Village Board — Agenda Packet
Village of Germantown · Washington County · Village Board · meeting of Mar 16, 2026 · Agenda packets
Open the original document More from Village of Germantown
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
MEETING: AMENDED REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE
BOARD
DATE & TIME: Monday, March 16, 2026 at 7:00 PM
LOCATION: Germantown Village Hall Board Room
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
Any member of the body and/or citizen may attend the meeting virtually through the WebEx platform, Meeting #:2551 746 8900 Password:
RGfHMePh684 which can be accessed by phone at 408-418-9388 or by clicking the link
below: https://villageofgermantown.my.webex.com/villageofgermantown.my/j.php?MTID=mbac09c1bf
900c82b3d4fd86d044402dc
Citizens not wishing to attend the meeting personally or virtually may submit any public comments by sending an email to
comments@germantownwi.gov by 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting so that it can be provided to the members of the body for their
consideration. Previously recorded VillageBoard Meeting Videos can be viewed
at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOYp0EgELzTCa9X_iCohyhQ
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER: This meeting has been given public notice in accordance with
Section 19.83 and 19.84, Wis. Stats, in such form that will apprise the general public
and news media of subject matter that is intended for consideration and action.
II. ROLL CALL:
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE / MOMENT OF SILENCE:
IV. PRESIDENT’S REPORT:
V. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF FORTHCOMING EVENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST /
COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
VI. CITIZEN INPUT: (Please be advised per 19.84(2) that information and comment will
be received from the public. It is the policy of this municipality that public input be
limited to a four (4) minute period per person with a time extension granted at the
discretion of the Chairperson. Be advised that there may be limited discussion of the
information received but no action will be taken under public comments.) Comments
that may be injurious to village personnel or other individuals will not be allowed.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Meeting Minutes: March 2, 2026 (ACTION)
B. Matteo's Mexican Grill One-Time Temporary Outdoor Entertainment Permit for
Cinco de Mayo (05/05/2026) (ACTION)
C. Producer Full-Service Retail Sales Application: Spirits of Norway Vineyard, LLC
dba On Cloud Wine, LLC for Hops & Hounds event on July 10, 2026, at
Homestead Hollow County Park (ACTION)
D. Contract with Dan Larsen Landscaping for spring tree planting for an amount
not to exceed $27,866.00. (ACTION)
E. Purchasing street lighting fixtures from Graybar for an amount not to exceed
$112,226.58. (ACTION)
F. Contract with Clark Dietz for Telecom Permit Reviews and Inspection Services
as a pass through cost in amount of $360,000 (ACTION)
Page 1 of 181
VILLAGE BOARD AGENDA
March 16, 2026
Page 2
G. Agreements with Fiberoptic Telecommunications Companies (ACTION)
H. Contract with Ruekert & Mielke to design Main Street Lift Station and Old Farm
Lift Station improvements in amount not to exceed $532,659.00 (ACTION)
Updated Attachment
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. A Resolution to adopt an Official Snow and Ice Removal Map as required by
the update to Municipal Code 8.02. (ACTION)
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
X. NEW BUSINESS:
A. A Resolution Establishing a Fee Schedule for Weights & Measures Devices
Required Under Section 12.26 of the Municipal Code. (ACTION)
B. A Resolution Disallowing the Claim of Lance Ambrose (ACTION)
C. Appointment of Director of Public Works. The Village Board may convene into
closed session pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(c) for the purpose of
considering employment, promotion, compensation or performance evaluation
data of any public employee over which the governmental body has jurisdiction,
and then may reconvene into open session to take such action as it deems
appropriate. (ACTION)
D. Retention bonuses for Certain Key Employees. The Village Board may
convene into closed session pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(c) for the
purpose of considering employment, promotion, compensation or performance
evaluation data of any public employee over which the governmental body has
jurisdiction or exercises responsibility and then may reconvene into open
session to take such action as it deems appropriate. (ACTION)
XI. ADJOURNMENT:
UPON REASONABLE NOTICE, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of disabled individuals through
appropriate aids and services. For additional information or to request this service, please contact the Village
Clerk at (262)250-4745 at least 2 days prior to the meeting.
Notice is hereby given that a possible quorum of other boards, committees, and/or commissions may attend this
meeting to gather information about an item over which they have decision-making responsibility. This may
constitute a meeting of these bodies per State ex rel. Badke v Greendale Village Board, even though these
bodies will not take formal action at this meeting.
Page 2 of 181
MEETING: REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE BOARD
DATE AND TIME: Monday, March 2, 2026 7:00 PM
LOCATION:
Germantown Vi
llage Hall Board Room
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: This meeting has been given public notice in accordance with
Section 19.83 and 19.84, Wis. Stats, in such form that will apprise the general public
and news media of subject matter that is intended for consideration and action.
Village President Bob Soderberg Called the Village Board meeting to order at 7:08
PM.
II. ROLL CALL:
Prese
nt: Trustee Robert Warren, Trustee Meg Cutts, Trustee David Baum, Trustee
Jan Miller, Trustee Kristen Borst, Trustee Jolene Pieper, Trustee Rick Miller, Trustee
Terri Kaminski, Village President Bob Soderberg
Also Present: Village Administrator Steve Kreklow, Village Attorney Brian Sajdak,
Village Clerk Donna Ott, Community Development Director Jeff Retzlaff
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE / MOMENT OF SILENCE:
IV. PRESIDENT’S REPORT:
Villa
ge President Soderberg shared that the Village’s 2024 Annual Comprehensive
Financial Report was awarded the Government Finance Officers’ Association
Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting, that Firefighter Craig Rossman
(Germantown Fire Department) was presented the Firefighter/EMT of the Year award
from VFW Post 9202, and that Sergeant Cody Farnsworth (Germantown Police
Department) was recognized by VFW Post 9202 as Officer of the Year. He also
welcomed new Police Officer Taylor Weiss to Germantown.
He continued to speak regarding the Germantown Area Chamber of Commerce
Candidates Forum on March 11th, and items on tonight's Village Board agenda.
Finally, he read aloud a proclamation recognizing Village Administrator Kreklow and
thanking him for his service to the Village of Germantown.
V. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF FORTHCOMING EVENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST /
COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS:
Trustee Kaminski
announced the upcoming Public Works & Highways Committee
DRAFT
Page 3 of 181
Page 2
meeting on March 4, 2026, at 5:30 PM.
Trustee Rick Miller announced the upcoming General Government & Finance
Committee meeting on March 16, 2026, at 5:30 PM.
Trustee Cutts announced the upcoming Public Safety Committee meeting on April 9,
2026, at 6:00 PM.
Trustee Jan Miller announced the upcoming Economic Development Commission
meeting on March 10, 2026, at 6:00 PM, the upcoming Senior Advisory Committee
meeting on March 5, 2026, at 1:30 PM, and the upcoming Tree Advisory Board
meeting on March 5, 2026, at 5:30 PM.
VI. CITIZEN INPUT: (Please be advised per 19.84(2) that information and comment will
be received from the public. It is the policy of this municipality that public input be
limited to a four (4) minute period per person with a time extension granted at the
discretion of the Chairperson. Be advised that there may be limited discussion of the
information received but no action will be taken under public comments.) Comments
that may be injurious to village personnel or other individuals will not be allowed.
Lynne Schauer Bednarz (W156N10121 Pawnee Ct) spoke regarding the Village
budget.
Norman Berger (W141N9978 Seven Pines Way) spoke regarding Village garbage
pickup.
Melanie Smythe (N140W17938 Cedar Ln) spoke regarding vacant positions and New
Business Item F (Retention Bonuses for Certain Department Heads).
Scott Hefle (W159N10514 Old Farm Rd) spoke regarding Unfinished Business Item A
(IGA with Washington County Related to a $750,000 Forgivable Loan to Flamingo
Marine).
Charles Krueger (W140N9766 Fond du Lac Ave) spoke regarding additional
apartments being built in Germantown.
VII. CONSENT AGENDA:
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: Meg Cutts
Seconded By: Jan Miller
Trustee Baum requested to split the question.
A. Meeting Minutes: February 16, 2026 (ACTION)
On consideration of Item A:
DRAFT
Page 4 of 181
Page 3
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, David Baum, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper,
Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Voice Vote (Yes 9, No 0, Abstained 0)
B. Approve Contract for Ballfield Fencing (ACTION)
On consideration of Item B:
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski,
Bob Soderberg
No: David Baum, Jolene Pieper
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Roll Call Vote (Yes 7, No 2, Abstained 0)
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
A. Intergovernmental Agreement with Washington County Related to a $750,000
forgivable loan to Flamingo Marine. (ACTION)
Village Administrator Kreklow and Christian Tscheschlok of Economic Development
Washington County (EDWC) provided details on this item.
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: Jolene Pieper
Seconded By: David Baum
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, David Baum, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper, Rick
Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: Jan Miller
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Roll Call Vote (Yes 8, No 1, Abstained 0)
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
X. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Premier Real Estate Management, LLC, Agent for Victory Place, LLC, Property
Owner. Ordinance for Rezoning approximately 7 acres from the I: Institutional
Zoning District to the Rm-2: Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District for a 48-
unit multi-family residential development located on Fond du Lac Avenue and
Crimson Road (approximately W140 N9889 Fond du Lac Avenue) in the
Victory Center Corridor. (ACTION)
DRAFT
Page 5 of 181
Page 4
Community Development Director Retzlaff, with Emily McFarland and Joshua
Kenitzer, the representatives for Premier Real Estate Management, LLC, provided
information for this item.
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: David Baum
Seconded By: Robert Warren
Yes: Robert Warren, David Baum, Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: Meg Cutts, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Voice Vote (Yes 5, No 4, Abstained 0)
B. Bradley Jansen, Agent and Prospective Owner for Rao Farms, LLC, Property
Owner. Application for a Conditional Use Permit for the “Operation of a
Commercial Stable and Horse Boarding Facility” pursuant to Section
17.13(2)(jj) of the Village Zoning Code from property located at N136W21238-
21342 Bonniwell Road. (ACTION)
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: Jolene Pieper
Seconded By: David Baum
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, David Baum, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper,
Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Voice Vote (Yes 9, No 0, Abstained 0)
C. An Ordinance Amending Section 1.379(2) Of The Germantown Municipal Code
Relating To The Membership Of The Economic Development
Commission. (ACTION)
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: Terri Kaminski
Seconded By: Rick Miller
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski,
Bob Soderberg
No: David Baum, Jolene Pieper
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Voice Vote (Yes 7, No 2, Abstained 0)
D. 4th of July -- Report and Discussion (ACTION)
DRAFT
Page 6 of 181
Page 5
Motion: Appoint Trustee Jan Miller to head up the 4th of July Committee, with Trustee
Kaminski serving in an advisory role
Motioned By: Jolene Pieper
Seconded By: David Baum
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, David Baum, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper,
Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Voice Vote (Yes 9, No 0, Abstained 0)
E. Update on Recruiting for Village Administrator and Director of Public Works.
(ACTION)
Village Administrator Kreklow and Jay Shambeau of Innovative Public Advisors
provided information on this item.
Motion: Approve the Village Administrator position description and hiring range
Motioned By: Jolene Pieper
Seconded By: David Baum
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, David Baum, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper,
Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Voice Vote (Yes 9, No 0, Abstained 0)
F. Retention bonuses for Certain Department Heads. The Village Board may
convene into closed session pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(c) for the
purpose of considering employment, promotion, compensation or performance
evaluation data of any public employee over which the governmental body has
jurisdiction or exercises responsibility and then may reconvene into open
session to take such action as it deems appropriate. (ACTION)
Motion: Enter into Closed Session at 9:22 PM
Motioned By: David Baum
Seconded By: Jolene Pieper
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, David Baum, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper,
Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Roll Call Vote (Yes 9, No 0, Abstained 0)
DRAFT
Page 7 of 181
Page 6
Motion: Return to Open Session at 9:49 PM
Motioned By: Jolene Pieper
Seconded By: David Baum
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, David Baum, Jan Miller, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper,
Rick Miller, Terri Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Voice Vote (Yes 9, No 0, Abstained 0)
Motion: Direct staff to proceed as discussed in Closed Session with respect to
retention bonuses
Motioned By: Jolene Pieper
Seconded By: Terri Kaminski
Yes: Robert Warren, Meg Cutts, Kristen Borst, Jolene Pieper, Rick Miller, Terri
Kaminski, Bob Soderberg
No: David Baum, Jan Miller
Abstain: None
Motion Carried by Roll Call Vote (Yes 7, No 2, Abstained 0)
XI. ADJOURNMENT:
Village President Soderberg adjourned the Village Board meeting at 9:50 PM.
DRAFT
Page 8 of 181
From: noreply@civicplus.com
To: Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Meeting Comment Form for Committees and Village Board
Date: Friday, February 27, 2026 1:27:25 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
Meeting Comment Form for Committees and Village Board
First Name Matthew
Last Name Uselding
Address1 3539 S Howell Ave
City Milwaukee
State WI
Zip 53207
Email Address matthew.uselding@outlook.com
(Section Break)
Which
Committee/Commission/Board
do you have comments for?
Village Board
What is the date of the
meeting?
3/2/2026
For which item do you wish to
provide comments?
Item E
What is your opinion of the
item?
I am IN FAVOR of the item.
Would you like to speak at the
meeting?
No, I do not wish to speak at the meeting. I only want to
submit my comments through this form.
Comments I want to take a moment to share how grateful I am for
Administrator Kreklow as he wraps up his time in
Germantown and starts his next chapter.
DRAFT
Page 9 of 181
I was 24 years old and finishing grad school when I was
hired at the Village of Germantown. I turn 30 next month.
Over the past five years, I’ve had the chance to work
side-by-side with Steve as we served this community
together. We’ve worked through tough budgets, big
capital projects, staff transitions, and all the daily
challenges that come with local government. Through it
all, I got to learn from someone who truly knows what
he’s doing.
Steve has been more than just an Administrator, I’m
proud to call him a colleague, a mentor, and a friend. He
pushed me to think deeper, communicate better, and
stay steady when things weren’t easy. He trusted me
early on in my career, and that trust meant more than he
probably knows. It helped shape my confidence and the
kind of leader I’m continuing to become.
What always stood out to me was the respect he has
across the profession. I can’t tell you how many times at
conferences someone would say, “Kreklow is the
Administrator down there, right? You’re lucky to have
him.” And they were right, we are.
Our organization is stronger because of him. The culture
he built, the team he developed, and the direction he set
will last long after his last day here.
I’m incredibly thankful for his mentorship and friendship.
I wish him nothing but success in this next chapter. Fox
Point is lucky to have him.
Thank you,
Matthew Uselding
Finance Director
Village of Germantown
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
DRAFT
Page 10 of 181
From: noreply@civicplus.com
To: Comments
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Meeting Comment Form for Committees and Village Board
Date: Friday, February 27, 2026 6:11:26 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
Meeting Comment Form for Committees and Village Board
First Name Donna
Last Name Ott
Address1 N112 W17001 Mequon Rd
City Germantown
State WI
Zip 53022
Email Address dott@germantownwi.gov
(Section Break)
Which
Committee/Commission/Board
do you have comments for?
Village Board
What is the date of the
meeting?
3/2/2026
For which item do you wish to
provide comments?
New Business Item E
What is your opinion of the
item?
I am NEITHER in favor or oppose the item.
Would you like to speak at the
meeting?
No, I do not wish to speak at the meeting. I only want to
submit my comments through this form.
Comments Administrator Kreklow's leadership within the Village has
strengthened not only the daily operations but has also
contributed to the morale by staff within the Village,
which plays a huge role in employee retention.
DRAFT
Page 11 of 181
Administrator Kreklow's approach and commitment to
service truly embodies the organizations values. While I
haven't had the privilege of working for and alongside
Administrator Kreklow for as long as many other staff
members have - I can still say with the same enthusiasm
and heart that Administrator Kreklow worked tirelessly
and hard to improve residents experiences, create a
welcoming village culture, I have been witness to his
leadership going far beyond managing daily operations.
Steve has been a steady presence that his team has
been able to rely on. He is a problem solver who I have
only witnessed him approach challenges with calm and
clarity. Administrator Kreklow has built internal and
external trust, encouraged collaboration, and created an
environment where both residents and staff feel
supported and valued.
Steve's consistency, patience, collaboration, culture, and
professionalism did not go unnoticed.
Through his service as Village Administrator, Steve has
built trust and the Germantown community is a direct
reflection of his commitment, dedication, care, and
integrity.
Thank you Administrator Kreklow for your tireless efforts,
open door policy, commitment to unwavering dedication
to the constituents, and promoting a work culture that
your team can thrive and grow in! I am grateful for your
leadership and am proud to have worked alongside you!
Wishing you great success in your next chapter! God
Bless and "THANK YOU"!
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
DRAFT
Page 12 of 181
From: crb crb
To: Comments
Subject: Re: VB MEETING COMMENTS 3-2-26
Date: Monday, March 2, 2026 3:44:59 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
Forgot one item.
That all comments send in need to be read aloud.
Like we said before, we don't know if everyone read all comments send in or not.
The Schneider's
From: crb crb <cash2u@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2026 3:43 PM
To: Comments <comments@germantownwi.gov>
Subject: VB MEETING COMMENTS 3-2-26
Good evening,
We would like to see the RETENTION BONUSES to
be a open meeting.
Since the taxpayers are paying for the increases.
Strongly disagree in giving
these bonuses
What is the proper procedure for a item to be submitted for the agenda for a meeting?
Example: RETETNTION BONUSES- NO NAME who submitted it.
It if not done properly then it should not be discuss and or have any action on it.
Tyler Munis due away with. Use Baird system.
ROOFTOPS- homes/condos = more money for the village
Apts/rentals= less money for village,
but more
money for developer.
All we hear we need more tax money for the village.
More roof tops equal better business to come to the village.
These are not our words, but the village trustees words.
How many more apts/or rentals do we need in the village?
OLD FLOWER SOURCE & ALL THE OTHER PROPERTIES: A complete list of all expenses from
start to now, how much everything has cost the residents(the landlords).
DRAFT
Page 13 of 181
Including what was paid out to BAILEY COPELAND and all the other companies that have been
involved in this issue.
Please get this done, before Mr. Kreklow last day of work in the village of 3-13-26.
Also at every village board, updates on the demo.
If any other fees have come up. Since signing the contract.
Please
also included updates from the Police/Fire depts of calls to the property at every board
meeting until demo is done.
Example: On 2-27-26
late morning, saw a police car there, but didn't see anything going on.
What are the proper procedures for intergovernmental agreements with Washington County?
Are they written out how things should be done. Example: Flamingo Marine (was this a
"closed door meeting" again and or they did it on their own, then almost a year comes before
the EDC)
Who will be repaying the $750,000. back?
The
Schneider's
DRAFT
Page 14 of 181
BUSINESS OF THE VILLAGE BOARD
MEETING DATE: March 16, 2026
PLACEMENT: Action Item
ITEM TITLE: Matteo's Mexican Grill One-Time Temporary Outdoor
Entertainment Permit for Cinco de Mayo (05/05/2026) (ACTION)
SUBMITTED BY: Kasie Miller, Chief Deputy Clerk
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Matteo's Mexican Grill, located at W156N11058 Pilgrim Rd, has submitted an
application for a One-Time Temporary Outdoor Entertainment Permit for their Cinco de
Mayo event, from 10:00AM until 10:00PM. Their temporary patio will be erected before
the event, and a 20 ft by 30 ft tent will be used as shelter for the temporary patio for this
event only. Five-hundred foot notices were mailed to adjacent property owners on
02/10/2026. The Outdoor Premise Extension to serve alcohol on the noted seating on
the sidewalk area and temporary patio was approved on 06/02/2025 for the 2025-2026
licensing year.
Police, Fire, and Community Development Departments have provided approval of this
application with recommended contingencies.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Matteos ONE TIME Cinco de Mayo 2026
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the One-Time Temporary Outdoor Entertainment Permit Application for
Matteo's Cinco de Mayo event, contingent upon compliance with all provisions of the
Zoning Code (Ch. 17) and Building Code (Ch. 14) and obtaining any zoning/building
permits where applicable.
ACTION BY COMMITTEE:
Page 15 of 181
Page 16 of 181
Page 17 of 181
Page 18 of 181
BUSINESS OF THE VILLAGE BOARD
MEETING DATE: March 16, 2026
PLACEMENT: Action Item
ITEM TITLE: Producer Full-Service Retail Sales Application: Spirits of Norway
Vineyard, LLC dba On Cloud Wine, LLC for Hops & Hounds event
on July 10, 2026, at Homestead Hollow County Park (ACTION)
SUBMITTED BY: Kasie Miller, Chief Deputy Clerk
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Effective May 1, 2024, 2023 Wisconsin Act 73 authorizes eligible producers
(manufacturers, rectifiers, wineries, and breweries) to make full-service retail sales at
their production premises and up to three off-site retail outlets.
Spirits of Norway Vineway, LLC dba On Cloud Wine, LLC submitted to the Clerk's
Office AB-105 Producer Full-Service Retail Sales Application and is requesting
approval of Unlimited Transfer Full-Service Retail Outlet to sell wine at the Hops &
Hounds event on July 10, 2026, from 4:00PM-7:30PM at Homestead Hollow County
Park. The Village must fill out Part G of the application and return to the Applicant prior
to the Applicant's submittal to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue's Division of
Alcohol Beverages (DAB) for review/approval. For Part G, Question 1: we as the
municipality are allowed to limit the scope of what the business sells (ex. if they sell
beer, wine, and liquor, but we only want them to sell beer, we can limit their offerings.)
For Part G, Question 2: we as the municipality can limit other activities, such as
operating hours. The State DAB conducts the background checks on the applicant and
verifies the business is allowed to hold the requested type of license prior to issuance.
The Germantown Police and Fire Departments reviewed the application and
recommended approval.
Additionally, the State DAB has provided additional information/faq's to assist
municipalities as this form is still relatively new:
What is the difference between a fixed and unlimited transfer full-service retail
outlet? Fixed full-service retail outlets may be transferred from one location to another
once per year. Unlimited transfer full-service retail outlets may be transferred an
unlimited number of times in a year. Only one of a producer’s full-service retail outlets
may be transferred without limitation on frequency.
Can a municipality limit authorized sales at a full-service retail outlet? Yes, a
municipality can limit authorized sales at a full-service retail outlet. Municipalities may
limit the scope of alcohol beverages offered for sale by the permittee. Municipal
approval of a full-service retail outlet must be based on the same standards and criteria,
established by ordinance, for the evaluation and approval of retail licenses. A
municipality may not impose any requirement or restriction in connection with the
approval that the municipality does not impose on retail licensees. Some examples of
Page 19 of 181
limitations may be: parking, zoning, or noise ordinance restrictions; not allowing sales of
alcohol beverages for off-premises consumption.
Does a producer need licensed operators (bartenders)? Yes. There must be one or
more licensed operators in charge of the premises. An operator's license is often called
a "bartender's license." Not all bartenders must hold operator's licenses, but there must
be at least one licensed operator in charge of the premises. If the premises is large,
with several serving areas, bar areas, etc., licensed operators must oversee each
distinct area to supervise and direct unlicensed persons who may be selling/serving
alcohol beverages.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Spirits of Norway Wine; Hops and Hounds Event 07.10.26_Redacted
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
ACTION BY COMMITTEE:
Page 20 of 181
Page 21 of 181
Page 22 of 181
Page 23 of 181
Page 24 of 181
Page 25 of 181
Page 26 of 181
Page 27 of 181
BUSINESS OF THE VILLAGE BOARD
MEETING DATE: March 16, 2026
PLACEMENT: Action Item
ITEM TITLE: Contract with Dan Larsen Landscaping for spring tree planting for
an amount not to exceed $27,866.00. (ACTION)
SUBMITTED BY: Scott Anderson, Superintendent
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Each year trees around the village are removed for various reasons which include
vehicle damage, storm damage and disease. The village currently has an estimated
229 “vacant” planting sites as reflected on our GIS layer. Tree planting was reflected as
part of the 2026 Highway Department capital budget in the amount of $30,000.00.
While it would be cost prohibitive to replace every tree at one time, staff works to
maintain the urban tree canopy by planting a portion of these vacant sites annually. The
proposed planting will be completed in accordance with the Comprehensive Tree Plan,
and as reflected in the approved 5-year planting maps. This seasonal planting will focus
on the section outlined as “year-3”.
Trees provide significant value to our community, but the most prevalent would be the
aesthetic value that can be seen as you travel our roadways and walk in our parks. This
year’s project will replace an estimated 90 trees in various areas around the village.
The project areas may include main throughfares, around village buildings and in the
park system. Again this year, replacement of trees within residential areas is also part
of the project scope. Trees planted in residential areas, have been confirmed to be a
previous planting site.
Staff has solicited pricing from area contractors and the results are listed below.
Dan Larsen Landscaping, Inc: $27,866.00
Property Solutions: $29,495.00
ESI LTD: $38,786.00
Johnson’s Nursery: $41,443.95
Century Landscape: $43,885.00
Wendland Nursery: $49,775.00
Your Personal Gardner, LLC: $95,500.00
ATTACHMENT:
1. g1
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends contracting with Dan Larsen Landscaping, Inc. to complete the 2026
spring tree planting project in an amount not to exceed $27,866.00. If approved, funds
shall be allocated from the parks department capital account: 40562000-592100.
Page 28 of 181
ACTION BY COMMITTEE:
Proper parliamentary procedure to deny a request is to have a motion made in the
affirmative and by voting NAY would deny the request if a majority vote.
Page 29 of 181
Page 30 of 181
BUSINESS OF THE VILLAGE BOARD
MEETING DATE: March 16, 2026
PLACEMENT: Action Item
ITEM TITLE: Purchasing street lighting fixtures from Graybar for an amount not
to exceed $112,226.58. (ACTION)
SUBMITTED BY: Scott Anderson, Superintendent
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
As part of the 2026 Highway Department capital budget, $114,000.00 was allocated to
upgrade street lighting fixtures. The project will replace 134 “cobra” and 81 “shoebox”
fixtures along many main throughfares.
The project will greatly reduce staff time spent responding to outages due to recent
lamp failures. Increased visibility would also be a safety improvement, especially at
major intersections in the project areas. County Line Road, Appleton Avenue, Lannon
Road, Pilgrim Road, River Lane and the Maple Road Industrial Park are some of the
areas where the project will have the greatest impact.
If approved, the street lighting fixtures will be supplied to the village through a local
vendor, Graybar. Graybar has been coordinating this project on behalf village staff with
the manufactures representative for both fixtures to be used in the project. The project
coordination dates back to the start of the 2026 budget process. Because of this, the
manufactures representative provides Graybar with a pricing discount over other
potential supply vendors. While staff could solicit pricing from other supply houses, the
cost per fixture will not be lower than the price obtained through Graybar. This is
because of the manufacture representatives internal controls. Please see the pricing as
outlined below.
Graybar Electrical Supply: $112,226.58
ATTACHMENT:
1. 2001648906_OLSONAX2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends purchasing the replacement street lighting fixtures from Graybar in
an amount not to exceed $112,226.58 and to forward this request onto the Village
Board with a positive recommendation. If approved, the funds shall be allocated from
the Highway Department borrowed capital account: 40562000-594400.
ACTION BY COMMITTEE:
Proper parliamentary procedure to deny a request is to have a motion made in the
affirmative and by voting NAY would deny the request if a majority vote.
Page 31 of 181
Page 32 of 181
650 S 108TH ST
WEST ALLIS WI 53214-1134
Phone: 414-607-7700
Fax: 414-778-1873
To: VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN
N122 W17177 FOND DU LAC
GERMANTOWN WI 53022
Attn: Scott Anderson
Phone: 262-250-4700
Email: ap@germantownwi.gov
Fax:
Date: 02/20/2026
Project Name:
GB Quote #: 2001648906
Purchase Order Nbr:
Release Nbr:
Additional Ref#:
Revision Nbr:
Valid From: 02/20/2026
Valid To: 03/22/2026
Contact: Andrew Olson
Email: andrew.olson@graybar.com
Proposal
We appreciate your request and take pleasure in responding as follows
Item Quantity Supplier Catalog Nbr Description Price Unit Ext.Price
100 136 HOLOPHANE ATB0 P304
MVOLT R3 NR
$410.39 1 $55,813.04
GB Part#:ATB0 P304 MVOLT R3 NR
***Item Note:*** * ESTIMATED LEAD TIME 35 BUSINESS DAYS AT TIME OF ORDER * NON- CANCELABLE * NON-RETURNABLE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
200 82 COOPER LTG USSL-PA2B-74
0-U-T3-SA-BZ
-U165762
$663.00 1 $54,366.00
GB Part#:USSL-PA2B-740-U-T3-SA-BZ
-U165762
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
300 82 COOPER LTG USSL/DIS-FDV $24.97 1 $2,047.54
GB Part#:USSL/DIS-FDV
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
This equipment and associated installation charges may be financed for a low monthly payment through Graybar Financial Services (subject to credit
approval). For more information call 1-800-241-7408 to speak with a leasing specialist.
This Graybar quote is based on the terms of sale in the EV2370 Master Agreement which can be found by clicking the link found at
https://www.omniapartners.com/suppliers-files/E-J/Graybar/Contract_Documents/EV2370/EV2370_Graybar_MAD_2017_12_20.pdf
Total in USD (Tax not included): $112,226.58
This equipment and associated installation charges may be financed for a low monthly payment through Graybar Financial Services (subject to credit
approval). For more information call 1-800-241-7408 to speak with a leasing specialist.
