Parks and Public Works Committee
City of Prescott · Pierce County · meeting of Jul 20, 2026 · Agendas
Open the original document More from City of Prescott
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
CITY OF PRESCOTT
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
MONDAY, JULY 20, 2026
5:00 PM
MUNICIPAL BUILDING
800 BORNER ST
PRESCOTT, WI 54021
1) Call to Order
2) Roll Call
3) Approve Minutes for June 15, 2026
4) Discussion on Alley Improvements behind Broad Street between Cherry Street and Orange
Street
5) Review of Magee Park Signs and Discussion on Trail Connection to Walnut Circle
6) Other Business
a) Discuss Armstrong Family Memorial Bench
7) Adjourn
NOTICE
ACCESS TO THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING FOR THE DISABLED IS AVAILABLE AT
THE MAIN ENTRANCE. ALL THOSE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS SHOULD CALL CITY
HALL OFFICES (715-262-5544) IF ASSISTANCE IS REQUIRED
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A QUORUM OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OR OTHER CITY
COMMITTEES MAY BE PRESENT AT THIS MEETING. THIS IS INCIDENTAL AND
NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL OR ANY OTHER COMMITTEES.
Parks and Public Works Committee Meeting Minutes
June 15th, 2026
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Parks and Public Works
Committee was held June 15th, 2026, Municipal Building, 800 Borner Street, Prescott,
Wisconsin, 54021. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 PM.
Committee Present: Dar Hintz, Lindsey Sorenson
Committee Absent: Ben Bettis
Staff Present: City Administrator Matt Wolf, Planner Luke Wiese, Public Works Director
Mike Kinneman
Others Present: Brian Crist of 527 Lake St, Megan Langer of Langer Family Properties
1. Approve Minutes for May 18th, 2026
Hintz motioned to approve the minutes for May 18th. Sorenson seconded; motion
passed without a negative voice (2-0).
2. Updated Non-Motorized Boat Launch Repair and Maintenance Items Cost
Estimate
City Administrator Wolf provided an update on the non-motorized boat launch repair and
maintenance project and reviewed the updated proposals submitted by Luke Busker
Masonry.
The Committee discussed the proposed improvements and directed staff to obtain a
revised quote that includes demolition and replacement of the existing concrete stairs and
sidewalk, tuckpointing of the fieldstone stairway walls, and tuckpointing and resetting of
stones along the existing limestone retaining walls. The Committee requested that the
stone plinths, planter bowls, and cast-iron bowls be removed from the revised quote. The
Committee also discussed adding a handrail and replacing the existing benches with new
benches at a different location, depending on the cost of the benches.
The Committee also decided to delay additional improvement items, including boulders to
prevent further deterioration, extension of the limestone retaining wall, and construction of
a five-foot-wide concrete access ramp, for a future phase of the project.
Staff will obtain a revised quote and forward it to City Council for consideration.
3. Discussion on Alley Improvements Behind Cherry Street and Orange Street
City Administrator Wolf presented information regarding potential improvements to the
alley connecting Cherry Street and Orange Street behind the businesses along Broad
Street. Wolf explained that the alley currently experiences drainage issues and that a
prospective purchaser of 216 Broad Street, Megan Langer, is exploring options to address
stormwater issues affecting the property. Addressing the issue would likely require
installation of a storm inlet connected to the City's stormwater system.
Wolf outlined a potential long-term solution that would include alley improvements and
additional stormwater infrastructure. While the option would be more costly and require
additional analysis and design work by Cedar Corporation, staff indicated it would be more
efficient if completed in conjunction with the potential redevelopment of 216 Broad Street.
Megan Langer stated that the project is currently in the architectural design phase and that
she is exploring options to address stormwater issues on the site. Langer added that she
intends for the rear alley area to be as attractive to visitors as the front of the building.
Public Works Director Kinneman suggested exploring an agreement with the owner of 220
Broad Street to direct stormwater runoff to the existing storm inlet located on the
neighboring gas station property.
Committee Member Sorenson supported improving the alley to accommodate future
redevelopment but recommended waiting for additional information regarding a potential
agreement between the affected property owners before proceeding further.
