Agenda for Regular Common Council Meeting - AMENDED

1 Regular Council Meeting August 18, 2026 AGENDA FOR REGULAR COMMON COUNCIL MEETING - AMENDED CITY OF SUPERIOR, WISCONSIN August 18, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. Government Center, Board Room 201, 1316 N 14th Street, Superior, WI 54880 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4.1. August 4, 2026 – Regular Common Council Meeting 5. CORRESPONDENCE TO BE FILED 6. MAYOR’S REPORT 6.1. Report from Mayor Paine 6.2. Priorities Based Budgeting 7. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS 7.1. Human Resources Committee (No meeting to report) 7.2. Public Works Committee (Meeting held August 6, 2026) RECOMMENDATIONS: 7.2.1. Waive the bidding requirements for the repair of the SS Meteor’s cracked hull and award the work to Fraser Shipyards in the amount of $29,900.00. 7.2.2. Approve the 2026 Hot Mix Asphalt Proposals. 7.2.3. Award the Engineering Design Contract for the North 28th Street Grade Separation Project to SRF Consulting Group in an amount not to exceed $2,464,037.00. 7.2.4. Publish a resolution relating to water utility acquisition. 2 Regular Council Meeting August 18, 2026 7.3. Finance Committee (No meeting to report) 7.4. Licenses and Fees Committee (No meeting to report) 7.5. Public Safety Committee (No meeting to report) 8. SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS 8.1. REPORTS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1.1 Public Art Commission (Meeting held July 30, 2026) Report from the Chair. RECOMMENDATIONS: 8.1.1.1 Award sponsorship to Superior Council for the Arts for the 2026 Regional Creative Industries Summit Event in the amount of $5,965.00. 8.2. REPORTS SANS RECOMMENDATIONS 9. OLD BUSINESS 10. NEW BUSINESS 10.1. Miscellaneous licenses. 10.2. Amend the Premise for a special event license application for Atypical Enterprises, Inc., dba Main Club, located at 1217 Tower Avenue (Agent: Shawn Roos), for Pride Weekend September 4 through September 7, 2026. 10.3. Amend the Premise for a special event license application for The Superior Flame, LLC, dba, The Superior Flame Night Club, located at 1612 Tower Avenue (Agent: Russ Melanson), for Superior Pride Block Party September 5, 2026. 10.4. Original Class “B” Beer and “Class B” Liquor license application for Solomon Witherspoon Group, LLC, doing business as Solomon Witherspoon, located at 1108 Tower Avenue (Agent: Amanda Anderson) for current license period through June 30, 2027, pending fire, police, and health department approvals, and proposed lease condition. 10.5. File a cross appeal with the Wisconsin State Board of Assessors to the objected valuation of property located at 153 Main Street (Property Owners: Exodus Real Estate Holdings, LLC). 3 Regular Council Meeting August 18, 2026 11. BUSINESS BY PUBLIC Due to the requirements of the Wisconsin Open Meetings laws, only matters placed on this agenda may be approved by the Council at this meeting. Citizens who wish to address the council may do so during Business by Public by signing up with the city clerk and indicating the agenda item they wish to address. All comments by members of the public shall be limited to three minutes in length. Electioneering or personal attacks are not allowed. The City of Superior complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you need an accommodation to participate in the public meeting process, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (715) 395 -7200 (OR dial 711 for Telecommunications Relay Service) prior to the scheduled meeting. The city will attempt to accommodate any reasonable request depending on the amount of notice received. In compliance with Wisconsin Open Meetings Law, this agenda was posted on 08/14/2026 at the following locations: Superior Government Center, Douglas County Courthouse, and online at https://www.superiorwi.gov/agendacenter. It was also emailed to the Superior Telegram and the Superior Public Library. 1 Regular Council Meeting August 4, 2026 PROCEEDINGS OF THE REGULAR COMMON COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF SUPERIOR, WISCONSIN August 4, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. Government Center, Board Room 201, 1316 N 14th Street, Superior, WI 54880 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL Present: Nick Ledin, Sarah Anderson, Garner Moffat, Jack Sweeney, Joe Radtke, Tylor Elm, Karly Caven, Mike Herrick, Rob Hering, Lindsey Graskey – 10 Virtual: Absent: Also Present: Mayor Paine, City Attorney Prell, Chief of Staff Bernacki, City Clerk Blunt, Deputy City Clerk Bacon 3. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4.1. July 21, 2026 – Regular Common Council Meeting MOTION TO APPROVE, by President Herrick, was seconded by Councilor Elm, and carried. 5. CORRESPONDENCE TO BE FILED 6. MAYOR’S REPORT 6.1. Report from Mayor Paine 7. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS 7.1. Human Resources Committee (Meeting held July 20, 2026) Report from Councilor Sweeney. RECOMMENDATIONS: 7.1.1. Approve the updated Nepotism policy (#04.06c). MOTION TO APPROVE, by President Herrick, was seconded by Councilor Graskey, and carried. 7.1.2. Approve the updated Disciplinary Actions policy (#16.01). MOTION TO APPROVE, by Vice President Moffat, was seconded by Councilor Sweeney, and carried. 2 Regular Council Meeting August 4, 2026 7.1.3. Approve the permanent seasonal Finance Intern Position. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Caven, was seconded by Councilor Sweeney, and carried. 7.2. Public Works Committee (No meeting to report) 7.3. Finance Committee (Meeting held July 28, 2026) Report from Co-Chair Elm. 7.4. Licenses and Fees Committee (Meeting held July 20, 2026) Report from Councilor Graskey. RECOMMENDATIONS: 7.4.1. Approve O26-4433, an ordinance amending City Code, Chapter 1 – General Provisions, Section 1-14 – Citations and deposit for violation of certain provisions, to assign citation authority for designated trails and routes, by adding Code Section 90-360 – Designated Trails/Routes and Enforcement Official(s) – Police Chief and/or Director of Parks & Recreation. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. 7.4.2. Conditionally approve the Outdoor Alcohol Consumption License for Port Town Tavern, with the licensed premises limited to the rear patio area, located at 1318 Tower Avenue (Agent: Barbara Engelking) for the current license period through June 30, 2027. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Anderson, was seconded by Councilor Hering, and carried. 7.5. Public Safety Committee (No meeting to report) 8. SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS 8.1. REPORTS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS 8.2. REPORTS SANS RECOMMENDATIONS 8.2.1. Urban Forestry Tree Board (Meeting held July 23, 2026) Report from the Chair. 8.2.2. Community Development Block Grant Advisory Board (Meetings held on July 23, 2026 and July 30, 2026) Report from the Chair. 9. OLD BUSINESS 10. NEW BUSINESS 3 Regular Council Meeting August 4, 2026 10.1. Miscellaneous licenses. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Ledin, was seconded by President Herrick, and carried. 10.2. Amend the Premise for a special event license application for Hudy’s Bar, located at 2126 E 5th Street (Agent: James Ronning), for a birthday party on August 8, 2026. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Vice President Moffat, was seconded by Councilor Sweeney, and carried. 10.3. Amend the Premise for a special event license application for Hudy’s Bar, located at 2126 E 5th Street (Agent: James Ronning), for East End Family Fun Days August 15, 2026. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Councilor Anderson, and carried. 10.4. Amend the Premise for a special event license application for East End Tavern, LLC, dba East End Tavern located at 2114 E 5th Street (Agent: Rick Lampton), for East End Family Fun Days August 15, 2026, pending fire department approval. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Hering, was seconded by Councilor Elm, and carried. 10.5. Approve R26-13884, a resolution approving the Form of Notice of Assignment of Leases (CHS, Inc. Projects). MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Councilor Radtke, and carried. 10.6. Approve R26-13885, a resolution approving the Forms of Assignment and Assumption of Development Agreements (CHS, Inc. Projects). MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Councilor Hering, and carried. 10.7. Approve O26-4434, an ordinance amending City Code Chapter 112 – Traffic Code, Article III Parking; Schedule J, Accessible Parking Zones to Add Accessible Parking Signage at 1317 North 7th Street (one side). MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Hering, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. 10.8. Original Class “B” Beer license application for City of Superior, Superior Historic Properties, Fairlawn Mansion, located at 906 E 2nd Street (Agent: Jordan Stish) for current license period through June 30, 2027 pending police, fire, and health department approvals. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Radtke, was seconded by Vice President Moffat, and carried. 10.9. Original Class “B” Beer license application for City of Superior, Superior Historic Properties, SS Meteor Maritime Museum, located at 3285 200 Marina Drive (Agent: 4 Regular Council Meeting August 4, 2026 Jordan Stish) for current license period through June 30, 2027 pending police, fire, and health department approvals. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Vice President Moffat, was seconded by Councilor Hering, and carried. 10.10. Original Class “B” Beer license application for City of Superior, Superior Historic Properties, Old Firehouse & Police Museum, located at 402 23rd Avenue E (Agent: Jordan Stish) for current license period through June 30, 2027 pending police, fire, and health department approvals. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Caven, was seconded by Councilor Anderson, and carried. 10.11. Original Class “B” Beer and “Class B” Liquor license application for President’s Liquor, LLC, dba President’s Bar & Liquor, located at 3824 E 2nd Street (Agent: James Bolin) for current license period through June 30, 2027 pending police, fire, and health department approvals. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Councilor Anderson, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. 10.12. Original Cigarette, Tobacco, and Vapor Product license application for President’s Liquor, LLC, dba President’s Bar & Liquor, located at 3824 E 2nd Street (Agent: James Bolin) for current license period through June 30, 2027 pending police, fire, and health department approvals. MOTION TO APPROVE, by Vice President Moffat, was seconded by Councilor Anderson, and carried. 11. BUSINESS BY PUBLIC MOTION TO ADJOURN until 6:55pm and resume in Committee of the Whole by President Herrick, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. Meeting adjourned at 6:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Blunt, City Clerk Superior, Wisconsin Approved this 18th day of August, 2026. Attest: ____________________________________ Mayor ____________________________________ City Clerk PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE – 8/06/2026 Meeting (Meets monthly on 1st Thursday at 5 p.m.) Page 1 of 4 *Attended virtually PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MINUTES August 6, 2026 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Councilor Ledin at 5:05 p.m. on August 6, 2026, in Government Center Room 204. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Nick Ledin, Garner Moffat, Tylor Elm, Joe Radtke (alt.) 1. ROLL CALL Members Present: Nick Ledin, Garner Moffat, Tylor Elm, Joe Radtke City Staff Present: Kara Czapinski, Jim Paine, Steve Roberts, Frog Prell, Justin Bernacki, Mike Herrick, Jess McCullough Others Present: Shelley Nelson, Bill Fennesssey, Mark Liebaert, TS*, Jeff Knudson*, Jenny Van Sickle*, Melanie Johnson* 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. Public Works Committee (Meeting held July 8, 2026) MOTION by Elm, second by Moffat and carried to approve the minutes from July 8, 2026. 3. OLD BUSINESS 3.1. Discussion and recommendation of a report submitted by Raftelis Financial Consultants evaluating the acquisition of utilities operated by Superior, Water, Light & Power. Mayor Paine shared the appraisals from Raftelis Financial Consultants regarding the electric and natural gas utilities, highlighting their greater complexity in comparison to the water utility appraisal. Copies were provided to committee members, and these documents will be included in the meeting packet and accessible on the city’s website. During the discussion, the committee examined the city's debt capacity and the distinctions between general obligation bonds and enterprise fund financing for utility acquisitions. They concluded that acquiring all three utilities simultaneously would likely be impractical without innovative financing solutions or partnerships; however, the acquisition of any single utility appears feasible within the city's financial framework, subject to further rate analysis. The committee also raised questions about potential rate savings from municipal acquisition, drawing on earlier projections for the water utility. Mayor Paine clarified that a comprehensive rate analysis is necessary to determine savings for the electric and gas utilities, noting that municipal bonds generally provide lower interest rates than the existing rate base, which could lead to reduced rates for customers. 