Historic Preservation Committee — Agenda packet

VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, September 22, 2026 – 6:30 pm 9996 Water Street NOTE: This Meeting will be simultaneously held via teleconferencing. Staff, committee members and the public are welcome to participate in this manner. Teleconferencing will be available by computer, phone, tablet, or dial in. Connection information below: 1. Call to Order 2. Quorum 3. Changes in Agenda 4. Visitors’ Comments 5. Approve Previous HPC Minutes 6. Devin Wolf – 9815 Water St. – Addition – Design Review 7. John Maher –9992 Moravia St. – Garage & Remodel – Design Review 8. New Business for Next Meeting/Next Meeting Date 9. Adjournment Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/743831397 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 743-831-397 United States: +1 (646) 749-3122 * It is possible that a quorum of the Village Board or other Village Committees may be present at the meeting. However, no action will be taken by the Board or any other committee unless specifically noticed. Date: 9/18/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website www.ephraim.wi.gov X Emailed to WDOR Radio X Emailed to Peninsula Pulse Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail: office@ephraim.wi.gov 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM HISTORIC PRESERV ATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2026 – 6:30 PM 9996 WATER STREET ACTION ITEMS: Schreck moved, Ellis seconded to approve the March 31, 2026 Historic Preservation Committee minutes as presented, all ayes with Thorp and Russell abstaining. Motion carried. Shreck moved, Ellis seconded to approve the May 26, 2026 Historic Preservation Committee minutes as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Schreck moved, Russell seconded to approve the landscape/land disturbance plan for Julia Uihlein at 10235 STH 42, all ayes. Motion carried. Russell moved, Schreck seconded to approve the Accessory Structure Design Review Application for 9751 STH 42 for Pea Properties, all ayes. Motion carried. Schreck moved, Russell seconded to approve the Addition Design Review Application for 9751 STH 42 for Pea Properties, all ayes, with Pentler nay. Motion carried. Schreck moved, Ellis seconded to adjourn at 7:03 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Present: Marcia Ellis, Kathy Pentler (online), Amy Russell, Cody Schreck, and BD Thorp – Chair. Absent: None. Staff: Brent Bristol - Village Administrator and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests in person: Steve and Mary Homa (Pea Properties, LLC), Nick Meissner (Meissner Landscape, Inc.), Andy Bartelt, Ken Nelson, Monique McClean, Laird Hart, Rick Hoyerman, Ruann Larson, and Susie Samson. Guests online: Doug Evans. 1. Call to order: Thorp called the meeting to order at 6:15 PM. 2. Quorum: A quorum of the Historic Preservation Committee was present. 3. Changes in agenda: There were no changes to the agenda. 4. Visitors’ Comments: There were no visitors’ comments. 5. Approval of previous minutes: Schreck moved, Ellis seconded to approve the March 31, 2026 Historic Preservation Committee minutes as presented, all ayes with Thorp and Russell abstaining. Motion carried. Shreck moved, Ellis seconded to approve the May 26, 2026 Historic Preservation Committee minutes as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 6. Julia Uihlein – 10235 STH 42 – Landscape/Land Disturbance Plan: Bristol provided background, noting that this is a nearly completed new home within the Historic District. He explained that final landscape design had not been finalized during the original design review process, which is common for large waterfront projects. Given the complexity of the landscape plan, he invited Nick Meissner of Meissner Landscape, Inc. to present the materials and design details in person. 2 Meissner walked the Committee through the overall site plan, describing the general design philosophy as one of naturalism — blending as seamlessly as possible with the surrounding landscape. Key elements of the plan included the following: The driveway will be asphalt for most of its length, transitioning approximately two-thirds of the way down to a permeable cobblestone paver. The owners had selected a specific cobblestone option that day, described as predominantly gray in a herringbone pattern, including a soldier course. A turf stone application will differentiate where the driveway starts and stops near the garage. The entry walk will be dry-set flagstone leading to the main entry, with a stepper path through a garden connecting to the building between the house and garage. Stormwater management was a central focus. All driveway water will be directed north along the property line into a dry creek bed filled with