2026.06.30 Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda and Packet

AGENDA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING RICHFIELD VILLAGE HALL 4128 HUBERTUS ROAD HUBERTUS, WI 53033 June 30, 2026 6:00 P.M. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 19.84, Wis. Stats., notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Village of Richfield Board of Zoning Appeals, at which a quorum of the Village Board may attend in order to gather information about a subject which they have decision making responsibility. The meeting will be held at the above noted date, time and location. Notice of Village Board Quorum, (Chai,person to announce the following if a quorum of the Village Board is in attendance at the meeting: "Please let the minutes reflect that a quorum of the Village Board is present and that the Village Board members may be making comments under the Public Comments section of the agenda, during any Public Hearing (s) or if the rules are suspended to allow them to do so.") 1. Call to Order/Detennination of Quorum 2. Verification of Open Meetings Law Compliance 3. Roll Call 4. Pledge of Allegiance 5. Recess and reconvene to gather additional infonnation at property located at 4823 Riverview Drive, Hubertus, WI, identified by Tax Key: Vl0_046800A 6. Reconvene at Village Hall 7. Upon motion duly made, seconded and approved by a roll call vote of the members present at the meeting, the Board reserves the right, prior to the hearing or during the heating, to adjourn into "Closed Session," pursuant to Section 19.85(l)(g), Wisconsin State Statutes, as needed to confer with legal counsel for the governmenta l body who is rendering oral or written advice concerning strategy to be adopted by the body with respect to litigation in which it is or is likely to become involved, specifically the hearing on the request for a Variance by Michael L Dallia and Catherine T. Dallia , petitioner for the property located at 4823 Riverview Drive, Hubertus, WI, identified by Tax Key: VlO 046800A. 8. The Board will return to open session to take action on those matters discussed in closed session and/or commence or continue the hearing on the request for a Variance by Michael L Dallia and Catherine T. Dallia , petitioners and owners of property located at 4823 Riverview Drive, Hubertus, Wl, identified by Tax Key: Vl0_046800A. 9. PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION regarding a petition from Michael L Dallia and Catherine T. Dallia to obtain a Variance from the Development Standards regarding the placement of fill found in Section 1 70 .1263 for the property located at 4823 Riverview Drive, Hubertus , WI, identified by Tax Key: V 10 _ 046800A. a. Announcement of Proceedings b. Presentation by Zoning Administrator c. Board Member questions d. Presentation by Applicant e. Board member questions f. Input from the Public g. Board member questions h. Legal Arguments of the Parties 1. Consideration of Any Other Issues Related to the Appeal J. Close Public Hearing k. Deliberation I. Upon motion duly made, seconded and approved by a roll call vote of the members present at the meeting, the Board reserves the right to adjourn into "Closed Session," pursuant to Section 19.85(1)(a), Wisconsin State Statutes, to deliberate concerning a case which was the subject of any judicial or quasi-judicial trial or hearing before that governmental body, specifically the request for a Variance by property owners Michael L Dallia and Catherine T. Dallia, for the property located at 4823 Riverview Drive, Hubertus, WI, identified by Tax Key: Vl O _ 046800A. m. The Board will return to open session to take action on those matters discussed in closed session, and/or deliberate and act on the matter subject to the hearing on the request for a Variance by Michael L Dalli a and Catherine T. Dallia for the property located at 4823 Riverview Drive, Hubertus, WI, identified by Tax Key: VlO 046800A. n. Announce Decision or Adjourn to a Date and Time Certain for a Decision/Announce Decision o. Direct Staff to Prepare Written Decision and take any necessary action 10. ADJOURNMENT Additional explanation of items on the agenda (Communication Fonns) can be found on the village's website at www.richfieldwi.gov. Notification of this meeting has been posted and/or published in accordance with the Laws of the State of Wisconsin. It is possible that members of and possibly a quo mm of members of other governmental bodies of the municipality may be in attendance at the above stated meeting to gather infonnation; no action will be taken by any governmental body at the above stated meeting other than the govemmental body specifically referred to above in this notice. Requests from persons with disabilities who need assistance to participate in this meeting or hearing should be made to the Village Clerk's office at 628~2260 with as much advance notice as possible.\ VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: June 30, 2026 SUBJECT: Va1iance Petition for 4823 Riverview Drive (Tax Key: V10_048600A) - Mike and Catherine Dallia, Petitioners DATE SUBMITTED: June 25, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator POLICY QUESTION: DOES THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS BEL!EVE THE APPL!CANT MET THE BURDEN FOR PROVING AN UNNECESSARY HARDSHIP, UNIQUE PROPERTY LIMITATIONS, AND A COMPELL!NG PUBLIC fNTEREST FOR THE REQUESTED VARIANCES? ISSUE SUMMARY: The issue before us tonight is whether the petitioner, Mike and Catherine Dallia, have made a compelling case for the requested "Dimensional Variance ". Our applicant is requesting a "Dimensional Variance " from Section 170.1263 of the Village Code, related to development standards within the Floodplain Overlay Dist1ict. A Class II Public Hearin g Notice was published in the Daily News on June 16th and June 23rd, respectively. On June 19th, the Public Hearin g Notice was sent to all properties within 500 feet of the subject property. At the time of this Communica tion Fonn , Staff has received one written co1Tespondence from a neighboring property owner. It is included in the attachments for your convenience. However, please be advised that the lack of objections from neighbors does not provid e a basis for granting a variance (Arndo,fer v. Sauk County Bel. Of Adjustments, 1991). The subject property is zoned Rs-4, Single-Family Lake Lots District. The parcel is located on the northwest side of F1iess Lake on Riverview Drive . The parcel was originally two (2) parcels that were combined by the property owner into CSM 6680 which was approved by both the Plan Commiss ion and the Village Board. The parcel is 0.31-acres in size. This was done approximately around the same time as the Village Board approved a re-platting of portions of the right-of-way on Riverview Drive because the road 'as platted' versus the road 'as traveled ' at the time, was considerably differen t, and on this parcel , still encroaches on the land that we have by prescriptive easement. Dimen sional variances provide relief when there is no reasonable use of the property (State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment , 1998). The Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a zoning variance may be granted only when strict enforcement of a zoning code would result in unnecessary hardship that effectively leaves the property with no reasonable use. The Court ruled that variances are meant to provide relief only in exceptional circumstances , not simply because a property owner wants to use land in a more convenient way. As you know, to legally grant a "Dimensional Variance ", the petitioner must prove three (3) different criteria: 1) unnecessary hardship- exists when no reasonable use can be made of the property without a variance 2) unique property limitations- such as steep slopes, wetlands, or other layered restrictions which prevent compliance with the ordinance . The circumstances of the applicant, such as a growing family, elderly parents, or a desire for a larger garage, VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: June 30, 2026 SUBJECT: Variance Petition for 4823 Riverview Drive (Tax Key: VJ0_048600A) - Mike and Catherine Dallia, Petitioners DATE SUBMITTED: June 25, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator are not legitimate factors in deciding variances. 