07-07-2026 Plan Commission Agenda and Packet

AGENDA PLAN COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 7, 2026 The public may view/listen to the meeting by: • Join by phone: +1-408-418-9388 United States Toll; 1-844-992-4726 United States Toll Free; Access code: 2864 954 4418 • Visiting the web link: https://tinyurl.com/RFPC7726; Webinar number 2864 954 4418; Webinar password: 567890 when dialing from a phone or video system • Viewing the City's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/cityofriverfalls CALL TO ORDER – 6:30 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of the June 2, 2026 Plan Commission meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 2. Special Sign Permit for Sycamore Two Senior Living/Memory Care at 816 Sycamore Street (Frisbie Companies, LLC, and RF2 QOZB, LLC) 3. Resolution regarding a Planned Unit Development Specific Implementation Plan for The Creamery at Cedar, a planned brewery, tap room, and event center at W. Cedar Street and River Street (Bearcat Investments, LLC) 4. Potential ordinance amendment to Title 17 – Zoning: Chapter 17. 08.070 – Fences; regarding setbacks and performance standards (height, materials, landscaping) for fences abutting a street REPORTS 5. Planning Update ADJOURNMENT Council members may be in attendance for informational purposes only. No official Council action will be taken. NOTE: Any person who has a qualifying disability as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act that requires the meeting or materials to be in an accessible location or format, may contact City Clerk Amy White at (715) 426-3408 or in person at 222 Lewis Stre et, for accommodations. Requests for accommodation should be made at least three (3) business days in advance of the meeting. Every effort will be made to arrange accommodation. Published: 07/01/26 in the Pierce County Journal; Posted: 07/02/26 Page 1 of 3 Community Development Department 222 Lewis Street River Falls, WI 54022 715.425.0900 www.rfcity.org MINUTES PLAN COMMISSION JUNE 2, 2026 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Members Present: Rob Gormanson, Diane Odeen, Rebecca Prendergast, Michael Woolsey, Alison Page, Members Absent: Chris Holtkamp, Steven Severson Staff Present: Emily Shively, Becky Corson, Chris Buntjer , Sgt Denton Anderson, Jonathan Thoen CALL TO ORDER Meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Gormanson, S/Woolsey to approve minutes. Motion carried 5/0. PUBLIC COMMENTS William Hansen (N8723 1025 th St) – Spoke about how Lake George is a unique water feature that should be protected and preserved along the Kinnickinnic River. Matt Johnson (109 W Cedar St) – Owner of Garage Bikes and Brews, spoke on a concern about the E-Bike usage and keeping right as far as you can when on main streets and single file usage in these areas. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Proposed ordinance amendment to Title 17 – Zoning: Chapter 17.124 – Regulations for the protection of wetlands within the shoreland Chris Buntjer, Senior Civil Engineer with the City of River Falls gave a presentation on the proposed wetland ordinance amendments. Buntjer explained that the DNR completed an audit of the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) which also included the stormwater and wetland ordinances (Ch. 17.124 & Ch. 17.128) and determined that t he existing wetland ordinance does not comply with NR 151.125 and 151.245 indicating only wetlands within the shoreland zone. Buntjer covered the proposed changes to demonstrate compliance with The DNR requirements. These changes are 1. Title Section, to change from protecting wetlands within the shoreland zone to protecting all wetlands within City corporate limits; 2. General Provisions Section to revise to include all wetlands within City corporate limits, not just shoreland; 3. Definition Section to add 1 Page 2 of 3 the DNR’s definition of Protective Areas, including the buffer requirements for various wetland types. Adding the buffer requirements will help ensure that City staff don’t approve something that wouldn’t be approved by a DNR wetland permit. 4. Shoreland -Wetland Zoning District revised to specify the inclusion of all wetlands within City corporate limits, and to add requirements for the inclusion of impervious surfaces within protective areas. Buntjer explained that these proposed changes will make City ord inances important and helpful for future annexation areas containing wetlands. Buntjer summarized that staff recommends forwarding the proposed changes with a favorable recommendation for City Council consideration with next steps of going to future City Council meetings. Conversation was had about whether we have to follow state law regardless of our ordinances which would include the DNR. And questions were raised about how many wetlands we have that are not adjacent to the Kinnickinnic River, and it was noted that there are not many but possible future potential with annexations. Questions were also asked about any projects that this would impact now or in the future that are not complying, and it was explained projects are already subject to these regulations from the DNR. There might be some projects that could contain wetlands and wetland setbacks, but overall projects are already following the DNR requirements. Michael Woolsey made a motion to forward the proposed ordinance amendments to City Council for approval. M/Woolsey, S/Odeen – carried 5/0 Proposed ordinance amendment to Title 10 – Vehicles and Traffic: Creating Chapter 10.21 relating to electric bicycles and electric scooters. Sgt Denton Anderson gave a presentation on ordinance amendments to Title 10 – Vehicles and Traffic: Creating Chapter 10.21. Sgt. Anderson gave a brief overview of the work completed so far on the amendment changes and the different classes of E -Bikes. He highlighted a few revisions to what was presented in January. The first update was to Class Three and the age range for users which is 16 years of age or older. The next update was to the definition of what is defined as a bike path and what is defined as a sidewalk. Sgt Anderson defined the sidewalk as any impervious portion of a roadway between the curb line or lateral lines of a roadway and adjacent property lines constructed for pedestrian use and are less than eight feet in width. Sgt. Anderson then explained that a bike path is defined as any impervious surface completely separated from the roadway that is eight feet wide or greater and constructed for pedestrian, bicycle, or other non -automotive means of transportation. Bike paths may also be referred to as Multi-Use Paths or Shared Use Paths. Sgt. Anderson shared a map of the bike paths and sidewalks within the City limits and what class of bikes can be used where. Conversation was had about sidewalks on Main Street and that width of the sidewalks in that area. Conversation was also had about current ordinances that require bicycle usage on the far right of the roadway. Conversation was had about how to tell what type of e-bike someone is using if they are pedaling or if you can tell what type of bike they are operating. Matt Johnson from Garage Bikes and Brews indicated it would be very hard to know what someone is riding on unless they fly past others on bikes. Page 3 of 3 Conversation was had about Main Street, and there was one amendment that was approved in January and no bikes are allowed on sidewalks in the downtown area (bicycles must be walked unless the rider is under 12 years of age), this is the only place in town where regular bikes are not allowed. Question was had on education or something for community for this ordinance and the one about e-motos maybe going out in a newsletter. Sgt. Denton Anderson then presented on the ordinance changes pertaining to scooters. He indicated that the provisions revolving around scooters are part of the e -bike ordinance. There was also a note of some wording that needed to be cleaned up about the usage of motor and human power optional which has been addressed. Commissioner Odeen made a motion to forward the proposed ordinance amendments to City Council with a favorable recommendation. M/Odeen, S/Gormanson – carried 5/0 Planning Update Emily Shively gave a planning update that Council adopted the Safe Streets Action Plan on May 12th. With that plan getting adopted the City was able to apply for a Safe Streets implementation grant which was submitted on May 23 rd with anticipation of hearing if that was awarded later in September. Shively also covered the housing needs analysis update that took place in 2026 which is now viewable on our website. Shively reminded commissioners she sent out a training opportunity they are welcome to sign up for, and that our next meeting will be on July 7th. Conversation was had about promoting the housing needs analysis study online on social media for others to review as well as a link to the master plan for expanding the City. Shively did indicate that will be highlighted in the River Falls reader in the future, as well as publishing ordinance amendment updates and updates on the Safe Streets Action Plan as well. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Woolsey made a motion to adjourn at 7:06 p.m. S/Odeen; motion carried 5/0. Respectfully submitted, Becky Corson, Community Development Coordinator MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Page and Plan Commissioners FROM: Anna Shakal, Planning Intern DATE: July 7, 2026 ITEMS: SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT FOR SYCAMORE TWO SENIOR LIVING/MEMORY CARE LOCATED AT 816 SYCAMORE STREET REQUEST Scenic Sign Corp has submitted a Special Sign Permit (SSP) on behalf of Frisbie Companies LLC for the approval of a monument sign for the new 24-unit memory care facility known as Sycamore Two located at 816 Sycamore Street. The applicant is requesting a deviation to allow placement of a monument sign 2 feet from the property line, rather than the 10-foot setback required by city ordinance. All other aspects of the monument sign, including size, height, lighting, square footage, and overall design, meet ordinance requirements. The Planned Unit Development site plan was originally approved with two monument signs because it consists of two separate lots - one for the memory care building and one for the four townhome buildings. The applicant has since eliminated the monument sign on the lot with the townhomes and is now proposing a single monument sign to serve the entire development. Location Map SYCAMORE STREET ESPRIT WAY 2 2 DISCUSSION The proposed monument sign consists of a 5’ 4 ½’’ x 9’ sign display area, or 26.7 sq. ft., supported with a masonry base and stone capping to match the architecture of the development. The sign will be lit by 2’’ overhanging house lighting elements that are powered within the cabinet which is allowable by code. The location of this sign is proximate to a n intersection with a sidewalk and staff requested the addition of a painted stop bar to ensure the signage is not impairing the safety of crossing pedestrians. This is included as a condition on the enclosed resolution. Sign Detail Sign location, additional signage, and striping detail (note, north is to the left) CRITERIA FOR SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT APPROVAL The Plan Commission may grant special sign permits in the event an applicant's proposed sign, though nonconforming in terms of the rules and regulations of the sign ordinance, if it is found to be aesthetically acceptable, innovative, functional and in the best interests of the city (Sec.17.84.060). Without destroying the purpose of the regulations of sign code , certain unconventional signs may be in order and acceptable; such sign must meet certain criteria. These criteria, with staff analysis, are detailed as follows: SYCAMORE STREET Stop bar Crosswalk striping 3 1. The applicant illustrates a consideration for aesthetic qualities that would be prohibited under other provisions of this chapter. a. Except for the proposed location, the sign conforms to sign code in all other aspects. The proposed sign is designed to be architecturally integrated and compatible with the surrounding development. 2. The applicant can prove that erection of the proposed sign will cause no extraordinary inconvenience to traffic and pedestrian movement. a. The proposed location of the sign is such that it will not impede any vehicular or pedestrian traffic nor create any inconvenience thereto with the addition of a stop sign, painted stop bar, and painted crosswalk markings. 3. The applicant has shown consideration for other property owners adjacent to or nearby the location of the sign. a. The positioning of the sign and illumination type mitigate any potential adverse impacts on surrounding property owners. 4. The person or group applying for a special sign permit shall file an application with the planning department and make payment of a fee. The fee will be set from time to time by resolution of the city council. a. A complete application has been received and the fee paid in full. Staff finds that these requests are reasonable because the reduced setback does not create any traffic concerns with the addition of signage and striping per conditions , and t he applicant’s decision to remove the monument sign on the twin home lot results in less total signage for the project, which helps mitigate total visual impact. SUMMARY The proposed monument sign requires a special sign permit because it is located 2 feet from the property line, which does not meet the required 10 -foot setback. The monument sign otherwise conforms to the sign code and staff finds the request satisfies the required code criteria for approval of a special sign permit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Plan Commission approve the enclosed resolution for a special sign permit for Frisbie Companies LLC, 816 Sycamore Street. ATTACHMENTS 1. Sycamore Two Site Plan 2. Monument Sign Rendering 3. Plan Commission Resolution REFFDREFWDWDWDPROJECT BM#1:TNH=911.44 PROJECT BM#2:TNH=908.24PROJECT BM#3:TNH=918.37 PROJECT BM#4:TNH=924.00 25.4'36.0'39.9'52.3'39.7'23.3'26.0'40.1'33.0'22.0'33.0'22.0'22.3'32.2'22.3'32.2'LOT 5LOT 46"5"12"9"12"WALLWALL EAST FOSTER STREETORANGE STREET SYCAMORE STREETBROADWAY STREETETFENCEFLOORELEV.=908.8FLOORELEV.=910.5FLOORELEV.=911.7EXISTINGBUILDINGEXISTINGBUILDINGACACACGPONDNN NNN NNNTT TN BROADWAY STREETORANGE STREET SYCAMORE STREETDETENTION PONDEX. BUILDINGEX. BUILDINGEX. BUILDING234556879SECURED COURTYARD101013'-4"24'-8"17'-4"40'-0"111111111111111111NEW SENIOR LIVING FACILITY17,200 SFONE-STORY12PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE12MONUMENT SIGNTOWNHOMESONE-STORYTOWNHOMESONE-STORYTOWNHOMESONE-STORYTOWNHOMESONE-STORY PLAN COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT FOR SYCAMORE TWO WHEREAS Signs that do not conform with some aspect of sign code but are aesthetically acceptable, innovative, functional, and in the best interest of the city may be approved by Plan Commission per Sec.17.84.060; and WHEREAS, Scenic Sign Corp, on behalf of Frisbie Companies, LLC ( Sycamore Two Senior Housing Development at 816 Sycamore Street), has submitted a Special Sign Permit request for a monument sign that is 2 feet from the property line; and WHEREAS, the sign ordinance requires that signs be set back 10 feet from the property line; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a monument sign with a 2 -foot setback from the west property line; and WHEREAS, the proposed sign otherwise conforms to all provisions of the sign code; and WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to provide striping and signage at the Esprit Way intersection with Sycamore Street proximate to the proposed sign as prescribed herein; and WHEREAS, Plan Commission finds that the proposed monument sign 2 feet back from property line meets the code criteria for the approval of a Special Sign Permit as follows: 1. The applicant illustrates a consideration for aesthetic qualities that would be prohibited under other provisions of this chapter. a. Except for the proposed location, the sign conforms to sign code in all other aspects. The proposed sign is designed to be architecturally integrated and compatible with the surrounding development. 2. The applicant can prove that erection of the proposed sign will cause no extraordinary inconvenience to traffic and pedestrian movement. a. The proposed location of the sign is such that it will not impede any vehicular or pedestrian traffic nor create any inconvenience thereto with the addition of a stop sign, painted stop bar, and painted crosswalk markings. 3. The applicant has shown consideration for other property owners adjacent to or nearby the location of the sign. a. The positioning of the sign and illumination type mitigate any potential adverse impacts on surrounding property owners. 4. The person or group applying for a special sign permit shall file an application with the planning department and make payment of a fee. The fee will be set from time to time by resolution of the city council. a. A complete application has been received and the fee paid in full. ATTACHMENT 3: PLAN COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , that the Plan Commission of the City of River Falls hereby approves the Special Sign Permit for a residential entrance monument sign 2 feet back from the property line subject to the following conditions. 