2026.06.04 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes V.2
Town of Troy · St. Croix County · meeting of Jun 4, 2026 · Minutes
Open the original document More from Town of Troy
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
1
DRAFT
PLAN COMMISSION MEETING
Town of Troy
June 4, 2026
Hudson Wisconsin 54016
Members Present: Doug Rowen, Dean Albert, Dan Pearson, Warren Vollmar, David Wolf,
Pete Hawksford
Members Absent: John Bjorseth
Staff Present: Rob Jones, Administrator David Carlson
Recording Secretary: Amanda Randall
Others present: Brooke Petska, Pam Brokaw, Heidi Fett, Claire Mireau, Chad Fett, Karyn
Kollitz, Michael Mireau, Matt Campana, Linda Simenson, Scott
Simenson, Dorothy Marty, Kara Miller, Chris Dyke, Randi Gilberston,
Grace Coggio, Bill Coggio, Dan Kugel, Adam Nigon, Beth Nigon, Ashley
Norman, Beth Gallagher, Dan Koepke, Kate Kielsmeier, Daryl
Handeland, John Bennett, Jill Berke.
Site Review Present: Doug Rowen, Dan Pearson, David Wolf, Pete Hawksford, Staff: Rob
Jones, Cedar Corp
AGENDA:
1. Call meeting to order
2. Roll call
3. Public input to Plan Commission
4. Approve minutes of April 30, 2026 Plan Commission meeting;
5. Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit:
Applicant: Butterfly Path, LLC
Site Location: 570 Coulee Trail
PID 040-1038-06-250
Request: To consider operating a senior center
6. Consideration and possible action on recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit:
Applicant: Butterfly Path, LLC
Site Location: 570 Coulee Trail
PID: 040-1038-06-250
Request: To consider operating a senior center
7. Consideration for Rezoning and Whole Farm Plan for Bennett property
Applicant: Nora and John Bennett
Site Location: 174 Carlson Lane, River Falls, WI
PID: 040-1111-50-201
Request: To split the current lot into 2 lots
8. Discussion and Consideration of Comprehensive Plan Updates-Process and Updates
9. Update and discussion on City of Hudson Cooperative Boundary Plan
10. Correspondence
2
11. Potential items for future meetings
12. Adjourn.
AGENDA:
1. Call to order
Plan Commission Chair Doug Rowen called the meeting of the Troy Plan Commission to order at 6:00
p.m.
2. Roll Call
Present were Doug Rowen, Dean Albert, Warren Vollmar, Pete Hawksford, David Wolf, and Dan
Pearson.
3. Public Input
Scott Simenson, 248 Carlson Lane expressed concerns with pedestrians on Town roads not wearing high
visibility clothing. He suggested the Town make high-visibility vests available.
4. Approve minutes of April 30, 2026 meeting:
The minutes of the April 30, 2026 Plan Commission meeting were previously distributed. Dean Albert
moved to approve the minutes of the April 30, 2026, Plan Commission meeting. Pete Hawksford
seconded. Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
5. Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit:
Applicant: Butterfly Path, LLC
Site Location: 570 Coulee Trail
PID 040-1038-06-250
Request: To consider operating a senior center
Doug Rowen called the public hearing to request a Conditional Use Permit for Butterfly Path, LLC at
570 Coulee Trail, to order at 6:02 p.m.
The Town received eighteen written comments that were entered into the record; all eighteen were in
support of the application.
Dan Koepke, 570 Coulee Trail, spoke in favor of the application as he believes this proposed use is
comparable to the winery’s use. The applicant is proposing to continue the agricultural use of the
property and offer a space for community use, much as the winery did. He noted the building meets
commercial code.
Grace Coggio, 558 Omaha Road, spoke in favor of the application and stated that the proposed use
would be a great asset to the community.
Scott Simenson, 248 Carlson Lane, spoke in favor of the application. He is involved in maker spaces and
would like to see such a space within the community.
Dr. Claire Mireau, spoke on behalf of The Butterfly Path. She explained that their Board of Directors is
composed of seven St. Croix County residents. Their goal is to develop a senior wellness hub to support
older adult vitality. She believes the use falls under an allowed Conditional Use due to their non-profit
status and low-impact land use goals. She noted that the property would not be used for assisted living,
senior housing, or treatment programs and that they are not going to expand the existing structures.
