Historic Preservation Committee — Agenda packet

VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, July 28, 2026 – 6:30 pm 9996 Water Street NOTE: This Meeting will be simultaneously held via teleconferencing. Staff, committee members and the public are welcome to participate in this manner. Teleconferencing will be available by computer, phone, tablet, or dial in. Connection information below: 1. Call to Order 2. Quorum 3. Changes in Agenda 4. Visitors’ Comments 5. Approve Previous HPC Minutes 6. Julia Uihlein – 10235 Hwy 42 – Landscape/Land Disturbance Plan 7. PEA Properties – 9751 Hwy 42 – Accessory Structure – Design Review 8. PEA Properties – 9751 Hwy 42 – Addition – Design Review 9. Doug Evans – 9807 Brookside Ln –Additions – Concept Review 10. New Business for Next Meeting/Next Meeting Date 11. Adjournment Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/825491853 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 825-491-853 United States: +1 (571) 317-3122 * It is possible that a quorum of the Village Board or other Village Committees may be present at the meeting. However, no action will be taken by the Board or any other committee unless specifically noticed. Date: 7/24/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website www.ephraim.wi.gov X Emailed to WDOR Radio X Emailed to Peninsula Pulse Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail: office@ephraim.wi.gov Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 31, 2026 – 6:30 PM Present: Marcia Ellis, Kathy Pentler, Cody Schreck Absent: BD Thorp-Chair, Amy Russell Staff: Brent Bristol- Administrator, Andrea Collak – Clerk/Treasurer Guests Present: Andy Bartelt, Ken Nelson, Monique McClean, Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman Guests Online: Gregory Golterman 1. Call to order: The meeting was called to order by Brent Bristol-Administrator at 6:30 PM. Bristol asked the committee members to appoint the temporary chair for this meeting. Ellis moved, Pentler seconded to appoint Cody Schreck the temporary chair for this meeting, all ayes and the motion carried. 2. Quorum: A quorum is present for this meeting. 3. Changes in Agenda: None 4. Visitors’ comments: None 5. Previous minutes: February 24, 2026 Pentler moved, Ellis seconded to approve the HPC meeting minutes from February 24, 2026, as presented, all ayes, and the motion carried. 6. John & Victoria Cultra – 9887 Water St – New SFR – Concept Review Bristol explained that the application before the committee was identical to what was presented to the committees at the last meeting. He noted that concerns were raised at the Plan Committee level, and there were questions that the Plan Committee needed to answer regarding dimensional requirements, specifically whether the square footage for the garage could be added to the building as part of the building footprint. Given these outstanding questions, the applicants chose to pursue the same application for concept review at this meeting. Pentler expressed continued concerns about the size and grandeur of the proposed house. She stated it was a beautiful house but not appropriate for the lot it would be placed on, noting it would become the focal point when entering Ephraim next to the beach. She had significant concerns about the view from the water, mentioning knee walls where patios are located and a permanent roof that appears part of the main roof. Pentler suspected the intention might be to enclose these areas in the future, similar to what occurred at the last Plan Committee meeting. Pentler emphasized the need for the structure to be more like a house rather than its current proposed form. Ellis agreed with Pentler after reviewing the historic preservation ordinances, stating the proposal was on the large side. Schreck echoed both committee members' concerns, emphasizing two key considerations not fully addressed previously: compatible infill and mass and scale. Pentler raised additional concerns about blue shutters, noting that approved colors are gray, white, and natural stone. She also questioned the door design. Pentler emphasized that there should be efforts to save what currently exists on the property, and if a year-round house was desired, the VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 31, 2026 Page 2 of 3 new structure should resemble the original house. She felt the proposed design did not look close to what was there or anything else on the main street in the Historic District. She stressed the importance of addressing views from both the road and the water. Schreck summarized that the primary concerns were mass and scale, particularly regarding precedent in the Protected Waterfront area and how the building would fit with surrounding structures in terms of compatible infill. 