00-Planning Commission Packet 8.18.2026

Planning Commission June 30,2026 1 CITY OF OCONTO FALLS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PUBLIC HEARING Council Chambers – Municipal Building 500 N. Chestnut Avenue Oconto Falls, WI 54154 WEDNESDAY JUNE 30, 2026 – 5:00 PM MINUTES Chairman Coopman called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. Roll Call: Present: Marty Coopman-Chair, Brad Rice, Chique Tousey-Tabar, Ashley Bahrke, Andy Mercier and Judy Kostreva Also Present: Mayor Clint Braun, City Administrator Peter Wills, Deputy Clerk Jenny Friedman, Street Superintendent Wally Remic, Michelle Tester, Heather Trempe 3. ******PUBLIC HEARING**** Ordinance 26-003 Detachment of a portion of County I - City boundary south of South Main Street north to the north side of Columbia Street *** Public Hearing for the consideration of Detachment Ordinance 26-003 that will detach a portion of County I from the City of Oconto Falls to the Town of Stiles. *** A. Open Public Hearing B. Receive Public Comments/Input C. Close Public Hearing An annexation for a portion of County I from the City of Oconto Falls to the Town of Stiles was completed back in August 2025. Following the annexation however, the land possession was never transferred over from the Town and County to the City in 2025 by the State of Wisconsin, due to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, and Wisconsin Department of Administration found errors in the legal documentation maps from the 1966 and 1973 annexations of Town of Oconto Falls property to the City that covers the area of the Oconto Falls High School and Elementary School in 1966 and Cemetery property in 1973. The City has been working with the City Attorney, and surveyor to correct the legal descriptions and maps from the 1966 and 1973 Annexations for a number of months, and the last part of the correction is the amending of the 25-007 ordinance annexing the property. The city has been working to start a detachment process of this annexation but before that could happen the errors form 1966 and 1973 need to have an affidavit of Correction filed and amend the Annexation Ordinance per Department of Administration and Department of Transportation. The Town of Stiles Chairman, Jason Flynn has been updated as part of the communications with this process. The City is now to the step to have Planning Commission host the public hearing on the detachment of a portion of County I, in order to start the detachment process. At 5:00pm Planning Commission June 30,2026 2 Chairman Marty Coopman opened the floor for public comments for Public Hearing for the consideration of Detachment Ordinance 26-003 that will detach a portion of County I from the City of Oconto Falls to the Town of Stiles. Deputy Clerk Friedman and City Administrator Wills verified there were no written in or called in concerns prior to the public hearing. Administrator Wills did state that there has been an open records request for all communication between the DOA and the City Administrator since September 2024. He is working on this request. First Call at 5:02 pm by Chairman Marty Coopman for public input. There were no concerns or questions. Second Call at 5:05pm by Chairman Marty Coopman for public input. There were no concerns from the public. Third Call at 5:06pm by Chairman Marty Coopman for public input. There were no concerns from the public. With no concerns from the public Chairman Marty Coopman closed the public hearing at 5:07pm. D. Committee discussion on Detachment Ordinance 26-003, that will detach a portion of County I from the City of Oconto Falls to the Town of Stiles. E. Committee recommendation on Detachment Ordinance 26-003 to City Council. MOTION: TOUSEY-TABAR/RICE Motion to recommend the Ordinance 26-003 Detachment of a portion of County I - City boundary south of South Main Street north to the north side of Columbia Street. Voice Vote: All present voting aye - MOTION CARRIED 4. ******PUBLIC HEARING**** Zoning Change Senior Center & related parcels 512 Caldwell Ave., Application to change zoning from (R-2) Multiple-Family Residence District to C-1 General Commercial District. *** Public Hearing for the consideration of Zoning Change application for Senior Center & related parcels 512 Caldwell Ave., Application to change zoning from R-2 Multiple-Family Residence to C-1 General Commercial District. *** A. Open Public Hearing B. Receive Public Comments/Input C. Close Public Hearing Senior Center & related parcels 512 Caldwell Ave. are currently zoned as R-2 Multiple-Family Residence. The City has submitted an application to change zoning from R-2 Multiple-Family Residence to C-1 General Commercial District. The Main Course is operating out of the Senior Center, concerns were brought to the City that it is zoned for R-2 and should be zoned C-1 for Commercial operations. C-1 zoning is consistent with the surrounding areas are zoned commercial. The C-1 zoning change would also better fit the purpose of the Senior Center. Chairman Marty Coopman opened the floor for public comments for Public Hearing for the consideration of Zoning Change application for Senior Center & related parcels 512 Caldwell Ave., Application to change zoning from R-2 Multiple-Family Residence Planning Commission June 30,2026 3 to C-1 General Commercial District. Deputy Clerk Friedman and City Administrator Wills verified there were no written in or called in concerns prior to the public hearing. First Call at 5:10pm by Chairman Marty Coopman for public input. There were no concerns or questions. Second Call at 5:14pm by Chairman Marty Coopman for public input. There were no concerns from the public. Third Call at 5:15pm by Chairman Marty Coopman for public input. There were no concerns from the public. With no concerns from the public Chairman Marty Coopman closed the public hearing at 5:15pm. D. Committee discussion on consideration of Zoning Change application for Senior Center & related parcels 512 Caldwell Ave., Application to change zoning from R-2 Multiple Family Residential to C-1 Commercial. E. Committee recommendation on Zoning Change application for Senior Center & related parcels 512 Caldwell Ave., Application to change zoning from R-2 Multiple Family Residential to C-1 Commercial to City Council. MOTION: RICE/BAHRKE Motion to recommend Zoning Change application for Senior Center & related parcels 512 Caldwell Ave., Application to change zoning from R-2 Multiple Family Residential to C-1 Commercial to City Council. Voice Vote: All present voting aye - MOTION CARRIED DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE RECOMMENDATION/ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING: 5. Approve Planning Commission Minutes from 06.02.2026 MOTION: RICE/ KOSTREVA Motion to approve the Planning Commission Minutes from 06.02.2026 with the amendments. Voice Vote: All present voting aye - MOTION CARRIED 6. Excavation Permit Violations, Unresolved by Contractors a. Excavation Permits Violations Unresolved by Contractors, Recommendation to Council Deputy Clerk Friedman explained that for companies like WE Energies to receive an Excavation Permit/ Right of Way Permit they submit an application and maps to the Deputy Clerk. Deputy Clerk Friedman then gathers all information and gets that information to the Street Superintendent and Utilities to review the paperwork to make sure it is ok for the company to come in and do the work at the location. There have not been any issues in the past but recently there have been a lot of complaints from the community that the workers have not left the area in good condition. This has been brought to the attention of the companies but there were still issues after they had come out and fixed it. The current Excavation/ Right of Way application terms does not have wording in the application to bill the applicant company and contractor if the City must do unresolved repair work ourselves or have it hired out. The proposed amendment to the application would cover the costs the City would Planning Commission June 30,2026 4 incur to do the uncompleted repairs. MOTION: RICE/KOSTREVA Motion to recommend the excavation application changes with adding ability to charge contractors to the Common Council. Voice Vote: All present voting aye - MOTION CARRIED 7. Adjournment Having no further discussion, Chairman Coopman declared the meeting adjourned at 5:31 PM. ______________________________ City Administrator Peter Wills A quorum of the Common Council was in attendance of this meeting Original Project Plan Approved: Monday, September 25, 2023 Project Plan Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls Oconto Falls, Wisconsin Amendment Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 Approved by: Plan Commission Tuesday, August 18, 2026 City Council Tuesday, August 18, 2026 Joint Review Board Tuesday, September 8, 2026 Prepared by MSA Professional Services, Inc. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls i SECTION I TIF Adoption Process and Calendar ...................................................................................... 1 SECTION II Introduction and Purpose ..................................................................................................... 2 A: Summary of Findings ......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION III District Description and Equalized Value Test .................................................................. 3 A: Boundary Description ........................................................................................................................... 3 B: Tax Parcels ........................................................................................................................................ 3 C: Equalized Value Test ..................................................................................................................... 3 D: Newly Platted Residential Subdivision .......................................................................................... 3 SECTION IV Statement of Kind, Number and Location of Public Works and Other projects ............... 4 A: Public Works Projects .......................................................................................................................... 4 B: Project Cost Summary .......................................................................................................................... 7 C: Ineligible / Estimated Non-Project Costs .............................................................................................. 9 SECTION V Economic Feasibility .............................................................................................................. 9 A: New Development Activities .............................................................................................................. 10 B: Tax Rate .............................................................................................................................................. 10 C: Projected Income ................................................................................................................................ 10 D: Impact on Overlying Taxing Jurisdictions ........................................................................................... 13 SECTION VI Financing ......................................................................................................................... 13 SECTION VII Proposed Zoning Changes ............................................................................................... 15 SECTION VIII Proposed Changes in the Community Development Plan, Map, Building Codes & Ordinance 15 SECTION IX Relocation ....................................................................................................................... 15 SECTION X Statement Indicating How the TID Promotes Orderly Development of Municipality ........ 