clear gravel beneath to promote infiltration. A catch basin with piping to the wetlands serves as a backup for heavy rain events. On the north side of the house, a stone stepper pathway will run through a planting area and open to a sodded lawn area with an 18” retaining wall to tuck the space into the landscape. An upper retaining wall, approximately 21’’–22’’ above grade, will serve as a knee wall to border the lawn and provide safety. Stone "seat stones" will protrude from the retaining wall as gathering spots. Steps on both the north and south sides allow for circulation around the property. A boardwalk — similar in character to a prior project at the same property — will traverse the wetland using galvanized steel pads that float on the surface, leading to a waterside patio and dock. On the south side of the house, stone stepper paths lead through a planting bed to a fenced dog run, which will be primarily turf with foundation plantings. Meissner noted that the fence design for the dog run had not yet been finalized, but he was exploring rustic options and planned to screen the generator with trees or solid fencing, and the air conditioning units with a lower wood fence. He noted that these portions of the project would be separate applications, once decisions were made. Meissner also presented photographic samples of the materials proposed, including dry-set irregular flagstone, split-face limestone retaining walls in an irregular bond pattern, "lily pad" steps with hand- dressed edges meant to evoke a natural bedrock ledge, weathered stone steps near the shoreline, dry creek bed materials referencing a neighboring property completed previously, and the chosen cobblestone paver. Bristol noted that impervious surface calculations had been submitted and that the project is approaching approximately 20% impervious coverage, with the permeable paver options helping to address this. He described the property as a large parcel being pushed close to its limits. Committee members were broadly positive regarding the project. Ellis expressed support for the plan and inquired about the boardwalk, asking about its length and construction method. Meissner estimated approximately 40’-50’ across the existing wetland and clarified that the galvanized steel pads float on the surface rather than being driven into the wetland. Russell praised the lily pad steps and the overall hardscape design. Pentler asked whether the dog run fence extended to the property line (it does not) and inquired about fence height, which Meissner indicated would comply with code and would be sufficient to contain both small and large dogs. She also asked about the steep driveway grade, and Meissner acknowledged it was very steep, noting there was limited ability to modify the slope without encroaching on wetlands. Schreck had no negative notes and expressed appreciation for the level of thought put into the design. Schreck moved, Russell seconded to approve the landscape/land disturbance plan for Julia Uihlein at 10235 STH 42, all ayes. Motion carried. 7. PEA Properties LLC -9751 STH 42 – Accessory Structure – Design Review: Bristol introduced this item, noting that the footprint of the existing accessory structure, described by the owner as a historic bunkhouse or "sugar shack," would not change, and that the enclosed space would be 3 slightly reduced. There were no setback issues identified. Property owners Steve and Mary Homa were present for Pea Properties, LLC. Steve Homa explained that the lower sloped roof section of the structure was in poor condition and would be removed. He intends to extend the roof to the north to create covered space for wood storage and a wood splitter, with a concrete slab poured underneath. The materials discussed included stained cedar siding and a black standing seam metal roof. Steve indicated the 1:12 pitch section of the roof requires a metal roof due to the low pitch being unsuitable for shingles, while the 4:12 pitch section faces the road but is set well up the hill from it. A discussion was held regarding the Accessory Structure Design Review Application for 9751 STH 42. Pentler noted she had visited the property but could not locate the building. Homa confirmed it is situated up the hill and to the right of the main house, well over 100’ from the road and not readily visible. Pentler stated she did not prefer the black metal roof but acknowledged it was unlikely to be seen by anyone. She also asked about the foundation, and Homa explained the structure currently sits on block and wood framing. He explained that he has plans to lift it, pour a concrete slab beneath it, and add posts with gravel or pavers around the perimeter. Schreck stated he was in favor of the white or cedar siding treatment but not the black metal roof. Pentler did not like the black metal roof as well. Russell moved, Schreck seconded to approve the Accessory Structure Design Review Application for 9751 STH 42 for Pea Properties, LLC, all ayes. Motion carried. 