Other Business
City Administrator Wolf presented a quote from Graphic House for the fabrication and
installation of signs at Riverfront Park and Sunset Park. Wolf stated that the final sign
designs are still being completed. The total project cost is $15,001.38 and would be funded
through existing accounts for each location.
The Committee supported moving forward with the proposal to the City Council for
consideration once the final sign designs are completed.
Commissioner Hintz motioned to adjourn. Sorenson seconded; motion passed
without a negative voice (2-0). The meeting was adjourned at 5:54 PM.
The next Parks & Public Works Committee will be July 20, 2026, at 5:00 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Luke Wiese, Planner
To: Parks and Public Works Committee
From: Matt Wolf, City Administrator
Date: July 17, 2026
Subject: Discussion on Alley Improvements Behind Cherry Street and Orange Street
Background
The City is working with Megan Langer as she looks to redevelop 216 Broad Street and has been
working with City staff to identify a stormwater management solution for the site. The property is
adjacent to the City-owned alley located northwest of Broad Street between Cherry Street and
Orange Street.
City staff met with Greg Adams of Cedar Corporation to review drainage conditions within the alley
and discuss potential improvements that could address stormwater runoff from the alley and the
adjoining properties.
An existing storm drain located near the Circle K property is privately owned by Circle K. The City
does not appear to have an easement for this system, and its design and available capacity of the
stormwater drain is currently unknown. Connecting to that system would therefore require
coordination and approval from Circle K and may not provide a practical long-term solution.
Discussion
Cedar Corporation has recommended designing a coordinated public stormwater and alley
improvement project. The proposed improvements would include:
• Installation of an area inlet near the 216 Broad Street property;
• Potential installation of an area inlet near the adjoining 220 Broad Street property;
• Extension of the storm sewer within the alley;
• Installation of a mountable curb along the west side of the alley; and
The coordinated design would allow stormwater from both adjoining properties to be incorporated
into the alley improvements. The design would also support the future redevelopment of 216 Broad
Street by allowing the property’s proposed site drainage to connect to the new public stormwater
improvements.
The proposed public improvements would need to be coordinated with the redevelopment project.
Cedar Corporation provided the following estimate for surveying, design, and construction staking:
Engineering Service Estimated Cost
Topographic survey and utility-locate coordination $2,100
Design and final plans $5,200
Construction staking, if needed $1,400
Total Estimated Cost $8,700
The estimate does not include bidding assistance, preparation of contract documents, or
construction oversight. These services would be necessary if the City elects to publicly bid the
project. However, preliminary discussions have considered completing the construction with City
Public Works staff, which could reduce the overall project cost.
The estimate also does not include the materials, labor, equipment, or other construction costs
associated with the physical alley and storm sewer improvements.
Because the proposed design would benefit the City alley and stormwater system, the
redevelopment of 216 Broad Street, and the adjoining 216 Broad Street property, staff propose
dividing the engineering costs equally among the three benefiting parties:
Participating Party Proposed Share
City of Prescott $2,900
Owner of 216 Broad Street $2,900
Owner of 220 Broad Street $2,900
Total $8,700
The proposed cost-sharing arrangement would be contingent upon all three parties agreeing to
participate. Any future construction costs and the allocation of those costs would need to be
determined separately after the design is completed and a more detailed construction estimate is
available. However, if the owner of 220 Broad Street choses not to proceed, the cost would then be
split.
Recommendation
Consider the proposal for the alley improvements by Cedar Corporation and working with the owners
of 216 and 220 Broad Street. With the costs to come out of the City’s Storm Water Fund.
Attachments
1. Alley Improvements Image
To: Parks and Public Works Committee
From: Matt Wolf, City Administrator
Date: July 17, 2026
Subject: Magee Park Updates
Discussion
City Planner Luke Wiese has completed an updated map of Magee Park, which is attached for review.
The City also plans to install a park rules sign. Staff is currently considering including the following
rules:
• Magee Park is open 6am – 10pm
• Leave no trace, please clean up after yourself
• All alcohol and glass are prohibited
• Fires permitted only in designated grills or fire rings.
• Smoking is limited to parking areas
• Pets must be kept on leads at all times
• No unauthorized motorized vehicles on trails.