1. A sign permit shall be applied for and granted prior to the installation of the proposed sign. 2. The sign must conform to all sign code provisions other than those granted relief to herein. 3. The applicant shall install a stop sign and striping at the intersection of the private drive leading into the Sycamore Two Development at Esprit Way and Sycamore Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Dated this 7th day of July 2026. CITY OF RIVER FALLS Alison Page, Mayor ATTEST: Amy White, City Clerk 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Page and Plan Commission FROM: Harley Mehlhorn, Senior Planner DATE: July 7, 2026 ITEMS: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A THREE-STORY MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT (CREAMERY AT CEDAR) LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIVER AND W. CEDAR STREETS RECOMMENDED ACTION Forward a Resolution approving the Specific Implementation Plan for The Creamery at Cedar to City Council with a favorable recommendation. BACKGROUND Matt and Stephanie Johnson are requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) for a mixed -use development known as The Creamery at Cedar. The project is located at the intersection of West Cedar Street and River Street adjacent to the Kinnickinnic River trail and Depot/City Station apartments (see Attachment A). The SIP is the final step in the PUD process and includes detailed architectural, site, access, stormwater, and operational plans and must be substantially conformant to the General Development Plan (GDP) approved for the project. City Council approved the GDP for this project on April 28th, 2026. The GDP established the use, overall design, and conceptual implementation of the site including the use of a flexible parking approach utilizing distributed off-site parking resources. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Creamery at Cedar is a three -story, mixed-use riverfront development designed by Studio EA and Auth Consulting (see Attachments B – D). The project includes: • A brewery/taproom and small restaurant on the first floor • An event space on the second floor • Four short-term rental apartments on the third floor • An outdoor patio overlooking the Kinnickinnic River The project remains substantially conformant to the approved GDP. Minor modifications have been made to the site design since GDP approval, including replacing the previously proposed elevated deck with an at -grade patio and shifting the pedestrian access alignment to the trail northeastward rather than extending directly east. Staff finds these changes to be minor in nature and consistent with the conceptual approvals previously granted by Council. 2 The principal implementation item addressed through this SIP is the formalization of the project’s parking plan. A detailed parking plan has been submitted and is proposed to be memorialized through the approving resolution (see Attachments E and F) . Staff finds this appropriate as the flexible parking approach formed the central basis for GDP approval and the submitted SIP now provides the operational detail necessary to implement that concept Zoning Conformance The subject property is zoned B-1 General Commercial District with a downtown transitional zone overlay. This district is intended to support a mix of commercial, residential, and entertainment uses in a walkable environment. The approved uses, including restaurant, event space, and residential units, remain consistent with the intent of downtown zoning. The use of a PUD continues to be appropriate due to the parking flexibility requested and previously approved conceptually through the GDP process. Comprehensive Plan Conformance The Comprehensive Plan supports mixed-use development, downtown investment, and strong connections to the riverfront. Staff finds the Creamery at Cedar aligns with these goals by: • Creating a destination along the riverfront • Supporting local business and tourism • Enhancing connections between downtown and the trail system • Encouraging walkability and reduced reliance on vehicles The proposal continues to support economic development objectives and provides additional opportunities for gathering, events, and short-term lodging within downtown. Access to Open Space The site is directly adjacent to the Kinnickinnic River and existing trail infrastructure. As part of the SIP, pedestrian access has been refined to provide a northeasterly trail connection rather than the previously illustrated direct eastern alignment. Staff finds this modification improves integration with the surrounding site design while maintaining the public benefit contemplated through the GDP. The proposed patio area, trail access improvements, and continued activation of the riverfront contribute to increased public use and enjoyment of nearby natural amenities. Access, Building Type, and Stormwater Access to the site will continue to be provided from River Street and includes pedestrian access to the adjacent trail system. The building remains a three-story structure with a footprint generally consistent with the GDP approval. Stormwater management is proposed to utilize and expand the existing stormwater facility located on adjacent City property as contemplated through the GDP process. Long -term maintenance obligations and associated responsibilities will be memorialized throu gh the Development Agreement. Staff finds the submitted materials provide an adequate framework for implementation subject to final engineering review and execution of the Development Agreement. Parking Parking remains the principal area of requested flexibility under the approved PUD framework. The applicant has submitted a detailed Parking Plan Narrative (see Attach ment E) which 3 establishes parking demand assumptions, identifies available supply, and outlines operational management procedures. Under the maximum theoretical special -event condition, parking demand is calculated at 177 spaces. More typical operating conditions are substantially lower with estimated demand ranging from approximately 30 spaces during normal weekday operations to 113 spaces during a typical weekend event. Eight on -site parking spaces are proposed including one accessible stall. These spaces are intended primarily to serve ADA parking, apartment occupants, and short -term patron use. Remaining parking demand is proposed to be accommodated through a coordinate d strategy consisting of: • Nearby public parking lots • On-street public parking (though identified nearby off-street technically satisfy parking requirements) • Shared parking agreements with private properties o Moose Lodge – 50 stalls o The Garage / Ron Jensen Shared parking – 16 stalls (including additional ADA) • Event shuttle service and operational management measures The applicant has identified more than 222 off -site parking spaces excluding on -street parking resources. The parking plan also includes operational measures such as event parking maps, directional signage, staff oversight, neighborhood protections, and po st-opening monitoring procedures. Staff finds the submitted parking plan provides sufficient implementation detail to support the concept approved under the GDP. Conditions memorialized within the approving resolution require that all private shared parking arrangements remain in force and documented, that replacement agreements be secured within 60 days of any termination, and that occupancy be reduced if parking supply cannot be maintained at required levels. Consistent with the GDP approval, staff recommends that on-street parking continue to be credited for no more than 30% of the total required parking supply. Setbacks No changes to setbacks are proposed from the approved GDP. The detailed site layout submitted through the SIP remains substantially conformant to the previously approved conceptual plan and staff finds no setback flexibility is required. Architecture and Site Design The proposed building architecture remains substantially consistent with the GDP approval and continues to present a high -quality design appropriate for a prominent downtown and riverfront location. Materials, massing, and building organization remain consistent with Downtown Overlay District guidance. The replacement of the elevated deck with an at-grade patio maintains the project’s emphasis on riverfront activation while improving integration with the surrounding site. The project continues to prioritize an active streetscape, pedestrian connectivity, and visual engagement with the river corridor. 