Plan Commission Packet 08.19.2026
City of Marathon City · Marathon County · meeting of Aug 19, 2026 · Agenda packets
Open the original document More from City of Marathon City
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
Kurt Handrick, Jr.
Village President
Cassie Lang
Village Clerk / Deputy Treasurer
311 Walnut Street | P .O. Box 487
Marathon City, WI 54448
Tel: 715-443-2221
www.marathoncitywi.gov
PLAN COMMISSION
OFFICIAL NOTICE & AGENDA
Wednesday, August 19, 2026
2:30 pm – Marathon Municipal Center
PUBLIC VIRTUAL ACCESS
Join Teams Meeting: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 265 468 778 661 631
Passcode: Qu97jQ3q
1. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: K. HANDRICK, M. AHRENS, M. TELFORD, C. STIEBER, S. CHEREK, L. OLBRANTZ, L.
WIESMAN
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. RECOGNITION OF VISITORS
a. Virtual Meeting Guidelines
This meeting will be recorded and available upon request
b. Public Participation at Government Meetings
4. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 3, 2026 PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Discuss and Approve Conditional Use Permit for Use of an Electronic Sign Submitted by St
Matthew’s Church
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Discussion and Direction on Residential Subdivision Development Guidelines
7. DISCUSS DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
a. Future Land Use – Residential Density
8. SET FUTURE MEETING(S) – NEXT STEPS IN PLANNING PROCESS
9. ADJOURNMENT
PLAN COMMISSION/PUBLIC HEARING
MINUTES
Monday, August 3, 2026
1. PUBLIC HEARING began at 4:34 pm
a. The Conditional Use Permit Application for an Electronic Sign Submitted by St. Matthew’s Church
Administrator Cherek opened the Public Hearing explaining that the Board of Appeals approved a
variance request to St Matthew’s Church allowing them to install an electronic sign over the permitted
8 square foot (2’x4’) maximum area allowed according to Zoning Code 13.12.8. The application
request showed a 32 square foot (4’x8’) electronic portion of the overall sign. A sign proof displayed a
total of 3 signs in 1 – the electronic sign positioned above signs for St Matthew’s Church and Little
Lions Childcare. The BOA also granted a variance for the overall size of the 3 signs, with a total square
footage of 53.12, over the 40 square foot max allowed in Code 13.12.9.
No public comments were made. Public hearing was closed.
2. CALL TO ORDER at 4:38 pm
ROLL CALL: K. HANDRICK-Present, M. AHRENS-Present, M. TELFORD-Present, C. STIEBER-
Present, S. CHEREK-Present, L. OLBRANTZ-Present, L. WIESMAN-Present
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. RECOGNITION OF VISITORS
a. Virtual Meeting Guidelines
This meeting will be recorded and available upon request
b. Public Participation at Government Meetings
5. APPROVAL OF JUNE 23, 2026 PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
MOTION – Approve June 23, 2026 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes
Motion made by Olbrantz second by Stieber. Motion passed by voice vote.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Review and Possible Action of Conditional Use Permit Application for an Electronic Sign Submitted
by St Matthew’s Church
Cherek explained that according to Zoning Code 13.12.8(2) the Plan Commission is required to
review all applications for electronic signs via a CUP. He shared a draft CUP outlining conditions
that match with Zoning Code 13.12.8, including restrictions on the light emitted, message rotation
frequency and hours of use. With the Board of Appeals granting a variance on the proposed area
or the sign, there was not a size restriction in the draft. The Commission agreed to have Cherek
work on a more finalized CUP with Attorney VanderWaal and bring back to the next Plan
Commission meeting on August 19th for possible approval. No action taken today.
b. Review and Possible Action on Building Permit Application for an Unclassified Use – Zoning Code
13.2.2(2)
i. Review Zoning Code 13.2.2 – Definitions & Table 13-5(A): Table of Allowable Land Uses -
Subsection: Accessory Uses/Structures
The Village received a building permit for a storage structure of which Cherek questioned the
classification of use. According to zoning code 13.3.2(2), questions to the classification of use need
Plan Commission recommendation and final determination by the Village Board. Table 13-5(A):
Table of Allowable Land Uses, determines sheds/storage buildings to be permitted, however,
Ordinance 13.2.2 Definitions, spells out what a structure is but does not define a shed or storage
building. Cherek brought this to the Plan Commission to define uses. They discussed whether the
structure in question was a carport, or could be classified as a shed if sides were attached.
Ultimately, the Plan Commission decided to allow the structure for temporary use and have Cherek
Cassie Lang
Village Clerk / Deputy Treasurer
work with Attorney VanderWall to change language in the Ordinance to include definitions of sheds
and storage buildings.
7. FUTURE MEETING DATE(S) & TIME(S)
a. Plan Commission Meeting – Comprehensive Planning – Wednesday, August 19, 2026 – 2:30 pm
8. ADJOURNMENT at 6:20 pm
Motion to made by Telford second by Stieber. Motion passed by voice vote.
