Village Board — Agenda packet

VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 NOTE: THIS MEETING WILL BE SIMULTANEOUSLY HELD VIA TELECONFERENCING. STAFF, COMMITTEE MEMBERS, AND THE PUBLIC ARE WELCOME TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MANNER. TELECONFERENCING WILL BE AVAILABLE BY COMPUTER, PHONE, TABLET, OR DIAL-IN. CONNECTION INFORMATION BELOW: 1. Call to Order: 2. Quorum: 3. Changes in Agenda: 4. Visitors’ Comments: 5. Approval of Previous Minutes: 6. President’s Comments: 7. Consent Agenda Items: 8. Public Hearing: a) Public Hearing regarding Ordinance 01-2026 an Ordinance amending the Village of Ephraim zoning code 17.20 (Protected Waterfront) 9. Administration: a) Presentation of 2025 Audit Report from CLA LLP b) Discussion regarding Phase 2- Airport Master Plan Study c) Discussion and Consideration regarding Ordinance 01-2026 an Ordinance amending the Village of Ephraim zoning code 17.20 (Protected Waterfront) d) Discussion and Consideration regarding intent to reinstate current PW Ordinance should a new PW Ordinance revision not be approved by the Village Board within 6 months. e) Discussion and Consideration regarding renewal – Class “B” Alcohol Beverage Retailers License: 1. A&M Enterprises of Door County Inc – dba Somerset Inn & Suites – 10401 Water Street f) Discussion and Consideration regarding renewal – Combination Class “B” and “Class C” Alcohol Beverage Retailers License: 1. Anatolia Cuisine DC LLC – dba Anatolia Cuisine DC – 9922 Water Street Unit 7 2. Chef’s Hat Café LLC – dba Chef’s Hat – 3063 Water Street 3. Klaud’s Kitchen Inc – dba Klaud’s Kitchen – 10420 Water Street 4. La Sirena LLC – dba La Sirena – 9996 Pioneer Lane 5. Prince of Pierogi LLC – dba Prince of Pierogi Restaurant – 9922 Water Street Unit 6 6. Summer Kitchen Inc - Summer Kitchen Restaurant – 10425 Water Street 7. Sunset Harbor Grill LLC – dba Sunset Harbor Grill – 10018 Water Street g) Discussion and Consideration regarding Temporary Class “B” Alcohol Beverage Retailers License: 1. Ephraim Business Council (EBC) – Fyr Bal Festival – June 20, 2026 2. Ephraim Fire & Rescue Association (EFRA) – Fyr Bal Festival – June 20, 2026 h) Update regarding North Path Project. i) Discussion and consideration regarding North path ribbon cutting j) Discussion regarding Administration building project planning, design and options k) Discussion and consideration regarding committee/committee appointments (see packet) l) Discussion and consideration regarding Non-Profit use of Village Hall and fees m) Discussion regarding planting of Liberty Tree n) Discussion and consideration regarding interviews for open maintenance position 10. Physical Facilities: a) Discussion and consideration regarding HVAC replacement at Village Hall b) Update regarding Village brush dump c) Discussion and consideration regarding Canada goose damage management plan d) Discussion and consideration regarding 2026 road paving projects utilizing DC Highway Department 11. CPC: a) Discussion and consideration regarding Emergency Operations Plan 12. Committee Minutes for review 13. New Business for Next Meeting: 14. The Village Board may entertain a motion and convene into closed session per §19.85(1)(c), considering employment, promotion, compensation or performance evaluation data of any public employee over which the governmental body has jurisdiction or exercises responsibility. For the purpose of discussing the building and grounds maintenance worker position. 15. Please take notice pursuant to §19.85(2) Wis. Stats, the Village Board may entertain a motion and reconvene in open session and may address the matters considered in closed session and all other matters on the agenda. 16. Adjournment: Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/562315093 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 562-315-093 United States: +1 (872) 240-3311 *Deviation from the listed order may occur*** Please note, that upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through appro priate aids and services. For additional information please contact Andrea Collak, Clerk Village of Ephraim, PO Box 138, Ephraim, W I 54211 Date: 5/11/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website: ephraim.wi.gov X Emailed to WDOR Radio/Peninsula Pulse VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM BOARD MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 12, 2026, 7:00 PM 9996 Water Street- Village Hall 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM VILLAGE BOARD MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2026 – 7:00 P.M. 9996 WATER STREET- EPHRAIM VILLAGE HALL Action Items: Mulliken moved, T. Nelson seconded to approve the minutes of March 10, 2026, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Mulliken moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve the consent agenda as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Mulliken moved, Meacham seconded to request that the Village Administrator work with the DOT for the Fyr Bal road closure as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Meacham moved, Mulliken seconded to approve the renewal of the Class “B” alcohol beverage retailer licenses for Hotel Ephraim LLC DBA Water Street Inn - 9944 Water Street and Ephraim Motel Inc., DBA Ephraim Motel - 10407 Highway 42, pending fire inspection, all ayes. Motion carried. Mulliken moved, Meacham seconded to approve the renewal combination– Class “B” and “Class C” Alcohol Beverage Retailers Licenses for Anatolia Cuisine LLC -9922 Water Street Unit 7, Prince of Pierogi LLC - 9922 Water Street Unit 6, Sunset Harbor Grill LLC - dba Sunset Harbor Grill- 10018 Water Street, Burren Enterprises LLC - dba Pearl Wine Cottage -3056 and 3058 Church Street, Larry George Krause dba Old Post Office Restaurant - 10040 Water Street, and SIP JF LLC- dba SIP- 10326 Water Street pending fire and health inspections, all ayes. Motion carried. T. Nelson moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve Resolution 01-2026 – 2025 Budget Amendment, all ayes. Motion carried. T. Nelson moved, Meacham seconded to set for public hearing on May 12, 2026, Chapter §17.20 of the Ephraim Code of Ordinances as it relates to the Protected Waterfront District, all ayes. Motion carried. Meacham moved, Hoyerman seconded to establish an agreement for annual fees with the Door County Pickleball Club with a first-year fee of three hundred dollars ($300) and five hundred dollars ($500) for each subsequent year for access to the westernmost tennis court, seven (7) days a week from 12:00 PM to 3:00 PM, all ayes with T. Nelson abstaining. Motion carried. Mulliken moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve the Wastewater Treatment Facility roof repair at a cost not to exceed four thousand six hundred dollars ($4,600), funded by the Wastewater Replacement Fund, all ayes. Motion carried. Mulliken moved, Meacham seconded to approve the Wastewater Treatment Facility Receiving Station roof repair at a cost not to exceed twenty-two thousand five hundred thirty dollars ($22,530), funded by the Wastewater Replacement Fund, all ayes. Motion carried. Mulliken moved, Hoyerman seconded to take no action on the McMahon engineering Proposal for Phase 2 of the Wastewater Project, all ayes. Motion carried. Meacham moved, T. Nelson seconded to adjourn at 9:20 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Present: Rick Hoyerman, Matt Meaham (online), Carly Mulliken, Tim Nelson, and Ken Nelson – President. Absent: None. Staff: Brent Bristol -Village Administrator, Justin MacDonald – Fire Chief/Maintenance Manager, Brad Rasmussen – Wastewater OIC, and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests in person: Cindy and Bruce Nelson, Grace and John Held, Marcia Ellis, Karen McMurtry, Andy 2 Bartelt, Kelsey Stone (EBC), Lane Methner (EBC), BD Thorp, and Scott and Julie Barnes. Guests Online: Kathy Pentler, Monique McClean, Tony Kappell (McMahon), “Angie”, Kerry Nelson, Paul Wilson, John Cox, and “caller 01”. 1. Call to Order: K. Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. 2. Quorum: A quorum was present for the meeting. 3. Changes to the agenda: There were no changes. 4. Visitors’ Comments: There were no Visitors’ Comments. 5. Approval of Previous Minutes: Mulliken moved, T. Nelson seconded to approve the minutes of March 10, 2026, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 6. President’s Comments: K. Nelson congratulated Tim Nelson and Matt Meacham on their recent re-election to the Village Board. He expressed his enthusiasm for working with them to benefit the Village. 7. Consent Agenda: Mulliken moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve the consent agenda as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 8. Administration: a. Presentation from Maintenance Manager Justin MacDonald relating to winter storm Elsa: K. Nelson thanked Justin MacDonald, Matt Bader, and Brad Rasmussen for their efforts, noting they operated the Village's three (3) trucks nearly non-stop for five (5) days, sometimes sleeping at the public works building during winter storm Elsa. MacDonald remarked on the challenges of the winter storm, underscoring the indispensable help from Rasmusson and Bader. Their roles were vital when the snowfall began on Thursday with nine inches (9”). Saturday's preparations included fueling trucks, preparing vehicles, and preparing the emergency generators. By early Sunday morning, operations began with two (2) trucks and a skid steer. Despite severe winds on Monday, which caused near-whiteout conditions and power outages, the team displayed teamwork by repeatedly getting unstuck and assisting each other. The office sustained closures Monday and Tuesday, described by MacDonald as "unheard of in village operations." With roads becoming impassable, efforts shifted to aiding the Highway and Sheriff's Departments. Tuesday saw improvements in road accessibility, further supported by Piel’s 1980 Oshkosh truck, crucial for opening up intersections that Village equipment was not capable of handling. MacDonald praised the cooperation of residents who heeded the calls not to travel, whose compliance eased efforts, reporting only three (3) welfare checks required. Closing with photos of snow drifts and operations, he expressed profound gratitude to his crew and recognized their sacrifices, highlighting how photo evidence documented their feats, with one (1) image even making national news. b. Presentation of the Annual Fire Report: MacDonald reviewed the 2025 Annual Fire Department Report. He covered 2025 staffing, training, equipment, fire inspections, equipment maintenance, station maintenance, annual testing, and community engagement. He went on to review call data, trends, and Fire/EMS responses in 2025. K. Nelson thanked MacDonald and asked him to pass along the board's appreciation to all volunteers, noting the impressive statistics. c. Update regarding the Door County Emergency Tower Project Draft Intergovernmental Agreement and Easement: Bristol noted he had received a response from the County regarding the Village’s concerns about the Easement and Maintenance Operations Agreements, which had been forwarded to the Board that day. Since neither they nor their attorney had adequate time to review the response, Bristol 3 suggested forwarding it to the Village attorney for review. He noted that the County had updated the site plan to move the tower to the far southeast corner of the village property on German Road, as previously requested. Further testing and borings would be needed at some point. d. Discussion and consideration regarding EBC request for Fyr Bal road closure: Lane Methner from the Ephraim Business Council requested the road closure for Fyr Bal on Saturday, June 20th, from 7:30 AM to 10:30 PM. This represented the same closure used successfully for many years, with this being her ninth Fyr Bal coordination. The closure would extend from Moravia Street (Marina area) on the south to Cedar Street to the north, with remote parking at the Ephraim Gibraltar Airport and old Shopko parking lot, and buses providing transportation from 8:30 AM to 10:30 PM. The request aimed to provide a safe environment for attendees, with coordination through Door County Emergency Services and MacDonald to ensure all safety measures were in place. Bristol noted this was approval to apply for the closure, as it remained subject to WI DOT approval for the state highway closure, though the WI DOT had been cooperative historically. Mulliken moved, Meacham seconded to request that the Village Administrator work with the DOT for the Fyr Bal road closure as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. e. Discussion and consideration regarding renewal – Class “B” Alcohol Beverage Retailers License: 1. Hotel Ephraim LLC – dba Water Street Inn – 9944 Water Street: 2. Ephraim Motel Inc. – dba Ephraim Motel – 10407 HWY 42: Meacham moved, Mulliken seconded to approve the renewal of the Class “B” alcohol beverage retailer licenses for Hotel Ephraim LLC DBA Water Street Inn - 9944 Water Street and Ephraim Motel Inc, DBA Ephraim Motel - 10407 Highway 42, pending fire inspection, all ayes. Motion carried. f. Discussion and consideration regarding renewal – Class “B” and “Class C” Alcohol Beverage Retailers License: 1. Anatolia Cuisine DC LLC – dba Anatolia Cuisine DC -9922 Water Street Unit 7 2. Prince of Pierogi LLC – dba Prince of Pierogi Restaurant – 9922 Water Street Unit 6 3. Sunset Harbor Grill LLC – dba Sunset Harbor Grill – 10018 Water Street 4. Burren Enterprises LLC – dba Pearl Wine Cottage – 3056 & 3058 Church Street 5. Larry George Krause – dba Old Post Office Restaurant – 10040 Water Street 6. Sip JF LLC – dba Sip- 10326 Water Street Mulliken moved, Meacham seconded to approve the renewal combination– Class “B” and “Class C” Alcohol Beverage Retailers Licenses for Anatolia Cuisine LLC -9922 Water Street Unit 7, Prince of Pierogi LLC - 9922 Water Street Unit 6, Sunset Harbor Grill LLC - dba Sunset Harbor Grill- 10018 Water Street, Burren Enterprises LLC - dba Pearl Wine Cottage -3056 and 3058 Church Street, Larry George Krause dba Old Post Office Restaurant - 10040 Water Street, and SIP JF LLC- dba SIP- 10326 Water Street pending fire and health inspections, all ayes. Motion carried. g. Discussion and consideration regarding Resolution 01-2026 – 2025 Budget Amendment: Bristol explained this was an annual resolution provided by Collak around audit time to close out the books by moving money around for the use of room tax, PRAT, and Capital Reserve funds that are set aside for specific purposes but not necessarily budgeted for use within a given year. T. Nelson moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve Resolution 01-2026 – 2025 Budget Amendment, all ayes. Motion carried. h. Update regarding the North Path Project: K. Nelson reported that construction was planned to start on the 21st of the month. A contractor had 4 cut down all stumps and still needed to grind them before construction could begin. Bristol noted that, as a land-disturbing activity, they hoped everything would be adequately drained without creating muddy conditions. The anticipated completion remained before Memorial Day weekend, fingers crossed. Bristol added that he would be communicating with affected property owners about project start, timing of disruptions, driveway access, and when work impacting individuals would occur. K. Nelson expressed appreciation for all landowners who engaged with easements to the Village for the path construction. i. Update regarding Moravia Point Landscaping Project: Bristol acknowledged that the winter storm caused delays, but noted that progress continued. They met with Bob Bultman from Door County Prairie Company for a proposal focusing on native prairie grass and flower plantings. Bultman emphasized patience, recommending against stump removal due to erosion risks. Prairie plants establish roots before flowering, with initial growth later replaced by perennials. Oats were suggested for quick greening over stumps. Prescriptive burning would control invasives and aid growth. The Physical Facilities Committee supported further investigation. T. Nelson sought clarity regarding bushes and trees in previous iterations of the plan. After review, it was noted that the motion giving Bristol direction from the March Board meeting addressed grass and seeds only, allowing for future additions. Bristol sought to confirm board expectations on the plan’s scope and whether work could start soon. K. Nelson directed Bristol to proceed with the plan, prioritizing greenery for Fyr Bal, without delaying progress. Some areas could green this year, though full seeding would likely be in the fall. Mulliken supported the plan's consistency, suggesting signage for education and protection during seeding, as seen in Madison with controlled burn sites. j. Discussion and consideration regarding setting PW ordinance amendment for public hearing: Nelson provided extensive background on the Protected Waterfront District Ordinance §17.20, which was modified in September 2024 to allow limited expansion possibilities for properties between Highway 42 and the water from Good Eggs to the Anderson Warehouse. The 2024 modifications to the ordinance aimed to allow up to 1.5-story homes while preventing full 2-story construction due to concerns about mass, scale, and compatible infill. However, since the amendment to the ordinance, two (2) concept plans have come forward showing full two (2) story houses with mass and scale beyond intended limits, all involving teardowns of existing structures. An ordinance modification would provide time to review and revise §17.20 to clarify original intentions and reflect the Plan Committee and Village Board goals. The proposal would repeal section §17.23(b)(1), allowing additions, modifications, or replacement of existing residences, while keeping section (2), allowing replacement of residences destroyed by natural disasters or fires. Section §17.25 covering the review process would also be struck. K. Nelson emphasized that current concept reviews had no vested interest. There would be one more, possibly two, depending on the timing of complete application submissions, Plan Committee meetings that would occur under existing rules, with any proposals meeting current ordinance requirements being considered under the current ordinance. K. Nelson read into the record the motion of the Plan Committee on March 31, 2026. “McClean moved, Held seconded to recommend to the Village Board a building permit moratorium of six months in the Protected Waterfront District, all ayes. Motion carried.” As Plan Committee Chairman, K. Nelson spoke about feeling constantly reactive over the past ten (10) years and believing the Protected Waterfront District was so critical that a timeout was needed to properly review and revise the ordinance. Hoyerman, as both a Board and Plan Committee member, agreed with K. Nelson's assessment while noting he would like to see a sunset provision or time frame to provide confidence to developers and 5 property owners that this wouldn't be permanent. He suggested a deadline would help provide motivation for completion. T. Nelson agreed with the time frame concept but observed that people would continue submitting concepts outside the ordinance language regardless of revisions. K. Nelson committed to the Plan Committee meeting twice monthly for working sessions if needed, suggesting six (6) meetings over three (3) months should be sufficient to complete revisions. This timeline would start after the May Village Board meeting, if approved, with a proposal back to the Village Board by August. Meacham asked if the Plan Committee would work to make the new ordinance clearer and more definitive. K. Nelson confirmed this goal, noting the need for better definitions of terms like "footprint" and distinctions between living space, garages, and sheds. Mulliken suggested approaching the new village attorney about reviewing the ordinance or providing available language. Bartelt, speaking as a Plan Committee member, supported the proposal but questioned whether a time limit was intentionally omitted. K. Nelson explained the attorney saw no need for time limits with this approach, but acknowledged Hoyerman's point about fairness. He committed to a three-month Plan Committee timeline with a proposal to the board by August. Bristol clarified this would only remove the Conditional Use option for additions, modifications, or teardown rebuilds, while maintenance, window replacement, siding changes, and other normal improvements would continue under regular processes, including Historic Preservation Committee Design Review. Bartelt suggested the time limit question could be addressed at the public hearing or through a motion amendment when actually passing the ordinance. Bristol suggested a secondary motion to reinsert old language if no plan committee proposal materialized by the deadline. John Cox stated that he found the approach "gimmicky" and questioned eliminating ordinance language temporarily rather than simply working harder on revisions. He planned to comment at the public hearing. Marsha Ellis from the Historic Preservation Committee asked about enforcement avenues and legal ramifications for homeowners with existing plans. Bristol confirmed no complete, formal applications had been submitted. Those who attended Plan Committee meetings were aware of potential changes, and they had until the ordinance change to submit applications under current rules. K. Nelson explained enforcement would simply involve not issuing building permits for eliminated project types. T. Nelson moved, Meacham seconded to set for public hearing on May 12, 2026, Chapter §17.20 of the Ephraim Code of Ordinances as it relates to the Protected Waterfront District, all ayes. Motion carried. 9. Physical Facilities: a. Discussion and consideration regarding the establishment of 2026 Pickleball fees: Meacham reported the Physical Facilities Committee had met with the Door County Pickleball Club and reached an agreement on an annual fee structure. The first-year fee would be three hundred dollars ($300), guaranteeing court time seven days a week from 12:00 to 3:00 PM. After discussions 6 with the administrative staff about tennis usage primarily occurring in the mornings, this timeframe worked well. After the first year, the annual fee would be five hundred dollars ($500). The lower first-year fee helped offset the club's investment in court striping and equipment. Hoyerman asked whether this was a multi-year agreement or required annual reapplication. Meacham indicated they would address this on a year-to-year basis. Bristol confirmed this would become part of the annual fee schedule review process each November. The arrangement would stripe the westernmost court for pickleball while maintaining tennis availability on the second court, even during pickleball times. Meacham moved, Hoyerman seconded to establish an agreement for annual fees with the Door County Pickleball Club with a first-year fee of three hundred dollars ($300) and five hundred dollars ($500) for each subsequent year for access to the westernmost tennis court, seven (7) days a week from 12:00 PM to 3:00 PM, all ayes with T. Nelson abstaining. Motion carried. 10. Wastewater: a. Discussion and consideration regarding WWTF and Receiving Station Roof Repair: Rasmussen explained that the main treatment plant roof, redone in 2008, was holding up fairly well but required approximately four thousand three hundred fifty dollars ($4,350) in repairs following last year's inspection. The receiving station building had its original roof with seams split around the entire perimeter, causing water to run down all four interior walls during the recent snow melt. Regardless of other project plans, Rasmussen recommended addressing the receiving station roof sooner rather than later. Work would occur within the next couple of weeks, pending approval, funded from the replacement fund. A discussion was held regarding the roof repairs at the Wastewater Treatment Facility. Mulliken noted the proposal included an additional two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for remedial work and questioned why this wasn't included. After discussion, K. Nelson suggested approving four thousand six hundred dollars ($4,600) total to include the remedial work. Mulliken confirmed the replacement fund balance was approximately six hundred seventy thousand dollars ($670,000) with Rasmusson and verified this work wasn't included in other WW Facility Plan Proposals. Bristol requested treating these as separate motions for the two (2) different projects. Mulliken moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve the Wastewater Treatment Facility roof repair at a cost not to exceed four thousand six hundred dollars ($4,600), funded by the Wastewater Replacement Fund, all ayes. Motion carried. Mulliken moved, Meacham seconded to approve the Wastewater Treatment Facility Receiving Station roof repair at a cost not to exceed twenty-two thousand five hundred thirty dollars ($22,530), funded by the Wastewater Replacement Fund, all ayes. Motion carried. b. Discussion and update regarding WW project: K. Nelson outlined three (3) tasks discussed at the previous meeting. First, he worked with Bristol and auditor Drewieske to create a spreadsheet examining options for delaying the project three (3) to five (5) years while exploring different funding approaches rather than facing an immediate $11 million impact and dramatic rate increases. This spreadsheet was in development. Second, Rasmusson, Oakley, and Kappell were working on value engineering to ensure the project included only needs rather than wants while maintaining all necessary components. Third, the analysis of REUs was being worked on. Bristol added that Roberts was establishing the foundational structure for an REU system, which involved considerable work. The goal was for her to hand off this foundation to the Wastewater Committee for modifications, ultimately enabling her to send invoices and collect payments through the system without requiring as much hands-on involvement. K. Nelson noted this had been a long-awaited, difficult process aimed at creating a fairer system that 7 could be clearly explained to residents. He mentioned Kappell's observation that pursuing a 2027 construction timeline would require action on his proposal that night due to Phase 2 design requirements and application deadlines. The discussion centered on whether this timeline was reasonable, considering both the possibility of loan forgiveness in 2027 and the challenge of determining funding approaches. Mulliken asked about combining phases to maximize loan forgiveness potential rather than pursuing separate phase applications. Nelson confirmed this approach, noting it would provide the maximum possible forgiveness rather than double benefits. Kappell explained that keeping phases separated now faced uncertainty about principal forgiveness availability after the state fiscal year 2027 funding cycle, when the bipartisan infrastructure law money would be exhausted. The DNR had no predictions about future principal forgiveness offerings. However, Mulliken's suggestion of reapplying for Phase 1 in 2027 was possible, which could maximize principal forgiveness if successful, while giving more time to address funding challenges. Bristol found this interesting, noting that going with two phases in 2027 wouldn't increase their score, likelihood of approval, or forgiveness amount. While the Clean Water Fund would continue beyond 2027, rates and principal forgiveness availability remained uncertain. Kappell acknowledged he would be speculating about when future funding decisions might be known, as these depended on federal government implementation and state distribution. K. Nelson suggested this approach would allow repackaging what they submitted, noting they couldn't include Phase 2 elements without a completed final design as required by the state. Mulliken recognized this would involve another two hundred thirty-six thousand dollars ($236,000) expenditure for engineering of Phase 2 and questioned whether this made sense given that their previous application didn't receive funding due to money running out rather than proposal deficiencies. Rasmussen noted the importance of considering construction management costs, as splitting into two (2) phases would cost significantly more than completing the project in one (1) year versus two (2). K. Nelson acknowledged this reality, noting construction engineering costs alone could add a couple of hundred thousand dollars for extended timelines. T. Nelson questioned the impact on sewer rates, with others confirming very significant increases of 100 percent or more. McMurtry noted that traditionally, capital improvements had been funded through M&L fees on the property taxes rather than sewer rates, though this could be changed by ordinance. T. Nelson reflected on their rationale from the previous month for delaying, questioning why they would pursue immediate action given the rate increase concerns. He expressed skepticism about qualifying for principal forgiveness upon resubmission and discomfort with imposing 100+ percent sewer rate increases without compelling reasons beyond speculation about potential forgiveness. Kappell confirmed that withdrawing from the 2026 funding cycle wouldn't negatively impact future applications, as the project was already scored and eligible for 2027 funding. Meacham stated he wouldn't vote for anything causing such dramatic rate increases and preferred delaying 3-5 years to put "the horse in front of the cart" rather than the reverse. K. Nelson asked Kappell about the feasibility of submitting applications and declining funding if principal forgiveness wasn't received, then returning in 3-5 years. Kappell confirmed this was common practice that wouldn't negatively affect the DNR's opinion of the municipality. 