4-9-26 Special City Council Packet
City of Menomonie · Dunn County · meeting of Apr 9, 2026 · Agenda packets
Open the original document More from City of Menomonie
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
CITY OF MENOMONIE
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
Menomonie City Hall
800 Wilson Avenue
1st Floor, City Council Chambers
7:00 pm
Thursday – April 9, 2026
Page 1 of 1
Pledge of Allegiance
1. Roll Call
2. New Business:
a) Summary of Written Public Input Received regarding Data Center (I-4)
District – Discussion only (no action).
3. Public Comments (agenda items only)
4. Adjourn
“PUBLIC ACCESS”
NOTE: Members of the public may view City Council meetings via Zoom
Teleconference / Video Conference or over the internet by going to
https://zoom.us/join (URL for Zoom meeting), or by calling 1 312 626 6799. The
Access Code for the meeting is 825 2728 7020. Please note this is for viewing
purposes ONLY . If you wish to participate, you must appear in person at the
meeting.
NOTE: Upon reasonable notice, efforts will be made to accommodate the needs of
individuals with disabilities. For additional information or to request the service,
contact the City Clerk or the City Administrator at 715-232-2221.
MEMORANDUM
Zaria Whitacre, Communications Specialist
communications@menomonie-wi.gov
715-232-2221 Ext. 1108
TO: City Council
FROM: Zaria Whitacre, Communications Specialist
SUBJECT: Public Comment Opportunity for Data Center (I-4) District Zoning Updates Responses
DATE: March 20, 2026
ATTACHMENTS: PDF Public Comment Opportunity for Data Center (I-4) District Zoning Updates
Responses
City Council Members,
Enclosed are 19 pages with the responses received for the Public Comment Opportunity for the
Data Center (I-4) District Zoning Updates on or before March 9th, 2026.
Thank you,
Zaria Whitacre
Public Comment Opportunity for Data Center (I-4) District Zoning Updates (Responses) 2/10/2026 14:11:36 Julie Swenson utphall@gmail.com N11614 State Road 79, Boyceville I live near the City of Menomonie. Water Usage,
Electricity
usage
The amount of water used affects an area much greater than the city of Menomonie. The kind of
water
consumption
typically
seen
used
at
the
large
data
centers
could
impact
ground
water
reserves
that
do
not
have
city
boundaries.
There
should
be
significant
limits
placed
on
how
much
water
is
used.
The
consumption
of
electricity
is
similar.
It
will
affect
an
area
much
larger
than
the
city
of
Menomonie.
Maybe
they
should
have
to
install
a
certain
percentage
of
their
own
electricity
generation
such
as
their
own
geothermal
or
their
own
solar
panels,
etc.
Geothermal
could
help
them
with
cooling
as
well.
2/10/2026 16:50:54 Rachel Rizzo Rachelriz@gmail.com 1209 10th St E, Menomonie, WI
54751
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise, Water Usage, Cancer risk I don't want to pay more for our electricity just because a
data
center
is
driving
up
demand.
How
infuriating.
2/10/2026 17:51:22 Courtney Heidenreich 080115court.hh@gmail.com 1832 6th St Apt 3 I live near the City of Menomonie., I have other friends & family who live here & in surrounding communities that this will effect also
Noise,
Lighting,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Air
pollution,
emfs,
&
other
health
concerns
coming
to
light
caused
by
data
centers
not
just
to
those
within
its
community
but
also
surrounding
communities
Respectfully,
don’t
build
or
even
think
of
considering
building
this
data
center.
No
one
I’ve
talked
to,
heard
from,
or
seen
comments
from
on
news
outlets
&
city
pages
wants
this.
We
are
all
concerned
for
our
health,
our
communities
health,
our
friends
&
families
health,
&
the
health
of
our
environment.
Ultimately
other
data
centers
are
starting
to
show
already
very
alarming
things
to
us
yet
all
of
the
bad
things
get
ignored
&
these
projects
get
pushed
through
anyway
ignoring
the
peoples
rights
&
desires
for
their
communities.
Please
don’t
let
them
build
this
data
center.
It’s
not
worth
it
for
anyone.
Our
lives
our
worth
more
than
a
data
center
individually
or
collectively.
2/10/2026 20:25:11 Brit Blankenheim Britbee14@yahoo.com 2615 Nelson drive 2 Menomonie wi I am a Resident of the City of Menomonie., I work in the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Water
Usage,
Long
term
job
opportunities
I will move out of this city if a data center is approved. I have family in other parts of the country
who
have
had
theirs
lives
affected
negatively
by
the
water
usage,
lack
of
jobs,
lack
of
positive
economic
impact,
and
noise
issues
causing
them
to
relocate.
I
will
not
stand
for
this.
Require
transparency
and
factual
data
on
noise,
water
usage,
utility
cost
increases
on
our
already
assets
limited
income
restricted
employed
households.
1
2/11/2026 11:02:03 No Name Provided I live near the City of Menomonie. Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Water
Usage,
Energy
and
the
economic
benefits
/
tax
incentives
impacts.
There
is
no
data,
research
and/or
studies
of
the
impacts
-
done
by
the
city,
by
the
shell
llc
and/or
the
corporate
entity
(whoever
that
is).e
"The
following
need
testing,
data,
research
and/or
studies
to
ensure
making
an
informed
and
educated
decision.
1. Increased Utility Rates: Data centers increase local electric utility rates by driving up
overall
energy
demand,
which
can
strain
grid
capacity
and
force
utilities
to
invest
in
costly
infrastructure
upgrades.
These
costs
are
passed
on
to
residents
through
higher
rates.
Data
centers
have
also
secured
long-term
power
agreements,
which
reduce
the
available
supply
and
push
prices
up
for
other
consumers.
2. High Resource Consumption: A single data center can consume up to 2 megawatt hours
of
power—equivalent
to
the
power
used
by
2,000
homes—and
millions
of
gallons
of
water
annually
for
cooling,
straining
local
resources
and
infrastructure.
3. Ineffective Tax Incentives: Tax breaks for data centers do not deliver the promised
economic
benefits,
such
as
high-paying
jobs,
and
they
reduce
local
tax
revenues,
while
shifting
financial
burdens
onto
communities
and
schools.
4. Climate and Energy Challenges: Data centers’ massive energy demands are prolonging
the
operation
of
fossil
fuel
plants
and
undermining
state
renewable
energy
goals,
as
seen
in
states
like
Michigan,
Virginia,
and
Nebraska.
5. Resource Efficiency Trade-Off: While advanced cooling methods like liquid immersion
and
direct-to-chip
cooling
offer
energy
efficiency
improvements,
current
technologies
force
a
trade-off
between
energy
and
water
efficiency,
limiting
sustainable
solutions.
6. Policy Solutions: To mitigate data centers’ environmental impacts and align their growth
with
sustainability
goals,
policymakers
should
adopt
model
laws
like
the
German
Energy
Efficiency
Act,
add
requirements
for
new
renewable
energy,
and
enforce
transparency
through
mandatory
reporting.
7. Studies for “ALL OF THE ABOVE” - Generally speaking – vary limited studies, research
and
data
provided
by
the
Data
Center
companies
themselves.
This
in
my
point
of
view,
is
an
ironic
lack
of
transparency;
“there
needs
to
be
requirements
for
Data
Centers”
–
in
providing
studies,
research,
test
results,
measurements,
etc…
"
2/11/2026 12:42:09 Tim Accola E6094 650th Ave I live near the City of Menomonie. Noise, Traffic, Landscaping, Water
Usage,
Power
consumption,
On
site
power
generation,
Pollution,
Remediation
of
the
site
after
it
is
abandoned,
Impact
of
construction
on
tourism
"Sorry I’m no legal expert so I have these written as plain English rather than ready to go
modifications
to
the
zoning
code.
