9.3.26 PC Agenda and Packet

PLAN COMMISSION MEETING VILLAGE HALL 4128 HUBERTUS ROAD, HUBERTUS, WISCONSIN SEPTEMBER 3, 2026 7:00P.M. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.84, Wis. Stats., notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Village of Rlclifield Plan Commission, at which a quorum of the Village Board may attend in order to gather information about a subject which they have decision making responsibility. The meeting will be held at the above noted date, time, and location. Notice of Village Board Quorum, (Chairperson to announce the following if a quorum of the Village Board is in attendance at the meeting: "Please let the minutes reflect that a quorum of the Village Board ls present and that the Village Board members may be making comments under the Public Comments section of the agenda, during any Public Hearlng(s) or if the rules are suspended to allow them to do so''.), 1. Call to Order/ Determination of Quorum 2. Verification of Open Meetings Law Compliance 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. August 6, 2026 - Plan Commission Meeting 5. DISCUSSION/ ACTION ITEMS a. Discussion/ Action regarding a proposed two lot Certified Survey Map (CSM) for the property located at 2414 &2450 Hillside Road (TNK V10_005100D & V10_005100E)-Nick & Emily Hamel & Herder LLC, Petitioner/Owner b. Discussion/Action on the proposed amendment to Section 170.870 Height of Buildings and Pother Structures specifically height of Detached Accessory Structures c. Discussion regarding the proposed concept Planned Development District (POD) for the property located 3733 & 3737 Hubertus Road (TKN: Vl0_082900B)-Magnum Excavating, Petitioner/ St. Gabriel Congregation, Owner 6. PLAN COMMISSION ADJOURNMENT Additional explanation ofiterns on the agenda can be found on the Village's website at www richficldwi.gov, Notification of this meeting has been posted in accordance with the Open Meeting Laws of the State of Wisconsin. It is possible that rnembers of and possibly a quorum ofrnembers of other governmental bodies of the municipality UIII)' attend the above stated meeting to gather infonnation; no action will be taken by any governmental body at the above stated meeting othertha.n the governmental body specifically referred to above in this notice. Requests from persons with disabilities who need assistance to participate in this meeting or hearing should be rnade to the Village Clerk's Office at (262) 628-2260 with as much advance notice as possible. Village of Richfield 4128 Hubertus Road Plan Commission Meeting Minutes August 6, 20261 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order/ Determination of Quorum a. Plan Commission The Plan Commission meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Chairman Otto. A quorum of the Plan Commission and Village Board were present. Plan Commission Members Present: Chairman Jim Otto, Vice-Chairman Dan Naze, Trustee Jack Lietzau, Commissioners Bob Bilda and Heidi Woelfel. Commissioners Brett Wittig and Village Administrator Jim Healy were excused absence. Also Present: Administrative Services Coordinator Brad Calder 2. Verification of Open Meetings Law Compliance The Administrative Services Coordinator stated that the agenda had been posted and sent to the media. 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. July 9, 2026 - Joint Plan Commission and Village Board Meeting Motion by Vice ChairmanNazeto awrove the Minutes from the Plan Commission Meeting from July 9, 2026, as presented. Seconded by Trustee Lietzau: Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. 5. DISCUSSION/ACTIONTfEMS. a. Discussion/.Action regardhtg a Special Exception for expansion to a Non-Conforming Structure located 223 Shady Lane (TKN: Vl0 _ 126300E) - Josh Grorich, Petitioners/ Julie Grorich, Owner • ASC Calder gave a brief introduction of the agenda item. Motion by ViceChairman Naze to recommend approval to the Village Board for the proposed Special Exception for Josh dr6tich for the property owned by Julie Grorich for property located at 223 Shady Lane (TNK: Vl 0 126300£); as prepared for Josh Grorich, with the following conditions of approval: Specific Conditions of Approval: 1. Prior to breaking grouncl on the addition, the petitioner must sign the Decision Letter prepared by Village Staff detailing the decision by the Plan Commission and Village Board. 2. Prior to breaking ground, the petitioner must receive approval from Building Inspection Department for the proposed addition and renovation of this single-family residential home. 3. Prior to breaking ground, the petitioner must pay all professional fees associated with the proposed Special Exception. 4. Prior to breaking ground, the petitioner shall sign a deed restriction that is reviewed and approved by the Village Attorney. Village of Richfield 4128 Hubertus Road Plan Commission Meeting Minutes August 6, 2026 I 7:00 PM General Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant shall satisfy all comments, conditions. and concerns of the Village Administrator. Planning and Zoning Administrator. Village Engineer. Village Planner. Village Attorney and Village Building Inspector. 2. Any unpaid bills owed to the Village by the subject properly owner or his or her tenants. operators or occupants, for reimbursement of professional fees (as described above): or for personal property taxes: of for real property taxes: or for licenses. permit fees, or any other fees owed to the Village: shall be placed upon the tax roll for the subject property if not paid within thirty (30) days of the billing by the Village. pursuant to Section 66.0627. Wisconsin Statutes. Such unpaid bills also constitute a breach of the requirements of this conditional approval that is subject to all remedies available to the Village, including possible cause for termination of this approval. • Seconded by Commissioner Bartel. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. b. Discussion/Action on a Plan ofOpera~on for BJ's Tailgate Tavern located 1907 State Hwy 175 (TKN: VlO _ 030900Z) - Brittany Trzebiatowski, Petitioner/SAS l11yestments LLC, Owner ASC Calder gave a brief introduction of the agenda item. Motion by Trustee Lietzau to approve the petitioned Plan of Operation for BJ's Tailgate Tavern proposed to be located at 1907 State Hwy 175 (Tax Key: VI0 030900Z). subjectto the following Specific Conditions of Approval: • • Specific Conditions ofApproval: I. The petitioner r~ceives all necessary permits andpassing inspections from the Building Inspection Department and Richfield Fire Department. Seconded by Commissioner BtirteLMotii,ti carried unanimously by voice vote. c. Discussion/ActiQn on a Plait of Operatfon for The Alpine located 1380 Friess Lake Road (TKN: VlO _ 067300Z & V10..:.067300E) - Scott Motto, Petitioner/Mottos Retreat LLC, Owner ASC Calder gave a brief introduction of the agenda item. Discussion between Commission l\.1.eip.bers and Mr. Scott Motto occurred. Mr. Motto asked that the hours of operation be from 7:QOAJ\.1 toA:00 PM. Motion by Trustee Lietzau to approve the petitioned Plan of Operation for The Alpine proposed to be located at 1380 Friess Lake Road (Tax Key: Vl0 067300Z & Vl0 067300E). subject to the following Specific Conditions of Approval: Specific Conditions of Approval: I. The petitioner receives all necessary permits and passing inspections from the Building Inspection Department and Richfield Fire Department. 2. The hours of operation shall be from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM. Seconded by Vice Chairman Naze. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. Village of Richfield 4128 Hubertus Road Plan Commission Meeting Minutes August 6, 202617:00 PM d. Discussion regarding the proposed concept Subdivision Design for the property located at on the northeast corner of State Hwy 164 and Elmwood Road (TKN: Vl0_0818)- Tim O'Brien Homes, Petitioner ASC Calder gave an introduction of the agenda item providing an overview of the proposed subdivision. Ms. Deb Beaver from Tim O'Brien Homes gave a presentation on the proposed subdivision and Tim O'Brien Homes. Trustee Lietzau had questions regarding possibly having fences around the retention ponds, mailboxes in the cul de sacs and landscaping in the open spaces. Discussion between Plan Commission Members and Ms. Beaveroccurred regarding traffic on Elmwood Road and at the intersection of State Hwy 164 and Elmwood Road. Discussion between Plan Commission Members occurred regarding the proposed subdivision. 6. ADJOURNMENT: Motion by Vice Chairman Naze. seconded by Trustee Lietzau. to adjourn the Plan Commission meeting at 7:48 PM: Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Brad Calder Administrative Services Coordinator VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSON COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Two Lot Ce1tified Survey Map for property located at 2414 & 2450 Hillside Road (TNK Vl0_005100D & Vl0_005100E) - Nick & Emily Hamel & Herder LLC. Petitioners I Agents DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Brad Calder, Administrative Services Coordinator POLI CY QUESTIONS: DOES THE PLAN COMMISSION WISH TO RECOMMEND TO THE VILLAGE BOARD APPROVAL OF A TWO LOT CSM FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2414 AND 2450 HILLSIDE ROAD? ISSUE SUMMARY: j . Nick and Emily Hamel currently own the parcel "Parcel A" at 2450 Hillside Road (TKN: Vl0_005100D). Herder LLC cmTently owns the parcel "Parcel B" at 2414 Hillside Road (TKN: Vl0_005100E). The registered agent for Herder LLC is Kristin Hamel. The proposed CSM is to go from move the shared propoerty line dividing the two current parcels to the south. Increasing the size of "Parcel A" and decreasing the size of "Parcel B". The purpose is to increa se the size of the parcel which will then allow Nick and Emily Hamel to build a larger detached accessory structure. Both "Parcel A" and "Parcel B" were created by CSM 5895 which was approved in 2021 "Parcel A", 2450 Hillside Road, identified by (TKN: Vl0_005100D) is currenly zoned Rs-lR, Country Estate­ Remnant Parcel District. The parcel is 5 .44 acres in size, with a single family home. This parcels currently conforms to all of the standards of Rs-1 R District . "Parcel B", 2414 Hillside Road, identified by (TKN: V 10 _ 0051 00E) is currently zoned Rs-1 R Country Estate­ Remnant Parcel District. The parcel is 8.3 acres in size, with a single family home located on the south end of the parce l. The parcel is unquie in that it incircle to smaller parcles that consist of the old St. Mary Church on one parcel which is also owned by Herder LLC. The second parcel is St. Mary 's Cemetary which is owned by St. Gabrie l's Parish. There is also a recorded access agrent for the parcel for access to the cemetary. The current parcel is confroming to all of the standards of the Rs-1 R District. Staff has been working with the owners for the last year on the proposed Two-Lot CSM, that call for the new property line to consist of the north property line for the cemertary parcel and then establishing a new shared property line between "Parcel A" and "Parce l B" going from the northeast comer of the cemetary parcel with the line extending to the east northeast. "Parce l A" will then 8. 715 acres in size and will meet all of the deminsinal standards of the Rs-1 R District. "Parcel B" will be reduced in size to 5 .023 Acres meeting the minimum required size of 5 acres and the other deminsonal standards of the Rs-1 R District. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSON COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Two Lot Certified Survey Map for property located at 2414 & 2450 Hillside Road (TNK Vl0_005100D & V10_005100E) -Nick & Emily Hamel & Herder LLC, Petitioners I Agents DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Brad Calder, Administrative Services Coordinator FUTURE IMPACT AND ANALYSIS: Forward to Village Board: Yes Additional Approvals Needed: Yes Signatures Required: Yes ATTACHMENTS 1. Application submitted by Nick and Emily Hamel REVIEWED BY: f/ll · /AA ,f · ~, • Village Dep( Clerk 2. DRAFT CSM prepared by Donald Thoma, PLS dated August 5, 2026 3. Letter dated August 25, 2026 from Village Engineer Will Hein STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to recommend to the Village Board the approval of the proposed Two-Lot CSM for Nick and Emily Hamel, for properties located at 2414 & 2450 Hillside Road (TNK: V10_005100D & Vl0_005100E) subject to the Specific and General Conditions Listed Below. Specific Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant shall satisfy all of the comments in the Letter from Village Engineer Will Hein dated August 25, 2026. General Conditions of Approval: 1. The subdivider shall satisfy all comments, conditions, and concerns of the Village Administrator, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Village Engineer, the Village Planner, and all reviewing, objecting and approving bodies, including, but not limited to, the Wisconsin Department of Commerce per Ch. 236, Wisconsin Statutes and Ch. Comm. 85, Wisconsin Administrative Code; Wisconsin Department of Administration per Ch. 236, Wisconsin Statutes; and Washington County. 2. The subdivider shall, on demand, reimburse the Village all costs and expenses of any type that the Village incurs in connection with this development, including the cost of professional services incurred by the Village (including engineering, legal, planning and other consulting fees) for the review and preparation of required documents or attendance at meetings or other related professional services for this application, as well as to enforce the conditions in this conditional approval due to a violation of these conditions. 3. Any unpaid bills owed to the Village by the subject property owner or his or her tenants, operators or occupants, for reimbursement of professional fees ( as described above); or for personal property taxes; of for real property taxes; or for licenses, permit fees, or any other fees owed to the Village; shall be placed upon the tax roll for the subject property if not paid within thirty (30) days of the billing by the Village, pursuant to Section 66.0627, Wisconsin Statutes. Such unpaid bills also constitute a breach of the requirements of this conditional approval that is subject to all remedies available to the Village, including possible cause for termination of this approval. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSON COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Two Lot Certified Survey Map for property located at 2414 & 2450 Hillside Road (TNK V10_005100D & V10_005100E) -Nick & Emily Hamel & Herder LLC, Petitioners I Agents DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Brad Calder, Administrative Services Coordinator APPROVED FOR SUBMITI AL BY: VILLAGE CLERIC USE ONLY BOARD ACTION TAKEN Resolution No, ______ _ Continued To: ______ _ Ordinance No, ______ _ Refen-ed To: ______ _ Approved ______ _ Other ______ _ Denied File No.------- : Washington County Certified Survey Map Lot 2 5 .023 Aores ~ 218,804 Sq. fet:1t lo (eXQuslve Df road) Sheet 1 r;if 3 . 1' Rs-m Realdenl!al (zonfng sui>Ject to change} Pront m1n.~ao• Sida min, ~ 50' Rear min, - ~01 {r.a.) means "recorded as" P.O.13. ~ lodlr::ates Point of Baglnn!ng. o ~ rnd[catasa 1.3''od X18" Jronf)lpe ' weighing 1.88 lbs.11t. set. • ~ Indicates a 1.3"od Iron pipe found unless noted. Beaflng& ti.re rererencetf to the WJsoonsln State Plane Coordinate Grid System, South Zone. Tha st,Ulh line of the SE 114 of Sao. 33-10-19 has a grid bearing of S 89°1~10" W. (NAO 8312011) 0 76 160 300 Seate In feet 1">!1160' Note/ Thero are addltlonal documents recorded for easements, Doc. 1090408 well, Doc. 1090407 oop1Io and Doc. 10911406 drlvmvays. Location Sketch NWF'radl114~Sec.3-9-19 • ~: j lik \\\lllllfl1,, J 00 ,,t ... cotv,,'.'.,j ~;;•'i',~.~A.; '°'.A. ,,• ·•.~r ,:. ~ "/ ··•.*~ :: l ~JTHQMA\ ~ r ( RlgH2r1,:o i - ~\ WIS, l;;;: -::. •.. . ... ~ ~ . .-~~ ~ , .,,,.". ·~O ,....-. ~.\'\,,,,, homa, 8-.2470 ,2028. Accurate E9 Surveying & Engineering_LLP Land $u1veying, Developing and Consulting 2911 Wlldllfe Lane, Richfield, WI 53076 Phone (262)677-2120 Ali gust 5, 2026 RE: Legal deserlption for additional l1111ds: Additional Land to be purchased from Hel'der, LLC to Nickolas J. and Emily G. Hamel: Part of Lot Three (3) of Certified Survey Map No. 5895, recorded in the Washington County Registry on June 3, 2005 !n Volume 43 of Certified Survey Maps on pages 192-194 as Docur.nen:t No. 1089978, being part of the NW 1/4 of the NW Fractional 1/4 of Section 3, Township 9 North, Range 19 East, in the Village of Richfield, Washington County, Wisconsin, which is bounded and described as follows: Commencing at a concrete monument with a 'brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 3; thence S 00°42'13" E, along the west line of said NW Fractional 1/4, 1067.42 feet; thence N 89°27'14" E, along the westerly extension of the line of said Lot 3, 40.00 feet, to the intersection of the east right-of-way line of Hillside Road and the point of beginning of lands herein desctihed; thence N 89°27'14" E, along the line of said Lot 3, 275.60 foet; thence N 76°28'00" E, 326.55 feet, to the intersection of the west line of said Lot 3; thence N 00°42'13" W, along said west line of Lot 3, 186.77 feet, to 1he northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence S 89°27'14" E, along the north line of said Lot 3, 594.00 feet, to the northwest comer of said Lot 3; thence S 00°42'13" E, along said east right-of-way line of Hillside Road and the west line of said Lot 3, 261.11 feet, to the point of beginning. Containing 3 .279 acres (142,847 square feet) more or less. Sheet3 of 3 Washington Count y Certifie d Survey Map Lois Two (2) and Three (3) of Certified Survey Map No. 5895. recorded in the Washington County Registry on June 3. 2005 in Volume 43 of Certified Survey Maps on pages 192-194 as Document No. 1089978. being part of the NW 1/4 of the NW Fractional 1/4 of Section 3, Township 9 North. Range 19 East, in the Village of Richfield. Washington County. Wisconsin. Corp orate Owner' s C ertificate: HERDER. LLC. a corporalion duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Wisconsin. as owner of Lot 2, does hereby certify that said corporation caused the land on this Certified Survey Map to be surveyed. divided and mapped as represented on this map. HERDER, LLC, does further certify that lhere is no mortgage and this Certified Survey Map is requined by sec. 236.34 of Wisconsin Statutes to be submitted to the following for approval. Village of Richfield Plan Commission Village of Richfield Village Board IN WITNESS WHEREO F. HERDER. LLC has caused these presents to be signed by James D. Hamel and Kristen K Hamel. its Officers. at h) £: )IJ £1H,1 \JOA ( +--1- Wisconsin. , A . and its corporate seal to ;;hereunt o affixed this l day of __ ~~-J--· "'V_-'x~t-~, 202k, In the presence ot. HERDER, LLC OF WISCONSIN) WASHINGTON COUNTY)s.s C, Personalty came before me this L,_ day of ---'-''-"'"-'-1-""'<.i...