3) no harm to public interest - a variance may not be granted which results in harm to public interests. Public interests can be determined from the general purposes of an ordinance as well as the purposes for a specific ordinance provision. Analyze short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts of variance requests on the neighbors, community, and statewide public interests. In looking at the Zoning District in question, the Intent of the Rs-4 District is as follows: "Single-Family Lake Lots (RS-4) District. The District is for comparatively small lake lots which have riparian shoreline lake frontage on Amy Belle Lake, Bark Lake, Friess Lake, Lake Five, and Little Friess Lake. It also refers to parcels located on Bark Lake Drive, Lakeview Avenue, Bonnie View Lane, Shore/and Lane, Footbridge Road, and Lake Drive. The Zoning classification is limited to those parcels so designated on July 20, 2023." The Village began working with the property owner several months ago when they first engaged the services of Mr. Evan Nickodem from Parish Surveying and Engineering in West Bend. Mr. Nickodem was hired to create a hydraulic model from the DNR's Surface Water Data Viewer to use in their analysis. The subject property is in the Flood Fringe and Flood Storage Districts, as classified by FEMA and the Wisconsin DNR. The applicable provision of the Code is that surrounding the proposed home, fill shall extend to a minimum of 15' beyond the limit of any structure. The following is an analysis of their submittal. The applicant has indicated they will present additional information the night of the public hearing, for the benefit of the BOZA. UNNECESSARY HARDSHIP For this type of variance, um1ecessary hardship exists when compliance would unreasonably prevent the owner from using the property for any permitted purpose (State ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Ed. Of Adjustment, 2004). To determine whether this standard is met, our Board should consider the purpose of the zoning ordinance in question, its effects on the property, and the short-term, long-term, and cumulative effects of granting the variance (State ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Ed. Of Adjustments, 2004). Applicant's Response: • "Literal enforcement of the terms of the zoning code would result in uffilecessary hardship, by unreasonably preventing the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or rendering conformity with such restrictions unreasonably burdensome. This lot of record is zoned for single family residential uses, and the property owner seeks approval to build a reasonable structure for that permitted use." (Conclusions of Law, Variance Decision for 4916 Lakeview Avenue , September 2015) • Without this variance we would not be able to build a house and use the property for its permitted purpose. • Approval of this variance will allow development that is consistent with the development on abutting parcels and ensures stability and compatible development as intended by the Zoning Code. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: June 30, 2026 SUBJECT: Variance Petition for 4823 Riverview Drive (Tax Key: Vl 0 _ 048600A) - Mike and Catherine Dallia, Petitioners DATE SUBMITTED: June 25, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator Staff's Response: The requested variance is not simply a matter of avoiding compliance with the dimensional standards of the RS-4 District. Rather, the Property is subject to the additional requirements of the Floodplain Overlay District, which significantly limit the area available for residential development. To construct a residence, the applicant must satisfy both the underlying zoning requirements and the floodplain management regulations established under Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 116. To demonstrate compliance with these floodplain regulations, the applicant commissioned a HEC-RAS hydraulic analysis. The purpose of the study was to determine whether the proposed fill and structure would adversely impact the Regional Flood Elevation (RFE) or Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of Friess Lake and the Oconomowoc River. The applicable standard prohibits development that would increase the BFE or place fill or structures within the floodway. An analogy often used to explain this concept is a claw-foot Victorian bathtub filled completely to the brim with water. One may be able to carefully place a volleyball, beach ball, or even a soccer ball on the surface without causing any water to spill over the edge. However, there comes a point where adding additional volume displaces enough water that it overflows the tub. The HEC-RAS analysis identifies that threshold- the exact nexus point in which that occurs. In floodplain terms, the "overflow" represents an increase in the Regional Flood Elevation or Base Flood Elevation, which is prohibited underNR 116. The hydraulic analysis submitted by the applicant demonstrates that the proposed fill and structure are not located within the floodway and will not increase the Base Flood Elevation of Friess Lake or the Oconomowoc River. Because the floodplain regulations substantially constrain the developable area of the lot beyond the requirements applicable to similarly zoned properties outside the Floodplain Overlay District, the applicant faces conditions unique to the property. These additional regulatory constraints create practical limitations on the reasonable residential use of the property and support a finding that the property is subject to an uunecessary hardship not generally shared by other properties within the RS-4 District or otherwise residentially zoned. The purpose of the proposed fill is to create a compliant building site within a property that is further constrained by the Floodplain Overlay District. Unlike a typical residential lot within the RS-4 District, development of this property is subject not only to the underlying zoning requirements but also to the additional standards imposed by Wisconsin's floodplain management regulations. To construct a residence, the applicant must establish a building pad that is elevated above the required flood protection elevation while ensuring that the placement of fill does not adversely impact flood storage capacity, flood conveyance, or surrounding properties. Additional information will need to be gathered during the site visit and during the Public Hearing to determine if this standard is met. VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: June 30, 2026 SUBJECT: Variance Petition for 4823 Riverview Drive (Tax Key: Vl0_04 8600A) - Mike and Catherine Dallia , Petitioners DATE SUBMITTED: June 25, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy , Village Administrator Unnecessary hardship must be due to unique physical limitations of the property , such as steep slopes or wetlands that prevent compliance with the ordinance (State ex rel. Spinner v. Kenosha County Bd. Of Adjustments, 1998). Applicant's Response: • "The unnecessary hardship is due to unique conditions created by compliance with the WDNR flood storage regulations. • This property lies within a WDNR designated Floodplain Storage area • Limited lot size to work with. • Public road goes thru the north side of the property which restricts buildable area Setback requirement for the 1 ft over the floodplain creates the need for additional filling." Staffs Response: The fill is not being placed for convenience or to create additional usable yard area. Rather, it is a necessary component of developing the property in a manner that complies with state and local floodplain regulations. The need for substantial engineered fill and a detailed hydraulic analysis reflects the unique physical constraints of the property and the additional regulatory burdens imposed by the Floodplain Overlay District. Absent the fill, the property would not be developab le. Additionally, it should be noted that as was previously mentioned, this parcel has a prescriptive road easement where actual road aspha lt is on their physical property. Additionally, on the ' lake side', they have a 25' easement granted for the benefit of the boat lot owners that are directly adjacent to their parcel. There are no known wetlands on this property. Additional information will need to be gathered during the site visit and Public Hearing to determine if this standard is met. NO HARM TO PUBLIC INTERESTS VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: June 30, 2026 SUBJECT: Variance Petition for 4823 Riverview Drive (Tax Key: Vl O 048600A) - Mike and Catherine Dallia, Petitioners DATE SUBMITTED: June 25, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator A variance may not be granted which results in harm to public interests (State v. Winnebago County, 1995; State v. Kenosha County Bd. Of Adjustments, 1998). In applying this test, the Zoning Board should review the purpose statement of the ordinance and related statutes to identify public interests. Considering public interests, zoning boards must consider the short-term and long-term impacts of the proposal and the cumulative impacts of similar projects on the interest of neighbors, the community, and even the state. Review should focus on the public interests, rather than the narrow interests or impacts on neighbors, patrons or residents in close proximity of the project. Applicant's Response: • "The unnecessary hardship is due to unique conditions created by compliance with the WDNR flood storage regulations. • This property lies within a WDNR designated Floodplain Storage area • Limited lot size to work with. • Public road goes thru the north side of the property which restricts buildable area • Setback requirement for the 1ft over the floodplain creates the need for additional filling." Staff's Response: The purpose of the Village's Floodplain Overlay District and the corresponding provisions of Wisconsin Administrative Code NR 116 is to protect public health, safety, and welfare by minimizing flood hazards, preserving flood storage capacity, and preventing development that would increase flood elevations or adversely impact neighboring properties and waterways. Based upon the HEC-RAS hydraulic analysis submitted by the applicant and reviewed as part of this petition, Staff