This Graybar quote is based on the terms of sale in the EV2370 Master Agreement which can be found by clicking the link found at
https://www.omniapartners.com/suppliers-files/E-J/Graybar/Contract_Documents/EV2370/EV2370_Graybar_MAD_2017_12_20.pdf
Page 1 of 2
Page 33 of 181
To: VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN
N122 W17177 FOND DU LAC
GERMANTOWN WI 53022
Attn: Scott Anderson
Date: 02/20/2026
Project Name:
GB Quote #: 2001648906
Proposal
We appreciate your request and take pleasure in responding as follows
Item Quantity Supplier Catalog Nbr Description Price Unit Ext.Price
Signed:__________________________________________
This Graybar quote is based on the terms of sale in the EV2370 Master Agreement which can be found by clicking the link found at
https://www.omniapartners.com/suppliers-files/E-J/Graybar/Contract_Documents/EV2370/EV2370_Graybar_MAD_2017_12_20.pdf
Page 2 of 2
Page 34 of 181
BUSINESS OF THE PUBLIC WORKS & HIGHWAYS COMMITTEE
GERMANTOWN, WI
MEETING DATE: March 4, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: New Business
ITEM TITLE: Consultant Services to Review Permit Applications for Fiberoptic
Telecommunications Installations and Inspections
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Driscoll – Village Engineer
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
In previous Director’s Reports the topic of anticipated large scale Fiberoptic Telecommunications
installations was identified. One applicant anticipates fiberoptic installation over two miles in the
Lone Oaks and Meadow Creek Cross subdivisions. A second applica nt anticipates fiberoptic
installation beginning with a five-mile ring along Pilgrim Road, Mequon Road and Division Road,
then expects to build out and expand from that ring in the future over two years over 100 miles.
Village staff historically have issued permits under the Village of Germantown Code of Ordinance
“Section 8.06 - Street Excavations” for utility work in the right-of-way under with a fixed fee per
permit application. That fee is typically $500 for street cut permit, and $150 for work outside of
the roadway. In addition to 8.06, the Village of Germantown Code of Ordinance “Section 8.065
Regulation of Rights of Way” was established following the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to
recover costs. It is anticipated that Village staff review and inspection time is anticipated to exceed
the $500 fee per permit, where the amount collected in permit fees may not cover the amount time
to review and inspect the proposed Fiberoptic Telecommunications work. In addition, that amount
of time would pull staff away from Village Board approved public works projects.
Village have requested proposals from consultant firms with experience in permit reviews and
inspection services. Prior to incurring consultant fees, Village staff expect to enter into agreements
to be signed by the respective utilities. These agreements with the respective fiberoptic utility
applicants are intended for the Village to recover costs per 8.065.
The following firms have submitted proposals:
Firm Hours Amount Rate
raSmith 833 $120,000 $144/hr
Ruekert Mielke 1,070 $165,330 $154/hr
Sigma 1,980 $249,600 $126/hr
Clark Dietz 2,400 $360,000 $150/hr
S.E.H. 3,087 $445,400 $144/hr
The consultant range of services greatly varies due to the uncertainty and unknown range of
services that will be required. R-M and Clark Dietz each have direct experience with similar
Page 35 of 181
fiber optic installations being completed. Staff has contacted references and all references for
both the consulting firm, Ruekert Mielke, and the consulting firm Clark Dietz had positive
references. The proposals for these two firms with applicable experiences are attached.
Staff requested the footages of the fiber optics their project experiences. Ruekert Mielke
responded with 1,170 miles of project experience. Staff plans to provide additional information
on Clark Dietz at the meeting.
ATTACHMENT: ORDINANCE RESOLUTION OTHER _____
Proposals
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests a discussion with the Public Works and Highways Committee prior to making a
recommendation to the Village Board for entering into a Consultant Contract to Complete Permit
Reviews and Site Inspections as a pass through cost with the respective utility company, contingent
upon Village Attorney review.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
A motion to support authorize staff and a vote “Aye” is in the affirmative to support the contract
award.
Page 36 of 181
1Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Telecommunications Permitting Assistance (“Project”)
This Agreement is by and between
Village of Germantown (“Client”)
N112 W17001 Mequon Rd.
Germantown, WI 53022
and
Clark Dietz, Inc. (“Clark Dietz”)
759 N. Milwaukee St
Suite 624
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Who agree as follows:
Client hereby engages Clark Dietz to perform the services set forth in PART I – SERVICES BY CLARK
DIETZ and Clark Dietz agrees to perform the Services for the compensation set forth in PART III -
COMPENSATION. Clark Dietz shall be authorized to commence the Services upon execution of this
Agreement and written or verbal authorization to proceed from Client. Client and Clark Dietz agree that
this signature page, together with Parts I - IV and attachments referred to therein, constitute the entire
Agreement between them relating to the Project.
Agreed to by Client Agreed to by Clark Dietz
By: By:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Page 37 of 181
2Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
PART I
SERVICES BY CLARK DIETZ
A. Project Description
Provide Consultant Administrative Permitting and Construction Inspection Services for
Telecommunications Permitting per Ordinance Section 8.065.
B. Scope
Scope shall be as detailed in the attached Proposal dated February 27, 2026 and adjusted by the Client as
necessary.
C. Schedule
Services are expected to begin Spring 2026 and continue up to 2 years or more, or as agreed upon between
Client and Clark Dietz.
D. Assumptions/Conditions
This agreement is subject to the following assumptions/conditions:
1. Detailed scope of services will be as discussed with the Client as part of negotiations with the
telecommunications company.
2. Fees are anticipated as shown in the attached Proposal dated February 27, 2026 and will be adjusted
accordingly as necessary during negotiations with the Client and the telecommunications company.
3. This Agreement and any legal actions concerning its validity, interpretation and performance shall be
governed by the laws of the location of the project.
4. Local permits for this project (street cuts, utility relocations, etc.) will be obtained by the Client with
information provided by Clark Dietz. All permit fees will be paid by the Client.
5. State permits for this project will be obtained by the Client with information provided by Clark Dietz.
All permit fees will be paid by the Client.
The tasks below can be performed for an additional fee:
1. Preparation of right-of-way or temporary construction easement drawings, descriptions or
negotiation/acquisition services;
2. Preparation of assessment roles or schedules;
3. Geotechnical investigations;
4. Processing of Federal permits
5. Contaminated site Phase I or Phase II environmental assessment investigations or remediation
activities;
6. Cultural, historic, archaeological, or wetland assessment investigations or remediation activities;
7. Retrieval and procurement of records required pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request.
The list above is not all-inclusive.
Page 38 of 181
3Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
Page 39 of 181
4Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
PART II
CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Client shall, at its expense, do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the Services:
A. Information/Reports
Provide Clark Dietz with reports, studies, site characterizations, regulatory decisions and similar
information relating to the Services that Clark Dietz may rely upon without independent verification unless
specifically identified as requiring such verification.
B. Representative
Designate a representative for the project who shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive
information, interpret and define Client’s requirements and make decisions with respect to the Services.
The Client representative for this Agreement will be Kevin Driscoll, PE, Village Engineer.
C. Decisions
Provide all criteria and full information as to Client’s requirements for the Services and make timely
decisions on matters relating to the Services.
D. Other
Page 40 of 181
5Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
PART III
COMPENSATION
A. Compensation
1. Compensation to Clark Dietz for services rendered by employees working on the Project in
accordance with PART I - SERVICES BY CLARK DIETZ of this Agreement will be at the hourly
billing rates shown in the attached Proposal dated February 27, 2026. The total compensation shall
include the following:
a. Payment for outside consulting and/or professional services performed by a subconsultant will
be at actual invoice cost to Clark Dietz. Clark Dietz will obtain written Client approval before
authorizing these services.
b. Payment for expenses incurred directly on behalf of the Project at actual cost to Clark Dietz.
Direct project expenses will be as defined in the attachment, “Schedule of Project Related
Expenses”.
B. Billing and Payment
2. Timing/Format
a. Invoices shall be submitted monthly for Services completed at the time of billing. Invoices
shall be considered past due if not paid within 45 calendar days of the date of the invoice.
Such invoices shall be prepared in a form supported by documentation required by the Client.
b. If payment in full is not received by Clark Dietz within 45 calendar days of the date of invoice,
invoices shall bear interest at one-and-one-half (1.5) percent of the past due amount per month,
which shall be calculated from the date of the invoice.
c. If the Client fails to make payments within 45 calendar days of the date of invoice or otherwise
is in breach of this Agreement, Clark Dietz may suspend performance of services upon seven
(7) calendar days’ notice to the Client. Clark Dietz shall have no liability to the Client for any
costs or damages as a result of suspension caused by any breach of this Agreement by the
Client. Upon payment in full by the Client, Clark Dietz shall resume services under this
Agreement, and the time schedule and compensation shall be equitably adjusted to
compensate for the period of suspension plus any other reasonable time and expense necessary
for Clark Dietz to resume performance.
d. Client shall make payments to Clark Dietz using one of the following methods:
1) CLARK DIETZ LOCKBOX:
Clark Dietz, Inc.
125 West Church Street
Champaign, IL 61820
2) ELECTRONIC FUNDS/ACH PAYMENT:
Account Name : Clark Dietz, Inc
Bank Name: Hickory Point Bank and Trust
Address: 225 N. Water St.
City/State/Zip: Decatur, Il 62523
Account Number: 3911880
ABA Routing Number: 071124805
3) WIRE TRANSFER (*Wire fees are the responsibility of the sending party)
Bank Name: Hickory Point Bank and Trust
Address: 225 N. Water St.
City/State/Zip: Decatur, Il 62523
ABA/Routing Number: 071124805
Account Title: Clark Dietz, Inc.
Page 41 of 181
6Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
Account Address: 125 W. Church St.
City/State/Zip: Champaign, IL 61820-3510
Account Number: 3911880
3. Billing Records
Clark Dietz shall maintain accounting records of its costs in accordance with generally accepted
accounting practices. Access to such records will be provided during normal business hours with
reasonable notice during the term of this Agreement and for 3 years after completion.
Page 42 of 181
7Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
PART IV
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. STANDARD OF CARE. Services shall be performed in accordance with the standard of professional practice ordinarily exercised
by the applicable profession at the time and within the locality where the services are performed. No warranty or guarantee, express or
implied is provided, including warranties or guarantees contained in any uniform commercial code.
2. CHANGE OF SCOPE. The Scope of Services set forth in this Agreement is based on facts known at the time of execution of this
Agreement, including, if applicable, information supplied by Clark Dietz and Client. Clark Dietz will promptly notify Client of any
perceived changes of scope in writing and the parties shall negotiate modifications to this Agreement.
3. DELAYS. If events beyond the control of Clark Dietz, including, but not limited to, fire, flood, explosion, riot, strike, war, process
shutdown, act of God or the public enemy, and act or regulation of any government agency, result in delay to any schedule established in
this Agreement, such schedule shall be extended for a period equal to the delay. In the event such delay increases the cost or time required
for Clark Dietz to perform its services, Clark Dietz shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment in compensation and extension of time.
4. TERMINATION/SUSPENSION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party in the
event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the
terminating party. Client shall pay Clark Dietz for all Services, including expenses and profit relating thereto, rendered prior to termination,
plus any expenses of termination.
5. REUSE OF INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE. All reports, drawings, specifications, computer data, field data notes and other
documents prepared by Clark Dietz as instruments of service shall remain the property of Clark Dietz. Clark Dietz shall retain all common
law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright thereto. Reuse of any instruments of service including electronic media,
for any purpose other than that for which such documents or deliverables were originally prepared, or alteration of such documents or
deliverables without written authorization or adaptation by Clark Dietz for the specific purpose intended, shall be at Client’s sole risk.
6. ELECTRONIC MEDIA. In accepting and utilizing any drawings, reports and data on any form of electronic media generated and
furnished by Clark Dietz, the Client agrees that all such electronic files are instruments of service of Clark Dietz, who shall be deemed the
author, and shall retain all common law, statutory law and other rights, without limitation, including copyrights.
The Client agrees not to reuse these electronic files, in whole or in part, for any purpose other than for the Project. The Client agrees not to
transfer these electronic files to others without the prior written consent of Clark Dietz. The Client further agrees that Clark Dietz shall have
no responsibility or liability to Client or others for any changes made by anyone other than Clark Dietz or for any reuse of the electronic
files without the prior written consent of Clark Dietz.
Any changes to the electronic specifications by either the Client or Clark Dietz are subject to review and acceptance by the other party. If
Clark Dietz is required to expend additional effort to incorporate changes to the electronic file specifications made by the Client, these
efforts shall be compensated for as Additional Services.
In addition, the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless Clark Dietz, its officers, directors,
employees and subconsultants (collectively, Clark Dietz) against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and
defense costs, arising from any changes made by anyone other than Clark Dietz or from any use or reuse of the electronic files without the
prior written consent of Clark Dietz.
The Client is aware that differences may exist between the electronic files delivered and the printed hard-copy construction documents. In
the event of a conflict between the signed construction documents prepared by Clark Dietz and electronic files, the signed or sealed hard-
copy construction documents shall govern.
7. OPINIONS OF CONSTRUCTION COST. In providing estimates of probable construction cost, the Client understands that Clark
Dietz has no control over the cost or availability of labor, equipment or materials, or over market conditions or the Contractor’s method of
pricing, and that Clark Dietz’s estimates of probable construction costs are made on the basis of Clark Dietz’s professional judgment and
experience. Clark Dietz makes no warranty, express or implied, that the bids or the negotiated cost of the Work will not vary from the
estimate of probable construction cost.
8. SAFETY. Clark Dietz specifically disclaims any authority or responsibility for general job site safety and safety of persons other
than Clark Dietz employees.
9. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND RELATIONSHIP WITH CONTRACTORS. Clark Dietz shall serve as Client’s
professional representative for the services and may make recommendations to Client concerning actions relating to Client’s contractors.
Clark Dietz will visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise agreed to in writing by the Client and Clark
Dietz, in order to observe the progress and quality of the Work completed by the Contractor. Such visits and observation are not intended
to be an exhaustive check or an inspection of the Contractor’s work but rather are to allow Clark Dietz to determine, in general, if the Work
is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. Based on this general observation, Clark Dietz will keep the Client informed
about the progress of the Work and shall advise the Client about observed deficiencies in the Work.
Page 43 of 181
8Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
Clark Dietz will not supervise, direct or have control over the Contractor’s work nor have any responsibility for the construction means,
methods, techniques, sequences or procedures selected by the Contractor nor for the Contractor’s safety precautions or programs in
connection with the Work. These rights and responsibilities are solely those of the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents.
Clark Dietz will not be responsible for any acts or omissions of the Contractor, any subcontractor, any entity performing any portions of the
Work or any agents or employees of any of them. Clark Dietz does not guarantee the performance of the Contractor and shall not be
responsible for the Contractor’s failure to perform its Work in accordance with the Contract Documents or any applicable laws, codes, rules
or regulations.
10. THIRD PARTY CLAIMS. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in
favor of a third party against either the Client or Clark Dietz. Clark Dietz’s services under this Agreement are being performed solely for
the Client's benefit, and no other party or entity shall have any claim against Clark Dietz because of this Agreement or the performance or
nonperformance of services hereunder. The Client and Clark Dietz agree to require a similar provision in all contracts with contractors,
subcontractors, subconsultants, vendors and other entities involved in this Project to carry out the intent of this provision.
11. MODIFICATION. This Agreement, upon execution by both parties hereto, can be modified only by a written instrument signed by
both parties.
12. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. Information relating to the Project, unless in the public domain, shall be kept confidential by
Clark Dietz and shall not be made available to third parties without written consent of Client, unless so required by court order.
13. INSURANCE. Clark Dietz will maintain insurance coverage for Professional, Comprehensive General, Automobile, Worker’s
Compensation and Employer’s Liability in amounts in accordance with legal, and Clark Dietz business requirements. Certificates
evidencing such coverage will be provided to Client upon request. For projects involving construction, Client agrees to require its
construction contractor, if any, to include Clark Dietz as an additional insured on its commercial general liability policy relating to the
Project, and such coverages shall be primary.
14. INDEMNITIES. Clark Dietz agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Client, its officers,
directors and employees against all damages, liabilities or costs, to the extent caused by Clark Dietz’ negligent performance of professional
services under this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom Clark Dietz is legally liable.
The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless Clark Dietz, its officers, directors, employees and
subconsultants against all damages, liabilities or costs, to the extent caused by the Client’s negligent acts in connection with the Project and
that of its contractors, subcontractors or consultants or anyone for whom the Client is legally liable.
Neither the Client nor Clark Dietz shall be obligated to indemnify the other party in any manner whatsoever for the other party’s own
negligence.
15. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY. In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the Project to both the Client and Clark Dietz,
the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the liability of Clark Dietz and their
officers, directors, partners, employees, shareholders, owners and subconsultants for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any nature
whatsoever or claims expenses from any cause or causes, including attorneys' fees and costs and expert-witness fees and costs, so that the
total aggregate liability of Clark Dietz and their officers, directors, partners, employees, shareholders, owners and subconsultants shall not
exceed Clark Dietz’s total fee for services rendered on this Project, or $250,000 , whichever is greater. It is intended that this limitation
apply to any and all liability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless otherwise prohibited by law.
16. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, and to the fullest extent permitted by
law, neither the Client nor Clark Dietz, their respective officers, directors, partners, employees, contractors or subconsultants shall be liable
to the other or shall make any claim for any incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising out of or connected in any way to the
Project or to this Agreement. This mutual waiver of consequential damages shall include, but is not limited to, loss of use, loss of profit,
loss of business, loss of income, loss of reputation and any other consequential damages that either party may have incurred from any cause
of action including negligence, strict liability, breach of contract and breach of strict or implied warranty. Both the Client and Clark Dietz
shall require similar waivers of consequential damages protecting all the entities or persons named herein in all contracts and subcontracts
with others involved in this project.
17. ACCESS. Client shall provide Clark Dietz safe access to the project site necessary for the performance of the services.
18. ASSIGNMENT. The rights and obligations of this Agreement cannot be assigned by either party without written permission of the
other party. This Agreement shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of any permitted assigns.
19. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Clark Dietz and Clark Dietz’ consultants shall have no responsibility for discovery, presence,
handling, removal or disposal of or exposure of persons to hazardous materials in any form at the project site, including but not limited to
asbestos, asbestos products, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) or other toxic substances. If required by law, the client shall accomplish all
necessary inspections and testing to determine the type and extent, if any, of hazardous materials at the project site. Prior to the start of
services, or at the earliest time such information is learned, it shall be the duty of the Client to advise Clark Dietz (in writing) of any known
or suspected hazardous materials. Removal and proper disposal of all hazardous materials shall be the responsibility of the Client.
Page 44 of 181
9Clark Dietz: PSA Updated 01/26
Both parties acknowledge that Clark Dietz’s scope of services does not include services related to the presence, identification, abatement or
removal of any Hazardous Materials. In the event Clark Dietz or any other person or entity involved in the Project encounters any Hazardous
Materials, or should it become known to Clark Dietz that any Hazardous Material may be present on or about the jobsite, Clark Dietz may,
at its sole option and without liability for consequential or other damages, suspend performance of its services until the Client identifies,
abates and removes the Hazardous Materials and indicates the jobsite is in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
The Client agrees to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless Clark Dietz, its officers, directors, employees,
agents and subconsultants from and against any claims, suits, demands, liabilities, losses, damages or costs arising out of or in connection
with the detection, presence, handling, removal, abatement, or disposal of any Hazardous Materials, except for the sole negligence or willful
misconduct of Clark Dietz.
20. REMODELING AND RENOVATION. For Clark Dietz’ services provided to assist the Client in making changes to an existing
facility, the Client shall furnish documentation and information upon which Clark Dietz may rely for its accuracy and completeness. Unless
specifically authorized or confirmed in writing by the Client, Clark Dietz shall not be required to perform or have others perform destructive
testing or to investigate concealed or unknown conditions. The Client shall indemnify and hold harmless Clark Dietz, Clark Dietz’
consultants, and their employees from and against claims, damages, losses and expenses which arise as a result of documentation and
information furnished by the Client.
21. CLIENT’S CONSULTANTS. Contracts between the Client and other consultants retained by Client for the Project shall require
the consultants to coordinate their drawings and other instruments of service with those of Clark Dietz and to advise Clark Dietz of any
potential conflict. Clark Dietz shall have no responsibility for the components of the project designed by the Client’s consultants.
22. NO WAIVER. No waiver by either party of any default by the other party in the performance of any particular section of this
Agreement shall invalidate another section of this Agreement or operate as a waiver of any future default, whether like or different in
character.
23. SEVERABILITY. The various terms, provisions and covenants herein contained shall be deemed to be separate and severable, and
the invalidity or unenforceability of any of them shall not affect or impair the validity or enforceability of the remainder.
24. STATUTE OF LIMITATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, parties agree that, except for claims for indemnification, the
time period for bringing claims under this Agreement shall expire one year after Project Completion.
25. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of a dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the services to be rendered
hereunder, Clark Dietz and the Client agree to attempt to resolve such disputes in the following manner: First, the parties agree to attempt
to resolve such disputes through direct negotiations between the appropriate representatives of each party. Second, if such negotiations are
not fully successful, the parties agree to attempt to resolve any remaining dispute by formal nonbinding mediation conducted in accordance
with rules and procedures to be agreed upon by the parties.
Page 45 of 181
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Administrative & Construction
Inspection Services for
Telecommunications Permitting
Germantown, WI
February 27, 2026
Page 46 of 181
CONTENTS
Cover Letter 3
Firm Background 4
Project Approach 6
Organizational Chart & Resumes 17
Relevant Projects 22
Page 47 of 181
759 North Milwaukee Street, Suite 624 / Milwaukee, WI 53202 / 414.727.4990 / clarkdietz.com
Kevin R. Driscoll, P.E.
Village Engineer
N112 W17001 Mequon Rd.
Germantown, WI 53022
engineering@germantownwi.gov
Re: C onsultant Administrative Permitting Services and Construction Inspection Services for
T elecommunications Permitting per Ordinance Section 8.065
C C: Matthew Mortwedt – Director of Public Works, Village of Germantown
Dear Kevin:
Clark Dietz has significant recent experience dealing with broadband fiber installation across Southern Wisconsin and
Northern Illinois. In fact, we have most recently developed a process for permit reviews and construction observations
within this broad service area with a vetted solution and tracking database to achieve the most efficient result.
Enclosed you’ll find details on our approach, considerations, and qualifications of our staff and firm to better explain
the following pillars of our capabilities.
• Permit submittal expectations for streamlined workflow. Our unique approach consists of upfront development
with the permittee regarding plan submittals, insurance requirements, public outreach expectations, performance
bond requirements, and restoration specifications.
• Fully customized project tracking. Our exceptional GIS capabilities allow us to provide an accessible dashboard,
fully customized to the needs of the Village, for tracking this widespread and complex undertaking. Graphical
visualization of each project area by stage (plan review, layout verification, installation, restoration and completion)
is foundational for improved communication and information sharing.
• Understanding of the importance of protecting Germantown’s infrastructure for the future. Not only is the
existing underground infrastructure critical, but the community perception and disruption must be managed during
widespread impacts. Setting clear expectations upfront is crucial to controlling the speed of installation and thus
minimizing Village resources.
A project of this size can be a major undertaking, and Clark Dietz proposes to act as a partner in achieving long-term
success. Having worked with many communities on this type of project, we know what to prepare for: drain on local
resources, risk of field conflicts with existing infrastructure, appropriate installation depths to prevent future disruption
after the project is complete, frequent resident communication, and necessary assurances regarding restoration. We
look forward to your consideration and please contact me with any additional information or discussion.
Sincerely,
Emily K. Basalla, PE, CFM
Project Manager
Senior Vice President/Regional Director
emily.basalla@clarkdietz.com
February 27 , 2026
Mustafa Emir, PhD, PE
Client Liaison
Executive Vice President
mustafa.emir@clarkdietz.com
Page 48 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 4
ILLINOIS / INDIANA / KENTUCKY / MICHIGAN / WISCONSIN / clarkdietz.com
OUR HISTORY
Our roots go back to the 1940’s to three
University of Illinois Engineering professors;
James Clark, Eugene Daily, and Jess Dietz.
These three formalized their association by
incorporating in 1953. By the late 1970s
Clark Dietz was a recognized leader among
Midwest-based civil engineering companies
serving clients from seven regional offices.
The original owners sold the firm and it was
ultimately owned by CRS Sirrine, one of the
nation’s largest engineering and architectural
firms. Through an employee buy-out of the
Champaign office and the name, Clark Dietz
again became a privately held corporation
in 1987 . Employee ownership has been
a key factor in the success of the firm,
with approximately 30 percent of current
employees now owning stock in the company
and all employees participating through an
ESOP. Today Clark Dietz employs more than
195 professionals in 13 offices.
OUR LOCATIONS
ABOUT US
Clark Dietz, Inc. is a multi-disciplined consulting engineering firm
operating from offices in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, and
Wisconsin. Our primary areas of service include civil and environmental
infrastructure, transportation, structural, mechanical, and electrical
engineering.
OUR PHILOSOPHY
As experienced consultants, we serve as trusted advisors to our
clients. As partners, we become fully vested in achieving their goals.
We believe in serving our clients to our utmost capacity, period. We
operate with integrity, foster collaboration, and expect excellence in
all we do. For more than 70 years we have built a reputation for the
integrity of our work, our actions, and our results. With an unwavering
commitment to our clients, we stand behind everything we do.
BELONGING & OPPORTUNITY
At Clark Dietz, we believe that the strength of our firm lies in the
diverse perspectives, experiences, and talents of our people. As
an employee-owned company, we succeed together by cultivating
a workplace where every individual feels valued, empowered, and
motivated to contribute their best.
We are committed to creating an environment where team members
can show up authentically and thrive—personally and professionally.
Our focus is on fostering engagement, belonging, and collaboration,
ensuring that everyone has a fair opportunity to grow and contribute to
our shared success.
Through partnerships with universities across the Midwest, we are
also investing in the next generation of engineering talent by offering
scholarships and experiential learning opportunities to students with
strong potential and drive. We believe that when people belong, they
excel—and when they excel, we all benefit.
SUSTAINABILITY
Nature’s most precious assets need our protection and we take this
responsibility seriously. Our specialists in environmental science,
green infrastructure, and our LEED Accredited professionals thoroughly
assess the impact a design may have on energy consumption,
waterways, habitat, vegetation, and water quality. At Clark Dietz, we
are fully committed to optimizing the benefits of sustainability in every
solution we design.
Page 49 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 5
WATER, WASTEWATER,
STORMWATER
Supply, Distribution, Storage
System Modeling and Studies
Facility and Master Plans
Treatment Processes
System Renewal and Rehabilitation
Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems
CSOs and SSOs
I/I Evaluation and Characterization
Geospatial Asset Management
TRANSPORTATION
Public Involvement
Streetscaping and Lighting
Traffic Engineering
Roadways and Highways
Multi-Modal Transportation
Intersection Design
Urban Drainage
Structural Engineering
CONSTRUCTION
Resident Engineering
Observation Services
Construction Layout
Documentation
Cost and Schedule Control
MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning
Chiller and Boiler Plants
Facility Piping Systems
Power Distribution Systems
Energy Modeling
Building, Site, Roadway Lighting
Plumbing and Fire Protection
SCADA, Automation, Controls
Security and Telecom
ARC Flash Hazard Analysis
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
Municipal Engineering
Development Reviews
Roadway Maintenance
Storm, Sewer, Water Main Maintenance
Regulatory Compliance and Reports
Grant Funding Assistance
Capital Planning
Land Acquisition
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Feasibility Assessments
Conceptual Design
Civil/Electrical/Structural Analysis
Our work is driven by purpose. To have a positive impact on people,
the natural environment, and the economic well-being of our client
communities. We are engineering more than infrastructure, we are
engineering quality of life.
Our mission is to collaborate with
clients to create infrastructure and
built environments that improve the
quality of life.
ENGINEERING SERVICES
CIVIL/STRUCTURAL
WATER RESOURCES
TRANSPORTATION
TRAFFIC
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
CONSTRUCTION
Page 50 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 6
Fiber Programs
Are Expanding...
And Clark Dietz Is
Already There.
Clark Dietz is currently
under contract
for fiber installation
program management
and inspection
services in multiple
municipalities, giving
our team real-time,
boots-on-the-ground
experience with the
exact challenges
Germantown is preparing
to face: multi-permit
phasing, neighborhood
coordination, juggling
multiple providers
at once, restoration
enforcement, and public
communication.
Clark Dietz understands the importance of delivering high-speed fiber
infrastructure to the residents of Germantown in a manner that is efficient,
well-coordinated, and minimally disruptive. We are currently supporting North
Shore communities as well as several municipalities in Northern Illinois as
telecommunications providers advance of similar installations. Based on
this experience, we have developed a repeatable and scalable process for
managing community-wide fiber projects that aligns closely with municipal
preferences and operational needs.
Our approach emphasizes clear expectations, proactive coordination,
transparent tracking, and consistent public communication to ensure a
successful outcome for all stakeholders.
TASK 1 – PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Pre-construction coordination is critical to the success of a village-wide
fiber installation program. The following activities establish a clear baseline
for execution and communication. Each task can be adjusted to align with
Village preferences; however, Clark Dietz strongly recommends addressing
expectations upfront to minimize field conflicts and schedule impacts.
1.1 MEETINGS
KICK-OFF MEETING
Kick-Off Meeting (Village and Clark Dietz)
Establish project expectations prior to commencement. Based on our
experience reviewing right-of-way permits for community-wide fiber installations,
clear guidelines are essential to maintaining schedule and avoiding surprises.
Topics may include:
• Submittal procedures
• Restoration standards
• Inspection and tracking processes
• Roles, responsibilities, and communication protocols
REGULAR PROGRESS MEETINGS
Clark Dietz will lead weekly meetings and prepare agendas and minutes.
These meetings will continue at a weekly basis until they can be
transitioned to less frequent meetings with mutual consent of the Village
and Clark Dietz staff.