8. PEA Properties LLC -9751 STH 42 – Addition – Design Review: Bristol explained that the proposed addition would be built over the northernmost portion of the existing building, which currently serves as a garage. He noted that the elevation drawings may appear unusual on first glance because the structure is built back into the hillside — appearing two stories from the front and single story from the rear. He confirmed there were no dimensional or setback issues with the project. Steve Homa explained that the existing asphalt shingle roof is approximately twenty (20) or more years old and would likely be replaced entirely in conjunction with the addition, using dimensional black shingles throughout. A discussion was held regarding the Addition Design Review Application for 9751 STH 42. Pentler said she had visited the property and appreciated that the existing structure was being retained with a modest modification. She approved of the black dimensional shingle roof over the metal option. Schreck noted that the addition maintained a simple, rectilinear design, the windows matched the existing structure, and the rear porch railing matched the existing railing already on the building. He expressed no concerns. Thorp noted that a rendering appeared to show a blue or charcoal-colored foundation. Homa confirmed the foundation was painted charcoal when purchased and was not proposed to change. Thorp acknowledged the Plan Committee would make the final determination on that detail. A concern was raised by Pentler regarding the black metal railing on the rear deck, noting that the Committee had previously been strict about prohibiting black metal railings on other projects. Schreck acknowledged the difficulty, pointing out that requiring a different railing on the addition would effectively be asking the owners to change what already exists on the front of the home. Bristol clarified that there is no formal prohibition on black metal railings in the code, noting it is more a matter of preference. Schreck moved, Russell seconded to approve the Addition Design Review Application for 9751 STH 42 for Pea Properties, LLC, all ayes with Pentler nay. Motion carried. 9. Doug Evans – 9807 Brookside Lane – Additions –Concept Review: Bristol introduced this item as a concept review, noting that the property off Brookside Lane consists of three small historic cottages — all under 550 ft 2, with the smallest at approximately 260 ft2 that were likely once part of a larger vacation rental complex. He noted the project may ultimately require variances 4 due to setback and other dimensional issues, and that the owner, Doug Evans, had requested a concept review before HPC and the Planning Committee to gauge initial reaction before investing in full plans. Doug Evans, participating remotely, explained that the primary driver of the project is overdue maintenance. All three cottage roofs need replacement. He described his intent to raise the roofline on the cottages by increasing the pitch from 4:12 to 7:12, which would allow him to add vaulted ceilings, create loft spaces for bedroom use, and free up floor space in the very compact interiors, which currently have 7- foot ceilings that feel cramped. He also noted that the steeper pitch and proposed steel roofing would help shed tree debris, reducing the need for frequent roof maintenance given the heavily treed site. He emphasized he was not looking to dramatically change the overall appearance of the cottages and sought feedback before proceeding further. A discussion was held about the concept review for 9807 Brookside Lane. Pentler said she had driven to the property and found it interesting. She expressed appreciation for Evan's intent to maintain the existing design character and raise the structures to improve functionality, and said she had no issues with the concept. Ellis agreed it looked like a great improvement. Schreck raised a design concern, stating that the renderings felt "a little too modern" to him. He observed that the proposed exterior treatment appeared to switch from horizontal siding to a board-and-batten style, and that a more elaborate entrance featured in one of the renderings had a "grand lodge" quality reminiscent of contemporary spec homes being built elsewhere. He encouraged efforts to bring the design closer to the original cottage character. Thorp echoed this sentiment, agreeing the design could look "a little bit more Ephraim-like." Evans asked for clarification on whether the concern was with the exterior material choices rather than the architectural lines, and Schreck confirmed that the rectilinear massing was being handled well, but that some of the stylistic choices in the renderings leaned too contemporary. Thorp noted that as this was a concept review, no formal recommendation to the Plan Committee would be made. 10. New Business for next meeting / next meeting date: No new business was noted. The next meeting of the Historic Preservation Committee is August 25, 2026. 