Board of Public Works Regular Meeting Agenda (PDF)

BPW Members: Jason Hiess Brandon Cesafsky Tom Hubbard Tim Normand Mike Tzanakis NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN IN ACCORDANCE with the provisions of Chapter 19, Subchapter IV of the Statutes of the State of Wisconsin, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the: Board of Public Works: X (Reasonable accommodations for participation by individuals with disabilities will be made upon request. Please call 715.726.2736) Will be held on Monday, June 8, 2026 at 5:30 pm in the City Hall Council Chambers, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Items of business to be discussed or acted upon at this meeting are shown on the attached Agenda or listed below: NOTE: If you are a board member and unable to attend the meeting, please notify the Engineering Dept. by calling 726.2736. 1. Approve the minutes of the May 11, 2026 Board of Public Works meeting. (Attachment) 2. Consider Happy Tails Dog Park Agreement. Make recommendation to the Common Council. (Attachment) 3. Consider 2025 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report and corresponding resolution. Make recommendation to the Common Council. (Attachment) 4. Adjournment. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A MAJORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY BE PRESENT AT THIS MEETING TO GATHER INFORMATION ABOUT A SUBJECT OVER WHICH THEY HAVE DECISION MAKING RESPONSIBILITY. Please note that attachments to this agenda may not be final and are subject to change. This agenda may be amended as it is reviewed. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of this Notice was emailed to the Chippewa Herald, posted on the 1st floor of City Hall, and on the outside City Hall Bulletin Board on Friday, June 5, 2026 at 9:00 am by LMR. Please note, these are draft minutes and may be amended until approved by the Common Council. CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, MAY 11, 2026 – 5:30 PM The Board of Public Works met in City Hall on May 11, 2026 at 5:30 pm. Attending were Mayor Jason Hiess, Vice-President Tom Hubbard, Director of Public Works Brandon Cesafsky, Alderman Tim Normand, and Mike Tzanakis. Also attending was Alderman Dan Dixon and Teri Ouimette. 1. Motion by Normand, seconded by Hubbard to approve the minutes of the April 27, 2026 Board of Public Works meeting. All present voting aye. MOTION CARRIED. 2. Cesafsky provided the background on the request to amend the ordinance for the City owned parking lot on the north side of Spring Street, between Bay and Bridge Streets. The request came from Teri Ouimette at Main Street after hearing local businesses were having a hard time with the 2 hour parking with longer appointments at the hair salon and tattoo shop. The ordinance drafted by Engineering follows the request from business owners and would change the lot to a 4 hour parking lot. Motion by Hiess, seconded by Hubbard to recommend Common Council approve an ordinance changing the parking lot on the north side of Spring Street, between Bay and Bridge Streets, to a 4 hour lot. All present voting aye. MOTION CARRIED. 3. Cesafsky provided the background on the ordinance to change parking restrictions in front of the Market on River building along River Street. Cesafsky explained that the Market on River recently completed a large concrete sidewalk project which eliminated a driveway and also provided a large bump out which now gives Island Street drivers better vision of River Street Traffic. The no parking would go from a 136 foot distance down to a 73 foot distance from the west corner of the building. Motion by Normand, seconded by Hubbard to recommend Common Council approve the ordinance changing the no parking area in front of Market on River from 136 feet from the east side of the Island Street right-of-way to 73 feet from the east side of the Island Street right-of-way. All present voting aye. MOTION CARRIED. 4. Cesafsky provided an update for the South Avenue Local Roads Improvement Program (LRIP) funding that City Engineer Bill McElroy applied for and was awarded. He stated that this project would be completed in 2027. Mayor Hiess stated this is a great project and he is excited that Engineering secured the funding. No Action Taken 5. Adjournment Motion by Normand, seconded by Hubbard to adjourn. All present voting aye. MOTION CARRIED. The Board of Public Works meeting adjourned at 5:48 pm. Brandon Cesafsky Secretary, Board of Public Works ( Page 1 of 5 ) USER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of June , 2026, between the City of Chippewa Falls, a Wisconsin Municipality, (“City”), and Chippewa Falls Happy Tails Dog Park, Inc. (“User”). BACKGROUND 1. Chippewa Falls Happy Tails Dog Park, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) NON-PROFIT organization and will hereafter be referred to as HTDP. It is a network of like-minded, dedicated volunteers formed to establish, operate and provide oversight of an off-leash, canine leisure area. 2. HTDP operates on approximately 42.11 acres of City Parcel 4416, which is also a fenced City storm water retention pond and the large dog park area. In addition, HTDP operates and maintains the small dog area, driveway entrance, parking lot, future shelter and water hydrant areas on 1.10 acres City owned parcel number 4046 west of said storm water pond and at the northeast corner of South Avenue and Chippewa Crossing Boulevard. WITNESSETH THAT, the parties hereto recite and agree as follows for the use and care of said city parcel numbers 4416 and 4046. USER RESPONSIBILITIES 1. User will secure and pay for all related costs necessary for snow removal. Three areas will be designated for snow removal: a. Driveway Entrance b. Parking Lot Area c. Concrete Side Areas 2. User will fund any fixed asset improvements that User deems worthy of investment or park enhancement (i.e. water, electrical, lighting, building structures, etc.). 3. User will pay all related reoccurring utilities service bills (i.e. water and sewer bills) resulting from installing said services to any future improvements listed in Attachments: I. 4. User agrees to secure all the necessary approvals from the City for all physical improvements currently planned or that may originate in the future. 5. User agrees to secure and, upon demand from the City, provide such evidence of liability coverage as the City may request. 6. User will be responsible for the maintenance of all miscellaneous park assets. (i.e. benches, small dog fence & related gates, shelters, etc.) 7. User agrees to provide the fecal waste bags for the designated fecal waste cans and routine emptying of these fecal waste cans. ( Page 2 of 5 ) 8. User will be responsible for all maintenance and related expenses (i.e. seal coating, crack filling, surface repairs) of the park’s black topped surface assets. (i.e. driveway, parking lot). 