7. Gregory Golterman – 9917 Water St – New SFR – Concept Review Pentler identified this as a project with logs and bluish-gray coloring. From her interpretation of the plans, it appeared to maintain the same footprint while raising the roofline to create a second story, leaving the road view relatively intact. She considered this the closest she had seen to someone sticking to the original vision and hoped they would maintain the gray logs as well. Schreck clarified that the packet indicated this would be a complete teardown of the foundation with a full rebuild, though maintaining the same footprint. Pentler asked about whether the second story vertical walls would be cedar. Gregory Golterman, participating in the meeting, confirmed it would be cedar. He also mentioned they planned to save the original logs and attempt to use them in some of the facade to maintain the original look and historic charm. Pentler inquired about the roof slopes in the front where three windows were located, asking if they were making the roof into a vertical cedar wall. Schreck explained that the dormer was being fully removed and replaced with flat siding. Pentler asked about square footage additions. Golterman estimated the total would be roughly 1,500 square feet, up from approximately 1,100 square feet currently, adding about 400 square feet. Pentler found this reasonable. Regarding height, Schreck noted the application showed 23 feet to the top of the roofline. Pentler expressed no issues with what she was seeing. Ellis praised the project, particularly loving that they would be using the original logs. Schreck appreciated the current log building's appearance and understood the need to update it for current requirements. He expressed concern about completely tearing down one of the shoreline buildings that strongly holds onto Ephraim's character aesthetically. While the replacement building borrowed from the original, he had concerns about mass and scale, particularly the building height on the Protected Waterfront, and wanted to hear Plan Committee input. Pentler asked if they could keep the outside structure intact, gut it from within, reinforce it, and add the top half to maintain authenticity. Golterman explained that three contractors said no, with one saying it could be done but hadn't responded in seven months. The contractors explained that the building had multiple elevations from its history as a fishing cottage with front and back additions at different levels, making leveling it extremely difficult. Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 31, 2026 Page 3 of 3 Pentler acknowledged that the varied levels gave the building its charming appearance, showing it grew with the Village. Regarding colors, Golterman confirmed it would be light gray, possibly slightly lighter to match the neighboring cottage, maintaining the same gray tone. For the chimney, he wasn't certain if they would use the original but confirmed all stonework would be Door County Fieldstone. Pentler commended the applicants for trying to preserve the scale and look without presenting a grandiose plan that wouldn't fit the area. Golterman confirmed this was their specific goal. 8. Carol Corbett – 10081 Water St. – Addition – Concept Review Due to lack of information this matter will be discussed at the future meeting. 9. New Business for the Next Meeting/Next Meeting Date: No new business was identified for the next meeting. The next meeting date is Tuesday, April 28th, 2026. 10. Adjournment Pentler moved, Ellis seconded to adjourn the Historic Preservation Committee Meeting at 6:50 PM, all ayes, and the motion carried. Recorded by, Andrea Collak- Clerk/Treasurer 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM HISTORIC PRESERV ATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 26, 2026 – 6:15 PM 9996 WATER STREET ACTION ITEMS: Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the April 28, 2026 Historic Preservation Committee minutes as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the new SFR Design Review Application for John and Victoria Cultra at 9887 Water Street, as presented. Roll Call Vote: Schreck aye, Pentler nay, and Thorp nay. Motion failed. Pentler moved, Schreck seconded to approve the Addition Design Review Application for Gregory Goltermann at 9917 Water Street, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Shreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the Addition Design Review Application for Roy Harsch at 9931 Water Street, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the Deck/Guard Rails Design Review Application for Ann Abbott at 9886 Water Street, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to adjourn at 6:55 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Present: Kathy Pentler (online), Cody Schreck, and BD Thorp – Chair. Absent: Amy Russell and Marcia Ellis. Staff: Brent Bristol - Village Administrator and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests in person: Drew Willmann (DeLeer’s Construction), Chris Schmeltz, Ken Nelson, Laird Hart, Andy Bartelt, Grace Held, Monique McClean, Rick Hoyerman, Kelsey Stone (EBC), and Roy Harsch. Guests online: John and Victoria Cultra . 1. Call to order: Thorp called the meeting to order at 6:15 PM. 2. Quorum: A quorum of the Historic Preservation Committee was present. 3. Changes in agenda: There were no changes to the agenda. 4. Visitors’ Comments: There were no visitors’ comments. 