Also
this
got
pretty
long
(I’ve
been
stewing
on
this
for
6
months
at
this
point).
These
in
my
view
are
the
minimum
requirements
to
make
a
data
center
a
viable
and
valuable
pursuit
in
the
Menomonie
community.
If
these
are
untenable
or
unattainable
then
the
actions
shouldn’t
be
to
remove
requirements
it
should
be
to
conclude
that
the
project
2
doesn’t fit our needs. Be selective about the things you allow in… we all know the rich friend
with
the
short
reach
when
the
bill
comes
to
the
table
–
don’t
invite
that
into
our
community.
Anywhere
in
here
that
I
recommend
assessments,
surveys,
etc.
I
mean
in
each
instance
that
it
should
be
completed
by
an
independent
third
party
not
a
firm
recommended
or
hired
by
a
prospective
developer
I
just
got
tired
of
saying
it
every
time.
Also
when
I
say
strict
fines
for
non-compliance
I
mean
it.
Whatever
would
actually
make
them
stay
compliant
rather
than
be
seen
as
just
the
cost
of
doing
business.
Noise: We should directly regulate noise to protect residents, businesses, and the character of the
community.
Data
centers
produce
continuous
sound
from
cooling
systems,
transformers,
and
other
mechanical
infrastructure,
and
if
allowed,
fossil
fuel
generators
add
even
more
disruptive
low
frequency
noise!
The
noise
pollution
has
been
reported
to
travel
miles
and
is
all
but
unbearable
for
those
close
by.
We
should
establish
strict
decibel
limits
at
property
boundaries
including
monitoring
devices
with
strict
penalties
if
they
are
not
in
compliance.
Also
require
independent
noise
studies
before
any
permits
are
issued.
These
studies
must
be
performed
by
third
party
experts,
not
consultants
hired
by
the
developer.
We
should
require
physical
noise
mitigation
features
such
as
vegetative
buffers,
berms,
and
setbacks,
and
we
should
prohibit
the
installation
of
fossil
fuel
based
generators
entirely.
This
single
requirement
eliminates
a
major
source
of
both
noise
and
air
pollution.
The
community
should
not
be
subjected
to
a
constant
industrial
hum
or
intermittent
generator
blasts
simply
because
a
developer
wants
to
minimize
its
own
costs.
Construction Phase Noise: We should actively manage noise produced during construction, which can last for years. To
protect
the
character
of
the
community,
we
should
impose
strict
construction
hour
limits
that
prohibit
early
morning,
late
evening,
and
weekend
activity
with
again
very
strict
penalties
if
they
fail
to
be
complied
with.
We
should
require
a
comprehensive
construction
noise
control
plan
that
addresses
sequencing
of
loud
activities,
use
of
quieter
equipment
when
feasible,
and
installation
of
temporary
sound
barriers.
We
should
mandate
vibration
monitoring
for
high
impact
operations.
The
developer
should
also
be
required
to
notify
neighbors
well
in
advance
of
especially
loud
construction
phases.
Nobody
should
be
forced
to
endure
uncontrolled
industrial
noise
for
multiple
years.
Traffic: We should tightly regulate construction related traffic. Data centers require enormous volumes
of
construction
materials
delivered
by
heavy
trucks,
and
unregulated
truck
flows
will
damage
local
roads,
create
traffic
bottlenecks,
and
disrupt
everyday
life.
To
prevent
this,
we
should
require
a
construction
traffic
management
plan.
We
should
require
all
construction
traffic
to
occur
outside
peak
commuting
hours.
We
should
impose
road
impact
fees
so
the
developer,
not
the
taxpayers,
pays
for
roadway
wear
and
necessary
repairs.
We
should
also
require
construction
to
be
phased
in
a
way
that
does
not
force
require
expansion
of
public
roadways.
Construction Impacts on Public Utilities and Roads: We should address the strain that construction places on water, sewer, stormwater, and
electrical
systems.
Data
center
construction
requires
extensive
utility
work,
and
without
requirements
in
place,
developers
may
overload
existing
systems
or
reroute
public
utilities
in
ways
that
create
long
term
vulnerabilities.
We
should
require
proof
of
coordination
with
all
3
relevant utility providers before any permits are issued. We should also require performance
bonds
dedicated
to
the
restoration
of
damaged
roads
and
public
infrastructure
after
construction.
Temporary
staging
areas,
parking
zones,
and
laydown
yards
should
be
strictly
controlled
so
they
do
not
obstruct
public
rights
of
way
or
interfere
with
local
businesses.
We
cannot
allow
long
term
stress
on
public
systems
simply
because
a
developer
doesn’t
care
about
our
community.
Long Term Construction Duration and Temporary Workforce Impacts: We should require proactive planning for the workforce influx that accompanies data center
construction.
These
projects
often
last
several
years
and
bring
in
thousands
of
out
of
state
workers.
This
influx
can
overwhelm
local
hotels
and
short
term
lodging
options,
leaving
tourists
with
nowhere
to
stay
and
reducing
tourism
revenue.
We
should
require
a
workforce
housing
impact
study
for
every
project
and
mandate
a
mitigation
plan.
We
should
require
the
developer
to
coordinate
with
local
tourism
organizations
to
prevent
economic
displacement
during
peak
seasons.
We
should
also
require
full
disclosure
of
projected
construction
timelines
and
workforce
levels
during
the
zoning
review
process
so
that
the
community
is
aware
of
the
long
term
impacts
before
approvals
are
granted.
Local Contractor Requirements and Use of Union Labor: This item also helps to address the above issue of housing out of town workers - We should
ensure
that
data
center
construction
benefits
the
local
workforce
rather
than
bypassing
it.
Too
often,
national
contractors
import
their
own
labor,
leaving
minimal
economic
benefit
for
the
surrounding
community.
We
should
require
that
a
majority
if
not
all
of
construction
labor
hours
be
performed
by
local
workers
or
local
contracting
firms
(local
to
West
Central
Wisconsin).
We
should
require
union
labor
or
state
certified
apprenticeship
programs
for
skilled
trades
to
guarantee
that
the
project
meets
high
standards
of
safety,
reliability,
and
worker
training.
We
should
require
community
workforce
agreements
that
formalize
commitments
to
fair
wages,
training
opportunities,
and
local
hiring.
Developers
should
also
be
required
to
publish
annual
labor
sourcing
reports
to
demonstrate
compliance.
If
a
project
occupies
hundreds
of
acres
and
consumes
massive
local
infrastructure
capacity,
it
should
also
create
meaningful
jobs
for
the
people
who
live
here.
Water Usage: We should implement strict limits on water usage to protect municipal supplies. AI focused data
centers
can
use
millions
of
gallons
of
water
per
day,
placing
enormous
stress
on
systems
designed
for
residential
and
commercial
use.
To
prevent
shortages
and
protect
long
term
sustainability,
we
should
impose
absolute
water
use
caps
on
each
facility
and
require
the
exclusive
use
of
municipal
water
systems
rather
than
private
wells.
We
should
mandate
unannounced
inspections
to
ensure
compliance,
because
developers
will
try
to
cheat
on
this
one
because
the
reason
they
want
to
develop
in
Wisconsin
is
because
of
the
water
capacity.
We
should
require
cooling
technology
that
minimizes
water
consumption,
and
we
should
require
hydrological
studies
performed
by
independent
third
party
experts
before
any
approval
is
granted.
Safeguarding
water
resources
must
be
non
negotiable
as
we
all
need
clean
safe
water
to
drink.
Power Consumption: We should regulate the enormous electrical demand of hyperscale data centers. A single facility
may
use
as
much
electricity
as
a
large
city,
and
unless
we
establish
firm
requirements,
this
4
consumption will raise residential utility rates and limit future industrial development. We should
require
grid
impact
assessments
before
approval
and
make
the
developer
pay
the
full
cost
of
any
required
utility
upgrades.
