RecordWell Data

Packet

City of Stoughton · Dane County · meeting of Sep 14, 2026 · Agenda packets

Open the original document More from City of Stoughton

Text

Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.

OFFICIAL NOTICE AND AGENDA Notice is hereby given that the Rivers and Trails Task Force of the City of Stoughton, Wisconsin, will hold a regular or special meeting as indicated on the date and at the time and location given below. Date and Time: Monday, September 14th, 2026 at 5:30pm In-person: Stoughton Public Works Conference Room (2439 County Road A, Stoughton, WI) Video Call Link: https://shorturl.at/TTHwC R & T Members: Kurt Byfield, Jim Killian, Joni Dean, Bob Diebel, Larry Liebmann, Ralph Erickson, Nicole Dewitt, Will Clifton, Phil Caravello Call To Order Roll Call And Verification Of Quorum Member Communication July Minutes RIVER AND TRAILS TASK FORCE JULY MINUTES.DOCX Trail Study Routes ROUTE 1.PDF ROUTE 2.PDF ROUTE 3.PDF ROUTE 4.PDF River Park Construction Timeline RIVER PARK CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE.DOCX Cofferdam Timeline YAHARA RIVER IMPROVEMENTS - COFFERDAM.PDF 1. 2. 3. 4. Documents: 5. Documents: 6. Documents: 6.I. Documents: OFFICIAL NOTICE AND AGENDA Notice is hereby given that the Rivers and Trails Task Force of the City of Stoughton, Wisconsin, will hold a regular or special meeting as indicated on the date and at the time and location given below. Date and Time: Monday, September 14th, 2026 at 5:30pm In-person: Stoughton Public Works Conference Room (2439 County Road A, Stoughton, WI) Video Call Link: https://shorturl.at/TTHwC R & T Members: Kurt Byfield, Jim Killian, Joni Dean, Bob Diebel, Larry Liebmann, Ralph Erickson, Nicole Dewitt, Will Clifton, Phil Caravello Call To Order Roll Call And Verification Of Quorum Member Communication July Minutes RIVER AND TRAILS TASK FORCE JULY MINUTES.DOCX Trail Study Routes ROUTE 1.PDF ROUTE 2.PDF ROUTE 3.PDF ROUTE 4.PDF River Park Construction Timeline RIVER PARK CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE.DOCX Cofferdam Timeline YAHARA RIVER IMPROVEMENTS - COFFERDAM.PDF 1. 2. 3. 4. Documents: 5. Documents: 6. Documents: 6.I. Documents: River and Trails Task Force Committee Minutes July 6, 2026 Department of Public Works Building, 2439 County Highway A, Stoughton, WI Present: Bob Diebel, Joni Dean, Larry Liebmann, Jim Killian, Kurt Byfield, Nicole DeWitt, Phil Caravello, Tony King. Absent: Jon Lewis, Ralph Erickson, Will Clifton Guest: Liam Ackley , Lisa Reeves CALL TO ORDER: 1. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. Approval of Minutes from February 2, 2026. Diebel motioned to approve, Killian seconded. Approved 7-0 3. Member Communications: a. Liam Ackley, a local Scout, introduced a potential Eagle Scout project involving interpretive trail signage. Members discussed incorporating educational signage and trail names into the City's growing trail system. There was a motion to move forward with the project by Diebel, seconded by Byfield. Motion carried unanimously. b. General discussion continued regarding future trail naming and creating a consistent naming convention for the City's trail network. NEW BUSINESS 4. Mandt Park Goose Management: King presented a discussion paper outlining several strategies to reduce Canada goose activity and droppings along the Mandt Park Riverwalk, including Border Collie hazing, native shoreline plantings, public education signage, nest and egg management, routine staff hazing, and continued trail cleaning. Members discussed the benefits of expanding native shoreline vegetation while maintaining access to fishing areas and scenic views. Border Collie hazing was viewed as an effective option if funding becomes available. No formal action was taken. 