5. Approval of previous minutes: Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the April 28, 2026 Historic Preservation Committee minutes as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 6. John and Victoria Cultra – 9887 Water Street -New SFR – Design Review: Bristol explained that the project had been before the Committee previously for concept review. He explained that the Cultras had received guidance from both HPC and the Plan Committee regarding roof design, particularly concerning dormers on the primary roof and the pitch of the roof over the screened porch. The applicants had redesigned the project to address these concerns. John Cultra, participating virtually with his wife Victoria, explained they had reduced the number of exterior lights as requested by the Committee, placing lights only at doorways. He noted they had worked to simplify the design and address concerns about rooflines and dormers. 2 Pentler raised concerns about the blue door color, questioning whether it would match existing Village blues and suggested the Village should provide clearer guidelines for historic colors. John Cultra explained that there was a lot of blue in the Village and they intend to use "Ephraim Blue" consistent with other historic buildings within the Village. He expressed willingness to work with the Committee on selecting an appropriate shade. Pentler expressed concerns about the multiple roof lines and peaks, suggesting the design still appeared too complex with a lot of sharp angles. John Cultra noted that they had removed the bumpouts on the front elevation and put in bay windows to match the existing structure. Schreck noted that he liked the blue shutters and door. He further discussed that the rooflines have moved in the right direction; he was not sure what else could be done. He stressed that there was a good reduction in lighting. The Committee further discussed the addition of the shutters to the plan set. Thorp questioned why they were added since the last presentation. John Cultra noted that so much was changed and simplified that they felt the shutters would add aesthetic appeal. Pentler questioned whether certain roof elements could be extended, such as over the breezeway, by way of making it flatter. Drew Willmann, the representative from DeLeers, explained that there were minimum roof pitches per Village ordinance, which required the roof line to be raised, as well as the need for functional access. He noted they had significantly simplified the west elevation since the previous presentation. Thorp noted concerns about the west elevation's roofline complexity and admitted he should have been more explicit about his reservations during the previous month's approval. Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the new SFR Design Review Application for John and Victoria Cultra at 9887 Water Street, as presented. Roll Call Vote: Schreck aye, Pentler nay, and Thorp nay. Motion failed. John Cultra expressed confusion about the change in Committee sentiment, noting they had made all requested modifications since receiving the previous approval and had only simplified the design further. Thorp explained that, in part due to running the meeting last month, he did not get a chance to express his concerns regarding the roof lines, although he approved the concept last month. He thought the roofline would be corrected; he felt it was not changed enough on the west elevation. While the plans have improved greatly, he felt they could be simplified further. John Cultra stressed that they had worked hard to address the Committee’s concerns and simplify the plan, especially from the front elevation. He expressed concern that the failed approval would carry negatively to the Plan Committee. 7. Gregory Golterman – 9917 Water Street – Addition – Design Review: Bristol explained that this was the first formal hearing for this project, following previous concept review sessions. Brent explained that the applicant had originally planned a full teardown and rebuild but had found a contractor capable of preserving the first floor while adding a partial second story. The Committee discussed the design materials, with Bristol noting the roof would be CertainTeed Landmark in driftwood color - a black base with gray and slight bluish-gray tones in the asphalt shingles. Schreck expressed satisfaction that the Goltermanns had pursued preserving a portion of the original building, stating this was much preferred over complete demolition. While acknowledging the front elevation showed some complexity with roof lines, he noted the existing building already had a stacked appearance. Pentler praised the size, design, and rectangular second story addition, noting the good color choices and historic materials used. 3 Pentler moved, Schreck seconded to approve the Addition Design Review Application for Gregory Goltermann at 9917 Water Street, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 8. Roy Harsch – 9931 Water Street – Addition – Design Review: Bristol provided extensive background on this complex project, explaining that it began with work started without permits, resulting in a stop-work order. The Harsch’s had initially sought variances for setback issues but were denied by the Board of Appeals. Amendments to the Protected Waterfront Ordinances allowed potential footprint modifications if the offsetting footprint was removed elsewhere on the property. The current project required a property exchange with neighboring property owners to address setback issues, which was conditionally approved upon Plan Committee approval of the footprint modification. The addition would be on the water side while removing/modifying a portion of the small structure closest to STH 42. Bristol explained