_06022026-1681
City of River Falls · Pierce County · meeting of Jun 2, 2026 · Minutes
Open the original document More from City of River Falls
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
Page 1 of 3
Community Development Department
222 Lewis Street
River Falls, WI 54022
715.425.0900
www.rfcity.org
MINUTES
PLAN COMMISSION
JUNE 2, 2026
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Members Present: Rob Gormanson, Diane Odeen, Rebecca Prendergast, Michael Woolsey,
Alison Page,
Members Absent: Chris Holtkamp, Steven Severson
Staff Present: Emily Shively, Becky Corson, Chris Buntjer , Sgt Denton Anderson,
Jonathan Thoen
CALL TO ORDER
Meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Gormanson, S/Woolsey to approve minutes. Motion carried 5/0.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
William Hansen (N8723 1025 th St) – Spoke about how Lake George is a unique water feature
that should be protected and preserved along the Kinnickinnic River.
Matt Johnson (109 W Cedar St) – Owner of Garage Bikes and Brews, spoke on a concern about
the E-Bike usage and keeping right as far as you can when on main streets and single file usage
in these areas.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Proposed ordinance amendment to Title 17 – Zoning: Chapter 17.124 – Regulations for the
protection of wetlands within the shoreland
Chris Buntjer, Senior Civil Engineer with the City of River Falls gave a presentation on the
proposed wetland ordinance amendments. Buntjer explained that the DNR completed an audit
of the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) which also included the stormwater
and wetland ordinances (Ch. 17.124 & Ch. 17.128) and determined that t he existing wetland
ordinance does not comply with NR 151.125 and 151.245 indicating only wetlands within the
shoreland zone.
Buntjer covered the proposed changes to demonstrate compliance with The DNR requirements.
These changes are 1. Title Section, to change from protecting wetlands within the shoreland
zone to protecting all wetlands within City corporate limits; 2. General Provisions Section to revise
to include all wetlands within City corporate limits, not just shoreland; 3. Definition Section to add
1
Page 2 of 3
the DNR’s definition of Protective Areas, including the buffer requirements for various wetland
types. Adding the buffer requirements will help ensure that City staff don’t approve something
that wouldn’t be approved by a DNR wetland permit. 4. Shoreland -Wetland Zoning District
revised to specify the inclusion of all wetlands within City corporate limits, and to add
requirements for the inclusion of impervious surfaces within protective areas. Buntjer explained
that these proposed changes will make City ord inances important and helpful for future
annexation areas containing wetlands.
Buntjer summarized that staff recommends forwarding the proposed changes with a favorable
recommendation for City Council consideration with next steps of going to future City Council
meetings.
Conversation was had about whether we have to follow state law regardless of our ordinances
which would include the DNR. And questions were raised about how many wetlands we have
that are not adjacent to the Kinnickinnic River, and it was noted that there are not many but
possible future potential with annexations. Questions were also asked about any projects that
this would impact now or in the future that are not complying, and it was explained projects are
already subject to these regulations from the DNR. There might be some projects that could
contain wetlands and wetland setbacks, but overall projects are already following the DNR
requirements.
Michael Woolsey made a motion to forward the proposed ordinance amendments to City Council
for approval. M/Woolsey, S/Odeen – carried 5/0
Proposed ordinance amendment to Title 10 – Vehicles and Traffic: Creating Chapter 10.21
relating to electric bicycles and electric scooters.
Sgt Denton Anderson gave a presentation on ordinance amendments to Title 10 – Vehicles and
Traffic: Creating Chapter 10.21. Sgt. Anderson gave a brief overview of the work completed so
far on the amendment changes and the different classes of E -Bikes. He highlighted a few
revisions to what was presented in January.
The first update was to Class Three and the age range for users which is 16 years of age or
older. The next update was to the definition of what is defined as a bike path and what is defined
as a sidewalk. Sgt Anderson defined the sidewalk as any impervious portion of a roadway
between the curb line or lateral lines of a roadway and adjacent property lines constructed for
pedestrian use and are less than eight feet in width. Sgt. Anderson then explained that a bike
path is defined as any impervious surface completely separated from the roadway that is eight
feet wide or greater and constructed for pedestrian, bicycle, or other non -automotive means of
transportation. Bike paths may also be referred to as Multi-Use Paths or Shared Use Paths. Sgt.
Anderson shared a map of the bike paths and sidewalks within the City limits and what class of
bikes can be used where.
Conversation was had about sidewalks on Main Street and that width of the sidewalks in that
area. Conversation was also had about current ordinances that require bicycle usage on the far
right of the roadway.
Conversation was had about how to tell what type of e-bike someone is using if they are pedaling
or if you can tell what type of bike they are operating. Matt Johnson from Garage Bikes and Brews
indicated it would be very hard to know what someone is riding on unless they fly past others on
bikes.
Page 3 of 3
Conversation was had about Main Street, and there was one amendment that was approved in
January and no bikes are allowed on sidewalks in the downtown area (bicycles must be walked
unless the rider is under 12 years of age), this is the only place in town where regular bikes are
not allowed. Question was had on education or something for community for this ordinance and
the one about e-motos maybe going out in a newsletter.
Sgt. Denton Anderson then presented on the ordinance changes pertaining to scooters. He
indicated that the provisions revolving around scooters are part of the e -bike ordinance. There
was also a note of some wording that needed to be cleaned up about the usage of motor and
human power optional which has been addressed.
Commissioner Odeen made a motion to forward the proposed ordinance amendments to City
Council with a favorable recommendation. M/Odeen, S/Gormanson – carried 5/0
Planning Update
Emily Shively gave a planning update that Council adopted the Safe Streets Action Plan on May
12th. With that plan getting adopted the City was able to apply for a Safe Streets implementation
grant which was submitted on May 23 rd with anticipation of hearing if that was awarded later in
September. Shively also covered the housing needs analysis update that took place in 2026 which
is now viewable on our website. Shively reminded commissioners she sent out a training
opportunity they are welcome to sign up for, and that our next meeting will be on July 7th.
Conversation was had about promoting the housing needs analysis study online on social media
for others to review as well as a link to the master plan for expanding the City.
Shively did indicate that will be highlighted in the River Falls reader in the future, as well as
publishing ordinance amendment updates and updates on the Safe Streets Action Plan as well.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Woolsey made a motion to adjourn at 7:06 p.m. S/Odeen; motion carried 5/0.
Respectfully submitted,
Becky Corson, Community Development Coordinator
Source: City of River Falls website. First collected Oct 9, 2026.