finds that the proposed fill and residential development satisfy those underlying public policy objectives. The engineering analysis demonstrates that the proposed fill is located within the Flood Fringe District rather than the Floodway and does not result in an increase to the Base Flood Elevation of Friess Lake or the Oconomowoc River. As such, the project does not diminish flood storage capacity in a manner that would adversely impact upstream or downstream properties, nor does it increase flood risk to neighboring lands or the broader community. Staff further notes that the proposed development remains subject to all applicable floodplain permitting requirements and regulatory standards intended to protect the public interest. The variance request does not seek relief from those standards. Rather, the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the floodplain regulations through detailed hydraulic modeling and engineering analysis. ~ Id VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD . BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COMMUNICATION FORM MEETING DATE: June 30, 2026 SUBJECT: Variance Petition for 4823 Riverview Drive (Tax Key: V10_048600A) - Mike and Catherine Dallia, Petitioners DATE SUBMITTED: June 25, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Jim Healy, Village Administrator The proposal maintains the protections intended by the Village's floodplain regulations, does not create measurable adverse impacts to surrounding properties or public resources, and does not establish a precedent that would undermine the long-term objectives of floodplain management within the Village. Additional information will need to be gathered during the site visit and Public Hearing to determine if this standard is met. FISCAL IMPACT & ANALYSTS: REVIEWEDBY: rn. /11,,,t ,,,. C Village Deputy Clerk Forward to Village Board: No Additional Approvals Needed: No Signatures Required: Yes ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application materials submitted by Applicant 2. Rs-4 Zoning District 3. Email dated June 22, 2026 from Erik and Kelly Rossebo from 4869 Riverview Drive 4. Slide Deck prepared by Applicant 5. Grading & Erosion Control Plan 6. 2015 Variance Decision Letter for Coyle 4916 Lakeview Ave (Included per Applicants Request) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to direct staff to draft a formal decision letter regarding the variance petition, proceedings, and general outcome with the intention that this letter will be signed by the voting members of the Board of Zoning Appeals and a copy of said document will be provided to the petitioner. APPROVED FOR SUBMITI AL BY: VILLAGE CLERIC USE ONLY BOARD ACTION TAKEN Resolution No. Continued To: Village Staff Member Ordinance No. Refen-ed To: Approved Denied Other File No. Village Administrator Floodplain Permit Village of Richfield, Wisconsin Version: May 21, 2018 Overview: Development in the 100-year floodplain, which covers about 13 percent of the Village, is subject to add itional develo pment standards to ensu re that development is compatible with flo odplain management object ives. Instruc tions: Given the many requirements and nuances in the floodplain regulations, please contact the zoning admin istrator to set up a time to review your project and your application. 1. App licant informa tion AppLicantname Mike Dallia Street address 210 1 Illinois Rd City, state, zip code North brook, IL 60062 Daytime telephone number 312-77 1-2674 Email mdallia@yahoo.com 2. Agent contact information. Include the names of those agents, if any, that helped prepare this application including the supplemental infor mation. Agents may include surveyors, engineers, architects , and attorneys. Name Company Street address City, state, zip code Daytime telephone number Email Agent 1 Evan Nickodem Parish Survey & Engineering 1 22 Wisconsin St West Bend, WI 53095 262-333-2167 enickodem@parishse.com 3. Subject property information Physicaladdress 4823 Riverview Dr., Hubertus, WI Parcel number V10-Q486OOA Agen t2 Note: The parcel number can be found on the tax bill for the property or it may be obtained from the Village Clerk. 4. General descript ion of proposed project (e.g., single-family home (1,800 square feet of living area), attached garage (450 square feet), patio (240 square feet), and attached deck (320 square feet). Fill floodplain area to provide pad for construction of a sing le family home. Pad will be a minimum of 2 feet above the regulatory floodplain elevatin 5. Existing buildings on the subject property? Ii] No D Yes If yes, provide the information Listed below for each buildingAND depict on the site plan. General Descriptio n Current Use Building 1 Building 2 Year Constructed [1] Total Floor Area in Square Feet [2] Page 2 Building3 Building 4 Notes: 1. If the year of construction is not known, provide an approximate year or a time period (e.g., 1930-1940). 2. The size of the building is measured from outside wall to outside wall. 6. Proposed development (check all that apply, but note that some of these uses are not permitted in the floodway district) D New building- industrial 0 New building- commercial 0 New building- institutional Iii New building- residential D New building- detached building D Elevate existing building (for flood proofing) ...... ---- .. ., __ ... _,.,_ .... - □ Addition to existing building [1] .... --...... _ .............................. _. ·- __ .. ··- --- D Alterations to existing building [1] 0 Repair existing bullding due to natural storm event [] Outdoor swimming pool D Deck D Patio D Fence D Walkways and paths D Driveway and related parking area ................ _. ·--···--··· ··-·-·--· 0 Boathouse [2] D Boat dock [2] 0 Beach, new [31 D Beach, re-establish [3] D Rip rap [3] -'--'---'---­ □ Seawall [3] • ····-·-··-·· .. ···-·"· iJ Fill D Retainingwall 0 Campground -------- □ Bridge or public utilities D Road D Parking lot 0 Fish habitat D R_elocatlo~-~! .. '.::~~~~-~~.~tream channel ___ _ 0 Ot~h•~r~:=========----- 0 other: Notes: Floodfringe Floodway □ □ □ □ □ □ 0 □ □ □ ...... , ..... -.--.. - □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ ................ ------- ........... ___ .... -···--- □ □ 0 □ ····---· ............ _ .. □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ ---- ---···"'--··---··· □ □ □ □ 1. Modifications, alterations, reconstruction or improvement of any kind to an existing building may be limited so as not to exceed established thresholds. 2. These projects are also subject to the review and approval of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 3. Any fill placed below the ordinary high-water mark is subject to the review and approval of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Page 3 7. Project cost for modifications, alterations, reconstruction or improvement of any kind to an existing building: The project cost includes all materials and related costs and labor (even if supplied by the owner). The zoning administrator may require an estimate from a qualified contractor to verify information provided. $ _____ _ 8, Onsite utilities (check all that apply) Electric service, underground Electric service, overhead Private well Conventional septic system Other septic system Holding tank New □ □ □ □ □ □ Existing □ □ □ □ □ □ 9. Details for new construction and additions For new construction and additions to an existing building, provide a full set of construction plans and at least two perpendicular cross-sections through the building that show the following: 1. The existing and proposed grade. 2. 100-yearflood elevation at the center of the building based on information from the Flood Insurance Study (FIS). 3. First floor {must be at least 2 feet above the 100-year flood elevation) 4. The crawl space and/or basement floor (must be at or above the 1 OD-year flood elevation) 5. 15 feet of fill extending around tl1e perimeter of the building includingthe attached garage, if any, that is 1 foot or more above the 100-yearflood elevation. 10. Work within 35 feet of the shore {ordinary high-water mark) Does the project involve removinganywoodyvegetation within 35 feet of the ordinaiy high-water marl<? ll!J No D Yes !fyes, please describe the work to be done. 11. Grading plan. Submit a grading plan if the grade of the subject property is going to be modified. The plan should clearly identify drainage patterns and calculations for cuts and fill. 12. Project map. Attach a site plan or a plat of survey with this information as appropriate to the project. It can consist of t:1 single page or multiple pages depending on the complexity of the features that need to be depicted. Project Information Project name Applicant name • Preparation date North arrow and graphic scale Address of subject property or legal description Property boundaries Required Setbacks • Yard setbacks (front, side, rear and shore) On-site septic systems (conventional and holding tanks) On-site wells and off-site wells within 10 feet of the perimeter of the subject property Site Features- Existing Ordinary high-water mark • Floodplain boundaries, floodfringe and floodway Site Features (existing and proposed) • Buildings • Outdoor storage/activity areas • Ground contours o Wetlands o Woodlands • Wildlife habitat, including critical wildlife habitat • Environmentally sensitive features • Water resources (rivers, ponds, etc.) • Environmental and manmade development constraints and hazards Including brownfields, contaminated sites, unstable soils, high groundwater, bedrock, and high-pressure natural gas lines • Easements/rights-of-ways {location, width, purpose, ownership) e Fences, buffers, and berms • Streets and driveways Drainage patterns on subject property and adjoining properties depicted with arrows • Downspouts on bulldings, and alt water discharge points • Rain gardens Page4 13. Attachments. List any attachments included with your application. Grading Plan, Floodplain summary letter report 14. Other information. You may provide any other information you feel is relevant to the review of your application. 