4 SIP ANALYSIS Staff finds the SIP to be substantially conformant to the GDP approved for the project. The development maintains the same mix of uses, building scale, site organization, and implementation of the requested parking flexibility approved conceptually by Council. The modifications included within the SIP, specifically the patio redesign and adjusted trail connection alignment, are minor and do not materially alter the approved concept. The submitted parking plan provides the operational framework necessary to imple ment the parking approach contemplated through the GDP and includes enforceable mechanisms to ensure long -term compliance. Staff finds the proposed SIP conformant to the Council approved GDP and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. SUMMARY The proposed Creamery at Cedar development consists of a mixed -use riverfront building containing a brewery, event space, and four short -term rental units. The SIP formalizes the distributed parking strategy approved conceptually through the GDP and includ es detailed implementation measures for parking management, access, and stormwater coordination. Minor modifications to the patio design and trail access have been incorporated while maintaining substantial conformance with the approved concept. Staff find s the SIP consistent with the Council approved GDP. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Plan Commission forward the enclosed resolution to City Council with a favorable recommendation. ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Site Plan C. Elevations D. Narrative E. Parking Plan F. Resolution A Vicinity Map (subject parcel highlighted blue) Cedar Street Pine Street 76 Coulee Rd Hudson WI 54016 WeAreStudioEA.com 715.386.8303 office June 19, 2026 Harley Melhorn City Planner 222 Lewis Street River Falls, WI 54022 SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NARRATIVE CREAMERY AT CEDAR – PUD APPLICATION PROJECT LOCATION: West Cedar Street & River Street PARCEL ID: 276010600100 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW Creamery at Cedar is a mixed-use, three-story riverfront development located in downtown River Falls at the intersection of West Cedar Street and River Street. The 0.44-acre site sits directly adjacent to the Kinnikinnic River and within the City’s established green corridor. The proposed building includes: • Level 1: 150 Occupant Brewery/ Taproom with small restaurant component 140 Occupant Tiered Outdoor Seating area overlooking the river • Level 2: 280 Occupant Event Space • Level 3: Four (4) Short-Term Rental Apartments • Direct connection to the adjacent paved trail The building footprint is approximately 5,800 square feet, with a total building area of approximately 17,000 square feet and a height of 44.5 feet. The project represents an estimated $5.5 million private investment and is anticipated to take approximately seven months to construct. 2. DOWNTOWN & RIVERFRONT CONTEXT The site is uniquely positioned: • In the downtown core • Within the green corridor • Directly adjacent to the Kinnikinnic River • Along the existing river trail system The project strengthens the physical and visual con nection between downtown River Falls and the Kinni riverfront. Site improvements will enhance trail connectivity and pedestrian access from the trail system into downtown. Rather than turning inward, the building activates the river edge with: • Outdoor seating overlooking the river • An outdoor stage for small-scale performances • Trail-oriented access and wayfinding This development transforms an underutilized parcel into an active, pedestrian-oriented destination that enhances the riverfront experience. 2 6 3. ALIGNMENT WITH THE RIVER FALLS COMPREHENSIVE PLA N The proposal strongly aligns with the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan goals and key themes. A. Connection: The Comprehensive Plan identifies River Falls as a welcoming community that fosters connection between people and places. Creamery at Cedar advances this goal by: • Creating a community gathering space downtown • Supporting events, celebrations, and cultural acti vities • Strengthening trail-to-downtown connectivity • Providing public-facing riverfront amenities The project physically and socially connects residents, visitors, and natural resources. B. Livability: The Livability goal emphasizes thoughtful growth, support for local businesses, housing diversity, and connection to place. Creamery at Cedar supports livability by: • Introducing diverse housing through short-term ren tal units • Supporting local employment (approximately 8 staff positions) • Filling a gap in downtown hospitality and event sp ace offerings • Reinforcing downtown as a mixed-use district The development provides new economic activity whil e reinforcing downtown’s identity. C. Resources & Outdoor Recreation: The Resources goal prioritizes natural and cultural resources and outdoor recreation to support healthy lifestyles. The Recreation Chapter further emphasizes providing a variety in amenities, preserving and enhancing natural resources, accessibility and equity in recreation. Creamery at Cedar supports these goals by: • Activating the Kinnikinnic riverfront • Improving trail access and connectivity • Providing kayak- and pedestrian-friendly access po ints nearby • Supporting recreational tourism and downtown visit ation The recreation chapter specifically notes that recreation infrastructure supports economic development and tourism by drawing visitors who then patronize local restaurants and shops. This project directly contributes to that ecosystem. D. Access & Multimodal Transportation: The Comprehensive Plan emphasizes accessible, multimodal transportation systems. The site is: • Walkable from downtown • Adjacent to the river trail • Near significant municipal parking resources • Bicycle-accessible By concentrating activity downtown rather than at the edge of the City, the project supports pedestrian, bicycle, and shared parking strategies consistent with City goals. E. Partnerships: The Comprehensive Plan highlights the importance of partnerships, and the Recreation Chapter emphasizes collaboration with co mmunity institutions. 3 6 The project’s distributed parking strategy and event operations rely on coordination with: • City municipal lots • Shared private parking partners • Local hotels (shuttle service) This collaborative approach reflects the Plan’s emphasis on mutually beneficial relationships. 4. RECREATION & RIVERFRONT ENHANCEMENT The Recreation Chapter identifies the community’s strong desire for continued investment in recreational amenities and river access. Creamery at Cedar enhances recreation opportunities by: • Improving access to the river trail • Providing a destination along the Kinni corridor • Supporting outdoor programming and small-scale per formances • Reinforcing downtown as a post-recreation gatherin g place The Recreation Chapter notes that recreational tourism supports economic vitality. The project strengthens this link by serving trail users, paddlers, and park visitors. 5. PARKING PLAN SUMMARY & OFF-SITE PARKING REQUEST Due to the compact riverfront site and the City’s goal of encouraging pedestrian-oriented downtown development, the project provides eight (8) on-site parking spaces including one accessible space. Per Municipal Code Chapter 17.80, maximum theoretic al parking demand during a special event equals: 177 parking spaces Typical operating conditions require substantially fewer: • Weekend with event: 113 spaces • Weekday with event: 45 spaces • Typical weekday: 30 spaces Off-Site Parking Strategy The Parking Plan identifies substantial nearby municipal and shared parking resources, including: • Main Street and Division Street Public Lot (10 spa ces) • Montessori Elementary/ W. Pine Street lot (25 spac es) • Heritage Park Lot (75 spaces) • Shared private parking agreement with Moose Lodge (50 spaces) • Shared private parking agreement with Jensen Autom otive (66 spaces) • Ostness Park lot (38 spaces) Total identified off-site available parking spaces within comfortable walking distance is 214 spaces, excluding on-street parking. This capacity exceeds the maximum code requirement and significantly exceeds typical operating demand. Refer to the included Parking Plan for more detailed information. REQUEST The applicant respectfully requests: 1. Approval to count identified off-site parking re sources toward required parking calculations. 2. Approval of a curb opening greater than 35 feet on River Street for safe site access. This approach aligns with the Downtown Overlay District’s intent and supports compact, walkable development. 