Village Board — Minutes
Village of Friendship · Adams County · Village Board · meeting of Feb 3, 2025 · Minutes
Open the original document More from Village of Friendship
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
VILLAGE BOARD MEETING – February 3rd, 2025, PAGE 1
The Friendship Village Board meeting was called to order followed by the Pledge of Allegiance by
all present. President Tony Sindelar called the meeting to order and roll call was taken. Present
were Trustees Brad Oberbeck, Ernie Klicko, Jerry Sonnenberg , Melvin Waller, Bob Berry, Jason
Pierce and President Sindelar. Also present were Attorney Joseph Hasler, Clerk/Treasurer Sandy
Shawback, and Deputy Clerk/Treasurer Rebecca Reuter.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION by Berry, second by Waller to approve the January 6th, 2025, Village Board minutes,
motion carried. 6 - yay 1- nay
TREASURER REPORT IF AVAILABLE
No report available
PAYING OF BILLS
MOTION by Klicko, second by Sonnenberg to approve January vouchers 27487-27532 in the
amount of $533,734.78, motion carried.
CITIZEN INPUT
No citizen input
ROPORT FROM COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE RICK PEASE
Not in attendance
DR. TOM FROM ADAMS-FRIENDSHIP AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT TO DISCUSS THE
UPCOMING REFERENDUM
Dr. Tom stated that tonight with him he has Nicki Ells who is the director of curriculum
instruction. They cannot advocate for or against the referendum. They are here tonight to present
some information and answer any questions. They don’t want to take up a lot of our time. As most
of you recall two years ago, we passed an operational referendum in the spring of 2024. We are in
the second year of a four-year operational referendum. What they are asking for now is an
opportunity to right size our district and vacate the existing middle school. The existing middle
school is 106 years old. Many of the mechanical systems in the building, from the electrical,
plumbing, heating and ventilation, and a lot of the structural systems in that building like
windows, ceilings, and roofing are at the end of their life. In order to just maintain it for just the
next five years the engineers they are working with are telling them it will cost us about a million
dollars a year, just to maintain that building because so many systems are failing. We are at a
point in time where if you had a car that was ex-number of years old and you were putting money
into it, and it got to the point where you were putting more money into it you would have to make
some decisions about whether it’s still worth investing in that car. Two years ago, we passed an
operational referendum. The only way school districts in the state of Wisconsin can generate
additional revenue is to go to referendum and ask the citizens to go to referendum. What we are
asking for now is a capital referendum, or a building referendum. What they’re proposing is for
over twenty years, an initial question of sixteen plus million dollars. And a second question of an
additional almost six million dollars. So, twenty-two plus million dollars to vacate the middle
school and move either 5th-8th grade or 4th-8th grade to an addition onto the East side on the
fine arts center at the high school. The softball field that spends most of its time underwater will
become the playground space for our younger learners. They believe there will be cost savings
over time, certainly over a twenty-year period to build new instead of continuing to put money into
a building that’s 106 years old. With the middle school building they are working with the USDA to
try to find a developer that might be interested in converting that building into housing. They don’t
know exactly what they would do with the existing middle school. They do know that it would
cost us between 2.5 and 3 million dollars just to demolish that building. So, they don’t want to
invest in that either. They do have a website where you can get a lot more information.
Ells stated that our newest building is the high school building. So being able to utilize some of
that space is part of the objective. It was originally built for over 700 students, and we are just
over 400 now. Being able to capitalize on some of that potential by moving our students and offer
those options to our 7th and 8th grade learners so they can take advantage of some of the CTE
classes. Currently they are transporting students from the middle school to the high school to be
able to have those opportunities. So, some of those savings are transportation cost. We are trying
to be more efficient with the resources we have. There is a lot of space in the middle school that
is not being utilized because of conditions and not having the need for some structure like the
boiler room and that kind of thing. Our new model, if you will, will be a more efficient learning
space for our students. They will have access to the same type of learning environment just in a
different setting just off the fine arts center. We do have extra space at the high school that isn’t
VILLAGE BOARD MEETING – February 3rd, 2025, PAGE 2
being utilized, we will fill up that space. One of the questions being asked in the community is why
we wouldn’t move kids over to the elementary school instead of the high school? Our elementary
school would have to have an updated sprinkler system if we add any additions on to that . It does
not have a current sprinkler system, so we would have to add that and it’s about 2 million dollars
within itself. We don’t have to do that at the high school because the fine arts center is there and
has a burn wall with a sprinkler system in it already. So that additional funding can be put into
additional leaning spaces. This last December we were faced with a nonrenewal for our
insurance based on the conditions of the middle school and the district office. We had to really
be creative as to what we were going to do. They went out to try to find any insurance companies
that would insure us. We finally were able to talk our existing company to give us an at cost
policy. With that for significantly less coverage was an additional thirty thousand dollars through
July. That has bought us time through July when we might become uninsurable.
Berry asked if the referendum should pass what kind of timeline are we looking at before things
would be complete?
Ells stated that they did meet with one construction firm that told them their timeline would be
the fall of 2026. They are looking for an eleven-to-thirteen-month turnaround to be able to do that
addition. The nice thing is that it doesn’t disrupt any of our current learning systems. The addition
would be able to continue while we are still in school. They would start building the shell if the
referendum were to pass and then we have about nine months to do planning with the current
middle school staff and high school staff to ensure a smooth transition between buildings.
Sonnenberg asked how that would relate to the insurance problem that they’re having. What
would we have to do for that year and a half?
Dr. Tom stated that they are hoping they can find some insurance. They still have their liability
insurance in case someone gets hurt on the playground. But structural insurance would be a
problem.
Ells stated that the individual that they work with felt like he would be able to talk with the current
insurance agents to keep them on the replacement cost that fallowing year through construction.
Dr. Tom stated that on the third floor there is only one outlet in each classroom at the middle
school. The building was built in a different time. To update the electrical panels that were from
1950 they received a quote of $60,000-$70,000.
Sonnenberg asked if you do the moving around of the children in the classrooms would the class
sizes change?
Ells stated that the new model they are showing we would keep the same class sizes that are
averaging around 20. In the new wing you would have office staff, speech and language therapist,
school socialist, classrooms and an additional gym.
Sonnenberg asked if there’s any requirements from the state on what the max of a classroom size
can be?
Dr. Tom stated that unfortunately no, there’s recommendations. We have a school to the
southwest of us and couldn’t pass an operational referendum last year and eliminated 15
teaching positions. They are going to have a referendum again in February and are proposing
eliminating another 15-17 teachers. And it’s a district about our size. If we were to eliminate 30
teaching positions, we’d be insolvent, we wouldn’t be able to serve our kids. Dr. Tom pointed out
that some of the middle school teachers came tonight in case anyone had any questions for
them.
Reuter asked if the new wing would have its own cafeteria, or how would it work taking the little
kids into the high school?
Dr. Tom stated that they would be able to utilize the kitchen in the high school. It was built for 700
students, and there are only 440 in there today. Then they would probably cart food to the gym. It
hasn’t been completely figured out yet.
Ells stated that collectively from the staff that was a big concern was having those common
times for passing. Based on information from the current food staff they are confident that they
can serve those extra learners in that gym space and use it as a cafeteria.
Dr. Tom stated that its interesting people are very concerned that 4th graders might comingle with
12th graders, and the reality is that we put 4K kids on school buses with 12th graders, and there’s a
lot less supervision on our busses then in the traditional spaces.
Berry stated that he doesn’t have any kids, what do projections show for enrollment in the
upcoming years moving forward?
Dr. Tom stated we had significant enrollment loss. We’er serving about 750 less students over
the last 20 years. It peaked in the 2001 school year with 2,150 students in our district, and the
membership count this year was 1,400.
Ells stated that the projections are 85-90 students per grade level. Right now, our 4 largest
classrooms are at the high school. Once those four classes graduate the average class should
stay between 85-90 students for the rest of 4K-12 grade.
VILLAGE BOARD MEETING – February 3rd, 2025, PAGE 3
Dr. Tom stated that the new high school is 27 years old, so they are starting to replace heaters,
and they had to replace the commercial dishwasher in the kitchen that was $80,000. Fortunately,
they had someone from a construction company walk through last week and he couldn’t believe
that the building was open in 1998 because it was in such good condition. That’s kudos to our
maintenance and custodial staff.
Sonnenberg stated that he would like to thank all the teachers in the audience for all they do in
the classroom and on the side. Without them we would not have the leadership coming through
that we need to have to make our Village very proud of what we’ve got.
Sindelar asked if there was any consideration on the admin building itself?
Dr. Tom stated the Friendship school was built in 1903, that portion is used about an hour and a
half a week by a community group. They try to really stay out of that space. It has an old steam
boiler system in it and there is no one local that will work on it. They have to bring people in from
Stevens Point, Wausau and Madison when they have issues with that boiler system. The issue is
they don’t have loading docks at the elementary school or the middle school. So, the old gym
serves as central storage. We can’t even get pallets into elementary school, they are caried in box
by box. He thanked the Village Board for listening, and if anyone has any questions, they can
reach out to him, or they can go on to the website that they have up.
DISCUSS CHAPTER 396 FROM THE COUNTY REGARDING NR 117
Berry stated that he’s about halfway through reading the packet, so if no one has any objections
he would like to table it for the next meeting. He would like everyone to do the research on this
before we jump in to do anything.
REVIEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Sindelar stated that in the last meeting we talked about the extension of the professional
agreement. After talking to the former council, he had a good idea to make some changes to it
where it’s not an interim like it was, but to change it to a training assistant agreement with the
hourly hours on there to be a little bit more adjustable for the board and the person. Along with at
the end of the agreement when the board feels, or the worker feels time is done just a 30 day
notice is given that the agreement is complete. The hours will be more flexible. The current hours
are limited to about 70 hours a month to work, so it would roughly be about 15 hours a week.
Sonnenberg asked where that 70 hours came from?
Sindelar stated that those are the hours she’s able to work in a month without jeopardizing her
social security payments.
Sonnenberg just wanted to make sure, because as he read through the minutes of the last
meeting, looking at item 3 of the agreement we had said 2 months. It almost looks like what you
have done, is taken the position and made it part-time assistance for training. He’d like to see,
and make sure we are getting as much education as we can within that 70 hours. That way we as
a board can feel comfortable that we are getting the right amount of training for Sandy, but also
that Sandy feels that she has gotten the right training. He just wants to make sure we don’t cut
ourselves short by putting in a specific hourly amount.
Sindelar stated that if the time comes to where the allotted time here is winding down, it can
come back to the Village Board and the board can add more time to that if it needs to be
extended.
MOTION by Sonnenberg, second by Berry to approve the Professional Services Agreement,
motion carried.
UPDATE ONEAST LAKE STREET PROPERTY
Sindelar stated that there was nothing new to update. He was waiting for the new council.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
Nothing to report
FIRE DISTRICT REPORT
Klicko stated that the Fire chief reported there were 8 calls in the proceeding month.
They have got 2 new certified pumper operators.
There was a budget surplus of $15,400 that goes into the major equipment fund.
They changed their address to 399 East Ann Street instead of their P.O. Box. They need a physical
address for grants.
There was an audit by the state attorney, nothing was found.
They bought a skid pumper unit for the UTV that the firefighters bought from their fundraising a year
ago.
They’ve been deciding on what they want to do with the ladder truck . It has al most $40,000 in
repairs that it needs.
VILLAGE BOARD MEETING – February 3rd, 2025, PAGE 3
AMBULANCE COMMITTEE REPORT
Sindelar stated that they met January 22 nd. Lifestar went over their yearly report. Most transports
did end up here a t our local hospital. One of the issues that was talked about was some of the
frequent callers that really aren’t emergency, the board questioned Lifestar about that. Lifestar is
working with th ose certain individual callers about other ways to cope and if it ’s really an
emergency or if there ’s something else that ca n help them along . So, they’re in the prosses of
working with these to help minimize those frequent callers that are technically not emergent. The
next meeting is on April 23rd at 6:00 P.M. One of the things on that agenda will be an election of the
officers for the committee.
FRIENDSHIP LAKE DISTRICT REPORT
Sonnenberg stated that they haven’t had a meeting and probably aren’t going to until April. They do
have a raffle fundraiser going on. They’ve sold tickets for the raffle that are put in for the whole year
and you can have your number picked out multiple times. They are hoping to raise around $9,000
net, after the proceeds are paid out to the winners.
Berry stated that they are planning on doing another golf outing sometime. They will also be doing
food for the duck derby.
DISCUSSION & ACTION ON SODA WATER BEVERAGE LICENSE
MOTION by Berry, second by Sonnenberg to approve water soda beverage license for Adams
County Chamber of Commerce , motion carried.
CORRESPONDENCE
No correspondence
SET AGENDA ITEMS FOR MARCH 3rd MEETING
Discuss chapter 396 from the county regarding NR 117
THE VILLAGE BOARD MAY GO INTO CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO WIS. STAT. SECTION
19.85 (1)(c) CONSIDERING EMPLOYMENT, PROMOTION, COMPENSATION OR
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DATA OF ANY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE OVER WHICH THE
GOVERNMENTAL BODY HAS JURISDICTION OR EXERCISES RESPONSIBILITY – PUBLIC
WORKS DIRECTOR POSITION REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS
MOTION by Berry, second by Sonnenberg. Rollcall vote was taken. Went into closed session at
6:42.
THE VILLAGE BOARD RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ENTER INTO OPEN SESSION AUTHORIZED
BY WIS. STAT. SECTION 19.85(2) TO POSSIBLY TAKE ACTION FROM THE CLOSED SESSION
AND CONTINUE WITH THE AGENDA
MOTION by Berry, second by Pierce to enter into open session.
Being no further business to come before the board, MOTION by Berry, second by Pierce to
adjourn, motion carried. Meeting ended at 7:06
__________________________________________
Rebecca Reuter
Deputy Clerk/Treasurer
Source: Village of Friendship website. First collected Oct 12, 2026.