Historic Preservation Committee — Agenda packet

VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, May 26, 2026 – 6:15 pm 9996 Water Street NOTE: This Meeting will be simultaneously held via teleconferencing. Staff, committee members and the public are welcome to participate in this manner. Teleconferencing will be available by computer, phone, tablet, or dial in. Connection information below: 1. Call to Order 2. Quorum 3. Changes in Agenda 4. Visitors’ Comments 5. Approve Previous HPC Minutes 6. John & Victoria Cultra – 9887 Water St. – New SFR – Design Review 7. Gregory Goltermann – 9917 Water St. – Addition – Design Review 8. Roy Harsch – 9931 Water St. – Addition –Design Review 9. Ann Abbott – 9886 Water St – Deck/Guard Rails – Design Review 10. New Business for Next Meeting/Next Meeting Date 11. Adjournment Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/746862853 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 746-862-853 United States: +1 (312) 757-3121 * It is possible that a quorum of the Village Board or other Village Committees may be present at the meeting. However, no action will be taken by the Board or any other committee unless specifically noticed. Date: 5/22/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website www.ephraim.wi.gov X Emailed to WDOR Radio X Emailed to Peninsula Pulse Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail: office@ephraim.wi.gov Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 31, 2026 – 6:30 PM Present: Marcia Ellis, Kathy Pentler, Cody Schreck On-line: BD Thorp-Chair, Amy Russell Staff: Brent Bristol- Administrator, Andrea Collak – Clerk/Treasurer Guests Present: Andy Bartelt, Ken Nelson, Monique McClean, Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman Guests On-line: Gregory Golterman 1. Call to order: The meeting was called to order by Brent Bristol-Administrator at 6:30 PM. Bristol asked the committee members to appoint the temporary chair for this meeting. Ellis moved, Pentler seconded to appoint Cody Schreck the temporary chair for this meeting, all ayes and the motion carried. 2. Quorum: A quorum is present for this meeting. 3. Changes in Agenda: None 4. Visitors’ comments: None 5. Previous minutes: February 24, 2026 Pentler moved, Ellis seconded to approve the HPC meeting minutes from February 24, 2026, as presented, all ayes, and the motion carried. 6. John & Victoria Cultra – 9887 Water St – New SFR – Concept Review Bristol explained that the application before the committee was identical to what was presented to the committees at the last meeting. He noted that concerns were raised at the Plan Committee level, and there were questions that the Plan Committee needed to answer regarding dimensional requirements, specifically whether the square footage for the garage could be added to the building as part of the building footprint. Given these outstanding questions, the applicants chose to pursue the same application for concept review at this meeting. Pentler expressed continued concerns about the size and grandeur of the proposed house. She stated it was a beautiful house but not appropriate for the lot it would be placed on, noting it would become the focal point when entering Ephraim next to the beach. She had significant concerns about the view from the water, mentioning knee walls where patios are located and a permanent roof that appears part of the main roof. Pentler suspected the intention might be to enclose these areas in the future, similar to what occurred at the last Plan Committee meeting. Pentler emphasized the need for the structure to be more like a house rather than its current proposed form. Ellis agreed with Pentler after reviewing the historic preservation ordinances, stating the proposal was on the large side. Schreck echoed both committee members' concerns, emphasizing two key considerations not fully addressed previously: compatible infill and mass and scale. Pentler raised additional concerns about blue shutters, noting that approved colors are gray, white, and natural stone. She also questioned the door design. Pentler emphasized that there should be efforts to save what currently exists on the property, and if a year-round house was desired, the VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 31, 2026 Page 2 of 3 new structure should resemble the original house. She felt the proposed design did not look close to what was there or anything else on the main street in the Historic District. She stressed the importance of addressing views from both the road and the water. Schreck summarized that the primary concerns were mass and scale, particularly regarding precedent in the Protected Waterfront area and how the building would fit with surrounding structures in terms of compatible infill. 7. Gregory Golterman – 9917 Water St – New SFR – Concept Review Pentler identified this as a project with logs and bluish-gray coloring. From her interpretation of the plans, it appeared to maintain the same footprint while raising the roofline to create a second story, leaving the road view relatively intact. She considered this the closest she had seen to someone sticking to the original vision and hoped they would maintain the gray logs as well. Schreck clarified that the packet indicated this would be a complete teardown of the foundation with a full rebuild, though maintaining the same footprint. Pentler asked about whether the second story vertical walls would be cedar. Gregory Golterman, participating in the meeting, confirmed it would be cedar. He also mentioned they planned to save the original logs and attempt to use them in some of the facade to maintain the original look and historic charm. Pentler inquired about the roof slopes in the front where three windows were located, asking if they were making the roof into a vertical cedar wall. Schreck explained that the dormer was being fully removed and replaced with flat siding. Pentler asked about square footage additions. Golterman estimated the total would be roughly 1,500 square feet, up from approximately 1,100 square feet currently, adding about 400 square feet. Pentler found this reasonable. Regarding height, Schreck noted the application showed 23 feet to the top of the roofline. Pentler expressed no issues with what she was seeing. Ellis praised the project, particularly loving that they would be using the original logs. Schreck appreciated the current log building's appearance and understood the need to update it for current requirements. He expressed concern about completely tearing down one of the shoreline buildings that strongly holds onto Ephraim's character aesthetically. While the replacement building borrowed from the original, he had concerns about mass and scale, particularly the building height on the Protected Waterfront, and wanted to hear Plan Committee input. Pentler asked if they could keep the outside structure intact, gut it from within, reinforce it, and add the top half to maintain authenticity. Golterman explained that three contractors said no, with one saying it could be done but hadn't responded in seven months. The contractors explained that the building had multiple elevations from its history as a fishing cottage with front and back additions at different levels, making leveling it extremely difficult. Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, March 31, 2026 Page 3 of 3 Pentler acknowledged that the varied levels gave the building its charming appearance, showing it grew with the Village. Regarding colors, Golterman confirmed it would be light gray, possibly slightly lighter to match the neighboring cottage, maintaining the same gray tone. For the chimney, he wasn't certain if they would use the original but confirmed all stonework would be Door County Fieldstone. Pentler commended the applicants for trying to preserve the scale and look without presenting a grandiose plan that wouldn't fit the area. Golterman confirmed this was their specific goal. 8. Carol Corbett – 10081 Water St. – Addition – Concept Review Due to lack of information this matter will be discussed at the future meeting. 9. New Business for the Next Meeting/Next Meeting Date: No new business was identified for the next meeting. The next meeting date is Tuesday, April 28th, 2026. 10. Adjournment Pentler moved, Ellis seconded to adjourn the Historic Preservation Committee Meeting at 6:50 PM, all ayes, and the motion carried. Recorded by, Andrea Collak- Clerk/Treasurer Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 – 6:15 PM Present: BD Thorp-Chair, Cody Schreck, Amy Russell Online: Kathy Pentler Absent: Marcia Ellis Staff: Brent Bristol- Administrator Guests Present: John Cultra, Drew Willmann of DeLeer’s Construction, Monique McClean, Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman Guests Online: Ann Abbott, Victoria Cultra 1. Call to order: The meeting was called to order by BD Thorp at 6:15 PM. 2. Quorum: A quorum is present for this meeting. 3. Changes in Agenda: None 4. Visitors’ comments: None 5. Previous minutes: March 31, 2026 The approval of minutes was postponed to the next meeting, as Thorp-Chair, Russell, and Ellis were not all present at the prior meeting and a sufficient number of attendees from that session were unavailable to approve the minutes. 6. John & Victoria Cultra – 9887 Water St – New SFR – Conditional Use - Design Review Bristol provided background on the Cultra application, noting this was a formal design review hearing after previous concept reviews. The applicants had made revisions based on feedback from both HPC and Plan Committee meetings. The Plan Committee determined that the proposed garage would remain a separate structure despite a covered roof connection, as it didn't share common walls or footprint, resulting in design modifications. John Cultra introduced himself, explaining that he and his wife have owned the property since January 2009 and have been visiting Ephraim since 1992. He described their family's connection to the area and their desire to rebuild due to the current home's deteriorating condition, including mold and water repulsion issues. Cultra emphasized their commitment to maintaining the historic character while meeting their family's needs as they will transition to spending more time in Ephraim. Drew Willmann of DeLeers Construction presented revised renderings reflecting the feedback received at prior meetings. Key figures noted were that the proposed conditioned space footprint of 1,039 square feet represents a reduction of 3 square feet from the existing 1,042 square feet, and the unconditioned garage footprint is reduced by 88 square feet, yielding an overall footprint reduction of 95 square feet. Total conditioned square footage including the second floor is approximately 1,922 square feet, compared to an estimated 1,650 square feet existing—an increase of approximately 270–300 square feet. Shreck expressed approval of the design direction, noting the simplification of roof lines compared to previous iterations, though he had some concerns about mass and scale. Russell agreed with Schreck's assessment, finding the design moving in the right direction despite still being somewhat busy with rooflines. Thorp raised concerns about the number of exterior lights, counting approximately 12 lanterns, VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 2 of 4 which he felt was excessive compared to neighboring properties. He referenced construction guidelines about being "relatively unadorned" and suggested the lighting would make the structure appear like "a Roman candle." Cultra agreed to work with the committee to reduce the number of lights. Additional discussions covered construction timing, with plans for an end of September 2026 start and completion outside of peak tourist seasons. The committee addressed technical details including chimney height compliance and roof pitch requirements. Pentler expressed significant concerns about the design's complexity for a historic Ephraim home, questioning the appropriateness of certain design elements including door colors, railings, and the overall busy appearance. She advocated for simpler, more traditional design elements consistent with Ephraim's historic character. Pentler also raised a concern about the screened porch, noting that a permanent foundation beneath it—combined with the full roofline—could set a precedent for future enclosure and appeared to add visual mass. Russell countered that she preferred the unified roofline as it simplified the overall form. The applicant explained that the porch is the family's most-used space and that the permanent foundation is intended to replace deteriorating wooden stilts damaged by prior high-water events, not to change the seasonal character of the space. Bristol confirmed that the screened porch square footage was not counted as conditioned living space. The committee noted that the proposed screened porch footprint is 4 square feet smaller than the existing structure. Cultra indicated that he would like to keep the existing blue color of the door. Schreck noted that Iverson House has a blue door. Pentler suggested discussing the color before approval. The committee discussed specific details including railing colors (which must be white per village requirements), door colors (with some debate about blue doors), and the screen porch foundation design. Committee members also noted that landscaping plans had not yet been developed; the applicant confirmed they are working with Meissner Landscaping and will submit a plan for review prior to installation. The committee agreed this could be handled at a future meeting. Thorp confirmed that the chimney height was compliant, with the contractor confirming a roof/framing height of 23 feet or less and total chimney height well within the 25-foot limit. The committee also noted that metal railings on the second-floor French door balcony, initially listed as black or bronze, would be required to be white, which the contractor confirmed would be amended. Schreck moved, Russell seconded to recommend the approval of the Design Review for John and Victoria Cultra at 9887 Water Street to the Plan Committee with the understanding that the Village will work with the applicants to reduce the number of exterior lights, Russell aye, Schreck, aye, Thorp aye, Pentler nay, and the motion passed 3 to 1. 