- • 202~ James D. Hamel and Kristan K. Hamel Officer of the above named corporation. lo me known t the persons who executed the foregoing instrument. and to me known to be such Officer of said corporation. and acknowledge that they executed the foregoing instrument as such officers as the deed of said corporation. by its authority. My commission expires _ __,\~f..,)~\,..,.9-.....,\~Vi~]~_ C!tonstnt of ~.ortgag.r: James D. Hamel and Kristen K Hamel. of the State of Wisconsin. mortgagee of the above described land Lot 1, does hereby consent to CRISTAL LIEUNGH Notary Public State of Wisconsin the surveying, dividing and mapping of the land described on this Certified Survey Map. and does hereby consent to the above certificate of Nickolas J.Hamel and Emily G. Hamel owners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said James D. Hamel and Kristen K Hamel has caused these presenls to be signed by James D. Hamel and Kristen K. Hamel (mortgagee). Al w~~Ltv-yW.,,.U'-(. Wisconsin, this .1_ day of /h,1..j\.L~t 202.4,i.. ~ ~tkJ ~!1::~~ • B/8/zt; STA E OF WISCONSIN ) WASHINGTON COUNTY)s.s (} ,A. . !.- Personally came before me this _'6_ day of flLAj V-'YI 202,bJames D. Hamel and Kristen K. Hamel Officer of the above named corporation. to me known to oe the persons who execuled the foregoing instrument. , , , , '' •~~IN 11, 1111 and to me known to be such Officer of said corporatio n. and acknowledge that they ,,'' ~~~ ...... .. / ~! ,t, 111 executed the foregoing instrumen t as such officers as the deed of said corporatio?' by its authority. ::::'* / •• .. * S ) (} g / ooNALDJTHOMA\ ::: U'(___. = : S-2470 : My commission expires - ~~0-~Y-+_A__,._ __ This instrument was drafted by Donald J. Thoma. S-2470 CRISTAL LIEUNGH Notary Public State of Wisconsin ::: \ RICHFIELD j ~ _ . WIS. . , -:., \ .. J,'Q'•--? .:.;::,~ / ¥~ . •·' ,,,' Washington County Certified Survey Map lota Two (2) and Three {S) of Certified Survey Map No. 6895, re1,.-orded In the Wash!ngton County Registry on June 3, 2005 In v-orume 43 of Certified eurv,.vey Maps on pages 1Sl2~184 as Ooaument No. 1080978, being part of the NW 1/4 of-Iha N\IV Fractlom,I 1/4 of Section 8, l0WS1shlp 9 North, Aanga Hl l:aat, In tha VIiiage of nlchfleld, Washington Counl)', Wlifconeln, Surveyor's Certificate: Shae12 of3 1. Donald J, Tltoma, Profeaslon~I Land Sul'l/8yor, hereby cattlry that by the dlrec:Hon of Ntckolae fiamal, J have au1vayed, divided and mapJJed the !and shown and des<1rlbad h&Tflon1 Lola 1\l{o (2) and Throe (3) ofCetllfled SllrV8y Map No. 5895, recorded In lhe­ Waah!ngton CXiunty R!:!glatry on June-3. 2006 In Volume43 of Certified survey MBM on page& 192--194 as Doaument No, 1089978, being part of Iha NW 114 of the NW Fraction al 1/4 of saoUon a, Township 9 North, .Renge 10 Ea.at, In the VIIIB!'Jff of RlohfJald, Wtlehlllgkm Counly. Wlecan11fn. Oonlainlng 13.738 aorea (698,423 eqUar& faet) more or less. I furthf.tr cert[fy that I he.Ve ful)y complled with the pra\lfalol'Je ofsao. 238,34 of Wlscionsln Statutee and th& VIiiage of RlohJlekf land Olvlelon Ordlmmca In swveytng, dtvlrJ/ng, map/'llng and dedloa:tlng sald land, end that fhls map la a oorreot repreaentallon of the e,<1a1ior baund~!ElJff th& li;ind aurveY$d a~d th~ cllVlS!lan of safd rands. Dahld lhls_~ __ ';day of~, 2026. \\\lllllt,r, 1 ,,,, d O O/V.1r/1,,,., ..... , ~~~ ......... ~/_,,, ,.~ §'-k/' ••• .. 1,:'~··-:. • . ~ti.ALO J TIIOMA ·, :! , rl~I /~:;S•.2470· ! ; ~ //\: ~IELD / ,: Oonald J3imffi S-247\ r8, / $ ~ ... ,···,. ,.,::0...,.$ -,:14-,. ....... ~,:,;,-1<>',., .. ,,, V &'OR"""',,,, 111111110\\\ Owner's Certificate: A& ownim:i of t.,ol 1, wo heroby certil'y (hijf wa o.auoerJ the lend tihown tind deswlbetl heroin to be au1veyed, divided and mappad as repreaantad on thl!ll Csrtlfled Survey M8P, We also certify them is a mortgage on this pro potty and that this Certlfletf Surv&y Map Is required to be- submllf8d lo fM: foU DWfng for approvalt VIiiage of Rlchffeld Plal'I Ccmmiasfon Village of Rf.chlleltCV/1 ge Board STATE OF WISCONSIN) WASHINGTON COUNTYJ,.s (') Personally came baf(l,e me tflfs L day of aro to me known to bu tha sam& paraone who executed the aame. (Notary:Sea,I,. _______ , Notary PUbllo, My commlaslon explro, __ } ~ci~l.,_g.._..1J21~i~ I e ns , CRISTAL LIEUNGH Notary Publtc Stute of Wisconsin Village of Richfield Village Board Approval: ' Thia ltmd division le: hareby approved and ac:oGptecf by tho ViJJage ot R!oh11erd Village Boardthle __ day of _____ ~ 20L, John Jeffords -V!lfage President Jim Healy~ Village Admlroo1ni:tor thtB fnstrumenlwas. dte.Red by Oonatd J. Tho1r1a, 8-2470 Village of Richfield Planning and Zoning 4128 Hubertus Road Hubartus,Wl53033 (p)262.628.2260 ◊ (f)262.628.2984 CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP APPLICATION CHECKLIST D Pre-application meeting with Village Staff • Date of meeting: ___ _ • Combining non.conforming lots (YIN): ___ _ • Combining conforming lots {YIN): ___ _ • Deed restrictions (YIN): ___ _ □ Application Received • Date received: ___ _ □ Determination of completeness • Date reviewed for completeness: ___ _ □ Communication Fonn sent to Plan Commission members • Date is Friday before Plan Commission meeting: ___ _ □ Communication Form and PC Agenda sent to applicant, Friday before meeting: ___ _ O PC meeting agenda posted at three U.S. Post Offices D Joint Plan CommlssionMllage Board Meeting □ Plan Commission recommendation to Village Board □ Village Board decision □ Applicant files approved CSM at Washington County Register of Deeds □ Application information stored In Lazerfisoh □ Revise zoning map with Tax Key ID sent to C/S for updating • Date sent to CIS: ----• Revised on: ___ _ CSM Fee $450.00 CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP APPLICATION The undersigned certifies that a final certifled survey map was prepared by a registered IEtnd surveyor. It oomplles with the requirements of Wis. Stats. §236.34; and certifies that the Information listed below iS aocurate. Overview Please fill out all forms attaohed In this document for the purposes of obtaining a concfrtlonal use permit. Submittal is 25 days prior to the next Plan Commission meeting. See Planning & Zoning Fee Schedule for all requtred fees. All certified survey maps are revf~.oed by the Plan CQmmtsslon and Village Board. The Plan commission meets on the first Thursday of every month and the Village Board meets on the ihlrd Thursday of every month. Property owner Information Nams: .AL.i cJ:-dl' t~ t: {f?; l j ¼!~ Company Name: -----~----------- ----- - - --- Mallng Address: 3.,4, fu:? !-l-i f.( S; ~ ('..:- City: .bL4.f;: 4'1- Phon& Numbef: l - C7l{ - J.,C\ Fax: Wisoonsln Registered Surveyor Nanw: V00 .,,,I~ Ih oO Q...-­ -state: '-" .k: Emal: company Name: h:~~ ~'-"( ve:~ j 11, ~ k B:11.~; MHJ .. ~ l~ J,. . e ,. Mallln{I Addre98: O: <3 l \ \.v 'j I e\ l, /e_,, l,,/1, City: 1L10fi ~ State: ~ \JV k Zip: s Sc> t" t., Phone Number: t - b r - t Fax· Email: Project Information nx PeroeJ Number: OQ S l QO V Size of Plr'cel {aores}: Zoning: Property Owner Affidavit I (we), attest that I am (we are) the owner(s) of the property which Is the subject of this application in ttie Village of Richfield, Washington County, Wisconsin, and that all the Information allached to or provided In support of said application, Including sketches, data, and any other documents and _ material, are honest and true to the best of my (our) knowledge. Further, I (we) as Owner(s) acknowledge and accept the responsibility for any and all fees charged or costs incurred by the Village of Richfield to cany out the processing and review of this application; I (we) further acknowledge and understand that I (we) will be required to start an escrow account to which all processing and review costs will be charged; I (we) further acknowledge that in the event that the initial fee is not sufficient to cover all the costs associated wl1h processing and reviewing the application I (we) will be required to provide the Village of Richfield an additional deposit; I (we) further acknowledge that the balance of any remaining fees shall be refunded wllhin a reasonable amount of lime after this appllcation has been processed. Further I (we) as Owner(s) of the subject property authorize and direct the Authorized Agent(s) Identified above to act as my (our) representatlve(s} in any matter regarding this applicatlon, which may lnclude the payment of filing fees on my (our) behalf; Further 1 (we} as Owner(s} of the property subject of this application and Authorized Agent(s) understand that this application and all required forms and information must be completed and accurate, as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator for the Vfllage of Richfield, before a meeting and/or public hearing (if required) can be scheduled. ~ l~-- . A..._; rlnt Name of Owner(s) ~ 14= Signaturedlwnet(s} ~ Name of Agents(s) The foregoing instrument was sworn to and acknowledged before me this 2, day of 11½cJ U-&f Notary~~ lA~T CRISTAL LIEUNGH Print Notary Signature Commission Expires ~c:C d Q r W61N497 Washington Avenue Cedarburg, WI 53012 c O R P O RAT 1 0 N ___ C_o_rn_m_u_ni-ty-ln-f-ra-,t-n_,c_tu-re-. -, -A-,,-h-ite-,-tt-,re--,-E-nv-ir-o-nn-,e-n-t,-1-Se-r-vic-e-,------2c:6==2-=-2"'04.,.._"'23,.,5"'0 August 25, 2026 Mr. James Healy, Village Administrator VIiiage of Richfield 4128 Hubertus Road Hubertus, Wisconsin 53033 Subject: Nickolas Hamel Certified Survey Map (CSM) Review Dear Mr. Healy: www.cedarcorp.com We have completed our review of the referenced CSM dated on August 5, 2026. The m;lp was prepared by, Donald J. Thoma, PLS of Accurate Surveying & Engineering LLP. The proposed Land Division is being proposed under section 330 of the Village Code and Chapter 236 of Wisconsin State Statutes. Based on our review, we have the following comments, questions, and recommendations for your consideration: • We recommend that an easement be created across the existing driveway which is shown on the southern portion of proposed Lot 1 to provide access to the cemetery. • We recommend that a note indicating the location of future wells be added to the face of the map in accordance with the requirements of Wisconsin Administrative Code Section 812.08 Table A due to the presence of the cemetery. Submitted data has been reviewed for conformance with generally accepted surveying practices and Village policies. Although this data has been reviewed, the surveyor is responsible for the thoroughness and accuracy of survey and supplemental data and for compliance with all state and local codes, ordinances, and procedures. Modification to the survey, etc., may be required should errors or changed conditions be found at a future date. Please contact me at (262) 204-2341 if you require any additional information or if you have any questions. Thank you for the opportunity to assist the Village of Richfield. Sincerely, CEDAR CORPORATION William A. Hein, PE, PLS Project Manager-Professional Land Surveyor Enclosure(s): As Noted cc: Matthew Stephan, PE, Cedar Corporation Donald J. Thoma, PLS, Accurate Surveying & Engineering LLP Cedarburg • Green Bay Madison Menomonie New Berlin VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSON COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Special Exception for Accessory Building - Height DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator POLICY QUESTIONS: DOES THE PLAN COMMISSION WISH TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE REGARDING THE ALLOWANCE FOR A 'SPECIAL EXCEPTION' RELATED TO THE HEIGHT OF ACCESSORY BUILDINGS WHEN THE HEIGHT IS NECESSARY TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PITCH OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME? ISSUE SUMMARY: The proposed amendment would allow a Special Exception to be considered when the height of an accessory building is determined to be desireable by the proeprty owner to match the roof pitch aod architectural design of the associated single­ family home. The intent is not to provide a blanket allowance for taller accessory structures, but rather, to recognize that with certain architectural designs it may be desireable by the proeprty owner to add additional building height to maintain a consistent and complementary appearance. In no case, would ao accessory building be permitted to exceed the height of the associated single-family home. The proposed provision, as discussed by the Plan Commission, has intentionally been limited to the Rs-1, Country Estates District and the Rs-lB, Single-Family Cluster/Open Space Residential District. These are the Village's most 'active' zoning districts and generally contain larger residential lots (1.25-ac & 10-ac, respectively) aod development patterns where larger accessory structures may be more appropriate due to the massing and scale of the home on the property. Requiring a Special Exception provides the Village with ao opportunity to evaluate each request individually, rather than establishing ao automatic entitlement to additional height. An important consideration is the architectural relationship between the primary residence aod the accessory structure. Roof pitch is a significant component of a building's overall appearaoce, and requiring ao accessory building to have a substaotially different or artificially reduced roof pitch solely to comply with a maximum height requirement can result in a structure that appears visually 'out of proportion' with the principal residence. Allowing the height necessary to carry a similar roof pitch can produce a more cohesive aod architecturally appealing property which is generally the concern we hear from existing property owners who are seeking the additional height. As an additional safeguard, Staff would recommend that as a condition of approval, deed restrictions be placed on properties receiving such a Special Exception. The restrictions would reinforce that the accessory structure may only be utilized for those uses otherwise permitted within the applicable zoning district. This would provide the Village with ao additional mechanism to ensure that the increased building height is being granted for its intended architectural purpose and is not subsequently used to facilitate an otherwise prohibited use, like ao accessory dwelling unit or a more invasive business not otherwise allowed by a Home Occupation. Together, the Special Exception process, the limitation to the Rs-1 aod Rs-lB Districts, the requirement that the accessory structure remain no taller thao the single-family home, and the recommended deed restrictions provide reasonable safeguards while allowing greater flexibility for quality residential architecture. Village Staff is seeking the opinion of the Piao Commission regarding these draft ordinances and if favorably viewed, we would be seeking a motion to prepare for a scheduled Joint Public Hearing between the group aod the Village Board. FUTURE IMPACT AND ANALYSIS: Forward to Village Board: Yes Additional Approvals Needed: Yes Signatures Required: Yes VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSON COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Special Exception for Accessory Building - Height DATE SUBMITTED: August 28, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator AITACHMENTS 1. Section 170.874-Placement of Detached Accessory Buildings on Lot 2. Section 170.870- Height of Buildings and Other Structures 3. DRAFT Ordinance Amendment related to the height of accessory buildings 4. Chapter 170, Article 5, Division 7 - Special Exception (170.440- 170.451) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to direct Staff to prepare for a Joint Public Hearing regarding the proposed allowance of Special Exceptions for accessory buildings that exceed the maximum allowable height development standard when the property owner seeks to match the roof pitch of an existing single-family home located on the same property. APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY: VILLAGE CLERK USE ONLY BOARD ACTION TAKEN Resolution No. ______ _ Ordinance No. ______ _ Approved ______ _ Other ______ _ Continued To: ______ _ Referred To: ______ _ Denied ______ _ File No. ______ _ § 170.870 Height of buildings and Q.ttter structu res. A. Intent. Standards controlling the height of buildings and other structures, along with other dimens ional standards, to ensure that structures fit the character of each zoning distr ict as generally set fo rth in the Village's Comprehensive Plan. _B_.__Standard. Except as specified in this section, the height of buildi ngs and other structures must comply with the standards specified in Appendix C,l11 except as modified. ~ Measurement of build ing height. The vertical distance from the grade plane to the average height of the highest roof surface. Exhibit 6-1 Measuring Building Height LJl 0 1 ::, D. Modifications. The height standards in Appendix Care modified as follows: (1} Essential services, such as utilities, water towers, transm ission towers and lines, are exempt from the height limitation for the zoning district in which they are located. (2) The height of telecommunicat ion towers is governed by the standards established under Appendix BY1 (3) Pursuant to the procedures and requirements in Article 5, the Plan Commission may approve a spec ial exception for spires, steeples, cupolas, and chimneys on institutiona l, commercial, and industrial build ings. (4) Pursuant to the proced ures and requirements in Article 5, the Plan Comm ission may approve a special exception fo r the height of an accesso ry building when additional height is desired by the property owner to match the roof pitch of the established single-family home in the following resident ial Districts: Rs-1, Rs-1 b (INSERT ANY OTHERS THE PLAN COMMISSION DEEMS APPROPRIATE). 