4 6 6. ADDRESSING NEIGHBORHOOD STREET PARKING CONCERNS The applicant understands potential concerns regarding residential street parking and proposes the following measures (as outlined in the Parking Plan): • Clear event contracts directing guests to municipa l lots • Pre-event parking maps • Directional signage to public lots • Staff monitoring during large events • Shuttle service from hotels • Encouragement of carpooling and rideshare • Explicit instructions discouraging residential str eet parking • Willingness to adjust operations based on City fee dback Events at maximum capacity are anticipated approxim ately 4–8 times per month, reducing the frequency of peak demand. The distributed parking model is designed to protect adjacent residential neighborhoods while leveraging existing municipal infrastructure. 7. SUSTAINABILITY & RESILIENCY The project incorporates: • Pervious pavement in parking areas • Compact urban footprint • Shared parking strategy • Trail connectivity to reduce vehicle trips These elements support the Comprehensive Plan’s Res iliency and Sustainability goals 8. EXISTING EASEMENT SUMMARY & REQUEST The applicant has reviewed all recorded easements a ffecting the property. Existing trail and utility easements will remain in place and be accommodated, and no easements prevent construction of the proposed development. The proposed site plan respec ts public infrastructure while supporting the City’s goals for compact, pedestrian-oriented downtown growth and enhanced riverfront activation. The following summarizes each easement and its rela tionship to the proposed development: A. Easement 235297 – Water & Sewer Easement (North Property Line) • Covers an existing sanitary sewer line located alo ng the north side of the parcel. • Easement width is undefined. • No watermain was located within this easement area . To support the City’s goals for compact, pedestrian-oriented downtown development, the applicant proposes relocating the existing sanitary sewer line from its current location along the north property line into the W. Cedar Street right-of-way. Relocation will create a more functional and efficient building envelope along River Street, allowing the project to better activate the street frontage and river corridor consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives. The relocation will be designed in coordination with City engineering staff and constructed to City standards. Following relocation and City acceptance of the new sewer alignment, the applicant intends to pursue formal release of the existing easement area. 5 6 This approach maintains uninterrupted sanitary service while improving site design, strengthening downtown street presence, and advanci ng the community’s riverfront development goals. B. Easement 235392 – Water & Sewer Easement (Along Trail) • Covers a sanitary sewer line located along the pub lic trail corridor. • Easement width is undefined. • No watermain was located within this easement area . This easement will remain in place. The site design preserves access to the sanitary line and does not interfere with its function. Trail connectivity improvements proposed as part of this project will be coordinated to ensure continued protection of utility infrastructure. C. Easement 347795 – Utility Line Easement (River S treet) • Described as a utility line easement of undefined width or specific location. • Title documentation included a sketch showing prop osed utility poles along River Street on the west side of the parcel. • No utility lines or poles were located in this are a during site investigation. Because no utilities were identified in this location, the easement does not currently affect the proposed building footprint or site improvements. If utilities are identified during construction planning, the applicant will coordinate with the appropriate utility provider and the City to address them. Otherwise, this easement has no functional impact on the development. D. Easement 565170 – Trail Easement • Covers the existing public trail as shown on the p roject topographic survey. This easement will remain in place and is fully supported by the project. Creamery at Cedar is designed to enhance trail connectivity, improve access, and activate the riverfront experience. No encroachments into the trail easemen t are proposed. E. Easement 584543 – Turnaround Easement (Adjoining Properties) • Located on adjoining properties to the west and so uth. • Allows use of the parking lot to the west for turn around purposes. • Does not encumber or restrict the subject parcel. This easement does not affect the project site and requires no action as part of this development. REQUEST The applicant respectfully requests approval to relocate the existing sanitary sewer (Easement 235297) from the north property line into the W. Cedar Street right-of-way to improve the developable area alo ng River Street and allow for a more cohesive building footprint. The relocation will be designed in coordination with City engineering staff and constructed to City standards, and upon City acceptance the applicant will pursue formal release of the existing easement area. The applicant is committed to full coordination with City engineering staff and utility providers to ensure all easement conditions are properly maintained, modified, or released as required prior to final development approvals and construction. 6 6 9. CONCLUSION Creamery at Cedar is a thoughtfully designed, downtown riverfront development that: • Activates the Kinnikinnic riverfront • Enhances recreation and trail connectivity • Supports local business and economic development • Aligns with Comprehensive Plan goals for Connectio n, Livability, Resources, Access, and Partnerships • Reinforces recreation and tourism objectives ident ified in the Recreation Chapter • Meets parking demand through a coordinated, manage d off-site strategy The project represents a significant private investment in downtown River Falls and fulfills the intent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan for mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented development along the river corridor. The applicant respectfully requests approval of the Planned Unit Development and associated parking flexibility to allow this catalytic riverfront project to move forward. 76 Coulee Rd Hudson WI 54016 WeAreStudioEA.com 715.386.8303 office June 19, 2026 Harley Melhorn City Planner 222 Lewis Street River Falls, WI 54022 PARKING PLAN NARRATIVE CREAMERY AT CEDAR – PUD APPLICATION Project Location: West Cedar Street & River Street Parcel ID: 276010600100 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Creamery at Cedar is a mixed-use hospitality development consisting of: • Level 1: 150 Occupant Brewery/ Taproom with small restaurant component 140 Occupant Tiered Outdoor Seating area overlooking the river • Level 2: 280 Occupant Event Space • Level 3: Four (4) Short-Term Rental Apartments • Direct connection to the adjacent paved trail Due to site constraints and the riverfront location, and the City’s goal of encouraging pedestrian- oriented downtown development, the project requests flexibility to utilize off-site parking resources pursuant to River Falls Municipal Code Chapter 17.8 0. Under the maximum special-event scenario, where the event space and brewery are simultaneously at full capacity and all short-term rental units are occupied, the code-based parking requirement is calculated as 177 parking spaces. This scenario represents the highest theoretical demand and is expected to occur infrequently, approximately 4–8 weekend events per month. More typical and realistic operating scenarios result in substantially lower demand: • Typical weekend event scenario: 113 parking spaces • Weekday with a small event: 45 parking spaces • Typical weekday operations with no event: 30 parki ng spaces Eight (8) on-site parking spaces including one accessible space are provided, which are prioritized for ADA-accessible parking, apartment occupants, and short-term patron use. The project is designed to rely on a distributed off-site parking strategy, consistent with the City’s downtown development goals. The project is located within a short walking distance of significant City-owned parking infrastructure. Additional off-site parking will be provided through shared parking agreements with private partners. In total, the parking plan identifies more than 222 parking spaces within walking distance, exclusive of on-street parking supply. Even under the maximum theoretical special-event sc enario, the project is supported by more than double the required parking supply when on-site and identified off-site resources are considered. Typical operating conditions result in a substantial surplus of available parking capacity. 