3.1.1 Recommendation of referendum and public meeting schedules. Mayor Paine introduced a referendum question for the April 6, 2027, ballot regarding the potential transition to a community-owned water utility, contingent upon the Public Service Commission's assessment of the purchase cost's affordability for the city. The legal team PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE – 8/06/2026 Meeting (Meets monthly on 1st Thursday at 5 p.m.) Page 2 of 4 *Attended virtually reviewed the question, with Frog Prell providing insights on statutory requirements and clarifying that the referendum is advisory and non-binding. Both Prell and Mayor Paine emphasized that the City Council retains the discretion to act based on financial viability and other considerations, while also discussing the amendment process, publication obligations, and possible legal challenges, confirming that the proposed language complies with legal standards. Mayor Paine suggested rescheduling a breakfast town hall to prevent conflicts with local events and highlighted upcoming public engagement initiatives, such as a happy hour at the Thirsty Pagan and additional library sessions. The committee evaluated the effectiveness of the public meeting format, with Mayor Paine indicating a willingness to adapt by including debates and visual aids for complex topics. They acknowledged the importance of anonymous questions and addressing misinformation, while also stressing the need for transparency by inviting representatives from coalition groups and Superior Water, Light, and Power to all meetings. Mayor Paine recognized the necessity for modern communication strategies and committed to exploring various outreach options, including summary videos, to engage residents who cannot attend in person. Justin Bernacki left the meeting at 5:38 p.m. Melanie Johnson left the meeting virtually at 5:42 p.m. Mark Liebaert left the meeting at 5:43 p.m. MOTION by Moffat, second by Ledin and carried to approve the referendum and to place a Water Utility Acquisition referendum question on the spring general election ballot – “Should the City transition to a community-owned water utility in the event the PSC determines the purchase cost to be a number within the City’s financial means?” Frog Prell, Mike Herrick and Bill Fennessey left the meeting at 6:08 p.m. 3.2 Discussion on City of Superior Ordinance 114-62(e) Hauled Waste Charges. Director Roberts provided a comprehensive memorandum that examined the existing hauled waste rate structure, comparing it with the rates for connected users and proposing various alternatives. These options included retaining the current rates, raising the fixed fee, or modifying the calculation methodology. During the discussion, committee members deliberated on the equity and impartiality of the current rates, with several indicating a desire to keep the existing system unless significant justification for change is presented. Ultimately, the committee resolved to defer any decision indefinitely. TS left the meeting virtually at 6:09 p.m. MOTION by Elm, second by Moffat and carried to hold item 3.2 indefinitely. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE – 8/06/2026 Meeting (Meets monthly on 1st Thursday at 5 p.m.) Page 3 of 4 *Attended virtually 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1. Recommendation to waive the bidding requirements for the repair of the SS Meteor’s cracked hull and awarding the work to Fraser Shipyards at a quoted cost of $29,900.00. Museum Director Jess McCullough detailed the identification of a structural crack in the SS Meteor, outlining the interim measures implemented and the pressing need for repairs prior to winter. Fraser Shipyards, the original builder and the sole qualified local contractor, submitted a proposal of $29,900, which was advised for approval. The committee deliberated on the available funding from Superior Public Museums and the potential for grant approval to alleviate the financial burden of the repairs on the city budget. Jenny Van Sickle left the meeting virtually at 6:14 p.m. MOTION by Moffat, second by Elm and carried to waive the bidding requirements for the repair of the SS Meteor’s cracked hull and awarding the work to Fraser Shipyards at a quoted cost of $29,900.00. 4.2. Recommendation to approve the 2026 Hot Mix Asphalt Proposals. MOTION by Elm, second by Moffat and carried to approve the 2026 Hot Mix Asphalt Proposals. Jess McCullough left the meeting at 6:26 p.m. 4.3. Recommendation to award the Engineering Design Contract for the North 28th Street Grade Separation Project to SRF Consulting Group. The committee examined the $2.4 million design contract with SRF Consulting Group, which entails a city contribution of $246,000, and noted the significant federal and railroad interest in the initiative. Members emphasized the project's critical role in enhancing transportation, fostering economic development, and ensuring public safety, particularly in mitigating frequent train-related congestion and improving access for pedestrians and cyclists. MOTION by Elm, second by Moffat and carried to award the Engineering Design Contract for the North 28th Street Grade Separation Project to SRF Consulting Group. 4.4. Notice of Fleet Vehicle Auction Removals – Received and filed PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE – 8/06/2026 Meeting (Meets monthly on 1st Thursday at 5 p.m.) Page 4 of 4 *Attended virtually 5. RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 ESD Director’s Update – Received and Filed 5.2 Director Update 5.3 Future Agenda Items 5.2.1 Discussion and recommendation of a report submitted by Raftelis Financial Consultants evaluating the acquisition of utilities operated by Superior, Water, Light & Power. 5.3 Confirm the next meeting date as September 3, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 204 of the Government Center. 6. ADJOURNMENT Councilor Ledin announced the meeting adjourned at 6:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Kara Czapinski MEMORANDUM DATE: August 6, 2026 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 18, 2026 TO: Mayor Jim Paine Superior Common Council FROM: Jess McCullough, Museum Director RE: Request to Waive Bid Requirement & Secure Fraser Shipyards for SS Meteor Hull Repair Introduction: I am recommending waiving the project bidding requirements for the repair of the SS Meteor’s cracked hull and awarding the work to Fraser Shipyards at a quoted cost of $29,900. This request is made due to the time-sensitive nature of the repairs and the proximity of qualified marine welders at Fraser Shipyards Background: In February 2025 a crack was discovered in the deck of the SS Meteor which was caused by shifting of the ship in the freeze-thaw cycle of the soil on Barker’s Island. On February 6, 2026 Fraser Shipyards submitted a fixed price bid to repair the SS Meteo r as part of a grant application that was submitted March 1, 2026 . The amount quoted was $29,900.00 which included all labor, materials, and equipment costs. Fraser has confirmed that this quote remains in place. (The grant was not selected by the Favrot Fund for Historic Preservation.) Delay of repair will eventually lead to increased damage to the ship, as well as the continued closure of usable space inside the ship which is blocked off by bracing . The affected room inside the ship is adjacent to the Meteor bar and is intended to be a rentable event space and venue. The sooner the crack is repaired the sooner the interior space can generate revenue. Fraser Shipyards in Superior is not only the place where the SS Meteor was originally constructed, but is the only available vendor for this project within 200 miles. Budget Source: The full cost of this repair would be borne by the Buildings and Construction budget. Efforts are currently underway to secure the $26,210.47 in restricted funds for the restoration of the Meteor currently held by Superior Public Museums. These restricted funds would be used to reimburse the Buildings and Construction budget when obtained. Conclusion: I recommend waiving bidding requirements for the repair of the SS Meteor’s cracked hull and awarding the work to Fraser Shipyards so the repair can be made in a timely manner and for $29,000. Recommendation Approved: _______________________________ Date: ____________ Division of Historic Properties Phone: (715) 394-5712 E-mail: museums@superiorwi.gov Website: www.superiorhistoricproperties.org Museum Director Jess McCullough 906 E 2nd Street Superior, WI 54880 FRASER SHIF'YAROS.LLC I Clough Ave. Superior, WI 54880 (715) 394-77787 To: Chase Dewhirst Date: July 22, 2026 Re: S.S. Meteor Fraser Shipyards is pleased to present the following fixed price bid on the SS Meteor for your consideration. The price below includes all labor, materials, equipment, staging, and management to complete the job. It also includes all items specified in your request. Any additional items identified upon commencement of the work will be completed on a time and material basis or at an agreed price. SS Meteor Crack Repair - $29,900.00 Quoting crack repair as per the plan set provided by AMI Consulting Engineers. Thank you for the opportunity to quote this work. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me so we can discuss. Derek Tanula Yard Superintendent Fraser Shipyards, LLC Public Works Department Phone: (715) 395-7334 Public Works Director Fax: (715) 395-7346 Chris Carlson E-mail: publicworks@superiorwi.gov 1316 N 14th Street, Suite 200 Website: www.superiorwi.gov Superior, WI 54880 MEMORANDUM Date: July 29, 2026 Council Agenda Date: August 18, 2026 TO: Mayor Paine and the Common Council FROM: Chris Carlson, Public Works Director RE: 2026 Hot Mix Asphalt Proposals 1. Introduction - Proposals for hot mix asphalt materials for the annual street maintenance program were opened by the Public Works Department. 2. Background - Each spring the Public Works Department request proposals from local suppliers for hot mix asphalt materials to be used on city projects. Specifications require submission of rates per ton for base course materials, wear course materials, and filler materials. The location of the supplier’s plant is also requested as travel distance is considered along with the cost of the materials. Suppliers must provide materials that meet either the WisDOT OR MnDOT Standard Specifications for Highway and Structure Construction. Our general use of these proposals allows the city to purchase from any suppliers based on the submitted unit prices. Choice of the supplier is based on availability of materials, location of the project relative to the supplier’s facility, and the ability of the supplier to meet the required specifications. 3. Budget Source - Funds for road maintenance are budgeted annually within the CIP . 4. Conclusion - The bids received were as follows: 1) Northland Constructors, - Duluth, MN (plant location – Garfield Ave) Wisc. Design Spec MN DOT Spec Base Course No bid No bid Wear Course No bid $81.80 Fine Mix No bid $81.80 2) Monarch Paving-Superior, WI (plant location-Albany Ave.) Wisc. Design Spec MN DOT Spec Base Course $69.19 No bid Wear Course $69.64 No bid Fine Mix $76.44 No bid The Public Works Department may use products from the vendor based on their submitted price and plant location. Recommend _____________________ Mayor Jim Paine MEMORANDUM DATE: August 06, 2026 Council Agenda Date: August 18, 2026 TO: Mayor Jim Paine and the Common Council FROM: Chris Carlson, Public Works Director RE: N28th Street Grade Separation: Preliminary Engineering It is my recommendation to award the N28th Street Grade Separation preliminary engineering design contract to SRF Consulting Group at an estimated cost of $2,464,037. This project is funded by a grant through the Federal Railroad Administration. The local city share is 10% of the final actual cost or approximately $246,404. 