5. Teigen Farm Park Master Plan Revision: King presented a revised concept for Teigen Farm Park that would replace the planned boardwalk with a natural walking trail and focus future improvements on habitat restoration. Discussion centered on reducing long-term maintenance, improving wildlife habitat, restoring the pond and dry basin, and preserving the site's natural character. Members agreed the revised concept better fits the park and noted that a boardwalk could still be considered in the future if restoration efforts support it. A motion was made by Byfield to recommend forwarding the revised Teigen Farm Park concept to the Parks and Recreation Committee for consideration. The motion was seconded by Killian and passed unanimously. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 6. PACER trail condition ratings and GIS integration for the City's trail system. 7. Continued discussion regarding trail naming and future trail signage. ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn by Byfield, seconded by Caravello, motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 6 :56 p.m. RIVER PARK CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE  Mid-August 2026 – Required mussel relocation was completed before in-river construction activities began.  August 2026 – The City , DNR, R.G. Huston, Strand, REP, and True North coordinated construction methods, permitting requirements, dredging, dewatering, contaminated-soil management, and the anticipated project schedule.  Fall 2026 – Initial construction activities and site preparation began or were scheduled to begin, including erosion controls, staging, temporary access, cofferdam preparation, and other work needed before the drawdown.  October 19, 2026 – Planned temporary drawdown begins. The river may be lowered no faster than six inches per day , with coordination among the City , DNR, and Dunkirk Dam operators.  October 2026 – March 2027 – Major work planned during the temporary drawdown includes: o Installation and use of temporary cofferdams o Dewatering of work areas o Dredging of the scour pool o Construction of the Fourth Street trail underpass o Shoreline stabilization and river improvements o Construction of the current deflector/diverter o Filling and abandonment of the former headrace and tailrace o Management and remediation of contaminated soil o Outfall and related utility work  March 15, 2027 – Planned end of the temporary drawdown period and restoration of normal river levels.  Spring – Summer 2027 – Anticipated completion of remaining above-water improvements, including: o Multi-use trail construction o Trail lighting o Landscaping and site restoration o Final shoreline work o Pavement and surface restoration o Project inspections and closeout www.sheet-piling.com www.gerdau.com/northamerica PZC profiles are named for their strength in metric designations. For example, PZC 18 has a Section Modulus of 1,800 cm3/meter. Make PZC sheet piling your first choice for its unmatched combination of drivability, ruggedness and strength to weight efficiency. PZC SHEET PILING PROPERTIES 12.56" 319 mm 27.88" 708 mm 0.375" 9.5 mm 0.375 9.5 mm "0.375" 9.5 mm PZC 13 27.88" 17.7" 0.60" 0.60" 0.525" 15.2 mm 13.3 mm 708 mm 450 mm 15.2 mm PZC 26 PZC 39 0.60" 15.2 mm 0.60" 15.2 mm 21.05" 535 mm 68˚51˚ 42˚ 0.525" 13.3 mm 22.50" 572 mm *Both sides of sheet; excludes socket interior and ball of interlock. All listed dimensions are nominal. Due to rolling practices, variations in web and flange thickness is common. Permitted variations for such dimensions are not addressed. PZC 14 PZC 13 27.88 12.56 0.375 0.375 14.82 50.4 353.0 56.2 6.10 5.60 6.38 21.7 152.0 24.2 708 319 9.5 9.5 95.6 75.1 14,690 920 1.86 1.71 135.1 106.0 20,760 1,300 PZC 18 25.00 15.25 0.375 0.375 14.82 50.4 532.2 69.8 6.10 5.60 7.12 24.2 255.5 33.5 635 387 9.5 9.5 95.6 75.1 22,150 1,145 1.86 1.71 150.6 118.2 34,890 1,800 PZC 19 25.00 15.30 0.420 0.420 16.16 55.0 576.3 75.3 6.10 5.60 7.75 26.4 276.6 