2 5 This Parking Plan demonstrates that required parking demand is accommodated through a coordinated strategy including: • On-site parking • Multiple nearby municipal lots • On-street public parking • Shared/private parking agreements • Event shuttle service • Operational parking management 2. OPERATIONAL OCCUPANCY ASSUMPTIONS The Owner provided anticipated operational demand f or the facility, which forms the basis of realistic parking projections. Brewery / Taproom • Weekdays: Typically under 50 patrons • Weekends: Typically under 100 patrons • Peak periods: Friday evening and Saturday afternoo n/evening Event Venue • Weekday gatherings: Approximately 50 attendees • Weekend events: Up to 225 attendees, approximately 4–8 events per month • Peak periods: Friday evening and Saturday afternoo n/evening These operational assumptions are consistent with the project narrative and reflect realistic use patterns rather than theoretical maximums. 3. CODE-BASED PARKING CALCULATIONS Per River Falls Municipal Code Chapter 17.80, required parking is calculated as follows based on four different building operation scenarios for special events, weekends with events, weekdays w/ small events, and typical weekdays: A. Maximum Special Event Scenario Use Calculation Required Parking Taverns & Restaurants 150 occupants × 30% 45 Outdoor Seating 140 occupants X 30% 42 General Industrial (Brewery) 1 per 500 SF 2 Short-Term Rental Apartments 1 per unit 4 Event Space 280 occupants × 30% 84 Total 177 Parking Spaces B. Weekend with Event Scenario Use Calculation Required Parking Taverns & Restaurants 100 occupants × 30% 30 Outdoor Seating 30 occupants x 30% 9 General Industrial (Brewery) 1 per 500 SF 2 Short-Term Rental Apartments 1 per unit 4 Event Space 225 occupants × 30% 68 Total 113 Parking Spaces 3 5 C. Weekday with Small Event Use Calculation Required Parking Taverns & Restaurants 50 occupants × 30% 15 Outdoor Seating 30 occupants x 30% 9 General Industrial (Brewery) 1 per 500 SF 2 Short-Term Rental Apartments 1 per unit 4 Event Space 50 occupants × 30% 15 Total 45 Parking Spaces D. Typical Weekday (No Event) Use Calculation Required Stalls Taverns & Restaurants 50 occupants × 30% 15 Outdoor Seating 30 occupants x 30% 9 General Industrial (Brewery) 1 per 500 SF 2 Short-Term Rental Apartments 1 per unit 4 Total 30 Parking Spaces On-Site Parking Provided: 8 Parking Spaces. The development therefore relies on locally distributed off-site parking resources consistent with policy in the Downtown Overlay District. 4. OFF-SITE PARKING SUPPLY STRATEGY The project is uniquely positioned near substantial municipal and private parking resources. A. Off-Street Parking: Municipal Public/ Shared Private Parking Lots Location Estimated Stalls Main & Division Public Lot 10 Heritage Park Lot 75 Montessori Elementary/ West Pine Street 25 Ron Jensen / The Garage (Shared Parking: Staff/ Ven dor, ADA Overflow) 16 Moose Lodge (Shared Private Parking) 50 Ostness Park Lot 38 Total 214 Identified Off-Site Capacity (Conservative, Non-Exclusive): 214 parking stalls, excluding on-street parking. This exceeds the maximum special-event code require ment when distributed across facilities. B. On-Street Parking: In addition to the off-site lots identified above, there is significant on-street parking capacity within approximately 1½ blocks wes t of the site (Division St. to Pine St. and 4 5 River St. to Lewis St.). Street parking associated with the project would primarily serve taproom patrons, which at maximum code-calculated occupancy equates to 66 parking spaces, and approximately half that during typical weekend operations. A review of aerial imagery indicates approximately 140 on-street parking spaces along the streets in this area, which exceeds projected demand. Field observations during peak afternoon hours further demonstrate available capacity, as shown below: Observed On-Street Parking Utilization (Peak Period) Time Parked Vehicles Observed 3:00 PM 23 4:00 PM 22 5:00 PM 21 6:00 PM 19 These counts confirm that existing on-street parking supply remains well below capacity during peak hours. Based on this analysis, available street parking within close walking distance is sufficient to accommodate projected demand. Refer to the included Walkability Map for more information. 5. EVENT PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Enhanced parking management procedures will be implemented for events exceeding approximately 150 attendees: • Shuttle service from local hotels • Pre-event parking maps included in event contracts • Directional signage to municipal lots • Staff monitoring during arrival periods • Encouragement of carpooling and rideshare • Explicit instructions discouraging residential str eet parking 6. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCESS The site benefits from strong non-vehicular access: • Direct river trail adjacency • Walkable downtown proximity • Bicycle parking provided on-site • Planned trail-to-building access improvements • Sidewalk and lighting enhancements A measurable percentage of patrons are expected to arrive by foot or bicycle, consistent with current operations at the existing building. 7. NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION MEASURES • Event guests will be directed to municipal lots ra ther than residential streets • Wayfinding signage will guide vehicles away from s ensitive residential areas • Staff oversight during major events • Willingness to adjust parking communications and o perations based on City or neighborhood feedback • Voluntary neighborhood outreach prior to public he arings 8. MONITORING AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Following project opening, the Owner will: 5 5 • Monitor parking during initial major events • Track apartment parking demand • Adjust parking allocation and communication as nee ded • Coordinate with City staff to resolve any issues 9. CONCLUSION The Creamery at Cedar meets the intent of the City’s parking ordinance through a distributed parking strategy supported by significant municipal parking resources and active operational management. While on-site parking is limited due to site constraints, the combination of municipal lots, shared parking, on-street parking, shuttle service, and walkable access provides capacity exceeding the maximum theoretical parking requirement. The project respectfully requests approval to count off-site parking resources toward the required parking supply consistent with the PUD framework. ³ These data are provided on an "AS-IS" basis, without warranty of any type, expressed or implied, including but not limited to any warranty as to their performance, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose. This map is not a substitute for accurate field surveys or for locating actual property lines and any adjacent features. Creamery at Cedar - Walkability Map Date: 2/20/2026 Pierce County, WI 1:8,000 F RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) FOR A MIXED-USE PROJECT (THE CREAMERY AT CEDAR) WHEREAS, Matt and Stephanie Johnson submitted an application for a mixed-use development known as The Creamery at Cedar located at the intersection of West Cedar Street and River Street (PID 276010600100) and approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) is the final step in the PUD process; and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting flexibility from standard parking requirements through implementation of a distributed parking strategy utilizing a combination of on -site parking, public parking lots, on-street parking, shared private parking agreements, and operational management measures rather than accommodating all required parking demand on-site; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to grant the requested flexibility in exchange for the project’s contribution to downtown vitality, riverfront activation, trail connectivity, economic development, and implementation of Comprehensive Plan goals related to walkability and effic ient use of existing public parking infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the Council approved the General Development Plan on April 28, 2026 and found it to be acceptable and consistent with City plans for the area; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission reviewed the Specific Implementation Plan on July 7 , 2026, and found it to be acceptable, substantially conformant with the approved General Development Plan, and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , that the City Council of the City of River Falls hereby approves the Specific Implementation Plan for The Creamery at Cedar mixed -use development subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall be in substantial conformance with the Specific Implementation Plan (SIP) approved herein. 