8 K. Nelson noted they would need to decide on resubmission by September 30, 2026, providing time to complete the three (3) tasks. Hoyerman emphasized that too many variables existed, including the REU system revision and the need to save money for future projects to avoid putting another board in similar positions. He felt they lacked sufficient real numbers to present to the public. K. Nelson agreed they should continue working on the three (3) outlined tasks - funding analysis, public engagement, and determining appropriate delay timelines - with a decision point in September about potential resubmission. Mulliken suggested ensuring any resubmitted Phase 1 represented a "needs only" proposal rather than including unnecessary elements. The consensus emerged to continue analysis work and public engagement while maintaining the September deadline option for potential resubmission. c. Discussion and consideration regarding McMahon engineering Proposal for Phase 2: Given the previous discussion outcomes, K. Nelson noted they wouldn't act on Kappell’s contract proposal for Phase 2 that night, deferring it to a future board meeting. Mulliken moved, Hoyerman seconded to take no action on the McMahon engineering Proposal for Phase 2 of the Wastewater Project, all ayes. Motion carried. d. Discussion regarding WW Solar Project: Bristol discussed pursuing solar as an independent project, separate from the treatment plant phases, following recommendations from the Wastewater and Green Tier Committees. Eland Electric, familiar with local solar installations, indicated continued eligibility for grants covering roughly a third of project costs if completed by the end of 2027. A discussion was held regarding the Wastewater Solar Project. B. Nelson noted that this allowed more flexibility than the earlier July 1 start date, with a decision needed by March 2027 for adequate preparatory time. Mulliken noted compatibility with the current plant and potential funding from a two-hundred-fifty-thousand-dollar ($250,000) Energy Innovation Grant with a June 30 deadline. Understanding grant timelines is crucial. B. Nelson underlined cost savings, highlighting reduced electric bills and a fourteen-and-a-half (14.5) year payback based on utility rate assumptions. The system suits Ephraim’s sunny land and aligns with power needs during high tourist seasons. Twenty- five (25) year solar panel warranties add investment security. Bristol and B. Nelson discussed grant eligibility requiring tax return filings, and competitive bidding for contracts over twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) was needed. K. Nelson summarized that the Board needed to figure out funding and that it was reasonable to make a decision six (6) to eight (8) months from now. 11. Committee Minutes for review: There were no comments. 12. New Business for the Next Meeting: a. Village Emergency Operations Plan 13. Adjournment: Meacham moved, T. Nelson seconded to adjourn at 9:20 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Recorded by, Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE BOARD FROM: CLERK SUBJECT: CLERK’S REPORT DATE: MAY 12, 2026 I submitted an annual project and expenditure report for the American Rescue Plan Act-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA-SLFRF) for the Village of Ephraim on April 13, 2026. In April I sent out notice regarding our Board of Review (BOR) to newspaper. The BOR notice was published on May 1st, 2026. The Open Book is scheduled for Tuesday, May 19th, 2026 from 10:00AM to 12 PM via phone, and the annual BOR meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 3rd, 2026, from 4:00PM to 6:00PM. Application for Alcohol License notices for Anatolia Cuisine, Chef's Hat, Klaud's Kitchen, La Sirena, Prince of Pierogi, Sunset Harbor Grill, Somerset Inn & Suites, and Summer Kitchen Restaurant were published in the newspaper on April 17, 2026. There were no significant modifications made to where the alcoholic beverages are going to be stored, sold/served, and consumed. The Renewal Alcohol Beverage License Applications are attached to your packet for your consideration. All of the businesses still need proof of a recently passed fire inspection and health inspection. The approval should be contingent upon a passed fire inspection and health inspection. Ephraim Business Council (EBC) and Ephraim Fire-Rescue Association (EFRA) applied for a Temporary Class "B" License. They would like to be able to sell fermented malt beverages at the 61st FYR Bal Festival on Saturday, June 20, 2026. Both applications are complete and attached to your packet for your consideration. I have taken minutes for HPC, Plan, and Wastewater Committee, and entered invoices for payment. I have also reconciled cash, made deposits, processed payroll, and all the necessary government reports. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Andrea Collak - Clerk/Treasurer VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 GENERAL FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 1 ADMINISTRATION 100-10-41110 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES .00 1,382,021.58 1,382,022.43 .85 100.0 100-10-41150 MANAGED FOREST LANDS .00 78.28 8.00 ( 70.28) 978.5 100-10-41210 ROOM TAXES 3,609.17 5,310.71 370,000.00 364,689.29 1.4 100-10-41220 ROOM TAX GRANT .00 29,076.22 50,000.00 20,923.78 58.2 100-10-41223 PRAT .00 43,562.96 150,000.00 106,437.04 29.0 100-10-41800 INTEREST ON TAXES 27.62 81.03 300.00 218.97 27.0 100-10-43410 STATE - SHARED REVENUE .00 .00 42,041.00 42,041.00 .0 100-10-43430 EXEMPT COMPUTER AID .00 .00 142.00 142.00 .0 100-10-43530 STATE TRANSPORTATION AIDS 25,787.00 51,574.00 103,148.00 51,574.00 50.0 100-10-43650 STATE AID - FOREST CROP .00 ( 19.57) .00 19.57 .0 100-10-43660 STATE PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES 497.67 2,368.57 2,000.00 ( 368.57) 118.4 100-10-43690 STATE-VIDEO SERVICE PROVIDER .00 .00 2,773.00 2,773.00 .0 100-10-44100 CABLE FRANCHISE FEES .00 3,295.23 13,000.00 9,704.77 25.4 100-10-44110 LIQUOR LICENSES 53.00 123.00 2,500.00 2,377.00 4.9 100-10-44111 OPERATOR LICENSE .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 100-10-44112 PICNIC LICENSE .00 .00 20.00 20.00 .0 100-10-44113 SHORT TERM RENTAL LICENSE .00 400.00 12,000.00 11,600.00 3.3 100-10-44200 DOG LICENSES 11.00 66.00 8.00 ( 58.00) 825.0 100-10-44300 BUILDING & SIGN PERMITS .00 25.00 1,500.00 1,475.00 1.7 100-10-44310 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES 2,751.00 5,756.10 2,000.00 ( 3,756.10) 287.8 100-10-46101 ASSESSMENT LETTERS 125.00 400.00 1,000.00 600.00 40.0 100-10-46730 TENNIS COURT FEES 305.00 305.00 1,000.00 695.00 30.5 100-10-46840 PERSONNEL SERV PAYMENTS .00 .00 19,900.00 19,900.00 .0 100-10-46900 OTHER REVENUE .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 100-10-48000 MISCELLANEUS INCOME 1,000.00 1,000.01 .00 ( 1,000.01) .0 100-10-48100 INTEREST INCOME/GENL .00 38,281.77 120,000.00 81,718.23 31.9 100-10-48200 RENTALS OF VILLAGE PROPERTIES .00 501.00 5,500.00 4,999.00 9.1 100-10-48307 SALE OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 34,166.46 1,564,206.89 2,285,362.43 721,155.54 68.4 FIRE 100-50-43420 STATE - FIRE DUES .00 .00 11,000.00 11,000.00 .0 TOTAL FIRE .00 .00 11,000.00 11,000.00 .0 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 34,166.46 1,564,206.89 2,296,362.43 732,155.54 68.1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 GENERAL FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 2 ADMINISTRATION 100-10-51100-100 SALARIES 2,100.00 8,400.00 30,000.00 21,600.00 28.0 100-10-51100-101 SS/MED 160.65 642.60 1,377.00 734.40 46.7 100-10-51100-320 TRAINING/CONFERENCES .00 .00 200.00 200.00 .0 100-10-51300-200 LEGAL FEES .00 2,661.50 25,000.00 22,338.50 10.7 100-10-51400-100 SALARIES 11,643.20 43,899.80 151,355.46 107,455.66 29.0 100-10-51400-101 SS/MED 803.04 3,629.32 11,578.69 7,949.37 31.3 100-10-51400-102 RETIREMENT 838.30 3,746.40 10,292.17 6,545.77 36.4 100-10-51400-103 HEALTH INSURANCE 3,952.60 10,862.11 47,431.17 36,569.06 22.9 100-10-51400-104 DISABILITY INSURANCE .00 920.91 2,800.00 1,879.09 32.9 100-10-51400-105 WORKERS COMPENSATION .00 200.00 457.47 257.47 43.7 100-10-51400-310 VEHICLE FUEL .00 12.23 400.00 387.77 3.1 100-10-51400-311 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 100-10-51400-312 CELLPHONE .00 510.56 1,750.00 1,239.44 29.2 100-10-51400-320 TRAINING/CONFERENCES .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 100-10-51400-330 BANK FEES 40.70 201.70 500.00 298.30 40.3 100-10-51400-331 POSTAGE 317.00 1,512.51 3,500.00 1,987.49 43.2 100-10-51400-332 OFFICE EQUIPMENT .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 100-10-51400-333 OFFICE SUPPLIES/EXPENCES .00 495.96 5,000.00 4,504.04 9.9 100-10-51400-334 COMPUTER SUPPLIES/EXPENCES .00 2,351.04 15,000.00 12,648.96 15.7 100-10-51400-335 PROFESSIONAL DUES/EXPENCES .00 65.00 1,500.00 1,435.00 4.3 100-10-51400-336 LEGAL NOTICES/ADDS .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 100-10-51400-339 PRINTING COSTS .00 242.80 2,500.00 2,257.20 9.7 100-10-51400-340 VEHICLE INSURANCE .00 178.00 373.48 195.48 47.7 100-10-51400-342 COMMITTEE/WORKER EXPENSE .00 .00 220.00 220.00 .0 100-10-51400-343 CONTINGENCY .00 .00 3,500.00 3,500.00 .0 100-10-51400-344 UNIFORMS .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .0 100-10-51400-710 CHARITABLE DONATIONS .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 100.0 100-10-51440-316 SUPPLIES/EXPENCES .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 100-10-51440-320 TRAINING/CONFERENCES .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 100-10-51440-342 COMMITTEE/WORKER EXPENSE .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .0 100-10-51500-100 SALARIES 2,741.76 12,252.74 35,639.97 23,387.23 34.4 100-10-51500-101 SS/MED 188.54 851.67 2,726.46 1,874.79 31.2 100-10-51500-102 RETIREMENT 197.40 882.18 2,423.52 1,541.34 36.4 100-10-51500-103 HEALTH INSURANCE 961.44 2,642.12 11,537.31 8,895.19 22.9 100-10-51500-300 AUDITING EXPENSES .00 .00 15,000.00 15,000.00 .0 100-10-51530-210 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICE .00 2,896.80 8,500.00 5,603.20 34.1 100-10-51600-211 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 1,231.00 1,259.06 28.06 97.8 100-10-51600-303 ELECTRICITY .00 3,191.10 7,500.00 4,308.90 42.6 100-10-51600-304 LP GAS .00 743.80 1,500.00 756.20 49.6 100-10-51600-305 WELL TESTS .00 60.00 240.00 180.00 25.0 100-10-51600-306 PHONE .00 1,103.70 4,000.00 2,896.30 27.6 100-10-51600-309 INTERNET .00 269.97 675.00 405.03 40.0 100-10-51601-210 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 100-10-51601-211 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 3,304.00 3,332.47 28.47 99.2 100-10-51601-303 ELECTRICITY .00 718.48 3,500.00 2,781.52 20.5 100-10-51601-304 LP GAS .00 2,884.59 7,000.00 4,115.41 41.2 100-10-51601-305 WELL TESTS .00 60.00 .00 ( 60.00) .0 100-10-51601-308 SEWER FEES .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 100-10-51601-309 INTERNET .00 612.45 1,700.00 1,087.55 36.0 100-10-51910-200 ILLEGAL TAXES REFUNDED .00 4,011.37 .00 ( 4,011.37) .0 100-10-51910-730 MISC EXPENSE .00 .00 3,800.00 3,800.00 .0 100-10-51930-212 LIABILITY INSURANCE .00 6,021.00 7,000.00 979.00 86.0 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 GENERAL FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 3 100-10-52400-100 SALARIES 770.56 3,443.71 10,017.60 6,573.89 34.4 100-10-52400-101 SS/MED 53.74 242.65 766.35 523.70 31.7 100-10-52400-102 RETIREMENT 55.48 247.94 681.20 433.26 36.4 100-10-52400-103 HEALTH INSURANCE 213.66 587.17 2,563.85 1,976.68 22.9 100-10-55300-316 SUPPLIES/EXPENSES .00 .00 2,600.00 2,600.00 .0 100-10-56400-100 SALARIES 1,926.40 8,609.26 25,044.00 16,434.74 34.4 100-10-56400-101 SS/MED 134.36 606.61 1,915.87 1,309.26 31.7 100-10-56400-102 RETIREMENT 138.70 619.86 1,702.99 1,083.13 36.4 100-10-56400-103 HEALTH INSURANCE 534.12 1,467.79 6,409.62 4,941.83 22.9 100-10-56400-333 OFFICE SUPPLIES/EXPENSES .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 100-10-56700-720 SUBSIDY TO ORGANIZATION .00 29,076.22 .00 ( 29,076.22) .0 100-10-56701-210 ROOM TAX EXPENSES .00 .00 50,000.00 50,000.00 .0 100-10-58100-600 PRINCIPAL .00 235,000.00 235,000.00 .00 100.0 100-10-58200-601 INTEREST .00 60,084.38 114,293.76 54,209.38 52.6 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 27,771.65 465,255.00 905,364.47 440,109.47 51.4 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 GENERAL FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 4 PUBLIC WORKS 100-20-53000-100 SALARIES 12,239.73 48,818.01 170,268.40 121,450.39 28.7 100-20-53000-101 SS/MED 831.91 3,773.92 12,681.28 8,907.36 29.8 100-20-53000-102 RETIREMENT 881.26 3,937.95 11,225.25 7,287.30 35.1 100-20-53000-103 HEALTH INSURANCE 4,660.44 12,642.25 61,696.79 49,054.54 20.5 100-20-53000-104 DISABILITY INSURANCE .00 630.66 2,500.00 1,869.34 25.2 100-20-53000-105 WORKERS COMPENSATION .00 1,882.00 5,028.86 3,146.86 37.4 100-20-53000-312 CELLPHONE .00 89.31 600.00 510.69 14.9 100-20-53000-320 TRAINING/CONFERENCES .00 .00 600.00 600.00 .0 100-20-53000-333 OFFICE SUPPLIES/EXPENSES .00 339.72 1,000.00 660.28 34.0 100-20-53000-344 UNIFORMS .00 .00 2,250.00 2,250.00 .0 100-20-53301-220 MOWING .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 100-20-53301-221 SWEEPING/MARKING .00 .00 6,000.00 6,000.00 .0 100-20-53301-222 ROAD TRIMMING .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 100-20-53301-223 SNOW REMOVAL .00 6,742.94 32,000.00 25,257.06 21.1 100-20-53301-300 FACILITY EQUIPMENT .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 100-20-53301-302 FACILITY MAINT./REPAIR/STREET .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 100-20-53302-820 OTHER IMPR. OUTLAY/STREET REC .00 5,000.00 .00 ( 5,000.00) .0 100-20-53310-310 VEHICLE FUEL .00 1,512.06 12,000.00 10,487.94 12.6 100-20-53310-311 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE .00 854.99 20,000.00 19,145.01 4.3 100-20-53310-340 VEHICLE INSURANCE .00 708.00 1,476.60 768.60 48.0 100-20-53321-303 ELECTRICITY/VISITOR CENTER .00 96.16 700.00 603.84 13.7 100-20-53321-305 WELL TESTS/VISITOR CENTER .00 .00 150.00 150.00 .0 100-20-53321-308 SEWER FEES/VISITOR CENTER .00 .00 600.00 600.00 .0 100-20-53322-210 OTHER CONTR. SERV./MAINT.BUILD .00 304.50 2,500.00 2,195.50 12.2 100-20-53322-211 PROPERTY INSURANCE/MAINT.BUILD .00 4,665.00 4,693.76 28.76 99.4 100-20-53322-301 FACILITY SUPPLIES/MAINT.BUILD .00 89.54 2,000.00 1,910.46 4.5 100-20-53322-302 FACILITY MAINT/REPAIR/MAIN.B .00 543.51 17,000.00 16,456.49 3.2 100-20-53322-304 LP GAS/MAINT.BUILD .00 2,948.79 2,500.00 ( 448.79) 118.0 100-20-53322-305 WELL TESTS/MAINT.BUILD .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .0 100-20-53322-309 INTERNET/MAINT.BUILD .00 165.00 2,225.00 2,060.00 7.4 100-20-53322-350 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES/MAINT.BUIL .00 341.00 5,000.00 4,659.00 6.8 100-20-53322-351 HARDWARE/TOOLS/MAINT.BUILD .00 27.04 1,500.00 1,472.96 1.8 100-20-53322-352 EQUIPMENT RENTAL .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 100-20-53322-820 BLDG IMPR.OUTLAY/MAINT.BUILD .00 403.50 3,000.00 2,596.50 13.5 100-20-53420-301 FACILITY SUPPLIES/STREET LIGHT .00 107.60 200.00 92.40 53.8 100-20-53420-302 FACILITY MAINT/REPAIR/STREET L .00 .00 400.00 400.00 .0 100-20-53420-303 ELECTRICITY/STREET LIGHT .00 4,217.67 18,000.00 13,782.33 23.4 100-20-53440-210 OTHER CONTR SERVICE/STORM SE .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 100-20-53620-210 OTHER CONTR SERVICE/RECYCLING .00 2,309.97 8,500.00 6,190.03 27.2 100-20-53621-210 OTHER CONTR SERVICE/GARBAGE .00 638.07 3,000.00 2,361.93 21.3 100-20-53640-210 OTHER CONTR SERVICES/WEED .00 .00 4,000.00 4,000.00 .0 100-20-55200-225 MULCH .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 100-20-55200-226 DIRT & STONE .00 .00 4,000.00 4,000.00 .0 100-20-55200-227 FLOWERS .00 .00 6,000.00 6,000.00 .0 100-20-55200-228 TREE CUTTING .00 1,490.19 6,500.00 5,009.81 22.9 100-20-55200-229 PLUMBING .00 33.96 3,000.00 2,966.04 1.1 100-20-55200-230 ELECTRICAL/PARKS & GROUNDS .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 100-20-55200-232 CONCRETE .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 100-20-55200-300 FACILITY EQUIPMENT/PARKS&GROU .00 .00 1,800.00 1,800.00 .0 100-20-55200-302 FACILITY MAINT/REPAIR/PARKS&GR .00 67.48 4,500.00 4,432.52 1.5 100-20-55200-303 ELECTRICITY/HARBORSIDE/WETLAN .00 220.38 700.00 479.62 31.5 100-20-55200-353 EQUIPMENT REPAIR/MAINT/PARKS .00 357.19 2,500.00 2,142.81 14.3 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 GENERAL FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 5 100-20-55200-830 OTHER IMPR OUTLAY/PARKS/TREES .00 8,187.77 28,400.00 20,212.23 28.8 100-20-55200-840 PROJECT OUTLAY/PARKS&GROUNDS .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 100-20-55420-305 WELL TESTS/BEACH .00 .00 120.00 120.00 .0 100-20-55420-308 SEWER FEES/BEACH .00 .00 645.00 645.00 .0 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 18,613.34 114,146.13 497,260.94 383,114.81 23.0 FIRE 100-50-52100-301 LAW ENFORCEMENT .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 100-50-52200-100 SALARIES 1,604.17 2,789.18 21,000.00 18,210.82 13.3 100-50-52200-101 SS/MED 310.64 1,623.21 4,000.00 2,376.79 40.6 100-50-52200-102 RETIREMENT 96.29 518.21 1,200.00 681.79 43.2 100-50-52200-103 HEALTH INSURANCE 67.07 678.82 3,000.00 2,321.18 22.6 100-50-52200-105 WORKERS COMPENSATION .00 316.00 1,000.00 684.00 31.6 100-50-52200-106 LOSA (AD) .00 .00 7,000.00 7,000.00 .0 100-50-52200-211 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 752.00 780.73 28.73 96.3 100-50-52200-302 FACILITY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR 27.00 948.54 5,000.00 4,051.46 19.0 100-50-52200-304 LP GAS .00 1,187.13 1,500.00 312.87 79.1 100-50-52200-310 VEHICLE FUEL .00 756.99 5,000.00 4,243.01 15.1 100-50-52200-312 CELLPHONE .00 155.87 800.00 644.13 19.5 100-50-52200-320 TRAINING/CONFERENCES .00 3,328.26 13,000.00 9,671.74 25.6 100-50-52200-333 OFFICE SUPPLIES/EXPENCES .00 .00 400.00 400.00 .0 100-50-52200-335 PROFESSIONAL DUES/EXPENCES .00 560.00 1,200.00 640.00 46.7 100-50-52200-340 VEHICLE INSURANCE .00 3,024.00 6,311.15 3,287.15 47.9 100-50-52200-353 EQUIPMENT REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 567.00 6,570.01 30,000.00 23,429.99 21.9 100-50-52200-368 PREVENTION MATERIALS (AD) .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .0 100-50-52200-369 FIRE NUMBER IMPROVEMENTS .00 134.34 500.00 365.66 26.9 100-50-52200-370 PAGER MAINTENANCE .00 .00 600.00 600.00 .0 100-50-52200-371 EQUIPMENT .00 2,417.69 28,200.00 25,782.31 8.6 100-50-52200-372 EPHRAIM FIRE CALLS 513.00 2,173.50 7,000.00 4,826.50 31.1 100-50-52200-374 MUTUAL AID FIRE CALLS 810.00 4,093.50 8,500.00 4,406.50 48.2 100-50-52200-375 EPHRAIM FIRE MTGS 540.00 3,745.50 22,000.00 18,254.50 17.0 100-50-52200-378 EPHRAIM EVENT CALLS .00 .00 475.00 475.00 .0 100-50-52200-379 INSPECTION/DATA ENTRY (AD) 54.00 398.00 3,100.00 2,702.00 12.8 100-50-52200-810 EQUIPMENT OUTLAY .00 .00 4,000.00 4,000.00 .0 100-50-52300-377 FIRST RESPONDER EXPENCES .00 .00 9,000.00 9,000.00 .0 TOTAL FIRE 4,589.17 36,170.75 189,866.88 153,696.13 19.1 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 50,974.16 615,571.88 1,592,492.29 976,920.41 38.7 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES ( 16,807.70) 948,635.01 703,870.14 ( 244,764.87) 134.8 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 WATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 6 PUBLIC WORKS 201-20-46410 WATER TEST REVENUE 4,500.45 9,767.11 38,627.00 28,859.89 25.3 201-20-48100 WATER ACCOUNT INTEREST .00 183.72 .00 ( 183.72) .0 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 4,500.45 9,950.83 38,627.00 28,676.17 25.8 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 4,500.45 9,950.83 38,627.00 28,676.17 25.8 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 WATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 7 WASTEWATER 201-30-53700-110 PERSONNEL SERVICES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 201-30-53700-210 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICE .00 .00 12,000.00 12,000.00 .0 201-30-53700-331 POSTAGE .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 201-30-53700-335 PROFESSIONAL DUES/EXPENSES .00 .00 400.00 400.00 .0 201-30-53700-397 WATER TESTING COSTS .00 37.25 12,800.00 12,762.75 .3 201-30-53700-398 WATER TESTING OPERATIONS EXP .00 256.36 8,400.00 8,143.64 3.1 201-30-53700-400 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT .00 .00 3,745.00 3,745.00 .0 TOTAL WASTEWATER .00 293.61 39,345.00 39,051.39 .8 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES .00 293.61 39,345.00 39,051.39 .8 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 4,500.45 9,657.22 ( 718.00) ( 10,375.22) 1345.0 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 DOCKS FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 8 DOCKS 202-40-46751 MOORINGS 1,367.97 6,252.93 8,000.00 1,747.07 78.2 202-40-46752 SEASONAL SLIPS 22,194.54 41,159.69 84,000.00 42,840.31 49.0 202-40-46753 LAUNCHING FEES .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 202-40-46754 TRANSIENT FEES 346.65 2,466.35 25,000.00 22,533.65 9.9 202-40-46755 SEASONAL DINGHY FEES 100.00 592.72 1,000.00 407.28 59.3 202-40-46756 SEASONAL LAUNCH FEES .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 202-40-48100 INTEREST INCOME .00 1,506.06 4,000.00 2,493.94 37.7 TOTAL DOCKS 24,009.16 51,977.75 134,000.00 82,022.25 38.8 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 24,009.16 51,977.75 134,000.00 82,022.25 38.8 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 DOCKS FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 9 DOCKS 202-40-55430-100 SALARIES .00 .00 24,000.00 24,000.00 .0 202-40-55430-101 SS/MED .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 202-40-55430-105 WORKERS COMPENSATION .00 148.00 337.40 189.40 43.9 202-40-55430-110 PERSONEL SERVICES .00 .00 19,900.00 19,900.00 .0 202-40-55430-211 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 5,875.00 5,903.15 28.15 99.5 202-40-55430-303 ELECTRICITY .00 473.03 1,800.00 1,326.97 26.3 202-40-55430-305 WELL TESTS .00 .00 120.00 120.00 .0 202-40-55430-307 WATER TREATMENT .00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 .0 202-40-55430-308 SEWER FEES .00 .00 496.00 496.00 .0 202-40-55430-309 INTERNET .00 365.00 1,300.00 935.00 28.1 202-40-55430-312 CELLPHONE .00 72.59 300.00 227.41 24.2 202-40-55430-331 POSTAGE .00 .00 175.00 175.00 .0 202-40-55430-333 OFFICE SUPPLIES/EXPESES .00 .00 1,200.00 1,200.00 .0 202-40-55430-334 COMPUTER SUPPLIES/EXPENCES .00 105.00 6,000.00 5,895.00 1.8 202-40-55431-240 BUOYS & PLACEMENT .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 202-40-55431-360 DOCK REPAIR .00 .00 8,000.00 8,000.00 .0 202-40-55431-361 DOCK EQUIPMENT .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 202-40-55431-362 MINOR PROJECTS .00 302.72 10,000.00 9,697.28 3.0 202-40-55431-810 EQUIPMENT OUTLAY .00 .00 38,468.45 38,468.45 .0 202-40-55431-830 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OUTLAY .00 8,255.00 .00 ( 8,255.00) .0 TOTAL DOCKS .00 15,596.34 134,000.00 118,403.66 11.6 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES .00 15,596.34 134,000.00 118,403.66 11.6 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 24,009.16 36,381.41 .00 ( 36,381.41) .0 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 WASTEWATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 10 WASTEWATER 610-30-41900 MISC NONOPERATING INCOME/TAX .00 131,120.66 131,120.00 ( .66) 100.0 610-30-44900 CONNECT/HT PERMIT FEES 14,157.00 14,157.00 .00 ( 14,157.00) .0 610-30-45190 0.045 LATE CHARGE-SEWERED CUS 78.25 78.25 1,500.00 1,421.75 5.2 610-30-46410 SEWER CHARGES ( 150.00) 115,077.00 460,308.00 345,231.00 25.0 610-30-46411 HOLDING TANK/SEPTIC CHARGES 1,557.68 3,677.83 24,000.00 20,322.17 15.3 610-30-46730 MISC RENTALS/SERVICES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 610-30-48100 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS .00 6,112.01 .00 ( 6,112.01) .0 610-30-48400 MISC INCOME/LAWSUIT SETTLEMEN .00 .00 20,000.00 20,000.00 .0 610-30-48410 WATER TEST LABOR INCOME .00 .00 12,000.00 12,000.00 .0 610-30-49200 TRANSFERS IN OTHER FUNDS - WW .00 .00 3,500.00 3,500.00 .0 TOTAL WASTEWATER 15,642.93 270,222.75 653,428.00 383,205.25 41.4 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 15,642.93 270,222.75 653,428.00 383,205.25 41.4 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 4 MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2026 WASTEWATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 33 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 05/07/2026 02:41PM PAGE: 11 WASTEWATER 610-30-57401-100 SALARIES 13,176.21 52,346.14 167,576.70 115,230.56 31.2 610-30-57401-101 SS/MED 909.47 4,092.70 12,475.37 8,382.67 32.8 610-30-57401-102 RETIREMENT 948.69 4,222.97 11,089.22 6,866.25 38.1 610-30-57401-103 HEALTH INSURANCE 4,166.55 11,345.62 45,031.78 33,686.16 25.2 610-30-57401-104 DISABILITY INSURANCE .00 444.57 2,000.00 1,555.43 22.2 610-30-57401-105 WORKERS COMPENSATION .00 1,805.00 4,853.47 3,048.47 37.2 610-30-57401-200 LEGAL FEES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 610-30-57401-211 PROPERTY INSURANCE .00 8,139.00 8,167.28 28.28 99.7 610-30-57401-306 PHONE .00 908.26 2,500.00 1,591.74 36.3 610-30-57401-309 INTERNET .00 165.00 1,500.00 1,335.00 11.0 610-30-57401-310 VEHICLE FUEL .00 408.76 3,000.00 2,591.24 13.6 610-30-57401-311 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE .00 1,960.47 4,000.00 2,039.53 49.0 610-30-57401-312 CELLPHONES .00 312.59 1,000.00 687.41 31.3 610-30-57401-320 TRAINING/CONFERENCES .00 606.35 4,000.00 3,393.65 15.2 610-30-57401-331 POSTAGE .00 .00 400.00 400.00 .0 610-30-57401-333 OFFICE SUPPLIES/EXPENSES .00 158.40 250.00 91.60 63.4 610-30-57401-334 COMPUTER SUPPLIES/EXPENSES .00 101.20 2,000.00 1,898.80 5.1 610-30-57401-335 PROFESSIONAL DUES/EXPENSES .00 528.58 4,000.00 3,471.42 13.2 610-30-57401-337 AUDITING EXPENSES .00 .00 6,900.00 6,900.00 .0 610-30-57401-340 VEHICLE INSURANCE .00 814.00 1,698.59 884.59 47.9 610-30-57401-343 CONTINGENCY .00 158.27 1,000.00 841.73 15.8 610-30-57401-344 UNIFORMS .00 .00 450.00 450.00 .0 610-30-57401-387 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 610-30-57401-389 SAFETY EXPENSES .00 142.52 4,000.00 3,857.48 3.6 610-30-57402-210 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES .00 368.64 2,000.00 1,631.36 18.4 610-30-57402-303 ELECTRICITY .00 7,746.31 30,000.00 22,253.69 25.8 610-30-57402-304 LP GAS .00 1,975.49 2,500.00 524.51 79.0 610-30-57402-351 HARDWARE/TOOLS .00 64.98 1,300.00 1,235.02 5.0 610-30-57402-380 CHEMICALS PLANT .00 4,325.32 9,500.00 5,174.68 45.5 610-30-57402-381 CHEMICALS LAB .00 582.28 3,000.00 2,417.72 19.4 610-30-57402-382 LAB EQUIPMENT & REPAIR .00 237.78 2,000.00 1,762.22 11.9 610-30-57402-383 SLUDGE EXPENSE .00 227.88 20,000.00 19,772.12 1.1 610-30-57402-385 PLANT EQUIPMENT & REPAIR .00 588.00 10,000.00 9,412.00 5.9 610-30-57402-386 ODOR CONTROL .00 .00 2,600.00 2,600.00 .0 610-30-57402-390 UV PLANT DISINFECTION .00 .00 4,500.00 4,500.00 .0 610-30-57402-810 EQUIPMENT OUTLAY .00 .00 7,500.00 7,500.00 .0 610-30-57403-303 ELECTRICITY .00 1,852.08 7,500.00 5,647.92 24.7 610-30-57403-304 LP GAS .00 80.10 1,000.00 919.90 8.0 610-30-57403-384 COLLECTION SYSTEM MAINT .00 2,146.29 13,000.00 10,853.71 16.5 610-30-57404-810 EQUIPMENT OUTLAY .00 3,909.13 116,515.60 112,606.47 3.4 610-30-57404-840 OTHER IMPROUTLAY-ENGINEERING .00 26,871.83 .00 ( 26,871.83) .0 TOTAL WASTEWATER 19,200.92 139,636.51 522,308.01 382,671.50 26.7 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 19,200.92 139,636.51 522,308.01 382,671.50 26.7 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES ( 3,557.99) 130,586.24 131,119.99 533.75 99.6 Ephraim Fire Department P.O. Box 138, Ephraim, WI 54211 Fire Chief Justin MacDonald April 2026 EPHRAIM RUNS: 1 04-04-26 3043 Cedar St. Apt.2 5 Firefighters Cooking fire/Vent building EPRHAIM EMR CALLS: 1 MUTUAL AID (MA) AUTO AID (AA) or MABAS RUNS: 5 04-06-26 2615 W. Meadow Rd. BHFD (AA) 5 Firefighters Chimney Fire/Cancelled 04-11-26 2040 Hill Rd. SBLG (MABAS) 9 Firefighters Wildland Fire/Assist on scene 04-11-26 Sand Ln. & Silverdale Rd. SBFD (MABAS) 7 Firefighters Wildland Fire/Cancelled enroute 04-14-26 998 STH 42 SBLG (AA) 6 Firefighters Smoke in home/Assist on scene 04-26-26 4458 CTY E EHFD (AA) 5 Firefighters Smoke in home/Cancelled at station YEAR TO DATE FIRE CALLS: 26 YEAR TO DATE EMS CALLS: 15 TRAINING COMPLETED: Ephraim Home Meeting: Our 1st training session was held on April 2nd, and training was on Wildland Fire Operations. Firefighters re- viewed all aspects of Wildland Operations from correct vehicle usage, water & foam applications, turnout gear usage, hose line usage, where to fight wildland fire from and general wildland firefighting safety was gone over. 14 Firefighters took part in this training. Ephraim 2nd Meeting: Our 2nd meeting was held on April 17th. Training was on Pump Operations with Engine 408. Firefighters trained on placing truck into gear, setting proper pressures, drafting operations, flowing water from several lines at one time and general pump operations safety was gone over. 8 Firefighter s took part in this training. Other Training: -EMR’s attended monthly training. -Chief MacDonald attended a 16 hour course on Fire Investigation and Explosions held in Sturgeon Bay. Other: -Monthly truck checks were completed -Engine 408 went to JB Truck for Radiator work while Engine 408 was out of service Baileys Harbor Fire pro- vided us with one of their Engines as a back up. -Engine 407 went to JB Truck for a Fuel issue. Truck was repaired in 2 days with some modifications to the tank. -Chief MacDonald began Fire Inspections on Businesses who hold Alcohol Licenses -Chief MacDonald and Assistant Chief Rockwell attended the FDIC Trade Show looking at new products for the department and gathering information regarding a new engine. -Work on Rescue Boat continues with new motor installation and revamp of fuel system Respectfully Submitted Fire Chief Justin MacDonald April 2026 Ephraim WW, WWT, SS Manager OIC Report EFF samples sent to Northern Lake Services for ammonia testing: Ph testing: Five times per week as required. TSS, BOD, Po4, labs with lab cleanup: Twice per week as required. Eff E-coli test, this must be done May-October once per week while running disinfection. • Installed UV system and start up without any issues. • Set up trash pump at lift 1 in preparation for possible back ups due to high flows during rain and snow melting. Glad to say we didn’t need to use it. We did have 345,000 gallons flow through the plant within a 24 hr period. • Spent several days looking for sources of infiltration. We were lucky to have Great Lakes TV & Seal on-site for two days with their camera truck. We found 5 leaking manholes, 4 have been repaired already, 1 sump pump connected to the sewer which has been shut off, and about 6 cracked or broken laterals, I have been in contact with most of them and repairs are in the process. • We completed the sewer flushing and will be scheduling the lift stations cleaning. • We sent out all the required effluent samples for our discharge permit renewal and will hopefully finish the renewal process soon. • We sent out our annual sludge characteristics test along with PFAS test required by Sturgeon Bay for their permit renewal. Ephraim Well Water Testing Year to Date Number of Water Tests: 147 304 In-House Bacteria: 107 262 Clean Water Testing: 40 42 Ephraim Septage Service: Holding Tank Pump Outs: 4 9 Septic Pump Outs / Inspections: Emergency Call Ins: Weather: Precip: 5.4 13.81 Max Temp: 67 67 Min Temp: 20 -17 Respectfully submitted, Brad Rasmusson Village of Ephraim Wastewater Manager Village of Ephraim Physical Facilities/Utilities April Maintenance Manager Report Work done in April: • Cleaning of Administration Building, Library, and Village Hall. • Turned on water to all buildings and completed repairs to broken water lines as needed. • Installed new thatcher’s on mowers (Joe Biwer made some new brackets for better fit) • Thatching