Plan Commission — Minutes
Village of Germantown · Washington County · Plan Commission · meeting of Sep 14, 2026 · Minutes
Open the original document More from Village of Germantown
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
MEETING: AMENDED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLAN
COMMISSION
DATE & TIME: Monday, September 14, 2026 at 6:30 PM
LOCATION: Germantown Village Hall Board Room
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: This meeting has been given public notice in accordance with
Section 19.83 and 19.84, Wis. Stats, in such form that will apprise the general public
and news media of subject matter that is intended for consideration and action.
Chairman Soderberg called the meeting to order at 6:33pm.
II. ROLL CALL:
Committee Members Soderberg, Warren, Tarantino, Williams, Henk, Fisher and Ewert
were present. Also present were Community Development Director Retzlaff,
Associate Planner Yanke and Planning Assistant Deb Remich (via Webex).
III. CITIZEN INPUT/PUBLIC APPEARANCE: (Please be advised per 19.84(2) that
information and comment will be received from the public. It is the policy of this
municipality that public input be limited to a four (4) minute period per person with a
time extension granted at the discretion of the Chairperson. Be advised that there may
be limited discussion of the information received but no action will be taken under
public comments.) Comments that may be injurious to village personnel or other
individuals will not be allowed.
Residents who spoke included:
Lynn Bednarz who lives on Pawnee Court.
Gerald Larson who lives on Hawthorne Avenue.
Steven Wesolowski who lives on Pheasant Run.
Randall Wolff who lives on Mulberry Court.
Robert Buth who lives on Lilac Lane.
Dale Pruitt who lives on Lilac Lane.
Virginia Henkel who lives on Riversbend Circle W.
IV. MEETING MINUTES:
A. PC Minutes 8-10-26 (ACTION)
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: Robert Warren
Seconded By: Russell Ewert
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Robert Williams, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino,
Russell Ewert, Brian Fisher
Page 2
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 7, No 0, Abstained 0)
V. NEW BUSINESS:
A. CR Devco, LLC, Agent for Daniel, Douglas & Todd Roskopf, John & Mary
Barnes, D&S Weyer No. II LLC, Property Owners; GTNV 282-999 & 281-978 -
Applications to (1) Amend the 2050 Future Land Use Plan classification of 40
acres from the "Schoen Laufen-Menomonee River District" to the "Lannon-
Mequon Road District"; (2) Create a new Planned Development Zoning District
(PDD) to be called "Heyday Germantown"; and (3) Rezone approximately 71
acres from the A-1: Agricultural & A-2: Agricultural Districts into the Heyday
Germantown PDD for purposes of developing a 256-unit residential community
located on Lilac Lane east of Schoen Laufen Park and west of Division Road.
(PUBLIC HEARING & ACTION) ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS ADDED
Director Retzlaff gave the background and overview of the proposed development,
which includes 47 acres of green space, onsite management, a public-use trail with a
pavilion and connection to the adjacent park. Of the 256 units proposed, 226 are one-
story attached with 4, 6 or 8 units per building, and 30 are two-story town house units
with 6 units per building. All roads within the development will be private with access to
3 public road connections, water will part of the public water system, sanitary sewer
will contain private laterals and a lift station that will connect to the public sanitary
system and there is an onsite stormwater management basin. Retzlaff introduced
Ryan Swingruber and Josh Wohlreich from CR Devco, doing business as Heyday
Development, who gave an in-depth overview of their project.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed 2050 Land Use Plan amendment to
reclassify the 40-acre “Roskopf parcel” from the “Schoen Laufen-Menomonee River
District” to the “Lannon-Mequon Road Corridor” as proposed.
