Agenda & Packet

There will be a regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals at Kenilworth Village Hall, 419 Richmond Road; Kenilworth, IL. The public may attend in person or by utilizing the following link: TEAMS MEETING LINK If you do not have access to a computer, you may attend via telephone: +1 872-242-8055 Meeting ID: 151 767 049# Zoning Board of Appeals Regular Meeting Monday, September 14, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. Kenilworth Village Hall, 419 Richmond Road I. II. III. IV. V. VI. Call to Order / Roll Call Approval of Minutes A. August 10, 2026 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing A. Public Hearing to Consider a Variation at 307 Melrose Avenue Pertaining to Maximum Length of Garage Door Openings Facing the Lot Line Abutting An Adjacent Street B. Public Hearing to Consider a Variation at 235 Leicester Road Pertaining to Minimum Yard Requirements C. Public Hearing to Consider a Variation at 336 Abbotsford Road Pertaining to Maximum Building Size and Maximum Building Coverage Requirements D. Continued Public Hearing to Consider a Variation at 167 Abingdon Avenue Pertaining to Maximum Building Size and Maximum Building Coverage Requirements (Continued to October 13, 2026) Other Business Business from the Public Rules for Public Comment may be viewed at https://www.vok.org/DocumentCenter/View/1423/Rules-for-Public-Comment Adjourn Village of 1 VILLAGE OF 1 2 3 4 KENILWORTH, IL 5 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 6 Monday, August 10, 2026 7 8 Agenda Item I. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL 9 The meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Kenilworth in the Kenilworth Village Hall, 10 Kenilworth, Illinois was held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 10, 2026. 11 Chair Murphy called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 12 Attendance was as follows: 13 14 Zoning Board of Appeals Members Present: 15 Eamon Murphy Chair 16 Katherine Peterson Member 17 Tim Quigley Member, Remote at 7:10 p.m. 18 Emily Tzur Member 19 Lori Roeser Member 20 Jenelle Chalmers Member 21 22 Zoning Board of Appeals Member Absent: 23 Mark Hinkamp Member 24 25 A quorum was present. 26 27 Others Recorded as in Attendance: 28 Village Officials and Staff: 29 Heather McFarland Asst. to the Village Manager 30 Michael Blue Village Planner, Teska Associates 31 Andrew Dunham Village Planner, Teska Associates 32 Megan Mack Village Attorney 33 Katarzyna Thake Village Manager, Remote 34 35 Others in Attendance: 36 Charles Waddell Applicant 37 Casey Waddell Applicant 38 Brad Minkow 39 Kylie Peart Northworks Architects 40 Keith Labutta Northworks Architects 41 42 Chair Murphy confirmed that Member Quigley met the electronic attendance criteria. No opposition 43 was shared. 44 45 Agenda Item II. APPROVAL OF THE MEETING MINUTES 46 The minutes of the regular Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) meeting of July 13, 2026 were presented to 47 the members. 48 49 2 Village of Kenilworth Zoning Board of Appeals 2 August 10, 2026 2 Member Peterson made a motion to approve the July 13, 2026, meeting minutes as presented. 1 Member Chalmers seconded the motion. 2 3 A roll call vote was taken as follows on the motion: 4 Yea: Murphy, Tzur, Peterson, Chalmers 5 Nay: None 6 Absent: Hinkamp, Quigley 7 Abstain: Roeser 8 9 The motion was approved 4-0. 10 11 Agenda Item III. PUBLIC HEARING 12 Chair Murphy opened the public hearing and swore in the applicants. 13 III.A Continued Public Hearing to Consider Variation s at 167 Abingdon Ave Avenue Pertaining to 14 Maximum Building Size and Maximum Building Coverage Requirements 15 Village Planner Andrew Dunham opened the first item with a presentation and explained that the 16 request remained unchanged from the July 13, 2026 meeting. Mr. Dunham stated the applicant 17 was requesting relief from building coverage and floor area requirements. 18 19 Charlie Waddell, applicant, explained that his request is intended to reflect community feedback 20 from the Village’s recent Zoning Code Audit and Survey. The feedback, he further explained, 21 showed interest in enabling property owners to modernize their homes. Mr. Waddell stated that 22 additional space is needed to improve how the home functions for his growing family and he would 23 like the improvements to be in line with community standards. 24 25 Project architect, Keith Labutta, shared that the request had been reduced by 30% from June to 26 July’s meeting. 27 28 Neighbor, Brad Minkow, noted his support for the request that he believed was modest and would 29 improve property values. 30 31 Member Roeser asked if the Waddell family had considered splitting their requests, as she could 32 more readily support the proposed work on the detached garage versus the garage and sunroom 33 addition. 34 35 Village Attorney Mackey relayed that the applicant is permitted to split the requests if that is what 36 they choose. In response to questions from the applicant, Ms. Mack explained regulations for non-37 conforming structures and that a variance would be required to rebuild the detached garage in its 38 exact footprint. Ms. Mack further explained that there would be a two-year waiting period for 39 similar applications if the current variance request was denied. 40 41 Chair Murphy and members Tzur and Quigley stated their support for the request. 42 43 Members Roeser, Chalmers, and Peterson shared support for the detached garage, however, they 44 did not believe a hardship was present to justify the variance request for the addition. 45 46 3 Village of Kenilworth Zoning Board of Appeals 3 August 10, 2026 3 Mr. Waddell requested a brief recess at 7:43 p.m. so they could discuss their preferred path 1 forward. The meeting resumed at 7:56 p.m. 2 3 Ms. Waddell asked the ZBA members how other similarly scoped variations were approved 4 compared to their request. Member Chalmers responded that the ZBA reviews the totality of 5 circumstances, and each property is unique. Member Roeser emphasized the need for requests 6 to meet the standards for variations outlined in the code. Member Peterson agreed. 7 8 Mr. and Ms. Waddell asked the ZBA to continue their request to September 14th for further 9 discussion. 10 11 Following a request by the applicant, Member Roeser made a motion to continue the request to 12 the regularly scheduled ZBA meeting on September 14, 2026. Member Chalmers seconded the 13 motion. 14 15 A roll call vote was taken as follows on the motion: 16 Yea: Murphy, Quigley, Tzur, Peterson, Chalmers, Roeser 17 Nay: None 18 Absent: Hinkamp 19 Abstain: 20 21 The motion was approved 6-0. 22 23 Agenda Item IV. OTHER BUSINESS 24 None 25 26 Agenda Item V. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC 27 None 28 29 Agenda Item VI. ADJOURN 30 Member Roeser made a motion to adjourn, and Member Chalmers seconded the motion. 31 32 A voice vote was taken as follows on the motion: 33 Yea: Murphy, Quigley, Tzur, Peterson, Chalmers, Roeser 34 Nay: None 35 Absent: Hinkamp 36 Abstain: 37 38 The motion was approved 6-0. 39 40 The meeting concluded at 8:32 p.m. 41 42 Respectfully Submitted, 43 44 Heather McFarland 45 Asst. to the Village Manager 46 4 Request for Commission Action Agenda Item: III.A Staff Contact: Andrew Dunham, Teska Associates, Inc. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider a Variation at 307 Melrose Avenue Pertaining to Maximum Length of Garage Door Openings Facing the Lot Line Abutting an Adjacent Street Petitioner: Amy Berka of Scott Simpson Design Build, on behalf of owner Todd and Sarah Simpson Location: 307 Melrose Avenue Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential Purpose: Request a variation to permit construction of a new one and a half -story, three-car garage with total garage door openings exceeding 20 feet in length facing the adjacent street Applicable Regulations: §153.080 Parking and Storage of Vehicles (F) Introduction: The petitioner, Scott Simpson Design Build, is requesting a variation to maximum total garage door openings facing the right-of-way requirements on behalf of the homeowner to permit construction of a one and a half-story three-car garage to replace the existing three-car garage on the same site. This property is situated on a corner lot at the east side of the intersection of Melrose Avenue and Essex Road. Discussion: A two-story stucco home and detached one-story garage are currently located on the 26,244 sq. ft. property at 307 Melrose Avenue. The existing three-car garage is situated in the rear yard and faces the lot line abutting Melrose Avenue and is 26 ft. and 3 in. in width. Its current garage door openings total 24 ft., making the existing garage a legal nonconformity. The petitioner proposes replacing the existing garage with a one and a half -story, three-car detached garage with the same orientation at roughly the same location. The proposed garage would measure 31 ft. 5 ½ in. in width with total garage door openings consisting of 27 ft. (the sum of three 9 ft. garage openings). An additional half story is proposed for storage space. The replacement garage would be served by the existing driveway. • A one and a half-story, three-car garage is proposed to replace the existing one-story, three-car garage as part of this request. Considered By: Date: Zoning Board of Appeals 09/14/26 Village of 5 • In total, the replacement garage would increase the total length of garage door openings facing the lot line abutting Melrose Avenue from 24 ft. to 27 ft. • The proposed garage would be 19 ft. 10 ¼ in. tall, compliant with the Zoning Code. • As part of the proposal, the garage depth would be decreased by 1 ft. 7 in. and its distance to the lot line would be increased to 5 ft. from the side lot line (north) and 8 ft. from the rear (west) lot line. • The existing garage openings are partially screened from the right-of-way by plantings and landscaping, which are expected to be retained as part of the proposal. • The current building size (floor area) of the structures on the property is 5,778 sq. ft. and the total building coverage of the structures is 3,577 sq. ft.; the proposed replacement garage would result in a net increase of 81 sq. ft. in both floor area and building coverage, compliant with the Code. • All other aspects of this proposed addition are compliant with the Zoning Code. Permit History: The permit and zoning request history of 307 Melrose Avenue is detailed in the table below. Year Type Purpose 2023 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #T2023-036 2022 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #2022-06T 2022 Fence Fence Installation, Permit #2022-273 2021 Building Interior Renovation, Permit #2021-024 2019 Building Roof Replacement, Permit #2019-106 2014 Building Garage Roof Replacement, Permit #2014-184 2014 Electrical Install EV Charger, Permit #2014-128 2013 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #2013-35T 2012 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #2012-80T 2011 Generator Generator, Permit #2011-150 2010 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #2010-55T 2009 Building Interior Patching, Permit #2009-136 2003 Building Replace Brick Walk and Patio, Permit #9721 1989 Building Driveway Extension, Permit #6657 1989 Building Addition, Permit #6850 1988 Building Interior Renovation, Permit #6630 1984 Building Rear Yard Variation to Build Deck 1981 Building Addition, Permit #5828 1979 Fence Fence Installation, Permit #5647 1970 Building Interior Renovation, Permit #5075 1952 Building Greenhouse Addition, Permit #3754 1920 Building Garage, Permit #9 1907 Estimated Home Construction Year 6 Requested Variation: Variation– Maximum Size; Maximum Lot Coverage Applicable Regulation: Section 153.080 (F) of the Zoning Ordinance The petitioner requests a variation from Section 153.080 (F) of the Zoning Code specifying a maximum total length of 20 feet for garage door openings facing the lot line abutting any adjacent street. The petitioner proposes replacing the existing nonconforming one-story, three- car detached garage with a total garage opening length of 24 ft. with a new one and a half -story, three-car detached garage with a total garage opening length of 27 ft. The proposed garage would have the same orientation as the existing garage, facing the lot line abutting Melrose Avenue. As part of this project, the property’s floor area and building coverage would increase by 81 sq. ft., in compliance with the Zoning Code. Section 153.080 (F) of the Zoning Ordinance specifies that no garage shall have door openings facing the lot line abutting any adjacent street where the sum of the garage door openings exceeds 20 ft. Existing garage door openings on this property facing Melrose Avenue total 24 ft. and the total openings of the garage would total 27 ft. The following table illustrates the requested variation from the maximum length of garage openings facing the lot line abutting any adjacent street: Maximum Total Garage Opening Length % Maximum Maximum Total Length of Garage Door Openings Facing the Lot Line Abutting an Adjacent Street 20 ft. 100% Existing Total Length of Garage Door Openings Facing the Lot Line Abutting Melrose Avenue 24. ft. 120% Variation % Maximum Proposed Variation 7 ft. 35% Proposed Total Length of Garage Door Openings Facing the Lot Line Abutting Melrose Avenue 27 sq. ft. 135% Example Motion for Consideration: I move to approve (with conditions) the request submitted by the petitioner, Amy Berka of Scott Simpson Design Build, on behalf of owner Todd and Sarah Simpson, to permit construction of a detached one and a half-story, three-car garage in the rear yard that exceeds maximum total length of garage door openings requirements by 7 ft. and at 307 Melrose Avenue in accordance with the materials included in this packet. 