1. Background Access to Billings Park at Belknap or N21st Streets is by viaducts that pass over the BNSF railyard. Those viaducts eliminate at-grade railroad crossings and the safety risks and delays they pose. The viaducts also provide dedicated pedestrian and bicycle facilities that safely separate users from vehicle traffic. Access to Billings Park at N28th Street is significantly different. The N28th Street access is at-grade and crosses multiple railroad tracks. At-grade crossings increase the risk of accidents between street users and trains. Pedestrian traffic does have a dedicated sidewalk. However, that sidewalk crosses multiple railroad tracks. It also comes to the roadway, directly adjacent to vehicle traffic at the three-track crossing. These at-grade crossings also result in delays for everyday travelers and concerningly for emergency services when the roadway is blocked by a train. Recognizing the safety concerns these multiple crossings represent, the city, in partnership with BNSF, applied for a Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant through the Federal Railroad Administration. The grant’s goal is to eliminate at-grade railroad crossings and the conflicts they inherently create. The city was successful and awarded a grant to perform preliminary engineering work on a new viaduct. The scope of the work is to study the corridor and produce a 30% design for a viaduct. Once this preliminary engineering work is complete, the hope is to apply for future funding through the program to complete the final design and then construct a new viaduct. This project will involve a thorough evaluation of alternatives for grade separation, considering various alignments, lengths, and methods. Input from residents will be important and solicited through multiple public engagement efforts. The anticipated benefits of the project include improved safety for vehicles and pedestrians, enhanced mobility, and better access for emergency services. Public Works Department 1316 North 14th Street, 2nd Floor Superior, WI 54880 Web site: www.superiorwi.gov Phone: 715-395-7334 Fax: 715-395-7346 TTY: 715-395-7521 2. Proposals A request for qualifications (RFQ) was advertised soliciting responses from interested engineering design firms. SRF Consulting Group, Ayres Associates, and Short Elliott Hendrickson each submitted a response. In accordance with the standard RFQ process, an internal selection committee reviewed the submittals and evaluated them based on criteria including: 1. Consultant and project team qualifications and relevant experience with similar projects 2. Project understanding and approach 3. Completeness of proposal and adherence to RFQ requirements 4. Responses to Qualification Evaluation Checklist The selection committee ranked the three firms and conducted interviews of the two highest ranked. The results of the process determined that SRF Consulting Group was the most qualified respondent. A meeting was held between SRF and the city to formalize the project scope and to discuss the project fee. A scope was developed and a project fee negotiated. The parties worked together to arrive at a fee that will accomplish the scope while minimizing project cost. 3. Budget Source This project is primarily funded by a $2,486,000 grant from the Federal Railroad Administration through their Railroad Crossing Elimination program. The grant includes a required 20% local share. Recognizing the benefit to both parties of at-grade crossing elimination, BNSF and the city agreed to split the local share equally. BNSF has delivered to the city their 10% share of the grant award. The remaining $246,404 will require funding through the Public Works CIP. 4. Recommendation It is my recommendation to award the N28th Street Grade Separation preliminary engineering design contract to SRF Consulting Group at an estimated cost of $2,464,037. Recommended: _________________________________ Jim Paine, Mayor Agreement Professional Engineering Services Agreement for the N28th Street Grade Separation Project This agreement made this 19th day of August 2026, by and between, SRF Consulting Group, Inc., located at 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota (herein known as ‘Consultant’), and the City of Superior, a municipal corporation, through its Public Works Department (herein known as ‘City’). The parties to this Agreement shall be bound by the following terms and conditions. Scope Consultant services include, but are not limited to, all of the tasks, activities and requirements included in Exhibit A, “Scope of Services” and other tasks and responsibilities as identified by the Public Works Department. By reference, Exhibit A is hereby incorporated into this Agreement but shall not in any way restrict the services provided by Consultant, nor prohibit the Public Works Director from requesting other tasks or procedures germane to the Agreement. If there are other tasks identified by the Public Works Director that are beyond the scope identified in Exhibit A, these will be considered extra services and can be added to this agreement by an amendment. Term The term of this agreement shall be from the date of the agreement through October 21, 2028, or completion of the scope of work. Services and Fees Costs shall be full compensation for services performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, incidentals, applicable taxes, fees and applicable expenses, necessary to complete the services for a not to exceed amount of two million, four hundred sixty- four thousand, thirty-seven dollars ($2,464,037.00), attached scope of work and cost proposal and incorporated herein by reference. All other expenditures shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant. Changes to services and/or fees that are agreed to by both parties shall be acknowledged in an amendment signed by both parties. Payments Consultant may invoice the City of Superior on a monthly basis during the progress of the work for partial payment on account for work completed and accepted to date and shall not impose any penalties or interest for amounts invoiced. The invoice shall be itemized and, in a form satisfactory to the City, of expenses incurred in the previous period. The City shall pay agreed upon amounts within thirty (30) days of receipt. Insurance Consultant shall provide up-to-date, accurate professional liability information on Consultant’s Data Record, including amount of insurance, deductible, carrier and expiration date of coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with an endorsement for earlier notice of cancellation and/or non-renewal and the Certificate of Insurance showing the type, amount, deductible, effective date and date of expiration of such policy. Consultant shall not cancel or materially alter this coverage without prior written approval by the City. Consultant shall be responsible for consultants maintaining professional liability insurance during the life of their Agreement and for 2 years after final acceptance for the service. Consultant and its subconsultants retained under the terms of this Agreement shall procure and maintain professional liability insurance providing for payment of the insured's liability for errors, omissions or negligent acts arising out of the performance of the professional services required under this Contract. It is hereby agreed and understood that the insurance required by the City is primary coverage and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, council members, agents, employees or authorized volunteers will not contribute to a loss. All insurance shall be in full force prior to commencing work and remain in force until the entire job is completed and the length of time that is specified, if any, in the agreement or listed below whichever is longer. 1. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY A. Limits (1) $1,000,000 each claim (2) $1,000,000 annual aggregate B. Must continue coverage for 2 years after final acceptance for service/job 2. GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE A. Commercial General Liability (1) $1,000,000 each occurrence limit (2) $1,000,000 personal liability and advertising injury (3) $2,000,000 general aggregate (4) $2,000,000 products - completed operations aggregate B. Claims made form of coverage is not acceptable. C. Insurance must include: (1) Premises and Operations Liability (2) Contractual Liability (3) Personal Injury (4) Products/Completed Operations must be carried for 2 years after acceptance of completed work. (5) The general aggregate must apply separately to this project/location 3. BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE COVERAGE A. $1,000,000 combined single limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage each accident B. Must cover liability for Symbol #1 - "Any Auto" - including Owned, Non- Owned and Hired Automobile Liability. 4. WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY A. Must carry coverage for Statutory Workers Compensation and an Employers Liability limit of: (1) $100,000 Each Accident (2) $500,000 Disease Policy Limit (3) $100,000 Disease - Each Employee 5. UMBRELLA LIABILITY - Provide coverage at least as broad as the underlying Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability and Employers Liability, with a minimum limit of $2,000,000 each occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate, and a maximum self-insured retention of $10,000. 6. ADDITIONAL INSURANCE PROVISIONS A. Primary and Non -contributory requirement - all insurance must be primary and non - contributory to any insurance or self-insurance carried by City B. Acceptability of Insurers - Insurance is to be placed with insurers who have an A.M. Best rating of no less than A- and a Financial Size Category of no less than Class VII, and who are authorized as an admitted insurance company in the state of Wisconsin. C. Additional Insured Requirements - The following must be named as additional insureds on the General Liability and Business Automobile liability coverage arising out of project work - City, and its officers, council members, agents, employees and authorized volunteers. On the Commercial General Liability Policy, the additional insured coverage must be ISO form CG 20 10 07 04 and also include Products - Completed Operations additional insured coverage per ISO form CG 20 37 07 04 or their equivalents for a minimum of 2 years after acceptance of work. This does not apply to Workers Compensation Policies. D. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions - Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. E. Evidences of Insurance - Prior to execution of the agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City a certificate of insurance (Accord Form 25-S or equivalent) signed by the insurer's representative evidencing the coverage required by this agreement. In addition form CG 20 10 07 04 for ongoing work exposure and form CG 20 37 07 04 for products -completed operations exposure must also be provided or its equivalent. F. Provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City for the workers’ compensation and liability insurances. Agreement General Terms and Conditions 1. No Relationship. Consultant understands and agrees that the relationship of Consultant and the City arising out of this agreement is that of a contracted service provider, not an employee or contracted employee of the City or any other entity within the municipality, and therefore, is not entitled to any benefits provided to employees of the City. 2. Taxes. Consultant will act as an independent contractor and will be responsible for all federal, state and local taxes arising in accordance with this contract, as well as any other taxes, fees or licensing expenses pertaining to these services. 3. Confidentiality. Consultant shall diligently protect the confidentiality of any information, documentation or communication received from the City that contains personal, financial or other information of a confidential nature, and shall not disclose said information to any other persons, organizations or entities without the expressed written approval of the City, except that Consultant may disclose confidential information that is reasonably necessary to defend itself in the event of a dispute. Nothing herein shall be construed to conflict with the obligations under Wisconsin Public Records Law, Wis. Stat. §19.31, et. Seq. 4. Qualifications. By accepting this agreement, Consultant represents that they possess the necessary skills and qualifications to perform work under this agreement. Consultant will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal licensure requirements and will provide proof upon request. 5. Legal Relations. Recommendations, policies, procedures and other communications provided by the Consultant under this agreement will comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations promulgated and enforced by the City and any other proper authority having jurisdiction over the conduct of the operations of the City. The Consultant shall use professional care to comply with and observe federal, state and local laws that may be applicable to the project. In carrying out provisions of this Agreement or exercising power or authority granted to the Consultant thereby, there shall be no personal liability to the City, it being understood that in such matters the City acts as representatives of the State. The Consultant is not an agent of the State. 6. Assignment of Agreement. The Consultant shall not subcontract, assign or transfer any part of this work to any other parties without the express written agreement of the City. 7. Claims. Claims, disputes and other matters in question arising from the performance of this contract shall be brought to the Director of Public Works for review and mutual resolution. If the parties cannot mutually resolve the matters in question, the parties shall endeavor to settle disputes by mediation. A demand for mediation shall be filed, in writing, within a reasonable period of time after a claim, dispute, or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall a demand for mediation be made after the date when the institution of legal or equitable proceedings, based upon such a claim, dispute, or other matter in question would have been barred by an applicable statute of limitations. 8. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, renderings, models, approved copies, manuals and other such documents prepared by the Consultant or any party pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of the City of Superior on completion, acceptance of, and payment for any of the Consultant’s work, or upon termination of the Agreement and upon payment with the terms of this Agreement, and shall be delivered to the City of Superior upon request. 9. Indemnifications. Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives and volunteers, and each of them, from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrativ e proceedings, claims, demands, damages, liabilities, interest, attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses of whatsoever kind or nature in any manner directly or indirectly to the extent caused, occasioned, or contributed to by reason of any negligent act, error or omission, whether active or passive, of Consultant or of anyone acting under its direction or control or on its behalf, even if liability is also sought to be imposed on the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives and volunteers. The obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives and volunteers, and each of them, shall be applicable unless liability results from the sole negligence of the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives and volunteers. Consultant shall reimburse the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agent or authorized representatives or volunteers for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. In the event that Consultant employs other persons, firms, corporations or entities (subcontractor) or volunteers as part of the work covered by this Agreement, it shall be the consultant’s responsibility to require and confirm that each sub-contractor enters into an Indemnity Agreement in favor of the City, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives and volunteers, which is identical to this Indemnity Agreement. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 10. Final Payment. Prior to final payment, the Public Works Department shall review project documents, recommendations, tasks and procedures, etc., and all other recommendations submitted by Consultant to determine the satisfaction thereof; it will be at the Public Works Department’s sole discretion when the final payment is made. Final payment will be made to Consultant within thirty (30) days of the City’s acceptance of services as complete. 11. Deficiencies. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for work found to not meet the standard of care or failing to conform to the requirements set forth in this agreement and is not entitled to further payments until corrected to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The City will inform the Consultant of any failure to meet the standard of care and/or items that do not conform to this agreement within thirty (30) days of receipt. 12. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for services performed to termination date. The results of the work by Consultant shall immediately be turned over to the City of Superior and is a condition of final payment. 13. Warranty of Documents. The City, its representatives, employees, and agents make no representations of the accuracy of documents, drawings, procedures, etc., provided to Consultant under this Agreement, and shall not be held liable for the inadequacy thereof. To the greatest extent possible, any document, drawing, procedure, etc., provided by the City for the purposes of the project that cannot be utilized as reliable information by the Consultant shall be noted as such by the City in the transmittal of the material. 14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the maters contained herein and supersedes all other written and oral agreements between the parties with respect to such matters. 15. Modification. This Agreement is binding only when signed by both parties. Any modifications or amendments must be in writing and signed by both parties. 16. Force Majeure. Each party shall be excused from any breach of this Agreement which is caused by war, strike, act of Nature or other similar circumstances normally deemed outside the control of well-managed businesses. 17. Governing Law. The Agreement will be interpreted, and the rights and liabilities of the Parties determined, in accordance with the laws of the State of Wisconsin. 18. Headings and Captions. Headings and Captions appear solely for convenience of reference. Such headings and captions are not part of this agreement and shall not be used to construe it. 19. Validity. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 20. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding among the Parties regarding the matters set forth herein and supersedes all previous negotiations, discussions, and understandings regarding such matters. The Parties acknowledge and represent that they have not relied on any promise, inducement, representation, or other statement made in connection with this Agreement that is not expressly contained herein. The terms of this Agreement are contractual and not a mere recital. 21. Safety And Security. The Consultant shall at all times perform in a safe and workmanlike manner to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. The Consultant shall comply with applicable requirements and specifications relating to the safety, health and sanitation measures applicable to the project. The Consultant shall exercise the applicable necessary precautions for the safety of its employees, and be in compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations. Including, but not limited to, the Wisconsin Labor Code, The U.S. Department of Transportation Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act, and OSHA standards. The Consultant shall provide its employees with all necessary safeguards, devices and protective equipment, including but not limited to adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment, and shall ensure the proper inspection and maintenance of safety measures are current and in compliance. The City may halt progress on any project where appropriate safety measures and equipment are not being used or any safety regulations are not being followed. Services will not be permitted to resume until required safety provisions have been made and delays caused by Consultants failure to comply withhis provision will not be considered a basis for an increase in the Agreement price or an extension of the completion deadline. 22. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that it will perform the Services in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality. To the extent Consultant’s services do not meet this standard of care; Consultant shall re-perform its work at no cost to the City. 23. Appropriation. State and/or Federal funds may be used to fund all or part of this Agreement. Allowances detailed in the Project scope shall be awarded at the City’s discretion, and is subject to available funding, project progress and other terms and conditions as identified by the City. The City will not be held liable for any damages incurred due to changes in State or Federal funding, including (but not limited to) a reduction, delay, or cancellation of the project. 24. Non-Discrimination. Upon execution of this Agreement, Contractor agrees as follows: Contractor and all Subcontractors do not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, independent contractor, or any other persons because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. 25. Authority. The Consultant represents that it has the authority to enter into this Agreement. If the Consultant is not an individual, the person(s) signing on behalf of the Consultant represents and warrants that they have been duly authorized to bind the Consultant and sign this Agreement on the Consultant’s behalf. The parties intending to be legally bound have executed this agreement on the day and year set forth above. Signatures Company: SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Address: 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55416 _____________________________ __________________________________ Name/Title Name/Title ATTEST: CITY OF SUPERIOR, WISCONSIN ___________________________________ Jim Paine, Mayor Heidi Blunt, City Clerk ___________________________________ Nicholas Rhinehart, Finance Director Frog Prell, City Attorney Provision has been made to pay the liability that will accrue under this contract. *Approved by Superior Common Council on SRF Project No.: 19203.00 Project Name: 28th Street Viaduct Project Prime Consultant: SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Subconsultant 1: Subconsultant 2: Subconsultant 3: Subconsultant 4: NWBE Terracon TRAINFO AET Subconsultant 5: HDR SCOPE OF SERVICES This Scope of Services below describes the services required. SRF will provide professional planning, engineering, and coordination services to support a federally funded Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant (RCE) planning effort in coordination with the F ederal Railroad Administration (FRA), BNSF Railway, and the City of Superior. Services will be completed in accordance with FRA requirements and will be sufficient to support future project development. The following tasks will be provided: Task 1. Project Administration and Management Task 1.1 Project Administration and Coordination SRF will demonstrate to FRA that the Project is carried out in the most cost -efficient manner. SRF will support overall project administration and coordination, working closely with the City and project partners, including FRA, railroad owners/operators, and local and regional agencies. Services will include: • Participation in a project kickoff meeting with FRA and project partners • Ongoing coordination and meetings with FRA, BNSF Railway and their subsidiaries, local governments, and the regional planning agency • Support for regularly scheduled project meetings, including preparation of agendas, meeting materials, and summaries • Coordination with subconsultants and technical specialists • Quality control and progress tracking to ensure work is completed consistently with the approved scope, schedule, and budget Task 1.2 Project Management Plan (PMP) SRF will prepare a Project Management Plan (PMP), that describes how the Project will be implemented and monitored to ensure effective, efficient, and safe delivery of the Project on time and within budget. The PMP will describe, in detail, the activities and steps necessary to complete the tasks outlined in this Scope of Services. SRF will prepare a Project Management Plan for FRA review and approval. The PMP will describe the approach to project delivery, management, coordination, quality assurance/quality control, and risk management. The PMP will include: • A detailed project schedule aligned with FRA requirements • A detailed project budget consistent with the approved grant budget • Expected data needs, sources of data, and expectations from project partners for procuring the data • Roles and responsibilities of the core project team and partners (if applicable), including an organization chart with named key staff and back-ups • QA/QC plan with independent technical review steps • Risk log with monthly updates • Change-management protocol (scope/budget/schedule) • Document control standards (versioning, file naming) • Agreed-upon meeting cadence (bi-weekly core-team check-ins monthly partner meetings; quarterly public-facing updates) • Communication and coordination protocols SRF will update the PMP, as required by FRA project management team, throughout the project. Task 1.3 Project Closeout Support SRF will assist the city with project closeout activities, including preparation of materials needed for the Final Performance Report documenting project activities, milestones, and outcomes. Task 2. Project Planning SRF will conduct technical analysis, stakeholder outreach, and other project planning activities, and prepare a Project Planning Package as detailed in the PMP. The Project Planning Package will be consistent with the objectives of the Project Planning Lif ecycle Stage identified in the FRA Guidance on Development and Implementation of Railroad Capital Projects (January 11, 2023). The Project Planning Package will include all information described in the PMP. FRA will review the Planning Package for acceptan ce. Information and activities necessary to perform and complete the required Project Planning Package will be included in the approved PMP. Task 2.1 Preliminary Purpose and Need Statement SRF will prepare a preliminary Purpose and Need Statement to support the alternatives analysis. The statement will be suitable for planning purposes and future agency and public review. SRF will submit the draft Purpose and Need Statement to the City for review prior to submission to FRA. Task 2.2 Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan SRF will develop and implement a comprehensive Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan . The Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan will identify and describe coordination strategies for key stakeholders, including: • Federal, state, regional, and local agencies • Railroad owners and operators • Elected and appointed officials • Emergency service providers, school districts, freight interests, and transit providers • Business, civic, and neighborhood organizations • Residents, property owners, travelers, and other members of the public The Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan will clearly outline how public input will be solicited, documented, and incorporated into the development and evaluation of alternatives. The Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan will: • Identify key stakeholder groups and points of contact • Describe engagement methods tailored to different audiences, such as public meetings, small-group briefings, workshops, online engagement, surveys, and