zoo UJ Ia =@ F <t) uJ UJ x. U) IIJ o fro) ztr d uJ F LL -J Lrj tIJ FF<<zatril!r>! Ioturo< ^[H&(r<Ocoo tsstu ittuxA= oiduXur ;u.FoouJoTO 9= ]Y >Eolo^l.UHoxUH HH Hg O --.r Fj o4 fiato ^ tlJ HItaIUJF@at -l-Fja<o t zIF J) F U) z toll- aF. UJ r.ll ra) F UJ o IU ula o IJJ Fz tt 3a tr, ta Fo uJ -ox. 0- lt o F xU Doz tFz IJJ F o o- oz =o fiF t J l II UJ zIFof Et,aa,Z-:rxx>"[!J,t <f 63,zt (, t uJ uJ z(,z tJJ uJ IF d) o UJ Fo uJ troa toz ) o- zoz3oIa U) uJ oz UJ tr FJ a -J) Fa 1 N l,! JF< aEuJrkt-Z (9 rr =o>F<zlri UJ>>F PT.LU >ouz>6 ^ziloaooQ e?zVo+ @-o* tr; uuJ =9=<oPLr ;R UE r.u =O6 J tIJ OzE<zi 8= 2ouz 6out t! a=io< ibz' OLU di6o+tr*za4.aFUJzx. =aouJ. e>,3,xd =E3*rZa zY-t--vat,t- LZz<iuJoa4zdorouJ(Ji(,uJooF fre3, F-() 66\o@outOo)Ttrttltrur an tz zo FO[!qaaot O z uJ ot oz t J () (L F H5T Ei = '-fr E P e'E E!=.^P t :- H=Er;EEieIl 3a 8EU EE EE =I- EEEiE;gEEIEE ;,lliErlgltrliE ^tfio 9oj a- El=-s_(J.l(Jo- -uJxz< =HFHB . r<ru='c.aTt -) o uJ u) o(L x trJ UJ ozo @ zo tozz6 8"HH HqE 23x =*a'au ) x*8 +o6 =zziP6roo vn=oGSrzX.t o'-tootr592t't --t trosl1isC)n -C)- o UJ t =o UJ t U) .J oa oz =to JJ I,IJ 3 f taz o TLJ Fo (L ooz:) ct tJJ d) d. lFa ozl -(L L IFO-e ts3 tlj o-(9,n fr>_ 9Qata{9()(rzu-i(L@- Fo I oozl ci uJ @JdF)u7 a) >. q, )z I I (L e.F(n Fz [rJ F t!th UJ t(L <J' CI' to I I I I ltl tllIl oFF o c0 oztrlotFzo() lrozotr { -J co F U) zo(L f!Z'J uJ zor.)t fi(,ozt_z o=.! 1< <) #p3:<>6,,o)(, ztr<<l-2. L Zfi ="(J^ J()-o e.i .-i J IN I J i N x. u.,, 3 L! o =io t tJ..l z =o d] o UJ ou(L o-z gd oHF< zoo9 H<J. tJ., uJ (/) O ;Z2 ll) ?(IUJo- t!,uJ <czxtro zo f ko ^LU <2 -UJ b6FOzu<tr tr'g ni t.lJ (! dl ui --.1 > *?k a4 a-_uio(9 LUf bFtFO 1z(L< tu C) z z tU z zoFOltFazo() U) o(L ga;sin atttulO= ""62liytlJutY i=<>dFa@z -'lHfS*'tr<*zwzl-tLY<r<lrr=dFE 99bffi8e H i r ";?ZE iZ=38: E g 5[HEEEE a=3Hlpp Fe=9lie 2_d"t_fr4r,9 ;BeEqiq =a*E;rfi e,222a=rfr *cEEE3E Z;gsBdi a tU Foz ozo t(, t LU zU o I9u,59|1 lzqh&.B ff; o arf : 6 Bn 2 t9 E a A z ur *;=*:fri H i u ifr H [E EiH3?\fr;a E EBH Ef; ??'EEEE; g:E; Z i Esia eEauEE* E nF fi E gEEE E EEEE Eirt ,r i 3 6 E 5=zE dft:gfig8g 3 g ur 2rEIlIEiEgErlElifigl; E fi i E Ei AI E EEEE IEEE E Eg IA U Eb#; gE g=g E :,H g E I EE'E EHEI E' H= E[ <)(oF-@O)Nc.jvro U/JY nlhlu AcNlov tl'trilrllll| l r !tll l !lIl I I I I tl II lt I lt ll l IlIt I aFz tlJ [! ot o- =t!OFZ_A OEzuU.J Ifr F sl Ial 1zl<ol >*ltol o -l I-tl uFl tu(/)l o- zl 8l - 2026-0383 Page 40 of 53 ::llv0 :lnvN :fioudru3sl0 r.lorsl^3u gLZ-gOlL:ursnnN sor lNlnncoo llrnS-sY uroc turlFsuocqlnB ur9-r80-98 pl 06i9-zE?-914 Pl 910'9 u 'uaPry Eatg Il '4mEoE.i t()t 4!n8 v 4F8 1..q8 etq 0?6e 1tr8 uF10 lrorouTrl roi EffiEM MlII[dffi salurcosse/EuqpsuoJ . qlny SI IVl]C oz F UU 6 +o gz/go/ to !az illh3u uoj 03sv3]3u gLZ-gOlL :j'rJ Jlu r.|oucnursr{oc ror NlSNOCSl,tl 'AlNnOC XIOUC 'IS 'l3SU3nOS JO t{,tlOl IS]NO]U ]CNVIUVA ry IIIIU]d ]SN ONVI 3CN]CIS]U U]B]M tPla(H)'lJ:l'tu gfo rNSfincoo or8 gz/ tz/zo :uvo ,$3hfu A3N3oY x JdZ :Ag o3xc].to ,ulhlu uliliho 3Ull .Asillvuo :3SVHd ONI,V\VUO -d t\ _uft 1Bo(9 aF z tr5 o4o (L aaoo) Fzt! =o TJ,J a il oo x (L oF oz<F 65 Ee co ,aEOzoz-J<F-zOIU zZ[,u o HU Eeco: uJ -J()S 3s_u)L oo ll aooJ z tU o TU a a IIJ ;-o<aOrLUF 3so- ui |.UOcoO odts,, Uo f,EaF- a tz aJ F LrJ o LU Y Fa Ntt/v ,,nz ) F[!o [r,l uJ a ooo3 ot-Fo c0 J UJ zz Io o+l F z UJ cl tlj a -r (, o=oEFUJ uzYUJ<FF<@t g-b 9F LIJ Y Fa ooo B U) oo) Fz uJ o uJ a a)- F UJ o F .J otrFzoozI U) ot t.rJ t.u ula F z UJ UJ o .J(L F zoaot UJ d o Ll- ; aulF oz a F z F zIaox UJ UJ o doFz z I.JJ t r.u o. oz J oa o- oF tL ozol- C) UJ aaaoE C) t!o d o(I) la o uJ . I.TJ rU) O-"<nT g3'-z+< F zI @ ot UJ F. z zt! =t. UJ (L F u.l vz 5 .,1oo;,2SYt6r9 iB8 tau(L(/)u- >o(ur(rlt|'llu, J oa Ef;FUJ aa(/)-o trl 9-- t= 3eoeF @ tz t-tJ Oz tFztu (,z EO t t =II l.U la u, r OF ,.d orL> :O I 8E 8i fr=' l* t= d5 eEsfiu aV BHgilfiEEE tgaa*a;5 *s<EBE'r# EfrEEH!Eg6HH;XEiE ziiiiz U: * 8frE fifi: IEE 4 \9i' =>a9x< N[t,0 oz =uJ(L oa @ IU do trJ oz laIU)luJItlolzlulolrl@FrF ei= -J -J)lroz UJ F oilfrLAA'tr)uJ 'z 4 brr) I zaFo[!a (, -o- F fo @ edm u E.t!FJ L (l-UUUFO E:d.