We
should
also
require
the
facility
to
participate
in
demand
response
programs
so
it
can
reduce
load
during
peak
demand
events,
helping
maintain
grid
reliability,
and
ensuring
that
the
people
of
the
community
are
prioritized
rather
than
giant
nameless
faceless
multi-national
conglomerates.
The
community
should
never
subsidize
the
massive
electrical
appetite
of
a
private
data
center.
On Site Power Generation: We should prohibit the installation of diesel and natural gas generators, both during construction
and
during
operation.
These
generators
emit
pollution,
produce
noise,
and
conflict
with
climate
and
public
health
priorities.
Instead,
we
should
require
the
facility
to
rely
on
battery
storage
or
renewable
energy
microgrids
for
backup
power.
We
should
also
require
any
purpose
built
power
generation
infrastructure
to
be
constructed
so
that
it
can
connect
directly
to
the
grid
and
continue
serving
the
public
after
the
data
center
is
abandoned.
This
ensures
that
large
infrastructure
investments
produce
long
term
community
value
rather
than
becoming
orphaned
industrial
equipment,
or
even
worse
landfill.
Pollution: We should adopt strict pollution control requirements. Construction creates dust, sediment
runoff,
and
air
quality
impacts
that
must
be
controlled
through
watering,
wheel
washing
stations,
erosion
barriers,
and
similar
measures.
After
construction,
data
centers
may
store
large
quantities
of
batteries,
refrigerants,
and
other
hazardous
materials
that
must
be
regulated.
We
should
require
robust
stormwater
management
systems
with
on
site
retention
and
filtration.
We
should
require
detailed
hazardous
materials
management
plans
covering
storage,
handling,
reporting,
and
emergency
response.
These
controls
protect
both
residents
and
the
natural
environment.
Site Remediation After Abandonment: We should require legal and financial guarantees to ensure that abandoned data centers do not
become
long
term
community
liabilities.
Money
in
the
hands
of
the
community
*not*
the
corporation
who
is
here
to
abuse
our
land.
These
facilities
sit
on
massive
concrete
slabs
with
buried
utilities
and
potentially
hazardous
materials.
Without
enforceable
requirements,
municipalities
may
inherit
enormous
cleanup
costs.
We
should
require
developers
to
submit
decommissioning
plans
before
construction
begins,
detailing
removal
of
equipment,
recycling
processes,
soil
testing
requirements,
and
full
site
restoration.
We
should
require
decommissioning
bonds
or
escrow
accounts
to
ensure
funds
are
available
regardless
of
the
operator’s
financial
condition.
We
should
set
strict
timelines
requiring
cleanup
to
begin
within
a
year
of
closure
so
that
sites
do
not
sit
unused
and
decaying.
Negative Economic Impacts and Long Term Industrial Development: We should take strong measures to protect the long term economic health of industrial zones.
Hyperscale
data
centers
consume
vast
tracts
of
land
and
massive
amounts
of
utility
capacity,
reducing
the
region’s
ability
to
attract
diverse
industries.
This
will
harm
job
creation
and
limit
long
term
economic
resilience.
To
address
this,
we
should
cap
the
percentage
of
industrial
land
that
can
be
occupied
by
data
centers
to
prevent
monopolization
of
available
land
(if
you
want
a
number
here
I
think
maybe
5-10
acres
feels
about
right).
We
should
require
developers
to
fund
utility
improvements
that
preserve
capacity
for
future
businesses
rather
than
diverting
it
all
to
a
5
single facility. We should require economic diversification studies showing how a proposed
project
would
affect
opportunities
for
manufacturing,
logistics,
and
other
sectors.
We
should
enforce
architectural
and
landscaping
standards
to
keep
surrounding
parcels
commercially
attractive.
And
we
should
require
ongoing
reporting
comparing
promised
economic
benefits
to
actual
performance."
2/11/2026 12:44:58 John Carpenter Johnca1967@gmail.com 1212 4th ave east I am a Resident of the City of Menomonie. Noise, Lighting,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Power
usage
and
how
the
city
and
surrounding
area
would
be
affected
The zoning simply should not allow a data center to be built. What conditions are needed to
make
this
happen
should
be
provided
by
elected
officials.
What
benefits
do
the
majority
of
City
residents
and
those
in
area
receive
from
the
data
center
being
built.
We
are
digging
in
the
weeds
way
to
much.
Other
than
the
land
owners
selling
property,
who
benefits
from
this
datacenter?There
is
way
to
much
dancing
around
by
the
mayor,
city
council
and
others.
2/11/2026 18:54:17 Nichole Baier nbear1031@gmail.com N233 County Road Z Eau Galle WI 54736 My parents live just down the road from the
proposed
site
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage
2/11/2026 19:10:23 Rick Rooney rick@circlesystemsinc.com N6412 County Road B,
Menomonie,
WI
54751
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage
Living right next door to this proposed project, I àm concerned my quality of life has just
cratered.
My
life's
investment
in
this
property
is
probably
lost.
I
would
like
mine
and
my
neighbors
properties
purchased
by
this
unknown
entity
at
above
market
prices,
with
moving
expenses
on
top
of
that.
2/11/2026 19:26:20 Sandy Rooney sandyrooney@gmail.com N6412 County Road
B,
Menomonie,
WI
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage
Living
less
than
1/4
mile
from
where
the
proposed
data
center
would
be,
my
entire
livelihood
would
be
impacted.
The
noise
pollution,
water
table
impact,
and
property
devaluation
of
my
home
is
unimaginable.
Everyone
voting
for
a
business
like
this
should
reflect
if
they
would
want
one
built
right
next
to
their
home.
I
would
like
to
see
that
every
home
impacted
by
a
business
like
this
be
purchased
from
the
company
above
market
value
with
moving
expenses
included.
2/12/2026 19:26:38 Shari Werlein mrswerlein84@gmail.com E6329 10th Ave Durand
I
live
in
Dunn
County
Noise,
Water
Usage,
Electricity
6
The constant noise from a data center is unacceptable. Water usage is a major concern
especially
for
the
resident's
in
the
area.I
don't
want
to
see
my
electric
rates
go
up!
2/13/2026 18:02:54 Melanie miss.mel.111@hotmail.com N7827 567th St Menomonie
WI
54751
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Power
usage/source(s)
It was my understanding from previous postings by the city that Ballonist LLC and/or the
company
it
represents,
were
working
with
Exel
Energy
regarding
power
usage.
I’ve
also
read
that
data
centers
often
provide
their
own
power
via
nuclear
power
modules,
solar
panel
fields
or
wind
turbines.
My
only
concern
about
a
DC
being
near
my
home
(I
live
near
the
proposed
location)
is
whether
my
utility
bill
from
Exel
would
increase.
I
think
that’s
something
only
Balloonist
and
Exel
can
answer.
I
also
recall
that
when
the
I-4
designation
came
up,
the
city
admin
said
the
new
DC
zoning
would
NOT
affect
the
parcel
purchased
by
Balloonist.
Is
the
city
now
reneging
on
the
warehouse
zoning
designation
that
was
assigned
to
the
parcel
before
it
was
purchased?
Doesn’t
seem
to
be
a
good
look
for
Menomonie,
or
Dunn
county
for
that
matter.
As
the
Menomonie
industrial
park
continues
to
expand,
the
residual
effects
of
manufacturing
facilities
and
warehouses
are
being
felt
by
rural
residents.
The
traffic
on
highway
B
coming
from
the
Walmart
distribution
center
to
3
truck
stops,
to
Anderson
Windows,
Hurlburt
and
now
the
Amazon
facility
has
more
effect
on
county
residents
than
Menomonie
residents.