8/28/26, 12:22 PM Appeal. - Village of Richfield, WI Chapter 170. Zoning Article 5. Specific Procedural Requirements DIVISION 7. Special Exception § 170.440. Purpose. Village of Richfield, WI Friday, August 28, 2026 Upon written petition, the Plan Commission may, on a case-by-case basis, grant a special exception for those development standards specifically noted as special exceptions in this chapter. § 170.441. Initiation. The owner of the subject property may submit an application for a special exception. § 170.442. Review procedure. The general steps outlined below shall be used in the review of a special exception application. A. Submittal of application materials. The applicant submits a completed application and other required materials to the Zoning Administrator along with the application fee as may be established by the Village Board. B. Determination of completeness. The Zoning Administrator reviews the submittal to make sure it is complete and ready for further review. A determination of completeness shall be made within 30 days of the submittal. If ii is not complete, the Zoning Administrator will notify the applicant in writing of such deficiencies and that the applicant has three months from the date of the notice to resubmit the application or forfeit the application fee. The Zoning Administrator will take no further steps to process the application until the deficiencies are remedied. The incomplete application is retained as a public record. A determination that an application is complete means the application is ready for formal review and does not suggest the applicant has provided sufficient information in all regards or preclude the reviewing authority from requesting additional information it deems appropriate. C. Review date. When the Zoning Administrator determines the application is complete, he or she schedules the review with the Plan Commission consistent with its adopted calendar. D. Staff report preparation and distribution. The Zoning Administrator may prepare a written staff report as described in this division and provide a copy of ii to each member of the Plan Commission and the applicant prior to the meeting at which the matter will be considered. The Zoning Administrator will also provide a copy to interested people upon request. E. General notice. Consistent with Division 2 of Article 4, the Zoning Administrator places the matter on the meeting agenda of the Plan Commission. https://ecode360 .com/prlnt/Ri3087?guid=42033541,42033542,42033536,42033504,42033515,42033537,42033507,42033508,42033509,42033480,4... 1/5 8/28/26, 12:22 PM Appeal. - VIiiage of Richfield, WI F. Meeting. Allowing for proper notice, the Plan Commission considers the application at a regular or special meeting. G. Decision. After considering all of the information submitted by the applicant and the staff report, if any, the Plan Commission makes a decision based on the decision criteria in this division to i) approve the special exception, ii) approve the special exception with conditions, or iii) deny the special exception. H. Preparation of final decision document. Based on the action of the Plan Commission, the Zoning Administrator prepares a final decision document consistent with this division subject to the direction given by the Plan Commission. I. Applicant notification. Within a reasonable time following the Plan Commission's decision, but not more than 10 workdays, the Zoning Administrator sends the decision document to the applicant by regular mail and/or email. J. Acceptance by property owner. If the application is approved, the property owner must sign the decision document to acknowledge the terms of the approval and return the same to the Zoning Administrator within six months of the decision. Prior to the expiration of the previously specified time period, the property owner may submit a petition to the Zoning Administrator requesting an extension and the Zoning Administrator may, with cause, extend the period within which the decision document must be signed. If the signed decision document is not returned within the initial or extended time period, if any, the decision shall automatically become null and void without any further action by the Village at the expiration of such lime limit. The decision document shall only become effective when all required signatures have been obtained and the original signature copy is returned to the Zoning Administrator. K. Public record copy. A copy of the decision document is retained as a public record. § 170.443. Basis of decision. The review authority shall consider the following factors: A. The size of the property in comparison to other properties in the area; B. The extent to which the issuance of the special exception would be in keeping with the overall intent of this chapter; C. Whether there are any unique circumstances and the nature of those circumstances that warrant the issuance of the special exception; D. The nature and extent of anticipated impacts to the natural environment that could potentially occur if the special exception was granted; E. The nature and extent of anticipated positive and negative effects on properties in the area; F. Actions the applicant will undertake to mitigate the negative effects, if any, of the proposed special exception; G. A factor specifically listed under a section of this chapter authorizing the issuance of a special exception; and H. Any other factor that relates to the purposes of this chapter set forth in § 170.05 or as allowed by state law. § 170.444. Imposition of conditions. https://ecode360 .com/print/Rl3087?guld-42033541,42033542,42033536,42033504,42033515,42033537,42033507,42033508,42033509,42033480,4... 2/5 8/28/26, 12:22 PM Appeal. - Village of Richfield, WI A. Generally. In approving a special exception, the review authority may impose one or more conditions deemed necessary to further the intent and purposes of this chapter. B. Effect on contracts with another party. The review authority shall not condition or withhold approval based upon the property owner entering into a contract or discontinuing, modifying, extending, or renewing any contract with a third party under which the third party is engaging in a lawful use of the propertyJ1l (1] Editorial Note: See§ 62.23(7)(gm) , Wis. Stats. The Village, for example, could not require an applicant to terminate an existing contract with another party that is engaged in a lawful use of the prope rty. § 170.445. Limitations on issuing special exception. A special exception shall only be approved in those instances where issuance is specifically authorized in this chapter. § 170.446. Application form and content. The application submittal shall include an application form as may be used by the Village and a site plan prepared at a scale of one inch equals 20 feet or other appropriate scale depicting the information listed in Appendix F. 111 [1] Code Editor's Note: Appendix Fis included in Chapter 170A, Zoning Appendix. § 170 .44 7. Staff report content. The staff report should include the following: A. A description of the requested special exception; B. Preliminary findings for the decision criteria listed in this division; C. A recommendation to approve the application, approve the application with conditions , or deny the application; D. A preliminary list of conditions whether the staff recommendation is for approval or denial; and E. Other information deemed necessary. § 170.448. Content of decision document. A. Approval. If the application for a special exception is approved, the decision document should include the following: (1) A statement that the special exception is approved; (2) A description of the special exception; (3) Reasons for the decision based on the criteria listed in this division; (4) Conditions of approval, if any; (5) A statement indicating that the property owner must sign the decision document and return it to the Zoning Administrator to acknowledge acceptance of the same; https ://ecode360 .com/print/Rl3087?g uid=42033541 ,42033542,42033536,42033504 ,42033515,42033537,42033507,42033508,42033509 ,42033480 ,4... 3/5 8/28/26, 12:22 PM Appeal. - VIiiage of Richfield, WI (6) A statement that the applicant may appeal the decision to a court of competent jurisdiction; (7) A statement that an aggrieved person, other than the applicant, may appeal the decision and that any work done by the applicant as authorized by the approval is done at the applicant's risk; (8) Other information the review authority or Zoning Administrator deems appropriate; (9) The signature of the Zoning Administrator on behalf of the reviewing authority; and (10) The date of the decision. B. Denial. If the application for a special exception is denied, the decision document should include the following: (1) A statement that the special exception is denied; (2) A description of the special exception; (3) Reasons for the decision based on the criteria listed in this division; (4) A statement indicating that the denial does not limit the applicant's ability to resubmit a revised application for consideration; (5) A statement that the decision may be appealed as provided for in this division; (6) Other information the review authority or Zoning Administrator deems appropriate; (7) The signature of the Zoning Administrator on behalf of the reviewing authority; and (8) The date of the decision. § 170.449. Effect of approval. If a special exception is approved, such approval shall run with the land and is binding on all subsequent property owners. § 170.450. Expiration of approval. An approval for a special exception shall automatically expire 12 months after the date of issuance unless substantial work has commenced under the permit and continues in good faith to completion. Upon petition and with cause, the Zoning Administrator may grant a one-time extension, not to exceed 12 months, provided that: A. The permit holder requests the extension prior to the expiration of the permit; B. The permit holder clearly demonstrates that circumstances beyond his or her control prevented the start of construction and the continuation of the same; and C. The project complies with this chapter in effect at the time the extension is granted. § 170.451. Appeal. An aggrieved person may appeal a final decision made pursuant to this division by filing an appeal with a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 calendar days of the final decision. § 170.452. through § 170.459. (Reserved) https://ecode360 .com/print/Rl3087?guid=42033541,42033542,42033536,42033504,42033515,42033537,42033507 ,42033508,42033509,42033480,4... 4/5 VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSION COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Adaptive Reuse Project - "Preapplication Conference with Plan Commission " for property located at 3737 Hubertus Road and 3733 Hubertus Road (TNK: Vl 0_082900 B) DATE SUBMITTED: August 26, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator POLICY QUESTIONS: WHAT FEEDBACK DOES THE PLAN COMMISSION HAVE FOR THE APPLICANT REGARDING THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE FORMER Sr. H UBERT'S CHURCH AND Sr. GABRIEL 's CATHOLIC SCHOOL AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRJCT (PDD)? ISSUE SUMMARY: The former St. Hubert's Catholic Church and St. Gabriel's Catholic School have been vacant since 2019 and have been on the market for much of that time. In early 2024, Village Staff, representative s from St. Gab1iel's Church, and Washington County Staff began working together to utilize a Brownfields Redevelopment and Planning Grant secured by the County. The grant provided an opportunity to investigate potential environmental hazards on the property while also engaging the community in a broader planning process to identify appropriate and beneficial future uses for the site. As part of this process , the Village, St. Gabriel 's Catholic Parish, and Washington County received grant dollars to conduct both a Phase I and Phase II Environmen tal Study for the property. The Phase I Environemtnal Study was completed in October of 2024. The former use of a 2,000 gallon and 700 gallon underground oil fuel tanks were identified as a recognized environmental condition (REC). The Phase II Environemtnal Study was completed in September of 2025 and was completed to evaluate the REC. 10 soil borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 20' below ground surface. Samples were collected from the site. All samples were laboratory tested for 'Volatile organic compounds' (VOCs) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals. Based on the findings from that study, the DNR determined that no further action or remediation is required. A copy of the letter dated January of 2026 is included in the attachments for your convenience. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMM ISSION COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Adaptive Reuse Project - "Preapp lication Conference with Plan Commission" for property located at 3737 Hubertus Road and 3733 Hubertus Road (TNK: Vl0_082900B) DATE SUBMITTED: August 26, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator Before us tonight is a proposal from Mr. Tracy Weber, owner of Magnum Excavation LLC., for a residential subdivision development he is proposing to call "Scenic Hill Condominiums " . The Village has two (2) different zoning categories for this type of residential use in our Code, RD-1 and RD-2. Mr. Weber is proposing to develop the property so that homes are constructed at one-half acre density . This is the same density (RD-2) in which the Fairway Fields Subdivision off STH 175 was developed at. That parcel involved in the Fairway Fields Subdivision was approximately 18-acres, compared to the subject property that Mr. Weber has made an offer to purchase which is 10.64-acres. The average condo unit in this developed has an assessed value of $568,000 based on the Village ' s Assessment Roll which was approved on August 26, 2026. A copy of those assessments for the Fairway Field Subdivision are included for your convenience. Mr. Weber's stated he expects to sell these condo units for approxima tely $650 ,000 per side ($400 per square foot) for what he says will be l ,660sqft floorplans. On this page, the colored photos, are examples of the existing homes in the Fairway Fields Subdivision. Mr. Weber has also included a 2D rendering of one of the models he plans to build along with a floorplan for your convenience. The condo units would all be two bedrooms, two baths, and have opt ions for a three (3) car garage, and for finished basements. Custom cabinetry with quartz countops were also mentioned by the developer, but the interior finishes would obvious ly vary unit­ to-unit based on the individual tasts of the prospective buyer. The siding used in this development is a cement board product like LP Smartside , have stone accents , and other architectural details like an arched entryway. His proposal has been conceptually laid out by Lake Country Engineering, Inc. Based on feedback from the Plan Commiss ion, this may or may not be the layout that gets officially proposed. There is one obtuse angle where the roads converge on one another that I believe would be problematic for snow removal. This development is proposing to have more than one way in and out, for safety purposes. Staff has also previously discussed with the developer about the potential that these do not become public roads, but are private roads built to a Village standard that will be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association to maintain and plow. That will ultimately be another policy decision for discussion amongst the Plan Commiss ion. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSION COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Adaptive Reuse Project - "Preapplication Conference with Plan Commission" for property located at 3737 Hubertus Road and 3733 Hubertus Road (TNK: VIO _082900B) DATE SUBMITTED: August 26, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator The proposal shows 10 condo buildings consisting of 20 total units with an average sale price of $650,000. The existing structures on the former St. Gabriel's and St. Hubert's site would be demolished as a part of this proposal. The developer has engaged his engineers to ensure he is able to meet the Village's stormwater management standards. A storm water report has been completed, but not yet reviewed by Village Staff. It is also included for your convenience. The developer is proposing a detention or retention pond along Hubertus Road and directly south of the cemetary. As part of this process, if the proposal moves forward, the developer will need to work with the Village's Hydrologist Dale Buser to ensure that the consumption of water for these 20 units will not have a negative impact by lowering the water levels by more than 1' at the nearest property boundary line. The Village has a trackrecord of working positively with the developer both in his work on the Elmwood Highlands Estates (STH 164 and Elmwood Road) and in the Fairway Fields Subdivision which he purchased from the original developer and constructed a majority of the units in. Tonight, pursuant to Section 170.323, entitled "Review Procedure" for the Planned Development District, the developer will be appearing before the Plan Commission for its required Preapplication Conference with the Plan Commission. This meeting is intended to provide an informal opportunity for the Plan Commission and the developer to discuss the proposed project before the formal review process begins. It also allows the public an opportunity to hear the proposal, too. The applicable section of the Village Code states the following and is also included in the attachments for your review: "Preapplication Conference with Plan Commission. The applicant meets with the Plan Commission for an informal discussion relating to the proposed project. At that meeting, the applicant shall provide the Plan Commission with materials that describe the proposed project in sufficient detail for a preliminary, nonbinding review." -Section 170.323(A)(2) It is important to emphasize that tonight's discussion is preliminary and nonbinding. The purpose is to allow the Plan Commission to become familiar with the proposal, ask questions, identify areas that may need additional consideration, and provide initial feedback to the developer before any formal approvals are considered. Items such as landscaping, streetscaping, signage, lighting, site design, and other elements associated with the overall development are within the Plan Commission's purview and will be appropriate subjects for discussion this evening. The developer will be present to answer questions, provide additional context regarding the proposed use, and explain why he believes this type of development is appropriate for the property. The proposed development represents a significant investment in the Village on a property that has proven to be challenging and, if ultimately approved and constructed as proposed, could result in approximately $13,000,000 in new property valuation on a piece ofland that currently is tax exempt. Tonight's meeting therefore provides an important opportunity for the Plan Commission to better understand the proposal, consider how it fits within the Village's broader land-use objectives, and begin identifying any issues o:i- questions that should be addressed as the project moves through the formal review process. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PLAN COMMISSION COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: September 3, 2026 SUBJECT: Adaptive Reuse Project - "Preapplication Conference with Plan Commission" for property located at 3737 Hubertus Road and 3733 Hubertus Road (TNK: Vl0_082900B) DATE SUBMITTED: August 26, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator Forward to Village Board: Yes Additional Approvals Needed: Yes Signatures Required: Yes ATTACHMENTS 1. Application Materials 2. Conceptual Development Yield Plan prepared by James Beaty, PLS 3. Tum Radius Plan prepared by Lake Country Engineering, Inc. 4. Building Elevations and Floorplan for "Typical" Homestyle 5. Excerpt from 2026 Village of Richfield Assessment Roll (Fairway Fields Subdivision) 6. Chapter 170 Article 5 Specific Procedural Requirements Division 2 Planned Development District 7. Letter dated January of2026 from the Wisconsin DNR to St. Gabriel's Congregation STAFF RECOMMENDATION: NIA, discussion only. APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY: VILLAGE CLERK USE ONLY BOARD ACTION TAKEN Resolution No. _____ _ Continued To: ______ _ Ordinance No. ______ _ Refen-ed To: ______ _ Approved ______ _ Denied ______ _ Other ______ _ File No. ______ _ Property Address: 2.737 City/State: Email Address: VILLAGE BOARD & PLAN COMMISSI ON APPLICATION VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD PROPERTY INFORMATION Tax Key Number: · IO- o <g:1100/3 PROJECT INFORMATION 41 28 Hubertus Rd Hubertus, WI 53033 Village Hall - 262.628.2260 Zoning: Acreage: 1 i /&,. 6F'! D Primary Contact Phone #: D Primary Contact Phone# : Company: APPLICATION TYPE Please check the application type you are applying for: □ Comprehensive Plan Amendment □ Zoning Code Amendment □ Rezoning □ Conditional Use ~ Planned Development District These application types are reviewed by the Plan Commission and then decided on by the Village Board. SIGNATURES The applicant and property owner(s) certify that: (1) all the infomi ation attached to or provided in support of said application, including sketches, data, and any other documents and material, are honest and true to the best of the applicant's and property owner{s)' knowledge; {2) the applicant and property owner(s) acknowledge and accept the respons ibility for any and all fees charged or costs incurred by the Village of Rich field to carry out the processing and review of this application; (3) the applicant and property owner(s) further acknowledge and understand that they may be required to start an escrow accou nt to which all process ing and review costs will be charged; (4) the applicant and property own er(s) further acknowledge that in the event that the initial fee is not sufficient to cover all the costs associated with processing and review ing the application, they will be required to provide the Village of Richfield an additional deposit; {5) the applicant and property owner(s) furthe r acknowledge that the balance of any remaining fees shall be refunded within a reaso nable amount of time after this application has been processed; (6) the applicant and property owner(s) understand that this application and all required forms and information must be completed and accurate, as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator for the Village of Richfield, before a meeting and/o r public hearing (if required) can be schedul ed. Name & Title (2) Property Owner Signature: Name & Title: Date: FOR VILLA GE STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: I Date Determined Complete: I Date Paid: Plan Comm ission Meeting Date: I Village Board Meeting Da te: I Receipt#: APPLICATION CHECKLIST This is not an exhaustive list. Village Staff may request additional items as deemed necessary. Comprehensive Plan Amendme nt Details about the review process can be found in §66.1001 of Wisconsin State Statutes: h ttgs :/ /docs. legis. wi sconsi n. gov/sta tu tes/sta tutes/66/x/1001 D This application form filled out with appropriate signatures D $350 application fee D Project narrative , including: description of need for amendment, potential impacts to neighboring properties , section(s) to be amended Zoning Text Amendment Details about the review process can be found in §170-30 of Richfield's Village Code: https://ecode360.com/42033019 D This applicat ion form filled out with appropriate signatures D $500 application fee D Project narrative, including: description of need for amendment, section(s) to be amended Rezoning (Zoning Map Amendment) Details about the review process can be found in §170-30 of Richfield's Village Code: https://ecode360.com/42033019 D This application form filled out with appropriate signatures D $400 application fee D Survey(s) and legal description(s) of property to be rezoned D Project narrative, including: description of need for amendment Conditional Use Details about the review process can be found in §170-35 of Richfield's Village Code: https://ecode3.60.com/42033187 □ This application form filled out with appropriate signatures □ Appl ication fee; $500 for change to existing Conditional Use; $400 for New Residential; $700 for New Bus iness □ Project narrative , including the following information: proposed use, hours of operation , and any potent ial impacts to neighboring properties □ Site plan or survey of property highlighting the space to be occupied Planned Development District Details about the review process can be found in §170-32 of Richfield's Village Code: https://ecode360.com/42033106 !Bl- This application form filled out with appropriate signatures '8' Application fee; $500 for New Residential; $750 for POD Amendment; $100 for Mixed Use POD per acre, $1,000 minimum )g Site plan with proposed location of structure(s) □ Project narrative, includ ing details about the planned development □ Draft Planned Development District Ordinance text Scenic Hill Condominiums A Luxwy Condominiwn subdivision located in Richfield, Wisconsin. The smne overall concept of the Fairway Fields Condominiums located at 3 I 02 Fairway View Court, Richfield, Wisconsin. Scenic Hill Condominiums to be: JO buildings/20 units. Two.family units owner occupied side by side ranch condominiums. Units will consist o[ 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 3 car garage, custom cabinetry with Quartz countertops throughout condo. Lands caped and concrete driveways. 1,660 sq Ji per side Interior upgraded trim and cabinets. Exterior Stone Facade LP Smart side exterior siding Approximate Values of Condominiums $650,000 o· 100 200 ~--~----GRAPHIC SC.ALE 1- :a: 100· PROPOSED z □N!NG• CONDOMINIUM - RD2 300 ! (2 Far,lly Cluster/Open Space Residential District) (PER CODD MINI MUM LOT IJIDTH - 175' HINIHUH LOT AREA - 1 .0AC. HIN FRONTAGE - 50' MAXIMUM HEIGHT1 <PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE> - 35' (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE> - 15' STREET SETBACK - 60'- Hwy I 50' Other ro<lds SIDE YARD SETBACK - 25' REAR YARD SETBACK - 40'CPrlnc lpa.0 / lO' CAc:c) OPEN SPACE: - 40:Z F.A.R, MAX "' 87. (SEE CODE on£R RESTRICTIONS HAY APPLY) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS: AREA (GROSS OVERALL) 464,964 S.F. (10.67 ACRES) 20 UNITS= 1.87 DU/AC / 0.534 AC/DU Subject to change based on final survey, slopes, environmental delineations, stormwater management and other miligating factors, CALL DIGGERS HOTLINE 1- 800-2◄2-8511 TOLL rR£E "11 S'TAIU'T[ [l ut750., 7•) 'il:!;IJ;Jl(l,tt.'I.J',/[JJl)((l.\fS ~tct 11:rcu TC,, t¥C.0YA1[ MIL 'J. AREA 259- llBl CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT YIELD PLAN OF ST GABRIEL CHURCH PROPERTY BEtNG UNPLAITED LANDS (PROPOSED CSM) LYING WITHIN AND BEtNG A PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, IN TOWN 9 NORTH, RANGE 19 VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD, WASHING TON COUNTY, WISCONS[N EAST, OWNER /SUBDIVIDER: TRACY WEBER WEBER HOMES N48 W26890 l YNt-.OAL£ RO PEWAUKEE. wt 53072 APPROVING AGENCIES VILLAG E OF RICHFIELD SURVEYOR : Doted thilJ 16th day of April, 2026 JAMES R BEATY, RLS 1834 HORIZON LAND DEVELOPME NT SERVICES. LLC WJ IJ 52562 PENNY LN WAL ES, WI 53 183 (262) 349-1515 www.llorlzonlan<Jdeve-/opmentservice.s.com ( J io,;01CA.rcs "ECOIIO(ll Dl\l(i',"SION WHU!( OtfTEA'(NT rllO\I ACnJA.1,. UE:.<5URE.¥£Hf e CM II SECTION 011 I/ ♦ 'i(CTIOH CQfli,,'E/11 AS CESCIIIBED • 1 • 1.0. 1"°11 PIPE fOUNO (~S OfllERwlSE NOTED) 0 1• LO. INOII Pl!'C, 1,.)1 5 0.0. Ul" lQJ,;C SCT (UNLLSS an-m,v,,sE ,.o,ai O BDU.AA0 + SO-l BOfllfoC/UONIT()<bi,,c; wttL r"-'<""--' !~o• _,......, >l CONTROL so• rlWTIC Sl(,>;.lit, ' ~ Cl'!OSSINC s;c;,.w. EI CA81.£PE.0£51AL 0 POWEii Pal.£ t,..CVT PCL£ : ~w~ • SP0l/TAAO/P£0ES1AL UGWI &.KANCIM:APP{I) PARKING """""'"""""" El ruC1111C ?EDESTAL SUECmc 11£TCR e tn.£Pll()t:[~ B ~E J>EOESI/.L fOWARl([O ll8EII' OPTIC ~ ~!~ fl c;.t.SWA~Sl"'G SIGH t) STORU w.NHOI.£ Q IIOVNO lfoLIT il ~UARE INLET " STQIIW SEWER ENO SECTIO'f S So\NITARI' MANHIJU ♦ SAA'ITAAY CL£,, t'0\JI CR Stl"fiC \lt.'it • ~'iff,t,Jff INIUICtP'TO" W,.'ff'IOI..[ Q\IISCQl.At,oEOIJ'> lolANH0l£ 4!» 11,t,f(R VAi.VE """'""" 0 'lll•JER SER\l'.CE CUR9 STOP Q W,t,ftR \IA."lHOLE L w<u. -f WAl!R SIJl!r,oa: • WO\,lNll'if\>G . """" CONcl'UOOS f;l£E OECIOUOUS mE '"""' rvYVVV'\ - EDGE OF TRITS ---rw-tDRC E WJN ~=~~~ J~"£R ---•-'iOftRUAIN ---, - w.11uo c;.,.s ..w'I --- l -""'-R~E'O [l.(CTIIIC -----ovtlfflf>DIIM'fS · ·~ -···- - ■ - BURUJJ rue. 'SERV --- 1 - "'-""'IK[O r[L(P/OI,[ - - - r,-1.t,t,,ll~EO CA8L.£ IV UhE ---•11-liMRKEO Fl9~ OPTIC ---• - c[NTUltt' rwcf --7~~~~~~ • >■ll.H ~[lv~TlNC @-o,uw,:zo,,..,,r, --~~ THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY JAMES R . BEATY PLS 1834 SHEET I OF 1 12 DINING/KITCHEN 7~ CEILftNG LINE@ ------------------------------------------------------------- 00 111111111111111111111111111 ~ -----'f-V~ BTl!P JXJWN ALL FOOTJMJS AS R,gmlllE» ffl,flo,¥tfJf!Bft°jfuryf/;~1f&fb} DEPl'l!S NAY VARY FROJI ll'HAT IS SHOWN ON PU.H. TOP OF PORCI i ADER 2'-0" MWVE 11()1Jse ll'AUS t OF BUILDING -= nF PORCH HEADER __ -i'-0" ABOVE HOUSE 1fALI.S~ < __ NORTH ELEVATION 1/4"~1'-0" PPER FLOOR I .. , .. , .. , .. r,SADDLE WI FLASHING / ,t ICE-GUARD ~~~ --.. ...... J .... , r--~ ' HEI FAIRWAY FIELDS DUPLEX LOT # 1 i ~CULTURED _JI I] STONE .-----~ FAfRWAY FIEWS WT 1110 FOR: TRACY WEBER JEFF HIBBARD DESIGN SERVICE, DEl.M'IEJJ) WISCONSIN l004 OLDE ONEIDA- STREET DESIGNED BY: JEFF HIBB,t.RD DESIGN SERl'ICES APPLETON, WJ. 54915 SHEET {11 DAW 11/21/18 PHONE: (920) 731-7365 t ' I d' • - ~I; t t IC' C" 9' X s• Off DOOR 1z• o· RAfW/IJ 14' O" Sim/ON•~•' I /lf/l!E'l ,o ,, 9'-r• HICfl tXll Iii.LL OF BUILDING e'-w Mf1f& I TE B 9 -I" CW DINI!f_G BQQi!j ii,~ < i! (MrHEDltlL CllJ 11 '}> i.,., I CREAi ROOM CJ.THJIDRJ.I, CllJ ~CJ.() = a·-r cu; 1138" IIJ/F ' m , al \'\, I I I I 11'-B'' -f w'ft.~IJl l/Nf'JJ'Z{/im BASE NIYtE! Till' OF GAIIAGJ/ ll'ALUJ DOt"/1 ~ I 1"-5" FRO/I fOP OIi' f{()IJSE "ll'ALUJ. I ~------------i--Y , I I.. HJ>P Of PORI/H flEADJ/H I Jl -(I'' .AHOY& 1/0/JS/i WALJ.'l SECl'!OH 'll"litr,. ,r /1,l/SED f/EBJ. l/001' '!"RliSSEs 2•" li!i C:.RfAh FLOOR PLAN s11 A"F:I' lo ,, SCALE: f/4" ~ /'-0" 1:A°dH Sj½,')fE FEET OF BU!UlINC /5" X1" Dflll08!/ Q"-10" OJ!'-111" / ___, FAIRWAY FIELDS DUPLEX LOT # 1 I NDTE: DIMENSIONS AS SHOffN ARE FINISHED DIMENSIONS, ADJUST FOR IWUCH FRAMING DIMENSIONS. o· 10·• NOTE: 9'-1" H!CH FIRST FWCR rfALLS UNLESS OT!lERl'/ISE NOTED NOTE: TOP 0/i' FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS @ 8'-0" OFF FLOOR UNLESS NOTED 10'-0" e-o X 6-10 11wr; DR fis'".,/j_fJ,H !~ Ii' -;, •'' .Y !' ~-WNlNG ROOM .I - ! CAfHEIIRAL Cl.I; ' !! ~ fN1'Eill()l/ Fi!OOC IJNE 28'-3'" ~11 ! ro·-o· 11~ ,, !1 ,, J - ' --·--··- ' i ,, ' Ii I 9" }( 8" OIi J!O/JR t•• X ?" 011 l)(J()R - b ' T 12·-o- ....----.---~ FAlRll'AY FfEWS wr I to roll: WAIT WEBER JEFF HIBBARD DESIGN SERVICE DELAFfEL" ~·1sc0Ns1N LQQLQl,DE QNb:TDA STREET DESIGNED BY: JEFF IIIDDMID f/ES/GN SI1Rl'lG/fS APPLETON, WJ. 54915 SHEET q 3 DATE; 3/21/18 PHONE: (920) 731~7365 L AKE C OUNTRY E NGINEERING, INC. Rob Davy, P.E. Mark Powers, R.L.S. St Gabriel Property Preliminary Storm Water Management Report Village of Richfield , Washington Co., Wl August 4, 2026 Project No. 26-3575 The development of this 10.32 ac property is to place 10 duplex condominiums , replacing the old church. This development is in the Rock River Water Shed and is considered a redevelopment. The objectives of this repot1 are to show that by adding these condominiums and roads • The post conditions flow rates are less than the exist ing condition flow rates. • That 90% of the predevelopment volume of stormwater will be infiltrated • That 40% of the Tss will be remo ved from the storm water on an average annua l basis. • That 30% of the TP will be removed from the storm water on an average annual basis. The parameters used to evaluate this area are • The soils are hydrologic group B & C type soils (CkC2 B, FsB B, CeC2 B, CrD2 B, ScA B and ThB2 C. • Cn of 71 for grass C, 6 1 for grass B, and 98 for impervious • Rainfall events for the different 24-hr storm events are 1-yr 2.35" 2-yr 2.65", 10-yr 3.82", and 100-yr 6.4 1" of rain. • Stotm distributions are MSE 3 • Hydrology Calculate using Hydraflow TR-55 modeling • Tss & TP removal using WinSLAMM v 10.5.0 • Infilt ration/ evaporation rate of 1.67 in/hr (to be verified once soil borings are done.) This property has 2- watersheds leaving the site. The first area is to the north west and into Hubet1us Road. The existing conditions show 6.34 acres and is mainly grass. The proposed conditions show 5.49 acres with 0.95 acres of imperviou s surface . The flows leaving this site are as follows Stonn event I-year 2-year 10-year 100- year existing 1.80 CFS. 3.22 CFS. 10.54 CFS. 32.81 CFS. Pro gen 2.69 CFS 4.22 CFS 11.46 CFS 32.83 CFS Pro released 0.00 CFS 0.11 CFS 3.03 CFS 27.77 CFS W. 359 N.5920 Brown Street, Suite I 02, Oconomowoc , WI 53066 (262) 569-9331 telephone 569-9316 fax The second area is to the north east and into Hube1tus Road. The exist ing cond itions show 3.97 acres with 1. 71 acres of impervious. The proposed conditions show 4.82 acres with 1.68 acres of impervious surface. The flows leaving the fire station site are as follows Storm event 1-vear 2-vear I 0-year 100- vear existing 4.49 CFS. 5.69 CFS. 10.73 CFS. 22.70 CFS. Pro gen 4.73 CFS 6.11 CFS 12.03 CFS 26.38 CFS Pro released 0.26 CFS 0.68 CFS 4.29 CFS 22.14 CFS By routing this development , through the infiltration basins the Tss will be reduced. This site generates 2,585 lbs of Tss on an average annual basis and on ly releases l25.31bs of Tss on an average annual basis , 2,459.7 lbs of Tss are removed on an average annua l basis or 95% By routing this developm ent, through the infilh·ation basin the Total Phosphorous (TP) will be reduced. This site generates 10.03 lbs ofTP on an average annua l basis and only releas es 0.6625 lbs of TP on an average annual , 9.3675 lbs of TP are removed on an average annual basis or 93.4% Pre-development calculations Total of 10.31 ac. = 449 ,104 s.f. x 29.02 total inched of rain / 12 in.= 1,086,083 cf that fall on this property , with 23,209 cf running off site or 1,062,874 cf infiltrated. Post development calculation Total of 10.31 ac. = 449 ,104 s.f. x 29 .02 total inched of rain / 12 in. = 1,086,083 cf that fall on this prope1iy, with 15,547 cf running off site or 1,070,536 cf infiltrated. So the post developmen t with the infiltration BMP's water shed infiltrates 100% of the pre development volume of storm water realeased. This repo1i shows that the village storm water requirements are met by routing the majority of the sites sto1m water nmoff through the infilh·ation BMP 's. Robert J Davy , P.E. 970 South Silver Lake Street , Suite I 05, Oconomowoc , Wl 53066 ~~\\\IWIIIIMti, 1~~ ~ CON ~~ I ~ I ROBERTJ. \ , 2:,: I \ • ONOMOW f H (262) 569-933 1 ;.:: ,::: ~ .> 0 ~ !!! ~ :ll EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP ~ l. g ST GABRIEL CHURCH PROPERTY, LOT 2 CSM ~ MAGNUM EXCAVATING ,. "',. NE l/4 S22. T9N. Rl9E. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD 1mm1m1m11 111m111111mm11m1m111111 11mmmm1 a so 100 200 3of42 FEIT PO Bex 1.:.:. Oc:onomawoc. WI 53066 Phtmt1(262J569-933f I~ ;~.!~_;;,-~: ~~:~..,'.~~.-------~------------------------ ,_ \ , ' ',. ' -\ • ----,-,uBERTUSROAD ___ .J..D,2-0---. l I'?:.:~,. c_.,{?: --, , ': -.\ •,.~·\ \}\):_:: -=-:.\\-:: . '-·\\,\ ' '' . ' . ' ' " ·" '' I~- t I l ,:,' • " '.'-·~ ·..;-5,,\.~ :·ti ,;_:\\ \ : lf \',\~ \./ n I m \\'.\ [,': ig 1,11 111 _ 1111 11 I ., ,:il \\\\ i i/r-~,, 1111 111 1111 ,qi 1tll I 111 11\ ',, llr 1,1 11, 1,1 1:, it, 11, 1,1 • 111 '11 : : ; ~ : : II I lij t1/ '11 It! Ill 1':: ::, ::: !], I 11 I 1, • 11 I 'I I I\ \/, \: : t : l '. 'i ~ \ I/ :1 _, i,: :: '! ,,1. \· ,'•!1 ,\ ,: 1\ 11 11 I •1 ,. 1 ':. \ I l 11 I I / i,_'r', \ •11 I I 1, .,_ ', -, ' ,oA-O ,,:',_,,' ·--: \ ,_, ., '' '. -I .,;.~t[.~-•,, 1''_ ,~\, '-", ', I I I I I._ '8) ~ " • ·,· ·, ., ' '• ' ',., ' • :SJ;A:' -----' ""'"""'""'"-'" ' . ''\"''":"" -',, ' '' ' ;/.,,-,. '_ I -•~---.......... •• • • • '. •• : ~:.\' ''' \ };.: .}· ' l { ft!, ,. ' I -1 l ' ----< -, -, -\ ' ' . I , ~- _;,_· [ ' '. ·<:<--··:-'.' ,_ ' \ ~~~:;:-:-:·-.::..;_ ',\ ___ _ -I ...___._ J-........ ·-• ._ -•• , 0J·_-.;:-,•·-l:.-0"~JCJ2c ,<] <:_:' \ ·:} )ti{ .: :~: -~: • :\.::·~--:~.--' ·::·,.::,\,f·<t:J_ }_(j3 . ~ -- 1030 l.<J'I ICSMMJr, ' ' .,, I •• ·,, .... I··· 1 , \ I ,t -- 1 !' ... \ ' *~i< ... ~ --,,\\~ .. , '1 -: .... ! \ ..... !}:,' ,_ 11-~t .. ~-~:· '' '· :t ',', <·---:-\_ • , •• -\--_:: l., _: ----~~:~::_~-·:::·-~~i(:::(:~.=:··.-·=:. §, ' • \. j .. '• 7· ,--_C,c, ,,, ·• ', • '· (}_,\-0- 'i,f / ! -\ -' . -• (',. -~-·~-------'' •', ,~, ,,;\ ... _ ... - y /, .: • -,' '~---· ------:, ' :-.i; i4,;:, /:, r. -: ->-•• ,, -,_ '-·-·01i5•~\1 'Rn'A A/ ~ _ , • :~. _ <t n' / ,,, , ,-hB2-(C) -·;,; ' ,,, ~ • , -=.o" i\\ \\1~ --~-------~---------~-=~--=-· --~:::;~. -;::.-··, ,t::-1/:-,., (1'MP) 'il,,,,-J:,,-_ ----~ •· :: . ". :,,·-· · ,r \: .' _., ~--'"' ~-~ . -~. ·---:,',, '·.\,I u: RA~S· ~--·c· • ':i:? 0 ' , -, , :: , . ' RAiS 1 /({N\ ....___ ___ ,__ . ,--: ... --: ' CrD? 1~~~? f --: ', '\,,~ <' -11· .... /,'/,> .. '~, J .25 -@ G P , , , ~ _ -, • _ ;, , . -, ,hi,,.", --. ._ -',._ (.f,,._, --, , ,, , ,- ---~ ' ··--\ - ' . ~ -.·, ' L _ MJN conts,1/,H,i : ; ' : • , --._ _ • -,,._~-,\i., ·-=~~, ,' ",I' .. , -........ ' .. ~:• ~>'\!!,\' •---,''t/, ,,~:, -4-0. • -I _-_____;rG,=-l.4_-1. ---------',-; ~---·.:...._ ___________ _,,_GQQ -·06 ,, --'\ ', ·,:_ ·,,:, I -.-·;1,;,: ', ,o_ -• •• • -·100 LF@ 10% 1 -SF) " ,,, ::,: ---'--~ 5 -· ·., ----.. :, •:, ,-----: 1 ::,, · : -----' -· • :) --' . . , . . ·•:a,•;, ··.' )::,: c'.-, ., ·'"'"' 0 • • ·,osq,55 LF-@2.8%\SCFJ ':--;;,, ca:,,~ ·• •• ', . . -., ,·, ', ... :-,. .:f,f';;i' , rfi'J!, ::;~ ,~fiiJ}'~'"'.1r~r~.i ~· ~< 0 s5 .> :> ' . '. ', ... •,. '.'_t:~: {"}!:+:~; > , , , r:;,, , 1 ;,;:, ~· I • EX e,fiSJTE·AREA + -, -~'~• .. , ... , .. -, ·· · 0 -+: ~' 1 •:, • • .'': /1) ii'!,,'.;,; ,:i , X ,;,.;. --., • • • •• • • '. c ,, +,.·· • • • • • \ · ... , ' ' / i/0' ', ','.>.,., .,, ,",;, ,~,;.// ,, ,\' ,,1: !1(1 '"/ ,,',, , { ,_ 2.~4 AL. -I -\ 1' -,._.u, • .., .. ~..,."';""" , ' ) \ \ 1 I 1111 fl "='1 ,, • ,,, ",, ,,.,,, ,,, .,,,.,., ,,,, ', J -' --,, ' ,, • ,, ",,, ',_, ' , ., ; ii::: :: ,,,, :::,, :::::',\ "'' ' : , ., • : "'n -64 C ' ' .,_., .\ . ', ::, ':: ',\' , ,, \'•, ', l f' 1,,,\'~,\1\1 -~,• '\'~,•~\\' ~ljl 11/ • I \_,. -\ 1' \1~ 1'~ 1 ~\_, •'_ \ ,,,.;,. ,:u: ·-:•,;,;/r:,,i,,:,;,, :1,,:,1 0]J AC.@:'>8 fJMP); ,,., \ iii \ \ ,,, · r <:,.":\ ,,~~ ,,,, 1 ~,1,,,\\\ 11 •\1 0 11\1~\ •] 1 , 1 ,, -.. --Clc<;.2...(8.) IU) ':• , '" · ',., I 1 .. ,, ':;:;,\ ',',',,: ::-::,:(•',',•;::,•:!'..:'.•'._ ,:(:: (,• 2 2'33.AO°JJ/;@, 1-GK.A:S-S \~ I ' ' lf) '· --..,_.-' :: -• \;;: '·, \',\\ ···:::,"\ ', ; ,•;•:•\•• '',•',:o:,, ,.,,,·: t-,.,. • • CJo , ' ro___ .,,-; :, : 0 11:,. • .. \ ···''-.'