15 SECTION XI Legal Opinion .................................................................................................................. 15 SECTION XII Glossary of TIF Related Terms ......................................................................................... 16 Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 1 SECTION I TIF Adoption Process and Calendar State statute prescribes the process for creating and amending Tax Incremental Finance Districts for the City of Oconto Falls. The laws require public input in the TIF creation and amendment process, including a public hearing held by the Plan Commission at which TIF information is discussed and whereby citizens can reasonably voice their opinion on the creation or amendment of a TIF District. A three -phased approval process is required to create or amend TIF Districts including approval by the Plan Commission, City Council, and the Joint Review Board. This Project Plan is for Territory Amendment No. 1 to the City of Oconto Falls TID No. 3 . Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was created on September 25, 2023 as a “mixed-use TID. The amendment involves the adding of six parcels of land which is adjacent to TID No. 3. Changes to the original Project Plan for TID No. 3 are highlighted in this amended Project Plan. The following is the formal meeting/action calendar for the City of Oconto Falls Tax Incremental Finance District No. 3 process: Table 1: Adoption Calendar Activity Date City notifies taxing entities (school district, county, vocational college, and any special taxing districts) on proposed territory amendment of TID No. 3 and upcoming meetings. By 8/6/2026 Publication of Class I Notice of First Joint Review Board Meeting. 8/7/2026 Publication of Class I Notice of Plan Commission Public Hearing. 8/7/2026 Joint Review Board - Meeting No. 1 to include representatives of taxing jurisdictions. Chairperson and member-at-large are selected at this meeting and a review of the draft amended Project Plan and Map occurs. 8/18/2026 Plan Commission holds the Public Hearing for the amended Project Plan and Map. Interested parties are given a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the proposed boundary and project plan. 8/18/2026 The Plan Commission action shall occur and a resolution recommending consideration and approval by the City Council is acted upon. 8/18/2026 City Council takes action on the proposed territory amendment of TID No. 3 boundary and project plan occurs. Approval by resolution contains findings that detail the TID’s consistency with state statutes. 8/18/2026 Publication of Class I Notice of second Joint Review Board Meeting. 9/4/2026 (Tentative) Upon approval of the City Council, the Joint Review Board holds a second meeting to review the TID and act by resolution on the amendment of TID No. 3. The JRB submits its decision to the City no more than 7 days after the vote. 9/9/2026 (Tentative) Department of Revenue is notified of the amendment of TID No. 3 by the City of Oconto Falls and subsequent approval by the Joint Review Board. 9/10/2026 Submit base packet documentation and amended Project Plan for Wisconsin Department of Revenue certification. On or Before 10/31/2026 Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 2 SECTION II Introduction and Purpose The City of Oconto Falls has identified a need to expand its economic base through business development. In order to promote development, the City is seeking to amend Tax Incremental Finance District (TID) No. 3 . The amendment of TID No. 3 will allow the City to make certain public improvements to the designated area so that business growth can occur. Anticipated growth, combined with the City’s commitment toward development, will ensure sufficient tax increment to retire all debt issued by the District for improvements. These improvements will allow the City to attract and retain potential development, and encourage further private investment in local businesses. The business development that is anticipated to occur will provide long-term tax benefits to both the City and all other overlying taxing jurisdictions. A: Summary of Findings In amending TID No. 3, the City of Oconto Falls has made the following findings, consistent with Section 66.1105 of Wisconsin Statutes: • Activities and improvements to the existing and amended TID No. 3 are intended to encourage and attract business growth in the City. • The improvement to the existing and amended area is likely to encourage, develop, and maintain a strong growth pattern in the City, taking advantage of major transportation routes through the City. • The improvement to the area is likely to maximize private investment within the existing and amended TID No. 3 and significantly enhance the value of substantially all other real estate in the District. • The improvement to the area is likely to make currently underdeveloped areas of the City more attractive by providing necessary and desired public improvements, which are compatible and feasible with existing systems. • The improvement to the area is likely to encourage and promote conformity with the City's land use policies and procedures. • The development in the existing and amended area would not take place in the absence of the improvements stated in the Project Plan. • The TID No. 3 is declared to be a “Mixed-use District” and at least 50% of the land in TID No. 3 has been classified as suitable for mixed -use development, as defined in s.66.1105(2)(cm). • The equalized value of the taxable property of the District plus the aggregate value increment of all existing districts within the City does not exceed 12% of the total value of equalized taxable property within the City. • The estimated percentage of the territory within the District that is devoted to retail business will not exceed 35% at the end of the District’s expenditure period. • The newly platted residential development within the District is less than 35% of the total land area. • Any vacant property within the TID is suitable for mixed-use development. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 3 SECTION III District Description and Equalized Value Test Tax Incremental District No. 3 is being amended by the City of Oconto Falls (Amendment #1). The City of Oconto Falls TID No. 3 was approved as a “Mixed-use District” by the City Council on September 25, 2023. The City of Oconto Falls finds that at least 50%, by area, of real property within the District is suitable for mixed-use development. A: Boundary Description The boundary for the existing and amended TID No. 3 was established using the following criteria: 1. The equalized value of the taxable property of the District plus the aggregate value increment of all existing districts within the City did not exceed 12% of the total value of equalized taxable property within the City at the time of amendment. 2. The District is contiguous and contains only whole parcels. 3. A map identifying the original boundaries and the amended boundaries, through Territory Amendment #1 for TID No. 3, are provided in Appendix A. B: Tax Parcels The following whole tax parcels will be included in the newly designated TID No. 3: 2660303005900T 2660303005975 2660202705305TA 2660303005900T1 2660202705275T 2660202705365T C: Equalized Value Test Per Wisconsin State Statute 66.1105(4)(gm)4.c., municipalities are restrained in their use of Tax Increment Financing such that the equalized value of taxable property of the (new/amended) district area plus the value increment of all existing districts do es not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property within the municipality. Table 2 indicates is the Equalized Value Test for Amendment #1 to TID No. 3: Table 2: Equalized Value Test 12% Calculation - Maximum Allowable TID Property Value Equalized Value (as of January 1, 2026) $306,826,300 Maximum Allowable TID Property Value (12%) $36,819,156 12% Test - Compliance Existing TID #3 Value Increment (as of January 1, 2026) $732,500 Amended TID #3 Equalized Value (Estimated) $5,928,400 Total Equalized Values $6,690,900 Percentage 2.18% D: Newly Platted Residential Subdivision None of above parcels have been identified as being suitable for a newly platted residential subdivision. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 4 SECTION IV Statement of Kind, Number and Location of Public Works and Other projects The City of Oconto Falls intends to implement a number of public works projects that will positively impact business and community related development in the newly designated TID No. 3 area. These projects will be undertaken within the 15-year expenditure period of the TID's existence, subject to change based upon the relative needs of the City and the ability of the newly designated District to recoup expenses through the generation of tax increment. These projects may be undertaken within TID No. 3 or within ½ mile of the TID No. 3 boundary, per 2007 Wisconsin Act 57 § 2. A brief description of each project is provided below. A: Public Works Projects Project No. 1 Property Development The City may engage in property development in order to retain current businesses and/or to encourage business expansion/attraction. Eligible costs include building demolition, earthwork (site preparation/grading/environmental remediation), or property access and utility improvements. Project No. 2 Water System Improvements Development and redevelopment in the project area may require the City to construct, alter, rebuild, or expand water system infrastructure. In addition, costs associated to installing new or upgrading existing water supply, storage and distribution system inside the TID are considered eligible project costs. If costs are i ncurred outside the TID, only the portion related to the TID will be eligible. Specific projects may include the construction of a new well and storage tank, improvements to the existin g wells and storage tank, SCADA improvements, and installation of new distribution mains and laterals. Project No. 3 Sanitary Sewer System Improvements Development and redevelopment in the project area may require the City to construct, alter, rebuild, or expand the sanitary sewer system infrastructure. In addition, costs associated to upgrading the sanitary sewer system inside the TID are considered eligible project costs. If costs are incurred outside the TID, only the portion related to the TID will be eligible. Specific projects may include the installation of sanitary sewer mains and laterals, upgrade of existing lift stations and construction of a new lift station to serve the TID, upgrades at the Wastewater Treatme nt Plant and SCADA improvements (including pump/motor replacements). Project No. 4 Drainage and Storm Water Management Improvements The construction of new buildings and other impervious surfaces within the TID will affect stormwater runoff to the existing detention and infiltration areas. As a result the City may need to undertake stormwater planning, design, and construction activities. The City may use TIF funds for public improvements to the City’s storm sewer system that improve the quality of discharges to surface waters, groundwater infiltration, or for erosion control stabilization projects. Stormwater planning and design an d constructi on of collection, Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 5 conveyance, treatment, and retention systems are eligible project costs. Specific projects may include the construction of stormwater management features for the Business Park and addressing storm drainage issues on local streets. Project No. 5 Electric, Natural Gas, and Other Utility Improvements In order to promote redevelopment the City may incur costs to relocate, upgrade, or bury electrical service lines, upgrade natural gas mains/lines, or telecommunication lines/cables. Such costs are eligible project