So
far
we’ve
been
hearing
nothing
but
negativity
from
Menomonie
leaders
regarding
a
data
center.
Isn’t
it
well
past
time
to
hold
public
hearings
that
include
representatives
of
Ballonist
and/or
whatever
tech
company
they
represent?
Companies
like
Meta
offer
positive
contributions
to
the
communities
where
they
have
DCs,
including
water
cleanup,
educational
(STEM)
grants,
development
of
green
concrete,
more
efficient
irrigation
systems
for
farmers,
on
top
of
providing
good
paying
jobs
for
local
tradespeople
over
a
period
of
several
years,
and
high
paying
tech
jobs
upon
completion
of
the
facility.
What
I’d
like
to
see
is
the
city
parsnip
stand
by
the
original
rezoning
of
the
parcel.
My
concerns
about
power
usage
can
be
answered
by
the
tech
company.
Using
the
data
center
topic
to
stir
up
votes
right
before
the
mayoral
election
is
obvious
and
sad,
frankly.
The
transparency
should
have
been
there
from
day
one
of
contact
from
Balloonist.
2/15/2026 13:20:23 Cody Reimer cody.reimer@gmail.com 2203 Tower Ridge Ave
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Water
Usage,
Power
Usage,
Permanent
Jobs
I don't want any data center whose power or water usage increases citizen's pricing. I don't want
tax
incentives
that
treat
temp
construction
jobs
as
long-term
community
investment.
2/15/2026 18:31:30 Andrew Hagen andrew.hagen@gmail.com 2868 Whisper Court
Unit
8
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Energy
Use
Storage data centers, even hyperscale data centers, have server racks that don't need to
consume
more
than
15-20
kilowatts
per
rack.
Non-hyperscale
data
centers
consume
up
to
7
kilowatts
per
server
rack.
AI
data
centers
consume
around
100
kilowatts
or
more
per
server
7
rack. I propose a distinction between a Storage Data Center, which could be the I-4 District
Zoning,
and
an
A.I.
Data
Center
which
would
necessitate
its
own
zoning.
A
Storage
Data
Center
would
allow
up
to
20
kilowatts
per
server
rack.
If
server
racks
would
require
more
than
20
kW,
then
it
would
need
to
be
rezoned
as
a
new,
high-demand
data
center.
Any
company
that
wants
to
build
a
data
center
must
choose
which
zone
their
data
center
fits
in,
a
storage
data
center,
or
a
high-demand
data
center.
This
is
separate
from
any
type
of
requirement
of
the
company
to
provide
its
own
energy
input
to
power
the
data
center.
If
server
rack
capacity
exceeds
20
kW
per
rack
while
the
storage
data
center
is
still
in
the
lower
I-4
designation,
the
company
must
power
down
servers
until
they
meet
the
requirement.
2/17/2026 7:54:17 steve faulhaber stevefaulhaber@gmail.com 803 24th street North
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
am
a
Business
Owner
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage
I am in favor of the data center, as long as it pays it own way and is not subsidized by the City
taxpayers.
The
City
needs
a
bigger
tax
base
and
there
are
already
more
jobs
than
there
are
people
to
fill
them
in
the
area.
Noise
and
lighting
should
be
kept
to
a
minimum,
but
the
east
side
already
has
the
race
track,
airport,
and
sand
mine
that
produce
plenty
of
noise.
Wal
Mart,
among
others,
throws
off
plenty
of
light
pollution.
Don't
let
a
loud
minority
kill
what
may
be
a
good
deal
for
the
City.
2/17/2026 23:50:44 McKinley Siegle msiegle@umich.edu E5229 710th Ave
Menomonie
WI
54751
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Lighting,
Water
Usage,
Electricity
Use
"1. Lighting should not be floodlights outward, should strive for minimal light/noise pollution. 2. They should have to disclose on a frequent (daily/monthly) basis how much water is being
used
in
all
operations
and
have
an
elected
independent
board
that
imposes
accountability
through
cap
limits
on
usage.
3. The electricity that will be used for this data center on a continuous basis is an issue, not just
for
potential
grid
strain
but
that
our
bill
as
residents
will
be
higher,
and
could
be
significantly
higher.
They
should
have
to
pay
for
the
respective
increase
in
power
consumption
for
the
county,
and
pre-emptively
address
grid
reliability
issues
through
local
infrastructure
modernization
investments
should
this
go
through.
This
should
also
probably
be
independently
guided."
2/18/2026 14:54:01 Stacey Siegle stsiegle@gmail.com E5229 710th Ave Menomonie
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Water
Usage,
electricity
I am concerned about a data center putting a strain on our energy grid. I am also concerned
about
the
ways
our
electricity
bill
would
skyrocket
(as
seen
with
other
data
centers
built
around
the
state).
We
live
in
the
country
for
the
quiet
and
darkness.
A
data
center
(or
any
building)
typically
adds
a
lot
of
light
pollution.
I
am
concerned
about
the
ways
the
constant
noise
would
8
interfere with the ecosystem. We have a lot of freshwater in Menomonie and in the midwest in
general.
I
am
concerned
about
the
strain/drain
a
data
center
would
put
on
our
water
supply.
2/18/2026 17:31:57 Steve Siegle ssiegle@charter.net E5229 710th Ave I work in the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Water
Usage
Concerned
about
the
potential
of:
a
strain
on
the
power
grid;
subsequent
increased
electricity
costs
that
may
not
be
shared
or
absorbed
by
the
main
user
(rather
Menomonie
and
surrounding
area
would
suffer
the
absorption);
noise
and
light
pollution;
traffic
congestion
especially
given
the
nearby
Amazon
Distribution
coming
in;
strain
on
water
supply/aquifer
and
the
longevity
of
water
supply.
2/18/2026 20:57:52 No Name Provided I work in the City of Menomonie., I live near the City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage
Where is the question that asks whether we support a data center being built? The biggest
problem
is
the
lack
of
transparency
in
the
process
that
brought
this
issue
to
our
community
in
the
first
place.
We
need
to
go
back
to
square
1,
not
start
in
the
middle
of
the
process.
All
of
the
issues
listed
above
have
become
issues
in
the
communities
that
have
allowed
data
centers
to
be
built,
even
with
so
called
limits
or
rules.
There
are
serious
quality
of
life
consequences
to
the
people
who
live
here
of
allowing
this
to
go
further.
It
is
clear
that
this
is
NOT
wanted
in
our
community.
Do
your
job
and
listen
to
the
people.
If
you
can't
do
that,
put
it
up
for
a
vote
and
let
the
people
decide.
2/21/2026 12:41:40 Charles Barnard Wizodd@gmail.com 214 18th St N I am a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Parking
requirements
for
normal
volume
rather
than
maximum
occupancy,
end
of
life
facility
decommisioning
costs
(put
in
trust
and
maintained
at
a
number
greater
than
independent
engineering
analysis,
reviewed
annually,)
local
power
impacts,
runoff
water
impacts,
aquifer
impacts,
local
weather
impacts
"See
""other""
First, no NDA's should be permitted when negotiating with companies, transparency is a vital
requirement
of
government.
Two, nothing should be built without considering the past records of behavior by the company or
the
individuals
operating
and
negotiating
for
them.
Poor
previous
actions
should
disqualify
them.
Three, end of life removal and clean up of the site costs must be independently determined by
engineering
analysis,
and
funds
exceeding
that
amount
by
20%
must
be
maintained
in
trust
at
all
times,
adjusted
for
inflation
annually
for
inflation
under
5%
or
every
6
months
between
5-10%,
every
month
10-20%,
daily
over
20%,
redetermined
every
time
changes
are
made
to
the
site
and
every
4th
year
after
an
evaluation
Three, local environmental impacts such as, aquifer health, atmospheric heat release, rain
runoff
etc
al
need
to
be
independently
evaluated
and
re-examined
with
every
modification
to
the
site,
as
well
as
routinely
every
4th
year.