Staff recommends approval of creating a Planned Development District (PDD) based
on the underlying Rm-1: Multi-Family Zoning District to be known as the “Heyday
Germantown PDD” and rezoning 71.34 acres from the A-1: Agricultural & A-2:
Agricultural Districts into the “Heyday Germantown PDD” subject to the following
requirements and conditions:
1. The Rm-1: Multi-Family Zoning District regulations shall constitute the
underlying conditions and restrictions for the PDD subject to the Developer
proposed modifications and Village staff provisions summarized herein. A
complete “conditions & restrictions” resolution establishing all use and
development allowances, requirements, and restrictions shall be drafted for
review and approval by the Village Board concurrent with review and
approval of an ordinance creating the Heyday Germantown Planned
Development District (PDD);
2. The General Development Plan dated August 25, 2026, and any
subsequent revisions necessary because of satisfying Village approvals
Page 3
shall constitute the General Development Plan (GDP) required under
Section 17.27 of the Zoning Code;
3. Developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Village
pursuant to Section 18 of the Village Code (Subdivision and Platting), as
well as, the preparation of detailed construction plans for improvements
including, but not limited to public street and intersection improvements,
sanitary sewer, water, storm water management facilities, master grading
and erosion control, landscaping & street trees, open space trails, lighting
and signage. At a minimum, said agreement shall require the review and
approval of said plans by Village staff prior to the commencement of
construction activities and establish the timing for installation of said
improvements (or as otherwise provided therein).
4. A certified survey map (CSM) is required to combine the two parcels that
comprise the Heyday Germantown PDD property (GTNV281-978&282-999).
Said CSM shall be submitted for Village approval prior to or concurrent with
Site Development & Building Plan approval.
Chairman Soderberg opened the public hearing at 7:57pm.
Residents who spoke in opposition to the project included:
Angela and Victoria Busalacchi who live on Lilac Lane.
Lynn Bednarz who lives on Pawnee Court.
Gerard Larson who lives on Hawthorne Avenue.
Melanie Smythe who lives on Cedar Lane.
Judy Rogers who lives on Wagon Trail.
Ellen Keller who lives on Lilac Lane.
Judi Kind who lives on Virginia Avenue.
Joan Schultz who lives on Harrison Circle, read her neighbors Melissa and Dan
Mulcahy's comments.
Denise and Jerry Hoinacki who live on Lilac Lane.
Neil Risler who lives on Harrison Circle.
Dennis Dee who lives on Lilac Lane.
Amanda Kaiser who lives on Lilac Lane.
Charlene Brady who lives on Hawthorne Drive.
Jan Miller who lives on Windsong Circle W.
Tom Steinbach who lives on Hilltop Drive.
Residents who spoke that were not in opposition of the project included:
Brian Sparrow who lives on Magnolia Drive.
Doug Roskopf who owns the parcel on Lilac Avenue.
Chairman Soderberg closed the public hearing at 9:09pm.
Residents concerns and applicant/developer responses included:
• Blasting: There are no basements, so the degree of blasting is very low; a
temporary blasting permit is required under Village ordinance with blasting
Page 4
further regulated under Wis. Admin Code with specific requirements for a
licensed blaster concerning pre-blast inspections and bonding.
• Stormwater pond: It's in the least invasive location which has varied bedrock at
6-10', so less blasting where it resides. They are bound by Village and State
ordinances. The pond will improve peak stormwater runoff on the site per the
current calculations. It is 8 acres and holds an additional 2.6' of depth above a
500-year storm capacity.
• How long do residents stay and retention levels: 80–90% retention, median
income of tenants $140,000/annually, 2.7 years is the average stay.
• Why not single-family homes? An independent for-sale homebuilder, Tim
O'Brien Homes, conducted an evaluation of the property on their own and
shared their conclusions with Heyday that they would not build single-family
homes on this site due to the many challenges that include blasting, road
maintenance and repairs, private lift station, extending River Lane and the price
of the land. Heyday stated that the numbers just don't add up. With the
proposed plan, whatever blasting is required will be minimal compared to what
would be required for a single-family home. The more extensive the blasting,
the more expensive it is, so Heyday plans to minimize it as much as possible.
• Traffic concerns: included the analysis being done during the summer, not
during the school year. They have offered to redo the impact analysis, but their
traffic consultant stated that despite the time of year, they take average rates
from previous data based on population and zip codes, and they apply those
rates for the study.
• Walking/running/biking safety: their internal path system would increase safety.
Earlier concepts included just an east-west trail, but they heard residents that
there wasn't walkability on Virginia and Lilac, so they created connectivity for
easier access. They would assist with any connectivity that was requested by
the Village.
• Lowering rent to encourage occupancy? That has not happened at their
facilities in Oak Creek or Sun Prairie. Rents are consistent with the market and
demographics and Germantown has even better demographics and market
data in terms of the radius of surrounding communities. There is enough
demand, population and income for this development. The average rent in
Germantown is currently $1200-$1300 for old apartments, which is low, but they
are 98% rented. These are high-end rental homes.