9. User will be responsible for the mowing of the designated park areas a. Top rim of the storm water retention pond. b. Small dog area. c. Large dog area d. Area surrounding driveway & parking area. 10. User agree s to actively monitor the compliance of park users to ensure adherence to the HTDP rules. Any observed violations will be documented and handled in accordance with the HTDP rules posted at the park entrance and included in the Annual User Permit Application. USER LISTING OF ASSETS & LOCATIONS Reference Tabs: VI, VII, VIII, IX USER PARK IMPROVEMENT PHOTOS Reference Tab: X CITY RESPONSIBILITIES 1. City agrees to effectively remedy any erosion issues which threaten the physical integrity of the perimeter fence of the pond at no cost to the User. 2. City agrees to make any and all repairs to the main perimeter fence encircling the pond as needed in order to maintain its current dog retention condition. 3. City agrees to provide guidance and direction and information resources for water, electrical, and landscaping improvements at no cost. 4. City agrees to mow the banked portion of the rim once per year or more if necessary. One of the time s should be scheduled in late fall. 5. City agrees to groom the path on the top of the pond rim as needed during the winter snow fall season to expressly improve the Users navigability of the rim path surface. This grooming will be provided if the existing equipment is a functional tool/asset of the City. 6. City agree s to allow User to secure a commercial Porta-Potty for use by park patrons. 7. City agrees to allow User to secure commercial trash container for disposal of park refuse and dog fecal waste. 8. City agrees to allow User to attach items (i.e. mailboxes for fecal bags, fecal waste cans, security lighting, etc.) to park fencing. Al so, the attachment of signage, banners and flags will be allowed with joint approval by User and City. ( Page 3 of 5 ) 9. City agrees to continue to allow the Bernard F. Willi Swimming Pool to be used by User once at the close of the pool season for a fundraising event. In the event a new aquatic facility is constructed or there is a change in management, this agreement may be subject to change. If more than one Lifeguard is required the User will be charged for the services of only one Lifeguard. 10. City agrees to allow the User to host events at the HTDP for purposes of training, fundraising and other related events utilizing the City’s “Street Use Permit Process”. 11. City agrees to allow City employees to sell the HTDP User Permits at the City Police Station and City Park & Recreation Department located in City Hall. 12. City agrees to prohibit the north boundary fence between the Maple Leaf Town Homes and HTDP from being removed in accordance with C.U.P. Re solution No. 15-01 adopted on January 15, 2015. The boundary fence is described on the page titled “Aspen Woods Duplex Homes Phase 1 and 2 Plat Narrative” under the heading General Development Plan: CONCEPT AND CHARTER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 13. City agrees to allow the User as may be necessary, to connect to north boundary fence between the Maple Leaf Town Homes to create a secure area adjacent to this boundary fence. 14. City affirms via the City’s insurance agency, Spectrum Insurance Group’s email authored by Darrel Zaleski dated March 5, 2015 at 4:20 pm that the City’s general liability insurance coverage does in no part extend to the User, including the Board of Directors. The User’s protection from any general liability claims stemming from its oversite responsibilities of the park operations would only be covered by general liability insurance coverage purchased directly by the User. Reference paragraph number five of the U ser responsibilities. 15. City agrees to the best of its ability under the then existing circumstances, to notify the User of any intention to sell the aforesaid BACKGROUND, Item #2. The City agrees and does hereby give to the User the right of first refusal, which must be 120 days of receiving written notice, to purchase the said more or less one acre(s) corner area. 16. City agrees to notify the User within 30 days in writing of any issues that would be deemed a potential threat to the User’s use of the HTDP. Reference: BACKGROUND, Item #2. 17. The City agree s to provide the User in writing a 12-month notice to terminate the User’s usage of the area described in the document titled: BACKGROUND, Item #2. 18. City agrees to consider the integration of the control, operation, maintenance and related expenses of the HTDP park to the City in the event that the User determines it no longer has the monetary and staff resources to sustain the operation of the park. ( Page 4 of 5 ) 19. City agrees this Agreement shall be for period of five (5) years from the date set forth in the introductory paragraph above. The City’s Board of Public Works, prior to expiration and in a timely manner, shall review this agreement for a further five (5) year extension and shall do so for further extensions. However, prior to any expiration date, on an as needed basis and with concurrence of both the City and the User, the User Agreement may be reviewed, revised, or terminated. The effective date of any changes to the Agreement will be negotiated by the City and User, but the date will not surpass the next extension date. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be executed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and sealed with its corporate seal; and the U ser has executed this Agreement at Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, the day and year first above written. In Presence of: ____________________________ ____________________________ CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS By:_______________________________ Jason R. Hiess, Mayor And:______________________________ Lynne R. Bauer, Finance Manager ( Page 5 of 5 ) (SEAL) USER: Happy Tails Dog Park, Inc. By:_______________________________ Mark Bassett, President Date:_____________________________ STATE OF WISCONSIN ) )ss.. COUNTY OF CHIPPEWA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ______________, 2026, by ______Jason R. Hiess ( Mayor) and ____Bridget Givens_________(City Clerk), respectively, of the City of Chippewa Falls, a Wisconsin Municipal Corporation, on behalf of the Municipal Corporation. __________________________________ Notary Public (SEAL) STATE OF WISCONSIN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF EAU