9
Four, before approval, the site needs to have erected a visual, full sized replica and of the
facility
and
site
as
it
will
appear
from
adjacent
properties
for
public
review
and
discussion
for
one
year,
to
ensure
that
it's
acceptable
to
the
people.
Said
visual
must
accurately
represent
the
actual
facility
and
landscaping
when
built.
Five, no tax breaks. Companies routinely promise jobs and income which don't go to residents
and
thus
the
community.
They
play
games
to
get
the
best
deal
which
seldom
actually
balance
the
lost
taxes
and
additional
service
costs
for
infrastructure
and
services.
Six, all costs of oversight, prosecution costs etc al shall be paid by the company, regardless of
outcome
in
court
or
other
settlement.
Any major company has resources far beyond those of our governmental agencies, and it's the
duty
of
government
to
ensure
that
no
decisions
result
in
a
loss
of
public
funds."
2/27/2026 8:44:21 Terry Siebold tsiebold29@gmail.com E6500 690th Ave.
Menomonie,
WI
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
Resident
of
Town
of
Red
Cedar.
Live
within
0.5
of
Balloonist
owned
property
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Construction
impact
to
nearby
residents
including
dust,
noise,
lighting
of
area
after
dark,
access
to
our
homes,
,
depreciation
of
home
values
for
residents
within
several
miles
of
data
center,
small
number
of
employees
per
square
foot
of
structure
is
this
economic
growth
for
Menomonie?,electrical
rate
increases,
property
tax
impacts,
long-term
monitoring
of
compliance
with
I-4
regulations,
cost
of
that
monitoring
to
city
budget,
do
not
allow
TID/TIF
financing,
transparency
from
end
users
of
project,
no
NDAs
allowed.
"Noise
needs
to
be
at
a
low
decibel
level,
monitored
on
a
regular
basis,
more
than
once
a
year!
Noise
level
needs
to
include
vibrations.
Limit
hours
during
construction.
Lighting
will
follow
guidelines
already
in
place
in
City
with
no
exceptions.
Ambient
light
at
a
minimum.
Traffic related to data center kept off of 690th Ave. Repair of Highway B for damage from
construction
vehicles
be
paid
for
by
end
user.
Adequate
turn
lanes
be
constructed
for
use
during
construction.
Building height maximum be measured to include any items on the roof of the building. Height
already
in
the
I-4
zoning
plan
should
be
used
with
no
increases.
Landscaping should be included in immediate occupation of building with the main purpose to
hide
structures
and
mediate
noise
as
much
as
possible.
Water usage will need to be monitored on monthly basis with restrictions that are set by experts
in
that
area.
Provisions
should
include
payment
by
end
user
for
future
private
well
replacement
that
may
be
incurred
because
of
contaminated
water
or
private
wells
that
""run
dry"".
The ""other"" concerns I listed should also be included. From what I understand, the
construction
period
alone
could
last
years.
Limits
on
days
work
can
take
place
as
well
as
length
of
construction
each
day
should
be
strongly
enforced.
I
want
to
be
able
to
use
my
outdoor
space!
Escrow
account
should
be
established
in
the
event
the
Data
Center
closes
and
abandons
the
buildings.
3/2/2026 14:31:52 Sherry Gibbs sherrygibbs99@gmail.com 411 Fagstad Street I am a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Water
Usage,
Environmental
issues
I
am
10
concerned about the environmental impacts of a data center on our local environment. Water
usage
and
pollution
is
a
huge
issue.
We
already
have
issues
with
algae
blooms
in
our
lake
and
river,
we
do
not
need
to
further
deteriorate
them.
3/3/2026 5:58:03 Benjamin Howard Benjamin.t.howard@gmail.com E5440 815th
Ave
Menomonie
WI
54751
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Traffic,
Water
Usage
"My
concern
for
lighting
is
that
it
will
add
to
light
pollution
from
the
city
and
take
away
from
ascetic
of
the
farm
land.
Traffic
is
already
increasing
annually
around
Menomonie
and
infrastructure
is
already
limited
especially
for
a
city
on
the
interstate.
The
water
usage
is
a
substantial
amount
that
developers
have
disclosed
and
is
far
too
excessive
for
the
area.
I enjoy living just outside of Menomonie because it’s a small town with plenty of resources for
every
need.
Building
a
monstrosity
of
a
data
center
seems
great
for
the
economy
on
the
surface
but
I
believe
is
insidious
and
will
ruin
the
small
town
charm
of
Menomonie
in
years
to
come.
This
will
set
a
bad
precedence.
"
3/3/2026 6:04:44 Cheryl Williams 1002williams@gmail.com 1002 Ingalls Rd.
Menomonie
Wisc.
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Water
Usage,
Electric
bill
costs
from
data
center
Cost
from
data
center
should
not
transfer
to
residents
and
and
it
should
not
be
taxed
as
a
warehouse.
It’s
a
business
and
should
not
get
tax
breaks
3/3/2026 8:57:36 James Colvin wyzurd1@gmail.com N3019 County Road Y, Menomonie
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Water
Usage,
No
NDA's,
closed
loop
water
cooling
system,
noise
limits.
total
transparency
as
to
ownership.
no
financial
impact
on
local
residents
of
any
kind.
Basically
other
than
being
able
to
see
the
structure
there
should
be
no
other
impact
on
the
area.
The
city
council
should
enact
ordnances
requiring
compliance
with
the
above
issues.
3/3/2026 17:13:12 Johanna Kellner joeykellner@hotmail.com 1013 5th Ave E. #A.
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
am
a
Business
Owner
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Power
supply,
pollution,
diminished
property
values
for
residents,
scale
of
project,
ceasing
operations
not
just
fines
for
noncompliance,
"Noise:
very
strict
low
noise
regulations
and
monitoring
during
construction
and
operations,
you
can't
run
power
saw
before
7am
in
the
city
already.
The
noise
will
travel
up
and
down
the
river
and
lake
that
is
so
close,
it
gets
amplified,
you
can
hear
things
from
miles
away.
People
have
bought
a
lot
of
retirement
homes
around
the
lake,
to
enjoy
peace
and
quiet.
Lighting: Nothing brighter than 60W equivalent for lighting. We want to see the stars. Landscaping: extra large setbacks and buffer zones, and heavily lined catch basins in case
there
is
a
spill
of
antifreeze
or
anything
else
toxic
they
might
use.
11
Traffic: No construction traffic between 7pm and 7am, and they need to fix the roads they
damage
right
away.
Water: Low water consumption only, no private well, public water only, so use can be monitored.
Maybe
it
can
come
out
of
the
river
instead
of
the
aquifer,
but
that
needs
to
be
studied
first,
if
that
would
have
less
impact
on
our
water
supply.
Power: NO private mini nuclear plant, use solar power produced on their property, or a wind
generators,
pay
for
their
own
power,
no
diesel
generators,
they
are
too
noisy
and
pollute
the
air.
Compensation for all property owners in the area, because all property values in and around
Menomonie
will
drop.
Only small scale Data Centers, only a small campus. Restricting building size alone is
ineffective,
there
are
ways
to
call
them
separate
buildings,
but
they
are
almost
attached.
Our community needs to keep it's small town charm. If there is any violation of any kind, they need to stop operations, with fines alone they just pay
and
do
what
they
want.
Funds up front, held by the city to restore the site afterwards so it doesn't turn into a polluted
waste
land.
Funds up front to dispose of nuclear waste in case they build a Mini Nuclear power plant. Funds up front for all of us who have to drill new wells because they deplete the water table. Nobody I have talked to, wants a Data Center here! If they build, a lot of people I talked to will
sell
and
leave
the
are."