· \•., ,',',, ' , ',,, :•:: :,:, ,-;.1,' :,,, ',' ' ',: ,... -8' 6 I ' ----··o ·FsB{t>) ' '' ' aB / '1 "I ~1 \\ ,,· ... \\(:::: '· ': 1: i:: l\c '\'I,: : Ii. ' • ,,.._ -', • ' -··· ]_.--·· -< · :, : ,_ ;, ' .::•,.'-'.•,· ,:·, .,:,, ' I:,:::,,,, ,,: : :,:: ' 100 'J:.F'@JL~¾ (Sf) ' ···•,··--·· ., · · , · ' : '' ','" ' \•:,', :•,•,: ' ,:;: :::• ;',;, ;:,: ;:: ', •:,,'. ' ,----~>; --~---,_ , ( ---.. J • I ' '.',\;\\:: : :::::::::::::::: ,',' :\',', 8-0 Lf@ 7:5% \.:>C.:d---------' 1111 1 1\1 1 1 I !]1: :/1 1:1: 1::: 1:1 j 11,1 \ ~ ' \ ' ~ ::H \;1,: J;~ ::j! Ji:::::':;: ,' _J\, I "' ! ~ (j <o- i:: !a §~ ~ ~~ I JI G 'I° <: - rT~ ,i ~Ii~ ~ ! ~ ' 0 ~ ul ,ljl ~If ~~ :,: VJ u N ,_ C, ..J UJ u: :,: u ii: 0 IL ..J 0 a...► w ~ ~ ~ ~ ::::! WO > ~ li\.?w z ::z:z~ <t ~;::a:: ~ ~~~ uu,- 0 _J>( . W WwN C/) ii:1:~ ~ ~::>._, 0 c..,~:::: a::: 1-<tw C... Ull:Z PROJ. I 26-~575 SHEET f "' "St 4- 0 "St 1 Hydrograph Return Period Recap Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (els) Hydrograph No. type Hyd(s) description (origin) 1-Yr 2-Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1 SGS Runoff ------ 0.44 0,89 ------ ------- 3.26 ------ ------- 10.21 EX OFFSITE AREA 1 2 SCS Runoff ------- 1.40 2.41 ------ ------- 7,93 ------ ------- 23.86 EX ONSITE AREA 2 3 Combine 1, 2 1.80 3.22 ------ ------- 10.54 ----- ------- 32.81 EX TOTAL FLOW NW 4 SCS Runoff ------- 2.25 3.41 ------ ------- 8.85 ------- ----- 23.62 PROAREAA 5 Combine 1, 4 2.69 4.22 ------- ------- 11.46 ------- ------- 32.83 PRO FLOW TO BMPA 6 Reservoir 5 0.21 0.35 ------- ------ 3.31 ------- ------ 28.11 FLOW OUT BMP A 7 Dlverslon1 6 0.21 0.24 ------ ------ 0.29 ------ ------ 0.34 INFILTRATION 8 Diversion2 6 0.00 0.11 ------ ------ 3.03 ------ ------ 27.77 OVERLAND 10 SCS Runoff ------- 4.49 5.69 ----- ----- 10.73 ------- ------- 22.70 EX ONSITE AREA 3 11 SGS Runoff ------ 4.73 6.11 ------ ------ 12.03 ------ ------- 26.38 PRAREAB 12 Reservoir 11 0,51 0.94 ------ ------- 4.61 ----- ------ 22.51 FLOW OUT BMPB 13 Diversion1 12 0,25 0.26 ------ ------- 0.32 ------- ------- 0,37 INFILTRATION 14 Dlversion2 12 0.26 0.68 ------- ------- 4.29 ------- ------- 22.14 OVERLAND Proj. file: 26-3575 MAG ST GABRIAL.gpw 5of42 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:05 PM Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve 2 Hydrograph Summary Report Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow Interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (acft) (ft) (acft) 1 SGS Runoff 0.44 3 738 0.043 ---- ----- ------ EX OFF SITE AREA 1 2 SGS Runoff 1.40 3 741 0.142 ---- ------ ------ EX ONSITE AREA 2 3 Combine 1.80 3 741 0.185 1, 2 ------ ------ EX TOTAL FLOW NW 4 SGS Runoff 2.25 3 738 0.176 --- ------ ------ PROAREAA 5 Combine 2.69 3 738 0,220 1, 4 ----- ------ PRO FLOW TO BMPA 6 Reservoir 0.21 3 909 0.219 5 1032.96 0.112 FLOW OUT BMP A 7 Dlverslon1 0.21 3 909 0.219 6 ----- ----- INFILTRATION 8 Diverslon2 0.00 3 759 0.000 6 ---- ------ OVERLAND 10 SGS Runoff 4.49 3 738 0.277 ---- ------ ----- EX ONSITE AREA 3 11 SGS Runoff 4.73 3 738 0.297 --- ------ ------ PRAREAB 12 Reservoir 0.51 3 807 0.296 11 1033.25 0.157 FLOW OUT BMPB 13 Diversion1 0.25 3 807 0.254 12 ---- ------ INFILTRATION 14 Diversion2 0.26 3 807 0.042 12 ----- ---- OVERLAND 26-3575 MAG ST GABRIAL.gpw Return Peri(l(1f 42Year Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:05 PM Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntellsolve 3 Hydrograph Summary Report Hyd, Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow Interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (acft) (ft) (acft) 1 SGS Runoff 0.89 3 735 0.065 ---- ----- ------ EX OFFSITE AREA 1 2 SCS Runoff 2.41 3 738 0.205 ---- ------ ------ EX ONSITEAREA2 3 Combine 3.22 3 738 0.269 1, 2 ------ ----- EX TOTAL FLOW NW 4 SGS Runoff 3.41 3 738 0.242 ---- ----- ------ PROAREAA 5 Combine 4.22 3 738 0.307 1, 4 ---- ----- PRO FLOW TO BMPA 6 Reservoir 0.35 3 828 0.306 5 1033.28 0.158 FLOW OUT BMP A 7 Diversion1 0.24 3 828 0.277 6 ------ ---- INFILTRATION 8 Diverslon2 0.11 3 828 0.029 6 ------ ------ OVERLAND 10 SGS Runoff 5.69 3 738 0.348 ---- ----- ----- EX ONSITE AREA 3 11 SGS Runoff 6.11 3 738 0.377 ···-- ------ ----- PRAREAB 12 Reservoir 0.94 3 774 0.377 11 1033.42 0.184 FLOW OUT BMPB 13 Diversion1 0.26 3 774 0.273 12 ------ ------ INFILTRATION 14 Dlversion2 0.68 3 774 0.104 12 ---- ----- OVERLAND 26-3575 MAG ST GABRIAL.gpw Return Peri<;i@f JiQ,Year Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:05 PM Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve 4 Hydrograph Summary Report Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (acft) (ft) (acft) 1 SGS Runoff 3.26 3 735 0.173 ---- ----- ------ EX OFFSITE AREA 1 2 SCS Runoff 7.93 3 738 0.518 ---- ------ ------ EX ONSITEAREA2 3 Combine 10.54 3 738 0.691 1, 2 ----- ------ EX TOTAL FLOW NW 4 SCS Runoff 8.85 3 738 0.554 --- ----- ------ PROAREAA 5 Combine 11.46 3 738 0.727 1, 4 ------ ------ PRO FLOW TO BMPA 6 Reservoir 3.31 3 759 0.727 5 1034.17 0.296 FLOW OUT BMP A 7 Diversion1 0.29 3 759 0.352 6 ----- ----- INFILTRATION 8 Diversion2 3.03 3 759 0.374 6 ------ ----- OVERLAND 10 SGS Runoff 10.73 3 738 0.652 ---- ---- •••OM• EX ONSITE AREA 3 11 SGS Runoff 12.03 3 738 0.730 ---- ----- ------ PRAREAB 12 Reservoir 4.61 3 750 0.730 11 1034.13 0.304 FLOW OUT BMPB 13 Diversion1 0.32 3 750 0.326 12 ----- ----- INFILTRATION 14 Diversion2 4.29 3 750 0.404 12 ------ ------ OVERLAND 26-3575 MAG ST GABRIAL.gpw Return Peri@!Jf 41) Year Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:05 PM Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntellsolve 5 Hydrograph Summary Report Hyd, Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph No. type flow interval peak hyd(s) elevatlon storage description (origin) (els) (min) (min) (acft) (ft) (acft) 1 SCS Runoff 10.21 3 735 0.508 ---- ----- ----- EX OFFSITE AREA 1 2 scs Runoff 23.86 3 738 1.452 --- ------ ------ EX ONSITE AREA2 3 Combine 32.81 3 735 1.960 1, 2 ------ ------ EX TOTAL FLOW NW 4 SGS Runoff 23.62 3 738 1.434 --- ----- ------ PROAREAA 5 Combine 32.83 3 735 1,942 1, 4 ----- ------ PRO FLOW TO BMPA 6 Reservoir 28.11 3 741 1.941 5 1035.00 0.447 FLOW OUT BMP A 7 Dlverslon1 0.34 3 741 0.416 6 ----- ------ INFILTRATION 8 Dlversion2 27.77 3 741 1.526 6 ----- ------ OVERLAND 10 SCS Runoff 22.70 3 738 1.409 -- ------ ------ EX ONSITE AREA 3 11 SCS Runoff 26.38 3 738 1.626 --- ------ ------ PRAREAB 12 Reservoir 22.51 3 741 1.625 11 1034.78 0.438 FLOW OUT BMPB 13 Diversion1 0.37 3 741 0,390 12 ------ ------ INFILTRATION 14 Diversi0n2 22.14 3 741 1.235 12 ----- ------ OVERLAND 26-3575 MAG ST GABRIAL.gpw Return Peri,;itjf 4])0 Year Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:06 PM Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 1 EX OFFSITE AREA 1 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 100 yrs Drainage area = 2.54 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = TR55 Total precip . = 6.41 in Storm duration = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Q (cfs) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 EX OFFSITE AREA 1 Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Yr J ~ Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:6 PM Peak discharge = 10.21 cfs Time interval = 3 min Curve number = 64 Hydraulic length = 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) = 8.6 min Distribution = Custom Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 0.508 acft Q (cfs) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 0.00 22.0 -- Hyd No.1 Time (hrs) 10of42 6 TR55 Tc Worksheet 7 Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntellsolve Hyd. No. 1 EX OFFSITE AREA 1 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.170 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.65 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 5.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 8.25 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 8.25 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 80.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope(%) = 7.50 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 4.42 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 0.30 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.30 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Welled perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 8.60 min llof 42 Precipitation Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 1 EX OFFSITE AREA 1 Storm Frequency Total precip. Storm duration = 100 yrs = 6.41 in = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Time interval Distribution Precip (in) 1.00 Incrementa l Rainfall Precipitation Hyd. No. 1 : EX OFFSITE AREA 1 - 100 Yr 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.30 0.20 0.10 ~ ~ 0.00 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 - - Custom Design Storm -- MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds 12of 42 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:6 PM = 3 min = Custom 20.0 22.5 Precip (in) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 25.0 Time {hrs) 8 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrograp hs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 2 EX ONSITE AREA 2 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 100 yrs Drainage area = 6.34 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = TR55 Total precip . = 6.41 in Storm duration = MSE3 distribut ion 3 min .eds Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 EX ONSITE AREA 2 Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Yr Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:6 PM Peak discharge = 23.86 cfs Time interval = 3 m in Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) = 11.6 min Distribution = Custom Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 1.452 acft Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 ) \ --------- 4.00 0.00 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 -- Hyd No. 2 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 13of 42 18.0 20.0 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) 9 10 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraf!ow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 2 EXONSITEAREA2 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length {fl) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.65 0.00 0.00 Land slope(%) = 10.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 8.24 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 8.24 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 703.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope(%) = 4.70 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 3.50 0.00 0,00 Travel Time (min) = 3.35 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 3.35 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0,00 0,00 Flow length (ft) = 0,0 0,0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 11.60 min 14of 42 Precipitation Report Hydra/low Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 2 EX ONSITE AREA 2 Storm Frequency Total precip. Storm duration = 100 yrs = 6.41 in = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Time interval Distribution Precip (in) 1.00 Incremental Rainfall Precipitation Hyd. No. 2: EX ONSITE AREA 2 - 100 Yr 0.90 0.80 0.70 0,60 0.50 0.30 0.20 0.10 I ~ ~ 0.00 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 -- Custom Design Storm -- MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds 15of 42 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:6 PM = 3 min = Custom 20.0 22.5 Precip (in) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0 .40 0.30 0.20 0. 10 0.00 25.0 Time (hrs) 11 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 3 EX TOTAL FLOW NW Hydrograph type Storm frequency Inflow hyds. = Combine = 100 yrs Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 0.0 = 1, 2 2.0 4.0 6.0 EX TOTAL FLOW NW Hyd. No. 3 -- 100 Yr ,), \ Peak discharge Time interval Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:6 PM = 32.81 cfs = 3 min Hydrograph Volume = 1.960 acft Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 0.00 22.0 -- Hyd No. 3 -- Hyd No. 1 -- Hyd No. 2 Time (hrs) 16of 42 12 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 4 PROAREAA Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 5.49 ac = 0 .0 % = TR55 = 6.41 in Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:6 PM Peak discharge = 23.62 cfs Time interval = 3 min Curve number = 70 Hydraulic length = 0 ft Timeofc onc.(Tc) = 14.1 min Distribution = Custom Storm duration = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0.0 2.0 -- Hyd No. 4 4.0 6.0 8.0 PRO AREA A Hyd. No. 4 -- 100 Yr I J \ r------ 10.0 12.0 14.0 l 7of 42 16.0 Hydrograph Volume = 1.434 acft 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) 13 14 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 4 PROAREAA Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.65 0.00 0.00 Land slope(%) = 10.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 8.24 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 8.24 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 955.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope(%) = 2.80 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 2.70 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 5.90 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 5.90 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 14.10 min 18of 42 Precipitation Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 4 PROAREAA = 100 yrs = 6.41 in Time interval Distribution Storm Frequency Total precip. Storm duration = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Precip (in) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.0 2.5 5.0 Incremental Rainfall Precipitation Hyd. No. 4 : PRO AREA A- 100 Yr ~ ~ 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 - - Custom Design Storm -- MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds 19of 42 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:6 PM = 3 min = Custom 20.0 22.5 Precip (in) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 25.0 Time (hrs) 15 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 5 PRO FLOW TO BMPA Hydrograph type Storm frequency Inflow hyds. = Combine = 100 yrs Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 0.0 = 1, 4 2.0 4.0 6.0 PRO FLOW TO BMPA Hyd. No. 5 -- 100 Yr J ~ ' Peak discharge Time interval Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 32.83 cfs = 3 min Hydrograph Volume = 1.942 acft Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10 .00 5.00 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 0.00 22.0 -- Hyd No. 5 -- Hyd No.1 -- Hyd No.4 Time (hrs) 20of 42 16 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 6 FLOW OUT BMP A = Reservoir = 100 yrs = 5 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Inflow hyd. No. Reservoir name = PRO BMPA Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 0 3 5 8 FLOW OUT BMP A Hyd. No. 6 -- 100 Yr I ) ~ 10 13 15 - - Hyd No. 6 -- Hyd No. 5 2lof42 Peak discharge Time interval Max. Elevation Max. Storage 18 20 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 28.11 cfs = 3 min = 1035.00 ft = 0.447 acft Hydrograph Volume = 1.941 acft 23 Q (cfs) 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 25 Time (hrs) 17 Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Pond No. 1 - PRO BMPA Pond Data Monday. Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used. Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) 0.00 1032.00 4,399 1.00 1033.00 5,732 2.00 1034.00 7,172 3.00 1035.00 8,719 Culvert I Orifice Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels 1 0 0 0 Invert El. (ft) 1033.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Length {ft) 35.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Slope(%) 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 N-Value .013 .000 .000 .000 Orif. Coeff . 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage n/a No No No Iner. Storage (acft) 0.000 0.116 0.148 0.182 Total storage (acft) 0.000 0.116 0.264 0.447 Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [D] Crest Len (ft) 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) 1034.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Coeff. = 2.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type Broad Multi-Stage = No No No No Exfiltration = 1.670 in/hr (Contour) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 ft Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage (ft) 3.00 Stage / Discharge Stage (ft) 3.00 2.00 L--- L.---- L----- -------- I 1.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 - - TotalQ 15.00 22of42 18.00 21.00 24.00 27.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 30.00 Discharge (els) 18 Hydrograph Plot Hydra/low Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 7 INFILTRATION Hydrograph type = Diversion1 Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hydrograph = 6 Diversion method = Pond - PRO BMPA Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 0 3 5 8 INFILTRATION Hyd. No. 7 -- 100 Yr \_ ' 10 13 15 Peak discharge Time interval 2nd diverted hyd. Pond structure Monday, Aug 3 2026 , 2:7 PM = 0.34 cfs = 3 min = 8 = Exfiltration Hydrograph Volume= 0.416 acft 18 20 23 Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 25 -- Hyd No. 7 -- Hyd No. 6 -- Hyd No. 8 Time (hrs) 23of42 19 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 8 OVERLAND Hydrograph type = Diversion2 Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hydrograph = 6 Diversion method = Pond - PRO BMPA Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 OVERLAND Hyd. No. 8 -- 100 Yr I \_ Peak discharge Time interval 2nd diverted hyd. Pond structure Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 27.77 cfs = 3 min = 7 = E xfiltration Hydrograph Volume = 1.526 acft Q (cfs) 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0 3 5 8 10 13 15 18 20 23 0.00 25 -- Hyd No. 8 -- Hyd No. 6 -- Hyd No. 7 Time (hrs) 24of 42 20 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM Hyd. No. 10 EX ONSITE AREA 3 Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 22.70 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 3 min Drainage area = 3.97 ac Curve number = 81 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydrau lic length = 0 ft Tc method = TR55 Time of cone. (Tc) = 11 .5 min Total precip. = 6.41 in Distribution = Custom Storm duration = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0.0 2.0 - - Hyd No.1 0 4.0 6.0 8.0 EX ONSITE AREA 3 Hyd. No. 10 --100 Yr ) \ -----.. 10.0 12.0 14.0 25of 42 16.0 Hydrograph Volume = 1.409 acft 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) 21 TR55 Tc Worksheet 22 Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntel!solve Hyd. No. 10 EX ONSITE AREA 3 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.65 0.00 0.00 Land slope(%) = 6.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 10.10 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 10.10 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 343.