project web content • Identify strategies to reach traditionally underserved or hard-to-reach populations • Align engagement activities with key project milestones and decision points • Describe how feedback will be summarized and used to inform the Purpose and Need Statement and Alternatives Analysis • Identify staffing levels, roles, and resources dedicated to stakeholder coordination and public engagement SRF will prepare the Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan for review and approval by the City. Task 2.3 Public/Stakeholder Coordination SRF will leverage a mix of in -person and digital engagement strategies throughout the study, with focused engagement at key study milestones at the beginning, middle, and end of the project. Our approach includes both traditional in-person public and stakeholder meetings, along with pop-up engagement events that will allow us to reach a broader cross -section of the community. Pop -up activities will be scheduled to align with major events to maximize visibility and participation. Engagement Strategies Include: • Two virtual community surveys (online and mobile-friendly) • An online comment map • Up to three in-person public meetings (assume 1 during Project Planning and the other 2 during the Environmental Review process) • Up to four pop-up engagement events (assume these could be during Project Planning or Environmental Review) • Project website serving as the central engagement hub to share information, host surveys, post meeting materials, and collect public feedback Task 2.4 Existing Conditions Assessment SRF will document existing conditions related to rail operations, roadway characteristics, safety, and surrounding land uses. This task will include: • Roadway and crossing characteristics (lanes, speeds, traffic volumes, control devices, multimodal facilities, and proximity to adjacent crossings) • Train operations (number of tracks, speeds, and train volumes) • Safety conditions, including crash history, incidents, and known deficiencies • Crossing safety condition analysis utilizing TRAINFO data • Topographic survey, including existing utilities, track location and elevation, road and trail facilities, environmental and drainage features, and existing right-of-way/properties. Task 2.5 Alternative Analysis SRF will develop planning-level alternatives (focused on alternative roadway alignments, with various bridge and wall variations) and conduct a transportation technical analysis for each alternative, which may include: • Existing and projected traffic volumes, including vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists, where applicable • Travel delay and queuing impacts associated with rail operations • Frequency and duration of roadway blockages • Directional travel impacts and effects on the surrounding roadway network • Consideration of access for emergency services, schools, and planned development. This includes emergency response time analysis. • Environmental impacts • Drainage conditions Traffic analysis methods and tools will be documented, and supporting data will be provided. SRF will prepare conceptual engineering sufficiently to support cost estimating at the planning level. Conceptual engineering will include: • Grade separation or closure concepts • Roadway crossing improvements and protective devices • Multimodal safety and mobility enhancements Conceptual designs will be developed in coordination with FRA and key stakeholders and will be consistent with applicable federal guidance. SRF will prepare planning-level capital cost estimates for each alternative, including: • Design, construction, and implementation costs • Major quantities and unit costs • Right-of-way and land acquisition considerations • Contingencies and allowances SRF will conduct a limited field geotechnical exploration and boring program to establish baseline data for initial foundation recommendations to be used in evaluating bridge and retaining wall alternatives and cost estimates. This program will collect a limited number of borings to establish soil, bedrock and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of 28 th Street. A draft geotechnical report and foundation recommendations will be generated so that cost considerations (soil corrections, spread footings, pile -supported foundations) and constructability considerations ( long-term settlement, preload periods and surcharge areas) can be identified which will influence Task 3 and Task 4 deliverables. The limited field investiga tions in this task will not be sufficient to complete the geotechnical requirements needed for Task 4. Task for includes a supplemental geotechnical program that will provide for the development of the preliminary design. SRF will conduct a high -level qualitative and quantitative environmental review to identify potential environmental constraints and considerations. This task will include preliminary evaluation of socioeconomic, cultural, human, and natural environmental r esources to inform alternatives screening and future project development. Documentation will include vetting of alternative screening criteria. Task 2.6 Implementation Pathway SRF will prepare an Implementation Pathway to guide next steps following completion of the Planning study. This task will include: • Outline of required approvals, permits, and agency coordination steps • Development of a phased implementation strategy, including short- term and long-term actions • Identification of potential funding sources and grant opportunities (federal, state, local) to support design and construction • Preparation of a roadmap document summarizing key milestones, estimated timelines, and responsibilities for advancing the project Task 2.7 Assemble Project Planning Package SRF will compile the core documents and technical proof needed to define the capital rail project idea before moving into official environmental review and design. This package will help to illustrate that the project is viable, meets community and rail needs, and satisfies the requirements set in the analyses and documentation from other tasks in this Scope to assemble a Project Planning Package. SRF will prepare the Project Planning Package for review and approval by the City prior to submittal to FRA. Task 3. Environmental Review SRF will prepare required documentation to comply with applicable environmental laws, including but not limited to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 4(f) of the US DOT Act, and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as well as applicable implementing regulations and guidance. SRF will provide FRA with sufficient information to determine the NEPA Class of Action and will prepare the environmental documentation as detailed in the PMP. The PMP will identify information and activities necessary to perform and complete the required environmental review. Task 3.1 Resource Review and Analysis 1. Land Use 2. Cultural Resources (assume no need for determinations of eligibility) 3. Parks and Recreational Facilities 4. Transportation 5. Hazardous Materials and Waste 6. Waters of the US (Wetlands) 7. Communities 8. Floodplains 9. Water Quality 10. Species Task 3.2 Public/Stakeholder Coordination SRF will prepare and lead three public involvement meetings (PIM), generally to coincide with the following primary milestones: 1. Purpose and Need (completed in Project Planning stage of the project) 2. Alternatives 3. Preferred Alternative SRF shall meet virtually or in person with the City prior to each PIM to coordinate the meetings. Popup meetings described previously in Task 2.3. Task 3.3 Agency Coordination SRF will coordinate with these agencies: 1. Federal Railroad Administration 2. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) 3. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) 4. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 5. Tribal Historic Preservation Offices 6. US Army Corps of engineers (USACE) 7. Wisconsin State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) This scope of services does not include the following activities: 1. Section 4(f) evaluations (for specific impacted sites) 2. Air Quality Analysis 3. Noise Analysis 4. Scope assumes up to 2 Phase 2 and beyond hazardous material investigations Task 3.4 Alternative Analysis SRF will further develop the No-Build Alternative and the preferred alternative that was selected during Project Planning and Environmental Review. This analysis will provide a higher level of analysis for comparison. These alternatives will be compared based on potential criteria noted in Task 3.1. The alternatives will also consider constructability, permitting requirements, and required mitigation measures. The evaluation will identify opportunities to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts and support selection of a preferred alternative for advancement through NEPA and subsequent project development. SRF will prepare planning-level capital cost estimates for the No-Build and preferred alternative, including: • Design, construction, and implementation costs • Major quantities and unit costs • Right-of-way and land acquisition considerations • Contingencies and allowances SRF will conduct a qualitative and quantitative environmental review to identify potential environmental constraints and considerations. This task will include evaluation of socioeconomic, cultural, human, and natural environmental resources to inform alternatives screening and future project development. Documentation will include vetting of alternative screening criteria. Task 3.5 Environmental Documentation SRF will prepare documentation necessary to support a Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Categorical Exclusion (CE) determination in accordance with NEPA and applicable federal environmental requirements. Services include: 1. Review available project information and confirm CE applicability. 2. Collect and review environmental resource information within the project area. 3. Evaluate potential project effects on natural, cultural, and community resources. 4. Conduct field reviews, as necessary, to document existing conditions. 5. Coordinate with the FRA, project team, and resource agencies, as needed. 6. Prepare the FRA Categorical Exclusion Worksheet, including supporting exhibits, mapping, and documentation. 7. Identify environmental commitments, permit considerations, and mitigation measures, if applicable. 8. Address review comments and provide final documentation supporting FRA environmental clearance. This scope of work assumes some level of analysis and documentation regarding the following resources: 1. Land Use 2. Cultural Resources 3. Parks and Recreational Facilities 4. Transportation 5. Hazardous Materials and Waste 6. Waters of the US (Wetlands) 7. Communities and Environmental Justice 8. Floodplains 9. Water Quality 10. Species Task 4. Preliminary Engineering SRF will complete and submit a preliminary engineering (PE) design set to FRA for approval, as specified in the PMP. The PE design set includes engineering from concept through the 30% design level, as detailed in the PMP, which includes but is not limited to necessary field surveys, operational analysis, legal due diligence, and preparation of drawings and cost estimates. The PE Design Set will include all design development and Project delivery documentation, along with eligible and allowable cost estimat es, with associated project milestone timelines necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness, feasibility, and readiness of the Project for final design and construction. DISCUSSION POINT: GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS Task 4.1 Roadway Engineering SRF will complete preliminary engineering for the preferred alternative. The following elements will be included in the analysis and engineering process as needed: 1. Ops/safety analysis 2. H&H analysis and BNSF design team coordination 3. Storm sewer, culvert design, and stormwater treatment design 4. Millenium Trail Extension/bike & ped design 5. Lighting analysis & design 6. Alignment/profile 7. Geometric refinement (roadway, bike/ped, intersection, and property access) 8. Corridor modeling 9. Preliminary drainage design 10. Planning level traffic control and staging analysis (vehicular, bicycle, & pedestrian) This task includes preparation of 30% design level plans including: 1. Title Sheet 2. Typical Sections 3. Project Overview 4. Plan & Profile Sheets 5. Preliminary Cross Sections Task 4.2 Structures Engineering SRF will perform preliminary engineering for proposed structural improvements (bridges, walls, culverts) , including review of existing conditions, field investigations, development of design criteria, preliminary structural analysis, conceptual structural layouts, constructability review, stakeholder coordination, and preparation of preliminary plans, quantities, and cost estimates. The work will advance the project to approximately 30 percent design and provide the technical basis for the Environmental Review and provide the baseline design for future project implementation activities (final design, permitting). This task includes preparation of 30% design level plans including: 1. Plan View 2. Elevation View 3. Typical Cross Section 4. SSR 5. General Layout SRF will conduct a supplemental geotechnical exploration and boring program to establish the minimum data for foundation recommendations to be used for the development of the preliminary structures design. The supplemental program will build upon the work conducted in the initial geotechnical program completed in Task 2 and will collect a sufficient level of additional borings to establish a more comprehensive definition of the soil, bedrock and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the proposed substructures. A final geotechnical report and foundation recommendations will be generated allowing the design team to estimate spread footing sized or driven pile lengths required for detailing in the preliminary plan and cost estimating. Long bridges and retaining wall sections require a substantial geotechnical program. In Task 4, we intend to collect the minimum number of borings to provide sufficient foundation recommendations and confidence in the preliminary design. If a complete boring program cannot be completed in this contract, additional verification borings can be completed in final desig n which are useful in co nfirming the finding and recommendations of the final geotechnical report and ensuring confidence in the preliminary design and anticipated project costs. Task 4.3 ROW Acquisition Plan SRF will gather and review title reports for the Preferred Alternative boundary. The work will include verification of property rights and utility easements. The following deliverables will be included: 1. Existing ROW exhibit showing land ownership and easements 2. ROW acquisition needs exhibit 3. ROW cost estimate Deliverables The following deliverables will be provided as part of the Scope of Services: Task 1 Deliverables: 1. Project Management Plan 2. Summary of expected data needs for analysis 3. Meeting materials and summaries 4. Input to final performance report Task 2 Deliverables: 1. Preliminary Purpose and Need Statement 2. Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan 3. Existing Conditions Memo 4. PIM meeting minutes 5. LOM meeting minutes 6. Popup meeting minutes 7. Alternatives Analysis Memo 8. Implementation Pathway memo 9. Project Planning Package Task 3 Deliverables: 1. GIS-based mapping of environmental constraints 2. CE Worksheet and attachments 3. Capital Cost Estimates Task 4 Deliverables 1. 30% design plans 2. ROW Acquisition Plan SCHEDULE Milestone Completion Date PMP 12/31/2026 Project Planning Package 6/30/2027 Environmental Review 1/31/2028 Preliminary Engineering 1/31/2028 7/29/2026 Page 1 of 5 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimate s Client: City of Superior Project: N28th Street Viaduct Subconsultants: NWBE, HDR, AET, Terracon, Trainfo 19203.PP TASK NO. TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH. SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 1.0 Project Administration and Management 1.1 Admin and Coordination - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 City Kickoff Meeting 16 8 - - - - - - - 24 $6,584.00 FRA Kickoff Meeting 8 8 - - - - - - - 16 $4,296.00 FRA Monthly Meetings (16) 16 16 - - - - - - - 32 $8,592.00 Biweekly PMT with Team/City 64 64 - - - - - - - 128 $34,368.00 Coordination with subconsultants and technical specialists 40 40 - - - - - - - 80 $21,480.00 Ongoing coordination with FRA, local governments, and region al planning agency 40 40 - - - - - - - 80 $21,480.00 City Status Reports 16 16 - - - - - - - 32 $8,592.00 FRA Quarterly Progress Reports 8 24 - - - - - - - 32 $8,312.00 Quarterly Financial Reports (SF-425 Fed Financial Report) - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Performance Measurement Requirements (deliverables tracking) 16 16 - - - - - - - 32 $8,592.00 BNSF Structure Coordination 40 34 120 194 $40,982.00 NPR Railroad Coordination 24 18 40 82 $18,198.00 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 1.2 Project Management Plan - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Draft 40 80 - - - - - - - 120 $31,520.00 Final 24 60 84 $21,924.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 1.3 Project Closeout 12 24 - - - - - - - 36 $9,456.00 final quarterly progress report - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 final SF-425 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 FRA Form 33 Final Performance Report - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Closeout documentation requested by FRA - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SRF Deliverables: - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 1.      Project Management Plan - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.      Summary of expected data needs for analysis - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 3.      Meeting materials and summaries - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 4.      Input to final performance report - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SUBTOTAL - TASK 1 364 396 52 160 0 0 0 0 0 972 $244,376.00 $251.42 2.0 Project Planning 2.1 Prepare a preliminary Purpose and Need Statement to supp ort the alternatives analysis 24 40 - 24 - - - - - 88 $21,296.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.2 Prepare a Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Draft SCP 12 24 - - - 30 - - - 66 $13,836.00 FInal SCP 12 20 - - - 20 - - - 52 $11,372.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.3 Public/Stakeholder Coordination - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Initial workshop 16 24 - - - 24 - - - 64 $14,104.00 Local Officials Meetings (in task 1) - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Public Involvement Meetings (1 in planning) 16 16 - - - 24 - - - 56 $12,096.00 Community Pop Up Events (1) 8 12 - - - 12 - - - 32 $7,052.00 BNSF Monthly Planning Coordination (captured in Task 1) - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.4 Existing Conditions Assessment - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Utility identification/coordination of existing facilities 8 8 - - - - - - - 16 $4,296.00 Roadway and crossing characteristics (lanes, speeds, traffic volumes, control devices, multimodal facilities, and proximity to adjacent crossings). (Sub) 8 8 - - - - - - - 16 $4,296.00 Train operations (number of tracks, speeds, and train volumes). (Sub) - - 8 - - - - - - 8 $1,784.00 Safety conditions, including crash history, incidents, and kno wn deficiencies. 8 - - - 16 - - - - 24 $4,960.00 Assess surrounding land uses - - - - 12 - - - - 12 $2,004.00 What problem are we solving, what alternatives were studied, which alternative is preferred, what environmental issues are likely, what will it roughly cost, and is there enough stakeho lder support to proceed into NEPA and preliminary engineering? Management, meetings, PMP, FRA/Grant Documentation SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 7/29/2026 Page 2 of 5 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimate s Client: City of Superior Project: N28th Street Viaduct Subconsultants: NWBE, HDR, AET, Terracon, Trainfo 19203.PP TASK NO. TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH. SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE Environmental Constraints and Opportunities - - - - - - - - - 0 $ 0.00 GIS Mapping - - - - - - - 24 - 24 $4,320.00 Literature Review - - 12 - 24 - - - - 36 $6,684.00 Existing Conditions Report 8 12 40 - 40 24 - - - 124 $24,404.00 Sub coordination for survey, hazmat, section 106, etc. 24 12 24 - - - - - - 60 $15,228.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.5 Alternative Analysis - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Traffic, bike/ped, blockages, Ods, etc - - - 40 24 - - - - 64 $11,328.00 Drainage - initial assessment 8 - 24 32 - - 56 - - 120 $21,112.00 Develop Screening Matrix - 16 24 - 24 - - - - 64 $13,376.00 Alternatives Analysis (drawings, locations, grades, typicals, phasing, staging, schedule, etc?) 40 - 24 24 40 - - - - 128 $27,864.00 Identify and Evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives 8 - 24 - 16 - - - - 48 $10,312.00 Planning Level Cost Estimates 12 - 24 - 12 - - - - 48 $10,788.00 Alternatives Analysis Memo 24 - 40 - 24 - - - - 88 $19,792.00 Geotechnical Engineering - Initial Borings & Draft Recommend ations - By subconsultant (AET), see Direct Subconsultant Expenses below - These hour are for SRF's coordination activities w/ sub. 3 - - 12 - - - - 15 $3,054.00 Survey (BNSF) - By subconsultant (TBD), see Direct Subconsultant Expenses below - These hour are for SRF's coordination activities w/ sub. 4 - - 20 - - - - 24 $4,804.00 Utility Coordination (BNSF) - By subconsultant (TBD), see Direct Subconsultant Expenses below - These hour are for SRF's coordination activities w/ sub. 6 - - 32 - - - - 38 $7,572.00 New or Modified Rail Lines - By subconsultant (HRD), see Direct Subconsultant Expenses b elow - These hour are for SRF's coordination activities w/ sub. 12 - 24 - - - - - 36 $8,784.00 Grade-Separation (Bridge) Concept Designs - Up to six (6) initial concept alternatives to be screened for evaluation - Up to three (3) final concept alternatives to be evaluated 12 - 60 80 - - - 180 332 $63,852.00 Bridge Aesthetics & Visualizations 10 - 24 10 24 - - - 68 $14,050.00 Bridge Lighting 8 - 16 - - - - - 24 $5,856.00 Bridge Drainage - 4 - 12 - - - - 16 $3,200.00 Constructability Review - 16 - 40 - - - - 56 $11,336.00 Construction Schedule - Phasing & Staging - 5 - 30 - - - - 35 $6,745.00 Bridge Type Study 8 - 20 80 - - - 160 268 $50,188.00 Draft Preliminary Design & Plans 4 - 24 80 - - - 160 268 $49,936.00 Draft Preliminary Cost Estimate - Design Quantities & Unit Costs by Structures staff 8 - 16 32 - - - - 56 $11,712.00 Draft Preliminary Cost Estimate Verification - Contractor-Style Costs by Project Controls Group - 10 - 40 - - - - 50 $9,830.00 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.6 Implementation Pathway - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Identification of recommended alternative(s) for advancement into FRA RCE Program Track – 2 Project Development, and/or NEPA and preliminary engineering. - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Outline of required approvals, permits, and agency coordination steps. - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Development of a phased implementation strategy, including short- term and long-term actions. - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Identification of potential funding sources and grant opportunities (federal, state, local) to support design and construction. - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Preparation of a roadmap document summarizing key milestones, estimated timelines, and responsibilities for advancing the project. 24 - - 60 - - - - - 84 $17,844.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.7 Project Planning Package - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Draft 12 12 24 80 - - - - - 128 $26,436.00 Final 12 12 24 40 - - - - - 88 $19,116.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SRF Deliverables: - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 1.      Preliminary Purpose and Need Statement - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.      Public/Stakeholder Coordination Plan - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 7/29/2026 Page 3 of 5 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimate s Client: City of Superior Project: N28th Street Viaduct Subconsultants: NWBE, HDR, AET, Terracon, Trainfo 19203.PP TASK NO. TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH. SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 3.      Existing Conditions Memo - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 4.      PIM meeting minutes - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 5.      LOM meeting minutes - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 6.      Popup meeting minutes - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 7.      Alternatives Analysis Memo - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 8.      Implementation Pathway memo - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 9.      Project Planning Package - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 0 SUBTOTAL - TASK 2 359 251 476 768 256 134 56 524 0 2,824 $576,619.00 $204.19 3.0 Environmental Review 3.1 Resource Review and Analysis 12 12 24 - 16 - - 12 - 76 $16,628.00 Natural resources - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Cultural and historic resources - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Social and community resources - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Physical environmental features - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Sensitive environmental areas - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 3.2 PIM/LOM/Stakeholder Meetings - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 1 (P/N) (part of task 2) - - 0 $0.00 2 (alts/concepts) 24 24 - - 24 24 - - - 96 $20,400.00 3 (preferred Alt) 24 24 - - 24 24 - - - 96 $20,400.00 popups (#...assume 2-3 mobilizations) 48 48 - - 48 24 - - - 168 $37,29 6.00 Pre PIMs (3, City/FRA/BNSF) 36 36 - - 36 36 - - - 144 $30,600.00 Story Map - 24 - - - - - 40 - 64 $13,224.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 3.3 Agency/Tribal Coordination - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Section 106 8 - 16 - - - - - - 24 $5,856.00 Section 7 ESA 2 - 8 - - - - - - 10 $2,356.00 Permitting needs 2 - 12 - - - - - - 14 $3,248.00 Mitigation needs 2 - 8 - - - - - - 10 $2,356.00 FAA/BOA 2 - 4 - - - - - - 6 $1,464.00 WDNR 16 16 4 - - - - - - 36 $9,484.