3/4/2026 18:11:15 Cynthia Bland blandc@uwstout.edu 1214 6th Avenue East I am a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Water
Usage,
Ruining
our
dark
skies;
increasing
our
electric
bills
I
wouldn't
want
any
data
center
whatsoever,
so
for
me
it's
not
about
imposing
limits.
If
they
can
create
a
data
center
that
has
ZERO
lights
at
night
and
guarantees
are
made
that
they
won't
ruin
our
dark
skies,
then
perhaps
I'd
concede.
If
they
could
do
a
closed
system
where
they
aren't
taking
up
massive
amounts
of
water
and
taking
all
the
energy
from
our
electrical
grid,
then
maybe
...
But
all
the
information
I've
seen
confirms
that
property
values
in
the
surrounding
areas
will
plummet,
our
electrical
bills
will
skyrocket,
our
dark
skies
will
be
ruined,
noise
during
construction
will
be
constant.
There's
no
benefit
here
for
residents.
3/5/2026 11:33:42 Kathleen Dunbar diamond45lp@yahoo.com 502 Evergreen Street,
Colfax,
WI
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Water
Usage,
Electricity
Use
and
pollution
I
believe
that
there
should
be
a
limit
on
how
much
ground
water
is
used,
as
it
does
not
seem
as
if
the
City
of
Menomonie
can
supply
the
necessary
water
for
such
a
facility.
I
am
worried
that
the
ground
water
that
is
more
likely
to
be
the
source
of
water
for
the
facility
would
be
used
up,
causing
wells
in
the
area
to
go
dry.
Plus
I
think
there
should
be
provisions
to
restrain
the
discharge
of
polluted
water
into
the
environment.
I
am
also
disappointed
that
good
farm
land
is
being
used
for
this
abomination.
I
also
think
that
a
limit
would
have
to
be
put
on
to
prevent
brown
outs
or
outright
outages.
In
all
I
just
think
that
these
facilities
should
be
banned
from
12
being built in our area. I think that you all have made a grave error in judgement in letting it get
this
far.
3/6/2026 12:29:37 Tim Crom tcpmgr@hotmail.com 2332 Sugar Maple Street N.E.
Menomonie,
WI
54751
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Water
Usage,
Electrical
usage,
Isolation
of
fiber
optic
traffic
"I
think
that
more
information
has
to
be
gathered
and
shared
withe
public.
There
needs
to
be
a
cap
that
any
business
can
draw
off
of
the
electrical
grid,
no
more
than
another
large
business
such
as
Anderson
Windows
Anything
over
that
wattage
cap.
would
have
to
self
supplied
by
the
business
through
wind
or
solar
farms.
Second
the
water
usage
has
to
be
self
contained
with
its
own
internal
cleaning
methods
for
that
water
if
needed.
If
a
water
source
is
needed
then
that
supply
will
have
to
come
through
above
ground
(river/lake)
sources
and
NOT
wells
for
potable
water
for
residents.
Third.
The
fiber
planned
to
supply
the
data
centers
should
be
from
the
Data
Centers
own
Isolated
ISP,
and
main
fiber
trunk
lines
with
NO
interconnection,
points
/
node
or
data
hub
sharing
with
residential
customers
as
to
avoid
fiber
speeds
being
slowed
(latency)
from
the
Data
Centers
Fiber/
transmission
speeds.
https://www.databank.com/resources/blogs/navigating-obstacles-addressing-common-data-cent
er-connectivity-challenges-in-the-usa/
https://kleinmanenergy.upenn.edu/commentary/blog/communities-are-at-risk-if-we-dont-slow-the
-roll-on-data-center-development/"
3/6/2026 14:15:31 Colette & Joe LaBuda colettelabuda@gmail.com 2324 Bundy Lane,
Menomonie
WI
54751
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Water
Usage,
electricity
use
"We
are
concerned
that
the
potential
negative
impacts
of
this
data
center
may
outweigh
the
benefits
for
our
community.
In
particular,
the
amount
of
water
required
to
cool
large
data
centers
is
troubling.
Our
area
water
resources
are
valuable
and
used
for
recreation,
tourism,
and
supporting
local
ecosystems.
This
large-scale
industrial
water
use
will
place
unnecessary
strain
on
these
resources
and
impact
the
natural
assets
that
Menomonie
residents
enjoy.
Noise. Data centers operate continuously and require large cooling systems and backup
equipment
that
run
24/7.
Even
if
individual
units
are
not
extremely
loud,
the
constant,
ongoing
noise
can
affect
nearby
residents
and
take
away
the
quiet,
natural
environment
that
is
an
important
part
of
our
area,
we
live
here
because
we
like
our
quiet
community.
Lighting. Data centers require exterior lighting for security and operations, which contributes to
light
pollution.
This
can
affect
nearby
homes
and
wildlife.
The enormous amount of electricity required to operate a data center is concerning. This will
place
a
significant
demand
on
the
electrical
grid,
which
will
require
additional
infrastructure
and
will
ultimately
impact
local
residents
through
higher
costs
and/or
reduced
reliability.
Important zoning protections should be in place, including limits on water use, strict noise and
lighting
standards,
buffers
and
setbacks
from
homes
and
recreational
areas,
and
requirements
guaranteeing
that
the
data
center's
electricity
demand
does
not
negatively
impact
local
residents.
13
Overall, a data center does not feel like a good fit for our area. Our community values its natural
environment,
outdoor
recreation,
and
quality
of
life.
The
long-term
environmental
footprint—including
water
use,
energy
consumption,
noise,
lighting,
and
land
use—should
be
carefully
considered
before
moving
forward.
The
negative
impacts
seem
to
outweigh
the
benefits
for
our
community
and
the
people
who
live
here.
"
3/6/2026 19:35:24 April Feinberg aj_whitetig@yahoo.com 307 2nd St W , Menomonie
WI
54751
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Water
Usage,
Electricity
usage.
The
data
center
will
strain
the
power
grid.
I
have
a
cousin
that
is
a
master
electrician.
He
worked
as
a
project
manager
for
the
upgrade
to
the
power
plant
in
Eau
Claire,
Wisconsin.
His
name
is
Ryan
Brewer
and
he
works
for
Van
Ert
Electric
Company
out
of
Eau
Claire.
Ryan
discussed
with
me
the
upgrade
that
they
did
to
the
power
plant
in
Eau
Claire.
He
explained
that
with
the
size
and
scope
of
the
plan
that
he
felt
that
even
with
the
upgrades
that
the
power
grid
will
not
be
able
to
sustain
the
power
load
that
would
be
required.
There
are
only
2000
electricians
there
certified
to
work
on
power
plants
in
the
upper
Midwest.
Ryan
and
his
crew
are
in
Cedar
Rapids
Iowa
for
the
next
year
upgrading
the
power
plant
there
for
the
data
center
that
they
are
building
there.
There
are
12
data
centers
planned
for
the
Twin
Cities
area
that
are
going
to
be
on
the
same
power
grid
as
our
data
center
if
the
power
grid
collapses
there
will
literally
be
nobody
to
fix
it.
"The
water
usage
should
be
a
recycled
system
using
the
Same
water
and
not
pulling
from
the
city
waterline.
They
need
to
pay
for
their
own
water
usage
there
there
will
be
no
incentives
to
put
the
burden
of
paying
for
the
water
on
the
city
residences.
There’s also the issue of we cannot take water away from farmers because we need the Crop
say
grow.
We’re
not
going
to
have
the
milk
and
dairy
that
we
are
so
known
for
in
this
state.
City power grid issue cannot be resolved because the current grid cannot sustain the planned
projects
in
the
upper
Midwest.