of all properties. • Seed several areas that trees removed • Door County Highway swept roadways. • Cleaned up sand across from beach • Deep cleaning all Public Restrooms. • Set up Administration Office for Election • Hung new gutters on Administration Office • Clean up several downed trees in parks • Hockers double ground wood chips by Maintenance Shop • Peninsula Property Services began work at Village Dump • Various Diggers Hotline Tickets completed for work in and around the north end path • Clean shop floor and document floor issues (heaving of epoxy in areas, drainage) • Open Spruce Street for season • Change out several old street light bulbs • Conducted Snow & Ice Control 1 time • Removed Christmas lights from Streetlights Respectfully Submitted Justin MacDonald Maintenance Manager jmacdonald@ephraim.wi,gov Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 1 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number 13 FRONTIER 0737-100501 1 Phone Charges-WW 262-159-0737 Invoice 04/25/2026 05/13/2026 478.05 478.05 610-30-5740 Total 0737-100501-4-2026: 478.05 .00 478.05 Total 13 FRONTIER: 478.05 .00 478.05 18 FERRELLGAS 1133469084 1 Propane VH Invoice 03/27/2026 05/13/2026 583.89 583.89 100-10-5160 Total 1133469084: 583.89 .00 583.89 1133530266 1 Propane WW Invoice 04/03/2026 05/13/2026 501.17 501.17 610-30-5740 Total 1133530266: 501.17 .00 501.17 1133613849 1 Propane VH Invoice 04/14/2026 05/13/2026 695.51 695.51 100-10-5160 Total 1133613849: 695.51 .00 695.51 1133707950 1 Propane VH Invoice 04/24/2026 05/13/2026 292.09 292.09 100-10-5160 Total 1133707950: 292.09 .00 292.09 Total 18 FERRELLGAS: 2,072.66 .00 2,072.66 24 WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE 0403256491- 1 Streetlights Invoice 04/28/2026 05/13/2026 713.60 713.60 100-20-5342 Total 0403256491-22-4-2026: 713.60 .00 713.60 Total 24 WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE: 713.60 .00 713.60 53 NORTHERN DOOR COMMUNICATIONS 30166 1 3 Months Radio Service Invoice 04/29/2026 05/13/2026 304.50 304.50 100-20-5332 Total 30166: 304.50 .00 304.50 Total 53 NORTHERN DOOR COMMUNICATIONS: 304.50 .00 304.50 64 CULLIGAN APRIL2026 1 Salt at WW Invoice 04/02/2026 05/13/2026 23.80 23.80 610-30-5740 Total APRIL2026: 23.80 .00 23.80 Total 64 CULLIGAN: 23.80 .00 23.80 139 HOCKERS EXCAVATING 4451 1 Double Grind Mulch Invoice 04/24/2026 05/13/2026 4,400.00 4,400.00 100-20-5520 Total 4451: 4,400.00 .00 4,400.00 Total 139 HOCKERS EXCAVATING: 4,400.00 .00 4,400.00 195 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 2001140041 1 WIS 42 Streetscape-North Path-2026 C Invoice 05/06/2026 05/13/2026 6,080.00 6,080.00 100-20-5330 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 2 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number Total 2001140041: 6,080.00 .00 6,080.00 Total 195 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC: 6,080.00 .00 6,080.00 235 QUILL CORPORATION 48634650 1 Office Supplies Invoice 04/21/2026 05/13/2026 79.33 79.33 100-10-5140 Total 48634650: 79.33 .00 79.33 Total 235 QUILL CORPORATION: 79.33 .00 79.33 342 BIWER WELDING APRIL2026 1 Skids for Door Prop Invoice 04/27/2026 05/13/2026 350.00 350.00 100-50-5220 Total APRIL2026: 350.00 .00 350.00 MAY2026 1 Mount Dethatchers on Mowers Invoice 05/04/2026 05/13/2026 619.00 619.00 100-20-5520 Total MAY2026: 619.00 .00 619.00 Total 342 BIWER WELDING: 969.00 .00 969.00 701 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM/GENL 1Q-SEWER 1 Sewer 1Q-Maintenance Invoice 04/01/2026 05/13/2026 150.00 150.00 100-20-5332 Total 1Q-SEWER: 150.00 .00 150.00 Total 701 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM/GENL: 150.00 .00 150.00 740 NORTHERN ELECTRIC INC 21433 1 North Path Project Invoice 05/05/2026 05/13/2026 643.80 643.80 100-20-5330 Total 21433: 643.80 .00 643.80 Total 740 NORTHERN ELECTRIC INC: 643.80 .00 643.80 916 FASTENAL COMPANY WISTU17819 1 Nylock Nuts & Flat Washers Invoice 04/23/2026 05/13/2026 14.38 14.38 100-20-5332 Total WISTU178196: 14.38 .00 14.38 Total 916 FASTENAL COMPANY: 14.38 .00 14.38 1064 KIM ROBERTS MAY2026 1 Phone Reimbursement-May 2026 Invoice 05/01/2026 05/13/2026 15.00 15.00 100-10-5140 Total MAY2026: 15.00 .00 15.00 Total 1064 KIM ROBERTS: 15.00 .00 15.00 1190 DANIEL OAKLEY MAY2026 1 Cell Phone Reimbursement-May 2026 Invoice 05/01/2026 05/13/2026 15.00 15.00 610-30-5740 Total MAY2026: 15.00 .00 15.00 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 3 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number Total 1190 DANIEL OAKLEY: 15.00 .00 15.00 1324 DEMPSEY LAW FIRM LLP 22398-5-5-20 1 Attorney Fees Invoice 05/05/2026 05/13/2026 2,704.50 2,704.50 100-10-5130 Total 22398-5-5-2026: 2,704.50 .00 2,704.50 Total 1324 DEMPSEY LAW FIRM LLP: 2,704.50 .00 2,704.50 9204 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLY 1129097 1 Cleaning Supplies Invoice 05/01/2026 05/13/2026 382.50 382.50 100-20-5332 Total 1129097: 382.50 .00 382.50 Total 9204 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLY: 382.50 .00 382.50 9290 ANDREA COLLAK MAY2026 1 Cell Phone Reimbursement-May 2026 Invoice 05/01/2026 05/13/2026 30.00 30.00 100-10-5140 Total MAY2026: 30.00 .00 30.00 Total 9290 ANDREA COLLAK: 30.00 .00 30.00 Total : 19,076.12 .00 19,076.12 Current period checks for future period invoices. 6 LAMPERTS 590468 Chk No: 47705 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 6.77- 610-21100 Total 590468: .00 .00 6.77- Total 6 LAMPERTS: .00 .00 6.77- 15 JUNGWIRTH'S ACE HARDWARE 342682,83,7 Chk No: 47703 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 52.38- 610-21100 Total 342682,83,794,343056: .00 .00 52.38- Total 15 JUNGWIRTH'S ACE HARDWARE: .00 .00 52.38- 16 HAMMERSMITH TV 10081464 Chk No: 47700 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 3.99- 100-21100 Total 10081464: .00 .00 3.99- 10081474 Chk No: 47700 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 22.97- 100-21100 Total 10081474: .00 .00 22.97- Total 16 HAMMERSMITH TV: .00 .00 26.96- 24 WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 629.75- 100-21100 Total 0403256491-00022-1-2: .00 .00 629.75- 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 795.08- 100-21100 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 4 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 512.98- 100-21100 Total 0403256491-00031-1-2: .00 .00 1,308.06- 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 80.02- 100-21100 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 448.41- 100-21100 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 29.00- 100-21100 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 70.56- 100-21100 Total 0403256491-00045-1-2: .00 .00 627.99- 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 181.92- 202-21100 Total 0403256491-00046-1-2: .00 .00 181.92- 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 177.60- 610-21100 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 428.78- 610-21100 0403256491- Chk No: 46957 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 1,575.28- 610-21100 Total 0403256491-00047-1-2: .00 .00 2,181.66- 0403256491- Chk No: 47758 (1) Calculated 02/02/2021 30.95- 100-21100 Total 0403256491-22-1-21: .00 .00 30.95- Total 24 WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE: .00 .00 4,960.33- 33 VAN'S FIRE & SAFETY 4142037 Chk No: 47731 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 418.14- 100-21100 Total 4142037: .00 .00 418.14- 4142038 Chk No: 47731 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 38.50- 610-21100 Total 4142038: .00 .00 38.50- Total 33 VAN'S FIRE & SAFETY: .00 .00 456.64- 48 GOING GARBAGE NOV2020 Chk No: 47698 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 2,261.27- 610-21100 Total NOV2020: .00 .00 2,261.27- Total 48 GOING GARBAGE: .00 .00 2,261.27- 53 NORTHERN DOOR COMMUNICATIONS 24548 Chk No: 46111 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 428.87- 610-21100 24548 Chk No: 46111 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 643.20- 100-21100 Total 24548: .00 .00 1,072.07- 24584 Chk No: 46111 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 1,786.51- 100-21100 Total 24584: .00 .00 1,786.51- 27187 Chk No: 47714 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 534.95- 100-21100 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 5 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number Total 27187: .00 .00 534.95- 27233 Chk No: 47714 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 34.95- 100-21100 Total 27233: .00 .00 34.95- Total 53 NORTHERN DOOR COMMUNICATIONS: .00 .00 3,428.48- 56 GIBRALTAR AREA SCHOOLS PILT2019 Chk No: 46952 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 1,641.62- 100-21100 Total PILT2019: .00 .00 1,641.62- PILT2020 Chk No: 47756 (1) Calculated 02/02/2021 1,882.70- 100-21100 Total PILT2020: .00 .00 1,882.70- Total 56 GIBRALTAR AREA SCHOOLS: .00 .00 3,524.32- 61 LEAGUE OF WISCONSIN MUNICIPALITIES 80988 Chk No: 46953 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 100.00- 100-21100 Total 80988: .00 .00 100.00- Total 61 LEAGUE OF WISCONSIN MUNICIPALITIES: .00 .00 100.00- 63 SAFEbuilt LLC 0054143-IN Chk No: 46120 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 211.50- 100-21100 Total 0054143-IN: .00 .00 211.50- Total 63 SAFEbuilt LLC: .00 .00 211.50- 98 EPHRAIM BUSINESS COUNCIL NOVEMBER Chk No: 47775 (1) Calculated 02/09/2021 1,581.50- 100-21100 Total NOVEMBER2020: .00 .00 1,581.50- OCT2020 Chk No: 47690 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 13,029.27- 100-21100 Total OCT2020: .00 .00 13,029.27- VARIOUS201 Chk No: 46093 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 250.00- 100-21100 Total VARIOUS2018: .00 .00 250.00- Total 98 EPHRAIM BUSINESS COUNCIL: .00 .00 14,860.77- 138 COUNTY OF DOOR - RYAN SCHLEY 2020-330004 Chk No: 47680 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 78.73- 100-21100 Total 2020-33000431: .00 .00 78.73- 2020-330004 Chk No: 47681 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 225.06- 100-21100 2020-330004 Chk No: 47681 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 214.00- 610-21100 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 6 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number Total 2020-33000432: .00 .00 439.06- 2020-330004 Chk No: 47679 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 5,278.46- 100-21100 Total 2020-33000459: .00 .00 5,278.46- PILT2019 Chk No: 46951 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 2,202.02- 100-21100 Total PILT2019: .00 .00 2,202.02- PILT2020 Chk No: 47754 (1) Calculated 02/02/2021 2,275.05- 100-21100 Total PILT2020: .00 .00 2,275.05- Total 138 COUNTY OF DOOR - RYAN SCHLEY: .00 .00 10,273.32- 228 NCL OF WISCONSIN INC. 447825 Chk No: 47712 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 62.67- 610-21100 Total 447825: .00 .00 62.67- Total 228 NCL OF WISCONSIN INC.: .00 .00 62.67- 235 QUILL CORPORATION 3331810 Chk No: 46117 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 57.79- 100-21100 3331810 Chk No: 46117 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 224.82- 100-21100 Total 3331810: .00 .00 282.61- 3453098 Chk No: 46117 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 37.98- 100-21100 Total 3453098: .00 .00 37.98- Total 235 QUILL CORPORATION: .00 .00 320.59- 342 BIWER WELDING DEC2020 Chk No: 47673 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 175.00- 100-21100 Total DEC2020: .00 .00 175.00- Total 342 BIWER WELDING: .00 .00 175.00- 346 DINGES FIRE COMPANY 15599 Chk No: 47686 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 180.00- 100-21100 Total 15599: .00 .00 180.00- Total 346 DINGES FIRE COMPANY: .00 .00 180.00- 357 KEITH'S AUTOMOTIVE 012838 Chk No: 47704 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 68.90- 100-21100 Total 012838: .00 .00 68.90- 012890 Chk No: 47704 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 158.95- 100-21100 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 7 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number Total 012890: .00 .00 158.95- Total 357 KEITH'S AUTOMOTIVE: .00 .00 227.85- 530 FLS BANNERS LTD 99297 Chk No: 46095 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 18.18- 610-21100 Total 99297: .00 .00 18.18- Total 530 FLS BANNERS LTD: .00 .00 18.18- 543 CELLCOM WISCONSIN RSA 10 216505 Chk No: 47676 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 39.40- 100-21100 216505 Chk No: 47676 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 26.46- 100-21100 216505 Chk No: 47676 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 22.08- 202-21100 216505 Chk No: 47676 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 19.82- 100-21100 216505 Chk No: 47676 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 89.81- 100-21100 216505 Chk No: 47676 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 78.11- 100-21100 Total 216505: .00 .00 275.68- Total 543 CELLCOM WISCONSIN RSA 10: .00 .00 275.68- 651 EAGLE MECHANICAL 12754 Chk No: 47689 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 1,195.40- 100-21100 Total 12754: .00 .00 1,195.40- Total 651 EAGLE MECHANICAL: .00 .00 1,195.40- 673 TOWN OF GIBRALTAR 30223116 Chk No: 47730 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 207.00- 100-21100 Total 30223116: .00 .00 207.00- Total 673 TOWN OF GIBRALTAR: .00 .00 207.00- 701 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM/GENL SEWER4Q-2 Chk No: 46127 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 110.00- 100-21100 SEWER4Q-2 Chk No: 46127 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 304.70- 100-21100 SEWER4Q-2 Chk No: 46127 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 110.00- 202-21100 SEWER4Q-2 Chk No: 46127 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 121.00- 100-21100 SEWER4Q-2 Chk No: 46127 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 110.00- 100-21100 Total SEWER4Q-2018: .00 .00 755.70- Total 701 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM/GENL: .00 .00 755.70- 720 DOOR COUNTY INSPECTIONS LLC EPH-1-1-202 Chk No: 47773 (1) Calculated 02/09/2021 1,473.53- 100-21100 Total EPH-1-1-2021: .00 .00 1,473.53- Total 720 DOOR COUNTY INSPECTIONS LLC: .00 .00 1,473.53- Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 8 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number 754 DAVE'S MOWING AND MORE LLC 6522 Chk No: 47684 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 886.20- 100-21100 Total 6522: .00 .00 886.20- Total 754 DAVE'S MOWING AND MORE LLC: .00 .00 886.20- 799 AFLAC ATTN: REMITTANCE PROCESSING 095960 Chk No: 46146 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 538.10- 100-21100 Total 095960: .00 .00 538.10- 183684 Chk No: 46950 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 480.40- 100-21100 Total 183684: .00 .00 480.40- Total 799 AFLAC ATTN: REMITTANCE PROCESSING: .00 .00 1,018.50- 822 NAPA AUTO PARTS 136778 Chk No: 47711 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 139.99- 100-21100 Total 136778: .00 .00 139.99- Total 822 NAPA AUTO PARTS: .00 .00 139.99- 883 TOP SHELF CAFE 12667 Chk No: 46123 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 18.77- 610-21100 Total 12667: .00 .00 18.77- Total 883 TOP SHELF CAFE: .00 .00 18.77- 924 AMERICAN INNOVATIONS BH114063 Chk No: 47670 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 16.52- 610-21100 Total BH114063: .00 .00 16.52- Total 924 AMERICAN INNOVATIONS: .00 .00 16.52- 945 RUSSELL SALFI FEB2019 Chk No: 46186 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 30.00- 610-21100 Total FEB2019: .00 .00 30.00- Total 945 RUSSELL SALFI: .00 .00 30.00- 948 DCC JAN2019 Chk No: 46161 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 27.57- 100-21100 Total JAN2019: .00 .00 27.57- NOV2020 Chk No: 47685 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 15.59- 100-21100 Total NOV2020: .00 .00 15.59- Total 948 DCC: .00 .00 43.16- Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 9 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number 985 MICHAEL McCUTCHEON FEB2019 Chk No: 46178 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 15.00- 100-21100 Total FEB2019: .00 .00 15.00- Total 985 MICHAEL McCUTCHEON: .00 .00 15.00- 1041 GARAGE DOOR SERVICE OF DC LLC 345658 Chk No: 47695 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 255.00- 100-21100 Total 345658: .00 .00 255.00- 345659 Chk No: 47695 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 255.00- 610-21100 345659 Chk No: 47695 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 29.90- 100-21100 Total 345659: .00 .00 284.90- Total 1041 GARAGE DOOR SERVICE OF DC LLC: .00 .00 539.90- 1042 SCOTT LOHMAN REIMB2020 Chk No: 47723 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 400.00- 100-21100 Total REIMB2020: .00 .00 400.00- Total 1042 SCOTT LOHMAN: .00 .00 400.00- 1043 5 ALARM FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT LLC 202676-1 Chk No: 47665 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 724.45- 100-21100 Total 202676-1: .00 .00 724.45- Total 1043 5 ALARM FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT LLC: .00 .00 724.45- 1044 STEPHAN REYNOLDS REIMB2020 Chk No: 47727 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 32.65- 100-21100 Total REIMB2020: .00 .00 32.65- Total 1044 STEPHAN REYNOLDS: .00 .00 32.65- 1178 NICOLET NATIONAL BANK 10000479 Chk No: 46955 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 54.56- 100-21100 Total 10000479: .00 .00 54.56- 10000944 Chk No: 46955 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 74.63- 100-21100 Total 10000944: .00 .00 74.63- Total 1178 NICOLET NATIONAL BANK: .00 .00 129.19- 9008 WATER STREET INN REBATE201 Chk No: 45285 (1) Calculated 01/10/2018 14.21- 100-21100 Total REBATE2017-1: .00 .00 14.21- Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 10 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number Total 9008 WATER STREET INN: .00 .00 14.21- 9039 NWTC -- taxes PILT2019 Chk No: 46956 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 436.60- 100-21100 Total PILT2019: .00 .00 436.60- PILT2020 Chk No: 47789 (1) Calculated 02/09/2021 454.68- 100-21100 Total PILT2020: .00 .00 454.68- Total 9039 NWTC -- taxes: .00 .00 891.28- 9068 CONWAY SHIELDS 0432328-IN Chk No: 46114 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 159.97- 100-21100 Total 0432328-IN: .00 .00 159.97- Total 9068 CONWAY SHIELDS: .00 .00 159.97- 9090 EVENSON LAUNDRY & CLEANERS 729253 Chk No: 46094 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 46.35- 100-21100 Total 729253: .00 .00 46.35- 729997 Chk No: 46167 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 46.35- 100-21100 Total 729997: .00 .00 46.35- Total 9090 EVENSON LAUNDRY & CLEANERS: .00 .00 92.70- 9101 SERVICE MOTOR COMPANY P20831 Chk No: 47725 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 79.17- 100-21100 Total P20831: .00 .00 79.17- Total 9101 SERVICE MOTOR COMPANY: .00 .00 79.17- 9186 ASSOCIATED APPRAISALCONSULTANTS INC 140568 Chk No: 46150 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 632.57- 100-21100 Total 140568: .00 .00 632.57- 152568 Chk No: 47763 (1) Calculated 02/09/2021 649.23- 100-21100 Total 152568: .00 .00 649.23- Total 9186 ASSOCIATED APPRAISALCONSULTANTS INC: .00 .00 1,281.80- 9204 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLY 956970 Chk No: 46184 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 43.41- 100-21100 Total 956970: .00 .00 43.41- 957089 Chk No: 46184 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 767.68- 100-21100 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 11 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Invoice Sequence Description Type Invoice Due Invoice Discount Net Invoice GL Account Number Number Date Date Amount Amount Check Amount Number Total 957089: .00 .00 767.68- Total 9204 PROFESSIONAL SUPPLY: .00 .00 811.09- 9229 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE 4017859262 Chk No: 46954 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 241.15- 100-21100 4017859262 Chk No: 46954 (1) Calculated 01/30/2020 214.96- 100-21100 Total 4017859262: .00 .00 456.11- Total 9229 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE: .00 .00 456.11- 9240 SEPTIC MAINTENANCE LLC 20-2251 Chk No: 47724 (1) Calculated 01/13/2021 331.80- 610-21100 Total 20-2251: .00 .00 331.80- Total 9240 SEPTIC MAINTENANCE LLC: .00 .00 331.80- 9266 GASCO 105286 Chk No: 46097 (1) Calculated 01/09/2019 71.94- 610-21100 Total 105286: .00 .00 71.94- Total 9266 GASCO: .00 .00 71.94- 9290 ANDREA COLLAK FEB2019 Chk No: 46148 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 30.00- 100-21100 Total FEB2019: .00 .00 30.00- REIMB2019 Chk No: 46148 (1) Calculated 02/13/2019 3.50- 100-21100 Total REIMB2019: .00 .00 3.50- Total 9290 ANDREA COLLAK: .00 .00 33.50- Total Current period checks for future period invoices.: .00 .00 53,272.24- Grand Totals: 19,076.12 .00 34,196.12- Summary by General Ledger Account Number GL Account Number Debit Credit Net 100-10-51300-200 2,704.50 .00 2,704.50 100-10-51400-312 45.00 .00 45.00 100-10-51400-333 79.33 .00 79.33 100-10-51601-304 1,571.49 .00 1,571.49 100-20-53302-820 6,723.80 .00 6,723.80 100-20-53322-210 304.50 .00 304.50 100-20-53322-301 382.50 .00 382.50 100-20-53322-351 14.38 .00 14.38 Village of Ephraim Unpaid Invoice Report Page: 12 Posting period: 05/26 May 07, 2026 02:40PM Summary by General Ledger Account Number GL Account Number Debit Credit Net 100-20-53323-308 150.00 .00 150.00 100-20-53420-303 713.60 .00 713.60 100-20-55200-225 4,400.00 .00 4,400.00 100-20-55200-830 619.00 .00 619.00 100-21100 .00 47,560.80- 47,560.80- 100-50-52200-353 350.00 .00 350.00 202-21100 .00 181.92- 181.92- 610-21100 .00 5,529.52- 5,529.52- 610-30-57401-306 478.05 .00 478.05 610-30-57401-312 15.00 .00 15.00 610-30-57402-304 501.17 .00 501.17 610-30-57402-381 23.80 .00 23.80 Grand Totals: 19,076.12 53,272.24- 34,196.12- Summary by General Ledger Posting Period GL Posting Period Debit Credit Net 01/18 .00 14.21- 14.21- 01/19 .00 4,711.58- 4,711.58- 02/19 .00 2,134.18- 2,134.18- 01/20 .00 10,375.32- 10,375.32- 01/21 .00 27,689.31- 27,689.31- 02/21 .00 8,347.64- 8,347.64- 05/26 19,076.12 .00 19,076.12 Grand Totals: 19,076.12 53,272.24- 34,196.12- VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM DOOR COUNTY, WISCONSIN ORDINANCE 01-2026, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM ZONING CODE The Village of Ephraim Village Board of Trustees, with quorum present and voting, and having received a recommendation from the Village Plan Committee, and having conducted a public hearing thereon, hereby adopts the following amendments to the Village of Ephraim Zoning Code: SECTION 1. Section 17.20 3) b) 1) of the Village of Ephraim Zoning Code is repealed in its entirety. SECTION 2. Section 17.20 5) of the Village of Ephraim Zoning Code is repealed in its entirety. SECTION 3. Severability. If any section or provision of this ordinance is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall not be affected. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption and posting or publication as required by law. All other provisions of the Village of Ephraim Zoning Code remain in full force and effect. Village Staff and the Village Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to take all action necessary to incorporate this amendment into the Village of Ephraim Zoning Code. Dated this ______ day, May, 2026. Village of Ephraim _________________________________ Ken Nelson, Village President Attest: __________________________ Andrea Collak, Village Clerk CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP) is an independent network member of CLA Global. See CLAglobal.com/disclaimer . CliftonLarsonAllen LLP CLAconnect.com CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP) is an independent network member of CLA Global. See CLAglobal.com/disclaimer . CliftonLarsonAllen LLP CLAconnect.com CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen LLP) is an independent network member of CLA Global. See CLAglobal.com/disclaimer . CliftonLarsonAllen LLP CLAconnect.com Ephraim-Gibraltar Airport (3D2) Phase 2 - Airport Master Plan Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting #2 March 19, 2026 Introductions Ephraim-Gibraltar (Airport Owner) Wisconsin Bureau of Aeronautics (WBOA) Westwood Professional Services TKDA TAC Members Other Attendees (In-Person & Virtually) TAC Meeting #2 Objectives Airport Activity Forecast (Critical Aircraft Determination) Status Facility Requirements Summary Formulation of Alternatives Analysis Review of Draft Runway Alternatives Review of Draft Building Area Alternatives Study Schedule / Next Steps Questions / Adjournment Airport Activity Forecast (Critical Aircraft Determination) Status Existing, Future, and Ultimate Critical Aircraft for Runway 14/32 Design Parameter Existing Critical Aircraft Future Critical Aircraft Ultimate Critical Aircraft Forecast Year 2024 2029 2034 Runway Design Code (RDC) A-I A-I A-I Aircraft Approach Category (AAC) A A A Airplane Design Group (ADG) I I I Taxiway Design Group (TDG) 1A/1B 1A/1B 1A/1B Weight Classification Small Small Small Source: TKDA Airport Activity Forecast (Critical Aircraft Determination) Status Existing, Future, and Ultimate Critical Aircraft for Runway 1/19 Design Parameter Existing Critical Aircraft Future Critical Aircraft Ultimate Critical Aircraft Forecast Year 2024 2029 2034 Runway Design Code (RDC) A-I A-I A-I Aircraft Approach Category (AAC) A A A Airplane Design Group (ADG) I I I Taxiway Design Group (TDG) 1A/1B 1A/1B 1A/1B Weight Classification Small Small Small Source: TKDA Facility Requirements Summary Facility Requirements Summary cont’d. Primary Runway 14/32 Data Table Summary Design Standard Existing Conditions PAL 1-2 Runway Identifier 14/32 Same Runway Dimensions 2,697’ x 60’ TBD** Runway Design Code A-I(S)-5000 A-I(S)-4000 Runway Wind Coverage (10.5 knots) 87.83% Same Runway Design Crosswind Component 10.5 knots Same Pavement Surface (Treatment) Asphalt (None) Same Pavement Strength (Wheel Type) 12,500 lbs. (DW) Same Runway Markings Non-Precision Same Runway Lighting Type MIRLs Same Visual and Instrument NAVAIDS PAPI PAPI, REIL Runway Safety Area (RSA)* 120’ x 240’ Same Runway Object Free Area (OFA)* 250’ x 240’ Same Runway Obstacle Free Zone (OFZ)* 250’ x 200’ Same Approach Runway Protection Zone (Length x Inner Width x Outer Width) 1,000’ x 250’ x 450’ Same Departure Runway Protection Zone (Length x Inner Width x Outer Width) 1,000’ x 250’ x 450’ Same Approach Visibility Minimums 1-mile Same 14 CFR Part 77 Primary Approach Type Non-Precision Same 14 CFR Part 77 Approach Code (Slope) A (NP) (20:1) B (NP) (20:1) Vertically-Guided / Circling Approach No/No Same FAA Approach Surface (Slope) 4 (20:1) Same FAA Instrument Departure Surf. (Slope) 7 (40:1) Same Parallel Taxiway / Runway Separation None 150’ Holding Position 120’ 125’ Source: FAA AC 150/5300-13B, TKDA * RSA, OFA, OFZ dimensions are width x distance beyond runway end ** Actual Runway Length to be added following FAA approval of forecast and runway length justification. Facility Requirements Summary cont’d. Crosswind Runway 1/19 Data Table Summary Design Standard Existing Conditions PAL 1-2 Runway Identifier 1/19 Same Runway Dimensions 1,941’ x 100’ TBD** Runway Classification Utility Same Runway Design Code (RDC) A-I(S)-VIS Same Runway Wind Coverage (10.5 knots) 89.94% Same Pavement Surface (Treatment) Turf Same Pavement Strength (Wheel Type) N/A Same Runway Markings None Same Runway Lighting Type Yellow Cones Same Visual and Instrument NAVAIDS None Same Runway Safety Area (RSA)* 120’ x 240’ Same Runway Object Free Area (OFA)* 250’ x 200’ Same Runway Obstacle Free Zone (OFZ)* 250’ x 200’ Same Approach Runway Protection Zone (Length x Inner Width x Outer Width) 1,000’ x 250’ x 450’ Same Departure Runway Protection Zone (Length x Inner Width x Outer Width) 1,000’ x 250’ x 450’ Same Approach Visibility Minimums Visual Same 14 CFR Part 77 Primary Approach Type Visual Same 14 CFR Part 77 Approach Code (Slope) A(V) (20:1) Same Vertically Guided / Circling Approach No Same FAA Approach Surface (Slope) 2 (20:1) Same FAA Instrument Departure Surf. (Slope) N/A Same Parallel Taxiway / Runway Separation N/A Same Holding Position 0’ 125’ Source: FAA AC 150/5300-13B, TKDA • RSA, OFA, OFZ dimensions are width x distance beyond runway end • ** Actual Runway Length to be determined based on justified length of Runway 14/32 and potential shift of the Runway 19 end to meet standards (overlapping RSAs). Facility Requirements Summary cont’d. Obstruction Mitigation Recommendations Runway End Standard(s) Deficiency Recommendation 14 FAA Approach Surface 4 – Instrument (> ¾ mi.) and Circling Vegetative Growth (Tree)  On-Airport: Remove trees  Off-Airport: Trim/remove trees 32 FAA Approach Surface 4 – Instrument (> ¾ mi.) and Circling Vegetative Growth (Tree)  On-Airport: Remove trees  Off-Airport: Trim/remove trees 14-32 Part 77 – Non-Precision Utility FAA Departure Surface 7 – Instrument Departures Vegetative Growth (Tree)  On-Airport: Remove trees  Off-Airport: Trim/remove trees 14-32 Part 77 – Non-Precision Utility [A(NP)] Vegetative Growth (Tree)  On-Airport: Remove trees  Off-Airport: Trim/remove trees 1 FAA Approach Surface 2 – visual with approach speeds of <50 Vegetative Growth (Tree)  On-Airport: Remove trees  Off-Airport: Trim/remove trees 19 FAA Approach Surface 2 – visual with approach speeds of <50 Vegetative Growth (Tree)  On-Airport: Remove trees  Off-Airport: Trim/remove trees 1-19 Part 77 – Visual Utility [A(V)] Vegetative Growth (Tree)  On-Airport: Remove trees  Off-Airport: Trim/remove trees Formulation of Alternatives Analysis Runways & Taxiways  Conduct environmental study for near-term airport development  Construct full parallel taxiway for Runway 14/32  Construct an unpaved taxiway to Runway 1/19  Reconfigure Taxiway A connectors to meet standards (Direct Access and High Energy Intersections)  Remove Runway 14/32 approach obstructions  Remove Runway 1/19 approach obstructions  Acquire easements for Runway 14 and 32  Extend Runway 14/32 (When justified) Building Area, Support Facilities  Maximize hangar development using existing infrastructure within airport property and to coincide with ongoing and programmed projects. N EXISTING AIRFIELD PAVEMENT EXISTING ROADS EXISTING BUILDINGS TREES OR TREE LINE DITCH EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE (FEE SIMPLE) EXISTING CLEAR ZONE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING AVIGATION EASEMENT LINE B.R.L. BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE PROPOSED BUILDINGS PROPOSED PAVEMENT VISUAL & NAVIGATATION AIDS RUNWAY PAVEMENT TYPE RUNWAY MARKING RUNWAY LIGHTING APPROACH SLOPE (ACTUAL) APPROACH SLOPE (DESIGN) PAVEMENT STRENGTH* RUNWAY CATEGORY % WIND COVERAGE 12 MPH 15 MPH EFFECTIVE GRADIENT (IN %) NON-PREC. INST. NON-PREC. INST. EXISTING ULTIMATE RUNWAY 14 - 32 RUNWAY DATA TANDUM (DT) GEAR AIRCRAFT U-UTILITY T-TRANSPORT P-PRECISION V-VISUAL NP-NON PRECISION RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE DATA LENGTHBASERUNWAY OUTER WIDTH SLOPE EXISTING 14 32 19 01 250' 250' 250' 250' 1000' 1000' 1000' 1000' 450' 450' 450' 450' 20:1 20:1 20:1 20:1 RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE DIMENSIONS (R.P.Z.) 14 32 19 01 250' 250' 1000' 1000' 1000' 1000' 450' 450' 20:1 20:1 20:1 20:1 RUNWAY SAFETY AREA RUNWAY WIDTH LENGTH BEYOND RUNWAY END RUNWAY SAFETY AREA DIMENSIONS (R.S.A.) 14 ULTIMATE 32 19 01 120' 120' NA NA NA NA 240' 240' 14 32 19 01 120' 120' 240' 240' ULTIMATE RUNWAY WIDTH LENGTH BEYOND RUNWAY END RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA ULTIMATE RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA DIMENSIONS (O.F.A.) 14 32 19 01 400' 400' 14 32 19 01 400' 400' RUNWAY END COORDINATES EXISTING RUNWAY LAT. LONG. ULTIMATE 14 32 19 01 14 32 19 01 RUNWAY 01 - 19 0.45% 90.53% 90.53% 95.05% 95.05% U - V U - NPI 12,500# (S) 12,500# (S) 14 (20:1) 32 (20:1) 14 (20:1) 32 (20:1) L.I.R.L. M.I.R.L. BIT. BIT. EXISTING ULTIMATE 93.71% 93.71% N/A N/A U - V U - V NONE (TURF) NONE TURF WHEN PROPERTY INTEREST IS PURCHASED, CONSIDERATION WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 1. LIMITS OF LAND ELIGIBLE FOR FAA PARTICIPATION; 2. DESIRES OF PROPERTY OWNER; 3. EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERSHIP BOUNDARIES; 4. PROTECTION OF THE IMAGINARY SURFACES DESCRIBED IN FAR. PART 77.25; 5. EXISTING LAND USE ZONING CONTROLS. A.R.P. STA.43+03.57 225.31' RT. 250' 250' 2627 34 35 TURF NONE NONE ULTIMATE PROPERTY INTEREST LINE ULTIMATE ULTIMATE RSA EXISTING O.F.A. ULTIMATE O.F.A. EXISTING R.S.A. ULTIMATE R.S.A. END OF ULTIMATE PAVED RWY 19 STA. 136+16.43 FOR PAVED RWY 19 EL. 764.6 EL.762.9 120' X 240' 120' X 240' 250' X 240' 400' X 240' 400' X 240' 400' X 240' 120' X 240' 120' X 240' EXISTING O.F.A. 250' X 240' ULTIMATE O.F.A. 400' X 240' EXISTING R.S.A. ULTIMATE R.S.A. 120' X 240' 120' X 240' STA. 32+00 EL. 763.1 STA. 29+00 EL. 764.0 ULTIMATE END OF RWY 14 STA 135+72.93 (RWY 1-19) STA 29+20.75 (RWY 14-32) 120' X 240' 400' X 240' ULTIMATE O.F.A. 400' X 240' ULTIMATE R.S.A. 120' X 240' EL. 810.0' EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING BUILDINGS 250' 250' 450' 450' 120' 120' 240' 240' 240' 240' 240' 240' 240' 240' 400' 400' 240' 240' 45^08'16.915" 87^11'22.139" 45^07'57.660" 87^10'56.093" 45^08'21.371" 87^11'24.482" 45^07'58.647" 87^11'28.972" 45^08'19.055" 87^11'25.034" 45^07'56.233" 87^10'54.164" 45^08'19.415" 87^11'24.869" 45^07'57.180" 87^11'29.262" N4^39'W WIND TEE EXISTING O.F.A. EXISTING R.S.A. BEACON AUTO PARKING TERMINAL GPS OF RWY 14 EXISTING END EXISTING R.S.A. END OF RWY. STA.138+16.43 O.F.A. EXISTING O.F.A.INTERSECTION OR RWYS. MAG. DEC. EXISTING ASPHALT PAPI PAPI, LPV NON-PREC. INST. 12,500# (S) 01 (20:1) 19 (20:1) 01 (20:1) 19 (20:1) 14 (19.9:1) 32 (33.1:1) *VALUES GIVEN ARE GROSS AIRCRAFT WEIGHT IN 1000# SINGLE (S), DUAL (D) & DUAL 32 (15.6:1) 14 (13.9:1) 01 (20:1) 01 (20:1) 19 (3.6:1) 19 (15.8:1) NONE 0.44% 0.34% 0.50% 300'150' 600' TABLE OF MODIFICATIONS TO STANDARDS ITEM MODIFICATION DATE OF FAA ACTION ACCESS TO RUNWAY AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN A SS O C I A T SE N N4^39'W MAG. DEC. EXISTING AIRFIELD PAVEMENT EXISTING ROADS EXISTING BUILDINGS TREES OR TREE LINE DITCH EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CLEAR ZONE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING AVIGATION EASEMENT LINE B.R.L. BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE PROPOSED BUILDINGS PROPOSED PAVEMENT LEGEND EXISTING BUILDINGS DESIGNED BY: EXISTING AUTO PARKING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING TERMINAL BUILDING 400'200'100'0 A SS O C I A T SE ELECTRICAL VAULT ULTIMATE AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE ULTIMATE AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE ELECTRICAL PANEL FUEL ULTIMATE SOUTH HANGAR AREA DEVELOPMENT ISLAND SEGMENTED CIRCLE CONCRETE FUELING PAD UNDER- GROUND FUEL TANK LIGHT POLE UAPL SEPTIC DRAIN FIELD DWN BY:FIRM OR AGENCY NAMEDATE:DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT EPHRAIM, WISCONSIN SHEET 3 REVISIONS SHEET 4 OF 9 N4^39'W MAG. DEC. EXISTING AIRFIELD PAVEMENT EXISTING ROADS EXISTING BUILDINGS TREES OR TREE LINE DITCH EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CLEAR ZONE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING AVIGATION EASEMENT LINE B.R.L. BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE PROPOSED BUILDINGS PROPOSED PAVEMENT LEGEND EXISTING BUILDINGS DWN. BY: READESIGNED BY: 400'200'100'0 A SS O C I A T SE ULTIMATE AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE SOUTH HANGAR DEVEL. AREA UAPL DATE: 5-4-12 Review of Draft Runway Alternatives e " " " " J A A RSA RSARSA RSA R O F Z RO FZ ROFZ RO FZ RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z TO FA TOFATOFA TOFATOFATSA TSA TSATSA TSATSATSATSATSA 500' RUNWAY 14/32 3,300' X 60' TOFATOFATOFATOFAT O F A T O F A T O F A RUNWAY 14-32 ALTERNATIVE A - EXTENSION TO 3,300' & FULL PARALLEL TAXIWAY EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS ROFA ROFZ PAPI Runway Safety AreaRSA AWOS Critical Area Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Pavement Removal Taxilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA o 0 250 500125 Feet 503' EXTENSION100' EXTENSION RELOCATE PAPIS ~7 ACRES ~2 ACRES MAINTAIN ACCESS FOR EXISTING RTTF AGREEMENT RTTF Agreement Area Future T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA e " " " " J A A 500' RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z RSA RSARSA R O F Z RO FZ ROFZ TO FA TOFATOFA TOFATOFATSA TSA TSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSATSA TSA TSA RUNWAY 14/32 3,200' X 60' TOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA RUNWAY 14-32 ALTERNATIVE B - EXTENSION TO 3,200' & FULL PARALLEL TAXIWAY EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS PAPI AWOS Critical Area Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Pavement Removal o 0 250 500125 Feet 503' EXTENSION RELOCATE PAPIS ~7 ACRES ~1 ACRE MAINTAIN ACCESS FOR EXISTING RTTF AGREEMENT RTTF Agreement Area Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone ROFA ROFZ Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA Future T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA e " " " " J A A 500' RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z RSA RSA RSA R O F Z ROFZRO FZ R O F Z RUNWAY 14/32 3,400' X 60' TO FA TOFATOFA TOFATOFATSA TSA TSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TOFATOFATOFATOFAT O F A T O F A T O F A RUNWAY 14-32 ALTERNATIVE C - EXTENSION TO 3,400' & FULL PARALLEL TAXIWAY EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR o 0 250 500125 Feet Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS PAPI AWOS Critical Area Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Pavement Removal 500' EXTENSION 203' EXTENSION RELOCATE PAPIS ~6 ACRES~2 ACRES MAINTAIN ACCESS FOR EXISTING RTTF AGREEMENT RTTF Agreement Area Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone ROFA ROFZ Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA Future T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA e " " " " J A A RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z RO FZ RO FZ R O F Z RSA RSA 500' RUNWAY 14/32 3,000' X 60' TSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSATSA TO FA TOFATOFA TOFATOFA TOFATOFATOFA TOF A RUNWAY 14-32 ALTERNATIVE D - EXTENSION TO 3,000' & PARTIAL PARALLEL TAXIWAY/TURNAROUND EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR o 0 250 500125 Feet 100' EXTENSION203' EXTENSION RELOCATE PAPIS ~4 ACRES ~2 ACRES MAINTAIN ACCESS FOR EXISTING RTTF AGREEMENT Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS PAPI AWOS Critical Area Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Pavement Removal RTTF Agreement Area Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone ROFA ROFZ Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA Future T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA " " J A A RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFZ ROFZ ROFZ RO ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFZ ROFZ ROFZ ROFZRSA ROFZ TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA 500' RUNWAY 14/32 3,300' X 60' RUNWAY 1/19 1,941' X 100' TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TO FA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA RUNWAY 1-19 ALTERNATIVE A - SHIFT RUNWAY 250' SOUTH EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS ROFA ROFZ Turf Runway PAPI Runway Safety AreaRSA AWOS Critical Area Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Pavement Removal Taxilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA o 0 200 400100 Feet 100' EXTENSION SHIFT RUNWAY 1-19 250' SOUTH Future Turf Runway " " J A RVZ RVZ RVZ RVZ RVZ RVZ RVZ RVZ RVZ 500' RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RO F A RO F A RO F A RO F A RO F Z RO F Z RO F Z RO F Z RO F Z RO F A RO F A RO F A RO F A RO F Z RO F Z RO F Z RO F Z RO F Z RO FZ RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RO FZ ROFZROFZROFZROFZROFZROFZROFZROFZROFZ RO FZ R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z RUNWAY 1/19 1,941' X 100'RUNWAY 18/361,941' X 60' RUNWAY 18-36 ALTERNATIVE A EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR o 0 170 34085 Feet Runway Object Free Area (ROFA) Runway Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ) Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS ROFA ROFZ Turf Runway PAPI Runway Safety Area (RSA)RSA AWOS Critical AreaFuture Runway Safety Area (RSA)RSA Future Runway Object Free Area (ROFA)ROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free Zone (ROFZ)ROFZ Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement REMOVE EXISITING TURF RUNWA Y ~3 ACRES ~0.1 ACRES ~0.06 ACRES Review of Draft Building Area Alternatives TOFA TOFA TOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA A TO FA TO FA TO FA TOFA TOFA TOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA TO FA TO FA T LO FA T LO FA T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A TSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA 35' 79' 40' 25' 49' ADG-1, TDG-1A BUILDING AREA ALTERNATIVE A1 EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS ROFA ROFZ PAPI Runway Safety AreaRSA AWOS Critical AreaFuture Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Pavement Removal Taxilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA o 0 60 12030 Feet 60' X 60' HANGAR Future Airport Building Future Gate Future Access Road EV CHARGERS TOFA TOFA TOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA A TO FA TO FA TO FA TOFA TOFA TOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA TO FA TO FA TLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFA TLOFATLOFA T LO FA T LO FA T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A TSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSA TSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA 35' 79' 40' 25' 40' 49' ADG-1, TDG-1A 49' 79' BUILDING AREA ALTERNATIVE A2 EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS ROFA ROFZ PAPI Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Pavement Removal Taxilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA o 0 60 12030 Feet Future Airport Building 60' X 60' HANGAR Airport Boundary AWOS Critical Area Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Future Gate Future Access Road e " " A RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F A R O F AR O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z R O F Z RO FZ RSA RSA RO FZ RO FZ R O F Z TO FA TO FA TOFA TOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA TO FA TOFA TOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA TO FA TLOFATLOFA TLOFATLOFA TLOFATLOFATLOFA TLOFATLOFATLOFA T LO FA T LO FA T L O F A T L O F A TLOFATLOFA TLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFA TLOFATLOFATLOFA T LO FA T LO FA TLOFATLOFA TSA TSA TSA TSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSA TSATSA TSATSATSA TSATSA TSATSATSA TSATSA TSATSATSATSATSATSA TSATSA TSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSATSATSA RUNWAY 14/32 3,300' X 60' T O F A T O F A T O F A T O F A T O F A T O F A T O F A 30' BUILDING AREA ALTERNATIVE B EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS PAPI Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Pavement Removal o 0 110 22055 Feet 100' EXTENSION RELOCATE PAPIS Airport Boundary AWOS Critical Area Future Airport Pavement Avigation Easement Future Land Acquisition ~9 ACRES FUTURE HANGARS 50' X 50' POTENTIAL LOCATIONS FOR STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT PONDS Future Airport Building Stormwater PondRunway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone ROFA ROFZ Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA Future T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA T axiway Object Free AreaTOFA EV CHARGERS " " RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFZ ROFZ ROFZ ROFA ROFZ ROF ROFA T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T LO FA T L O F A T L O F A T LO FA T L O F A T L O F A T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSATSA TSA TSATSATSATSATSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSATSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TO FA TOFA TOFA T O F A TOFA TOFA TOFA T O F A TOFA TOFA 1,000' LANDSIDE ACCESS ROAD ADG-I, TDG 1A ADG-I, TDG 1A 30' 50' 49' 79' 25' 39.5' BUILDING AREA ALTERNATIVE C EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS ROFA ROFZ PAPI Runway Safety AreaRSA AWOS Critical Area Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airside Pavement Avigation EasementPavement Removal Taxilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA o 0 100 20050 Feet Future Airport Building Future Landside Pavement AUTOMOBILE PARKING LOT HANGARS 50' X 50' POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR STORMW ATER FACILITY Stormwater Pond TERMINAL BUILDING 80' X 80' EV CHARGERS " " RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA OFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFZ ROFZ ROFZ ROFA ROFA ROF ROFZ ROFZ ROFZ TO FA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RO FA RO FA RO FA RO FA RO FA RO FA R O F A RO FA RO FA RO FA RO FA RO FA RO FA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T LO FA T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T L O F A T LO FA T LO FA 1,000' LANDSIDE ACCESS ROAD ADG-I, TDG 1A ADG-I, TDG 1A 30' 50' BUILDING AREA ALTERNATIVE D EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT - 3D2 MASTER PLAN STUDY Village of Ephraim, WI / Town of Gibraltar, WI SOURCE: CITY OF FISH CREEK, DOOR COUNTY, WI DNR Runway Object Free Area Runway Obstacle Free Zone Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Building Airport Pavement Airport Boundary e Airport Beacon A Wind Cone J AWOS ROFA ROFZ PAPI Runway Safety AreaRSA AWOS Critical Area Future Runway Safety AreaRSA Future Runway Object Free AreaROFA Future Runway Obstacle Free ZoneROFZ Future Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Future Airside Pavement Avigation EasementPavement Removal Taxilane Object Free AreaTLOFA T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axiway Safety AreaTSA Future T axilane Object Free AreaTLOFA o 0 100 20050 Feet REMOVE TURF RUNWAY Future Airport Building Future Landside Pavement TERMINAL BUILDING 80' X 80' AUTOMOBILE PARKING LOT POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR STORMW ATER FACILITY HANGARS 50' X 50' Stormwater Pond EV CHARGERS Study/Schedule Next Steps • Aviation Activity Forecast Approval • Finalize Facility Requirements • Update/Revise Airfield and Building Area Alternatives • Draft RPZ Alternatives analysis • Schedule next meeting after forecast approval: • Review updated alternatives • Select preferred development plan Questions? 1 -------- Original message -------- From: Jeff Drajesk <jdrajesk@gmail.com> Date: 5/6/26 5:39 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Ken Nelson <kennelson2419@gmail.com> Cc: Brent Bristol <bbristol@ephraim.wi.gov> Subject: Re: Airport Commission Master Plan Option Selections Hi Ken and Brent, I will be referring to the options included in the TEC Presentation #2 covered on March 19th (attached) b and I would request that the Board members have copies of that at the meeting. I can specify which pages I will be covering if needed. I am also looking for Justin's email address to directly invite the Ephraim Fire/Rescue group to our 80th Anniversary celebration on June 6th. Can you provide that to me? Thanks, Jeff On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 2:45 PM Ken Nelson <kennelson2419@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Jeff. We will be interested in hearing the AP commissions plans to make the Airport financially independent for not only operations but capital expenditures as well. Thanks, Ken 2 Ken Nelson P O Box 201 Ephraim, WI 54211 kennelson2419@gmail.com On May 5, 2026, at 2:01 PM, Jeff Drajesk <jdrajesk@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Ken, I will come prepared to address these concerns and questions, and please forward over any others you or any of the other board members may have before then. Thank you, Jeff Jeff Drajesk 262-758-9832 On Sun, May 3, 2026 at 12:32 PM Ken Nelson <kennelson2419@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Jeff, One of my concerns about land acquisition is the amount the BOA is willing to pay. In my opinion, the previous properties the AP acquired were well above market value. Anyone living around the AP knows this. We have a big enough AP; let’s not consider any property acquisition. To evaluate future hangers (I believe we will have 8 more locations available now with recent property acquisition) based on future internal AP operations makes no sense to me. Let’s fill up what we have before we start buying property for the potential future that may very well never happen. Thanks, Ken Ken Nelson President, Village of Ephraim P O Box 201 Ephraim, WI 54211 kennelson2419@gmail.com 3 On May 3, 2026, at 11:15 AM, Jeff Drajesk <jdrajesk@gmail.com> wrote: Copying in the others - sorry. Jeff On Sun, May 3, 2026 at 12:14 PM Jeff Drajesk <jdrajesk@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Ken, I will be back to meet with the Board on May 12th. Regarding your questions, 1. A full-length taxiway is a significant safety improvement to eliminate the need to back-taxi aircraft before they take off. Our run-up areas are small and the distance between aircraft there and landing aircraft is an additional hazard. The Commission feels this is an important addition while we are "doing it right" for this major rebuild. 2. The Commission wishes to change runway 1/19 to 18/36 and maintain it as a turf runway. That also helps reduce the distance needed to land in case of an emergency landing for larger aircraft as well - grass slows you down faster. 4. The Commission chose creating new hangars on existing property as our first choice. However, this will likely be more expensive overall than acquiring the property immediately to the north of the existing hangars due to the need to create access roads and bring in power, in addition to significantly more clearing/excavation. The Commission has previously discussed this with our BoA representatives and they told us that the FAA considers all options and may decide to fund the less expensive option overall. We will reopen that discussion, and the impact on local tax revenue will be included in that discussion. As mentioned previously, the Commission is unanimously against acquiring additional property unless the owner wishes to sell. Sincerely, Jeff On Sun, May 3, 2026 at 10:24 AM Ken Nelson <kennelson2419@gmail.com> wrote: Good Morning Jeff, 4 Thank you for sharing the AP Commission feedback on the presentation by the DOA. I would like to clarify that the two people who attended the presentation from Ephraim represented our village Board and Plan Committee. Before you reply to the DOA with the Commissioners comments, I would like you to present this report to the Ephraim Village Board to get their input. I will work with Brent to get you on our May agenda (May 12). Will you be back in town? Based on my observations I have a few comments I’d like you to consider: 1. Rebuild of RW 14/32. Is the parallel TW a need or a want? I understand the short extension of the RW from a safety perspective, but is a parallel TW necessary? 2. Rebuild of RW 1/19. Please confirm this will remain a turf RW. 4. d. Future hanger development. I expressed concern at the meeting with the idea of buying property for hanger expansion. There are options that allow for extensive hanger development (more than could conceivably be needed in the next 20 years) on existing AP property. Gary Glopjek voiced agreement with my comment and stated we have adequate existing property for hanger expansion. This potential acquisition would take a significant property off the tax roll (in addition a significant acquisition cost). I look forward to your presentation to our VB. Thanks, Ken Ken Nelson President, Village of Ephraim P O Box 201 Ephraim, WI 54211 kennelson2419@gmail.com On May 1, 2026, at 4:50 PM, Jeff Drajesk <jdrajesk@gmail.com> wrote: 5 Dear Laura and Brent, Attached is a written summary of the Ephraim-Gibraltar Airport Commission's feedback on the various options presented by the WI Bureau of Aeronautics and Westwood Engineering at our last Technical Advisory Committee meeting on March 19th, 2026. We would be happy to discuss this with the Town and Village Boards if desired, and an open public comment meeting will also be scheduled in June. With best regards, Jeff -- Jeff Drajesk Ephraim-Gibraltar Airport Commission Airport Master Plan Feedback on Future Development Options May 1, 2026 On Thursday, March 19, 2026, a Technical Advisory Committee meeting was held by TKDA, contracted by the WI Bureau of Aeronautics (BoA) to develop the Airport Master Plan for this Airport. In attendance were all members of the Ephraim-Gibraltar Airport Commission, representatives from the WI BoA and Westwood Engineering (responsible for development of plans based on the AMP). Members of the Ephraim Village Board also attended. Various options were presented on the 1) rebuild of runway 14/32, 2) rebuild of runway 1/19, 3) current hangar development area, and 4) future hangar development. Feedback on each area of development are presented below: 1. Rebuild of runway 14/32 a. Based on the fact that this runway is the shortest runway of this Class in the State of Wisconsin with extensions noted in two prior Airport Layout Plans, there were four options were presented with runway lengths of 3,000 – 3,400 feet, representing a 300-700 foot extension of the existing runway. b. The Commission unanimously supported Alternative D with a 3,000-foot runway, with an additional request to extend the parallel taxiway to the full length of the runway to eliminate the need to back-taxi and thereby reduce risk / increase safety for ground operations. i. This option minimized conflicts with the Runway Protection Zones (RPZs) on both end of the runway and limited such zones to the physical limitations of WI State Highway 42 and Maple Grove Road. 2. Rebuild of runway 1/19 a. Two options were presented for improvement to the existing turf/alternate runway: shift the existing runway by 250 feet to the South to eliminate any safety area conflicts between the two runways, or shift the northern end by 250 feet AND rotate the runway by 10 degrees for a new 18/36 runway orientation. b. The Commission unanimously supported the second option as it almost precisely matches the existing Airport property without RPZs extending over private property. This option also slightly reduces the length of a future taxiway connecting to future hangars planned on existing Airport property. 3. Current hangar development area a. There were two options presented for the current hangar development area, with the only difference being the placement of the apron for the five hangars closest runway. b. The Commission unanimously supported placement of the apron on the side of the runway (Alternative A2), which provides a significant advantage for snow removal/melting for these hangars and also decreases taxiway traffic for this hangar area. 4. Future hangar development a. Two basic options were presented for areas of future hangar development: continuation of hangar development to the north of the existing hangars along Maple Grove Road (Alternative B), or development of a new area to the west of runway 14/32 and south of runway 1/19 (Alternatives C and D). b. A version of Alternative B has been noted on the prior Airport Layout Plan prepared in 2012, with a new net total of 30 hangars in this area. This option depends on acquisition of 9 acres of new property currently privately owned. c. The second option represents a revision from the 1992 and 2012 Airport Layout Plans, now moving the hangars away from the runway and the existing weather reporting station, and also orienting the hangars to maximize sun exposure for snow removal/melting. This area is within the current Airport property and does not require any additional property to be acquired. i. This option will require the creation of a new landside access road and electrical power from Highway A, as well as the creation of new taxiways to connect to runway 14/32 and eventually to runway 18/36. ii. Two versions were presented: Alternative C with 30 hangars and a taxiway only to Runway 14/32, and Alternative D with 32 hangars and taxiways to both Runway 14/32 and 18/36. d. The Commission has come to the following plan: i. IF the owner of the existing property immediately to the north of the existing hangars is willing to sell the property between now and when demand exists for additional hangars, the Commission supports development of this area (Alternative D) due to the significant savings and efficiencies of extending the current layout without the need for new access roads, new taxiways and long underground power lines. ii. If the current property owner is NOT interested in selling, the Commission supports Alternative D on existing Airport property. iii. The Commission will request a ballpark estimate of the costs for development of both areas for future development decisions. Conclusion The Ephraim-Gibraltar Airport is required by FAA and the WI BoA to have an Airport Master Plan which has been developed using all available and practical options considered to “operate the airport in a safe and serviceable condition and in accordance with the minimum standards” (Federal Grant Assurance #19, WI DoT Chapter Trans 55.06(2). Working with expert consultants and the WI BoA, the Commission has selected the options that best serve the needs of the Airport and community by maximizing the potential of the existing Airport property with minimal impact on neighboring properties and owners. The Airport Master Plan includes all foreseeable new development projects for the Ephraim- Gibraltar Airport for the next 20+ years, with the caveat that the existing facilities will require active maintenance and upkeep until the runways or other facilities again require renewal or rebuilding (against the background of the current runway lasting over 50 years). Administration Building Project Overview & Options Carly, Ken & Brent 5/12/2026 Problems: Deferred maintenance and an old building coupled with operational changes in the administration department over time have resulted in the following challenges and issues with the current administrative building: • A flat roof, lack of proper insulation, and leaks within the building not only have resulted in its physical and esthetic degradation but also pose a risk relative to air quality and record retention. • The offices do not have proper, or in some cases any, HVAC within. One office does not have an openable window. • Lack of conditioned space in the lower level severely limits our long-term storage ability. • On one hand, relocation of meetings to the Village Hall was positive as it has removed the disruption that previously occurred with meetings held at the admin office. However, despite having a very expensive and quality AV system in the Hall, it is not without its bugs. Whoever is reading this has probably experienced an AV failure or disruption along the way. These disruptions, while not regular, are occurring, and they are occurring even with regular trouble shooting and testing by Brent. The normal process is a dry run of the equipment before each HPC/Plan Meeting, each Board meeting, and before committee meeting week at the first of each month. On average, although Brent is spending 4-5 hours each month checking, trouble shooting and fixing connectivity issues, issues still occur. • Additionally, the time required to set up and break down the Village Hall for meetings is something that falls on a busy maintenance department. Project Goals: • Provide safe and effective work environment for Admin Staff • Provide adequate storage for Admin operations and record retention • Find a solution that can permit us to move meetings back to the Admin Office while hopefully minimizing meeting disruption to the operation of the office • Allow the Fire Department to use new space for classroom training, possibly freeing up their existing training room for other purposes Option Breakdown Option 0: (Partial renovation) Pro: • Addresses the deferred maintenance issues within the current building. • HVAC added to the two rear offices and basement • Conditioned basement allows for additional storage • New roof on building • New insulation on exterior walls and roof of building Con: • No alterations within the office building • No relocation of meetings from Village Hall • No room for any growth • No accessibility improvements • Not intended as a long-term solution Option 1: (Full renovation of existing structure) Pro: • Can possibly move smaller committee meetings back to Admin Building • Conditioned basement allows for additional storage • Options for minor reconfiguring of office layout within the existing building envelope • Some modernization of facility to better support current and future needs • Better accessibility with the addition of exterior ramp • HVAC added to the two existing rear offices and basement Con: • 1 office still has no openable window • Still requires the use of Village Hall for HPC/Plan and Village Board Mtgs. • Meetings held in office are still somewhat disruptive to office operations as the flow and access is not ideal • AV system while new would likely still have to be broken down from time to time and cannot likely be hard wired. This increases the likelihood of failure, disruption and maintenance. Option 2: (Small addition) Pro: • All village meetings, minus the largest public hearings, can move back to Admin bldg. • Board/Committee member table and AV systems can be permanent/hard wired • Conditioned basement allows for additional storage • Small addition allows for a more significant reconfiguring of the office/meeting room layout for more separation and better flow. Offices can all be new construction designed based on needs with new HVAC equipment and openable windows. • Modernizes facility to