Joint Village-Utility Packet 07.20.2026
City of Marathon City · Marathon County · meeting of Jul 20, 2026 · Agenda packets
Open the original document More from City of Marathon City
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
Kurt Handrick, Jr.
Village President
Andrew Berens.
Utility Commission Chair
Cassie Lang
Village Clerk / Deputy Treasurer
311 Walnut Street
P .O. Box 487
Marathon City, WI 54448
Tel: 715-443-2221
www.marathoncitywi.gov
JOINT VILLAGE BOARD/UTILITY
COMMISSION
OFFICIAL NOTICE & AGENDA
Monday, July 20, 2026 - 4:00 pm
Marathon Municipal Center
PUBLIC VIRTUAL ACCESS
Join Teams Meeting: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 228 799 277 309 664
Passcode: ic7sA6FH
1. CALL TO ORDER
VILLAGE ROLL CALL: K. HANDRICK JR., M. AHRENS, J. LAWRENCE, K. PAUL, B.
PARLIER, A. CABRERA, K. SORENSON
UTILITY ROLL CALL: A. BERENS, B. BOHR, M. TELFORD, D. SEILER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. RECOGNITION OF VISITORS
a. Virtual Meeting Guidelines
i. This meeting will be recorded and available upon request
b. Public Participation at Government Meetings
4. PSC WATER RATE STUDY PRESENTATION WITH EHLERS FINANCIAL
5. SCHEDULED MEETINGS
a. Regular Utility Commission Meeting: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 – 4:00 pm
b. Regular Village Board Meeting: Wednesday, August 5, 2026 – 6:00 pm
c. Special Meetings as Needed
6. ADJOURNMENT
Village of Marathon City, WI
2026 Water Rate Study
Phase 2: PSC CRC Application & Updated LRCFA
July 20th, 2026 Joint Utility and Village Board Meeting
2
Why are we here?
Phase 1 presented May 27th, 2026: Conventional Rate Case necessary to address catch-up
increase prior to additional Well related project costs being taken into consideration.
Proceeding with a rate case now with ease the burden on residents as it will allow for more
incremental increases.
May 27th, 2026: Phase 2 was approved and since then Ehlers completed PSC CRC Application
with assistance from Village staff. Original increase estimated at 38.02%.
Tonight: Ehlers to present initial results of application and seek consensus to file application as
presented, or with any discussed changes.
3
Water Rate Application Initial Results
• Current Benchmark
ROR is 6.4%
• Final projected rate
increase is 27.34%
4
Water LRCFA w/ PSC Application
5
Water Impact on Avg. Res. Bill
6
• Sorted by 12 kgal consumption column
• PFP not included
Water Rate Comparison – By County
7
• Chart on the right shows all
completed rate cases in the
state between 12/1/25 and
3/1/26
• Ehlers is planning to file a
total of 20 rate cases by
July 31
• Last Village CRC was 27%
Are other Utilities doing this?
8
Rate Structure Changes: Public Fire Protection
• CRC allows for tariff changes, and one common change is
converting PFP from levy charge to water bill
• Currently charge is a municipal charge of 73,230 and a direct
charge of approximately 73,230 (collect more revenue due to rate
assessment change)
• Due to levy limits GF Expenditures > GF Revenues
There is a solution to reduce GF Expenditures
By moving the remainder of PFP to water bill it eliminates GF expenditure line item
and free up about 73k to GF budget
Must change as a part of or within five years of a Conventional Rate Case
• During the CRC process the PSC will conduct a Cost-of-Service Study which
will divide the overall increase into the different revenue categories
• The Public Fire Protection Fee will likely be increased during the COS Study
and may increase by as much, more or less than the anticipated overall
increase.
• Do have option to change charge methodology
Currently charge based on assessment
Could change to meter size or other
9
PFP cost (146,460) could increase during a CRC
Equivalent Meter EM 339 89.4%
Equivalent Service ES 16 4.2%
Square Footage of Improvemen SQ 3 0.8%
Alternate Method (unique) ALT 4 1.1%
Valuation PV 16 4.2%
Uknown UNK 1 0.3%
Count by Direct Charge (in whole or in part) Type
10* 5/8” or ¾” meter using 12,000 gallons/quarter
PFP Conversion Impact to Sample RES Water Bills (Assessment)
• PFP Notice
only shows
water bill
change
and
not total cost
of water
change
• Assumes PFP
conversion to
direct charge
assessment
method.
• 5/8” or ¾” meter PSC assumes 12,000 Gallons/quarter as average residential usage.
• ^Levy PFP based on PFP Mill Rate applied to approx. $275,000 Residential Property
11
Final PFP Conversion Estimated Impact
• For residential customers the difference between what they were paying
($97.99+$118.72 = $216.71) and what their future estimate is ($138.21), is a $78.50
annual savings based on current values.
• Subject to changes for PFP costs reviewed during CRC
12* 5/8” or ¾” meter using 12,000 gallons/quarter
PFP Impact to Sample Resident Water Bills
• PFP Notice
only shows
water bill
change
and
not total cost
of water
change
• Assumes PFP
conversion to
direct charge
assessment
method.
• 5/8” or ¾” meter PSC assumes 12,000 Gallons/quarter as average residential usage.
• ^Levy PFP based on PFP Mill Rate applied to approx. $275,000 Residential Property
13
Other Considerations (Monthly Billing)
• The CRC process is an opportunity to make other changes. One change
discussed is a change from a quarterly to monthly billing frequency
Con: Increase to administrative burden
Pro: Easier for residents to budget
• File CRC Application for Test Year 2026
• PSC CRC Rate Proceedings Estimated Timeline from Application Filing
Audit: 2-3 months
Public Hearing: 4-5 months
Implementation: 6 months
Subject to PSC timing
• Customer Communication
Best practice to notify customers of requested rate increase at time of filing PSC
application (only statutory requirement is once public hearing is scheduled)
Upon PSC’s acceptance of application, Ehlers will send suggested language
14
Recommendations
TONIGHT’s ACTION: Approval to file PSC CRC application.
15
Questions?
16
Important Disclosures
Ehlers is the joint marketing name of the following affiliated businesses (collectively, the “Affiliates”): Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
(“EA”), a municipal advisor registered with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) and the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”); Ehlers Investment Partners, LLC (“EIP”), an SEC registered investment adviser; and Bond Trust
Services Corporation (“BTS”), a holder of a limited banking charter issued by the State of Minnesota.
Where an activity requires registration as a municipal advisor pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act of 1934 (Financial
Management Planning and Debt Issuance & Management), such activity is or will be performed by EA; where an activity
requires registration as an investment adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Investments and Treasury
Management), such activity is or will be performed by EIP; and where an activity requires licensing as a bank pursuant to
applicable state law (paying agent services shown under Debt Issuance & Management), such activity is or will be performed
by BTS. Activities not requiring registration may be performed by any Affiliate.
This communication does not constitute an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any investment (including without
limitation, any municipal financial product, municipal security, or other security) or agreement with respect to any investment
strategy or program. This communication is offered without charge to clients, friends, and prospective clients of the Affiliates
as a source of general information about the services Ehlers provides. This communication is neither advice nor a
recommendation by any Affiliate to any person with respect to any municipal financial product, municipal security, or other
security, as such terms are defined pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act of 1934 and rules of the MSRB. This
communication does not constitute investment advice by any Affiliate that purports to meet the objectives or needs of any
person pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or applicable state law.
Source: City of Marathon City website. First collected Oct 17, 2026.