ORDER GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
ST MATTHEWS CHURCH
VILLAGE OF MARATHON CITY,
MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN
WHEREAS, a complete application has been filed by ST MATTHEW’S LUTHERAN
CHURCH, (hereinafter “Applicant”) for a monument sign to display illumination messages as a
conditional use for Church and Village community events, on Applicant’s property located at 302
County Road NN, Marathon City, WI; and
WHEREAS, the A pplicant’s application and submitted documents consists of a
completed and Conditional Use Permit Application dated July 13, 2026, Variance Request letter
dated July 13, 2026, and Sign Permit Application on June 29, 2026 that depicts the Illumination
Sign design details along with location on Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, Applicant represents and warrants that the application and materials
submitted heretofore are true, accurate, and correct; are incorporated fully herein and shall be relied
upon by the Village in its determination(s) herein; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant is the fee simple owner of that property located within the
Village of Marathon City with a mailing address and Parcel ID as follows:
302 County Road NN
Marathon City, WI 54448
Parcel ID: 151-2806-082-0958
(“Subject Property”)
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is zoned CF - Community Facilities and Institutions
pursuant to the Zoning Code of the Village; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to §13.5.16 and Article 12, Section 13.12.8(2) of the Zoning Code,
The Plan Commission shall review all applications for electronic message unite signs that the
Applicant proposes in its Application and is permitted as conditional accessory use in the CF
Community Facilities and Institutions District use; and
WHEREAS, Applicant further intends to utilize the Subject Property for those permitted
uses identified in the CF Community Facilities and Institutions District and as set forth in that
Conditional Use Permit Application with the Village of Marathon City; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of the completed application for a Conditional Use Permit,
Variance Request and materials identified hereinabove, the Village Clerk properly referred the
same to the Board of Appeals and Plan Commission of the Village of Marathon City for a public
hearings and recommendations; and
-2-
WHEREAS, upon referral of the Conditional Use Permit application by the Village Clerk,
the Plan Commission for the Village of Marathon City scheduled a public hearing thereon as soon
as practical; and
WHEREAS, upon the necessary publication of the required notice of public hearing as
required by §13.4.8( 4) of the Zoning Code, the Plan Commission held a public hearing on the
application on August 3, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission, following the public hearing and necessary study and
investigation, having given the matter due consideration, and having based its recommendation on
those factors set forth in §13.4.8(6) Zoning Code of the Village of Marathon City including the
health, general welfare, safety and economic prosperity of the Village, as well as the
Comprehensive Plan of the Villa ge, recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit with
conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board after review of the recommendation of the Plan
Commission and after it also conducted the necessary study and investigation, having giving the
matter due consideration, and basing its determination on the effects of those standards as set forth
in §13.4.8(6) as well as §13.5.16 of the Zoning Code, and as long as the conditional use operates
in strict compliance with the following conditions resolves, orders and finds that:
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED AND RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Commencing upon the date hereof, a Conditional Use Permit for the Subject Property is
hereby granted as set forth herein. The Conditional Use Permit granted herein shall apply only to
the specific use of the Subject Property by St. Matthews Lutheran Church, and the Conditional
Use Permit shall continue and exist only so long as the Subject P roperty is operated in strict
compliance with the terms of this Permit. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to initial and
continued compliance with each and every one of the following conditions, restrictions, and
limitations:
1. This Conditional Use Permit is granted to allow an electronic message sign as
depicted in the application, to be constructed as set forth in the application and
related materials under the following conditions:
A. Illumination Restrictions:
(i) Illumination shall be designed and maintained to eliminate negative impacts on
surrounding rights-of-way and properties. The light from an illuminated sign shall
not be of an intensity or brightness that will create a negative impact on property
uses in direct line-of-sight to the sign.
(ii) Flashing, flickering and/or other lighting which may distract motorists are
prohibited.
(iii) The sign shall comply with the applicable provisions of the electrical
code as adopted by the Village and must be UL Listed.
-3-
(iv) The s ign shall not be illuminated in a manner that interferes with (including
glaring or blinding), misleads or confuses traffic.
(v) External light sources shall be directed and shielded to limit direct illumination
of any object other than the sign.
(vi) In no instance shall the amount of illumination attributable to the sign, as
measured a distance of 10 inches from the face, exceed 60 foot -candles above
ambient lighting conditions.
(vii) In no case, with all lighting components energized, shall the lighting intensity
of any sign, whether resulting from internal or external illumination, exceed 60 feet
candles when measured with a standard light meter held at a distance of ten inches
from the sign face.
(viii) The electronic message portion of the sign shall not exceed 0.3 footcandles
above ambient light conditions measured from a distance based on the area of the
sign [measurement distance = √ (Area of Sign Sq. Ft. x 100)], perpendicular to the
sign face, and using an illuminance meter capable of accuracy of two decimals.
Example: A 24 square foot electronic message center would be limited to 0.3
footcandles when measured at a distance of 49 feet. Measurement Distance =
√(24*100) = 49 feet.