better support current and future needs • Accessible ramp is completely enclosed • Addition only impacts the portion of the building that was previously an addition. Original aesthetics retained • Room for Fire Department classroom training Con: • Looking at the long term this plan likely limits office staffing to 3 full-time employees. Current staff does not see the need for a 4th full-time staff member on the horizon. Space can be found for part- time employees, limited-term employees or interns if need be Option 3: (Large addition) Pro: • All village meetings can move back to Admin bldg. • Board/Committee member table and AV systems can be permanent/hard wired • Conditioned basement allows for additional storage • Large addition would completely separate the admin office from the meeting room so no disruption would occur • Completely modern office housed in a brand-new office addition. • Better accessibility • Enough space to guarantee that the addition would satisfy the needs of the admin department for the foreseeable future. • Accessible ramp is completely enclosed. Con: • Cost • Separation is a con on election day as the offices of Andrea and Kim would be removed from the operation and out of earshot. • Significant change to the look of the building, additional bulk Option 4: (New building) Pro: • Ground up purpose built new construction that will be a long-term solution without the need to utilize a portion of the existing building. Con: • Plan results in either the demolition of the existing Admin building or the relocating of the facility to a new location. The latter option would still require us to incur the costs of deferred maintenance in Option 0 • If built in the same location, we would lose a historic building • If built on the same site but in a different location, would require new utility connections, parking lot, driveways, etc • Cost Page 1 PHONE 920·766·5795 1·800·236·2534 FAX 920·766·5004 WEB SITE www.kellerbuilds.com ADDRESS P.O. Box 620, Kaukauna, WI 54130-0620 Planners | Architects | Builders Offices in Fox Cities, Madison, Milwaukee, & Wausau Option 0: Deferred Maintenance Budget: $600,000 with $50,000 contingency The project scope is limited to targeted deferred maintenance, including the addition of HVAC to two enclosed office spaces (currently not code compliant), improvements to building insulation / exterior envelope, conditioned HVAC basement, and full roof replacement. The work does not include building expansion, reconfiguration, or full system replacement beyond these defined areas, and is intended to address specific performance deficiencies rather than a long term solution. Option 1: Remodel Existing (Existing 2,172 sq. ft.) Budget: $1,300,000 with $100,000 contingency Timeline: 5 months construction A comprehensive renovation of the existing 2,172 square foot facility to improve functionality, code compliance, and overall building performance. Work would involve reconfiguration of interior spaces, upgrades to mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and improvements to the building envelope as needed. This approach maintains the existing structure while modernizing the facility to better support current and future operational needs. Option 2.0: Remodel & Addition Total: 2,990 (Existing 2,172 sq. ft. & 818 sq. ft. New) Budget: $1,800,000 with $100,000 contingency Timeline: 6 months construction This option includes renovation of the existing 2,172 square foot facility combined with an 818 square foot addition to allow internal ramps (rather than external). This option improves on ‘option 2’ in allowing a safer solution with lower long-term maintenance costs. Work includes integration of new and existing systems, interior reconfiguration, and upgrades to building systems and envelope as required to support the addition. Option 3: Remodel & Addition Total: 4,178 sq. ft. (Existing 2,172 sq. ft. & 2,006 sq. ft New) Budget: $2,300,000 with $100,000 contingency Timeline: 7 months construction This option includes renovation of the existing 2,172 square foot facility combined with a 2,006 square foot addition to expand overall building capacity. The project would address deficiencies within the existing structure while providing new, purpose-built space to support operational needs. Work includes integration of new and existing systems, improved layout and circulation, and targeted upgrades to the existing building to align with the addition. Option 4: New Facility (New 3,500 sq. ft.) Budget: $2,000,000 with $100,000 contingency Timeline: 8 months construction This option includes construction of a new 3,500 square foot facility, replacing the existing building entirely. The new facility would be designed to meet current operational requirements, building codes, and energy performance standards. Important to note this does not include land cost. This approach eliminates constraints associated with the existing structure and allows for a fully optimized layout, modern systems, and long-term durability with reduced maintenance needs. TYPICAL EXISTING WALL DEMO WALLS WALL KEY NEW WALL/FURRING NEW MASONRY/ VENEER WALL NEW COOLER/ FREEZER WALLS NEW PRECAST WALL FIRE WALL OR FIRE BARRIER NEW IMP WALL NEW FOUNDATION WALL EXISTING MASONRY WALL DEMO MASONRY WALL DN UP STAIR ELEV. WOMENS' LOCKERS ARCHIVE FILES WOMENS' TOILET MENS' LOCKER MENS' TOILET RECEPTION OFFICE OFFICE BREAK ROOM STORAGE COPY/ WORK MEETING 2,172 SF PRELIMINARY NO: SUPERVISOR: EXPEDITOR: DRAWN BY: CONTRACT NO: DATE: SHEET: REVISIONS "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" This design, drawing and detail is the copyrighted property of KELLER, INC. No part hereof shall be copied, duplicated, distributed, disclosed or made available to anyone without the expressed written consent of KELLER, INC. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WISCONSIN DESIGNER: PROJECT MANAGER: INTERIOR DESIGNER: EX1.0 05.08.2026 ACM ------- ------- P25244 ------- PROPOSED FOR: EPHRAIM, VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM D. FLANIGAN G. STRAUB ------- 10005 NORWAY ST N 54211 1/4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTH OPTION 0 TYPICAL EXISTING WALL DEMO WALLS WALL KEY NEW WALL/FURRING NEW MASONRY/ VENEER WALL NEW COOLER/ FREEZER WALLS NEW PRECAST WALL FIRE WALL OR FIRE BARRIER NEW IMP WALL NEW FOUNDATION WALL EXISTING MASONRY WALL DEMO MASONRY WALL DN UP STORAGE STAIR PASSAGE JAN. UNISEX TOILET UTILITY SINK ELEV. TRANSACTION COUNTER COPIER OFFICE LOCKABLE BUILT-IN A/V CABINET LAT. FILESLAT. FILES LAT. FILES LAT. FILES TVTV TV TV SERVER OFFICE OFFICE COPY / WORK 7'-7 1/4" 3 1/2" 9'-2 3/4" 7'-4 1/2" 3 1/2" 3'-1 1/4" 3 1/2" 12'-8 3/4" 9'-5" 3 1/2" 9'-5" 3 1/2" 22'-6 1/4" (30 SEATS) MOTORIZED SOLAR SHADES 30" REF. MICRO COFFEE MIN. 1'-6". TV BREAK ROOM MEETING ROOM INFILL FLOOR @ LOCATION OF DEMOLISHED CHIMNEY 5'-7 3/4" 3 1/2" 5'-4" UNISEX TOILET 9'-6 1/2" 3 1/2" 5'-3 1/4" 3 1/2" 11'-5 1/2" 11'-3 1/4" ENTRY LOBBY 23'-9 1/2" 14'-6" 3 1/2" 4'-4" RAMP UP RAMP UP 5'-0"24'-0"10'-0" 8'-0" 5'-0"15'-0" DN LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE TO MATCH EXISTING 8" MAX. 3" GAP PRELIMINARY NO: SUPERVISOR: EXPEDITOR: DRAWN BY: CONTRACT NO: DATE: SHEET: REVISIONS "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" This design, drawing and detail is the copyrighted property of KELLER, INC. No part hereof shall be copied, duplicated, distributed, disclosed or made available to anyone without the expressed written consent of KELLER, INC. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WISCONSIN DESIGNER: PROJECT MANAGER: INTERIOR DESIGNER: A1.0 02.18.2026 ACM ------- ------- P25244 ------- PROPOSED FOR: EPHRAIM, VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM D. FLANIGAN G. STRAUB ------- 10005 NORWAY ST N 54211 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 03.10.2026 ACM 2 3 4 5 6 OPTION 1 TYPICAL EXISTING WALL DEMO WALLS WALL KEY NEW WALL/FURRING NEW MASONRY/ VENEER WALL NEW COOLER/ FREEZER WALLS NEW PRECAST WALL FIRE WALL OR FIRE BARRIER NEW IMP WALL NEW FOUNDATION WALL EXISTING MASONRY WALL DEMO MASONRY WALL DN UP STORAGE STAIR PASSAGE JAN. UNISEX TOILET UTILITY SINK ELEV. COPIER WORK / BREAK TV TV 7'-7 1/4" 3 1/2" 9'-2 3/4" 29'-7 7/8" 3 1/2" 5'-9 3/16" 3 1/2" 5'-11 3/16" MOTORIZED SOLAR SHADES OFFICE INFILL FLOOR @ LOCATION OF DEMOLISHED CHIMNEY LOBBY LAT. FILES LAT. FILES LAT. FILES LAT. FILES 23'-9 1/2" TRANSACTION WINDOW AT 42" A.F.F. LAT. FILES LAT. FILES 4'-0" 42'-0" 3'-0" 6'-4" 15'-8" 6'-4" 10'-8" TV 9'-8 3/8" 3 1/2" 10'-2" 8'-3 15/16" 818 SF ADDITION OFFICE TV 30" REF. MICROCOFFEE TV (49 MAX. OCCUPANCY) MEETING ROOM (40) CHAIRS SET UP AT ALL TIMES CEILING MOUNTED MOTORIZED PROJECTION SCREEN PORTABLE LECTERN R 6' - 0" R 8' - 0" WOMEN'S TLT. MEN'S TLT. BABY CHANGING STATION BABY CHANGING STATION CLEAR 4'-8" SERVER OFFICE 30" DEEP COUNTERTOP @ 30" A.F.F. RAMP UP 41'-0" RAMP UP14'-6" RAMP 12'-0"6'-4"9'-8"6'-4"6'-8" 28'-6" RAMP 13'-7 1/4" 3 1/2" 5'-1 1/4" 3 1/2" 13'-7 1/2" 5 1/2" 7'-6" 11'-3 3/4" 3 1/2" 8'-7 1/4"3 1/2"11'-0 1/4" 8'-4 5/16" 4'-8" 8'-8 1/4" 3 1/2" 11'-6 1/2" INTERN WORKSTATION PRELIMINARY NO: SUPERVISOR: EXPEDITOR: DRAWN BY: CONTRACT NO: DATE: SHEET: REVISIONS "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" This design, drawing and detail is the copyrighted property of KELLER, INC. No part hereof shall be copied, duplicated, distributed, disclosed or made available to anyone without the expressed written consent of KELLER, INC. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WISCONSIN DESIGNER: PROJECT MANAGER: INTERIOR DESIGNER: A1.0 05.08.2026 ACM ------- ------- P25244 ------- PROPOSED FOR: EPHRAIM, VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM D. FLANIGAN G. STRAUB ------- 10005 NORWAY ST N 54211 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 OPTION 2 TYPICAL EXISTING WALL DEMO WALLS WALL KEY NEW WALL/FURRING NEW MASONRY/ VENEER WALL NEW COOLER/ FREEZER WALLS NEW PRECAST WALL FIRE WALL OR FIRE BARRIER NEW IMP WALL NEW FOUNDATION WALL EXISTING MASONRY WALL DEMO MASONRY WALL DN UP MEETING ROOM STORAGE STAIR PASSAGE JAN. UNISEX TOILET UTILITY SINK ELEV. PANIC ELECTION STORAGE LOCKABLE BUILT-IN A/V CABINET CEILING MOUNTED SPEAKERS CEILING MOUNTED SPEAKERS MEETING ROOM (59 SEATS) MOTORIZED SOLAR SHADES 30" REF. MICRO COFFEE TV KITCHENETTE INFILL FLOOR @ LOCATION OF DEMOLISHED CHIMNEY LOBBY / WAITING PORTABLE LECTERN (27) CHAIRS SET UP AT ALL TIMES CEILING MOUNTED MOTORIZED PROJECTION SCREEN CEILING MOUNTED MOTORIZED PROJECTION SCREEN R 6' - 0" R 8' - 0" MECHANICAL CHASE 1'-0" MIN TV 103' - 3" 100' - 0" 103' - 3" NEW 5'-0" WIDE OPENING PANIC 11'-2 1/2" 3 1/2" 15'-4 1/4" 8'-11 3/4" 3 1/2" 2'-0" 46'-8" 4'-8" 3'-8" 7'-4" 3'-8" 8'-0" 3'-8" 8'-0" 3'-8" 4'-0" 17'-8" 42'-0" 4'-0" 7'-4" 19'-4" 7'-4" 4'-0" EXISTING TENNIS COURT 45'-8" 9'-7" 3'-8" 3'-0" 3'-8" 3'-0" 5'-5" 3'-0" 3'-8" 3'-0" 3'-8" 4'-0" 5'-0" 21'-0" 9'-3" 15'-5" 1'-0" 11'-5" 3 1/2" 10'-1 1/4" 3 1/2" 11'-1 1/4" 3 1/2" 11'-2" 1'-0" TV 30" REF. COFFEE MICRO BREAK ROOM PASSAGE TVTV LAT. FILESLAT. FILES LAT. FILESLAT. FILES CONFERENCE (FUTURE OFFICE) OFFICE OFFICE SERVER COPIER 30" DEEP COUNTERTOP @ 30" A.F.F. HALF DOOR WITH TRANSACTION COUNTER AT 42" A.F.F. TRANSACTION WINDOW AT 42" A.F.F. LAT. FILESLAT. FILES COPY / WORK OFFICE WELCOME / WAITING ENTRY LOBBY TV BABY CHANGING STATION BABY CHANGING STATION MENS TOILET WOMENS TOILET 8'-11 3/8" 3 1/2" 8'-1 5/8" 3 1/2" 8'-1 5/8" 3 1/2" 18'-6 7/8" 1'-0" 1'-0" 10'-10" 3 1/2" 10'-2" 5 1/2" 4'-9 3/4" 3 1/2" 13'-1 3/4" 1'-0" 103' - 3" 101' - 1" 101' - 1" 29'-4" 3 1/2" 6'-1 3/4" 3 1/2" 8'-7 1/4" 1'-0" 5'-8 1/4" 3 1/2" 4'-7 1/4" 3 1/2" 5'-8 1/4" PANIC 102' - 5" RAMP UP RAMP UP UP 1'-0" 12'-1 3/4" 3 1/2" 9'-4 3/4" 3 1/2" 4'-5 1/4" 3 1/2" 13'-1 3/4" 1'-0" 2 A3.0 __________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ___________________ 1 A3.0 __________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ___________________ HALF WALL TO FOLLOW SLOPE OF RAMP 5'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0"5'-0" 1'-0" MIN. 5'-0" 3'-6" 3'-6" PANIC 6" 5'-11 1/4" 6" (2) NEW WINDOWS RESIZED TO FIT IN MODIFIED OPENING PRELIMINARY NO: SUPERVISOR: EXPEDITOR: DRAWN BY: CONTRACT NO: DATE: SHEET: REVISIONS "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" This design, drawing and detail is the copyrighted property of KELLER, INC. No part hereof shall be copied, duplicated, distributed, disclosed or made available to anyone without the expressed written consent of KELLER, INC. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION WISCONSIN DESIGNER: PROJECT MANAGER: INTERIOR DESIGNER: A1.0 02.18.2026 ACM ------- ------- P25244 ------- PROPOSED FOR: EPHRAIM, VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM D. FLANIGAN G. STRAUB ------- 10005 NORWAY ST N 54211 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 03.10.2026 ACM 2 3 4 5 6 OPTION 3 Committee Members Whose Terms Are Expiring PLAN COMMITTEE – 3 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2028 Ken Nelson (Chair) 920-854-3269 kennelson2419@gmail.com 2028 Andy Bartelt* 314-255-6114 bartelta@csl.edu 2028 Rick Hoyerman 920-421-1642 rick@128trustee.com 2028 BD Thorp 612-207-7486 bdthorp@aol.com 2028 Laird Hart 920-854-4528 lairdhart@icloud.com 2026 Grace Held* 414-719-0858, 920-854-9840 glheld@charter.net 2026 Monique McClean 503-799-8455, 503-799-2909 moniquemcclean@gmail.com HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE (HPC) – 3 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2026 BD Thorp (Chair) 612-207-7486 bdthorp@aol.com 2027 Marcia Ellis 920-857-7852 marciacellis@gmail.com 2027 Amy Russell 319-541-0835 russelliowa@msn.com 2028 Cody Schreck 920 -854-9688 cshreck@ephraim.org 2026 Kathy Pentler 262-893-5699 kpentler@yahoo.com COMMUNITY PROTECTION (CPC) – 3 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2026 Carly Mulliken (Chair) 608-215-5323 ekmulliken@gmail.com 2027 Tad Dukehart* 920-421-2256, 920-854-2949 tdukehart@gmail.com 2028 Keith Krist* 920-421-1401, 920-854-5289 None 2028 Laird Hart 920-854-4528 lairdhart@icloud.com 2028 John Cox* 920-421-0100 johnandshelleycox@gmail.com WASTEWATER COMMITTEE – 5 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2030 Karen McMurtry (Chair)* 920-559-1545 pkmcmurtry@gmail.com 2028 Rick Hoyerman (Board Rep.) 920-421-1642 rick@128trustee.com 2026 Jim Peterman* 920-854-2921 jamesjpeterman@sbcglobal.net 2027 Bruce Nelson* 920-585-0289 brucejamesnelson@gmail.com 2027 Dennis Jewell 785-393-0463 Jdjewell78@gmail.com Committee Members Whose Terms Are Expiring AIRPORT COMMITTEE – 3 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2026 Scott Pearson 2026 Gary Glojek 414-379-3414 gglojek@glojekltd.com 2027 Tim Halbrook 920-626-3018 timhalbrookbld1@gmail.com BOARD OF APPEALS – 3 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2026 Karen McMurtry (Chair)* 920-559-1545 pkmcmurtry@gmail.com 2026 Duska Pearson 630- 975-4942 duskapearson@mac.com 2027 Steve Sauter 920-421-0755 ssauter@icecreamsource.com 2027 Keith Krist 920-421-1401, 920-854-5289 No email 2027 Sara Glenn* 920-421-2275, 920-868-2828 Sara@TrueDoorCounty.com 2028 Alt. #1 Rob Moore 847-650-0692 rmoore524@aol.com 2028 Alt. #2 LIBRARY COMMITTEE – 3 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2027 Carly Mulliken (Chair) 608-215-5323 ekmulliken@gmail.com 2027 Windsor McCutcheon* 920-421-3292, 920-854-3218 windsorwmc@gmail.com 2028 Grace Held 414-719-0858, 920-854-9840 glheld@charter.net 2026 Cindy Nelson* 920-585-6556 cindyandbruce@gmail.com 2026 Mary Wilson 920-421-1856 mwilson54211@gmail.com 2028 Paul Flottman* 920-421-3801 andersonhousesg@gmail.com 2027 Scott Lohman 920-421-0751 scooterlohman@charter.net 2027 2027 Brian Reinhardt 920-493-6506 brian@truedoorcounty.com PHYSICAL FACILITIES/UTILITIES – 3 YEAR TERM Term Member Phone Email 2028 Matt Meacham (Chair)* 920-333-0002, 920-819-9922 mmdcgolfer@yahoo.com Committee Members Whose Terms Are Expiring Please turn to the next page for recommended appointments. DOOR COUNTY TOURISM ZONE COMMISSION - 3 YEAR TERMS 2027 Melissa LeBelle 920-854-9773 gm@highpointinn.com 2028 Matt Meacham 920-333-0002, 920-819-9922 mmdcgolfer@yahoo.com 2029 Ken Nelson 920-854-3269 Kennelson2419@gmail.com NON-PROFIT USE OF THE VILLAGE HALL Currently, with approval, non-profits (operating inside or outside of the Village) can request that fees be waived for rental of the Village Hall. At this time, more nonprofits are renting the hall at no cost than those paying to use it. 2026 Reservations for the Village Hall 2/6 - Library – no rental fee 2/22 - EHF Smorgasbord Event – no fee 2/28 - Village resident rental ($160 daily charge) 4/21 - EHF Presentation – no fee 5/18 - Library County Meeting – no fee 6/17 - PGA Potluck– no fee 6/20 - EYC Pancake Breakfast – no fee 6/22 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 6/25 - EHF Presentation – no fee 6/29 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 7/6 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 7/8 - EHF Presentation – no fee 7/9 - Library Event - no fee 7/13 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 7/20 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 7/21 - EHF Presentation – no fee 7/23 - Library Event - no fee 7/27 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 7/29 - EHF Presentation – no fee 7/31-8/1 – Ephraim Men’s Club – no fee 8/3 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 8/10 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 8/17 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 8/18 - EHF Presentation – no fee 8/24 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 8/31 - Concert in the Park (rain location) – no fee 9/16 - EHF Presentation – no fee 9/25 – MS WALK – no fee 12/4-12/5 – Christmas in the Village – no fee 12/11-12/12 – EHF Christmas Traditions Fieldtrip – no fee • So far, for 2026, there is only one rental that has generated income. • The other 29 rentals that are on the Village Hall Rental schedule as of 5/6/2026 will incur no fees for the rental of the Village Hall. • For each of the rentals, there is a loaded labor rate cost of breaking down the hall and then setting it up again for Village meeting use. It takes about an hour at a loaded labor rate of $84.73. • Therefore, for the 29 non-profit rentals on the schedule for 2026, it will cost the Village $2,457.17 to set up and break down the Village Hall for their use. o In sum, there has been one paid rental (resident rate of $160) so far for 2026. o There is also only one outside the Village non-profit Village rental (MS WALK). o We have one request from a non-village, non-profit that has never rented the hall to use the hall at no cost in July. • Attachment – Village of Sister Bay Non-Profit Rental Policy. Page 1 Nonprofit Organization (NPO): A tax-exempt organization. Door County–Based NPO: Tax-exempt organization serving or located in Door County. Daily Rate: Standard single‑day rental rate, listed in the fee schedule and on facility rental forms. Internal Revenue Service: Internal Revenue Service Policy Statement: An eligible Door County–based NPO pays an annual use fee equal to one (1) published daily rate for the facility they use, without the required payment of a security deposit. Eligibility: An eligible Door County–based NPO is responsible for and must submit the following documentation to the Village of Sister as part of the facility rental intake process to be considered eligible for the facility rental benefits outlined in the policy: 1. Documentation of NPO Status 2. Documentation of NPO Presence in Door County, WI Documentation could include, but is not limited to: 1. IRS Determination Letter 2. State Certificate of Exempt Status (CES) 3. Most Recent Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax (Form 990) Village of Sister Bay Facility Rental Fees for Nonprofit Organizations Policy Adopting Body: Parks, Property and Streets Committee Adoption Date: April 6th, 2026 Effective Date: April 7th, 2026 Revisions: N/A Purpose: To establish a consistent, fair, and administratively simple fee structure for nonprofit organizations using Village facilities, while supporting cost recovery and equitable access. Scope: This policy applies to all Village-owned reservable facilities listed in the published Facility Fee Schedule and on facility rental forms. Definitions: Page 2 Direct Use Requirement: Facility use under this policy must be for the nonprofit organization itself. Facilities may not be reserved, used, or sub -licensed by third parties, individuals, or groups claiming affiliation with the nonprofit organization unless the nonprofit is the direct organizer, host, and beneficiary of the event. This requirement is intended to ensure that facility rental benefits are used only by legitimate nonprofit organizations and only for their own activities. Verification: Village Staff will review the NPO's submitted documentation and determine whether the eligibility criteria are met. 1. If the eligibility criteria are determined to be met, Village Staff will proceed with processing the facility rental in accordance with the policy. 2. Village Staff may request additional information from the NPO if the submitted documentation is unclear . 3. If the eligibility criteria are not met, Village Staff will inform the NPO of the determination in writing and list the eligibility criteria(s) that were not met. Appeal of Determination: If the Village Staff determines that the NPO does not meet the criteria and the determination has been issued in writing, the NPO may appeal the determination, in writing, and the appeal should be based on the eligibility criteria listed within the policy. The NPO has the right and responsibility to submit additional documentation and/or rationale in support of the appeal. The appeal would be heard at the Parks, Property, and Street Committee of the Village of Sister Bay, when appropriate. The Parks, Property, and Street Committee’s decision to grant the NPO’s appeal is final. Administration: NPOs seeking to benefit from the policy must submit documentation annually. Village Staff will review documentation and determine eligibility in accordance with the policy. Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail: office@ephraim.wi.gov VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 To: Ephraim Village Board Re: Village Hall Air Conditioning Board of Trustees, The Village Hall currently has 3 main air conditioning units that service the hall, kitchen and bathroom areas, and the library has its own air conditioning not connected to these units. Since the last inspection 2 of the units have failed, leaving 1 to cool the entire building, 1 the compressor is bad and the other out of freon from either a leak or failure, these units have been in service for over 15 years, with annual service done to them. I have obtained 2 quotes for replacement of the air conditioning units: 1. Wulf Brothers for a cost of $69,995.00 2. AM Mechanical and Refrigeration Inc for a cost of $52,650.00. It would be my recommendation to accept the quote from AM Mechanical and Refrigeration Inc for a cost not to exceed $53,000.00 with the cost to come out of the Capital Reserve Account for Village Hall Mechanical. Thank You Justin MacDonald Maintenance Manager For: Village of Ephraim Town Hall Scope of Project: Update A/C system, replace (3) – 5 ton outdoor condensing units and (3) indoor air handlers with new evaporator coils, new hot water coils, fans and controls, existing systems are leaking refrigerant and are obsolete. -Furnish and Install (3) Bryant Legacy 134SAN06000N 5 ton, 16 SEER2, R454b outdoor condensing units -Furnish and install (3) Bryant Legacy FT5ANBD60L00 5 ton, 2 stage air handlers with ECM drive -Furnish and install (3) Willow Springs 24x24 3-Row hot water coils mounted in supply ducts -Install auxiliary drain pans under air handlers along with water sensing switches to shut down system in case of a condensation leak or coil leak, install automatic water shut off valve on boiler water feed line also that will shut down if hot water coils leak. -Install freeze stat on hot water coils to shut down fans if less than 34 degree air is sensed at coils -Install Jackson Systems TK-400 twinning/parallel kit on 2 air handlers to sync them together -Install new condensate drain lines -Clean out copper refrigerant lines with solvent and reconnect to new air handlers and condensers -Repipe hot water coils to new location in supply ducts -Fabricate and install new duct transition fittings, insulate them with duct wrap -Reconnect duct mount smoke detection system -Replace all 3 condensing units, recover old refrigerant and oil, dispose of old units properly -Pressure test all systems with 250 PSI of nitrogen -Evacuate all systems to 500 microns -Set up thermostat for new system and set up staging operation -Test operation of system, register for warranty. -Clean up and haul away all old debris and equipment. -Purge air from boiler system after repiping coils and test operation. $52,650 60% deposit required to order equipment/schedule job - Signature: _________________________________________ Date: _________________________ ESTIMATE 176259737 ESTIMATE DATE Aug 18, 2025 J O B A D D R E S S VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM 9996 Water Street South Ephraim, WI 54211 USA Job: E S T I M AT E D E TA I L S Air Handler Replacement : Provide and Install: 2- ADP Central Air Conditioning Air Handler Model BVRMC6A50S4N1R (twin system) 1- Armstrong Central Air Conditioning Air Handler Model 7AH2AE60PX71 (single system) 3 - Armstrong outdoor condensing units, 13.4 Seer2, Puron advanced R454B model A7AC13F60P limited 5 year compressor warranty, 1 year limited parts warranty on balance of units with product warranty registration and (1) year labor warranty 3- Water safety shut down switches incase a drain line over flows unit will shut down - Install custom drain pans for under each unit in case of a leak in the future - Sheet metal modifications for new air handler 3 - Refrigerant liquid line filter drier 3 - Install new lineset or flush existing with RX11 flush 3 - High density Cladlite condenser pad 2- Water to air coil for heating 3- Puron advanced Low Ambient Kit / Fan Cycling kit - Make connections from existing boiler system to new water to air coil - Purge air from new water to air coil - Install antifreeze to boiler system for air handlers - Low voltage control wiring - Coil condensate drain line to same location as current units - Remove and dispose of existing equipment if needed - Start up and check system operation Note: Existing Fresh Air controls to stay as is, also smoke control system to stay as is. *Line voltage wiring NOT included for outdoor unit if needed *Local permit NOT included *High voltage if needed NOT included *Carpentry work NOT included for removal or install of door for access Wulf Brothers Inc 200 Commerce Dr Luxemburg, WI 54217 (920) 845-2525 BILL TO VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM P O BOX 138 EPHRAIM, WI 54211 USA Estimate #176259737 Page 1 of 2 S E R V I C E D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y P R I C E T O TA L 1 Bid Price 1.00 $69,995.00 $69,995.00 SUB-TOTAL $69,995.00 TOTAL $69,995.00 Thank you for the opportunity to partner with you! Please contact us with any questions. Wulf Brothers now offers convenient online payment options! Call us today or email your information to wulfbrothers@wulfbrothers.com to receive all future invoices and statements via email. CUSTOMER AUTHORIZATION The summary above is furnished by Wulf Brothers Inc as a good faith estimate of work to be performed at the location described above and is based on our evaluation and does not include equipment and material cost increases or additional labor and materials which may be required should unforeseen problems arise after the work has started. I understand that the final cost of the work may differ from the estimate, perhaps materially. All work to be completed in a professional manner according to industry standard practices and is backed by Wulf Brothers' 1 year labor warranty. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our reasonable control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workman’s Compensation Insurance. THIS IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF THE FINAL PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED. I agree and authorize the work as summarized on these estimate terms, and I agree to pay the full amount for all work performed: 1/2 of contracted amount is due upon estimate acceptance and balance due upon completion. 1-1/2% monthly finance charge may be applied to unpaid balances over 30 days. This estimate is valid for 30 days from the estimate date and may be withdrawn by us prior to acceptance. ***SURCHARGES MAY BE ADDED AFTER ACCEPTANCE SHOULD APPLICABLE TARRIFFS BE ENACTED*** Sign here Date Estimate #176259737 Page 2 of 2 Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail: office@ephraim.wi.gov VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 To: Ephraim Board of Trustees Re: German Road Brush/Yard Waste Dump Update Village Board of Trustees, The Brush/Yard Waste Dump has reopened on German Road; the contractor completed the work the middle of last week. You will see several changes to the use of the area; they are as follows: 1. You will not be dumping in the same spot as you did before, it will be further back on the property, please follow the yellow arrows to the new dump site. 2. Brush and Limbs will be situated on the very southeast corner of the new dump area, a big yellow sign is in place showing where it should be dumped. 