that the request is to proceed with finishing the addition, match all existing materials, and partially remove/ modify the small structure closest to STH 42. Roy Harsch explained the addition would use the same materials as the existing structure: 8-inch cedar siding painted white, along with green shingles matching the current roof. He described the personal necessity of the project, explaining that his wife uses a walker and they need to reconfigure the kitchen to accommodate modern appliances and accessibility needs. Schreck noted that from an HPC perspective, matching materials and maintaining architectural consistency addressed the Committee's primary concerns. Shreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the Addition Design Review Application for Roy Harsch at 9931 Water Street, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 9. Ann Abbott – 9886 Water Street – Deck/Guard Rails – Design Review: Bristol explained that snow damage had pulled the existing deck away from the house, creating an opportunity to replace both decking and guardrails. The new guardrails would be similar to white Trex- style railings previously approved, and the decking would be light gray Trex material. With no applicant representative present, the Committee reviewed the materials samples provided. There were no concerns with the proposed materials. Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to approve the Deck/Guard Rails Design Review Application for Ann Abbott at 9886 Water Street, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 10. New Business for next meeting / next meeting date: No new business was noted. The next meeting of the Historic Preservation Committee is June 23, 2026. 11. Adjournment: Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to adjourn at 6:55 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Recorded by, Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk PERMEABLE PAVER/COBBLE PAVING 591.5 FFE 587.4 FFE SPR SPR CDR CDR CDR ASH CDR FLLN CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR MPL LCST CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR LCST MPL MPLASHLCST ASH MPL MPL MPLCDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR MPL ELM CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR ELM ELM CDR LRCH LRCH LRCH LRCH LRCH MPL CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR HEM CDR CDR CDR CDR SPR SPR CDRCDR CDR CEDAR STONE COTTAGE 601.1 FFE 600.85 PFE 600.8 GFE CDR CDR CDR MPL MPL MPL MPL MPL ASH/DEAD ASH/DEAD BSWD MPL CDR MPL CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR BSWD CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR MPL MPL CDR LOW/MOIST AREA 7-1-13 ELC TRNS PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BEDPLANTING BED ASPHALT DRIVE PLANTING BED FENCED DOG RUN SODDED LAWN PLANTING BED PLANTING BED SODDED LAWN SODDED LAWN SODDED LAWN S T A T E H W Y '42' GRAY LOGS COTTAGE RENOVATED ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT MOTORCOURT EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT DRIVE EXISTING LITTLE DRAGONFLY COTTAGE EXISTING BIG DRAGONFLY COTTAGE GARAGE ASH/DEAD CDR SODDED CDR CDR A/CA/C GEN SODDED LAWN RENOVATED ASPHALT DRIVE GEN 12' 2" X 3' 4" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" PLANTING BED CBL VT (3) WF/SMP/VT VTVT EO VT EO/VT VT VT (3) WTR EM VT (2) GS EO(2) WF/DS EO EO GSEO/VTVT VTVTVT EO EO EO DS DS DS DS DS STMP STMP STRM STRM STRM STRM STRM STRM PLANTING BED PLANTING BED BUNKHOUSE CABIN 592.5 FFE SODDED LAWN WASH CABIN 1"- 3" BEACH STONE OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC. EXPOSED BED ROCK OR WEATHERED LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING AT DRIVE EDGES. BEGIN CUT FOR DRIVE SLOPE AT THIS POINT TERRACED LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS LOWER WELL HEAD ~2' & TOP WITH A HOLLOW BOULDER 1"- 12" BEACH STONE DRY CREEK BED OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC. CHARACTER BOULDERS PLACED AT EDGES. WATER TO BE CONVEYED TO WETLAND VIA AN 18" CATCH BASIN 6" SOLID PIPE15" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING 18"-24" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING 2.5' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 3.5' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 3.5' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS. WALLS TO EXTEND ABOVE GRADE ~ 21" EFFLUENT TANK W/ MANHOLES LIMESTONE STEPPERS DRY SET FLAGSTONE PAVING. JOINTS TO BE TIGHT & EDGES TO BE IRREGULAR. LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP TO CONNECT BEDROCK TO FOUNDATION 12"-36" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 5' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY 3'-4' WIDE IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS 3' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING5.5'-7' WIDE IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS; 7" RISERS IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS; 7.5" RISERS 3' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING CHARACTER/SEAT BOULDERS AT LAWN EDGE GRADE TO BEGIN ROLLING & SLOPING DOWN AT THE LAWN EDGE 36" WIDE CEDAR MULCH PATHWAY WITH WEATHERED STONE STEPS CHARACTER/SEAT BOULDERS AT PERIMETER OF PATIO LEVEL EXISTING GRAVEL RIDGE & TOP WITH DRY SET FLAGSTONE PAVING. JOINTS TO BE TIGHT & EDGES TO BE IRREGULAR. FIRE RING WITH WEATHERED STONE SURROUND. TO HAVE A LOG LIGHTING SYSTEM WITHIN RING. 5' WIDE ELEVATED & FLOATING BOARDWALK. EDGES TO BE CUT EVEN WITH EACH OTHER. EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING GENERATOR EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANELS EXISTING CHARTER & ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER EXISTING WELL HOUSE EXISTING SANITARY LIFT STATION EXISTING RIP RAP EXISTING NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE EXISTING IRON PIPE EXISTING IRON PIPE EXISTING SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE LOCATION OF BURIED PROPANE TANKS 16' WIDE TURFSTONE DRIVE; CORES TO BE CHIPPED STONE. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED DOCK 18"-24" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 2 SEAT STONES PROTRUDING FROM WALL LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS; 7.0" RISERS 3.5' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY 42" HIGH FENCE SURROUNDING UTILITIES & DOG RUN WITH 3' & 4' GATES BURIED 4" DRAIN TILE 6' HIGH RED CEDAR FENCE WITH 4' GATE 3.5' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY BURIED 4" DRAIN TILE 18" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING 6"-24" HIGH LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL MIXED CHARACTER BOULDERS & LIMESTONE OUTCROPPING 3' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY BURIED 4"& 6" DRAIN TILE MULCHED PARKING AREA LOCATION OF PROPANE TANK REGULATORS N DESIGN.PLANT.BUILD.MAINTAIN Phone: 920. 743.1011 Fax: 920.743.8878 www.meissnerlandscape.com PERMEABLE PAVER/COBBLE PAVING 591.5 FFE 587.4 FFE SPR SPR CDR CDR CDR ASH CDR FLLN CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR ELM CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR ELM ELM CDR LRCH LRCH LRCH LRCH LRCH MPL CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR HEM CDR CDR CDR CDR SPR SPR CDRCDR CDR CEDAR STONE COTTAGE 601.1 FFE 600.85 PFE 600.8 GFE MPL CDR BSWD CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR ELC TRNS PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BEDPLANTING BED PLANTING BED FENCED DOG RUN SODDED LAWN PLANTING BED PLANTING BED SODDED LAWN SODDED LAWN SODDED LAWN GRAY LOGS COTTAGE RENOVATED ASPHALT DRIVE EXISTING LITTLE DRAGONFLY COTTAGE GARAGE ASH/DEAD GEN 12' 2" X 3' 4" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" PLANTING BED CBL VT (3) WF/SMP/VT VTVT EO VT EO/VT VT VT (3) WTR EM VT (2) GS EO(2) WF/DS EO EO VTVTVT EO EO EO DS DS DS DS DS STMP STMP STRM STRM STRM STRM STRM STRM PLANTING BED PLANTING BED BUNKHOUSE CABIN 592.5 FFE SODDED LAWN WASH CABIN 1"- 3" BEACH STONE OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC. BEGIN CUT FOR DRIVE SLOPE AT THIS POINT TERRACED LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS LOWER WELL HEAD ~2' & TOP WITH A HOLLOW BOULDER 1"- 12" BEACH STONE DRY CREEK BED OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC. CHARACTER BOULDERS PLACED AT EDGES. WATER TO BE CONVEYED TO WETLAND VIA AN 18" CATCH BASIN 6" SOLID PIPE15" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING 18"-24" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING 2.5' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 3.5' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 3.5' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALLS. WALLS TO EXTEND ABOVE GRADE ~ 21" EFFLUENT TANK W/ MANHOLES LIMESTONE STEPPERS DRY SET FLAGSTONE PAVING. JOINTS TO BE TIGHT & EDGES TO BE IRREGULAR. LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP TO CONNECT BEDROCK TO FOUNDATION 12"-36" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 5' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY 3'-4' WIDE IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS 3' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING5.5'-7' WIDE IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS; 7" RISERS IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS; 7.5" RISERS 3' HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING CHARACTER/SEAT BOULDERS AT LAWN EDGE GRADE TO BEGIN ROLLING & SLOPING DOWN AT THE LAWN EDGE 36" WIDE CEDAR MULCH PATHWAY WITH WEATHERED STONE STEPS CHARACTER/SEAT BOULDERS AT PERIMETER OF PATIO LEVEL EXISTING GRAVEL RIDGE & TOP WITH DRY SET FLAGSTONE PAVING. JOINTS TO BE TIGHT & EDGES TO BE IRREGULAR. FIRE RING WITH WEATHERED STONE SURROUND. TO HAVE A LOG LIGHTING SYSTEM WITHIN RING. 5' WIDE ELEVATED & FLOATING BOARDWALK. EDGES TO BE CUT EVEN WITH EACH OTHER. EXISTING GENERATOR EXISTING ELECTRICAL PANELS EXISTING CHARTER & ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER EXISTING WELL HOUSE EXISTING RIP RAP EXISTING NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE EXISTING SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE 16' WIDE TURFSTONE DRIVE; CORES TO BE CHIPPED STONE. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED DOCK 18"-24" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 2 SEAT STONES PROTRUDING FROM WALL LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING IRREGULAR "LILY PAD" LIMESTONE SLAB STEPS; 7.0" RISERS 3.5' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY 42" HIGH FENCE SURROUNDING UTILITIES & DOG RUN WITH 3' & 4' GATES BURIED 4" DRAIN TILE 6' HIGH RED CEDAR FENCE WITH 4' GATE 3.5' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY BURIED 4" DRAIN TILE 18" HIGH LIMESTONE BOULDER OUTCROP RETAINING 6"-24" HIGH LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL MIXED CHARACTER BOULDERS & LIMESTONE OUTCROPPING 3' WIDE LIMESTONE STEPPER PATHWAY BURIED 4"& 6" DRAIN TILE N DESIGN.PLANT.BUILD.MAINTAIN Phone: 920. 