(vx) The sign shall be equipped with photosensitive equipment which
automatically adjusts the brightness and contrast of the sign in direct relation to the
ambient outdoor illumination.
(x) Messages displayed on the sign shall not change, scroll, flash, rotate or
otherwise transition more frequently than once every four (4) seconds.
B. Time Restrictions: The electronic message board shall be turned off, or otherwise
not illuminated, between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. No messages or light
emitted from the sign shall be visible during these hours.
2. This Conditional Use Permit is granted solely and exclusively to the Applicant for
only so long as it continues to own in fee simple the Subject Property. This
Conditional Use Permit is not transferrable to any other person or entity without
the prior approval of the Village.
3. This Conditional Use Permit is conditioned upon the Applicant and the Subject
Property being and remaining compliant with all other Village, County, State, and
Federal laws, rules, and regulations. The Applicant shall apply for, receive, and
file proof of such permission with the Village Administrator of all other required
local, state, and federal permits before activities commence.
-4-
4. The terms, conditions, and representations of the submittal s by the Applicant for
Conditional Use Permit dated July 13, 2026, are hereby incorporated herein and
made a part of the conditions hereof to the extent not otherwise modified by the
requirements herein and to the extent so modified, the conditions set forth herein
shall control.
5. The Applicant shall promptly reimburse the Village for all costs and expenses of
any type that the Village incurs in connection with this Conditional Use Permit,
including by way of enumeration without limitation, the cost of professional
services incurred by the Village (including legal and other consulting fees) for
review of and preparation of the Conditional Use Permit, attendance at meetings or
other related professional services as well as for any actions the Village is required
to take to enforce any of the conditions in this Conditional Use Permit due to a
violation of these conditions by the Applicant.
6. Any use not specifically listed as permitted shall be considered to be prohibited
except as maybe otherwise specifically provided herein. In case of a question as to
the classification of use, the question shall be submitted to the Plan Commission
for recommendation and Village Board for determination.
7. No use is hereby authorized unless the use is conducted in a lawful, orderly, and
peaceful manner. Nothing in this Permit shall be deemed to authorize any public
or private nuisance or to constitute a waiver, exemption, or exception to any law,
ordinance, order, or rule by the Village , Marathon County, State of Wisconsin,
United States, or other duly constituted authority, except only to the extent that it
authorizes the use of the Subject Property in any specific respects described herein.
8. Should this permitted Conditional Use be abandoned or discontinued in any manner
for twelve (12) months or greater or continued other than in strict conformity with
the conditions of the original approval or should the Applicant be delinquent in
payment of any monies due and owing to the Village, this Conditional Use shall be
deemed terminated and therefore null and void.
9. Any change, addition, modification, alteration and/or amendment of any aspect of
this Conditional Use, including but not limited to an addition, modification,
alteration and/or amendment to the use, premises, structures, land or owners other
than as specifically authorized herein, shall require a new permit and all procedures
in place at the time must be followed.
10. Should any paragraphs or phrase of this Conditional Use Permit be determined by
a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, illegal, or unconstitutional, said
determination as to the particular phrase or paragraph shall not void the remainder
of this Conditional Use and the remainder shall continue in full force and effect.
-5-
11. If any aspect of this Conditional Use Permit is in conflict with any other aspect of
the Conditional Use Permit, the more restrictive provision shall be controlling as
determined by the Village Board.
12. Copies of this Order shall be filed in the permanent records of the Village Board
for the Village of Marathon City and copies sent to the proper authorities as well as
the Applicant.
Approved this _____ day of August, 2026.
VILLAGE BOARD, VILLAGE OF MARATHON CITY
By:_______________________________________
Kurt Handrick, Village President
Attest: ____________________________________
Cassandra Lang, Village Clerk
Approval/Acceptance of Applicant dated this ___ day of _________________, 2026.
ST MATTHEWS CHURCH
Applicant:
By:___________________________________
Attest: ________________________________
1 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Seven
Land Use
Land use is a crucial component of livability and provides a basis for the formulation of policy to coordinate
a sustainable pattern of development. The existing natural landscape and land use patterns influence future
land use and development. Balancing the needs of the community with land use issues requires that each
situation be considered individually and that the community seeks the solution which fits the unique
challenges it faces.
Previous Plans and Studies
Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan, 20 17
The Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan is a policy plan that describes existing and future land
uses, and regulatory tools for land use. The overall goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide
consistency between official mapping, zoning and subdivision ordinances, local plans, and other
implementation tools.
Marathon County Comprehensive Plan, 20 26
The Marathon County Comprehensive Plan chapter on land use analyzes pattern of development, existing
land use, and future land use. The plan’s land use goal is as follows: Marathon County makes sound land use
decisions which balance the needs of agriculture, recreation, economic development, and growth to wisely
maximize the land’s potential. Objectives to achieve this goal include:
• Promote the preservation of agricultural land .
• Promote practices that preserve soil health and land productivity .
• Encourage revitalization of former residential properties in rural areas.