15. Applicant certification e I certify that all of the Information In this application, alongwfth any attachmeilts, is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • I understand that th!s application and any written materials relating to this application will become a permanent public record and that by submitting this application I acknowledge that I have no right to confidentiality. Any person has the right to obtain copies of this application and related materials or view it on line. • I understand that compliance with any applicable floodplain development standards does not remove my property from the floodplain. The flood protection standards contained in the village's floodplain management ordinance are based on engineering experience and scientific research. Larger floods may occur or the·flood height may be increased by man made or natural causes. If this application is approved, such approval does not imply or guarantee that non-floodplain areas or permitted floodplain uses will be free from flooding and flood damages. In addition, an approval does not create liability on the part of, or a cause of action against, the village or any officer, employee, or agent thereof for any flood damage that may result from reliance on this decision. e I understand that the Village may request additional information depending on the nature of my project. Property Owner(s): Name-print Name-Signature Date Name-print Name-Signature Date ~-......- - ... Ol),tlll aa'li l.'.6~ .... I•"" .~I I,/.( OMllliUMIO IU .. J. IA ■ns M■ I IIY.t d5d , .......... ) I f \ I \ / ------- -- --:-; . - - :~:.-;::.~-......__~~- ---- -• . . -.... ,, \ I I I I I I I I I / I ,,/ / , I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ 0 z <( ££0£S IM 'sn.Hl3BnH <> ~O M31J\~31\I~ £l81' ~~ Vl17VO 13VH:lll,\I iffi 'l'U.U. 1:l3'0Yd t_ I I ' ' ' \ \ \ I I \ \ I I I I / I I I I I N 0 !I -r- 5 U iii PSe PAR ISH SU RV E Y & UIG IHEEAING May 12, 2026 Mike Dallia 210 l Illin ois Road Nor thbrook , IL 60062 Re: Floodp lain Analysis Summaiy for Insta llation of Fill for New Structure 4823 Riverview Drive Villag e of Richfield, WI PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is a 0.31 acre vacant lot front ing Riverview Drive to the north. A majo1ity of the lot is part of the floodplain associated with Friess Lake. The floodplain on the n01th end of Friess Lake is cons idered tlood fiinge or tlood storage having a base flood elevation of 96 l. l ft. There are no known wetla nds on the propetty. INTRODUCTION Paris h Survey & Engineering, LLC has been retained by Mike Dallia , the owner of the property at 4823 Riverv iew Drive, in the Village of Richfield , Wiscons in, to determine if the installation of fill for new single family home construction would be in confotmance with Wisco nsin Adm inistrative Code NR 116. A map, generated from the Wash ington County GIS website, containing a locati on of the subject p roperty, can be found in Attachment A. The property is located in the Northwest ¼ of the North west ¼ of Sect ion 17, Township 9 North , Range 19 East, Village of Richfield, Wiscons in. The comm unity/zoning authority for this project is Washington County Land Use Division. The specific contacts for this project are: • Jim Healy - Village Adm inistrator, Village of Richfield • Brett Scherer - Land Use Manage r, Washington County • Andrea S tem - Water Managem ent Engineer-Wi sconsin Depa1tment of Natural Resources (WDNR) The vertica l datum for this location is NGVD 88; the horizontal datum is NAO 83 , Western Hemispher e. A copy of the current floodplain is presented on a FIR.l"1ETTE for this location which can be found in Attachm ent B. APPLICABLE FLOODPLAI N REGULATIONS The appli cable regulation to confom1 with the a nalysis is Wisconsin Adminish·ative Code-NR 11 6-Fl oodplain Management. The Villag e of Richfi eld, WDNR and Washington County all adhere to this code regarding development within a floodplain. The provision of the fill cannot raise the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of Friess Lake or the Oconomowoc River and the structur e and/or fill can not be located in the floodway . This report, along with the hydraulic model input and output, will show that the proposed fill and structur e are not located in the floodway and will not increa se the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of Friess Lake or the Oconomowoc River. HYDRAULIC MODEL DEVELOPME NT We obtained the Effective Hydrauli c Model from the WDNR Surface Water Data Viewer for use in the ana lysis. The model description : 122 Wisconsin Street • West Bend. Wisconsin 53095 Phone (262) 346-7800 • www.parishse.com • Detailed (Zone AE) study of Oconomowoc River in Village of Richfield, Washington County Study extends detailed FIS study from Waukesha County where the Oconomowoc River discharges into the Rock River to the headwaters of the Oconomowoc River northeast of Friess Lake in Washington County. Within this hydraulic model, the upstream reach of the Oconomowoc River from approximately extends to the northeast of Friess Lake to River Station 215818. The downstream limit of the model reach is at River Station 195146, approximately 800 feet south of the footbridge crossing the Oconomowoc River south of Friess Lake. Once the Effective Hydraulic Model was downloaded from the WDNR website, it was saved as the Duplicate Effective Hydraulic Model. The geometry of the Duplicate Effective Hydraulic Model, such as slopes and overbank areas on either side of the river, and lake, and roughness co-efficients were reviewed for accuracy. Topography and aerial imagery provided in the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Surface Water Data Viewer (SWDV) was used for this purpose as well as topography from Washington County GIS. The geometry of the Duplicate Effective Hydraulic Model was generally consistent with our review. However, a Corrected Effective Hydraulic Model was produced using updated elevation data from both the Washington County GIS system and bathymetric data as available on the SWDV for River Stations 198278 and 198720 was developed for this project. The man-made geometry of the Duplicate Effective Hydraulic Model at Freiss Lake, such as physical crossings, and structures were reviewed for accuracy. As noted above, a Corrected Effective Hydraulic Model was produced to include both updated River Stations 198278 and 198720, and the inclusion of River Station 198470 to effectively model existing elevation data cutting through the project site that is the subject of this study. For the newly introduce River Station 198470, topographic survey data collected on the subject property was included with the other data to generate the River Station elevation data. The Corrected Effective model was created to compare the modeled water surface elevations within Friess Lake and the Oconomowoc River with the Duplicate Effective model to determine if the addition of a new River Station and updated elevation data will change the water surface elevations modeled. None of the changes from the Duplicate Effective model to the Corrected Effected model were sufficient to have any effect ou the published water surface elevation for the regulated floodplain. PROPOSED HYDRAULIC MODELING The subject property is located on the right side of the introduced River Station 198470 starting at Station 2+805.36 of the River Station cross section. The project is intended to fill a small section of lands with elevations less than one foot (l ') below the regulated floodplain water surface elevation of961.10. The lands will be filled to 961.10 to 2' above the floodplain to meet the requirements of the building being outside and above the floodplain elevation at River Station 198470. A Cross Section Location Plan specific to this project is inclnded as Attachment C. An encroachment was also added to determine the if the proposed fill and structure will be located out of the floodway. The floodway encroachment was determined using an iterative approach which was resulted in locating the floodway at the lake shore. The proposed flll/grading design plan for the property is shown in Attachment D. HYDRAULIC MODEL RESULTS The following table summarizes the BFE (Base Flood Elevation) for the Effective Hydraulic Model and the Post-Project Conditions Hydraulic Model incorporating the proposed fill. The MD-08-25 Page 12 Dallia property cross section is highlighted below which shows the Base Flood Elevation (water surface elevat ion) does not increase with the proposed fill. Model River Duplicate Correcte d Post-Project Station Effective Effective Conditions Model Model Model 195930 961.02 961.02 961.02 196136 961.02 961.02 961.02 196923 961.02 961.02 961.02 197915 961.02 961.02 96 1.02 198278 961.02 96 1.02 961.02 198470 - 961.02 96 1.02 198720 961.02 961.02 96 1.02 199343 961.02 96 1.02 961.02 200347 961.03 961.03 96 1.03 20 1393 961.03 96 1.03 96 1.03 201506 961.03 96 1.03 96 1.03 The cross section output below shows that the velocity in the Right Overbank is 0.00 ft/second which indicates little to no conveyance. The low velocity indicates that this area is acting as the flood fringe and not the floodway , therefore the proposed fill is located in the flood fringe. fii Cross Section Output X File Type Options Help River: JoconomowocRiver ..:J Profile: J 10% i.l Reach -J 1------- ..:J~... RS: J-i9- 8-470 ______ ..:J~ .. ! J..!J Plan: Joconom R. Prop i.l Plan: Ocnnom R. Pro OconomowocR!ver 1 RS: 196470 Profile: 10% E.G. Elev {ft) 960. 