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope(%) = 6.10 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 3.98 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 1.43 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1.43 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity {ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length {ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 11.50 min 26of 42 Precipitation Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 10 EX ONSITE AREA 3 Storm Frequency Total precip. Storm duration = 100 yrs = 6.41 in = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Time interval Distribution Precip (in) 1.00 Incremental Rainfall Precipitation Hyd. No. 10: EX ONSITE AREA 3 -100 Yr 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 LJ 0.00 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 - - Custom Design Storm -- MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds 27of 42 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 3 min = Custom 20.0 22.5 Precip (in) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.30 0 .20 0.10 0.00 25.0 Time (hrs) 23 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 11 PRAREAB Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. = = = = = = SCS Runoff 100 yrs 4.82 ac 0.0 % TR55 6.41 in Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM Peak discharge = 26.38 cfs Time interval = 3 min Curve number = 79 Hydraulic length = 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) = 11.6 min Distribution = Custom Storm duration = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Shape factor = 484 Q (cfs) 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0.0 2.0 -- Hyd No.11 4.0 6.0 8.0 PRAREAB Hyd. No. 11 -- 100 Yr \ t------.. 10.0 12.0 14.0 28of 42 16.0 Hydrograph Volume = 1.626 acft 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) 24 TR55 Tc Worksheet 25 Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntellsolve Hyd. No. 11 PRAREAB Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 100.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 2.65 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 6.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 10.10 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 10.10 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 310.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope(%) = 4.80 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 3.53 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 1.46 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1.46 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc .............................................................................. 11.60 min 29of 42 Precipitation Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 11 PRAREAB Storm Frequency Total precip. Storm duration = 100 yrs = 6.41 in = MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds Time interval Distribution Precip (in) 1.00 Incrementa l Rainfall Precipitation Hyd. No. 11: PR AREA B - 100 Yr 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 ~ 0.00 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 - - Custom Design Storm -- MSE3 distribution 3 min .eds 30of 42 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 3 min = Custom 20.0 22.5 Precip (in) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0 .70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 25.0 Time (hrs) 26 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 12 FLOW OUT BMPB Hydrograph type Storm frequency Inflow hyd. No. Reservoir name = = = = Storage Indication method used. Q (cfs) 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0 3 Reservoir 100 yrs 11 PR BMP B 5 8 FLOW OUT BMPB Hyd. No. 12 -- 100 Yr I _/ ~ 10 13 15 - - Hyd No. 12 - - Hyd No. 11 31of 42 Peak discharge Time interval Max. Elevation Max. Storage 18 20 Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 22.51 cfs = 3 min = 1034.78 ft = 0.438 acft Hydrograph Volume = 1.625 acft 23 Q (cfs) 28.00 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 25 Time (hrs) 27 Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Pond No. 2 - PR BMP B Pond Data Monday, Aug 3 2026 , 2:7 PM Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Average end area method used. Stage I Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) 0.00 1032.00 1.00 1033.00 2.00 1034.00 3.00 1035.00 Culvert/ Orifice Structures Rise (in) Span (in) No. Barrels Invert El. (ft) Length (ft) Slope(%) N-Value Orif. Coeff. Multi-Stage Stage (ft) 3.00 [AJ 12.00 12.00 1033.00 0.00 0.00 .012 = 0 .60 = n/a [BJ 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 .000 0.00 No Contour area (sqft) 4,196 6,017 7,943 9,974 [CJ [DJ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .000 .000 0.00 0.00 No No Iner. Storage (acft) 0.000 0.117 0.160 0.206 Weir Structures Crest Len (ft) Crest El. (ft) Weir Coeff. Weir Type Multi-Stage = Total storage (acft) 0.000 0.117 0.277 0.483 [AJ [BJ 10.00 0.00 1034.00 0.00 2.60 0.00 Broad No No [CJ [DJ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No No Exfiltration = 1.670 in/hr (Contour) Tailwater Elev. = 0.00 ft Nole: Culvert/Orifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control. Stage I Discharge Stage (ft) 3.00 l---~ --------2.00 I 1.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 -- Total Q 15.00 18.00 21.00 24.00 32of 42 27.00 30.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 33.00 Discharge (cfs) 28 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow Hydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 13 INFILTRATION Hydrograph type = Diversion1 Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hydrograph = 12 Diversion method = Pond - PR BMP B Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0 3 5 8 INFILTRATION Hyd. No. 13 -- 100 Yr \ J ' ~ 10 13 15 Peak discharge Time interval 2nd diverted hyd. Pond structure Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 0.37 cfs = 3 min = 14 = Exfiltration Hydrograph Volume = 0.390 acft 18 20 23 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 25 -- Hyd No.13 - - Hyd No. 12 -- Hyd No. 14 Time (hrs) 33of 42 29 Hydrograph Plot Hydraflow H ydrographs by lntelisolve Hyd. No. 14 OVERLAND Hydrograph type = Diversion2 Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hydrograph = 12 Diversion method = Pond - PR BMP B Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 0 3 5 8 OVERLAND Hyd. No. 14 -- 100 Yr ' j :::--..... 10 13 15 Peak discharge Time interval 2nd diverted hyd. Pond structure Monday, Aug 3 2026, 2:7 PM = 2 2.14 cfs = 3 min = 13 = Exfiltration Hydrograph Volume = 1.235 acft 18 20 23 Q (cfs) 24.00 20.00 16.00 12.00 8.00 4.00 0.00 25 - - Hyd No. 14 - - Hyd No. 12 - - Hyd No. 13 Time (hrs) 34of 42 30 Residential 2 Junction 3 Outfall 35of 42 Data file name: K:\WlnSLAMM\26-3575 MAGNUM ST GABRIAL\26-3575 ST GABRIAL.mdb WlnSLAMM Version 10.5.0 Rain file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\Raln Flles\WI Milwaukee 69.RAN Particulate Solids Concentration file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\v10.1 WI_AVG01.pscx Runoff Coefficient file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\WI SL06 Dec06.rsvx Resldentlal Street Dellvery flle name: C:\WlnSLAMMFiles\WI_Res and Other Urban Dec06.std lnstitut!onal Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst lndust Dec06.std Commercial Street Delivery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\WI_Com Inst lndust Dec06.std lndustr!al Street Delivery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\WI_Com Inst lndust Dec06.std Other Urban Street Delivery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\WI_Res and other Urban Dec06.std Freeway Street Dellvery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\Freeway Dec06.std Apply Street Dellvery Flies to Adjust the After Event Load Street Dirt Mass Balance: False Pollutant Relative Concentration file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\WI_GEO03.ppdx Source Area PSD and Peak to Average Flow Ratio FIie: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\NURP Source Area PSD Files.csv Cost Data flle name: Seed for random number generator: -42 Study period starting date: 01/05/69 Start of Winter Season: 12/06 Study period ending date: 12/31/69 End of Winter Season: 03/28 Date: 08-03-2026 Time: 14:02:05 Site Information: LU# 1 - Residential: Residential 1 Total area (ac}: 5.490 . 1 - Roofs 1: 0.400 ac. Pitched Connected PSD Flis: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz 13- Paved Parking 1: 0.240 ac. Connected PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD File: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz 37 - Streets 1: 0.310 ac. Smooth Street Length = 0.1066 ml Street Width = 23.99156 ft Street Edges = 2 Default St. Dirt Accum. Annual Winter Load = 2500 lbs PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD FIie: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\NURP.cpz 45 - Large Landscaped Areas 1: 4.540 ac. Normal Silty PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD FIie: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\NURP.cpz LU# 2 - Residential: Resldential 2 Total area {ac): 4.820 1 - Roofs 1: 0.610 ac. Pitched Connected PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz 25 - Driveways 1: 0.320 ac. Connected PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD FIie: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\NURP.cpz 37 - Streets 1: 0.750 ac. Smooth Street Length = 0.2578 ml Street Width = 24.00116 ft Street Edges= 2 Default St. Dirt Accum. Annual Winter Load = 2500 lbs PSD File: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD FIie: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz 45 - Large Landscaped Areas 1: 3.140 ac. Normal Silty PSD FIie: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz Source Area PSD FIie: C:\WinSLAMM Files\NURP.cpz Control Practice 1: Blofilter CP# 1 (DS) - DS Biofilters # 1 1. Top area (square feet}= 8719 2. Bottom aea (square feet) = 4398 3. Depth (ft): 4.5 4. Biofilter width (ft) - for Cost Purposes Only: 1 0 5. Infiltration rate (In/hr) = 1.67 6. Random Infiltration rate generation? No 7. Infiltration rate fraction (side}: 0.01 8. Infiltration rate fraction (bottom}: 1 9. Depth of blofilter that is rock filled (ft) 0 10. Porosity of rock filled volume= O 11. Engineered soil Infiltration rate: 1.67 12. Engineered soil depth (ft)= 1.5 13. Engineered soil porosity= 0.27 14. Percent solids reduction due to flow through engineered soil = 80 15. Biofllter peak to average flow ratio= 3.8 16. Number of biofiltratlon control devices= 1 17. Particle size distribution file: Not needed - calculated by program 18. Initial water surface elevation (ft): O Soil Data Soil Type Fraction in Eng. Soil User-Defined Media Type 1.000 Blofllter OutleUDischarge Characteristics: Outlet type: Broad Crested Weir 1. Weircrestlength (ft): 10 2. Weir crest width (ft): 6 3. Height of datum to bottom of weir opening: 3.5 Outlet type: Surface Discharge Pipe 1. Surface discharge pipe outlet diameter (ft): 0.67 2. Pipe invert elevation above datum (ft): 2.5 3. Number of surface pipe outlets: 1 36of 42 Control Practice 2: Blofilter CP# 2 (DS) - DS Blofilters # 2 1. Top area (square feet)= 9974 2. Bottom aea (square feet)= 4196 3. Depth (ft): 4.5 4. Biofllter width (ft) - for Cost Purposes Only: 30 5. Infiltration rate (in/hr)= 1.67 6. Random inflltration rate generation? No 7. lnflltratlon rate fraction (side): 0.01 8. lnflltration rate fraction (bottom): 1 9. Depth of blofllter that Is rock filled (ft) 0 10. Porosity of rock filled volume= 0 11. Engineered soil Infiltration rate: 1.67 12. Engineered soil depth (ft)= 1.5 13. Engineered sotl porosity= 0.27 14. Percent solids reduction due to flow through engineered soil= 80 15. Blofllter peak to average flow ratio= 3.8 16. Number of biofiltration control devices= 1 17. Particle size distribution file: Not needed - calculated by program 18. Initial water surface elevation (ft): 0 Soll Data Soll Type Fraction In Eng. Soil User-Defined Media Type 1.000 Biofilter Outlet/Discharge Characteristics; Outlet type: Broad Crested Weir 1. Weir crest length (ft): 1 0 2. Weir crest width (ft): 6 3. Height of datum to bottom of weir opening: 3.5 Outlet type: Surface Discharge Pipe 1. Surface discharge pipe outlet diameter (ft): 2. Pipe invert elevation above datum (ft): 2.5 3. Number of surface pipe outlets: 1 37of 42 SLAMM for Windows Version 10.5.0 (c) Copyright Robert Pitt and John Voorhees 2019, All Rights Reserved Data file name: K:\WinSLAMM\26-3575 MAGNUM ST GABRIAL\26-3575 ST GABRIAL.mdb WlnSLAMM Version 10.5.0 Rain file name: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\Rain Flles\WI Milwaukee 69.RAN Particulate Solids Concentration file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\v10.1 Wt_AVG01.pscx Runoff Coefficient file name: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\WI_SL06 Dec06.rsvx Pollutant Relative Concentration file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\WI_GEO03.ppdx Residential Street Delivery flle name: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\WI_Res and Other Urban Dec06.std lnstitutlonal Street Delivery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst lndust Dec06.std Commercial Street Delivery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\W/_Com Inst lndust Dec06.std Industrial Street Delivery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\WI_Com Inst lndust Dec06.std Other Urban Street Delivery file name: C:\WlnSLAMM Files\WI_Res and Other Urban Dec06.std Freeway Street Delivery file name: C:\WinSLAMM Flles\Freeway Dec06.std Apply Street Delivery Files to Adjust the After Event Load Street Dirt Mass Balance: False Source Area PSD and Peak to Average Flow Ratio FIie: C:\WlnSLAMM Flles\NURP Source Area PSD Files.csv Cost Data file name: Seed for random number generator: -42 Study period starting date: 01/05/69 Study period ending date: 12/31/69 Start of Winter Season: 12/06 End of Winter Season: 03/28 Model Run Start Date: 01/05/69 Model Run End Date: 12/31/69 Date of run: 08-03-2026 Time of run: 14:01 :24 Total Area Modeled (acres): 10.310 Years in Model Run: 0.99 Runoff Percent Particulate Particulate Percent Volume Runoff Solids Solids Particulate (cu ft) Volume Cone. Yield Reduction (mg/L) (lbs) Total of all Land Uses without Controls: 274259 151.0 2585 Outfall Total with Controls: 15547 94.33% 129.1 125.3 Annualized Total After Outfall Controls: 15763 127.1 Pollutant Cone. Cone. Cone. Pollutant Yield Pollutant Yield No Controls With Controls Units No Controls With Controls Particulate Solids 151.0 129.1 mg/L 2585 125.3 Total Phosphorus 0.5860 0.6826 mg/L 10.03 0.6625 Biofilter # 1 is expected to clog in 9.52 years .. Percent Solids Reduction due to Engineered Media= 80 Biofilter # 2 is expected to clog In 5.73 years .. Percent Solids Reduction due to Engineered Media= 80 38of 42 Solids Reduction 95.15% Pol. Yield Percent Units Reduction lbs 95.15 % lbs 93.39 % Dalo File: K:\WinSlAMM\26-3575 MAGNUM ST GABRIAL \26-3575 ST GABRIAL.mdb Rain File: WI Milwaukee 69.RAN Dale: 08-04-26 Time: 6:25:52 AM Site Desc1iption: Runoff Voltime Total (ell at lhe Outfall Rain Sta,t Rain Outfall Total Rv Total Losses Calculated Event Peak Pie-Dev Nt1mbe1 Dale Tolal(in) (cf) (in.J CM' Flow (cfo) RtinolfVot 80 09105169 0.74 0 0.000 0.74 n/a 0.000 n/a 81 09/14/69 0.01 0 0.000 0.01 n/a 0.000 nla 82 09/15/69 0.03 0 0.000 0.03 n/a 0.000 nla 83 09116169 0.03 0 0.000 0.03 nla 0.000 n/a 84 09123/69 0.16 0 0.000 0.16 n/a 0.000 nla 85 09/25/69 0.01 0 0.000 0.01 n/a 0.000 nla 86 09129/69 0.84 0 0.000 0.84 n/a 0.000 nla 87 10/06/69 0.01 0 0.000 0.01 n/a 0.000 n/a 88 10/06/69 0.01 0 0.000 0.01 nla 0.000 n/a 89 10/09/69 0.05 0 0.000 0.05 nla 0.000 n/a 90 10/10/69 0.14 0 0.000 0.14 nla 0.000 n/a 91 10/10/69 1.34 0 0.000 1.34 n/a 0.000 n/a 92 10112/69 1.63 0 0.000 1.63 n/a 0.000 nla 93 10115/69 0.16 0 0.000 0.16 nla 0.000 n/a 94 10/19/69 0.44 0 0.000 0.44 nla 0.000 nla 95 10/19/69 0.35 0 0.000 0.35 nla 0.000 nla 96 10/21/69 0.02 0 0.000 0.02 nla 0.000 n/a 97 10/24/69 0.01 0 0.000 0.01 n/a 0.000 nla 98 10130/69 0.32 0 0.000 0.32 n/a 0.000 n/a 99 11/02/69 0.77 0 0.000 0.77 n/a 0.000 n/a 100 11/11/69 0.05 0 0.000 0.05 n/a 0.000 n/a 101 11/11/69 0.04 0 0.000 0.04 n/a 0.000 n/a 102 11113/69 0.03 0 0.000 0.03 n/a 0.000 nla 103 11/17/69 0.15 0 0.000 0.15 n/a 0.000 nla 104 11/18169 0.02 0 0.000 0.02 n/a 0.000 n/a 105 11/19169 0.01 0 0.000 0.01 n/a 0.000 n/a 106 11126/69 0.07 0 0.000 0.07 n/a 0.000 n/a 107 12/07/69 108 12111/69 109 12/16/69 110 12/21169 111 12123169 112 12124/69 113 12/24/69 114 12/27/69 115 12/28/69 116 12/31/69 Mi11if!1um: 0.00 0 0.000 0.01 61.9 0.000 2929.0 Maximum: 1.96 10910 0.149 1.67 72.G 1.859 10315.0 Average: 0.25 134.li 0.002 0.25 71.1 1.481 5802.3 Total 29.02 15547 28.61 23209.00 'Note: NACS doe, not 1ecommend using CN method fo11ains < 0.5 in. See 'P1eDevelopment A1eas and CN' Help fo1 mo,e info. 39of 42 43° 14' U-N 43' 14' 2"N Soil Map-Washington County, Wisconsin Map Scale: 1:1,670 if printed on A portrait (BS' x 11") sheet ----== ==------- ========Meters 0 ~ ~ oo m ---===-----= ====feet 0 50 100 200 DJ Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordi1ates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 16N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources -em Conservation Service WelH:j8if~ ey National Cooperative Soil Survey 0 i ... 8/4/2026 Page 1 of 3 43° 14' n•N Soil Map-Washington County, Wisconsin MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) D Area of Interest (AOI) Soils □ □ Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Specia l Point Features (2) Blowout l&I Borrow Pit ~ Clay Spot ◊ Closed Depression ;x; Gravel Pit .-. Gravelly Spot 0 Landfill A Lava Flow & Marsh or swamp '}{' Mine or Quarry @ Miscellaneous Water 0 Perennial Water V Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot . -. Sandy Spot @ Severely Eroded Spot ◊ Sinkhole ~ Slide or Slip fJ Sadie Spot USDA Natural Resources '1iiiiiii Conservation Service § Spoil Area 0 Stony Spot Dl Very Stony Spot ~ Wet Spot 6 Other ~- Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transport ation t-H Rails - Interstate Highways - US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Backgro und Aerial Photography We4f8if~ey National Cooperativ e Soil Survey MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1 :15,800 . Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detai l of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercato r (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves d irection and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection , should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Washington County, Wisconsin Survey Area Data: Version 25, Sep 10, 2025 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1 :50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 4, 2022-Sep 13,2022 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 8/4/2026 Page 2 of 3 Soll Map-Washington County, Wisconsin Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol 7243A 7323C2 7845B2 796902 Totals for Area of Interest Natural Resources Conservation Service Map Unit_ Name Acres In AOI St. Charles slit loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Casco loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded Theresa silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded CascoRRodman complex, 12 to 20 percent slopes, eroded Web Soll Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 42of 42 Percent of AOI 0.9 3.3 6.0 0.0 10.3 9.1% 32.5% 58.2% 0.2% 100.0% 81412026 Page 3 of 3 Owner Property Description Districts Class Acres Land lmpts Total Vl0-03710401 3092 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $498,700 $568,700 JAMES NAWROCKI PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 401 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $498,700 $568,700 KATHLEEN NAWROCKI 1527662+1572782 2570 Holy Hill Area School 3092 FAIRWAY VIEW CT District HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710402 3094 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $520,800 $590,800 SCOTT A DANIEL PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 402 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $520,800 $590,800 SUE A DANIEL 1S26409+1617312+1617334 2570 Holy Hill Area School 3094 FAIRWAY VIEW CT District Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710501 3102 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $488,900 $558,900 TIMOTHY M TREACY PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 501 DOC 1508043 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $488,900 $5S8,900 DAWN M TREACY 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3102 FAIRWAY VIEW CT Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710502 3104 FAIRWAYVW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70.000 $SGS.BOO $63S.800 SORGENT FAMILY IRREV TRUST PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT S02 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $S65,800 $635,800 3104 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 1489851+1527S81 2570 Holy Hill Area School District HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710701 3107 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70.000 $496.300 $566,300 BELA MESZAROS PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 701 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $496,300 $566,300 GAIL MESZAROS 1501627+1508215 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3107 FAIRWAY VIEW CT Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 V10 03710702 3105 FAIRWAYVW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $497,600 $567,600 WE8ERTRUST PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 70Z DOC 1501559 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $497,600 $567,600 3105 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 2570 Holy Hill Area School District HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710801 3097 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $496,300 $566,300 ROBERT TRISCARI PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 801 DOC 1511854 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $496,300 $566,300 LISA A TRISCARI 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3097 FAIRWAY VIEW CT Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Village of R1chf1eld, Washington County July 21, 2026 9:02 am Page 203 of 836 Owner Property Description Districts Class Acres Land lmpts Total Vl0-03710802 3095 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $499,900 $569,900 DAN PIERGIES PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 802 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $499,900 $569,900 ALICE PIERGIES 151380o+1602235+1602490 2570 Holy Hill Area School 3095 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 802 District HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710901 3087 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $533,400 $603,400 BONNIE BLOOMQUIST TRUST PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 901 DOC 1525622 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $533,400 $603,400 CHARLES F WEDEMEYER LIVING TRUST 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3087 FAIRWAY VIEW CT Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710902 3085 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $495,900 $565,900 CHRISTINE LAUER PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 902 DOC 1523846 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $495,900 $565,900 3085 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 902 2570 Holy Hill Area School HUBERTUS WI 53033 District Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03711001 3077 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $515,700 $585,700 RENEE LUEDKE PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 1001 DOC 1560860 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $515,700 $585,700 3077 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 2570 Holy Hill Area Schoo! District HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03711002 3075 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $515,800 $585,800 DANIEL N BRANSKI PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 1002 DOC 1581785 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $515,800 $585,800 SUSAN L BRANSKI 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3075 FAIRWAY VIEW CT HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03711101 3067 FAIRWAYVWCT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $494,4<)0 $564,400 TAMARA R MULCAHY PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 1101 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $494,400 $564,400 MICHAEL P MULCAHY 1472044+1556912 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3067 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 1101 Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03711102 3065 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $522,900 $592,900 NEALJ RUFFING PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 1102 DOC 1473815 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $522,900 $592,900 JANICE R RUFFING 2570 Holy Hill Area School 3065 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 1102 District Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Villaeofih I g R c fie d, Washington County July 21, 2026 9:02 am Page 204 of 836 Owner Property Description Districts Class Acres Land lmpts Total V10-037100Y HUBERTUS RD Moraine Park D 3.660 $1,700 $0 $1,700 WEYER I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PT OF SW SE DOC 1516S69 EXC PT SOLD+PT PLATTED Hartford Union Totals 3.660 $1,700 $0 $1,700 1247 STATE HWY 17S 2570 Holy Hill Area School District HUBERTUS WI S3033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 3.660 Vl0-03710101 3062 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $557,200 $627,200 JOHN C WALLER REV TR PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 101 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $557,200 $627,200 3062 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 1524982+1570323 2570 Holy Hill Area School District HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710102 3064 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $550,400 $620,400 TOM LAUMANN PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 102 DOC 1519885 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $550,400 $620,400 2570 Holy Hill Area Schoo! ANITA LAUMANN District 3064 FAIRWAY VIEW CT Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710201 3072 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $424,300 $494,300 DAVID CLARKE JR PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 201 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $424,300 $494,300 JULIE A CLARKE 1615529+1626935 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3072 FAIRWAY VIEW CT Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710202 3074 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $434,500 $504,500 PAUL W WINKELMANN TR PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 202 DOC 160648S Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $434,500 $504,500 JESSICA M WINKELMANN TR 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3074 FAIRWAY VIEW CT Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710301 3082 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $433,100 $503,100 CHRISTOPHER J KNAUB PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDO UNIT 301 DOC Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $433,100 $503,100 3082 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 1533768+1585136 2570 Holy Hill Area School District HUBERTUS WI 53033 Richfield Fire Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Vl0-03710302 3084 FAIRWAY VW CT Moraine Park A 0.000 $70,000 $432,500 $502,500 RAE ANN M KRENN PT SW SE FAIRWAY FIELDS CONDD UNIT 302 DOC 1491277 Hartford Union Totals 0.000 $70,000 $432,500 $502,500 FRITZ KRENN 2570 Holy Hill Area School District 3084 FAIRWAY VIEW CT 302 Richfield Fire HUBERTUS WI 53033 Section: 13 Acres: 0.000 Villa e of Richfield Washin g gton County July 21, 2026 9:02 am Page 202 of 836 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. - Village of Richfield, WI Chapter 170. Zoning Village of Richfield, WI Wednesday, August 26, 2026 Article 5. Specific Procedural Requirements DIVISION 2. Planned Development District § 170.320. Purpose. A planned development district allows for more flexibility in the development of land while ensuring substantial compliance with the intent of this chaRter and the Village's Comprehensive Plan. As further described in Article 7, the following may be reviewed as a planned development district: A. Conventional planned unit development; B. Conservation subdivision; and C. Adaptive reuse project. § 170.321. Initiation. The owner of the subject property may submit an application for the establ ishment of a planned development district. § 170.322. Development agreement. If a planned development district is established pursuant to this division, the Village and developer may enter into a development agreement that specifies the duties and obligations of both parties with respect to the development project. § 170.323. Review procedure. https ://ecode360 .com/prinURl3087?guid=42033 112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,4. .. 1/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. -Village of Richfield, WI Establishment of a planned development district involves a two­ step process. The review of a proposed project begins with a general development plan. If the Qeneral development plan is approved (i.e., an ordinance is adopfed), a precise implementation plan for all or a part of the project is reviewed. Ir the precise implementation plan is approved, the project is officially approved. The general steps outlined below shal be used in the review of an application for the establishment of a planned development d1stnct. A. Step One: General development plan. (1) Presubmittal meeting with staff. The a[)P,licant or the apRlicant's agent meets with the Zoning Aaministrator to review i) applicable regulations ancf procedures· ii) apP,licable sections of the Village's Comprehensive Plan ana apP,licable neighborhood J)lans, if any; and iii) the proposal. Upon request, the Zoning Administrator may waive the requirement LO hold a presubmittal meeting when he or she determines such meeting is nol necessary given the nature of the project and/or the ext~nt to wflich the applicant understanas the Village's zoning requirements. (2) Preapplication conference with Plan Commission. The applicant meets with the Plan Commission for an informal discussion relating to the proRosed _project. At that meeting, the applicant shall proviae the Plan Commission with materials that descrioe the proRosed project in sufficient detail for a preliminary, nonbinaing review. (3) Submittal of application materials. The applicant submits a completed application and other required materials to the Zoning Administrator alonQ with the application fee as may be established by the Village Board. (4) Determination of completeness. The Zoning Administrator reviews the submittal to make sure it is complete and ready for further review. A determination of completeness shall be made within 30 days of the submittal. If it is not complete, the ZoninQ Administrator will notify the applicant in writing of such aeficiencies and that the applicant has three months from the date of the notice to resubmit the application or forfeit the application fee. The Zoning Administrator will take no further steps to process the application until the deficiencies are remedied. The incomplete application is retained as a public record. A determination that an application is complete means the application is ready for formal review and does not suggest the applicant has provided sufficient information in all regards or preclude the reviewing authoriJy from requesting additional information It deems appropriate. (5) Review date. When the Zoning Administrator determines the application is comRlete, lle or she schedules the review with the Plan Commission consistent with its adopted calendar. https://ecode360.com/print/Rl3087?guid=42033112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,4... 2/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. - Village of Richfield, WI (6) General notice. Consistent with Division 2 of Article 4, the Zoning Administrator provides for i) a Class 2 public notice, ii) property owner notice, and, iii) meeting agenda notice. (7) Staff report preparation and distribution. The Zoning Administrator may prepare a written staff reP.ort as described in this cfivision and P,rovide a copy of it to each member of the Plan Commission and Village Board, the applicant, and any other interested person upon request. (8) Public hearing. Allowing for P,roper notice, the Plan Commission and Village Boartl conduct a Joint public hearing to review the aP,P,lication consistent with Division 3 of Article 4, with the Village President servinq as the presiding officer. Prior to the close of the public nearing, the applicant or the Plan Commission may request a continuance consistent with Division 3 of Article 4. If the P,Ublic hearing is adjourned the Plan Commission maY, tlirect the Zoning Administrator to conduct additional research related to the proposed district. (9) Staff follow-up. After the close of the public hearinq, the Plan Commission may direct the Zoning Adminisfrator, Vill~g~ Engine~r,. and/or the Village Attorney to prepare a preliminary dec1s1on document. (10) Plan Commission recommendation . The Plan Commission makes a recommendation to the Village Board based on the decision criteria in this division to i) approve the general development plan subject to approval of a precise imP,lementation plan; ii) approve the general development plan with conditions, subject to approval of a precise implementation plan; or iii) deny the general development plan. (11) General notice. Consistent with Division 2 of Article 4, the Zoninq Administrator _places the matter on the meeting agencfa of the Village Board. (1 2) Village Board meeting. Allowing for proper notice, the Village Boarp considers the application at a regular or special meeting. ( 13) Decision. The Village Board after considering the Plan Commission's recommendation makes a decision based on the decision criteria in this division to i) approve the general development plan, subject to ap~roval of a P,recise implementation plan; ii) approve the general tlevelopment P,lan with conditions, suoject to approval of a precise implementation plan; or iii) deny the general development plan . ( 14) Preparation of decision document. If the general developmen.t plan i~ approved, the Zoning Administrator prepares a final ordinance. (15) Applicant notification. Within a reasonable time followin8 the Village Board's decision, but not more than 1 https://ecode360 .com/print/ Rl3087?guid=42033112,42033113.42033146,42033106,42033107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,4 ... 3/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. -Village of Richfield, WI workdays, the Zoning Administrator sends the decision document to the applicant by regular mail and/or email. (16) Acceptance by property owner. If the general deveropment plan is approved, the property owner must sign the decision document to acknowled,qe the terms of the approval and return the same to the Zoning Administrator within two months of the decision. Prior to the expiration of the previously specified time period, the gropert:y owner may submit a petition to the Zoning Administrator requesting an extension and the Zoning Administrator may, with cause, extend the period within which the decision document must be signed. If the signed decision document is not returned witliin the initial or extended time period, if any, the decision shall automatically become null and void without any further action by the Village at the expiration of such time limit. The decision document shall only become effective when all of the Rroperty owner signatures have been obtained and th~ original signature copy is returned to the Zoning Administrator. B. Step Two: Precise implementation plan. (1) Submittal of precise implementation plan. The applicant submits a precise implementation plan and other required materials to the Zoning Administrator along witli the application fee as may be established by fhe Villaqe Board. At the discretion of the applicant, such materials may be submitted concurrently with the review of the general development plan. (2) Determination of completeness. The Zoning Administrator reviews the submittal to make sure it is complete and ready for further review. A determination of completeness shall be made within 30 days of the submittal. If it is not complete, the ZoninQ Administrator will notify the apP,licant in writing of such cfeficiencies and that the applicant has three months from the date of the notice to resubmit the application or forfeit the application fee. The Zoning Administrator will take no further steps to process the application until the deficiencies are remedied. The incomplete application is retained as a public record. A determination that an application is complete means the application is ready for formal review and does not suggest the applicant has provided sufficient information in all regards or preclude the reviewing authori.ty from requesting additional information It deems appropriate. (3) Review date. When the Zoning Administrator determines the application is comrJlete, lle or she schedules the review with the Plan Commission consistent with its adopted calendar. (4) General notice. Consistent with Division 2 of Article 4, the Zor:ting Administrator shall provide for a meeting agenda notice. https://ecode360.com/print/Rl3087?guid=42033112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,4... 