• Provide tools for managing and coordinating growth.
Regional Comprehensive Plan, 2025
The RCP’s Land Use chapter looks in detail at the land uses through the ten -county region and identifies
the following issues and trends related to land use:
• Dispersed Land Use Patterns. As the Region continues to age, a dispersed population will
impact the ability of residents to access services. There are also concerns about continuing to
fund infrastructure as a result.
2 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
• Contamination and Blight. Older neighborhoods in the Region may have sites contaminated
by former industry and structures that have fallen into disrepair. There is an opportunity to
rehabilitate these properties to save infrastructure costs compared to new construction.
• Environmental Features. Development pressures can fragment woodlands and other wildlife
habitat, increase runoff into waterways, impact aesthetics, and contribute to erosion if not
designed properly.
• Land Use Demand. Work-from-home may increase the number of people living in certain
areas, and decrease demand for commercial space, influencing land use patterns and infrastructure
needs.
• Renewable Energy. While renewable energy provides environmental and economic
opportunities, large scale solar and wind power is approved at the State level, with few tools for
municipal and county government to manage its location, screening, and other impacts.
• Comprehensive Plans. While many communities and counties have adopted comprehensive
plans, they are frequently not being updated as required by Wis. Stats. 66.1001. See Map 7 for
Comprehensive Plan status.
Existing Land Use
The Village of Marathon City is bordered by four towns: Stettin to the northeast, Marathon to the
southeast, Cassel to the southwest, and Rib Falls to the northwest. The northern part of the Village is
crossed by STH 29 running east -west.
The Big Rib River is a dominant land feature in the Village, bisecting the Village east -west. The originally
platted section of the Village is to the south of the River and is made up primarily of small lots, including
most of the single -family residences and small- scale commercial uses. These small -scale commercial areas
are located between the River and 4th Street. Most Village public services are also located south of the
Big Rib River, including the Village Hall, the library, and the different facilities of the Marathon School
District.
North of the River, many larger lots are found, with both commercial and residential properties. This area
includes a significant amount of wetlands which limit development. Commercial development is
congregated near the STH 29 interchange, providing ease of access to Village residents as well as people
coming from other communities. The Business and Industrial Park has several large employers as well as
space to expand and develop.
Most of the existing agricultural land within the Village is found along the Village boundary. This includes
the land to the far south of the Village along STH 107 and CTH B, to the east along CTH NN, and in the
newly annexed lands north of STH 29. Several quarries or gravel pits are located on the northeast side of
the Village, on both sides of STH 29 west of STH 107.
3 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Knowledge of the existing land use patterns within a community is necessary to develop a desired “future”
land use pattern. The Existing Land Use Map was developed using air photos from a countywide flight
in 2025. Eleven basic categories were used to classify the various existing land uses. The categories include
Agriculture, Commercial, Governmental, Industrial, Open Lands, Outdoor Recreation, Residential,
Transportation, Utility, Water, and Woodlands.
Land use classifications are groups of land uses that are compatible, and that separate conflicting uses. The
classifications are not zoning districts and do not have the authority of zoning but are intended for use as
a guide when making land use and zoning decisions.
Existing Land Use Classifications
The Existing Land Use Map outlines the existing land use pattern throughout the Village. The intent
of an existing land use map is to illustrate the location of existing land use categories within the Village
for planning purposes. Land use classifications are grouped by the use most central to each parcel. For
example, lands classified as residential may also have a barn or home -based business on site.
Existing land use classifications and acreage totals are presented in Table 21. Industrial uses account for
the largest share of the Village ’s land area at about 18 percent. The next largest land use category is
Agriculture at about 17.5 percent, followed by Woodlands and Residential. Uses such as C ommercial,
Governmental, Industrial, Open Lands, Outdoor Recreation, Transportation, and Utilities occupy the rest
of the Village.
Table 21: Existing Land Use, 2025
Land Use Acres Percent of Total
Agriculture 366 17.5%
Commercial 71 3.4%
Governmental 102 4.9%
Industrial 372 17.9%
Open Lands 57 2.7%
Outdoor Recreation 62 3.0%
Residential 319 15.3%
Transportation 226 10.9%
Utility 3 0.1%
Water 159 7.6%
Woodlands 348 16.7%
Total 2,085 100.0%
Source: NCWRPC
4 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Development Trends
Land Supply
The Village has great potential to expand in the future if adjacent land owners wish to annex their
properties into the Village. Unlike most municipalities in the nearby Wausau metropolitan area, Marathon
City is not bounded by any other incorporated municipalities. The towns adjacent to the Village each have
their own unique identity, but the amenities of the Village may draw other nearby landowners to join.
There are also opportunities for new development within the Village itself. Recently annexed lands, mostly
along the north side of Marathon City, present great opportunities for new development and growth. The
Future Land Use map presents a rough ideal of how the Village should develop these lands. Additionally,
several commercial and residential buildings within the Village are vacant or in need of revitalization, and
could be ideal locations for redevelopment.
Land Demand
Based on the population projections discussed in Chapter 1, Table 2 2 summarizes the projected land
demand based on the current acres of each land use per person:
Wisconsin DOA Projections project a declining demand for land within the Village over the next several
decades. The County’s projected need for an additional 6,336 housing units by 2040, decreasing household
sizes, and the Village’s status as one of the most suitable and desirable locations within the County for
residential development, make the DOA’s projected decrease in demand for land within the City unlikely.
NCWRPC Projections project slightly lower decreases in demand for land than the DOA projections.
Given that there is a significant projected need for housing in Marathon County by 2040, and the suitability
and desirability of the Village for future development, future land demands are likely to be closer to the
NCWRPC projections than the DOA projections .
Though the DOA’s population projections are considered the official state projections, the Village being
able to provide water and sewer infrastructure and the high quality of the Marathon School District means
that land demand for future development will likely exceed the DOA projections. Therefore, the
NCWRPC projections predict an alternative scenario that could result from these factors.
5 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Table 22: Land Use Demand in Acres
Projection Category 2020-2030 2030-2040 2040-2050
WI DOA Projected new residents -92 -94 -110
Residential (0.22 acres/person) -21 -21 -25
Commercial (0.05 acres/person) -5 -5 -5
Industrial (0.26 acres/person) -24 -25 -29
Total -49 -50 -59
NCWRPC Projected new residents -27 -27 -26
Residential (0.22 acres/person) -6 -6 -6
Commercial (0.05 acres/person) -1 -1 -1
Industrial (0.26 acres/person) -7 -7 -7
Total -14 -14 -14
Source: Wisconsin DO A & NC WRPC
As previously mentioned, there is a projected need for an additional 6,336 housing units in Marathon
County by 2040. With a strong school district and the provision of sewer and water infrastructure, the
Village of Marathon City is well suited to fill projected housing demands within Marathon County .
Additionally, shrinking household sizes means that demand for housing can continue even if there is not a
population increase, since more housing units are needed to house the same number of people when
household sizes decrease. Therefore, it is more likely that the re will be demand for land within the Village
in the future despite projected decreases in population.
Residential
Residential demand is measured by examining population projections from the Wisconsin DOA and the
NCWRPC. Population projections range from a DOA projected decrease of 296 residents between 2020
and 2050 and an NCWRPC projected decrease of 80 residents between 2020 and 2050. While Table 2 2
shows projected decreases in residential land demand within the Village over the next several decades,
factors such as decreasing household sizes, a significant projected need for housing throughout Marathon
County, and the Village’s appeal for development opportunities make it more likely that demand for future
residential development will be in contrast to these projections.
Commercial and Industrial
Commercial and industrial development is subject to market forces and difficult to predict. Based on the
DOA & NCWRPC projections, there is a projected decrease in demand for both commercial and
industrial development for each decade between 2020 and 2050. Should economic development efforts
reverse these projected decreases in demand by DOA, then more land may be needed for these types of
development.
6 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Land Values
Table 23 displays the assessed land values in the Village of Marathon City. It is important to note that
tax exempt lands are not included in values for Table 2 2. Overall, land value per acre in the Village is
valued at about $172,851 per acre based on assessed land values from tax information submitted to the
Department of Revenue. Residential properties have the highest value per acre, followed by those
properties designated as Manufacturing and Commercial.
Table 23: Assessed Land Value (per acre), 2025
Land Classification Total Value of Land
and Improvements Average Value per Acre
Residential $144,033,500 $809,177
Commercial $37,474,200 $123,677
Manufacturing $73,565,400 $275,526
Agriculture $95,800 $297
Undeveloped $195,600 $776
Forest $405,700 $3,559
Agricultural Forest $74,600 $1,913
Other $838,700 $93,189
Total $256,683,500 $172,851
Source: WI Department of Revenue
Managed Forest Law & Public Lands
The Managed Forest Law (MFL) was established in Wisconsin to encourage better forest management
and provide tax relief to the woodland owners. Currently, there are no lands within the Village enrolled
in the MFL program. According to the most recent statement of assessment submitted to the DOR there
are over 226 acres of public lands within the Village.
Future Land Use Map
The Village of Marathon City Future Land Use Map represents the anticipated future pattern of land
uses. The map includes distinct land use categories to guide where new residential and non- residential
development should be encouraged to located or where development should be discouraged. See the
Land Use Descriptions for a general overview of each land use category on the map.
The Future Land Use Map is not a zoning map. The Future Land Use Map is general in nature and was
developed as a general guide for future development in the Village . Although general, the future land use
plan map indicated appropriate future land uses, and as a result shows where rezoning may occur. In many
areas the existing zoning districts already reflect the desired future land uses; while in other areas, zoning
map or text changes may be required to meet some of the desired future land uses.
7 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
The identification of desired future land use types through the map does not imply that an area is
immediately appropriate for rezoning. Given service demands and a desire for controlled growth, careful
consideration to the timing of zoning decisions is es sential. In some places, it may be desirable to rezone
land to reflect the planned land use designations as soon as possible. In other cases, it may be appropriate
to wait to rezone the area until an actual development proposal is brought forward.
Future land use planning assists local governments with balancing individual property rights and community
goals, minimizing conflict between different land uses, and maximizing use of public expenditures. It is
essential that future land use planning is ongoing and flexible. Periodic plan updates ensure that the plan
continues to reflect future community preferences.
Village Plan Commission members participated in a mapping exercise with NCWRPC staff to identify the
desired future land uses by using eleven common Land Use Map Classifications, as described below. Village
Plan Commission members used their broad knowledge of the Village to draw shapes on a map
representing the different land uses. The goal was to produce a generalized land use plan map (future land
use) to guide the Village 's growth.
The map includes eight land use categories to guide where new residential and non- residential
development should be encouraged to locate or where development should be discouraged. Descriptions
of each land use category are provided below.
8 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map Classifications
Agriculture
Areas recommended to be preserved for the purpose of general crop farming or the raising of
livestock. The following zoning districts are considered to be compatible with the intent of this land
use district: (A) Agricultural.
Commercial
Areas recommended for commercial and retail developments. The following zoning districts are
considered to be compatible with the intent of this land use district: ( C-1) General Commercial and
(C-2) Downtown Commercial.
Governmental
Areas recommended for government buildings, libraries, school, churches, etc. The following zoning
districts are considered to be compatible with the intent of this land use district: (CF) Community
Facilities and Institutions.
Industrial
Areas recommended for industrial developments. The following zoning districts are considered to be
compatible with the intent of this land use district: (I-1) Commercial/Light Industrial and (I-2) Industrial.
High Density Residential
Areas recommended for high density residential development, typically consis ting of smaller lot sizes
and consisting of single -family houses , two -family homes, and multi -family housing . The following
zoning districts are considered to be compatible with the intent of this land use district: ( R-1S) Single
Family Residential – Small Lots, (R-2) Single and Two -Family Residential, and (R-3) Multifamily
Residential.
Low Density Residential
Areas identified for low residential density, often featuring larger lot sizes and/or lots located in a more
rural setting. The following zoning districts are considered to be compatible with the intent of this
land use district: (R-1L) Single Family Residential – Large Lots and (R-4) Rural Residential.
Conservation and Recreation
Areas recommended for parks, sport fields, and other outdoor recreation spaces. The following zoning
districts are considered to be compatible with the intent of this land use district: (CR) Conservancy
and Recreation
Water
Areas with surface water features that preclude development . The following zoning districts are
considered to be compatible with the intent of this land use district: Water
9 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
2025 Wisconsin Act 173
Wisconsin Act 173 became law in 2026, and it requires comprehensive plans to project residential land
demand in five -year increments and list the minimum and maximum densities for areas mapped for
residential use in a municipality’s future land use map. Ar eas that are owned by local, state, and federal
government, as well as areas within the 100 -year floodplain or wetlands, are excluded from density
calculations. For the Village of Marathon City , the densities permitted are described below. Additionally,
Figure 9 provides a table showing residential uses allowed via permitted use and conditional use within
the Village of Marathon City.
High Density Residential: (R -1S) Single Family Residential – Small Lot, (R -2) Single - and Two -Family
Residential, and (R -3) Multifamily Residential are to be used for this land category. Locations mapped as
High Density Residential have a maximum density of 7.98 dwelling units per acre (R -1S), 3.11 dwelling
units per acre (R-2), and 15.56 dwelling units per acre (R -3). See sections 13.5.5, 13.5.7, and 13.5.8 of the
Village’s Zoning Ordinance for permitted densities for this land use and zoning districts.
Low Density Residential: (R -1L) Single Family Residential – Large Lots and (R -4) Rural Residential are to
be used for this land category. Locations mapped as Low Density Residential have a maximum density of
1 unit per acre (R-1L) and 0.17 units per acre (R-4). See sections 13.5.6 and 13.5.9 of the Village’s Zoning
Ordinance for permitted densities for this land use and zoning districts .
Agriculture : (A) Agriculture is to be used for this category. Single -Family detached dwellings are allowed
as a permitted use within this zoning district and land category, while mobile home parks are allowed via
a conditional use permit. Locations mapped as Ag riculture have a maximum density of 0.17 dwelling units
per acre. See section 13.5.14 for permitted densities for this land use and zoning district.
Commercial: (C-1) General Commercial and (C- 2) Downtown Commercial are to be used for this land
category. Single-Family Attached Dwellings (<5 units on a lot ), Multifamily Dwellings (<5 units on a lot) ,
Multifamily Dwellings (>4 units on a lot), and Zero Lot Line uses are allowed as a conditional use within
the C-2 zoning district. Community Living Arrangements serving nine to 15 persons and 16 or more
persons are allowed as a conditional use within the C -1 zoning district. Locations mapped as Commercial
allow for a maximum density of 4.36 dwelling units per acre (C -1) and 15.56 dwelling units per acre (C-
2). See sections 13.5. 10 and 13.5.11 for permitted densities for this land use and zoning districts.
Note that this does not mean that this comprehensive plan automatically re -zones areas in each land use
category as the zoning district listed for each land use category. Rather, a rezoning and/or comprehensive
plan amendment in the future should ensure that the zoning district and future land use category are
consistent with each other. Table 22 lists the land demand in acres based on population projections from
DOA and NCWPRC. Because these projections are only available in ten -year increments, and Act 17 3
requires five- year increments, the five -year demand is calculated by dividing each decade in two as
indicated in Table 24 . Note that the DOA projection reflects the “low” range of acreage demand and
the NCWRPC projection reflects the “high” range of demand, with actual demand likely falling somewhere
between the two.
10 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Figure 9: Allowable Residential Uses
Source: Village of Marathon City Zoning Ordinance (Updated Dec 2, 2024)
Table 24: Act 173 Residential Demand Projections
Projection and Residential
Land Use
2025-
2030
2030-
2035
2035-
2040
2040-
2045
2045-
2050
Total
2025-
2050
DOA Projected Land Demand -10 -11 -11 -12 -12 -56
NCWRPC Projected Land Demand -3 -3 -3 -3 -3 -15
Source: DOA & NCWRPC
11 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Programs and Tools
The principal land use program in Wisconsin is the comprehensive planning program, while the primary
land use tools are zoning, subdivision ordinance, and official mapping.
Comprehensive Planning Programming
Wisconsin’s comprehensive planning law was established in state statutes in 1999. The comprehensive
plan is intended to be a local government's guide to community physical, social, and economic
development. Comprehensive plans are not meant to serve as la nd use regulations in themselves; instead,
they provide a rational basis for local land use decisions with a twenty -year vision for future planning and
community decisions.
The Wisconsin Comprehensive Planning Law does not mandate how a local community should grow, but
it requires public participation at the local level in deciding a vision for the community's future. The
uniqueness of individual comprehensive plans reflects community -specific and locally driven planning
processes.
While a local government may choose to include additional elements, a comprehensive plan must include
at least all of the nine elements below as defined by the Comprehensive Planning Law (s. 66.1001).
• Issues and Opportunities (Demographics)
• Agricultural, Natural and Cultural Resources
• Housing
• Utilities and Community Facilities
• Transportation
• Economic Development
• Land Use
• Intergovernmental Cooperation
• Implementation
Zoning
Zoning is the major implementation tool to achieve proposed land uses. The Village of Marathon City
enforces its own zoning ordinance. Under the ordinance, zoning regulations are applied to zoning districts
to regulate land use and development. The Village has five residential, two commercial, two industrial, and
four special districts under the current zoning code. The zoning map identifies the locations where each
district is sited.
Basically, zoning is a set of regulations used to minimize land use conflicts and promote development that
supports a community’s values. It regulates how property is used and how development occurs as well
as the physical placement of buildings on land. Under Wisconsin Statutes, counties and local units of
government are authorized to adopt zoning ordinances.
12 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
A zoning ordinance consists of a written text and a map. The text of a zoning ordinance specifies the
permitted land uses, the size of buildings, yard/lot dimensions, and other prerequisites in obtaining
permission to develop, while the zoning map arranges the community into districts or zones, such as
agriculture, residential, commercial, or industrial. Each of these districts has different regulations. The goal
of the zoning ordinance is to establish a reasonable development pattern by keeping similar and related
uses together and separating dissimilar, unrelated, incompatible uses, particularly in relationship to
transportation facilities, utilities and public services and facilities.
Consistency between Land Use and Zoning
Land use and zoning designations are related, but not necessarily identical. Land use categories tend to be
fairly general whereas zoning districts regulate specific land uses and development requirements. Because
the land use categories are general it is common for more than one zoning district to correspond to each
land use category. It is also possible that some zoning districts might be consistent with more than one
land use designation.
Achieving consistency between land use and zoning is required by State Statutes. This generally occurs
when a community is considering a proposed zoning change. The decision to approve a zoning change
must be based on the adopted comprehensive plan, and specifically, the future land use map. Generally, if
the requested zoning is consistent with the land use designation on the property it should be approved,
unless unique circumstances indicated the rezoning would negatively impact surrounding properties or
the community. If a rezoning request is not consistent with the land use designation, the community
should consider denying the rezoning request.
In situations where a rezoning request is not consistent with the land use designation - but the community
believes the requested zoning is appropriate in the specific location and would benefit the community -
the zoning change can be approved, however, the land use map should be amended accordingly to establish
land use and zoning consistency. The process for amending the land use map is discussed in greater detail
in the Implementation Chapter .
Shoreland Zoning
All counties, including Marathon County, are mandated by Wisconsin law to adopt and administer a zoning
ordinance that regulates development in shoreland and floodplain areas for the entire county outside of
villages and cities in accordance with state sho reland zoning standards. Municipalities may apply their own
zoning in shoreland areas as long as it does not impose requirements regulated by a county.
Land Division
The Village of Marathon City has their own Subdivision Ordinance. Subdivision regulation relates to the
way in which land is divided and made ready for development. A community can control the subdivision
of land by requiring a developer to meet certain conditions in exchange for the privilege of recording a
plat. While imposing conditions restricting the use of private property, the cumulative effect of land
13 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
subdivision on the health, safety, and welfare of a community is so great as to justify public control of the
process.
There is some overlap between zoning and subdivision codes in terms of standards. Both ordinances, for
example, can set lot sizes. Both can deal with the suitability of land for development. Implementing
important plan techniques such as rural cluster deve lopment often requires use of the zoning ordinance
and the subdivision ordinance.
A local land division code can provide the Village the means to review and regulate new divisions of land
to ensure consistency with the vision, goals, objectives, land protection criteria, and other
recommendations of an adopted plan. The ordinance would require administration and enforcement by
the Village. Therefore, local control of divisions of land would require Village oversight. It also adds a layer
of government involved in regulating proposals for land divisions.
Official Mapping
An Official Map is a map adopted by a municipality that specifies locations of future roads and other
utilities or public facilities, along with right -of-way widths and other specifications. When a land division
is approved, it must accommodate dimensions for future facilities according to the Official Map. Currently,
the Village of Marathon City does not have an official map.
Other Tools
Additional tools and approaches can be utilized by the Village to achieve the goals of the plan. These
include but are certainly not limited to the following: fee simple land acquisition, easements (purchased
or volunteered), deed restrictions, land dedication, and ordinances or programs regulating activities such
as impact fees, land division, building permits, and erosion control.
Land Use Issues
• Limited Land Ы Limited land supply for new housing in the Village appears to be one fac tor in
out-migration of residents to the countryside where larger lots are available for building.
• Site Planning Ы The development of a general site plan for recently annexed lands will assist the
Village in maintaining a desired growth pattern and maximizing the available lands.
14 DRAFT Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Goals, Objectives & Policies
Land Use Goal: The Village of Marathon City makes sound land use decisions to balance the
diverse needs of the community and to wisely maximize the land’s potential.
1. Provide tools for managing and coordinating growth and development.
a. Explore the creation and adoption of an official map to site the locations of future
infrastructure.
b. Maintain clear and open communication with neighboring Towns to discuss potential
annexations.
2. Preserve Marathon CityЯ s downtown as the center of the community.
a. Develop a long-term downtown development plan.
b. Enhance the streetscape of the downtown to identify it as a unique shopping location.
c. Concentrate manufacturing businesses in the Business and Industrial Park and encourage
businesses aimed at the local community to locate downtown.
Map 7Village of Marathon City Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use
210 McClellan St., Suite 210, Wausau, WI 54403
715-849-5510 - staff@ncwrpc.org - www.ncwrpc.org
North Central
Wisconsin Regional
Planning Commission
Prepared By:
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey
and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is
a compilation of records, information and data used for
reference purposes only. NCWRPC is not responsible for
any inaccuracies herein contained.
Source: WisDOT, WI DNR, NCWRPC, Marathon Co
²
DRAFT
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
Minor Civil Division
State Highways
County Highways
Local Roads
Private Roads
On-Off Ramps
Parcels
Future Land Use
Agriculture
Commercial
Governmental
Industrial
High Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Conservation and Recreation
Water
2nd Street
Weisenberger Road
Pheasant Lane
Spruce Street
4th Street
8th Street
Blue Stone Lane
Schoolhouse Lane
152nd Avenue
Westview D
rive
South Road
3rd Street
10th Street
H
eindl Lane
North Street
6th Street
5th Street
1st Street
Washington Street
Hemlock Street
Pine Street
Oak Street
Market Street
Chestnut StreetEast Street
Hickory Street
Main Street
Town Road
RiverRoad
Cattail Avenue
Krautkram er Road
Sonnentag Road
SpringValleyCourt
N
orth
152nd
Avenue
9th Street
154th Avenue
Maratech Avenue
Otter Falls Trail
Thornapple St r eet
Windy Lane
North Ridge Road
N
orth
128th
Avenue
N
orth
136th
Avenue
CoralFallsRoad
SonnentagLane
Creekside
Road
Perth
Road
Burlwood Road
Marathon Road
Soda Creek Road
Night Owl Lane
Scotch Creek Road
East 4th Street
Purple Martin Lane
Charley Road
H ighland Drive
Firecrown Lane
H
azelGrouse
Lane
Maple Leaf Road
N orth Business Parkway
W
alnut Street
"ÿB
"·107
"·107
"·29
³±NN
³±NN
S c otchCreek
Big Rib River
Big Rib River
Town of Stettin
Town of Marathon
Town of Cassel Town of Rib Falls
Town of StettinTown of Rib Falls
Town of Cassel Town of Marathon
Source: City of Marathon City website. First collected Oct 17, 2026.