11. Adjournment: Schreck moved, Ellis seconded to adjourn at 7:03 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Recorded by, Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk S:\EPHRAIM\Office Forms\Zoning\Forms\Building\BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.doc 1 P lease Print 1. Owner/Property Tax Parcel. No. __________-___________-_____________ Owner_____________________________________________ Mailing Address ____________________ City _________________________ State ___________________________________________ Zip __________________________ Phone(s) ______________________________________ Email _________________ Location of Project ______________________________ Nearest Cross Street _____________________ Property Use: ______________________________________________________________________ Zoning Area: ______________________ Historic District? Yes No C ontractor/Contact: ____________________________Address ________ Phone(s) _________________________ Cell Phone 2. Type of Improvement ___ New Building A ccessory Structures ___ Addition ___ Garage ___ Exterior Alteration ___ Storage Building ___ Foundation Work Only ___ Repair/Replacement ___ Other ___________________ ___Other__________________ 3. Describe Proposed Construction: __________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Cost Total cost of improvements as applied for in permit: $________________ Structural Improvement Cost (if new building or addition, entire amount of structure; if alteration, renovation or repair, structural portions only): $________________ In clude with Application: Certified Survey Building plans, including all elevations, floor plans (if commercial, State-approved plans must be given to the office prior to obtaining your permit) Site plan showing lot dimensions, setbacks from all lot lines for structures For commercial structures, parking plans Parking plan for construction vehicles during construction phase Permit Fee/Impact Fee Land Disturbance Application Drainage Plan Landscape Plan VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM BUILDING /ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1 of 2 Application Date ______________ X X Interior Remodel Interior remodel consisting of bathroom additions and Window and Door replacement. Exterior: Addition of a detached 25x25 garage. John J Maher Madison Wisconsin 53711 9992 Moravia St Church St Residential Home R1 Single-Family Residential Jason Reinhardt x X X 121240024B 08/31/2026 150,000 110,000 S:\EPHRAIM\Office Forms\Zoning\Forms\Building\BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.doc 2 Dimensions: Number of Stories: ____________ Height at Peak: _______________________ Roof Pitch(es): _____________________ Total Footprint, Exterior: _______________ T otal Square Footage, All Floors Exterior: ________________ Total Square Footage, Parking/Drives/Walkways: ______________________________ Type: Wood Frame Structural Steel Reinforced Concrete Other___________________ Principal Heating: ___ Propane ___ Oil ___ Electric ___ Other (Explain)_____________________________________________ Plant Manager Signature__________________________Date__________ Sewage Disposal: Current: Proposed : None Current System Continued Demolition/Moving ? Sewered Connect to Available Sewer Septic Extend Sewer to Property Mound/In-Ground On-Site System Other ___________________ Type: ____________________________________________ (copy of permit to be on file with Village) Year Installed: ____________ If On-Site System, Year Last Pumped/Inspected: _________ For sewage disposal planning, your contact is the Ephraim Treatment Plant Manager, 920/854-4991. Please contact him as soon as possible to allow proper planning and discussion of any necessary sewer connection permits or fees involved. Fire Chief Signature _________________________Date____________ Fire Department: Sprinklers needed? /box3 Yes /box3 No Driveway width/tree clearance (width/height): _______________________ Clearance around structures for truck access: ________________________ Fire # Assigned __________ Fire Department requires driveways at least 12’ wide and clearance 12’ high; Fire Chief may be in contact with you during construction to check truck access and, if commercial structure, any sprinklering, water sources, or other safety considerations Application and materials must be in the Village offices one week prior