Public Works & Utility Committee Meeting Packet 10/12/2026, at 4:30 p.m.

Village of Weston, Wisconsin MEETING NOTICE Meeting: PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY COMMITTEE Members: Zeyghami {C}, Lopes-Serrao {VC}, Hubbard, Jordan, and Mumper Ex-Officio: Gebert, Jami Date/Time: Monday, October 12, 2026 , at 4:30 p.m. Location: Weston Municipal Center, 4747 Camp Phillips Rd, Weston, WI 54476 Agenda: The agenda packet will be sent out 3 days prior to the meeting. Attendance: Committee members, Department Directors, and other guests, please indicate if you will, or will not, be attending so we may determine in advance if there will be a quorum with an RSVP to the Staff Advisor(s): RSVP: Michael Wodalski mwodalski@westonwi.gov (715) 359-6114 This notice was posted at the Municipal Center and was e-mailed to local media outlets (Print, TV, and Radio) on 10/05/2026. A quorum of members from other Village governmental bodies (boards, commissions, and committees) may attend the above- noticed meeting in order to gather information. No actions will be taken by any other board, commission, or committee of the Village, aside from the Village Public Works & Utility Committee. Should a quorum of other government bodies be present, this would constitute a meeting pursuant to State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis.2d 553,494 N.W.2d 408 (1993). Wisconsin State Statutes require all agendas for Committee, Commission, or Board meetings be posted in final form, 24 hours prior to the meeting. Any posted agenda is subject to change up until 24 hours prior to the date and time of the meeting. All final agendas will be posted on the Village’s website at www.westonwi.gov and a hard copy posted at the Village Municipal Center. Any person who has a qualifying disability, as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act, that requires the meeting or the materials to be in an accessible location or format, must contact the Weston Clerk’s Department, by 12 noon, the Friday prior to the meeting, so any necessary arrangements can be made to accommodate each request. VILLAGE OF WESTON, MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN OFFICIAL MEETING AGENDA OF THE PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY COMMITTEE Public Works & Utility Meeting – Agenda 10/12/26 Prepared by: Michael Wodalski, Public Works Director The following items were listed on the agenda in the Village Clerk’s Office, in accordance with Chapter 2 of the Village’s Municipal Code and will be ready for your consideration at the next regular meeting of the Public Works Committee which has been scheduled for MONDAY, October 12, 2026, @ 4:30 P.M., in the Board Room, at the Weston Municipal Center 4747 Camp Phillips Rd. Wisconsin State Statutes require all agendas for Committee, Commission, or Board meetings be posted in final form, 24 hours prior to the meeting. Any posted agenda is subject to change up until 24 hours prior to the date and time of the meeting. Join Zoom Meeting by Computer Join Meeting by Phone: https://zoom.us/j/5445915099 +1 312 626 6799 Meeting ID: 544 591 5099 AGENDA ITEMS 1. Meeting called to order by Public Works & Utility Committee Chair Zeyghami 2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag 3. Welcome, introductions and acknowledgement of guests. 4. Roll Call by Recording Secretary - Public Works Committee: Hooshang Zeyghami {C}, Luis Lopes-Serrao {VC}, Tom Hubbard, Roy Mumper, Joe Jordan 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS MINUTES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6. Approval of 9/14/26 Public Works & Utility Committee Minutes 7. Acknowledge September 2026 Water and Sewer Permits STAFF REPORTS 8. CIP Update 9. Street Operations Update 10. Utility Operations Update POLICY DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11. Business 51 Reconstruction – Neupert Ave Pedestrian Crossing A quorum of members from other Village governmental bodies (boards, commissions, and committees) might attend the above-noticed meeting to gather information. Should a quorum of other government bodies be present at this meeting it would constitute a meeting pursuant to State ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis.2d 553,494 N.W.2d 408 (1993). No official actions other than those of the Public Works Committee shall take place. VILLAGE OF WESTON, MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN OFFICIAL MEETING AGENDA OF THE PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY COMMITTEE Public Works & Utility Meeting – Agenda 10/12/26 Prepared by: Michael Wodalski, Public Works Director 12. Proclamation recognizing Crash Responders Safety Week from November 2-6, 2026 13. 2027 Sanitary Sewer Rate Options 14. Sanitary Sewer I & I Study Results 15. Potential Utility Easement from Executive Ct to Kramer Ln 16. Engineering Design Contract for Volkman St (Bus 51 to McIntyre) 17. BUS 51 Storm Pond Construction Services Contract 18. Draft 2027 Street Maintenance Plan FUTURE ITEMS 19. Next meeting date(s): a) Monday, November 9, 2026 @ 4:30 p.m. Regular Meeting b) Monday, December 14, 2026 @ 4:30 p.m. Regular Meeting 20. Topics for future meetings a) Watermain Replacement 21. Remarks from Staff a) Wednesday, October 14, 2026 @ 5:30 p.m. Ross Ave (River Bend to Pauls) Public Information Meeting b) Wednesday, October 21, 2026 @ 4:00 p.m Pints, Plows, & Smart Salting Policies Event 22. Remarks from Committee members. 23. Announcements. ADJOURNMENT VILLAGE OF WESTON, MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN OFFICIAL MEETING AGENDA OF THE PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITY COMMITTEE HELD ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 @ 4:30 PM, IN THE BOARD ROOM AT 4747 CAMP PHILLIPS ROAD Public Works & Utility Meeting – Meeting Minutes 9/14/2026 Prepared by: Stacy Gilmeister, Utility Clerk AGENDA ITEMS 1. Meeting called to order by Public Works & Utility Committee Chair Zeyghami at 4:30 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag 3. Welcome, introductions and acknowledgement of guests. 4. Roll Call by Recording Secretary Member Present Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES - ARRIVED AT 4:40 PM Hubbard, Tom EXCUSED Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES Village Staff in attendance, in-person: Swenson, Wodalski, Blarek, Dolan, Gebert, and Gilmeister. Audience in attendance, via Zoom: Trustee Beck Audience members present in person: None 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 6. Approval of 8/10/26 Public Works & Utility Committee Minutes Motion by Jordan, second by Mumper move to approve August 10, 2026, meeting minutes. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES Public Works & Utility Meeting – Meeting Minutes 9/14/26 Prepared by: Stacy Gilmeister, Utility Clerk 7. Acknowledge August 2026 Water and Sewer Permits Motion by Jordan, second by Mumper, move to acknowledge August 2026 Water and Sewer Permits. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES STAFF REPORTS 8. CIP Update Wodalski explained his report to the Committee. Discussed the differences in project costs among municipalities. Wodalski explained how cross-training staff contributes to cost savings. 9. Street Operations Update Blarek explained his report to the Committee. Discussed the overlay process and longevity. Discussed 2026 fuel budget and usage. 10. Utility Operations Update Swenson explained his report to the Committee. Discussed the process of valve replacement and repairs. Swenson stated flushing is complete. POLICY DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11. Business 51 Reconstruction – Neupert Ave Pedestrian Crossing Dolan explained the response to the Neupert Ave pedestrian crossing inquiry. Dolan is awaiting a follow-up response from the DOT for clarification of the project. Public Works & Utility Meeting – Meeting Minutes 9/14/26 Prepared by: Stacy Gilmeister, Utility Clerk Doland will follow up with the DOT Project Manager and regional traffic engineer for more insight into this project. Motion by Jordan, second by Lopes-Serrao move to have the staff continue to move forward for the traffic crossing knowing that there will be some collateral cost to the Village. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 12. Wausau Tile Sanitary Sewer Easement Wodalski explained the easement plan from Riverside Land Surveying LLC. Motion by Jordan, second by Mumper move to recommend the Village Board vacate the existing water and sanitary sewer easements within the Wausau Tile Property. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 13. Ferge Ave Project Typical Section Discussion Dolan explained the street reconstruction project options. Motion by Mumper, second by Jordan move to Recommend Staff proceed with preferred Alternative A for Delonay Ave, Alternative B for Ferge St, and Alternative D for Post Ave on the Road Typical Section for 2027 Capital Improvement Project. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Public Works & Utility Meeting – Meeting Minutes 9/14/26 Prepared by: Stacy Gilmeister, Utility Clerk Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 14. Howland Ave Project Typical Section Discussion Dolan explained the alternative multiuse path versus pedestrian path. Discussed the street reconstruction of Howland Ave east and west of Camp Phillips Rd. Motion by Jordan, second by Mumper move to Recommend Staff proceed with preferred Alternative 2 for the west side of Camp Phillips Road for Howland Ave with the change of the multiuse path to 10 feet rather than 8 feet. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES Motion by Lopes-Serrao, second by Jordan move to Recommend Staff include sidewalk on the east side on Howland Ave, east of Hwy X running from the YMCA to Heritage Hills Dr. on the north side. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 15. Gravel Road Maintenance Discussion Wodalski and Blarek explained the gravel maintenance and costs. There are approximately 23 homes located on the existing gravel roads in the Village. Public Works & Utility Meeting – Meeting Minutes 9/14/26 Prepared by: Stacy Gilmeister, Utility Clerk Dave Diesen at 1804 Highland Ave., Weston – stated Highland Ave. received water, sewer, storm sewer and an asphalt road for 5 houses years ago. Motion by Mumper, second by Jordan move to do nothing at this point until there is additional development then will reconsider it. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 16. E Jelinek Ave Final Assessments Wodalski explained the preliminary and final assessment rates. Motion by Mumper, second by Lopes-Serrao move to recommend the Staff finalize the assessments as presented. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 17. Weston Ave Final Assessments Wodalski explained the two different preliminary assessments. One from Ryan St to County Rd J and the other from County Rd X to Ryan St. Wodalski asked the Committee if the desire is to keep the assessments as two or make one final assessment. Motion by Lopes-Serrao, second by Jordan move to recommend the Staff create one final assessment report for both phases. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Public Works & Utility Meeting – Meeting Minutes 9/14/26 Prepared by: Stacy Gilmeister, Utility Clerk Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 18. Alderson St and Jelinek Ave Change Order #2 Wodalski and Dolan explained the change order. Motion by Jordan, second by Mumper move to recommend the Board of Trustees approve Change Order No. 2 to decrease the project cost and close out the Jelinek Avenue and Alderson Street Intersection project for the total amount of $846,959.25. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES 19. Winter Street Parking Ordinance Update Wodalski explained the request for the Ordinance update to be uniform with other neighboring communities. Motion by Mumper, second by Lopes-Serrao move to modify the existing ordinance to make No Parking effective on all Village Streets from November 1 to March 31 between the hours of 2AM and 7AM with then additional restrictions on streets referenced on the attached map from the hours of 7AM to 4PM based on an alternating day basis. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES Public Works & Utility Meeting – Meeting Minutes 9/14/26 Prepared by: Stacy Gilmeister, Utility Clerk 20. Next meeting date(s): a) Monday, October 12, 2026 @ 4:30 p.m. Regular Meeting b) Monday, November 9, 2026 @ 4:30 p.m. Regular Meeting 21. Topics for future meetings a) Watermain Replacement 22. Remarks from Staff None. 23. Remarks from Committee members None. 24. Announcements None. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Mumper, second by Jordan to adjourn the PW meeting at 6:10 p.m. Yes Vote: 4 No Votes: 0 Abstain: 0 Not Voting: 1 Result: PASS Member Voting Zeyghami, Hooshang {Chair} YES Lopes-Serrao, Luis {Vice Chair} YES Hubbard, Tom --- Jordan, Joe YES Mumper, Roy YES Date From 9/1/2026 and Date To 9/30/2026 and Template Meter and Jurisdiction Village of Weston Permits Issued Issue DatePermit Address Contractor Permit # ValuationOwner Name FeesParcel IDTemplate Finished Sq Ft Project Sq Ft Village of Weston 202601487 3616 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 15 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601488 3618 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 16 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601489 3710 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 18 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601490 3712 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 19 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601491 3802 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 20 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601492 3804 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 21 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601493 3702 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 17 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601494 3812 GREEN PASTURES LN, WESTON Timber Ridge Builders LLC. 09/14/2026192280829101 22 TIMBER RIDGE BUILDERS LLC $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601456 8708 HINNER SPRINGS DR, WESTON CHARLIES HARDWARE 09/08/2026192280829400 38 KATHERINE DAHLIE $60.00Meter 0 506 202601465 3805 MUSKIE DR, WESTON TTP Plumbing LLC 09/09/2026192280810401 76 EDWARD KORDUS $60.00Meter 0 506 202601586 5810 WESTON AVE, WESTON France Service, LLC, DBA France Sales & Service, Inc 09/28/2026192280822309 81 ANDREW WALDVOGEL $1,325.00Meter 0 506 202601437 6003 BUSINESS HIGHWAY 51, WESTON Highpoint Landworks, Inc. 09/03/2026192280818309 48 JHGV LLC $60.00Meter 0 507 Date From 9/1/2026 and Date To 9/30/2026 and Template Meter and Jurisdiction Village of Weston Permits Issued Issue DatePermit Address Contractor Permit # ValuationOwner Name FeesParcel IDTemplate Finished Sq Ft Project Sq Ft Village of Weston Permits Valuation Village of Weston Permits Fees Village of Weston Permits Issued 12 $12,105 Village of Weston Permits Finished SqFt 0 Village of Weston Permits Project SqFt 12Total Permits Issued Total Permits Fees Total Permits Valuation $12,105 Total Finished Sq Ft Total Project Sq Ft 0 Date From 9/1/2026 and Date To 9/30/2026 and Template Lateral Permits Issued Issue DatePermit Address Contractor Permit # ValuationOwner Name FeesParcel IDTemplate Finished Sq Ft Project Sq Ft Village of Weston 202601585 5810 WESTON AVE, WESTON France Service, LLC, DBA France Sales & Service, Inc 09/28/2026192280822309 81 ANDREW WALDVOGEL $50.00Lateral 0 503 Village of Weston Permits Valuation Village of Weston Permits Fees Village of Weston Permits Issued 1 $50 Village of Weston Permits Finished SqFt 0 Village of Weston Permits Project SqFt 1Total Permits Issued Total Permits Fees Total Permits Valuation $50 Total Finished Sq Ft Total Project Sq Ft 0 REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 6 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Capital Improvement Plan Update From: Michael Wodalski, Director of Public Works Question: Solely an update on project status Background Current Capital Improvement Plan Projects Below is an update on the status of the various Capital Improvement Plan Projects that are ongoing. - Street Projects: 1. Weston Ave (CR-X to CR-J):  East Construction Phase: 100% Complete  West Construction Phase 100% Complete  West Construction Phase 2 – Substantially Complete  Consultant: AECOM  Contractor: Integrity Grading and Excavating Working on getting final assessments calculated. 2. Schofield Ave (Normandy Ave to Birch St): $2,652,390 in Grant Funds  Total Project Cost ~$7,668,000  Construction Year: 2025 – Substantially Complete  Consultant: Clark Dietz  Contractor: Haas Nearly wrapped up and will work on Special Assessments this fall. Trerweiler is planning to be back to work on some warranty items the week of October 12. They are planning to defer some of the full panel work though to spring of 2027 to avoid having fresh concrete interacting with salt over winter. 3. Alderson St and Jelinek Ave Intersection:  Estimated Project Cost ~ $1,080,000  Construction Year: 2026  Consultant: Village / MSA  Contractor: Haas This project is complete. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 2 OF 6 Figure 1: Aerial View of Alderson and Jelinek Intersection 4. Bloedel Ave:  Estimated Project Cost ~ $1,920,000  Construction Year: 2026  Consultant: Village  Contractor: Francis Melvin REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 3 OF 6 Concrete work is currently ongoing and should be completed by 10/16. Asphalt paving and restoration will be following right behind the concrete work. Figure 2: Bloedel Ave looking west towards Cherry St. 5. Concord Ave and Bayberry St:  Construction Year: 2026  Consultant: Village  Contractor: Haas This project is nearing completion. All pipe work is complete, the road is built and concrete started this past week. Concrete work will continue into the week of 10/12 and asphalt work is anticipated to start likely later the week of 10/19. Figure 3: Concord Ave just west of CR-X looking west. Concrete shoulder started on 10/7. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 4 OF 6 6. Ross Ave (Metro Dr/Pine St to Alderson St): $2,634,977 in Grant Funds  Total Project Cost Estimate ~ $4,271,800  Consultant: Becher Hoppe  Anticipate Construction in 2027 per DOT agreement Design work is ongoing. ROW acquisition is the main task right now. 7. Ross Ave (River Bend to Pauls): $2,211,598 in Grant Funds  Estimated Project Cost ~ $4,986,600  Construction Year: ~2028  Consultant: Becher Hoppe Working with the Town on the agreement. I had a Preliminary design meeting with Becher Hoppe and the DOT on the project as well as many of the local utility companies. There is a Public Information Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 14 at 5:30 pm here at the Weston Municipal Center. 8. Fuller St Reconstruction:  Total Project Cost ~ $4,239,000  Construction Year: 2025 – Substantially Complete  Consultant: Becher Hoppe  Contractor: Francis Melvin There is punch-list work yet to be completed this fall. 9. Ross Ave and CR-X Intersection: $2,352,000 in Grant Funds  Estimated Project Cost ~ $2,952,000  Construction Year: ~2028  Consultant: SEH Design work is progressing. We are working with SEH to get a separate design contract for the Sternberg intersection. 10. Business 51 (Volkman St to Schofield Ave):  Construction Year: 2029/30  Consultant: Becher Hoppe Becher Hoppe has submitted the 30% plans to the DOT. There is an item in the packet about adding a crosswalk at Neupert Ave. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 5 OF 6 11. Business 51/STH 29 Storm Pond:  Construction Year: 2026/27  Consultant: Strand I’ll be working with the DNR and Strand to get our Clean Water Fund Loan put together. The goal was to bid this project over winter and have it start next year. - Utility Projects: 1. Well 4 PFAS Treatment:  Construction Cost: $2,821,651 • Principal Forgiveness Amount: $1,790,743.00 • Net Loan Amount: $767,460.00  Construction Year: 2025 – Substantially Complete  Consultant: AECOM  Contractor: August Winter The GAC Tanks have been installed and water has been pumping to the system as of 10/24/2025. Working on getting this project closed out as all items have now been completed. 2. Well 3 Iron, Manganese and PFAS Treatment:  Construction Cost: $4,576,735 • Principal Forgiveness Amount: $3,012,992.00 • Net Loan Amount: $1,291,283.00  Construction Year: 2026  Consultant: AECOM  Contractor: 8Pine Construction has started on the addition to the treatment plant for iron and manganese removal. Substantial Completion is anticipated in April 2027. 3. Cedar Creek Interceptor Access Road:  Construction: Anticipate TBD  Consultant: Mi-Tech/TBD Will be working on easements. 4. Bellewood Ave Watermain Replacement:  Construction Year: 2026  Consultant: Village/MTS  Contractor: No bids were received on this project. It appears Rothschild will be postponing the repaving of Bellewood to next year so we can rebid the project and replace the watermain next year instead. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 6 OF 6 5. Military Road:  Construction Year: 2026  Consultant: MSA  Contractor: Steen Construction Project is complete. - Subdivision Projects: 1. Hinner Springs:  Construction Year: 2026  Developer: Timber Ridge Builders Timber Ridge Builders are proposing an additional phase within the Hinner Springs Subdivision to extend several more lots along Green Pastures and are also looking to create 2 lots off of Birch St between Birchwood Highlands and Green Pastures. 2. Green Tree Acres:  Construction Years: 2025-TBD  Developer: Green Tree Builders Subdivision work continues within the Green Tree Subdivision. Currently Phases 1 and 2 are complete and they are working on houses within Phase 2. We are anticipating Green Tree starting Phase 3 yet this year. 3. Granite Ridge Subdivision:  Construction: 2026 - TBD  Developer: Timber Ridge Builders Timber Ridge has completed the infrastructure within Phase 1 of the subdivision. If home sales go well, we anticipate seeing Phase 2 work starting in spring. Attached Docs: Committee Action: N/A Fiscal Impact: Recommendation: Recommended Language for Official Action No Action is needed, solely a discussion item. Or, Something else _____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 1 OF 9 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Street Operations Update From: Forrest Blarek, Street Superintendent Question: Solely an update on project status Background Current Street Operations Project: • For the past month we have received alot of sand fill from the road cut from projects that are taking place in the Village. • It took a staff member to be on site everyday to keep the site organized and was able to direct where the material to be placed. • In total the Village has a stock pile of over 52,000 cubic yards of sand fill. STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 2 OF 9 • Sign department operator has been painting cross walks, turn lanes, curb heads, and doing sign installation on a daily basis. • These areas that are getting painted are either newly reconstructed areas and the areas where GSB sealant have been put down. STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 3 OF 9 • Rural ditch mowing was completed in September. • This task takes a staff member around 2-3 months to complete. • Staff makes an initial pass with both rear mower and boom and then returns to do a few more passes with just the boom. • By mowing back to the ROW line helps with visablity and prevents brush growth. STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 4 OF 9 • Kafka wood clearing came in and was able to chip the brush pile down at the yard waste site. • They were behind this year due to the storms that came through the state. STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 5 OF 9 • DPW crew shaped and paved back in the water valves that got replaced. • The DPW continues to provide blacktop restoration associated with Water Utilities projects. By completing this work in-house, the Village can utilize existing personnel and equipment, reduce reliance on outside contractors, and achieve overall cost savings while maintaining efficient project completion. STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 6 OF 9 • DPW completed various concrete repairs. • Keeping this work within the Village staff utilizes the experience and expertise of the staff while maintaining greater control over the quality and scheduling of the work. The crew’s knowledge and ability to complete these tasks efficiently also reduces the need for contractors and keeps costs STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 7 OF 9 STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 8 OF 9 Fleet & Equipment Maintenance Update Pictured from left to right: First Picture: Unit 9 Unit 9 is having the undercarriage thoroughly washed and treated with Fluid Film rust inhibitor. Our goal is to have all trucks washed and treated before winter to help protect the equipment from salt and corrosion. Second Picture: Truck 10 Truck 10 is being fully prepared for the winter season. The truck received complete service and inspection, including fluid sampling, an undercarriage wash, and Fluid Film application. During the inspection, several maintenance and repair items were identified and completed: • Drained and replaced fluid in both differentials and power dividers using 80W- 140. • Replaced both chain thrower wheels and installed a new cap on one chain thrower arm. • Installed new front brake shoes, hardware, and two new brake drums. • Installed four new air brake chambers on the rear drive axles and adjusted all brakes. • Installed a new 100-amp circuit breaker for the vibrator to address the existing 80-amp breaker repeatedly tripping with the tarp and vibrator on the same circuit. • Rotated the front steer tires side to side and rotated the rear drive tires. • Installed two new drive tires. • Replaced the rear amber/green strobe lights. • Replaced the air dryer filter. Third Picture: Units 70 and 9 Unit 9 currently has the box lift cylinder removed and sent out for rebuilding. All other repairs and winter preparation have been completed. Fourth Picture: Unit 70 Unit 70 is also being prepared for winter. It will receive a complete service and inspection, undercarriage wash, and Fluid Film treatment. Repairs and maintenance to this unit include: • Drain and refill transmission fluid and replace transmission filters. • Replace rear axle seals, brake shoes, brake hardware, and drums. • Replace the air dryer. STAFF REPORT STREET SUPERINTENDENT REPORT PAGES 9 OF 9 Additional Shop Work Completed Unit 85, Pickup: Completed service and overall inspection. Replaced front brakes and tie rod ends. Unit 32, Front -End Loader: Completed service and overall inspection. The machine was washed and the cab interior cleaned. Unit 38, Front -End Loader: Completed repairs to the lift cylinder. Unit 88, Inspections Van: Completed A/C repairs. Unit 8, 1-Ton Dump Truck: Completed service and inspection, including oil and transmission fluid sampling, tire rotation, and differential fluid replacement. The driver- and passenger-side rocker panels and lower driver's door were also repainted to address rust. Unit 151, Patch Trailer: Replaced batteries and serviced the unit. Additional Work Along with the equipment maintenance listed above, the shop has also been working on: • Maintenance to shop equipment, small engine tools. • Continuing the upfitting of Unit 211 bucket truck. • Routine street sweeper upkeep. • Loader broom upkeep. • Maintenance to Shoulder machine. Overall, the shop has been focusing on the seasonal changeover of snow removal equipment. UTILITY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2026 1. Superintendent Comments a. Water  Well #6 VFD failure. Back in o peration after replacement.  Well #7/8 standby gener ator troubleshooting. Work to be completed soon.  Water valve and curb stack adjustments  Replaced valves at 3 Locations (Mesker, Kellyland and Municipal). (Photos in report)  Exterior cleaning of Business Pa rk Tower (Photos in report)  Lead and Copper sampling event com pleted. Awaiting results to send reports to residents.  Operators assisted with utilit y requests on Bloedel, Concord and Military Projects.  Unidirectional Watermain flushi ng operations were completed.  Numerous lateral inspections w ere completed. (Photo in report).  Meter Card maint enance continued.  Private Well sampling collected. LATERAL INSPECTION(S) VALVE REPLACEMENTS EXTERIOR TOWER CLEANING b. Sewer  Televising Van final testing with IT Pipes.  I&I Study field work completed . Discussion in meeting regarding findings.  Sanitary Sewer jetting operat ions continued (Photo in report).  