Topics may include, depending on the timeline of activities:
• Schedule updates
• Resident issues and resolutions
• RFIs and response timelines
• Coordination with Village departments
• Status of notifications
• Dashboard feedback
• Process adjustments
• Customization or troubleshooting
• Overall schedule and progress
• Dashboard feedback
• Process adjustments
• Customization or troubleshooting
• Overall schedule and progress
• Monthly invoicing by permit area and stage
PROJECT APPROACH
Page 51 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 7
PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING
A formal MANDATORY pre-construction meeting with the Contractor will be
conducted prior to any field work.
At a minimum, the meeting will address:
• Utility potholing requirements (hydro-excavation recommended)
• Verification of permits outside the public right-of-way
• Restoration standards, timelines, and procedures
• Notification protocols for field work initiation
• Use of centralized email and dashboard updates for stage tracking
• Meeting minutes will be prepared and distributed
TRACK RESIDENT FEEDBACK, COMPLAINTS, AND PROJECT PROGRESS
Clark Dietz will work with the Village’s existing GIS tracking systems,
including Survey123, and enhance functionality as needed to manage
feedback tracking, project documentation, and status.
Village staff will have direct access to view records and submit comments or
tasks.
Dashboard elements may include:
• Permit number with geographic project location
• Resident complaints and resolutions (linked spatially)
• Stage-based tracking, color-coded for clarity:
○ Plan Review
○ Initial Centerline Layout Inspection
○ Construction
○ Restoration Inspection
○ Reinspection / Spot Inspection
○ Punch List
○ Final Approval
○ Field records summarized by permit area
ADJUST SUBMITTAL PROCESS WHEN NEEDED
Setting expectations with the permittee/contractor prior to commencement of
the project is integral to its success. In our prior experience reviewing right-of-
way permits for community-wide fiber installation projects, guidelines are the
best way to keep the project on schedule while minimizing surprises.
Clark Dietz will be open to discussions with the Village and the permit
applicants to fine tune intake and submittal requirements as the project
progresses.
Task 2 describes an initial list of submittal requirement – however, these
conditions may be adjusted to the needs to the Village and the expectations of
the residents in living with the disruption of fiber installation.
There may also be additional changes needed to accommodate constraint
on the contractor and permit applicant. Overall, Clark Dietz will come to the
table with an open mind but hold firm in enforcing the letter and the intent of
Ordinance 8.065.
TROUBLESHOOT ISSUES WITH PERMIT APPLICATIONS
In our experience, many permit submittals will be incomplete and some will
ignore the established requirements. Clark Dietz is fully prepared to handle
these issues and work with applicants to remedy the inconsistencies and
incompleteness of submittals.
PROJECT APPROACH
WHAT SETS OUR
APPROACH APART:
• Dedicated,
experienced staffing
• GIS-driven inspection
and documentation
• Municipal-first
mindset: we act
on behalf of the
Village, not telecomm
providers, with a focus
on resident needs,
locator availability, and
speed/schedule of
installation.
• Proven resident-facing
coordination
• Approach built from
scratch: lessons
learned, already
applied
Page 52 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 8
We have some lessons learned on this matter – such as recognition of
‘systemic’ submittal deficiencies that must be addressed before we are too far
into the project. An example of this type of deficiency is the use of the wrong
scale, consistently not including necessary items on plans, or consistently not
using the appropriate clearance or set back distances etc.
In our view, one of the most significant consequences of permit application
issues will be the additional review costs that will be incurred by the applicant.
In almost every case, the applicant will be completely “surprised” by these
additional costs incurred and will demand immediate explanations. The
explanations are not difficult, but the financial consequences might be.
We are prepared for such inquiry: we will work with the Village in setting up the
appropriate amount of escrow or other financial tool to cover these somewhat
expected overruns, in the event that they come to reality.
UPDATES ON RESPONSES TO COMPLAINTS
The tracking dashboard is proposed as a great tool for the maintenance of
issue resolution documentation and updates on complaint resolution.
Clark Dietz proposes to implement a resident notification system that
seeks to prevent most complaints. Stakeholder communication is essential
to minimizing disruption and maintaining public confidence.
Clark Dietz recommends the following outreach milestones:
• Initial Village-wide Mailer
○ Distributed during plan review; includes QR code linking to the Village’s
GIS.
• Door Hangers by Permit Area
○ Distributed at least 7 days prior to construction, including:
○ Schedule
○ Contractor and contact information
○ FAQs
1.2 SUMM ARY OF SUBMITTALS/STAGES OF WORK
Clark Dietz is proposing to leverage and enhance the Village’s existing GIS
tools, including Survey123, for project tracking purposes. We have used
dashboard concepts on many occasions and have found that it helps in
tracking resident and project participant inquiries enables the team to
respond to and track resident inquiries during construction.
1.3 SE T UP CALL LINE
DEDICATED PHONE NUMBER
Clark Dietz will create the toolset to track Emergency Contact and
Communications.
• Establish a 24-hour emergency response contact for resident inquiries
• Develop a centralized email inbox linked to the GIS dashboard to ensure all
correspondence is logged and traceable
FAQ
Clark Dietz will prepare a FAQ document that will be continuously maintained
and updated as the project progresses. The FAQ document will be widely
distributed and addressed to Village officials as well as residents.
PROJECT APPROACH
As fiber projects
accelerate across the
region, Clark Dietz
is focused on this
specialized municipal
infrastructure—bringing
accountability, structure,
and confidence to a type
of project that must
be managed with a
community’s needs in
mind, while maintaining
a positive relationship
with fiber installers.
Page 53 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 9
TRACK RESIDENT COMPLAINTS
Ongoing Complaint Tracking will leverage the Village’s GIS tools, including
Survey123 and associated tracking dashboards, as enhanced for this
project.
• Field concerns logged and resolved through the dashboard
• Information provided to Village staff for GIS updates, including:
○ Project timeline and purpose
○ Updated schedules
○ FAQs
○ Contact information
1.4 P ERMIT CLOSEOUT/REPORTS/RECORDS
PUNCH LIST
• Maintain a preliminary punch list during construction within the dashboard
• Coordinate formal punch list walkthroughs with Village staff for each permit
area
• Coordinate punch list completion with the Contractor within 20 working
days
FINAL WALKTHROUGH AND RECORD DRAWINGS
• Conduct final inspections with Village staff
• Update dashboard status to Final Approval
• Review Contractor-submitted record drawings (hardcopy and GIS formats)
• Cross-check as-builts against field-collected survey data
TASK 2 – REVIEW PERMITS / INSPECTIONS PER 8.065
2.1 R EVIEW OVERALL NETWORK PLAN
APPROVAL OF OVERALL PLAN
We strongly recommend that the applicants be required to submit an OVERALL
WORKPLAN. Review and approve the overall network vision, including the hub
location, prior to individual permit submittals.
The review and approval of an overall vision of the network will help address
anticipated conflicts with alignment, including the hub (starting point) prior to
individual submittals.
The overall plan review will accomplish the early identification of:
• Alignment conflicts
• Non-public right-of-way segments
• Environmental or jurisdictional constraints ensures compliance with local
requirements and minimizes redesign.
COORDINATE REVIEWS WITH VILLAGE STAFF
Conduct an initial review of fiber plans prior to the formal pre-construction
meeting. Fiber plan detail varies significantly, and early alignment on
expectations reduces downstream conflicts.
• Conduct a pre-application meeting with the applicants
• Provide formal guidance on plan content, level of detail, and conditions
PROJECT APPROACH
Page 54 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 10
PERMIT APPLICATION WORKFLOW AND GUIDELINES
The following items are recommended before submittals begin. These can be
adjusted based on the preferences of the Village, but it’s important to address each
item early on with all stakeholders.
For example, a reasonable submittal framework for the applicant could have the
following set of requirements and expectations:
• Each submittal to consist of approximately 1 mile of fiber installation (8-10
pages, no more than 1”=60’ scale half size, depending on congestion of
the corridor). Anything deviating from this will warrant additional review
times and fees.
• Establish escrow amount for collection of fees prior to review/inspection.
This allows the Village to reduce even temporary expenditures of their
taxpayer funds.
• Set expectations for the location of any structures (handholes), and
requirements for the fiber network alignment (outside of pavement, rear
yards, clearance from other utilities, etc.).
• Require hydro-excavation for any potholing necessary within Village right-of-
way and notification to residents
• Determine a process for installation in rear yards and verification of existing
easements (if applicable).
• Finalize process for review, request for inspections, and final approval (for
locations in Village right-of-way and on private property).
2.2 R EVIEW INDIVIDUAL WORK PLANS
COORDINATE PERMIT TRACKING
Tracking individual permits will be done through an online system built upon
and integrated with the Village’s existing GIS tools (including Survey123),
with enhancements added as necessary. The system leverages an automatic
notification process for each request by sending an email to Clark Dietz and the
Village. This process of direct input by the permittee/contractor to request each
of the 4 Stages of the project (Plan Review, Initial Centerline (CL) Inspection,
Final Inspection, or Reinspection) would allow better clarity and organization
and improve efficiency of communication.
This Task will help to minimize the shuffling of paperwork, scanning documents,
and inconsistencies during submittal intake.
• There is a potential to create additional functionality in addition to the
Village’s current GIS tools.
PROJECT APPROACH
Proven, Repeatable
Municipal Fiber
Program Mode:
Clark Dietz is not
developing this process
from scratch. We are
currently supporting
multiple North
Shore and Northern
Illinois communities
through similar scale
fiber installations.
Our approach is
refined, field-tested,
and scalable—
reducing learning
curves, preventing
common pitfalls,
and accelerating
program startup for
Germantown.
Page 55 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 11
REVIEW EACH SUBMITTAL FOR 8.065 COMPLIANCE
In order to clearly demonstrate compliance with Section 8.065, Clark Dietz will
create a form that mimics the contents of that section for use by the applicants.
In our experience, having a stand-alone document that contains all of the
requirements of the ordinance is a great resource, both for the review agent
and the applicant.
In the past, we have transformed stormwater ordinances into a stormwater
management plan approval application, the erosion control ordinance into
an erosion control permit application, etc. The ordinance in fact refers to an
application form, which may be available already. The ordinance also refers to
the “required attachments,” in other words, many of the items we would expect
to use are already in place, though may also need some tweaks and updates to
clarify the intent of the Village.
The application form will essentially “bridge” the ordinance requirements with
the engineering review, and thereby offer a comprehensive tool that satisfies
the intent of the ordinance and the practicalities of construction.
Here’s the excerpt from the ordinance regarding permit applications:
EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATION. Application for a permit shall be
made to the Department. Permit applications shall contain, and will be
considered complete only upon compliance with the requirements of
the following provisions:
1) Registration with the Department if required by this chapter;
2) Submission of a completed permit application form, including all
required attachments, and scaled drawings showing the location
and area of the proposed project and the location of all existing and
proposed facilities;
3) Payment of all money due to the Village for:
a. Applicable permit fees and costs as set forth below;
b. Subject to section e., unpaid fees or costs due for prior
excavations; or
c. Subject to section e., any loss, damage, or expense suffered by the
Village because of applicant’s prior excavations of the rights-of-way
or any emergency actions taken by the Village.
d. When an excavation permit is requested for purposes of installing
additional facilities, and the posting of a restoration bond for the
additional facilities is insufficient, the posting of an additional or
larger restoration bond for the additional facilities may be required.
e. The Department shall not deny a registrant an excavation permit
because of a dispute between the Village and the registrant, related
to subsections b. and/or c. if the dispute has been adjudicated in
favor of the registrant or if the dispute is the subject of an appeal
filed by the registrant and no decision in the matter has at yet been
rendered.
PROJECT APPROACH
Unlike traditional
spreadsheet-based
tracking, we’ll use the
Village’s GIS tools to
provide spatial permit
tracking, stage-based
color coding, resident
complaint linkage,
photo documentation,
and a full “who-what-
when” accountability
chain. This creates
transparency for
Village staff, improves
response time, and
provides defensible
documentation
aligned with Section
8.065 requirements.
This is real-time
accountability, not
just a permit-log.
Page 56 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 12
UNDERSTAND SCOPE OF WORK FOR EACH SUBMITTAL
Part of the requirement of an overall plan is to understand where in the network
at any given permit application fits – in other words, our understanding and
access of the overall plan helps in positioning any given permit application
within the overall network.
And understanding the position of a permit application within the network gives
us and the Village and understanding of the constraints that the segment may
create or solve as part of the overall network.
For example, a less-than-optimal location of a hub (or ring) may affect
connecting network links to the hub to potential space or alignment constraints.
At Clark Dietz, we have developed an understanding of fitting each component
of a network in the overall system and predict potential pitfalls.
SET LOCATION AND ALIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS
Clark Dietz will assist the Village in establishing clear program-wide guidelines,
including:
• Submittal Criteria
○ Maximum plan scale requirements
○ Identification of all existing utilities
○ Recommendation that all permit areas be submitted concurrently,
when feasible, to avoid connectivity conflicts
• GIS Data Requirements
○ Require submittal of proposed fiber linework in GIS format
○ Integrate approved alignments into the project dashboard to support
inspections and coordination
• Aboveground Infrastructure Standards
○ Locations and placement requirements
○ Clearance from existing utilities
• Fiber Conduit Depth
○ Preferred depth: 24–36 inches
○ Balance shallow installation (utility avoidance) with long-term Village
maintenance needs (e.g., sidewalks)
• Agency Coordination
○ Address permit requirements with WisDOT, Washington County DOT,
WDNR, and other agencies as applicable
• Escrow Consideration
○ Assistance in establishing an escrow account for review and inspection
fees to reduce any use of Village funds
COORDINATE INSTALLS/EXCAVATIONS IN PUBLIC ROW
Clark Dietz will require that the contractor/applicant perform hydro-excavation
for any potholing necessary within Village right-of-way and notification to
residents. This will greatly reduce disturbance to both the public realm and
affected private properties.
PROJECT APPROACH
Clark Dietz transforms
ordinance language
into functional
application tools and
review checklists
that help applicants
achieve compliance the
first time. By creating
structured intake forms
and clear submittal
standards, we reduce
rework, minimize
disputes over fees,
and protect Village
resources.
Page 57 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 13
COORDINATE INSTALLS/EXCAVATIONS OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC ROW
Outside of the public ROW, Clark Dietz believes that the installations in private
property are tightly defined and prescribed by the applicant.
We will require that the contractor determine and present for
approval a process for installation on private property and
verification of existing easements.
FINAL APPROVALS AND INSPECTION NEEDS
Before the permit intake process is started, Clark Dietz will work with Village
staff to create a clear submittal requirements document for the applicants. The
workflow we envision as a deliverable for this work is as follows:
• Stage 1: Plans and application are submitted for review:
○ Enter/confirm plan location, documents, and application into the GIS
database
○ Verify presence of existing easement (rear yard installation)
○ Draw schematic location of centerline alignment (based on plan)
○ Notify contractor of comments/revisions or approval of plan
• Stage 2: Centerline alignment is staked in the field and utilities located:
○ Conduct preliminary field inspection to ensure location matches approved
plans
○ Track photos, comments, and create a field report in the GIS database
○ Notify contractor of comments/revisions or approval of centerline
• Stage 3: Installation and restoration is complete:
○ Conduct final field inspection
○ Track photos, comments, and create a field report in the GIS database
○ Notify contractor of comments/punchlist items or final approval
• Stage 4: Re-Inspections requested by Village or necessary for follow-up of
comments:
○ Conduct additional field inspection
○ Track photos, comments, and create a field report in the GIS database
○ Determine next steps (if any) or resolution and notify contractor and Village
ARCGIS SURVEY 123 UPDATES
We will work with the Village to leverage its Survey 123 system to keep track of
the project.
• Each time the permit application moves through the intake-review-
comment-approval-construction-verification workflow, the Online dashboard
is updated, and accountability chain is recorded.
• Each time a complaint is filed, and response-action-resolution workflow is
implemented, the Online Dashboard is updated, and accountability chain is
recorded.
Our GIS Specialist will be available for troubleshooting and modifications as
necessary during ongoing maintenance of the dashboard and corresponding
database throughout the life of the project.
Note: “accountability chain” refers to the recording of “who, what,
when” for responses to permit movements or complaint resolution.
PROJECT APPROACH
Page 58 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 14
TRACK SUBMITTALS, REVIEWS, INSTALLS, INSPECTIONS
We will use the Village’s GIS tools to track the fiber installation. Our specialists
may offer enhancements for existing tools to elevate the functionality of existing
tools.
This is a completely customized setup to fit the needs of the Village, including
custom summaries, ability to submit feedback and detailed daily activities.
Permit applications and status tracking will be accomplished through an
enhanced version of the Villages Survey 123 tool described above.
The dashboard will offer Stage-based tracking, color-coded for clarity:
• Permit number with geographic “project” location established for each
submittal
• Tracking of Stage (color coded for easy visual navigation) with database
information captured for each stage:
○ Stage 1: Plan Review
▪ Reviewer
▪ Comments/Next Steps
▪ Approval Date
○ Stage 2: Init ial CL Inspection
▪ Inspector
▪ Photos
▪ Comments/Next Steps
▪ Approval Date
○ Stage 3: Final Inspection
▪ Inspector
▪ Photos
▪ Comments/Next Steps
▪ Approval Date
○ Stage 4: R einspection/Spot Inspection (as needed or requested)
▪ Inspector
▪ Photos
▪ Comments/Next Steps
▪ Final Approval Date
• Resident complaints and resolutions (linked to permit number location)
• Summary section of # of submittals in each Stage and linear footage
2.3 W EEKLY REPORTS
The proposed Project dashboard will have the capability to produce weekly (or
any other frequency) reports for distribution. The distribution may be internal
project participants or to a wider audience as directed by the Village staff.
PROJECT APPROACH
Proactive Resident
Communication:
Fiber installation is
highly visible and
disruptive. Our layered
communication
strategy—Village-
wide mailers, door
hangers, 24-hour
call line, centralized
email logging, and
live dashboard
tracking—prevents
most complaints
before they occur and
provides defensible
documentation when
issues arise. This
protects public trust
while minimizing staff
time spent responding
to escalations.
Page 59 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 15
TASK 3 – INSPECTION SERVICES
The Construction phase services consist of the following main elements:
• Pre-construction photos and video
• Daily field reports integrated into ArcGIS Online, including:
• Work activities
• Field notes
• GIS-based photos and survey shots
• Resident outreach and resolutions
3.1 CENTERLINE LA YOUT VERIFICATION
• Require Contractor to stake or paint the proposed centerline prior to construction
• Clark Dietz will verify alignment against approved plans and confirm JULIE locates
• Recommend a pre-application meeting with JULIE due to current locate delays
3.2 INSTALLAT ION AND RESTORATION VERIFICATION
• Conduct final field inspection
• Track photos, comments, and create a field report in the GIS database
• Notify contractor of comments/punchlist items or final approval
3.3 RE-INSPECTIONS IF NEEDED OR REQUIRED
Re-Inspections requested by Village or necessary for follow-up of comments:
• Conduct additional field inspection
• Track photos, comments, and create a field report in the GIS database
• Determine next steps (if any) or resolution and notify contractor and Village
PROFESSIONAL FEES AND INVOICE DETAILS
As you know, the devil in computing the fee is in the details. For this purpose, we are assuming that the limits and
rules set for permit applications and submittals will roughly follow the example given in the above referenced PERMIT
APPLICATION WORKFLOW AND GUIDELINES.
Under this scenario, we would expect to receive and process about 100 permit applications (each for about a mile of
installation).
Task 1:
Project Administration (2 yrs) 400 hours $80,000
Task 2: Track and Review 100 Permits (1 Review Per Permit) 1,000 hours $140,000
Task 3: Inspection Services (2 Field Visits Per Permit) 1,000 hours $140,000
TOTAL: 2,400 hours $360,000
For a 100-mile fiber installation, br oken into 100 separate submittals, the above fee structure can be presented as:
• 2 0 hours of review and inspections per 1 mile submittal.
• $2,800 in professional fees for review and inspections per 1 mile submittal.
• We are anticipating that the hours and fee breakdown between review and inspection will be 50-50.
• The above numbers do not include potential additional expenses for re-inspections, violations of permit conditions,
or submittals that require additional revisions due to incomplete materials etc.
Once an o
verall plan is discussed and approved, submittal limitations and process are established, work will be
conducted with a mix of the staff below, as necessary.
Assigned Staff and Rates
Project Manager Emily Basalla $255/hr
GIS Specialist Devin Car lson $175/hr
Reviews Andy Ashley $180/hr
Tania Tkatchuk $140/hr
Inspections Steve Wlaho vich $180/hr
Tania Tkatchuk $140/hr
Jake Westall $135/hr
Monthly invoices to the Village will be formatted exactly in the three categories listed above and will
include permit number and location.
PROJECT APPROACH
Page 60 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 16
Inspections Using Field Maps
Clark Dietz recognizes GIS as an integral and rapidly evolving technology. Our
team is committed to leveraging its potential to enhance our services. Guided
by our values of flexibility, community, and trust, we design solutions that
combine process improvement principles with geospatial technology. We balance
infrastructure needs with economic pressures, ensuring that our solutions are
not only effective, but also aligned to the unique needs of our clients and the
communities we serve.
In the ever-evolving landscape of Construction Management, our team
recognized a growing challenge: traditional inspection processes were often
time-consuming, prone to errors, and lacked the ability to capture real-time
data. To address these issues, we developed a GIS-based Construction
Inspection Solution that streamlines inspection workflows and project
management.
Our Construction Inspection Solution was developed with the needs of Field
Inspectors, Project Managers, and our Clients in mind. Central to this solution is
our ArcGIS based inspection app, which empowers inspectors to collect data and
project photos directly from the field using mobile devices. This data is instantly
uploaded to a cloud-based, centralized database, eliminating the need for
cumbersome paper forms and reducing the risk of errors.
While GIS platforms are not new to the Engineering industry, Clark Dietz has
developed a way to give up-to-date information to our Clients in real time.
Our construction site observers enter the data into their smartphone or
tablet, and the customized dashboard populates for both the project/
construction manager and client to access.
This information includes:
• Resident contacts (time of call, name, address, inquiry, date of resolution,
and needed follow-up);
• Field data input information (similar to field book with weather, conditions,
challenges, and workings of the day);
• Quantity tracking (both preliminary and final at the end of the field day);
• Project photos (including geolocated location and direction of each photo);
• Reporting options, such as weekly progress reports.
Our GIS solution can be fully customizable
to the needs and desires of the Client.
Additionally, once this information is housed
in the GIS, cloud-based database, certain
information can be posted for the public
to see as well such as phase
maps for a project, anticipated
start of construction, updates,
contact information, and so
much more.
PROJECT APPROACH
GIS EXPERIENCE & SOLUTIONS
Why GIS
Fiber installation infrastructure
projects require tracking
information on a parcel-by-parcel
basis. With GIS, data tracking
includes quantities, photos, and
resident inquiries, and engineering
coordination.
Managing this complexity with GIS
allows for clear communication
among the Village, contractor,
consultant, and public, now and
into the future.
How We Use It
Our GIS-integrated inspection
system enables real-time
field data collection, parcel-
based documentation, custom
dashboards for staff updates,
and streamlined reporting and
regulatory compliance.
Field-Ready Tools
We tailor GIS solutions for
construction inspection, utility
asset management, and
communication, using mobile
tools designed with inspectors,
engineers, and municipal staff in
mind.
The Result
A structured, location-based
platform that supports accurate
documentation, improved
public transparency, faster
project delivery, and smarter
infrastructure decisions.
Explore More
Scan the QR code
to explore our GIS
StoryMap.
Page 61 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 17
TEAM ORGANIZATION*
GIS SPECIALIST
Program Manager/
GIS Specialist
Devin Carlson, GISP
KENOSHA OFFICE
PROJECT MANAGER
Emily Basalla, PE, CFM
MILWAUKEE OFFICE
CLIENT LIAISON
Mustafa Emir, PhD, PE
MILWAUKEE OFFICE
INSPECTION
PLAN REVIEW
Plan Reviewer
Andy Ashley, PE
MILWAUKEE OFFICE
Plan Reviewer/
Field Observer
Tania Tkatchuk, EIT
MILWAUKEE OFFICE
Construction Oversight
Steve Wlahovich
MILWAUKEE OFFICE
Field Observer
Jake Westall
MILWAUKEE OFFICE
*OUR MILWAUKEE OFFICE IS
LESS THAN 20 MILES FROM
GERMANTOWN
Page 62 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 18
EXPERIENCE
22 Years
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, Univ. of
Missouri Columbia
REGISTRATIONS
PE, WI, E-41026
PE, MI, 6201313671
PE, IN, 12100316
ASFPMCFM, MST, US-17-
09577
PE, IL, 062.061744
ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Using Hec-Ras to Model
Bridges, Culverts and
Floodplains, University of WI
- Madison
BMP-LID Design with EPA-
SWMM, IAFSM
WinSLAMM for Urban
Stormwater Quality
Management, NASECA
Wisconsin
Designing Bio/Infiltration
BMPs for Stormwater Quality
Improvement, University of
WI-Madison
XP-SWMM Training, XP
TEAM RESUMES
EMILY BASALLA, PE, CFM
PROJECT MANAGER
CLARK DIETZ
Emily Basalla is a senior project manager with more than
20 years of experience in municipal, environmental,
and civil engineering, with deep expertise in stormwater
management and permitting. Her experience includes
storm sewer and drainage design, roadway and pavement
projects, water main relocations, sanitary sewer systems,
and wastewater processes. Emily is a Certified Floodplain
Manager and regularly supports communities with
floodplain mapping, regulatory compliance, and flood risk
reduction strategies.
Emily is particularly valued for her leadership in municipal
permitting and developer review services. She is highly
experienced with NPDES, state, and local permitting
processes and serves as a trusted on-call reviewer for
multiple municipalities, handling stormwater design,
grading and drainage, floodplain impacts, and hydrologic
and hydraulic analyses. Her balanced approach protects
neighborhood integrity while supporting responsible
development, ensuring municipalities receive technically
sound, defensible reviews that stand up to regulatory and
public scrutiny.
▸ Gurnee Fiber Management, Gurnee, IL
▸ Glendale Fiber Management, Glendale, WI
▸ Elmhurst Fiber Design & Management, Elmhurst, IL
▸ Village Engineering, Green Oaks, IL
▸ Village Engineering Services, Bayside, WI
▸ Scott Street Basin Design, Franklin Park, IL
▸ Stormwater Quality Initiative, Glendale, WI
▸ City Engineering Services, Glendale, WI
▸ Village Staff Eng. Services, Harwood Heights, IL
▸ Village Engineering, Shorewood, WI
▸ Village Engineering Services, River Hills, WI
▸ Village Staff Eng. Services, Franklin Park, IL
“Large-scale fiber installations are not
traditional construction projects, and
they shouldn’t be managed like them.
They are utility programs that touch
nearly every neighborhood, every right-
of-way condition, and every municipal
department at once. The difference
between a smooth program and a
community headache is proactive
inspection, clear expectations, and
constant coordination.
Clark Dietz is already navigating this
exact challenge for fiber installations
in communities like Gurnee and
Warren Township, where we serve as
the City’s extension, coordinating with
contractors, managing resident concerns,
protecting municipal infrastructure,
and documenting every step through
GIS-based tracking and reporting.
We understand how quickly issues can
escalate if they are not addressed in real
time, particularly related to right-of-way
restoration, erosion control, and utility
conflicts.
For Germantown, our focus is simple:
be present in the field, responsive to
residents, and accountable to the Village.
Our inspection approach is structured,
repeatable, and proven, aiding efficiency
of the fiber network installation while
the character, infrastructure, and
standards of the community are protected
throughout construction and long after
the work is complete.”
Emily Says...
Page 63 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 19
TEAM RESUMES
DEVIN CARLSON, GISP
PROGRAM MANAGER/
GIS SPECIALIST
CLARK DIETZ
Devin Carlson is a Certified GIS Professional and
Clark Dietz GIS Specialist with more than 15 years
of experience supporting municipal infrastructure
programs. Her expertise includes GIS-based asset
management, potable water and sanitary sewer
systems, field data collection, and utility mapping.
Devin has developed and maintained GIS platforms
that help municipalities better understand, manage,
and plan for their infrastructure investments.
Devin plays a key leadership role in integrating GIS
with stormwater, water, and sewer programs. Her
experience includes stormwater quality modeling
support, erosion control enforcement mapping, utility
inspections, and coordination with county and state
agencies. By leveraging GIS to link inspection data,
CCTV footage, and maintenance records, Devin
provides municipalities with actionable information that
improves decision-making, transparency, and long-term
system performance.
▸ Gurnee Fiber Management, Gurnee, IL
▸ Glendale Fiber Management, Glendale, WI
▸ Elmhurst Fiber Design & Management, Elmhurst, IL
▸ Village Engineering, Green Oaks, IL
▸ City Engineering Services, Glendale, WI
▸ Village Engineering Services, Bayside, WI
▸ Village Engineering, River Hills, WI
▸ Village Engineering, Random Lake, WI
▸ Municipal Engineering Services, Kenosha, WI
▸ Erosion Control Enforcement, Glendale, WI
▸ Engineering Services, Whitefish Bay, WI
▸ General Engineering, Elmhurst, IL
▸ Village Engineering, Brown Deer, WI
EXPERIENCE
15 Years
EDUCATION
AS, Civil Engineering, Fresh
Water Resources, Gateway
Technical College
AS, Architectural Structural
Engineering, Gateway
Technical College
BA, Environmental Science,
Carthage College
MS, Cartography & GIS,
University of Wisconsin -
Madison
ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Certified GIS Professional
WinSLAMM for Urban
Stormwater Quality
Management
ESRI Training - Going Places
with Spatial Analysis
ESRI Training - Field Data
Collection and Management
Using ArcGIS
Esri Training - Cartography
ANDREW ASHLEY, PE
PLAN REVIEWER
CLARK DIETZ
Andy Ashley is a civil engineer with broad municipal
planning, design, and construction observation
experience that supports effective plan review and
inspection for infrastructure projects. His background
includes street, sanitary sewer, and stormwater design;
surveying; hydrologic and hydraulic modeling; water main
replacement; and construction management, with regular
involvement in reviewing plans for constructability and
compliance with municipal standards. Andy serves as
a trusted municipal engineer to multiple communities,
acting as the primary consultant for roadway rehabilitation
and traffic engineering in Whitefish Bay and leading
annual water main replacement programs in Glendale
that replace more than 7 ,000 feet of pipe per year.
His experience also includes roadway resurfacing and
reconstruction design, traffic studies, bidding support,
and incorporation of green infrastructure and sustainable
design elements. In addition, Andy assists municipalities
with grant identification and application development and
supports park and trail planning efforts that reflect local
conditions and community priorities.
▸ Gurnee Fiber Management, Gurnee, IL
▸ Glendale Fiber Management, Glendale, WI
▸ Elmhurst Fiber Design & Management, Elmhurst, IL
▸ City of Glendale, 2021 Resurfacing Construction,
Glendale, WI
▸ 2015 Stormwater Plan Review, New Albany, IN
▸ Alley Construction, Glendale, WI
▸ Brown Deer 2023 Permit Review Services, Brown
Deer, WI
▸ Old Grand Ave Water Main, Gurnee, IL
▸ 2022 City Engineering, Glendale, WI
▸ Bayside 2024 Village Engineering, Bayside, WI
▸ Village Engineering, Whitefish Bay, WI
▸ General Engineering Services, Shorewood, WI
▸ 2022 Village Engineering Services, River Hills, WI
▸ General Engineering Services, Pleasant Prairie, WI
EXPERIENCE
14 Years
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Wisconsin
Milwaukee
REGISTRATIONS
PE, IL, 062.070457
PE, WI, 45780-6
AFFILIATIONS
American Public Works
Association
Page 64 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 20
TEAM RESUMES
TANIA TKACHUK, EIT
FIELD OBSERVER
CLARK DIETZ
Tania is a civil engineer with an emphasis in structural
engineering and extensive experience in construction
inspection for municipal infrastructure projects. She
has served as a construction inspector on a wide
range of public works projects, including water main
installations, paving, sidewalks and ramps, parking
structures, demolition, and reservoir upgrades. Tania
is trained in erosion control through NASECA and has
inspected projects funded by agencies such as MMSD,
including Regenerative Stormwater Conveyance (RSC)
and Green Alley improvements.
She is experienced in monitoring contractor
compliance, maintaining thorough documentation,
and coordinating with residents, contractors, and
municipal stakeholders to keep projects on schedule
and minimize community disruption. Her professional
and approachable demeanor helps maintain clear
communication throughout construction.
In addition to her inspection work, Tania is proficient
in AutoCAD, Civil 3D, ArcGIS Pro, Survey123, and
Bluebeam, allowing her to efficiently review plans,
track field changes, and support accurate project
recordkeeping. Her combined field and design
experience brings a practical, detail-oriented approach
to infrastructure inspection projects.
▸ Port Washington & Jean Nicolet Water Sewer
Construction Inspection, Glendale, WI
▸ Lateral Replacement Inspection, Glendale, WI
▸ Annual Sidewalk and C&G Inspection, Kenosha, WI
▸ Komatsu Mining Parking Lot Inspection, Oak Creek, WI
▸ Vel R. Phillips Plaza Construction Inspection
Services, Milwaukee, WI
▸ Lead Service Line Replacement Program
Construction Inspection Services, Milwaukee, WI
▸ Sump Collection Inspection, Franklin, WI
▸ Rosenow Creek Trail Construction Inspection,
Oconomowoc, WI
EXPERIENCE
9 Years
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, Univ. of
Wisconsin Platteville
REGISTRATIONS
EIT, WI, 514139-500
ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Naseca, Construction Site
Erosion Control & Stormwater
Permit Compliance Training
WinSLAMM for Urban
Stormwater Quality
Management
STEVEN WLAHOVICH
CONSTRUCTION OVERSIGHT
CLARK DIETZ
Steven is a seasoned Construction Inspector with
more than 20 years of field experience. His experience
includes managing daily field operations of public
infrastructure projects including water main, sanitary,
storm sewer, and roadway construction. He completes
detailed documentation of daily field operations
(IDR’s), measure and document job quantities, plan
review, implementation of job specifications and local
governing specifications, implementing soil erosion/
soil control procedures, project estimating, preparing
bidding documents and progress payments for various
projects, survey and layout, preparing record drawings,
and on the job problem solving.
As a former Construction Manager for the Village of
Pleasant Prairie, Steven managed the Construction
Management department operations, budgeting,
and field staff. Steven had full oversight of Village
projects related to Public Infrastructure: survey,
design, estimating, bidding documents, contract
administration, permitting, and specification
documents. Other responsibilities included
management of GPS Village assets, plan reviews, job
specification review and local governing specification
review, traffic control plan review, and job safety
review, right-of-way inspection and permitting, and
implementation of soil erosion/soil control procedures.
▸ Kenosha Water Utility, Redevelopment Block I
Inspection, Kenosha, WI
▸ Annual Sidewalk and C&G Inspection, Kenosha, WI
▸ Vel R. Phillips Plaza Construction Inspection
Services, Milwaukee, WI
▸ Maple Fields Site Development Phase 2,
Construction Inspection, Jackson, WI
▸ PPII Sump Collection Inspection, Franklin, WI
▸ Lake County Public Works, Oak Terrace Wellhouse
Construction Services, Lake County, IL
▸ East Side Sewer Construction, Bayside, WI
▸ Resurfacing Construction, Glendale, WI
▸ Glencoe Sewer Construction Services,
Bayside, WI
EXPERIENCE
24 Years
EDUCATION
AAS, Civil Engineering
Technician-Highway, Gateway
Technical College
ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Medium Diameter Pipe
Fusion Certified
Page 65 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 21
TEAM RESUMES
Our Milwaukee-based team, less than
20 miles from Germantown, combines
senior municipal permitting leadership,
dedicated GIS expertise, and experienced
construction inspectors.
Our strategy pairs ordinance-level review
expertise with real-time, parcel-based
inspection tracking.
The result is a field-tested, accountable
program model that protects Village
infrastructure, minimizes staff burden,
and maintains public trust from permit
intake through final restoration.
Our decades of public infrastructure
experience will provide Germantown
with responsive, defensible information
through the project lifecycle.
JAKE WESTALL
FIELD OBSERVER
CLARK DIETZ
Jacob (Jake) Westall is an Environmental Engineer
with Clark Dietz, supporting municipal infrastructure
and construction projects throughout Wisconsin
and Illinois. A December 2024 graduate of the
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee with a Bachelor
of Science in Environmental Engineering, Jake brings
strong technical skills in GIS, AutoCAD, and hydraulic
modeling, along with hands-on experience in roadway,
sidewalk, storm sewer, and watermain improvement
projects. His Clark Dietz project experience, led
by high-hour involvement on major construction
assignments such as the City of Kenosha 38th
Street Construction project and the City of Glendale
2024 ARPA Sidewalk Construction program, reflects
substantial participation in active construction
environments and coordination with municipal
stakeholders.
Jake’s background includes construction-phase
support, field coordination, inspection assistance,
and contractor communication. His prior field and
GIS experience with the Milwaukee Metropolitan
Sewerage District further strengthened his inspection,
documentation, and utility coordination capabilities.
▸ 38th Street Construction, Kenosha, WI
▸ 2024 ARPA Sidewalk Construction, Glendale, WI
▸ 2024 Emergency Storm Sewer Improvements,
Whitefish Bay, WI
▸ 2024 Alley Construction, Glendale, WI
▸ 38th Street Construction, Kenosha County, WI
▸ 2024 Resurfacing Construction, Glendale, WI
▸ Glen Flora Avenue Construction, Gurnee, IL
▸ East Side Sewer Construction, Bayside, WI
▸ Construction Inspection, Oconomowoc, WI
▸ Watermain Design, Elmhurst, IL
▸ 2026 Watermain and Road Design, Glendale, WI
▸ Sewer Lateral Digitization, Milwaukee, WI
EXPERIENCE
1 Year
EDUCATION
BS, Environmental
Engineering, University of
Wisconsin Milwaukee
ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Medium Diameter Pipe
Fusion Certified
Page 66 of 181
FIBER INSTALLATION/INSPECTION PROJECTS
City-Wide Fiber Optic Installation
City of Elmhurst, IL
Clark Dietz designed and provided construction oversight for 12 miles of fiber optic cable throughout the City of Elmhurst.
Clark Dietz was responsible for permitting the length of the fiber through City owned properties and right of way, IDOT
roadways, Illinois Prairie Path crossings, and creek crossings. A majority of the fiber was installed in residential areas
which required heavy coordination with the City and residents. The work required potholing of all utility crossings, including
all water and gas services, installation of fiber handholes, directional drilling of 2” conduit with tracer wire, pulling fiber,
and fiber terminations and connections to various facilities. Weekly map updates were delivered to residents detailing
where crews would be and what to expect along with City website updates throughout the project. We developed a GIS
dashboard for monitoring installation locations and documenting photos of the work, including before, during, and
restoration which streamlined our ability to respond to resident questions and concerns.
Village of Gurnee Fiber Management Program
Village of Gurnee, Illinois
The Village of Gurnee reached out to Clark Dietz for assistance regarding the management of a community-wide fiber
installation project. Clark Dietz and the Village worked together to develop a construction monitoring dashboard,
brainstorming and customizing ways to organize the permit review submittals, comments, project stage and overall
mapping for easy access by Village staff. Clark Dietz established permit requirements, service request processes, and
created standard permit applications and restoration specifications for fiber optic installation permitting. Services include
plan reviews for conflicts with existing utilities, restoration requirements, and construction inspections for alignment and
restoration.
Warren Township Highway Department (WTHD) Fiber Management Program
Warren Township, Lake County, Illinois
Clark Dietz is currently assisting the WTHD with fiber company coordination. Two different fiber companies have applied for
permits for community-wide fiber optic in northern Illinois. Being a small township entity, WTHD reached out to Clark Dietz
to help develop a right-of-way permit application, set permit requirements for plan submittals, provide recommendations
on escrow and insurance limits, and work to file a Master License Agreement with each company. Clark Dietz led a
process expectation meeting with the WTHD and two fiber companies, is currently reviewing submittals, providing
comments, ensuring permits from other agencies are being received, and handling part-time construction
inspection and restoration expectations.
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 22
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Page 67 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 23
RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) PERMIT REVIEW PROJECTS
Right-of-Way Permit & Development Review Services
Village of Green Oaks, Illinois
Clark Dietz provides right-of-way permit review and development review services for the Village of Green Oaks as part of
our role as Village Engineer. Clark Dietz reviews ROW permit applications and associated plans for compliance with Village
ordinances, floodplain and stormwater requirements, erosion control standards, and accepted engineering practices.
Reviews are coordinated with Village staff and outside agencies as needed to ensure consistency and timely approvals.
During construction, Clark Dietz provides inspection oversight within the public right-of-way to verify compliance with
approved permits and standards, while maintaining clear documentation and communication through project closeout.
Right-of-Way Permit Review & Construction Coordination
City of Glendale, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz performs right-of-way permit review services for the City of Glendale, supporting development and utility
projects within the public right-of-way. Services include review of permit applications, construction plans, and supporting
documentation for compliance with municipal codes, stormwater and erosion control requirements, and infrastructure
standards. Clark Dietz coordinates closely with City staff, contractors, and utility providers to address conflicts, clarify
requirements, and expedite reviews. Construction inspections are conducted as needed to confirm permitted work is
installed in accordance with approved plans, protecting City infrastructure and minimizing impacts to residents and traffic.
Right-of-Way Permit & Engineering Review Services
Village of Bayside, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz assists the Village of Bayside with right-of-way permit reviews for public and private projects, ensuring proposed
work complies with Village ordinances and engineering standards. Reviews include evaluation of roadway, grading,
drainage, utility, and restoration details within the public right-of-way, with particular sensitivity to established residential
neighborhoods. Clark Dietz provides clear review comments and works directly with applicants and Village staff
to resolve issues efficiently. When construction occurs, Clark Dietz supports compliance through field coordination and
inspection, helping ensure safe, orderly, and properly restored rights-of-way.
Right-of-Way Permit Review & Compliance Oversight
Village of Brown Deer, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz provides right-of-way permit review services for the Village of Brown Deer, supporting development, utility, and
infrastructure projects within the public right-of-way. Clark Dietz reviews permit submittals for compliance with municipal
codes, subdivision and zoning requirements, stormwater and erosion control standards, and accepted engineering
practices. Our staff coordinates reviews with Village departments and utility providers to identify conflicts early and
maintain efficient permit processing. Construction activities within the right-of-way are monitored as needed to verify
compliance with approved permits and restoration requirements.
Right-of-Way Permit Review & Neighborhood-Focused Coordination
Village of Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz provides right-of-way permit review services for the Village of Whitefish Bay, supporting development and utility
work within a highly developed and neighborhood-focused community. Clark Dietz reviews ROW permit applications and
associated engineering plans for compliance with Village ordinances, stormwater and erosion control requirements,
and infrastructure standards, with careful attention to constructability and neighborhood impacts. Our team
coordinates closely with Village staff, contractors, and residents to clearly communicate requirements and expectations.
When construction occurs, Clark Dietz supports the Village through field coordination and inspection to ensure permitted
work is completed properly and public rights-of-way are restored in accordance with Village standards.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Page 68 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 24
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS
Erosion Control Plan Review & Inspection Services
Village of Green Oaks, Illinois
Clark Dietz serves as the Village Engineer and Erosion Control Enforcement Officer for the Village of Green Oaks, providing
erosion control plan review, permitting support, and construction-phase inspections for public and private projects. Clark
Dietz reviews development applications for compliance with local ordinances and Lake County Watershed Development
Ordinance requirements, coordinates reviews with Village staff and outside agencies, and conducts routine and follow-
up site inspections to identify deficiencies and protect downstream resources. Inspection findings are documented and
communicated to permit holders and Village staff, and corrective actions are tracked through project closeout. This
structured, responsive approach allows the Village to maintain consistent ordinance enforcement while minimizing
construction impacts to residents and natural resources.
Erosion Control Inspection & Ordinance Administration
City of Glendale, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz provides erosion control inspection services for the City of Glendale, administering the City’s erosion control
ordinance and enforcing compliance with WDNR and NPDES construction site requirements. Services include review of
erosion control plans prior to permit issuance and routine inspections of active construction sites, including projects one
acre or greater, conducted at frequencies required by NPDES permits. Clark Dietz documents site conditions, identifies
non-compliance or potential threats to waters of the state, and works directly with contractors and City staff to
ensure timely corrective action. Inspection records are maintained and shared with the City to support enforcement,
compliance tracking, and reporting.
Municipal Erosion Control Review & Construction Oversight
Village of Bayside, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz assists the Village of Bayside with erosion control plan review and construction-phase inspection services
for development and infrastructure projects. Clark Dietz evaluates erosion control and grading plans for ordinance
compliance and constructability, then performs field inspections to verify proper installation and maintenance of approved
best management practices, particularly within public rights-of-way and established residential areas. Deficiencies are
communicated directly to contractors and Village staff, with corrective actions tracked to resolution. This proactive
inspection and coordination approach supports Bayside’s development goals while protecting adjacent properties and
environmental resources.
Erosion Control Permitting & Inspection Services
Village of Brown Deer, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz provides erosion control permitting support and inspection services for the Village of Brown Deer, assisting
with plan review, permit administration, and construction-phase compliance monitoring. Erosion control plans are reviewed
for adherence to Village ordinances and applicable regulatory standards, followed by routine site inspections to verify
implementation and maintenance of approved measures. Clark Dietz documents inspection findings, coordinates
corrective actions with contractors and Village staff, and maintains organized permit and inspection records through
project closeout. This approach helps the Village manage construction activity efficiently while safeguarding public
infrastructure and waterways.
Page 69 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 25
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROJECTS
Vel R. Phillips Plaza Construction Inspection Services
City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Clark Dietz is providing construction inspection and oversight services for the City of Milwaukee’s $15 million Vel R. Phillips
Plaza development at 401 West Wisconsin Avenue, a 30,000-square-foot civic space honoring the legacy of civil rights
leader Vel R. Phillips and designed to serve as a gateway gathering place in the Westtown district. The project includes a
2,900-square-foot food and beverage tenant space, landscaped public plaza areas, integration with the MCTS East-West
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), and provisions for a future Milwaukee Streetcar extension. During construction, Clark Dietz
identified a modified design approach that significantly reduced the volume of contaminated soil requiring off-
site disposal, saving the City more than $500,000 while maintaining project quality and schedule. In partnership
with Ellis Engineering and Construction Management Services (EECMS), our team has provided full-time inspection, pay
quantity oversight, budget management, documentation, and coordination to address unforeseen site conditions, expedite
permitting, and support successful delivery of this highly visible public project.
Watermain Construction Administration
City of Elmhurst, Illinois
Clark Dietz provided construction administration and inspection services for the City of Elmhurst’s 2022 Water Main
Improvements Project, which included the replacement of approximately 3,500 linear feet of water main along IL-83 and
Fellows Court and was completed in 2024. Our team oversaw construction activities within the State Highway 83 right-
of-way, ensuring contractor compliance with project specifications, schedules, and budget requirements while monitoring
water main installation, pavement replacement, and parkway restoration. Construction inspectors managed contract
administration, reviewed and tracked pay quantities, maintained paperless daily reports and project documentation, and
coordinated closely with City staff, IDOT, and contractors. Advanced traffic control measures were monitored to maintain
public and worker safety along this high-traffic corridor, and GIS-supported, digital reporting tools were used for real-time
tracking and efficient project management. Through consistent field oversight and proactive coordination, Clark Dietz
helped deliver the project on time, within budget, and in full compliance with City and state standards.
Oak Terrace Well House/Interconnect Construction Observation
Lake County, Illinois
Clark Dietz provided construction observation services for the Oak Terrace Well House Interconnect and System
Improvements project for Lake County Public Works. Our inspection team monitored the construction of the new well house
and integration with the existing water distribution system, including installation of well pumps, treatment equipment,
controls, site piping, HVAC, a backup generator, and a sanitary sewer relocation. Throughout construction, we verified
compliance with project plans, regulatory requirements, safety standards, and quality control procedures,
coordinating closely with the contractor and County staff to support successful system integration and project
completion.
Special Service Areas Construction Engineering and Inspection
Village Green Oaks, Illinois
Clark Dietz provided construction engineering and inspection services for Special Service Areas 14 and 15 and associated
Village-funded water system extensions in the Village of Green Oaks. The project included installation of approximately
5,100 linear feet of new water main serving 29 residential lots along Cranbrook Road, Kenton Lane, and Lexington Road, as
well as roadway rehabilitation using full-depth reclamation with cement stabilization. Our construction staff coordinated
closely with Village representatives, contractors, and residents, providing field inspection, quantity tracking, and
documentation to support multiple funding sources. Services also included resident coordination, inspection of water
main installation and testing, oversight of roadway reconstruction, and verification that all improvements met Village
standards and IEPA requirements prior to project closeout.
Page 70 of 181
Village of Germantown / Telecommunications Inspection Services / 26
REFERENCES
What our Clients have to say ...
“Clark Dietz’s professionalism, teamwork, ingenuity, and collaboration brought improvements well beyond
the original goal... Their genuine interest in listening to our needs and vision to optimize the result brought
our entire community a [project] of which they can be proud...”
– Robert Vanden Noven, PE, Director of Public Works
Port Washington, WI
“Clark Dietz remained committed to delivering a successful product, ultimately contributing to a project that
has positively impacted our community in meaningful ways. The 60th Street Reconstruction project not only
fulfilled its original objectives but also introduced additional benefits, such as increased mobility throughout
the corridor, incorporation of planned flooding relief, and all six segments designed and constructed over
$1.5M below the City’s budget, despite unforeseen challenges. Thanks to the dedication and expertise
of Clark Dietz, the project stands as a lasting example of thoughtful engineering and community-driven
solutions.”
– Brian Cater, PE, Director of Public Works
Kenosha, WI
“The Brush Hill Roadway Improvements included a section of road that was a full reconstruction and raising
of the pavement in front of two large condo buildings and a church. [Clark Dietz’s] excellent communication
between the contractor, city staff and these properties made this project a success, as the City didn’t need
to address any complaints or issues from these properties for the entire month of pavement removal, a
temporary stone pavement section and paving operations.”
– Michael Litwin, Civil Engineer II
City of Elmhurst
Client relationships are important to Clark Dietz. We believe strong relationships are built by listening to and understanding
our clients. We see our clients as integral members of our project teams, and we genuinely value our rapport with them.
We encourage you to contact our clients listed below to discuss their experiences working with us.
Ted Sianis, PE
City Engineer
City of Elmhurst
630.530.3769
ted.sianis@elmhurst.org
Amy Sarver
Highway Commissioner
Warren Township
847 .244.1101 x301
highway@warrentownship.net
Nicholas Leach, PE, CFM
Village Engineer
Village of Gurnee
847 .599.7586
nleach@village.gurnee.il.us
Page 71 of 181
Emily Basalla, PE, CFM
Senior Vice President
Project Manager
Clark Dietz, Inc.
759 North Milwaukee Street, Suite 624
Milwaukee, WI 53202
414.727.4990
emily.basalla@clarkdietz.com
clarkdietz.com
Join us on social media:
Page 72 of 181
BUSINESS OF THE PUBLIC WORKS & HIGHWAYS COMMITTEE
GERMANTOWN, WI
MEETING DATE: March 4, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: New Business
ITEM TITLE: Fiberoptic Telecommunications Agreements
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Driscoll – Village Engineer
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
The Village anticipates Fiberoptic Telecommunications installations in 2026 in STH 145/Fond du
Lac Ave, Donges Bay Road, Pilgrim Road, and the subdivisions of Glenwood Heights, Pilgrim
Park, Lone Oaks, Meadow Creek Crossing and Rustic M eadows. This includes one fiberoptic
installation over two miles , and a second fiberoptic installation beginning with a five-mile ring
that is expected to build out with significant expansion from that ring in the future.
Village staff historically have issued permits under the Village of Germantown Code of Ordinance
“Section 8.06 - Street Excavations” for utility work in the right -of-way based on a fixed fee per
permit application. That fee is typically $500 for street cut permit, and $150 for work outside of
the roadway. In addition to 8.06, the Village of Germantown Code of Ordinance “Section 8.065
Regulation of Rights of Way” was established following the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to
recover costs. It is anticipated that Village staff time for the plan reviews and inspections may
exceed the $500 fee and the Village would not recover 100% of the costs to review and inspect the
proposed Fiberoptic Telecommunications work.
In coordination with the Village Attorney, Village staff are looking to establish agreements with
the respective fiberoptic utility applicants. These agreements are intended to recover 100% of the
costs associated with permit review and inspection of the fiberoptic work . The Village is looking
to contract consultant services for permit reviews and inspections. Village staff have been in
communication with the prospective applicants of the respective utility companies regarding these
agreements based on 8.065.
ATTACHMENT: ORDINANCE RESOLUTION OTHER _____
Exhibit of anticipated Fiberoptic Work Areas, Draft Agreements, Ordinances
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests that the Public Works and Highways Committee recommend approval to the Village
Board to enter into agreements with the respective utility companies that allows the Village to
pass through costs of Consultant Permit Reviews and Inspection Services, contingent upon final
review by the Village Attorney.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
A motion to support authorize staff and a vote “Aye” is in the affirmative to support the
agreements.
Page 73 of 181
Print Date: 2/27/2026
Village of Germantown GIS
Proposed Fiberoptic Utility Installations
24,000.00
Village Of Germantown
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
Germantown, WI 53022
262-250-4700
SCALE: 1 = 2000'
DISCLAIMER:
This map is not a survey of the actual boundary of any property this map
depicts.
The Village of Germantown Does not guarantee the accuracy of the material contained
here in and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information
or its derivatives.
Exhibit 1 - Overview Map
Page 74 of 181
1
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("this Agreement") is entered into by and between the
Village of Germantown, a village organized and existing under the laws of the state of Wisconsin
(“Village”), and Metro Fibernet, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Licensee”) , for the
use of Village’s rights-of-way for the installation, operation and maintenance of
telecommunications facilities.
WHEREAS, the Village is the owner of certain public rights -of-way, and has adopted
official standards governing the construction of facilities within those rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the Village is authorized under applicable law , including Village of
Germantown Code of Ordinance 8.065, to grant, renew and revoke licenses for the use of the public
rights-of-way for the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunications facilities
within its municipal boundaries; and
WHEREAS, Licensee desires to construct, install, operate, and maintain
telecommunications facilities in and/or upon the Village's public rights -of-way (the "ROWs")
within the Village's boundaries, subject to the provisions of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Village desires to permit Licensee to utilize the ROWs for such purposes,
subject to the provisions of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board has determined that establishing a License Agreement for
telecommunications use of public rights-of-ways will provide an efficient and consistent
framework for managing the deployment of telecommunications facilities , while ensuring
compliance with applicable laws and Village standards, and without requiring a
telecommunications company to seek separate Village Board approval for each site-specific permit
involving a Village right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, Licensee is authorized and empowered to enter into this Agreement and to
perform the covenants and promises herein made and undertaken.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above stated preambles and the mutual
covenants and promises hereinafter contained, the Licensee and the Village agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into this License Agreement as if
fully set forth in herein.
2. Grant of License. For and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein, and subject to
the terms and conditions set forth herein and compliance with all Federal, State and local laws and
regulations, the Village grants a non -exclusive revocable license (“License”) to Licensee to use
the ROWs to install, operate and maintain telecommunications and broadband equipment (the
“Facilities”). This License does not convey to Licensee any right, title or interest (including
Exhibit 2 - Metronet Draft Agreement
Page 75 of 181
2
leasehold interest) in the ROWs, but constitutes only a license to use and occupy the ROWs for
the purposes stated herein.
The rights granted to Licensee are and shall remain at all times subordinate to the Village’s
superior rights of ingress, egress, and use of the public ROWs. This Agreement and the rights
granted herein are non -exclusive and do not, explicitly or implicitly, preclude the Village from
granting other licenses or permissions for the installation and operation of telecommunications
facilities within the Village’s municipal boundaries.
3. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of five (5) years, beginning on the
date approved by the Village Board and ending five (5) years thereafter, unless sooner terminated
as provided for herein. Upon expiration of the initial term , this Agreement shall automatically
renew for successive five (5) year terms. Either party may terminate this Agreement at the end of
the initial term or renewal term by provid ing the other party with at least twelve months (12)
months’ prior written notice of termination.
4. Title; Condition of ROWs. It is understood and agreed that the Village makes no
representations, warranties, or assurances regarding: (a) the condition of title or boundaries of the
ROWs; (b) the condition of any underground ducts, conduits, utilities, or other facilities within the
ROWs; (c) any improvements or soil conditions located on the ROWs; or (d) the suitability of the
ROWs for Licensee’s intended use.
Licensee assumes all risks associated with the placement, operation, and maintenance of the
Facilities within the ROWs, including the suitability of the ROWs for such Facilities. Licensee
accepts the ROWs in an “AS IS, WHERE IS” condition, including any environmental conditions.
Accordingly, the Village shall not be liable for any damages, claims, or liabilities arising from or
related to adverse claims concerning the title, boundaries, or condition of the ROWs.
5. Location. The location of the Facilities shall be subject to approval by the Village’s
Director of Public Works or designee. Unless otherwise specified in a permit issued by the Village,
Licensee shall not place the Facilities in any manner that unreasonably interferes with the use of
the ROWs by the Village, any utility, the general public, or other persons lawfully authorized to
use or be present in the public ROWs. Licensee shall comply with all applicable Village
ordinances and regulations , including the Village of Germantown Development Handbook,
regarding permitting for the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the Facilities. If
any portion of the Facilities is designed to be installed in a location that does not comply with
permit requirements or applicable standards, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly
relocate such Facilities to a location approved by the Village.
6. Use of ROWs. In its use of the ROWs and any work performed thereon, Licensee shall
comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of Federal, State,
County, and local regulatory authorities, including all applicable Village ordinances governing
permitting and construction within the ROWs , including Germantown Munici pal Code §8.065,
attached as an exhibit to this agreement.
Page 76 of 181
3
Prior to work in the ROW , applicant to provide registration information as outlined in sections
8.065 (d) and (e). Upon authorization from Village, Licensee shall use and occupy the ROWs
solely for the installation, operation, and maintenance of the Facilities, which shall be limited to:
• underground conduit, fiber optic telecommunications cable, and related equipment where
existing similar utilities are underground; and
• aerial fiber optic telecommunications cable and related equipment where existing similar
utilities are aerial.
Applicant shall satisfy all requirements of the excavation permit as outlined in the Village Code
of Ordinances 8.06 and 8.065. In addition, applicant to provide a traffic control plan conforming
with the MUTCD, a staging plan showing equipment and materials storage areas, a communication
plan for resident outreach and complaints, and a corresponding schedule for the traffic control and
staging and operations. These plans are to be in accordance with the Village of Germantown
Development Handbook Section 1.2 and be provided by the applicant to the Village for review,
comment and approval in advance of mobilizing and beginning work. It is specifically understood
that the ROWs shall not be used for the burning of refuse, the accumulation or storage of debris
or other material, or for any unsanitary or unhealthful purposes. All parts of Licensee’s Facilities
shall be underground except in areas where existing similar utilities are aerial. Any unauthorized
or impermissible use of the ROWs shall constitute a material breach of this License Agreement.
If necessary, Licensee shall adjust and/or relocate any affected portion of a permitted or
unpermitted utility facility that occupies Village ROW to facilitate the alteration, improvement,
safety enhancement or maintenance of a highway as may be directed by the Village . The
adjustment or relocation may affect facilities off the ROW as well. A utility is responsible for all
costs associated with the adjustment or relocation unless a specific Village executed utility
parcel or agreement otherwise provides. This paragraph shall not impact utility priorities otherwise
established by law.
7. Installation, Operation and Maintenance. In performing any work or exercising any
rights under this Agreement, Licensee shall not obstruct or interfere in any manner with the
Village’s ROWs, existing utility easements, private rights-of-way, sanitary sewers, sewer laterals,
water mains, storm drains, gas mains, poles, aerial facilities, or other existing telecommunications
facilities without the express written approval of the Village or the owners, including franchisees,
of the affected property.
Maintenance of the Facilities within the ROWs shall be the sole responsibility of Licensee.
Licensee shall maintain the Facilities in good and safe condition and in compliance with all
applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and policies. T he Village reserves the right
to enter upon and repair any damage to areas surrounding the licensed premises. If such damage is
caused by Licensee, the actual, reasonable, and documented cost of such repair shall be borne by
Licensee.
Page 77 of 181
4
Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, in the event of an unexpected repair or
emergency (“Emergency Maintenance”), Licensee is required to notify the Village’s on site
representative (Inspector) and may access the ROWs and commence such Emergency Maintenance
work, following communication with the Director of Public Works and as required under the
circumstances.
8. Marking. Prior to and during any installation or relocation of any underground cables or
utility lines, Licensee shall contact the Diggers Hotline One Call System (commonly known as
“Call Before You Dig” or “811”) to obtain planning prints for design and for hotline markings in
the respective field location to ascertain the presence and location of existing aboveground and
underground facilities within the ROWs to be occupied by Licensee’s Facilities and shall install
route markers in accordance with applicable law . On application materials submitted to the
Village, applicant to provide Diggers Hotline registration certificate number as required by Village
of Germantown Ordinance section 8.065 (e)(1)a, along with other contact registration information
Licensee agrees that it will become a member of the One Call System (811) as a
requirement of this Agreement. This system is designed to alert Licensee to planned work in the
rights-of-way so that Licensee can mark the location of its Facilities to avoid damage.
In the event the field markings are different than the plan drawings, such as due to changes in
underground utility locations , Contractor to stop and cease work in that area, and applicant to
resubmit updated plans for that excavation area.
9. Public Safety. Licensee or other person acting on its behalf, at its own expense, shall
submit a traffic control plan for the placement and use of suitable barricades, flags, flagmen, lights,
flares and other measures as required per the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control for the safety of
all members of the general public and to prevent injury or damage to any person, vehicle or
property by reason of any work in or affecting the ROWs or other property. The Village may
require regular weekly meetings, and interim phone calls with the Foreman, to discuss safety and
schedule and communication and overall project plans and progress.
10. Restoration of ROWs. Within fourteen (14) days after completion of initial construction
operations or any repair, relocation, or removal of the Facilities, Licensee shall grade and restore
all areas disturbed by such work to a condition substantially similar to that which exis ted prior to
the work. This time period may be reasonably extended upon written request by Licensee for good
cause shown. Applicant is required to notify the Village’s representative (Inspector) of restoration
activity, as scheduled, to document the restoration condition and proceed as outlined in Village of
Germantown Code of Ordinances sections 8.065 (j) and (k).
If weather or other conditions prevent full restoration within the required time, Licensee shall
perform temporary restoration at its sole expense and shall promptly complete permanent
restoration when conditions permit.
In the event Licensee fails to restore disturbed areas or make necessary repairs to the ROWs or
other Village property as required herein, the Village may, after providing Licensee with at least
Page 78 of 181
5
fourteen (14) days’ prior written notice and an opportunity to cure, perform or cause such
restoration or repairs to be made. The Village may then seek reimbursement from Licensee for the
actual, reasonable, and documented costs incurred, which shall be supported by invoices and
documentation provided to Licensee. Licensee shall remit payment within thirty (30) days of
receipt of such documentation. Alternatively, the Village may draw upon any security posted by
Licensee to recover such costs.
11. Damage to Licensee’s Facilities. The Village shall not be liable for, and Licensee
expressly waives, any claims for damage to or loss of Licensee’s Facilities within the ROWs
arising from or in connection with public works, public improvements, construction, excavation,
grading, filling, or other work of any kind in the ROWs by or on behalf of the Village, except to
the extent such damage or loss is caused by the Village’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.
12. Reimbursement of Village Expenses. Licensee shall reimburse the Village for all actual,
reasonable, and documented costs incurred by the Village for third-party contracted services and
related expenses directly attributable to Licensee’s activities under this Agreement, including but
not limited to:
(a) inspection services;
(b) engineering or technical review;
(c) traffic control services; and
(d) restoration work performed by contractors on behalf of the Village.
The Village shall provide Licensee with written documentation of such costs, including copies of
invoices and receipts. Licensee shall remit payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of such
documentation.
In accordance with Wisconsin statutory requirements, the Village shall not charge Licensee
overhead or administrative costs in excess of those amounts recoverable under state law, and any
such charges must be separately itemized and supported by documentation.
This Section shall comply with applicable Wisconsin statutes and municipal ordinances governing
municipal cost recovery.
13. No Transfer or Assignment. This License Agreement shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. During the term of this License
Agreement, Licensee acknowledges and agrees that it does not have the right or authority to
transfer or assign this License Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent
of the Village; provided, however that Licensee shall have the right, without the Village’s prior
written consent, to assign or otherwise transfer this Licensee Agreement to any successor entity or
affiliate or subsidiary of Licensee, or to any entity into which Licensee may be merged or
consolidated or which purchases all or substantially all of the assets of Licensee. Any such written
consent required under this Section 1 2 may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed . Any
Page 79 of 181
6
transferee or assignee must, at a minimum, show satisfactory evidence that it meets the insurance
requirements and other terms, conditions, and provisions contained herein.
14. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. Each party (the “Indemnifying Party”) agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the other party (the “Indemnified Party”), including its officers,
directors, employees, agents, affiliates, successors, and permitted assigns, from and against any
and all third-party claims, actions, proceedings (including administrative or informal proceedings),
judgments, damages, penalties, fines, costs, liabilities, or losses, together with reasonable
attorneys’ fees and other expenses, to th e extent arising directly out of or directly related to:
(a) the Indemnifying Party’s breach of this Agreement; or
(b) the negligent acts, errors, or omissions, or willful misconduct of the Indemnifying Party or
its contractors, agents, or employees in connection with activities undertaken pursuant to this
Agreement.
This indemnity shall not apply to the extent that any claim or liability results from the negligence
or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Party.
Nothing contained within this License Agreement is intended to be a waiver or estoppel of the
Village or its insurer to rely upon the limitations, defenses, and immunities contained within
Wisconsin law, including those contained within Wisconsin Statutes §§ 893.80, 895.52, and
345.05. To the extent that indemnification is available and enforceable, the Village or its insurer
shall not be liable in indemnity or contribution for an amount greater than the limits of liability for
municipal claims established by Wisconsin Law.
15. Insurance. Licensee shall, at its sole expense, cause to be issued and maintained during
the Term of this Agreement insurance coverages of the types and in the amounts set forth below,
as applicable:
Type of Insurance Limit
General Liability (including General Aggregate $2,000,000
contractual liability) written Prod./Comp. Op. Agg. $1,000,000
on an occurrence basis Personal & Adv. Injury $1,000,000
Each Occurrence $1,000,000
Automobile Liability, including Combines Single Limit $1,000,000
any auto, hired auto and non-
owned autos
Excess Liability, Umbrella Form Each Occurrence $2,000,000
Aggregate $2,000,000
Workers’ Compensation Each Accident $ 500,000
Page 80 of 181
7
Prior to commencing work on the Facilities described herein, Licensee shall furnish the
Village with the appropriate Certificates of Insurance, and applicable policy endorsements.
Licensee shall have the Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Umbrella/Excess
Liability policies endorsed to add the “ Village of Germantown, its officers, officials, agents and
employees” as “additional insureds”.
17. No Encumbrances. Licensee shall not place, permit, or allow any liens, mortgages,
security interests, pledges, claims, or other encumbrances to attach to or be filed against the
Village’s title to the ROWs. This provision shall not restrict Licensee from granting security
interests or liens in its own Facilities, provided that such interests do not encumber or otherwise
affect the Village’s ownership of the ROWs.
18. Taxes. Nothing contained in this License Agreement shall be construed to exempt Licensee
from any fee, tax, property tax levy or assessment, which is or may be hereinafter lawfully imposed
on it relative to its use of the ROWs or its operation of the Facilities.
19. Termination. The Village may terminate this License Agreement and the License granted
herein for any of the following reasons:
(i) Fraud or Misrepresentation: Licensee knowingly made fraudulent, false, or materially
incomplete statements in the permit application; or
(ii) Failure to Cure Breach: Licensee fails to cure a material breach of this Agreement or
noncompliance with any material provision after receiving written notice and a forty -
five (45) day cure period; provided, however, that if such noncompliance cannot
reasonably be cured within f orty-five (45) days, the cure period shall be extended for
such additional time as is reasonably necessary under the circumstances, provided
Licensee has commenced and is diligently pursuing such cure; or
(iii) Public Safety Threat: Licensee’s physical presence or the presence of its Facilities
within the ROWs presents a direct or imminent threat to public health, safety, or
welfare; or
(iv) Failure to Construct as Approved: Licensee fails to construct the Facilities substantially
in accordance with the permit and approved plans; or
(v) Traffic Control Deficiencies: Licensee fails to provide required traffic control and does
not respond to Village requests to correct such deficiencies within a reasonable time
frame.
Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, Licensee shall, within one hundred eighty
(180) days of written notice from the Village, remove its Facilities from all Village ROWs and
restore all ROWs as required herein.
Page 81 of 181
8
This paragraph shall not apply to decisions to non-renew this License under paragraph 3.
20. No Waiver. The waiver by one party of any breach of this Agreement or the failure of one
party to enforce at any time, or for any period of time, any of the provisions hereof will be limited
to the particular instance and will not operate or be deemed to waive any fu ture breaches of this
Agreement and will not be construed to be a waiver of any provision except for the particular
instance.
21. Amendments. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties. No
oral changes or modifications of this Agreement shall be permitted or allowed. Changes or
modifications to this Agreement shall be made only in writing and upon necessary and proper
signature of the Licensee and the Village.
22. Notices. Any notice will be in writing and will be deemed to be effectively served when
deposited in the mail with sufficient first-class postage affixed and addressed to the party at the
party's place of business. Notices shall be addressed to designated representatives of both parties
as follows:
Village: Department of Public Works –
Engineering Section
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
Germantown, WI 53022
Licensee: Metro Fibernet, LLC
Attn: Sr. Vice President OSP
3701 Communications Way
Evansville, IN 47715
With a copy to: Metro Fibernet, LLC
Attn: Legal – ROW Permitting
11880 College Boulevard. Ste 100
Overland Park, KS 66210
23. Severability. In the event that any provision of this License Agreement shall be held
invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or
render unenforceable any other provisions hereto.
24. Conflict with Village Ordinances. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between
the provisions of this License Agreement and any applicable Village ordinance, the terms of this
License Agreement shall control and govern the rights and obligations of the parties with respect
to the subject matter herein.
Page 82 of 181
9
25. Law and Venue. This License Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted, and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Wisconsin, without regard to its conflict of law
principles. Any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement shall be brought
exclusively in a state or federal court of comp etent jurisdiction located within the State of
Wisconsin who’s jurisdiction includes Washington County, and each party hereby consents to the
jurisdiction and venue of such courts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed
and to become effective as of the date first written above.
METRO FIBERNET, LLC
VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN
By:_______________________________ By:________________________________
Printed Name:_______________________
Its:
Printed Name:_______________________
Its: Village President
Date: ______________, 20____ Date: ______________, 20____
Page 83 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 1 of 10
8.065 REGULATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY. (Cr. Ord. #05-16)
(a) FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. The Village finds that the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 has
resulted in increased use of the public rights-of-way and increased costs to the taxpayers of the Village and
that these costs are likely to continue into the foreseeable future.
The Village finds that excavation and occupancy of the public rights -of-way causes direct and indirect costs to be
borne by the Village and its taxpayers, including but not limited to:
(1) Administrative costs associated with public right-of-way projects, such as registration, permitting,
inspection and supervision, supplies and materials.
(2) Management costs associated with ongoing management activities necessitated by public right -of-way
users.
(3) Repair costs to the roadway associated with the actual excavation into the public right -of-way.
(4) Degradation costs defined as depreciation caused to the roadway in terms of decreased useful life, due
to excavations into the public rights-of-way.
In response to the foregoing facts, the Village hereby enacts this ordinance relating to administration of and
permits to excavate, obstruct and/or occupy the public rights-of-way, together with an ordinance making
necessary revisions to other Code provisions. This ordinance imposes reasonable regulations on the placement and
maintenance of facilities currently within its rights-of-way or to be placed therein at some future time. It is
intended to complement the regulatory roles of state and federal agencies.
The Village's authority to enact this ordinance is pursuant, but not limited to, the following federal, state and local
authority: 47 U.S.C. 253(c); Wis. Stat. § 61.34(1); Wis. Stat. § 66.0425; Wis. Stat. § 66.0915; Wis. Stat. § 86.16; Wis.
Stat. § 182.017; Wis. Stat. § 196.58; and Wis. Stat. § 196.499(1).
The purpose of this [section] is to provide the Village a legal framework within which to regulate and manage the
public rights-of-way, and to provide for recovery of costs. This [section] provides for the health, safety and welfare
of the residents of the Village as they use the rights-of-way of the Village, as well as to ensure the structural
integrity of the public rights-of-way. The Village desires to minimize and anticipate the number of excavations
taking place thereon and to regulate the placement of facilities within the rights-of-way to ensure that they remain
available for public services. The taxpayers of the Village bear the financial burden for the upkeep of the rights -of-
way. A primary cause for the early and excessive deterioration of its righ ts-of-way is the frequent excavation by
persons who locate facilities therein. Under this chapter, all persons who excavate, obstruct and/or occupy the
public rights-of-way will reimburse the Village's administrative, ongoing management and degradation cos ts. Right-
of-way users will bear a fair share of the financial responsibility for the integrity of the public rights -of-way.
(b) DEFINITIONS. The following definitions apply in this [section]. References hereafter to "sections" are unless
otherwise specified references to sections in this [section]. Defined terms remain defined terms whether or
not capitalized.
"Alternative Telecommunications Utility Other" has the meaning in Wis. Stat. § 196.01.
"Applicant" means any person requesting permission to excavate, obstruct and/or occupy a right -of-way.
"Degradation" means the accelerated depreciation of the right-of-way, caused by an excavation of the right-of-
way, resulting in the need to reconstruct such right-of-way earlier than would be required if the excavation did not
occur,
"Department" means the Department of Public Works of the Village.
"Department Inspector" means any person authorized by the Department to carry out inspections related to the
provisions of this chapter.
Exhibit 3 - Village Ordinance for Telecommunications
Page 84 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 2 of 10
"Emergency" means a condition that (1) poses a clear and immediate danger to life or health, or of a significant
loss of property; or (2) requires immediate repair or replacement in order to restore service to a customer.
"Excavate" means to dig into or in any way remove or physically disturb or penetrate any part of a right -of-way.
"Facilities" means all equipment owned, operated, leased or subleased in connection with the operation of a
service or utility service, and shall include but is not limited to poles, wires, pipes, cables, underground conduits,
ducts, manholes, vaults, fiber optic cables, lines and other structures and appurtenances.
"In," when used in conjunction with "right-of-way," means over, above, in, within, on or under a right-of-way.
"Local Representative" means a local person or persons, or designee of such person or persons, authorized by a
registrant to accept service and to make decisions for that registrant regarding all matters within the scope of this
chapter.
"Obstruct" means to place any object in a right-of-way so as to hinder free and open passage over that or any part
of the right-of-way.
"Occupy" means to dwell or reside above, on, in, or below the boundaries of the public rights -of-way.
"Permittee" means any person to whom a permit to excavate or occupy a right -of way has been granted by the
Village under this chapter.
"Person" means, municipality, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, limited liability company,
limited liability partnership and individuals and their lessors, transferees and receivers.
"PSC" means the Public Service Commission of the State of Wisconsin.
"Public Utility" has the meaning provided in Wis. Stats. § 196.01.
"Registrant" means any person who has registered with the Village (1) to have its facilities located in any right -of-
way, or (2) to use or seek to occupy or use the right-of-way or any facilities in the right-of-way.
"Repair" means to perform construction work necessary to make the right -of-way useable for travel, according to
department specifications, or to return facilities to an operable condition.
"Repair Bond" means a performance bond, a letter of credit, or cash deposit posted to ensure the availability of
sufficient funds to assure that right-of-way excavation repair work is completed in both a timely and quality
manner, per Department specifications.
"Restore or Restoration" means the process by which an excavated right-of-way and surrounding area, including
pavement and foundation, is reconstructed according to Department specifications.
"Restoration Bond" means a performance bond, a letter of credit, or cash deposit posted to ensure the availability
of sufficient funds to assure that right-of-way excavation restoration work is completed in both a timely and
quality manner, per Department specifications.
"Right-of-Way" means the surface and space above and below a public roadway, highway, street, bicycle lane and
public sidewalk in which the Village has an interest, including other dedicated rights -of-way for travel purposes.
"Service" or "Utility Service" includes municipal sewer and water services and also includes, except as provided
herein, but is not limited to (1) those services provided by a public utility as defined in Wis. Stat. § 196.01(5); (2)
telecommunications, pipeline, fire and alarm communications, water, electricity, light, heat, cooling energy, or
power services; (3) the services provided by a district heating or cooling system; and (4) cable service as defined
and regulated under 47 U.S.C. 521 through 573. Wireless telecommunications service and cellular mobile radio
telecommunications (CMRS) services as defined by Section 332(d) of the Federal Communications Act of 1996 (47
U.S.C. 332 (d)(l)) are excluded, unless these services have a presence in the right -of-way.
"Supplementary Application" means an application made to excavate or obstruct more of the right -of-way than
allowed in, or to extend, a permit that had already been issued.
Page 85 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 3 of 10
"Telecommunications Carrier" has the meaning in Wis. Stat. § 196.01.
"Telecommunications Provider" has the meaning in Wis. Stat. § 196.01.
"Telecommunications Rights-of-Way User" means a person owning or controlling a facility in the public right -of-
way, or seeking to own or control a facility in the public right-of-way, that is used or is intended to be used for
transporting telecommunication or other voice or data information. This includes telecommunications providers,
utilities, ATUs, and carriers. For purposes of this chapter, a cable television system defined and regulated under
Wis. Stat. § 66.082(2)(d), and telecommunication activities related to providing natural gas or electric energy
services, and which are not offered for resale as telecommunications services, are not telecommunications right -
of-way users.
"Telecommunications Service" means the offering for sale or the conveyance of voice, data or other information at
any frequency over any part of the electromagnetic spectrum, including the sale of service for collection, storage,
forwarding, switching and delivery incidental to such communication and including the regulated sale of customer
premises equipment. Telecommunications service does not include cable television service, wireless service or
broadcast service.
"Telecommunications Utility" has the meaning in Wis. Stat. § 196.01.
"Unusable Facilities" means facilities in the right-of-way which have remained unused for one year and for which
the registrant is unable to provide proof that it has either a plan to begin using them within the next 24 months or
a potential purchaser or user of the facilities.
"Village" means the Village of Germantown, Wisconsin, a Wisconsin municipal corporation.
(c) ADMINISTRATION. The Department of Public Works ("Department") is responsible for the administration of
the rights-of-way, and the permits and ordinances related thereto.
(d) REGISTRATION FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY OCCUPANCY.
(1) Registration. Each person who occupies, uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right -of-way or any
facilities in the right-of-way, including by lease, sublease or assignment, or who has, or seeks to have,
facilities located in any right-of-way shall register with the Department and pay the fee set forth in
subsection (f). Registration will consist of providing application information and paying a registration
fee.
This section shall not apply to those persons exclusively utilizing facilities provided by another right -of-
way user.
(2) Registration Prior to Work. No person may construct, install, repair, remove, relocate, or perform any
other work on, or use any facilities or any part thereof in any right-of-way without first being registered
with the Department.
(3) Exceptions. Nothing herein shall be construed to repeal or amend the provisions of a Village ordinance
requiring persons to plant or maintain the tree lawn in the area of the right -of-way between their
property and the street curb, construct sidewalks, install street signs or perform other similar activities.
Persons performing such activities shall not be required to obtain any permits under this Chapter.
(e) REGISTRATION INFORMATION.
(1) Information Required. The information provided to the Department at the time of registration shall
include, but not be limited to:
a. Each registrant's name, Diggers Hotline registration certificate number, address and e -mail
address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers.
b. The name, address and e-mail address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers of a
local representative. The local representative or designee shall be available at all times. Current
Page 86 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 4 of 10
information regarding how to contact the local representative in an emergency shall be provided
at the time of registration.
c. All right-of-way users shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Village the financial capability
to cover any liability which might arise out of their presence in the right -of-way.
d. If the person is a corporation, a LLC or LLP, a copy of any certificate required to be filed under
Wisconsin statute as recorded and certified to by the Department of Financial Institutions.
e. A copy of the person's certificate of authority from the Wisconsin Public Service Commission or
other applicable state or federal agency, where the person is lawfully required to have such
certificate from said commission or other state or federal agency.
f. Execution of an indemnification agreement in a form prescribed by the Department, which is
consistent with, and shall not exceed the obligations provided in, Section 1.24 herein.
(2) Notice of Changes. The registrant shall keep all of the information listed above current at all times by
providing to the Department information as to changes within 15 working days following the date on
which the registrant has knowledge of any change.
(f) REGISTRATION FEE.
(1) Registration Fee. The Department shall establish the registration fee in an amount sufficient to recover
the costs incurred by the Village for processing registrants. This fee shall be computed as the average
of labor costs, indirect costs, and other costs associated with registration.
(2) Fee Computation. The Village may recalculate, and by resolution, establish the registration fee.
(g) EXCAVATION PERMIT REQUIREMENT.
(1) Excavation permit required. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or other chapters of the
Village Code, no person shall excavate any right-of-way or place facilities in a right-of-way without first
having obtained an excavation permit from the Department. No person shall ex cavate the right-of-way
or maintain an excavation in the right-of-way beyond the date or area specified in the permit unless
such person makes a supplementary application for another excavation permit before the expiration of
the initial permit, pursuant to subsection (n), and a new permit or permit extension is granted.
(2) Permit Display. A copy of any permit issued under this chapter shall be made available at all times by
the permittee at the indicated work site and shall be available for inspection by the Department upon
request.
(h) EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATION. Application for a permit shall be made to the Department. Permit
applications shall contain, and will be considered complete only upon compliance with the requirements of
the following provisions:
(1) Registration with the Department if required by this chapter;
(2) Submission of a completed permit application form, including all required attachments, and scaled
drawings showing the location and area of the proposed project and the location of all existing and
proposed facilities;
(3) Payment of all money due to the Village for:
a. Applicable permit fees and costs as set forth below;
b. Subject to section e., unpaid fees or costs due for prior excavations; or
c. Subject to section e., any loss, damage, or expense suffered by the Village because of applicant's
prior excavations of the rights-of-way or any emergency actions taken by the Village.
Page 87 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 5 of 10
d. When an excavation permit is requested for purposes of installing additional facilities, and the
posting of a restoration bond for the additional facilities is insufficient, the posting of an
additional or larger restoration bond for the additional facilities may be required.
e. The Department shall not deny a registrant an excavation permit because of a dispute between
the Village and the registrant, related to subsections b. and/or c. if the dispute has been
adjudicated in favor of the registrant or if the dispute is the subj ect of an appeal filed by the
registrant and no decision in the matter has at yet been rendered.
(i) EXCAVATION PERMIT FEE.
(1) Fee Calculation. The excavation permit fee shall be established by the Department in an amount
sufficient to recover the costs incurred by the Village. This fee shall recover costs incurred by the
Village for each of the following categories as provided herein:
a. Administrative: The general formula for computing the administrative fee shall be the average
per-permit costs for labor plus indirect and other costs.
b. Repair: No repair fee shall be collected by the Village, however the Permittee shall be required to
repair the public right-of-way to Department specifications, subject to inspection and acceptance
by the Department, as per subsection (j), and to pay a degradatio n fee.
c. Degradation: The general formula for computing the degradation fee shall be the cost per square
yard for street, overlay and seal coat multiplied by the appropriate depreciation rate for that
street multiplied by the area of the patch. The area of the patch shall be c alculated by adding 2
feet to each side of the actual street cut. Depreciation schedules shall be provided by type of
street.
d. The total excavation permit fee shall be calculated as follows:
Total Excavation Permit Fee = Administrative Cost + Degradation Fee (if applicable).
(2) Village Exemption. Notwithstanding subsection (1)c., the Village and its contractors shall not pay
degradation fees.
(3) Payment of Permit Fees. No excavation permit shall be issued without payment of applicable fees.
4. Non refundable. Permit fees paid for a permit that the Department has revoked for a breach as stated
in subsection (q) are not refundable.
(j) RIGHT-OF-WAY REPAIR.
(1) Timing. The work to be done under the excavation permit, and the repair of the right -of-way as
required herein, must be completed within the dates specified in the permit, increased by as many
days as work could not be done because of circumstances beyond the con trol of the permittee or when
work was prohibited as unseasonable or unreasonable under subsection (p).
(2) Repair. In addition to repairing its own work, the permittee must repair the general area of the work,
and the surrounding areas, including the paving and its foundations, to the specifications of the
Department. The Department shall inspect the area of the work and accept the work when it
determines that proper repair has been made, per specifications of the Department. A Permittee may
request to have the Village repair the right-of-way.
a. Village Repair. If the permittee requests to have the Village repair the right-of-way, the Village
may accept or reject the request at its sole option. If the Village accepts, the permittee shall be
billed for the Village's costs, and shall pay the amount thereof within 30 days of billing.
b. Permittee Repair. If the Permittee chooses to repair the right- of-way, it shall at the time of
application for an excavation permit post a repair bond in an amount determined by the
Page 88 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 6 of 10
Department to be sufficient to cover the cost of repairing the right-of-way to Department
specifications. If, 36 months after completion of the repair of the right -of-way, the Department
determines that the right-of-way has been properly repaired, the surety on the repair bond shall
be released.
(3) Standards. The Permittee shall perform repairs according to the specifications of the Department
and/or in the conditions specified in the permit the Department shall have the authority to prescribe
the manner and extent of the repair, and may do so in written procedures of general application or on
a case-by-case basis.
(4) Guarantees. The permittee guarantees its work and shall maintain it for 36 months following its
completion, except for organic material which shall be maintained for 12 months. During this period it
shall, upon notification from the Department, correct all repair work to the extent necessary, using the
method required by the Department. Said work shall be completed within 10 calendar days of the
receipt of the notice from the Department, not including days during which work cannot be done
because of circumstances constituting force majeure or days when work is prohibited as unseasonable
or unreasonable under subsection (p).
(5) Failure to Repair. If the permittee fails to repair the right-of-way in the manner and to the condition
required by the Department, or fails to satisfactorily and timely complete all repair required by the
Department, the Department at its option may do such work. In that event the permittee shall pay to
the Village, within 30 days of billing, the cost of repairing the right-of-way. If permittee fails to pay as
required, the Village may exercise its rights under the repair bond.
(k) RESTORATION IN LIEU OF REPAIR AND DEGRADATION. The permittee may elect to restore the excavation
and surrounding pavement in lieu of repair and a degradation fee. If restoration is elected, the Department
shall specify the area to be restored, and the methods and materials to be used for the restorati on. The
permittee shall then also comply with the preceding subsectuib (j), as applied to restoration instead of
repair.
(l) INSPECTION.
(1) Notice of Completion. When the work under any permit hereunder is completed, the permittee shall
notify the Department.
(2) Site Inspection. Permittee shall make the work site available to the Department and to all others as
authorized by law for inspection at all reasonable times during the execution of and upon completion
of the work.
(3) Authority of Department. At the time of inspection, the Village may order the immediate cessation of
any work which poses a threat to the life, health, safety or well being of the public. The Village may
issue an order to the registrant for any work that does not conform to the applicable standards,
conditions or codes. The order shall state that failure to correct the violation will be cause for
revocation of the permit. Within 10 days after issuance of the order, the registrant shall present proof
to the Department that the violation has been corrected. If such proof has not been presented within
the required time, the Department may revoke the permit pursuant to subsection (q).
(m) ONGOING MANAGEMENT FEES.
(1) Fee Basis. Fees shall reflect the ongoing or long-term costs to the Village of managing access to the
right-of-way. These costs are exclusive of Administrative costs collected under Excavation Permit Fees.
Fees shall be initially set, and may be annually re-computed, to recover the costs incurred by the
Village in ongoing management of the right-of-way. Ongoing management costs include, but are not
limited to, inventory maintenance, facility tracking, GIS, tree trimming, grass mowing, right of way
maintenance, location marking and general inquiries related to public right -of-way users. The fee shall
be based on the number of feet of right-of-way occupancy by a Telecommunications Right-of-Way
Page 89 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 7 of 10
User. The per foot management fee shall be calculated as follows: Annual management fee per foot =
Total annual management cost/Total ROW occupancy feet.
(2) Payment of Fees. Ongoing management fees shall be subject to adjustment and correction at the
conclusion of the calendar year. Such fees shall be paid for all and any part of a calendar year, prorated
on a daily basis, during any time period in which the said person uses or occupies the right-of-way to
furnish telecommunications service, or places, maintains or uses the person's wires, mains, pipes, or
any other facilities in the right-of-way.
(n) JOINT APPLICATIONS.
(1) Joint Application. Registrants may jointly apply for permits to excavate the right-of-way at the same
place and time.
(2) With Village Projects. Registrants who join in a scheduled excavation performed by the Village,
whether or not it is a joint application by two or more registrants or a single application, are not
required to pay the degradation portion of the excavation permit fee.
(3) Shared Fees. Registrants who apply for permits for the same excavation, which the Department does
not perform, may share in the payment of the excavation permit fee. Registrants must agree among
themselves as to the portion each will pay and indicate the same on thei r applications.
(o) SUPPLEMENTARY APPLICATIONS.
(1) Limitations on Area. An excavation permit is valid only for the area of the right-of-way specified in the
permit. No permittee may perform any work or excavate outside the area specified in the permit,
except as provided herein. Any permittee which determines that an area gr eater than that specified in
the permit must be excavated must, before working in that greater area (1) make application for a
permit extension and pay any additional fees required thereby, and (2) be granted a new permit or
permit extension.
(2) Limitation on Dates. An excavation permit is valid only for the dates specified in the permit. No
permittee may begin its work before the permit start date or, except as provided herein, continue
working after the end date. If a permittee does not finish the work by the perm it end date, it must
apply for a new permit for the additional time it needs, and receive the new permit or an extension of
the old permit before working after the end date of the previous permit.
(3) Fees for Supplementary Applications. A permittee shall pay administration costs for any additional
permits. A permittee is not required to pay an additional degradation fee for the same excavation, if
one has already been paid on the original permit.
(p) OTHER OBLIGATIONS.
(1) Compliance with Other Laws. Obtaining a permit to excavate and/or occupy the right-of-way does not
relieve permittee of its duty to obtain all other necessary permits, licenses, and authority and to pay all
fees required by any other Village, County, State, or Federal rules, laws o r regulations. A permittee
shall comply with all requirements of local, state and federal laws. A permittee shall perform all work in
conformance with all applicable codes and established rules and regulations, and is responsi ble for all
work done in the right-of-way pursuant to its permit, regardless of who does the work.
(2) Prohibited Work. Except in an emergency, or with the approval of the Department, no right -of-way
excavation may be done when seasonally prohibited or when conditions are unreasonable for such
work.
(q) REVOCATIONS, SUSPENSIONS, REFUSALS TO ISSUE OR EXTEND PERMITS.
(1) Grounds. The Department may refuse to issue a permit or may revoke, suspend or refuse to extend an
existing permit if it finds any of the following grounds:
Page 90 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 8 of 10
a. The applicant or permittee is required by subsection (d) to be registered and has not done so;
b. The applicant or permittee is seeking to perform work not included in its construction and major
maintenance plan required under subsection (g); which work was reasonably foreseeable by the
applicant or permittee at the time said plan was filed;
c. Issuance of a permit for the requested date would or interfere with an exhibition, celebration,
festival, or other event;
d. Misrepresentation of any fact by the applicant or permittee;
e. Failure of the applicant or permittee to maintain required bonds and/or insurance;
f. Failure of the applicant or permittee to complete work in a timely manner;
g. The proposed activity is contrary to the public health, safety or welfare, including factors related
to clear zones, fall zones and other similar concerns;
h. The extent to which right-of-way space where the permit is sought is available;
i. The competing demands for the particular space in the right -of-way;
j. The availability of other locations in the right-of-way or in other rights-of-way for the facilities of
the permit applicant;
k. The applicability of ordinances or other regulations of the right -of-way that affect location of
facilities in the right-of-way;
l. The condition and age of the right-of-way, and whether and when its is scheduled for total or
partial reconstruction; or
m. The applicant or permittee is otherwise not in full compliance with the requirements of this
chapter or other local, state or federal law.
(2) Discretionary Issuance. Notwithstanding subsection (1)b., the Department may issue a permit where
issuance is necessary (a) to prevent substantial economic hardship to a customer of the permittee or
applicant, or (b) to allow such customer to materially improve its utility serv ice, or (c) to allow the
permittee or applicant to comply with state or federal law or Village ordinance or an order of a court or
administrative agency.
(3) Appeals. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Department revoking, suspending, refusing to issue
or refusing to extend a permit may file a request for review with the Public Works and Highways
Committee. A request for review shall be filed within 10 days of the decision being appealed. Following
a hearing, the Public Works and Highways Committee may affirm, reverse or modify the decision of the
Department.
(r) WORK DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT.
(1) Emergency Situations. Each registrant shall immediately notify the Village by verbal notice on an
emergency phone number provided by the Village of any event regarding its facilities that it considers
to be an emergency. The registrant may proceed to take whatever actions are necessary to respond to
the emergency. Within 2 business days after the occurrence of the emergency the registrant shall apply
for the necessary permits, pay the fees associated therewith and otherwise fully comply with the
requirements of this Chapter. If the Village becomes aware of an emergency regarding a registrant's
facilities, the Department may attempt to contact the local representative of each registrant affected,
or potentially affected, by the emergency. The Village may take whatever action it deems necessary to
protect the public safety as a result of the emergency, the cost of which shall be borne by the
registrant whose facilities occasioned the emergency.
Page 91 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 9 of 10
(2) Non-Emergency Situations. Except in an emergency, any person who, without first having obtained the
necessary permit, excavates a right-of-way must subsequently obtain a permit, and shall in addition to
any penalties prescribed by ordinance, pay double the normal fee for said per mit, pay double all the
other fees required by this chapter or other chapters of the Village Code, deposit with the Department
the fees necessary to correct any damage to the right-of-way and comply with all of the requirements
of this chapter.
(s) SUPPLEMENTARY NOTIFICATION. If the excavation of the right-of-way begins later or ends sooner than the
date given on the permit, permittee shall notify the Department of the accurate information as soon as this
information is known.
(t) LOCATION OF FACILITIES.
(1) Undergrounding. Under conformity with local, state and federal law, unless existing aboveground
facilities is used, the installation of new facilities and replacement of old facilities shall be done
underground or contained within buildings or other structures in confor mity with applicable codes
except where otherwise authorized by the Department.
(2) Corridors. The Department may assign specific corridors within the right-of-way, consistent with
Wisconsin Public Service Commission standards. All excavation or other permits issued by the
Department involving the installation or replacement of facilities shall de signate the proper corridor for
the facilities at issue consistent with the Wisconsin Public Service Commission's corridor selection
standards.
(3) Limitation of Space. The Department may prohibit or limit the placement of new or additional facilities
within the right-of-way if there is insufficient space to accommodate all of the requests of persons to
occupy and use the right-of-way. In making such decisions, the Department shall strive to the extent
possible to accommodate all existing and potential users of the right-of-way, but may prohibit or limit
the placement of new or additional facilities when required to protect the public, health, safe ty or
welfare.
(u) RELOCATION OF FACILITIES. Except as prohibited by State or Federal law, a Registrant must promptly and at
its own expense, with due regard for seasonal working conditions, permanently remove and relocate its
facilities in the right-of-way whenever the Department requests such removal and relocation, and shall
restore the right-of-way to the same condition it was in prior to said removal or relocation. The Department
may make such request to prevent interference by the company's facilities with (i) a pre sent or future Village
use of the right- of-way, (ii) a public improvement undertaken by the Village, (iii) an economic development
project in which the Village has an interest or investment, (iv) when the public health, safety and welfare
require it, or (v) when necessary to prevent interference with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel
over the right-of-way.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person shall not be required to remove or relocate its facilities from any right -of-
way which has been vacated in favor of a non-governmental entity unless and until the reasonable costs thereof
are first paid to the person therefor.
(v) INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER FACILITIES DURING MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION. When the Village performs
work in the right-of-way and finds it necessary to maintain, support, shore, or move a registrant's facilities ,
the Village shall notify the local representative. The registrant shall meet with the Village's representative
within 24-hours and coordinate the protection, maintenance, supporting, and/or shoring of the registrant's
facilities. The registrant shall accomplish the needed work within 72-hours, unless the Village agrees to a
longer period. In the event that the registrant does not proceed to maintain, support, shore, or move its
facilities, the Village may arrange to do the work and bill the registrant, said bill to be paid within 30 days.
(w) INDEMNIFICATION. Permittee expressly acknowledges and agrees, by acceptance of the permit, to
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Village, its officers, boards, committees, commissions, elected
Page 92 of 181
Created: 2025-10-07 14:03:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29)
Page 10 of 10
officials, employees and agents, from and against all loss or expense (including liability costs and attorney's
fees) by reason of any claim or suit, or of liability imposed by law upon the Village or its agents or employees
for damages because of bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained by any
person or persons or on account of damages to property, including loss of use thereof, arising from, in
connection with, caused by or resulting from the permittee's acts or omissions in the exercise of its rights
under this permit, whether caused by or contributed to by the Village or its agents or employees.
(x) ABANDONED FACILITIES.
(1) Discontinued Operations. A registrant who has determined to discontinue its operations in the Village
must either:
a. Provide information satisfactory to the Department that the registrant's obligations for its
facilities under this chapter have been lawfully assumed by another registrant; or
b. Submit to the Department a proposal and instruments for dedication of its facilities to the
Village. If a registrant proceeds under this clause, the Village may, at its option:
i. Accept the dedication for all or a portion of the facilities; or
ii. Require the registrant, at its own expense, to remove the facilities in the right -of-way at
ground or above ground level; or
iii. Require the registrant to post a bond or provide payment sufficient to reimburse the
Village for reasonably anticipated costs to be incurred in removing the facilities.
However, any registrant who has unusable and abandoned facilities in any right -of-way shall remove it
from that right-of-way within 2 years, unless the Department waives this requirement.
(2) Abandoned Facilities. Facilities of a registrant who fails to comply with subsection (1) and which, for 2
years, remains unused shall be deemed to be abandoned. Abandoned facilities are deemed to be a
nuisance. In addition to any remedies or rights it has at law or in equity, the Village may, at its option (i)
abate the nuisance, (ii) take possession of the facilities, or (iii) require removal of the facilities by the
registrant, or the registrant's successor in interest.
(3) Public Utilities. This section shall not apply to a public utility as defined by Wis. Stat. § 196.01(5).
(y) RESERVATION OF REGULATORY AND POLICE POWERS. The Village, by the granting of a permit to excavate,
obstruct and/or occupy the right-of-way, or by registering a person under this chapter does not surrender or
to any extent lose, waive, impair, or lessen the lawful powers and rights, which it has now or maybe
hereafter granted to the Village under the Constitution and statutes of the State of Wisconsin to regulate the
use of the right-of-way by the permittee; and the permittee by its acceptance of a permi t to excavate,
obstruct and/or occupy the right-of-way or of registration under this chapter agrees that all lawful powers
and rights, regulatory power, or police power, or otherwise as are or the same may be from time to time
vested in or reserved to the Village, shall be in full force and effect and subject to the exercise thereof by the
Village at any time. A permittee or registrant is deemed to acknowledge that its rights are subject to the
regulatory and police powers of the Village to adopt and enforce general ordinances necessary to the safety
and welfare of the public and is deemed to agree to comply with all applicable general law, and ordinances
enacted by the Village pursuant to such powers.
(z) SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this chapter is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction, such
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Page 93 of 181
1
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("this Agreement") is entered into by and between the
Village of Germantown, a Village organized and existing under the laws of the state of Wisconsin
(“Village”), and AT&T (“Licensee”), for the use of Village’s rights-of-way for the installation,
operation and maintenance of telecommunications facilities.
WHEREAS, the Village is the owner of certain public rights -of-way, and has adopted
official standards governing the construction of facilities within those rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the Village is authorized under applicable law , including Village of
Germantown Code of Ordinance 8.065, to grant, renew and revoke licenses for the use of the public
rights-of-way for the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunications facilities
within its municipal boundaries; and
WHEREAS, Licensee desires to construct, install, operate, and maintain
telecommunications facilities in and/or upon the Village's public rights -of-way (the "ROWs")
within the Village's boundaries, subject to the provisions of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Village desires to permit Licensee to utilize the ROWs for such purposes,
subject to the provisions of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board has determined that establishing a License Agreement for
telecommunications use of public rights-of-ways will provide an efficient and consistent
framework for managing the deployment of telecommunications facilities , while ensuring
compliance with applicable laws and Village standards, and without requiring a
telecommunications company to seek separate Village Board approval for each site-specific permit
involving a Village right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, Licensee is authorized and empowered to enter into this Agreement and to
perform the covenants and promises herein made and undertaken.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above stated preambles and the mutual
covenants and promises hereinafter contained, the Licensee and the Village agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into this License Agreement as if
fully set forth in herein.
2. Grant of License. For and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein, and subject to
the terms and conditions set forth herein and compliance with all Federal, State and local laws and
regulations, the Village grants a non -exclusive revocable license (“License”) to Licensee to use
the ROWs to install, operate and maintain telecommunications and broadband equipment (the
“Facilities”). This License does not convey to Licensee any right, title or interest (including
Exhibit 4 - Draft Agreement for AT&T
Page 94 of 181
2
leasehold interest) in the ROWs, but constitutes only a license to use and occupy the ROWs for
the purposes stated herein.
The rights granted to Licensee are and shall remain at all times subordinate to the Village’s
superior rights of ingress, egress, and use of the public ROWs. This Agreement and the rights
granted herein are non -exclusive and do not, explicitly or implicitly, preclude the Village from
granting other licenses or permissions for the installation and operation of telecommunications
facilities within the Village’s municipal boundaries.
3. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of five (5) years, beginning on the
date approved by the Village Board and ending five (5) years thereafter, unless sooner terminated
as provided for herein. Upon expiration of the initial term , this Agreement shall automatically
renew for successive five (5) year . Either party may terminate this Agreement at the end of the
initial term or renewal term by providing the other party with at least twelve months (12) months’
prior written notice of termination.
4. Title; Condition of ROWs. It is understood and agreed that the Village makes no
representations, warranties, or assurances regarding: (a) the condition of title or boundaries of the
ROWs; (b) the condition of any underground ducts, conduits, utilities, or other facilities within the
ROWs; (c) any improvements or soil conditions located on the ROWs; or (d) the suitability of the
ROWs for Licensee’s intended use.
Licensee assumes all risks associated with the placement, operation, and maintenance of the
Facilities within the ROWs, including the suitability of the ROWs for such Facilities. Licensee
accepts the ROWs in an “AS IS, WHERE IS” condition, including any environmental conditions.
Accordingly, the Village shall not be liable for any damages, claims, or liabilities arising from or
related to adverse claims concerning the title, boundaries, or condition of the ROWs.
5. Location. The location of the Facilities shall be subject to approval by the Village’s
Director of Public Works or designee. Unless otherwise specified in a permit issued by the Village,
Licensee shall not place the Facilities in any manner that unreasonably interferes with the use of
the ROWs by the Village, any utility, the general public, or other persons lawfully authorized to
use or be present in the public ROWs. Licensee shall comply with all applicable Village
ordinances and regulations , including the Village of Germantown Development Handbook,
regarding permitting for the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the Facilities. If
any portion of the Facilities is designed to be installed in a location that does not comply with
permit requirements or applicable standards, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly
relocate such Facilities to a location approved by the Village.
6. Use of ROWs. In its use of the ROWs and any work performed thereon, Licensee shall
comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of Federal, State,
County, and local regulatory authorities, including all applicable Village ordinances governing
permitting and construction within the ROWs , including Germantown Munici pal Code §8.065,
attached as an exhibit to this agreement.
ExhibitVillage Ordinance for Telecommunications
Page 95 of 181
3
Prior to work in the ROW , applicant to provide registration information as outlined in 8.065
sections (d) and (e).
Upon autho rization from Village, Licensee shall use and occupy the ROWs solely for the
installation, operation, and maintenance of the Facilities, which shall be limited to:
• underground conduit, fiber optic telecommunications cable, and related equipment where
existing similar utilities are underground; and
• aerial fiber optic telecommunications cable and related equipment where existing similar
utilities are aerial.
Applicant shall satisfy all requirements of the excavation permit as outlined in the Village Code
of Ordinances 8.06 and 8.065 Sections (g) and (h) . In addition, applicant to provide a traffic
control plan conforming with the MUTCD , a staging plan showing equipment and materials
storage areas, a communication plan for resident outreach and complaints, and a corresponding
schedule for the traffic control and staging and operations. These plans are to be in
accordancprovided by the applicant to the Village for review, comment and approval in a dvance
of mobilizing and beginning work. It is specifically understood that the ROWs shall not be used
for the burning of refuse, the accumulation or storage of debris or other material, or for any
unsanitary or unhealthful purposes. All parts of Licensee’s Facilities shall be underground except
in areas where existing similar utilities are aerial. Any unauthorized or impermissible use of the
ROWs shall constitute a material breach of this License Agreement.
7. Installation, Operation and Maintenance. In performing any work or exercising any
rights under this Agreement, Licensee shall not obstruct or interfere in any manner with the
Village’s ROWs, existing utility easements, private rights-of-way, sanitary sewers, sewer laterals,
water mains, storm drains, gas mains, poles, aerial facilities, or other existing telecommunications
facilities without the express written approval of the Village or the owners, including franchisees,
of the affected property.
Maintenance of the Facilities within the ROWs shall be the sole responsibility of Licensee.
Licensee shall maintain the Facilities in good and safe condition and in compliance with all
applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and policies. T he Village reserves the right
to enter upon and repair any damage to areas surrounding the licensed premises. If such damage is
caused by Licensee, the actual, reasonable, and documented cost of such repair shall be borne by
Licensee.
Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, in the event of an unexpected repair or
emergency (“Emergency Maintenance”), Licensee is required to notify the Village’s on site
representative (Inspector) and may access the ROWs and commence such Emergency Maintenance
work, following communication with the Director of Public Works and as required under the
circumstances.
Page 96 of 181
4
8. Marking. Prior to and during any installation or relocation of any underground cables or
utility lines, Licensee shall contact the Diggers Hotline One Call System (commonly known as
“Call Before You Dig” or “811”) to obtain planning prints for design and for hotline markings in
the respective field location to ascertain the presence and location of existing aboveground and
underground facilities within the ROWs to be occupied by Licensee’s Facilities and shall install
route markers in accordance with applicable law . On application materials submitted to the
Village, applicant to provide Diggers Hotline registration certificate number as required by Village
of Germantown Ordinance 8.065 Section (e)(1)a, along with other contact registration information
Licensee agrees that it will become a member of the One Call System (811) as a
requirement of this Agreement. This system is designed to alert Licensee to planned work in the
rights-of-way so that Licensee can mark the location of its Facilities to avoid damage.
In the event the field markings are different than the plan drawings, such as due to changes in
underground utility locations , Contractor to stop and cease work in that area, and applicant to
resubmit updated plans for that excavation area.
9. Public Safety. Licensee or other person acting on its behalf, at its own expense, shall
submit a traffic control plan for the placement and use of suitable barricades, flags, flagmen, lights,
flares and other measures as required per the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control for the safety of
all members of the general public and to prevent injury or damage to any person, vehicle or
property by reason of any work in or affecting the ROWs or other property. The Village may
require regular weekly meetings, and interim phone calls with the Foreman, to discuss safety and
schedule and communication and overall project plans and progress.
10. Restoration of ROWs. Within fourteen (14) days after completion of initial construction
operations or any repair, relocation, or removal of the Facilities, Licensee shall grade and restore
all areas disturbed by such work to a condition substantially similar to that which exis ted prior to
the work. This time period may be reasonably extended upon written request by Licensee for good
cause shown. Applicant is required to notify the Village’s representative (Inspector) of restoration
activity, as scheduled, to document the restoration condition and proceed as outlined in Village of
Germantown Code of Ordinances 8.065 Sections (j) and (k).
If weather or other conditions prevent full restoration within the required time, Licensee shall
perform temporary restoration at its sole expense and shall promptly complete permanent
restoration when conditions permit.
In the event Licensee fails to restore disturbed areas or make necessary repairs to the ROWs or
other Village property as required herein, the Village may, after providing Licensee with at least
fourteen (14) days’ prior written notice and an opportunity to cure, perform or cause such
restoration or repairs to be made. The Village may then seek reimbursement from Licensee for the
actual, reasonable, and documented costs incurred, which shall be supported by invoices and
documentation provided to Licensee. Licensee shall remit payment within thirty (30) days of
receipt of such documentation. Alternatively, the Village may draw upon any security posted by
Licensee to recover such costs.
Page 97 of 181
5
11. Damage to Licensee’s Facilities. The Village shall not be liable for, and Licensee
expressly waives, any claims for damage to or loss of Licensee’s Facilities within the ROWs
arising from or in connection with public works, public improvements, construction, excavation,
grading, filling, or other work of any kind in the ROWs by or on behalf of the Village, except to
the extent such damage or loss is caused by the Village’s gross negligence or willful misconduct.
12. Reimbursement of Village Expenses. Licensee shall reimburse the Village for all actual,
reasonable, and documented costs incurred by the Village for third-party contracted services and
related expenses directly attributable to Licensee’s activities under this Agreement, including but
not limited to:
(a) inspection services;
(b) engineering or technical review;
(c) traffic control services; and
(d) restoration work performed by contractors on behalf of the Village.
The Village shall provide Licensee with written documentation of such costs, including copies of
invoices and receipts. Licensee shall remit payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of such
documentation.
In accordance with Wisconsin statutory requirements, the Village shall not charge Licensee
overhead or administrative costs in excess of those amounts recoverable under state law, and any
such charges must be separately itemized and supported by documentation.
This Section shall comply with applicable Wisconsin statutes and municipal ordinances governing
municipal cost recovery.
13. No Transfer or Assignment. This License Agreement shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. During the term of this License
Agreement, Licensee acknowledges and agrees that it does not have the right or authority to
transfer or assign this License Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent
of the Village; provided, however that Licensee shall have the right, without the Village’s prior
written consent, to assign or otherwise transfer this Licensee Agreement to any successor entity or
affiliate or subsidiary of Licensee, or to any entity into which Licensee may be merged or
consolidated or which purchases all or substantially all of the assets of Licensee. Any such written
consent required under this Section 1 2 may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed . Any
transferee or assignee must, at a minimum, show satisfactory evidence that it meets the insurance
requirements and other terms, conditions, and provisions contained herein.
14. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. Each party (the “Indemnifying Party”) agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the other party (the “Indemnified Party”), including its officers,
directors, employees, agents, affiliates, successors, and permitted assigns, from and against any
and all third-party claims, actions, proceedings (including administrative or informal proceedings),
judgments, damages, penalties, fines, costs, liabilities, or losses, together with reasonable
Page 98 of 181
6
attorneys’ fees and other expenses, to the extent arising directly out of or directly related to:
(a) the Indemnifying Party’s breach of this Agreement; or
(b) the negligent acts, errors, or omissions, or willful misconduct of the Indemnifying Party or
its contractors, agents, or employees in connection with activities undertaken pursuant to this
Agreement.
This indemnity shall not apply to the extent that any claim or liability results from the negligence
or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Party.
15. Insurance. Licensee shall, at its sole expense, cause to be issued and maintained during
the Term of this Agreement insurance coverages of the types and in the amounts set forth below,
as applicable:
Type of Insurance Limit
General Liability (including General Aggregate $2,000,000
contractual liability) written Prod./Comp. Op. Agg. $1,000,000
on an occurrence basis Personal & Adv. Injury $1,000,000
Each Occurrence $1,000,000
Automobile Liability, including Combines Single Limit $1,000,000
any auto, hired auto and non-
owned autos
Excess Liability, Umbrella Form Each Occurrence $2,000,000
Aggregate $2,000,000
Workers’ Compensation Each Accident $ 500,000
Prior to commencing work on the Facilities described herein, Licensee shall furnish the
Village with the appropriate Certificates of Insurance, and applicable policy endorsements.
Licensee shall have the Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Umbrella/Excess
Liability policies endorsed to add the “ Village of ______________, its officers, officials, agents
and employees” as “additional insureds”.
17. No Encumbrances. Licensee shall not place, permit, or allow any liens, mortgages,
security interests, pledges, claims, or other encumbrances to attach to or be filed against the
Village’s title to the ROWs. This provision shall not restrict Licensee from granting security
interests or liens in its own Facilities, provided that such interests do not encumber or otherwise
affect the Village’s ownership of the ROWs.
18. Taxes. Nothing contained in this License Agreement shall be construed to exempt Licensee
from any fee, tax, property tax levy or assessment, which is or may be hereinafter lawfully imposed
on it relative to its use of the ROWs or its operation of the Facilities.
Page 99 of 181
7
19. Termination. The Village may terminate this License Agreement and the License granted
herein for any of the following reasons:
(i) Fraud or Misrepresentation: Licensee knowingly made fraudulent, false, or materially
incomplete statements in the permit application; or
(ii) Failure to Cure Breach: Licensee fails to cure a material breach of this Agreement or
noncompliance with any material provision after receiving written notice and a forty -
five (45) day cure period; provided, however, that if such noncompliance cannot
reasonably be cured within f orty-five (45) days, the cure period shall be extended for
such additional time as is reasonably necessary under the circumstances, provided
Licensee has commenced and is diligently pursuing such cure; or
(iii) Public Safety Threat: Licensee’s physical presence or the presence of its Facilities
within the ROWs presents a direct or imminent threat to public health, safety, or
welfare; or
(iv) Failure to Construct as Approved: Licensee fails to construct the Facilities substantially
in accordance with the permit and approved plans; or
(v) Traffic Control Deficiencies: Licensee fails to provide required traffic control and does
not respond to Village requests to correct such deficiencies within a reasonable time
frame.
Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, Licensee shall, within one hundred eighty
(180) days of written notice from the Village, remove its Facilities from all Village ROWs and
restore all ROWs as required herein.
20. No Waiver. The waiver by one party of any breach of this Agreement or the failure of one
party to enforce at any time, or for any period of time, any of the provisions hereof will be limited
to the particular instance and will not operate or be deemed to waive any fu ture breaches of this
Agreement and will not be construed to be a waiver of any provision except for the particular
instance.
21. Amendments. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties. No
oral changes or modifications of this Agreement shall be permitted or allowed. Changes or
modifications to this Agreement shall be made only in writing and upon necessary and proper
signature of the Licensee and the Village.
22. Notices. Any notice will be in writing and will be deemed to be effectively served when
deposited in the mail with sufficient first-class postage affixed and addressed to the party at the
party's place of business. Notices shall be addressed to designated representatives of both parties
as follows:
Page 100 of 181
8
Village: Village Clerk
Village of Germantown
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
Germantown, WI 53022
Licensee: AT&T
Attn: Jeff Oldenburg
<Address>
With a copy to: AT&T
Attn: Legal – ROW Permitting
<Address>
23. Severability. In the event that any provision of this License Agreement shall be held
invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or
render unenforceable any other provisions hereto.
24. Conflict with Village Ordinances. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between
the provisions of this License Agreement and any applicable Village ordinance, the terms of this
License Agreement shall control and govern the rights and obligations of the parties with respect
to the subject matter herein.
25. Law and Venue. This License Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted, and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Wisconsin, without regard to its conflict of law
principles. Any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement shall be brought
exclusively in a state or federal court of competent jurisdiction located within the State of
Wisconsin, and each party hereby consents to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed
and to become effective as of the date first written above.
AT&T
VILLAGE OF GERMANTOWN
By:_______________________________ By:________________________________
Printed:____________________________
Title:
Printed:____________________________
Title: Village President
Date: ______________, 20____ Date: ______________, 20____
Page 101 of 181
Created: 2026-01-06 12:38:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 30)
Page 1 of 2
8.06 STREET EXCAVATIONS. (Rep. & Recr. Ord. #5-94)
(1) PERMIT REQUIRED. (Am. Ord. #10-05) No person shall excavate in any street, alley or public ground without
a permit therefore from the Public Works Department.
(2) FEE. (Am. Ord. #9-00; Am. Ord. #10-05; Am. Ord. #36-05)
(a) The following permit issuance and administration fees shall be collected by the Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of any permit for excavating in the municipal right -of-way but outside
paved or improved streets, and excavating within a paved or improved street, except that such fees
shall nor apply to telecommunications carriers and utilities, public service corporations, and
cooperative associations organized under Ch. 185, Wis. Stats., to furnish telecommunications, gas,
light, heat or power services:
1. For excavating in the municipal right-of-way but outside paved or improved streets: $200.00.
2. For excavating within a paved or improved street: $500.00.
(b) The following permit issuance and administration fees shall be collected by the Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of any permit to telecommunications carriers and utilities, public
service corporations, and cooperative associations organized u nder Ch. 185, Wis. Stats., to furnish
telecommunications, gas, light, heat or power services, for excavating in the municipal right -of-way but
outside paved or improved streets, and excavating within a paved or improved street:
1. For excavating in the municipal right-of-way but outside paved or improved streets, and for
excavating within a paved or improved street: $150.00.
(3) PROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC. (Am. Ord. #10-05) No permit shall be issued unless the method of construction
and location of the work to be performed shall be such that the public safety and convenience will not be
impaired. The person seeking the permit (1) shall erect and maintain su ch barriers, warning lights and signs
in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as to adequately inform the traveling
public of the nature and location of the work being performed, and (2) shall comply wi th all provisions and
conditions as stated on the permit.
(4) REPAIR OF STREET OPENING. The person to whom a permit is issued under this section shall complete the
work involved as soon as possible and shall immediately repair all pavements, gutters and sidewalks in as
good condition as before the opening and as may be directed by the Villag e Engineer in accordance with
standards and specifications established by the Public Works Committee and on file in the office of the
Village Engineer.
(5) CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE REQUIRED. In addition, the applicant shall file with the Village Clerk a certificate
of general liability and property damage insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 bodily injury per
occurrence, $1,000,000.00 aggregate and $500,000.00 property damage per occurren ce, $500,000.00
aggregate, conditioned that the applicant will indemnify and save harmless the Village, its officers and agents
against all injuries and property damage resulting or arising from any negligence on the p art of the applicant
or his agents, employees or subcontractors and that such applicant or his insurer shall notify the Village, in
writing, 10 days prior to the cancellation of any certificate of insurance afforded hereunder.
(6) PERFORMANCE BOND. (Cr. Ord. #10-05) Applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department a
performance bond or check in the amount of $1,500.00 to be returned upon satisfactory completion of road
opening repair and final inspection.
(7) EXPIRATION. (Cr. Ord. #23-10) Permits shall remain valid for 90 days from the date of issuance, after which
the permit shall expire.
Exhibit 5 - Village Ordinance for Excavation in the Right-of-Way
Page 102 of 181
Created: 2026-01-06 12:38:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 30)
Page 2 of 2
(8) PENALTIES. (Cr. Ord. #23-10) Persons who violate the terms of the permit or who neglect to receive an
approved permit before beginning street excavation in the right-of-way shall be penalized as provided in
section 25.04 of the Municipal Code.
Page 103 of 181
BUSINESS OF THE VILLAGE BOARD
MEETING DATE: March 16, 2026
PLACEMENT: Action Item
ITEM TITLE: Contract with Ruekert & Mielke to design Main Street Lift Station
and Old Farm Lift Station improvements in amount not to exceed
$532,659.00 (ACTION) Updated Attachment
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Driscoll, Village Engineer, Timothy Zimmerman,
Superintendent
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
The Utility Advisory Committee, Public Works and Highway Committee and Village
Board authorized the generation of the Sanitary Sewer System Facilities Plan in 2024
and finalized the Main Street and Old Farm Lift Station Facilities Plan Report in
2025. The Village Board approved a budget amount for a consultant contract to design
improvements to the Main Street and Old Farm Lift Stations and force mains. Staff
requested proposals to select consultants with experience in lift station design. The
proposals are summarized:
Firm Hours Amount
Ruekert Mielke 2,917 $532,659
S.E.H. 3,952 $795,215
ATI 5,352 $1,094,478
MSA 6,513 $1,122,472
Hourly rates are comparable ranging from $172/hr to $204/hr, where the budgeted
amount of hours is based on the respective consultants’ project background familiarity
of the Village’s sanitary system.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Germantown, Village of - Main St_Old Farm Lift Station_Force Mains
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Village Staff requests the Public Works and Highways Committee recommend to the
Village Board the award of a contract for Consultant Design Services to Improve Main
Street Lift Station and Old Farm Lift Station and Force Mains to Ruekert Mielke on a
time and materials basis in an amount not to exceed $532,659.
ACTION BY COMMITTEE:
A motion to support authorize staff and a vote “Aye” is in the affirmative to support the
contract award.
Page 104 of 181
VILLAGE OF
GERMANTOWN
Consultant Design Services to Improve Main Street Lift Station and
Old Farm Lift Station and Force Mains (#2609)
February 20, 2026
Page 105 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
W233 N2080 Ridgeview Parkway, Waukesha, WI 53188 262-542-5733
2
February 20, 2026
Matthew Mortwedt
Director of Public Works
Village of Germantown
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
Germantown, WI 53022
Re: Consultant Design Services to Improve Main Street Lift Station and Old Farm Lift Station and Force Mains
(#2609)
Mr. Mortwedt:
Ruekert & Mielke, Inc. is pleased to submit our proposal to provide professional engineering services for the
Main Street Lift Station and Old Farm Lift Station and Force Mains project. We have received and reviewed
addenda 1 through 4 and have incorporated their requirements into this submittal.
A Proven Team Aligned with the Village’s Project Goals
The Village is undertaking a critical investment in its wastewater conveyance system to address aging
infrastructure, improve reliability, and support long-term growth. Over 45 years of work with the Village
culminated most recently in our collaboration on the Facilities Plan for this project. Our long-standing
knowledge of the Village’s wastewater system, combined with the recent study efforts and ongoing
engagement with Village staff, positions the R/M team and the Village to move forward with confidence in
developing this project.
In-House Expertise for Efficient Project Execution
Our multidisciplinary, in-house team offers comprehensive expertise in wastewater process design, force
mains, structural, mechanical, electrical, HVAC, environmental permitting, and SCADA integration. This
approach provides continuity, clear accountability, and a coordinated design that supports constructability and
long-term system performance.
Proven Navigation of WDNR and Clean Water Fund Requirements
Our environmental team offers extensive experience navigating WDNR and Clean Water Fund Program
requirements. This expertise supports the Village’s regulatory compliance and funding objectives while
minimizing delays during permitting and implementation.
We appreciate the opportunity to support the Village on this important project and look forward to continuing
our long-standing partnership. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please let us
know.
Sincerely,
RUEKERT & MIELKE, INC.
Dave Arnott, P .E.
Project Manager
darnott@ruekert-mielke.com
Jerad Wegner, P .E.
Client Liaison
jwegner@ruekert-mielke.com
Page 106 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
4
5
7
10
20
26
27
28
29
WHY R/M
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
PROJECT APPROACH
STAFF EXPERIENCE
FIRM EXPERIENCE
FIRM DESCRIPTION
SCHEDULE
CONSULTANT EFFORT & COST
LEVEL OF EFFORT
KEY DIFFERENTIATORS
45 YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE IN
THE VILLAGE
WELL-ROUNDED
PROJECT TEAM
PERMITTING
EXPERTISE
Permitting for a project like
this can be complex. Our
in-house Environmental
Team has years of experience
navigating complex
regulations and can efficiently
get this project approved.
R/M brings a well-rounded,
experienced project team
to the Village. Our expertise
spans hydraulics, buried
pipelines, mechanical,
electrical, plumbing,
structural, HVAC, site work,
and more allowing us to keep
everything in-house.
Our understanding of
the Village’s wastewater
system and completion
of the Facilities Plan
for this project allows
us to enter the design
phase for this project
efficiently.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
3
Page 107 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
R/M’s reputation extends
beyond the Village, with
a proven history of
Area operators consistently provide positive
references to our work.
• Lake Pewaukee Sanitary
District
• Village of Hartland
• City of Oconomowoc
• City of Pewaukee
• Village of Pewaukee
similar successful
projects for
communities across
southeastern
Wisconsin, including:
Ruekert & Mielke, Inc. (R/M) is uniquely positioned
to support the Main Street and Old Farm lift
station and force main project with expertise,
experience, and a deep understanding of the
Village’s specific needs.
R/M has worked with the Village for over 45 years
on your sanitary sewer system and lift stations. We
are familiar with your collection system, lift stations,
permitting system, internal committee organization,
approval processes, and SCADA system. This will
reduce hassle and extra effort on the part of the
Village for this project with a tight design timeline.
Dave Beyer, Dave Arnott, and Jared Wegner
offer a combined 72 years of experience with the
Village.
Our environmental group delivers comprehensive
environmental permitting expertise. This is critical
for this project with complex permits, such as
waterway crossings, wetland permits and floodplain
permits. We will work to identify the critical path
for environmental and other permitting at the
project onset through a permitting matrix that we
will prepare initially with the preliminary Design
Study Report. The R/M environmental group will
be an asset to the Village for this project with
multiple complex permits.
R/M has a full-service team that includes electrical,
mechanical, structural, plumbing, and HVAC.
R/M acquired Axiom
Consultants in 2024
to provide our clients
with in-house structural,
plumbing, and HVAC
services. This advantage
will provide the
Village with structural,
plumbing, and HVAC services will provide cohesion
and consistency for the design project.
R/M offers the Village of Germantown a high-value
solution for this project. Our long history with your
system, combined with in-house multidisciplinary
and environmental expertise, allows us to anticipate
challenges, streamline coordination, and deliver a
cohesive design that supports reliable operations and
long-term performance.
EXPERIENCE WITH THE VILLAGE
16 YEARS
Jerad Wegner, PE
26 YEARS
Dave Arnott, PE
30 YEARS
Dave Beyer
Our Environmental Experts are skilled in
compliance efforts and permits, including:
Wetland & Waterway Disturbance
Permitting
Threatened Endangered Species
Compliance
Cultural, Archeological, & Historic
Compliance Oversight
The Axiom addition to R/M also brings
enhanced building expertise and design
to R/M. No subconsultants for electrical,
mechanical, structural, plumbing, and HVAC will
be used by R/M on this project.
4
WHY RUEKERT & MIELKE?
Page 108 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
The Village is undertaking a significant upgrade
to its two primary wastewater conveyance assets:
the Main Street and Old Farm Lift Stations and
their associated force mains to address aging
infrastructure, operational reliability, and long-term
capacity needs. Both stations, constructed in 1986,
are critical components of the Village’s conveyance
system and are currently challenged by pump
clogging, aging mechanical/electrical systems, limited
ventilation, aging building assets such as roofing and
brickwork, and capacity constraints associated with
future growth, including anticipated full build-out with
development in the Town of Richfield.
The Village’s 2025 Facilities Plan, authored by R/M,
outlines a comprehensive improvement strategy that
increases conveyance capacity, enhances reliability
and safety, and provides the redundancy needed for
long-term system resilience. The final WDNR Facilities
Plan approval is pending, and the R/M design will
incorporate all elements as described in the approved
plan.
Lift Station Conditions & Drivers
Both facilities are wet well/dry well stations with
three pumps, a recirculation chopper pump for rag
mitigation, and original 1986 equipment. The Main
Street station provides 6,250 gpm of firm capacity,
and Old Farm provides 7,400 gpm of firm capacity.
While structurally sound, both stations require
modernization to address capacity, ventilation, safety,
and operational issues, particularly the persistent
clogging problems that reduce pump efficiency and
increase maintenance burden at the most critical
times during wet weather events.
Force Main Improvements
At Main Street, the existing force main consists of
a 16-inch ductile iron pipe, while at Old Farm, it is
a 20-inch ductile iron pipe. These existing pipes
will be retained and lined to backup systems for
redundancy. New C-900 PVC force mains with larger
diameters (20-inch and 30-inch) will be installed to
deliver the increased conveyance capacity needed
for anticipated growth. The new mains may follow the
current alignment and are likely to be constructed
using open-trench methods, which support cost-
effectiveness and simplify both permitting and
easement processes. Three options for force main
alignment will be presented to the Village in the
preliminary Design Study Report. We will coordinate
with the Village to help determine the optimal force
main route from each station.
Process, Mechanical, HVAC, Electrical, and
Structural Upgrades
The project includes comprehensive mechanical
improvements: new pumps and motors at Old Farm,
upgraded pump impellers at Main Street, and full
replacement of original check and plug valves. Aging
overhead cranes require replacement due to parts
unavailability.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
5
Page 109 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
Old Farm Lift Station
Main Street Lift Station
HVAC upgrades are essential to increase ventilation
in the lower pump rooms and avoid Class I, Division 1
classification. Conversion from electric to natural gas
heating, heat recovery units in the generator rooms,
and corrosion-minimizing exhaust routing are key
safety and energy-efficiency improvements for the
HVAC systems.
Electrical modernization includes new motor control
centers, switchgear, PLC-based controls, and
upgraded service capacity. The existing variable
frequency drives will be reused.
New Buildings and Facility Enhancements
Two significant new structures will be constructed at
each site: the Generator Buildings and the Screenings
Buildings. Both will be designed to match the
architecture of the existing buildings and will provide
expanded functionality. Natural-gas-powered standby
generators will be appropriately sized to supply
power to all three pumps at each station, ensuring
full redundancy and resiliency during outages. The
new Screenings Buildings will include an automated
fine screen and washer/compactor, which will greatly
reduce the frequency of pump clogging and the
amount of pump maintenance required.
Building and site upgrades will include roof
replacement, tuckpointing, wet well HVAC
improvements, wet well crack sealing, and
replacement of access door interlocks. These
improvements are intended to extend the life of
existing assets and enhance operator safety.
Funding and Regulatory Framework
The Village intends to finance the project through the
WDNR Clean Water Fund Program (CWFP), which
provides low-interest loans and can significantly
reduce life-cycle costs. Design must therefore
incorporate all CWFP requirements, including
Buy America, Build America (BABA) provisions,
documentation for financial assistance, and
coordination with WDNR throughout permitting and
bidding.
Old Farm Motor Control Center
Main Street Pumps
6
Page 110 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
There are several technical factors that we will be
focusing on early in the project:
R/M will utilize our full-service team with our
technical expertise to deliver a complete, accurate,
constructible, and CWFP-compliant project while
minimizing operational disruptions and ensuring long-
term performance.
1. Project Initiation and Data Collection
We will begin with a comprehensive kick-off
meeting to confirm project goals, facility constraints,
schedules, and design preferences. Early tasks
include:
• Reviewing the Facilities Plan and integrating any
WDNR feedback.
• Verifying pump curves, hydraulic conditions, and
operational histories.
• Conducting field assessments of structural,
mechanical, HVAC, electrical, and Instrumentation
& Control (I&C) components.
• Surveying force main routes for constructability,
utility conflicts, and restoration needs. We plan to
use a drone flight for each force main route. We
have used drones before on utility projects in the
last 5 years to efficiently capture existing utility
(paint and flags) and topographic information.
These initial tasks were completed by R/M in the
successful design of the recent Lake Pewaukee
Sanitary District Lift Station 13 Reconstruction
project. We will use this experience for the Village of
Germantown.
2. Basis of Design Development
As a foundation for our design, we will prepare a
preliminary and final Design Study Report (DSR) that
clearly defines:
• A listing of project upgrades based on our kickoff
meeting and initial coordination.
PROJECT APPROACH
R/M will confirm that new station piping is not
required for the Old Farm lift station. We expect
the fittings immediately before and after the
pumps may have to be replaced. We will confirm
that no additional pump room space is needed at
the Old Farm station.
The size of the screening facilities at each station
will be critical. The hydraulics of sewer system
immediately upstream of each lift station are very
important. We will have to determine how much
the sewer can be surcharged at each station with
a partially blinded screen. It is likely that a screen
with a lower capacity compared with the projected
peak hour (8.0 MGD for Main Street and 13.7
MGD for Old Farm) capacity may be economical
and still provide a significant reduction in the
amount of rags entering the wet well. In general,
residents do not use more rags in wet weather
when flow rates to the lift stations are the highest.
However, we also realize that higher-than-normal
flow rates can dislodge rags that are caught up
in the sewers and temporarily cause a release of
significant rags in a slug.
The pump controls will be analyzed to
accommodate the temporary higher flow rates to
the wet well when the screen takes several steps
clearing the screen field. When this happens,
wastewater at a high flow rate will enter the wet
well. R/M will coordinate the screen controls
with the pump controls to optimize overall
performance.
The methodology of lining the existing force
main with its bends will be investigated. Detailed
specification and design will be completed based
on coordination with multiple contractors. R/M
has already started this process in the lift stations
Facilities Plan.
1
2
3
4
7
Page 111 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
• An initial size, location and configuration of the
Generator and Screenings Buildings.
• Three alternatives to the force main alignment for
each station.
• We will identify how the new force main for Old
Farm Lift will be constructed with respect to the
Village’s plan to reconstruct Division Road in 2027
from the Jefferson Creek to County Line Road.
• Force main lining methodology and
constructability.
R/M will meet and coordinate with the Village on
the preliminary and final Design Study Report. After
coordination with the Village and a decision on the
chosen route, a Final Design Study Report will be
issued along with 30% plans. The deliverables of this
report and plans are:
• Pump selection and hydraulic modeling for both
stations and force mains.
• Mechanical and HVAC design standards
consistent with code and safety requirements.
• Initial footprint, layout, size, and configuration for
the new Generator and Screenings Buildings.
• Initial electrical one-lines, MCC and PLC
configurations, and standby power needs.
• Wet well rehabilitation approach and confined-
space entry improvements.
• Open-trench force main construction sequencing
and traffic/restoration requirements.
• Geotechnical analysis of the lift station sites and
chosen force main route.
• 30% plans.
• Initial cost estimate.
The DSR will be reviewed collaboratively with Village
staff to ensure alignment before progressing to
detailed design.
3. Detailed Design (60% and 90% Submittals)
Design will proceed through structured milestones,
each accompanied by cost estimates and permitting
updates. Key design elements include:
Force Mains: Plan and profile drawings, air release
valves, connection/tie-in details, and lining approach
for the existing mains.
Lift Station Improvements: Pump sizing,
structural modifications, valve replacement details,
crane replacements, and wet well rehabilitation
specifications.
Buildings: Architectural, structural, HVAC, plumbing,
electrical, and controls design for both new buildings.
Electrical Systems: New MCCs, PLC panel design,
generator integration, grounding, and safety
compliance.
I&C and SCADA: Standardized controls architecture
that aligns with Village preferences. We will
coordinate the new designed controls and telemetry
equipment at each location with the Village’s SCADA
system. SCADA design will be completed. SCADA
integration (most of item Addendum 2, item 5.7.1) will
be completed in a future construction phase.
Constructability reviews at each stage ensure
safe sequencing, efficient tie-ins, and minimized
downtime.
4. Permitting and CWFP Coordination
We will prepare all WDNR submittals required for:
• WDNR lift station and force main plan review and
permitting.
• Environmental permits (floodplain, storm water,
wetland and waterway, other).
• CWFP Application and Financial Assistance
Agreement and loan closing coordination after
the bidding process.
Old Farm Hydraulic Curve From Study
8
Page 112 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
• Buy American Build American compliance and
material certifications.
Our team maintains up-to-date knowledge of WDNR
review timelines and will coordinate closely to avoid
schedule delays.
5. Public Bidding Support
We will prepare complete, biddable, and
clear contract documents including front-end
specifications consistent with CWFP requirements
(e.g. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise solicitation,
Federal wage rates, and Buy America, Build America
provisions). Bidding services include:
• Conducting a pre-bid meeting.
• Answering bidder questions.
• Managing addenda.
• Attending bid opening.
• Reviewing bids and preparing award
recommendations.
• Our scope includes bidding services for the Old
Farm and Main Street projects separately. Main
Street will likely be approximately one year after
the Old Farm bidding.
6. Construction-Period Support (If Authorized)
Although construction management is not part
of the RFP , our documents will be prepared with
construction-phase clarity in mind.
Subconsultants
R/M does not propose the use of subconsultants for
this project. We will complete all work in-house,
which will streamline coordination and support
efficient project delivery while keeping the project
on schedule.
PROJECT SUCCESS
We will utilize our technical expertise and knowledge
of the Village to deliver a high-quality design for
this crucial project. By grounding design decisions
in the Facilities Plan, engaging closely with
Village operators, and aligning with WDNR CWFP
requirements, we will deliver a project that meets
future growth needs, enhances safety, and extends
the life of critical wastewater assets.
Project Flexibility
The R/M team also offers the Village project
flexibility in the following aspects:
R/M will present the option to the
Village to bid the Old Farm lift station
and force main project approximately
1 year before the bid for the Main
Street lift station and force main.
R/M will present the option to the
Village to bid both lift stations and
force main together. In this case, there
would be one phase construction
project.
R/M will present three force main
route options for each lift station.
The Village can choose the option
that is optimum for cost and ongoing
maintenance.
9
Page 113 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
10
Project Manager
Dave Arnott, P .E.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Project Engineer
Ethan Botmen, P .E.
Electrical Engineer
Eric Widas
HVAC/Plumbing
Engineer
Joe Lomheim, P .E.
Structural
Engineer
Justine Siglin, P .E.
Client Liaison
Jerad Wegner, P .E.
SCADA Analyst
Dave Beyer
Project Engineer,
Quality Control
Don Heikkila, P .E.
Matt Mortwedt, Tim
Zimmerman, Kevin Driscoll
Environmental
Specialists
Kaley Simonis
Tiffany Wagner, AEP
Force Main
Project Engineers
Shane Davis, P .E.
Mike Blazejovsky
Page 114 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
DON HEIKKILA, P .E.
Project Engineer, Quality Control
Don brings more than 27 years of
experience in the water and wastewater
industry. He has expertise in process
mechanical, instrumentation, electrical, and building
systems. Don’s strong attention to detail and focus on
completeness support his role in quality assurance.
DAVE ARNOTT, P .E.
Project Manager
Dave will serve as the Project Manager
and oversee overall management for the
design and bidding phases. He has more
than 25 years of experience in the municipal water and
wastewater industry and has completed numerous lift
station projects. His expertise includes hydraulics, pump
selection, process mechanical design, and lift station
plumbing and HVAC. His experience spans the planning,
design, bidding, and construction phases.
ETHAN BOTMEN, P .E.
Project Engineer
Ethan will lead the site, process
mechanical, and building design. He has
four years of experience in the municipal
water and wastewater industry, including a recent design
project with upgrades at 21 lift station locations. Typical
improvements included pump replacements, hydraulic
upgrades, and building design.
DAVE BEYER
SCADA Analyst
Dave will assist Eric with the controls and
telemetry design for the new lift station
components. During construction, Dave
will lead telemetry coordination for alarms and generator
operational status. He will ensure this information is
integrated into the station PLC and communicated back
to the City’s main SCADA system.
ERIC WIDAS
Electrical Engineer
Eric will serve as the Project Engineer for
electrical and controls. He has completed
several lift station upgrades with new or
replacement natural gas powered standby generators.
He designs 480V power distribution for R/M water and
wastewater projects and has experience with SCADA
systems, including PLC programming. Eric will work
closely with Dave Beyer to ensure the correct controls,
SCADA, and telemetry components are specified for the
new station.
SHANE DAVIS, P .E.
MIKE BLAZEJOVSKY
Project Engineers
Mike will design the existing
force main lining and assist
Shane with the new force main design. They recently
completed the design and construction management of
7,000 feet of force main for the Lake Pewaukee Sanitary
District. They will apply this experience to the Village of
Germantown project.
JUSTINE SIGLIN, P .E.
Structural Engineer
Justine is a Senior Structural Engineer with
over a decade of experience in building
design and construction. She will lead the
building design for the Screening and Generator Buildings
at each lift station.
JOE LOMHEIM, P .E.
HVAC and Plumbing Engineer
Joe is a Senior Mechanical Engineer with
over 15 years of experience in building
systems design and construction with
plumbing and HVAC. He will lead the plumbing and HVAC
design for the Screening Building, Generator Building and
existing buildings at each lift station.
KALEY SIMONIS
TIFFANY WAGNER, AEP
Environmental Specialists
Kaley and Tiffany will oversee
environmental compliance,
including wetland and waterway disturbance permitting,
threatened endangered species compliance, and cultural,
archaeological, and historic compliance oversight.
11
OUR TEAM
Page 115 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
EXPERIENCE
Dave is an experienced project manager specializing in wastewater
infrastructure design and improvement. He has led numerous lift
station and treatment facility upgrades, focusing on enhancing
safety, efficiency, and providing capacity for future growth. Dave
has successfully managed projects involving influent pumping
system upgrades, screening facilities upgrades, and standby power
improvements. With a strong ability to lead multidisciplinary teams,
he ensures projects are completed on time and within budget
while prioritizing reliability and cost-effective solutions that benefit
operators and communities for decades.
LIFT STATION EXPERIENCE
Atkinson Street Lift Station Upgrade
Village of Mukwonago
This project upgraded the Village’s largest lift station by converting the existing dry pit station to a
submersible design, eliminating confined space hazards associated with the buried steel pump chamber. The
improvements significantly increased station capacity to support future development in the tributary area.
A new control building now houses the valves and controls near the wet well, and the station was upgraded
from a duplex to a triplex design. The enhanced system also resolved issues with rags accumulating on pump
impellers. The existing wet well was reused to reduce costs, and the station now operates without confined
spaces.
Wastewater Treatment Facility Influent Lift Station Upgrade
Village of Mukwonago
To meet increased influent pumping demands, this project converted an existing dry pit station with a buried
steel pump chamber into a modern dry pit design within a heated, well-lit, and ventilated pump room,
eliminating confined space hazards. The new underground pump room houses three larger-capacity dry pit
submersible pumps, piping, and valves, providing a peak hour capacity of 3,600 GPM. Upgraded pumps
prevent rag accumulation, improving facility operations. Variable speed drives and enhanced controls were
also implemented for better performance during peak events.
12
DAVID W. ARNOTT, P .E.
PROJECT MANAGER
With 27 years of municipal wastewater experience, Dave interfaces
with multiple internal project stakeholders to ensure alignment and
efficiency on the design process. He is committed to delivering
high-quality results and will work closely with the Village to
ensure a reliable, long-term solution for the Old Farm and Main
Street lift station and force main project. Dave realizes that close
communication with the Village throughout the design process is
critical to success.
• Screening Processes
• Hydraulics
• Mechanical Equipment
• Standby Power
• Energy Efficiency
• Force Main Design
EXPERTISE:
CONTACT
262.542.5733
darnott@ruekert-mielke.com
Waukesha
EDUCATION
• Master of Science, Civil
Engineering and Mechanics
- University of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee
• Bachelor of Science, Civil and
Environmental Engineering -
University of Wisconsin,
Madison
Page 116 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
DAVID W. ARNOTT, P .E.
PROJECT MANAGER
Kopmeier Drive Lift Station
Village of Pewaukee
This project upgrades the existing dry pit lift station
to a submersible design, eliminating confined space
hazards associated with the buried pump and valve
chamber. The improvements increase station capacity
to accommodate future growth in the tributary
area. A new adjacent control building will house
valves, controls, and a standby generator, while the
existing concrete wet well will be preserved with an
epoxy coating for longevity. Variable speed drives
will enhance pumping rate flexibility, and special
permitting was required due to the station’s proximity
to a railroad. This project is currently in construction.
Wastewater Treatment Facility Influent Lift
Station Upgrade
City of Columbus
The City needed extra capacity for its influent
pumping at the wastewater treatment facility. Five
vertical line shaft pumps were replaced with three
larger capacity dry pit submersible pumps for
maintenance considerations. The pumps were
located in an existing lower level pump room in a
building. Valve and pipe fitting changes were made
too. With the different style pumps, staff no longer
must grease shaft couplings at elevated levels
increasing safety. The station capacity was expanded
to over 3,500 gpm. The newer pumps no longer
catch rags improving the operation of the facility.
The pump motors were outfitted with variable speed
drives and the controls were upgraded for improved
operation during peak events.
Jericho Acres Lift Station Upgrade
City of Pewaukee
This project upgraded an existing dry pit station to
a submersible design, eliminating the buried steel
pump chamber and associated confined space
hazards. The existing wet well was reused to reduce
costs. A new building was constructed to house pump
controls, switchgear, valves, and a standby generator,
with valve access available from both inside and
outside the building. The upgrade also increased
station capacity to accommodate future development
in the tributary area.
WWTF UPGRADE EXPERIENCE
Wastewater Treatment Facility Screening
Upgrade
City of Columbus
The City replaced their screening facilities that were
located on the wet well deck level. The new screen
and washer/compactor were located on the finished
floor level. The upgrade improved operator safety
by eliminating the need to manually carry bagged
screenings up a staircase 25 feet deep on a daily
basis. The project greatly reduced the operators from
needing to access the lower level of the influent wet
well which contained hazardous gases. The project
included much updated screening and washing
equipment and ventilation equipment that benefited
the City with enhanced operations.
Grit Removal System Wastewater Treatment
Facility Upgrade
City of Oconomowoc
Project Manager for the replacement and upgrade
of the facilities grit removal system. Dave led a
technical team for planning. design, and construction
management for a newer, more efficient grit removal
system. This project included mechanical, hydraulic,
structural, electrical, and control components. The
upgraded system allowed the facility to capture more
grit protecting downstream processes and tanks.
Wastewater Treatment Facility & Screening
Addition
Village of Mukwonago
The Village replaced their comminuter (cutting and
grinding) facilities with screening facilities. A new
fine screen was placed in the lift station wet well
deck. Rags and debris were removed before the
wastewater fell to the lower wet well level. Screenings
were automatically transferred to the ground floor
level of a building addition where the screenings
compactor was located. Here, the screening were
washed and compacted before being compressed
and collected in a rolling dumpster for disposal.
The project included new plumbing, electrical
and HVAC equipment for code requirements. The
project allowed inert material to be removed at
the headworks of the facility instead of collecting
in downstream tanks and treatment processes. The
farm-applied biosolids from the facility are now
cleaner and do not contain rag material that was
previously only cut up in smaller pieces.
13
Page 117 of 181
ruekertmielke.com
Your Infrastructure Ally
Ethan has hands-on and project administration experience with a wide
range of municipal engineering and pursued his master’s studies to
focus on water and wastewater treatment. Ethan focused on studying
the biochemistry involved in treating a variety of constituents, as well as
experimenting with different water treatment technologies.
EXPERIENCE
Lift Station 13 Reconstruction
Lake Pewaukee Sanitary District
The goal of this project was to convert an existing wet well/dry well
“can-style” lift station into a submersible station without routine
confined entry concerns. Ethan assisted in the mechanical design of the
system and site design, as well as coordinating between disciplines for
a canopy-covered wet well and controls building.
Mukwonago WWTF Biosolids Study
Village of Mukwonago
For this ongoing study, Ethan checked calculations for solids
generation, developed conceptual designs for alternatives, and
conducted equipment sizing and cost coordination. This study will
provide the Village with a plan for more efficient management of their
biosolids including the potential to accept high strength waste.
Waterford Lift Station Upgrades
Waterford Sanitary District #1
This design project was to upgrade lift station facilities that were
determined to have undersized pumping capabilities in a previous
study. Ethan assisted in hydraulic calculations and subsequent
pump sizing. He also worked on the site and mechanical design at
multiple lift stations, and is currently assisting in ongoing construction
administration.
Main Street & Old Farm Lift Station Facilities Plan Report
Village of Germantown
This study focused on identifying the upgrades necessary for two major
lift stations in the Village. Ethan assisted in hydraulic calculations and
cost estimating for establishing a plan and budget for improvement.
Evergreen Lift Station Upgrades
City of Cedarburg
This project converted an existing wet well/dry well “can-style” lift
station into a submersible station with an above ground control and
valve building. Ethan was the project manager for this project and
designed the hydraulic and mechanical features as well as site design
for the lift station and nearby access driveway.
ETHAN J. BOTMEN, P .E.
PROJECT MANAGER
CONTACT
920.876.6382
ebotmen@ruekert-mielke.com
Green Bay
EDUCATION
• B.S. - Civil & Environmental
Engineering
- University of Wisconsin,
Madison
• M.S. - Civil & Environmental
Engineering
- University of Minnesota,
Twin Cities
REGISTRATIONS &
AFFILIATIONS
• Professional Engineer - WI
14
Page 118 of 181
ruekertmielke.com
Your Infrastructure Ally
Don has over 25 years of experience with planning, design, and
construction administration related to Wastewater Pumping, Wastewater
Treatment, and Water Supply and Treatment facilities. Don is the
engineer of record for the Erie Sewer Authority and is the project
manager for planning studies and capital projects for the City of Erie/
Erie Sewer Authority Wastewater Treatment Plant.
EXPERIENCE
Wastewater Treatment Facility Upgrade
City of Oconomowoc
Lead designer for grit removal system. Project involved replacing the
aeration system and grit collection and dewatering system for the
existing aerated grit chambers with an induced vortex stacked tray grit
removal system and the installation of grit pumps and high efficiency
grit classification and dewatering equipment. The project also involved
repairs and painting of circular sludge and scum collector mechanisms
in one primary clarifier and one secondary clarifier.
Wastewater Treatment Facility Upgrade
Village of Mukwonago
Lead designer. The project involved rehabilitating the existing floating
covers for anaerobic digesters, the addition of a pumped mixing
system for the anaerobic digesters, replacement of the grit pump and
grit classifier and dewatering equipment, enhancements to the grit
chamber, and the addition of a septage receiving station.
Wastewater Treatment Facilities Design & Planning
Sewage Lift Stations
Industrial Wastewater Treatment Design & Operation
Assistance
• Industrial Meat Processing
• Dairy/Cheese, WI & MN
CONTACT
920.876.6382
dheikkila@ruekert-mielke.com
Green Bay
EDUCATION
• B.S. - Environmental
Engineering
- Michigan Technological
University
REGISTRATIONS &
AFFILIATIONS
• Professional Engineer - WI, PA
• Central States Water
Environment Association
(CSWEA)
• Water Environment Federation
(WEF)
• Wisconsin Wastewater
Operators Association
(WWOA)
• American Waterworks
Association (AWWA)
DONALD J. HEIKKILA, P .E.
PROJECT ENGINEER, QA/QC
» professional « engineer
P .E.
• City of Oconomowoc
• City of Peshtigo
• Village of Suring
• Salem Utility District
• City of Waupaca
• City of Erie
• Town of Baileys Harbor
• Village of Mukwonago
• City of Oconto Falls
• Village of Crivitz
• Village of Suamico
• City of Peshtigo
• Village of Mishicot
• Kenosha County Parks
• Delevan Lake Sanitary District
• City of Columbus
• Village of Mukwonago
• Village of Crivitz
15
Page 119 of 181
16
ruekertmielke.com
SHANE DAVIS, PE
FORCE MAIN PROJECT
ENGINEER
Shane is a project engineer with experience in the design and planning
of water supply, distribution systems, and booster stations. Shane also
has experience with drinking water and wastewater treatment processes
design and construction administration.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
MIKE BLAZEJOVSKY
FORCE MAIN PROJECT
ENGINEER
• Water Distribution System Modeling | Village of Howard
• Well Head Protection Programs | Village of Oregon
• Well Site Investigation | Village of Menomonee Falls
Office
90.876.6382
Email
sdavis@ruekert-mielke.com
Education
Master of Science, Civil &
Environmental Engineering
- Brigham Young University, Utah
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering
- Brigham Young University, Idaho
Office
262.542.5733
Email
mblazejovsky@ruekert-mielke.com
Education
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering
- Marquette University
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Lift Station 13 Force Main | Lake Pewaukee Sanitary District
Shane designed 7,000 feet of new 16-inch force main for the LPSD’s Lift
Station 13. The force main is located under a county trunk highway and
was carefully designed around existing utilities including water, sewer,
gas, and communication lines. Shane’s responsibilities included creation
of project drawings, specifications, and project contract, obtain DNR
approval, and construction administration.
State Highway 117 Water Main Replacement | Village of Bondeul
Shane was the primary design engineer for a water main replacement
along State Highway 117. The project included roughly 2,700 feet of new
water main. Shane’s responsibilities included water main design and
writing project specifications for review within the Wisconsin Department
of Transportation.
Mike has extensive experience managing a wide variety of projects
including sanitary and storm sewer inspection, sewer condition analysis,
sewer main and lateral rehabilitation, chemical grouting, manhole
rehabilitation, sanitary and storm sewer design, sanitary sewer inflow
and infiltration studies, cost estimating, and quantity take-offs. Mike
also has unique field experience with hands-on installation of sewer,
water, and storm utilities as well as design, permitting, and installation of
Private Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (POWTS) in the State of
Wisconsin.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Sanitary Sewer System Facilities Plan | Village of Germantown
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Lift Station 13 Force Main | Lake Pewaukee Sanitary District
Completed design, bidding, and construction management for a
7,000 linear foot 16-inch diameter force main installation to serve a
new pumping station and alleviate capacity issues within the LPSD
sanitary system. The project required significant coordination with other
municipal and County stakeholders and was completed early and under
budget.
Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Rehabilitation | Lake Pewaukee Sanitary
District
Completed planning, design, bidding, and currently managing
construction of televising, lining, and grouting of the Sanitary District’s
main sanitary sewer interceptor, which showed signs of severe
deterioration in many locations. A key component of the project was
planning for bypass of the District’s main lift station, pumping almost
continuously through an existing 16” Force Main.
Page 120 of 181
17
ruekertmielke.com
JUSTINE SIGLIN, PE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
Justine is a Senior Structural Engineer with over a decade of experience
in building design and construction. She specializes in multi-story
wood, concrete, and steel structures, as well as architectural integration,
existing building analysis, and historic rehabilitation. As a team leader,
Justine manages projects from concept through completion, ensuring
tailored, cost-effective solutions that meet client goals.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
JOE LOMHEIM, PE
HVAC & PLUMBING
ENGINEER
• Reasoner Dam Analysis | City of Humboldt
• Muscatine County Maintenance Building | City of Muscatine
Office
319.519.6220
Email
jsiglin@axiom-con.com
Education
Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering (Structures)
- Iowa State University
Office
319.519.6220
Email
jlomheim@axiom-con.com
Education
Bachelor of Science, Mechanical
Engineering
- University of Iowa
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Lift Station 13 Reconstruction | Lake Pewaukee Sanitary District
Justine completed the structural design efforts, project drawings,
and specifications for a new control building, a new adjacent wet well
structure, and a canopy structure covering the wet well. The control
building was designed as a masonry structure with a wood framed roof,
supported on traditional shallow foundation system. The interior design
aspects of the control building included a recessed in ground control
room, generator pad, and equipment hoist beam. The wet well structure
was designed out of concrete and extended 36 feet below grade. The
owner also requested the design of a steel framed, open air, canopy
structure over the surface of the wet well. Integrated into the design of
the canopy was a hoist beam system and two operable roof hatches.
The roof hatches were controlled by a hydraulic ram system allowing
the hatches to be opened, providing the required access for pumping
equipment to easily gain entrance into the wet well for required
maintenance and pumping.
Joe is a Senior Mechanical Engineer with over 15 years of experience
in building systems design and construction. He leads the Mechanical,
Electrical, Plumbing, and Technology (MEPT) Division, specializing
in systems analysis, specialty studies, and building rehabilitation. He
oversees multidisciplinary coordination and ensures seamless delivery
from kickoff to completion. His expertise and leadership make him a
trusted consultant for integrated solutions that align with client goals.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
• The MoLo Historica Rehabilitation | City of Des Moines
• Field Day Brewery Co. | City of North Liberty
• MidAm Building Supply New HQ | City of Mount Pleasant
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Harrison Elementary School Additions & Renovations | City of Cedar
Rapids
Joe provided mechanical engineering leadership for the Harrison
Elementary School additions and renovations. His work included HVAC
system design, plumbing layouts, and integration with architectural plans
to ensure energy efficiency and occupant comfort.
Iowa River Power Building Rehabilitations | City of Coralville
Joe managed mechanical system upgrades for the historic Iowa River
Power Building. He focused on modernizing HVAC and plumbing
systems while preserving the building’s character and meeting current
code requirements.
Page 121 of 181
18
ruekertmielke.com
ERIC WIDAS
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
Eric has more than 34 years of design and project management
experience in the water, automotive, pulp and paper, food, packaging
and personal hygiene industries. Eric has a broad range of skill sets
including facility power distribution, generators, motor control,
instrumentation, CAD, and PLC/SCADA software.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
DAVE BEYER
SCADA ANALYST
• Lift Station Upgrades | Village of Hartland, Village of East Troy,
Village of Pewaukee
• Well 4 HMO Treatment Upgrade | Village of Pewaukee
• SCADA & PLC | City of New Berlin
• Wastewater Treatment Facility Aeration Expansion | Village of Slinger
• Booster Station Upgrades | City of Muskego
Office
920.876.6382
Email
ewidas@ruekert-mielke.com
Education
Bachelor of Science, Electrical
Engineering
- Michigan Technological University
Office
262.542.5733
Email
dbeyer@ruekert-mielke.com
Education
Associate of Science, Electrical
Engineering Technology
- Wisconsin School of Electronics
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Lift Station Upgrades | Waterford Sanitary District
20 Lift Station upgrades included electrical designs for three new
generator/pump control buildings, new pump control panel specification
for all locations, instrumentation and PLC/SCADA upgrades.
Well 3 Upgrade & Well 6 Building | Village of Oregon
Well 3 upgrade included electrical designs for replacing an existing
MCC, new outdoor generator, chemical rooms additions, SCADA/PLC
panel replacement, and other facility upgrades. Well 6 new construction
included electrical designs for a MCC, building lighting, HVAC, chemical
rooms, filter system, PLC/SCADA panel, and generator.
Dave brings over 30 years of SCADA experience that includes the
design, configuration, start-up, training, and operations support of
SCADA systems for water and wastewater utilities.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
• SCADA System Design & Analysis
• Design & Integration of Controls and SCADA Telemetry (Lift Station
Rehabilitation/Upgrade)
• PLC Programming & Network Design
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Water & Wastewater Utility - SCADA System | Village of Grafton
Responsibilities included: Evaluation of SCADA system status and
preparation of System Analysis report; SCADA system hardware and
software design; SCADA computer network and radio network design;
supervision of radio system hardware installation and configuration;
coordination of the project team throughout system design and
deployment; on-going support for the entire SCADA system.
Village of Germantown
• SCADA Service Work
• SCADA Upgrades
• Goldendale Booster SCADA
Integration
• Well 4 Controls & SCADA
• Well 7 SCADA PLC Integration
• Well 12 SCADA Integration
• SCADA Radio System Upgrade
Page 122 of 181
19
ruekertmielke.com
KALEY SIMONIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
SPECIALIST & PERMITTING
Kaley brings more than 15 years of experience in environmental project
management and planning. She specializes in complex permitting, and
excels in coordinating field data collection, government communication,
and stakeholder engagement to ensure the successful completion of
permit applications. Her strategic approach to ecological assessments
has led to the successful delineation, routing, and oversight of
environmentally sensitive projects.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
TIFFANY WAGNER,
AEP
ENVIRONMENTAL
SPECIALIST & PERMITTING
• NEPA/WEPA Environmental Assessments for Clean Water Fund/Safe
Drinking Water Loan Programs and Community Development Block
Grant
Office
920.486.6628
Email
ksimonis@ruekert-mielke.com
Education
Bachelor of Science, Environmental
Studies, Business Minor,
Concentration in Leadership &
Management
- California University, Pennsylvania
Office
262.953.3050
Email
twagner@ruekert-mielke.com
Education
Bachelor of Science, Environmental
Studies, Minor in Geoscience
- University of Wisconsin, Parkside
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Wisconsin Public Service Commission (PSC) Construction Authoriza-
tions
Kaley facilitates project planning and guidance for clients to meet
PSC’s Application Filing Requirements for critical infrastructure projects,
including water towers, wells, and treatment facilities.
Clean Water Act 401/404 Permitting
Kaley has been performing wetland and waterway disturbance
permitting and compliance for over 15 years. She has worked across
the state of Wisconsin to facilitate compliance for projects ranging from
private development to large scale municipal infrastructure, and utility
scale development. She provides guidance during sitting to facilitate
compliance and scheduling.
Tiffany plays a key role in integrating environmental considerations
into project development and ensuring regulatory compliance. She has
supported environmental review efforts for municipal, utility, and private
sector projects, including Certified ER Reviews, NEPA/WEPA reviews
under the SDWLP , and wetland and waterway permitting and field
assessments. Her work includes evaluating natural resource impacts,
coordinating with regulatory agencies, and providing field data to
support project planning.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Wetland and Waterway Delineation
• Safe Drinking Water Loan Program Environmental Review
• Wisconsin Public Service Commission (PSC) Construction
Authorization
PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS
Certified Endangered Resource (ER) Review
Perform ER Reviews to screen a proposed project area for potential
impacts on endangered resources like rare plants, animals, and natural
communities for clients.
Wetland and Waterway Permitting Compliance
Support municipal, utility, and private sector projects through
preparation and coordination of state and federal wetland and waterway
permits. Experience includes permitting for road improvements, paths,
water main extensions, and other infrastructure. Responsibilities include
impact evaluation, preparing applications, coordinating with regulators,
and ensuring compliance.
Page 123 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
R/M has partnered successfully with dozens of municipal clients over the past 40 years to complete lift station,
force main, and screening projects. The table below highlights our experience with these project types. It
includes brief project descriptions, a dot matrix illustrating similarities to the Germantown components, the
R/M staff who completed the work and are part of this project team, and reference information.
20
LIFT STATION, FORCE MAIN,
SCREENING FACILITIES PROJECT
EXPERIENCE
Client/Project
Name Project Components
Clean Water Fund
Screening
Facilities
Building
Standby Generator
Team/Area of Responsibility Contact
City of Columbus
WWTF Screening
Facilities
Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor.
Design of building addition to house screening equipment. HVAC
upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Peter Gallun
920-630-0037
WI Dept of Admin.
Div. of Facilities
Development Oshkosh
Correctional Institute
Design new heavy duty screenings facilities with fine screen and
washer/compactor. Design of building addition to house screening
equipment. HVAC upgrades. Plumbing upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Kathy
Kalscheur
(retired)
Village of Mukwonago
WWTF Upgrade
Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor.
Design of building addition to house screening equipment. HVAC
upgrades. Plumbing upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building Wayne Castle
262-441-1366
City of Oconomowoc
WWTF Septage
Receiving
Improvements
Project management of new septage receiving screening facilities, lift
station, and storage system. X X
Dave Arnott - Administration and
Management
Mike Hallada - Inspection
Tim Reel
262-569-2192
Lake Pewaukee
Sanitary District
Lift Station 13
Reconstruction
Design of 7,000 feet of 16-inch PVC force main. Design of new lift
station, with chopper pumps for rags, building design and canopy design.
Project includes standby generator.
X X X
Dave Arnott, Ethan Botmen - Mechanical
and Building
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Shane Davis - Force Main
Justine Siglin - Structural
Joe Loheim, Plumbing and HVAC
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Tom Koepp
262-333-9603
City of Cedarburg
Evergreen Lift Station
Upgrade
Design of new lift station to replace a dry pit station, also included new
wet well and bike path. X X
Ethan Botmen - Mechanical and Buildings
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Mike Weiser
262-375-7900
Town of Waterford
Sanitary District No. 1
Lift Station Upgrades
Design of upgrades at 21 lift stations. Upgrades included new pumps,
buildings, generators, controls, and SCADA system. X X X
Ethan Botmen, Dave Arnott - Mechanical
and Buildings
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Dan Dickinson
414-331-0065
City of Oconomowoc
Northeast Park Lift
Station
New submersible lift station. Provide generator inside new park shelter
building. X X Dave Arnott - Structural, Mechanical, and
Site Work
Tim Reel
262-569-2192
Village of Mukwonago
Atkinson Dr. Lift Station
Add generator and vavle building. Replace controls and valves. Convert
station to submersible design. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Dave Brown
262-363-6416
City of Columbus
Kiwanis Lift Station
Renovation
Flow rate analysis with pump run time data, pump replacement and
generator addition, wet well mixing system addition. X Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Peter Gallun
920-623-5915
Village of Hartland
Crystal Drive Lift Station
Renovation
Building addition, generator addition, telemetry upgrade. X X Dave Arnott - Building Tom Jenson
262-367-8168
City of Cedarburg
Dorchester Dr. Lift
Station
Convert drypit station to submersible design. Provide piping and valves in
new generator building. X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Mike Wieser
262-375-7900
Village of Benseville
Redmond Reservoir
Pump Station
Upgrade
Storm water pump station rehabilitation including mechanical. Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Mehul Patel
630-350-3405
City of Crystal Lake
Lift Station 12 upgrade Pump replacement, piping upgrades & MCC replacement. Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Dan Langguth
815-459-
2020, ext.
4169
Village of Dousman
Main Street Lift Station
New submersible lift station with building. Electrical & piping upgrades.
New force main & gravity sewer. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan, Mechanical, and
Force Main 262-965-3302
City of Muskego
McShane Dr. Lift
Station
Wet well rehabilitation. Emergency force main to creek. Valve
replacement. Controls replacement. Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Tim Bourdo
262-679-4100
Village of Mukwonago
Black Bear Lift Station New submersible lift station with building. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Dave Brown
262-363-6416
City of Pewaukee
Northmound Dr. Lift
Station
Replace generator and building. Replace controls. Add auxiliary pump
connection. Rehabilitate maintenance elevator. Re-route force main.
Reconfigure site. Provide temporary pumping facilities.
X Dave Arnott - Mechanical, Structural and
Site Plan
Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
City of Oconomowoc
Lily Rd. Lift Station
Replace valves. Replace pumps and a portion of force main.
Incorporation of salvaged control panel. Add wet well riser sections. Add
valve manhole.
Dave Arnott - Mechanical, and Force Main Tim Reel
262-569-2192
City of Pewaukee
Jericho Acres Lift
Station
Convert drypit station to submersible design. Provide piping and valves in
new generator building. X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
Village of Menomonee
Falls
Menomonee Ave Lift
Stations and Force Main
Wet weather sewage lift stations & force main. Reroute sewage to
another party of collection system with greater capacity. Project included
12,000 feet of 12-inch forcemain.
X Dave Arnott - Main and Gravity Sewer
Force
Tom Hoffman
262-535-4415
Village of Germantown
Lift Station No. 6
Replace generator in relocated building. Replace pumps, valves, drives
and controls. Replace manhole decks. Provide temporary pumping
facilities.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Structural
Tim
Zimmerman
262-253-7765
Village of Hartland
Arlene Dr. Lift Station
Updated controls, added VFDs, replace pumps. Provide temporary
pumping facilities. X
Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical
Dave Beyer - Controls and SCADA
Tom Jenson
262-367-8168
City of Pewaukee
Kopmeier Dr. Lift
Station
Replace pumps. Add valve manhole. Replace generator, building and
controls. Provide temporary pumping facilities. Draw down testing. X Dave Arnott - Mechanical, Structural and
Site Work
Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
Village of Dousman
WWTF Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor X X X Dave Arnott- Mechnical and Process 262-965-3302
Page 124 of 181
Ruekert Mielke
Your Infrastructure Ally
ruekertmielke.com
21
Client/Project
Name Project Components
Clean Water Fund
Screening
Facilities
Building
Standby Generator
Team/Area of Responsibility Contact
City of Columbus
WWTF Screening
Facilities
Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor.
Design of building addition to house screening equipment. HVAC
upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Peter Gallun
920-630-0037
WI Dept of Admin.
Div. of Facilities
Development Oshkosh
Correctional Institute
Design new heavy duty screenings facilities with fine screen and
washer/compactor. Design of building addition to house screening
equipment. HVAC upgrades. Plumbing upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Kathy
Kalscheur
(retired)
Village of Mukwonago
WWTF Upgrade
Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor.
Design of building addition to house screening equipment. HVAC
upgrades. Plumbing upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building Wayne Castle
262-441-1366
City of Oconomowoc
WWTF Septage
Receiving
Improvements
Project management of new septage receiving screening facilities, lift
station, and storage system. X X
Dave Arnott - Administration and
Management
Mike Hallada - Inspection
Tim Reel
262-569-2192
Lake Pewaukee
Sanitary District
Lift Station 13
Reconstruction
Design of 7,000 feet of 16-inch PVC force main. Design of new lift
station, with chopper pumps for rags, building design and canopy design.
Project includes standby generator.
X X X
Dave Arnott, Ethan Botmen - Mechanical
and Building
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Shane Davis - Force Main
Justine Siglin - Structural
Joe Loheim, Plumbing and HVAC
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Tom Koepp
262-333-9603
City of Cedarburg
Evergreen Lift Station
Upgrade
Design of new lift station to replace a dry pit station, also included new
wet well and bike path. X X
Ethan Botmen - Mechanical and Buildings
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Mike Weiser
262-375-7900
Town of Waterford
Sanitary District No. 1
Lift Station Upgrades
Design of upgrades at 21 lift stations. Upgrades included new pumps,
buildings, generators, controls, and SCADA system. X X X
Ethan Botmen, Dave Arnott - Mechanical
and Buildings
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Dan Dickinson
414-331-0065
City of Oconomowoc
Northeast Park Lift
Station
New submersible lift station. Provide generator inside new park shelter
building. X X Dave Arnott - Structural, Mechanical, and
Site Work
Tim Reel
262-569-2192
Village of Mukwonago
Atkinson Dr. Lift Station
Add generator and vavle building. Replace controls and valves. Convert
station to submersible design. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Dave Brown
262-363-6416
City of Columbus
Kiwanis Lift Station
Renovation
Flow rate analysis with pump run time data, pump replacement and
generator addition, wet well mixing system addition. X Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Peter Gallun
920-623-5915
Village of Hartland
Crystal Drive Lift Station
Renovation
Building addition, generator addition, telemetry upgrade. X X Dave Arnott - Building Tom Jenson
262-367-8168
City of Cedarburg
Dorchester Dr. Lift
Station
Convert drypit station to submersible design. Provide piping and valves in
new generator building. X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Mike Wieser
262-375-7900
Village of Benseville
Redmond Reservoir
Pump Station
Upgrade
Storm water pump station rehabilitation including mechanical. Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Mehul Patel
630-350-3405
City of Crystal Lake
Lift Station 12 upgrade Pump replacement, piping upgrades & MCC replacement. Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Dan Langguth
815-459-
2020, ext.
4169
Village of Dousman
Main Street Lift Station
New submersible lift station with building. Electrical & piping upgrades.
New force main & gravity sewer. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan, Mechanical, and
Force Main 262-965-3302
City of Muskego
McShane Dr. Lift
Station
Wet well rehabilitation. Emergency force main to creek. Valve
replacement. Controls replacement. Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Tim Bourdo
262-679-4100
Village of Mukwonago
Black Bear Lift Station New submersible lift station with building. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Dave Brown
262-363-6416
City of Pewaukee
Northmound Dr. Lift
Station
Replace generator and building. Replace controls. Add auxiliary pump
connection. Rehabilitate maintenance elevator. Re-route force main.
Reconfigure site. Provide temporary pumping facilities.
X Dave Arnott - Mechanical, Structural and
Site Plan
Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
City of Oconomowoc
Lily Rd. Lift Station
Replace valves. Replace pumps and a portion of force main.
Incorporation of salvaged control panel. Add wet well riser sections. Add
valve manhole.
Dave Arnott - Mechanical, and Force Main Tim Reel
262-569-2192
City of Pewaukee
Jericho Acres Lift
Station
Convert drypit station to submersible design. Provide piping and valves in
new generator building. X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
Village of Menomonee
Falls
Menomonee Ave Lift
Stations and Force Main
Wet weather sewage lift stations & force main. Reroute sewage to
another party of collection system with greater capacity. Project included
12,000 feet of 12-inch forcemain.
X Dave Arnott - Main and Gravity Sewer
Force
Tom Hoffman
262-535-4415
Village of Germantown
Lift Station No. 6
Replace generator in relocated building. Replace pumps, valves, drives
and controls. Replace manhole decks. Provide temporary pumping
facilities.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Structural
Tim
Zimmerman
262-253-7765
Village of Hartland
Arlene Dr. Lift Station
Updated controls, added VFDs, replace pumps. Provide temporary
pumping facilities. X
Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical
Dave Beyer - Controls and SCADA
Tom Jenson
262-367-8168
City of Pewaukee
Kopmeier Dr. Lift
Station
Replace pumps. Add valve manhole. Replace generator, building and
controls. Provide temporary pumping facilities. Draw down testing. X Dave Arnott - Mechanical, Structural and
Site Work
Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
Village of Dousman
WWTF Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor X X X Dave Arnott- Mechnical and Process 262-965-3302
Client/Project
Name Project Components
Clean Water Fund
Screening
Facilities
Building
Standby Generator
Team/Area of Responsibility Contact
City of Columbus
WWTF Screening
Facilities
Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor.
Design of building addition to house screening equipment. HVAC
upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Peter Gallun
920-630-0037
WI Dept of Admin.
Div. of Facilities
Development Oshkosh
Correctional Institute
Design new heavy duty screenings facilities with fine screen and
washer/compactor. Design of building addition to house screening
equipment. HVAC upgrades. Plumbing upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Kathy
Kalscheur
(retired)
Village of Mukwonago
WWTF Upgrade
Design new screenings facilities with fine screen and washer/compactor.
Design of building addition to house screening equipment. HVAC
upgrades. Plumbing upgrades.
X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical and Building Wayne Castle
262-441-1366
City of Oconomowoc
WWTF Septage
Receiving
Improvements
Project management of new septage receiving screening facilities, lift
station, and storage system. X X
Dave Arnott - Administration and
Management
Mike Hallada - Inspection
Tim Reel
262-569-2192
Lake Pewaukee
Sanitary District
Lift Station 13
Reconstruction
Design of 7,000 feet of 16-inch PVC force main. Design of new lift
station, with chopper pumps for rags, building design and canopy design.
Project includes standby generator.
X X X
Dave Arnott, Ethan Botmen - Mechanical
and Building
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Shane Davis - Force Main
Justine Siglin - Structural
Joe Loheim, Plumbing and HVAC
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Tom Koepp
262-333-9603
City of Cedarburg
Evergreen Lift Station
Upgrade
Design of new lift station to replace a dry pit station, also included new
wet well and bike path. X X
Ethan Botmen - Mechanical and Buildings
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Mike Weiser
262-375-7900
Town of Waterford
Sanitary District No. 1
Lift Station Upgrades
Design of upgrades at 21 lift stations. Upgrades included new pumps,
buildings, generators, controls, and SCADA system. X X X
Ethan Botmen, Dave Arnott - Mechanical
and Buildings
Eric Widas, Dave Beyer - Electrical and
Controls
Don Heikkila - QA/QC
Dan Dickinson
414-331-0065
City of Oconomowoc
Northeast Park Lift
Station
New submersible lift station. Provide generator inside new park shelter
building. X X Dave Arnott - Structural, Mechanical, and
Site Work
Tim Reel
262-569-2192
Village of Mukwonago
Atkinson Dr. Lift Station
Add generator and vavle building. Replace controls and valves. Convert
station to submersible design. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Dave Brown
262-363-6416
City of Columbus
Kiwanis Lift Station
Renovation
Flow rate analysis with pump run time data, pump replacement and
generator addition, wet well mixing system addition. X Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Peter Gallun
920-623-5915
Village of Hartland
Crystal Drive Lift Station
Renovation
Building addition, generator addition, telemetry upgrade. X X Dave Arnott - Building Tom Jenson
262-367-8168
City of Cedarburg
Dorchester Dr. Lift
Station
Convert drypit station to submersible design. Provide piping and valves in
new generator building. X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Don Heikkila - Electrical and Controls
Mike Wieser
262-375-7900
Village of Benseville
Redmond Reservoir
Pump Station
Upgrade
Storm water pump station rehabilitation including mechanical. Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Mehul Patel
630-350-3405
City of Crystal Lake
Lift Station 12 upgrade Pump replacement, piping upgrades & MCC replacement. Dave Arnott - Mechanical
Dan Langguth
815-459-
2020, ext.
4169
Village of Dousman
Main Street Lift Station
New submersible lift station with building. Electrical & piping upgrades.
New force main & gravity sewer. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan, Mechanical, and
Force Main 262-965-3302
City of Muskego
McShane Dr. Lift
Station
Wet well rehabilitation. Emergency force main to creek. Valve
replacement. Controls replacement. Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Tim Bourdo
262-679-4100
Village of Mukwonago
Black Bear Lift Station New submersible lift station with building. X X Dave Arnott - Site Plan and Mechanical Dave Brown
262-363-6416
City of Pewaukee
Northmound Dr. Lift
Station
Replace generator and building. Replace controls. Add auxiliary pump
connection. Rehabilitate maintenance elevator. Re-route force main.
Reconfigure site. Provide temporary pumping facilities.
X Dave Arnott - Mechanical, Structural and
Site Plan
Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
City of Oconomowoc
Lily Rd. Lift Station
Replace valves. Replace pumps and a portion of force main.
Incorporation of salvaged control panel. Add wet well riser sections. Add
valve manhole.
Dave Arnott - Mechanical, and Force Main Tim Reel
262-569-2192
City of Pewaukee
Jericho Acres Lift
Station
Convert drypit station to submersible design. Provide piping and valves in
new generator building. X X Dave Arnott - Mechanical Jane Mueller
262-691-0804
Village of Menomonee
Falls
Menomonee Ave Lift
Stations and Force Main
Wet weather sewage lift station
Text truncated. Open the original for the full document.
Source: Village of Germantown website. First collected Oct 18, 2026.