to Plan Committee meeting date to allow for proper processing and notification of Committee members. When permits are issued, work must start within 6 months and be completed within one year. The owner of this property and the undersigned agree to conform to all applicable laws of the State of Wisconsin and the Village of Ephraim. Signature of Applicant___________________________ Print Name _____________________________ F OR OFFICE USE ONLY For New Buildings or Additions, Complete this Section Also: Permit #_____________________________ Permit Fee: $_________________________________ Date Permit Issued ___________ Zoning Administrator Signature:_________________________________ Restrictions: _____________________________________________________________________________ 2 of 2 1 25x255/12 625 SQFT X X 16' Jason C Reinhardt reinhardt@deleers.com Village of Ephraim Historic District Design Review Checklist THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETELY FILLED OUT TO BE CONSIDERED BY HPC AND/OR THE PLAN COMMITTEE. This checklist reflects the identified standards of design review for new construction in the Village of Ephraim. Under each subsection, please briefly describe the construction plans as they apply to each. The more detail, the better. Some of these standards will be identified visually on the construction plans, but we do ask that you describe them herein and provide any additional information, such as drawings and/or plans, that will help streamline the process. The standards can be found in §17.15(13) ( Design Review), §17.26(11) (Historic District), and §17.20 (Protected Waterfront). Material and color samples must be provided as well as photos of the existing structure for evaluation by the Historic Preservation Committee for referral to the Plan Committee. 1 OWNER INFORMATION: * Please provide a mailing address where you can receive mail. Owner Name: John Maher Owner Street Address : Zip: 53711 Phone #1: Phone #2: Email: j 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Property Address (Please list all applicable fire numbers): 9992 Moravia St 3 STRUCTURE FORM / BUILDING DESIGN Please describe the architecture of the building/ building design. Ordinance narrative: Ephraim is known for its traditional architecture, simple rectangular forms, gable and hip roofs, and frame construction. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) We plan to match the design, style and color of the existing structure. 4 SITE & DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Please describe the site plan. Ordinance narrative: Please refer to §17.15 and the table of standards. Ensure that the layout adheres to zoning setbacks and zoning code. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) 5 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS Please describe the architectural details including such items as window and door shapes. Ordinance narrative: Architectural details should reflect the traditional architecture of the Village which is known for its simple rectangular building forms, gable & hip roofs, and frame construction. Simplicity is the keyword. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) Rectangle windows and doors. 6 COLORS/MATERIALS Please describe the color and materials for the following characteristics of the project design. Ordinance narrative: White is the distinctive historic color of the Village. Wood and natural stone are recommended. Unfinished or galvanized metal siding or roofing is discouraged. To achieve unity, there are distinguishing colors that are appropriate and compatible for the Historic District, which include white, naturally weathered wood, or natural wood. Fluorescent and bright colors are prohibited. Wrought iron is not an acceptable material in the Historic District. Structure(s): Color: Material: Building(s): Color: Material: Siding: (Please note vertical or horizontal) Color: Brown Material: Horizontal Cedar Roof: Color: Match house Material: Asphalt Trim: Color: Match house Material: Wood Sash: Color: Material: Chimney: Color: Material: Window Frames: Color: White Material: Aluminum Window: Color: Material: Door Frames: Color: White Material: Aluminum Doors: Color: White Material: Aluminum or steel Shutters: Color: Material: Fences: Color: Material: Gates: Color: Material: Porch Trim: Color: Material: Handrails: Color: Brown Material: Composite Guardrails: Color: Material: Driveway: Color: Material: Sidewalk: Color: Material: Patio/Deck: Color: Material: Other Architectural/ Ornamental Features (describe and detail color and materials): Color(s): Material(s): 7 UTILITY WIRING (Location) Please describe and show all utility service wiring on the plot plan. Ordinance narrative : Utility service wiring should be brought to a structure underground, if at all possible. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) We will installing a new exterior panel to the back side of the house and running the wire underground to supply power to the new garage and garage panel. 8 ROOF PITCH Please describe the roof design. Ordinance narrative : Pitches less than 3/12 and/or 12/12 are subject to further design review. In the Historic District, tar and gravel roofs are not compatible. Unfinished or galvanized metal siding or roofing is highly discouraged in all zoning districts, but a metal roof requires a conditional use in the Historic District. In the Protected Waterfront District, primary roof pitches less than 6/12 or more than 12/12 are prohibited. Additionally, in the PW, up to 50% of the total roof pitch can be made up of dormers that may be less than 6/12 but in no case may they be less than 3/12. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) Gable roof with a 5/12 pitch. 9 CHIMNEY Please describe in detail the chimney, along with all venting and exhaust flues, along with their height. Ordinance narrative: In the Protected Waterfront District, nothing can penetrate above 25 feet in height (including all venting and exhaust flues), with the roof line not exceeding 23 feet. In all other districts, chimneys are allowed up to a maximum of 35 feet from grade. 10 SIZE AND LAYOUT OF STRUCTURE Please explain project plans for square footage and floor area, as well as plans for variations in material or lines to create diversity. Ordinance narrative : Any structure in any district that is proposed, by way of initial construction or successive additions, to have in excess of 5,000 square feet in floor area or 50,000 cubic feet in bulk requires special attention to avoid overbuilding of a site or overpowering the environs where prevailing structural sizes are smaller. No single building face of 50 feet or more in length shall be uninterrupted. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) The project is a 25' x 25' garage equaling 625 SQFT 11 DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK(s), & PATIO (OR DECK) Please describe and provide plans for driveways, sidewalks, patios, and decks. Ordinance narrative : Native flagstone is an excellent substitute for concrete and asphalt in pedestrian areas. Where paving is used, it shall be kept to a minimum and buffered with landscaping when possible. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) At this time we are planning to use the existing driveway. 12 LANDSCAPING PLANS / FENCES Please describe and provide the landscaping plans, noting details such as hardscape and softscape. Ordinance narrative : Plantings rather than large expanses of grass lawn are to be encouraged, and live native plants should be used. Recognizing that the open shoreline is one of Ephraim’s most distinctive features, the intent of this ordinance is to provide for as much open viewing space along our shoreline as possible in the PW district. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) Landscaping will remain the same and unchanged as much as possible. 13 ADDITIONAL FEATURES 14 SIGNATURE Signature of Applicant: Date: 09/18/2026 Internal Use Only Date Received: Complete Application Color and Material Samples Provided □Yes □No Existing Structure Photos Provided □Yes □No 15 ADDITIONAL SPACE John Maher 9992 Moravia St x 30' x 30' Build detached garage Ephraim Foundation INC x x 10/15/2026 04/30/2026 09/18/2026 UP DN UP U.C. Refr. DN KITCHEN 101 FAMILY ROOM 105 DINING 104 STORAGE 102 LINEN SLOPED CLG SLOPED CLG HALL 204 BATH 203 STAIR 200 BEDROOM 201 BEDROOM 202 PRIMARY BEDROOM 205 P. BATH 206 LINEN FLAT ROOF 8-3/4" STEP UP KITCHEN 101 FAMILY ROOM 105 DINING 104 NEW LDRY/POWDER 107NEW WET BAR 106 LINEN 7' - 2 1/2" 8' - 3 1/4" 9' - 6 3/4" SUBZERO UNDER COUNTER DRAWER PULL-OUT CABINET STORAGE 2' - 1" CAB.CAB. ICE MAKER REPLACE WINDOW REPLACE WINDOW 3 1/2" 5' - 10 3/4" 3 1/2" 3' - 1" HALL 204 BATH 203 STAIR 200 BEDROOM 201 BEDROOM 202 PRIMARY BEDROOM 205 FLAT ROOF 8-3/4" STEP UP P. BATH 206 SHOWER 209 2' - 0 1/2" 3 1/2" 3' - 6"5' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 5 1/4" 4' - 4" 3' - 10" 3 1/2" 3' - 7" 3 1/2" 2' - 1" 12' - 7 1/4" NICHE NICHE RMC RECESSED MED. CAB. REPLACE WINDOW WALL KEY 2x6 WOOD STUD WALL 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL BEARING 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL 2x2 WOOD STUD WALL DEMOLISHED WALL DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A1.