• Restrictions include how many renters are allowed within a unit, income
verification, credit check, and registration are all required. There is a ceiling on
how many cars you can have, parking boats or any other recreation vehicles in
driveways is not allowed. You have to qualify to live here.
• Environmentally sensitive land, how is that affected? They did an environmental
assessment that designated no environmental corridor on the property. All it
identified was 2.17 acres in the NW corner of the site that calls for a future river
trail. They will dedicate that area of the property which is wetland, and they are
required by the DNR to stay 50ft from that area.
Commissioners were in favor of the development due to:
To maintain million-dollar improvements, you need to either do a referendum or you
Page 5
have to rely on development.
We need to grow in this community. Rental developments have a stigma, but they
provide a healthy stock of homes.
The percentage of rentals to single-family homes will only increase 2% overall.
Traffic reports from TADI include several factors, and they take different seasons and
traffic patterns into account.
They are not asking for a TID or any money from the Village. They have no intention of
trading or selling an asset which they believe will be the best in their portfolio.
This is not affordable housing. That's not what they develop, but they are attainable.
Renters are saving 33% if you add all costs to purchasing a median home, so these
rents are affordable by comparison. This opens up housing stock that is closed now in
Germantown.
In addition to the proposed private lift station, Heyday is willing to install a separate
oversized gravity sanitary sewer from River Lane down to Lilac Lane through the
Heyday development that would enable both the Auroa and Heyday private lift stations
to be retired at some point in the future.
They feel that this is a minor amendment to the 2050 plan.
No residents came forward to state what they would like to see developed on this site
as an alternative. Need to consider what the Village needs.
The paths are going to improve things, along with the stormwater pond, a lot of green
space, and if you are going to put another desirable use there which would be
commercial or recreational, who wants ball fields with lights shining or commercial
parking lots with traffic? There is no alternative that would be acceptable to neighbors.
The stormwater pond is a concept this is not the final plan. There have been significant
changes to this plan since it was originally brought forward.
Bedrock will need to be crushed and that will help with the balance of the site, they
have preliminary pricing for blasting and crushing for the site. They have found that
this is feasible after receiving those costs.
Architecture has improved, but they would like to see some variability as well as the
large berm off Lilac Lane needs to be looked at. The berm is 6–8' in height for
landscaping to block headlights and the visibility of the units. They also increased the
setbacks to accommodate residents' concerns. They will bring forward material boards
and other architectural options if this project were to move forward.
Deeper garages provide options for families with SUV's and larger vehicles. So they
have adjusted the depths by 3'-4' for optionality moving forward.
School bus and fire truck turning requirements were studied, but they could do a
further study, including turn radiuses for buses and school pickup numbers. There is
no public parking on these private streets. The parking is 4 to 1 unit and there are 4-5
spaces of visitor parking as well. The roadways are slightly more narrow than
standard village roads.
In Heyday's other existing developments, renter turnover is relatively low trending
about 70% retainage for renters, so they are lower than the normal transient renter
numbers for school students, so this is a more stable rental environment than standard
rentals, with higher rents, and they retain renters with fewer school-age children.
The tax revenue for the schools and residents is significant, which means that the
$500,000 in tax revenue is significant for all residents, so that helps all of us in keeping
the tax base lower. A hard no can't be the only answer for all development in the
Village, and we need to look at the significance of the tax income that this will
generate.
Page 6
Property maintenance is provided by Village Green not Heyday directly, they are
based out of Minneapolis. There will be language in the Development Agreement that
they will maintain the greenspace and a guarantee that it will continue and that no
development will happen in that space.
Street damage from heavy loads being hauled down a new road in the Village like
Division Road, there is normally a reconstruction assessment of the road, then after
the project is complete they will provide financial guarantee in the bonding process to
make repairs as required to return the road to its original condition.
Motion: Approve Amendment to the 2050 Future Land Use Plan as presented
Motioned By: Robert Warren
Seconded By: Brian Fisher
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Robert Williams, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino,
Russell Ewert, Brian Fisher
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 7, No 0, Abstained 0)
Motion: Approve PPD with 4 conditions
Motioned By: Brian Fisher
Seconded By: Robert Warren
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Robert Williams, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino,
Russell Ewert, Brian Fisher
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 7, No 0, Abstained 0)
B. Premier Real Estate Management, LLC, Agent for Victory Place, LLC, Property
Owner. Site Plan and Certified Survey Map applications for a 48-unit
multifamily residential development (Town Nine Apartments) totaling 7.0 acres
located on Fond du Lac Avenue (approximately W140N9889 Fond du Lac
Avenue) in the Victory Center Corridor. (ACTION)
Associate Planner Yanke went over the background of the proposal. He stated that the
site plan includes on-site storm water ponds, a center amenity area with dog park and
gazebo/grill area, a cross-access easement at FDL Ave entrance for future access to
the south parcel, 5' sidewalk along FDL Ave frontage and 6' asphalt trail through the
southern part of the site. Yanke introduced Bob Murray from Premier Real Estate who
went over the proposal in more detail.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed 1-lot Certified Survey Map (CSM) for the
Premier Real Estate/Town Nine property located on Fond du Lac Avenue
(approximately W140N9889 Fond du Lac Avenue), subject to the following conditions:
1. All technical issues and corrections identified by the Village Surveyor (see
July 20, 2026, memo from Bob Beilfuss, PLC) shall be addressed and
reflected in a revised CSM reviewed and approved by Village staff prior to
recording.
Page 7
2. Prior to recording, the CSM shall be updated/revised to reflect the
appropriate Resolution No. adopted by the Village which formally vacates
the existing Crimson Road right-of-way through the property.
Staff recommends approval of the site development and architectural building plans
submitted by Premier Real Estate Management, LLC, for a 48-unit multifamily
residential development (Town Nine Apartments) on a 7.0-acre property located on
Fond du Lac Avenue (approximately W140N9889 Fond du Lac Avenue), subject to the
following conditions:
1. This approval is for the various plan sheets that comprise the site
development and building plans as noted below and is subject to
compliance with all the conditions and requirements set forth herein and
subsequently adopted and/or revised by the Plan Commission. Approval is
granted for the following unless superseded by subsequent plan sheets
approved by Village Staff pursuant to revisions required herein and/or by the
Plan Commission:
a. Site/civil engineering plans dated July 13, 2026.
b. Landscape plan dated August 18, 2026.
c. Photometric lighting plan dated July 9, 2026.
d. Architectural building plans and elevations dated July 9, 2026.
If revised plan sheets are necessary, each revised sheet shall contain the date of said
revision clearly stamped in the lower right corner.
2. The technical issues and plan revisions identified in the August 26, 2026,
memo from Public Works and the Village Engineer shall be addressed in
revised plan sheets and/or supplemental documents as necessary prior to
commencing construction activities and/or issuance of building permits.
3. State agency (DSPS) approved plans and a $25,000 occupancy bond are
required by Inspection Services. The Village of Germantown is an
authorized delegated agent of DSPS and may be used as an alternative to
provide all commercial plan review and inspection services through
SAFEBuilt of WI and the Village of Germantown.
4. The Developer shall install 5-foot wide sidewalk along the west side of Fond
du Lac Avenue (STH 145) for the entire property frontage. The Developer
shall install 6-foot asphalt trail/path through the site on the southern portion
of property connecting Crimson Road segment to the west to Fond du Lac
Avenue (STH 145) to the east. Where applicable, construction methods
shall be in compliance with the Village of Germantown Development
Handbook design standards and constructed asset forth in a Development
Agreement.
Page 8
5. Public utilities (i.e. sanitary and water) shall be installed in compliance with
the Village of Germantown Development Handbook design standards and/or
asset forth in a Development Agreement. Final utility profiles, plans, and
precise location shall be coordinated with the Public Works Director, Village
Engineer, and Water and Wastewater Utility Superintendents.
6. Unless mutually agreed to between the Developer and the Village as set
forth in the Development Agreement, the provisions of Village Code Section
11.08 pertaining to garbage and recycling collection for a property
containing five (5) or more residential units (“multiple-family dwellings”) shall
apply.
7. The approved Certified Survey Map (CSM) creating the subject
development site and memorializing the vacation of the existing Crimson
Road right-of-way through the parcel shall be recorded at the Washington
County Register of Deeds prior to commencing construction activities and/or
issuance of building permits.
8. A Development Agreement shall be reviewed by the Public Works and
Highways Committee and approved by the Village Board. Maintenance
guarantees pertaining to stormwater management facilities, sidewalks &
pedestrian paths/trails, and utilities shall be included in the Development
Agreement.
9. Documentation shall be submitted to the Village showing proof of an
“artificial exemption” for the delineated wetland found on site, as illustrated
in the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WisDNR) confirmation
letter regarding the Wetland Delineation prepared for the site. Such
documentation shall be submitted to the Village prior to commencement of
construction and/or issuance of building permits.
10. Specific design and location details for signage must comply with the
Village’s Sign Code regulations and be submitted and approved by the Plan
Commission, prior to sign installation.
11. The Developer shall provide additional landscape plantings along the west
property line to increase screening/buffering between the project site and
residential subdivision to the west. A revised landscape plan including the
additional plantings showing quantity, type, and placement in relation to the
existing tree line, shall be submitted to the Village Forester and Community
Development Department for review and approval prior to commencing
construction activities and/or issuance of building permits.
12. If the Village observes and/or receives complaints regarding negative
impacts associated with and/or created by the property and any related
activities, including but not limited to noise and lighting, the Property
Owner/Operator shall work with the Village to identify the source of such
impact(s), evaluate alternative mitigation measures, and implement a
mutually-agreeable solution to mitigating the impact(s).
Page 9
Motion: Approve Certified Survey Map
Motioned By: Josh Tarantino
Seconded By: Robert Warren
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Robert Williams, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino,
Brian Fisher
No: Russell Ewert
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 6, No 1, Abstained 0)
Motion: Approve Site Plan
Motioned By: Bridget Henk
Seconded By: Robert Warren
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Robert Williams, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino,
Brian Fisher
No: Russell Ewert
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 6, No 1, Abstained 0)
C. DAHM NO 74 LLC (d.b.a. Crew Carwash), Property Owner of N96 W17500
County Line Road. Request to extend Village approval of the Site Plan and
Conditional Use Permit No. 05-2025 for a 4,500 sqft automated car wash
facility. (ACTION)
Motion: Move Item C to the top of the agenda as presented
Motioned By: Robert Warren
Seconded By: Josh Tarantino
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Robert Williams, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino,
Russell Ewert, Brian Fisher
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 7, No 0, Abstained 0)
Director Retzlaff went over the 3rd extension request for Crew Carwash. The new
deadline for commencing construction will be April 8, 2028; with demolition and tank
removal slated for late 2027.
Staff recommends approval of the request to extend Site Plan approval plan for an
additional 12 months with a new deadline for commencement of construction to April
8, 2028, with the same conditions of approval in the original April 8, 2024, Plan
Commission approval.
Recommend to the Village Board to APPROVE the request to extend the approval of
CUP #05-2026 for an additional 12 months with a new deadline for commencement of
construction to April 8, 2028, with the same conditions of approval contained in CUP
#05-2026.
Krissy Atterholt with Amundsen Davis on East Kilbourn Avenue stated that the delay is
for coordination of roll out of 5 other facilities in municipalities across the state so they
can open at the same time. Commissioners stated concerns about whether this project
Page 10
will ever move forward and did not want to see it sit as an empty site for a long period
of time.
Motion: Approve CUP extension
Motioned By: Robert Warren
Seconded By: Josh Tarantino
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino
No: Robert Williams, Russell Ewert, Brian Fisher
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 4, No 3, Abstained 0)
Motion: Approve Site and Building Plan extension
Motioned By: Josh Tarantino
Seconded By: Bridget Henk
Yes: Bob Soderberg, Robert Warren, Bridget Henk, Josh Tarantino, Brian Fisher
No: Robert Williams, Russell Ewert
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 5, No 2, Abstained 0)
VI. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Director Retzlaff gave a brief update.
A. Status of Village Center District Community Engagement & Holy Hill Gateway
District Master Plan Projects
B. Status of Approved Residential Development (Sutton Farm and Carillon)
VII. NEXT MEETING DATE:
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
None
IX. ADJOURNMENT:
Chairman Soderberg adjourned the meeting at 11:09pm.
Source: Village of Germantown website. First collected Oct 18, 2026.