Intermittent Crossing
With the City’s approval of the trail connection between Magee Park and Walnut Circle, the
proposed trail alignment includes one crossing of an intermittent stream. The current crossing
location is not one of the two bridge crossings previously approved by the Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources, as shown on the attached concept plan.
The existing paved trail within Magee Park crosses the intermittent stream at two locations. As part
of the recent park improvements, one location was constructed as an at-grade crossing because the
trail could remain compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility requirements. That
crossing cost approximately $38,070.
The second location required a pedestrian bridge because the grade could not be modified while
maintaining an ADA-compliant trail. The bridge had a total cost of approximately $144,900.
The City must determine whether the new Walnut Circle trail connection should include a permanent
crossing at this location. One option would be to construct an at-grade crossing similar to the
approximately $38,000 crossing completed as part of the recent improvements. The other option
would be to leave the crossing unimproved for the time being and reserve available funding for a
potential pedestrian bridge in the future.
As part of this discussion, the City should also consider whether this trail segment may eventually be
paved to create a continuous paved trail connection between Walnut Circle and Magee Park. If the
City intends to pave the trail in the future, establishing a permanent stream crossing as part of the
current project may be the most practical approach.
Recommendation
Review the proposed park rules and provide any requested revisions.
Discuss the trail connection between Magee Park and Walnut Circle and provide direction regarding
whether to:
1. Construct a permanent at-grade stream crossing
2. Leave the crossing unimproved and plan for a potential bridge in the future
Attachments
1. Magee Park Trail Map
2. Magee Park to Walnut Circle Concept Plan
© 2026 Microsoft Corporation © 2026 Maxar ©CNES (2026) Distribution Airbus DS © 2026 TomTom
884
842
812814814814814
786770
756756752754756
888
808 836824810760758
810808812 768754766768
770760762786788814
820826 764
770
758
762
820
800
770
770768760 840838842
860858810812
850810808812
810808812
860858862
840838842
Infiltration Basin
10'
SedimentBasin
Flood FringeFlood Way
40'-12" HDPE w/ApronEndwalls @ 2.5% Grade
24'-12" HDPE w/ApronEndwalls @ 2% Grade760 Bottom
762 Bottom
764.0 F.L.
763.0 F.L.
765.0 F.L.
8' Wide Swale @1% Grade, Min.
763763764764
765765
766
767768768767766765
768 Top
767767766765764
770763
767
767
766
765
765
768769
764763
762762
762
761
761761
760760
10' Wide Emergency Overflow@ Elevation 766
PLOT DATE: 4/1/2026 8:14 PM D:\Prescott\ZONE2\zone2.dwg
OFSHEET NO.PROJECT #:Coulee River TrailsCONCEPTUAL TRAIL DESIGNZONE 2 WALKING TRAILS VER21154021-2
WI DNR APPROVEDBRIDGE LOCATION
SCHOOL DISTRICTPROPERTY
WI DNR APPROVEDBRIDGE LOCATION
ADDITIONAL PARKLAND BOUNDARY
GULLY CROSSING
PROPOSED MOUNTAIN BIKEOPTIMIZED / HIKING TRAIL(NORTH SEGMENT - 0.95 MILE)
PROPOSED MOUNTAIN BIKEOPTIMIZED / HIKING TRAIL(SOUTH SEGMENT - 0.90 MILE)
PHASE 1SEGMENT 2 - 0.24MILEACCESSIBLE CONNECTIONTO MAGEE PARK FROMWALNUT DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING MAGEE,PAVED TRAIL
SEGMENT 3 - 0.32 MILEACCESSIBLE TRAILBRIDGE LOCATION TOMAGEE PARK PAVED
SEGMENT 4 - 0.15 MILEACCESSIBLE TRAILBRIDGE LOC. WESTTO BRIDGE LOC. EAST
SEGMENT 5 - 0.14 MILEACCESSIBLE TRAILBRIDGE LOC. EAST TOWALNUT DEVELOPMENT
PHASE 1SEGMENT 1 - 0.24 MILEACCESSIBLE TRAILWALNUT DEVELOPMENT PAVED TRAILBEGINNING AT INT. OF DEXTER ST.
PROPOSED STORMWATERBASIN
Source: City of Prescott website. First collected Oct 9, 2026.