3. Yard Waste will be situated on the southwest corner of new dump area; a new sign is ordered and will be placed once it is here. For future disposal it is my recommendation to tub grind the brush annually, if we keep the brush to the southeast side all tub grindings could then be placed on the northside of the dump area for people to pick up. For tub grinding we will need to add additional money into the budget unknown amount at this time but will have better numbers for budget time. By tub grinding we will continue to have a place to put brush and not need to add additional area. The other option is to have the brush hauled out by a contactor at an unknown cost. Thank You Justin MacDonald Maintenance Manager Canada Goose Damage Management Summary of next steps per: Mike Jones, Wildlife Biologist/Certified Wildlife Biologist Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service I will send an email out next week about goose round-up costs, procedures, timeframes, and the DNR permit needed to be completed. I will need to know by June 2 or 3rd at the latest if you have enough birds and want a goose round-up. Since you are farther away from our office and might potentially have many birds, I quoted you a cost of $4,000 over the winter. We charge $3,500 for the majority of sites that are closer to our office and have fewer birds so you might see that price quoted in the email. We might be able to lower the price if we capture at both Ephraim and Fish Creek but won’t know that for sure until we get much closer. We would need at least 45-50 birds to come all the way to Ephraim. If you want to let me know by June 2 that you tentatively want us to come, I can put a place holder on a date for you and you could decide to withdraw at your June 9 th meeting. Since I have to have to put the schedule together by June 5th, I need to know, at least initially if you are interested. It is easier to remove a location from the our schedule rather than have you want to get added after the schedule has been set since there are so many locations we have to coordinate the removals. Thanks, Mike 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM VILLAGE BOARD MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2026 – 7:00 P.M. 9996 WATER STREET- EPHRAIM VILLAGE HALL Action Items: 5. Administration: a. Presentation from Mike Jones from USDA Wildlife Services regarding Canada Goose Damage Management: Mike Jones from the US Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services presented information about Canada Goose damage management options. He explained that his agency specializes in nuisance wildlife ma nagement. They are a federal agency that handles all goose issues in Wisconsin because geese are federally protected birds. Jones reviewed basic goose biology. He described two distinct populations of geese in Wisconsin: Spring migrants that move through the area without causing significant problems, and resident birds that stay year-round and cause most issues. He noted that resident geese live up to twenty years, are highly productive with about five surviving offspring per clutch, and are very adaptable to living near humans. These birds tend to return to where they learned to fly year after year. The resident birds don’t go very far south anymore, most going to open water and seeking out warehouse rooftops in Chicago to feed at the railyards. He explained that geese have few natural predators, with most being egg predators, which does not control the population much. The DNR h as two hunting seasons designed for different populations. The early season, from September 1-15, targets resident birds with a 5-bird daily limit . Traditional goose season, which targets migrant birds (late September – December), has a long season with a lower bag limit for migrant birds to control harvest impacts. Jones detailed the main problems caused by geese, particularly the 1-2 pounds of feces each bird produces daily. He showed examples of parks requiring daily power washing and communities budgeting $10,000 annually for daily feces removal from beaches. He also mentioned that geese can be aggressive during nesting season and harbor parasites, causing swimmer's itch, with high E. coli levels in their feces posing health risks. The presentation co vered abatement management options, including a no feeding ordinance, habitat modification allowing the shoreline to grow up, exclusion methods such as fences and overhead grids, harassment techniques, pyrotechnics, repellents, and trained dogs. Jones noted that most of these methods provide only short-term ef fectiveness as geese adapt quickly. For population management, Jones explained three methods: hunting seasons, nest and egg destruction through oiling, and roundup and removal during the flightless molting period. He detailed the egg oiling process, which prevents oxygen transfer across egg membranes, typically around April 15th in Wisconsin. The challenge is finding the nests. Oiling requires a Wisconsin Depar tment of Natural Resources (DNR) permit and registration with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Jones discussed management authority. Population management authority approval ultimately rests with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Population management is a local decision that must be in accordance with Federal, State, and local requirements. Regarding roundup and removal, Jones explained that his agency requires at least 35-40 birds at a site and conducts operations during the 3-week flightless period from mid-June through early July. The process involves using kayaks and boats to push geese onto land, then using panels to corral 3 them into crates. All captured birds must be euthanized as the DNR doesn't allow relocation because adult birds would fly back. Jones discussed two options for the captured birds: Food pantry processing for adults (requiring testing of 10% of the adults, with a minimum of five birds, for lead and mercury at about $250 per sample) or disposal as animal food, though bird flu concerns have complicated the latter option recently. He noted that there was another community within swimming distance contemplating a round-up as well, and he had received approval to test 10% of the total geese from both communities. The communities could split the cost. He outlined the typical process: Communities contact him by June 1st with bird counts, his agency schedules the roundup between June 15th and the end of June, and charges $4,000 for Door County locations due to the distance from their Waupun office. Jones noted they typically catch 60-70 geese per site and conduct 20-30 roundups annually statewide. He stressed that they need written permission from each landowner to catch geese on private property. The effectiveness of roundups provides immediate relief and removes birds that return to the same areas annually. Sites typically don't need repeat roundups for 3-7 years, with an average of 5 years between treatments. A discussion was held regarding the roundup. Mulliken inquired about potential partnerships with other municipalities for cost-sharing and testing expenses. Hoyerman asked about demand for processed goose meat, with Jones noting that only about 25% of sites opt for food pantry processing due to additional costs. T. Nelson confirmed that all permitting goes through Jones rather than requiring a separate DNR contact. K. Nelson asked about scheduling around Fyr Bal on June 20th, and Jones confirmed they could accommodate working before that date. He also clarified the June 1st deadline for decision-making and explained that food pantry decisions could be made closer to the actual roundup date. MacDonald estimated seeing 30-40 geese in the morning. He provided an overview of the number of staff hours dedicated to keeping sidewalks and grass clean around the shorefront throughout the season. Bristol noted that after previous board discussions about this topic, several parties had reached out in support. He also confirmed that a local food pantry had expressed a strong interest in receiving processed goose meat, as they have successful experience with salmon and venison programs. Dennis Jewell, an Ephraim resident, spoke in favor of pursuing goose removal. b. Discussion and consideration regarding implementation of Canada Goose Damage Management for 2026: Bristol noted that the Board had time to make a decision and suggested potentially gathering information from neighboring municipalities while respecting privacy restrictions. He confirmed that if another site had already completed testing, it could reduce testing requirements for Ephraim. K. Nelson polled the board members for their interest in proceeding. Hoyerman supported proceeding. T. Nelson was in favor. Mulliken noted that while not speaking officially for the Community Protection Committee, the Committee had discussed the goose problem extensively and tried various mitigation methods without permanent success. Meacham also supported proceeding. K. Nelson agreed with the other four board members, establishing consensus to continue moving the project forward. The Board agreed that they would make the final decision on whether to proceed with the roundup at the May Village Board meeting. Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail: office@ephraim.wi.gov VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 To: Village Board of Trustees Re: 2026 Road Paving Ephraim Board of Trustees, I was just able to meet with the Door County Highway Department last Thursday May 7 th regarding paving for 2026. I submit the following roads and small addition to the rear of the pole building: Roadway: Cost: North Orchard Rd from Water St to just past Bella Vista Lane $ 46,254.00 Holand Road $ 48,615.00 Spruce Lane off of Norway St. $ 42,699.00 Public Works 28’ x 42’ addition behind Pole Building $ 4,195.00 Total: $141,763.00 South Norway St. was an alternate but after further review that has been removed from this year’s schedule. It is my recommendation to move forward with the 2026 paving for a cost not to exceed $142,000.00 with the money to come from our Road Improvement Fund. Respectfully Submitted Justin MacDonald Maintenance Manager 4/23/2026 Page 1 of 15 Village of Ephraim Emergency Operations Plan The Emergency Operations plan is not an exhaustive document, but is intended to provide a framework based on current guidance. 4/23/2026 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contact Information Emergency Telephone Listing Emergency Operations Center Alerting List Plan Overview Purpose Situation and Assumptions Responsibilities During an Emergency Concept of Operations Organization Responsibilities and Tasks Village Emergency Management Director Village of Ephraim Administrator Village of Ephraim Clerk Public Information Officer Law Enforcement Human Services Public Works Emergency Medical Services Fire Services Additional Resource Management Plan Development and Maintenance Legal Basis Attachments Sample Disaster Declaration 4/23/2026 Page 3 of 15 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE LISTINGS Door County Sheriff's Office 911 (Emergency/ 920-746-2400 Ephraim Fire Chief 911 (Emergency) Liberty Grove Sister Bay Fire Department 911 (Emergency) /920-854-4021 (non-emergency) Gibraltar Fire Department 911 (Emergency) /920-421-3456 (non-emergency) MABAS 154 County Community Emergency Response Team County and Regional Services Door County Emergency Government 920-746-7195 Door County Emergency Services 920-743-5461 WI Emergency Management East Central Office 920-929-3730 DNR - Emergency Government Duty Officer 800-943-0003 Door County Highway Department- Commissioner 920-746-2500 Medical Facilities Sturgeon Bay Aurora Health Clinic - Walk-in 920-746-7200 Bellin Health Clinic - Walk-in 920-743-0255 Door County Memorial Hospital 920-743-3367 Support Agencies Door County Human Services 920-746-7155 Door County Health Department Hotline 920-746-2588 American Red Cross 920-468-8535 Salvation Army 920-746-2300 Telecom Frontier 800-921-8101 Spectrum 833-267-6094 Utilities Wisconsin Public Service - Electric 800-450-7240 Hazardous Spills ChemTrec 800-424-9300 National Response Center (call regarding spills) 800-424-8802 Wisconsin DNR 920-746-2870 4/23/2026 Page 4 of 15 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER ALERTING LIST Village Emergency Management Director Ken Nelson, Village President Emergency Operation Center Operations Committee (Elected Officials: Trustees listed in order of seniority) Tim Nelson Matt Meacham Carly Mulliken Rick Hoyerman 4/23/2026 Page 5 of 15 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN A. PURPOSE: This municipal plan has been developed to provide procedures for Village of Ephraim government agencies to respond to various types of emergencies or disasters that affect the community. It provides a link to procedures that will be used by the county government since the Village of Ephraim is part of the County Emergency Management Program. This municipal plan is to be used in conjunction with the Door County Emergency Operations Plan. The municipal plan will be maintained in accordance with current standards of the Door County Emergency Operations Plan and in accordance with the local/municipal government. Review of this municipal plan shall be accomplished concurrently with the county plan. B. SITUATION AND ASSUMPTIONS Several types of hazards pose a threat to the lives, property, or environment in Door County. These hazards are outlined in the Door County Hazard Analysis. A copy of this is located in the County Emergency Operations Center. C. RESPONSIBILITIES DURING AN EMERGENCY 1. Village: The Village is responsible for opening and maintaining all Village public roads. They will act in coordination with the State and County. The Village is also responsible for all Public Buildings, in addition to the Public Beach, Firehouse Marina, public properties along Eagle Harbor, Harborside Park, and Anderson Dock.  Emergency Operations Center Operations Committee consists of the elected Village Board of Trustees. 2. Property Owners: All parcel owners are responsible for maintaining their private property. Any tree on private property that falls onto public property is the responsibility of the property owner to remove. 3. Businesses: All businesses are responsible for their private property. It is their responsibility to provide electrical service during an emergency. Distribution of emergency information and resources to guests/ patrons is the responsibility of the business owners. D. CONCEPT AND ESCALATION OF OPERATIONS Municipal officials have primary responsibility for disasters that take place in the municipality. They will activate the appropriate emergency response agencies, as necessary, to address the disaster. Actions that the municipality and county should consider if this municipal plan is activated are as follows: 1. Municipal agencies assess the nature and scope of the emergency or disaster. 2. If the situation can be handled locally, do so using the procedures in this plan, as appropriate. a. The Village President, as the Village Emergency Management Director, assists w ith the coordination of all emergency response actions. b. A Village Command Post shall be established at the Administrative Building at 10005 Norway Street as long as there is power and the ability to restrict access. If power is not able to be established through the use of a generator at the Administrative Building, then the Maintenance Garage at 10285 Town Line Drive shall be utilized as an alternate Village Command Post. c. The Village Emergency Management Director declares a Local State of Emergency and notifies the Door County Emergency Management Director of this action. d. The Village Emergency Management Director shall f orward the Local State of Emergency Declaration to the Door County Emergency Management Director. 4/23/2026 Page 6 of 15 e. The Door County Director of Emergency Management activates the County Emergency Operations Center. This facility is located at 916 N 14th Ave, Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin. f. Municipal emergency response officials/agencies respond according to the checklists outlined under ‘Responsibilities and Tasks’, pages 7 through 12. 3. If municipal resources become exhausted or if special resources are required, the Village Emergency Management Director shall request county assistance through the C ounty Director of Emergency Management. 4. If assistance is requested, the County Director of Emergency Management assesses the situation and makes recommendations. The County will do the following (to the extent appropriate): a. Activate the County Emergency Operation Center. b. Implement the County Emergency Operations Plan. c. Respond with County resources as requested. e. Coordinate County resources with municipal resources. f. Notify Wisconsin Emergency Management, Regional Director. g. Forward Uniform Damage Situation Report (UDSR) and USDR local as appropriate. h. Assist municipality with prioritizing and allocating resources. 5. If municipal and county resources are exhausted, the County Emergency Management Director can request state assistance through Wisconsin Emergency Management. 6. If state assistance is requested, the Wisconsin Emergency Management Administrator, in conjunction with the East Central Regional Director, Door County Director of Emergency Management , and the Village Emergency Management Director , can assess the disaster or emergency situation and recommend that personnel, services , and equipment be made available for response, mitigation, or recovery. 7. After completing the assessment, the Emergency Management Regional Director immediately notifies the Wisconsin Emergency Management Administrator. 8. The State Administrator of Emergency Management notifies the Governor and makes recommendations. 9. If state assistance is granted, procedures will be followed as stated in the Wisconsin Emergency Operations Plan and the County Emergency Operations Plan. 4/23/2026 Page 7 of 15 E. ORGANIZATION F. RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: The Village President, as the chief elected municipal official and as is also the Village Emergency Management Director. They are is responsible for coordinating the response of municipal agencies and coordinating the response with County officials , if County assistance is necessary. In the President's absence, the chain of command shall be followed with the most senior available Village Trustee acting as the Village Emergency Management Director. 1. Village Emergency Management Director: The Village Emergency Management Director coordinates all components of the emergency management program in the Village of Ephraim. This includes and may not be limited to hazard analysis, preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery activities for all natural and technological disasters/emergencies. The following tasks represent a checklist of actions that should be considered:  The Emergency Management Director ensures that the County Emergency Operations Center or Village Command Post has been activated. The Emergency Management Director shall report to the assigned command post.  Update the County Emergency Management Director regarding the situation and actions taken.  Brief the County Emergency Operations Center staff as to the status of the disaster, if opened.  Discuss available resources, including personnel, by checking with the County Emergency Operations Center Staff. If deficiencies do exist, take action to obtain the needed resources.  Update the Village Public Information Officer/Administrator, or appointed designee, regarding travel restrictions on local roads and recommend protective actions if necessary.  Engages with Village departments regarding response to the situation.  The Emergency Management Director , with input from Department Heads and the County Emergency Management Directors, will conduct damage assessment activities in the Village of Ephraim. The following tasks represent a checklist of actions that should be considered in an emergency or disaster situation.  R ecord initial information from first responders such as law enforcement, public works, or fire services.  Activate the damage assessment team, which consists of the Village of Ephraim Emergency Operations Director/ Village President Village Administrator Village Clerk and Deputy Clerk Village Trustees in order of seniority Sheriff's Office Door County Emergency Management State and Federal Emergency Management Fire Chief Assistant Fire Chief Command Staff: Captains Line Personnel Maintenance Manager Maintenance StaffWastewater Staff 4/23/2026 Page 8 of 15 Emergency Operations Committee (Committee composition located on page 4):  Within first 2 - 3 hours: Complete preliminary Uniform Disaster Situation Report (USDR). Provide damage assessment information to the C ounty Emergency Management Director to assist in the preparation of the Uniform Disaster Situation Report (USDR). 1. Number of fatalities 2. Number of critical/minor injuries. 3. Number of homes/businesses damaged/destroyed. 4. Number of public facilities , such as highways, roads, bridges, etc. damaged. 5. Number of people who require shelters.  Within 8 hours: 1. Recount items 1 - 5 above. 2. Complete another USDR (link – template available through xx), estimating public and private damage. 3. Video and/or take photos of major damage.  Within 24 hours:  Update items 1 - 5 above.  Complete updated USDR.  Plot damage assessment information on maps in the municipal Emergency Operation Center and locate damaged sites on a map.  Record all expenditures for municipal personnel, equipment, supplies, services, etc., and track resources being used.  Ensure that all department/agency heads have begun to keep separate and accurate records of disaster-related expenditures.  Coordinate with the municipal Public Information Officer, or appointed designee.  Be ready to issue a Declaration of Emergency.  Determine whether or not C ounty, State, or Federal assistance should be requested. Consult the County Emergency Management Director. (Village/County resources must be fully committed before state or federal assistance will be available. If assistance is requested, specify the type and amount of assistance needed.) 2. Village of Ephraim Administrator  Report to the Village of Ephraim Emergency Command Post when notified.  Assist in the damage assessment process by:  Provide information regarding the dollar value of property damaged as a result of the disaster. 4/23/2026 Page 9 of 15  Provide information (name, telephone number, etc.) regarding the owners of property that has been damaged/destroyed as a result of the disaster.  Delegate authority to department directors to permit the acquisition of equipment and supplies needed following a disaster, not to exceed $5,000. 3. Village Clerk/Treasurer  Maintain records indicating Village expenses incurred due to the disaster.  Assign department directors' account numbers to which emergency expenditures may be charged. 4. Public Information Officer - Communications The Village Administrator, or designated appointee, is responsible for public information activities for the Village of Ephraim and will function as the sole point of contact for the news media and public officials. The following tasks represent a checklist of actions that should be considered in an emergency or disaster situation.  Warn the following using the Alert Phone List located on page 4:  Municipal Elected Officials.  County Emergency Management Director.  Municipal Command Post representatives. If Department heads are out of the area, they need to be notified of the emergency.  Ensure all agencies represented at the municipal Command Post have communications to their staff. This equipment consists of cell phones, radios, portable hotspots, and laptops.  If necessary, request that Door County Emergency Management activate the Integrated Public Alert and Warming System (IPAWS) with specific emergency information within a geographical area. Maintain liaison with the County Emergency Operations Center, if activated , and Village Command Post to stay abreast of the situation.  If necessary, establish a news media briefing area and brief the media at periodic intervals.  If the situation escalates and the County Emergency Operation Center is activated, coordinate with the County Public Information Officer to prepare news releases.  If required, assist the County in establishing a Joint Public Information Officer.  In conjunction with other Department Heads, conduct press tours of disaster areas within the municipality as the situation stabilizes.  If necessary or deemed appropriate, communicate with the following outlets to share emergency information:  Local radio stations.  WDOR 93.9 920-743-4411  Door County Daily News 920-746-9430  Rewind 97.7 920-743-0977 4/23/2026 Page 10 of 15  WLGE 106.9 ‘The Lodge’ 920-854-3400  Local publications.  Let’s Go Door County 920- 471-3983  Peninsula Pulse 920-839-2121  Update municipal website. (Utilize the ticker bar for emergencies)  Physical municipal postings at Visitor Information Center, Administrative Building, and Post Office.  Coordinate with Ephraim Business Council for social media postings.  Coordinate with the Ephraim Fire Department for social media postings. 5. Law Enforcement The Door County Sheriff's Office is responsible for law enforcement activities in the Village of Ephraim. The following tasks represent a checklist of actions this department should consider in an emergency or disaster situation.  Ensure that all Sheriff’s Office staff have been notified and that they report as the situation directs.  Direct the designated law enforcement representative to report to the Village of Ephraim Command Post.  Secure the affected area and perform traffic and crowd control.  Participate in warning the public as the situation warrants.  Determine the scope of the incident as to immediate casualties/destruction and whether the incident has the potential to expand and escalate.  Direct officer(s) to close off the damage site area to stop all inbound traffic. Set up an emergency pass system.  Report the above information to the appropriate law enforcement agencies.  Establish a staging area in the municipality; designate a Command Post; and establish initial command until relieved.  If appropriate and if available, dispatch a communications vehicle to the scene of the disaster. Other responsibilities may include:  Enforce curfew restrictions in the affected area.  Coordinate the removal of vehicles blocking evacuation or other response activities.  As necessary, shelter in place as may be appropriate from the affected area.  Assist the medical examiner with mortuary services.  Assist with search and rescue activities. 4/23/2026 Page 11 of 15  If the County Emergency Operation Center is activated, establish and maintain contact with the person representing law enforcement.  Try to anticipate your department’s needs for manpower and equipment 24- hours in advance. If additional assistance is needed, utilize mutual aid agreements with other police departments. 6. Human Services Based on the emergency situation, human services should be coordinated through the County Director of Emergency Management and the Director of the Department of Health and Human Services. The following tasks represent a checklist of actions th ese departments must consider in an emergency or disaster situation.  Coordinate activities of municipal agencies/departments that provide human services type of services. (Identified in County Resource Manual).  Coordinate with the Red Cross in opening and managing shelters in the municipality or geographical region.  Ensure the canteen is set up to feed emergency workers in the municipality.  Work with the Red Cross/Salvation Army in providing food and clothing to disaster victims.  Provide emergency assistance to persons with special needs.  Provide necessary outreach services to citizens affected by an emergency or disaster.  Distribute emergency literature to disaster victims, giving instructions and assistance pertaining to their immediate needs.  Provide psychological counseling and crisis intervention to disaster victims.  If the County Emergency Operation Center is activated, establish and maintain contact with the Director of the Department of Human Services. If the County Emergency Operation Center is not activated, establish and maintain contact with the Director of Health and Human Services Officer directly at the County Department of Health and Human Services. 7. Public Works (Maintenance Department and Wastewater Department) The following tasks represent a checklist of actions this department should consider in an emergency or disaster situation.  Ensure that all department personnel have been alerted and that they report as the situation directs.  The Department reports to the Village Command Post.  Review the disaster situation with staff and report the situation to the Village Emergency Management Director.  Maintain transportation routes. Provide support to Law Enforcement with traffic control and access to the affected area.  If necessary, coordinate flood-fighting activities, including sandbagging, emergency diking, and pumping operations.  Coordinate with Law Enforcement travel restrictions/road closures within the municipality.  Activate stationary emergency generators and lighting. 4/23/2026 Page 12 of 15  Assist with urban search and rescue activities as may be requested.  As necessary, establish a staging area for public works.  Report public facility damage information to the Command Post.  If the County Emergency Operation Center is activated, establish and maintain contact with the County Highway Commissioner. Contact information is located on page 3. 8. Emergency Medical Services Door County Emergency Services is responsible for emergency medical services activities in the Village of Ephraim. The following tasks represent a checklist of actions this person should consider in an emergency or disaster situation.  Coordinate emergency medical care and transport if necessary for victims (hospitals and ambulances).  Assure that public health needs of disaster victims are met.  Assume primary operational control for health- related emergencies such as pollution, contamination, diseases, and epidemics.  Establish a triage area for victims.  Establish a staging area in the municipality. 9. Fire Services The Ephraim Fire Department is responsible for fire services activities in the Village of Ephraim. The following tasks represent a checklist of actions this department should consider in an emergency or disaster situation.  Establish the designated staging area, Village Command Post, as directed by on -scene personnel.  Assist Law Enforcement in warning the affected population.  Rescue injured/trapped persons.  Protect critical facilities and resources.  Designate a person to record the arrival and deployment of emergency personnel and equipment.  Assist Law Enforcement with evacuation, if needed. Other responsibilities may include:  Assist with traffic control.  Assist with debris clearance.  If the Regional Hazardous Materials Team is needed for a Level A response, obtain assistance through the Green Bay Metro Fire.  If additional assistance is necessary, utilize Mutual Aid Agreements. 4/23/2026 Page 13 of 15 G. ADDITIONAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: The services below have not been identified in the action plans, but may provide additional assistance if required. 