743.1011 Fax: 920.743.8878 www.meissnerlandscape.com PERMEABLE PAVER/COBBLE PAVING 591.5 FFE 587.4 FFE SPR SPR CDR CDR CDR ASH CDR FLLN CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR MPL LCST CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR LCST MPL MPLASHLCST ASH MPL MPL MPLCDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR MPL ELM CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR ELM ELM CDR LRCH LRCH LRCH LRCH LRCH MPL CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR HEM CDR CDR CDR CDR SPR SPR CDRCDR CDR CEDAR STONE COTTAGE 601.1 FFE 600.85 PFE 600.8 GFE CDR CDR CDR MPL MPL MPL MPL MPL ASH/DEAD ASH/DEAD BSWD MPL CDR MPL CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR BSWD CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR CDR ELC TRNS PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BED PLANTING BEDPLANTING BED RESHAPED DRIVE PLANTING BED FENCED DOG RUN SODDED LAWN PLANTING BED PLANTING BED SODDED LAWN SODDED LAWN SODDED LAWN S T A T E H W Y '42' GRAY LOGS COTTAGE RENOVATED ASPHALT DRIVE ASPHALT MOTORCOURT RESHAPED DRIVE EXISTING LITTLE DRAGONFLY COTTAGE EXISTING BIG DRAGONFLY COTTAGE GARAGE ASH/DEAD SODDED LAWN SODDED LAWN GEN 12' 2" X 3' 4" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" A/C 31" PLANTING BED CBL VT (3) WF/SMP/VT VTVT EO VT EO/VT VT VT (3) WTR EM VT (2) GS EO(2) WF/DS EO EO GSEO/VTVT VTVTVT EO EO EO DS DS DS DS DS STMP STMP STRM STRM STRM STRM STRM STRM PLANTING BED PLANTING BED BUNKHOUSE CABIN 592.5 FFE SODDED LAWN WASH CABIN N DESIGN.PLANT.BUILD.MAINTAIN Phone: 920. 743.1011 Fax: 920.743.8878 www.meissnerlandscape.com SHEET: SCALE: DATE DRAWN: TITLE PAGE 6/16/26 PEA Builders Inc. W195 S7548 Woodland Pl., Muskego, WI 53150 Ph: (414) 324-6123 SStteevvee && MMaarryy HHoommaa 99775511 WWaatteerr SStt.. EEpphhrraaiimm,, WWII 5544221111 PPhh ((441144)) 332244--66112233 #/#" = 1'-0" DATE REVISED: DRAWN BY: - A-1.1 PAGE TABLE Label Ti tle Comments A-1.1 TITLE PAGE A-1.2 EXISTING & PROPOSED PLANS A-1.3 ELEVATIONS & SCHEDULES A-1.4 ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN A-2.1 SECTION & PROPOSED ELECTRICAL PLAN BID SET 1st Floor Living 758 S/F Bedroom Suite Addition 356 S/F Deck Addition 190 S/F EPHRAIM COTTAGE UP UP S1 A-2.1 S1 A-2.1 S1 A-2.1 S1 A-2.1 E4 A-1.4 E4 A-1.4 E1 A-1.3 E1 A-1.3 E3 A-1.3 E3 A-1.3 E2 A-1.4 E2 A-1.4 10'-0 11/16" 20'-2 1/4" 8'-0 5/8" 15' 7'-11 3/4" 13'-11 1/16" 14'-1 3/4" CL 7'-10 1/16"7'-10 1/16" 4'-3 1/2" 17'-2 9/16" 12'-1 3/16" 15'-8 5/8" 22'-7 9/16" 11'-11 1/2" 13'-6" X 9'-8" 14'-5" X 21'-8" 4'-6" X 9'-9" 5'-8" X 4'-6" 7'-8" X 5'-3" 7'-2" X 11'-6" 19'-5" X 11'-8" 5'-6" X 9'-8" 9'-7" X 11'-0" EX. GARAGE EX. BEDROOM PROP. GREAT RM EX. BATH EX. BEDROOM PROP. FOYER PROP. KITCHEN DOUBLE 11 7/8" MICROLAM EX. PATIO EX. PATIO TRIPLE 2X8 BEAM 2x8 JOISTS 16" OC. 11 7/8" OPEN JOISTS 16" OC PROPOSED UPDATED FIRST FLOOR SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT PROPOSED UPDATED FIRST FLOOR SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT 2436RS 2436RS2436RS286828682436RS2436RS 28682436RS 2868 2436RS 2436RS 2436RS 2468 2436RS 2436RS 2868 2868 2468 4068 80703068 2468 2068 10'-0 5/8" 20'-2 1/4" 7'-11 5/8" 38'-2 1/2" 12'-2" 9'-11 1/2" 34'-1 1/2" 14'-1 3/4" 12' 15'-7"7'-11 3/4"13'-10 3/4" 38'-2 1/2" 19'-5" X 11'-4" 13'-6" X 9'-8" 7'-6" X 5'-2" 5'-7" X 9'-8" 9'-8" X 11'-0" 7'-2" X 11'-7" 14'-2" X 21'-8" GARAGE KITCHEN LIVING BEDROOM BEDROOM FOYER BATH EXISTING PLAN SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT EXISTING PLAN SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT D13D13 W04W04 W04W04 W01W01 D17D17 W01W01 W04W04 W04W04 W02W02W02W02 D11D11 D12D12 D05D05 22'-9" 3'-11 7/8" 15'-9 1/16" 22'-9" 12' 15'-8 1/8" 3'-8" 11'-1 5/8" 1'-3" 4' 2'-1" 15'-5 1/8" 15'-1 1/8"6'-4 1/2" 20'-6 5/8" 15'-9" X 12'-0" 15'-0" X 15'-4" 11'-1" X 6'-4" DECK PROP. BEDROOM PROP. BATH PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT SHEET: SCALE: DATE DRAWN: EXISTING & PROPOSED PLANS 6/16/26 PEA Builders Inc. W195 S7548 Woodland Pl., Muskego, WI 53150 Ph: (414) 324-6123 SStteevvee && MMaarryy HHoommaa 99775511 WWaatteerr SStt.. EEpphhrraaiimm,, WWII 5544221111 PPhh ((441144)) 332244--66112233 #/#" = 1'-0" DATE REVISED: DRAWN BY: - A-1.2 BID SET PROPOSED BUILDING NOTES NO CHANGE TO THE EXISTING FOOTPRINT ADDITION CONSISTS OF -GARAGE SECOND LEVEL BEDROOM SUITE -DECK ADDITION TO BEDROOM SUITE - KITCHEN EXPANSION REMOVAL OF WALL 2X4 EXTERIOR WALLS SIDING OF ADDITION TO MATCH EXISTING BOTTOM OF FOOTING -7.8' TOP OF FOOTING -7.2' 8" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - FOUNDATION -2.8' 4'-4" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 5.8' 8'-7" TOP OF PLATE 14.3' 8'-7" HIGHEST RIDGE 18.8' 4'-5 5/8" E1 ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE1 ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT BOTTOM OF FOOTING -7.8' TOP OF SUBFLOOR - FOUNDATION -2.8' 5' TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 1ST FLOOR 0' 2'-10" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 5.8' 5'-9" TOP OF PLATE 14.3' 8'-7" HIGHEST RIDGE 18.8' 