Clean, collect pH Probe data also re-calibrated probes.  Clean bad spots.  Lift Station Cleaning for fall underway.  Lift Station(s) standby gener ator general maintenance.  Lift Station(s) pump f ilters cleaned/replaced. SEWER JETTING c. Diggers Hotline Locates  Village Utility Operators mark ed approximately 275 locates. Many communication installations, project planning as well as upgrades to WPS gas lines. d. Work Orders  Village Utility Operators comp leted 29 Work Orders. The majority of work orders were for various water meter installations, meter communication issues, lateral inspections and water quality responses. e. Contract Work/Activi ties Completed/Upcoming  Permanent PFAS project for Well #3/Treatment Plant ongoing.  Entered Monthly we ll data to DNR.  Street/Subdivision Projects: Gr een Tree Acres ongoing, Grantie Ridge ongoing, Bloedel Ave. Reconstruction, Concord/Bayberry Reconstruction and Military Project (Rothschild) ongoing.  Business Park Tower exterior cleaning.  Valve Exercising program continues during flushing.  Water main flushing completed.  Sanitary Sewer jetting completed.  Lift Station cleaning for fall underway 2. Customers Added New customers added during the month. *A new customer includes new connections and change in residences Type No. of Customers Residential Single Family/Condo's 59 Multi Family 1 Commercial/Industrial 2 Total 62 3. Water Pumped in 1,000s of gallons (Last 4 Months) The Well #3 (Offline since 2022) portion of Treatment Plant project ongoing. Alta Verde (#1) Kerry (#2) Mesker (#3) Sternberg (#4) Bloedel (#5) June Total - 18,087 - 20,493 - Peak - 860 - 896 - July Total - 22,778 - 23,721 - Peak - 863 - 1,119 - August Total 15 20,393 - 23,107 22 Peak 15 949 - 923 22 September Total - 23,986 - 18,761 - Peak - 947 - 765 - 15 85,244 - 86,082 22 Rippling Creek (#6) Well #7 Well #8 TOTALS June Total 7,128 11,966 12,104 69,778 Peak 398 532 539 403 July Total 9,371 14,896 15,024 85,790 Peak 505 678 682 481 August Total 9,512 14,785 15,875 83,709 Peak 415 617 957 487 September Total 2,949 11,803 11,815 69,314 Peak 268 482 496 370 28,960 53,450 54,818 Total gal X 1000 308,591 Total gal X 1000 (Less Foremost) 223,347 4. Wastewater Flows (Last 4 Months) Rib Mountain Metropolitan Sewerage District Flow Charge Totals. Bus. 51 Flow (X1000) Cedar Creek Flow (X1000) Total Flow Charge (X1000) June Total 21,377 16,688 38,065 July Total 18,772 15,128 33,900 August Total 17,569 14,547 32,116 September Total 17,916 13,914 31,830 75,634 60,277 135,911 5. Lift Station Hours Summary of Lift Station Hours for last two months. Lift Station Hours 2026 Harlyn Fox St. Mesker/Je linek Kathleen E.C. River Month Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 3 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Aug 67.3 67.7 58.1 56 53.3 55.2 55.9 3.7 3.8 43.1 43.4 Sep 68.5 72 56.5 54.7 51.7 53.2 53.6 3.8 3.1 40.1 40.5 2026 Tanya/Tricia Progress Way Po inte Park Terrace Ryan St. Month Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 3 Aug 45 35.9 4.4 5 26.1 30.1 9.1 18.7 26.5 41.9 38.4 Sep 40 31.7 4.6 4.8 22.9 36.3 7.8 18.2 25.1 41.1 38.8 2026 Heritage Hills Ross Ave. Mesker/Colleen Trotzer Month Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Pump 1 Pump 2 Aug 24.7 25.8 30.2 30.3 129.9 133.3 0.6 0.6 Sep 17.6 17.8 26.3 26.5 119 124.1 0.6 0.6 REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 2 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Business 51 Sidewalk Crossing at Neupert Ave From: Michael Wodalski, PE - Director of Public Works Isaac Dolan, PE – Staff Engineer Question: Does the Public Works Committee support adding a pedestrian crossing on Business 51 at Neupert Ave to be incorporated with the State’s upcoming reconstruction project? Background We had a follow up meeting with the DOT regarding the Neupert Ave crossing and including that as part of the Business 51 reconstruction project. Attached is a summary from the meeting. At the end of the day, the DOT is considering the project as a perpetuation project where the standard practice is for them to reconstruct the road as it is currently constructed. Then if a municipality requests additional work, such as a new crosswalk, that cost would be the municipality’s responsibility. In total, the additional work would likely be in the $40,000 - $60,000 if we wanted to move forward with this project. Isaac had sent one other follow up email, but as of Thursday 10/8, we have not received any DOT responses to that follow up. Information from 8/10/26 Public Works Meeting: With the reconstruction of Business 51 being planned staff has inquired with the DOT about adding a pedestrian crossing at Neupert Ave as currently the only crossing of Business 51 exists at Jelinek Ave and then again at Schofield Ave which leaves pedestrians with no dedicated crossing between those two streets. Attached is the email string between the Village and DOT regarding this item and the option we have from the DOT if we want it included would include a road shift at the Neupert intersection to accommodate a pedestrian island. To accomplish this the state is asking that the Village pay for 1/3 of that cost which is currently estimated at $20,000. We need to let the DOT know if this is something we want to pursue as it will impact ROW and design. Attached Docs: - Pedestrian Crossing concept at Neupert and BUS 51 - Email string between Village and WisDOT staff ______________________________________________________________________ REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 2 OF 2 Committee Action: - Public Works discussed in August and had additional questions which staff is bringing back in September Fiscal Impact: - Estimated at $20,000 to add a pedestrian crossing at Neupert Ave and BUS 51 _______________ ___________________________________________________________ Recommendation: - Staff thinks adding a mid-block crossing would help pedestrians better navigate the BUS 51 corridor. Recommended Language for Official Action I move to _____________________ . Or, Something else ____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: From: Boehm, Korey J - DOT To: Isaac Dolan; Michael Wodalski; Jami Gebert Cc: Kujawa, Kevin - DOT; Nemec, Elizabeth A - DOT Subject: Business 51 / Marathon County / 6999-10-15 / Neupert Avenue Summary Date: Friday, October 2, 2026 2:19:47 PM All, I appreciate the time you were able to take today to discuss the Neupert Ave pedestrian crossing. As discussed the following is a summary of what the Department would cover for the creation of the crossing on the north side of Neupert across Business 51. Department Responsible Roadway widening to accommodate the median refuge Original Crosswalk Markings and Signage Sidewalk necessary for new curb ramps to facilitate the crossing All driveway aprons Village Responsible Sidewalk impacted by roadway widening that wasn’t needed for curb ramps Initial Estimated cost $20,000. Impacts to properties behind the sidewalk needed for the widening purposes Initial Estimated cost $10,000 - $30,000. SMFA commitment before design begins Agreeing to crosswalk permit (Covers future crosswalk marking needs between WisDOT improvement projects) Bases and conduit for potential future RRFB (If Desired) Initial Estimated cost $5,000 -$7,500. Future RRFB system As we discussed with this being a perpetuation project standard practice is to reconstruct what is currently existing with geometric upgrades and changes being made only at areas with documented safety issues. If a municipality requests additional work such as this, it would fall under WisDOT’s up scope policy. This policy has any additional improvements being fully funded by the requesting municipality. As discussed in the meeting this morning, we are willing to work with the village of Weston by covering the costs for the roadway widening and all new curb ramps as part of the change. But with the lack of a documented safety issue, our policy does not permit coverage of the remaining impacts. Design efforts would begin on the changes once we have a commitment from the Village of Weston and update the SMFA with the estimate costs accordingly. We will review and respond to your most recent email that was sent today next week. As discussed during our meeting earlier our estimated costs we believe are conservative and likely would be reduced after identifying all the needs during its final design. If there are further questions please let me know. Sincerely, Korey Boehm, PE Project Manager WisDOT NCR-DTSD 715-459-2943 GVTEL CC 696+00697+00698+00699+00700+00701+00702+00696+00 'SB'697+00 'SB'698+00 'SB'699+00 'SB'700+00 'SB'701+00 'SB'702+00 'SB' 198+00 199+00 200+00 201+00 202+00 BUS 51 'NB' NEUPERT AVE NEUPERT AVE 12'12'12'BUS 51 'SB' 6'6' 12' 12'12' 12'12'8' 12'10' 5' 5' 12'12' WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42EHWY: BUS 51COUNTY: MARATHONP:\54XX\5470.DP.22.BUS51.MAR\CADDS\69991085\SHEETSOTHER\NEUPERT AVE ALT\NEUPERT AVE ALT.DWGFILE NAME : 7/29/2026 12:06 PMPLOT DATE :PLOT BY :PARKER TISCHAUSER 2 PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE :1 IN:40 FTLAYOUT NAME - 01 NEUPERT AVE ALTERNATIVEPROJECT NO: 6999-10-85 From: Boehm, Korey J - DOT To: Isaac Dolan Cc: Michael Wodalski; Jami Gebert Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries Date: Thursday, August 20, 2026 10:50:41 AM Attachments: image001.png image002.png image003.png Issac see below in red for answers to your questions. Sincerely, Korey Boehm, PE Project Manager WisDOT NCR-DTSD 715-459-2943 From: Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2026 10:22 AM To: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Cc: Wodalski P.E., Mike <mwodalski@westonwi.gov>; Jami Gebert <jgebert@westonwi.gov> Subject: Re: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Morning Korey, Village of Weston staff presented your provided information to our committee last night. Though I was able to get a consensus from the committee that they are in full support of providing the community with a safe pedestrian accommodation at BUS 51 and Neupert Avenue, I was unable to obtain a recommendation from them to our Board to fund the crossing without providing additional information. Based on the information provided to date, the concerns that the committee mentioned last night have been summarized below: If the road is shifting 4' to the west, what is the cause of the 20'+ of impacts shown on the backside of the sidewalk? The 20’ behind the existing sidewalk is to provide TLE areas to allow for slopes to be blended in. This distance may change as the design is finalized, but was a starting point so we can have discussions. With the reduction in terrace width driveway aprons will become steeper beyond our standards. To provide the best quality entrance the sidewalk will need to be lowered to allow the apron slopes to meet our standards. the apron slope which means that portions of the driveways will need to be replaced to address the elevation changes. Who is covering the cost of the impacts shown in the 20'+ zone if the original plan was not to relocate the sidewalk? We were told we were only covering the sidewalk up to the $20k. With this being an impact based on the request from the village, this would be a cost born by the village. Depending on impacts, cost for the HMA could vary between $10k - $30k. Who is covering the cost of the large overhead business signs located in these zones if they are impacted? Was that cost included somewhere? We would do everything possible to work around these signs by utilizing pedestrian curb or other features. What is happening to the parking in this impacted zone? Both properties have parking or travel lanes in these 20' impacted zones. Altering the parking has zoning impacts within our community. At this time without fully completing the design we are hoping there would be no changes in the number of stalls. If there was for some reason and village still wanted to proceed with this a variance may need to be granted. Your email states that the alternative would result in shifting the sidewalk and WisDOT is requesting the Village cover the full costs of the sidewalk replacement estimated at $20k However, the provided alternative shows the sidewalk remaining in the same location and the terrace reducing from ~8' to 5'. I was mistaken, the sidewalk will remain in its current location, but the elevations will need to change with the terrace being narrowed. The travel lanes are shown as 12' and the SB left turn lane is shown as 10', can we reduce the NB left turn lane to be 10' to reduce the over street shift another 2'? The NB left turn lane is also 10’, it was mislabeled as 12’. The Village can understand that if there have been no safety concerns at this intersection, that there may not be that particular warrant to install an RRFB. Our residents, committee members, and staff strongly believe that given the speed (35 MPH), AADT, commercial nature of the corridor with lots of driveways, and that this is a 4-lane road, an RRFB would be warranted to prevent a pedestrian from getting hit by a vehicle, especially given that the crossing would be located near the crest for NB traffic. Our Public Works & Utilities committee members have proven to be more proactive, rather than reactive, when it comes to bicycle and pedestrian safety within our community. Do you have an estimated cost to install an RRFB at this location? RRFB setups with over head arms likely are in the $20k - $30k. There is variation based on a number of factors. Can you direct me to criteria that WisDOT uses to determine when to and when not to install an RRFB? TEOpS 04-11 -Specicifally 4-11-3 covers the guidance we have for RRFBs. I was checking FHWA's website on RRFBs (https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven- safety-countermeasures/rectangular-rapid-flashing-beacons-rrfb) and a safety sheet (https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/files/RRFB_508_0.pdf). I also think this preventative measure would align with the State's safety effort for Zero in Wisconsin. This would be the only RRFB on the corridor between STH 29 and Schofield Avenue. One of these was installed at BUS 51 and Military Road in the Village of Rothschild and has helped improve motorists' awareness of pedestrians crossing the road. I want to apologize for not being able to get a recommendation from our committee to the board last night. However, this item will return to the committee with the requested follow-up information that I have summarized above for you to answer for next month's meeting. If we had gotten this information from you a little sooner, we could have had time to vet this information before adding it to the agenda a week ahead of the meeting. We really only had 4 days before that item had to be added to the meeting agenda and distributed to the committee members in preparation for the meeting. Regards, Isaac Isaac Dolan, P.E. Village of Weston, Wisconsin Direct: 715-241-2634 Email: idolan@westonwi.gov As a local governmental entity, the Village of Weston is subject to Wisconsin statutes relating to open records. Any e-mail received by anyone at the Village of Weston, as well as, any e-mail sent by someone from the Village of Weston, are subject to these laws. Unless otherwise exempted from the Open Records law, senders and receivers of Village e-mail should presume that any e-mail is subject to release upon request. From: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2026 4:24 PM To: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov>; Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com> Cc: Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Kujawa, Kevin - DOT <Kevin.Kujawa@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries If I can get an answer shortly after the 10th of August we can likely make that work. Sincerely, Korey Boehm, PE Project Manager WisDOT NCR-DTSD 715-459-2943 From: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2026 11:46 AM To: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov>; Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com> Cc: Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Kujawa, Kevin - DOT <Kevin.Kujawa@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Korey, Thanks for the information. I can get this in front of our Public Works Committee on August 10th if that’s soon enough. The only other question I have is if there is any chance the CSD funds could be used for this change. I pasted part of what Elizabeth sent us previously regarding the amenities that could be covered and medians are something listed as well as multimodal amenities which I’d think a cross walk in general fits the multimodal item. Thanks, Michael Wodalski, P.E. Director of Public Works Village of Weston, Wisconsin 4747 Camp Phillips Rd, Weston, WI 54476 Office: 715-359-6114 Direct: 715-241-2636 Email: mwodalski@westonwi.gov | Website: www.westonwi.gov As a local governmental entity, the Village of Weston is subject to Wisconsin statutes relating to open records. Any e-mail received by anyone at the Village of Weston, as well as, any e-mail sent by someone from the Village of Weston, are subject to these laws. Unless otherwise exempted from the Open Records law, senders and receivers of Village e-mail should presume that any e-mail is subject to release upon request. From: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2026 11:19 AM To: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov>; Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com> Cc: Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Kujawa, Kevin - DOT <Kevin.Kujawa@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries Importance: High Good Morning Michael, The department has continued investigation into the potential for the crossing at Neupert and have the following information to share. A crossing could be accommodated but will require a shift of approximately 4’ to the west of the SB lanes. This will impact all sidewalk between the shifting tapers of the roadway. The department is willing to fund the roadway shift, but would require the village to cost share in this change by funding the sidewalk replacement. The estimated cost of shifting the roadway is approximately $40,000. Currently the sidewalk costs are estimated at approximately $20,000, meaning the department is funding 2/3 of the change with the village funding approximately 1/3. We would also have to complete a crosswalk permit since there isn’t an existing crossing. Because there is no documented safety issue if the village would want an RRFB they would need to fund it as well. There is a risk that parking for the businesses on the west side of the roadway may be impacted with a potential reduction in parking availability. These impacts still need to be determined, but I wanted to make you aware of this potential risk. Please let me know ASAP if the village wants to pursue this as we need to begin the design effort immediately to keep our schedule. Sincerely, Korey Boehm, PE Project Manager WisDOT NCR-DTSD 715-459-2943 From: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov > Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 12:08 PM To: Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com> Cc: Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Kujawa, Kevin - DOT <Kevin.Kujawa@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov>; Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Stephanie, I don’t know what the finished typical section looks like, but right now there appears to be an extra 6-ft of ROW available behind the sidewalk on the west side of the road, is any of that able to be used as that would then likely make the median wide enough for a refuge island? If not, and the only way to implement it is by restricting vehicle turning movements, then no, I don’t believe it is still something the Village would be pursuing. Thanks, Michael Wodalski, P.E. Director of Public Works Village of Weston, Wisconsin 4747 Camp Phillips Rd, Weston, WI 54476 Office: 715-359-6114 Direct: 715-241-2636 Email: mwodalski@westonwi.gov | Website: www.westonwi.gov As a local governmental entity, the Village of Weston is subject to Wisconsin statutes relating to open records. Any e-mail received by anyone at the Village of Weston, as well as, any e-mail sent by someone from the Village of Weston, are subject to these laws. Unless otherwise exempted from the Open Records law, senders and receivers of Village e-mail should presume that any e-mail is subject to release upon request. From: Stephanie Christensen <schristensen@emcsinc.com> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2026 11:54 AM To: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov> Cc: Scott Kaiser <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Kujawa, Kevin - DOT <Kevin.Kujawa@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov>; Korey J - DOT Boehm <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Subject: Re: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries Michael We need to move ahead on our curb ramp design at Neupert. Did the Village want a median refuge island on the south leg of Bus 51 and preclude NB left turns (see my very crude sketch below)? A response one way or the other would be appreciated in the next week. Thanks. --- Stephanie G. Christensen, PE (WI) EMCS, Inc. | 715.318.9017 (direct) http://www.emcsinc.com | schristensen@emcsinc.com From: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2026 10:50 AM To: Wodalski P.E., Mike <mwodalski@westonwi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Cc: Scott Kaiser <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Stephanie Christensen <schristensen@emcsinc.com>; Kujawa, Kevin - DOT <Kevin.Kujawa@dot.wi.gov> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries This email comes from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless it is an email you expected to receive. Michael, I have presented your request to our bike/ped coordinator and our traffic section and received the following: The speed limit of 35 MPH is conducive to RRFB installation The width of the roadway being 4 travel lanes plus a turn lanes is not conducive to RRFB installation. If a two stage crossing was installed, an RRFB would be possible. This would require the elimination of either the NB or SB turn lane. ADT of 16500 in 2023 is very high for an RRFB. Typically these are utilized in situations where the ADT is less than 12,000. This ADT is not conducive for RRFB installation. The sight distance at this location is more than 8x the speed limit which is conducive for RRFB installation. Due to the ADT and width of crossing, unless a refuge is able to be included in the design the Department would not permit a crossing at this location. The crossing near Military road is at a location with less roadway width to cross and sees less ADT than the proposed location at Neupert. Please let me know your thoughts based on this information. Sincerely, Korey Boehm, PE Project Manager WisDOT NCR-DTSD 715-459-2943 From: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:05 PM To: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Cc: Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Korey, I suppose there’s not one direct driver, just that we are trying to be more conscious of pedestrian crossings along our collectors and arterials in the Village. The distance between Jelinek Ave and Schofield Ave is over half a mile and in looking at this if it were a local project, we would try to find a location near the middle of the project for a pedestrian crossing, which Neupert provides in this case. In a car a half mile isn’t a long distance, but on foot even if it’s just a quarter mile that could be a 6+ minute walk for someone, which they likely wouldn’t do so then the person ends up just crossing the street at their desired location and hopefully doesn’t get hit. I can’t say on my own if the Village would fund it, but if the State had a number in mind, I could run it past our Village Board. Thanks, Michael Wodalski, P.E. Director of Public Works Village of Weston, Wisconsin 4747 Camp Phillips Rd, Weston, WI 54476 Office: 715-359-6114 Direct: 715-241-2636 Email: mwodalski@westonwi.gov | Website: www.westonwi.gov As a local governmental entity, the Village of Weston is subject to Wisconsin statutes relating to open records. Any e-mail received by anyone at the Village of Weston, as well as, any e-mail sent by someone from the Village of Weston, are subject to these laws. Unless otherwise exempted from the Open Records law, senders and receivers of Village e-mail should presume that any e-mail is subject to release upon request. From: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:51 PM To: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Cc: Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries Michael, There is a process that we can go through to have our traffic section review the request, but we need some additional information: What is the driver of this request? Complaints from Police or residents? Other reasons? Will the village of Weston fund a potential installation? The Department has pretty strict requirements on when we will install them. Having this information will help during the review of the request. Sincerely, Korey Boehm, PE Project Manager WisDOT NCR-DTSD 715-459-2943 From: Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov > Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2026 3:58 PM To: Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com>; Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Cc: Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Stephanie, I don’t believe there would be a strong desire to restrict turning onto the side streets so if that is the only way to have that installed then I would say it’s not worth pursuing. However, I look at Military Rd and BUS 51 in Rothschild and at that location there are overhead trombone arms and there is not a refuge island. Is something like that a possibility here where real estate wouldn’t be a factor? Thanks, Michael Wodalski, P.E. Director of Public Works Village of Weston, Wisconsin 4747 Camp Phillips Rd, Weston, WI 54476 Office: 715-359-6114 Direct: 715-241-2636 Email: mwodalski@westonwi.gov | Website: www.westonwi.gov As a local governmental entity, the Village of Weston is subject to Wisconsin statutes relating to open records. Any e-mail received by anyone at the Village of Weston, as well as, any e-mail sent by someone from the Village of Weston, are subject to these laws. Unless otherwise exempted from the Open Records law, senders and receivers of Village e-mail should presume that any e-mail is subject to release upon request. From: Stephanie Christensen <schristensen@emcsinc.com > Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2026 2:49 PM To: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov>; Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov>; Michael Wodalski <mwodalski@westonwi.gov> Cc: Scott Kaiser <skaiser@emcsinc.com> Subject: Re: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries Importance: High Is there any follow up on the question about a possible pedestrian crossing at Neupert and the information below? We are working on 60% plans and would need to know soon about this. Thanks. --- Stephanie G. Christensen, PE (WI) EMCS, Inc. | 715.318.9017 (direct) http://www.emcsinc.com | schristensen@emcsinc.com From: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 12:58 PM To: Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov> Cc: Stephanie Christensen <schristensen@emcsinc.com>; Scott Kaiser <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Wodalski P.E., Mike <mwodalski@westonwi.gov> Subject: RE: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries This email comes from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless it is an email you expected to receive. Good Afternoon Issac, Regarding your email below I can provide you the following thoughts/information: Project Schedule – Currently we will be delivering our 60% plans in August. We ask that any local utility plans and estimates be submitted to EMCS by mid-July. Construction Timeline - The project has a 5/1/2029 PSE date with a letting date of 8/14/2029. Construction could conceivably start in 2029 with some limited work being done, but it is more likely that construction will be completed in 2030 and 2031. Neupert Avenue – We have looked into this situation and have the following comments: There are width challenges at this location. The median is only 16’ wide and cannot accommodate a turn lane plus a pedestrian refuge. The roadway cannot be widened as there would be real estate impacts to parking or buildings on one or both sides of the roadways. A potential option to accommodate a crossing would be to preclude NB left turns onto Neupert from Bus 51 and place a refuge on the south leg. A ground mounted RFB (Rapid Flashing Beacon) would be required. This means NB access to Neupert west of Business 51 would be from other local roads from the north and south. Is this something the village would be open to? If so we could discuss and present this option at the public involvement meeting that will be held later this summer. If we determine there is some other alternative we will get back in touch. Please let us know what the village’s thoughts are on the Neupert Avenue option. If there are any further questions please let me know. Sincerely, Korey Boehm, PE Project Manager WisDOT NCR-DTSD 715-459-2943 From: Isaac Dolan <idolan@westonwi.gov > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2026 12:35 PM To: Boehm, Korey J - DOT <Korey.Boehm@dot.wi.gov> Cc: Christensen, Stephanie <schristensen@emcsinc.com>; Kaiser, Scott <skaiser@emcsinc.com>; Wodalski P.E., Mike <mwodalski@westonwi.gov> Subject: Business 51, Everest Drive to Eau Claire River Bridge, Marathon County | Village of Weston-General Inquiries CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Afternoon Korey, My name is Isaac Dolan and I work with Michael Wodalski at the Village of Weston as a Staff Engineer. I am just reaching out about the BUS 51 project that is tentatively scheduled for construction in 29/30. Over the summer Michael and I were discussing the project and thought that some type of protected pedestrian crossing at Neupert Ave would be beneficial to the community given its distance from the nearby signalized crossings (Jelinek Ave and Schofield Ave). I understand we’re still very early in the project (~30% Design) but wanted to mention this ahead of any 60% deliverables where items like this would be locked in prior to real estate. Also, we are working with Becher-Hoppe Associates on utility improvements for the corridor and we were wondering if there is a tentative 60% Design milestone set for the project? Thank you for your time and consideration. Best Regards, Isaac Isaac Dolan, P.E. Staff Engineer Village of Weston, Wisconsin 4747 Camp Phillips Rd, Weston, WI 54476 Office: 715-359-6114 Direct: 715-241-2634 Email: idolan@westonwi.gov | Website: www.westonwi.gov As a local governmental entity, the Village of Weston is subject to Wisconsin statutes relating to open records. Any e-mail received by anyone at the Village of Weston, as well as, any e-mail sent by someone from the Village of Weston, are subject to these laws. Unless otherwise exempted from the Open Records law, senders and receivers of Village e-mail should presume that any e-mail is subject to release upon request. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION VILLAGE OF WESTON 4747 CAMP PHILLIPS ROAD, WESTON, WI 54476 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works & Utility, October 12, 2026 Description: Discussion and/or action on a proclamation recognizing Crash Responders Safety Week from November 2 – 6, 2026 From: Michael Wodalski, Director of Public Works Jami Gebert, Administrator Question: Would the committee like to recommend to the Board approval of a proclamation recognizing Crash Responders Safety Week? Background WisDOT’s Traffic Incident Management Enhancement (TIME) program reached out to municipalities seeking support through a proclamation recognizing the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Crash Responder Safety Week (CRSW) from November 2- 6, 2026. This FHWA sponsored initiative communicates the simple steps everyone can take to keep roadway responders and the public safe around traffic incidents. Since 2016, WisDOT has participated in CRSW by providing public awareness and education via social media, in-person press events and Governor’s proclamations. For the last two years WisDOT has led the nation in obtaining proclamation commitments from the Governor, County, and Municipal governments. 2026 is the 11th anniversary for CRSW, and this year’s theme is “Move Over or Slow Down, Lives Are on the Line”. Attached is a draft proclamation for consideration. Attached Docs: Proclamation No. 2026-002 Committee Action: TBD. Fiscal Impact: None. Recommendation: Approve proclamation as presented. Recommended Language for Official Action I motion to recommend approval of proclamation 2026-002, recognizing Crash Responders Safety Week to the Board of Trustees. Or something else . . . VILLAGE OF WESTON, MARATHON COUNTY, WISCONSIN PROCLAMATION NO. 2026 – 002 A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING CRASH RESPONDERS SAFETY WEEK FROM NOVEMBER 2 – 6, 2026 WHEREAS, each year, Crash Responders Safety Week is set aside to recognize the often lifesaving work of our crash responders and to remind the traveling public to “Move Over or Slow Down, Lives Are on the Line”; and WHEREAS, these crash responders work tirelessly to clear incidents quickly and safely, reducing the risk of secondary crashes that often result in serious injuries and fatalities; and WHEREAS, at every crash scene, emergency responders, representing fire, law enforcement, emergency medical services, public works, and towing/transportation services, are at risk of being struck and injured or even killed in a secondary crash; and WHEREAS, each driver has a responsibility to drive safely and take every precaution to reduce the risk of secondary crashes, which includes following the state’s Move Over Law, designed to provide a safety zone for workers on the side of roadways; and WHEREAS, in 2025, crash data for Weston showed 373 crashes, including 87 injury crashes and 1 fatality, while Wisconsin recorded 128,800 traffic crashes and 492 fatalities, demonstrating that the public can help save lives by slowing down, moving over when approaching traffic incidents, eliminating distractions, and exercising patience and caution in work zones and emergency response areas; and WHEREAS, this observance provides an opportunity for the Village of Weston to reaffirm its commitment to the safety of all who travel and serve on our roads and to promote a culture of mutual responsibility, awareness, and respect among all roadway users; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the VILLAGE OF WESTON BOARD OF TRUSTEES hereby proclaim November 2 -6, 2026, as CRASH RESPONDERS SAFETY WEEK and encourage all residents to join in recognizing the heroic service of crash responders and commit to practicing safe driving habits that protect those who protect us. ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF WESTON, at a meeting thereof, this 19th day of the month of October 2026. VILLAGE OF WESTON, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Wisconsin. By: MARK MALONEY, Board President ATTEST: By: PAMELA BREHM, Village Clerk REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 4 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Sanitary Sewer Rate Increase From: Michael Wodalski, PE - Director of Public Works Josh Swenson – Utility Superintendent Question: Should the Public Works Committee recommend the Village Board increase the sanitary sewer utility rates? Background The Village of Weston’s Sanitary Sewer Utility Rates were last increased in January of 2025. This adjustment was made due to the sewer utility running at a deficit and trying to break even from the increase in costs from the Rib Mountain Metropolitan Sewerage District (RMMSD) fees which are related to their treatment plant construction project. Roughly 90% of the Village’s wastewater flows to and is treated by RMMSD thus, when the bills from RMMSD go up, the Village’s sanitary sewer costs go up. At the end of 2025, the Sanitary Sewer Utility operated at a loss of $440,571 for the year. For 2026, the Sanitary Sewer Utility as of the end of August is at a positive $96,201, however the Village did sell our older Sewer Vac Truck in March of 2026 for $352,500, thus without that sale, the sewer utility is operating at a loss of $256,299. Heading to year end, we’re projecting we’ll be likely around a loss of $400,000 if we remove the sale of the old vac truck. Since we don’t have a vac truck to sell every year we will need to increase the sewer rates to offset the increase in fees from RMMSD. The Village received RMMSD’s preliminary 2027 budget, which forecasts an additional $100,000 in costs for the Village of Weston Sanitary Sewer. As I look at projecting out to next year I looked at 5 potential options to see what the potential revenue and expenses would be. I have the options laid out below. To make the calculations I used the following assumptions: - Projected 2027 expenses = $3,925,000 - Total number of equivalent meters (3/4-inch meters) = 8,048 (2026 YTD count) - Total 1,000s of gallons of sewer billed = 374,270.60 (this was the 2025 actual) - Estimated Non-Operating Revenue = $325,000 Sanitary sewer bills are calculated off of a base fee which is determined by the size of the meter serving the property. Then there is a consumption fee which is calculated based on every 1,000 gallons of water used. There are many different options to adjust the sewer rate, but for preliminary analysis I moved forward with 5 scenarios which are: REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 2 OF 4 A) Do Nothing (-$783,316) – This scenario does not adjust current rates and was more for seeing what the projected deficit for 2027 would be if the rate does not change. B) 33% Recovery (-$522,232) – This would be a 3-step approach to breaking even where we’d recover 33% of the deficit in 2027 and then recover another third in 2028 and the last third in 2029 where then revenues would match expenses. C) Half Recovery (-$391,238) – This would be a 2-step approach to breaking even where we’d look to recover 50% of the deficit in 2027 and then revaluate for 2028 with likely a second increase to cover the remaining 50%. D) Break Even ($1,746) – this was the rates we’d need to charge to have the sewer utility break even in 2027. The goal of this would be to have revenues match expenses in 2027. E) A verage Rates for Area Communities ($23,840) – This scenario put our rates at the average for the area communities for 2027. Overall, this scenario is a little more than the break even scenario, but does project a slight positive net income. F) Compare to the next highest community above break even ($318,518) – If we wanted to have some positive net income in 2027, but didn’t want to change our positioning with our neighboring communities at a break even point. This scenario would leave us just under a quarterly cost for the Village of Kronenwetter. A table of those scenarios is shown below: Scenario Total Revenue Total Expenses Net Income A $3,141,684 $3,925,000 - $783,316 B $3,402,768 $3,925,000 -$522,232 C $3,533,762 $3,925,000 -$391,238 D $3,926,746 $3,925,000 $1,746 E $3,948,840 $3,925,000 $23,840 F $4,243,518 $3,925,000 $318,518 When looking at neighboring communities in Central Wisconsin, and assuming an average residential property uses 12,000 gallons of water a quarter, the bill for a Weston Utility customer is currently $89.25, which is the 3 rd lowest in the area out of 11 communities. If we look at a stepped approach, Weston would still be the 3rd lowest community in 2027. If we wanted to get to a break-even point, Weston would move to the 5th lowest community or (5 of 11). The last scenario shows what an approximate rate would be for Weston if we got close to the 6th community, but still stayed slightly under. That scenario has a positive net income over $318,000. The figures below show this data in a tabular and graphical format. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 3 OF 4 Table 1: Central WI Sanitary Sewer Rates as of 9/15/26 $- $20.00 $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $160.00 Central WI Sewer Quarterly Utility Rates based on a 12,000 gallon bill (updated 9/15/26) REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 4 OF 4 There are many different combinations we can make, but I’d like to get this discussion started here so we can look at where we want to be by the end of 2027. We’ve been using up fund balance the last several years running at a deficit and should look at breaking even at a minimum in the near future as it’s not sustainable to keep the rates where they are currently. Staff is looking for guidance on the scenarios and other opinions the committee may have. Rib Mountain does have a separate sewer charge for industrial users, which is a higher rate than residential and commercial users. That is another option we could look at, but is not as common. Attached Docs: - See above tables and graphs - Scenario Calculations __________ ____________________________________________________________ Committee Action: - Public Works previously recommended an increase in 2024 Fiscal Impact: - Sewer utility is projected to have a deficit of $783,316 in 2027. _______________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Recommendation: Staff recommends moving forward with a rate increase for 2027 and is looking for feedback from the Committee on how best to move forward. A breakeven increase would raise a residential quarterly bill by $25.07. Recommended Language for Official Action I Move to _______________________ . Or, Something else ____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: Weston Sewer Utility 10/07/26 2027 Financial Projections Projected Total Expenses for 2027 3,925,000$ 325,000$ 3,600,000$ 1,113,753$ 2,486,247$ 1,702,931$ (Based on 2025 flow) Units Billed in (1000's of gallons) = 374,270.6 @ $4.55 (783,316.0) Shortfall Estimated 2027 Base Charge Revenues with $0.00/1000 Increase Base charges increased ±0% Customer count as of 12/31/25 Meter Size Rate/Qtr. Base Charge Ratio (multiple of 5/8") Number of Meters Equivalent Meters Total Annual Charges 5/8" / 3/4" $34.65 1.0 5,859 5,859.0 812,057 $ 1" $103.43 3.0 147 441.0 60,817 $ 1 1/2" $206.85 6.0 136 816.0 112,526$ 2" $344.40 10.0 40 400.0 55,104 $ 3" $791.70 23.0 12 276.0 38,002 $ 4" $1,411.20 41.0 4 164.0 22,579 $ 6" $3,166.80 92.0 1 92.0 12,667$ Totals 6,199.0 8,048.0 1,113,753$ Revenue Excess/(Shortfall) (783,316)$ Increase in Base Rate Needed (%) 70.33% Increase in total equivalent meters needed 5,652 Increase in volume charges to meet total revenue target 31.51% Average Residential Bill (48,000 gallons per year) 34.65$ 54.60$ 89.25$ 0.00%% Change from '26 2027 Estimate: Option A - Do Nothing Projected Non-operating (Other) Income Required Operating Revenue from metered sales = Estimated Revenue from Base Charges Required Revenue from Volume Charges = Estimated Revenue from Volume Charges = Revenue Excess (Shortfall) from metered sales = Weston Sewer Utility 10/07/26 2027 Financial Projections Projected Total Expenses for 2027 3,925,000$ 325,000$ 3,600,000$ 1,225,128$ 2,374,872$ 1,852,640$ (Based on 2025 flow) Units Billed in (1000's of gallons) = 374,270.6 @ $4.95 (522,232.5) Shortfall Estimated 2027 Base Charge Revenues with $0.40/1000 Increase Base charges increased ±10% Customer count as of 12/31/25 Meter Size Rate/Qtr. Base Charge Ratio (multiple of 5/8") Number of Meters Equivalent Meters Total Annual Charges 5/8" / 3/4" $38.12 1.0 5,859 5,859.0 893,263 $ 1" $113.77 3.0 147 441.0 66,899 $ 1 1/2" $227.54 6.0 136 816.0 123,779$ 2" $378.84 10.0 40 400.0 60,614 $ 3" $870.87 23.0 12 276.0 41,802 $ 4" $1,552.32 41.0 4 164.0 24,837 $ 6" $3,483.48 92.0 1 92.0 13,934$ Totals 6,199.0 8,381.0 1,225,128$ Revenue Excess/(Shortfall) (522,232)$ Increase in Base Rate Needed (%) 42.63% Increase in total equivalent meters needed 3,425 Increase in volume charges to meet total revenue target 21.99% Average Residential Bill (48,000 gallons per year) 38.12$ 59.40$ 97.52$ 9.26%% Change from '26 2027 Estimate: Option B - 33% Recovery Projected Non-operating (Other) Income Required Operating Revenue from metered sales = Estimated Revenue from Base Charges Required Revenue from Volume Charges = Estimated Revenue from Volume Charges = Revenue Excess (Shortfall) from metered sales = Weston Sewer Utility 10/07/26 2027 Financial Projections Projected Total Expenses for 2027 3,925,000$ 325,000$ 3,600,000$ 1,225,128$ 2,374,872$ 1,983,634$ (Based on 2025 flow) Units Billed in (1000's of gallons) = 374,270.6 @ $5.30 (391,237.8) Shortfall Estimated 2027 Base Charge Revenues with $0.75/1000 Increase Base charges increased ±10% Customer count as of 12/31/25 Meter Size Rate/Qtr. Base Charge Ratio (multiple of 5/8") Number of Meters Equivalent Meters Total Annual Charges 5/8" / 3/4" $38.12 1.0 5,859 5,859.0 893,263 $ 1" $113.77 3.0 147 441.0 66,899 $ 1 1/2" $227.54 6.0 136 816.0 123,779$ 2" $378.84 10.0 40 400.0 60,614 $ 3" $870.87 23.0 12 276.0 41,802 $ 4" $1,552.32 41.0 4 164.0 24,837 $ 6" $3,483.48 92.0 1 92.0 13,934$ Totals 6,199.0 8,381.0 1,225,128$ Revenue Excess/(Shortfall) (391,238)$ Increase in Base Rate Needed (%) 31.93% Increase in total equivalent meters needed 2,566 Increase in volume charges to meet total revenue target 16.47% Average Residential Bill (48,000 gallons per year) 38.12$ 63.60$ 101.72$ 13.97%% Change from '26 Projected Non-operating (Other) Income Required Operating Revenue from metered sales = Estimated Revenue from Base Charges Required Revenue from Volume Charges = Estimated Revenue from Volume Charges = Revenue Excess (Shortfall) from metered sales = 2027 Estimate: Option C - Half Recovery Weston Sewer Utility 10/07/26 2027 Financial Projections Projected Total Expenses for 2027 3,925,000$ 325,000$ 3,600,000$ 1,225,128$ 2,374,872$ 2,376,618$ (Based on 2025 flow) Units Billed in (1000's of gallons) = 374,270.6 @ $6.35 1,746.4 Excess Estimated 2027 Base Charge Revenues with $1.80/1000 Increase Base charges increased ±10% Customer count as of 12/31/25 Meter Size Rate/Qtr. Base Charge Ratio (multiple of 5/8") Number of Meters Equivalent Meters Total Annual Charges 5/8" / 3/4" $38.12 1.0 5,859 5,859.0 893,263 $ 1" $113.77 3.0 147 441.0 66,899 $ 1 1/2" $227.54 6.0 136 816.0 123,779$ 2" $378.84 10.0 40 400.0 60,614 $ 3" $870.87 23.0 12 276.0 41,802 $ 4" $1,552.32 41.0 4 164.0 24,837 $ 6" $3,483.48 92.0 1 92.0 13,934$ Totals 6,199.0 8,048.0 1,225,128$ Revenue Excess/(Shortfall) 1,746$ Increase in Base Rate Needed (%) -0.14% Increase in total equivalent meters needed (11) Increase in volume charges to meet total revenue target -0.07% Average ResAverage Residential Bill (48,000 gallons per year) Base Charge 38.12$ Volume Charge 76.20$ Total 114.32$ 28.08%% Change from '26 Projected Non-operating (Other) Income Required Operating Revenue from metered sales = Estimated Revenue from Base Charges Required Revenue from Volume Charges = Estimated Revenue from Volume Charges = Revenue Excess (Shortfall) from metered sales = 2027 Estimate: Option D - Break Even Weston Sewer Utility 10/07/26 2027 Financial Projections Projected Total Expenses for 2027 3,925,000$ 325,000$ 3,600,000$ 1,269,678$ 2,330,322$ 2,354,162$ (Based on 2025 flow) Units Billed in (1000's of gallons) = 374,270.6 @ $6.29 23,840.3 Excess Estimated 2027 Base Charge Revenues with $1.74/1000 Increase Base charges increased ±14% Customer count as of 12/31/25 Meter Size Rate/Qtr. Base Charge Ratio (multiple of 5/8") Number of Meters Equivalent Meters Total Annual Charges 5/8" / 3/4" $39.50 1.0 5,859 5,859.0 925,745 $ 1" $117.91 3.0 147 441.0 69,331 $ 1 1/2" $235.81 6.0 136 816.0 128,280$ 2" $392.62 10.0 40 400.0 62,819 $ 3" $902.54 23.0 12 276.0 43,322 $ 4" $1,608.77 41.0 4 164.0 25,740 $ 6" $3,610.15 92.0 1 92.0 14,441$ Totals 6,199.0 8,381.0 1,269,678$ Revenue Excess/(Shortfall) 23,840$ Increase in Base Rate Needed (%) -1.88% Increase in total equivalent meters needed (151) Increase in volume charges to meet total revenue target -1.02% Average Residential Bill (48,000 gallons per year) 39.50$ 75.48$ 114.98$ 28.83% Revenue Excess (Shortfall) from metered sales = % Change from '26 2027 Estimate: Option E - Average in Area Estimated Revenue from Volume Charges = Estimated Revenue from Base Charges Required Revenue from Volume Charges = Projected Non-operating (Other) Income Required Operating Revenue from metered sales = Weston Sewer Utility 10/07/26 2027 Financial Projections Projected Total Expenses for 2027 3,925,000$ 325,000$ 3,600,000$ 1,392,191$ 2,207,809$ 2,526,327$ (Based on 2025 flow) Units Billed in (1000's of gallons) = 374,270.6 @ $6.75 318,517.5 Excess Estimated 2027 Base Charge Revenues with $2.20/1000 Increase Base charges increased ±25% Customer count as of 12/31/25 Meter Size Rate/Qtr. Base Charge Ratio (multiple of 5/8") Number of Meters Equivalent Meters Total Annual Charges 5/8" / 3/4" $43.31 1.0 5,859 5,859.0 1,015,072$ 1" $129.29 3.0 147 441.0 76,021 $ 1 1/2" $258.56 6.0 136 816.0 140,658$ 2" $430.50 10.0 40 400.0 68,880 $ 3" $989.63 23.0 12 276.0 47,502 $ 4" $1,764.00 41.0 4 164.0 28,224 $ 6" $3,958.50 92.0 1 92.0 15,834$ Totals 6,199.0 8,381.0 1,392,191$ Revenue Excess/(Shortfall) 318,518$ Increase in Base Rate Needed (%) -22.88% Increase in total equivalent meters needed (1,838) Increase in volume charges to meet total revenue target -14.43% Average Residential Bill (48,000 gallons per year) 43.31$ 81.00$ 124.31$ 39.29% Revenue Excess (Shortfall) from metered sales = % Change from '26 2027 Estimate: Option F - Next Community Estimated Revenue from Volume Charges = Estimated Revenue from Base Charges Required Revenue from Volume Charges = Projected Non-operating (Other) Income Required Operating Revenue from metered sales = REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 1 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Preliminary Inflow and Infiltration Study Results From: Josh Swenson - Utility Superintendent Michael Wodalski, PE - Director of Public Works Question: Should the Public Works Committee acknowledge the preliminary findings from the I&I Study? Background The Weston Sanitary Utility contracted with In-Pipe Technologies to study a portion of the Village of Rothschild where Weston provides water and sewer service. This area is known to have high groundwater and we have historically had more watermain breaks in this area due to the clay soils. Staff thought this would be a good area to start the study in as it has the natural characteristics that would make the area prone to I & I. The study did appear to find 3 likely areas of I&I that we will then target for lining and repair. Attached Docs: - Preliminary Study Findings ______________________________________________________________________ Committee Action: - Committee previously approved the study Fiscal Impact: - The future costs are yet to be determined, but the goal would be the expense of lining these areas would be somewhat offset by the reduction of wastewater flows we currently are being charged for. _______________ ___________________________________________________________ Recommendation: Staff recommendation is to acknowledge the study results. Recommended Language for Official Action I Move to ________________________________ . Or, Something else ____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: I N F L O W & I N F I L T R A T I O N S T U D Y Weston I&I Study Sanitary sewer flow monitoring & basin analysis · Weston, WI In-Pipe Technology · October 2026 CONFIDENTIAL 1 Background & Methods What I&I is, where we looked, and how we measured it I & I 1 0 1 Two Ways Extra Water Gets Into Your Sewers Both consume treatment capacity, drive overflows (SSOs), and can trigger regulatory action 3 / 30 INFILTRATION (Mostly Groundwater) Slow & steady Highest when the water table is up INFLOW (Stormwater) Fast & rain-driven Spikes during and right after rain G ets in throug h… W hen you see it Infiltration Cracked pipe, bad joints, defective laterals, leaky manhole walls Steady overnight floor that won't drop Inflow Roof downspouts, foundation drains, sump pumps, holes in manhole covers Sharp peak that tracks the rain gauge Goal of this study: find which basins leak the most so rehab dollars go where they cut the most excess flow. M O N I T O R I N G N E T W O R K I-Tracker Meters Ultrasonic level sensors at basin outlets, recording every 15 minutes 4 / 30 METERED BASINS 14 RECORDING INTERVAL 15 min STORMS ≥ 0.25 IN 4 08/21 reported M O N I T O R I N G N E T W O R K System Schematics 5 / 30 METERED BASINS 1.1 1.2•Three independent i-Tracker trees drain to separate outfalls: Weston 1, 2 and 3. •14 meters recorded from 07/21/2026 to 09/02/2026 at 15-minute intervals. •Weston 2.5 sits in the 2.4 chain, but its usable record ends 08/07, so Weston 2.4 and 2.6 are compared directly across the gap it leaves. •Weston 1.3 holds a single record in the level workbook and is not metered, so it does not appear in this analysis. 1 3.1 3.2 3 2.1 2.4 2 2.22.3 2.62.7 Rainfall During the Study AUW gauge (Wausau), recorded hourly and spread evenly across four 15-minute steps TOTAL RAINFALL 44 days · rain on 11 of them STORMS ≥ 0.25 IN 4 of 7 wet blocks · 1 large enough to report LARGEST STORM 1.42 in A 15-minute step counts as wet if it is raining, or if it rained within the previous 24 hours. That rule, not a storm list, defines every dry-weather baseline in this deck. 6 / 30 2.83 in 08/21–22 · peak 0.94 in/hr MONITORING NETWORK Only the Aug 21-22, 2026 storm (1.42 in) is large enough to carry an RDII result. M E T H O D O L O G Y How We Turned Depth Into Findings Four steps — kept practical, with no equations needed on the floor 7 / 30 1. Level → Flow WHAT WE DID • Depth in a known pipe converts to flow using partial-pipe hydraulics (Manning, 8 in everywhere except i-Tracker 3 at 10 in). • Anchored so each site's dry-weather mean equals its routed land-use base flow. 2. Isolate basins WHAT WE DID • Subtract upstream meters from each meter's reading. • Leaves the basin's OWN flow — the basis for all per-basin I&I. • Worked through for Basin 3.2 on the next three slides. 3. Groundwater OVERNIGHT LOW (GWII) • Read the overnight low (2–5 a.m.) when sanitary use is near zero. • A floor that won't drop = possible infiltration. Needs velocity to confirm. 4. Rain response STORM vs BASELINE (RDII) • Flow during the 08/21-22 storm (A) minus the matching dry-weather baseline (B). • A − B = the rain-driven excess, reported in GPM and per 1,000 ft of pipe. 2 Overall Results Base flow, dry-weather diurnal, groundwater & rain response A N A L Y S I S E X A M P L E Basin 3.2 — The Site 9 / 30 Basin Pipeline length (ft) 3.2 958.0 Manhole condition recorded at installation A N A L Y S I S E X A M P L E Basin 3.2 — Groundwater (GWII) 10 / 30 Basin N ig ht- m in flow (G PM ) D ry- weather m ean (G PM ) Low / m ean Intensity (G PM / 1,000 ft) Weston 3.2 1.10 1.50 0.73 1.15 Basin Pipeline length (ft) 3.2 958.0 The same calculation is applied to all 14 basins, then ranked across the study area. F I N D I N G - G R O U N D W A T E R Potential Groundwater Infiltration (GWII) Isolated basin flow — the overnight low, and that low per 1,000 ft of the basin's own pipe 11 / 30 Basin N ig ht- m in flow (G PM ) Intensity (G PM / 1,000 ft) Rating Weston 2 1.70 1.54 HIGH Weston 2.3 1.90 1.23 HIGH Weston 3.2 1.10 1.15 MODERATE A N A L Y S I S E X A M P L E Basin 3.2 — Rain Response (RDII) 12 / 30 The same calculation is applied to all 14 basins, then ranked across the study area. Basin A — wet (G PM ) B — d ry (G PM ) A − B (G PM ) Pipe length (ft) Intensity (G PM / 1,000 ft) Weston 3.2 1.8 1.6 +0.20 958 +0.21 Analysis period: the rain period plus 2 hours F I N D I N G - R A I N R E S P O N S E Rain-Driven Response (RDII) — Aug 21-22, 2026 13 / 30 Basin A — wet (GPM ) B — d ry (GPM ) A − B (GPM ) Intensity (G PM / 1,000 ft) Rating Weston 2 3.1 0.5 +2.60 +2.36 HIGH Weston 3.1 1.3 0.5 +0.80 +1.05 MODER ATE Weston 3 1.9 0.6 +1.30 +0.57 MODER ATE In the Weston 3 basin we observed rain-driven infiltration: the water level receded slowly for days after the storm, rather than spiking and clearing. P R I O R I T Y R A N K I N G S Next Step Priority 14 / 30 Action: smoke testing and CCTV on the HIGH reaches, to find direct inflow and infiltration paths. Look for a direct connection: a cross-connection, a yard drain, or a manhole sitting in a low spot. This narrows the field inspection from about 26,000 ft of sewer to roughly 3,300 ft, ruling out 22,700 ft. 3 I-Tracker Detailed Analysis All 14 metered basins — base flow, groundwater, rain response and follow-up Weston 3.1 Drains to Weston 3. MEAN TOTAL FLOW (GPM) Night min 0.40 · low/mean 80% GROUNDWATER (GPM) 0.40 / 0.50 isolated low / mean · ratio 0.80 RAIN RESPONSE (ISOLATED) +1.05 Findings Rain response, Aug 21-22, 2026: isolated A − B = +0.80 GPM (A 1.3, B 0.5 GPM), or +1.05 GPM per 1,000 ft of its own pipe. Highest isolated rain-response intensity after Weston 2: 1.05 GPM per 1,000 ft over a short 763 ft reach. The peak reached 4.4 GPM against a 0.5 GPM baseline - a factor of 9.5, the largest multiplier in the study. The dry record ends 08/24, so it covers this storm but not the later ones. Recommended follow-up: a manhole inspection and a velocity reading on the next field visit; not a priority reach. 16 / 30 0.50 GPM GPM/1,000 ft · MODERATE Weston 3.2 Drains to Weston 3. MEAN TOTAL FLOW (GPM) Night min 1.10 · low/mean 73% GROUNDWATER (GPM) isolated low / mean · ratio 0.73 RAIN RESPONSE (ISOLATED) +0.21 Findings Rain response, Aug 21-22, 2026: isolated A − B = +0.20 GPM (A 1.8, B 1.6 GPM), or +0.21 GPM per 1,000 ft of its own pipe. Isolated night-minimum intensity of 1.15 GPM per 1,000 ft, third highest in the study, on a short 958 ft reach. The mean response is modest but the peak reached 5.4 GPM against a 1.5 GPM baseline, +3.8 GPM. A flat mean beside a sharp peak points to a direct inflow path rather than slow infiltration. Recommended follow-up: a manhole inspection and a velocity reading on the next field visit; not a priority reach. 17 / 30 1.50 GPM GPM/1,000 ft · LOW 1.10 / 1.50 Weston 3 System outfall. Receives Weston 3.1 and 3.2. MEAN TOTAL FLOW (GPM) Night min 2.50 · low/mean 93% GROUNDWATER (GPM) 1.00 / 0.70 isolated low / mean · ratio 1.43 RAIN RESPONSE (ISOLATED) +0.57 Findings Rain response, Aug 21-22, 2026: isolated A − B = +1.30 GPM (A 1.9, B 0.6 GPM), or +0.57 GPM per 1,000 ft of its own pipe. System outfall for the Weston 3 tree, with an isolated base flow of 0.52 GPM from 5 houses of its own. Isolated night-minimum intensity is low at 0.44 GPM per 1,000 ft. The isolated low-over-mean figure above 1 is a subtraction artifact of two small numbers, not a physical ratio. Recommended follow-up: a manhole inspection and a velocity reading on the next field visit; not a priority reach. 18 / 30 2.70 GPM GPM/1,000 ft · MODERATE Real Science. Real Results. Let's work together. In-Pipe Technology LLC 725 N. Central Avenue, Wood Dale, IL 60191 888.325.5033 · www.in-pipe.com REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 3 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Potential Utility Easement from Executive Ct to Kramer Ln From: Michael Wodalski, PE - Director of Public Works Josh Swenson – Utility Superintendent Question: Does the Public Works Committee Recommend staff work with the property owner at 7209 Executive Ct to obtain a water utility easement for a future watermain connection? Background The property owner at 7209 Executive Ct earlier this year submitted a rezone request to purchase a thin strip of land to the north of his property from his neighbor. This strip of land was not designated for any type of easement, but was envisioned as a route for a future watermain connection from the Edgewood Estates subdivision out to the Kramer Ln and Gusman Rd intersection. Currently the Edgewood Estates subdivision has two dead end watermains at either cul-de-sac (Estate Dr or Executive Ct) and the only connection to the main water system is at N Apache Ln. If there is ever an issue with REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 2 OF 3 the water system within the subdivision, all 19 properties would likely need to be without water while the issue is addressed. When the subdivision was platted, a utility easement north from the Executive Ct cul-de- sac was established to the north property line. With the property owner now looking to purchase the 33-ft strip of land north of the subdivision, the likelihood of a road connection in that location in the future becomes more unlikely and as we go through the land division process, staff would recommend securing a utility easement so a future water connection could be made. This would allow for the subdivision to be looped in the future if/when watermain is extended on Kramer Ln. There are not plans immediately for that, but the property owner does appear to be willing to work with us on an easement if the Committee determines it is necessary. In a 2029 Ross Ave is planned to have watermain extended along it’s route which will make land to the east of Kramer more ready for development which could then drive further development along Kramer Ln in the future. There would not be a need to install a watermain through the easement right away, but the land would at least be secured if it was needed in the future. Attached Docs: - ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ Committee Action: - Fiscal Impact: - The cost of the easement is to be determined _______________ ___________________________________________________________ REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 3 OF 3 Recommendation: Staff would recommend securing a utility easement for future utility connections. Recommended Language for Official Action I move to ___________________ . Or, Something else ____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 2 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Volkman St utility design from Business 51 to McIntyre St From: Michael Wodalski, PE - Director of Public Works Question: Does the Public Works Committee Recommend the Village Board approve a design contract with Becher Hoppe for water and sanitary sewer replacement on Volkman St between Business 51 and McIntyre St? Background The Village entered into a design contract with Becher Hoppe in 2022 to design the replacement of water and sanitary sewer within the Business 51 corridor. During this time, the Village of Rothschild has been working on a watermain redundancy project to place a watermain on Volkman St between Business 51 and McIntyre St. Volkman is the divider between Weston and Rothschild in this location with Weston being to the north and Rothschild to the south. This is an area of AC watermain which we would want to have replaced if the road is being dug up. Similarly, the sanitary sewer in this area should be replaced as well due to its age. Rothschild would like to have this work completed in 2027. Along with this, there is a water interconnect between the Rothschild and Weston systems which could serve as a future metering station as well. I had also asked Becher Hoppe to look at the potential for replacing the water and sewer mains on McIntyre St. This would require a street reconstruction. As the months have gone on and the fate of the DCE Jr. High is up in the air, I think we may want to pause on any proposed work on McIntyre until we have a better understanding of the future of that site. The quote from Becher Hoppe includes Volkman and McIntyre for a cost of $45,000. The cost for Rothschild for Volkman St is $22,500, so I’d think our cost for Volkman would be similar. I have not received a revised quote or breakdown yet from Becher Hoppe for just the Volkman portion of the work, but wouldn’t anticipate it to be much different than the $22,500 amount. We do have plans to start working through the neighborhoods between the Jr. and Sr. High starting around 2029 so I think McIntyre could wait and we would have another project close by to be able to partner it with at a future date. I hope to have an updated number for the Committee on Monday. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 2 OF 2 Attached Docs: - Proposal from Becher Hoppe which includes McIntyre ______________________________________________________________________ ____________ Committee Action: - Fiscal Impact: - _______________ ___________________________________________________________ Recommendation: Staff recommends having Becher Hoppe design the infrastructure work on Volkman St between BUS 51 and McIntyre Recommended Language for Official Action I move to ___________________ . Or, Something else ____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: October 6, 2026 Michael Wodalski PE Director of Public Works Village of Weston 4747 Camp Phillips Road Weston, Wi 54476 Subject: Proposal Agreement for Utility and Roadway Improvements Associated to Volkman Dr and McIntyre Avenue. Dear Mr. Wodalski Thank you for the opportunity to provide this Proposal Agreement for design engineering services associated to utility and roadway improvements on Volkman Drive (McIntyre Avenue to East Grand Avenue) and McIntyre Avenue (Volkman Dr to Machmueller St). It is understood that the Village of Weston and the Village of Rothschild would like to engage in a joint project for infrastructure improvements for the limits described above on Volkman Drive, and the Village of Weston would like to also complete street and utility design on McIntyre Ave. Our team has completed much of the field survey and preliminary water main design for Volkman Dr. with adjacent projects, and we plan to utilize as much of this information as possible for these projects. Below you will find a detailed scope associated with the work. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. SCOPE / DESCRIPTION Basic services to be provided by Becher-Hoppe Associates, Inc. (BHA) include the following: 1. Utilize field survey data including right of way, topography, utilities, and existing digital terrain model, collected by others for the WisDOT (6999-12-80/88/89) project. 2. Verify existing utilities by calling in a new Diggers Hotline Ticket and surveying the existing utilities as needed. 3. Perform field survey services for McIntyre Street from Volkman Drive to Machmueller Street. The survey will include collecting all ground data, utilities, measure downs, and right of way within the area described. 4. Final design of roadway 5. Storm Sewer Design 6. Sanitary Sewer Design 7. Water Main Design a. New water main pipe, laterals, fittings, and hydrants 8. Prepare final plans for bidding a. Title Sheet b. General Notes c. Construction Details d. Existing Conditions e. Project Overview f. Erosion Control g. Utility Plan and Profile Page 2 of 5 h. Roadway Plan and Profile i. Cross Sections 9. Obtain necessary permits/approval a. Water main replacement b. Sanitary sewer replacement c. Notice of Intent Storm Water Permit d. Natural Heritage Inventory Portal (NHI) Endangered Resources Review Request (ERR) 10. Opinion of Probably Costs 11. Specifications a. EJCDC Contract documents b. Technical standard specifications incorporating Weston’s and Rothschild’s Specifications. 12. Review Meetings a. One meeting for preliminary design review (2 hours) b. One meeting for final design review (2 hours) 13. Bidding a. Upload bidding package into Quest b. Answer Bidder questions – develop addenda as needed c. Review bidder “Qualification Statements” d. Conduct project bid opening; tabulate and analyze bids e. Provide award recommendations ADDITIONAL SERVICES We can provide additional services as may be required and will provide a Proposal for such services upon request.  Geotechnical Services  Establish Right of Way  Design Alternates  Phased Design  Construction Oversite Services o Administration o Oversite o Staking CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES The Village of Weston (Client) shall provide or make available all relevant information and data pertaining to this project to BHA. The Client shall also provide access to all private and public property which is required for Becher Hoppe to perform their services. COMPENSATION Compensation for our work will be based on our current standard billing rates and expenses. See attached Becher Hoppe 2026 Rate Schedule for example. Our opinion of the cost to perform Basic Services is estimated at $45,000. Page 3 of 5 PROJECT PERSONNEL The Project Manager will be Joe Kafczynski who may be reached at 715-574-6031 or jkafczynski@becherhoppe.com. If Joe is not available, your secondary contact will be Matt Graun who may be reached at 715-316-2241 or mgraun@becherhoppe.com. TIME FRAME We will commence work on this Project immediately upon receipt of your accepted copy of this Proposal Agreement. We anticipate completion of our work by spring of 2027. STANDARD CONDITIONS Included with this Proposal Agreement is our Standard Terms and Conditions, which are part of this Proposal Agreement for professional services. Please review the Standard Terms and Conditions. ACCEPTANCE If the terms of this Proposal Agreement are acceptable, please sign and return to me. This Proposal is valid for 60 days. We look forward to the opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, Matthew T Graun Joe Kafczynski, P.E. Vice President Project Manager MTG/ Document1 ACCEPTED BY: CLIENT NAME Signature: ____________________________________ Name: ______________________________________ Title: _______________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ Classification Hourly Rate Per Diem Rate Engineering Specialist $230 Meal-Breakfast (at IRS rate) $16.00 Project Engineer III $200 Meal-Lunch (at IRS rate) $19.00 Project Engineer II $180 Meal-Dinner (at IRS rate) $28.00 Project Engineer I $160 Travel (at IRS rate) $0.725/mile Structural Engineer $170 Lod ging At Cost Civil 3D Designer $180 Field Equipment Rate Resource Manager $180 GPS $40/Hou r Staff Engineer $120 Robotic Total Station $40/Hou r Engineer Intern $90 Drone $100/Hou r CAD Technician III $135 Supplies Rate CAD Technician II $125 Posta ge At Cost CAD Technician I $115 Printin g Materials At Cost Project Representative III $135 Other Rate Project Representative II $125 Permittin g / Plan Approval Fees At Cost Project Representative I $115 Sub-consultant’s Fee X 1.10 Expert Witness Rate X 2 Professional Land Surveyor, PLS $175 Overtime Rate X 1.25 Survey Supervisor $155 Survey Technician II $115 Survey Technician I $105 Real Estate Specialist II $180 Updated 2/12/26 Technical Assistant $120 2026 Rate Schedule Becher-Hoppe Associates, Inc. reserves the right to adjust any portion of the rate schedule as needed to reflect the firm’s salary and reimbursable expenses review practices. Invoice billing rates will be adjusted accordingly. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 2 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: WisDOT Storm Pond Design Services – Amendment 3 From: Michael Wodalski, PE - Director of Public Works Question: Should the Public Works Committee Recommend the Village Board Approve an Engineering Contract Amendment with Strand Associates to provide construction and Clean Water Fund Loan services for the BUS 51 Storm Pond in an amount of $92,800? Background The Village of Weston has been working with Strand Associates for the design of the Business 51 (WisDOT Storm Pond) to provide phosphorus removal from the Village’s storm sewer system prior to discharging storm water into the Wisconsin River. This is a joint project with the Village of Rothschild and City of Schofield. We submitted a Clean Water Fund application in fall of 2025 and are preparing to bid this project over the 2026-2027 winter. As we went through the Clean Water Fund process, it was determined that the Village of Weston and Rothschild would not be eligible for any Principal Forgiveness on this project. The City of Schofield would be, but only for the percentage of the project they are responsible for, which is fairly minimal and a new application would need to be submitted which likely would cost more than the Principal Forgiveness amount. Therefore, we will be proceeding with the Village of Weston as the lead agency for construction of the project as we have the highest contribution and benefit from the project. As we move into construction and get into the Clean Water Fund (CWF) process, we will need the assistance of a qualified consultant. With Strand working with us up to this point, the communities would prefer to continue working with Strand as they have the most familiarity with the project and storm ponds is one of their areas of expertise. Based on the drainage areas going to the basin, costs for the project are broken out as: - 70.5% Weston = $65,424.00 - 27.8% Rothschild = $25,798.40 - 1.7% Schofield = $1,577.60 In discussing this with both Rothschild and Schofield staff they are of the opinion we should continue working with Strand. We are also still pursuing a partnership with the Wisconsin DOT as they would also see some benefit from the pond and they could then claim phosphorus removal too. Attached Docs: - Draft Contract Amendment ______________________________________________________________________ Committee Action: - Public Works Approved previous contract and project Fiscal Impact: - The Weston cost is an additional $65,424.00 paid by the Storm Water Utility. This is a Capital Project planned for construction in 2027 REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 2 OF 2 _______________ ___________________________________________________________ Recommendation: Staff recommends approving the design contract amendment. Recommended Language for Official Action I Move to recommend the Village Board approve the contract amendment with Strand Associates for Construction and Clean Water Fund Loan oversight for the WisDOT Storm Pond Project in an amount of $92,800. Or, Something else ____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 1 OF 3 Public Mtg/Date: Public Works Committee – 10/12/2026 Description: Draft 2026 Street Maintenance Plan From: Michael Wodalski, PE - Director of Public Works Forrest Blarek – Street Superintendent Question: Does the Public Works Committee Recommend the Village Board approve moving forward with the 2026 street maintenance work as presented by staff? Background Attached is a preliminary plan of items to be completed in 2027 for contracted street maintenance. As we were moving through the 2027 budget we now feel the amounts to be approved for 2027 are set and we can then start working on getting bid packages setup for the 2027 work. This draft plan for 2027 currently includes: • Routine crack sealing of asphalt streets (the eventual goal is to get 1/4 of the asphalt roads sealed every year), we’d crack seal any street that is to receive the GSB-88 seal this year as well as recent overlays and newly paved roads. Staff will begin crack sealing roads as soon as temperatures allow in spring during weight limit periods as well to get the lower volume streets sealed. • Asphalt Overlays (2.36 Miles) o Mesker St (Ross Ave to Schofield Ave) – This is a main connector between two major east/west streets in the Village. It also has several manufacturing facilities along it which see heavy truck use and as a result the street is beginning to have signs of rutting and pavement failure. o River Meadow, Louann and Roxanne – This is a continuation of some of the older streets in the Sandy Meadows area that we started to overlay in the last few years There is spots of severe pavement deterioration within the wheel paths and an overlay will correct that. o Alderson St (Schofield Ave to Jelinek Ave) – Over the past two years there has been major construction on either end of this segment and detours have used this route so shutting it down for repaving was not an option as it is a main connector for the Target area, Kennedy Park and the High School complex. The pavement in this area has some areas of extensive cracking, rutting and general pavement failure. o River Bend Rd (Apache to Kiowa) – this shorter section of road has general pavement failure, extensive cracking and has lost its crown. An overlay will restore proper drainage and improve the ride quality. • GSB-88 (4.47 Miles) o This is the Gilsonite asphalt rejuvenator that we have been using in recent years to help keep the newer pavements in good condition. This product REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 2 OF 3 helps restore the asphalt content of the pavement and helps to keep cracking to a minimum as asphalt pavement ages.  Streets planned for this year are: • Sandhill and Crane Meadows Subdivisions which were overlaid in 2024. These are located east of Alderson St and south of Shorey Ave. • Eau Claire Ave, Raybelle, Pleasant View, Deere, Rudolph, these streets were overlaid in the 2020-2022 range and are located between Alderson St and CR-X. • Hinner Springs Subdivision Streets. These roads have now been completed and have seen a fair amount of construction traffic so now would be a good time to apply a rejuvenator and get the roads back to a like new state. • Concrete Repairs o Schofield Ave between Mesker St and Teagan Ln will be targeted. In 2026 we did the eastbound lanes and 2027 would then focus on the westbound lanes in this section. • We then also carry an unassigned budget of roughly $50,000 for asphalt pavement repairs which is used for wedging, pothole patching, paving short sections of poor pavement, etc. • Repaving – For 2027 we’ll look at repaving E Everest Ave west of Kathleen St. The new Mountain Bay Metro Police Department will have a driveway access on the far west side of E Everest Ave and we’d look to coordinate repaving the rest of E Everest then to Kathleen St as that section of roadway is in poor condition. With Howland Ave being reconstructed in 2027, staff will also look at rebuilding the western portion of Woodland Dr. Woodland has sections of nearly failed pavement and we would rebuild the road similar to what was completed this past year on Shirley Ave. Overall, the total cost of this plan has an estimated amount of $848,789.28. There is $650,000 budgeted in the Operating Fund and $200,000 in the CIP budget for the concrete repairs. With that $850,000 budgeted expense, a contingency amount of $1,210.72 remains in the maintenance budget. This plan will apply a surface treatment to 7.68 miles of streets in the Village. A new road should generally be crack sealed and have a GSB seal within the first 3 years with then routine crack sealing every 2-3 years thereafter. If we can keep up with these low-cost treatments as we get new pavement (either via reconstruction, repaving or as an overlay) the pavement life should be significantly extended as compared to just paving and letting the road go. A chipseal is the intermediate treatment when aggregate loss in the pavement starts becoming prevalent and those small voids need REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION PAGES 3 OF 3 to be filled. As long as the road itself is still structurally sound (no dips, potholes, etc.) a chipseal is still a cost-effective treatment to further extend the life of the roadway. The asphalt overlay is generally a corrective treatment for roads that have experienced some settling, rutting, heaving, etc. and the cross slope and crown of the road need to be re-established. In general, we try to take care of other roadway deficiencies when we overlay a road (replace broken curb, fix any inlets, manholes, replace culverts, etc.) and in essence it becomes a mini revitalization of not just the pavement section but also the drainage and other utility infrastructure. Attached Docs: - Draft 2027 Street Maintenance Plan and Map ______________________________________________________________________ Committee Action: Public Works has discussed the draft plan previously Fiscal Impact: - The plan as presented is within the proposed 2027 budget. _______________ ___________________________________________________________ Recommendation: Staff recommends moving forward with the plan as presented Recommended Language for Official Action I move to recommend the Village Board approve the 2027 Street Maintenance Plan as presented. Or, Something else ____________________________________________________________________ Additional action: 10/7/26 Maintenance Length Area Treatment (miles) (SY) Comments Chipseal (Double Chip) Subtotal 0.00 - $0.00 Gilson ite Sealer / GSB-88 Comments Sandhill Subdivision 0.47 8,118.33 $9,336.08 Crane Meadows Subdivision 0.97 16,641.11 $19,137.28 Eau Claire Ave 0.99 13,263.89 $15,253.47 Raybelle 0.47 7,245.56 $8,332.39 Pleasant View, Deere, Rudolph 0.52 7,930.00 $9,119.50 Hinner Springs 1.05 15,228.65 $17,512.95 Hinner Springs, Kaziak, Green Pastures, Maplefield Subtotal 4.47 53,198.89 $78,691.67 Overlays and Pavement Replacement Traffic Control $7,500.00 Mesker (Ross to Schofield Ave) 0.63 12,648.89 $94,866.67 Incl Coleen Match River Meadow and Louann 0.35 6,317.78 $47,383.33 Alex to Michael Roxanne 0.24 4,102.22 $30,766.67 Starting at Jacob Cul-de-sac Alderson (Schofield Ave to Jelinek) 0.42 8,255.56 $59,626.51 River Bend Rd (Apache to Kiowa) 0.15 1,966.67 $14,204.43 Subtotal 2.36 33,291.11 $254,347.61 Repave Woodland (Howland to N/S section) $75,000.00 E Everest Ave 0.08 1,227.78 $20,000.00 From the new MBMPD Lot to Kathleen St Subtotal 0.08 $95,000.00 Cracksealing GSB Streets and newer pavements $90,000.00 Subtotal 0.00 $90,000.00 Patching Propane $750.00 Full Depth Patches $20,000.00 Chipseal Prep & Pothole Patching $15,000.00 Cold patch material Surface patching / Wedging $20,000.00 Lane Wedging, Overlays & some full section repairs Subtotal $55,750.00 Concrete Repair Schofield Ave (Mesker to Teagan) 0.77 $250,000.00 Westbound Lanes Bridge Deck Repairs $5,000.00 Sidewalk $10,000.00 Hospital Area Curb Repair $10,000.00 Subtotal 0.77 $275,000.00 TOTAL 7.68 $848,789.28 Plus CIP Funding $200,000.00 NET TOTAL $648,789.28 Contingency $1,210.72 DRAFT 2027 SURFACE MAINTENANCE BUDGET Estimated Cost All streets to be GSB'd, streets that were recently overlaid/paved. DRAFT SCHOFIELD AV SHOREY AV CAMP PHILLIPS RD RYAN ST HEEREN ST BIRCH ST ALDERSON ST JELINEK AV FULLER ST KMIECIK ST CALLON AV JONES ST MESKER ST HOWLAND AV E JELINEK AV STERNBERG AV SANDY LN EAU CLAIRE AV NEUPERT AV PINE ST RINGLE RD VON KANEL ST ISAIAH ST ALEX ST HEUSS AV CONCORD AV COMMUNITY CENTER DR NORTHWESTERN AV RIVER BEND RD BABL LN WILLARD LN EVEREST AV FERGE ST THOMAS AV DALEY AV DJ LN ISAIAH ST MALLARD CT FOOTHILL AV TRICIA AV WOODLAND DR SCENIC DR JANICE AV KELLYLAND ST LINDA ST PINE PARK ST MARY LN SUNSET ST CEDAR AV FOX ST ASPEN ST S TIMBER ST ROGAN LN COMMERCE DR BLOEDEL AV PAT ST CHRISTIE LN AUGUSTINE AV ENTERPRISE WAY POST AV SCOTT ST MOUNT VIEW AV CUTOFF RD CHADWICK ST LANG LN BUSKA ST LAHR AV MACHMUELLER ST LEE AV HEWITT AV GORDON ST ELM ST COROZALLA DR CONNIE LN JOSEPH AV LORA LEE LN ZADRA ST CREEL DR STELLA AV PINE TER JAMES LEE ST NORMA AV NICK AV APACHE LN JM PL JAGLER LN WINDSOR DR TEAGAN LN VENTURE CIR TECHNOLOGY DR MORNING VIEW LN VERN LN OLD COSTA LN HUNT ST HARNEY AV SHIRLEY AV HOLMAN RD SKI LN N APACHE LN HOLLY AV POWERS ST RADTKE AV ALAN LN CALEB DR MOYER AV KENNEDY AV FEITH AV MUNICIPAL ST GLAD ST BRUCE DR RIVER PINES MAPLE ST PARK RIDGE DR BERNARD AV RYAN AMY DR BEVERLY LN TROTZER LN WESTFAIR AV LOUANN DR MEMORY LN DEER ST LAGUNA AV QUENTIN ST LABRADOR RDMONTEREY AV PRAIRIE ST JACOB ST BREHM ST CHERRY ST ALTA VERDE ST HAMPTON AV WILLOW ST JAMAR ST SANDHILL DR CHERYL DR SAXON AV HEATH ST JANELLE ST MEADOW LN EDWARDS ST BRIANNA ST KYLE RD QUENTIN ST DECKER ST KIOWA LN JARP ST DAWN ST CECIL ST RUDOLPH DR S GORDON ST CHRISTIANSEN AV MEURET LN SETTER RD E NEUPERT AV PENINSULA LN MUSKIE DR ELSEGUNDO AV N HORSESHOE DR S HORSESHOE DR DEPOT ST FELCH DR ABITZ ST DUSK STKELLY PL SIBERIAN DR ERIC ST BURNS ST E RAYBELLE DR RANDOM ST SCHOONOVER RD BAYBERRY ST CARIBOU LN HUBERT ST RICKYVAL ST ROCK RAPIDS DR SHAWNA ST KOSTUCK LN HIDDEN RIVERCIR LAWNDALE ST OAK AV FOX RUN LN STANDING OAK DR CORONADO DR SYNERGY CT ABRAHAM ST JOAN DR DANIELLE DR WARWICK DR SHADY LN KATHLEEN ST WINDEMERE PL PLEASANT VIEW DR CAMP PHILLIPS RD RIVER MEADOW DR TRANSPORT WAY RYAN ST E BERNARD AV BIRCHWOOD LN RED OAK CT HIGH RIDGE CIR RICHFLEX ST RANDYLYN ST HIGHLAND AV ROSE ST KNAACK AV PARTNERS LN SHEPHERD LN WENDY LN JACQUELYN BLVD HEATHER ST JASON AV AMANDA DR REGENT ST PINE RIDGE LN ADVENTURE WAY BONNIE LN ORION LN VON KANEL ST CALLON AV STERNBERG AV STERNBERG AV LAWNDALE ST VOLKMAN ST ZINSER ST BIRCH ST ALTA VERDE ST STATE HIGHWAY 29 ARROW ST ROSS AV NORTHLAND ST CORTEZ LN SHOREY AV WESTON AV TANYA ST RIVER BEND RD SCHOFIELD AV CATHY ST ANDREA ST HEEREN ST STONEY GATE CIRCLE JEAN ELLEN ST OAK TER LEDUC ST PARKWAY LN S BIRCH LN BUS 51 PRIEBE AV ROXANN DR CATHY DR DOMINIKA ST POINTE RD BROLTA LN CASEYRAE CT DELIKOWSKI ST CROSSTRAIL LN HORIZON CT BECKYBLVD TWIN PINES LN CHEROKEE ST CARTER AV W RAYBELLE DR HARWOOD AV KECK AV MERIDIAN AV ROD'S WAY ROSSENBACH AV WALNUT ST HILGEMANN ST HICKORY ST SOLAR AV JESSICA ST MAKENZIE DR AMIR DR E EVEREST AV BIRCHWOOD LN WINDING CREEK DR WHITE PINES LN WESTON PINES LN MEADOW CREEK LN HIDDEN RIVER CT BROOK CT FLORLANA LN CAMP PHILLIPS RD COUNTY ROAD J SCHMUTZLER ST SARUS LN SHAWN DR E MONTEREY AV PHEASANT RUN CT N BIRCH LN COLLEEN AV RAE JAMES ST JALEN CIR DELONAY ST TERRIER LN N KRUEGER AV BOXER LN S KRUEGER AV WENONAH DR PUFFER ST MEMORIAL CT STONE GATE DR RIVER POINTELN PUBLIC ACCESS CASTLEBERRY CIR TAPPE DR SANDGATE CT MCINTYRE AV RIVERFRONT PL MICHAEL DR CRESTWOOD DR WALLEYE DR ALEX ST QUENTIN ST RICHARD AV SANDY LN ROSS AV ANNABELLE CTBARBICAN AV CROSS POINTE BLVD SPRING CREST CIRCLE MEADOWROCK DR MOOSE DR WESENICK ST JELINEK AV RIPPLING CREEK DR SILVER HAWK WAY DECOY ST CALEB DR ANTELOPE DR CANOE ST CANOE ST KAYAK DR PORTAGE ST BUS 51 COMMERCE DR WESTON AV STATE HIGHWAY 29 ZINSER ST NORMANDY ST E EVEREST AV KIRK ST STONE RIDGE DR MINISTRY PARKWAY ACRE AV DOUGLAS LN CRANBERRY BLVD RODNEY ST LEEDS CT ALDERSON ST COUNTY ROAD J RANDY JAY ST LEYBURN DR WESTVIEW BLVD SCHOFIELD AV FRANCISCAN WAY ROBIN ST CAMP PHILLIPS RD BIRCH ST VON KANEL ST Legend 2027 Maintenance Type Asphalt Overlay GSB-88 Reconstruct Repaving Concrete Repair 0 0.75 1.50.38 Miles : Created By: Village of Weston GIS Department X/XX/20XXAdoption Date (Village): 10/7/2026Map Date: 2027 Street Maintenance Map Marathon County, Wisconsin DRAFT