3
Beth Nigon 487 Bauer Road, spoke and reminded the Town that Conditional Use Permits have
conditions such as hours of operation and parking; she would like the Town to consider what would
happen if the property was sold. She is concerned about extra traffic, parking, noise, and potential issues
with extra events. She requested the Town make the conditions narrow.
Adam Nigon, 487 Bauer Road, spoke and expressed concern with the language of the application; he
does not want the property to become an event center with drinking and noise on the weekends. While
he does not think that is the intention for this property, he is concerned with the language in the
application. He stated that they would be serving alcohol later than the winery did.
Chris Dyke, 495 Bauer Road spoke. He believes the application is vague and noted there is a lot of land
that could be expanded on. He would like to see restrictions to protect the community and believes more
information is needed before proceeding with the project. He noted that he had had good conversations
with the applicant and thanked them for that. He also stated he received his notification letter regarding
this hearing two days ago and believes more neighbors would be present at the hearing with more notice.
Barbara Peterson, 548 Omaha Road spoke. She stated that she was supportive of the application at first
but asked what the Conditional Use Permit will allow, and what would happen if the property was sold.
Chairperson Rowen noted that the Conditional Use Permit stays with the property if the approved use
does not change.
Chairperson Rowen called for public comment three times and as no one asked to speak, the public
hearing was closed.
6. Consideration and possible action on recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit:
Applicant: Butterfly Path, LLC
Site Location: 570 Coulee Trail
PID 040-1038-06-250
Request: To consider operating a senior center
Rob Jones reviewed the application and noted that the subject property is 18.01-acres within the AG-
RES district and LECR Overlay District. The property contains an existing residence, detached
accessory structures, parking area, landscaped grounds, former vineyard plantings, and associated site
improvements. The property was originally granted a Conditional Use Permit by St. Croix County in
2013 to operate a vineyard and winery as a limited commercial recreational activity. Following the
Town’s assumption of zoning administration authority, the Town adopted and amended the permit in
2016 and subsequently approved additional amendments in 2017 addressing operational hours, food
service, live music, and related activities. The existing approvals are associated with operation of the
Cracked Barrel Winery. The current application proposes a different principal use and is therefore being
reviewed as a new Conditional Use Permit under Chapter 170 to operate a “non-profit religious,
community service, recreational, and educational retreat facility.” The applicant proposes utilizing
existing buildings and site improvements with minimal physical changes to the property. The applicant
indicates that alcohol service would not occur as part of daily operations but intends to pursue a Class
“B” Beer and “Class C” Wine license to offer beer and wine service during certain events. Programming
is anticipated to occur primarily during daytime and early evening hours, generally concluding by 9:00
p.m.
Dr. Claire Mireau spoke on behalf of the applicants. She explained that Butterfly Path began in 2018 and
is governed by a board of directors. They are funded through public and private grants, donations,
memberships, and merchandise sales. The goal of the project is to be a physical home for senior
programming offered in the area, as such a place does not currently exist; they will be partnering with
4
groups who are already working with seniors. They plan to design their programs according to demand
and are not yet sure which programs will be the most popular. They anticipate seasonal special events,
maybe once per quarter, that would be outside their normal programming. They expect the site to serve
perhaps fifty people throughout the day; the program timing would be staggered so they do not expect
fifty people at once. The program would always have at least one staff member on site.
Rob Jones reviewed the conditions the winery operated under and discussed typical conditions that are
set for Conditional Use Permits. He noted that any event over three hundred people requires a Special
Event Permit from the Town. The consumption and sale of alcohol was discussed. Butterfly Path board
member Brooke Petska explained that they are asking for social alcohol consumption supervised by a
licensed bartender; they foresee alcohol consumption on weekends during certain evening hours, ideally
4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., and would mainly be for fundraising activities. Hours of operation for the facility
would be 7:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m., with their main programs running from 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.,
seven days a week. Their board has discussed rental of the facility and imagines that rental would only
be offered to members. The facility will operate like a club: members pay an annual fee and then
members pay extra for additional offerings.
The Commission discussed parking, as this would be a commercial operation in a residential area. One
parking stall is needed for every three people allowed by occupancy. Town Ordinance requires paving
and marking if the lot is over five stalls, but the Ordinance also allows the Town to approve a different
plan if suggested by the applicant. Considering their target demographic, they may want to consider
paving the parking lot. The Commission also discussed lighting; the applicant indicated that they will
not be adding any additional lighting. Any signage will be subtle and will follow the Town’s sign
ordinance. The applicant plans on having a live-in caretaker who lives in the existing apartment to
provide security and handle opening and closing. Retail sales would be of products produced on-site or
branded merchandise for the Butterfly Path, in addition to alcohol if approved and licensed.
Dan Pearson moved to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the Butterfly Path,
Inc., located at 570 Coulee Trail, for operation of a non-profit religious, community service,
recreational and educational retreat facility, subject to conditions, based on the following findings:
1. The Plan Commission conducted a public hearing and considered all oral and written testimony
received as part of the record.
2. The Plan Commission finds that the proposed use is appropriately classified under the
conditional use category of “non-profit religious, community service, recreational and educational
retreat facilities, uses, structures and accessory structures.”
3. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding agricultural and rural residential
character of the area.
4. Existing access, parking, and site improvements provide a suitable framework for the proposed
operation.
5. The proposed use is not expected to create unreasonable impact to neighboring properties when
operated in accordance with permit conditions.
6. Potential impacts related to traffic, parking, noise, site operations, and related activities can be
reasonably mitigated through conditions applied to the Conditional Use Permit.
7. The Conditional Use Permit shall incorporate the explicit conditions determined appropriate by
the Town Board based upon the Plan Commission recommendation and public hearing record.
The Plan Commission recommends the following conditions:
5
1. Hours of operation to be 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Monday through Wednesday and 7:00 a.m.
until 9:00 p.m. Thursday through Sunday.
2. There will be no additional lighting.
3. Any signage must follow the Town’s sign ordinance.
4. Live and amplified music is allowed three days a week provided the music is not audible beyond
the applicant’s property lines.
5. The Fire Department sets capacity, and the applicant must comply with any requirements of
the department.
6. The site will have no new or expanded buildings without an approved permit, and any new
buildings will require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit.
7. The property is allowed four 1-day events of no more than two hundred people per year.
8. The property is allowed an average daily attendance of no more than sixty people.
9. A Private On Site Wastewater Treatment System (POWTS) inspection is required to make
sure the system meets the wastewater treatment capacity and, if an update is needed, it is
required to be completed before operation on the property is allowed.
10. Twenty parking stalls are required for sixty people and no on-street parking is allowed.
11. The applicant shall provide a site plan addressing parking and landscaping for the Town
Plan Commission and Town Board approval within three months with full implementation
within twelve months.
12. Retail sales are limited to sale of items produced by members, items made on site, items
made from products grown on site, and sales of branded promotional items for the Butterfly
Path at 570 Coulee Trail.
13. On-site alcohol sales and consumption are allowed Thursday through Sunday from 4:00
p.m. to 8:30 p.m. if a license is issued and all ordinances and statutes are complied with.
14. One licensed food vendor at a time is allowed and packaged food will be available for
members at other times a food vendor is not on site.
15. The Conditional Use Permit is to be formally reviewed, including a public hearing, and
reconsidered two years from approval of the Conditional Use Permit. (Administrator Carlson
will ensure this condition is worded appropriately to comply with the law)
Seconded by Warren Vollmar. Discussion. Roll call vote - all ayes. Motion carried.
7. Consideration for Rezoning and Whole Farm Plan for Bennett property
Applicant: Nora and John Bennett
Site Location: 174 Carlson Lane
PID 040-1111-50-201
Request: To split the current lot into 2 lots
Rob Jones explained that applicants John and Nora Bennett are requesting three coordinated land use
actions for their 13.004-acre property located at 174 Carlson Lane. The Plan Commission held the
rezoning public hearing on March 5, 2026. No public comments were received or made at the hearing.
The Plan Commission did not take action on the Farm Plan, Rezone, or CSM at that time. The
applicant’s representative presented the request as a rezoning from AG to AG-RES in conjunction with a
50/50 Farm Plan and conservation easement.. This revised application creates three lots: Lot 2,
approximately 6.50 acres and identified as the Farmette lot; Lot 3, approximately 2.50 acres, containing
the existing residence and accessory buildings at 174 Carlson Lane; and Lot 4, approximately 4.00 acres,
proposed as an additional residential lot. The CSM layout will require two additional driveways, north
and south of the existing home on Lot 3. Driveway locations need to be shown on the CSM for Lots 2
and 4 and the Conservation Easement note also needs to be added. He noted the lot layout is atypical due
to topographical challenges with wetlands and slopes. The applicant is also requesting Exceptions to
Design Standards, including: a setback reduction on Lot 3 to 75-foot front yard and 25-foot side and rear
6
yards; a lot width of less than 150 feet for Lots 2 and 4; and an exception for the depth-to-width ratio
greater than 3:1 for Lots 2 and 4. The CSM does not show the contiguous buildable areas for each lot
and the County will require those be shown; surveyor Dan Kugel explained that Lot 3 would not meet
the required half-acre CBA using the typical setbacks. Modifying the setbacks on Lot 3 will limit any
expansion of non-conforming structures.
The Commission discussed the proposed setbacks, the existing structures, driveways, contiguous
buildable areas, and changing the lot configuration to need fewer Exceptions to Design Standards. There
was extensive discussion on the proposed driveways, and if it is possible to have a shared driveway with
the neighbor. If Lots 2 and 3 increased in size it would be easier for the Town to approve the CSM as
less Exceptions would be needed. Rob Jones stated he could put together an option sheet for the
applicant to help him decide if he wants to reconfigure the lot layout with only two lots; the north lot
line of Lot 3 would go all the way to the north side and Lot 2 would not have road frontage, but would
be accessed by a shared driveway. This would resolve the length-to-width ratio issue. If the requested
Exceptions on the side and rear setbacks were eliminated it would make the 75’ front setback request
more palatable. The Commission would need to see a revised CSM along with a driveway easement,
shared driveway agreement, and the Conservation Easement would need to go back to the Town
Attorney to reflect the lot changes. It was noted that if they are unable to secure an agreement with the
neighbor on the potential shared driveway, they can run the driveway through the flag portion of the lot.
Dan Pearson moved the Plan Commission table the application for Nora and John Bennett at 174
Carlson Lane until the applicant submits a revised application. Dean Albert seconded. Motion
carried.
8. Discussion and Consideration on Comprehensive Plan Updates-Process & Updates
Rob Jones provided the Commission with a memo updating the scope status and completion budget for
the Comprehensive Plan update. Cedar Corp. is requesting that the Plan Commission consider
recommending Town Board authorization to proceed with the remaining Comprehensive Plan
completion work on a time-and-material basis. The additional authorization is estimated at
approximately $20,000 for the work completed since March 2026 and the remaining work required to
complete the Plan update. The amount approved in 2024 was just for the mapping updates.
Administrator Carlson stated that the price is very competitive. Dean Albert moved that the Plan
Commission recommend to the Town Board to authorize Cedar Corporation to proceed with the
work updating the Comprehensive Plan for approximately an additional $20,000 as defined in the
Cedar Corporation memo. Seconded by Warren Vollmar. Motion carried.
9. Update and Discussion on City of Hudson Cooperative Boundary Plan
Chairperson Rowen updated the Plan Commission on the proposed Cooperative Boundary Plan with the
City of Hudson. The draft agreement will be moving to the public comment phase. He reviewed the
benefits of the Agreement, including shared City and Town rules for annexation and use, City support
for the Town’s TDR program, protection and restoration of rights to develop land, and not allowing
forced annexations. As parcels are attached or annexed to the City of Hudson and/or River Falls, the
Extraterritorial Plat Review boundaries between the Cities would also shift. The Agreement runs for
ninety-nine years and provides excellent framework for long-term collaboration between the City and
the Town. The Joint Public Hearing will be on July 14th. The Agreement will need to be approved by the
Town Board, Hudson City Council, and the WI State Department of Administration. The earliest
possible approval would be at the end of the year.
10. Correspondence
There was no correspondence to report.
7
11. Potential items for future meetings
Work on the Comprehensive Plan updates will continue.
12. Adjourn
David Wolf moved to adjourn the meeting of the June 4, 2026, Plan Commission 9:57 at p.m. Dan
Pearson seconded. Motion carried.
Source: Town of Troy website. First collected Oct 9, 2026.