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 3.4 Alternative Analysis - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Planning-level design alternatives 12 12 40 80 - - - - - 144 $30,0 04.00 Impact assessments - - - - 40 - - - - 40 $6,680.00 Avoidance measures - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Contaminated soil analysis 4 4 - - - - - - - 8 $2,148.00 Drainage - Alternatives Assessment 8 - 40 56 - - 80 - - 184 $32,336 .00 Bridge Aesthetics & Visualizations 40 - 120 40 140 340 $68,900 .00 Bridge Drainage - 40 - 70 110 $22,850.00 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 3.5 Environmental Doc Draft (CE Worksheet + Attachments) - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Draft 24 24 100 - - 80 - - - 228 $46,868.00 Final 24 24 80 - - 60 - - - 188 $39,488.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SRF Deliverables: - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 1.      GIS-based mapping of environmental constraints - - - - - - - - - 0 $ 0.00 2.      CE Worksheet and attachments - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 3.      Capital Cost Estimates - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SUBTOTAL - TASK 3 288 288 456 246 328 248 80 52 0 1,986 $412,586.00 $207.75 In practical terms, FRA expects a project to emerge from environmental review with: a completed NEPA decision, completed Section 106 and ESA compliance, applicable permits in place or well advanced, defined mitigation commitments, and sufficient do cumentation to support advancement into Final Design SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 7/29/2026 Page 4 of 5 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimate s Client: City of Superior Project: N28th Street Viaduct Subconsultants: NWBE, HDR, AET, Terracon, Trainfo 19203.PP TASK NO. TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH. SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 4.0 Preliminary Engineering Survey/Data Tasks (can we do all of this in planning stage?) - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Topographic survey - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Locate existing utilities - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Inventory existing storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and drainage structures/culverts - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Locate existing property corners - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 BNSF-UPRR Joint Guidelines for Railroad Grade Sep. Projects - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 4.1 Roadway Tasks - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Ops/safety analysis 8 - - - 24 - - - - 32 $6,296.00 Drainage coordination with BNSF design team 16 - 24 32 - - - - - 72 $15,784.00 Storm sewer and culvert analysis and design 8 - 32 40 - - 80 - - 16 0 $27,624.00 Water quality treatment analysis and design 8 - 32 40 - - 80 - - 160 $27,624.00 Millenium Trail Extension/bike & ped design 10 - 40 - - - 60 - - 1 10 $19,940.00 Lighting analysis & design 10 - - 50 - - - - - 60 $12,010.00 Alignment/profile 10 - 10 - 40 - - - - 60 $11,770.00 Geometric refinement 10 - 20 - 60 - - - - 90 $17,340.00 Corridor modeling - - 40 - 120 - - - - 160 $28,960.00 Preliminary drainage design - - 0 $0.00 Planning level traffic control and staging analysis (vehicular, bicycle, & pedestrian) 20 - 40 - - - - - - 60 $14,640.00 30% plans/estimate draft 40 80 180 - 160 - 160 - - 620 $120,140.00 30% plans/estimate final 40 80 100 - 100 - 100 - - 420 $84,120.00 4.2 Structure Tasks - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 Geotechnical Engineering - Supplemental Borings & Final Recommendations - By subconsultant (AET), see Direct Subconsultant Expenses below - These hour are for SRF's coordination activities w/ sub. 6 - - 24 - - - - 30 $6,108.00 Preliminary Bridge Plans 4 - 24 80 - - - 160 268 $49,936.00 Bridge Aethetic Details - 2 40 - - - - - 42 $9,422.00 Bridge Lighting Plans 20 - 120 - - - - - 140 $32,480.00 Bridge Drainage Plans - 2 32 - - - - - 34 $7,638.00 Preliminary Retaining Wall Plans 2 8 40 - 80 - - 120 250 $46,460.00 Constructability Review - 16 - 40 - - - - 56 $11,336.00 Construction Schedule - Phasing & Staging - 40 - 200 - - - - 240 $46,640.00 Preliminary Cost Estimate - Design Quantities & Unit Costs by Structures staff 6 - 12 24 - - - - 42 $8,784.00 Preliminary Cost Estimate Verification - Contractor-Style Costs by Project Controls Group - 8 - 32 - - - - 40 $7,864.00 0 $0.00 4.3 ROW Acquisition Plan, detailed schedule, and compensation plan 40 - 80 - - - 120 $26,080.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SRF Deliverables: - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 1.      30% design plans - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 2.      ROW Acquisition Plan - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 - - - - - - - - - 0 $0.00 SUBTOTAL - TASK 4 258 236 786 642 584 0 480 280 0 3,266 $638,996.00 $195.65 Duration (Months) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Duration (FTE) 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 2.3 TOTAL ESTIMATED PERSON-HOURS 1,269 1,171 1,770 1,816 1,168 382 616 856 0 9,048 % of Hours 14% 13% 20% 20% 13% 4% 7% 9% 0% 100.0% AVERAGE HOURLY BILLING RATE $286.00 $251.00 $223.00 $183.00 $167.0 0 $146.00 $136.00 $180.00 $156.00 ESTIMATED LABOR AND OVERHEAD $362,934.00 $293,921.00 $394,710.00 $332,328.00 $195,056.00 $55,772.00 $83,776.00 $154,080.00 $0.00 $1,87 2,577.00 AVERAGE HOURLY PAYROLL RATE $286.00 $251.00 $223.00 $183.00 $16 7.00 $146.00 $136.00 $180.00 $156.00 ESTIMATED LABOR $362,934.00 $293,921.00 $394,710.00 $332,328.00 $1 95,056.00 $55,772.00 $83,776.00 $154,080.00 $0.00 $1,872,577.00 Refine design of preferred alternative to a 30% stage to better define impacts and estimate costs and construction time re quirements. Not needed - delete SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 7/29/2026 Page 5 of 5 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimate s Client: City of Superior Project: N28th Street Viaduct Subconsultants: NWBE, HDR, AET, Terracon, Trainfo 19203.PP TASK NO. TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I TECH. SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE ESTIMATED OVERHEAD COST 0.00% $0.00 ESTIMATED LABOR AND OVERHEAD $1,872,577.00 FIXED FEE 0.00% $0.00 SRF ESTIMATED DIRECT NON-SALARY EXPENSES $11,825.00 $1,884,402.00 $579,635.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE (SRF and Subconsultants combine d) $2,464,037.00 SRF ESTIMATE OF DIRECT NON-SALARY EXPENSES: MILEAGE: Personal Vehicles 11400 Miles @ $0.725 $8,265.00 RENTAL VEHICLE: $0.00 M&IE (perdiem) 20 Per Diems @ $68.00 $1,360.00 LODGING: Hotel 20 Nights @ $110.00 $2,200.00 REPRODUCTION: Copy Duplication 0 Copies @ $0.10 $0.00 Color Copies 0 Copies @ $0.35 $0.00 Bond Prints 0 Prints @ $6.00 $0.00 Mylar Prints 0 Prints @ $12.00 $0.00 COURTHOUSE COPIES: 0 Copies @ $1.00 $0.00 PRINTING: $0.00 SUPPLIES: $0.00 COMMUNICATIONS: Mail, Express, Etc. $0.00 Postage $0.50 Cell Phone Charges 0 Minutes @ $0.30 $0.00 SRF EXPENSES: $11,825.00 SUBCONSULTANTS: NWBE $175,905.00 Tasks 2-4 Terracon $30,000.00 Task 2-3 HDR $55,000.00 Task 2-4 AET (Task 2) $71,296.00 Task 2 AET (Task 4) $192,434.00 Task 4 Trainfo $55,000.00 Task 2-3 SUBCONSULTANTS: $579,635.00 SUBTOTAL: (SRF Labor and Expenses) SUBCONSULTANTS: SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. August 6, 2026 Public Works Committee Agenda: August 6, 2026 TO: Public Works Committee Members FROM: Mayor Jim Paine RE: Recommendation to place a Water Utility Acquisition referendum question on the spring general election ballot. Recommendation: I recommend that the Public Works Committee and City Council place the following question on the April 6, 2027 spring ballot to authorize the city’s acquisition of the water utility through the statutory process: Should the City transition to a community-owned water utility in the event the PSC determines the purchase cost to be a number within the City’s financial means? Office of the Mayor Jim Paine, Mayor Justin Bernacki, Chief of Staff to the Mayor Phone: (715) 395-7212 E-mail: mayor@superiorwi.gov 1316 North 14th Street, #301 Superior, WI 54880 Website: www.superiorwi.gov R26-xxxxx A RESOLUTION SUBMITTING QUESTION TO REFERENDUM AND SPECIFYING THE METHOD OF PAYMENT FOR A WATER UTILITY WHEREAS, Superior Water, Light & Power, Company ("SWL&P"), a wholly owned subsidiary of ALLETE, Inc., operates a public water utility serving the City of Superior; and WHEREAS, the City of Superior has undertaken a study of the potential municipalization of the water utility and an appraisal of the cost, and deems it prudent to pursue its acquisition; and WHEREAS, Superior Water, Light & Power is not open to a negotiation of a voluntary sale of the utility; and WHEREAS Wisconsin law requires that acquisition of the water utility be approved by a majority vote of the City of Superior residents at a referendum election; and, WHEREAS Wisconsin law requires the common council to specify the method of payment for the utility; and WHEREAS, the City’s Public Works Committee voted unanimously on August 6, 2026 to recommend that the question of the acquisition of the water utility be submitted to voters at the April 6, 2027, Spring Election; and WHEREAS, Wis. Stat. § 66.0803(1)(b) requires that a resolution be adopted by a majority of all of the members of the City Council at a regular meeting after publication at least one week previous in the official newspaper; and, WHEREAS, this resolution was published in the Superior Telegram at least one week prior to the regular meeting of the Superior City Council on September 1, 2026; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Superior, Douglas County, Wisconsin, does hereby resolve that: 1. The following question shall be submitted to a referendum at the Spring Election to be held on April 6, 2027: “Should the City transition to a community -owned water utility in the event the Public Service Commission of the State of Wisconsin determines the cost of acquisition to be within the City’s financial means?" R26-xxxxx Water Utility Referendum Page 2 of 2 2. Upon receipt of the final cost to acquire the utility from the Public Service Commission, the City Council shall solicit the advice of the Mayor, City Finance Director, and any other financial and legal advice they deem necessary to determine whether the cost is within the City’s financial means. 3. The City will issue municipal general obligation bonds, municipal revenue bonds, or a combination of the two to pay for the acquisition of the utility. The debt service for these bonds shall be paid exclusively by future water utility rates and shall not be paid by the property tax levy. 4. The City Clerk shall issue a notice of referendum, which shall include a general statement of the plant and equipment that the City proposes to acquire from the Superior Water, Light & Power, Company, and a description of the manner of payment. Passed and adopted this xx day of xxxxx, 2026. Approved this xx of xxxxx, 2026. ________________________________________ Mayor Attest: ____________________________________ City Clerk Page | 1 Public Art Commission – 7/30/2026 Mtg PUBLIC ART COMMISSION Minutes Thursday, July 30, 2026 – 10:00 a.m. The meeting was called to order by Chair Lindsey Graskey at 10:00am on July 30th, 2026 in Government Center Room 204. 1. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Lindsey Graskey, Heidi Blunt, Paul Robinson VIRTUAL: Beatrice Erickson (other) ABSENT: Caroyln Nelson-Kavajecz CITY STAFF PRESENT: Justin Bernacki OTHERS PRESENT: Jane Hoffer-Moen, JoAnn Hardine, Eris Vafias, Shelley Nelson, Jess McCullough 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Meeting held April 28th, 2026 No Action 3. OLD BUSINESS 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Grant Application for Award Consideration: 4.1.1 Nordic Handcraft Workshop Series submitted by DCHS requesting $3,500 MOTION Blunt, Seconded Robinson to approve $3,500 award. Motion passes. 4.1.2 Vision Superior submitted by Jonathan Asp requesting $10,000 Discussion held, no action taken 4.1.3 St. Louis River Rendezvous submitted by SLRR – Patrick Rohde requesting $6,000 MOTION Blunt, Seconded Robinson to approve $5,900 award of $6,000 request to Patrick Rohde and SLRR for actors, food, and firewood to add to the $3,000 marketing granting from Tourism. Motion passes. 4.1.4 Strike for Dickie! A Musical submitted by Kathy Laakso, Time Arc Theate requesting $9,660 MOTION Blunt, Seconded Robinson to approve $7,960 award of the $9,660 request to Kathy Laakso and Time Arc Theater after subtracting rent request. Motion passes. 4.1.5 Victorian Séance Experience submitted by Jess McCullough requesting $2,500 MOTION Blunt, Seconded Robinson to approve $2,500 award to Jess McCullough. Motion passes. Page | 2 Public Art Commission – 7/30/2026 Mtg 4.1.6 Regional Creative Industries Summit Scholarship submitted by Superior Council for the Arts requesting $5,965 Discussion held. MOTION Blunt, Seconded Robinson to recommend to Council at their next meeting, 8/18. Motion passes. 4.2 Downtown garbage can artist proposal from Parks Dept. Update from Chair Graskey. Held in committee. 5. RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Previous Grant Recipient Updates 5.2 Financials Update from Chair Graskey, $20,670 remaining in funds. No action taken. 