2. The parking plan submitted as part of this approval and memorialized through this resolution shall govern implementation of the approved parking strategy. 3. Any shared or private parking agreements utilized to satisfy required parking shall be executed through a recordable document and remain in force for the duration of the approved use. 4. If any shared or private parking agreement used to satisfy required parking requirements is terminated, replacement parking sufficient to maintain compliance with the approved parking plan shall be secured within sixty (60) days. 5. If replacement parking sufficient to maintain compliance with the approved parking plan is not secured within sixty (60) days, occupancy of the building shall be reduced as necessary to remain compliant with available parking supply. 6. On-street parking credited toward satisfaction of required parking shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total required parking supply. 7. Stormwater management improvements utilizing and expanding the existing City stormwater facility shall be implemented in accordance with approved engineering plans and memorialized through the Development Agreement. Dated this 28th day of July 2026. CITY OF RIVER FALLS Alison Page, Mayor ATTEST: Amy White, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Page and Plan Commission FROM: Harley Mehlhorn, Senior Planner DATE: July 7, 2025 RE: BOULEVARD MAINTENANCE AND FENCE ORDINANCE UPDATES RECOMMENDED ACTION Forward a recommendation regarding the adoption of a boulevard maintenance requirement and amendments to the fence ordinance to City Council. BACKGROUND This memorandum outlines proposed code amendments related to boulevard maintenance and potential updates to the Fence Ordinance. The first proposed amendment would establish an explicit requirement for property owners to maintain the boulevard adjacent to their property. While this expectation has historically been implemented in practice and referenced in specific sections of City Code, such as provisions governing managed natural landscapes , it is not currently stated as a standalone requirement. This amendment seeks to codify an existing and longstanding expectation. The proposed fence ordinance options were prompted by a series of right -of-way fence encroachments along West Division Street between Main Street and Dry Run Road. The Fence Ordinance was last amended in 2018, when the City adopted the current 3 -foot setback requirement for side and rear yard fences abutting a right -of-way, along with associated landscaping requirements. Those amendments were intended to preserve space for sidewalks and improve the overall streetscape. Although these proposed updates were catalyzed by conditions on West Division Street, staff used this opportunity to evaluate whether the current Fence Ordinance appropriately balances public interests with private property use citywide. Any ordinance changes would apply throughout the City, not solely to West Division Street. Staff is presenting two options for consideration; however, the Commission may recommend any combination of qualitative and quantitative amendments to the existing ordinance or recommend keeping the ordinance as it is today. OPTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Option One The first option is to make no changes to the existing Fence Ordinance. The current standards have been in place since 2018 and, to date, staff has identified only this instance as presenting notable implementation challenges due to property owners having installed improvements or landscaping that would be impacted if their fences were brought into conformance. 4 2 Under the existing ordinance, property owners are required to maintain a three-foot landscaped strip between the right-of-way and any fence setback. This requirement was intended to improve the streetscape, provide visual separation between public and private spaces, and preserve flexibility for public improvements such as sidewalks and trails in the right-of-way. Option Two The second option would remove both the three -foot setback and associated landscaping requirements. This approach would provide property owners and occupants with additional usable yard area and eliminate the narrow strip of land between the fence and righ t-of-way that, in practice, has often remained unplanted or has been inconsistently maintained. Removal of the setback would also provide a clearer delineation between public and private property. A provision clarifying that all appurtenances and structural members of such fences shall be entirely on private property is proposed, chiefly to avoid footings or structural overhangs into public right-of-way. DISCUSSION Staff also evaluated a tiered approach that would reduce, rather than eliminate, the setback requirement. However, staff found limited benefit in establishing an intermediate standard. A three-foot setback provides sufficient space to accommodate landscapi ng and ongoing maintenance and creates a meaningful visual buffer. As the setback decreases, the area becomes increasingly difficult to maintain and less capable of supporting landscaping, resulting in a dimensional requirement that offers limited function al or aesthetic benefit. Given existing variations in right -of-way width throughout the City, smaller setback increments are unlikely to produce a meaningful streetscape outcome. Accordingly, staff recommends either retaining the existing standards or removing the setback and landscaping requirements entirely. Regardless of the Commission’s recommendation on fence standards, staff recommends forwarding the proposed ordinance amendment requiring property owners to maintain the boulevard adjacent to their property. Staff views this amendment as a clarification and codification of a longstanding expectation rather than a substantive policy change. CONCLUSION The proposed ordinance amendments are intended to clarify existing maintenance expectations and evaluate whether current fence regulations continue to advance the City’s public -private interface, streetscape, and property use objectives. The boulevard maintenance amendment would codify a longstanding expectation that adjacent property owners maintain boulevard areas, creating clearer and more consistent administration of City Code. The fence ordi nance options present alternative approaches to balancing priv ate property use with public interests related to streetscape character, maintenance, and right-of-way conditions. Adoption of any recommended amendments would establish updated standards applicable citywide and provide clearer guidance for future administration and enforcement. The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed amendments for statutory compliance and ordinance formatting. RECOMMENDATION Forward a recommendation regarding the adoption of a boulevard maintenance requirement and amendments to the fence ordinance to City Council. ATTACHMENTS: A. Boulevard Maintenance Ordinance Amendment B. Fence Ordinance Amendment ORDINANCE NO. 2026 -___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12 STREETS, SIDEWALKS, OTHER PUBLIC PLACES, AND PROPERTY USE IMPACTS, CHAPTER 12.04 (BOULEVARD MAINTENENCE) THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVER FALLS DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. That Chapter 12.04 Streets and Sidewalks Generally be amended to create Section 12.04.050 – Boulevard maintenance of the City of River Falls Municipal Code as follows: 12.04.050 - Boulevard maintenance. A. Boulevard Areas to be Maintained. The owner or occupant of any lot or parcel shall maintain the boulevard area adjacent to such lot or parcel by keeping all grass, weeds, and other vegetation cut to a height not greater than six (6) inches, unless a Managed Natural Landscape Permit, as defined in Section 8,40,060 - Managed natural landscaping, has been obtained and all provisions and conditions thereof are complied with. For purposes of this section, “Boulevard” means the portion of the street right -of-way located between the back of curb line and the sidewalk or, where no sidewalk exists, the property line. B. Maintenance Standards. The boulevard area shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition and shall be free of excessive vegetative growth, noxious weeds, and conditions that interfere with the intended use of the public right-of-way or visibility for pedestrians and vehicles. C. Deposits and Obstructions Restricted. No person shall place, deposit, store, or allow materials, debris, yard waste, or other obstructions to accumulate within the boulevard area except as otherwise permitted. D. Abatement. 