1. Support From Private Agencies/Volunteer Groups: Door County Community Emergency Response Team (Gibraltar Fire & Rescue partnered with Door County Emergency Management) 2. Support From State and Federal Agencies: The Village of Ephraim adopted Resolution #01- 2006, designating the National Incident Management System (NIMS) as the standard for Incident Management in the Village of Ephraim . The Village Fire Chief and one (1) other appointed designee shall has completed training under this program, fulfilling the requirement for federal assistance. Information and assistance in securing state or federal support may be obtained by contacting the County Emergency Management Director. Requests for National Guard assistance should be channeled through the County Emergency Management Director to the Wisconsin Emergency Management, Regional Director - East Central Regional Office, to the Wisconsin Emergency Management Administrator. H. PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE: The Village of Ephraim Emergency Operations Plan Development Team is composed of the Village Board, Administrative Staff, Community Protection Committee, and Village Fire Chief. These officials are responsible for developing and maintaining this plan. This Team meets on an as-needed basis or as determined by the Village President. The Team reviews incidents, changes, and new information and makes revisions in this plan. The following also conducts after-action reviews of all exercises and major incidents: • Village of Ephraim Board • Village of Ephraim Administrator • Village of Ephraim Fire Chief/Deputy Chief • Village of Ephraim Maintenance Manager • Village Clerk I. LEGAL BASIS The Legal Basis for the development of this municipal plan is stated in the following documents: FEDERAL PL 100-707 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act Title 40, Chap. 116, US Code Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 PUBLIC LAW 103-337 WISCONSIN STATUTES 21.11 Call to Active Service 26.97 Law Enforcement and Police Power (Town Chairs) 59.025 Administrative Home Rule 59.026 Construction of Powers 59.031 County Executive, (2) Duties and Powers 59.033 County Administrator, (2) Duties and Powers 59.05 Chairperson; Vice Chairperson; Powers and Duties 59.07 General Powers of County Board. (146) Local Emergency Planning Committees 59.08 Public Work, How Done; Public Emergencies 4/23/2026 Page 14 of 15 59.083 Consolidation of Municipal Services, Home Rule, Metropolitan Dist. 59.24 Peace Maintenance 61.34 Powers of Village Board 66.325 Emergency Powers 83.09 Emergency Repairs of County Trunk Highways 166.03 (1) Powers and Duties of the Governor (4) Powers and Duties of Counties and Municipalities (5) Powers and Duties of Heads of Emergency Government Services 213.095 Police Power of Fire Chief, Rescue Squads 895.483 (2) Civil Liability Exemption; County Emergency Response Team COUNTY ORDINANCES MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS MABAS DIVISION 154 4/23/2026 Page 15 of 15 Village of Ephraim Disaster Declaration Whereas, a disaster namely ________________________ within the Village of Ephraim; and Whereas, because of such emergency conditions, the Village Board is unable to meet with promptness; Now Therefore Be It Resolved, pursuant to Wis. Stat. §66.325 and Wis. Stat. Ch. 323 , as Village President of the Village of Ephraim , I do hereby proclaim a state of emergency in effect for the time during which the emergency conditions exist or are likely to exist, and Further, pursuant to Wis. Stat. §66.325 and Wis. Stat. Ch. 323, the Village President of the Village of Ephraim shall exercise all of the powers conferred upon the governing body under Wis. Stat.§66.325 (1), which, within the discretion of the Officer , appear necessary and expedient during said state of emergency, and Further, the Ephraim Village Board, at a special or regularly scheduled board meeting, shall approve, amend or repeal this resolution. Signed this ______ day of ______, _______. ___________________________________ President, Village of Ephraim The Ephraim Village Board at a meeting held on the _____ day of ________, ______ approved, amended, and repealed this resolution. ____________________________________ Clerk, Village of Ephraim 1 Library Committee April 14, 2026 Meeting Minutes Call to Order: Attendees: Carly Mulliken, Chairperson; Grace Held, Member; Cindy Nelson, Member; Mary Wilson, Member, Suzanne Ihrig, Branch Manager. Windsor McCutcheon, Treasurer, did not attend, but submitted her report beforehand. Guest: Kelsey Stone from Ephraim Business Council. Meeting called to order at 2:08 p.m. by Carly Mulliken, who noted that we have a quorum. Previous Minutes: Motion to approve the minutes from the meeting held on November 13, 2025 made by Cindy Nelson; seconded by Grace Held. All ayes. Visitor Comments: No visitor comments received. Treasurer’s Report: • Checking account balance: $4,513.39. • The Committee elected to renew the CD account for a six-month period. Current balance: $8,426.81. • Motion to approve Treasurer’s Report made Grace Held; seconded by Cindy Nelson. All ayes. Librarian’s Report: • Door County Reads went well. Our event was held on February 6 when we hosted a ceramics class with Karen Eckert of Owl Arts. The participants made spoon rests inspired by the cooking themes in The Briar Club. We had 17 participants plus a waitlist of 9, which is a great response. • We started a Homeschool Kids Book Club on February 5th. Ran through February and March; may resume over the summer. The kids met each Thursday and discussed two books from James Patterson’s Treasure Hunters series and did activities based on the books. We averaged about 10 kids per session. • Book club is going strong. Will end for the year in June with a planning session for 2026 – 2027. We celebrated the 45th anniversary of the Ephraim Library Book Club with birthday cake, coffee, tea, and treats. • Planning for summer reading programs is pretty much done. This year’s theme is “Unearth a Story in Door County.” We’ll have our usual prize cart June – August, then we’re hosting ODBS on June 1 and Peninsula Reptiles on June 11. Door to Summer Adventures is pretty much nailed down; we have four sessions planned in July. First session is a celebration of 250 years with Colin Welford leading the kids in a sing-along of patriotic songs. Next, the kids will dig for actual fossils. Then, we’ll learn about how animals hibernate with Jennifer Birkholz, the Natural Resources Supervisor at Peninsula State Park. Finally, we’ll learn about gnomes and folklore and eat cherry pie with author Sally Collins, who will read her children’s book Sloane the Gnome Bakes a Cherry Pie. • The Library Board approved its first round of changes stemming from the Rethinking Libraries consultants. Changes were minimal and will be invisible to the public. Area manager was added that all the branch managers will report to instead of us reporting to the Director. • Library Board meeting will be held at the Ephraim Village Hall on Monday, May 18 at 5:00. • Dumpster will be here on Monday, April 27 and picked up Thursday, April 30. I am planning on coming here on Wednesday, April 29 for the clean out. • StoryWalk updates continue to be on hold until the updates to Harbor Park begin to take shape. • Motion to approve Librarian’s Report made by Cindy Nelson; seconded by Mary Wilson Nelson. All ayes. 2 Fyr Bal Book Sale: • Kelsey Stone will forward links to committee so we can proceed with buying a 10” x 10” cashiers’ tent and 12 sandbags. Windsor McCutcheon and Suzanne Ihrig will decide who will purchase it. • Donations have been average so far but are picking up. • Suzanne will enlist the library Marketing Department to use Facebook and Instagram posts to enlist volunteers and donations. • Suzanne Ihrig already input a request for the creation of eye-catching signage for enlisting volunteers and donations at the post office. We can also use the donation box at the post office for donations. Everyone on the committee should check the donation box frequently. Discussion and Consideration of Ephraim Business Council Membership: • The Library Committee decided against joining the Ephraim Business Council as members at this time. Furniture Purchase: • No update; will proceed. Goal is to have furniture purchased and delivered this summer. We have the money in the checking account to cover this expense. New Business • None. Next Meeting Date: June 4th, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. at the Ephraim Library. Adjournment: Mary Wilson made a motion to adjourn at 3:05 p.m.; Grace Held seconded. All ayes. 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM COMMUNITY PROTECTION COMMITTEE MINUTES WEDNESDAY, APRIL 22, 2026 – 2:30 PM VILLAGE HALL - 9996 WATER STREET ACTION ITEMS: Dukehart moved, Hart seconded to approve the minutes of January 28, 2026, all ayes. Motion carried. Hart moved, Cox seconded to send the revised Emergency Operations Plan to the Village Board for review with the understanding that it would stimulate further discussion and refinement at the Board level, all ayes. Motion carried. Hart moved, Dukehart seconded to adjourn at 3:13 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Present: John Cox, Tad Dukehart, Laird Hart (online), and Carly Mulliken - Chair. Absent: Keith Krist. Staff: Brent Bristol – Village Administrator/Zoning Administrator and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests: None. 1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 2:30 PM. A quorum was present for this meeting. 2. Changes to the agenda: There were no changes. 3. Approval of the previous minutes: Dukehart moved, Hart seconded to approve the minutes of January 28, 2026, all ayes. Motion carried. 4. Visitors’ Comments: There were no visitors’ comments. 5. Discussion and recommendation of Village Emergency Plan: A discussion was held regarding the revised Village Emergency Plan. The discussion stressed that the plan is an internal guide for staff, emphasizing the importance of keeping the document updated with current names and contact information for effective communication in emergencies. Additionally, the discussion led to the possibility of drafting an external summary for public use, reinforcing the necessity of calling 9-1-1 in genuine emergencies. The Committee reached consensus on simplifying responsibility language for property owners in (C)(2), agreeing to keep it concise by stating that all parcel owners are responsible for maintaining their private property, thus avoiding any legal complexities. The same was decided for (C)(3). It was noted that flexibility in the Public Information Officer's role should be maintained, recommending an appointment by the Village President over a rigid assignment to the Village Administrator. The Committee requested that all references to the Public Information Officer include “or designated appointee”. Additional discussions highlighted concerns about the chain of command. Cox highlighted that under state statute, the Village Administrator has authority. Discussion included the Emergency Operations Committee (Village Board), which, based on trustee seniority, would be next in line as Emergency Management Director, if the Village President were unable to serve in the role. The organization flow chart was also reviewed. It was proposed to revise the flowchart, moving the Village Administrator below the Emergency Operations Director (Village President) into the second row of organizational command, placing greater emphasis on the Village Administrator reporting directly to the Emergency Operations Director. Spending authority during disasters was another point of consideration for Department Directors, with the acknowledgment that it needs careful evaluation by the Village Board due to varying opinions on appropriate limits in emergency scenarios. On National Incident Management System (NIMS) training, the Committee recommended adding the following language: “The Fire Chief and one other shall complete training under this program”. 2 Hart moved, Cox seconded to send the revised Emergency Operations Plan to the Village Board for review with the understanding that it would stimulate further discussion and refinement at the Board level, all ayes. Motion carried. 6. Discussion of general safety issues in the Village: The fading orange speed limit flags require replacement, Dukehart noted. Updates on the German Road communication tower were discussed; location and legal questions are ongoing. The Committee agreed that moving forward is vital to ensure adequate downtown communication coverage. 7. New business for the next meeting: The next CPC meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 27, 2026, at 2:30 PM. 8. Adjournment: Cox moved, Dukehart seconded to adjourn at 3:32 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Recorded by, Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk Approved: May 7, 2026 EPHRAIM-GIBRALTAR AIRPORT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 23, 2026 GIBRALTAR TOWN CENTER 4097 MAIN STREET, FISH CREEK WI 54212 8:00 A.M. Call to order: The Ephraim-Gibraltar Airport Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Drajesk at 8:00 a.m. Roll call/quorum: Members present: Jeff Drajesk, Rich Bierman, Gary Glojek, Scott Peasron and Mary Houck all via Zoom. Members absent: Tim Halbrook. Agenda/proper notice/adopt agenda: Motion (Biermann/Houck) to adopt agenda as amended to remove item 6. Carried. Approve minutes of previous meeting(s): Motion (Glojek/Houck) to approve minutes of March 19, 2026 meeting as presented. Carried. Public comment: None. Update to Drajesk RTTF Agreement: No discussion. Fuel purchase timing: Drajesk reported approximately 2,000 gallons of fuel remain, expected to last into June. Drajesk reported fuel pricing was $5.57 per gallon one month ago and looking at current market pricing, noted it is approximately $5.65 per gallon. Airport makes $1.00 per gallon. Standard fuel order is 8,000 gallons, though smaller quantities or split loads with other airports are possible. Commission discussed delaying purchase as long as possible due to market conditions and considering smaller purchases or split pur chase if prices remain high. Nearby airport pricing was reviewed. Consensus to revisit at the May meeting with updated pricing and purchase options. Review options presented at March 19, 2026 TAC meeting: Drajesk reviewed runway and development options presented at March 19, 2026 TAC meeting. Commission discussed Runway 14-32 options and supported a 3,000-foot runway. Runway width was discussed and noted to meet current standards. Commission discussed extending taxiway, including extension toward both runway ends; cost estimates will be obtained. Alternatives for Runway 1-19 were reviewed, and Commission discussed reconfiguration from 1-19 to a 18-36 alignment. Discussion included that proposed alignment would fit within existing airport property and avoid need to extend onto adjacent properties. Commissioners discussed relationship of runway to surrounding uses and maintaining alignment within current boundaries. Commission supported 18- 36 alignment. Hangar development options were discussed, including expansion onto adjacent property and development on existing airport property. Commission expressed preference to utilize existing airport property for future expansion rather than acquire additional land. Comm ission agreed not to pursue acquisition of property; however, would entertain any property that comes available and is offered to the airport. Commission also supported Alternative A2 for hangar layout, with apron access in front of hangars toward runway. Airport 80 th anniversary preparation update: Houck reported ongoing planning for June 6, 2026 event. Coordination with Town and Village continues, with social media outreach underway. VIP invitations to neighboring property owners are being distributed. A c ommemorative poster and promotional materials are in development. Gift bags for guests are planned. Food, music, and sponsorships remain in progress. Static aircraft displays and participation from hangar owners are being coordinated. Hangar construction update : Bierman reported density and compaction testing is underway, with site work progressing toward final elevations. Site preparation, including landscaping and paving, is anticipated to be complete by mid- to late-May. Concrete work is expected to begin in early June. Weekly construction meetings continue, Airport Manager Report: Excused. Attending Airport Manager Conference. Airport Report: Drajesk reported he was contacted by Hal Davis at the BOA asking if he would be willing to chair a session at a future Airport Managers Conference on Wis. Stat. 114, airport commissions, and working with sponsors and owners. Drajesk reported Virgil Kreder intends to sell Hangar C -1 and has two potential buye rs. Drajesk directed Kreder to contact the Clerk to provide purchaser information and initiate preparation of a new lease. Drajesk noted action needs to occur on Hangar C-7 before September when the variance expires. Friends Report/maintenance update: Drajesk reported on status of Young Eagles event. Review Payables (monthly-year-end): Drajesk questioned an unfamiliar charge. Clerk explained it was for the Aviation Ground Operations Liability Insurance policy. Motion ( Houck/Glojek ) to approve payables. Carried. Set Next Meeting date: Thursday, May 21, 2026 at 8:00 a.m. Adjourn: Motion (Glojek/Pearson) to adjourn at 8:47 a.m. Carried. Respectfully submitted, Laura Reetz, Clerk 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM PLAN COMMITTEE WORKING SESSION MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 - 12:00 PM 10005 NORWAY STREET – VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Present: Andy Bartelt (online), Laird Hart (online), Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman, Monique McClean, BD Thorp – Temporary Chair. Absent: Ken Nelson. Staff: Brent Bristol - Village Administrator and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests: John Cox. Call to Order: Bristol called the working session to order at 12:00 PM and requested that the Committee appoint a temporary chair. Held moved, Hoyerman seconded to appoint Thorp Temporary Chair, all ayes. Motion carried. BUILDING HEIGHTS The Committee conducted an extensive review of the proposed changes from the last working session regarding building heights that applied to both §17.15(12) and §17.20(5). The Committee spent considerable time discussing the exceptions and absolute limitation provision under section §17.15(12)(b). The Committee determined the need to add further clarification to §17.15(12)(b) (new language in bold), “Other rooftop accessories, which include but are not limited to, such as spires, belfries, parapet walls, cupolas, domes, flues, vent pipes, chimneys, communication devices, and all other projections, are allowed to a maximum of thirty-five feet (35’) from grade. Such architectural projections may exceed the thirty-five feet (35') maximum by Planning Committee approval via special exception review. Under no circumstances shall any projection and/or any accessory a structure exceed thirty-seven feet (37’) from grade.” The Committee further determined to add additional clarifying language to §17.20(5)(b)(iv) (new language in bold), “Other rooftop accessories, which include but are not limited to, such as spires, belfries, parapet walls, cupolas, domes, flues, vent pipes, chimneys, communication devices, and all other projections are allowed to a maximum of twenty-five feet (25’) from grade the approved peak roof line (maximum twenty three feet (23’) in height as measured from the crown grade of State Highway 42.” The Committee briefly discussed basement regulations, noting that walkout basements don't count against overall square footage limits when they're open toward the rear property line. Bristol explained that properties could have significant finished square footage through this mechanism. Discussion included the definition of living space and whether basements should be included in calculations. The Committee noted that walkout basements provide an easier path to becoming a living space due to egress requirements, but the Committee decided to postpone further discussion until K. Nelson's return, as this appeared to be an item he had specifically highlighted for review. SIGNS The Committee discussed concerns about long, skinny banner signs versus traditional flags. Bristol explained that K. Nelson’s issue was with elongated signs, preferring that businesses use standard 3x5 flags that say "open" rather than the longer banner-style signs that were becoming more common. Held supported restricting to a 3x5 “open” flag rather than the long, skinny sign flags. Hoyerman questioned whether businesses typically use standard sizes and expressed concern that restricting their ability to attract attention would be unfair to businesses. The Committee acknowledged the need to balance aesthetic concerns with business visibility needs. MacClean noted that businesses set back from the road, particularly on the north end, face visibility challenges. The Committee discussed whether different standards might be appropriate for different zoning districts. Hoyerman suggested consulting with the Ephraim Business Council before making final decisions, noting that businesses in different districts of the Village may have different needs. The Committee agreed this would be helpful input before dictating specific requirements. 2 PROTECTED WATERFRONT (PW) ORDINANCE Bristol explained that another path had been advised by the Village Attorney without using a moratorium. The path provides a vehicle to stop taking on major projects within the PW district, similar to what was used for the Multi-Family Development process. He noted that all complete applications submitted before the pubic hearing on May 12 would be heard under the current ordinance as written. All applications would be judged on the merit of their adherence to the zoning code as written today. The Committee discussed preparation for future working sessions once the approval to remove the sections was obtained. Bristol suggested that Committee members individually develop short lists of problems and concerns with the current Protected Waterfront Ordinance, including issues related to bulk, square footage, definitions, and clarity. Thorp mentioned K. Nelson’s request for each member to identify three specific problems with the Protected Waterfront Ordinance and recommend solutions. Bristol noted that problems could include issues with definitions and clarity concerns, not just dimensional requirements, since all projects require conditional use permits. Bristol provided an overview of the action the Plan Committee had before them in relation to §17.20 – Protected Waterfront Ordinance for the 7 PM meeting. The Committee would be approving the path that the Board, with the assistance of the Village Attorney, identified for moving forward. They would be affirming the intent of the mechanism to strike the language from the ordinance instead of using a moratorium. The meeting adjourned at 12:44 PM. Recorded by Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 – 6:15 PM Present: BD Thorp-Chair, Cody Schreck, Amy Russell Online: Kathy Pentler Absent: Marcia Ellis Staff: Brent Bristol- Administrator Guests Present: John Cultra, Drew Willmann of DeLeer’s Construction, Monique McClean, Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman Guests Online: Ann Abbott, Victoria Cultra 1. Call to order: The meeting was called to order by BD Thorp at 6:15 PM. 2. Quorum: A quorum is present for this meeting. 3. Changes in Agenda: None 4. Visitors’ comments: None 5. Previous minutes: March 31, 2026 The approval of minutes was postponed to the next meeting, as Thorp-Chair, Russell, and Ellis were not all present at the prior meeting and a sufficient number of attendees from that session were unavailable to approve the minutes. 6. John & Victoria Cultra – 9887 Water St – New SFR – Conditional Use - Design Review Bristol provided background on the Cultra application, noting this was a formal design review hearing after previous concept reviews. The applicants had made revisions based on feedback from both HPC and Plan Committee meetings. The Plan Committee determined that the proposed garage would remain a separate structure despite a covered roof connection, as it didn't share common walls or footprint, resulting in design modifications. John Cultra introduced himself, explaining that he and his wife have owned the property since January 2009 and have been visiting Ephraim since 1992. He described their family's connection to the area and their desire to rebuild due to the current home's deteriorating condition, including mold and water repulsion issues. Cultra emphasized their commitment to maintaining the historic character while meeting their family's needs as they will transition to spending more time in Ephraim. Drew Willmann of DeLeers Construction presented revised renderings reflecting the feedback received at prior meetings. Key figures noted were that the proposed conditioned space footprint of 1,039 square feet represents a reduction of 3 square feet from the existing 1,042 square feet, and the unconditioned garage footprint is reduced by 88 square feet, yielding an overall footprint reduction of 95 square feet. Total conditioned square footage including the second floor is approximately 1,922 square feet, compared to an estimated 1,650 square feet existing—an increase of approximately 270–300 square feet. Shreck expressed approval of the design direction, noting the simplification of roof lines compared to previous iterations, though he had some concerns about mass and scale. Russell agreed with Schreck's assessment, finding the design moving in the right direction despite still being somewhat busy with rooflines. Thorp raised concerns about the number of exterior lights, counting approximately 12 lanterns, VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 2 of 4 which he felt was excessive compared to neighboring properties. He referenced construction guidelines about being "relatively unadorned" and suggested the lighting would make the structure appear like "a Roman candle." Cultra agreed to work with the committee to reduce the number of lights. Additional discussions covered construction timing, with plans for an end of September 2026 start and completion outside of peak tourist seasons. The committee addressed technical details including chimney height compliance and roof pitch requirements. Pentler expressed significant concerns about the design's complexity for a historic Ephraim home, questioning the appropriateness of certain design elements including door colors, railings, and the overall busy appearance. She advocated for simpler, more traditional design elements consistent with Ephraim's historic character. Pentler also raised a concern about the screened porch, noting that a permanent foundation beneath it—combined with the full roofline—could set a precedent for future enclosure and appeared to add visual mass. Russell countered that she preferred the unified roofline as it simplified the overall form. The applicant explained that the porch is the family's most-used space and that the permanent foundation is intended to replace deteriorating wooden stilts damaged by prior high-water events, not to change the seasonal character of the space. Bristol confirmed that the screened porch square footage was not counted as conditioned living space. The committee noted that the proposed screened porch footprint is 4 square feet smaller than the existing structure. Cultra indicated that he would like to keep the existing blue color of the door. Schreck noted that Iverson House has a blue door. Pentler suggested discussing the color before approval. The committee discussed specific details including railing colors (which must be white per village requirements), door colors (with some debate about blue doors), and the screen porch foundation design. Committee members also noted that landscaping plans had not yet been developed; the applicant confirmed they are working with Meissner Landscaping and will submit a plan for review prior to installation. The committee agreed this could be handled at a future meeting. Thorp confirmed that the chimney height was compliant, with the contractor confirming a roof/framing height of 23 feet or less and total chimney height well within the 25-foot limit. The committee also noted that metal railings on the second-floor French door balcony, initially listed as black or bronze, would be required to be white, which the contractor confirmed would be amended. Schreck moved, Russell seconded to recommend the approval of the Design Review for John and Victoria Cultra at 9887 Water Street to the Plan Committee with the understanding that the Village will work with the applicants to reduce the number of exterior lights, Russell aye, Schreck, aye, Thorp aye, Pentler nay, and the motion passed 3 to 1. 7. Gregory Golterman – 9917 Water St – New SFR – Concept Review Bristol explained that Gregory Goltermann could not attend but had submitted written materials showing design revisions based on previous feedback. The significant change was finding a contractor willing to salvage and repurpose the existing first floor structure rather than complete Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 3 of 4 demolition, addressing the committee's previous concerns about preserving and incorporating the existing first floor structure into the new design—a priority the committee had expressed at the previous meeting. A late-submitted elevation also reflected a return to hand-hewn dovetail siding on the road-facing portion of the structure, consistent with the existing stone facade. The committee members expressed enthusiasm for preserving the existing structure. Schreck was particularly excited about maintaining the original building's historic fishing shack heritage. Pentler praised the design for maintaining clean, straight lines with natural materials while appearing consistent with the current structure's appearance. Russell, who had missed the previous meeting, found no objections to the revised proposal. Thorp agreed that Goltermann had done an excellent job incorporating the committee's feedback while preserving the original character. The committee reached consensus to support the concept review without requiring a formal vote. 8. Matt LaLonde – 9890 Water St. – Deck/Guard Rails – Design Review Bristol presented the LaLonde application for deck and railing system replacement, showing before and after visuals. The proposal involved replacing existing materials and eliminating first- floor railings in favor of wraparound stairs, with new dark gray decking and white aluminum clad railings. Pentler found the design much cleaner and simpler, meeting all Village criteria, though she suggested the door color should be gray rather than blue to maintain consistency. Russell expressed strong approval with no objections, particularly appreciating the white railing choice. Schreck had no issues with the proposal. Thorp confirmed the railing material specifications and expressed general approval, while noting Pentler’s concern about door color consistency with other blue doors in the area. Russell moved, Schreck seconded to recommend the approval of the Design Review application for Deck/Guard Rails to the Plan Committee for Matt LaLonde at 9890 Water Street, all ayes and the motion carried. 