36.1 635 388 10.7 10.7 104.2 81.8 23,990 1,235 1.86 1.71 164.1 128.8 37,780 1,945 PZC 25 27.88 17.66 0.485 0.560 20.40 69.4 938.7 106.3 6.65 6.15 8.78 29.9 404.1 45.7 708 449 12.3 14.2 131.6 103.3 39,070 1,740 2.03 1.87 185.9 145.9 55,190 2,455 PZC 26 27.88 17.70 0.525 0.600 21.72 73.9 994.3 112.4 6.65 6.15 9.35 31.8 428.1 48.4 708 450 13.3 15.2 140.1 110.0 41,390 1,840 2.03 1.87 197.9 155.4 58,460 2,600 PZC 28 27.88 17.75 0.570 0.645 23.22 79.0 1,057 119.1 6.65 6.15 10.00 34.0 455.1 51.3 708 451 14.5 16.4 149.8 117.6 44,000 1,950 2.03 1.87 211.6 166.1 62,150 2,755 PZC 37 22.50 21.02 0.488 0.563 20.45 69.6 1,349 128.4 6.65 6.15 10.91 37.1 719.6 68.5 572 534 12.4 14.3 132.0 103.6 56,160 2,100 2.03 1.87 230.9 181.2 98,270 3,680 PZC 39 22.50 21.05 0.525 0.600 21.76 74.0 1,429 135.6 6.65 6.15 11.61 39.5 762.1 72.3 572 535 13.3 15.2 140.4 110.2 59,480 2,220 2.03 1.87 245.6 192.8 104,100 3,890 PZC 41 22.50 21.09 0.561 0.636 23.03 78.4 1,507 142.7 6.65 6.15 12.28 41.8 803.6 76.1 572 536 14.2 16.2 148.6 116.6 62,720 2,340 2.03 1.87 260.0 204.1 109,700 4,090 Per Unit of Wall Section Nominal Width Wall Depth (Height) Web Thickness Flange Thickness in. (mm) in. (mm) in. (mm) in. (mm) Area Weight Area WeightMoment of Inertia Moment of Inertia Section Modulus Section Modulus Total Surface Area Nominal Coating Area* in.2 (cm2) in.2/ft (cm2/m) lbs/ft (kg/m) lbs/ft2 (kg/m2) in.4 (cm4) in.4/ft (cm4/m) in.3 (cm3) ft2/ft (m2/m) in.3/ft (cm3/m) ft2/ft (m2/m) Per Single Section 54˚15.25 387 mm " 25" 635 mm 0.375 9.5 mm " 0.375" 9.5 mm 0.375" 9.5 mm PZC 18 27.88 12.60 0.420 0.420 16.15 55.0 381.6 60.5 6.10 5.60 6.95 23.7 164.3 26.0 708 320 10.7 10.7 104.2 81.8 15,890 990 1.86 1.71 147.2 115.5 22,440 1,400 SPECIFICATIONS Gerdau Steel Grades for PZC and PS Profiles * A690 contains specified levels of Ni, Cu, and P at higher levels than the other listed grades on the table. *would contain singly or in combination, dependent on production type (1, 2 or 3) **= not specified (Where **is shown for copper a minimum of 0.20 may be specified). (A) For each reduction of 0.01% below C maximum, an increase of 0.06% Mn above specified maximum is permitted, up to a maximum of 1.50%. (B) For material with thickness of 1/2" (13mm) or less, Mn maximum of 1.35% would apply when C is greater than 0.21%. (C) For each reduction of 0.01% below C maximum, an increase of 0.06% Mn above specified maximum is permitted, up to a maximum of 1.10%. North American Grades ASTM Yield Strength (ksi) (MPa) European Grades EN 10248 Yield Strength (ksi) (MPa) ASTM A328 ASTM A572-50 ASTM A572-60 ASTM A572-65 ASTM A690 C % ** 0.23 max 0.26 max 0.23 max 0.22 max Mn % ** 1.35 maxA 1.35 maxA 1.65 maxB 0.60 - 0.90C P % 0.035 max 0.04 max 0.04 max 0.04 max 0.08 - 0.15 S % 0.04 max 0.05 max 0.05 max 0.05 max 0.04 max Si % ** 0.40 max 0.40 max 0.40 max 0.40 max Cu % ** ** ** ** 0.50 min Ni % ** ** ** ** 0.40 - 0.75 Cr % ** ** ** ** ** Mo % ** ** ** ** ** Sn % ** ** ** ** ** V % ** 0.010 -0.15* 0.010 -0.15* 0.010 -0.15* ** Cb / Nb % ** 0.005 - 0.05* 0.005 - 0.05* 0.005 - 0.05* ** Yield ksi [MPa] 39 min [270] 50 min [345] 60 min [415] 65 min [450] 50 min [345] Tensile ksi [MPa] 65 min [450] 65 min [450] 75 min [520] 80 min [550] 70 min [485] Elong % 17 @ 8 in. 18 @ 8 in. 16 @ 8 in. 15 @ 8 in. 18 @ 8 in. Gerdau Sheet Piling Grades and their Chemistries For most sections, S 240 GP, S 270 GP, and S 355 GP Z-profiles can be supplied for European projects requiring the ÜHP proof of conformity. A572 Grade 60 is the most economical and readily available grade. Please inquire for minimum order requirements for other grades. A 328 39 270 A 572 Grade 50 50 345 A 572 Grade 60 60 415 A 572 Grade 65 65 450 A 690* 50 345 S 240 GP 35 240 S 270 GP 39 270 S 355 GP 51 355 S 430 GP 62 430 S 450 GP 65 450 www.sheet-piling.com www.gerdau.com

Source: City of Stoughton website. First collected Oct 16, 2026.