15 Element Left OB I Channel I Right OB Ve! Head {ft) 0.00 Wt. n-1/al. 0.060 0.030 0.060 W.S. Elev {ft) 960.1 5 Reach Len. (ft) 65.00 192.25 406.10 Crit W .S. {ft) Flow Area {sq ft) 89.90 54301.24 122.19 E.G. Slope {ft/ft} 0.000000 Area (sq ft} 89.90 54301.24 122.19 Q Total {cfu} 520.00 Flow (cfu) 0.0 5 519.85 0.10 Top Width {ft) 2563.15 Top Width (ft) 109.43 2375.86 77 P.7 Vel Total {ft/s) 0.0 1 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) 0.00 0.01 C •• .......... 9.,.QO Max Chi Dpth {ft} 45.68 Hydr. Depth (ft} 0.82 22.86 1.57 Conv. Total (cfu} 21608930.0 Conv. {cfu) 2278.8 21602570.0 4:)77.0 Length Wtd. {ft) 192. 26 Wetted Per. {ft} 109.85 2385.49 78.13 Min Ch El (ft} 914.46 Shear Ob/sq ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Alpha 1.01 Stream Power Ob/ft s) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Frein Loss (ft} 0.00 Cum Volume (acre-ft) 21.32 5095.67 106.22 C & E Loss {ft) 0.00 Cum SA {acres) 10.84 152. 71 51.92 Errors, w- and Notes Warning: Divided flow computed for this cross-section. Average velocity of flow in right overbank. WISCONSIN and VILLAGE OF RICHFIELD CODE COMPLIANCE As required in Wisconsin NR I 16.13 (2)(b) For residential areas where fill is applied to design a constructible property with the floodfring e zone of a given floodplain , three criteria apply. ) MD-08-25 Page 13 1. The fill must not be less than l foot above the regional flood elevation . The floodplain water surface elevation in this area is computed to be 96 1.02 ft. The elevation of lands shall be raised to 962.02 feet to be at the minimum 1 foot over the floodplain elevat ion. 2. The fill shall extend to a minimum of 15 feet beyond the limit of any structure or building erected on the site. The site is designed to be a elevation 962.02 feet to a point 4 feet from the crest of the buildable zone on the north side of the property . This is not in compliance with the Village of Richfield code 170.1263 B. Any structure or building constructed within the prescribed setbacks will meet the criteria of lands being at or above 962.02 feet. A variance from this code requirement will be needed through the Village of Richfield to construct on this building pad with the reduced setback to the floodpla in as noted above. 3. Fill placed in areas of flood storage will be required to have fill remo ved to compensate for the filling that occmTed on the lands to maintain the flood storage volume required by the State and Village. Village code l 70.1263 B. allows for fill in flood storage areas if this fill is compensated for with excavation within the flood storage area. 4. Dryland access shall be provided to structur e or building. The proposed site will have grading at or above the floodplain elevation of 961.02 from the building pad to Riverview Drive located to the 1101thwest comer of the property. CONCLUSIONS The result of the analysis, as shown in the tables above, is that the provision of the fill on the property at 4823 Riverview Drive in the Village of Richfield , does not negatively impact the Base Flood Elevation , is located in the flood fringe , not the floodway , of Freiss Lake or the Oconomowoc Riv er, and meets the code requirements of the Village. Respectfu lly submitted , Evan P. Nickodem , P.E. LISTING OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A-SWDV Floodplain Map showing Project Location. Attachment 8-FIRMETTE - Village of Richfield Attachment C-Cross Section Location Maps Attachment D.-Fill/Grading Plan. Attachment E-HEC-RAS Model Cross-sections. Attachment F-HEC-RAS Tabu lar Output. Attachment G-WDNR Submittal Checklist. Attachment H-Parcel Survey. MD-08-25 Page 14 ATTACHMENT A LOCATION MAP National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette '~FEMA 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 Basemap Imagery Source: USGS National Map 2023 Legend ATTACHMENT B SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND ANO INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A. V, A99 With BFE or Depth Zone AE. AO, AH, VE. AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1 % annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drain age areas of less than one square mile zone x Future Conditions 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone x Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Zone x Area with Flood Risk due to Levee zone o I NO SCREEN Area of Minima I Flood Hazard ZoneX c:::::::J Effective LOMRs Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone o GENERAL 1- - - · Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer STRUCTURES I I I I I I I Levee, Dike, or Floodwall OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS 9 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance Water Surface Elevation , - - - Coastal Transect -i,i- Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) = Limit of Study --- Jurisdiction Boundary [ Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available N No Digital Data Available Unmapped --{- The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an author itative property location. This map complies with FEM A's stand ards for the use of digital flood maps If it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard Informat ion is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 8/ 19/ 2025 at 4:40 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time . The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map Image Is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community Identifiers , FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unm apped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WY: surtace water Data Viewer (SWDV_VS_AppJ ATTACHMENT C ..-------------------- ZoneAE I d ' ZoneAE ;',.. ,, #, 0 - 0'' r ZoneAE ., J c., ,_,. _,: 0 .J "' "' a, ~ ~ £ S--..... __ z_ Friess Lake ZorieAE ~ ZoqeAE ' ' Zone' AE ZOQ~AE (EL 961) ~ Zone AE ~ Map projection : NAD 1983 HARN Wiscons i n TM o 800 1,600 Feet Map: t---+-~+-s.-,~-+-..-,1-,-...,._~,._,_,.~..,._,...... o 240 480 Meters ~ N This map is a Product eene@ted hv a PNR web maeoini aeolicatioo This map is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be su1Lable for legal, eng1nee11ng, or surveying purposes. fhe user is solely responsible for verifying the accuracy of mformauon before using for any purpose By using this product for any purpose user agree5 to be bound by alt disclaimers found here: httos·J/dotwisconsin g9y/leeal Dote Printed: 3/16/2026 4:51 PM -- Cross-Sectio ns Flood Hazard Boundaries SFHA / Flood Zone Boundary Flood Hazard Zones 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Floodplain Analysis Lines Flood Insura nce Study Floodpla in Analysis Points • Case by Case Analysis for Development in Floodplain Encroachment Analysis □ Floodplain Analysis Upstream Catchment ~ Floodplain Storage Rivers and Streams Intermitten t Streams Open Water Rivers and Streams Intermittent Streams Service laye r Credits: Digitial FEMA Floodplains (National Flood Hazard Layer)•: , DNR Basic Feature VTL (WTM): Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, GIS Section, Surface Water: WiDNR, USGS, and other data, Paper FIRMS: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources NEW RIVER STATION CROSS SECTION RS-198470 ATTACHMENT C 19514~ 1 in Horiz. = 788.6537 ft 1 in Vert. = 503.1037 ft 20396 197915 196923 ,\ : , .,.,. \ ,I· I i" , \I ; 1------------- l " --- i, // \ I ',, J; ....... _ /,' --- --✓✓ ----- ,i' ·-------·-\ \ \ ' \ \ \, ', ',, .... , _..... , .............. _, .... ---- ·, -----------------~// __ , '::::-,.__ ' '" - "!. ¾:- , ', 'i--,.. I ',, I I I I I I I I I • I \ I \.' , J I '-. /,.,,.,-- .... ,--.. / ,,/ ✓ / / ,,,, ~--.... ---,,,,✓ ATTACHMENT D DIGGf R~WHOTllNl Dial ® or (800)242 -8511 www.D iggersHot line.com - - Da'l9IO - COOl),IL --- -- -~-- - Q,- - ~ .... CCW10M. --- ----allfflll& -=-=- -~l'!Cbl .... =-::.. -DIISnc:STtl'lil"1Et. • -td'l'Mi.a!DOTfl'KOMffl'IIOffCTICII. -ICIIMi.$l.T,oct. - -IG"IMi.ClllotQE1 ~ lmca « ClllffllCP M IC'tl'lee l~~-,.,,..,..., ___ I ~ 0f1ltANCD ,., 91)91 QI IV,MS. IM't A0Dll101L1r,1. <XIIIS'nlUC'1CI Dl11WICD F N'fW:Mll IT 'Ml: WJ.Ml[Of~:IIWL~'ICA'IIU,CQC f0...0. ....-0 J,o,UACC 0- WCWl"1m lOl'1l0IL - NCl'OltD ~All[ASAN)~ 0ClllltM:llllllAT_,3lUJDICIIII.Q..:Illfl)lOCGPIZTE 00NSJIU:'Tl0NW UICl:ICll0CllfflQ..INll"_.IIIICl>II N:DOll:>NIICl.•1"M~ ft l'.IIOlll0NCClffllQ.. ~~ ~ ~~ LOCM. ~ AS C0IClffl0NS IINIIUMT ...