Joint Village-School Minutes 07.15.2026
City of Marathon City · Marathon County · meeting of Jul 15, 2026 · Minutes
Open the original document More from City of Marathon City
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
JOINT WITH MARATHON SCHOOL DISTRICT
MINUTES
Wednesday, July 15, 2026
1) CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 pm
2) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3) Roll Call (Village): K. HANDRICK - Present, M. AHRENS - Present, K. SORENSON –
Present (6:04pm), K. PAUL - Present, B. PARLIER - Present, J. LAWRENCE - Absent, A.
CABRERA – Absent
Marathon School Board did their Roll Call First and is recorded on their Official Meeting
Minutes.
4) Written notice of this meeting has been posted and sent to the news media on
Thursday, July 9th, 2026.
5) Review District enrollment trends – School Administrator
School District Administrator Woyak presented current and projected student enrollment trends
to members of the Village Board and Marathon School Board. She reported that district
enrollment is beginning to level off and decline slightly after several years of significant growth.
Administrator Woyak described this as a "population bubble" currently moving through the high
school, which is expected to be followed by smaller graduating classes and lower enrollment
levels in the coming years unless the district experiences another influx of families moving into
the area.
The School Board and Village Board then discussed the potential for future residential
subdivision development within the Village. Village Administrator Cherek stated that he is
currently working with developers but continues to address the gap between development costs
and the infrastructure investments needed to make residential projects feasible. He indicated
that progress is being made and that he will continue collaborating with both the School District
and Village as development opportunities advance.
Both the School Board and Village Board expressed support for responsible, strategic growth.
Members noted that residential development within the Village could help maintain student
enrollment while serving families who reside within the district boundaries. They also
emphasized the importance of encouraging residential growth within the Village to strengthen
the community and limit urban sprawl whenever possible.
6) Update on Village Tax Increment District – Village Administrator
Village Administrator Cherek provided an overview of the development activity and financial
status of both TID 1 and TID 2.
For TID 1, Administrator Cherek explained that the district was established in 2002 with a
base valuation of $7,361,400 and has grown to a current value of approximately
$50,325,000. He noted that the district reached the end of its expenditure period on January
3, 2023, although approximately $107,414 in previously contracted work remains to be
completed.
Cherek reviewed the TID 1 financial model, explaining that current projections show the district
ending with a deficit if no additional growth occurs. However, he emphasized that the model
does not account for future development opportunities. He noted that one developable lot
remains within the district and that he is actively working to market and develop the property. He
also discussed the Phillips Enterprise Limited and Menzner Hardwoods developments,
highlighting ongoing conversations regarding a potential second phase of the Menzner
Hardwoods project. Cherek stated that, if future development proceeds as anticipated, TID
revenues could accelerate debt repayment and potentially allow the district to close earlier than
currently projected.
For TID 2, Administrator Cherek reported that the district was established in 2016 with a base
valuation of $1,124,000 to promote development within the Village's downtown area. Since its
creation, the district's value has increased by approximately $5,286,000, largely attributable to
the expansion of Marathon Cheese. He noted that the district's expenditure period is scheduled
to end on June 16, 2031.
Cherek also provided an update on the Stittleburg Restorative Health Care development and
reviewed TID 2 financial projections. Based on current assumptions, the district is expected to
generate sufficient revenue to retire all existing debt by 2037. He explained that while there may
be opportunities for future borrowing to support development, the district's ability to take on
additional debt is currently limited as it continues repaying advances from the Village and Utility
general funds, which are projected to continue through 2037.
7) Share information regarding District’s Strategic plan – School Administrator
The School District Administrator informed those present that the School Board is beginning
work on a comprehensive 10-year strategic planning process and encouraged participation from
Village officials and community members. The administrator emphasized the importance of
gathering input from stakeholders to help guide the district's long-term priorities and future
direction.
Village Board members shared that the Village is also currently developing and updating its
Comprehensive Plan, a long-term strategic plan focused on future growth and community
development. The Village encouraged participation from School Board members, residents, and
other stakeholders to ensure that planning efforts reflect community needs and priorities.
Both boards recognized the value of collaboration and public engagement as they undertake
their respective long-range planning initiatives and discussed the benefits of coordinating efforts
where possible
8) Discussion of current and future projects
8.1 Collaborative projects
8.2 Village projects, planning and timelines
8.3 District projects, planning and possible timelines
Village Administrator Cherek reviewed the Parks Department budget and compared it to the
School District's softball field use license agreement. He explained that expenditures for the
County Materials Sports Complex are currently running above his original projections. However,
Steven Cherek
Village Administrator / Treasurer
given that this is the facility's first full year of operation, he indicated that the 2026 budget
remains generally within the range of what was anticipated.
Administrator Cherek noted that several expenses incurred this year were one-time or
unexpected costs associated with opening and establishing a new park facility. As a result, he
expects some expenditure categories to decrease in future years as operations stabilize.
Based on his review of the budget and ongoing maintenance needs, Cherek stated that the
School District and other user groups can expect an increase of approximately 9% in their use
agreement fees next year. He explained that the proposed adjustment also includes setting
aside $2,000 annually for future capital equipment purchases and replacement needs related to
the maintenance and upkeep of the ball fields, helping to ensure the long-term sustainability of
the facility. He also said this will be an item of discussion at the next Village Board Meeting as
they set the 2027 Village Park Budget.
Administrator Cherek and District Administrator Woyak outlined other future projects that could
present opportunities for collaboration between the Village and the School District. These
included potential construction of a storage shed at the County Materials Sports Complex by
School Students and the installation of flashing pedestrian crosswalk signs along designated
Safe Routes to School, particularly at locations currently staffed by crossing guards.
Both boards acknowledged the value of continued cooperation on projects that enhance
community amenities, improve public safety, and support students and families within the
Village.
9) ADJOURNMENT : 7:26pm
Village motion made by Parlier second by Ahrens. Motion passed by voice vote.
Source: City of Marathon City website. First collected Oct 17, 2026.