Agenda & Packet

There will be a meeting of the Architectural Review Commission at Kenilworth Village Hall, 419 Richmond Road; Kenilworth, IL. The public may attend in person or by utilizing the following link: TEAMS MEETING LINK If you do not have access to a computer, you may attend via telephone: +1 872 242 8055 US (Chicago) Meeting ID: 652 208 505# Architectural Review Commission Meeting Agenda Wednesday, April 15, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. I. Call to Order / Roll Call II. Approval of Minutes A. March 2, 2026, Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting III. Regular Business A. Public Hearing to Consider the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to Install New Signage at 402 Green Bay Road B. Public Hearing to Consider the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Purpose of Façade Improvements and the Installation of Downlighting at 400- 408 Green Bay Road IV. Other Business V. Business from the Public Rules for Public Comment may be viewed at https://www.vok.org/DocumentCenter/View/1423/Rules-for-Public-Comment VI. Adjourn Village of The Village of Kenilworth is subject to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Individuals with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who require certain accommodations in order to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or who have questions regarding the accessibility of the meeting or the facilities are requested to contact Village Administration at 847-251-1666 promptly to allow the Village to make reasonable accommodations for those persons. 1 VILLAGE OF KENILWORTH, IL Architectural Review Commission Meeting Monday, March 2, 2026 Agenda Item I. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Architectural Review Commission of the Village of Kenilworth in the Kenilworth Village Hall, Kenilworth, Illinois, was held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, March 2, 2026. Management Analyst Jordan Schmidt called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Attendance was as follows: Architectural Review Commissioners Present: Chip Hackley Present Paul Armstrong Present Paul Ozga Present Gunta Cepuritis Present Erin Paul Absent Joel Joyce Present John Pilant Present (online) A quorum was present. Other Recorded as in Attendance: Village Officials and Staff: Kathy Thake Village Manager Heather McFarland Assistant to the Village Manager Jordan Schmidt Management Analyst Michael Blue Teska, Village Planner Megan Mack Ancel Glink, Village Attorney Others, Signing In: Jeanne Keiler Eric Miller Alice Read Greg Kirrish Jennifer Swain Anne Bird Rob Wiebking Bill Tribe David Joyce Justin Kozlowski April Palin Marjie Zander Jolie Schwartz Dorthy Karr Henry Gaunaurd Chad Emigolz Rick Gordon Laura Fitzpatrick 2 Village of Kenilworth Architectural Review Commission 2 March 2, 2026 Laura Divecchio Ken Kaufman Louis Keiler Ian Fisher Matt Hogan Anna Simpson Boyd Zander J.T. Mohr Emily Wilson Lydia Barhight Cecile Fosco Leslie Burke Vivian Vahlberg 414-331-4064 Mr. Schmidt indicated that he was in receipt of a request from Chair Pilant to attend the meeting electronically in accordance with the Electronic Meeting Attendance Policy. As a quorum physically present, the Chair will be authorized to attend electronically unless a motion is made and passed by a two-thirds majority of those physically present to deny the request. Hearing no such motion, Mr. Schmidt deemed the Chair Present as a voting member. Due to the physical absence of Chair Pilant, an Acting Chair was required to be appointed. Commissioner Hackley volunteered to fill the role. Commissioner Cepuritis made a motion to approve the appointment. Commissioner Ozga seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken as follows: For: Armstrong, Ozga, Joyce, Cepuritis, Hackley, Pilant Opposed: None Abstain: None Absent: Paul The roll call tally was six votes in favor, and none opposed. Mr. Schmidt declared Commissioner Hackley the Acting Chair Agenda Item II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Acting Chair Hackley introduced the approval of the minutes from the previous meeting. Commissioner Joyce made a motion to approve January 21, 2026, Architectural Review Commission meeting minutes and Commissioner Armstrong seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken as follows: For: Armstrong, Ozga, Joyce, Cepuritis, Hackley, Pilant Opposed: None Abstain: None Absent: Paul The roll call tally was six votes in favor, and none opposed. Acting Chair Hackley declared the January 21, 2026, Architectural Review Commission meeting minutes approved. Agenda Item III. REGULAR BUSINESS a. Public Hearing to Consider the Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Purpose of Constructing a New Building at 515-519 Park Drive Remanded by Village Board 3 Village of Kenilworth Architectural Review Commission 3 March 2, 2026 Village Planner Michael Blue, Teska Associates, provided an overview of the application history, noting that the project has been reviewed at two Architectural Review Commission (ARC) meetings, two Plan Commission meetings, and two Village Board meetings. Mr. Blue summarized the Village Board’s decision to remand the application to both the ARC and the Plan Commission for additional review. He explained that the Village Board requested the commissions to: • Evaluate potential design modifications to mitigate the impact of the building’s height. These considerations may include, but are not limited to: o Removal of the penthouse o Adjustments to the fourth-floor setbacks o Elimination of the top floor o Exploration of a maximum building height of 40 feet • Provide feedback regarding the potential public benefits associated with the development proposal Mr. Blue also presented a brief overview of the applicant’s revised concept. The updated proposal eliminates the previously proposed commercial uses and instead consists entirely of residential units, with a maximum building height of 40 feet. The applicant, Michael Freiburger, then introduced the revised proposal in greater detail. Mr. Freiburger reviewed the feedback provided at the prior ARC meeting and summarized the various design iterations that had been considered. He presented the updated concept and discussed how, in his view, the proposal aligns with the key components of the Village’s design guidelines. Mr. Freiburger also outlined potential public benefits associated with the project. Among these was a proposed contribution toward enhancements to the Park Drive median to support its function as a community gathering space. Following the applicant’s presentation, the Commission began deliberations. Commissioner Armstrong asked several technical questions regarding floor-to-floor heights. Acting Chair Hackley acknowledged the applicant’s efforts to reduce the building height to 40 feet and stated that the overall scale was moving closer to what had been requested. He suggested further refinement of architectural elements to continue reducing perceived scale. Commissioner Ozga commented favorably on the design and expressed the view that the applicant had made meaningful efforts to reduce the building’s scale. Chair Pilant continued to express concern regarding the massing and scale of the building in relation to surrounding structures. He noted the complexity of transitioning between commercial and residential uses along the corridor. Commissioner Joyce raised concerns about setbacks along the remaining sides of the building and the potential for long, uninterrupted wall planes. Commissioner Armstrong commented on the “shed dormer” and the curved or “swooping” design element, suggesting these could be further set back to help reduce massing. He also suggested recessing the building entrance as a way to reduce perceived scale. Acting Chair Hackley stated that the building’s solid-to-void relationship helped mitigate massing concerns, a view with which Commissioner Ozga agreed. Commissioner Cepuritis stated that if the project is now exclusively residential, the design should more clearly reflect a residential character and better align with the surrounding context. He also inquired whether any portion of the building would overhang adjacent properties; Mr. Freiburger confirmed that it would not. Hearing no further discussion from the Commission, Acting Chair Hackley opened the meeting for public comment. David Joyce expressed concern regarding the application process, stating that residents did not have sufficient time to review the revised concept. Eric Miller, a rear neighbor, expressed concern 4 Village of Kenilworth Architectural Review Commission 4 March 2, 2026 about the building’s height and its visual impact on his backyard, stating that he was concerned about facing a large wall. Bill Tribe raised concerns about the procedural process and suggested that the application should restart. Alice Read questioned whether the proposed public benefits justified an increase in height from 35 feet to 40 feet. Justin Kozlowski stated that the design did not fit within Kenilworth and described it as overly modern. Rob Wiebking expressed continued concerns regarding massing and the design of the rear elevation, noting that it would directly affect his view and potentially impact alley traffic. April Palin stated that the design did not align with the historic character of the Village. Jeanne Keiler raised concerns about the proposed height and the perception that developers may be permitted to exceed standards that residents must follow. Marjie Zander expressed concerns regarding the application process, as well as the size and density of the development. She also stated that, in her view, the proposal does not meet the design guidelines. Vivian Vahlberg emphasized the importance of the rear elevation design and suggested exploring whether similar residential development could extend further down Park Drive. Mr. Freiburger responded to questions and comments from both the Commission and the public. He sought clarification on specific concerns and expressed openness to exploring additional design refinements, particularly regarding the rear elevation and potential modifications to address concerns about the building’s modern character. The Commission then discussed next steps and clarified what action or feedback was being requested at this meeting. Village Attorney Megan Mack and Mr. Blue provided guidance, reiterating that the matter had been remanded to the ARC at the direction of the Village Board to obtain additional feedback on the proposal. Ms. Mack posed the following question to the Commission: Are the reduced building height and proposed design in keeping with the intent of the design guidelines for the Green Bay Road Corridor? A straw poll was conducted. The results were as follows: • Yes: Hackley • No: Joyce, Armstrong, Ozga, Cepuritis, and Pilant Ms. Mack requested that the Commission provide specific, actionable feedback to be forwarded to the Plan Commission and Village Board. The Commission identified the following areas for further exploration: 1. The design was described as overly “crisp”; consider incorporating more traditional Tudor elements to soften the appearance. 2. If the building is exclusively residential, the architectural character should more clearly reflect a residential design while maintaining an appropriate transition along the corridor. 3. Explore alternative designs or modifications to the shed dormer. 4. Revisit the “swoop” design element to address massing concerns. 5. Consider additional step-backs for residential portions of the building. 6. Provide more detailed information regarding the rear elevations. 7. Explore reducing ceiling heights to approximately 8 feet to 8 feet 6 inches to further reduce overall building height and massing. 8. Consider recessing the lobby entrance. 9. Evaluate the incorporation of horizontal banding within the window bays. 10. Explore asymmetrical design elements to further break up the building’s mass and reduce perceived scale. 5 Village of Kenilworth Architectural Review Commission 5 March 2, 2026 Hear no further discussion, Commission Cepuritis made a motion to close the public hearing. Commissioner Joyce seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken as follows: For: Armstrong, Ozga, Joyce, Cepuritis, Pilant, Hackley Opposed: None Abstain: None Absent: Paul The roll call tally was six votes in favor, and none opposed. Acting Chair Hackley declared the public hearing closed. Agenda Item IV. OTHER BUSINESS None. Agenda Item IV. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC None. Agenda Item V. ADJOURN Acting Chair Hackley made a motion to adjourn and Commissioner Joyce seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken as follows: For: Armstrong, Ozga, Cepuritis, Joyce, Pilant, Hackley Opposed: None The roll call vote was six in favor, and none opposed. Acting Chair Hackley declared the meeting adjourned at 9:33 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Jordan Schmidt Management Analyst 6 Request for Recommendation Agenda Item: III.A Staff Contact: Jordan Schmidt, Management Analyst Andrew Dunham, Teska Associates, Inc. Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness – 402 Green Bay Road Petitioners: Melissa Cook of Lucky Lane Gifts, LLC Tenant: Lucky Lane Gifts, LLC Owner: Jim Nash of Farnsworth-Hill, Inc. Location: 402 Green Bay Road Zoning: B Business District Requested Action: Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness Purpose: Construction of exterior black awning displaying the business name, installation of two window signs, and logo sign on the door. Applicable Regulations: Kenilworth Zoning Ordinance §153.242 Certificates of Appropriateness Summary: The Petitioner, Melissa Cook, seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a new black canvas valance on the existing awning with the business name, “LUCKY LANE GIFTS”, in serif lettering on the front façade facing Green Bay Road and projecting over the sidewalk. Additional signage includes gold vinyl window signage with the text “MONOGRAMS” and “GIFTS” in sans serif lettering near the bottom of the business’s storefront windows; on the business’s door, a window sign displaying the business’s website in matching gold sans serif font is proposed, as well as a circular business logo. The proposed window signage would be located on the front façade of the building. This proposal utilizes the existing black awning, replacing the valance to create a cohesive black awning. A nearby business, M+M Interior Design at 406 Green Bay Road, has similar existing signage, with a black awning and valance, with white text displaying the business name on the valance. Considered By: Date: Architectural Review Commission 04/15/2026 Village of 7 Master Sign Plan Village Code also requires a master sign plan for buildings with multiple occupants. This proposal reuses an existing awning and replaces the existing white valance with a black one to create more cohesion with other occupants of this building. Whereas most window signage in this building utilizes white sans serif text, the US Post Office (another occupant of this building, at 408 Green Bay Road) utilizes gold text. Any additional exterior signage proposed in the future will be assessed for compatibility with the proposed signage. Applicable Sign Standards: The applicable regulations of the Kenilworth Sign Code are as follows. Specification Requirement Proposed Sign §153.051(E) A logo on a sign is limited to no more than 15% of the total sign area. Total Proposed Logo Size COMPLIANT; .75 sq. ft. of logo is proposed (15% of 5 sq. ft. total) §153.052(B)(1) Permanent commercial message signs in the B District must be oriented toward Green Bay Road or Park Drive COMPLIANT; Proposed signage is oriented toward Green Bay Road §153.052(B)(3)(b) Front Façade Area 321.8 square feet Total Combined Sign Area Permitted The lesser or 7.5% of the total area of the front façade or 25 square feet, for each occupant in a multi-occupant building. 24.13 square feet* Total Proposed Combined Sign Area COMPLIANT; 5 sq. ft. sign area proposed §153.052(B)(7)(b) The letters on an awning shall be placed on the front descending skirt only and shall not exceed six inches in height COMPLIANT; lettering is situated on the valance of the awning at a height of 4.5 inches §153.052(B)(7)(c) Awnings with or without signs shall be constructed and erected so that the lowest portion of the projecting frame and descending skirt shall not be less than seven feet six inches above the level of the sidewalk or ground located below the awning. COMPLIANT; awning valance is a replacement of existing, approved valance §153.052(B)(7)(d) Awning signs shall be limited to only the regular operating name of the occupant’s business, organization or entity and the street address numbers of the building to which the awning is attached. COMPLIANT; awning sign displays the business’s name §153.052(C)(2) Design Criteria for Permanent Commercial Message and Institutional Signs The proposed sign is designed and installed in a safe manner, utilizing high- quality materials, appropriate colors, appropriately limited graphic elements and wording, and not covering architectural elements of the building. Sign will consist of a black fabric awning with white lettering; limited window signage will employ gold vinyl sans serif lettering. *Calculation was derived using a previous Certificate of Appropriateness application for the same storefront 8 Required Action: Consideration of the required Certificate of Appropriateness approval. Architectural Review Commission Action: The Architectural Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Certificate of Appropriateness. Example Motions for Consideration: I move that the Certificate of Appropriateness, as requested by Melissa Cook of Lucky Lane Gifts, LLC, to install a sign as shown in the Sign Plans prepared by Fast Signs and Acme Awning Company be approved. I move that consideration of the Certificate of Appropriateness, as requested by Melissa Cook of Lucky Lane Gifts, LLC, to install a sign as shown in the Sign Plans prepared by Fast Signs and Acme Awning Company be deferred until ________(date) to allow the applicant additional time to respond to comments heard this evening. Attachments: • Certificate of Appropriateness Application – 402 Green Bay Road • 402 Green Bay Road Proposed Signage Proposed Signage: Proposed awning signage (text area will be 4.5 in. tall by 63 in. wide) 9 Proposed window signage Proposed door signage (note: logo size will be reduced to a square footage of 0.75 sq. ft.) 10 Existing Building Photos: Existing Building, featuring awning signage from previous tenant and leasing signage. 11 2 ARCHITECTURALREVIEWCOMMISSION CERTIFICATEOFAPPROPRIATENESS PropertyAddress: qoDate:___________ ApplicantInformation Applicant: NameS3CA,Coo’— AddressU)()Gd Phone/FaxI--0 TenantIBusinesslnformalion(ifdifferentthanApplicant): NameC. Addressd5VI-e()((O1 Phone/Fax3iq(O ProperlyOwnerlnfo,mation(ifdifferentthanTenantlBusiness): Name\1\( AddressC)CUCI\,*c Phone/Fax333C) Consultants(asapplicable): Name _______________ Address ________________ Phone/Fax ________________ 419RichmondRoadPhone:847-251-1666 Kenilworth,IL60043Fax:847-251-3908 E-mail:info@vok.org ,k./Witvle#r( (fjCf/ —- -— ci .i(oôoI 12 ApplicationRequirements 1.Submit12copiesoftheapplicableitemsontheCertificateofAppropriatenessApplication SubmissionChecklistattached. 2.DescriptionofProject: JLk)vn-tccJ—F\Jcacfv7O°vcrr,- \cC\cUC(i?*/u/CCryIi’ -Ecockr(OO1.A-o{jMi(,PJ-(-11’-fkrs/Li)a1?JcCV7 R1jOuY(epC-ts’1iis-ro1d1’ k{A..Qb(’)ffryy12f+I/ULJ(ThdOVlL/(/(J&)‘1(‘/(/1i“/4(YO9fl14’7// arck&‘ñ(1J4-7-LI 3.ApplicationAcknowledgements: Byexecutionofthisapplicationinthespaceprovidedbelow,theapplicant,tenant/businessor ownerdoherebycertify,acknowledge,agreeandaffirmtotheVillageofKenilworththatthe informationcontainedinthisapplicationistrueandcorrect. Signature __________ Name Date&(CF) CertificateofAppropriatenessProcess: Afterthisapplicationandallnecessarymaterialsaresubmitted,theapplicationwillbeputonthe docketforanArchitecturalReviewCommission(ARC)meeting.Itisrecommendedthatthe applicationbesubmitted45dayspriortotheARCmeeting.TheVillagewillprovidetheApplicantwith anotificationpacketcontaininganoticetobedeliveredtoallpropertyownerslivingwithin250feetof thepropertyandtheVillagewillpublishalegalnoticeinalocalnewspaper.Notificationsmustbe donenotlessthan15daysormorethan30daysinadvanceofthepublichearingdate.Applicants shouldexpectahearingwithin60daysofsubmittinganapplication.Allapplicantsareencouragedto readtheKenilworthZoningOrdinance. CallCommunityDevelopmentDepartmentat(847)251-1666oremailcommunityvok.orgwithany questions. 2 13 StatementofIntent:LuckyLaneGifts To:VillageofKenilworthBuildingDepartment/ArchitecturalReviewBoard From:LuckyLaneGifts Date:February26,2026 Subject:ProposalforExteriorSignageandAwningat402GreenBayRoad DearMembersoftheBoard, ThisletterservesasaformalStatementofIntentforproposedexteriorimprovementsat LuckyLaneGifts.Asanewlocalbusiness,wearecommittedtocontributingtothevibrant andsophisticatedatmosphereofKenil.worth.Ourgoalistoimplementhigh-quality, tastefulbrandingthatalignswiththeVillage’sarchitecturalstandards. 1.NewAwningInstalLation WeproposetheinstallationofanewfabricvalIancetobeaddedbelowthecurrentblack awning. •Design&MateriaL:ThematerialisblackSunbrellafabricwithwhiteLettering,fontis CalifornianFBBoldin4.25”.Bottomtrimwillhavea“GreekKey”scallopededgein white.Seeattachedmockup. •Purpose:Theawningisintendedtoprovideshadeforourwindowdisplays,offer weatherprotectionforpedestrians,andenhancethestorefront’svisualappeal. Alongwithnamerecognition. •Dimensions:Themeasurementsare262”totalLength(includingsides)x8”height. 2.WindowLetteringandGraphics Tocomplementtheawning,weproposetheapplicationofvinylletteringtothestorefront windowstoidentifythebusiness. •Content:TheletteringwilifeaturetheLuckyLaneGiftslogoonthemaindooralong withoutwebsiteatthebottom.Inaddition,thewords,“Monograms”&“Gifts”willbe addedtothebottomofthefront2retailwindows.TheLuckyLaneGiftsLogowillbe inourbrandedcolors,withtheadditionallettersinagoldfoil.Seeattached mockup. •Measurements:Belowarethemeasurementsofeachdesign: o“Monograms”38.79”wx3.625”h 14 o“Gifts”19.65”wx3.625”h oLogo—14”round o“www.LuckyLaneGifts”—fitwidthofglassdoorx2”height Conclusion Webelievetheseenhancementswillprovideawelcomingentranceforourcustomers whilerespectingthehistoricandaestheticintegrityofKenilworth.Allmaterialsusedwillbe ofprofessionalgradeandinstalledbylicensedcontractors. ThankyouforyourtimeandforwelcomingLuckyLaneGiftstothecommunity.Welook forwardtoyourfeedback. Sincerely, MelissaCook LuckyLaneGifts,Owner LucJkytneGifts@grnaL[.corn 314-561-2083 15 I t i• 16 17 18 FA5TSIGNS MakeYourStatemenr fastsigns.com/2130 A50%depositoftotalinvoiceamount($150minimum)isrequiredtobegin productionunlessotherarrangementshavebeenmadeandagreedupon. THISESTIMATEISVALIDFOR30DAYS IfFileSetup!Layoutisaserviceyou’verequested,youareallowedupto3proof revisions.Onceexhausted,youwillbeinvoicedin15-minuteincrementsforany additionalrevisions. Approvalsorpermitsrequiredbythevillage,landlord,orpropertymanager, etc.aretheresponsibilityofthecustomer.FASTSIGNSofSkokiecantakecare ofallpermitsforanadditionalfee. INSTALLATIONORDERS:TheproposalincludesMATERIALSandINSTALLATION. PricingassumesCLEARACCESSforinstallationequipmentandpersonnel.Itis assumedthatthearea,surface,sub-surface,windows,andoverhead conditionsarenormal,andgroundsub-surfacesoilisreadilyworkable.Should OBSTRUCTIONSbeencountered(ie:furniture,partitions,personnel,rock, constructiondebris,frozenground,concrete,water,hard-pan,dirt/grimeor otherobstacles,hiddenobstaclesinorbehindwallsorotherimpediments),or ifCHANGESaremadeaftertheapprovaltotheinstallationparameters previouslyagreedupon,PRICINGMAYINCREASEandwillbedependenton additionaltime,materialandequipmentrequirements.Thispricingincreaseis theresponsibilityofthepurchaser. NOTE:Iftheclient’ssignrequireselectricalhookup,itistheresponsibilityof theclienttomakesureliveelectricisavailableandrunningtotheinstallation sitepriortothescheduledinstallation. ESTIMATE6Ud EST-8468 PaymentTerms:CashCustomer CreatedDate:2/20/2026 DESCRIPTION:LuckyLaneGifts-(1)14’PrintedVinylLogoDecal+(1)CutVinylWebAddress’+(2)GoldCutVinylWords‘Monograms BillTo:Walk-in-103401-Skokie,IL402GreenBayRd 3437DempsterSt.Kenilworth,IL60093 Skokie,1L60076us US RequestedBy:MelissaCookSalesperson:KimHackl Email:luckylanegifts@gmail.comEmail:kim.hackl@fastsigns.com NO.ProductSummaryQTYUNITPRICEAMOUNT LuckyLaneGifts-(1)14”PrintedVinylLogoDecal+(1)Cut 1Vinyl‘WebAddress”+(2)GoldCutVinylWords1$638.50$638.50 “Monograms’!“Gifts-i-FileSetup-I-Installation Subtotal: Taxes: $638.50 $20.09 GrandTotal:$658.59 spJBic9L‘sel4osC9l. WOOl!M uec:. sepaa.‘sioloDI’.‘Seq!SC9[:(9i).x Page1of2 GeneratedOn:2/23/20268:40AM 19 ESTIMATE AcmeAwningCompanyLLCAcmeAwning@att.net 3080SkokieValleyRoadUnit4+1(847)4460153 /ciiie HighlandPark,IL60035www.AcmeAwning0nline.com EST.1935 Co. BilltoShipto Melissa Cook Melissa Cook Lucky Lane Gifts, LLC Lucky Lane Gifts, LLC 402 Green Bay Rd 402 Green Bay Rd Wilmette, IL 60091 Wilmette, IL 60091 Estimate details Estimate no.: 2275 Estimate date: 02/13/2026 Date Product or service Description Qty Rate Amount 1. Valance Price to build new valance is 1 $993.05 $993.05 customers choice of premium outdoor acrylic cloth. Includes Lucky Lane Gifts text on valance. Price includes washing of existing awning. Dimensions: 1510”Widthx3’Projectionx8”Height inRomanstyle(seemockupfor approval) 2.AwningRecoverPricetorecovermainbodyofawning1$0.00$0.00 (add$300tototal$1293.05) Total $993.05 Note to customer We love to partnerwith our local businesses, so be sure to ask aboutourPRICEMATCHguarantee! *50%Depositdueatsigning* *Signature of estimate includes approval of any attached rendering/mockup/awningdesign.Additionalfeesmayapplyfor added changes to graphic design. *Permitsaretheresponsibilityofthecustomer,unlessagreedupon betweenAcmeAwningCo.andcustomer* *AllPermitsandFeesaretheresponsibilityofthepurchaser* *Allelectricalworkistheresponsibilityofthepurchaser* Serviceislicensedandbonded.Allsalesarefinal. Bysigningonthelinebelowyouareagreeingtoprice,termsand servicesofferedbyAcmeAwningCo,Inc. Anysuppliedrenderingshavebeenreviewedandareapprovedby customer. 20 Request for Recommendation Agenda Item: III.B Staff Contact: Jordan Schmidt, Management Analyst Andrew Dunham, Teska Associates, Inc. Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness – 400-408 Green Bay Road Petitioners: Jim Nash of Green Bay Enterprise, LLC c/o Farnsworth-Hill, Inc. Owner: Jim Nash of Farnsworth-Hill, Inc. Location: 400-408 Green Bay Road Zoning: B Business District Requested Action: Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness Purpose: Installation of downlighting at various locations along the façade. Applicable Regulations: Kenilworth Zoning Ordinance §153.242 Certificates of Appropriateness Summary: The Petitioner, Jim Nash of Farnsworth-Hill, Inc, seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness to install eighteen (18) lights along the front façade of the building facing Green Bay Road and Park Drive to illuminate the building’s architectural features. This illumination will not illuminate existing or proposed signage and therefore is subject to the Village’s Business District Design Guidelines rather than the Village’s Sign Code. Of the 18 lights proposed for the façade of 400-408 Green Bay Road, six (6) of which will consist of high wattage down lights located at the building peaks, eleven (11) will consist of high wattage flood lights for building elevations, and one (1) 600-watt multi-tap transformer with photocell. Proposed Lighting Specifications/Description: Specifications as provided by Jeff Hannah of Accents Lighting: My company has been contracted by Jim Nash to install low voltage lighting for the building on the corner of Green Bay Dr. and Considered By: Date: Architectural Review Commission 04/15/2026 Village of 21 Park Dr. This lighting is intended to light the façade of the building from the top down with a warm, low voltage light. We will be using two different fixtures for this installation. The flood down lights will be a 7- watt 3000 kelvin brass flood light. The spot down lights (for the higher peaks) will be a 12 to 18- watt 3000 kelvin brass spot light. The lighting will be hooded and will not bleed onto neighboring properties or streets. It is meant to provide a sense of safety and increase the aesthetics of the building at night. Lighting Inspiration Imagery: Inspiration imagery, provided by applicant. Kenilworth Business District Design Guidelines The Village Zoning Code does not specify lighting regulations for building facades when not illuminating signage. Therefore, signage should be assessed by its concurrence with the design guidance set forth by Kenilworth Business District Design Guidelines, adopted April 29, 2013. The applicable guidelines from Section J (Lighting) of the Design Guidelines document are listed below. • J (1): Appropriate and judicious lighting of a building’s façade is encouraged to identify stores and businesses, promote a sense of safety and security, and highlight prominent buildings and building features in the Business District. Excessive up-lighting shall be avoided to reduce light pollution. • J (2): Lighting shall be used to illuminate pedestrian and parking areas. • J (3): Lighting shall provide a sense of safety without having a negative effect on neighboring properties and shall be located, aimed, lamped, or shielded to minimize glare, sky glow, and stray light. Lights should not shine across property lines, especially along alleys and into residential neighborhoods. • J (5): Building lighting fixtures should be subtle and understated, and consistent with the architectural style of the Business District. 22 • J (8): Exterior lighting with an incandescent quality is encouraged, regardless of the lamp type, to create a warm atmosphere. Required Action: Consideration of the required Certificate of Appropriateness approval. Architectural Review Commission Action: The Architectural Review Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Certificate of Appropriateness. Example Motions for Consideration: I move that the Certificate of Appropriateness, as requested by Jim Nash of Farnsworth-Hill, LLC, to install exterior downlighting as detailed by Accents Lighting be approved. I move that consideration of the Certificate of Appropriateness, as requested by Jim Nash of Farnsworth-Hill, LLC, to install exterior downlighting as detailed by Accents Lighting be deferred until ________(date) to allow the applicant additional time to respond to comments heard this evening. Attachments: • Certificate of Appropriateness Application – 400-408 Green Bay Road • Proposed Lighting Locations • Proposed Lighting Specifications/Description • Lighting Inspiration Imagery 23 of ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS PropertyAddress:L4Ob(1)Date: ) L1/2t ApplicantInformation Applicant: Name G q Address 0-- Phone/Fax q - 3’ 0 Tenant/BusinessInformation(ifdifferentthanApplicant): Name C-v 4t( L(-(j Address q0 H- l (iLb *rAirzm Phone/Fax(Lii 2 %0 PropertyOwnerInformation(ifdifferentthanTenant/Business): Name ______________________________________ Address _________________________________ Phone/Fax __________________ Consultants(asapplicable): Name N/4 Address- Phone/Fax 419RichmondRoadPhone:847-251-1666 KenilworthIL60043Fax:847-251-3908 E-mail:info@vok.org L—L 7O’ Ns 4TL t0v1 24 Application Requirements ____ _________ ____________________ 1. Submit 12 copies of the applicable items on the Certificate of Appropriateness Application Submission Checklist attached. 2. Description of Project: kWtALL TNtkJJ1 1-1N(.. fN 3. Application Acknowledgements: By execution of this application in the space provided below, the applicant, tenant/business or owner do hereby certify, açknpwledge, agree and affirm to the Village of Kenilworth that the information contained n’(hi%’application is true and correct. ( SignatureNameDate Certificate of Appropriateness Process: After this application and all necessary materials are submitted, the application will be put on the docket for an Architectural Review Commission (ARC) meeting. It is recommended that the application be submitted 45 days prior to the ARC meeting. The Village will provide the Applicant with a notification packet containing a notice to be delivered to all property owners living within 250 feet of the property and the Village will publish a legal notice in a local newspaper. Notifications must be done not less than 15 days or more than 30 days in advance of the public hearing date. Applicants should expect a hearing within 60 days of submitting an application. All applicants are encouraged to read the Kenilworth Zoning Ordinance. Call Community Development Department at (847) 251-1666 or email communitycvok.orq with any questions. 2 25 Statement of Intent – 400 Green Bay Rd. The structure located at 400-408 Green Bay and 501-509 Park is an iconic building. The building has featured in print, television, film and social media. The purpose is to upgrade the structure with tuck pointing certain sections of the façade and enhance with lighting. The tuck pointing joints will be ground out to a depth of ½” , and then pointed with type N mortar and finished with tooled joints. The mortar will be matched to existing color and style. The lighting is intended to enhance the architectural details and significance of the structure. This will prominently display the ornamental features of the original construction. 26 V -I 27 2 -1 28 (C V j 29 I 30 , i.... f /i 4 ‘1. w 44 b 31 —1 --I 32 — /14 I ‘H 33 3/19/26 Good morning, Andrew, My company has been contracted by Jim Nash to install low voltage lighting for the building on the corner of Green Bay Dr. and Park Dr. This lighting is intended to light the façade of the building from the top down with a warm, low voltage light. We will be using two different fixtures for this installation. The flood down lights will be a 7-watt 3000 kelvin brass flood light. The spot down lights (for the higher peaks) will be a 12 to 18-watt 3000 kelvin brass spot light. The lighting will be hooded and will not bleed onto neighboring properties or streets. It is meant to provide a sense of safety and increase the aesthetics of the building at night. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you. Jeff Hannah Accents Lighting 34 LightingYourImagination 6HighWattageDownLightsforthebuildingpeaks$795.00$4,770.00 11HighWattageFloodLightsforthebuildingelevations$795.00$8,745.00 600WattMulti-TapTransformerwithphotocell$750.00$750.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ GrandTotalAllOptions:$14,265.00 Theaboveprices,specificationsaresatisfactoryandherebyaccepted.You’reauthorizedtodotheworkasspecified.Paymentsvillbemadeasoutlinedbelow.A servicechargeofI1/2%permontlisvilIheaddedtoallbalancesunpaidafter60daysfromthedateofnstaIlation.IntheeventthatcollectioncostsareincUrredto collectapastdliebalance,purchasershallberesponsibleftirallcollectioncosts,meltidingreasonableattorneyfees.Ifbalancesarenotpaidwithin180daysfromthe dateofinstallation,purchaserherebyauthorizesOutdoorAccents,Inc.toremoveanyandallistalleditemswithoutfurthernotice. Warranties: Proposal Acceptedby: OneYearLabor/ThreeYearsLEDLamps/LifeonTransformer&Lights ______________________Date Accepted: Name: UOTE E22-Jan-26 Farnsworth-HillInc.c/oJimNash 708ChurchSt. Address: City,StateZip: HomePhone: CellPhone: EmailAddress: Bidto:PropertyLocation (Ifdifferentfrombillto) EvanstonIL 847-328-3330 Bidby: Jeff ;worth-hiII.com 400GreenBayRd Kenilworth QuantityUnitPriceTotalPrice Terms 1/2down Lightingfor400GreenBayRd.:$ I2oncomoletion 571N.ChicagoStreetJolietIL60432IPhone:815-774-9185IFax877-539-0510 35 36 37 38 39