There
are
12
planned
data
centers
within
the
next
two
years
in
the
Twin
Cities
area
which
is
on
the
same
power
grid
as
ours.Until
such
time
that
the
power
plants
can
be
upgraded
to
sustain
the
power
that
is
needed
to
run
the
data
center.
Virginia
is
struggling
with
this
issue.
The
towns
around
the
data
centers
in
Virginia
are
having
constant
brownouts
and
blackouts
because
all
of
the
power
is
going
to
the
data
centers
especially
300+
acre
campus
like
the
one
that’s
being
planned
for
here.
The
only
thing
I
can
think
of
is
to
make
it
a
70
percentage
of
electricity
come
from
solar
or
wind.
Because
literally
as
soon
as
the
lights
go
on,
and
then
this
building
the
lights
go
out
in
Menomonie.
I
would
also
like
them
to
pay
for
their
own
electricity.
I
don’t
want
any
subsidies
on
this
project.
Most
of
the
people
in
this
town
cannot
afford
to
pay
twice
or
three
times
as
much
a
month
as
they
do
now.
That’s
what’s
happening
in
Virginia."
3/7/2026 7:30:40 Dave Henderson djjbdhend@sbcglobal.net N7061 564th St
Menomonie,Wi
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Damage
to
property
values
near
facility,
damage
to
the
farming
infrastructure.
14
3/7/2026 8:48:03 Cat Henderson kchenderson48@gmail.com E6075 708th Ave,
Menomonie,
WI
54751
Directly
impacted
by
the
location
of
the
proposed
data
center
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Utility
usage,
Property
devaluation
for
nearby
houses,
contribute
to
local
economy
with
hiring
local
contractors
and
ongoing
employments
and
shopping
local
where
possible,
Hours
of
operation
for
all
construction
"Noise
-
I've
read
DC
noise
is
constant
and
enough
to
rattle
windows
in
nearby
homes,
it
can
create
issues
with
anxiety
and
trouble
sleeping
etc,
even
when
it
is
within
a
typical
acceptable
range.
You
need
to
get
input
from
other
communities
who
are
already
suffering
with
the
noise
on
what
an
acceptable
level
is
and
set
the
range
as
if
YOU
lived
in
the
impact
area.
Implement
an
online
noise
monitoring
system
alerting
the
city
contact
responsible
for
enforcement
of
the
zoning
and
impose
fines.
Lighting - We currently have beautiful night skies in the area and can see the northern lights.
The
building
lights
need
to
be
low
and
pointed
downward
to
minimize
light
pollution
to
animals
and
neighbors.
PLEASE
NO
24x7
flashing
neon
signs!!
Traffic - Please minimize all traffic including construction traffic from the residential area of 690th
Ave.
Hwy
B
is
very
busy,
I
think
the
650th
Ave
would
deal
best
with
the
additional
traffic.
Building Height – Again the directly impacted neighbors all currently live in a beautiful country
setting
which
we
hate
to
lose,
especially
when
we
will
be
losing
on
so
many
levels.
There
is
no
upside
for
us.
I
think
the
building
should
be
no
more
than
2
stories
high.
Landscaping – It needs to be well maintained to not create an eyesore. Water Usage – There needs to be a monitoring system in place to ensure water usage does not
exceed
the
proposed
amount
the
city
agrees
they
can
support
and
enforcement
with
fines.
It
is
easy
to
do
a
low
projection
to
get
approval
and
then
say
ooops,
sorry.
Other – Utility usage – it is a cop out by the city to say this is outside of your purview. It could
directly
and
negatively
impact
the
entire
city
and
township
if
Xcel
doesn’t
have
the
right
agreement
in
place
to
ensure
the
additional
capacity
is
funded
only
by
the
data
center.
Many
communities
have
seen
their
household
utility
costs
go
up
when
a
data
center
has
come
to
town.
You
can
do
better.
Other – Property devaluation for nearby homes – technically none of the homes are within the
city
limits
but
we
are
directly
impacted
by
your
decisions.
The
township
and
the
city
should
work
together
to
minimize
the
negative
property
impacts.
I’d
like
to
see
a
substantial
and
permanent
reduction
in
property
taxes
for
the
homes
on
690th
and
708th,
the
city
could
replace
the
revenue
to
the
township
since
this
is
going
to
be
“such
a
great
income
opportunity
to
the
city.”
Other – Contribute to local economy – include a requirement for during construction and
ongoing
operations
where
they
need
to
prove
they
bought
and
hired
local
for
XX%.
The
demolition
company
I
heard
was
from
MI?
Numerous
items
could
have
been
reused
or
recycled
locally
but
they
gave
no
consideration
to
it
at
all.
Other – Hours of operation during construction – initial and ongoing – I don’t think construction
should
be
done
outside
of
8am
–
6pm
on
weekdays,
10am
–
6pm
on
weekends.
Construction
involves
exceptional
noise
with
big
trucks,
pounding,
loud
motors,
truck
backup
beeping,
dust
etc.
Please
again
place
yourself
in
our
shoes
when
making
decisions.
15
Thank for the opportunity to provide input. I hope you consider these items as if it was
happening
in
YOUR
backyard.
" 3/7/2026 11:18:53 Rachel Tilseth rachelwt72@gmail.com 921 22nd Ave. NE #310
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Data
center
pays
for
their
infastructure
costs
I
strongly
urge
that
the
city
council
form
a
committee
to
do
this
vital
work
to
stop
the
data
center.
3/7/2026 13:17:34 Patrick B Andraska patandraska@gmail.com N7901 770th Street
Colfax
Wisconsin
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Water
pollution
that
could
contaminate
the
Aquifers
that
supply
our
water.
"All
of
the
provisions
that
were
presented
and
signed
by
are
residents
on
Feb.
15th,
2026."
3/7/2026 13:32:40 Patti L Andraska patandraska@gmail.com N7901 770th St,
Colfax
WI.
54730
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
I
would
like
to
see
noise
limits,
including
time
of
day
restrictions,
and
also
limited
excessive
lighting
surrounding
the
proposed
site.
Traffic
at
the
area
should
be
monitored
and
restricted
to
reasonable
time
of
day
limits,
and
damage
incurred
to
roads
repaired
at
data
center
expense.
Building
height
and
surrounding
landscaping
should
be
addressed
in
an
effort
to
not
detract
from
the
natural
surroundings
of
the
area.
Access
to
required
water
must
not
interfere
with
standing
aquifers
and
bodies
of
water
that
supply
local
families
and
farms.
In
conclusion,
city
staff
and
council
members
are
urged
to
prioritize
the
42
provisions
compiled
and
signed
by
area
residents
on
2/15/26.
3/7/2026 13:34:44 Jody Henderson jlhend5@gmail.com N7061 - 564th Street,
Menomonie,
WI
54751
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Electricity
Cost/Use,
Property
Value
of
housing
in
area
"Noise
and
Lighting
need
to
be
kept
to
a
minimum
for
residents
nearby.
Both
of
these
aspects
are
going
to
have
negative
impact
for
residents
living
close
to
this
plot
of
land
for
the
data
center.
Traffic of extra vehicles will have a negative impact on roads and costs to the county and
townships
directly
related
to
this
property.
The
county
and
the
townships
cannot
afford
these
costs
as
their
budgets
have
only
a
certain
amount
already
stretched
to
the
limit.
The Data Building can also have a negative landscaping impact due to the open farmland/fields
surrounding
it.
I
would
like
to
see
it
remain
more
farmland
and
open
spaces
to
keep
wildlife
and
trees
in
the
area,
as
living
in
the
country
(not
a
city)
should
be.
I feel that the data center will also put a high demand on both water and electricity in an area
that
will
not
be
able
to
support
it
without
a
huge
increase
in
the
cost
of
these
resources.