-11 ~ ~ ..S !IWJ. K INSlAIJ.lll lO IICUCIE M: w;ltol,lQI a, SJ:IIIO!T M llCIUJIMJIIDCIUCT~ ~~Aam:ma:~~ .l'.;:,...S: ~II OJ Ul Q_ M a: M <(c~ ::;~'.'.: <i! > s: 0 a: Iii ...J w :, ~ w > ... F <( ii: IX'. ,._ :I: MW i u (.) N al - a,:, ::;; "' J: Pl.AH lll\.E: !t <j '' it ; I •11 li •· ~x GRADING ANO EROSION CONTROL PLAN ORA'flN 8'r. EPN OE9QED8Y: EPN CHEO<ED SY: EPN Pl.NI DAlE; 5112/2026 PROJECT Ho. \MO-08-25\ PRELIMINARY "'"'"" C1.02 g C 0 ~ > (l) jjJ ATTACHMENT E Oconomowoc River Plan: 1) DETAILED Effective 3/16/2026 2) Ocon R Cor Eff 3/16/2026 3) Oconom R. Prop 3/16/2026 Surveyed XS (OCO_ 16) f11~----- .06 --------, +.045~ ,---- _06 985-I el 4 980 975 970 965 960 955 950 945-1-~~-r--~---.-- ~-,-----.--~~~-r--~---r- ~-,-----.--~~--r- -~---.--~-,---~-~-. Legend --.0.-- EG 1 % - Ocon R Cor Eff EG 1 % - Oconom R. Prop EG 1% - DETAILED Effective WS 1% - DETAILED Effective WS 1%- Ocon R Cor Eff WS 1 % - Oconom R. Prop Crit 1%- DETAILED Effective Crit 1 % - Ocon R Cor Eff Crit 1 % - Oconom R. Prop Ground lneff • Bank Sta 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Station (ft) g C .Q ro a, [ij 970 960 950 940 930 920 Oconomowoc River ATTACHMENT E Plan: 1) DETAILED Effective 3/16/2026 2) Ocon R Cor Eff 3/16/2026 3) Oconom R. Prop 3/16/2026 New Cross Section 2026 .06--+,------- - - -------- .03-----------;+- .06-, Legend WS 1% - Ocon R Cor Eff --------------------··· .. ····------------------· EG 1%- Ocon R Cor Eff WS 1 % - Oconom R. Prop ----- -··----- EG 1 % - Oconom R. Prop Ground • Bank Sta 910+----r---o--r------r----r---,--r------,--,---,--..------,--,----,--,,-,--,----,--,,-,-~--,--;-~-.---,--,-~-.--.-,-..---.---,---, 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Station (ft) g C: 0 ~ > Q) uJ 980 970 960 950 940 930 920 Oconomowoc River ATTACHMENT E Plan: 1) DETAILED Effective 3/16/2026 2) Ocon R Car Eff 3/16/2026 3) Oconom R. Prop 3/16/2026 Lake Friess: DNR June 1970 Lake Survey .06-+--------.03-------~ t - .06- 1 Legend ws 1% - DETAILED Effective EG 1% - DETAILED Effective WS 1% - Ocon R Cor Eff EG 1% - Ocon R Cor Eff WS 1 % - Oconom R. Prop EG 1%- Oconom R. Prop Crit 1 % - Ocon R Cor Eff Grit 1 % - Occinom R. Prop Ground lneff • Bank Sta 910+-~~~~~~~~-~---,--.-~--,--~-,-~~-~~--. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Station (ft) ATTACHMENT F HEC-RAS River· OconomowocRlver Reach· 1 Prome· 1% Reach River Sia Profll,:, Plan QTolal Min Ch El W.S.Elav CritW.s. E.G. Elev E.G.Slope VolChnl Flow Area Too Width Froude #Chi {cfa) {fl) (ft) (ft) '" 11111) /ft/s\ <ooll Ull 1 201550 Blldge 1 201600 1% DETAILED Effeollve 870.00 954.91 961,03 956.11 001.03 0.000ll03 0.20 6066.43 1686.26 0.01 1 20161){j 1% OeonRCorEff 870.00 954.91 961.03 956.11 961.03 0.000003 0,20 6057.19 1866.27 0.01 "---· 201500 1% Oeouom R. Prop 870.00 954.91 961.03 966.11 001.03 0.000003 0,20 6057.19 1668.27 O.o1 1 201393 1% DETAILED Effoc~vo 870,00 964.76 901.03 968.66 961.03 0.000004 0,24 6250.81 1646.45 0.02 1 201393 1% Oeon R Cor Elf 870,00 954.76 961.03 956.66 061.03 0.000004 0,24 6251.67 1646.47 0.02 1 201393 1% O<:onom R. Proo 870,00 954.76 961.oJ 956.68 961.03 0.000004 0,24 6251,67 1648.47 0.02 1 200347 1% DETAILED Effective 870,00 953.39 961.03 956.66 961.03 0.000004 0.23 5891.52 1516.86 O.Q2 1 200347 1% 000n R Cor Elf 870.00 953.39 961.03 956.66 961,03 0.000004 0.23 5892.28 1616.92 0.02 1 200347 1% Oconom R. Prop 870.00 963.39 961.03 956.66 961,03 0.000004 0.23 5892,28 1516.92 0.02 1 199343 1% DETAILED Effective 870.00 953.43 961.02 956.80 961.03 0.000D08 0.33 3710.76 872.66 0.02 1 199343 1% Ocon RCorEff 670.00 953.43 961.02 958.80 961.03 0.000008 0.33 3711.25 872.78 0.02 1 199343 1% Oconom R. Prop 870,00 953.43 961,02 956,80 981.03 0.000008 0.33 3711.25 872.76 0.02 1 198720 1% __ ~!§JAILED Effective 840.00 953.12 961.02 956.74 961,02 0.000008 0.37 4203.96 1549.12 0.03 1 198720 1% Ocon R cor Eff • 840.00 949.24 981.02 961.40 961.02 0.000008 0.42 3829.48 1441.90 0.02 r·---- 198720 1% Oconom R, Prop 840.00 949.24 981.02 951.40 961.02 0,000008 0.42 3829.46 1441.90 0.02 1 1 198470 1% Ocon RCorEII 840.00 914,46 961.02 961.02 0.000000 0.01 56780.43 2671.25 0.00 ----1 198470 1% Oconom R. PIOP 840.00 914,48 981.02 961,02 0.000000 0.01 56780.15 2673.01 0.00 1 198278 1% OETAILEO Effective 640.00 910.60 961,02 011.10 961.02 0.000000 0.01 81410.99 2673.11 0.00 1 198271.1 1% Ocon R<:orEff 640.00 914.46 961,02 915.06 981,02 0,000000 0,01 56686.18 2671.25 0.00 1 198278 1% Oconom R. Prop 940.00 914.46 961,02 916.06 961.02 0.000000 0.01 56566.18 2671.25 0.00 1 197915 1% DETAILED EffecliVil 840,00 907.50 961.02 961.02 0.000000 0.01 122294.30 3367.51 0.00 _1 197915 1% Ocor, RCorElf 840,00 907,50 981.02 961.02 0.000000 0.01 1222S4.30 3387.51 0.00 1 197915 1% 0e()l1om R. Prop 840.00 9D7.50 961.02 961.02 0,000000 0.01 122294.30 3387.51 0.00 1 196923 1% DETAILED F.ffecilvo- 840.00 915.55 961.02 961.02 0.000000 0.01 113912.70 3760.40 0.00 ~-- ~-96923 1% Ocon RCorEff 840.00 915.55 961.02 961.02 0.000000 0.01 113912.70 3760.48 o.oo ~---- 19892~- 1~ Oconom R. Prop 840.00 915.55 901.02 961.02 0.000000 0.01 113912.70 3760.40 0.00 1 196136 1.%· DETAILED EffecUve 810.00 954.94 961.02 961.02 0,000018 0.38 5110,37 2681.81 0,03 1 196136 1% OconRCorEff 810.00 954.94 961.02 961,02 0.000018 0.38 5110.37 2581.81 0.03 1 196136 1% Oconom R. Prop 810.00 954.94 961.02 961.02 0,000018 0.38 5110.37 2681.81 0.03 1 195930 1% DETAILEO EJfedlve 810.00 954.139 961.02 958.00 961.02 0.000038 0.53 4313.44 2343.26 O.<M 1 195930 1% OconRCorEff 810.00 954.69 961.02 958,00 961.02 0.000038 0.53 4313.44 2343.26 0.04 1 195930 1% Oconom R. Prop 010.00 954.69 961.02 958.00 961.02 0.000038 0.53 4313.44 2343.26 0.M 1 195916 Bridge ATTACHMENT G Checklist for Submitting a Floodplain Study Wisconsin Depattment of Natural Resources This outline for department review of floodplain stud ies may not contain all of the requiremen ts of the administrat ive code. It is a general outli ne and detailed exam ination of the code s should be done to be assured that a submittal may meet department appro val. Approp 1iate areas should be filled in by the engine er submitti ng the study for WDNR review . Commun ity/Zon ing Authority:_V_il_la_g_e_ o_f _R_ic_h_fi_e_ld ______ _ _ ______ _ _ Officia l Strea m Name: Oconomowoc River -------- - --------- -------- County: Washington Study Author: Evan Nickode m, P.E. Submis sion Date: - ----- - ------ ----------- ---- Sub mitted to: Andrea Stern-WD NR Water Management Engineer Legal Descr iption: Upstream Limit NW 1/4(QQ) , NE 1/4(Q) , Sect ion(s)_1_0 ___ , Township_9 __ , Range_1_9 __ Downstream Limit SE 1/4(QQ) , NE l/4(Q) , Section (s) 32 , Township _8_, Range~ Study Type (circle): Bridge/Culvert Channel Realignment Enclosur e Filling/Gradino BFE detem1ination Other ___ _____ ______________ _ __ _ 05/19 / 17 I) General Documentation NA Contact (Telephone Conservation) Repotis NA Meeting Minutes/Reports __ General Correspondence __ Submittal letter or e-mail from zoning authority requesting review II) Narrative Report ~ Purpose of the study ~ Geographic location of the study ATTACHMENT G ~ Detailed description of the methodology used for hydrology, hydraulics and any special applications used in the study ~ Description of the project location related to model river stations X Documentation of the changes made between each model run ~ Floodway Data Table Note: Include at least one table with the following output variables: 'River Sta' 'Q Total' 'W.S. Elev' 'Top Wdth Act' 'Flow Area' 'Ve! Total' X Previous studies on the same watercourse - date/author/source of study X Data collection methods NA Past flooding X Benchmark identification and location X C d" • • h h • __ oor mat10n wit ot er agencies ~ Other supporting documentation provided (circle) Soils Maps Watershed Maps Photographs Stream Flow Records other: FEMA Firm Maps, SWDV Maps, Fill/Grading Design 2 05/19/17 III) Engineering Analyses !) Hydrologic Analysis (electronic input/output files) '!__ Is there an existing model? Oconomowoc River Hydrologic Model Existing model input file name: __________ _ The two techniques used to detem1ine the regional flood flow discharges: ___ Log-Pearson Type III, described in Technical Bulletin #17B ___ Regional Regression Equations (i.e. Congers) X ___ Synthetic hydrographs (i.e. HEC-HMS) ATTACHMENT G __ Was floodplain storage explicitly taken into account to attenuate flood peak flow? __ ff yes, have flood storage district maps been created for the community to adopt? Which rainfall distribution was used? --------- If a distribution other than NRCS 's MSE3/MSE4 was used, --------- what duration was the critical duration when the critical duration analysis was perfom1ed to identify the peak sto1m duration? ___ Technical Release No. 55 (TR-55) Comparison of similar drainage basins at gaged sites --- Historic flood data --- Other methods with department approval ( comment on what method) --- Input file name: ________ _ __ New peak flows tie in with upstream and downstream published flows 3 05/19/17 ATTACHMENT G 2) Hydraulic Analyses (electronic input/output files) Note: The same model must be used for both existing and proposed conditions for relative consistency '!__ Is there an existing model? analysis 11736 input file Existing model input file name: __________ _ Unknown . . d I d ,, · · · I d h ____ Ex1stmg mo e was not trnncate ,rom its ongma stu y reac New hydraulic model type (i.e. HEC-RAS) HEC--RAS ------------- New input file name (project model name that has one or multiple runs): OconomowocRiverFi .prj . • . Eflec:tive - Detail Hydraulic Study(.p01 ), Corrected Effective pre-project - Model plan descnpt10ns: ________________________ _ Oconomowoc R. Car Ell (.p03), Proposed condition post-project - Oconomowoc R. Proposed (.p04) (ex. p.01 = effective, p.02 = corrected effective, p.03 = pre-project, p.04 = post-project...) What is the vertical datum of the survey/geometric data (NAVD88, NGVD29 ... ) NA VD 88 Y ____ Is there a dam with operable gates in the study reach? NA If yes, does the modeled operation represent the DNR approved Inspection, Operations, and Maintenance Plan (IOM)? The dam operator then assumes liability that the gates will be operated as outlined in the TOM. Dupllcate Effective model had gate openings optimized to maintain summer water levels. This was not changed or modified in any way. If not, explain __________________________ _ ~ Is there a detailed study upstream of the submitted reach? (YIN) NA If yes, do the profiles match within 0.5' at the boundary? (YIN) ~ Is there a detailed study downstream of the submitted reach? (YIN) NA If yes, do the profiles match exactly at the boundary? (YIN) ~ Model shows increases due to development (proper legal arrangements required) 4 05/19/17 ATTACHMENT G 3) Misce llaneous ~ Supporting hand calculation s, sketches and figures used in analyses ~ Key to Cross -Section Labeling NA Key to Transect Labeling (coastal study only) IV) Mapping information ~ Workmaps including floodway , floodfringe , cross sections, and stream centerlines _x _ _ F loodway Data Table Note: Include at least one table with the following output va1iables: 'River Sta ' 'Q Total ' ' W.S. Elev' 'Top Wdth Act ' ' Flow Area ' 'Ve! Total' Digital mapping data provided: ----- --===-- - - ----------- (Circle) ESRI shapeftle(s) /database (£AD dai) Other Horizontal coordinate system used: __________ ___________ _ V) Certification ~ Signed, stamped, and subm itted by a Professional Engineer registered in Wisconsin N Evan P. Nickodem R . . # E-31628 ame _______ _ _________ eg1strat1on 5 05/ 19/17 ATTACHMENT H 1403324 Washington County Certified Survey Map Lois One (1) and Two (2), In Block Three (3), In Friess Lake Grove, a recorded subdivision In the NW 1/4 and $W 1/4 all In Section 17, Towmil1lp 9 North, Rerig1;11Q East, in the Town of Rlchfleld now the Village of Richfield, Washington CoLmly, Wisconsin. t Northwest comer Sec. 17-9-19 conc.mon./brass cap OwneriSubdlvlder IIIIII Ill I IIII Ill 11111111111111111 RECOROEO April 21, 2016 4 :00 PM SHARON A MARTIN REGISTER Of DEEDS WASHINGTON COUNTY, WI Recording fee Paid: $30,00 t found t---. 480,777.96 --.::.::::i=-~12~=.,467,787.63 I (State Pl!lne Coordinates) Badger Home Builders Inc, Danie! J. Tlnll 1323 Poplar Drlve Waukesha, WI 53168 Bearings are referenced to the Wisconsin Slate Plane Coordinate Grid Syslem, South Zone, the west Ene of the NW 1/4 has a grid beating ofN 00"47'05"W. Sheet 1 of3 ' ' Ii~ I ~-~ j ;:j w !l: C ~ ~ i.; ~~~ I Surveyor Donald J. ·rhoma Accurate Surveying & Engineering LLP. 2911 Wildllfe Lane Richfield, WI 63076 axlsilng house (r,a,) means ~recorded as" (meas.) means "measured as" • • 0 Thlg Certllled SUNBY Map mergn Lo111 & 2, Block 3, In Frleu Leke Grovo lo term on& parcel. The resul~ng lot Is considered norn:(lnformlng llecausei U1ey do not conform to lhe development sklndardt 8 cootalned In Chapter 70 oftl,e A vmaga or Rlchlleld'9 1111.mlclpol code. All sooh nonconformities 11 are subject to appllcQb!e provlslonB ol tho munk:lpul cede relating to nonconforming rota and !ltrucluraa. - Indicates a 1.5"od Iron pipe found . - Indicates a 1.3"od Iron pipe found unless noted - Indicates a 1.3"od x 18" Iron pipe weighing 1.68 lbs,/ft. set or set from a previous survey. - ind!oates a mag nail set from previous susvey. - Indicates a Railroad spike set. • Indicates a metal draw In asphalt roadway (not dug up) 0 20 40 Dated this ay of b . 2016. Re\/lsed this 24th da of Februa 16. Jim Healy IL From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Jim, Erik R. <erikrossebo@gmail.com> Monday, June 22, 2026 10:07 AM Jim Healy 2026.6.18 Memo to Residents 500 ft from BOZA Property Mike Dallia Just wanted to let you know that I would approve any variance needed in association for Mike Dallia's property. My boat lot is next to his. Any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Erik & Kelly Rossebo 4869 Riverview Dr. Hubertus, WI 53033 414-587-7660 1 w 1 2 Dimensional Variance Relief Request 4823 Riverview Dr, Hubertus Variance Request Michael and Catherine Dallia have applied to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) requesting dimensional variance relief from the placement of fill surrounding the perimeter of a planned single­ family home, pursuant to Section 170.1263. • Request to put in less than the required 15 feet of fill around the perimeter of the proposed building pad. 6/26/2026 1 ' '..i- - - t . .. •....u..i"• T 1?J :__ •11' I lit J>.-•----:--_: ... ~~,._ --•-:::::=--_ I • V '1: -. ••••••• -- < .. ,t - - ~\\t , ' -=!-: : - · .. . , / ; - . ·§· , . r·--·•- -'7 I -~ '\. - / {i ' . ~ _. - -- / ' ·---, / i ' ' \ _, - -------" .... ' ' , ' i ' r7· I ,, --~, .. -_:.,,- ·, <°. ··•,./ ,· / ~ , \ ,( ~ I 1/ ,,- - - .. - • ' • • I , ! '! , ~--:~ ··f-;, L---, 1 ' . }/ ----- . ~~- - _;·;h. :·/ -1· ' • : , . : I --·· •• ~ --=;;;;;.,--,- ' ------ . I .: - • • i .. 3 ........... - - U ---~ -___ .., ____ _ -· - ---·-· ~ --·-· "==";":.-:~:--~ ..:~"':--­ ~.~!'. -:~..: -L""\:!;-- ·-·--·- - C1.02 Technical Detail for Variance Request 4 • The building proposal • Seeking a variance to support filling and excavating to comply with Village of Richfield code regarding the building pad in the floodplain area. 6/26/2026 2 Criteria for Approval of a Variance 5 • To qualify for this variance, we will demonstrate that all three of the following criteria defined in state statues have been met • Unnecessary Hardship • Unique Property Limitations • No Harm to Public Interests Unnecessary Hardship 6 • "Literal enforcement of the terms of the zoning code would result in unnecessary hardship, by unreasonably preventing the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or rendering conformity with such restrictions unreasonably burdensome. This lot of record is zoned for single family residential uses, and the property owner seeks approval to build a reasonable structure for that permitted use." (Conclusions ofLaw, Variance Decision for4916 Lakeview Avenue, September 2015) • Without this variance we would not be able to build a house and use the property for its permitted purpose. • Approval of this variance will allow development that is consistent with the development on abutting parcels and ensures stability and compatible development as intended by the Zoning Code. 6/26/2026 3 Unique Property Limitations 7 • The unnecessary hardship is due to unique conditions created by compliance with the WDNR flood storage regulations. • This property lies within a WDNR designated Floodplain Storage area • Limited lot size to work with. • Public road goes thru the north side of the property which restricts buildable area • Setback requirement for the 1ft over the floodplain creates the need for additional filling. No Harm to Public Interest 8 • "Issuance of a variance in this instance would not be contrary to the public interest by creating or having the potential for creating an adverse impact on the public health, safety, or welfare of adjoining and surrounding residents, properties or the community. This merely allows for the construction of a residence that is compatible with surrounding development patterns. Just as the residences on the abutting lots create no adverse impact, a residence on this lot also creates no adverse impact." (Conclusions ofLaw, Variance Decision for4916 Lakeview Avenue, September 2015) • Summary analysis shows that proposed filling does not cause an increase in the flood plain elevation upstream or downstream of the property. • Approval of this variance would allow the creation of a building pad and single-family home that meets FEMA and Wisconsin DNR flooi::I storage codes. • This variance does not conflict with uses on adjacent properties or in the neighborhood[ does not result in harm to public interests, and does not require multip e or extreme variances. 6/26/2026 4 6/26/2026 Zoning Approval Precedence •Asimilar variance was granted by the Board of Zoning • 4916 Lakeview Avenue (Tax Key: V10-056200) • Approval in September 2015 9 5 EX. POV-.'ER POlE -----------..... - ........ ........ , \ \ ', .......... --------- ' ,,,-- ........ _,,/ .................. , ......... ___________ .,,, w ;,, ... b r> 0 0 z \ I I EX POl'l!R POLE / I I \ '-· 0 10 20 • ■ ••• ..... - DIGGlRSWHOJllNl Dia l ® or (800)2 42-85 11 www .DiggersHotline.com LEGEND: - SJ6~ - - - EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR. - - •935• - - - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR. --936 - - - PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR, --935-- - PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR. P4 E- - - PROPOSED STORM SEWER. -- -- - £XISTING STORM SEWER. @ - INSTALL YttSOOT TYPE O INL£T PROTECTION. __,...._ - INSTALL SfLT FENCE. - - INSTill DITCH CHECK, f-- - ORAINMlE ARROW. SIAOES 'Y CQNSJBUCDQN DNE $QE)l.lL£; APRIi 15 2026 1. INSTALL SITE SILT FENCE, INLET PROTECTION AHO TEMPORARY Ca-lSTRUCllON ENTRANC[S AS SHO'M-1 ON Pl.ANS. ANY ADDITIONAL CONSlRVCTlON ENTRANCES IF APPROVED BY lHE I/IL.LAGE OF R!CHFlELD SHAll HAVE A TRACKING PAD. APBJl 16 2926 - SEPTEMBER 1 2026 2. SlRIP TOPSOIL 'MTHN TI-IE Ulr.41TS OF 11-IE WE'T OE1ENT10N PONDS ANO CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY STOCkPIL£, TO BE SEEDED ANO SILT FENCE PLACED AROUND lHE PERIMETER. J. CONSiRUCT BOTH WET OETDHlON PONDS. ALL GRADING SH"1..l DIRECT AU RUN-OFF TO THE 'l\£T DETENTION PONDS THROIJG-IOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. 4. STRIP REMAINING TOPSOIL V,,,THIN GR~ING LIMITS ANO CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY TOPSOIL STOCKPIL£ LOCATION ACCORDING TO "SPEC1f1CATIONS FOR GRADING &: EROSION CONTROL: ON "CONSTRUCTION NOTES PAGE". 5. BEGIN PROPOSED Sil[ GRADING - RESEEO SECTIONS OF PROJECT THROUGHOUT THE GRADING PROCESS TO MINIMIZE RUN-OFF. 6, START CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITIES: WATER SERVICE. SANITARY SE'NER ANO STORM SEWER. 7. CONSTRUCT BUILDING PADS ANO BUILDINGS. 8. CONTINUE SITE GRADING. 9. INSTAU. BASE COURSES, PROPOSED PAVEMENTS 10. INSTAU LANDSCAPING, 11. APPLY FINAL STABILIZATION TO ENTIRE SITE. SfPIEMBEB 2 - 15 2026 ALL PERMANENT SEEDING SHAU. BE COMPLETED BY SEPTEMBER 15. ALL TEMPORARY SEEDING SHAU BE COMPLEltO BY OCTOBER 15 (REFER TO ONR STANDARD 1059.) STABIUZA.TION FOR All EXPOSED SOIL AF1ER OCTOBER 15 SHAU CONSIST OF ANIONIC POl YARCRYL.AMIOE (PAM) IN ADDITION TO TEMPORARY SEEDING IN AREAS 'MTI-IOUT EROSION CONTROL MAT. PLACE PAM IN ACCORDANCE 'Mn-I 'M>NR TECHNICAL STANDARD 1050. AFTER OCTOBER 15 All SLOPES •:1 OR SlEEPER lHAl ARE NOT PERI.AANENTI..Y VECETAlEO SHAU HAVE EROSION IJAT INSTALLED IN PREPARATION Of 'MNTER CONDITIONS. SPREAD SALVAGED OR IMPORTED TOPSOIL IN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAS AND RESTORE. CONTRACTOR 1.AAY MODIFY SEQUENCING J,,S NEEDED TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION If EROSION CONTROLS ARE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE wm~ THE CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION CONTROL REOUIRE1'ENTS SET FORTH IN F£0ERAL. STATE &: LOCAL PERMITS. NOTIFY -V,LJ..AGE OF RIOfflELD PRIOR TO OiANGE. AS CONDITIONS WARRANT DURING CONSlRUCltON ADDITIONAL BMPS SHAU. BE' INSTAll.ED TO REDUCE THE' MIGRATION OF SEDIMENT THE' THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE REMOVE All TEMPOO:ARY EROstON CONTROL MEASURES AFTER SITE IS STASIUZED ANO STABILIZE ANO AREAS OISnJRBEO BY REMOVAL Of BMPS. vi z 0 vi 5~ W,= 0: Q. ii: ~ C t,! <( C 0 z OJ w F' ,= Ul Q_ t; ~ 0: Q. PLAN TITLE: 0 '.!: ~E w ,n 8 w ~ :ii z -oj i; .h. z • H ► "& w ~ > ~§ "' :::, ~r-; "' 8"' :,: ~ ;I "' ;: ,-1 "' 1:! ls: < GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRA\\N BY: EPN DESIGNED BY: EPN CHECKED BY: EPN PLAN DATE: 5112/2026 PROJECT NO: \MD-08-25 \ PRELIMINARY SHEET NO: C1.02 A. Findings of Fact1 Variance Decision Village of Richfield Board of Zoning Appeals Sally S Coyle Trust 4916 Lakeview A venue Tax Key: V I 0-056200A Village of Richfield Forward. Preserving ... A Country Way of Life! Having considered the information submitted by the application. observations made at the subject property, the Staff report prepared by the Village Planning and Zoning Administrator. and comments made at the public hearing by the applicant and those members of the publ ic in attendance, the Board of Zoning Appeals makes the following findings: I) Sally S Coyle Trust (hereinafter "applicant") owns the property at 49 16 Lakeview Avenue (Tax Key: VI0-056200A) in the Village of Richfield (hereinafter "suqject property"). 2) The subject property is located on tht: south side of Friess Lake and is zoned f- 1, Flood land District. 3) There is currently a single-family residence on the subject property which does not comply with current floodplain regulations. 4) The subject property is considered a lot of record in that it was created prior to the adoption of the relevant regulations. There are newer single-family residences on the lake. 5) The Board of Zoning Appeals conducted a public hearing, which was duly noticed in the West Bend Daily News with a Class II Public Notice. Prope1ties within 300 feet of the subject property were also notified via first-class mail. 6) The Board of Zoning Appeals viewed the subject property on September 23.2015 as part of its proceedings. 7) Mr. Don Thoma. Ms. Ann Coyle, and Jim Healy, Village Administrator, were all sworn-in by the Chairman and provided oral testimony. 8) Mr. Jim Healy, Administrator, provided factual background information about the property as well as read po1tions of the staff communication form which was distributed to the members of the Board of Zoning Appeals. 9) Ms. Ann Coyle. representing the applicant, presented their request to the Board along with Mr. Don Thoma, agent and surveyor. Mr. Thoma in particular addressed stormwater management issues related to the project. B. Requested Variance The applicant requested to put in less than the required 15 feet of fi II around the perimeter of the house. 1 To the extent that the findings of fact address issues of law, they shall be deemed to be conclusions of law, and to the extent the conclusions of law include issues of fact, they shall be deemed to be findings of fact. The heading under which the statements are made shall not be controlling. 4128 Hubertus Road - Hubertus, Wisco nsin 53033 Phone (262) 628-2260 - Fax (262) 628-2984 - www.richfieldwi.gov Page 2 C. Conclusions of Law2 The Board of Zoning Appeals makes the following conclusions of law: I) The Board finds that literal enforcement of the terms of the zoning code would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship, by unreasonably preventing the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or rendering conformity with such restrictions unreasonably burdensome. This lot of record is zoned for single family residential uses, and the prnperty owner seeks approval to build a reasonable structure for that permitted use. Compliance with the literal code requirements of the zoning code would result in a long narrow house, which is substantially disproportionate to the home construction standards in the immediate area. The purpose of having fi II around the perimeter of a house is to provide an additional layer of protection from floodwaters. Given the size of the property, the requested variance does not violate the intent of the Code. Allowing development that is consistent with the development on abutting parcels ensures stability and compatible development, as intended by the Zoning Code, and denying the ability to do so would therefore be unreasonably burdensome. 2) The unnecessary hardship is clue to unique or special conditions or limitations affecting the subject property and/or structure that are not typical or generally shared by other surrounding properties. The subject property is about 6,535 square feet in area, a relatively small lot in the area. 3) Issuance of a variance in this instance would not be contrary to the public interest by creating or having the potential for creating an adverse impact on the public health, safety, or welfare of adjoining and smrounding residents, properties or the community. This merely allows for the construction of a residence that is compatible with surrounding development patterns. Just as the residences on the abutting lots create no adverse impact, a residence on this lot also creates no adverse impact. D. Order and Determination Based on the above findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the record herein, the Board, by majority vote (5-0), grants the variance to allow the construction of a single-family home with less than the required 15 feet of fill provided the retaining wall on the west side has a "lip" on it to prevent stormwater from flowing onto the adjoining property. This is to be verified by the building inspector for the Village of Richfield following construction. E. Approval Period If construction does not sta11 on the single family residence consistent with this decision within two years from the date of this approval and continues in good faith to completion, this approval shall automatically become null and void. F. Appeal An aggrieved party may appeal this decision to a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 days after the date of filing of this written Decision shown below. • G. Date of Decision This decision was prepared based upon the Board's discussions at the hearing and have been reviewed and approved by the Board, and issued on the last date of signature shown below, nunc pro tune September 23, 2015. 2 See footnote I . Page 3 Richfield Board of Zoning Appeals s;gned. ~ Robert Bilda, Chairman s;g,,ed~-Jack Li tza,Me 1b ~ __, Voted: Yes Voted: Yes Voted: Yes s;gned. -~~ Voted, Yes Justin Pen;&J~ Atte Jim / Voted: Yes Dated this K_ day of Qec:8½f>..ei.i2015 f Dated this;Z day of ~ , 20 15 Dated this 'ZZ: day of 6'~ 1 , 2015 Dated this ;2/{ray of fJc~ , 2015 Dated this .,)Oday of a/2/:Je-; , 2015 Board member(s) in at but not voting: Diane Sommers, 2nd Alternate Board members absent: Brian Gallitz with excused absence