Public Works Committee — Minutes
City of Pewaukee · Waukesha County · Public Works Committee · meeting of Jan 22, 2026 · Minutes
Open the original document More from City of Pewaukee
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
City of Pewaukee
W240 N3065 Pewaukee Road
Public Works Committee Meeting Minutes
Thursday, January 22, 2026
In Attendance:
Mayor Steve Bierce, Alderman Jerry Wamser, Michael Kreiter, James Blackwood
Also In Attendance:
Director of Public Works M. Wagner, City Engineer M. Gabbey, Utility Manager J. Mueller,
Administrative Assistant H. Jacobs
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Bierce called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. and called for everyone to stand for
the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Public Comment - Please limit your comments to two minutes. If further time for discussion
is needed, please contact your District Alderperson prior to the meeting.
There were no public comments.
3. Discussion and Action Regarding the Minutes
3.1 Discussion and possible action to adopt Dec 10 2025 meeting minutes
Motion was made and seconded (M. Kreiter, J. Blackwood) to approve the
December 10, 2025 meeting minutes. Motion passed unanimously.
4. Storm Water Management Division
4.1 Discussion and possible action to approve the Intergovernmental Agreement
regarding Transfer of Phosphorus and Total Suspended Solids Credits from Fox River
Water Pollution Control Center to Others as Part of Fox Illinois Total Maximum Daily
Load. [Wagner/Wirtz]
Ms. Wagner presented information regarding the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA).
She explained that the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) is
developing a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) limit for the upper Fox River, which
will assign pollutant loading limits to each community that must be reduced over time.
Two key pollutants included in the TMDL are phosphorus and total suspended solids,
both of which are also reduced at the Fox River Pollution Control Center (treatment
plant).
Ms. Wagner noted that the City of Pewaukee owns approximately 17.22% of the
treatment plant, which is primarily owned and operated by the City of Brookfield, with
ownership shares divided among seven communities. The treatment plant's
phosphorus removal level is already set lower than what is anticipated under the
TMDL, creating potential credits that communities may receive based on their
percentage of ownership and wastewater flows.
The proposed agreement outlines how credits will be allocated among the
communities and the potential costs for Pewaukee to realize these credits. The
Stormwater Utility would reimburse the Sewer Utility for any additional costs
associated with accessing these credits. Ms. Wagner emphasized that this is the most
economical method for the City to meet requirements that will be established under
the TMDL.
There were no questions or concerns raised by committee members.
Motion was made and seconded (J. Wamser, M. Kreiter) to recommend the
approval of the Intergovernmental Agreement to the Common Council. Motion
passed unanimously.
5. Engineering Division
5.1 Discussion and possible action to apply for a Joint Quiet Zone for Duplainville Road
and Parkside Road with the Village of Pewaukee's Forest Grove Drive, Oakton
Avenue, Wisconsin Avenue and Kopmeier Drive. [Wagner/Gabbey]
Mr. Gabbey presented information regarding the proposed joint quiet zone. He
explained that the City has been pursuing quiet zones throughout its limits, with
crossings at various stages of development. Current crossings under review include
Watertown Road, Green Road, and Weyer Road along the Canadian National
Railway, as well as Springdale Road (in partnership with the City of Brookfield),
Duplainville Road, and Parkside Road along the Canadian Pacific Railway.
Mr. Gabbey reported that the Village of Pewaukee approached the City about
submitting a joint quiet zone application encompassing all crossings along the
Canadian Pacific Railway through both municipalities: Duplainville Road, Forest
Grove Drive, Oakton Avenue, Wisconsin Avenue, Kopmeier Drive, and Parkside
Road.
The primary purpose of the joint application would be to expedite the Village's
approval process, as its crossings require Alternative Safety Measures that typically
involve a lengthy approval timeline. By combining into a joint system, the Village
would benefit from quad gate systems already in place at City crossings, thereby
lowering the overall risk index and allowing all crossings to be included in a quiet zone
without undergoing an extended Federal Railway Administration (FRA) review
process.