7. Gregory Golterman – 9917 Water St – New SFR – Concept Review Bristol explained that Gregory Goltermann could not attend but had submitted written materials showing design revisions based on previous feedback. The significant change was finding a contractor willing to salvage and repurpose the existing first floor structure rather than complete Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 3 of 4 demolition, addressing the committee's previous concerns about preserving and incorporating the existing first floor structure into the new design—a priority the committee had expressed at the previous meeting. A late-submitted elevation also reflected a return to hand-hewn dovetail siding on the road-facing portion of the structure, consistent with the existing stone facade. The committee members expressed enthusiasm for preserving the existing structure. Schreck was particularly excited about maintaining the original building's historic fishing shack heritage. Pentler praised the design for maintaining clean, straight lines with natural materials while appearing consistent with the current structure's appearance. Russell, who had missed the previous meeting, found no objections to the revised proposal. Thorp agreed that Goltermann had done an excellent job incorporating the committee's feedback while preserving the original character. The committee reached consensus to support the concept review without requiring a formal vote. 8. Matt LaLonde – 9890 Water St. – Deck/Guard Rails – Design Review Bristol presented the LaLonde application for deck and railing system replacement, showing before and after visuals. The proposal involved replacing existing materials and eliminating first- floor railings in favor of wraparound stairs, with new dark gray decking and white aluminum clad railings. Pentler found the design much cleaner and simpler, meeting all Village criteria, though she suggested the door color should be gray rather than blue to maintain consistency. Russell expressed strong approval with no objections, particularly appreciating the white railing choice. Schreck had no issues with the proposal. Thorp confirmed the railing material specifications and expressed general approval, while noting Pentler’s concern about door color consistency with other blue doors in the area. Russell moved, Schreck seconded to recommend the approval of the Design Review application for Deck/Guard Rails to the Plan Committee for Matt LaLonde at 9890 Water Street, all ayes and the motion carried. 9. Pine Grove Resort – 10080 Water St. – Design Review – Fence Bristol presented a request from Pine Grove Resort for a fence along the waterside seawall area adjacent to the gazebo and patio deck. The original proposal for a 4-foot black metal fence had been revised to a 42-inch see-through metal fence in a bronze or walnut brown color, following the Village guidance that see-through fences are limited to 42 inches in height under the village ordinance. The committee expressed significant skepticism about the proposal. No representative from Pine Grove Resort was present to explain the purpose or need for the fence. Members questioned why the fence was necessary, noting that the existing stone seawall and surrounding area had not historically required fencing and that no incidents were known to have occurred there. Pentler questioned the basis for the request and suggested that if any fencing were to be approved, natural cedar or a split-rail wood fence would be more appropriate to the area's character. Russell echoed Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 4 of 4 this sentiment and stated she would like to understand the need before rendering judgment, expressing a preference for a natural stone or cedar solution if fencing was truly required. Schreck stated that even the bronze/brown metal, while an improvement over black, remained too close to black in his view and that he could not support the proposal as presented. Thorp noted that the committee wished to avoid setting a precedent for metal fencing along the waterfront. He referenced photographs taken during a recent walk-through of the protected waterfront district, noting that split-rail fencing appears in the southern portion of the Village, including on committee member properties, and that the existing Pine Grove stone wall still contains pipe anchors that once held a simple pipe railing—suggesting a more modest solution would be appropriate. Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to recommended approval of the Design Review application for the Fence to the Plan Committee, Schreck nay, Russell nay, Thorp nay, Pentler nay, and the motion failed with no members voting in favor. 10. New Business for the Next Meeting/Next Meeting Date: No new business was identified for the next meeting. The next meeting date is Tuesday, May 26th, 2026. 11. Adjournment Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to adjourn the Historic Preservation Committee Meeting at 6:50 PM, all ayes, and the motion carried. Recorded by, Andrea Collak- Clerk/Treasurer Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail:bbristol@ephraim.wi.gov Gebhart Conditional Use – Building Replacement in Protected Waterfront (PW) District John & Victoria Cultra - 9887 Water Street Tuesday – May 26, 2026, 7:00 p.m. Ephraim Village Hall – 9996 Water St. NOTE: THIS MEETING OF WILL BE SIMULTANEOUSLY HELD VIA TELECONFERENCING. STAFF, COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC ARE WELCOME TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MANNER. TELECONFERENCING WILL BE AVAILABLE BY COMPUTER, PHONE, TABLET, OR DIAL IN. CONNECTION INFORMATION BELOW: At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Ephraim Plan Committee on Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 7:00 p.m, the committee will consider a conditional use request from John & Victoria Cultra to allow the razing and replacement/construction of a new single family residence on the property located at 9887 Water Street. The zoning ordinance affords such applications this opportunity to be considered by conditional use, subject to the design criteria of the PW Building Replacement ordinance language. Notice is being sent to all Ephraim property owners and neighboring municipalities within 300’. Comments may be made in person at the meeting or in writing to be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 26 , 2026 . Written comments via email at bbristol@ephraim.wi.gov will also be accepted. All written comments must include name and address of commenting residents. Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/899827717 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 899-827-717 United States: +1 (872) 240-3311 Date: 5 /14/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website www.ephraim-wisconsin.com X Emailed to WDOR Radio X Emailed to Peninsula Pulse VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 S:\EPHRAIM\Office Forms\Zoning\Forms\Building\BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.doc 1 P lease Print 1. Owner/Property Tax Parcel. No. __________-___________-_____________ Owner_____________________________________________ Mailing Address _____________________________________ City _________________________ State ___________________________________________ Zip __________________________ Phone(s) ______________________________________ Email__________________________________ Location of Project ______________________________ Nearest Cross Street _____________________ Property Use: ______________________________________________________________________ Zoning Area: ______________________ Historic District? Yes No C ontractor/Contact: ____________________________Address__________________________________ Phone(s) ____________________________________ Cell Phone (______) _______________________ 2. Type of Improvement ___ New Building A ccessory Structures ___ Addition ___ Garage ___ Exterior Alteration ___ Storage Building ___ Foundation Work Only ___ Repair/Replacement ___ Other ___________________ ___Other__________________ 3. Describe Proposed Construction: __________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Cost Total cost of improvements as applied for in permit: $________________ Structural Improvement Cost (if new building or addition, entire amount of structure; if alteration, renovation or repair, structural portions only): $________________ In clude with Application: Certified Survey Building plans, including all elevations, floor plans (if commercial, State-approved plans must be given to the office prior to obtaining your permit) Site plan showing lot dimensions, setbacks from all lot lines for structures For commercial structures, parking plans Parking plan for construction vehicles during construction phase Permit Fee/Impact Fee Land Disturbance Application Drainage Plan Landscape Plan VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM BUILDING /ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1 of 2 Application Date ______________ S:\EPHRAIM\Office Forms\Zoning\Forms\Building\BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.doc 2 Dimensions: Number of Stories: ____________ Height at Peak: _______________________ Roof Pitch(es): _____________________ Total Footprint, Exterior: _______________ To tal Square Footage, All Floors Exterior: ________________ Total Square Footage, Parking/Drives/Walkways: ______________________________ Type: Wood Frame Structural Steel Reinforced Concrete Other___________________ P rincipal Heating: ___ Propane ___ Oil ___ Electric ___ Other (Explain)_____________________________________________ Plant Manager Signature__________________________Date__________ Sewage Disposal: Current: Proposed : None Current System Continued Demolition/Moving ? Sewered Connect to Available Sewer Septic Extend Sewer to Property Mound/In-Ground On-Site System Other ___________________ Type: ____________________________________________ (copy of permit to be on file with Village) Year Installed: ____________ If On-Site System, Year Last Pumped/Inspected: _________ For sewage disposal planning, your contact is the Ephraim Treatment Plant Manager, 920/854-4991. Please contact him as soon as possible to allow proper planning and discussion of any necessary sewer connection permits or fees involved. Fire Chief Signature _________________________Date____________ Fire Department: Sprinklers needed? /box3 Yes /box3 No Driveway width/tree clearance (width/height): _______________________ Clearance around structures for truck access: ________________________ Fire # Assigned __________ Fire Department requires driveways at least 12’ wide and clearance 12’ high; Fire Chief may be in contact with you during construction to check truck access and, if commercial structure, any sprinklering, water sources, or other safety considerations Application and materials must be in the Village offices one week prior to Plan Committee meeting date t o allow for proper processing and notification of Committee members. When permits are issued, work must start within 6 months and be completed within one year. The owner of this property and the undersigned agree to conform to all applicable laws of the State of Wisconsin and the Village of Ephraim. Signature of Applicant___________________________ Print Name _____________________________ FO R OFFICE USE ONLY For New Buildings or Additions, Complete this Section Also: P ermit #_____________________________ Permit Fee: $_________________________________ Date Permit Issued ___________ Zoning Administrator Signature:_________________________________ Restrictions: _____________________________________________________________________________ 2 of 2 Applicant Design Checklist Village oi Ephraim Owners Name(s): Contractor(s): Project Location: The checklist below reflects the identified standards of design review for new construction in the Village of Ephraim. Under each sub-section please briefly describe the construction plans as they apply to each. The more detail the better. Some of these standards will surely be identified visually on the construction plans, but I do ask that you describe them here and provide any additional information, such as drawings and/or plans, that will help streamline this process. The italicized sentences reflect characteristics deemed compatible with the visual character of Ephraim, these and additional standards can be found in chapter 17 .15(13) of our village zoning ordinance. 1. Building Design: Traditional Architecture, simple rectangular forms, gable roofs, frame construction. 2. Site Planning/Landscaping: Presen,ing existing vegetation and topography. 3. Building Color: White has been the distinctive historic color ... greens, browns, grays, and other earth tones are acceptable. 4. Materials: Wood and stone recommended. Materials metallic in appearance are out of the character of the village. s. Architectural Details: Building details should be simple and without Ji-ills_. 6. Utility Service Wiring (location): To be shown on plot plan. 7. Roof Pitch/Rooi Color: . _ . Pitches less than 3:· 12 CJrJdldr nzo,·e thail 2: 12 ~re su,bject to further de~ign revie"!',. . ' . . ,. .., · 8. Additional Features: Owner/Agent Signature, 1 City: State: Email: 2 3 4 5 Village of Ephraim Historic District Design Review Checklist THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETELY FILLED OUT TO BE CONSIDERED BY HPC AND/OR THE PLAN COMMITTEE. This checklist reflects the identified standards of design review for new construction in the Village of Ephraim. Under each subsection, please briefly describe the construction plans as they apply to each. The more detail, the better. Some of these standards will be identified visually on the construction plans, but we do ask that you describe them herein and provide any additional information, such as drawings and/or plans, that will help streamline the process. The standards can be found in §17.15(13) (Design Review), §17.26(11) (Historic District), and §17.20 (Protected Waterfront). Material and color samples must be provided as well as photos of the existing structure for evaluation by the Historic Preservation Committee for referral to the Plan Committee. OWNER INFORMATION: * Please provide a mailing address where you can receive mail. Owner Name: Owner Street Address : Zip: PROPERTY INFORMATION: Property Address (Please list all applicable fire numbers): Phone #1: Phone #2: ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS Please describe the architectural details including such items as window and door shapes. Ordinance narrative: Architectural details should reflect the traditional architecture of the Village which is known for its simple rectangular building forms, gable & hip roofs, and frame construction. Simplicity is the keyword. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) STRUCTURE FORM / BUILDING DESIGN Please describe the architecture of the building/ building design. Ordinance narrative: Ephraim is known for its traditional architecture, simple rectangular forms, gable and hip roofs, and frame construction. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) SITE & DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Please describe the site plan. Ordinance narrative: Please refer to §17.15 and the table of standards. Ensure that the layout adheres to zoning setbacks and zoning code. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) 6 Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: 7 COLORS/MATERIALS Building(s): Material: Please describe the color and materials for the following characteristics of the project design. Ordinance narrative: White is the distinctive historic color of the Village. Wood and natural stone are recommended. Unfinished or galvanized metal siding or roofing is discouraged. To achieve unity, there are distinguishing colors that are appropriate and compatible for the Historic District, which include white, naturally weathered wood, or natural wood. Fluorescent and bright colors are prohibited. Wrought iron is not an acceptable material in the Historic District. Structure(s): Material: Trim: Material: Siding: (Please note vertical or horizontal) Material: Roof: Material: Window: Mate rial: Sash: Material: Window Frames: Material: Chimney: Material: Shutters: Material: Door Frames: Material: Doors: Material: Porch Trim: Material: Fences: Material: Gates: Material: Driveway: Material: Handrails: Material: Guardrails: Material: Other Architectural/ Ornamental Features (describe and detail color and materials): Color(s): Material(s): Sidewalk: Material: Patio/Deck: Material: UTILITY WIRING (Location) Please describe and show all utility service wiring on the plot plan. Ordinance narrative : Utility service wiring should be brought to a structure underground, if at all possible. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) 8 9 10 11 12 13 ADDITIONAL FEATURES SIZE AND LAYOUT OF STRUCTURE Please explain project plans for square footage and floor area, as well as plans for variations in material or lines to create diversity. Ordinance narrative : Any structure in any district that is proposed, by way of initial construction or successive additions, to have in excess of 5,000 square feet in floor area or 50,000 cubic feet in bulk requires special attention to avoid overbuilding of a site or overpowering the environs where prevailing structural sizes are smaller. No single building face of 50 feet or more in length shall be uninterrupted. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK(s), & PATIO (OR DECK) Please describe and provide plans for driveways, sidewalks, patios, and decks. Ordinance narrative : Native flagstone is an excellent substitute for concrete and asphalt in pedestrian areas. Where paving is used, it shall be kept to a minimum and buffered with landscaping when possible. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) LANDSCAPING PLANS / FENCES Please describe and provide the landscaping plans, noting details such as hardscape and softscape. Ordinance narrative : Plantings rather than large expanses of grass lawn are to be encouraged, and live native plants should be used. Recognizing that the open shoreline is one of Ephraim’s most distinctive features, the intent of this ordinance is to provide for as much open viewing space along our shoreline as possible in the PW district. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) CHIMNEY Please describe in detail the chimney, along with all venting and exhaust flues, along with their height. Ordinance narrative: In the Protected Waterfront District, nothing can penetrate above 25 feet in height (including all venting and exhaust flues), with the roof line not exceeding 23 feet. In all other districts, chimneys are allowed up to a maximum of 35 feet from grade. ROOF PITCH Please describe the roof design. Ordinance narrative : Pitches less than 3/12 and/or 12/12 are subject to further design review. In the Historic District, tar and gravel roofs are not compatible. Unfinished or galvanized metal siding or roofing is highly discouraged in all zoning districts, but a metal roof requires a conditional use in the Historic District. In the Protected Waterfront District, primary roof pitches less than 6/12 or more than 12/12 are prohibited. Additionally, in the PW, up to 50% of the total roof pitch can be made up of dormers that may be less than 6/12 but in no case may they be less than 3/12. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) 14 Date: 15 SIGNATURE ADDITIONAL SPACE Complete Application Color and Material Samples Provided □Yes □No Existing Structure Photos Provided □Yes □No Internal Use Only Date Received: Signature of Applicant: 1860 Mid Valley Drive | De Pere, WI 54115 P 920.347.5830 F 920.347.5861 Drew Willmann DeLeers Construction, Inc. 1860 Mid Valley Dr De Pere, WI 54115 Village of Ephraim 9996 Water St S Ephraim, WI 54211 04/23/2026 RE: Parking Mitigation Plan – 9887 Water St. To the Members of the Village, I am writing to outline our parking management plan for the upcoming construction project located at 9887 Water Street. We recognize that parking availability in the village is a shared resource, and our goal is to execute this project with minimal disruption to residents, local businesses, and visitors. Due to the limited parking footprint on the project site itself, we have developed a two-phase strategy to manage our team’s vehicles throughout the year: Offseason Strategy (Typically October – May) During the offseason months, when visitor traffic to the area is at its lowest, we intend to utilize street parking and the public beach parking area for our crew and subcontractor vehicles. We believe this is the most efficient use of available space while keeping village streets clear for local traffic and snow removal operations. Summer Season Strategy (Typically June – September) We understand the importance of maintaining accessible parking for tourists and residents during the busy summer months. To alleviate pressure on the village’s infrastructure, we will implement the following: • Vehicle Reduction: We will limit the number of vehicles permitted to travel directly to the project site. Crews will be encouraged to carpool from off-site locations to reduce the overall "footprint" of the project. • Street Parking Compliance: Any necessary overflow parking will utilize first-come, first-served street parking. Our teams will be instructed to park responsibly, ensuring they do not block driveways, hydrants, or impede the flow of traffic or pedestrians. Our team is committed to being a respectful neighbor during this process. We will maintain open lines of communication with the Village and are prepared to adjust our logistics should any specific concerns arise. Thank you. Sincerely, Drew Willmann Pre-Construction Associate 920.615.8220 UP DN DN DN DN FOYER SUN PORCH UNCONDITIONED GATHERING ROOM KITCHENDINING COVERED ENTRY GARAGE UNCONDITIONED 4' - 0" 15' - 0" 24' - 0" 2' - 0" 45' - 0" 8' - 2"12' - 6" 20' - 8" 3' - 6"15' - 6"4' - 5"7' - 8"4' - 11" 36' - 0" 7' - 6" 9' - 6" 13' - 0" 30' - 0" 11' - 10" 3' - 6" 15' - 4" 15' - 0" 2' - 0"15' - 6" 17' - 6" 3' - 11" 8' - 8" 3' - 11" 16' - 6" 9' - 5 1/2" 15' - 7" 4' - 8" 8' - 