4/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. - Village of Richfield, WI (5) Staff report preparation and distribution. The Zoning Administrator may prepare a staff report that evaluates whether the precise implementation plan is consistent with the approved general development plan and the suitability of the proposed plan given the additional information provided in the plan and supplemental materials. The Zoning Administrator provides a copy of it to each member of the Plan Commission and Village Board, the applicant, and any other interested person upon request. (6) Meeting. Allowing for proP,er notice, the Plan Commission review~ the precise implementation plan and the staff report, 1f any. (7) Determination of consistency. The Plan Commission determines whether the precise implementation plan is qenerally consistent with the approved general aevelopment plan with resP,ect to density/intensTty and P,ermissible rand uses. If the Plan Commission aetermines that the P,recise imQlementation plan is not qenerally consistent, the Plan Commission shall render fhat decision in writing and take no further action on the precise implementation plan. (8) Plan Commission recommendation. If the precise implementation plan is deemed to be consistent with the general develoP,ment plan, the Plan Commission makes a recommendation to the Villaqe Board based on the decision criteria in this division ro i) approve the precise implementation plan, ii) approve the precise impl~m~ntation plar:, with conditions, or iii) deny the precise 1mplementat1on plan. (9) General notice. Consistent with Division 2 of Article 4, the Zoning Administrator _places the matter on the meeting agencfa of the Village Board. (10) Village Board meeting. Allowing for proper notice, the Village Boarp considers the application at a regular or special meeting. (11) Decision. The Village Board after considering the Plan Commission's recommendation makes a decision based on the decision criteria in this division to i) approve the precise imP.le·mentation plan, ii). approve ttie precise 1mpl~m~ntation plar:, witti conditions, or iii) deny the precise 1mplementatIon plan. (12) PreP.aration of decision document. Based on the action of the Village Board1 the Zoning Administrator prepares a decision aocumenL consistent with this division. (13) Applicant notification. Within a reasonable time followin8 the Village Board's decision, but not more than 1 workdays, the Zoning Administrator sends the decision document to the applicant by regular mail and/or email. (14) Acceptance by property owner. If an approval includes one or more cond1t1ons of approval, the property owner https ://ecode360 .com/p rint/Rl3087?guid =42033112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033 107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,4... 5/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. -Village of Richfield, WI must sign the decision document to acknowledg_e the terms orthe apP,roval and return the same to the Zoning Administrator within two months of the decision. Prior to the expiration of the previously specified time period, the groperty owner may submit a petition to the Zoning Administrator requesting an extension and the Zoning Administrator may, with cause, extend the period within which the decision document must be signed. If the signed decision document is not returned witliin the initial or extended time period, if any, the decision shall automatically become null and void without any further action by the Village at the expiration of such time limit. The decision document shall only become effective when all required signatures have oeen obtained and the ori.Qir:ia.l si,qnature copy is returned to the Zoning Adrrnrnstrator. § 170.324. Basis of decision. In the review of a general development plan and the precise implementation pland the Plan Commission, in making its recommendation, an the Village Board, in making its decision, shall consider the following factors: A. Whether develoP,ment in the proposed project is in keeping with the spirit ana intent of this chapter; B. Whether development in the progosed project is consistent with the Village's Comprehensive Plan; C. Whether development in the proposed district is consistent with a neighborhood plan or otHer subarea plan that may have been prepared for land in or near the proposed district; D. The effects of development in the proposed project on traffic safety and efficiency, both within ana outside of tlie district; E. Whether the proposed plan for development in the proRosed project is properly planned and is properly coordinatea with the existing and anticiRated land uses on properties in the immediate and surrounaing area; F. The extent to which the natural features and open space on the site are preserved; G. Whether development in the proposed project complies with provisions of this chapter and other land development regulations of the Village that may apply; H. The .effects of d~y~lopment in the proposed project on public services and fac1llt1es; I. Whether adequate water and sanitary sewer facilities can be provided; J. The proposed means of maintaining any undeveloP,ed areas of the proposed project for the purpose for which it was set https://ecode360 .com/print/Rl3087?guid=42033112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,4... 6/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. - Village of Richfield, WI aside; K. Effects of the proP,osed use on surrounding properties, including existing ana anticipated uses; L. Effects of the proposed use on the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding proP,erty for uses permitted in the zoning district and adjoining districts; M. Whether the plan for development enhances the baseline zoning district, as defined oy the Plan Commission and Village Board, on the design and development standards of the underlyin_q zoning district;c11 and [1] Editonal /\Tote: For example, a planned development district may enhance the baseline zoning district, when it includes desirable features or amenities tflat are not otherwise required , including but not limited to additional landscaping /buffering, open space, or enhanced design elements . N. Any other factor that relates to the purposes of this chapter set forth in § 170.05 or as allowed by state law. § 170.325. Imposition of conditions. A. B. Generall.Y. The Plan Commission may recommend and the Village Board may impose conditions as may be necessary to granl approval. sucti conditions may relate to any of the factors It considered in reaching its decision. In addition, the Plan Commission may recommend and the Village Board may require the provision of off-site exactions thal may be necessary to approve the establishment of the planned development disfnct project. Effect on contracts with another party. The Village Board shall not condition or withhold approval based upon the property owner entering into a contract or discontinuing, modifying, extending, or renewing any contract with a thircf party under which tHe third party is engaging in a lawful use of the property. c11 L 1] Editorial Note: See § 62.23(7)(gm) , Wis. Stats. The Village, for example, could not require an applicant to terminate an existing contract with another party that is engaged in a lawful use of1he property. § 170.326. Application form and content. A. General development plan. The application submittal for a general development plan shall include the following: (1) An application form as may be used by the Village; https://ecode360 .com/prinURl3087?guid=42033112,42033113,42033146,42033106 ,42033107,42033181,4 2033182,42033161,4 2033183,42033184,4... 7 /10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM B. Development agreement. -Village of Richfield, WI (2) A general development plan prepared at an appropriate scale depicting the information listed in AP,oendix F/11 [1] Code Editor's Note: Appendix Fis incluaed in Chapter 170A, Zoning Appendix. (3) A preliminary draft of covenants if any are to be imposed; and (4) A development schedule, if the project is to be constructed in phases, which includes the anticipated beginning date and ending date of each phase and a description of those project-related elements to be completed in each phase. Precise imRlementation plan. The application submittal for a precise implementation plan shall include the following: (1) An application form as may be used by the Village; (2) A precise implementation plan prepared at an appropriate scale depicting the information listed in Appendix F;[21 [2] Code Editor's Note: Appendix Fis incluaed in Chapter 170A, Zoning Appendix. (3) A final draft of covenants if any are to be imposed; ( 4) Hom.eowners' association documents, if proposed or required; (5) A development agreement, if proposed or required; and (6) A development schedule, if the project is to be constructed in phases, which includes the anticipated beginning date and ending date of each phase and a description of those project-related elements to be completed in each phase. § 170.327. Staff report content. The staff report should include the following: A. P,r~lirninary findings for the decision criteria listed in this d1v1s1on; B. A preliminary list of recommended conditions of approval; and C. Other information deemed necessary. § 170.328. Effect of approval. If the Village Board approves a planned development district, the approval sllall run with the land and is binding on all subsequent property owners. https://ecode360 .com/prinURl3087?guid=42033112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,4... 8/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. - Village of Richfield, WI § 170.329. Effect of approved planned development district on land division standards. Development in a planned development district is subject to the Village's land division regulations to the extent applicaole, except that the Plan Commission or Village Board may waive a devel.opment standard in the land division regulations as provided therein. § 170.330. Amendment of approved planned development district. If the Village Board approves a olanned develoP,ment district, the Plan Commission ana Village Board shall review all proposed changes to the project plan that was approved at the time of approval. If in ttie opinion of the Village Board, the proposed change constitutes a minor alteration , the Village Board may approve the requested change at a re.Qular or special meeting of ttie Village Board. If the P,roposed cnange constitutes a major alteration , the review proceaure in this division must be followed. § 170 .331 . Expiration of an approval. If any portion of a P,lanned development district that can be developed remains substantially undeveloped (i.e . ., less than 50% completed) three years after final approva , the Village Board may rescind the approval, in whole or in part, following a public hearing. Upon petition and with cause, the Village Board may qrant a one-time extension, not to exceed four years. In the event the Village Board rescinds an approval, the Villaqe Board shall at that time reclassify undeveloped lands in the district based on the zoning regulations in effect at that time. Developed P,Ortions of the planned development district may either be allowea to retain the planned development district designation or be reclassified based on the zoning regulations in effect at that time. § 170.332. Appeal. An aggrieved person may appeal a final decision made pursuant to this division by filing an appeal with a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 calendar days of the final decision. https://ecode360 .com/prinURl3087?guid=42033 112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033 107,42033181 ,42033 182,42033161,42033 183,42033184,4 ... 9/10 8/26/26, 5:57 PM Development agreement. -Village of Richfield, WI § 170.333. through § 170.349. (Reserved) https://ecode360.com/prinURl3087?guid=42033112,42033113,42033146,42033106,42033107,42033181,42033182,42033161,42033183,42033184,... 10/10 State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1027 W Saint Paul Ave. Milwaukee, WI 53233 January 15, 2026 Timothy Bickel St. Gabriel Catholic Parish 1200 Saint Gabriel Way Hubertus , WI 53033 Sent via electronic mail to frtim@stgabrielhubertus.org Tony Evers, Governor Karen Hyun, Ph.D., Secretary Telephone 608-266-2621 Toll Free 1-888-936-7463 TTY Access via relay - 711 Subject: Liability Clarification and "No Action Required" Determination Letter St. Gabriel Catholic Parish Hubertus Road Property, 3733 Hubertus Rd, Hubertus , Wisconsin 53033 Parcel # 082900B BRRTS Activity Name: St Gabriel Catholic Parish Hubertus - USTs BRRTS # 07-67-598467 and 09-67-598466 FID # 267036550 Dear Mr. Bickel: The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) received a request for a liability clarification and a "No Action Required" determination from Stantec Consulting Services , Inc. (Stantec) on behalf of St. Gabriel Catholic Parish on December 23, 2025 (Request). The Request was submitted with the appropriate review fee for the site location (Property) identified above. The purpose of this letter is to provide St. Gabriel Catholic Parish clarification as to environmental liabilities and current environmental conditions at the Property. Wisconsin Statutes (Wis. Stat.)§ 292.55(1 )(d)1 authorizes the DNR to issue a letter to a person seeking assistance concerning the liability of a person owning or leasing a property for environmenta l pollution at a property , the type and extent of environmental pollution at a property, the adequacy of an environmental investigation, or any other matter related to a request for assistance. This type of letter contains a DNR determination as to whether response actions are needed under Wisconsin Administrative Code (Wis. Admin. Code) chs. NR 700 to 799 based on the discharge of one or more hazardous substances, or the presence of environmental pollution at the Property. The DNR based this letter on review of environmental reports and other documents that were provided in the Request: • Liability clarification letter request , completed Form 4400-237, signed November 26, 2025, including a cover letter and attachments. • Discharge notification form submitted to the DNR on December 23, 2025; • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Stantec, October 3, 2024: • Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Stantec, September 23, 2025. PROPERTY USE The Property consists of a 10.6-acre parcel that is currently improved with five buildings including a school/administration building, convent house/school, rectory home, church, and a garage. Refer to the attached Figure 3 for a map of the Property. dnr_wi.gov wisconsin.gov {) PRINTED "" ~ DNRECYCLEC - PAPER - Liability Clarification and "No Action Determination" Letter for St Gabriel Catholic Parish Hubertus - USTs BRRTS # 07 -67-598467 and 09-67-598466 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY Page 2 The Property is in Hubertus and is surrounded by a cemetery and commercial and residential properties. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted by Stantec in 2024. The former use of 2,000-gallon and 700-gallon fuel oil underground storage tanks (USTs) was identified as a recognized environmental condition (REC). A Phase II ESA was conducted by Stantec to evaluate the REC. Ten soil borings (SB-1 to SB-10) were advanced to a maximum depth of 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). Two samples were collected from SB-1 and one sample from the rest of the borings. All samples were laboratory analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals. Laboratory analytical results identified selenium above its Wis. Admin. Code ch. NR 720 residual contaminant level (RCL) for groundwater pathway. Methylene chloride was identified in several samples exceeding its RCL for groundwater pathway. Selenium appears to be associated with background conditions. The methylene chloride was also detected in the blank and appears to be a lab contaminant. Based on this information , the DNR concurs that no action is required. DETERMINATIONS Wis. Stat. ch. 292 and Wis. Admin. Code chs. NR 700 to 799 require those who are responsible for a hazardous substance discharge or environmenta l pollution to take actions necessary to restore the environment to the extent practicable and minimize the harmful effects from the discharge to the air, lands or waters of the state. Wis. Stat. § 292.55 authorizes the DNR to issue clarification letters concerning liability for environmental pollution. Information submitted to the DNR with your request for liability clarification indicates that no hazardous substance discharges or environmental pollution has occurred on the Property. Therefore , based on information provided at this time, further site investigation activities are not required, and no response action is required under Wis. Admin. Code chs. NR 700 to 799. As with any environmental assessment, some areas of the Property were not assessed, the number of samples collected were limited based on professional judgment and financia l considerations, and environmental samples were not analyzed for all parameters. This letter relates and refers only to those conditions described above and to information and data you submitted to the DNR in your request for this letter. The DNR makes no determination concerning the presence or absence of hazardous substances or environmental pollution on the Property other than those identified in the documents and reports listed above, which you submitted to the DNR. In the future, if the DNR becomes aware of new information concerning the contaminants referenced above or the presence of any other contaminants on the Property, the DNR will evaluate that data at that time to determine if any response actions are required. CLOSING This letter, site and case-related information and DNR contacts can be found online in the Bureau for Remediation and Redevelopment Tracking System (BRRTS) on the Web (BOTW ); go to dnr.wi.gov and search "BOTW." Use the BRRTS ID# found at the top of this letter. The site can also be found on the map view, Remediation and Redevelopment Sites Map (RRSM) by searching "RRSM." If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 608-400-9934, or m ackenzie. reynoldssparg ur@wisconsi n. gov. Liability Clarification and "No Action Determination" Letter for St Gabriel Catholic Parish Hubertus - USTs BRRTS # 07-67-598467 and 09-67-598466 Sincerely, Mackenzie Reynolds-Spargur Southeast Region Project Manager Remediation and Redevelopment Program Attachment: Figure 3, Soil Contamination , September 9, 2025, Stantec cc: Erin Gross, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. - erin.gross@stantec .com Margaret Brunette, DNR, Remediation and Redevelopment Program - ma rgaret. bru nette@wisconsin.gov Page 2 Michael Prager, DNR, Remediation and Redevelopment Program - michael.prage r@wisconsin.gov