>(j)-f(9><2 = atu t:) X otu r.u a o (! t o, c_ oo o) a EtrPoo 8(soLr-o oo <.) -o (') ocoo iHs>P(L -^roou(\$(, oo6q) o_ o oooa9or--Eo)lgo)gtsdE co ,P [i o, -ipI9o(!o!l-LL Ioo):<(I q) ol oo(E o) ;o o EE g =(,oP >'i;Yo= =>E9g"6'-or=a6 0 E .E r:5 9 96 oJO C o t =E3>i oN j o>-aoa:oluuJ 3P3 [<3UJ(rXuJ U-l uJ 9k-b>=o6o5 uJ!Io(Jo-*fr iHrXcoFv<o >u-<,ulg.sJ2 =Fo=xoE ltl .o <6+rul=9(9ufi _r.,r g trcfr26"=!-ur<k9-ea9oouJxzdT!<F o oz LrJ t =uJ IF ttu o o ov ro tl- nO ;etr a.l o- H5 =(,-a9, u=dt t,lJ LlJ dt ==[! uloo od rl FI =oiur =dz<>,a Itloo.- co Eu72<x =jfip FF ()uJl(Ido L) 'aozO- oJoouZcntr oZ -rod"-62 lrl ul (/) 2 y3' u)-2r-ilFr>JF- crlBo H,H-(Ltr ;SPJ*(J6v)z A^UJ<oQr 8fi8zai gHH o F Xo EEOa<)z --.r OJI<k b,9 e5 =u =adoO(r e3+zF<zlOayu) 3*oLLt-o A t?5Yfia222 9UE()l: =o)gpd Lo i u.t z=o-otao;ul !!Fcovt< -PO<rJFr,!(LUJIO-oF< a tLl F oz uJ Oz tU TL za @ ottu tL o Nil r,t aF z to(L (L f cr) -@ LJ.l LrJ t = aFa oLUE Ntr!,1 oo Eou zIF IJ Fa 1ot oz F a zo F J a =toII tU o zI F )J F at) z o x. oz F U) af-aod q F dUrF LU (,oF azIFo rJJ a ozz 6-to TL J F tU o F(n oc F- x.oo-o-l </) o LU c F z @ F<t) on O t ct) I d.UF 2 =@ UJ C) z UJ IL FJ aat!Foz J (tt frFZz tJJ (J L) tlJ lrd)o 91 '->o<(LF loa\3 =t.z.a Hi o-al- uJ Ogto 3stLF trE rdtr> c.i i I. z a>) 3s d E U: E ni<+ Q z ss8 Z; P,=1" g =o 0a r.r,r t u(Io(r uJ d) e'i r IJJ co oF F60 Hr 9T6>J< \tF *oi! .ui- 2< =s; H=ipd FUJ 9a(ro BC qE tr=(, (L oF F Fz u.J J :)a UJ uotrlE>tl.l fi2_tr. (,zzu.l trlO,,r 8EB>:CO *o E! Ir IOF uj =ti6(\a X.a d]F s8O(Ltv-()o tl- o @ 5 x Q 5 tI- o trJ N U) l =z = uJ dl -JJ -.tq pv'a9OIo-cooO-9a90 I a= PU(J2 ato 9LLzzqaxaYo *tro EH Sp =:] F* )olUl!dY =B )r-.z aa 3s d =l{: tr o(2J ZWss oz1*,o o 4 :-2'-azirD>d O zo ( r.u 0( r.lJ o-od uJ d] G{ OFu <,/) C()cLd #p =E()ue.) o-EL,A a LJJ t-oz o d.d) u d.UF)tr J J iz 5=sh z =@ IJJ 3=I-uJF-.colb Pub E=9oz]n(LulY o>xag? V 23,E>> /, ,/, J F r,r,J o LU UJ a o)aF LrJ o t.rJ UJ al) (D J Ft!o ul UJ a F zIaot UJ a uJ Foz -J d IU z [U o aI.z oz o l. z aF z a F z (/) F z ) oa UJ IF z o tlJ aa U,J to =)) I at) F zI U' ot UJ uJ rF tJ- o a, IIJ oo UJ F otFzoO zaaottu o -J aF[!o LLl UJ a F zo an ol- x. oLdJ, (Il ab r rro f,O z. irJ rL! oO^z-2 oz2z. 6 LJ CO F ,or-OZA =o -U J o.a f,{o HJL.J u UJ a Fol.a1 oZ-r Fil ^U(JuJ u Za:)-2 F oI -Z J 60 f, =o ru l'r O O >@l? azqa 4-3<rtr>F-YoIGFo.O .s </) Sc/onOG =lr<1="22u1 o<o-< -ti^Q E*UAEAFK =9*";ATPa 5E-6H36fr,4F=(d 2ia6u9ud ai=t e?=Ha(,,.-j-Fl=troUJ(JUJZozo-< LL o o F t-- odl [!IF Z uJ O J 0. tlj co FozaJ[u <*IYA= aoFOzu at 3T uJ co J) Ia ,_: ctkz<EO-i-< EaE bE(,.! IF x.-Fra'u FUJzlLuJt(),, So ?3z>.o2 9=o<dgZnoiltro()oz<-rF =u) 33OO ro c.i O,rl -F- N aJ t UJ Fz l =z =F UJ d) )) Ia tq U) 69ua BxrYs9of _k5 l zit<ouuEIal\ooAo(rl+ L!-(J zoaot u.l IF =J(L oo)J Iou)a7Zvdt-[!<F() k -rrIooP =30trkq)* SVo\ =itu< =J>L SK'a> r.u JIL bf,)A 3iixOod F oz 2Qq 88Y EHHB9our iitr g He*g z=zu.t >==q 66=[c{tr)-<,rroXE-oX Fla Yz dt t!o (L oF-gt> Ebo:-zF- ozt!Fx uJ ,l 2026-0383 Page 41 of 53 August 19, 2026 St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Sent via Email Re: Joseph and Natalie Weber Variance Requests Dear Board Members: The Department of Natural Resources received the hearing notice for August 27, 2026, public hearing concerning variance requests on the 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. Joseph and Natalie Weber request the following variances: 1. Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.2.d.1.g. to construct an addition to a non-conforming principal structure that is within the Ordinary High- Water Mark and bluff line setbacks, 2. Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, as required by St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. to exceed 1500 square feet total footprint of a non-conforming principle structure wholly or partially within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark setback area. 36.G.5.c.3 (Structure Setbacks) to construct an accessory structure, 3. Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.3.b. to reconstruct an existing deck with a reduced overall footprint, 4. R-2 Residential Zoning District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 15.405.2.a.2. to construct a structure within the 50-foot road right-of-way setback area to expand a non- conforming principal structure The Snyder vs Waukesha County Zoning Board of Adjustment decision (74 Wis. 2d 468, 478-79, 247 N.W.2d 98) made it clear a circumstance or desire of the applicant is not a factor to be considered when deciding variances. As the Board reviews these variance requests, please keep in mind that the applicant has the burden of proving that their request meets all of the statutory requirements for the granting of a variance for all four variance requests. That is, the applicant must prove that they will suffer unnecessary hardship if the provisions in the county’s Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District are literally enforced. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has made it clear that proof of unnecessary hardship by itself does not entitle an applicant to a variance. All three statutory variance criteria must be satisfied in order to grant a variance. It may be possible that the applicant will provide additional evidence at the hearing which may change the conclusions listed below. Unique physical limitations: The applicant must demonstrate that unique physical limitations (wetlands, steep slopes, streams, rock outcroppings) or special conditions of the property exist that prevent compliance with ordinance regulations. The physical limitations must be unique to the property in question and not generally shared by other properties in the area. No harm to public interests: The applicant must demonstrate that variance will not result in harm or be contrary to public interests. The Board must consider the impacts of the proposed project as well as the cumulative impacts of similar projects on the interests of the neighbors, the community, and the State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2984 Shawano Avenue Green Bay, WI 54313-6727 dnr.wi.gov wisconsin.gov Page 42 of 53 general public. These interests are listed in the purpose statement of the ordinance and, for the St. Croix Riverway Zoning, include promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, reducing the adverse effects of overcrowding and poorly planned shoreline and bluff area development, preventing soil erosion and pollution and contamination of surface water and groundwater, preserving and maintaining the exceptional scenic, cultural, and natural characteristics of the water and related land of the Lower St. Croix . Unnecessary hardship: The applicant must demonstrate that if the variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship exists. The applicant may not claim unnecessary hardship because of conditions which are self-imposed or created by a prior owner (for example, building a home in compliance and then subsequently constructing a deck without a permit). Courts have also determined that economic or financial hardship does not justify a variance. When determining whether unnecessary hardship exists, the Board must consider the property as a whole, rather than just a portion of the parcel. Questions for consideration: The proposed deck is about 15.9’ x 47.7’ and has a floor area of over 758 square feet. The footprint of the former deck adjacent to the residence was approximately 15.9’ x 32’ which was 500 square feet in area. Does the proposed deck need to expand further to the east and west beyond the footprint of the former deck? Is this portion of the variance request for minimal relief? According to Chapter 17 Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, Conditional Use and Variance Procedures, Section 17.J.2.b., the variance application submitted is incomplete and lacks the following items. It is unclear if the project meets all requirements and/or if a conditional use permit is also required. • Location of the bluffline and water setback. • The location and description of existing and proposed alterations of vegetation, topography, including vegetation removal and replacement. • A recent aerial photo with property lines drawn in, showing the location of existing and proposed structures, including height and setback dimensions. • Photos of the site taken from the river slightly