9. Pine Grove Resort – 10080 Water St. – Design Review – Fence Bristol presented a request from Pine Grove Resort for a fence along the waterside seawall area adjacent to the gazebo and patio deck. The original proposal for a 4-foot black metal fence had been revised to a 42-inch see-through metal fence in a bronze or walnut brown color, following the Village guidance that see-through fences are limited to 42 inches in height under the village ordinance. The committee expressed significant skepticism about the proposal. No representative from Pine Grove Resort was present to explain the purpose or need for the fence. Members questioned why the fence was necessary, noting that the existing stone seawall and surrounding area had not historically required fencing and that no incidents were known to have occurred there. Pentler questioned the basis for the request and suggested that if any fencing were to be approved, natural cedar or a split-rail wood fence would be more appropriate to the area's character. Russell echoed Historic Preservation Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 4 of 4 this sentiment and stated she would like to understand the need before rendering judgment, expressing a preference for a natural stone or cedar solution if fencing was truly required. Schreck stated that even the bronze/brown metal, while an improvement over black, remained too close to black in his view and that he could not support the proposal as presented. Thorp noted that the committee wished to avoid setting a precedent for metal fencing along the waterfront. He referenced photographs taken during a recent walk-through of the protected waterfront district, noting that split-rail fencing appears in the southern portion of the Village, including on committee member properties, and that the existing Pine Grove stone wall still contains pipe anchors that once held a simple pipe railing—suggesting a more modest solution would be appropriate. Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to recommended approval of the Design Review application for the Fence to the Plan Committee, Schreck nay, Russell nay, Thorp nay, Pentler nay, and the motion failed with no members voting in favor. 10. New Business for the Next Meeting/Next Meeting Date: No new business was identified for the next meeting. The next meeting date is Tuesday, May 26th, 2026. 11. Adjournment Schreck moved, Pentler seconded to adjourn the Historic Preservation Committee Meeting at 6:50 PM, all ayes, and the motion carried. Recorded by, Andrea Collak- Clerk/Treasurer of the Village of Ephraim. Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 – 7:00 PM Present: BD Thorp, Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman, Monique McClean Online: Ken Nelson-Chair, Andrew Bartelt Absent: Laird Hart Staff: Brent Bristol- Administrator Guests: John Cultra, Drew Willmann of DeLeer’s Construction, David Hatch, Jennie Bexell, Fred Bexell, Kelsey Stone, Sarah Martin, Lane Methner Online: Victoria Cultra, Connie Smith, John Cox, Judy Schwengel, Kathy Pentler, Bret Cultra, Mark Nelson Missy LeBelle, Paul Wilson 1. Call to order: The meeting was called to order by Brent Bristol-Administrator at 7:00 PM. In the in- person absence of Chair Ken Nelson, Bristol asked the committee to appoint a temporary chair for the meeting. McClean moved, Held seconded to appoint BD Thorp as temporary chair for the meeting, all aye and the motion carried. 2. Quorum: A quorum is present for this meeting. 3. Approval of previous minutes: March 31, 2026 Held moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve the Working Session meeting minutes from March 31, 2026, as presented, all ayes, and the motion carried. Hoyerman moved, McClean seconded to approve the Plan Committee meeting minutes from March 31, 2026, as presented, all ayes, and the motion carried. 4. Changes in Agenda: None 5. Visitors’ comments: None 6. John & Victoria Cultra – 9887 Water St – New SFR – Conditional Use – Design Review Bristol provided background, noting that the Cultra project had previously undergone two concept reviews before both the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and the Plan Committee. At the prior meeting, the committee determined that the existing garage and existing home were two independent buildings, and that the footprint of one could not be used to increase the footprint of the other. The applicant's team, represented by contractor Drew Willmann of DeLeer's Construction, returned with a revised design reflecting a reduced footprint relative to the existing home. Bristol read into the record a piece of written correspondence from neighboring property owners Tom and Kathleen Price at 8889 Water Street. The letter expressed concerns about the concentration of mass on the second floor, the roofline complexity, and chimney placement, noting that the proposed north side elevation "dwarfs the adjacent structure, resulting in a loss of visual harmony." The letter expressed support for the project while asking the design team to consider these concerns. Thorp summarized the HPC's recommendation, which was a 3-1 vote to approve, with conditions including reduction of exterior lighting fixtures and concerns raised about waterside railings and rooflines. The committee noted that the revised plans represented an improvement over prior submission. VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 2 of 6 Committee discussion centered on several substantive concerns: Roof Pitches and Complexity: Hoyerman expressed concern about the sheer number of rooflines and their varying pitches. The architect confirmed that the shallowest pitch was a 3:12 saddle roof used solely to shed water from an interior valley, with all other primary pitches at 4:12 or above. Nelson noted that the ordinance permits pitches below 6:12 only for dormers, and that the screened porch roof on the west elevation—at less than 6:12—could not be characterized as a dormer and therefore did not comply. The architect acknowledged this could be raised to 6:12 but the intention was to lower the mass. Nelson further suggested exploring whether the two shed dormers on the south elevation could be combined into a single, simpler form to reduce visual complexity. Exterior Lighting: Multiple committee members called for a significant reduction in exterior lighting, consistent with Door County's dark sky principles. Nelson recommended that exterior lighting be limited to fixtures at exterior doorways only. Overall Design Simplicity: Held and McClean both expressed concern that the design remained too "busy" and did not reflect the simple farmhouse character desired in Ephraim. McClean acknowledged the progress made but indicated that the design could move further in that direction. Hoyerman also expressed that the window grids and multiple rooflines contributed to a lack of simplicity. Bristol advised the committee on the applicable timeline, noting that the Village Board had set a public hearing for May 12 on a proposed PW ordinance amendment. Any completed application received prior to that date would still be heard under the current code at the May Plan Committee meeting. This meant a narrow but viable window existed for the applicants to submit revised plans. Hoyerman moved, to approve the New SFR, Conditional Use, Design Review application for John and Victoria Cultra at 9887 Water Street as submitted, all nays, and the motion failed. Following the vote, the committee provided the following consensus direction to the applicants for a revised submission: ● The roof pitch over the screened porch must be raised to a minimum of 6:12 to comply with the ordinance, as it does not qualify as a dormer. ● Exterior lighting should be reduced to fixtures at exterior door/entry locations only. ● The two shed dormers on the south elevation should be considered for elimination or consolidation into a single form. ● All plans must be fully dimensioned, interior and exterior. ● Material and color samples should be provided at the next meeting. ● Roof pitch calculations should be provided demonstrating compliance with the 50% dormer rule. Bristol clarified that a new submission would constitute a new conditional use hearing, requiring re- notification of all properties within 300 feet. A separate landscape plan was not required for the May submission, though hardscape and impervious surface values would eventually need to be addressed. 7. Gregory Golterman – 9917 Water St. – New SFR – Concept Review Bristol explained that applicant Gregory Goltermann was unable to attend but submitted documentation describing the evolution of the design concept. The primary development was a return to Goltermann's original vision of retaining as much of the existing first-floor material—log Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 3 of 6 construction—as possible and building upward from that base rather than undertaking a full teardown. The project remains entirely within the existing building footprint and complies with the Village's 25-foot setback and 23-foot maximum roof height requirements. This is a concept review discussion. Thorp reported that the HPC reviewed the revised concept and expressed strong approval, praising Goltermann's responsiveness to prior feedback and the overall simplified design. No formal vote was taken at HPC, consistent with concept review status. Committee members expressed support. Bartelt noted that while the multiple gables and rooflines might seem complex, in this context they gave the building character rather than appearing overwhelming. Nelson praised the decision to reuse original log materials, calling it a meaningful contribution to the design, and asked that color samples and material documentation (grey and natural field stone) be provided at the design review stage, given that the logs have been painted and their original appearance would not be visible once removed. Nelson noted that he appreciated what the applicant had done on the north wall (side elevation) which was a blank wall at the last meeting. Nelson would like to see material and color samples at the next meeting. As this was a concept review, no formal vote was taken. The committee indicated a clear path forward to formal design review submission. 8. Matt LaLonde – 9890 Water St. – Deck/Guard Rails – Design Review Bristol summarized the application as a proposal to replace the existing first and second floor decking and guardrail system at 9890 Water Street with composite decking in a dark gray Trex-type product and white aluminum guardrails, as shown in the submitted concept drawings. Material samples were provided. Thorp reported that the HPC voted 4-0 to recommend approval, with committee members noting the proposal represented an aesthetic improvement over the existing conditions. One HPC member raised a question about the blue doors on the property, but this did not affect the recommendation. Held moved, Bartelt seconded to approve Deck/Guard Rails, Design Review application for Matt LaLonde at 9890 Water Street as presented, all ayes and the motion carried. 9. Pine Grove Resort – 10080 Water St. – Design Review - Fence Bristol explained that Pine Grove Resort had submitted an application for a new fence along the waterfront portion of the property. After staff consultation, the applicant revised the initial proposal from a 4-foot black metal fence to a 42-inch walnut-brown metal fence to better align with ordinance requirements and staff guidance regarding natural materials and colors appropriate for the Historic District. Thorp reported that the HPC voted to deny the application. Key concerns included the absence of a representative from Pine Grove at the HPC meeting, the use of metal construction with numerous vertical spindles, and a lack of clarity about the exact location and purpose of the fence near a drop- off in the terrain. The HPC suggested that if a fence were to be reconsidered, a split-rail design consistent with fencing found elsewhere in the Village would be more appropriate. Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 4 of 6 Nelson agreed, stating that the density of vertical spindles was not appropriate for the waterfront, even in a darker color. Bartelt echoed this position and indicated he would defer to or support a delay of this item. Hoyerman concurred noting that the design choice does not seem to accomplish a guest safety. McClean agreed. She would like to see a split-rail fence instead. Held suggested a split-rail fence or an increase in the height of the existing stone wall as alternatives. Thorp noted that the existing stone wall retains pipe fittings that could accommodate a pipe railing similar to what remains on the stairs. Hoyerman moved, McClean seconded to approve the Fence, Design Review application for Pine Grove Resort at 10080 Water Street as presented, all nays and the motion failed. 10. David Hatch – 10337 Townline Dr. – New Commercial Shop – Conditional Use – Design Review Bristol provided background, noting that David Hatch had previously appeared before the committee, but the application was tabled pending survey clarification on lot boundaries and access. Hatch returned with updated site documentation confirming that the proposed 2,400-square-foot workshop/storage structure would be constructed on Lot 1 (larger, further offset on Townline Drive), with legal driveway access provided via an easement across his son's adjacent property to the south rather than from Townline Drive directly. Notice was sent out to all neighboring properties within 300 feet. Bristol noted he has not received any correspondence regarding this item. David Hatch appeared in person and explained that the project represents a consolidation and relocation of his existing workshop operations, which are currently housed in a structure situated on a property line. He described the building as intended for private use—storage, staging, and carpentry work—for himself and eventually his family. Bristol clarified that under the Village's zoning code, the only mechanism to permit a building of this size (exceeding the 1,000-square-foot residential accessory structure limit) in the Commercial North District is as a trade and contractors’ establishment under the Conditional Use provisions, which appropriately applies given Hatch's carpentry trade. A brief discussion addressed the question of bathroom/sanitary requirements for a commercial structure. Bristol noted this would be addressed through the separate building permit and state inspection process, not through the zoning approval before the committee. Nelson also noted that the Conditional Use provisions for accessory structures over 1,000 square feet could provide an alternative path, though the committee proceeded under the trade and contractors’ classification. Bristol recommended that any approval be conditioned on the removal of unpermitted and unlicensed structures from the adjacent property to the west, and on the establishment of a recorded legal easement for driveway access across the neighboring parcel. McClean moved, Held seconded to approve of New Commercial Shop, Conditional Use, Design Review application for David Hatch at tax parcel 121-01-123127 K1 & K2 contingent upon removal of unlicensed and unpermitted structures and the creation of a legal easement with his neighbor for driveway access, all ayes and the motion carried. Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 5 of 6 11. Sip (Jennie Bexell) – 10326 Water St. – Accessory Structure – Conditional Use – Outdoor Service Bristol introduced the application, noting that Jennie Bexell (SIP) had previously appeared before the committee. The proposal involves the installation of a 13-by-17-foot aluminum gazebo structure on the north side of the building at 10326 Water Street to provide covered outdoor bar and small grill area. The structure would be a seasonal installation, removed during the winter months. Bristol noted that he has not received any correspondence for this item. Jennie Bexell explained that the intent is to allow outdoor food and beverage service without requiring staff to move equipment in and out each day. She clarified that no new seating is being added—rather, some existing outdoor seating (previously approximately 12 seats) would be relocated under the covered structure, resulting in approximately 6 to 8 seats. The gazebo color was selected to match the gray tones of the existing building. Bartelt sought clarification on the seating count and whether new seats were being added; Bexell confirmed no net addition. Thorp asked about material and color samples; Bexell confirmed the structure is a pre-manufactured kit and that the color was selected to complement the existing building. The committee was satisfied with the description and did not require samples prior to approval. Held moved, Hoyerman seconded to approve the Accessory Structure, Outdoor Service- Gazebo-Small Bar and Grill, Conditional Use application for SIP JF LLC at 10326 Water Street as presented, all ayes and the motion carried. 12. Ephraim Business Council – Event – Fyr Bal The Ephraim Business Council representative Kelsey Stone confirmed that the Fyr Bal Festival event application is unchanged from prior years in terms of logistics, layout, road closure, signage, portable restrooms, remote parking at the airport and former Shopko lot, and bus transportation. McClean moved, Held seconded to approve the Ephraim Business Council Event application for the Fyr Bal Festival on Saturday, June 20, 2026, as presented, all ayes and the motion carried. 13. Ephraim Business Council – Event – Bondemarked McClean moved, Held seconded to approve the Ephraim Business Council Event application for the Evenings in Ephraim Bondemarked, Artisan and Farmers Market, every Monday from June 22 through August 31, 2026, at 10404 North Water Street, all ayes and the motion carried. 14. Ephraim Business Council – Event – Evenings in Ephraim McClean moved, Held seconded to approve the Ephraim Business Council Event application for Evenings in Ephraim Concerts at Harborside Park and Gazebo, every Monday from June 22 through August 31, 2026, all ayes and the motion carried. Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, April 28, 2026 Page 6 of 6 15. Discussion and recommendation regarding proposed PW ordinance changes Bristol provided context, explaining that this item represented a return to the committee for a refreshed recommendation. Following the committee's earlier direction to explore a mechanism to pause major new building applications in the Protected Waterfront (PW) district, Village legal counsel recommended a cleaner approach modeled on a prior action used for multi-family development: amending the zoning code to remove the specific conditional use provisions that enable additions, modifications, and replacement of existing residential structures in PW, temporarily suspending that pathway while new ordinance language is developed. Specifically, the proposed ordinance amendment would remove two provisions: Section 17.20(b)(1), which allows conditional use applications for additions and modifications to existing structures in PW, and Section 17.20(5), which provides the substantive guidance standards for such applications. The Village Board has set a public hearing on this amendment for May 12, 2026. Any completed applications received before the Board's potential approval would continue to be heard under the current code. Hoyerman expressed measured support, emphasizing the importance of a sunset provision to ensure that the removed language would automatically be reinstated if new ordinance language were not adopted by December 31, 2026. He articulated concern that without such a safeguard, the removal could become permanent under pressure from those who prefer no change to the Protected Waterfront District. Bartelt and Nelson both agreed with this provision. Nelson confirmed he had already presented to the Village Board that the Plan Committee was committed to delivering a revised ordinance within 90 days of the Board's approval. McClean and others noted the importance of making it clear on the record that the committee's intent is not to eliminate the ability to renovate or rebuild homes in PW, but to craft better, clearer standards for doing so. The committee agreed that this message should be conveyed clearly to the public and to the Village Board. Bristol noted that the proposed sunset mechanism would need to be reviewed by Village legal counsel to confirm it could be added to the ordinance amendment without re-publication or a new public hearing notice. Nelson concurred, suggesting the attorney be consulted before the May 12 meeting. Hoyerman moved, McClean seconded that the Plan Committee recommend that the Village Board approve the amendment to the Village of Ephraim zoning code pertaining to the Protected Waterfront zoning district at its May 12 Public Hearing, and that the Village Board farther adds a sunset provision reinstating the existing zoning language in the event that no new ordinance language is adopted by December 31, 2026, all ayes and the motion carried. 16. New business for the next meeting/Next meeting date: There was no new business to add to next month’s agenda. The next meeting date would be May 26th, 2026. 17. Adjournment: Held moved, Hoyerman seconded to adjourn the Plan Committee meeting at 8:45 PM, all ayes, and the motion carried. Recorded by Andrea Collak-Clerk/Treasurer 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM PHYSICAL FACILITIES & UTILITIES MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2026, 8:00 AM 9996 WATER STREET Action Items: Flottman moved to adjourn at 8:08 AM, Lohman seconded, all ayes. Motion carried. Present: Paul Flottman, Scott Lohman, and Matt Meacham – Chair. Absent: Brian Reinhardt. Staff: Brent Bristol – Village Administrator, Justin MacDonald – Maintenance Manager/Fire Chief, and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests online: None. Guests in person: None. 1. Call to Order: Meacham called the meeting to order at 8:00 AM. 2. Quorum: A quorum was present for this meeting. 3. Changes in Agenda: There were none. 4. Approval of Previous Minutes: Lohman moved, Flottman seconded to approve the minutes of April 7 and April 9, 2026 5. Visitors’ Comments: There were none. 6. Maintenance Manager Report: MacDonald provided an overview of the activities the Maintenance Department completed in April. He explained that April had been a transition month focused on preparing facilities for spring and summer operations. The department completed dethatching all Village properties and coordinated with the Highway Department to sweep all roadways before the recent heavy rains. MacDonald reported that gutters were reinstalled at the Administration office after being removed for winter due to ice-damming issues. They also continued cleaning up downed trees and debris from winter storms. Bathrooms were being slowly reopened with deep cleaning procedures to ensure everything was operational for the season. Despite the spring timing, the department had to conduct ice control operations once in April. MacDonald also noted they had handled various digger requests related to the North End Walking Path construction project. He mentioned that the contractor had begun work at the dump site. 7. Update on German Road Dump: MacDonald provided an update on the German Road dump project. He announced that work was expected to be completed in the next couple of days. He explained that the project had experienced delays due to weather, as well as waiting for weight restrictions to be lifted from the Town of Liberty Grove Road before contractors could access the site. He described the current state of the work, noting that contractors had scraped the area down to bedrock, which he believed would create a much better driving surface. Berms had been constructed around the perimeter of the expanded area. He detailed the planned organization of the dump site and noted he was waiting for the signs to arrive to direct traffic flow properly once the construction was complete. A discussion was held regarding the German Road brush and yard waste site. Lohman inquired about the expansion size. MacDonald confirmed the new dump was at least five times larger than the original area. When asked about the need for additional gravel, MacDonald indicated he didn't believe additional material would be necessary, as contractors were working to level the area using existing materials, including dredging materials from marina operations. Further discussion arose about future dredging 2 operations from the marina. MacDonald explained that the same location previously used for dredging material would continue to be available, with materials being pushed back further toward German Road to create more space. MacDonald reiterated that weight restrictions had been the primary constraint, noting that the Village office had received numerous calls from residents asking about the dump's reopening. He emphasized that contractors couldn't work any faster than the conditions allowed. Bristol raised concerns about drainage, questioning whether the excavated area might become a "swimming pool" during wet conditions. MacDonald acknowledged that the experienced equipment operators weren't shooting grades but expressed confidence that the bedrock base with its natural fractures would provide adequate drainage. 8. New Business for the next meeting: a. No new business was discussed. 9. Adjournment: Flottman moved to adjourn at 8:08 AM, Lohman seconded, all ayes. Motion carried. Recorded by, Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM GREEN TIER AD-HOC COMMITTEE WORKING SESSION MINUTES THURSDAY, MAY 7, 2026 - 9:00 AM - 9996 WATER STREET Present: Lane Methner (online), Bruce Nelson, Cindy Nelson, Sophie Nelson, Zoe Sanders (online), and Carly Mulliken- Chair. Absent: Jeff Lutsey. Staff: Brent Bristol – Village Administrator and Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk. 1. Discussion and Consideration Regarding Plans for Community Clean-Up Day and Tree Giveaway: The Committee discussed the upcoming Community Clean-Up Day scheduled for May 9, 2026. The Committee reviewed who would be responsible for specific tasks to ensure a successful event. 2. Discussion regarding 2026 Goals: Continuing Goals: • Signage at the Wetlands: Project progressing with proofs expected at the end of May. • Waterfilling Stations: Installation is being coordinated by MacDonald, dependent on weather conditions. • Public Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: Past discussions of a fast charger were reviewed, as well as locations, and coordination with possible future projects. It may be a part of a larger discussion of future capital projects and keeping an eye out for grant opportunities. • Green Tier page on the website: The Committee was pleased with the updates to the Village Green Tier web page. They noted that they would continue to keep an eye out for additional information that would serve the community to add to the page on the website. Goal achieved! • Community Clean-up Expansion to include battery drop off: Battery drop off is included in the Clean Up day for May 9, 2026. Goal achieved! • North End Path inclusion in the Ephraim Business Council (EBC) brochure: The North End Path was included in the EBC 2026 brochure in the Nature & Outdoors section on page 12. Goal Achieved! Projects for the Committee to be aware of and be a part of the conversation: • Moravia Point: Bristol provided an update on the progress of establishing a native prairie in the area of Moravia Point. He reviewed that it will take time and patience, but it is the best plan for the site in terms of maintenance and site stability. • Goose Roundup: The Board had a Public Hearing in March. If the round-up moves forward, it would happen in the next month during the molting stage when the birds are flightless. • Harborside Park: It could be a large project due to the desire for the Library to have a permanent story walk, making the park more accessible, and adding bathrooms. The discussion has become more of a Board discussion regarding future Capital Projects. • Trees: The Committee reviewed the trees lost recently throughout the Village. Bristol reviewed the plan for replacing trees after the completion of the North End Path project. Bristol noted that Ephraim Historical Foundation had suggested a Liberty Tree to honor the nation’s 250th anniversary of independence. Mulliken suggested the site of the tree lost outside of the Library as a perfect location for the Liberty Tree. • Playground at Administration Building: The Committee agreed that the focus on the playground at Harborside to be more inclusive would allow for the removal of the Administration Building playground. The Committee agreed that they would want a commitment that the Harborside Park Playground would be updated if the Administration Building playground was to be removed. Items for the Committee to watch for updates and future year goals: • Development and updates from the Door County Trail Group: The Committee noted that the Strategic Master Trails Plan for Door County would be the next development phase for the group. • Compost Initiatives: The County Green Tier Group has placed a higher priority on educating those in attendance at festivals and events about composting. Their next meeting is in November. • Community Garden: While there is a lack of interest and room within the Village, the Committee expressed interest in providing information to residents regarding a Community Garden behind the Door County Medical Center in Sister Bay. 3. Update on Wetlands Signage Project: C. Nelson provided an update on the Wetlands Signage Project. She noted that she had been in touch with the contractor, who is waiting for proofs from production. 4. Update on Solar for the Wastewater Treatment Facility: Mulliken explained that the Solar Project for the Wastewater Treatment Plant faces timeline and funding challenges. B. Nelson mentioned that the Wastewater Committee has discussed treating solar as a separate project. Though there's Board interest in this approach, a decision has yet to be made. Funding research, largely ineffective due to income-based qualification issues, highlighted a potential small grant from Destination Door County. C. Nelson stressed the need for a comprehensive review of explored funding avenues to avoid repetitive research. Mulliken suggested potentially enlisting Stantec for grant applications, pending Board approval. B. Nelson emphasized timeliness, indicating that delaying decisions reduces funding chances. However, a "biddable plan" remains pending, which in turn prevents pursuing any grant funding. A discussion about the bidding process considered a request for proposal versus specific plans. B. Nelson agreed to consult with the solar contractor further on unresolved issues. 7. Update on Water Bottle Filling Station: Mulliken reported that MacDonald is coordinating installation with the contractor. Due to the temperatures, it will be a few weeks before installation can occur. 5. Next meeting: The Committee scheduled its next meeting for June 4, 2026, at 9:00 AM The meeting adjourned at 9:43 AM. Recorded by Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk