Agenda & Packet

There will be a special meeting of the Public Works Committee at Village Hall, 419 Richmond Road, Kenilworth, IL. The public may attend in person or by utilizing the following link: TEAMS MEETING If you do not have access to a compu ter, y ou may attend via telephone: +1 872-242-8055 Meeting ID: 907 780 741# Pu blic Works Committee Special Meeting Agenda March 19, 2026 at 4:00 p.m. I. Ca ll to Order / Roll Call II. Ap proval of Minutes A. De cember 18, 2025 III. Reg ular Scheduled Business 1. Dis cussion and Review of the Green Bay Road Enhancement Project Priorities Survey 2. Resolu tion Authorizing Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with the Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois for Green Bay Road Design Services for Phase I Engineering Study in the Amount Not to Exceed $432,000 3. Dis cussion and Recommendation Concerning the Approval of an Agreement to Provide Parking Study Services with TYLin 4.Discussion of an Ordinance Amending Kenilworth Code Sec. 150.196 as it Relates to Water Service Ownership 5. Upd ate of Outgoing Request for Proposals • Oxford Road Design Engineering • Abingdon, Robsart, & Tudor Water Main Design Engineering • Water Rate Study IV. Busin ess from the Public V. Adjo urn Village of 1 VILLAGE OF Public Works Committee Regular Meeting December 18, 2025 Agenda Item I. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Public Works Committee of the Village of Kenilworth in the Kenilworth Village Hall, Kenilworth, Illinois was held at 4:00 pm on Thursday, December 18, 2025. Acting Chair Gottschall called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. Attendance of the Commission was as follows: Trustee Christopher Ottsen Present, Remote Trustee Matt Lojkovic Present Acting Chair John Gottschall Present President Cecily Kaz Present A quorum was present. Other Recorded as in Attendance: Village Officials and Staff: Kathy Thake Village Manager Donny Leicht Public Works Superintendent Heather McFarland Assistant to the Village Manager Molly Burns Management Analyst Jordan Schmidt Management Analyst Agenda Item II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 25, 2025 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING Acting Chair Gottschall asked if any members of the Committee had any proposed changes to the minutes. Trustee Lojkovic made a motion to approve the August 25, 2025 Public Works Committee Meeting Minutes as presented, and Trustee Gottschall seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Agenda Item III.1. DISCUSSION CONCERNING LEAD SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENTS 2 Management Analyst Schmidt opened the discussion by first reviewing the takeaways from the March 19 and August 25 meetings, and provided updated information on the number of remaining lead service lines in Kenilworth, the requirements of LSLRNA, and the various cost sharing programs proposed by nearby communities. Management Analyst Schmidt provided the Committee with four different cost-sharing program options that range the financial commitment required of the Village versus the homeowner. Trustees quickly aligned on the belief that the Village should pay for any main replacement that is from the main to the valve and contribute a fixed amount to any resident who is replacing the portion of the line from the valve to the meter. Trustee Lojkovic asked if the fixed amount provided would increase over the years to keep pace with inflation, to which Management Analyst Schmidt responded that could be included in the policy development. Trustee Ottsen asked if an increase in water rates could generate the funds needed for the program, to which Management Analyst Schmidt responded that a water rate study is budgeted for FY26 and that option can be explored. Village Manager Thake provided that from an equity standpoint this could be difficult, as you would have all residents paying into the program when only a fraction of homes will benefit from the program. Village President Kaz agreed that avenue could be difficult. Trustee Ottsen then offered that the funds generated from an increased water rate could be set aside to fund the public portion specifically. Management Analyst Schmidt asked the Committee to provide formal direction on how to continue developing the policy. A motion was made to recommend to the Village Board of Trustees that (1) the Village Board approve a text amendment stating that the Village owns the water main infrastructure up to the valve, and that option one, where the Village will fund the replacement up to the valve and offer residents a fixed amount of $3,000 to replace their service lines from the valve to the meter, be recommended to the Board. Trustee Lojkovic provided the motion and Trustee Gottschall provided the second to the motion. A voice vote was taken as follows on the motion: Yea: Gottschall, Ottsen, Lojkovic Nay: None Absent: None Abstain: None Agenda Item IV. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC No members of the public expressed a desire to address the Committee. Agenda Item V. ADJOURN With no further business, Acting Chair Gottschall opened the floor to a motion to adjourn the meeting. Trustee Lojkovic offered a motion to adjourn the meeting and Trustee Gottschall seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken as follows on the motion: 3 Yea: Gottschall, Ottsen, Lojkovic Nay: None Absent: None Abstain: None The meeting concluded at 5:11 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Molly Burns Management Analyst 4 Request for Committee Action Agenda Item: III.1 Staff Contact: Kathy Thake, Administration Molly Burns, Administration Subject: Recommendation of the Green Bay Road Enhancement Project Priorities Summary: One of the goals outlined in the FY26 budget was to continue the review of the configuration of Green Bay Road within the business district and move forward with a Phase I Engineering Study. Before this phase begins, the Village Board requested that the project priorities be identified. With this goal in mind, a survey was developed with the intention of confirming the vision residents have for the future of the Business District. Staff now request the Public Works Committee to review the survey data and confirm the list of ranked priorities to the Village Board. Background of Matter: The Village Board and community at-large have considered various iterations of a Green Bay Road Enhancement project dating back to 2013. During one of these iterations, the 2022 Green Bay Road Corridor Strategic Visioning process, the Village surveyed residents to identify priorities for improvements within the Business District. The results of that survey indicated priorities such as gathering spaces, illumination, and sales tax-generating businesses. Amenities, including parking and multi-family housing, were not as important. In line with the 2026 budget goals, Phase 1 Engineering is set to begin later this spring. Before this next step commences, the Village Board has asked that the project priorities be reaffirmed. A survey developed to gauge this information was published on February 18 th and closed on March 11th. In total, 240 survey responses were collected. Below, the survey questions and the number of responses respective to each option are provided. The questions are listed in order of level of priority based on response data. 1. How important is it to beautify our business corridor to reflect the overall quality of our neighborhood? This could include things like shade trees, benches, planters and lighting. • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 13 • Neutral: 19 • Important/Very Important: 207 • Unsure/No Answer: 1 2. How important is walkability to our business corridor from any home in Kenilworth? This means that accessing the business corridor is safe, accessible, and has practical pedestrian connections. • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 18 • Neutral: 26 Considered By: Date: Public Works Committee 3/19/26 Village of 5 • Important/Very Important: 194 • Unsure/No Answer: 2 3. How important is it for the corridor to attract sales tax-generating businesses, such as retail stores and restaurants? • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 18 • Neutral: 33 • Important/Very Important: 188 • Unsure/No Answer: 1 4. How important is it for the business corridor to offer residents and visitors gathering spaces? This could include things like wider sidewalks, public plazas, farmers markets, or any space where people gather, connect, and foster community. • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 22 • Neutral: 33 • Important/Very Important: 182 • Unsure/No Answer: 3 5. How important is it for the business corridor to be well-illuminated for safety in the evening? • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 15 • Neutral: 43 • Important/Very Important: 180 • Unsure/No Answer: 2 6. How important is the availability of accessible parking when visiting the business corridor? • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 40 • Neutral: 57 • Important/Very Important: 142 • Unsure/No Answer: 1 7. How important is bikeability to the business corridor from any home in Kenilworth? • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 65 • Neutral: 67 • Important/Very Important: 106 • Unsure/No Answer: 2 8. How important is it to have high-quality multi-family housing in the business corridor? This could mean apartments, townhomes, and/or luxury condominiums. • Very Unimportant/Unimportant: 116 • Neutral: 67 • Important/Very Important: 57 • Unsure/No Answer: 1 6 The ranking of priorities, based on number of people who selected “important” or “very important”, are as follows: Rank Priority Percentage 1 Beautify the Corridor 86 2 Walkability 81 3 Sales-Tax Generating Businesses 78 4 Gathering Spaces 76 5 Well-Illuminated 75 6 Parking 59 7 Bikeability 44 8 Multi-Family Housing 24 The 2026 survey results confirm that the priorities that were both most important and least important to residents in 2022 are largely the same, with the only variations being in how the questions were worded and the 2026 survey’s inclusion of “walkability” as a priority. Using the data available, staff recommend the Public Works Committee discuss the results of the survey and provide a recommendation to the Village Board on project priorities for the Phase 1 Engineering Study. Financial Impact: None. Recommendation: The Village Manager recommends that the Public Works Committee discuss the results of this survey and provide a recommendation to the Village Board. Attachment: None. 7 Request for Committee Action Agenda Item: III.2 Staff Contact: Kathy Thake, Administration Heather McFarland, Administration Subject: Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with the Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois for Green Bay Road Design Services for Phase I Engineering Study in the Amount not to Exceed of $432,000 Summary: One of the goals in the FY26 Budget is to continue forward with the Green Bay Road Enhancement Project with a Phase I Engineering Study. Based upon the completion of the conceptual design , i t is recommended that the Village engage Ciorba Group to complete the Phase I Engineering. Background of Matter: The Village has been assessing community goals and opportunities for improvement for the Green Bay Road corridor for close to twenty years. This has encompassed comprehensive plans, design guidelines, corridor plans, and community workgroups. Early in the evaluation process, the desire to reconfigure Green Bay Road to improve safety, review parking, and revitalize the corridor emerged as a prominent theme. In late 2025 , and in preparation of FY26 budget goals, it was evident the Green Bay Road Enhancement Project would need to move forward with Phase I Engineering Study to continue making progress on the streetscape and alignment concepts, thereby moving it closer to reality. After the January 26, 2026 Village Board Project presentation, staff was directed to rank project priorities in advance of proceeding with the Phase I study. Under Committee agenda item III.1, this matter is discussed in greater detail. The agenda item before the Public Works Committee for consideration is the Professional Services Agreement with the Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois for Green Bay Road Design Services for Phase I Engineering Study in the Amount not to Exceed of $432,000. The purpose of the Phase I Engineering study would be to further explore the preferred roadway and streetscape plan from Kenilworth Avenue to Winnetka Avenue in accordance with IDOT design criteria. The work would encompass both the Village of Kenilworth and Winnetka, therefore both communities will be engaged during the process and share costs. The Phase I Engineering report is a required step to proceed to Phase II and roadway construction. This, and the fact that the roadway is owned and maintained by the Illinois Department of Transportation. A detailed description of the proposed services, which includes several coordination meetings, multiple public meetings , and consideration of five geometric Considered By: Date: Public Works Committee Village Board (Staff presentation) Village Board (Ciorba presentation) 03/19/26 01/26/26 11/17/25 Village of 8 studies, is included in the Ciorba Scope of Work as an exhibit to the Professional Services Agreement: 1. Road Diet with diagonal parking on west side (with access lane & median), sidewalk on east and west side, and parallel parking on east side. 2. Road Diet with diagonal parking on west side (with access lane & median), sidewalk on west side only, parallel parking on east side. 3. Road Diet with diagonal parking on west side (no median), sidewalk on west or both sides, parallel parking on east side. 4. Road Diet with parallel parking on both sides, sidewalk on west only or both sides (Sidewalk width will be larger if placed on west side only). 5. Road Diet with parallel parking on both sides, bike lanes, sidewalk on west or both sides (Sidewalk width will be larger if placed on west side only). Bid Waiver – Section 3 of Purchasing Manual Due to Ciorba Group’s familiarity with the project and successful delivery of the conceptual design, staff is seeking a waiver of typical bid requirements, for the Professional Services Agreement for Green Bay Road Design Services for Phase I Engineering Study in the Amount not to Exceed of $432,000. There are a number of reasons the proposal from the Ciorba Group was identified as preferred. They include: • Experience working on the Winnetka streetscape enhancement project; • Proposed partnership with Teska Associates, who also worked on the streetscape project; • Experience with Kenilworth working on several projects, including Green Streets and the Green Bay Road Conceptual Design; • Experience with grant applications and navigating the complex process of State funding; and • Cost savings based on project knowledge. Based on the se reasons, the village managers of both communities recommend a bid waiver to enter into a professional services agreement with the Ciorba Group . Doing so will allow the Project to continue moving forward without delays. As written, the Village of Kenilworth would engage the Ciorba Group. However, Winnetka representatives would be participating as desired at all stages. If the agreement is authorized by the Public Works Committee and Village Board, work would commence as soon as late April or early May. The Village of Winnetka is likely to consider the proposal in mid-April. Supplemental Background – Green Bay Road Efforts Green Bay Road Enhancement Project In 2023, the villages of Kenilworth and Winnetka entered into a joint agreement with Ciorba Group to initiate a study of Green Bay Road between Kenilworth Avenue and Winnetka Avenue. The purpose of the study was to explore the feasibility and desirability of roadway reconfiguration concepts and identify streetscape enhancements. Staff from both communities worked with Ciorba to develop potential concepts inspired by the Green Bay Road Conceptual Transportation and Streetscape Plan to share with residents. In 2024, several open houses were held to gather public input on potential streetscape and alignment concepts for Green Bay Road. Green Bay Road Visioning Process In 2021, the Green Bay Road Strategic Vision Committee was assembled to evaluate whether the vision developed as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan remained relevant to the business corridor. The Committee’s review process included focus group meetings, public forums, and 9 stakeholder surveys. During the visioning process, several commenters raised concerns related to traffic speed and pedestrian safety along Green Bay Road. Notably, they believed this to be the biggest impediment to development and suggested a lane reduction to slow traffic, additional parking, new pedestrian crossings, and larger sidewalks. Given these concerns, in addition to the renewed interest in the business district and desire to create a pedestrian-friendly area, a review of the configuration of Green Bay Road within the business district was identified as a primary goal of the Village Board in 2023. Green Bay Road Conceptual Transportation and Streetscape Plan One of the first steps in the comprehensive evaluation of the corridor was to plan and design for better multi-modal transportation. The analysis, which began in 2012, was led by the Plan Commission and included representatives from Sears School, the Park District, PACE, METRA, Union Pacific, and IDOT, with consulting support from Houseal Lavigne (planning), Gewalt Hamilton (traffic engineering), Active Transportation Alliance (transit specialists), and Altamanu (urban planning). Following diligent work by all parties to gather stakeholder feedback through surveys and workshops, the Green Bay Road Conceptual Transportation and Streetscape Plan was delivered to the Village Board in October 2013. Several of the recommended changes have since been implemented: • Reconfigured parking on Richmond Road, east of the Metra station; • Reconfigured Metra drop-off area; • Realigned Sterling Road intersection; • New development opportunity at 604 Green Bay Road; and • Shortened pedestrian crossing at Kenilworth Avenue / Richmond Road intersection. Among the recommendations was a suggestion to reconfigure Green Bay Road to incorporate diagonal parking and reduce the drive lanes from four to two. The intent was to meet community interest in maintaining traffic flow, creating a more vibrant commercial area, and to establish a distinct community character. Policy: Village Board approval is required to engage in non -emergency agreements in excess of $20,000. Additionally, the Village Purchasing Manual guides the process for the purchase of materials in excess of $20,000. Section 1 General Provisions of the Kenilworth Purchasing Manual provides an exception to the Formal Bidding process when professional services are sought as well as Section 3 provides for a bid waiver in connection with these services. Financial Impact: The proposal from Ciorba is for an amount not to exceed $432,000. The Village of Winnetka has tentatively agreed to pay 30% ($ 129,600), leaving $302,400 in Village expenses. The study area is approximately 70% in Kenilworth and 30% in Winnetka. The FY26 TIF fund included $375,000 in projected expenditures for the project. Recommendation: The Village Manager recommends that the Public Works Committee consider and recommend approval of this item to move forward to the Village Board for consideration at the next Village Board meeting. Attachments: Scope of Services Resolution and PSA (forthcoming with Village Board agenda packet) 10 CON SULTANT: Ciorba Group, Inc. PRINCIPAL Duane O’Laughlin, PE PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Johnson, PE, PTOE ROUTE: Green Bay Road COUNTY: Cook LOCAL AGENCY CONTACT: Kathy Thake, Village of Kenilworth PROJECT UNDERSTANDING This project involves developing a preferred preliminary roadway and streetscape plan for Green Bay Road from Kenilworth Avenue to Winnetka Avenue. Alternates developed in the Green Bay Road Concept Study will be developed further along with new alternates following IDOT design criteria. In addition to the Village of Kenilworth, engaging both the Village of Winnetka and IDOT will be critical to the success of any proposed concept for this section of Green Bay Road. Successful completion of the Concept Refinement Phase now allows the Villages to initiate a full Phase I preliminary engineering study All deliverables to the Village and other organizations will be provided electronically unless otherwise noted. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Meetings, Coordination & Data Collection a. Meetings i. Prepare for and attend one virtual kick-off meeting with Kenilworth and Winnetka staff. At this meeting the project scope and key outcomes of previous and current planning efforts will be discussed. Project needs and goals will be defined. Prepare meeting minutes and distribute for approval. ii. Prepare for and attend one virtual kick-off meeting with IDOT. Prepare meeting minutes and distribute for approval. iii. Prepare for and attend two virtual FHWA meetings with IDOT. Prepare meeting minutes and distribute for approval. iv. Prepare for and attend one virtual meeting with IDOT. Prepare meeting minutes and distribute for approval. v. Prepare for and attend one virtual meeting with the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)/Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). Prepare meeting minutes and distribute for approval. vi. Prepare for and attend two in-person presentations to the Village of Kenilworth Public Works Committee. Prepare meeting minutes and distribute for approval. vii. Prepare for and attend two in-person presentations to the Kenilworth Village Board. A PowerPoint exhibit will be prepared. Assume Village Board will prepare required meeting minutes. viii. Prepare for and attend one in-person presentation to the Winnetka Village Council. A PowerPoint exhibit will be prepared. Assume Village Council will prepare required meeting minutes. ix. Prepare for and attend virtual meetings with Kenilworth to discuss project progress (12 meetings). Winnetka staff will be invited to all meetings. 11 b. Coordination i. Coordination with Kenilworth, Winnetka, IDOT, UP/Metra, Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC). ii. Coordinate with IDOT to determine IDOT’s anticipated date to repave Green Bay Road so project will not immediately remove pavement after IDOT improvement. iii. Coordination with subconsultants iv. Coordinate project with private utility companies to identify potential conflicts. v. Internal project team coordination to gauge progress, identify issues, and verify interdisciplinary coordination. c. Data Collection i. Obtain and review existing roadway and traffic signal plans and ROW plats/plans from IDOT and other sources. ii. Obtain data from Kenilworth & Winnetka that could include: 1. Roadway plans 2. Property plats 3. Benchmark Information 4. 5-year crash reports 5. Utility information 6. Plans for any new developments that could impact project limits 7. Flooding/Drainage Issues 8. Village standards iii. Perform a J.U.L.I.E. design locate and obtain utility atlases. Plot utilities into existing CADD files. iv. Conduct a site visit to observe existing conditions, existing travel and parking patterns, and to perform a photo log. v. Obtain Aerials from USGS Site and other sources. 2. Surveys a. Topographic Survey. The topographic survey will include the full ROW of Green Bay Road and extra as needed to capture topographic information from the building line on the west to the UP Railroad property on the East and will extend 50’ past the return radius of the curb at each intersection within the survey limits. Topographic survey items will include the following information within the project limits: i. Spot elevations will be taken at 50-foot cross sections including grade changes, to show topography at a 1’ contour interval ii. Visible man-made features iii. Ditches and above ground features iv. Location of existing utilities within or adjacent to the site including: v. Evidence of existing above ground utilities (if readily visible and accessible or flagged by the utility company or locating service) vi. The size and invert or top of pipe elevations of sewers and water mains if manholes and valve vaults are visible and accessible. vii. Underground utilities may be depicted from drawings provided by utility companies or others, if readily available viii. Utilities will be shown on the survey based on observed evidence (above ground) and the utility atlases. 12 b. Limited Boundary Survey. The limited boundary survey will locate the property corners adjacent to the subject property to identify and draft the current right of way lines of Green Bay Rd., adjoining intersections, and the railroad property line along the east side of Green Bay Road within the project limits. c. Ciorba will not perform title searches or create any formal survey plats or documents. Verification of property ownership and Public Right of Way is not included in this scope, and the depiction of property lines on the survey will be limited to what is seen on the Cook County Map Application, evidence found in the field, and any historical documents that may be found during research or provided to Ciorba by the Village to be used for this survey. 3. Water Resources a. Review information on known drainage problems to be provided by Village and/or IDOT. i. Kenilworth indicated that there are no flooding issues other than the Skokie Ditch occasionally backing up. The FEMA map shows the floodway west of Ridge Road, therefore any backups in the storm sewer caused by the Skokie Ditch are considered beyond the scope of this project. b. Obtain land use data for use in hydrologic analysis. c. Identify drainage areas to project site and calculate runoff rates based on existing and proposed land cover. d. Prepare General Location Drainage Map and Existing Drainage Plan. e. Evaluate sensitivity of outlets from project site and determine if detention is needed to address outlet sensitivity or known drainage problems. Determine method of providing detention if needed. f. Evaluate drainage alternatives and coordinate with Village and IDOT to develop preferred plan, including hydraulic analysis of proposed storm sewer improvements. g. Prepare Proposed Drainage Plan for preferred alternate. h. Describe water quality concerns and strategies. i. Summarize all aspects of drainage studies in written Location Drainage Technical Memorandum (LDTM) with exhibits. Submit memo to Village and IDOT for review. Address comments and prepare final LDTM. j. Analyze and develop location of proposed water main throughout the project corridor from Park Drive to north Kenilworth limit (existing water main is 55 to 60 years old). Proposed water main alignment from Park Drive to north of Roger Street developed in 2020 will be reviewed and updated as needed. i. Coordinate with Winnetka to determine if they would need new water main included in project also. 4. Roadway Lighting Feasibility a. Perform high-level photometric analysis and lighting layout to ensure the selected roadway lighting from the streetscape concept meets IES standards for the selected roadway cross section. i. Identify owner requirements ii. Equipment selection/vendor coordination iii. Photometric analysis (1 cross section) iv. Preliminary layout v. Quantities/estimate of cost 13 vi. Voltage drop calculations/cable sizing b. Kenilworth has recently used a decorative street lighting system at Kenilworth Avenue and Richmond Road. c. Coordinate with IDOT to verify what they will require for the project. 5. Engineering Studies a. Traffic Studies i. Obtain a 24 hour traffic count at the Green Bay Road and Kenilworth Avenue intersection. Obtain 3 hour counts during the AM and PM peak hour at the Green Bay Road intersections with Park Drive and Winnetka Avenue. Traffic counts will be done using Miovision cameras to obtain traffic and pedestrian data. ii. Coordinate with CMAP to obtain traffic projections and apply these projections to each movement. iii. Perform an existing Highway Capacity Software (HCS) analysis for 3 intersections. Perform proposed HCS analysis for 2 alternatives. iv. Develop an Intersection Design Study for intersections having a revised lane configuration. It is assumed that one IDS will be needed. v. Existing and proposed typical sections will be developed for the project corridor including up to five alternatives for proposed cross sections. Deliverable: Typical Section Plan Sheets. vi. Develop ADA sidewalk detail sheets at side streets within proposed construction limits (includes Park Drive, Melrose Avenue, Wayland Avenue, Roger Avenue, and other proposed crossing locations from the east to west side of Green Bay Road). vii. Since Green Bay Road is an IDOT significant route, a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) will be developed for the preferred alignment and submitted to IDOT for approval. The TMP will identify delays associated with the project and identify measures to notify the public and reduce congestion during construction. Typical sections will be provided for each stage of construction. It is assumed that the project will be constructed using stage construction and a detour route will not be used. b. Environmental Studies i. Prepare Environmental Survey Request (ESR) form and submit to IDOT. ii. Since Green Bay Road is a State Route, IDOT will perform the special waste and wetland analysis. iii. It is assumed that wetlands do not exist within the project limits and a wetland impact analysis will not be required. c. Geometric Studies i. Develop project specific design criteria and document all potential design exceptions that would be required. Perform concept level geometric checks following IDOT reconstruction or rehabilitation criteria. The geometric checks will evaluate the existing alignments, superelevation rates and transition lengths. ii. Develop horizontal geometric layout and plan sheets for up to five proposed alternatives. All geometric design work will be performed using Bently Open Roads software, scaled aerials, and existing topographic survey information. Potential alternatives to be considered are: 14 1. Road Diet with diagonal parking on west side (with access lane & median), sidewalk on east and west side, and parallel parking on east side. 2. Road Diet with diagonal parking on west side (with access lane & median), sidewalk on west side only, parallel parking on east side. 3. Road Diet with diagonal parking on west side (no median), sidewalk on west or both sides, parallel parking on east side. 4. Road Diet with parallel parking on both sides, sidewalk on west only or both sides (Sidewalk width will be larger if placed on west side only). 5. Road Diet with parallel parking on both sides, bike lanes, sidewalk on west or both sides (Sidewalk width will be larger if placed on west side only). iii. Develop preferred plan and profile. iv. Investigate right-of-way and easement requirements based on geometry and construction needs for two alternates. d. Safety Studies i. Perform a crash analysis, identifying any crash patterns and mitigation strategies. Crash data from the past 5 years for the project corridor assumed to be provided by the Village or IDOT. Location, type, severity, and number of crashes will be tabulated. Crash diagrams and a technical memorandum will be provided. e. Project Development Report i. Develop Location Map ii. Include Public Transportation Schedules and/or Maps iii. Review and Document Design Exceptions iv. Prepare draft report and exhibits. v. Process report (Anticipated to be Categorical Exclusion, State Approved). vi. Revise report based on review comments and public comments (2 revisions) vii. Develop two disposition of comments f. Public Involvement i. Prepare for and attend one in-person open house public meeting for the project (Villages of Kenilworth and Winnetka combined). The open house meeting will be advertised in Village newsletter/emails, on Village websites, and via Village social media. At the public meeting, plan exhibits and typical sections will be provided for two preferred alternates. Other exhibits will be provided indicating landscaping concepts, project details, and project schedule. review past research and site analysis information, confirm stakeholder behaviors and attitudes, and brainstorm desired streetscape outcomes. Preliminary recommendations will be presented with two preferred alternatives presented. The meeting will incorporate engagement activities designed to obtain community input and inform the design work. The meeting location will be at a designated venue and preferred exhibits for presentation would be coordinated with Kenilworth and Winnetka. Following the meeting, input will be gathered, documented, and summarized for reporting back to the community and included in the technical memorandum. (Ciorba and Teska) ii. Develop impact letters and exhibits for any properties requiring temporary easement or right of way acquisition. 15 iii. A separate Public Meeting with Winnetka is not included will require additional services. 6. Quantity Calculations and Estimates a. Determine quantity of major pay items. b. Develop opinion of probable construction cost for two alternatives using previous similar project bid tabs and recent bid tabs from IDOT website 7. Funding Assistance a. Review potential grants that could be used to help fund the project. b. Assist in developing three grant applications for the project. Potential funding options include Invest in Cook, ITEP, and the MWRD Green Infrastructure Partnership Program. 8. QC/QA a. Perform Quality Control/Quality Assurance during the project per Ciorba Group’s Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan. QC/QA reviews will be conducted by Ciorba for all sub-consultant submittals prior to being submitted to the Village, IDOT, or other agencies/project stakeholders. 9. Project Management and Administration a. Provide project oversight. b. Prepare progress reports. c. Project control of scope, schedule, and budget. 10. Preliminary Streetscape Design (Performed by Teska Associates, Inc.) a. Attend two Village meetings. b. Prepare two alternative streetscape concepts based on the two preferred alternatives. c. Prepare exhibits for and attend public open house. d. Attend Village virtual meeting to discuss public comments. e. Prepare final streetscape based on the preferred alternative. See attached detailed scope. 11. Geotechnical Engineering (Performed by Soil and Material Consultants, Inc.) a. Obtain seven 10’ deep geotechnical borings at 500’ intervals. b. Prepare report findings and recommendations. See attached detailed scope. 16 February 4, 2026 Proposal No. 23,859 Mr. Duane O’Laughlin, P.E. Chief Operating Officer Ciorba Group 8725 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60631 Re: Pavement Investigation Green Bay Road Kenilworth, Illinois Dear Mr. O’Laughlin: Submitted for your consideration is our proposal to provide the requested pavement section investigation and subsurface soil condition analysis for the proposed improvements along Green Bay Road from Kenilworth Avenue to Winnetka Avenue in the Village of Kenilworth, Illinois. Scope of the Investigation A total of 7 boring locations will be established at intervals of approximately 500 feet and on alternate sides of the centerline. Offsets from centerline will be varied to include various portions of existing pavement. We will contact JULIE to locate public utilities. At each location existing pavement materials will be cored to determine material types and thicknesses. The soils will be auger drilled to establish the soil profile within 10.0 feet of existing surface elevations. A soil sample will be obtained immediately below the base using a split barrel sampler and at 2.5 foot intervals for the remaining depth of the boring. Additional samples may be obtained from the auger flights. A pocket penetrometer reading will be performed on testable samples of cohesive soil. Soil samples will be returned to our laboratory for testing including determination of moisture content. Cohesive soils obtained by split barrel sampling will be further tested to determine dry unit weight and unconfined compressive strength. Selected soil samples will be tested for determination of grain-size distribution, Atterberg limits and other pertinent testing. Engineering Evaluation, Report The field investigation and laboratory testing will be completed under the direction of a Registered Professional Engineer. Preliminary information will be available upon request. Upon completion of the investigation an engineering evaluation will be completed and a Phase I report prepared. The report will present our findings and appropriate recommendations. 17 Dat e: February 11, 2026 To: Duane O’Laughlin, Ciorba Group, dolaughlin@ciorba.com From: Jodi Mariano, Teska Associates, JMariano@TeskaAssociates.com RE: Green Bay Road Phase 1 Streetscape, Kenilworth – Landscape Architectural scope Tha nk you for the opportunity to continue to assist Ciorba Group, the Village of Kenilworth and the Village of Winnetka with the above-mentioned project. Teska provided design services to Ciorba Group for conceptual streetscape design and public outreach between August 2023 and February 2024. We understand Village staff wishes to build upon earlier design efforts and to proceed with additional design studies and public outreach for the Green Bay Road Corridor project. STREETSCAPE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE Introduction: The Streetscape Design work is focused on Green Bay Road, from Kenilworth Avenue at the south to Winnetka Avenue at the north. This assignment will continue the streetscape and corridor design work conducted by Ciorba / Teska between August 2023 and February 2024. The work also builds upon previous corridor studies conducted by the Villages of Kenilworth and Winnetka below: - Village of Kenilworth Green Bay Road Conceptual Transportation + Streetscape Plan (2013) - Village of Winnetka Downtown Master Plan (2016); Streetscape + Signage Plan (2018); and Comprehensive Plan (2023). The ou tcome of this design work would be a refined concept level streetscape plan supported by recommended materials, products, and plantings. The plan would be supported by a conceptual cost estimate. Special focus would be on promoting the corridor business environment, opportunities for placemaking, gateway entry features, beautification, and pedestrian safety for the Villages of Kenilworth and Winnetka. Streetscape features that would be addressed include lighting, paving, furnishings, gateway features, and plantings. 18 S TREETSCAPE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE (continued) 1. Village review meetings - corridor alternatives review. Teska will review corridor alternatives to be prepared by Ciorba. Teska will attend up to two Village review meetings to evaluate and discuss alternatives towards determining two preferred alternatives for public review. 2. Alternative streetscape concepts packages - two preferred alternatives. Based on Village direction to proceed with two preferred alternatives, Teska will develop two concept plan packages. Two concept plan packages will be supported by plans, sections, vignettes and product and material photographs as appropriate to convey the design intent. Streetscape concept packages will be shared with staff via teleconference for review and feedback. Teska will make updates to the concept packages prior to the public meeting, as required. 3. Public meeting and exhibits. Based on Village feedback about the streetscape concepts, Teska will prepare public meeting exhibits and materials to describe the two corridor alternatives and to receive public feedback. Public meeting exhibits may include the following: Project introduction and summary of work completed to date; Existing conditions maps and photos; Two alternative streetscape concept packages (plans, sections, vignettes, product photos). Exhibits will be designed to be engaging and to invite quantitative and qualitative participant feedback. Teska will provide digital postcards / flyers for the Village’s use in distributing announcements to the community. Meeting logistics shall be by the Village. Following the public meeting, Teska will prepare a meeting summary. 4. Village review meeting and selection of final concept. Following the public meeting we will discuss public feedback with Village staff via teleconference. Together we will discuss which concept – or elements from each concept – will be carried forward into the final streetscape concept package. 5. Final streetscape concept package – one preferred concept. Based on direction from Village staff on the preferred concept, Teska will develop a draft final concept plan packages for staff review. The concept plan package will be supported by plans, sections, vignettes and product and material photographs as appropriate to convey the design intent. A conceptual cost estimate will be prepared. The draft final streetscape concept package will be shared with staff via teleconference for review and feedback. Teska will make updates to the concept package as required. The final streetscape concept package will be documented and provided to Ciorba in PDF format. 6. Team and staff coordination. In addition to the meetings noted above, Teska anticipates coordination with Ciorba and Village staff via email, telephone and teleconference. END OF SCOPE 19 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE 3/5/2026 Activity Grand Total Principal Project Manager III Project Manager II Project Manager I Project Engineer II Project Engineer I Lead Surveyor Technician III Engineer IV Technician II Engineer III Engineer II Engineer I Technician I CAD Manager TOTAL 2260 41 24 40 289 140 24 36 12 403 100 152 207 676 100 16 1. Meetings, Data Collection & Coordination Task Total: 281 11 123 86 45 16 0110 Meetings Meetings: 180 11 85 72 12 Kick-off Meeting with Villages (1 mtg x 1 hrs/mtg x 3 staff) 3 1 1 1 Village Board Meetings (3 mtg x 3 hrs/mtg x 2 staff) 18 9 9 Village Public Works Meetings (2 mtg x 3 hrs/mtg x 2 staff) 12 6 6 Project Progress Mtgs with Village (12 mtg x 1 hrs/mtg x 2 staff) 18 12 6 Meeting with UPRR/ICC (1 mtg x 1 hrs/mtg x 3 staff) 2 1 1 IDOT Virtual Kickoff Meeting (1 mtg x 1 hrs/mtg x 3 staff) 3 1 1 1 IDOT Virtual Misc Meeting (1 mtg x 1 hrs/mtg x 2 staff) 2 1 1 FHWA Virtual Meetings (2 mtg x 1 hrs/mtg x 2 staff) 4 2 2 Meeting Minutes - 20 each 36 16 20 Prepare Agenda/Exhibits for Meetings - 23 each 46 24 10 12 PowerPoint Presentation for Village Board Mtgs (3 Mtgs) 36 12 24 0120 Coordination Subtotal: 66 38 8 16 4 Coordination with Village 16 16 Coordination with Other Agencies 12 8 4 Coordination with Project Team 16 4 4 4 4 Subconsultants Coordination 6 6 Coordination with Utilities 8 8 Submit Plans to Utilities (1 submittal) 4 4 Coordination with Railroad 4 4 0130 Data Collection Subtotal: 35 6 17 12 Obtain Plans from Village 1 1 Obtain Tax Maps/ROW Plats 2 2 Obtain Plans from Other Agencies 2 2 Obtain Utility Atlases & Draft in CADD 18 6 12 Field Checks 12 6 6 2. Survey Task Total: 256 8 36 12 100 100 0210 Field Survey Subtotal: 204 4 100 100 Project Survey Plan & Field Preparation 4 4 Establish Control Points and Ties 16 8 8 Horizontal Topography 80 40 40 Property Corner Location 16 8 8 Cross Sections 64 32 32 Drainage Inventory 24 12 12 0220 Process Survey Subtotal: 12 12 Down Loading Total Station 4 4 Create Digital Terrain Model 8 8 0230 Boundary Survey Office Subtotal: 40 8 32 Property Research / Order Title / Rewiew Documents 16 16 Boundary Analysis & Calculation 16 16 QA/QC of Deliverable / Revisions 8 8 Page 1 of 3 20 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE 3/5/2026 Activity Grand Total Principal Project Manager III Project Manager II Project Manager I Project Engineer II Project Engineer I Lead Surveyor Technician III Engineer IV Technician II Engineer III Engineer II Engineer I Technician I CAD Manager 3. Water Resources Task Total: 483 21 72 144 42 204 0310 Preliminary Stormwater Analysis Subtotal: 364 60 116 188 Hydrologic Modeling 40 8 12 20 Hydraulic Modeling (Storm Sewer) 84 12 24 48 Storm Water Detention Analysis 40 8 12 20 Alternatives Analysis 16 4 8 4 Analyze Sensitivity of Outfalls 40 8 12 20 Existing Drainage Evaluation and Plans (3 sheets at 1" = 50') 72 8 24 40 Proposed Drainage Plans (3 sheets at 1" = 50') 72 12 24 36 0320 Stormwater Reports Subtotal: 56 12 28 16 Drainage Tech Memo 56 12 28 16 0350 Water Main System Subtotal: 63 21 42 Identify & Report Conflict Locations (Kenilworth) 3 1 2 Identify & Report Conflict Locations (Winnetka) 4 2 2 Water Main Design (Kenilworth) 10 4 6 Water Main Design (Winnetka) 14 6 8 Water Main Sheets (Concept Proposed Alignment) (Kenilworth) 16 4 12 Water Main Sheets (Concept Proposed Alignment) (Winnetka) 16 4 12 4. Roadway Lighting Feasibility Task Total: 34 12 13 9 0410 Lighting Studies and Plans Subtotal: 34 12 13 9 Identify owner requirements 2 2 Equipment Selection 12 8 4 Voltage Drop Calculations 2 1 1 Photometric Calculations - Segment (x segments) 5 1 4 Lighting Layout 13 1 4 8 5. Engineering Studies Task Total: 920 4 104 64 246 112 374 16 0510 Traffic Studies Subtotal: 274 18 34 76 8 138 Traffic Count Reduction & Tabulation 12 6 6 Develop Traffic Projections for each Movement (3 Ints) 12 6 6 Roadway Capacity Analysis 3int x (a.m. & p.m.) (1ex +1 pr)(4hr) 48 4 6 18 20 Develop Existing and Proposed Typical Sections (5 Alts) 20 2 2 8 8 Intersection Design Studies (1 IDS x 60 hrs/IDS) 60 6 12 20 22 ADA Detail Sheets (Estimate 22 Ramps x 4 hrs) 88 4 8 16 60 Traffic Management Plan/Analysis 34 2 6 10 16 0520 Environmental Studies Subtotal: 42 3 5 8 26 Prepare Environmental Survey Request (ESR) Form 10 1 1 8 Prepare ESR Exhibits (2 sheets) 10 2 8 Prepare ESR Aerials (2 Sheets) 20 2 2 8 8 Environmental Document Preparation - Clearance Renewal 2 2 0530 Geometric Studies Subtotal: 336 26 112 84 98 16 Horizontal Geometry Study (5 Alts) 90 10 20 24 36 Vertical Geometry Study 42 6 36 Plan and Profile Sheets (5 Alts x 3 Shts/Alt) 120 10 24 40 46 Sight Distance Study of Preferred Alternate 24 8 16 Right-of-Way Analysis (2 alts x 3,000'/50 = 120 Sections) 60 24 20 16 Page 2 of 3 21 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE 3/5/2026 Activity Grand Total Principal Project Manager III Project Manager II Project Manager I Project Engineer II Project Engineer I Lead Surveyor Technician III Engineer IV Technician II Engineer III Engineer II Engineer I Technician I CAD Manager 0540 Safety Studies Subtotal: 50 6 24 20 Crash Data Charts and Tables 30 2 8 20 Review and Analyze Crash Data 8 8 Write Crash Analysis Summary (Memo) 12 4 8 0550 Preliminary Project Plans and Report Subtotal: 136 41 37 58 Design Exception checks and documentation 12 1 1 10 Report Preparation 56 20 20 16 Report Revisions (2 revisions) 44 12 16 16 Disposition of Comments (2 dispositions) 24 8 16 0590 Public Involvement Subtotal: 82 4 10 6 16 12 34 Advertise in Newspaper 6 2 4 Prepare Meeting Exhibit Boards 40 4 6 6 8 16 Attend Open House Public Meeting (1 Meeting) 16 4 4 4 4 Collection of Public Comments/Management & Reporting 20 2 4 14 6. Quantity, Specifications & Estimates Task Total: 114 7 6 4 3 32 8 8 46 0710 Quantity, Specifications and Estimates Subtotal: 114 7 6 4 3 32 8 8 46 Quantity Calculations and BOM (Roadway - 2 Alts) 52 2 20 30 Quantity Calculations and BOM (Lighting) 10 1 3 6 Quantity Calculations and BOM (Water Resources) 36 4 8 8 16 Estimate of Cost 16 2 4 4 6 7. Funding Assistance Task Total: 88 22 30 36 0810 Funding Assistance Subtotal: 88 22 30 36 Review Potential Grants for Project 4 4 Assist in Developing Grant Applications (3 Grants) 84 18 30 36 8. QC / QA Task Total: 44 16 24 4 0910 QC / QA Subtotal: 44 16 24 4 Preparation and Revisions of QC/QA Plan - Quality Plan 4 4 Water Resources QC/QA 16 16 Roadway QC/QA 24 24 9. Project Management & Administration Task Total: 40 10 30 1010 Project Management & Administration Subtotal: 40 10 30 Project Management 32 8 24 Work Plan 2 2 Budget Analysis 2 2 Project Startup 2 2 Project Scheduling 2 2 Page 3 of 3 22 Cost Estimate of Consultant Services (Direct Labor Multiple) Firm Ciorba Group, Inc. Date 03/05/26 DIRECT SERVICES DBE % OF ITEM MANHOURS PAYROLL COSTS BY TOTAL TOTAL GRAND OTHERS TOTAL Meetings, Data Collection & Coordination 281 56,380.99$ 168.00$ -$ 56,548. 99$ 13% Survey 256 33,720.79$ 720.00$ -$ 34,440. 79$ 8% Water Resources 483 71,834.37$ -$ -$ 71,834. 37$ 17% Roadway Lighting Feasibility 34 7,199.97$ -$ -$ 7,199. 97$ 2% Engineering Studies 920 144,822.86$ 3,888. 00$ -$ 148,710. 86$ 34% Quantity, Specifications & Estimates 114 17,814.14$ -$ -$ 17,814. 14$ 4% Funding Assistance 88 14,891.32$ -$ -$ 14,891. 32$ 3% QC / QA 44 11,830.90$ -$ -$ 11,830. 90$ 3% Project Management & Administration 40 10,431.75$ -$ -$ 10,431. 75$ 2% Soil and Material Consultants 11,967.00$ -$ 11,967. 00$ 3% Teska Associates 45,740.00$ -$ 45,740. 00$ 11% TOTALS 2260 368,927.10$ 4,776. 00$ 57,707. 00$ 431,410. 10$ 100% PRINTED 3/5/2026, 10:25 AM 23 Village of Kenilworth Green Bay Road - Phase I Ciorba Group Direct Costs Meetings, Data Collection & Coordination Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Extended Cost Vehicle (mileage) mile 0.700$ 240 168.00$ 168.00$ Total Survey Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Extended Cost Vehicle (day) day 90.00$ 8 720.00$ 720.00$ Total Engineering Studies Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Extended Cost Vehicle (mileage) mile 0.700$ 80 56.00$ Traffic Count (1 day) hour 76.00$ 24 1,824.00$ Traffic Count (1 hr) hour 84.00$ 12 1,008.00$ Reproductions - Outside sheet 40.00$ 10 400.00$ Advertisement dollar 600.00$ 1 600.00$ 3,888.00$ Total 24 SCHEDULE OF FEES -- PAVEMENT AND SUBSURFACE SOIL INVESTIGATION Item Units Fee Estimated Cost FIELD Boring Layout 5 hr. $ 120.00 /hr. $ 600.00 Utility Location 1 hr. $ 120.00 /hr. $ 120.00 Attenuator Truck 8 hr. $ 220.00 /hr. $ 1,760.00 Mobilization 1 $ Lump Sum $ 700.00 Drilling (7 at 10’) 70 ft. $ 19.00 /ft. $ 1,330.00 Split Barrel Sampling 28 ea. $ 14.00 ea. $ 392.00 Pavement Coring 7 ea. $ 130.00 ea. $ 910.00 IDOT Permit 1 $ Lump Sum $ 3,000.00 LABORATORY Moisture Content Unit Weight 1 $ Lump Sum $ 675.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength Organic Content 3 ea. $ 150.00 ea. $ 450.00 Hydrometer Analysis 3 ea. $ 125.00 ea. $ 375.00 Atterberg Limits 3 ea. $ 125.00 ea. $ 375.00 REPORT Senior Engineer (P.E.) 8 hr. $ 160.00 /hr. $ 1,280.00 __________ Estimated Total Cost: $ 11,967.00 If requested the scope of work can be reduced to include pavement cores only and no soil borings for a cost of $7,570.00. 25 KENILWORTH GREEN BAY ROAD 02.11.26 SUBTOTAL 1 Village review meetings and corridor alt review (2 mtgs) 8 $1,480 8 $1,200 0 $0 $2,680 2 Prepare (2) alternative streetscape concept packages 16 $2,960 30 $4,500 90 $11,700 $19,160 3 Prepare public meeting exhibits, attend public meeting 16 $2,960 20 $3,000 40 $5,200 $11,160 4 Village review meeting and final concept selection (1 mtg) 2 $370 2 $300 0 $0 $670 5 Prepare final streetscape concept package + costs 4 $740 20 $3,000 40 $5,200 $8,940 6 Team coordination + staff meetings 8 $1,480 8 $1,200 0 $0 $2,680 SUBTOTAL FEES 54 $9,990 88 $13,200 170 $22,100 $45,290 REIMBURSABLES (REPRODUCTIONS: $450) $450 TOTAL $45,740 TESKA ASSOCIATES Assoc LA $130$150 Principal/PM Sr Assoc LA $185 STREETSCAPE + OUTREACH SCOPE 26 Request for Committee Action Agenda Item: III.3 Staff Contact: Kathy Thake, Administration Heather McFarland, Administration Subject: Recommendation to Approve an Agreement with TYLin in the Amount of $16,300 to Complete a Parking Study Summary: Limited parking along the Green Bay Road corridor is often referenced by community members as a concern when discussing future development. The Village would like to evaluate the existing parking supply and potential solutions to address these concerns. After reviewing four proposals for a parking study, staff recommend an agreement be approved with TYLin in the amount of $16,300. The Public Works Committee should review the proposal and provide a formal recommendation to the Village Board. Background of Matter: The 2026 Budget includes funds for a Phase I study for the Green Bay Road Enhancement Project. Before this phase of the Project begins, the Village Board has requested that guiding priorities be identified. Among the priorities to consider is increasing the available parking supply in the Business District. Limited available parking has been long referenced as a concern in the Project area that includes portions of Green Bay Road and Park Drive. An opportunity exists as part of the Green Bay Road Enhancement Project to reconfigure parking to create new spaces. Doing so, however, may impact other priorities, such as expanded sidewalks or adding bike lanes. To help with the priority analysis, staff requested proposals from several local firms to complete a parking study. The study would examine existing parking supply, use patterns, and make recommendations for improvements. Projections on future parking availability and behavior in response to development would be available as an add-on service. If the final report notes that adequate parking supply exists, the Village may want to give preference to other priorities. Four proposals to complete a parking study along Kenilworth’s Green Bay Road corridor from local firms were received: Parking Study Proposals Firm Price Projections Lead Time Desman $ 11,500 $2,600 Three weeks KLOA $ 15,000 Included Eight weeks TYLin $ 16,300 Included Five - six weeks Considered By: Date: Public Works Committee 03/19/26 Village of 27 Walker $ 19,900 Included Ten weeks Proposals were evaluated based on their price, lead time, interview, and past experience with the Project team. Based on these factors, TYLin was selected as the preferred consultant to move forward with for the study. TYLin recently worked with Teska, a subcontractor for Kenilworth’s Phase I Study, to perform a parking study for the Village of Glencoe’s business district. Given their familiarity with the north shore and Green Bay Road, paired with their work experience with Teska, staff are confident that they will produce a thoughtful report. Policy: Village Board approval is required to engage in non -emergency agreements in excess of $20,000. Additionally, the Village Purchasing Manual guides the process for the purchase of materials in excess of $20,000. The practice of the Village is to solicit proposals for professional services in a like manner. Financial Impact: The proposal from TYLin is estimated at $ 16,300. Staff are waiting for an updated proposal to exclude parking projections from the primary scope of work and list it as an add-on task. It is expected that the total agreement cost will decrease as a result. The TIF fund includes $100,000 for professional planning services for the Green Bay Road corridor. Recommendation: The Village Manager recommends that the Pubic Works Committee authorize the agreement with TYLin in the amount of $16,300. Attachment: Proposal and Professional Services Agreement 28 