4'-5 5/8" E3 ELEVATION 3 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE3 ELEVATION 3 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT WINDOW SCHEDULE 3D EXTERIOR ELEVATION QTY SIZE R/O COMMENTS 2 2668 EX 32"X83" 2 2436DH 29"X43" 4 3020AW 37"X25" WINDOW SCHEDULE SCALE: 1 IN = 1 FT WINDOW SCHEDULE SCALE: 1 IN = 1 FT DOOR SCHEDULE 3D EXTERIOR ELEVATION QTY SIZE R/O 1 2668 L/R IN 32"X82 1/2" 1 2868 L IN 34"X82 1/2" 1 2868 R 34"X82 1/2" 1 2868 R EX 34"X83" 1 5568 L/R EX 67"X83" DOOR SCHEDULE SCALE: 1 IN = 1 FT DOOR SCHEDULE SCALE: 1 IN = 1 FT SHEET: SCALE: DATE DRAWN: ELEVATIONS & SCHEDULES 6/16/26 PEA Builders Inc. W195 S7548 Woodland Pl., Muskego, WI 53150 Ph: (414) 324-6123 SStteevvee && MMaarryy HHoommaa 99775511 WWaatteerr SStt.. EEpphhrraaiimm,, WWII 5544221111 PPhh ((441144)) 332244--66112233 #/#" = 1'-0" DATE REVISED: DRAWN BY: - A-1.3 BID SET WINDOWS & DOORS NOTES NEW WINDOWS AND DOORS TO ADDITION ONLY BOTTOM OF FOOTING -7.8' TOP OF SUBFLOOR - FOUNDATION -2.8' 5' TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 1ST FLOOR 0' 2'-10" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 5.8' 5'-9" TOP OF PLATE 9.1' 3'-4" TOP OF PLATE 14.3' 5'-3" HIGHEST RIDGE 18.8' 4'-5 5/8" GRADE LINE E2 ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE2 ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT TOP OF SUBFLOOR - FOUNDATION -2.8' TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 1ST FLOOR 0' 2'-10" TOP OF SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 5.8' 5'-9" TOP OF PLATE 14.3' 8'-7" HIGHEST RIDGE 18.8' 4'-5 5/8" GRADE LINE E4 ELEVATION 4 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE4 ELEVATION 4 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT 6 3/4 : 12 6 3/4 : 12 6 3/4 : 12 6 3/4 : 12 7 : 12 6 3/4 : 12 2 11/16 : 12 10'-0 11/16" 20'-2 1/4" 8'-0 5/8" 12'-3 1/2" 11'-5 3/4" 7'-5 7/8"7'-5 7/8" 4'-5 3/8" 4'-5 3/8" 10'-11 3/4" 13'-5 9/16" 7'-7 1/2" 7'-11 3/4" ROOF DEMO PROPOSED ADDITION ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT PROPOSED ADDITION ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT 7 1/2 : 12 7 1/2 : 12 7 : 12 16'-8" 23'-9" 15' 17'-4 7/8"6'-4 1/8" 2' PROPOSED ADDITION ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT PROPOSED ADDITION ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT SHEET: SCALE: DATE DRAWN: ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN 6/16/26 PEA Builders Inc. W195 S7548 Woodland Pl., Muskego, WI 53150 Ph: (414) 324-6123 SStteevvee && MMaarryy HHoommaa 99775511 WWaatteerr SStt.. EEpphhrraaiimm,, WWII 5544221111 PPhh ((441144)) 332244--66112233 #/#" = 1'-0" DATE REVISED: DRAWN BY: - A-1.4 BID SET 8'-5 1/2" 7'-10 11/16" 1'-10 7/8" BOTTOM OF FOOTING -7.8' TOP OF FOOTING -3.2' 4'-8" EXISTING SUBFLOOR - 1ST FLOOR 0' 3'-2" PROPOSED SUBFLOOR - 2ND FLOOR 5.8' 5'-9" TOP OF PLATE 14.3' 8'-7" HIGHEST RIDGE 18.8' 4'-5 5/8" 7'-2 5/16" 7'-5" S1 SECTION 1 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTS1 SECTION 1 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT R R RR R R R R PROPOSED ELECTRICAL ADDITION SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT PROPOSED ELECTRICAL ADDITION SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT SHEET: SCALE: DATE DRAWN: SECTION & PROPOSED ELECTRICAL PLAN 6/16/26 PEA Builders Inc. W195 S7548 Woodland Pl., Muskego, WI 53150 Ph: (414) 324-6123 SStteevvee && MMaarryy HHoommaa 99775511 WWaatteerr SStt.. EEpphhrraaiimm,, WWII 5544221111 PPhh ((441144)) 332244--66112233 #/#" = 1'-0" DATE REVISED: DRAWN BY: - A-2.1 BID SET AS BUILT B4232B4232 B4232B4232 2636FA 5468 2636FA 2636FA 31026RS31026RS 2636FA 2868 4X4 POST 4X4 POST 4X4 POST 4X4 POST 4X4 POST 4X4 POST E7 A-1.1 E7 A-1.1 E9 A-1.1 E9 A-1.1 S1 A-1.1 S1 A-1.1 S1 A-1.1 S1 A-1.1 E6 A-1.1 E6 A-1.1 E8 A-1.1 E8 A-1.1 20'-2 1/2" 7'-9" 14'-2 1/2" 12'-4" 11'-8" 8' CL3'-3 1/4" 20'-2" 20'-2 1/2" 6' 173 SQ FT WORK AREA 1ST FLOOR SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT 1ST FLOOR SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT TOP OF SUBFLOOR - FOUNDATION 0' TOP OF PLATE 7' 7' RIDGE 9.8' 2'-9 3/16" 1" 12" 4" 12" E6 ELEVATION 5 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE6 ELEVATION 5 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT B.O. FOOTING -5' T.O. FOOTING -1' 4' TOP OF SLAB 0' 1' EXTERIOR CASING TOP 7' 6'-11 1/2" E7 ELEVATION 6 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE7 ELEVATION 6 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT E8 ELEVATION 7 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE8 ELEVATION 7 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT E9 ELEVATION 8 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTE9 ELEVATION 8 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT 12'-4" 14'-2 1/2" THICKENED SLAB FOUNDATION SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT FOUNDATION SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT TOP OF SUBFLOOR - FOUNDATION 0' TOP OF PLATE 7' 7' S1 SECTION 1 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FTS1 SECTION 1 SCALE: 1/4 IN = 1 FT SHEET: SCALE: DATE DRAWN: SUGAR SHACK 7/17/26 PEA Builders Inc. W195 S7548 Woodland Pl., Muskego, WI 53150 Ph: (414) 324-6123 SStteevvee && MMaarryy HHoommaa 99775511 WWaatteerr SStt.. EEpphhrraaiimm,, WWII 5544221111 PPhh ((441144)) 332244--66112233 #/#" = 1'-0" DATE REVISED: DRAWN BY: SH & LK A-1.1 CONCEPTUAL DWGS 7.17.26 1 Brent Bristol From: Doug Evans < Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2026 1:56 PM To: Brent Bristol Subject: Brookside Lane - Cottage #1 - Studio Hi Brent, all my cottages need to have their roofs replaced as soon as possible, so I’d like to approach my renovation project differently than we discussed. I’m good with keeping all the cottages closer to their current design and size, but I would like to make some improvements while completing the roof repairs if possible. Otherwise, I may have to rip off a brand new roof if I go back to make improvements later. I’ve attached a new narrative, a current picture, a concept picture, and building plans that have my adjustments. This is the smallest cottage which has no variance concerns due to proximity to boundary or water. Current Picture: SCALE1"•30' PLAT OF SURVEY BElNG A PA'll' OF GOV£RNMEt<T LOT 2, SECTION 23, TOWNSlilP 31 NORTli, RA.�GE 27 EAST, VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM, DOOR COUNTY, WISCONSIN ........... EAST 2'!,0.7'+/- 210.10' � • I • w ,.. t:..... .,,. r----------- �//�� I / • /I/ / is I I / / I / / / I I / I I II I I ,' t l 1 I _ _., 11 I / I I I I '"""' I f I 1 I I I I \....,-\ I I I / I I I ',,,.. pGrCel conta.ns o-<1o.l:,� I / I I I I I I I I I I I '€, I ·�\ I -.. t.(,(h·/-OCr"U I / / ', I/ I ' - .,..,.-1 I ', --- I I , I I \ I I' _..... J / \ I I \ I I \ , El I I .,. \ __ 1-'· --, I I --- i I '"'"" I I I . ntt.11Jlt \ , I I I I I I I I II I I I • 1!12.6 3' v,m 172.6'+/- ,,. I l,WBS k ROBIN LINDSLOOJ.1400 'l:ut RANDOLPH UNtr ui3 CRCCACO, lL 80601 ...,...,, PE.'f!NSUU L\NI> co=TANTS. I.LC. 824D EGG KARBOR ROAD SnlRGEON' UAY. WI $423S "'0 � - !!:!> � I I i! I I "' l IC, I5 0 I§ 0 M I r I :,, Iz � I I tc,i 1/4 ccrn.,r$0�. 2.r:11-21 iII.J m 0 I + • OOOR ecuwrr MOHUWtm8' ♦ • CXIST�O 1/2.' IRON PFE�1 � t NI �lo-�, 1kt to the �tb-1 CO!"'!III' .,,, O:'ld tt.t cer.t�lfll• liocctbll ot SIOOlit'c"t l.cl'• .... 1. ulcbllthtd o• per p,-o'4c,..1t reittr •KV•.,,. .I \i\'ttr�f!d rno ello""' •-u!ob� l:ly -, �. Ccn �fldtr le"I.. Vo�d� Lwrl �• Teen,9, "II " ii [ = J • 11,ll.Dff> Zet.t """' . 'f' 8vJ:leO •-doPlol..d -t,o-.., "'""i -� .if+ct .;t llmt <ff ,_r,n-.0 0"'1 tr,o,;1,1 l'll)l t,. telt4 •"" d!',o,Jt lll'fl. «tlo,.-.,1lrfl\'\fll Wllfk:,S,'0,t ll't--1 �"' �-v.llop, �l Of Qli't'd"', .,., L ______ �t,\ ______ J O�t eoi.:;; N e.'759"J7• W ors:,�PTiON: A i:on:d ef fond btl19 o r:<1rt cf Co1'tl'l'lmt11t Lot 2, Section 23. 10•11.shl,, J1 �•,orth,Ao11agc 21 Ectt. "11!1119, of t,)11rorn. Co�r CCunty, 'ftl,con,l'I more pO"U::11lory u.orbt4 ot,011¢ .. 1: Comme.r.ch9 ct U·.o Ec,t 1/4 coen,r of sold St<:Ucn 23. tht11e. S OO'CO'S9'" W --1316.tC> f�l, thcnu H eg-,,i•3t• W --13",59 f .. t to the SC COMtr cf ,old Go ... cmmtnlLot 2, thcnc• Nortl\ -.. 513.15 , .. t cloflg th• &3tt i:n, or ,cid CO">�mmcnt Lot 2, ,aid llnt o:»:i being ttlc ctl\lcrtlt10 of Srcol<.ticl♦ Lot!&. U'!etiee •.-·ut -- 2� fttl to th• ;iohtof W;!nt1lt19 of lon<lt t:, 3t �--¢'bed; ll\e,,c. !x,uU, -- 300,00 feet. thcr.ce 'lli'nt -­l52.60 ful too t,c,'1'1l btlr.g Ectt .. _ 20+/-fo11t from '.h1 ee.,t1.· of [phroffl C1uk, t.;.,c11,:c N 10-5'1'� W --�5.57 tut CIO"IQ o n,ecnccr lhe lo o pMt being £est --20•/-fN:t ft'Ot'I\ 11',1 eentor of [pllroin Crec'I. thenee Eo,t -210.70 feet to l'I• ;olrltor 11eglnnl19. Seid �orctl <tl'ltO:-rs l,68t/ ... o::rn, Including o.1 lo11ds l)fa9 llchottn ofore,<11.l r.'lt<l�cftt line o�d th, c:1nttor ot [p?lro!m Creek bcto,un ,Ide lot ihu oJCtffldM o, �(!:1:rU:1e-:I, lot;ctn« •I� O'I eostmen� ow•tfl'l•nt ot CS.tcttltcl I� �him, IC<:8, R�ord,._pot;o 71-78, 9JWKO attAC«S (CS}"°''SlTt..ot: -IOn:n S.US'ftl-1fl'ltt ¢IGlc f"'I'\ ,t<;t-, TS IUl 'NOV, 1 .5 20"6 /'J/• D/-')'j)f)J (-J,.fvJ ,. 9807 Brookside Lane, Ephraim • Repair Cottage #1 – Studio o Square footage (16’ x 16’) • Remove existing roof and replace with a new steel 7-12 pitch gable roof. • Remove existing porch and replace with a 16’ wide x 6’ deep covered deck. o Deck roof will be extension from newly installed roof. • Increase height of all existing walls from current 7’ height to 9’ height. • Add loft to back portion of the cottage using engineered truss system. o Access to loft will be a permanently installed ladder. Contact Info: Doug Evans Cell: gmail.com 1 Brent Bristol From: Doug Evans < Sent: Friday, July 24, 2026 9:20 AM To: Brent Bristol Subject: Re: Brookside Lane - Cottage #1 - Studio Attachments: IMG_1461.jpeg; IMG_1457.jpeg Here are a couple additional pictures of what I would have in mind for the other two cottages. I would provide blueprint/plans for all 3 cottages prior to submitting permit. The work on each cottage would be similar to cottage #1. 1) Remove exiting roofing structure 2) Extend walls up from 7 foot to 9 foot 3) Install new floor truss system 4) Install new roof with higher pitch than existing 5) Replace porch No increase in primary foundation footprint Increase in porch size in front portion of cottages only. Thanks again, Doug On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 8:52 AM Brent Bristol < wrote: Ok, great! So, on the new plans and submittals the plans for cottage 1 are clear. On the other two you speak to making some improvements in making the roof repairs/changes. Do you have any concepts of what those changes/improvements would be? Sincerely, Brent Bristol