CLAIRE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of _________________, 2026 by Mark Bassett, the President of Happy Tails Dog Park, Inc., on behalf of the Happy Tails Dog Park, Inc. _____________________________ Notary Public ( SEAL) Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Influent Flow and Loading 1. Monthly Average Flows and BOD Loadings 1.1 Verify the following monthly flows and BOD loadings to your facility. Influent No. 701 Influent Monthly Average Flow, MGD x Influent Monthly Average BOD Concentration mg/L x 8.34 = Influent Monthly Average BOD Loading, lbs/day January 1.8080 x 223 x 8.34 = 3,366 February 1.8244 x 195 x 8.34 = 2,970 March 1.8981 x 242 x 8.34 = 3,834 April 2.1918 x 166 x 8.34 = 3,041 May 2.1145 x 216 x 8.34 = 3,802 June 2.2407 x 177 x 8.34 = 3,315 July 2.4426 x 152 x 8.34 = 3,093 August 2.0982 x 172 x 8.34 = 3,004 September 1.9366 x 192 x 8.34 = 3,094 October 1.8385 x 199 x 8.34 = 3,051 November 1.7147 x 209 x 8.34 = 2,987 December 1.7124 x 193 x 8.34 = 2,758 2. Maximum Monthly Design Flow and Design BOD Loading 2.1 Verify the design flow and loading for your facility. Design Design Factor x % = % of Design Max Month Design Flow, MGD 7.18 x 90 = 6.462 x 100 = 7.18 Design BOD, lbs/day 5330 x 90 = 4797 x 100 = 5330 2.2 Verify the number of times the flow and BOD exceeded 90% or 100% of design, points earned, and score: Months of Influent Number of times flow was greater than 90% of Number of times flow was greater than 100% of Number of times BOD was greater than 90% of design Number of times BOD was greater than 100% of design January 1 0 0 0 0 February 1 0 0 0 0 March 1 0 0 0 0 April 1 0 0 0 0 May 1 0 0 0 0 June 1 0 0 0 0 July 1 0 0 0 0 August 1 0 0 0 0 September 1 0 0 0 0 October 1 0 0 0 0 November 1 0 0 0 0 December 1 0 0 0 0 Points per each 2 1 3 2 Exceedances 0 0 0 0 Points 0 0 0 0 Total Number of Points 0 0 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 3. Flow Meter 3.1 Was the influent flow meter calibrated in the last year? Yes Enter last calibration date (MM/DD/YYYY) 2025-07-28 No If No, please explain: 4. Sewer Use Ordinance 4.1 Did your community have a sewer use ordinance that limited or prohibited the discharge of excessive conventional pollutants ((C)BOD, SS, or pH) or toxic substances to the sewer from industries, commercial users, hauled waste, or residences? Yes No If No, please explain: 4.2 Was it necessary to enforce the ordinance? Yes No If Yes, please explain: 5. Septage Receiving 5.1 Did you have requests to receive septage at your facility? Septic Tanks Holding Tanks Grease Traps Yes Yes Yes No No No 5.2 Did you receive septage at your facility? If yes, indicate volume in gallons. Septic Tanks Yes 3,797,355 gallons No Holding Tanks Yes 8,458,551 gallons No Grease Traps Yes 241,550 gallons No 5.2.1 If yes to any of the above, please explain if plant performance is affected when receiving any of these wastes. Plan performance with the above influent was stressing at times with recent changes in the Chippewa Falls system. Fats Oils and Grease (FOG) service area in 2025 was reduced to the 54729 zip code to reduce the amount that our facility was receiving from surrounding communities. The FOG that were were taking at the plan was causing issues with equipment and the maintenance of that equipment. After making the change to the FOG service area, we saw a large improvement. 6. Pretreatment 6.1 Did your facility experience operational problems, permit violations, biosolids quality concerns, or hazardous situations in the sewer system or treatment plant that were attributable to commercial or industrial discharges in the last year? Yes Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 No If yes, describe the situation and your community's response. 6.2 Did your facility accept hauled industrial wastes, landfill leachate, etc.? Yes No If yes, describe the types of wastes received and any procedures or other restrictions that were in place to protect the facility from the discharge of hauled industrial wastes. The City received 117000 gallons of leachate in 2025. The plant was monitored for our discharge limits and although we had difficulties at times, managed the load of leachate. Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (BOD/CBOD) 1. Effluent (C)BOD Results 1.1 Verify the following monthly average effluent values, exceedances, and points for BOD or CBOD Outfall No. 004 Monthly Average Limit (mg/L) 90% of Permit Limit > 10 (mg/L) Effluent Monthly Average (mg/L) Months of Discharge with a Limit Permit Limit Exceedance 90% Permit Limit Exceedance January 25 22.5 3 1 0 0 February 25 22.5 3 1 0 0 March 25 22.5 3 1 0 0 April 25 22.5 3 1 0 0 May 25 22.5 3 1 0 0 June 25 22.5 3 1 0 0 July 25 22.5 2 1 0 0 August 25 22.5 2 1 0 0 September 25 22.5 3 1 0 0 October 25 22.5 6 1 0 0 November 25 22.5 5 1 0 0 December 25 22.5 5 1 0 0 Outfall No. 001 Monthly Average Limit (mg/L) 90% of Permit Limit > 10 (mg/L) Effluent Monthly Average (mg/L) Months of Discharge with a Limit Permit Limit Exceedance 90% Permit Limit Exceedance January 25 22.5 February 25 22.5 March 25 22.5 April 25 22.5 May 25 22.5 June 25 22.5 July 25 22.5 August 25 22.5 September 25 22.5 October 25 22.5 November 25 22.5 December 25 22.5 * Equals limit if limit is <= 10 Months of discharge/yr 12 Points per each exceedance with 12 months of discharge 7 3 Exceedances 0 0 Points 0 0 Total number of points 0 NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to state waters, the points per monthly exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of discharge. Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is 12/6 = 2.0 1.2 If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance? 0 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 2. Flow Meter Calibration 2.1 Was the effluent flow meter calibrated in the last year? Yes Enter last calibration date (MM/DD/YYYY) No If No, please explain: Effluent weir was is inaccessible for calibration. The prior wastewater supervisor was looking into ways to safely access the weir but nothing was completed. We are currently working with the company on a solution. 3. Treatment Problems 3.1 What problems, if any, were experienced over the last year that threatened treatment? Toward the end of the year the treatment plan was experiencing issues with high phosphorus amounts which we believe was a result of losing a large industrial discharge combined with high amounts of leachate and hauled waste being received. 4. Other Monitoring and Limits 4.1 At any time in the past year was there an exceedance of a permit limit for any other pollutants such as chlorides, pH, residual chlorine, fecal coliform, or metals? Yes No If Yes, please explain: Sept 2025 we had 25 % of ecoli samples that were over 410/100ml On 5/19/25 we had one violation on PH (5.8) 4.2 At any time in the past year was there a failure of an effluent acute or chronic whole effluent toxicity (WET) test? Yes No If Yes, please explain: 4.3 If the biomonitoring (WET) test did not pass, were steps taken to identify and/or reduce source(s) of toxicity? Yes No N/A Please explain unless not applicable: Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Total Suspended Solids) 1. Effluent Total Suspended Solids Results 1.1 Verify the following monthly average effluent values, exceedances, and points for TSS: Outfall No. 001 Monthly Average Limit (mg/L) 90% of Permit Limit >10 (mg/L) Effluent Monthly Average (mg/L) Months of Discharge with a Limit Permit Limit Exceedance 90% Permit Limit Exceedance January 30 27 February 30 27 March 30 27 April 30 27 May 30 27 June 30 27 July 30 27 August 30 27 September 30 27 October 30 27 November 30 27 December 30 27 Outfall No. 004 Monthly Average Limit (mg/L) 90% of Permit Limit >10 (mg/L) Effluent Monthly Average (mg/L) Months of Discharge with a Limit Permit Limit Exceedance 90% Permit Limit Exceedance January 30 27 4 1 0 0 February 30 27 3 1 0 0 March 30 27 2 1 0 0 April 30 27 3 1 0 0 May 30 27 5 1 0 0 June 30 27 4 1 0 0 July 30 27 4 1 0 0 August 30 27 3 1 0 0 September 30 27 4 1 0 0 October 30 27 4 1 0 0 November 30 27 4 1 0 0 December 30 27 4 1 0 0 * Equals limit if limit is <= 10 Months of Discharge/yr 12 Points per each exceedance with 12 months of discharge: 7 3 Exceedances 0 0 Points 0 0 Total Number of Points 0 NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to state waters, the points per monthly exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of discharge. Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is 12/6 = 2.0 1.2 If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance? 0 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Effluent Quality and Plant Performance (Phosphorus) 1. Effluent Phosphorus Results 1.1 Verify the following monthly average effluent values, exceedances, and points for Phosphorus Outfall No. 001 Monthly Average phosphorus Limit (mg/L) Effluent Monthly Average phosphorus (mg/L) Months of Discharge with a Limit Permit Limit Exceedance January 1.4 February 1.4 March 1.4 April 1.4 May 1.4 June 1.4 July 1.4 August 1.4 September 1.4 October 1.4 November 1.4 December 1.4 Outfall No. 004 Monthly Average phosphorus Limit (mg/L) Effluent Monthly Average phosphorus (mg/L) Months of Discharge with a Limit Permit Limit Exceedance January 1.4 0.555 1 0 February 1.4 1.083 1 0 March 1.4 1.124 1 0 April 1.4 1.174 1 0 May 1.4 1.275 1 0 June 1.4 0.920 1 0 July 1.4 1.191 1 0 August 1.4 1.207 1 0 September 1.4 0.711 1 0 October 1.4 1.002 1 0 November 1.4 0.857 1 0 December 1.4 0.844 1 0 Months of Discharge/yr 12 Points per each exceedance with 12 months of discharge: 10 Exceedances 0 Total Number of Points 0 NOTE: For systems that discharge intermittently to waters of the state, the points per monthly exceedance for this section shall be based upon a multiplication factor of 12 months divided by the number of months of discharge. Example: For a wastewater facility discharging only 6 months of the year, the multiplication factor is 12/6 = 2.0 1.2 If any violations occurred, what action was taken to regain compliance? 0 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Biosolids Quality and Management 1. Biosolids Use/Disposal 1.1 How did you use or dispose of your biosolids? (Check all that apply) Land applied under your permit Publicly Distributed Exceptional Quality Biosolids Hauled to another permitted facility Landfilled Incinerated Other NOTE: If you did not remove biosolids from your system, please describe your system type such as lagoons, reed beds, recirculating sand filters, etc. 1.1.1 If you checked Other, please describe: 2. Land Application Site 2.1 Last Year's Approved and Active Land Application Sites 2.1.1 How many acres did you have? 2346.4 acres 2.1.2 How many acres did you use? 112.5 acres 2.2 If you did not have enough acres for your land application needs, what action was taken? 2.3 Did you overapply nitrogen on any of your approved land application sites you used last year? Yes (30 points) No 2.4 Have all the sites you used last year for land application been soil tested in the previous 4 years? Yes No (10 points) N/A 0 3. Biosolids Metals Number of biosolids outfalls in your WPDES permit: 3.1 For each outfall tested, verify the biosolids metal quality values for your facility during the last calendar year. Outfall No. 006 - LIQUID SLUDGE Parameter 80% of Limit H.Q. Limit Ceiling Limit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 80% Value High Quality Ceiling Arsenic 41 75 0 0 Cadmium 39 85 0 0 Copper 1500 4300 0 0 Lead 300 840 0 0 Mercury 17 57 0 0 Molybdenum 60 75 0 0 Nickel 336 420 0 0 Selenium 80 100 0 0 Zinc 2800 7500 0 0 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Outfall No. 007 - CAKE SLUDGE Parameter 80% of Limit H.Q. Limit Ceiling Limit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 80% Value High Quality Ceiling Arsenic 41 75 <6.3 <5 <5.7 <6.9 0 0 Cadmium 39 85 .63 .58 .95 .82 0 0 Copper 1500 4300 900 930 1100 1200 0 0 Lead 300 840 18 22 25 26 0 0 Mercury 17 57 <.3 .28 .59 .39 0 0 Molybdenum 60 75 58 61 76 67 3 1 Nickel 336 420 56 60 65 42 0 0 Selenium 80 100 12 <9.6 <11 <13 0 0 Zinc 2800 7500 700 730 900 1000 0 0 3.1.1 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the high quality limits OR 80% of the limit for molybdenum, nickel, or selenium = 3 Exceedence Points 0 (0 Points) 1-2 (10 Points) > 2 (15 Points) 3.1.2 If you exceeded the high quality limits, did you cumulatively track the metals loading at each land application site? (check applicable box) Yes No (10 points) N/A - Did not exceed limits or no HQ limit applies (0 points) N/A - Did not land apply biosolids until limit was met (0 points) 3.1.3 Number of times any of the metals exceeded the ceiling limits = 1 Exceedence Points 0 (0 Points) 1 (10 Points) > 1 (15 Points) 3.1.4 Were biosolids land applied which exceeded the ceiling limit? Yes (20 Points) No (0 Points) 3.1.5 If any metal limit (high quality or ceiling) was exceeded at any time, what action was taken? Has the source of the metals been identified? Molybdenum was high in our biosolids for the 3rd quarter. We had some large changes with our process and collection system dischargers that we are monitoring closely and working through. 0 4. Pathogen Control (per outfall): 4.1 Verify the following information. If any information is incorrect, use the Report Issue button under the Options header in the left-side menu. Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Outfall Number: 007 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit: Sample Dates: 01/01/2025 - 03/31/2025 Density: Sample Concentration Amount: Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: No Process: Anaerobic Digestion Process Description: Anaerobic Digestion at >94 degrees and MCRT of > 15 days, verified by 30 day rolling average detention time and continuous temperature monitoring and daily temperature recording. Outfall Number: 007 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit: Sample Dates: 04/01/2025 - 06/30/2025 Density: Sample Concentration Amount: Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: Yes Process: Anaerobic Digestion Process Description: Anaerobic Digestion at >94 degrees and MCRT of > 15 days, verified by 30 day rolling average detention time and continuous temperature monitoring and daily temperature recording. Outfall Number: 007 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit: Sample Dates: 07/01/2025 - 09/30/2025 Density: Sample Concentration Amount: Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: No Process: Anaerobic Digestion Process Description: Anaerobic Digestion at >94 degrees and MCRT of > 15 days, verified by 30 day rolling average detention time and continuous temperature monitoring and daily temperature recording. Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Outfall Number: 007 Biosolids Class: B Bacteria Type and Limit: Sample Dates: 10/01/2025 - 12/31/2025 Density: Sample Concentration Amount: Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: Yes Process: Anaerobic Digestion Process Description: Anaerobic Digestion at >94 degrees and MCRT of > 15 days, verified by 30 day rolling average detention time and continuous temperature monitoring and daily temperature recording. 4.2 If exceeded Class B limit or did not meet the process criteria at the time of land application. 4.2.1 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at the time of land application? Yes (40 Points) No If yes, what action was taken? 0 5. Vector Attraction Reduction (per outfall): 5.1 Verify the following information. If any of the information is incorrect, use the Report Issue button under the Options header in the left-side menu. Outfall Number: 007 Method Date: 01/28/2025 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: No Limit (if applicable): &gt;=38 Results (if applicable): 56 Outfall Number: 007 Method Date: 05/13/2025 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: Yes Limit (if applicable): &gt;=38 Results (if applicable): 67 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Outfall Number: 007 Method Date: 09/02/2025 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: No Limit (if applicable): &gt;=38 Results (if applicable): 66 Outfall Number: 007 Method Date: 12/17/2025 Option Used To Satisfy Requirement: Volatile Solids Reduction Requirement Met: Yes Land Applied: Yes Limit (if applicable): &gt;=38 Results (if applicable): 56 5.2 Was the limit exceeded or the process criteria not met at the time of land application? Yes (40 Points) No If yes, what action was taken? 0 6. Biosolids Storage 6.1 How many days of actual, current biosolids storage capacity did your wastewater treatment facility have either on-site or off-site? >= 180 days (0 Points) 150 - 179 days (10 Points) 120 - 149 days (20 Points) 90 - 119 days (30 Points) < 90 days (40 Points) N/A (0 Points) 6.2 If you checked N/A above, explain why. 0 7. Issues 7.1 Describe any outstanding biosolids issues with treatment, use or overall management: We are currently monitoring our molybdenum levels at the plant. We have taken test from every one of our stored piles to make a determination about land applying. Our latest tests were lower than we have seen for 8 months. Some major changes that we have made that could result in this are no longer taking septage haulers and no longer taking leachate. We hope to be accepting the septage haulers back into the plan and have a quality verification process which will be implemented. Total Points Generated 25 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 75 Section Grade C Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Staffing and Preventative Maintenance (All Treatment Plants) 1. Plant Staffing 1.1 Was your wastewater treatment plant adequately staffed last year? Yes No If No, please explain: In 2025 we went through staffing turnover and were also down one operator for the whole year. Could use more help/staff for: Collection system maintenance and plant maintenance. 1.2 Did your wastewater staff have adequate time to properly operate and maintain the plant and fulfill all wastewater management tasks including recordkeeping? Yes No If No, please explain: Short staffing and an old plant restrict our ability to respond to preventative tasks and force us to respond to reactive maintenance. 2. Preventative Maintenance 2.1 Did your plant have a documented AND implemented plan for preventative maintenance on major equipment items? Yes (Continue with question 2) No (40 points) If No, please explain, then go to question 3: 2.2 Did this preventative maintenance program depict frequency of intervals, types of lubrication, and other tasks necessary for each piece of equipment? Yes No (10 points) 2.3 Were these preventative maintenance tasks, as well as major equipment repairs, recorded and filed so future maintenance problems can be assessed properly? Yes Paper file system Computer system Both paper and computer system No (10 points) 0 3. O&M Manual 3.1 Does your plant have a detailed O&M and Manufacturer Equipment Manuals that can be used as a reference when needed? Yes No 4. Overall Maintenance /Repairs 4.1 Rate the overall maintenance of your wastewater plant. Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor Describe your rating: Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 We have a system in place but due to the lack of staffing/vacancies and the age of our plant the system does not receive the attention that it needs. This is often because of plant equipment failures or collection system failures that need immediate attention and pull staff away from routine maintenance tasks. Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Operator Certification and Education 1. Operator-In-Charge 1.1 Did you have a designated operator-in-charge during the report year? Yes (0 points) No (20 points) Name: DANIEL R REITER Certification No: 38323 0 2. Certification Requirements 2.1 In accordance with Chapter NR 114.56 and 114.57, Wisconsin Administrative Code, what level and subclass(es) were required for the operator-in-charge (OIC) to operate the wastewater treatment plant and what level and subclass(es) were held by the operator-in-charge? Sub Class SubClass Description WWTP OIC Advanced OIT Basic Advanced A1 Suspended Growth Processes X X A2 Attached Growth Processes A3 Recirculating Media Filters A4 Ponds, Lagoons and Natural A5 Anaerobic Treatment Of Liquid B Solids Separation X X C Biological Solids/Sludges X X P Total Phosphorus X X N Total Nitrogen D Disinfection X X L Laboratory X X U Unique Treatment Systems SS Sanitary Sewage Collection X NA X NA 2.2 Was the operator-in-charge certified at the appropriate level and subclass(es) to operate this plant? (Note: Certification in subclass SS is required 5 years after permit reissuance.) Yes (0 points) No (20 points) 2.3 For wastewater treatment facilities with a registered or certified laboratory, is at least one operator that works in the laboratory certified at the basic level in the laboratory (L) subclass? Yes No N/A – Wastewater treatment facility does not have a registered or certified laboratory 2.4 For wastewater treatment facilities that own and operate a sanitary sewage collection system, has at least one operator been designated the OIC for sanitary sewage collection system and certified at the basic level in the sanitary sewage collection system (SS) subclass? Yes No N/A – Owner of the Wastewater treatment facility does not own and operate a sanitary sewage collection system 0 3. Succession Planning 3.1 In the event of the loss of your designated operator-in-charge, did you have a contingency plan to ensure the continued proper operation and maintenance of the plant that includes one or more of the following options (check all that apply)? One or more additional certified operators on staff Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 An arrangement with another certified operator An arrangement with another community with a certified operator An operator on staff who has an operator-in-training certificate for your plant and is expected to be certified within one year A consultant to serve as your certified operator None of the above (20 points) If "None of the above" is selected, please explain: 0 4. Continuing Education Credits 4.1 If you had a designated operator-in-charge, was the operator-in-charge earning Continuing Education Credits at the following rates? OIT and Basic Certification: Averaging 6 or more CECs per year. Averaging less than 6 CECs per year. Advanced Certification: Averaging 8 or more CECs per year. Averaging less than 8 CECs per year. Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Financial Management 1. Provider of Financial Information Name: Courtney Trainor Telephone: 715-726-2743 (XXX) XXX-XXXX E-Mail Address (optional): 2. Treatment Works Operating Revenues 2.1 Are User Charges or other revenues sufficient to cover O&M expenses for your wastewater treatment plant AND/OR collection system ? Yes (0 points) No (40 points) If No, please explain: 2.2 When was the User Charge System or other revenue source(s) last reviewed and/or revised? Year: 2025 0-2 years ago (0 points) 3 or more years ago (20 points) N/A (private facility) 2.3 Did you have a special account (e.g., CWFP required segregated Replacement Fund, etc.) or financial resources available for repairing or replacing equipment for your wastewater treatment plant and/or collection system? Yes (0 points) No (40 points) 0 REPLACEMENT FUNDS [PUBLIC MUNICIPAL FACILITIES SHALL COMPLETE QUESTION 3] 3. Equipment Replacement Funds 3.1 When was the Equipment Replacement Fund last reviewed and/or revised? Year: 2025 1-2 years ago (0 points) 3 or more years ago (20 points) N/A If N/A, please explain: 3.2 Equipment Replacement Fund Activity 3.2.1 Ending Balance Reported on Last Year's CMAR $ 4,310,760.00 3.2.2 Adjustments - if necessary (e.g. earned interest, audit correction, withdrawal of excess funds, increase making up previous shortfall, etc.) $ 0.00 3.2.3 Adjusted January 1st Beginning Balance $ 4,310,760.00 3.2.4 Additions to Fund (e.g. portion of User Fee, earned interest, etc.) + $ 88,610.30 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 3.2.5 Subtractions from Fund (e.g., equipment replacement, major repairs - use description box 3.2.6.1 below*) - $ 0.00 3.2.6 Ending Balance as of December 31st for CMAR Reporting Year $ 4,399,370.30 All Sources: This ending balance should include all Equipment Replacement Funds whether held in a bank account(s), certificate(s) of deposit, etc. 3.2.6.1 Indicate adjustments, equipment purchases, and/or major repairs from 3.2.5 above. 3.3 What amount should be in your Replacement Fund? $ 4,399,370.30 Please note: If you had a CWFP loan, this amount was originally based on the Financial Assistance Agreement (FAA) and should be regularly updated as needed. Further calculation instructions and an example can be found by clicking the SectionInstructions link under Info header in the left-side menu. 3.3.1 Is the December 31 Ending Balance in your Replacement Fund above, (#3.2.6) equal to, or greater than the amount that should be in it (#3.3)? Yes No If No, please explain. 0 4. Future Planning 4.1 During the next ten years, will you be involved in formal planning for upgrading, rehabilitating, or new construction of your treatment facility or collection system? Yes - If Yes, please provide major project information, if not already listed below. No Project # Project Description Estimated Cost Approximate Construction Year 1 Aeration Blower upgrade, Return Sludge Pumping capacity increase, WWTP electrical update. $2,400,000 2026 2 Kennedy Rd Lift Station. Replace current lift station from 1970 with submersible pump station. $400,000 2026 3 River Street and Jefferson Ave sanitary sewer siphon rehab/replacement. $1,000,000 2025 4 Influent Wetwell rehab and improvements $100,000 2027 5 Anaerobic Digestion rehab and Improvements $570,000 2027 6 Phosphorus Optimization Project which will add equipment to monitor and adjust the ferric chloride into our system base on the need determined by an in-line analyzer. $500,000 2026 7 Facility Plan Update to access the condition of the plant, inventory the plants infrastructure, and look at the future of the plant and improvements for the next 20 years. This project was started in 2026. $150,000 2026 5. Financial Management General Comments ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND USE 6. Collection System 6.1 Energy Usage 6.1.1 Enter the monthly energy usage from the different energy sources: COLLECTION SYSTEM PUMPAGE: Total Power Consumed Number of Municipally Owned Pump/Lift Stations: 13 Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Electricity Consumed (kWh) Natural Gas Consumed (therms) January 45,243 312 February 40,950 210 March 38,124 277 April 34,491 276 May 26,482 199 June 23,707 116 July 25,434 31 August 22,933 6 September 22,570 7 October 23,807 12 November 32,796 14 December 42,792 175 Total 379,329 1,635 Average 31,611 136 6.1.2 Comments: 6.2 Energy Related Processes and Equipment 6.2.1 Indicate equipment and practices utilized at your pump/lift stations (Check all that apply): Comminution or Screening Extended Shaft Pumps Flow Metering and Recording Pneumatic Pumping SCADA System Self-Priming Pumps Submersible Pumps Variable Speed Drives Other: 6.2.2 Comments: 6.3 Has an Energy Study been performed for your pump/lift stations? No Yes Year: 2000 By Whom: Focus on Energy Describe and Comment: Two lift station facilities were reviewed. One of the stations was move to water pumping rate structure by Xcel Energy. VFD's were installed in the other facility. Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 6.4 Future Energy Related Equipment 6.4.1 What energy efficient equipment or practices do you have planned for the future for your pump/lift stations? Facility Plan Update may result in some facility improvements to help reduce energy costs. 7. Treatment Facility 7.1 Energy Usage 7.1.1 Enter the monthly energy usage from the different energy sources: TREATMENT PLANT: Total Power Consumed/Month Electricity Consumed (kWh) Total Influent Flow (MG) Electricity Consumed/ Flow (kWh/MG) Total Influent BOD (1000 lbs) Electricity Consumed/ Total Influent BOD (kWh/1000lbs) Natural Gas Consumed (therms) January 159,126 56.05 2,839 104.35 1,525 11,234 February 144,577 51.08 2,830 83.16 1,739 8,666 March 133,090 58.84 2,262 118.85 1,120 4,321 April 136,386 65.75 2,074 91.23 1,495 4,322 May 131,658 65.55 2,009 117.86 1,117 4,322 June 137,081 67.22 2,039 99.45 1,378 4,322 July 142,065 75.72 1,876 95.88 1,482 4,323 August 132,247 65.04 2,033 93.12 1,420 24 September 121,469 58.10 2,091 92.82 1,309 116 October 105,796 56.99 1,856 94.58 1,119 185 November 112,947 51.44 2,196 89.61 1,260 1,783 December 126,941 53.08 2,392 85.50 1,485 4,515 Total 1,583,383 724.86 1,166.41 48,133 Average 131,949 60.41 2,208 97.20 1,371 4,011 7.1.2 Comments: 7.2 Energy Related Processes and Equipment 7.2.1 Indicate equipment and practices utilized at your treatment facility (Check all that apply): Aerobic Digestion Anaerobic Digestion Biological Phosphorus Removal Coarse Bubble Diffusers Dissolved O2 Monitoring and Aeration Control Effluent Pumping Fine Bubble Diffusers Influent Pumping Mechanical Sludge Processing Nitrification SCADA System UV Disinfection Variable Speed Drives Other: Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 7.2.2 Comments: 7.3 Future Energy Related Equipment 7.3.1 What energy efficient equipment or practices do you have planned for the future for your treatment facility? Large plant upgrades resulting from the facility plan and Capital improvement plan being completed. 8. Biogas Generation 8.1 Do you generate/produce biogas at your facility? No Yes If Yes, how is the biogas used (Check all that apply): Flared Off Building Heat Process Heat Generate Electricity Other: 9. Energy Efficiency Study 9.1 Has an Energy Study been performed for your treatment facility? No Yes Entire facility Year: By Whom: Describe and Comment: Part of the facility Year: 2017 By Whom: Strand Associates Describe and Comment: Anaerobic Digester Methane Gas Usage Study in 2022. Let to new installation of digester heating boiler and 2 micro turbines. Study was reviewed in 2015 by Strand Associates which lead to decommissioning micro turbines due to energy savings as cost of maintenance. Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems 1. Capacity, Management, Operation, and Maintenance (CMOM) Program 1.1 Do you have a CMOM program that is being implemented? Yes No If No, explain: 1.2 Do you have a CMOM program that contains all the applicable components and items according to Wisc. Adm Code NR 210.23 (4)? Yes No (30 points) N/A If No or N/A, explain: 1.3 Does your CMOM program contain the following components and items? (check the components and items that apply) Goals [NR 210.23 (4)(a)] Describe the major goals you had for your collection system last year: Prevent sanitary sewer overflows, promote safety, educate the public about the system, and maintain 33% of our system including jetting, root cutting, and televising. Did you accomplish them? Yes No If No, explain: Due to short staffing and new employees requiring training we did not complete the collection system maintenance. Organization [NR 210.23 (4) (b)] Does this chapter of your CMOM include: Organizational structure and positions (eg. organizational chart and position descriptions) Internal and external lines of communication responsibilities Person(s) responsible for reporting overflow events to the department and the public Legal Authority [NR 210.23 (4) (c)] What is the legally binding document that regulates the use of your sewer system? Municipal Code Chapter 13 If you have a Sewer Use Ordinance or other similar document, when was it last reviewed and revised? (MM/DD/YYYY) 2017-01-10 Does your sewer use ordinance or other legally binding document address the following: Private property inflow and infiltration New sewer and building sewer design, construction, installation, testing and inspection Rehabilitated sewer and lift station installation, testing and inspection Sewage flows satellite system and large private users are monitored and controlled, as necessary Fat, oil and grease control Enforcement procedures for sewer use non-compliance Operation and Maintenance [NR 210.23 (4) (d)] Does your operation and maintenance program and equipment include the following: Equipment and replacement part inventories Up-to-date sewer system map Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 A management system (computer database and/or file system) for collection system information for O&M activities, investigation and rehabilitation A description of routine operation and maintenance activities (see question 2 below) Capacity assessment program Basement back assessment and correction Regular O&M training Design and Performance Provisions [NR 210.23 (4) (e)] What standards and procedures are established for the design, construction, and inspection of the sewer collection system, including building sewers and interceptor sewers on private property? State Plumbing Code, DNR NR 110 Standards and/or local Municipal Code Requirements Construction, Inspection, and Testing Others: Overflow Emergency Response Plan [NR 210.23 (4) (f)] Does your emergency response capability include: Responsible personnel communication procedures Response order, timing and clean-up Public notification protocols Training Emergency operation protocols and implementation procedures Annual Self-Auditing of your CMOM Program [NR 210.23 (5)] Special Studies Last Year (check only those that apply): Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) Analysis Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) Sewer Evaluation and Capacity Managment Plan (SECAP) Lift Station Evaluation Report Others: 0 2. Operation and Maintenance 2.1 Did your sanitary sewer collection system maintenance program include the following maintenance activities? Complete all that apply and indicate the amount maintained. Cleaning 3 % of system/year Root removal 3 % of system/year Flow monitoring 0 % of system/year Smoke testing 0 % of system/year Sewer line televising .1 % of system/year Manhole inspections 0 % of system/year Lift station O&M 104 # per L.S./year Manhole rehabilitation .5 % of manholes rehabbed Mainline rehabilitation .8 % of sewer lines rehabbed Private sewer inspections 0 % of system/year Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Private sewer I/I removal 0 % of private services River or water crossings 0 % of pipe crossings evaluated or maintained Please include additional comments about your sanitary sewer collection system below: 2025 collection system maintenance with staffing and plant issues we were dealing with was minimum. in 2026 we have greatly improved this and are tracking everything we do. 3. Performance Indicators 3.1 Provide the following collection system and flow information for the past year. 33 Total actual amount of precipitation last year in inches 34.7 Annual average precipitation (for your location) 79.5 Miles of sanitary sewer 13 Number of lift stations 1 Number of lift station failures 0 Number of sewer pipe failures 20 Number of basement backup occurrences 12 Number of complaints Average daily flow in MGD (if available) Peak monthly flow in MGD (if available) Peak hourly flow in MGD (if available) 3.2 Performance ratios for the past year: 0.08 Lift station failures (failures/year) 0.00 Sewer pipe failures (pipe failures/sewer mile/yr) 0.01 Sanitary sewer overflows (number/sewer mile/yr) 0.25 Basement backups (number/sewer mile) 0.15 Complaints (number/sewer mile) Peaking factor ratio (Peak Monthly:Annual Daily Avg) Peaking factor ratio (Peak Hourly:Annual Daily Avg) 4. Overflows LIST OF SANITARY SEWER (SSO) AND TREATMENT FACILITY (TFO) OVERFLOWS REPORTED ** Date Location Cause Estimated Volume 0 6/26/2025 4:25:00 PM - 6/26/2025 4:55:00 PM 49 E Spring St Chippewa Falls WI Equipment Failure 3,225 ** If there were any SSOs or TFOs that are not listed above, please contact the DNR and stop work on this section until corrected. What actions were taken, or are underway, to reduce or eliminate SSO or TFO occurences in the future? This was due to a lift station failure and a siphon which has a failed pipe. The siphon was bid out in 2026 and we plan to replace the siphon in 2026. 5. Infiltration / Inflow (I/I) 5.1 Was infiltration/inflow (I/I) significant in your community last year? Yes No Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 If Yes, please describe: 5.2 Has infiltration/inflow and resultant high flows affected performance or created problems in your collection system, lift stations, or treatment plant at any time in the past year? Yes No If Yes, please describe: 5.3 Explain any infiltration/inflow (I/I) changes this year from previous years: None 5.4 What is being done to address infiltration/inflow in your collection system? Replacing clay tie pipes with PVC with our reconstruction projects. Total Points Generated 0 Score (100 - Total Points Generated) 100 Section Grade A Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Grading Summary WPDES No: 0023604 SECTIONS LETTER GRADE GRADE POINTS WEIGHTING FACTORS SECTION POINTS Influent A 4 3 12 BOD/CBOD A 4 10 40 TSS A 4 5 20 Phosphorus A 4 3 12 Biosolids C 2 5 10 Staffing/PM A 4 1 4 OpCert A 4 1 4 Financial A 4 1 4 Collection A 4 3 12 TOTALS 32 118 GRADE POINT AVERAGE (GPA) = 3.69 Notes: A = Voluntary Range (Response Optional) B = Voluntary Range (Response Optional) C = Recommendation Range (Response Required) D = Action Range (Response Required) F = Action Range (Response Required) Compliance Maintenance Annual Report Chippewa Falls Wwtp Last Updated: Reporting For: 6/4/2026 2025 Resolution or Owner's Statement Name of Governing Body or Owner: Date of Resolution or Action Taken: Resolution Number: Date of Submittal: ACTIONS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER RELATING TO SPECIFIC CMAR SECTIONS (Optional for grade A or B. Required for grade C, D, or F): Influent Flow and Loadings: Grade = A Effluent Quality: BOD: Grade = A Effluent Quality: TSS: Grade = A Effluent Quality: Phosphorus: Grade = A Biosolids Quality and Management: Grade = C Staffing: Grade = A Operator Certification: Grade = A Financial Management: Grade = A Collection Systems: Grade = A (Regardless of grade, response required for Collection Systems if SSOs were reported) ACTIONS SET FORTH BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR OWNER RELATING TO THE OVERALL GRADE POINT AVERAGE AND ANY GENERAL COMMENTS (Optional for G.P.A. greater than or equal to 3.00, required for G.P.A. less than 3.00) G.P.A. = 3.69 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX COMPLIANCE MAINTENANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS: Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 208 requires the Owner of a wastewater treatment facility to complete an electronic Compliance Maintenance Annual Report (eCMAR). WHEREAS: The Manager of Public Utilities has completed the eCMAR for 2025 and presented it to the Board of Public Works. WHEREAS: One Sanitary Sewer Overflow occurred and was reported as required to the DNR. The cause of which was a lift station electrical failure resulting in a sewer main over at the manhole near the River Street Siphon. WHEREAS: The Board of Public Works reviewed the eCMAR with a GPA score of 3.69 on June 8, 2028 and recommended adoption of a resolution documenting the review of the eCMAR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Common Council of the City of Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin informs the Department of Natural Resources that the electronic Compliance Maintenance Annual Report has been reviewed and corrective actions have been taken.  A rehab/replacement of siphon infr astructure has been undertaken. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Manager of Public Utilities is directed to submit this resolution and eCMAR to the DNR. Dated this 16th day of June, 2026. _____________________________________ Council President ADOPTED: __________________________ APPROVED: __________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ City Clerk