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... REMODEL PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 1 EXISTING/DEMO FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 2 EXISTING/DEMO SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 3 REMODELED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 4 REMODELED SECOND FLOOR PLAN CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS Refrigerator FD FD FD FD WALL BRACING INFORMATION: CONTINUOUS BRACING USED 25'-0" X 25'-0" RECTANGLE EAVE TO RIDGE: 6'-0" WALL HEIGHT: 9'-4 1/2" EXTERIOR STUD SPACING: 16" O.C. WIND SPEED: 90 (ASCE 7-05) SEIDMIC DESIGN B HOUSE MINIMUM PANEL LENGTH: 48" 18" MINIMUM PANEL LENGTH IN PORTAL FRAMED WALLS 4.75' OF WALL BRACING REQUIRED ON FRONT AND REAR WALLS 4.75' OF WALL BRACING REQUIRED ON LEFT AND RIGHT WALLS WALL KEY 2x6 WOOD STUD WALL 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL BEARING 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL 2x2 WOOD STUD WALL DEMOLISHED WALL • • • GENERAL NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD. HEADER HEIGHTS NOTES: VERIFY FLOORING THICKNESS TO SET DOOR AND WINDOW HEADERS. SHIMMING MAY BE REQUIRED UNDER DOOR UNIT FOR THICKER FLOORS. VERIFY IF WINDOW HEADERS SHOULD MATCH ENTRY/PATIO DOOR HEADER HEIGHTS. 1. 2. DOOR SCHEDULE NOTES: SEE DOOR ORDER FOR ROUGH OPENINGS. SEE SELECTION SHEET FOR STYLE OF DOOR. 4 A1.2 5" / 12"5" / 12" 2' - 0" 5 1/2" 24' - 0" 5 1/2" 2' - 0" 2' - 0" 5 1/2" 24' - 0" 5 1/2" 2' - 0" DETACHED GARAGE 001 STORAGE 002 4' - 6" 7' - 4" 7' - 4" 5' - 9" 12' - 5 1/2" 12' - 5 1/2" 24' - 11" 24' - 11" 5 1/2" 6' - 1 1/2" 17' - 10 1/2" 5 1/2" 4 A1.2 (2) 11 7/8" LVL 002.1 001.1 6' - 8" CS-WSP 4' - 0" 2' - 8" CS-WSP 4' - 0" 7' - 7" CS-WSP 3' - 5 1/2"18' - 0" CS-WSP 3' - 5 1/2" EXISTING WELL 5 1/2" 9' - 0" 14' - 10" 8" 16' - 11 1/2" 8' - 0"LANDSCAPE RETAINING WALL (BY LANDSCAPE TRADE PARTNER) WOOD STORAGE AREA 4 A1.2 1/8" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 25' - 0" 8' - 0"17' - 0" 25' - 0" 25' - 0" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 8" THICK X 6'-0" HIGH POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION W/ (2) #4 BARS TOP & BOTTOM ON 16" X 8" CONCRETE FOOTING W/ (2) #4 BARS CONT. 4" CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB W/ #4 BAR 2' O.C. EACH WAY 12"X12" THICKENED EDGE SLAB W/ (2) #4 REBAR CONTINUOUS 9' - 4 1/2" 8" 2' - 0"2' - 0" 002.1 DETACHED GARAGE 001 STORAGE 002 ROOF TRUSSES BY MFR. SIDING BUILDING WRAP OVER 7/16" OSB SHEATHING 2X6 STUDS @16" O.C. 4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER COMPACTED STONE ALUMINUM VENTED SOFFIT ALUMINUM FASCIA 2X6 SUB FASCIA MIN. 1/2" DIA. ANCHOR BOLTS PER SPS 321.18(1)(C)3 2X6 TREATED MUD SILL W/ SILL SEAL CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT - TYP. THICKENED EDGE SLAB W/ (2) #4 REBAR CONTINUOUS ASPHALT SHINGLES ON WARRANTED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SYSTEM (BY ROOFING TRADE PARTNER) PER MFR. SPECS. ON 5/8" OSB SHEATHING GRADE ICE & WATER SHIELD TO INSIDE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL, ONE ROW IN VALLEYS - TYP. 8" 7' - 0" 2' - 8 1/2" 8" 5" 12" 5" 12" 1. 2. CONCRETE PITCH GENERAL REQUIEMENTS: 1/8" PER FOOT MIN. TO 1/4" PER FOOT MAX. PITCH TO FLOOR DRAINS WALL BREAK & CENTER BREAKS AS REQUIRED WATERPROOF LAPPING NOTE: *** PROPERLY LAPPING HOUSE WRAP & FLASHING IS CRITICAL TO CREATING A WATERPROOF BARRIER, FOLLOWING A "SHINGLE-LAP" METHOD WHERE HIGHER PIECES OVERLAP LOWER ONES. DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A1.2 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... DETACHED GARAGE PLANS DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NO. WIDTH HEIGHT JAMB COMMENTS 001.1 18' - 0" 8' - 0" 6 9/16" OVERHEAD DOOR 002.1 2' - 8" 6' - 8" 6 9/16" ENTRY DOOR 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 1 DETACHED GARAGE ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 2 DETACHED GARAGE FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 3 DETACHED GARAGE FOUNDATION PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0"A1.2 4 DETACHED GARAGE SECTION CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A2.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 1 WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 2 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 3 GARAGE WEST ELEVATION DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A2.2 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.2 1 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.2 2 NORTH ELEVATION DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A9.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... 3D VIEWS A9.1 1 FIRST FLOOR 1 A9.1 2 SECOND FLOOR 1 CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS A9.1 3 EXTERIOR SW A9.1 4 EXTERIOR NE NEW 25'X25' DETACHED GARAGE 89° 36' 05" 215.48' N E 15° 59' 50"141.26' S W LANDSCAPE RETAINING WALL (BY LANDSCAPE TRADE PARTNER) DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET C1.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... SITE PLAN 1" = 20'-0"C1.1 1 SITE PLAN CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS