Plan Commission — Minutes
Village of Germantown · Washington County · Plan Commission · meeting of Feb 9, 2026 · Minutes
Open the original document More from Village of Germantown
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
MEETING: REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION
DATE AND TIME: Monday, February 9, 2026 6:30 PM
LOCATION: Germantown Village Hall Board Room
N112 W17001 Mequon Road
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: This meeting has been given public notice in accordance with
Section 19.83 and 19.84, Wis. Stats, in such form that will apprise the general public
and news media of subject matter that is intended for consideration and action.
II. ROLL CALL:
Committee Members Warren, Shadid, Tarantino, Williams and Ewert were all
present. Committee Members Soderberg and Henk were absent excused. Also
present were Community Development Director Retzlaff, Associate Planner Yanke
and Administrative Coordinator Remich (both via Webex).
Motion: Appoint Trustee Warren as Chairman Pro Tem
Motioned By: William Shadid
Seconded By: Josh Tarantino
Yes: Robert Warren, William Shadid, Robert Williams, Josh Tarantino, Russell Ewert
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 5, No 0, Abstained 0)
III. CITIZEN INPUT/PUBLIC APPEARANCE: (Please be advised per 19.84(2) that
information and comment will be received from the public. It is the policy of this
municipality that public input be limited to a four (4) minute period per person with a
time extension granted at the discretion of the Chairperson. Be advised that there may
be limited discussion of the information received but no action will be taken under
public comments.) Comments that may be injurious to village personnel or other
individuals will not be allowed.
Citizens that spoke included:
Melanie Smythe who lives on Cedar Lane.
Sarah Larson who lives on Butternut Road.
IV. MEETING MINUTES:
A. PC Minutes 1-12-26
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: William Shadid
Seconded By: Josh Tarantino
Yes: Robert Warren, William Shadid, Robert Williams, Josh Tarantino, Russell Ewert
No: None
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 5, No 0, Abstained 0)
Page 2
V. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Premier Real Estate Management, LLC, Agent for Victory Place, LLC, Property
Owner. Application for Rezoning 6.87 acres from the I: Institutional Zoning
District to the Rm-2: Multiple-Family Residential Zoning District for a 48-unit
multi-family residential development located on Fond du Lac Avenue and
Crimson Road (approximately W140 N9889 Fond du Lac Avenue) in the
Victory Center Corridor. (PUBLIC HEARING & ACTION)
Director Retzlaff reviewed the history of multifamily proposals that have been brought
to the Plan Commission for this location, with the last one being in 2024 which was
denied due to the density. Retzlaff gave a brief summary of the current proposal and
stated that this plan is consistent with the 2050 plan for the Victory Center Corridor
and is an acceptable use. Retzlaff introduced Emily McFarland and Josh Kenitzer from
PRE/3 Development. McFarland went over the background of PRE/3 and gave a
review of their proposal and layout, which included four, 12-unit buildings totaling 48
homes each with 2-bedrooms and bathrooms, an attached garage with an onsite
management office. The entrance to the development will be off Fond du Lac Avenue.
Their goal is to begin construction in 2026 with home rentals to begin by the Fall of
2027. The density of the proposed project is in the 6.8/acre range, which is lower than
the allowed density. Retzlaff went over the Village's housing ratio, financial and school
district impacts and the potential for a bicycle/walking path through the development.
He also stated that the Crimson Road extension if not critical to the local road system
and could be abandoned.
Chairman Warren opened the Public Hearing at 7:08pm.
Residents that spoke included:
Jo Landry who lives on Knollcrest Circle was against the proposal due to the increased
traffic, crime, noise and thinks property values will go down.
Todd Steiner who lives on Fond du Lac Avenue was against the proposal because he
doesn't want any rentals, only owner-occupied homes.
Kim Glasshof who lives on Amber Drive is also against the proposal for the same
reasons as Todd Steiner.
Chairman Warren closed the Public Hearing at 7:20pm.
Discussion Followed.
Plan Commission members' were positive about the lower density, private roads,
walking path, onsite management and enhanced landscaping. Retzlaff stated that
there is no Village ordinance that mandates only owner-occupied developments are
allowed. And he stated that no other types of development for this property have been
brought forward to the Plan Commission other than multifamily in years. McFarland
stated they submitted references, and they have similar products in many of our
surrounding communities. They encourage residents to drive by those developments
and reach out to those references. Kenitzer stated they maintain all their properties
and do not outsource their property management. Tenants are signed to 12-month
leases and continue with month-to-month after that, a security deposit is required, and
they perform background and criminal checks on prospective tenants. Commissioners
feel that multifamily is an important part of a healthy community, single family housing
in this corridor just doesn't work.
Page 3
Staff recommends approval of this request to rezone the 7-acre Victory Place LLC
property from the I: Institutional to the Rm-3: Multi-Family Residential Zoning District
for purposes of developing a 48-unit multifamily residential community subject to the
following conditions:
1. The final arrangement of buildings, parking, access and internal circulation,
stormwater management facilities, public & private utilities, landscaping &
lighting, sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and other amenities, the final number,
density, and type of buildings and dwelling units, building architecture and
materials, emergency vehicle access, and all other features of the development
will be determined through the site development and building plan review and
approval process. Detailed site development and building plans shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Plan Commission pursuant to Section
17.43 of the Zoning Code prior to the issuance of any permits authorizing
construction. Said plans shall be generally consistent with the Proposed Site
Plan dated December 16, 2025, and conceptual elevations and renderings
submitted in the rezoning application in terms of the number and layout of
buildings and dwelling units, architecture and materials, access intersection and
internal street layout.
2. A certified survey map (CSM) is required to combine the two parcels that
comprise the Victory Place LLC property (GTNV_354978 & 354963) and
memorialize the right-of-way vacation of Crimson Road through and adjacent to
the property. Said CSM shall be submitted for Village approval prior to or
concurrent with Site Development & Building Plan approval.
3. If the Village does not require the developer to construct the Crimson Road
extension to Fond du Lac Ave/STH145 and agrees to vacate the Crimson Road
right-of-way through the property, the developer shall:
o Work cooperatively with the Village and pay all costs associated with
said right-of-way vacation;
o Accommodate any/all utility connections deemed necessary by the
Village to/from the existing segment of Crimson Road;
o Provide emergency access to/from the existing Crimson Road at the
southwest corner of the property if deemed necessary by the Village as
part of the site development and building plan approval process. The
design of said emergency access to be reviewed and approved by the
Village Engineer in cooperation with the Village Fire Department;
o Include in the detailed site development plans a pedestrian/bicycle path
to be installed along the southern property line starting at the existing
Crimson Road segment west of the PRE/3 property and then across and
through the multifamily development to connect to the required sidewalk
along the west side of Fond du Lac Avenue. The design of said
pedestrian/bicycle path to be reviewed and approved by the Village
Engineer in cooperation with the Village Parks & Recreation Department;
4. As deemed necessary through the site development and building plan approval
process, the developer will be required to enter into a Development Agreement
with the Village pursuant to section 17.43 of the Zoning Code to address the
responsibility for and timing of public and private improvements, including but
not limited to the installation of water and sewer utilities, landscaping and street
Page 4
trees, storm water management facilities, roadway & intersection
improvements, pedestrian path & sidewalk, and any other provision(s) deemed
necessary by the Village. Unless otherwise provided for in the Development
Agreement, all development shall meet and comply with all applicable Village
Code requirements and design standards for public improvements, including
the construction of sidewalk adjacent to and the full length of property frontage
along Fond du Lac Avenue.
5. Fond du Lac Avenue/STH 145 is under WisDOT access jurisdiction. A traffic
impact analysis (TIA) shall be prepared to assess potential traffic impact on the
abutting street system and the potential need for intersection improvements on
Fond du Lac Ave/STH145. Said TIA to be prepared and submitted prior to or
concurrent with Village Site Development & Building Plan review.
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: William Shadid
Seconded By: Josh Tarantino
Yes: Robert Warren, Robert Williams, Josh Tarantino
No: William Shadid, Russell Ewert
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 3, No 2, Abstained 0)
B. Bradley Jansen, Agent and Prospective Owner for Rao Farms, LLC, Property
Owner. Application to amend/transfer Conditional Use Permit No. 6-12 for the
“Operation of a Commercial Stable and Horse Boarding Facility” pursuant to
Section 17.13(2)(jj) of the Village Zoning Code from property located at
N136W21238-21342 Bonniwell Road. (PUBLIC HEARING & ACTION)
Director Retzlaff stated that Brad Jansen, the applicant and prospective owner of the
property, has applied for a CUP to allow the operation of a commercial stable and
horse boarding facility at the location. Although the write-up included in the packet
indicated this is a transfer of an existing CUP that was issued for the same use back in
2012 to the current owner, the Village will actually be issuing a new CUP to the
applicant if approved as the existing CUP had a condition that it's non-transferable.
The only change from the existing operation proposed by the applicant under a new
CUP is an increase in the maximum number of horses allowed to be kept on site, from
12 to 18 horses for the commercial operation.
Chairman Warren opened the Public Hearing at 8pm.
No residents came forward to speak.
Chairman Warren closed the Public Hearing at 8:01pm.
Staff recommends approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the operation of a
commercial stable and horse boarding facility at N136W21238-21342 Bonniwell Road,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The uses and activities allowed on the property shall be limited to those uses
and activities specified in the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application
documents received January 5, 2026. Days and hours of operation shall be
limited to those specified in the CUP documents submitted to the Village.
Page 5
2. The total number of horses allowed to be kept on site at any one time that are
not owned by the property owner shall not exceed eighteen (18). Hours of
operation shall be Monday to Sunday 7AM– 7PM.
3. All manure shall be disposed of in a manner that does not create a nuisance
affecting adjacent and/or nearby property owners. The spreading of manure on
site or on adjacent land shall be in accordance with accepted practices and all
applicable DNR regulations.
4. The owner/operator is responsible for reporting any significant changes in the
type, intensity, amount, or location of the land uses and activities, days and
hours of operation, size or location or other operational characteristics of said
uses and activities authorized under this CUP to the Village Zoning
Administrator.
5. If the use, activities and/or operation subject of this permit fall out of conformity
with the conditions herein, or, where there is a change in the nature, character,
intensity or extent of the activities or uses which cause problems or harmful
effects that were not anticipated at the time of approval of this CUP, the
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) may be modified or terminated by the Village
Board by the amendment to or addition of conditions after public hearing
thereon.
6. All temporary and permanent exterior signs require a permit and shall comply
with all current sign regulations. Off-premises advertising and directional
signage is regulated by the Village and requires a permit if/when allowed.
7. All future site improvements, including all building, parking area, landscaping,
stormwater management facilities, signage, exterior lighting, and any other
improvements made to or on the property that are necessary for the land uses
and activities authorized under this CUP shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Village through the Zoning Permit or Site Plan application
process as determined by the Village Zoning Administrator. If required, Site
Plan review and approval will include Plan Commission review and approval.
8. Pursuant to Section 17.47 of the Zoning Code, if the Village observes and/or
receives complaints regarding negative impacts associated with and/or created
by business-related activities conducted on the property, including but not
limited to noise, dust or other airborne materials, the Property Owner/Operator
shall work with the Village to identify the source of such impact(s), evaluate
alternative mitigation measures, and implement a mutually-agreeable solution
to mitigating the impact(s).
9. This Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall be non-transferable. In the event there
is a change in the owner/operator of the commercial stable and horse boarding
facility for which this CUP was issued, this CUP shall become null and void. If
the owner/operator wants to operate a commercial stable and horse boarding
facility, a new CUP would have to be obtained pursuant to Sections 17.13 and
17.42 of the Zoning Code to operate said business from this property.
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: William Shadid
Seconded By: Josh Tarantino
Yes: Robert Warren, William Shadid, Robert Williams, Josh Tarantino, Russell Ewert
No: None
Page 6
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 5, No 0, Abstained 0)
C. Lisa Burck, Innovative Signs, Agent for Truck Country of WI, Inc. property
owner; N128 W21795 Holy Hill Road; Sign Application for wall and monument
signage. (ACTION)
Director Retzlaff reviewed the sign proposal for wall and monument signage, including
a monument sign on the southwest corner of the property along the highway as well as
multiple wall signs. The proposed wall signs are code compliant. There is a provision
in the zoning code that provides for taller monument signs due to topographical
challenges, allowing up to a maximum height of 75' but cannot be more than 25' higher
topographically than the highest roadway within 200' of the sign location. The overall
size can be increased up to 144' sqft per side or 288' sqft on all sides. This property
sits very low, so this sign would need to be taller to be seen from the freeway, but
cannot be higher than the elevation of the nearby off-ramp. They are requesting an
increase in height of the sign from 10' to 50'. There are six criteria for discretionary
allowances to be used by the Plan Commission to determine allowance. Retzlaff
introduced Jamie Dieman and Brian Harrigan with Innovative Signs, who stated that
they proposed the taller monument sign due to the site and visibility for truck traffic.
Retzlaff stated that within 200' of this proposed sign is the Hwy 41 off ramp and that
elevation is 975'. The code states that you can't be 25' higher than that top elevation
and the proposed sign is at 999', so it is allowable. You won't be seeing a large portion
of that sign, you will see the top sections and maybe 1 or 2 of the lower support
sections.
Discussion Followed. Concerns included the brightness and timing on the digital
portion of the sign and whether the sign meets all six (6) criteria specified in the Village
code that would allow for the Plan Commission to approve.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed wall and monument sign package for
Truck Country USA located at N128W21795 Holy Hill Road, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The Plan Commission determines that the criteria under Section 17.50(g) are or
can be met by the Truck Country sign proposal.
2. The Plan Commission determines that the proposed monument sign base,
comprised of two pylons covered with aluminum shrouds, are code compliant
and acceptable.
3. Applicant/owner shall obtain an electrical permit(s) from Building Inspection
Services prior to sign installation.
4. Owner shall provide information required under 17.46(7)(h) and necessary to
determine compliance with the electronic message center operational
requirements.
Motion: Approve as presented
Motioned By: William Shadid
Seconded By: Russell Ewert
Yes: Robert Warren, William Shadid, Josh Tarantino, Russell Ewert
No: Robert Williams
Page 7
Abstain: None
Motion Passed (Yes 4, No 1, Abstained 0)
D. Status Report on Village Center District Community Engagement Program
(CEP)
Director Retzlaff updated the Plan Commission on the Village Center District
Community Engagement Program. He stated that SRF gave a presentation of the
engagement program to the Village Board on Feb. 2nd and one major change was
made to the timeline, extending it out 1 month into July to allow for one of the pop-up
events being held on July 4th. The program will include one community online and
hard copy survey, an interactive mapping portal that will allow people to view and
comment on various aspects of the project, a dedicated project website, email and
social media postings and notifications along with traditional press releases, two focus
group meetings with interest groups and two pop-up events. The Village Board also
received a schedule of items that could be added as time goes on throughout the
process. No additions were made but if we get to the point where we think we want to
add another pop-up event or survey, we can do so. The original scope was to focus
on the three properties already owned by the Village, but they voted to expand the
scope to include the west main street properties. We will keep the Plan Commission
apprised as we move forward on progress and activities.
VI. ANNOUNCEMENTS:
None.
VII. ADJOURNMENT:
Chairman Warren adjourned the meeting at 9:09pm.
Source: Village of Germantown website. First collected Oct 18, 2026.