7" 5' - 0 1/2" 14' - 7" 12' - 6 1/2" 12' - 6 1/2" 12' - 7" 5' - 2 1/2" 9' - 0 1/2" 7' - 3" 12' - 0 1/2" 14' - 6 1/2" 23' - 1" 16' - 6 1/2" MASTER BEDROOM EAST BEDROOMWEST BEDROOM 4' - 0" 24' - 0" 2' - 0" 30' - 0" 17' - 0" 15' - 6" 32' - 6" 4' - 0" 26' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0"12' - 6" 32' - 6" 12' - 4 3/4"12' - 4 3/4" 10' - 0 1/2" 10' - 0 1/2" 5' - 3 1/2"8' - 11" 8' - 11" 5' - 3 1/2" 3' - 6 1/2" 19' - 1" 14' - 1 1/2" 3' - 2" 12' - 2 1/2" 5' - 2 1/4" 7' - 3 1/2" 5' - 10" 4' - 11 3/4" 12' - 1" 12' - 0 1/2" 3' - 2" 8' - 8" 6' - 8" 3' - 1" EXISTING/NEW FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS 1,042 SQ.FT. 1,040 SQ.FT. 187 SQ.FT. 191 SQ.FT. 363 SQ.FT. EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF CONDITIONED SPACE: NEW FOOTPRINT OF CONDITIONED SPACE: NEW FOOTPRINT OF UNCONDITIONED SUN PORCH: EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF UNCONDITIONED SUN PORCH: FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING UNCONDITIONED GARAGE: 269 SQ.FT.FOOTPRINT OF NEW UNCONDITIONED GARAGE: TOTAL REDUCED UNCONDITIONED PORCH FOOTPRINT = TOTAL REDUCED CONDITIONED SPACE FOOTPRINT = TOTAL REDUCED GARAGE FOOTPRINT = 2 SQ.FT. 4 SQ.FT. 94 SQ.FT. - - - 94 SQ.FT. 4 SQ.FT. 2 SQ.FT. + TOTAL PROJECT FOOTPRINT REDUCTION = 100 SQ.FT. NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE 883 SQ.FT.NEW SECOND FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: 1,040 SQ.FT.NEW FIRST FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: 187 SQ.FT.NEW UNCONDITIONED SUN PORCH: NEW UNCONDITIONED GARAGE: 269 SQ.FT. + + 1,923 SQ.FT.TOTAL CONDITIONED SPACE = TOTAL UNCONDITIONED SPACE = 456 SQ.FT. DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2021/Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: A1.1 XX.XX.XX ... Spencer Crane David Greene Drew Willman ... ... ... ... ... ... FLOOR PLANS 9887 Water Street, Ephraim, WI 54211 Cultra 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN NORTH CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12" 7" / 12" 9 1/2" / 12" 4" / 12" 4" / 12" 7" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12" 4" / 12" 4" / 12" 7" / 12" 7" / 12" 7" / 12" 7" / 12" 4" / 12" 7" / 12" 4" / 12" 9" / 12" 9" / 12" 4" / 12" 4" / 12" ROOF SQUARE FOOTAGE 557 SQ.FT. SECONDARY ROOFS (DORMER & SADDLE ROOFS UNDER 6/12): 1,802 SQ.FT. PRIMARY ROOFS (ROOF PITCHES OVER 6/12): (76.5% ) (23.5%) DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2025/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: A1.2 XX.XX.XX 9887 Water Street, Ephraim, WI 54211 Cultra ... Spencer Crane David Greene Drew Willman ... ... ... ... ... ... ROOF PLAN CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 1 ROOF PLAN NORTH DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2025/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: A2.1 XX.XX.XX 9887 Water Street, Ephraim, WI 54211 Cultra ... Spencer Crane David Greene Drew Willman ... ... ... ... ... ... EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 1 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 2 NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 3 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 4 WEST ELEVATION 584' - 0" 586' - 0" 585' - 0" 586' - 0" 585' - 0" 585' - 0" 585' - 0" 586' - 0" 584' - 0" 585' - 0" 584' - 0" 585' - 0" 586' - 0" 584' - 0" 584' - 0" 585' - 0" 586' - 0" 586' - 0" 586' - 0" 586' - 0" 585' - 0" 584' - 0" 38.9' FROM CENTERLINE 40' SETBACK FROM BULKHEAD LINE 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK S.T.H. "42" (WATER ST.) BULKHEAD LINE APPROXIM ATE ORDINARY HIGH W ATER M ARK EXISTING WELLEXISTING CONCRETE CROWN OF HWY. 42 @ ELEV. 58780'± N 24°51'00" W 94.45'104'± N 62°22'04" E 82.61' S 21°47'02" E29.32' S 20°03'21" E57.48' PROPOSED BURIED PROPANE TANK 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 40' - 0" 9' - 1" 45' - 9" 42' - 3" 39' - 1" 15' - 10" 27' - 6" 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 9' - 1" 15' - 0" 45' - 3" 25' - 2" NEW HOME NEW SUN PORCH NEW GARAGE NEW PERMEABLE PAVER DRIVE NEW PERMEABLE PAVER WALKWAY NEW PERMEABLE PAVER WALKWAY NEW PERMEABLE PAVER WALKWAY NEW PORCH NEW COVERED PORCH NEW COVERED PORCH EAGLE HARBOR EXISTING FOOTPRINT BUILDABLE AREA SEWER LINE GAS LINE ELECTRICAL LINE GAS METER ELECTRICAL SERVICE SILT FENCESILT FENCE SILT FENCE 38.9' FROM CENTERLINE 40' SETBACK FROM BULKHEAD LINE 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK S.T.H. "42" (WATER ST.) EAGLE HARBOR BULKHEAD LINE APPROXIM ATE ORDINARY HIGH W ATER M ARK EXISTING WELLEXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE STOOP EXISTING HOME EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVE EXISTING STONE WALKWAY EXISTING STONE WALKWAY EXISTING STONE WALKWAY EXISTING STONE PATIO CROWN OF HWY. 42 @ ELEV. 58780'± N 24°51'00" W 94.45'104'± N 62°22'04" E 82.61' S 21°47'02" E29.32' S 20°03'21" E57.48' 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK EXISTING SUN PORCH EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING FOOTPRINT BUILDABLE AREA 38.9' FROM CENTERLINE 40' SETBACK FROM BULKHEAD LINE 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK S.T.H. "42" (WATER ST.) EAGLE HARBOR BULKHEAD LINE APPROXIM ATE ORDINARY HIGH W ATER M ARK EXISTING WELLEXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE STOOP EXISTING HOME EXISTING STONE WALKWAY EXISTING STONE WALKWAY EXISTING STONE WALKWAY EXISTING STONE PATIO CROWN OF HWY. 42 @ ELEV. 58780'± N 24°51'00" W 94.45'104'± N 62°22'04" E 82.61' S 21°47'02" E29.32' S 20°03'21" E57.48' 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK EXISTING SUN PORCH EXISTING GARAGE 38.9' FROM CENTERLINE 40' SETBACK FROM BULKHEAD LINE 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK 15' SIDEYARD SETBACK S.T.H. "42" (WATER ST.) BULKHEAD LINE APPROXIM ATE ORDINARY HIGH W ATER M ARK EXISTING WELLEXISTING CONCRETE CROWN OF HWY. 42 @ ELEV. 58780'± N 24°51'00" W 94.45'104'± N 62°22'04" E 82.61' S 21°47'02" E29.32' S 20°03'21" E57.48' NEW HOME NEW SUN PORCH NEW GARAGE NEW PERMEABLE PAVER DRIVE NEW PERMEABLE PAVER WALKWAY NEW PERMEABLE PAVER WALKWAY NEW PERMEABLE PAVER WALKWAY NEW PORCH NEW COVERED PORCH NEW COVERED PORCH EXISTING FOOTPRINT BUILDABLE AREA SILT FENCESILT FENCE SILT FENCE EXISTING CONDITIONED HOME FOOTPRINT: EXISTING STONE WALKWAYS/PATIOS: EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACES: EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVE: NEW CONDITIONED HOME FOOTPRINT: NEW PORCHES: EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACES: PROPOSED PERMEABLE PAVER WALKWAYS/DRIVE: TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: PROPERTY SQUARE FOOTAGE: EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PERCENTAGE: 1,042 SQ.FT. 682 SQ.FT. 815 SQ.FT. 255 SQ.FT. 3,348 SQ.FT. 7,401 SQ.FT. 45.2% + ÷ TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: PROPERTY SQUARE FOOTAGE: IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PERCENTAGE: 1,040 SQ.FT. 238 SQ.FT. 520 SQ.FT. 665 SQ.FT. (2,919 SQ.FT. - 665 SQ.FT.