6. ADJOURNMENT MOTION to adjourn at 10:53am. Next meeting will be confirmed via online poll. Respectfully submitted by Justin Bernacki Superior Council for the Arts Sponsorship Request Regional Creative Industries Summit Requested Amount for 2026: $5,965 The Superior Council for the Arts respectfully requests monetary sponsorship support from the City of Superior Public Arts Commission for the upcoming Regional Creative Industries Summit, planned for Fall 2026 in Superior. This free, public arts event is designed to strengthen arts, culture, and creative economic development throughout the City of Superior, Douglas County, and the surrounding region. The Summit will bring together artists, creative workers, cultural organizations, tribal representatives, educators, business leaders, tourism partners, chambers of commerce, nonprofit and for-profit arts organizations, downtown businesses, major employers, service clubs, elected officials, and engaged community members interested in fostering a stronger creative culture across the Northland. Hosted by the Superior Council for the Arts in partnership with Create Wisconsin, the City of Superior Public Arts Commission and the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation Office of Rural Prosperity (WEDC ORP), the Summit will serve as the second gathering in an ongoing collaborative placemaking and placekeeping initiative focused on strengthening the regional creative economy and civic infrastructure. Purpose & Vision The summit will create an intersection of arts and economic development through a collaborative process involving everyone who cares about the future of the region and Wisconsin overall. The event will: ● Explore the role of arts and creativity in economic vitality, workforce development, civic infrastructure, tourism, and sense of place ● Assess current creative assets, including artists, organizations, businesses, cultural initiatives, and community spaces ● Identify opportunities to strengthen and expand the regional creative economy ● Develop actionable next steps for collaborative programming, partnerships, and policy alignment ● Bring together individuals involved in creative placemaking, education, workforce development, and community engagement Summit Features The Regional Creative Industries Summit will include: ● Structured networking and facilitated components ● Invited speakers focused on the creative economy and community development ● Panel discussions ● Small-group facilitated discussions centered on creative asset mapping and initiative development ● A catered networking lunch featuring a local Superior restaurant ● Professional facilitation by the Superior Council for the Arts, Create Wisconsin, and WEDC, and hopefully the Superior Public Arts Commission (if interested/able) ● Multi-disciplinary artistic performances and live artistic performances and displays, including music, live painters, theater, dance, and interactive arts experiences By integrating live artistic activation directly into the planning process, the summit models the very ecosystem it seeks to strengthen — positioning creativity not only as content, but as method. Anticipated Outcomes This Summit seeks to activate meaningful discussion and long-term action surrounding: ● Arts and culture as essential drivers of economic growth ● Workforce and educational development for the 21st century ● Vibrant, accessible, and engaged communities ● Regional and statewide collaboration opportunities ● Awareness of creative programs and initiatives across Wisconsin ● Actionable strategies to expand opportunities for artists, businesses, and residents throughout the state The event is designed for approximately 75 participants and builds upon a successful 2024 gathering that drew approximately 25 attendees. This expanded Summit reflects growing regional interest and continued momentum around creative economic development in the Northland. Statewide Initiative The Regional Creative Industries Summit is part of a broader statewide series of Creative Industries Summits taking place across Wisconsin in 2026 through partnerships with local hosts, Create Wisconsin, and WEDC Office of Rural Prosperity. Sponsorship Support Funding from the City of Superior Arts Commission would directly support: ● Venue and event logistics ● Speaker and facilitator expenses ● Artist and performer compensation ● Community engagement ● Marketing, outreach efforts and documentation: photos and video ● Food and hospitality for attendees ● Materials supporting long-term regional collaboration and planning Together, we can continue positioning Superior and the Northland as a thriving center for creativity, innovation, collaboration, and economic growth through the arts. The Superior Council for the Arts sincerely appreciates your consideration and continued support of arts and culture in our community. Raheem Lee Harrison 1627 B Avenue NE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 pending PD approval Joshua James Seaborn 1274 33rd Street SE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52403 pending PD approval Toua Yang 104 E 5th St, Superior, WI 54880 pending PD approval Courtney B. Griffin 524 N 21st St, Superior, WI 54880 Roadtrip Limo 524 N 21st St, Superior, WI 54880 Vehicle registration and schedule of fees 10.1 City Clerk's Office - Miscellaneous License Applications 08/18/2026 2026-2027 Peddler/Solicitor/Direct Seller 2025-2026 Taxicab Operator 2025-2026 Vehicle for Hire MEMORANDUM DATE: August 14, 2026 TO: Mayor Paine and Members of the Common Council FROM: Heidi Blunt, City Clerk RE: Original License Applications – Solomon Witherspoon Mr. Solomon Witherspoon has submitted original applications for a Class “B” Beer and “Class B” Liquor license for a proposed business at 1108 Tower Avenue, formerly the location of Alyce’s Palace Bar. In April 2026, the Council conditionally approved Mr. Witherspoon for the same license at 424 Tower Avenue. Since that time, his business plans have changed, and he is now seeking licensure at the 1108 Tower Avenue location. Mr. Witherspoon is currently working to finalize a lease agreement with the property owners and prepare the premises for required inspections. He has requested that the Council consider the applications for conditional approval while that work is completed. The Clerk’s Office recommends conditional approval, with authorization to issue the licenses once the following conditions have been satisfied: 1. Recommendations for approval are received from the Police, Fire, and Health Departments; and 2. Mr. Witherspoon provides proof of a lease agreement for the premises at 1108 Tower Avenue. A sample motion is provided for the Council's convenience: MOTION TO APPROVE the Class “B” Beer and “Class B” Liquor license for Solomon Witherspoon at 1108 Tower Avenue, subject to receipt of recommendations for approval from the Police, Fire, and Health Departments and proof of a lease agreement for the premises. Heidi Blunt, City Clerk Dawn Bacon, Deputy City Clerk Lori Lang, City Clerk Assistant Phone: (715) 395-7200 Fax: (715) 395-7264 E-mail: cityclerk@superiorwi.gov 1316 North 14th Street, #200 Superior, WI 54880 Website: www.SuperiorWI.gov TO: City of Superior Common Council CC: Mayor Jim Paine FROM: Colin Payton, City Assessor DATE: August 18, 2026 RE: Recommendation to Appeal – Exodus Real Estate Holdings, LLC Objection to Assessment INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this memorandum is to advise the Common Council of my recommendation that the City of Superior pu rsue a cross-appeal regarding the assessment determination involving Exodus Real Estate Holdings, LLC. DISCUSSION: The Exodus property is classified as a Manufacturing property by the WI DOR. As such, it is not locally assessed. It is locally taxed. All valuation opinions, property records, etc., are the responsibility of the WI DOR Manufacturing and Utility Division. That department would be the lead on a cross-appeal. In any assessment, whether locally or state assessed, the assessor’s value is presumed to be correct, and the burden lies upon th e appellant to prove that the assessme nt is incorrect. As such, I must assume that the assessment made by the Manufacturing Division is correct. RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, I recommend that the Common Council authorize the appropriate City officials, in consultation with the City Attorney's Office and any necessary outside legal counsel, to appeal the determination con cerning the objection file d by Exodus Real Estate Holdings, LLC and to take such additional actions as may be necessary to pursue that appeal. Approve: ____________________ Mayor Jim Paine Approved by the Common Council on August 18, 2026 PA-132M (N. 12-23) Section 2: Municipal Contact Information Municipal Objection to Manufacturing Real Estate Assessment Form PA-132M Wisconsin Department of Revenue Stand alone appeal Cross appeal * Section 1: What ty pe of objection are you filing? (check one) ■ Complete all sections ■ See Filing Requirements on page 2 ( ) - Municipality name Mailing address City State Zip ( ) - Contact/agent name Email Phone Fax * If agent, submit current Agent Authorization Form (PA-105) with this form * If cross appeal, provide the associated case number Property owner name (on assessment notice) Mailing address City State Zip Property street address City State Zip Taxation district Town Village City County (Check one) Enter municipality → Section 3: Propert y Information Wisconsin tax number (on notice) Assessment as shown on notice – Total $ Section 4: Asses sment Information and Opinion of Value Local parcel no.Notice date (mm-dd-yyyy) - - Your opinion of value (required under state law (sec. 70.995(8)(c)(1), Wis. Stats.) – Total $ Section 5: Reason for Objection and Basis of Estimate Reason(s) for objection – (required under state law (sec. 70.995(8)(c)(1), Wis. Stats.) (Attach additional sheets if needed) DOR account number - - I, the undersigned, declare under penalties of law that I have personally examined this form and supplemental documents. To the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete. For Department Use Only BOA# Basis for your opinion of value – (required under state law (sec. 70.995(8)(c)(1), Wis. Stats.) (Attach additional sheets if needed) Municipal official / Authorized agent Sign here ........ Name (please print) Signature Municipality or title Date - - - 2 - Municipal Objection to Real Estate Assessment Note:  • If you would like to discuss your objection informally before the Wisconsin State Board of Assessors (BOA) reviews your appeal, contact the district office in your area  • If you do not complete this form and provide the requested information below (under Filing Requirements), the BOA will deny your appeal Filing Requirements To file an appeal, you must submit the following to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue (DOR) 1. State prescribed form ○ Under state law (sec. 70.995(8)(c), Wis. Stats.), you are required to file a state prescribed objection form with the BOA ○ You must submit a separate objection form and fee for each real estate assessment you are appealing ○ Section 4 and 5 of this form – you must provide your opinion of value, the reason for your objection, and the basis for your opinion of value under state law (sec. 70.995(8)(c)1., Wis. Stats.) 2. Filing fee – include a $200 filing fee payable to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue for stand alone appeals ○ DOR does not consider your objection filed until you pay this fee (Note: If the property owner filed an objection and submitted the $200 fee, the municipality does not need to submit the $200 fee for the cross appeal) ○ DOR waives the fee if a prior year appeal on the same property is pending under state law (secs. 70.995(8)(c) and (d), Wis. Stats.) 3. Timely file Stand alone appeal – to file an objection to the manufacturing assessement found on the municipal full value notice ○ You must file your appeal no later than 60 days after the date of the municipal full value notice ○ Your appeal is considered timely filed if the BOA receives it with the filing fee by the 60 th day; or you send your appeal form by certified mail with the filing fee, and it is postmarked before midnight of the 60 th day Municipal cross appeal – to file an objection in response to a manufacturer’s objection of the manufacturing assessment ○ You must file your appeal no later than 15 days after the property owner files an objection ○ Your appeal is considered timely filed if the BOA receives it within 15 days after the property owner files an objection; or you send your appeal form by certified mail, and it is postmarked before midnight of the 15th day 4. Authorization ○ Agent – if an agent is representing the municipality, the municipality must provide written authorization for the agent when submitting the objection form. Submit Agent Authorization Form (PA-105) with this form. ○ Governing body – the municipality must provide written authorization by the governing body when submitting the objection form Submitting Information Submit your state prescribed objection form with the following: • Notice of Manufacturing Real Estate Assessment • All supporting documents, including correspondence Where to File Submit the objection form, $200 filing fee (if applicable) and all supporting documents to: Street Address: Mailing A ddress: Wisconsin Department of Revenue Wis consin Department of Revenue State Board of Assessors Sta te Board of Assessors #6-97 #6-97 2135 Rimrock Rd PO Bo x 8971 Madison WI 53713-1443 Mad ison WI 53708-8971 Phone: (608) 267-778 8