upstream and downstream of the property, and directly offshore. • Is a mitigation plan required? • How much area is proposed to be filled and graded? Is a conditional use permit required? The Department is not opposed to the board granting the requested variances provided the Board of Adjustment finds the applicant has met the burden of proof that the request meets all the statutory requirements for the granting of a variance for all four individual variance requests. If the board finds that the above criteria have been met, the Department provides consent to the granting of the variances. The Department also recommends that a condition be placed such that best management practices shall be utilized during construction to prevent erosion and sedimentation. Please note that these comments are regarding the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway zoning, and shoreland zoning regulations only, and do not reflect applicable erosion control, waterway permitting, floodplain zoning, or other department regulations. It is the responsibility of the Board of Adjustment to assure that the statutory standards for the granting of a variance are met. The standards help to ensure protection of the public interest, including the preservation of water quality and fish and wildlife habitat along lakes and rivers. Wisconsin’s navigable waterways are held in trust for all people to enjoy. The Department appreciates your commitment to St. Croix County’s protection of the Lower St Croix National Scenic Riverway for future generations. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Sincerely, Sue Vanden Langenberg Shoreland Zoning Program Coordinator Page 43 of 53 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service St. Croix National Scenic Riverway 401 N. Hamilton Street St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin 54024 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1.A.1 August 26, 2026 Joseph and Natalie Weber 1353 Chatterton Ct Eagan, Minnesota 55123 RE: Tract LOSA 12-173, House and Deck Rebuild, Building Additions, Excavation Dear Mr. and Ms. Weber: Thank you for meeting with National Park Service (NPS) staff in May about your rebuilding plans for 1478 Twin Springs Road, Town of Somerset , St. Croix County (PIN 032-2084-30-000) Wisconsin. This property is within the boundary of the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway (Riverway) and identified as tract LOSA 12-173. NPS owns a “Scenic Easement – Limited Development” interest, as described in the recorded Grant of Easement Document 357473. This legal document outlines land use restrictions and requires NPS approval on specific activities so that the Riverway scenic resources located on your property are preserved and protected. According to the plans included with the variance application which was submitted to St. Croix County on July 7 th, you propose to rebuild structures destroyed by fire , with additions. NPS has divided your request into three project areas as NPS understands them. Project 1: rebuilding a house in the original location, with additions. It includes what appears to be a 4 ft x 44 ft (176 sq ft) addition on the landward side and a 13 ft x 26 ft (338 sq ft) addition on the northeast end of the home. The addition on the northeast end seems to incorporate 140 sq ft of a previously standing accessory shed plus 198 additional sq ft on all sides of the shed footprint. Plans also include a large window well on the southwest end. The height of the house to the peak will not exceed the 14.5 ft height of the previous building. Project 2: deck replacement. The main deck will be rebuilt in the original location with what appears to be a 5.5 ft x 15 ft lateral extension on the southwest end. The plans also indicate that the footprint of the old 16 ft x 16 ft deck is being relocated adjacent to the house overlapping part of the previous deck and filling in a roughly 10.5 ft x 10.5 ft space adjacent to the house. Project 3: grading and potential vegetation removal. The plan removes two retaining walls and builds one new wall in a different location. Excavation