February 13, 2026 Ms. Heather McFarland Assistant to the Village Manager Village of Kenilworth 419 Richmond Road Kenilworth, IL 60043 RE: Proposal for Transportation Planning Services, Green Bay Road Parking Study, Kenilworth, IL Dear Heather: TYLin is pleased to submit this proposal to the Village of Kenilworth (Client) to provide professional transportation planning services related to the Kenilworth business district. It is our understanding that the Village would like to better understand existing and future parking availability along and around the Green Bay Road corridor as you assess potential lane reduction configurations. Based on discussions with you and our familiarity with the area, TYLin developed the enclosed Scope of Services to determine existing and future projected parking characteristics. Our schedule for completing data collection and an existing conditions summary presentation (Task 1) is approximately five to six weeks from receipt of the signed agreement and the necessary project- related information. This estimated schedule is exclusive of atypical conditions in the business district such as events or holiday weeks. If you accept this Scope of Services and budget, please sign where indicated and return a copy of the proposal to our office. A rate sheet for hourly services is also attached. Thank you for the opportunity to support the Village. Sincerely, Sara Disney Haufe, PE, PTOE Kelly Conolly, PE Vice President + Sector Manager Associate 29 SCOPE OF SERVICES TYLin will evaluate parking supply and demand characteristics within the Kenilworth business district defined generally as a study area along Green Bay Road from Ashland Lane to the Kenilworth village limit and including some segments one block east and west of Green Bay Road such as areas on Ashland Lane, Kenilworth Avenue, Richmond Road, Park Drive, and other local streets. Work performed to complete this Scope of Services will consist of the following. Task 1. Existing Conditions Based on information provided by the Village and field studies conducted by the team, TYLin will inventory publicly available parking options within the study area, including on-street parking, off- street public parking, Metra parking, and others as deemed practical by the field data collection team. Number of spaces by type or regulation will be recorded on a block-by-block basis. TYLin will also conduct hourly parking occupancy counts within the study area during the following periods: • One typical weekday (from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM) • One typical Saturday (from 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM) These timeframes were selected to coincide with various peak periods of activity of existing and potential future land uses in the area, including commercial, restaurant, and office, as well as the traditional commuter trends. Survey dates and time periods will be confirmed with the Client before data collection takes place. Existing condition parking survey findings will be documented within a presentation slide deck via project mapping, charts, and tables, and will communicate parking shortages and surpluses, usage patterns, and peak demand times, providing a baseline from which conclusions about future parking demand can be drawn. Task 2. Future Parking Projections & Analysis Using the data collected in Task 1 (Existing Conditions), TYLin will assist the Village in projecting future parking demand in the district. In order to accomplish this task, the Client must provide development information for use in projecting future conditions in the study area, such as project location, land use, size/density (in square feet, number of dwelling units, etc.) and assumed parking supply. Using this information, and published data in ITE’s Parking Generation Manual, Sixth Edition and the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) Shared Parking, Third Edition adjusted to reflect the mixed-use and transit-oriented nature of the area, TYLin will estimate peak parking demand generated by these projects. The analysis will provide a comparative review of estimated parking demand relative to future parking supply; the elimination of spaces or the introduction of additional supply will be 30 considered as provided by the Village. This Scope of Services covers one (1) development scenario within the study area. As necessary, the project team will identify a menu list of alternative parking solutions to help address future parking needs. The options may include, but are not limited to, strategies such as rebalancing parking allocation; changes to parking policy (such as paid parking, time limits, permits, and violation fines); enforcement techniques and hours; wayfinding and informational signage; and education and marketing. TYLin will discuss the benefits and impacts of various parking solution options with staff and refine the alternatives into a final set of recommendations. Task 3. Memorandum Report TYLin will produce a technical memorandum, with appropriate tables and figures, documenting the analyses conducted. A draft memorandum will be submitted to the Client for review, and comments will be incorporated into a final version for the Client’s use. MEETINGS At the Client’s request, a senior representative of TYLin will be available to attend meetings, both virtual and in-person, related to the proposed project, including project team meetings, community meetings, and public hearings. Attendance at meetings will be performed at the Client’s request on a time-and-materials basis according to then-current hourly rates. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Any additional services not included in the Scope of Services will be billed on a time-and-materials basis according to then-current hourly rates and travel costs. A change order must be approved by the Client before TYLin can commence work on any additional services. These additional services will include meetings, updating the report with new information from the Client, and deliverable revisions beyond those included in the Scope of Services. 31 FEE SUMMARY AND AUTHORIZATION For the Tasks 1 through 3 outlined in the Scope of Services, TYLin will be compensated with the fees listed below: Task 1 (Existing Conditions) $ 9,300 Task 2 (Future Parking Projections & Analysis) $ 3,900 Task 3 (Memorandum Report) $ 3,100 Total $16,300 Please note that this proposal shall be binding for 45 days from the date of issuance. If you accept this fee for the work detailed herein, please return a signed copy of this agreement. Attached: 2026 Standard Billing Rates Professional Services Terms and Conditions AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED ACCEPTED BY: ____________________________ ______________________________ Signature Name (please print) ____________________________ _______________________________ Title & Company Date BY SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT, YOU CERTIFY THAT YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO BINDING CONTRACTS ON BEHALF OF YOUR ORGANIZATION. 32 Standard Billing Rates Effective January 1, 2026 Sr Vice President/Sector Leader $369 Sector/Practice Manager $357 Vice President $328 Associate Vice President $275 Sr. Associate $266 Associate, Engineering $230 Associate, Planning $203 Senior Advisor $351 Technical Advisor $284 Technical Director $324 Sr. Engineer III $219 Sr. Engineer II $189 Sr. Engineer I $171 Engineer II $158 Engineer I $135 Sr. Planner/Urban Designer III $234 Sr. Planner/Urban Designer II $189 Sr. Planner/Urban Designer I $158 Planner/Urban Designer II $135 Planner/Urban Designer I $126 Graphic Designer II $126 Graphic Designer I $113 Sr. Civil Designer III $189 Sr. Civil Designer II $180 Sr. Civil Designer I $167 Civil Designer II $140 Civil Designer I $118 Sr. Community Outreach Liaison I $153 Community Outreach Liaison II $131 Community Outreach Liaison I $95 Sr. Inspector/Office Engineer $167 Construction Inspector $131 Sr. Technician $122 Technician $104 Sr. Proj. Coordinator $176 Project Coordinator $161 Office Administrator $118 33 TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. General. These Terms and Conditions, together with the executed proposal and any attachments thereto, and written modifications made after the date the proposal is executed, constitute the Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) between the Choose an item. (“Consultant”) and the person or entity to whom the proposal is addressed (“Client”) to perform the scope of services (“Services”) set forth in the proposal for the project identified in the proposal (“Project”). The Agreement is the entire and integrated agreement of the parties for the Project and it may be modified only in writing. 2. Independent Contractor. Consultant is an independent contractor and is not an employee, agent or partner of Client. Nothing in this Agreement establishes a fiduciary relationship between Consultant and Client. 3. Standard of Care. Consultant shall perform its obligations in accordance with the skill and care ordinarily applied by professionals performing similar services at the same time and in the same locality as the Project and under similar circumstances (“Standard of Care”). Consultant will render the Services without any warranty, express or implied, regarding the quality or timeliness of the Services and Client expressly waives all such warranties. 4. Time of Performance. Consultant shall perform the Services according to Client’s schedule as expeditiously as is consistent with the Standard of Care. Neither party to this Agreement will be liable to the other party for delays in performance or for direct or indirect costs resulting from delays that result from labor strikes, riots, acts of war or terrorism, acts of governmental authorities, extraordinary weather conditions or other natural catastrophe, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control or contemplation of either party. The time for Consultant’s performance shall be extended to the extent of delays that are outside of Consultant’s reasonable control. 5. Compliance with Law. Consultant shall exercise the Standard of Care to comply with the requirements of all applicable codes, regulations, and current written interpretations thereof published and in effect during this Agreement. 6. Responsibility at the Project Site. The Consultant shall not be responsible for (a) construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (b) safety precautions and programs in connection with work or activities at the project site, (c) acts or omissions of any contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any work or undertaking any activities at the Project site, or (d) the failure of any of them to carry out any work or perform their activities in accordance with their contractual obligations, including, but not limited to, the requirements of any drawings, specifications or other documents prepared by Consultant in the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not be the prime contractor or similar under any occupational health and safety legislation. 7. Payment. Consultant will invoice monthly for Services rendered and payment will be due within thirty (30) days of the invoice date (“Due Date”) without offset or withholding. All invoices are due and payable in US dollars when rendered. A service charge of 1.5% per month, or the maximum amount allowable by law, may be assessed to balances not paid by the Due Date. In the event Client does not make payment by the Due Date, Consultant may suspend or terminate the Services, without liability to Client for delay, after providing seven (7) days’ written notice to Client. Before resuming performance, Client shall pay Consultant all sums due prior to the suspension and any expenses unavoidably incurred in suspending and resuming the Services. Following the resumption of performance, time schedules and Consultant’s fee for the remaining Services shall be equitably adjusted. Retainers, if any, will be credited on the final invoice. Unless otherwise noted, the fees in this Agreement do not include any value-added, sales, or other taxes that may be applied by the government on fees for services; such taxes will be added to all invoices, as required. 8. Indemnity. To the fullest extent allowed by law, the Client shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Consultant and all of its employees, officers, and directors from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) related to, arising out of, or resulting from this Agreement or any Project or construction related thereto; provided that any such claims, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by the negligent act or omission, and/or strict liability of the Client, anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Client, or anyone for whose acts the Client may be liable. Additionally, the Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from any and all claims and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, that arise due to the reuse of the documents and designs produced by consultant under this agreement. Nothing in this provision obligates the Client to indemnify Consultant for claims arising solely from defects contained in designs furnished by Consultant or for claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of Consultant. 9. Authorized Use of Deliverables. Client’s modification of any reports, drawings, deliverables, or specifications (“Consultant Documents”), or any use of Consultant Documents on another project, without Consultant’s professional involvement or written consent is at Client’s sole risk and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Client shall indemnify and defend Consultant from claims by any third party arising from such use or modification. 10. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement for the material default of the other party to perform its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party, but only after providing seven (7) days’ written notice to the defaulting party and an additional ten (10) days to cure the default. In the event of any termination, Client shall pay to Consultant all amounts due for Services performed prior to the date of the termination. Consultant may terminate this Agreement without cause upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Client. 11. Limitation of Liability. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the parties agree to limit the total liability, in the aggregate, of Consultant, and Consultant’s officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, and subconsultants to Client, and to anyone claiming by, through, or under Client, for any claims, losses, costs, or damages whatsoever, arising out of, resulting from, or in any way 34 related to the Project or Agreement from any cause or causes, including but not limited to tort, negligence, professional errors and omissions, strict liability, breach of contract, or breach of warranty, to the total compensation received by Consultant or $50,000 whichever is greater. 12. Waiver of Consequential Damages. The Client and Consultant mutually waive consequential, indirect or special damages for claims, disputes or other matters in question arising out of or relating to the Services or the Project, whether in contract or in tort, including but not limited to loss of use, loss of profit, lost opportunity costs, diminution in value, or claims for delay, impact or disruption damages made by Client or any of its contractors or subcontractors, whether or not the possibility of such damages had been disclosed to the other party in advance or could have been reasonably foreseen by such other party. This mutual waiver is applicable, without limitation, to all consequential damages due to either party’s termination. 13. Existing Conditions. Client shall furnish to Consultant all applicable information and technical data in Client’s possession or control reasonably required for the proper performance of the Services. Consultant shall be permitted to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that Client provides regarding the Project. Consultant shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal, disposal or exposure of persons to hazardous materials of any form and Client shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Consultant from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) arising from the presence, discharge, release or escape of asbestos, hazardous waste, or other conditions, substances, wastes or materials at Client’s site, except to the extent caused by the gross negligence of Consultant. 14. No Personal Liability. This Agreement does not create and shall not be deemed to create or permit any personal liability or obligation on the part of any owner, shareholder, officer, director, employee, agent or representative of Consultant. Each party agrees that any claim arising under or related to the Project shall be made only against the corporate legal entity of Consultant or Client. 15. No Third-Party Rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any person or entity other than Client and Consultant any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim under this Agreement. 16. Severability. If any of these Terms and Conditions are adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction and determined to be invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect, and remain binding upon the parties. 17. Assignment. Neither Consultant nor the Client shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assigning party from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. 18. Survival. Sections 8 (Indemnity), 11 (Limitation of Liability), and 12 (Waiver of Consequential Damages) of this Agreement shall survive the completion of Consultant’s Services on the Project and the termination of the Agreement for any cause. 19. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State, Province, or Territory in which the Project is located. 35 Request for Committee Action A genda Item: III.4 S taff Contact: Jordan Schmidt, Administration Donny Leicht, Public Work Superintendent Subject: Discussion of an Ordinance Amending Kenilworth Code Sec. 150.196 as it Relates to Water Service Ownership S ummary: As part of the Public Works Committee review of and discussion on lead service lines, the Committee reviewed current code language regarding the ownership of water service lines. At the February 17th Village Board meeting, the Board considered recommendations from the Committee on the creation of a cost-sharing program and code updates concerning service line ownership. At the Village Board meeting, a question arose as to when the Village would assume ownership over service lines. Given the Board’s desire for additional information on the pilot program roll out, staff thought it was an optimal time to reaffirm the Committee’s recommendation on service line ownership, and then bring all items back to the Board for approval. B ackground of Matter: In 2022, the State of Illinois adopted the Lead Service Line Replacement and Notification Act (ILSLRNA), with the goal of replacing all lead water service lines in the state. Over the course of three meetings in 2025, the Public Works Committee reviewed the status of lead in the Village, and recommended the creation of a cost-sharing program to help incentivize and facilitate their replacement. As part of that discussion, the Committee reviewed the Village’s current code language on service line ownership. S ervice Line Ownership: Historically, Kenilworth residents have owned and maintained the entire service line from the water main to the water meter. In 2014, after reviewing common practice, and in connection with the KW2023 project and other expected water main work, the Village adopted updated code language regarding service line ownership. “P rovided, however, that if the Village constructs and installs new water pipes and accessories and buffalo box from the water main of the Village to a buffalo box for a premises on or after March 1, 2014, the Village shall thereafter be responsible to keep and repair such water pipes and accessories and buffalo box for that premises, and every person having service from the water mains of the Village at that premises thereafter shall be responsible to keep and repair, at his or her own cost and expense, the remaining water service line pipes, accessories, and plumbing fixtures commencing from the buffalo box to and in said premises.” S ince the code update, beginning March 1, 2014, any time the Village constructed a water line between the water main and buffalo box (B-box) during a water main replacement, the Village assumed the ownership and maintenance of that portion (public portion). The remainder of the line, from the B-box to the meter, remained under the ownership, and was the responsibility of, the property owner. Considered By: Date: Public Works Committee 03/19/26 12/18/25 08/25/25 03/19/25 Village of 36 In 2019, the Village Board adopted a new set of model building codes, which is where the code language regarding service line ownership was written, and did not reinclude that section. After researching the matter, it appeared this was done inadvertently. During its review of the issue, the Committee recommended readopting code language to reaffirm the Village’s practice of taking ownership over the public portion of the service line. The code update was brought forward to the Village Board for adoption along with the cost-sharing program. At the Board meeting a question arose as to when ownership would be transferred to the Village. As written in the proposed amendment, the Village would assume ownership over the public portion immediately, rather than incremently through water main replacement projects, as was done through the previous code language. “The village shall be responsible to keep and repair all water pipes, accessories, and buffalo boxes located in Village public rights-of-way as set forth in §150.196.” Given the scope of the change, as well as other requested information on the plan for piloting the cost-sharing program, staff wanted to reaffirm the Committee’s recommendation, and then bring it back to the Village Board for adoption along with the cost-sharing program. Financial Impact: The transfer of ownership of the public portion of the service line would increase the Village’s potential liability if any breaks were to occur. The Village currently sees a handful of service line breaks/repairs in a year. Accepting ownership and liability for all lines, regardless of age or condition, from main to B-box, would result in an increase in the Village’s repair budget. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Public Works Committee reaffirm the original intent of Ord. 1121 regarding the Village assuming service line ownership of the public portion when replaced on or after March 1, 2014 to limit potential liability to the Village. Attachment: • Ordinance 1121 – Approved 2/18/2014 • Draft Ordinance 37 ORDINANCE NO. 1121 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 150 OF THE KENILWORTH VILLAGE CODE REGARDING ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS PLUMBING CODE Passed by the Board of Trustees this 18th day of February, 2014 Published by the Board of Trustees this19th day of February, 2014 Printed and published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees ILLINOIS Village Clerk 38 ORDINANCE NO. 1121 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 150 OF THE KENILWORTH VILLAGE CODE REGARDING ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS PLUMBING CODE Whereas, the Village of Kenilworth (the “Village”) is a unit of local government organized under the laws of the State of Illinois; and Whereas, in 2009, the Village of Kenilworth adopted the 2004 Plumbing Licensing Law and the Illinois Plumbing Code, Ill. Adm. Code Part 890, subject only to the additions, deletions and modifications specifically set forth in subsection 150.196 of chapter 150 of the Kenilworth Village Code; and Whereas, the Village proposes to update subsection 150.196 to include language specific to the ownership of water service lines in the Village; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTES OF THE VILLAGE OF KENILWORTH, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. The recitals listed above are incorporated in this Ordinance as the findings of the President and Board of Trustees. SECTION 2. AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 150. Subsection 150. 196 of the Kenilworth Village Code amending section 890.110(m) of the Illinois Plumbing Code entitled “Maintenance of water connections and fixtures” shall be, and is hereby, amended as follows [additions are bold and underlined; deletions are everstruck]: A. Section 890.110(m) shall be amended in its entirety to state as follows: “Every person having service from the water mains of the Village shall, at his or her own cost and expense, keep and repair all pipes, accessories, and plumbing fixtures commencing with the tap into the water main to and in said premises; provided., however, that if the Village constructs and installs new water pipes and accessories and buffalo box from the water main of the Village to a buffalo box for a premises on or after March 1. 2014. the Vi1lae shall thereafter be responsible to keep and repair such water pipes and accessories and buffalo box for that premises, and every person having service from the water mains of the Village at that premises thereafter shall be responsible to keep 39 andrepair,athisorherowncostandexpense,theremainingwater servicelinepipes,accessories,andplumbingfixturescommencing fromthebuffaloboxtoandinsaidpremises.Ifanysuchsupplypipes accessoryorplumbingfixturebepermittedtoremainoutofrepairjy anypersonotherthantheVillage,theWaterDepartmentVillagemay, aftertwo(2)days’priornotice,postedonthemainentrancetothepremises, shutoffthewatertosaidpremises.Whenthewaterissoshutoff,itshallnot bepermittedtobeturnedonagainuntilsuchpipe,fixture,meteror accessoryshallhavebeenplacedinproperrepair.” Section3.EFFECTIVEDATE. ThisOrdinanceshallbecomeeffectiveafteritspassageandpublicationand approvalinaccordancewiththelawsoftheStateofIllinois. PASSED:This18thdayofFebruary,2014 AYES:Hughes,Lien,McClamroch,Lennon,Potter NAYS:None ABSENT:Thomas ABSTAIN:None,7) VillagePresident ATTESJ VillageClerk #27679634v2 40 (N 41 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO KENILWORTH CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTERS 50 AND 150 CONCERNING THE ILLINOIS PLUMBING CODE Passed by the Board of Trustees this _____ day of ______, 2026 Printed and published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees this ___ day of ___, 2026 VILLAGE OF KENILWORTH, ILLINOIS __________________________________ Village Clerk 42 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO KENILWORTH CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTERS 50 AND 150 CONCERNING THE ILLINOIS PLUMBING CODE WHEREAS, the Village of Kenilworth (“ Village”) is an Illinois municipal corporation organized and operating under the Illinois Municipal Code (“Code”); and WHEREAS, in or around 2009, the Village adopted the Illinois Plumbing Code with certain amendments; and WHEREAS, the Village Public Works Committee (“Committee ”) recently reviewed the Kenilworth Code of Ordinances (“Village Code”) concerning ownership over water service lines in the Village; and WHEREAS, the Committee has determined that the Village Code should be amended to address ownership and responsibility concerning certain water service infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the Village Board finds and determines that amending the Village Code in accordance with this Ordinance is in the Village’s best interests and that approving this Ordinance will promote the public health, safety, and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Kenilworth, Cook County, Illinois, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals listed above are incorporated in this Ordinance as the findings of the Village Board. SECTION 2. Chapter Amended. Kenilworth Code of Ordinances Chapter 50 is amended as follows (additions underlined): § 50.17 SERVICE PIPE LEAKS; RESPONSIBILITY FOR REPAIRS. (A) Every person supplied by the village with water shall, at his or her own expense, keep in repair all service pipes and appurtenances leading from the village water main to his or her meter and prevent waste of water from those mains, service pipes and appurtenances. (B) Every water main leading from village water main which is installed to serve a private fire hydrant, is hereby designated a private water main, and every owner of private premises for whose protection from fire the private water main is or may be installed, shall at his or her own expense, keep the private water main and the private fire hydrant served thereby and all appurtenances thereto, in repair and prevent waste of water from the private water main, private fire hydrant and all appurtenances thereto. (C) If leaks between the village mains and the meter, or in a private water main or private fire hydrant, are not repaired within two days after notice is served either upon the owner or person in possession, charge or control of the premises, in person or by mail, the Director of Public Works may shut off the water until proper repairs have been made; provided, however, that if in the opinion of the Superintendent, the leak is of sufficient size to require that service be shut off sooner, he or she may shut off the service without notice until the repair is made. No reduction shall be made from the regular rates as billed on account of leaking pipes, private water mains, hydrants or fixtures. 43 (D) The village shall be responsible to keep and repair all water pipes, accessories, and buffalo boxes located in Village public rights-of-way as set forth in §150.196. SECTION 3. Chapter Amended. Kenilworth Code of Ordinances Chapter 150 is amended as follows (additions underlined): § 150.196 ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND MODIFICATIONS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS PLUMBING CODE. The following sections of the Illinois Plumbing Code are hereby amended, deleted, or modified as hereinafter set forth: Section Number Section Title Additions, Deletions and Modifications 890.110(e) General Regulations; Maintenance of water connections and fixtures Add new subsection: “Plumbing and drainage systems in all buildings, public and private, shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance by a licensed plumber in accordance with the provisions of the State of Illinois Plumbing License Law. If a plumbing contractor is found to be using unlicensed plumbers, the contractor’s plumbing permit will be revoked.” "Every person having service from the water mains of the Village shall, at his or her own cost and expense, keep and repair all pipes, accessories, and plumbing fixtures commencing with the tap into the water main to and in said premises; however, the Village shall own and shall keep and repair all water pipes, accessories, and buffalo boxes located in Village public rights- of-way, and every person having service from the water mains of the Village at that premises thereafter shall be responsible to keep and repair, at his or her own cost and expense, the remaining water service line pipes, accessories, and plumbing fixtures commencing from the buffalo box to and in said premises. If any such supply pipe, accessory or plumbing fixture be permitted to remain out of repair by any person other than the Village, the Village may, after two (2) days' prior notice, posted on the main entrance to the premises, shut off the water to said premises. When the water is so shut off, it shall not be permitted to be turned on again until such pipe, fixture, meter or accessory shall have been placed in proper repair." 890.110(f) Overhead Sewers Add new subsection: “All new buildings with basements, floors, rooms, or occupancy areas below grade shall have overhead plumbing with ejector pumps.” * * * * * * * * * SECTION 4. Superseder. In the event a conflict exists between the terms of this Ordinance and any other ordinance or resolution of the Village, the terms of this Ordinance shall govern. The provisions of the Village Code amended by this Ordinance shall be reprinted with the foregoing changes. SECTION 5. Severability. If any part, subsection or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the remaining sections, subsections, and clauses shall not be affected thereby. SECTION 6. Effective Date. 44 A. The Village Clerk is authorized and directed to identify the local amendments to the Village’s building codes to the Capital Development Board in the manner provided by law. B. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect 30 days after the identification to the Capital Development Board provided in Section 5.A; and after passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided for by law. [Signature page follows] 45 Passed this ___ day of ____, 2026. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Approved this ____ day of ____, 2026. ATTEST: Village President Village Clerk 46