Mr. Gabbey addressed concerns regarding potential crashes affecting the entire quiet
zone. He explained that if a crash occurred at one crossing and raised the risk index,
the City could file an amended quiet zone application to remove that specific crossing
while maintaining quiet zone status for the remaining crossings.
City staff indicated that a condition of the partnership would require the Village to
implement the safety measures at its crossings that would have been required for
individual quiet zone establishment, even if those measures might not technically be
required under a joint zone. Ms. Wagner confirmed she had discussed this
requirement with the Village Administrator, who understood and agreed.
Committee members discussed the status of other quiet zones in the area. Mr.
Gabbey noted that improvements at the Springdale crossing were complete, but is
awaiting completion of improvements at additional crossings by the City of Brookfield.
There was also discussion regarding whether the quiet zone could eventually extend
through Oconomowoc, although some gaps may remain.
Motion was made and seconded (J. Blackwood, M. Kreiter) to recommend to the
Common Council moving forward with the establishment of a joint quiet zone
with the Village of Pewaukee, including the crossings at Duplainville Road,
Forest Grove Drive, Oakton Avenue, Wisconsin Avenue, Kopmeier Drive, and
Parkside Road, contingent upon the Village constructing the Alternative Safety
Measures that would have been required for individual establishment. Motion
passed unanimously.
5.2 Presentation, Discussion, and Possible Action of the Preliminary Layout for the
Pewaukee Road Trail Extension Project. [Gabbey]
Mr. Gabbey provided background on the Pewaukee Road Trail Extension Project. He
explained that in 2024 the City received a residential petition requesting extension of
the trail along Pewaukee Road from its current termination at Riverwood Drive north
to Tower Place. The Public Works Committee previously directed staff to secure
funding and retain a consultant, R.H. Batterman, to conduct feasibility studies.
The consultants presented two alternatives:
• Alternative 1 (yellow line): Along Highway 164 at an estimated cost of
$1,334,000
• Alternative 3 (blue line): Utilizing private paths through the commercial area at
an estimated cost of $1,131,000
The committee engaged in discussion regarding the merits of each alternative. Mayor
Bierce stated that he viewed the alternatives as fundamentally different in purpose.
He noted that the yellow path would complete an unfinished segment but would place
pedestrians in proximity to high-speed traffic. In contrast, the blue path would provide
a more leisurely route that could better serve residents in the Avondale area as well
as employees in the commercial district.
Alderman Wamser commented on the potential for future mixed-use development in
the area and suggested the blue path would be more relaxing and appealing to
residents who may feel uncomfortable near highway traffic.
Mr. Blackwood expressed concern that the business park area may feel isolated on
weekends, which could make some users uncomfortable. However, he also noted that
the highway route is extremely noisy, which would make conversation difficult for trail
users.
The committee also discussed potential connections to ProHealth Care. Mr.
Blackwood questioned whether City taxpayers should fund the estimated $200,000
switchback ramps that would primarily benefit ProHealth.
Following additional discussion regarding lighting, safety, and maintenance
considerations, the committee agreed that the blue alternative with a single
connection at the rear of ProHealth was preferable. Ms. Wagner noted that
easements from private property owners would be required. However, businesses
may support the project if the city assumes maintenance responsibilities.
Motion was made and seconded (J. Wamser, J. Blackwood) to recommend that
staff pursue the blue line alternative with the rear connection to ProHealth.
Motion passed unanimously.
6. Public Comment - Please limit your comments to two minutes. If further time for discussion
is needed, please contact your District Alderperson prior to the meeting.
There were no public comments.
7. Adjournment
Motion was made and seconded (J. Wamser, J. Blackwood) to adjourn the meeting
at 5:09 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
Respectfully Submitted
Magdelene Wagner
Director of Public Works
Source: City of Pewaukee website. First collected Oct 7, 2026.