7 Attachments: 1. 307 Melrose Avenue Zoning Board of Appeals Application, dated July 31, 2026 2. Narrative of zoning variation request provided by Scott Simpson Design Build, dated July 31, 2026 3. Zoning Compliance Worksheet, dated July 30, 2026 4. Copy of Plat of Survey, dated December 16, 2022 5. Architectural Drawings provided by Scott Simpson Design Build, dated July 31, 2026 6. Section 153.224 (E), Standards for Variations 8 1 Village of 419 Richmond Road Phone: 847-251-1666 Kenilworth, IL 60043 Fax: 847-251-3908 E-mail: info@vok.org Zoning Board of Appeals Application General Information Date: ________ Zoning Board of Appeals Jurisdiction Zoning Variations Special Uses Text Amendments Zoning Map Changes Administrative Appeals Property Address Address of Property That is the Subject of this Application : ______________________________________________________ Attach Legal Description of Property that is the Subject of this Application. Zoning District:_________________________________________________________________________________________ Current Use____________________________________________________________________________________________ Applicant Information Applicant Name _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Email ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Owner of Property (if different than Applicant) Name _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Email ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 2 Primary Contact Personfor Applicant Name _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Email ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Applicant’s and Primary Contact’s Relationship to Property: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ownership Details Check appropriate category and attach proof of ownership and all relevant additional ownership information to this application. _____ Individual _____ Joint Tenants/Tenants in Common ____ Land Trust ____ Trust ____ Corporation _____Limited Liability Company ____Partnership If property is held in a trust, also include a certified copy of the trust agreement or a simple affidavit (under oath before a notary) as to who are the beneficiaries of the trust. Consultants (as applicable) List any additional consultants and their contact information on additional sheets of paper and attach. Architect Name ________________________________________________________________________________________ Company ________________________________________________________________________________________ Address ________________________________________________________________________________________ Phone _________________________________________________________________________________________ E-mail _______________________________________________________________________________________ Attorney Name ________________________________________________________________________________________ Company ________________________________________________________________________________________ Address ________________________________________________________________________________________ Phone _________________________________________________________________________________________ E-mail _______________________________________________________________________________________ 10 3 Requested Action Check all that apply and provide on this form or attach on separate sheets all information required by the Sections of the Zoning Ordinance listed below for the types of relief requested: ____ Zoning Variation(s) for _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____ Special Use for___________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____ Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment ____ Rezoning from _____to_____ - Zoning Map Amendment ____ Administrative Appeal ____ Other (describe): _______________________________________________________________________________ Filing Fees All Applications require payment of a non-refundable fee; in addition, applications for special uses, text amendments, and zoning map require additional funds that are held in escrow for recovery of actual costs pursuant to Sections 153.290 – 153.293 of the Zoning Ordinance. Please attach a check with your application and indicate below the amount of fee submitted: ________ $ 350.00 Zoning Variations Special Uses Text Amendments Zoning Map Changes Air Conditioning Fences Administrative Appeals Kenilworth Code of Ethics On a Separate Sheet of Paper, list and attach the name, address and nature and extent of any current or potential interest that any village officer or employee may have in or with respect to the owner, the Applicant or the property. If none, Check here:_____ Repeat Application Has any other application for this property been submitted to the Village that seeks similar relief and has been denied within the last two years? _____Yes ____ No If yes, attach a statement of the ground Applicant believes justifies reconsideration. 11 12 5 Required Materials Submit a completed application with 9 copies of the following materials: ____ Drawings, if applicable, to Variance Application: 1. Existing Floor Plans - provide floor plans of all levels of the existing building 2. Demolition Floor Plans – provide floor plans of all levels of the existing building and indicate existing parts to be removed 3. Proposed Floor Plans - provide floor plans of proposed additions to the existing building 4. Existing Exterior Elevations – provide elevations of all existing exterior elevations that are to change 5. Proposed Exterior Elevations - provide elevations of all elevations that are altered ____ Plat of Survey& Parcel(s) Legal Description, no more than 5 years old ____ Title Policyor Deed. ____ Certified Copy of Trust Agreement, if applicable. ____ Simple Affidavit identifying Trust beneficiaries, if applicable. ____ WrittenExplanation of Request,on separate sheets of paper. Address the standards and requirements for the relief requested, and how they are satisfied by the request. ____Filing Fee - payable to the Village of Kenilworth. After this application and all necessary materials are submitted, the application will be put on the docket for a Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting. It is recommended that the application for any matter requiring public notice be submitted 45 days prior to the Zoning Meeting. The Village will provide Applicant with a notification packet containing a notice is to be delivered to all property owners living within 250 feet of property. The Zoning Board of Appeals meets once every other month. In general, applicants should expect a hearing within 60 days of submitting an application. Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney. The concurring vote of 4 members of the Zoning Board shall be necessary to grant a variation or to reserve any order, requirement, decision or determination of the Village, or to decide in favor of an applicant for relief. No order granting a variation shall be effective for a period longer than six months unless a building permit is obtained and the construction, alteration, or moving of the building covered by the order is started within such period. All Applicants are encouraged to read Sections 153.240 – 153.249 of the Village of Kenilworth Zoning Ordinance. Authorized Variations To vary any of the requirements with respect to minimum sizes of lots, maximum height of buildings and other structures, maximum and minimum size of buildings, maximum lot coverage by structures and other impervious surfaces, and minimum depth and width of yards per Section 153.244. To vary any of the regulations contained in Sections 153.075 – 153.086 (Supplemental Regulations Applicable to all Residential Districts). To vary any of the regulations contained in Section 153.185 – 153.192 (Off-Street Automobile Parking Requirements). To vary Sign Code regulations per Section 153.244 13 6 Standards for Variations For Zoning Variations, please respond to the applicable standards listed below in the written explanation of the request. (1) The Board shall not grant a variance from any of the regulations of Chapter 153: Zoning, as authorized by Subsection 153.244(D), unless it shall make a finding of fact, based upon the evidence presented to it in a particular case, that: (a) In the case of property the principal use of which is for business purposes, the property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations applicable to the district in which it is located; (b) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; and (c) The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. (2) For the purposes of supplementing the above standards, the Board, in making its determination whether the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances and whether the variation, if granted, may alter the essential character of the locality, shall take into consideration the following factors to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board: (a) The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the property in question would result in a practical difficulty or particular hardship upon the applicant for the variation, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulation were enforced; (b) The conditions upon which the application for variation is based would not be applicable generally to other property in the same district; (c) The request for the variation is not based exclusively upon the desire to make more money out of the property; (d) The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; (e) The variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties or substantially increase the runoff of storm water onto adjacent properties or public streets, or substantially increase congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. (3) For the purpose of further supplementing the above standards and factors in connection with requests for variations from the requirements of Section 153.068, the Board, in making its determination, may also take into consideration the following factors, among other factors deemed relevant by the Board, to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board: (a) The effects of the proposed construction on the overall appearance of the size and bulk of the existing structures on the property when viewed from streets abutting the property and from adjacent properties; (b) The proximity of the proposed construction to streets abutting the property and to adjacent properties; (c) The relative proximity of the proposed construction to streets abutting the property and to adjacent properties in comparison with the relative proximity of existing structures on other properties in the same vicinity; (d) The magnitude of the variation requested in absolute terms and in proportion to the floor area and/or impervious surfaces allowed if the strict letter of the regulation were enforced; 14 7 (e) The need for other variations in connection with the proposed construction and the nature and extent of those other variations; (f) The need for the variation to allow the owner or occupant of the property to make reasonable use of a structure, the design of which otherwise fails to conform to generally accepted or prevailing standards of the Village for the use and enjoyment of a structure as a residence for a family; (g) The efficient and advantageous use of existing structures and the degree to which the proposed construction makes efficient, economical, and advantageous use of existing and proposed floor area and impervious surfaces; and (h) The reasonableness of the variation requested in light of the purposes served by the proposed construction and the design problems of the existing structure intended to be alleviated by the proposed construction. (4) For purposes of supplementing the above standards and factors in connection with requests for variations from the requirements of Section 153.067, the Board, in making its determination, may also take into consideration the following factors, among other factors deemed relevant by the Board, to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board: (a) The heightand location of existing and proposed structures on the property and adjacent properties; (b) The need to maintain theheightof the proposed structure in relation to the height of an existing structure in order to enable the existing and proposed structures to present a pleasing appearance reflecting architectural integrity and harmony among separate structural elements; and (c) The need to maintain a particular heightof a proposed addition to a structure in order to observe sound structural design and accommodate good building practices in the construction of the proposed addition. (5) For the purpose of supplementing the above standards with regard to variations for signs, the Board, in making its determination shall take into consideration the following factors to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant to the Board: a) In the case of a commercial message sign, strict application of the Kenilworth Sign Code would render the applicant unable to yield a reasonable return from its property. b) The variation will not endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood; c) The variation would not result in a sign or master sign plan as required by the Kenilworth Sign Code that: 1. Would not be in harmony with the general and specific purposes for which the Kenilworth Sign Code and the provisions from which a variation is sought were enacted; 2. Would be materially detrimental to the public welfare or materially injurious to the enjoyment, use, development, or value of adjacent property or improvements; 3. Would substantially increase congestion in the public streets due to parking or traffic; 4. Would create an unnecessary distraction to vehicle and pedestrian traffic; and 5. Would result in a sign that is not aesthetically consistent with the environment, or not proportional or architecturally compatible with existing land uses and buildings and with any adjacent residential neighborhood. 15 July 31, 2026 Village of Kenilworth Zoning Board of Appeals 419 Richmond Road Kenilworth, Illinois 60043 RE: 307 Melrose Avenue – responses to standards for variation application Dear Village of Kenilworth Zoning Board of Appeals, The following are responses to the Standards for Variation 153.244 (E): (1) The Board shall not grant, and the Plan Commission, as applicable, shall not recommend approval of, a variance from any of the regulations of this chapter, as authorized by subsection (D) above, unless it shall make a finding of fact, based upon the evidence presented to it in a particular case, that: (a) In the case of property, the principal use of which is for business purposes, the property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations applicable to the district in which it is located; Response: Not applicable – this is residential property. (b) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; and Response: The unique circumstance is the age of the existing garage along with the standard to which it was built. The current garage does not reasonably fit typical vehicles of today’s size. The existing garage is non-conforming with 24’ of garage doors facing the street; the single garage door is 8’ wide and the double door is 16’ wide. Both doors are only 6’-7” tall. The size of a typical single garage door is 9’ wide and 8’ tall. (c) The variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The design of the proposed garage will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The current garage walls are wood lap siding with 1x6 and 1x4 wood trim. The siding is painted tan while the trim is painted green. The proposed garage walls will be stucco with painted wood trim to match the house color and detailing. A front and rear facing dormer were also added to the garage to complement the original architecture of the home as a nod to the larger dormer on the front and back of the house. (2) For the purpose of supplementing the above standards, the Board or, as applicable, the Plan Commission, in making its determination whether the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances and whether the variation, if granted, may alter the essential character 16 of the locality, shall take into consideration the following factors to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board or, as applicable, the Plan Commission: (a) The particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical condition of the property in question would result in a practical difficulty or particular hardship upon the applicant for the variation, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulation were enforced; Response: The height of the existing first floor and the location of the home on the lot present a practical difficulty for a side-load garage. The existing first floor is approximately 5’ above grade resulting in an 8-riser stair from the garage to the house which seemed excessive to the team. The height difference of the existing home merged with a ground level garage may make complying with the aesthetics noted in Standard 4(b) quite a challenge. If an attached garage was added all views from the family room to the rear yard would be completely blocked. All of these factors resulted in the Owner seeking zoning relief for a modernized detached garage. If the regulation is strictly enforced, the Owner would be limited to building a garage that would not fit 3 cars. (b) The conditions upon which the application for variation is based would not be applicable generally to other property in the same district; Response: The request for variation is based solely on the specific conditions of 307 Melrose Avenue. (c) The request for the variation is not based exclusively upon the desire to make more money out of the property; Response: This is our client’s forever home. They are firmly rooted in the community. Their motivation for the project is to have a 3-car garage that is sized appropriately and more functional – there is no intention to sell the property for profit. (d) The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; and Response: The current hardship was not created by any person who has an interest in the property. (e) The variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties or substantially increase the run-off of stormwater onto adjacent properties or public streets, or substantially increase congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Response: The proposed project will not create any of the conditions listed above. 17 (3) For the purpose of further supplementing the above standards and factors in connection with requests for variations from the requirements of § 153.068, the Board, in making its determination, may also take into consideration the following factors, among other factors deemed relevant by the Board, to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board: (a) The effects of the proposed construction on the overall appearance of the size and bulk of the existing structures on the property when viewed from streets abutting the property and from adjacent properties; Response: The proposed garage design is an improvement in appearance when viewed from adjacent properties and abutting streets. (b) The proximity of the proposed construction to streets abutting the property and to adjacent properties; Response: The proximity of the garage to adjacent properties and abutting streets is consistent with neighboring homes. From Melrose to the face of the garage is 142’-5”. From Essex to the face of the garage is 158’-9 1/2". (c) The relative proximity of the proposed construction to streets abutting the property and to adjacent properties in comparison with the relative proximity of existing structures on other properties in the same vicinity; Response: The proximity of the garage to adjacent properties and abutting streets is consistent with neighboring homes. The proposed garage setbacks are also an improvement: 5’ on the north side proposed (vs 2’-3” existing) and 6’ on the west side (vs 1’-6” existing.) (d) The magnitude of the variation requested in absolute terms and in proportion to the floor area and/or impervious surfaces allowed if the strict letter of the regulation were enforced; Response: Not applicable – there is no request for floor area or impervious surface relief. (e) The need for other variations in connection with the proposed construction and the nature and extent of those other variations; Response: Not applicable – there are no other variations requested. (f) The need for the variation to allow the owner or occupant of the property to make reasonable use of a structure, the design of which otherwise fails to conform to generally accepted or prevailing standards of the village for the use and enjoyment of a structure as a residence for a family; Response: The proposed variation will not diminish or impair property values withing the neighborhood. The necessary replacement of a garage that has reached the end of its serviceable life with a new, sound structure and modernized 3-car garage will be an improvement. Additionally, the proposed new garage will complement the original architecture 18 of the home, which the existing garage does not. (g) The efficient and advantageous use of existing structures and the degree to which the proposed construction makes efficient, economical and advantageous use of existing and proposed floor area and impervious surfaces; and Response: The existing 26’-3” x 25’-3” (662.6 sf) garage is in poor condition. The proposed garage is 31’-5 1/2" x 23’-8" (744.5 sf). The proposed garage is 5’-2 1/2" wider in the east west direction and 1’-7” shallower in the north south direction. The 31’-5 1/2" width of the garage is set by (3) 9’ wide individual overhead doors and (4) 10” Simpson portal frame kits. Portal frames are required by code because standard wall bracing is insufficient to resist the lateral loads on the south wall. (h) The reasonableness of the variation requested in light of the purposes served by the proposed construction and the design problems of the existing structure intended to be alleviated by the proposed construction. Response: The requested variation is reasonable. While the proposed garage is wider than the existing garage, only 17’-8 5/8” will be visible from Melrose once a proposed addition to the home is built. The view from Essex is improved as the proposed garage is 1’-7” shallower. (4) For purposes of supplementing the above standards and factors in connection with requests for variations from the requirements of § 153.067, the Board, in making its determination, may also take into consideration the following factors, among other factors deemed relevant by the Board, to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board: (a) The height and location of existing and proposed structures on the property and adjacent properties; Response: The proposed height (19’-10 1/4") is significantly less than the adjacent coach house at 321 Melrose. (b) The need to maintain the height of the proposed structure in relation to the height of an existing structure in order to enable the existing and proposed structures to present a pleasing appearance reflecting architectural integrity and harmony among separate structural elements; and Response: Not applicable – the garage is detached from the house. (c) The need to maintain a particular height of a proposed addition to a structure in order to observe sound structural design and accommodate good building practices in the construction of the proposed addition. Response: Not applicable – this is not an addition. 19 (5) For the purpose of supplementing the above standards with regard to variations for signs, the Board or, as applicable, the Plan Commission, in making its determination or recommendation shall take into consideration the following factors to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board or, as applicable, the Plan Commission: (a) In the case of a commercial message sign, strict application of the Kenilworth Sign Code would render the applicant unable to yield a reasonable return from its property. Response: Not applicable. (b) The variation will not endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood; Response: The proposed variation will not endanger public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. (c) The variation would not result in a sign or master sign plan as required by the Kenilworth Sign Code that:  Would not be in harmony with the general and specific purposes for which the Kenilworth Sign Code and the provisions from which a variation is sought were enacted;  Would be materially detrimental to the public welfare or materially injurious to the enjoyment, use, development, or value of adjacent property or improvements;  Would substantially increase congestion in the public streets due to parking or traffic;  Would create an unnecessary distraction to vehicle and pedestrian traffic; and  Would result in a sign that is not aesthetically consistent with the environment, or not proportional or architecturally compatible with existing land uses and buildings and with any adjacent residential neighborhood. Response: Not applicable. 20 Existing garage – view North from Melrose 21 Existing garage – view West from rear yard 22 Existing garage – south elevation/Melrose 23 Existing home – south elevation/Melrose 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 S S CF/SF 590.65 630 E 10'0 20' 50' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTHEASTERLY 1/2 OF LOT 10 AND ALL OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 19 IN KENILWORTH COMPANY'S ADDITION TO KENILWORTH SAID ADDITION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 307 MELROSE AVE, KENILWORTH, ILLINOIS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREAS 1"=20' C-1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROJECT STAFF ISSUE REVISIONS DATE PROJECT MANAGER: ENGINEER: ENGINEER: TECHNICIAN: COPYRIGHT: THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED, REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR SOLD EITHER WHOLLY OR IN PART, EXCEPT WHEN AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. PROJECT NO.: 251136 BASE FILE: SHEET FILE: ISSUE DATE: AUG 14, 2025 SCALE: SHEET NUMBER 307 MELROSE AVE, KENILWORTH, IL 60043 D.KOZLOWSKI 1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 08-12-25 1018 BUSSE HIGHWAY PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 847-823-3300 bbono@bonoconsulting.com 4234 MERIDIAN PKWY, STE 116 AURORA, IL 60504 331-229-3512 rwalker@bonoconsulting.com DESIGN FIRM NO. 184.008857-0002 BONO CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS CB I A Sevee & Maher Engineers company ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL GEOTECHNICAL WATER COMPLIANCE 4 Blanchard Road, PO Box 85A, Cumberland, Maine 04021 Phone 207.829.5016 Fax 207.829.5692 sme-engineers.com SME SEVEE & MAHER ENGINEERS SME SEVEE & MAHER ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL GEOTECHNICAL WATER COMPLIANCE 4 Blanchard Road, PO Box 85A, Cumberland, Maine 04021 Phone 207.829.5016 Fax 207.829.5692 sme-engineers.com 33 2. P R O P O S E D S I T E P L A N1. E X I S T I N G S I T E P L A N Scott Simpson Design Build JULY 31, 2026 S i m p s o n R e s i d e n c e 3 0 7 M E L R O S E -- K E N I L W O R T H Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0" A1 Site Plans plan north 34 1. E X I S T I N G D E T A C H E D G A R A G E P L A N 2. E X I S T I N G D E T A C H E D G A R A G E R O O F P L A N 5. P R O P O S E D D E T A C H E D G A R A G E P L A N 6. P R O P O S E D D E T A C H E D G A R A G E A T T I C P L A N 7. P R O P O S E D D E T A C H E D G A R A G E R O O F P L A N 3. G A R A G E S E C T I O N 4. G A R A G E S E C T I O N A T D O R M E R S Scott Simpson Design Build JULY 31, 2026 S i m p s o n R e s i d e n c e 3 0 7 M E L R O S E -- K E N I L W O R T H Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A2 Plans + Sections plan north 35 1. E X I S T I N G E A S T E L E V A T I O N 2. E X I S T I N G S O U T H E L E V A T I O N 3. E X I S T I N G W E S T E L E V A T I O N 4. E X I S T I N G N O R T H E L E V A T I O N 6. P R O P O S E D N O R T H E L E V A T I O N 5. P R O P O S E D W E S T E L E V A T I O N3. P R O P O S E D E A S T E L E V A T I O N 4. P R O P O S E D S O U T H E L E V A T I O N Scott Simpson Design Build JULY 31, 2026 S i m p s o n R e s i d e n c e 3 0 7 M E L R O S E -- K E N I L W O R T H Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" A3 Exterior Elevations 36 8 Standards for Special Uses For Special Use requests, please respond to the applicable standards listed below in the written explanation of the request. (G) Standards. No special use shall be recommended by the Board of Appeals or the Plan Commission, as the case may be, or authorized by the Board of Trustees unless the Board of Appeals or the Plan Commission, as the case may be, and the Board of Trustees shall have taken into consideration the following factors to the extent deemed relevant to the proposed special use and the principal structure and each accessory structure used for or associated with the proposed special use: (1) The necessity for the public convenience at the particular proposed location; (2) The effects of the proposed design, location and operation on the public health, safety and welfare; (3) Injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is proposed to be located; (4) Interference with the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties; (5) Compatibility with permitted uses in the district in which it is proposed to be located; (6) Increased traffic congestion on public ways or increased parking required on public ways; (7) Damage to or destruction of natural scenic or historic features of significance to the village or the immediate neighborhood; and (8) In the case of playground equipment, in addition to the foregoing applicable factors, its proximity to and effect on neighboring properties, its expected intensity of use, and the consistency of the equipment and its expected use with play equipment customarily associated with a residential use. 37 Request for Commission Action Agenda Item: III.B Staff Contact: Andrew Dunham, Teska Associates, Inc. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider a Variation at 235 Leicester Road Pertaining to Minimum Yard Requirements Petitioner: Vincent Fiore of Fiore Builders on behalf of owner Coskun Cavusoglu Location: 235 Leicester Road Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential Purpose: Request a variation to permit construction of a new addition and garage to encroach into the required rear yard Applicable Regulations: §153.070 Minimum Yard Requirements (A) Introduction: The petitioner, Fiore Builders, is requesting a variation to minimum rear yard requirements on behalf of the homeowner to permit construction of a two-story addition to the principal structure containing a three-car garage, laundry room, and second-story game room. This property is situated on the east side of Leicester Road between Oxford Road and Woodstock Avenue. The existing detached garage would be removed as part of the scope of work. Discussion: A two and a half-story brick home and detached one-story garage are currently located on the 16,975 sq. ft. property. The current home, the principal structure on the property, is located 56 ft. from the rear lot line (compliant with the Zoning Code) and the detached garage is situated 8 ft. from the rear lot line (compliant with the setback requirements of accessory structures). The Zoning Code specifies that minimum rear yard depth equal the larger of 25 ft. or 20% of the depth of the lot. For this lot measuring 175 ft. in depth, the rear yard setback is 35 ft. (20% of 175 ft.). The applicant proposes removing the existing three-car garage and replacing it as part of a two-story addition to the principal structure. This addition would encroach 9 ft. and 9 in. into the required rear yard setback, resulting in a rear yard depth of 25 ft. 3 in. Considered By: Date: Zoning Board of Appeals 09/14/26 Village of 38 • One two-story addition to the rear of the principal structure is proposed. The addition would consist of the following. o A three-car attached garage replacing the existing detached three-car garage. o A laundry room. o A game room on the second floor. • This addition would reduce the rear yard setback (56 ft.) to 25 ft. 3 in., less than the minimum 35 ft. required for this lot by Code. • The variation is requested to modernize an existing home by improving accessibility to the garage and adding living and laundry space to the rear of the home. • As part of the scope of this work, the existing detached garage would be demolished, and the driveway would be reoriented to serve a side-loaded garage. • All other aspects of this proposed addition are compliant with the Zoning Code. Permit History: The permit and zoning request history of 235 Leicester Road is detailed in the table below. Year Type Purpose 2022 Plumbing Flood Control, Permit #2022-095 2015 Building Driveway Replacement, Permit #2015-113 2010 Fence Fence Replacement, Permit #2010-71 2010 Fence Fence Replacement, Permit #2010-70 2010 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #2010-16T 2006 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #2006-10T 2005 Building Reroofing, Permit #1035 2002 Building Interior Drain Tile, Permit #9447 2002 Plumbing Flood Control Valve and Sump Pump, Permit #9430 1999 Building Interior Renovation, Permit #8750 1995 Building Driveway, Permit #7869 1994 Building Family Room Addition, Permit #7717 1988 Fence Fence Installation, Permit #6525 1988 Fence Fence Installation, Permit #6515 1987 Building Garage Replacement, Permit #6407 1933 Building Garage, Permit #2330 1908 Construction Date Requested Variation: Variation– Minimum Yard Requirements Applicable Regulations: Section 153.070 (A) of the Zoning Ordinance The petitioner requests a variation from Section 153.070 (A) Minimum Yard Requirements. The petitioner proposes a decrease in the rear yard setback of 30 ft. 9 in. for a rear addition to the 39 principal structure including an attached garage, reducing the rear yard setback from 56 ft. to 25 ft. 3 in., 9 ft. 9 in. less than the minimum required rear yard for this property. Section 153.070 (A) of the Zoning Ordinance specifies the required minimum rear yard of a residential building in the R-1 zoning district to be the larger of 25 ft. or 20% of the depth of the lot. For this lot measuring 175 ft. in depth, a 35 ft. minimum rear yard setback (20% of 175 ft.) is required. The following table illustrates the requested variation from the maximum rear yard requirements: Lot Depth Lot Depth 175 ft. Maximum Floor Area % Min Rear Yard Minimum Rear Yard Setback The larger of 25 ft. or 20% of the lot depth 35 ft. 100% Existing Rear Yard Setback 56 ft. 160% Variation % Min Rear Yard Proposed Variation 9 ft. 9 in. 27.9% Proposed Rear Yard Setback 25 ft. 3 in. 72.1% Example Motion for Consideration: I move to approve (with conditions) the request submitted by the petitioner, Vincent Fiore of Fiore Builders, on behalf of owner Coskun Cavusoglu, to permit construction of a two-story rear addition to the principal structure of a single-family residence that encroaches into rear yard setback by 9 ft. 9 in. at 235 Leicester Road in accordance with the materials included in this packet. Attachments: 1. 235 Leicester Road Zoning Board of Appeals Application, dated June 28, 2026 2. Narrative of zoning variation request provided by Coskun Cavusoglu, dated June 30, 2026 3. Zoning Compliance Worksheet, dated July 30, 2026 4. Copy of Plat of Survey, dated January 29, 2025 5. Architectural Drawings provided by Fiore Builders, dated July 30, 2026 6. Section 153.224 (E), Standards for Variations 40 Vi Wage of Address of Prope That is the Subject of this Application Attach Legal Description of Property that !S the Subject of this Application. Zoning District ________ Current Use SAe 4L1 L JUL 2 ZOZ6 Village of KenilwOj Applicant Information 4 Rchmor.ciRoa Prone847-251-i6. Kenirvarth. IL 60043 Fax 847-25-39C8 Zoning Board of Appeals Application General Information Date: _______ • Zoning Variations • Special Uses • Text Amendments • ZonIng Map Changes • Administrative Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals Jurisdiction Property Address L-Ei5r1L oiô PL) o-c9- OC) Appcart — I—— Name V ra _______ _______________________ _____ Address- ‘J( k t-y LL4. __________________________ Small S k 1L / __________ Owrer of Property (it di than,AppItcat Name C C S C) (‘ C L’ S L— ____ Atdress J3 - - 1 i I- Telephone 41 Primary Contact Person for Applicant Name ___________ ________ AddressEmal LQ1tJ Telephone 3’ cC q3___ Appitcants and Pnmary Contacts Relationship to Property: ,r i’ ri Check appropriate category and attach proof of ownership and all relevant additional ownership information to this application. ndMdual ______ Joint Tenants/Tenants in Common Land Trust Trust Corporation ______Limited Liability Company Partnership Ifproperty is held in atrust, also include a certified copy of the trust agreement or a simple affidavit (under oath before a notary) aS to who are the beneficiaries of the trust. Consulta nts (as icabie). - List any additional consultants and their contact information on additional sheets of paper and attach. ArchitectName ____ Company f2ri. Ac4-c-*c ________ Address 9ui _____________ i (>L>-1 Phone “‘ ()‘ E-mail Ai:) S cC ____ AttorneyName ________________ _______ ___ Company IL\1 1((/ Address \ Phone _____ ________ E-ma!i 42 Requested Action CheckallthatapplyandprovideonthisformorattachonseparatesheetsallinformationrequiredbytheSectionsof theZoningOrdnancelistedbelowforthetypesofreliefrequested: )(ZoningVariation(s)forTJU Q- SpecialUsefor_________________________ __________ ZoningOrdinanceTextAmendment Rezonngfrom__to_____-ZoningMapAmendment AdministrativeAppeal Other(describe) F.hngFees-- AllApplicationsrequirepaymentofanon-refundablefee:inaddition,applicationsforspecialuses,textamendments,andzoning maprequireaddionalfundsthatareheldinescrowforrecoveryofactualcostspursuanttoSections153.290—153293ofthe ZoningOrdinance Pleaseattachacheckwithyourapplicationandindicatebelowtheamountoffeesubmitted: $350M0 /.ZoningVariations) ‘ETies TextAmendments •ZoningMapChanges •AirConditioning Fences Admnstrab’.’eAppeals KenilworthCodeofEthics (3aSeparateSheetofPaper,tstandattachthename,addressandnatureandextentofanycurrentorpctentainterestthat anyvillageofficeroremployeemayhaveinorwithrespecttotheowner,theApplicantortheproperty. Itnone.Checkhere ______ Repeatpplication Hasanyothercppfcationforf.ispropertybeensubmittedtotheVll!cgethatseekssmfcrreterandhasbeendenedwfnthe lastbiioyears’?Yes _ No yes,attachastatementofthegroundApohoantbefevesustidese000sderaticr 43 Byexecutionofthisapplicationinthespaceprovidedbelow,theapplicantandowner(s)doherebycertify,acknowledge,agree andaffirmtotheVillageofKenilworththat. 1.TheVillageanditsrepresentativeshavetheright,andareherebygrantedpermissionandlicense,toenterupon property,andintoanystructureslocatedtherein,forthepurposesofconductinganyinspectionsthatmaybenecessaryin connectonwiththsapp!cation 2I(We)havecarefullyreadthisapplicationtheKenikvorthZoningOrdinanceandfrillyunderstandthetermsand prOVSionSofeach. 3.I(We)waiveanyrightstoexemptionfromdisclosureundertheIllinoisFreedomofInformationActofanyandall documentsandinformationsubmittednconnectonwhthsappltcaton. 4.1(We),inaccordancewiththerequirementsoftheKenilworthZoningOrdinanceagreetopayallapplicablefilingfees andberesponsb!eforthepaymentofatrembursableexpensesassociatedwiththeprocessngofthsapplcaton 5Thelnformatoncor.tanedinthisapp!catlonistrueandcorrect Applicant’sSignature(s) Sgoature ______ ________________ PrintedName: _________________________________________ Date ______________ __________ Signature: DrntHMm: Date: ________ Signature: PnntedName Date: Sgnature. PrintedName. flf 44 Required Matenals - Submit acompleted application with 9copies of the following materials: Drawings. itapphcabe, to Vanance Applicaton. 1 Existing Floor Plans- provide floor plans of all levels of the existing building 2 Demolitron Floor Plans— provde floor pns of at levels of the exstng huild!n.g and ndcate eyshn9 parts to he removed 3. Proposed Floor Plans provide floor plans of proposed additions to the existing building 4. Existing Extenor Elevations provide elevations of all existing extehor elevations That are to char, ge 5. Proposed Exterior Elevations provide elevations of all elevations that are altered Plat of Suey & Parcel(s) Legal Description, no more than 5 yea o!d — Title Policy or Deed Certified Copy of Trust Agreement. ifapplicable Simple Affidavit identifying Trust beneficiaries, ifapplicable Written Explanation of Request, on separate sheets of paper. Address the standards and reqvirements for the relief requested, and how they are satisfied by the request. Flling Fee- payable to the Village of Kenilwofth After this application and all necessary materials are submitted, the application will be put on the docket for a Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting. It is recommended that the application for any matter requiring public notice be submitted 45 days prior to the Zoning Meeting. The Village will provide Applicant with a notification packet containing a notice is to be delivered to all property owners living within 250 feet of property. The Zoning Board of Appeals meets once every other month. In general, applicants should expect a hearing within 60 days of submitting an application Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney. The concurring vote of 4 members of the Zoning Board shall be necessary to grant a variation or to reserve any order, requirement. decision or determination of the Village. or to decide in favor of an applicant for reief. No order granting a variation shall be effective for a period longer than six months unless a building permit is obtained and the constructon, alteration, or moving of the building covered by the order is started within such period. All Applicants are encouraged to read Sections 153.240— 153.249 of the Village of Kenilworth Zoning Ordinance. Authonzed • To vary any of the requirements with respect to minimum sizes of lots, maximum height of buildings and other structures, maximum and minimum size of buildings, maximum lot coverage by structures and other impervious surfaces, and minmurn depth and ‘Mdth of yards per Section 153 244 To vary any of the regulations contained in Sections 153 075 —153 086 (Supplemental Regulations Applicable to all Residential Districts). To vary any ofthe regulations contained in Section 153 185— 153.192(Off-StreetAutomobfe Par!cng Requrements). ‘a van,’ Sign Code regulatons per Section153 244 45 Section 153.244(E) – Standards for Variations Property Address: 235 Leicester Road Applicant: Coskun & Kader Cavusoglu Introduction This narrative is submitted in support of the requested variation from the rear yard setback requirements to permit construction of an attached garage at 235 Leicester Road. The request is based upon the unique physical characteristics of the property, the historic nature of the residence, and the accessibility needs of the homeowners' daughter. The requested variation represents the minimum relief necessary to reasonably accommodate these circumstances while preserving the architectural integrity of the home and maintaining compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. 1. Standards for Variations 1(a) - Business Property Not applicable. The property is improved with a single-family residence and is not used for business purposes. 1(b)- The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The hardship arises from several unique circumstances specific to this property. The residence was constructed in 1908, decades before the adoption of the Village's current zoning regulations. The home is recognized as a Centennial Home by the Kenilworth Historical Society , and the owners have intentionally preserved its original architectural character rather than substantially altering the historic structure. The original placement of the residence on the lot, together with the existing easement and required setbacks, leaves no practical alternative location for a functional attached garage. In addition, the homeowners' daughter has Morquio Syndrome (MPS IVA), a rare skeletal disorder resulting in significant bone fragility and mobility limitations. These accessibility needs further limit the available design alternatives and require a garage configuration that safely accommodates independent vehicle access. These circumstances are unique to this property and were not created by the current owners. 46 1(c)- The variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed garage has been designed to complement the existing residence and maintain the architectural character of both the home and the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed improvement will preserve the appearance of a historic Centennial Home while providing functionality consistent with modern residential use. The requested variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 2. Supplemental Standards 2(a) - Practical Difficulty or Particular Hardship Strict enforcement of the rear yard setback would create a practical hardship rather than a mere inconvenience. The homeowners are requesting an attached garage primarily to provide safe access for their daughter between the residence and her vehicle. Because of Morquio Syndrome, she is at an increased risk of serious injury from falls. During winter months, walking across snow and ice between the residence and a detached garage presents a significant safety concern. In addition, moving the garage farther from the property line would reduce the interior width available for parking. This would prevent her from fully opening the driver's side door while another vehicle occupies the adjacent parking space, making it difficult or impossible for her to safely and independently enter and exit her vehicle. The requested variation directly addresses these hardships. 2(b) - Conditions Not Generally Applicable The conditions supporting this request are unique to this property. Few properties combine: • a residence constructed in 1908, • historic preservation of the original structure, • existing easement constraints, • the need for an attached garage, and • documented accessibility requirements for a disabled family member. 47 These circumstances are not generally applicable to other residential properties within the Village. 2(c) - Request Not Based Upon Financial Gain The requested variation is not intended to increase the value of the property or maximize development. Rather, the request is intended to preserve the historic residence while providing safe and accessible accommodations for the homeowners' daughter. 2(d) - Hardship Not Self-Created The hardship was not created by the current owners. The residence was constructed in 1908 and its placement on the property predates the current zoning regulations. The owners have intentionally preserved the home's historic design rather than substantially altering or relocating the existing structure. The daughter's medical condition is permanent and independent of the owners' actions. 2(e) - No Adverse Impact Approval of the requested variation will not adversely affect neighboring properties. The proposed garage: • will maintain the residential character of the neighborhood; • will not materially reduce light or air to adjacent properties; • will not increase traffic; • will not create drainage concerns; • will not increase fire hazards; and • will not diminish surrounding property values. The garage has been designed to be architecturally compatible with the existing residence and neighboring homes. 48 3. Additional Standards 3(a) - Overall Appearance The proposed garage has been carefully designed to complement the architecture of the existing residence. Materials, rooflines, proportions, and detailing are intended to preserve the appearance of the historic home. 3(b) - Proximity to Adjacent Properties The proposed location represents the only practical location for an attached garage. The requested variation has been minimized to reduce impacts on neighboring properties. 3(c) - Comparison to Neighborhood The proposed construction remains compatible with surrounding residential development. The addition preserves the scale and character expected within the neighborhood while respecting the historic nature of the existing residence. 3(d) - Magnitude of Variation The requested variation represents the minimum relief necessary to accommodate the existing site constraints. The garage has been positioned to minimize the extent of the requested encroachment while providing the functionality required for safe vehicle access. 3(e) - Need for Additional Variations No additional zoning variations are requested. 3(f) - Reasonable Residential Use The requested variation allows the residence to continue functioning as a safe family home while accommodating the accessibility needs of the homeowners' daughter. Without the requested relief, the home cannot reasonably provide the safe vehicle access required for her continued independence. 3(g) - Efficient Use of Existing Structures The proposal makes efficient use of the existing residence by preserving the historic structure while incorporating an attached garage that accommodates the family's accessibility needs. The design avoids unnecessary demolition or alteration of the original home. 49 3(h) - Reasonableness of the Request The requested variation is reasonable because it balances several important public interests: • preservation of a recognized Centennial Home; • accommodation of a documented disability; • protection of public safety by reducing fall risk; • preservation of neighborhood character; and • the minimum relief necessary to accommodate existing site conditions. Conclusion The requested variation results from the unique physical characteristics of the property, the preservation of a historic 1908 residence, and the documented accessibility needs of the homeowners' daughter. The request is not based upon convenience or financial gain. It represents the minimum relief necessary to provide safe, accessible use of the property while preserving the architectural character of the residence and maintaining compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. For these reasons, the applicants respectfully request approval of the requested variation. Prepared by: Coskun & Kader Cavusoglu, Property Owners In consultation with: Roman Holowka, R.T.H. Associates, Inc. 50 51 ZONING COMPLIANCE WORKSHEET FACEt Compietton f th:s worksheet is required for any construction that alters ouiiding floor area or existing inlperv!ous surtaces GO a lot. See Se’im 6 for letin rs of buid rg u a age impe ao is su’ares and for area a at as sanoLs uf qu red siagrams end calcuiatiu is Compte each Sechon of the worksheet based or the proposed scope of work: DATE. Sect co 1 Pioperty Date complete for all prolects 2 Building Coverage - complete for chanqes to any roofed stmctm or 3 Impervious Surfaces - complete for changes to any other Impervious surfaces 4 Floor Area Cacuiations complete fo changes to any roofed structuio S Requded Minimum Yarits - Ott1pIete soptuDnatS Sedan for IC?. corstructic.i: 6 D:egranrs and Calculations- deLr’itions and examples of diagrams and caittlatiuos equirad for ah pro;ects .j: PROPERTY DATA Z ? STEEP SLOPE ZONE? Y N I Prolecf address 15. Using a dOrreat Piat cf Sr my ca cjlate the lot area in square feet If tie lo area iotdon the Phit input that number c 18 ‘ Lakefront Lct Area extends to toe of the bluff (base of sea wall closest to the lake I. or where bluff meets the beach P there is no sea viaL. I1 Sit: I I_nt area* lot oidllr 01 leirgtts 2: BUiLDING COVERAGE cede §t53.568(B) 2a Complete the appropriate calculation toi the lot area 1ef, amid enter product in line 2A For lot CiSC <576 f or,\Rmsx 3 3 I‘ (p ( are6t6)4D9 B C Coieragc May m AiV I — ro are 2- 0 a cc 2 2a Enter the sum of nirnoers 2c-2 in line 2a. Submit dagramns with dimensions and square footage calculations per Section fiA 20 Total exisfng boNing coverage 7. 7, rt. 2 4• ç ] 2oE:oSlIrcj buIci:nq coverage to be remover: - ir. Ft 2s Building niJerege Total Etistmnq— °rogosed — i r ii + 7. .1 3: iMPERVIOUS SURFACES code §133 068(C) 3u Eta the SLi’ u Ic am-O 30 ire Ic. C 30 .S S :S-uttt.;Sm’umcer. subtract P Comr Sod Fc single family allached dwo!linqs the rna,cniurr .-‘pervicus surface showed is. IOU- t 35x lot arent - r ::: 417 4 l 35. 4 psi toe aura •f urroers 3e-3u 10 i:C Ic.egnma -‘n c--orsc:s -r,r. Oi5..C ;sicu:si 005 Sv:Io- IS. iotai csuso no 52 ZONINGCOMPLIANCEWORKSHEET ___ pA3520F4 PROJECTADDRESS 4:FLOORAREA§153.068(A) 4CorIpieteInsaeo::or.otenorelmneOnmoplipeandCOICIpmccnctnwoe4A —c-,‘L.- ..cla‘w-.eUuDo>f)+20u -orHoarwsrsaIax:nmmPhrr.eu—.--.-... CeEnternesumof40tnrough4wnHeH SubrotdmgramshOdmensmmsandsquareiuOt-lgecalculationsDecSecpon60. 40ToIRox:s7r:gfroomarea- 0oSuDtaoeX:sUngSootamaloccrernoocrU.- ] Slto4 -- — —ouZonCateSc —IsFloorArea:TotalEx:stngtocematn--Proposedlferiptlonofapplicableames). 4a.Oljjoaa,jnecflourarea±Zk1.-- 5:REQUIREDMINIMUMYARDS+BUILDINGHEIGHT§103067+§153070154C85 Ccrrnpteletheappropr’ate:nformat;ontmtheproposedscopeHtoo..St.bnu.c:nSOC0130Yaro:atarleusncrc!ngdimensionstoat‘ins. ROOFEDSTR0040RESAoLHO—EDEOUIPIIEI1+SuRFACES Thnripol81tinj—dtstancetlotLinendiScmalistotflu --as - Rear RearInstalledatgrade?7N 1-.— —--...— Screenedfromsoem-hew?RN Height1 -- .......[‘Jailrnojflled07N garaGeClt’:ernntoncrHectricCicqrspnent Stde 80€Sihe RearRear 11prado?“7 Octletsi0’)r’S’&e’:Slm? — -—-—010crrrper/ocss,rO1ces’ CStanceICnoamOcO. 0-Cr0,ICCLG,Om.1.550CC0!.lOC . 5:mS0.01 ‘SC5 and.nCr0COntOofrca1 53 54 N 55 N 56 N 57 N N 58 Ii[t rILJgtI[‘1I For Zoning Variations, please respond to the applicable standards listed below in the written explanation of the request.(1) The Board shaH not grant a variance from any of the regulations of Chapter 153: Zoning, as authorized by Subsection 153 244(D), unless itshaH make a finding of fact. based upon the evidence presented to itin aparticular case, that (a) In the case of property the principal use of which is for business purposes, the property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations applicable to the district in which it is located; (b) The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances; and (c) The vacation, tf granted, wli not alter the essential character of’ the localty. (2) For the purposes of supplementing the above standards, the Board, in mak;nq its determination whether the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances and whether the variation, ifgranted, may alter the essential character of the locality, shall take into consideration the following factors to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board’ (a) The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the property in question would result in a practical difficulty or particular hardship upon the applicant for the variation, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, ifthe strict letter of the regulation were enforced; (b) The conditions upon w’hich the application for variation is based would not be applicable generally to other property in the same dstnct, (c) The request for the variation is not based exclusively upon the desire to make more money out of the property; d) The alleged drtticutty or hardship has not been,, created by any person presentiy having an interest in the property, (e) The variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties or sLibstantially increase tne runoff of storm water onto adjacent properties or public streets, or substantially increase congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of tire or otherwise endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. (3 For the purpose of further supplementing the above standards and factors in connection with requests for variations from the requirements of Section 153.068, the Board,fl rnakng its deterrnnatton, may also take into consideration the following factors, among other factors deemed relevant by the Board, to the extent they are established by the evidence and deemed relevant by the Board: ça) The effects of the proposed construction on the overall appearance of the size and bulk of the exsting structures on :he property when vewed from streets abottng the property arid from ao300ent properties (b) The proximity of the proposed construction to streets abutting the property and to adjacent properties; Ici The relative proximity of the proposed construction to streets abutting the property and to aiacent propsTesri ‘ojith the relative proximity of existing structures on other properties in the same vicinity: d The magnitude of the vanabon requested in absolute terms andri proport’or’ to rhe floc’r a-ac aic’ mpcri. ‘oc srfaces allowed ifthe strict iette of the regulation were enforced, 59 Request for Commission Action Agenda Item: III.C Staff Contact: Andrew Dunham, Teska Associates, Inc. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider a Variation at 336 Abbotsford Road Pertaining to Maximum Building Size and Maximum Building Coverage Requirements Petitioner: Leah Conley Location: 336 Abbotsford Road Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential Purpose: Request variations to permit construction of a one- story rear addition to the principal structure Applicable Regulations: §153.068 Maximum Building Size; Maximum Building Coverage (A), (B) Introduction: The petitioner, Leah Conley, is requesting variations to maximum building size and maximum building coverage requirements on behalf of the homeowner to permit construction of a one story addition to the principal structure. This property is situated on the south side of Abbotsford Road between Kenilworth and Woodstock Avenues. Discussion: A two-story frame house and one and a half-story garage are currently located on the 17,500 sq. ft. property. The current building size (floor area) of these structures is 5,862 sq. ft., higher than the maximum allowed floor area per the Zoning Code (5,400 sq. ft.) creating an existing nonconformity. Existing building coverage is 3,473 sq. ft., lower than the maximum allowed building coverage (3,600 sq. ft.), and therefore compliant with the Zoning Code. • Two one-story additions to the rear of the principal structure are proposed as part of this request. This addition consists of two components: (1) a mud room addition to the family room, replacing part of the existing wooden deck, and (2) an addition to the kitchen, replacing existing exterior stairs. • In total, these additions would increase building coverage and floor area by 146 sq. ft. o The mudroom would measure 112 sq. ft. o The kitchen addition would measure 34 sq. ft. Considered By: Date: Zoning Board of Appeals 09/14/26 Village of 60 • Existing building coverage is compliant, and the proposed variation would increase building coverage beyond the maximum allowable by the Zoning Code by 19 sq. ft. • The existing home and garage exceed the Zoning Code’s maximum building size (floor area) requirements by 462 sq. ft., and the proposed variation would increase the nonconformity by 146 sq. ft., yielding a floor area that is 608 sq. ft. above the maximum building size. • The variation is requested to modernize an existing home by adding a mudroom and creating a more usable kitchen space. • As part of the scope of this work, 146 sq. ft. of existing decks would be removed. This impervious surface would not be replaced elsewhere on the property, thereby reducing impervious coverage by 146 sq. ft. • All other aspects of this proposed addition are compliant with the Zoning Code. Permit History: The permit and zoning request history of 336 Abbotsford Road is detailed in the table below. Year Type Purpose 2014 Building Re-roofing, Permit #2014-22 2008 Building Garage Addition and Renovation, Permit #2008-218 2008 Zoning Zoning Variation Approved for Maximum Floor Area, approved 10/20/08 2008 Generator Generator Installation, Permit #2008-181 2008 Tree Tree Removal, Permit #2008-39T 2004 Building Lawn Sprinkler, Permit #10047 2004 Fencing Air Conditioner Fencing Installation #10039 2003 Building Construction of Two-Story Addition, Replacement of Garage #9662 2002 Zoning Zoning Variation Approved for Maximum Floor Area, approved 7/9/02 2000 Plumbing Sub Floor Drainage and Flood Control, Permit #9137 2000 Electrical Electrical Work, Permit #9126 1996 Building Interior Renovation (Kitchen), Permit #8044 1987 Building Demolition and Replacement of Garage, Permit #6432 1986 Building Air Conditioning Installation, Permit #6259 1972 Fencing Fence Installation, Permit #5164 1941 Building Dormer Window Installation, Permit #3189 1891 Home Construction Date Requested Variation: Variation– Maximum Size; Maximum Lot Coverage Applicable Regulations: Section 153.068 (A) of the Zoning Ordinance Section 153.068 (B) of the Zoning Ordinance 61 The petitioner requests a variation from Section 153.068(A) Maximum Building Size and Section 153.068(B) Maximum Building Coverage. The petitioner proposes an increase in the existing nonconforming building size (floor area) of 146 sq. ft. for a new mudroom and an expansion of the kitchen, totaling 6,008 sq. ft., 608 sq. ft. above the maximum allowable floor area. The proposed addition to the principal structure and garage will also increase the existing, Code- compliant building coverage by 146 sq. ft., totaling 3,619 sq. ft., 19 sq. ft. above the maximum allowable floor area, creating a new nonconformity. As part of this project, 146 sq. ft. of impervious surface would be removed. Section 153.068 (A) of the Zoning Ordinance specifies the maximum floor area of a residential building to be calculated as follows: (Lot area X 0.24) + 1,200. No significant alteration has occurred since 2005, and therefore the property is not subject to lower floor area requirements. This lot measures 17,500 sq. ft., resulting in a maximum floor area of 5,400 sq. ft. The existing structures’ floor area measures 5,862 sq. ft., higher than the maximum allowed floor area; the proposed addition would increase floor area by 146 sq. ft., resulting in a proposed floor area of 6,008 sq. ft. The following table illustrates the requested variation from the maximum building size: Lot Area Lot Area 17,500 sq. ft. Maximum Floor Area % Max Floor Area Maximum Floor Area (Lot area X 0.24) + 1,200 5,400 sq. ft 100% Existing Floor Area 5,862 sq. ft. 108.5% Variation % Max Floor Area Proposed Variation 146 sq. ft. 2.7% Proposed Floor Area 6,008 sq. ft. 111.26% Section 153.068 (B) of the Zoning Ordinance specifies the maximum building coverage of a residential building to be calculated as follows: (Lot area X 0.16) + 800. This lot measures 17,500 sq. ft., resulting in a maximum building coverage of 3,600 sq. ft. The existing structures’ building coverage measures 3,473 sq. ft., compliant with the Zoning Code; the proposed addition would increase building coverage by 146 sq. ft., resulting in a proposed building coverage of 3,619 sq. ft. The following table illustrates the requested variation from the maximum building coverage: Lot Area Lot Area 17,500 sq. ft. Maximum Building Coverage % Max Building Coverage Maximum Building Coverage (Lot area X 0.16) + 800 3,600 sq. ft. 100% Existing Building Coverage 3,473 sq. ft. 96.5% Variation % Max Building Coverage Proposed Variation 146 sq. ft. 4.1% Proposed Floor Area 3,619 sq. ft. 100.5% 62 Example Motion for Consideration: I move to approve (with conditions) the request submitted by the petitioner, Leah Conley, to permit construction of a rear addition to the principal structure of a single-family residence and addition to the detached garage that exceeds maximum floor area requirements by 608 sq. ft. and maximum building coverage by 19 sq. ft. at 336 Abbotsford Road in accordance with the materials included in this packet. Attachments: 1. 336 Abbotsford Road Zoning Board of Appeals Application, dated July 15, 2026 2. Narrative of zoning variation request provided by Melichar Architects, dated July 17, 2026 3. Zoning Compliance Worksheet, undated 4. Copy of Plat of Survey, dated July 12, 2021 5. Architectural Drawings provided by Melichar Architects, dated July 10, 2026 6. Section 153.224 (E), Standards for Variations 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 M E L I C H A R A R C H I T E C T S The Practice of Fine Architecture 207 EAST WESTMINSTE R, LAKE FORE ST, I L 60045 • 847 -295 -2440 • MELICHARA RCHITE CTS.COM 7/22/2026 Village of Kenilworth Zoning Department Re: Explanation of Request for Zoning Variation 336 Abbotsford, Kenilworth Illinois As the applicants' representatives, we respectfully request approval of a zoning variation to permit a modest 146-square-foot, one-story rear addition to the existing residence. The proposed addition is intended to address practical difficulties created by the home's existing configuration while preserving its architectural character and maintaining compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Existing Hardship and Unique Circumstances The current owners purchased the home in 2021. Prior to their ownership, the previous owners obtained zoning variations in 2002 to construct a family room, kitchen, and breakfast area addition. Although that renovation increased the size of the residence, it resulted in a floor plan that does not function efficiently for everyday family living. The practical difficulty arises not from the owners' personal preferences, but from the home's existing physical configuration. The location of the existing family room, structural walls, circulation pattern, and the relationship between the kitchen and adjoining spaces create design constraints that cannot reasonably be resolved through interior remodeling alone. These existing conditions, established long before the current owners acquired the property, limit the ability to improve the home's functionality while remaining within the current zoning requirements. Working with Melichar Architects, the applicants explored twelve separate design alternatives to resolve these deficiencies within the existing building envelope. Each option was carefully evaluated before concluding that a modest rear addition represents the minimum amount of additional floor area necessary to create a functional kitchen layout, establish an appropriate connection to the dining room, and provide the mudroom that the residence has historically lacked. The requested variation is therefore based on a practical hardship created by the existing structure rather than a matter of convenience. The conditions giving rise to this request are unique to this property and are not generally applicable to other homes within the neighborhood. The applicants did not create these circumstances. Rather, they inherited the existing layout and are seeking only the minimum zoning relief necessary to make reasonable use of their home as a modern family residence. The request is not intended to maximize the size, value, or development potential of the property. 71 Village of Kenilworth Zoning Department 7/22/2026 Page 2 The Practice of Fine Architecture 207 EAST WESTMINSTE R, LAKE FORE ST, I L 60045 • 847 -295 -2440 • MELICHARA RCHITE CTS.COM Compatibility with the Neighborhood The proposed addition has been carefully designed to preserve the essential character of both the residence and the surrounding neighborhood. The addition is limited to a single story, does not increase the height of the home, and is located entirely at the rear of the residence, where it is largely concealed from public view. The project replaces an existing rear deck and is constructed over an existing hardscape patio. As a result, the proposal does not increase the property's impervious surface coverage. The architectural design, scale, rooflines, materials, and detailing are consistent with the existing residence, allowing the addition to blend seamlessly with the original home. Because of its modest size and rear location, the proposed addition will not impair access to light or air for neighboring properties, increase stormwater runoff, create traffic or public safety concerns, or adversely affect surrounding property values. The addition remains appropriately separated from adjacent properties and is centered on the rear elevation to minimize its visibility and its impact on neighboring homes. Compliance with the Standards for Variations The requested variation satisfies the standards set forth in Section 153.244(E) of the Village Code because: • The practical difficulty results from the unique physical configuration and existing layout of the residence, rather than from the applicants' personal preferences. • The conditions creating the hardship are specific to this property and are not generally applicable to other properties within the zoning district. • The hardship was not created by the current owners, who purchased the home after the existing conditions had already been established. • The request represents the minimum variation necessary to make reasonable use of the residence while preserving the existing home. • The proposed addition will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood, impair adjacent properties, increase impervious surface coverage, or adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. For these reasons, the applicants respectfully request approval of the requested zoning variation. 72 Building | Planning Division 419 Richmond Rd. Kenilworth, IL 60043 E: community@vok.org P: 847-251-1666 x5253 ZONING COMPLIANCE WORKSHEET ඘ඉඏඍ 1 ඗ඎ 4 ZONING CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7/12/2023 Completion of this worksheet is required for any construction that alters building fl oor area or existing impervious surfaces on a lot. See Section 6 for defi nitions of building coverage, impervious surfaces, and fl oor area, as well as samples of required diagrams and calculations. Complete each Section of the worksheet based on the proposed scope of work: Section 1 Property Data - complete for all projects 2 Building Coverage - complete for changes to any roofed structure or impervious surfaces 3 Impervious Surfaces - complete for changes to any other impervious surfaces 4 Floor Area Calculations - complete for changes to any roofed structure 5 Required Minimum Yards - complete appropriate section for new construction 6 Diagrams and Calculations - defi nitions and examples of diagrams and calculations required for all projects lot width lot length ච - =- - + + + = 2උ 3ඍ 3උ 2ඌ 3ඌ 3ඎ 2ඍ 3ඏ = = = = 3ඉ Impervious Surfaces: Maximum Allowed* 2ඊ Building Coverage: Total Existing + Proposed 2ඉ Building Coverage: Maximum Allowed 1ඊ Lot area* 1ඉ Project address 3ඊ Impervious Surfaces: Total Existing to remain + Proposed ඌඉගඍ: ඛගඍඍ඘ ඛඔ඗඘ඍ ජ඗ඖඍ? 1: Pක඗඘ඍකගඡ Dඉගඉ Y N 2: Bඝඑඔඌඑඖඏ C඗ඞඍකඉඏඍ 3: Iඕ඘ඍකඞඑ඗ඝඛ Sඝකඎඉඋඍඛ For lot area < 5,716 s.f. Maximum impervious allowed*: For lot area 5,716 - 19,999 s.f. For lot area 20,000+ s.f. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. 3ඉ: Enter the sum of 3උ and 3ඌ in line 3ඉ. If 3ඌ is a negative number, subtract it from 3උ.* 2ඉ: Complete the appropriate calculation for the lot area (1ඊ), and enter product in line 2ඉ 1ඊ: Using a current Plat of Survey, calculate the lot area in square feet. If the lot area is noted on the Plat, input that number in 1ඊ. * Lakefront Lot Area: extends to toe of the bluff (base of sea wall closest to the lake), or where bluff meets the beach if there is no sea wall. 3ඊ: Enter the sum of numbers 3ඍ-3ඏ in line 3ඊ. Submit diagrams with dimensions and square footage calculations per Section 6B. 2ඊ: Enter the sum of numbers 2උ-2ඍ in line 2ඊ. Submit diagrams with dimensions and square footage calculations per Section 6A. Total existing building coverage Total existing impervious surfaces Existing building coverage to be removed 2ඉ ඕඑඖඝඛ 2ඊ Existing impervious surfaces to be removed New building coverage to be added New impervious surfaces to be added Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. ඔ඗ග ඉකඍඉ ච .25 = ඔ඗ග ඉකඍඉ x .3 (ඔ඗ග ඉකඍඉ x .16) + 800 ඔ඗ග ඉකඍඉ x .2 *For single family attached dwellings, the maximum impervious surface allowed is: 100 + (.35 x lot area) code §153.068(C) code §153.068(B) code §153.033 336 Abbotsford Road, Kenilworth, Illinois 17,500 100' 175' 3,600 3,473 N/A 4,375 3,600 3,473 127 0 4,502 3,617 146 3,619 146 3,471 73 Building | Planning Division 419 Richmond Rd. Kenilworth, IL 60043 E: community@vok.org P: 847-251-1666 x5253 ZONING COMPLIANCE WORKSHEET ඘ඉඏඍ 2 ඗ඎ 4 ZONING CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7/12/2023 - - + 4උ 4ඌ 4ඍ 4ඎ = = 4ඊ Floor Area: Total Existing to remain + Proposed 4ඉ Floor Area: Maximum Allowed 4: Fඔ඗඗ක Aකඍඉ New building or substantial alteration built after 10/22/2005 Existing buildings built on or before 10/22/2005 Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. 4ඉ: Complete the appropriate calculation for the building type and enter product in line 4ඉ 4ඊ: Enter the sum of 4උ through 4ඎ in line 4ඊ. Submit diagrams with dimensions and square footage calculations per Section 6C. Total existing fl oor area Subtract existing fl oor area to be removed Subtract Zoning Credit (see Section 5 for description of applicable areas). Add proposed new fl oor area Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. (ඔ඗ග ඉකඍඉ x .21) + 1,200 (ඔ඗ග ඉකඍඉ x .24) + 1,200 ඘ක඗ඒඍඋග ඉඌඌකඍඛඛ §153.068(A) * Additional sections of village code regulate distance of new impervious surfaces to lot lines and/or the public right of way. Principal Building: distance to lot line Air conditioning units: distance to lot line Roof overhang Accessory Structure (includes detached garage) Other outdoor electrical equipment Other impervious surfaces* Front Side Side SideSide Side Side SideSide Rear Rear RearRear Distance to nearest lot line Distance to nearest lot line Height from grade Height Height Installed at grade? Installed at grade? Y N Y N Y N Y N Y N Screened from street view? Wall mounted? Screened from street view? ක඗඗ඎඍඌ ඛගකඝඋගඝකඍඛ ඉඔඔ ඗ගඐඍක ඍ඙ඝඑ඘ඕඍඖග + ඛඝකඎඉඋඍඛ Complete the appropriate information for the proposed scope of work. Submit with site plan or annotated survey showing dimensions to lot line. 5: Rඍ඙ඝඑකඍඌ Mඑඖඑඕඝඕ Yඉකඌඛ + Bඝඑඔඌඑඖඏ Hඍඑඏඐග §153.067 + §153.070 + 153.085* 336 Abbotsford Road, Kenilworth, Illinois 5,400 146 N/A 5,862 6,008 (Village Information) No change in building height and side yards 74 Building | Planning Division 419 Richmond Rd. Kenilworth, IL 60043 E: community@vok.org P: 847-251-1666 x5253 ZONING COMPLIANCE WORKSHEET ඘ඉඏඍ 3 ඗ඎ 4 ZONING CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7/12/2023 ඍචඑඛගඑඖඏ + ඌඍඕ඗ ඊඝඑඔඌඑඖඏ උ඗ඞඍකඉඏඍ ඘ක඗඘඗ඛඍඌ ඖඍඟ ඊඝඑඔඌඑඖඏ උ඗ඞඍකඉඏඍ 6: Dඑඉඏකඉඕඛ ඉඖඌ Cඉඔඋඝඔඉගඑ඗ඖඛ Instructions: Diagrams + calculations showing existing conditions, demolition, and proposed conditions are required for all submissions. 1. Attach plans or diagrams showing existing conditions, area s to be demolished, and proposed additions 2. Identify each area with either a letter or number that is keyed to calculations showing the dimensions and total square footages. 3. Whenever possible, use either a graphic or color key to di ff erentiate areas on a diagram 4. Calculations are required showing how the square footages were determined. 5. Separate diagrams and calculations are to be included for each of the following: a. Building Coverage b. Other Impervious Surfaces c. Floor Area Graphic and color keys used in sample diagrams: 6ඉ: BUILDING COVERAGE: SAMPLE DIAGRAMS + CALCULATIONS Defi nition: Building Coverage includes all roofed structures + areas on the fi rst fl oor and at grade level; see Village zoning code for further information. (i.e. principal + accessory structures, roofed entries + porc hes, second fl oor projections, carports, gazebos, etc). Excludes Porte Cochere. Demo Area Description w l sq.ft. sq.ft. A Garage 21.95 19.90 436.81 B House 14.80 8.75 129.50 C House - Demo 14.58 11.92 173.79 173.79 D house 1.00 6.50 6.50 E house 35.77 26.06 932.17 F uncovered porch 8.95 4.00 35.80 1714.56 173.79 173.79 1540.77 Area Description w l sq.ft. H House - 1 story 5.00 1.50 7.50 J House - 1 story 14.50 7.75 112.38 K House - 1 story 7.00 16.25 113.75 L House - 1 story 8.50 4.25 36.13 M House - 1 story 13.50 3.75 50.63 N House - 2 story 13.50 8.25 111.38 431.75 1972.52 Total Proposed Bldg.Cov. Total Existing Bldg.Cov. Total Existing Bldg.Cov. to be demolished Total Existing Bldg.Cov. to remain Total Existing Building Coverage Total Proposed Building Coverage Total Existing to remain + proposed Building Coverage ඏකඉ඘ඐඑඋ ඓඍඡ: —›ÃÊ Ä›ó උ඗ඔ඗ක ඓඍඡ: yellow red green ›ø®Ýã®Ä¦ —›ÃÊ Ä›ó SAMPLE DIAGRAMS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS ›ø®Ýã®Ä¦ 75 Building | Planning Division 419 Richmond Rd. Kenilworth, IL 60043 E: community@vok.org P: 847-251-1666 x5253 ZONING COMPLIANCE WORKSHEET ඘ඉඏඍ 4 ඗ඎ 4 ZONING CALCULATION WORKSHEET 7/12/2023 ඍචඑඛගඑඖඏ + ඌඍඕ඗ ඎඔ඗඗ක ඘ඔඉඖ ඍචඑඛගඑඖඏ + ඌඍඕ඗ ඛඑගඍ ඘ඔඉඖ ඘ක඗඘඗ඛඍඌ ඎඔ඗඗ක ඘ඔඉඖ ඘ක඗඘඗ඛඍඌ ඛඑගඍ ඘ඔඉඖ Defi nition: Floor Area includes the areas listed below, see Village zoning code for further information: Principal Building fl oor area - Basement: any areas that are used for automobile st orage and/or garage. - First fl oor: all areas included under Building Cov erage section - see example diagram + calculations - Second fl oor: all area except half stories above the fi rst story with a fl oor to ceiling height of less than 5 ft. - Third fl oor: excludes half stories above the second fl oor Accessory Structures fl oor area - First fl oor and grade levels: all areas included under Building Coverage section. - Excludes half stories above the fi rst fl oor Zoning Credits for the following fl oor areas in single family homes where both the home and feature existed before 6/22/1990 - Bay windows, open porches, and covered entries. 6උ FLOOR AREA: SAMPLE DIAGRAMS + CALCULATIONS 6: Dඑඉඏකඉඕඛ ඉඖඌ Cඉඔඋඝඔඉගඑ඗ඖඛ Required for all submissions Area Description w l sq.ft. Total Floor Area Floor 1 1714.56 173.79 1540.77 Floor 2 P 14.80 8.33 123.28 Q 35.77 26.48 947.19 R 13.50 5.25 70.88 1070.47 S 13.50 8.25 111.38 111.38 1181.85 ϮϳϮϮ͘ϲϮTotal existing to remain + new Floor Area Existing 1st Floor Area Exist. to remain 1st Floor ^ĞĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽǀĞƌĂŐĞ Total Existing 2nd Floor Area Total New 2nd Floor Area Total Existing to remain + new 2nd Floor Area Demo 1st Floor Area 6ඊ OTHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: SAMPLE DIAGRAMS + CALCULATIONS Defi nition: Other Impervious Surfaces includes all impermeable areas not listed under Building Coverage, (i.e. driveways, walkways, patios, decks). Includes Porte Coc here. See Village zoning code for further information. Demo Area Description w l sq.ft. sq.ft. A a/c pad 3.00 2.00 6.00 B stone steppers 54.80 C driveway 1578.10 D stoop 14.40 8.78 126.43 1 demo - edging 28.50 28.50 2 demo - edging 15.60 15.60 3 demo - patio 618.80 618.80 4 demo - steppers 19.40 19.40 5 demo - walkway 25.50 7.75 197.63 197.63 2431.00 879.93 879.93 1551.08 Area Description w l sq.ft. Ee d ge + stepper 31.10 Fe d ging 36.00 Ge d ging 13.80 H patio 670.50 J walkway 270.00 1021.40 2572.48 irregular Total Proposed Other Impervious Surfaces irregular irregular irregular irregular irregular irregular irregular irregular irregular irregular Total Existing to remain + proposed Other Impervious Surfaces Total Existing Other Impervious Surfaces tal Existing Other Impervious. to be demolished Total Existing Other Impervious to remain Total Proposed Impervious Surfaces Total Existing Other Impervious Surfaces SAMPLE DIAGRAMS SAMPLE DIAGRAMS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 76 77 10'-3" x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 35.0' REAR YARD 175.00' 10.0' SIDE YARD 175.00' FRAME GARAGE 10.0' SIDE YARD FRAME GARAGE STUCCOGARAGE CONCRETE WALK WOOD FENCE 2 1/2 STORY FRAME HOUSE WITH BASEMENT #336 40.0' FRONT YARD ASPHALT DRIVEWAY CONCRETE WALK ASPHALT DRIVEWAY PATIO WOOD FENCE 52'-5" 76'-5" 2 STORY FRAME GARAGE 100.00' 100.00' TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE AREADESCRIPTIONS.F. ABUILDING4,994.81 BGARAGE867.024 TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE5,862.04 EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED0 TOTAL EXIST. BLDG COVERAGE TO REMAIN 5,862 S.F. MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/16" = 1'- 0" EXISTING SITE PLAN DATE: 07/10/2026 78 10'-3" x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 35.0' REAR YARD 175.00' 10.0' SIDE YARD 175.00' FRAME GARAGE 10.0' SIDE YARD FRAME GARAGE STUCCOGARAGE CONCRETE WALK WOOD FENCE 2 1/2 STORY FRAME HOUSE WITH BASEMENT #336 40.0' FRONT YARD ASPHALT DRIVEWAY CONCRETE WALK ASPHALT DRIVEWAY PATIO TO REMAIN WOOD FENCE 52'-5" 76'-5" 2 STORY FRAME GARAGE 100.00' 100.00' DEMO DECK AND STAIRS FRONT PORCH TO REMAIN DEMO DECK AND STAIRS MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/16" = 1'- 0" DEMOLITION SITE PLAN DATE: 07/10/2026 79 10'-3" x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 35.0' REAR YARD 175.00' 10.0' SIDE YARD 175.00' FRAME GARAGE 10.0' SIDE YARD FRAME GARAGE STUCCOGARAGE CONCRETE WALK WOOD FENCE EXISTING 2 1/2 STORY FRAME HOUSE WITH BASEMENT #336 40.0' FRONT YARD ASPHALT DRIVEWAY CONCRETE WALK ASPHALT DRIVEWAY EXISTING PATIO WOOD FENCE 52'-5" 62'-4 1/2" EXISTING 2 STORY FRAME GARAGE NEW TERRACE AND STAIRS PROPOSED ADDITION 100.00' 100.00' 54'-0 1/2" A B AB 3'-6 1/2" 9'-6" 10'-11 1/2" 10'-3" TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE AREADESCRIPTIONWLS.F. 13.559.533.725 210.9510.25112.24 TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE146 S.F. EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE5862.04 S.F. TOTAL EXISTING TO REMAIN +PROPOSED6008.04 S.F. MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/16" = 1'- 0" PROPOSED SITE PLAN DATE: 07/10/2026 80 DINING ROOMFOYER LIVING ROOM STUDY KITCHEN PATIO DN UP _ UP CLOSET DN DN DN DN _DN DN REAR FOYER BREAKFAST FAMILY ROOM MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN DATE: 07/10/2026 81 DINING ROOMFOYER LIVING ROOM STUDY KITCHEN PATIO DN UP _ UP CLOSET DN DN DN DN _DN DN REAR FOYER BREAKFAST FAMILY ROOM DEMO EXISTING DECK AND STAIRS DEMO EXISTING STONE COLUMN DEMO EXISTING DECK AND STAIRS DEMO EXISTING INTERIOR STRUCTURES AS SHOWN DEMO EXISTING INTERIOR STRUCTURES AS SHOWN DEMO EXISTING INTERIOR STRUCTURES AS SHOWN EXISTING TO REMAIN MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" DEMOLITION FIRST FLOOR PLAN DATE: 07/10/2026 82 DRESSER DN GUEST BEDROOM FOYER LIVING ROOM DINING ROOM KITCHEN PATIO DN UP _ UP CLOSET DN DN _ DN DN BREAKFAST FAMILY ROOM FREEZER PANTRY REF PRODUCTTRADENAMEMODELNUMBER SINK SINK RANGE SHOWER PIANO LINEN PRODUCTTRADENAMEMODELNUMBER WET BAR CLOSETCLOSET CUBBIES COUNTERTOP DN WOOD DECK MUDROOM BATHROOM BEV REF CLOSET DN HALL 3'-6 1/2" 9'-5 5/8" ADDITION 10'-11 1/2" 10'-3" ADDITION 10'-11" WOOD DECK 3'-3" 3'-0" 3'-2 5/8" 3'-7 1/2" 3'-0" 3'-7 1/2" MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN DATE: 07/10/2026 83 T/FIN. SECOND FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. THIRD FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. FLR. EL. +0'-0" T/FAMILY RM. FIN FLR EL. +1'-0"T/FNDN EL. +3'-5 1/2" STONE BASE, TYP. T/NEW BASMNT. FTG EL. -10'-8" COPPER ROOF OVER DSPOUT TYP. GUTTER CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF, TYP. STONE CHIMNEY MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" EXISTING EXTERIOR SOUTH ELEVATION DATE: 07/10/2026 84 T/FIN. SECOND FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. THIRD FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. FLR. EL. +0'-0" T/FAMILY RM. FIN FLR EL. +1'-0"T/FNDN EL. +3'-5 1/2" STONE BASE, TYP. T/NEW BASMNT. FTG EL. -10'-8" TYP. GUTTER CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF, TYP. STONE CHIMNEY COPPER ROOF OVER MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" EXISTING EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION DATE: 07/10/2026 85 T/FIN. SECOND FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. THIRD FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. FLR. EL. +0'-0" T/FAMILY RM. FIN FLR EL. +1'-0"T/FNDN EL. +3'-5 1/2" T/NEW BASMNT. FTG EL. -10'-8" DEMO EXISTING DECK AND STAIRS DEMO EXISTING STONE COLUMN DEMO EXISTING WALL DEMO EXISTING DECK AND STAIRS MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" DEMO EXTERIOR SOUTH ELEVATION DATE: 07/10/2026 86 T/FIN. SECOND FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. THIRD FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. FLR. EL. +0'-0" T/FAMILY RM. FIN FLR EL. +1'-0"T/FNDN EL. +3'-5 1/2" T/NEW BASMNT. FTG EL. -10'-8" DEMO EXISTING DECK AND STAIRS DEMO EXISTING DECK AND STAIRS DEMO EXISTING DOOR AND TRANSOM MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" DEMO EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION DATE: 07/10/2026 87 T/FIN. SECOND FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. THIRD FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. FLR. EL. +0'-0" T/FAMILY RM. FIN FLR EL. +1'-0"T/FNDN EL. +3'-5 1/2" STONE BASE, TYP. T/NEW BASMNT. FTG EL. -10'-8" COPPER ROOF OVER DOWNSPOUT TYP. GUTTER CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF, TYP. STONE CHIMNEY NEW ADDITION MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" PROPOSED EXTERIOR SOUTH ELEVATION DATE: 07/10/2026 88 T/FIN. SECOND FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. THIRD FLR. EL. MATCH EXISTING T/FIN. FLR. EL. +0'-0" T/FAMILY RM. FIN FLR EL. +1'-0"T/FNDN EL. +3'-5 1/2" STONE BASE, TYP. T/NEW BASMNT. FTG EL. -10'-8" TYP. GUTTER CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF, TYP. STONE CHIMNEY COPPER ROOF OVER NEW ADDITION MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'- 0" PROPOSED EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION DATE: 07/10/2026 89 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS T H E P R A C T I C E O F F I N E A R C H I T E C T U R E LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS 60045 P 847-295-2440 F 847-295-2451C 2026 MELICHAR ARCHITECTS 207 EAST WESTMINSTER JOB NO.: 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY CONLEY RESIDENCERENOVATIONS 336 ABBOTTSFORD ROAD KENILWORTH, IL SCALE: NTS PROPOSED EXTERIOR RENDERING DATE: 07/10/2026 90 91