It
will
16
also have a detrimental impact on the water table (irrigation at high levels already in area) and
more
demand
on
the
power
grid
for
this
area.
For the residents who live nearby, it will decrease the values of homes and land surrounding
the
data
center
parcel.
This
data
center
is
not
bringing
in
many
jobs
or
positive
aspects
for
this
current
location
and
therefore
I
don't
believe
the
zoning
should
be
changed
to
allow
its
construction
at
this
time."
3/7/2026 14:49:14 Ann Kohanek akohanek1004@gmail.com 420 Heller Road I am a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage
Utility
usage
and
cost
responsibility;
long
term
effect
on
the
environment.
A
number
of
ideas
for
ordinances
to
address
data
center
concerns
were
developed
by
a
local
group.
I
sincerely
hope
that
the
Menomonie
City
Council
will
thoroughly
review
and
give
credence
to
them.
3/7/2026 16:06:37 Deanna Shane shandee101@hotmail.com N7038 740th St,
Menomonie,
WI
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Please
use
the
Community
Resolutions
as
a
resource
in
making
these
decisions.
I
urge
the
city
staff
and
council
to
prioritize
the
42
provisions
outlined
in
the
Community
Resolution
that
has
been
signed
by
hundreds
of
area
residents.
It
represents
the
shared
thoughts
and
concerns
of
100+
individuals
who
attended
the
Citizen
led
town
hall
on
February
15,
2026.
3/7/2026 16:47:42 Beth Kilby bessie4jc@pm.me 480th St. Menomonie I am a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
do
away
with
the
Data
Center
I-4
zoning
-
it
won't
restrict
anything
The
effort
in
obtaining
signatures
on
restrictions/regulations
on
the
I-4
data
center
rezone
lacks
foresight.
No
data
center
will
abide
by
any
rules.
I
did
not
sign
the
resolution.
Menomonie
is
too
small
a
community
to
regulate
big
tech.
Once
they
get
their
foot
in
the
door,
it's
game
over.
This
should
be
blatantly
obvious.
3/8/2026 11:54:28 Jennifer Wander Jennywander3@att.net N6977 564TH St.
Menomonie
WI
54751
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Increased
electric
bills,
decreased
property
values,
other
environmental
concerns.
I
want
the
city
council
to
do
what
it
needs
to
do
to
make
sure
that
a
data
center
will
not
be
allowed
to
be
built
anywhere
in
our
area.
3/8/2026 20:49:26 Michael White gysgtwhite1@gmail.com E6502 690th Ave
Menomonie
WI
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Please
use
the
Community
Resolution's
as
a
resource
in
making
these
decisions.
I
urge
the
city
staff
and
council
to
prioritize
the
42
provisions
17
outlined in the Community Resolution that has been signed by hundreds of area residents. It
represents
the
shared
thought
and
concern
of
100+
individuals
who
attended
the
Citizen
Led
Town
Hall
on
February
15,
2026.
3/8/2026 20:57:28 val waters nashvall7@gmail.com E6778 870th ave colfax wi 54730
town
of
tainter,
on
lake
tainter;
drive
by
the
land
being
rezoned
on
B
regularly
to
reach
I94
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Water
Usage,
electromagnetic
frequencies
(EMFs)
"electromagnetic
frequencies
(EMFs)
involved
in
the
maintenance
of
the
digital
data
need
to
be
restricted.
the
emanations
detrimentally
affect
our
physical
health
causing
cognitive
as
well
as
effecting
our
immune
systems.
headaches,
vision,
hearing..Recommend
a
risk
assessment
for
hyper
data
centers
by
a
professional
company
like
IAQ-EMF
consulting
Inc.
noise: should have definite limits that are safe for no damage to human hearing, that create
normal
peace,
healthy
living,
good
sleep.
lighting should not keep neighbors awake, nor should noise. traffic patterns will change with such usage of land and must be well planned for. Wisconsin's water is mostly healthy, and regular testing and planning should be regulated and
maintained
as
both
closed
loop
and
other
systems
still
affect
water
quality
in
the
neighboring
lands."
3/8/2026 21:03:33 Jessica White jessrs200@gmail.com E6502 690th Ave.
Menomonie,
WI
54751
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
live
on
690th
Ave
in
Red
Cedar.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Housing
Protection
"Housing
Protection:
I
live
off
690th
ave
and
am
very
concerned
about
the
data
center
being
built
within
approximately
1
mile
of
my
property.
We
will
see
this
from
our
home
windows
everyday
and
will
be
very
affected
by
every
negative
aspect
it
brings.
My
biggest
concern
is
that
home
values
on
our
street
will
fall
and
that
should
we
want
to
move,
whether
due
to
the
data
center/change
of
job/retirement/etc,
we
would
not
ever
be
able
to
do
so
as
we
would
not
be
able
to
sell
our
home
at
the
cost
we
owe.
I
do
not
want
to
be
forced
to
live
here
forever
or
choose
foreclosure,
which
would
take
7
years
to
overcome.
I
would
like
to
see
home
protections
built
in
-
specifically
that
a
data
center
will
match
the
market
value
of
our
home
if
we
ever
choose
to
sell.
Homes
within
a
certain
distance,
and
all
those
on
690th
should
be
guaranteed
this!
Other Concerns: I was part of the community meeting that worked together to write provisions
that
we
would
like
to
see
for
the
I4
zone.
I
urge
the
city
staff
and
council
to
prioritize
the
42
provisions
outlined
in
the
Community
Resolution
as
it
represents
the
shared
thought
and
concern
of
myself
and
100+
individuals
who
attended
the
Citizen
Led
Town
Hall
on
February
15,
2026,
and
has
been
signed
by
hundreds
of
area
residents
backing
it."
3/9/2026 8:14:18 Holly Powell holly.s.powell@gmail.com 3551 Sharon Drive, Eau
Claire
WI
54701
I
live
near
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
live
in
Eau
Claire,
WI
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
Studies
for
job
related
18
gains/losses due to any proposed data center. "I urge the city staff and council to prioritize
the
42
provisions
outlined
in
the
Community
Resolution
that
has
been
signed
by
hundreds
of
area
residents.
It
represents
the
shared
thoughts
and
concerns
of
100+
individuals
who
attended
the
Citizen
Led
Town
Hall
on
February
15,
2026.
I also see data center construction not only affecting the city of Menomonie but also affecting
the
resources
and
environment
and
job
situation
for
people
in
the
state
of
Wisconsin
and
Minnesota.
Our
water
bodies
and
energy
systems
are
closely
connected.
Thank
you!"
3/9/2026 10:34:15 Kim Blue contact.kim.blue@gmail.com 1715 2nd St E, Menomonie
WI
54751
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
am
a
Business
Owner
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.,
I
work
in
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage
I
urge
city
staff
and
council
to
prioritize
the
42
provisions
outlined
in
the
Community
Resolution
that
has
been
signed
by
hundreds
of
area
residents.
It
represents
the
shared
thought
and
concern
of
100+
individuals
who
attended
the
Citizen
Led
Town
Hall
on
February
15,
2026.
3/9/2026 10:55:31 Amy J Eitrheim abejaybe@gmail.com 2711 Cherry Blossom Lane
I
am
a
Resident
of
the
City
of
Menomonie.
Noise,
Lighting,
Traffic,
Building
Height,
Landscaping,
Water
Usage,
pollution
of
water,
air,
ground;
increased
utility
use
and
burdens
on
area
residents
"I
urge
the
city
staff
and
council
to
prioritize
the
42
provisions
outlined
in
the
Community
Resolution
that
has
been
signed
by
hundreds
of
area
residents.
It
represents
the
shared
thought
and
concern
of
100+
individuals
who
attended
the
Citizen
Led
Town
Hall
on
February
15,
2026."
19
Source: City of Menomonie website. First collected Oct 19, 2026.