(PERMEABLE)) 2,254 SQ.FT. 7,401 SQ.FT. 30.5% + ÷ EXISTING HOME IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALC. NEW HOME IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALC. EXISTING UNCONDITIONED SUN PORCH FOOTPRINT: 191 SQ.FT. EXISTING UNCONDITIONED GARAGE FOOTPRINT: 363 SQ.FT. NEW UNCONDITIONED SUN PORCH: 187 SQ.FT. NEW UNCONDITIONED GARAGE: 269 SQ.FT. EXISTING/NEW FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS 1,042 SQ.FT. 1,040 SQ.FT. 187 SQ.FT. 191 SQ.FT. 363 SQ.FT. EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF CONDITIONED SPACE: NEW FOOTPRINT OF CONDITIONED SPACE: NEW FOOTPRINT OF UNCONDITIONED SUN PORCH: EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF UNCONDITIONED SUN PORCH: FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING UNCONDITIONED GARAGE: 269 SQ.FT.FOOTPRINT OF NEW UNCONDITIONED GARAGE: TOTAL REDUCED UNCONDITIONED PORCH FOOTPRINT = TOTAL REDUCED CONDITIONED SPACE FOOTPRINT = TOTAL REDUCED GARAGE FOOTPRINT = 2 SQ.FT. 4 SQ.FT. 94 SQ.FT. - - - 94 SQ.FT. 4 SQ.FT. 2 SQ.FT. + TOTAL PROJECT FOOTPRINT REDUCTION = 100 SQ.FT. CROWN OF HWY. 42 587' - 0" 21' - 11 1/8" 24' - 11 1/8" CENTERLINE DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2025/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: C1.1 XX.XX.XX 9887 Water Street, Ephraim, WI 54211 Cultra ... Spencer Crane David Greene Drew Willman ... ... ... ... ... ... SITE PLAN CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 1" = 10'-0"C1.1 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1" = 10'-0"C1.1 2 EXISTING SITE PLAN 1" = 10'-0"C1.1 3 EXISTING/PROPOSED SITE PLAN OVERLAY NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"C1.1 4 ELEVATION DIAGRAM Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail:bbristol@ephraim.wi.gov Gebhart Conditional Use – Building Modification in Protected Waterfront (PW) District Gregory Goltermann - 9917 Water Street Tuesday – May 26, 2026, 7:00 p.m. Ephraim Village Hall – 9996 Water St. NOTE: THIS MEETING OF WILL BE SIMULTANEOUSLY HELD VIA TELECONFERENCING. STAFF, COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC ARE WELCOME TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MANNER. TELECONFERENCING WILL BE AVAILABLE BY COMPUTER, PHONE, TABLET, OR DIAL IN. CONNECTION INFORMATION BELOW: At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Ephraim Plan Committee on Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 7:00 p.m, the committee will consider a conditional use request from Gregory Goltermann to allow a second floor addition/modification on the existing single family residence on the property located at 9917 Water Street. The zoning ordinance affords such applications this opportunity to be considered by conditional use, subject to the design criteria of the PW Building Replacement ordinance language. Notice is being sent to all Ephraim property owners and neighboring municipalities within 300’. Comments may be made in person at the meeting or in writing to be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 26 , 2026 . Written comments via email at bbristol@ephraim.wi.gov will also be accepted. All written comments must include name and address of commenting residents. Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/899827717 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 899-827-717 United States: +1 (872) 240-3311 Date: 5 /14/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website www.ephraim-wisconsin.com X Emailed to WDOR Radio X Emailed to Peninsula Pulse VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 May 7, 2026 Village of Ephraim 9097 Spruce Street, Ephraim, WI 54211 Re: Building Permit - 9917 Highway 42, Goltermann Residence | PW District | Second- Story Addition Dear Committee Members, Project Overview The property at 9917 Highway 42 is an existing single- family residence located in the Protected Waterfront (PW) District. The proposal is to add a second story to the existing cottage structure. T he architect and structural engineer determined that the existing structure can support a vertical addition with appropriate internal reinforcement (addition of a steel frame), allowing the project to retain the original exterior character and footprint. Design Retain the existing structure and overbuild vertically, which offers the following advantages: • Covered entry addition: The revised design includes a 5- foot covered entry addition at ground level. This element serves a specific design purpose: By adding the covered entry, the second floor reads visually as a dormer rather than a full second story, maintaining the 1.5 -story character. The covered entry does not encroach further toward any setback line than any other portion of the existing structure, consistent with §17.20(5)(a)(1). The footprint does not change. • No encroachment on existing setbacks: The second floor will be set in slightly from the lower -level footprint, maintaining or improving upon the existing grandfathered setbacks per §17.20(5)(a)(1). • Modest increase in finished area: Total square footage increases from approximately 1,150 sq. ft. to approximately 1,400 sq. ft., adding roughly 250 sq. ft. of finished living space on the second floor. • Height compliant with §17.20(5)(b)(3): Overall building height is 22’ - 4 1/8” as measured from the crown grade of State Highway 42, which is within the 23- foot maximum height limit. Per the site survey prepared by Bay Surveying LLC (Brian J. Peot, R.L.S. S -2763, dated February 15, 2026, Job #26008), the crown grade of Highway 42 at this location is elevation 587.3’ . The chimney is projected at approximately 24’- 4 1/ 8” above the highway crown grade, which is within the allowance of up to 2 feet above the approved peak roof line per §17.20(5)(b)(4). • Roof pitch compliant with §17.20(5)(b)(5) and (6): The primary roof pitch is 12/12, which falls within the permitted range of 6/12 to 12/12. The new shed roofs are 3/12, which is permissible for secondary/dormer roof areas under §17.20(6), provided they do not exceed 50% of the total roof pitch square foot age. The 3/12 shed roof area constitutes approximately 47.2% of total roof area, which is within the 50% maximum and confirms compliance with this limit. The 3/12 pitch is also consistent with existing shed roof elements on the structure. • Materials and character compatible with the Historic District (§17.20(5)(b)(1)– (2)): Exterior materials will include natural Door County stone, log or log- facade accents, and siding, with white trim and grey tones. Any salvageable materials from the remodel will be reused where possible. The design intent is to minimize visual impact from the street and maintain the cottage character consistent with the Village Historic District. Construction Timeline Project start after Labor day 2026 - completion prior to May 2027 Please do not hesitate to contact the project architect, Marc Isaksen, at midarchitect@gmail.com or 920-559-7069 if any questions arise prior to the meeting. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully submitted, Greg Goltermann Owner, 9917 Highway 42, Ephraim, WI 314-853-3881 Enclosures: • Architectural drawings — Marc Isaksen Design, LLC (05/06/2026) • Floor plans: Second Floor Plan, Entry Elevation, Side Elevation, Water Elevation • Existing photos of the property • Building/Zoning Permit Application • Applicant Design Checklist • Conditional Use Permit Application • Village of Ephraim Historic District Design Review Checklist • Survey/Site Plans REV A1 SHEET NO. 05/06/2026 PROJECT NO. 26-9917 DATE DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: MWI MWI DATE DESCRIPTION BY MARC ISAKSEN DESIGN, L.L.C. 1009 EGG HARBOR RD, SUITE 114 STURGEON BAY, WISCONSIN 54235 EMAIL: midarchitect@gmail.com PHONE: 920-559-7069 FAX: 920-743-3813 GOLTERMANN RESIDENCE BUILDING REMODEL AND ADDITION 9917 HWY 42 EPHRAIM, WI SHEET SIZE: 24x36 MASTER BEDROOM BEDROOM 2 KING QUEEN SHELF SHELF BATH BATH 8' CEILING SLOPED CEILING IN SHOWER COVERED PORCH REPLACE DOOR WITH WINDOW KITCHEN BATH MECH CRAWLSPACE ACCESS CLOSET LIVING DINING FRIG DW SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SECOND FLOOR PLAN CLOSET DOWN UP STEP 8' CEILING SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ENTRY ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" WATER ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION DESK SIDING BUILDING INFORMATION: OVERALL HEIGHT - 22'-4 18" MAIN ROOF SLOPE - 12/12 SHED ROOFS - 3/12 EXISTING FOOTPRINT SQ.FT. - 815 EXISTING TOTAL SQ. FT. = 1,150 PROPOSED TOTAL SQ.FT. = 1,400 SCOPE OF WORK: 1. REMOVE EXISTING SECOND FLOOR AND ROOF. 2. INSTALL NEW STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAME INSIDE OF THE EXISTING LOG WALLS TO SUPPORT NEW SECOND FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR ROOF SYSTEM. 3. RELOCATE STAIRS 4. RELOCATE THE EXISTING KITCHEN INTO THE SPACE THAT IS CURRENTLY THE FIRST FLOOR BEDROOM. 5. INSTALL NEW FLOOR SYSTEM, SECOND FLOOR BEDROOMS AND ROOF STRUCTURE. NEW WALLS EXISTING WALLS ADDED COVERED PORCH SO THAT THE SECOND FLOOR BECOMES MORE OF A 1 1 2 STORY NEW STRUCTURAL POSTS - TYP. NEW STRUCTURAL POSTS - TYP. MATCH EXISTING SIDE OVERHANG CROWN OF HWY 42 - 587.3' FLAGSTONE CROWN OF HWY 42 - 587.3' EXISTING LOGS EXISTING LOGS EXISTING STONE EXISTING LOGS 8" SIDING 8" SIDING REPLACE EXISTING DOOR WITH A WINDOW. INFILL LOWER PORTION OF WALL WITH EXISTING LOGS THAT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE GABLE END. Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail:bbristol@ephraim.wi.gov Gebhart Conditional Use – Building Modification in Protected Waterfront (PW) District Leslie & Roy Harsch - 9931 Water Street Tuesday – May 26, 2026, 7:00 p.m. Ephraim Village Hall – 9996 Water St. NOTE: THIS MEETING OF WILL BE SIMULTANEOUSLY HELD VIA TELECONFERENCING. STAFF, COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC ARE WELCOME TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MANNER. TELECONFERENCING WILL BE AVAILABLE BY COMPUTER, PHONE, TABLET, OR DIAL IN. CONNECTION INFORMATION BELOW: At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Ephraim Plan Committee on Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 7:00 p.m, the committee will consider a conditional use request from Leslie and Roy Harsch to allow a first floor addition/modification on the existing single family residence on the property located at 9931 Water Street. As the PW ordinance does not permit projects resulting in increased footprint, the proposed footprint addition will be offset by the removal of equal square footage of existing footprint on the road side of the home. The zoning ordinance affords such applications this opportunity to be considered by conditional use, subject to the design criteria of the PW Building Replacement ordinance language. Notice is being sent to all Ephraim property owners and neighboring municipalities within 300’. Comments may be made in person at the meeting or in writing to be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 26 , 2026 . Written comments via email at bbristol@ephraim.wi.gov will also be accepted. All written comments must include name and address of commenting residents. Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/899827717 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 899-827-717 United States: +1 (872) 240-3311 Date: 5 /14/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website www.ephraim-wisconsin.com X Emailed to WDOR Radio X Emailed to Peninsula Pulse VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DRAINAGE PROJECT TO ADDRESS JOINT RUNOFF ISSUES As part of the proposed addition to our cottage at 9931 Water Steet we will utilize the combination of a thick concrete slab and thick foundation wall to assist in directing the runoff from our existing south roof and that of the proposed addition and the runoff from front roofs of Mr. Munns’ house past the southwest corner of the proposed addition. In addition, we propose to place a perforated plastic drainage pipe on top of a layer of gravel in the excavated area which will then be backfilled with gravel. This gravel filled trench and drainage pipe will extend from approximately 5 feet east of the original corner of the cottage and extend past the corner of the new addition. It will continue along a rock wall away from the addition through an open area south of a raised flower bed and continue approximately 5 feet into the existing drainage swale which straddles our property line. The location of the trench with the plastic drainage tube and gravel backfill is shown on Attachment 1. The trench will extend past the present jay shaped stone edging that separates the swale area from the raised flower bed and the existing lawn area. The cross section of the drainage trench with the drainage tube is shown in Attachment 2. The drainage swale is shown on Attachment 3. As shown on Attachment 1, the proposed addition with the thick concrete slab and extension of the foundation and the drainage tube placed on a gravel bed with gravel backfill will direct runoff past the cottage foundation to an area that is lower than the corner of the cottage foundation. With final grading and the existing flower bed on the north side of the drainage swale, any surface water will be directed away from the proposed addition and down the swale toward the bay. The existing drainage swale is lower in elevation and serves to collect any surface water or runoff from the proposed construction. The runoff would then filter naturally as it is pass through hostas, ferns and other plant roots in the swale. Diverted ground water from the drainage pipe and any diverted surface water will be absorbed into the ground and/or flow down through the swale toward the lake. The swale ends at the edge of the rock drainage system that was constructed when the command improvements were jointly build with Tom Munns as part of our joint shoreline protection project to provide protection from high lake levels. This rock drainage system drains through a backfilled rock and sand bed before entering the lake. Given the small area of the excavation needed for the 8 by 7 feet addition and its location adjacent to the swale, any erosion or runoff should be nonexistent given the existing the swale and relevant elevations. The disturbed soil consists of cedar litter mixed with dirt with limited plant growth. Once the construction is complete and the excavated area backfilled with gravel surrounding the drainage pipe on the southside along the property boundary and flower beds finalized on the northside of the excavation, the drainage swale will recover quickly from the installation of the drain tube and gravel backfill with existing plants expanding into small length of the disturbed area. This will allow for the roof drain water from the Munns property and the roof drainage from the south roof area of the cottage to be collected. diverted and drained in a manner that should not result in any flooding in our yard.