1. If the provisions of this section are not complied with, the city or designee shall serve written notice upon the owner, lessee, occupant, or any person having care or control of such lot or parcel to comply with the provisions of this section. 2. If the person upon whom the notice is served fails, neglects, or refuses to bring the boulevard area into compliance within seven (7) days from the date of such notice, or if no person can be found in the city who either is or claims to be the owner of suc h lot or parcel or who represents or claims to represent such owner, the city may cause such boulevard maintenance to be completed. A 3. The cost of such maintenance, and other costs associated with it, at the discretion of the city, shall be billed to the property owner and payable to the city within thirty (30) days. Costs shall be invoiced per the city's current fee schedule. 4. Failure to pay the city for the services billed will result in the costs being assessed against the property as a special charge per Section 13.32.010. Section 2. Effective date. This ordinance amendment shall take effect from and after its date of publication as provided by law. FOR THE CITY OF RIVER FALLS Alison Page, Mayor ATTEST: Amy White, City Clerk Adopted: ____________ Published: ____________ ORDINANCE NO. 2026 -___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 ZONING, CHAPTER 17.08, SECTION 17.08.070 - FENCES (FENCE HEIGHT ALONG STREETS) THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVER FALLS DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. That Chapter 17.08 – General Requirements, Section 17.08.070 - Fences of the City of River Falls Municipal Code be amended as follows: E. Height. Except where otherwise required by this code, the following regulations apply to fence height. For the purposes of fence height requirements, alleys are not considered a street. 1. Limitations. Except where otherwise required by this code or required by a condition of approval for a development application, the following limitations apply to fence height: Type of Yard Maximum Height for Body of Fence Fence within a residential zone Fence within a Nonresidential Zone Yard abutting a street 3 feet Front Yard: 3 feet Side or Rear Yard: 6 feet 6 feet Yard not abutting a street 6 feet 10 feet 4. Exceptions. a. A residential fence in a side or rear yard abutting a nonresidential zone may rise up to the height of eight feet. b. Commercial fences in a side or rear yard abutting a residential zone must rise up to a minimum of eight feet in height. c. A residential fence in a rear or side yard that abuts a street may rise up to a height of six feet if the fence is set back a minimum of three feet from the property line and adequate landscaping is installed and maintained on the street side of the fence. Landscaping to be approved as part of the permit. Grasses, shrubs or small trees along with flowers will be acceptable with the intent to break up the visual solidness of the wall. Native plants are always encouraged. These requirements apply to all such fences greater than three feet up to six feet. Section 2. Effective date. This ordinance amendment shall take effect from and after its date of publication as provided by law. B FOR THE CITY OF RIVER FALLS Alison Page, Mayor ATTEST: Amy White, City Clerk Adopted: ____________ Published: ____________ Community Development Department: June 2026 Page 1 of 2 Introduction This report is provided monthly to update the Plan Commission, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and other interested parties on Community Development efforts of the past month as it relates to the City’s Strategic Initiatives and the Department work plan. 2026 Community Development Major Projects *Denotes a Council Strategic Initiative CONNECTED COMMUNITY Kinnickinnic River Corridor Plan Phase I * o Senator Baldwin included the Kinni Corridor Project design funding in her list for 2027 congressionally directed spending initiatives. We’ll know more later this year if it advances. Safe Streets Action Plan* o The Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan was adopted by Council on May 12th. Glen Park Phase II* o Staff provided an update to the Park and Recreation Advisory Board concerning additional funds available through Park Impact Fee fund balance. Staff recommending using additional fund balance towards Glen Park Phase 02. PRAB forwarded a recommendation to Council to use fund balance for a new park shelter, W Cascade trail improvements, and a multi-purpose sport court. Locust Street design o Preliminary roadway design is complete. Engineering design is expected to be completed in Fall 2026. Mapping o Map of available sites for development o Map of current development in River Falls ECONOMIC VITALITY Downtown Project* o The Safe Streets for All Implementation Grant application has been submitted for a downtown reconstruction project. Continued Infill in Corporate Parks/Innovation Center Expansion* o Work with the Economic Development Administration (EDA) continues on the grant to expand the Innovation Center. o One April 28th the City Council approved the sale of a portion of Lot B in the Whitetail Ridge Corporate Park. Ensure sustained (re)development of the City from the prospect stage through construction o Brookgreen – Occupancy granted for Buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and Clubhouse. Buildings 7-10 are under construction. o Oak Hill – 5 permits issued, 3 COs issued. o The Preserve – 0 permits issued, 3 COs issued o Thompson Heights – 0 permits issued, 3 COs issued o Wildflower Meadows – 2 permits issued o The Wildflower Meadows subdivision on Powell Avenue is under construction. Water and Sewer utilities are currently being installed. o An annexation petition submitted by the Delbert and Elaine Johnson trusts for approximately 55 acres south of CTH M at 1060th Street was approved by Council on June 9, 2026. o An application for a Planned Unit Development Specific Implementation Plan has been submitted for The Creamery – a brewery, taproom, and event center with four short-term rental units at W. Cedar Street and River Street. Plan Commission will review the request at their meeting on July 7, 2026. Community Development Department: June 2026 Page 2 of 2 o An application for s ite plan approval was submitted for The Whisk, a n approx imately 10,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Whitetail Ridge Corporate Park. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Examine Impact Fees* o Finance Dept is working with a consultant to examine impact fees for development Economic Development o The Economic Development Manager is a member of RFEDC, WEDA, River Falls Chamber, and St. Croix Valley Innovation Center Management Committee. QUALITY MUNICIPAL SERVICES Library Remodel* o The majority of the library remodel is complete. Fire Station Remodel* o Fire Station demolition began the week of February 9th and is ongoing. Vertical pre-cast concrete walls are up and there will continue to be short term roadway closures on Second Street and Elm Street. Division Street crosswalks o The Safe Streets for All Action Plan includes a concept plan for an improved pedestrian crossing at East Division and Wasson Lane. WIDNR Urban Non-Point Source Pollution grant o MSA Professional Services is completing a City-wide phosphorus model to document compliance with our stormwater MS4 Permit. Stewardship of Public Infrastructure o The 2026 Mill and Overlay project was awarded to Lepke Trucking and Excavating. Work will occur starting in July and will occur on Paulson Road. City staff prepared a grant application and anticipates receiving a Wisconsin Local Roads Improvement Grant for $50,000 to support this project. Conservation and Parks Division o Staff and volunteers have installed the first four pollinator demonstration gardens at DeSanctis Park. The gardens are located at the Glover Station School House. The Community Development Department oversees the Plan Commission, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Business Improvement District Board , Historic Preservation Commission , City Board of Appeals , Downtown Design Review Committee , Extraterritorial Zoning Committee (ETZ), Extra Territorial Board of Appeals, and River Falls Economic Development Corporation. BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Permit Type JUNE YTD Permit Value JUNE Permit Value YTD Building Permits 41 146 $11,115,000 $32,229,000 New Home Permits 7 44 $1,860,000 $11,716,000