includes removing soil to enlarg e the walkout area of the house facing the river. Page 44 of 53 NPS needs more information to clarify certain project details. We have requested through St. Croix County the following; before and after building dimensions, window well details, vegetation removal, and clarification if a tram is part of the request. Once we receive the requested information, we will complete our review under the NPS scenic easement and provide a project determination. Because this project must also comply with all local, county, and state regulations , the Town of Somerset, St. Croix County, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources have been included for reference. If you have any questions, please contact me via email laura_hojem@nps.gov or at 715-483-2261. Sincerely, Laura L. Hojem Lands Program Manager cc: Jeri Koester Town of Somerset, Clerk townclerk@townofsomersetwi.com Kevin Grabau St. Croix County Land Use Administrator cdd@sccwi.gov Susan Vanden Langenberg Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Zoning Program Coordinator Susan.vandenlangenberg@wisconsin.gov Page 45 of 53 Page 46 of 53 Page 47 of 53 Page 48 of 53 September 14, 2026 St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Sent via Email Re: Joseph and Natalie Weber Variance Requests Dear Board Members: The Department of Natural Resources received the hearing notice for August 27, 2026, public hearing concerning variance requests on the 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. It is our understanding that the hearing is postponed to September 24, 2026, and Joseph and Natalie Weber request the following variances: 1. Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.2.d.1.g. to construct an addition to a non-conforming principal structure that is within the Ordinary High- Water Mark and bluff line setbacks, 2. Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, as required by St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. to exceed 1500 square feet total footprint of a non-conforming principle structure wholly or partially within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark setback area. 36.G.5.c.3 (Structure Setbacks) to construct an accessory structure, 3. Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.3.b. to reconstruct an existing deck with a reduced overall footprint, 4. R-2 Residential Zoning District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 15.405.2.a.2. to construct a structure within the 50-foot road right-of-way setback area to expand a non- conforming principal structure According to the application materials, it appears the project is requesting the following five variances: The required setback from the OHWM is 200’. 1. Proposed residence (beyond the footprint of the original house) is about 127’ from the OHWM. 2. Proposed deck (beyond the footprint of the original deck) is 112’ from the OHWM. The required setback from the bluffline is 40’. 3. Proposed deck (beyond the footprint of the original deck) is 31’ from the OHWM. The footprint of the residence shall not exceed 1500 square feet in area. 4. The footprint of the proposed residence (including attached garage) is about 2,433 square feet. The required setback from the road right-of-way is 45’. 5. Proposed residence (beyond the footprint of the original house) is about 32’ from the road R-O-W. The Snyder vs Waukesha County Zoning Board of Adjustment decision (74 Wis. 2d 468, 478-79, 247 N.W.2d 98) made it clear a circumstance or desire of the applicant is not a factor to be considered when deciding variances. As the Board reviews these variance requests, please keep in mind that the applicant has the burden of proving that their request meets all of the statutory requirements for the granting of a variance for all four variance requests. That is, the applicant must prove that they will suffer unnecessary hardship if the provisions in the county’s Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District are literally enforced. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has made it clear that proof of unnecessary hardship by itself does not entitle an applicant to a variance. All three statutory variance criteria must be satisfied in order to grant State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2984 Shawano Avenue Green Bay, WI 54313-6727 dnr.wi.gov wisconsin.gov Page 49 of 53 a variance. It may be possible that the applicant will provide additional evidence at the hearing which may change the conclusions listed below. Unique physical limitations: The applicant must demonstrate that unique physical limitations (wetlands, steep slopes, streams, rock outcroppings) or special conditions of the property exist that prevent compliance with ordinance regulations. The physical limitations must be unique to the property in question and not generally shared by other properties in the area. No harm to public interests: The applicant must demonstrate that variance will not result in harm or be contrary to public interests. The Board must consider the impacts of the proposed project as well as the cumulative impacts of similar projects on the interests of the neighbors, the community, and the general public. These interests are listed in the purpose statement of the ordinance and, for the St. Croix Riverway Zoning, include promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, reducing the adverse effects of overcrowding and poorly planned shoreline and bluff area development, preventing soil erosion and pollution and contamination of surface water and groundwater, preserving and maintaining the exceptional scenic, cultural, and natural characteristics of the water and related land of the Lower St. Croix . Unnecessary hardship: The applicant must demonstrate that if the variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship exists. The applicant may not claim unnecessary hardship because of conditions which are self-imposed or created by a prior owner (for example, building a home in compliance and then subsequently constructing a deck without a permit). Courts have also determined that economic or financial hardship does not justify a variance. When determining whether unnecessary hardship exists, the Board must consider the property as a whole, rather than just a portion of the parcel. Questions for consideration: The proposed 15’ x 48’ (1’ deeper on the northwester 16’ section) irregular-shaped deck has a floor area of about 736 square feet (including the two sets of stairs). • Does the deck need to expand east and west beyond the footprint of the former deck (500 sq. ft.) which was adjacent to the residence? • Is this portion of the variance request for minimal relief? • Would replacement of the residence within the same footprint (1,934 sq. ft.) and which exceeds the 1,500 square foot limitation within Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. considered minimal relief? The Department is not opposed to the board granting the requested variances provided the Board of Adjustment finds the applicant has met the burden of proof that the request meets all the statutory requirements for the granting of a variance for all four individual variance requests. If the board finds that the above criteria have been met, the Department provides consent to the granting of the variances. The Department also recommends that a condition be placed such that best management practices shall be utilized during construction to prevent erosion and sedimentation. Please note that these comments are regarding the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway zoning, and shoreland zoning regulations only, and do not reflect applicable erosion control, waterway permitting, floodplain zoning, or other department regulations. It is the responsibility of the Board of Adjustment to assure that the statutory standards for the granting of a variance are met. The standards help to ensure protection of the public interest, including the preservation of water quality and fish and wildlife habitat along lakes and rivers. Wisconsin’s navigable waterways are held in trust for all people to enjoy. The Department appreciates your commitment to St. Croix County’s protection of the Lower St Croix National Scenic Riverway for future generations. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Sincerely, Sue Vanden Langenberg Shoreland Zoning Program Coordinator Page 50 of 53 Weber Variance Request to Exceed 1500 Square Foot Footprint of a Non- conforming Principle Structure within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark Setback Cover Memo To: Board of Adjustment From: Ken Witt, County Administrator Jason Kjeseth, Community Development Director Date: September 24, 2026 Agenda Item: Weber Variance Request to Exceed 1500 Square Foot Footprint of a Non-conforming Principle Structure within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark Setback Background Information: Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.2.d.1.h. to exceed 1500 square feet total footprint of a non-conforming principle structure wholly or partially within the 200-foot Ordinary High-Water Mark setback area, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. A Class II notice was published in the Star Observer for the weeks of August 6, 2026, and August 13, 2026, establishing a public hearing at the August 27, 2026, St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Meeting starting at 8:30AM in the St. Croix County Government Center Board Room, 1101 Carmichael Rd., Hudson WI. Two weeks prior to the meeting landowners within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified of the hearing. This request was postponed from the August 27, 2026, Board of Adjustment meeting. Page 51 of 53 Weber Variance Request to Reconstruct an Existing Non-conforming Deck Cover Memo To: Board of Adjustment From: Ken Witt, County Administrator Jason Kjeseth, Community Development Director Date: September 24, 2026 Agenda Item: Weber Variance Request to Reconstruct an Existing Non-conforming Deck Background Information: Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the Lower St. Croix Riverway Overlay District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 17.I.3.b. to reconstruct an existing deck with a reduced overall footprint, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. A Class II notice was published in the Star Observer for the weeks of August 6, 2026, and August 13, 2026, establishing a public hearing at the August 27, 2026, St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Meeting starting at 8:30AM in the St. Croix County Government Center Board Room, 1101 Carmichael Rd., Hudson WI. Two weeks prior to the meeting landowners within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified of the hearing. This request was postponed from the August 27, 2026, Board of Adjustment meeting. Page 52 of 53 Weber Variance Request to Expand a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the 50-foot Road Right-of-Way Setback Cover Memo To: Board of Adjustment From: Ken Witt, County Administrator Jason Kjeseth, Community Development Director Date: September 24, 2026 Agenda Item: Weber Variance Request to Expand a Non-conforming Principal Structure within the 50-foot Road Right-of-Way Setback Background Information: Joseph and Natalie Weber request a variance in the R-2 Residential Zoning District, to St. Croix County Ordinance Section 15.405.2.a.2. to construct a structure within the 50-foot road right-of-way setback area to expand a non-conforming principal structure, on a 0.8-acre property located at 1488 Twin Springs Road in part of GL 1, Sec 15 T30N R20W, Parcel # 032-2083-80-100, Town of Somerset. A Class II notice was published in the Star Observer for the weeks of August 6, 2026, and August 13, 2026, establishing a public hearing at the August 27, 2026, St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Meeting starting at 8:30AM in the St. Croix County Government Center Board Room, 1101 Carmichael Rd., Hudson WI. Two weeks prior to the meeting landowners within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified of the hearing. This request was postponed from the August 27, 2026, Board of Adjustment meeting. Page 53 of 53

Source: St. Croix County website. First collected Oct 9, 2026.