costs, including those costs that would be incurred by private landowners as a result of City decisions to relocate, upgrade, or bury utilities. Project No. 6 Transportation and Parking Infrastructure Improvements To encourage development, the City may need to construct or reconstruct streets, access drives, and/or parking lots to improve or increase parking in the project area. Eligible project costs include, but are not limited to: excavation, removal or placement of fill, construction of road base, asphalt or concrete paving or repaving, street resurfacing, parking lot resurfacing, installation of curb and gutter, installation of sidewalks and bicycle lanes/paths, installation or repair of culverts and bridges, installation or repair of traffic control signage/signals, pavement marking, and installation of retaining walls. Project No. 7 Streetscaping, Landscaping and Park Improvements In order to attract development and improve the appearance of the TID, the City may install amenities to enhance development sites, rights -of-way, parks, and other public spaces. These amenities include, but are not limited to: landscaping, lighting of streets, installation of planters, benches, clocks, tree rings, trash receptacles , installation of brick or other decorative walks, terraces and street crossings. In addition, the City may find it necessary to make certain site improvements to any of the City owned parks for the purposes of improving park land, enhancing park access and the general aesthetics of the TID. These and any other similar amenities installed by the City are eligible project costs. Specific projects may include the installation entrance features, signage and landscape screening. Project No. 8 Development Incentives The City may enter into agreements with property owners, lessees, or developers of land located within the TID for the purpose of sharing costs to encourage the desired type of improvements and assure tax base is generated sufficient to recoup project costs. Such improvements could include cash grants or loans. No cash grants will be provided until a developer agreement is executed. Any payments of cash grants made by the City are eligible project costs. Establishment of a Revolving Loan Fund (low interest loan or temporary grant) is considered Development Incentives and these are eligible project costs. Loan and/or matching grant recipients will be required to sign an agreement specifying the nature of the property improvements to be made. Eligible im provements will be those that are likely to improve the value of property, enhance the visual appearance of the property and surrounding area, correct safety deficiencies, or as otherwise specified by the Main Street Committee or City Council. Any funds returned to the Main Street Committee or City Council from the repayment of loans made are not considered revenues to the TID, and will not be Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 6 used to offset TID Project Costs. Instead, these funds will be placed into a revolving loan fund and will continue to be used for the program purposes stated above. Project No. 9 Economic Development Planning To encourage quality development and/or redevelopment within the TID, the City may engage in planning and economic development projects including land use plans, grant applications, zoning regulations and design guidelines, economic development plans, impact fee studies, Business Improvement District (BID) amendment , and business attraction and retention related costs. GIS mapping and assistance with developer’s agreements are eligible costs. As provided for in Wisconsin Statutes Section 66.1105(2)(f)(1)(h) and 66.1333(13), the City may provide funds to its Main Street Committee to be used for administration, planning, and operations related to the purposes for which it was established in furtherance of any redevelopment or urban renewal project in the TID. Funds provided to the Main Street Committee for this purpose are eligible project costs. Project No. 10 Financing Costs Interest expense, debt issuance expenses, redemption premiums, and any other fees and costs incurred in conjunction with obtaining financing for projects undertaken under this Project Plan are eligible project costs. Project No. 11 TID Administration The City will provide TID administration and reporting to the Department of Revenue including base packet submittal and annual eligibility evaluations. The City may charge to the TID appropriate allocations of administrative costs, including, but not limited to, employee salaries and prorated equipment usage. Costs allocated must bear a direct correlation to the time spent by City employees and/or equipment costs in connection with the implementation of the Project Plan. In addition, costs related to outside review of TID performance, TID auditing costs, or legal counsel associated to the TID are eligible costs. Project No. 12 Township Annexation Fees The City may use tax increments to help pay the fees that are required for annexation of territory into the City to become part of the TID. Project No. 13 Façade Improvement Program The City may encourage improvement efforts of the central city and downtown area through cash grants/incentives, in the form of a Facade Improvement Program. No cash grants/incentives will be provided until an agreement is executed. Any payments of cash gr ants/incentives made by the City are eligible project costs. Establishment of a Revolving Loan Fund (low interest loan or temporary grant) for the purpose of Facade Improvement are eligible project costs. Loan and/or matching grant recipients will be required to sign an agreement specifying the nature of the property improvements to be made. Eligible improvements will be those that are likely to improve the value of property, enhance the visual appearance of the property and surrounding area, eliminate slu m and/or blight conditions, or as otherwise specified by the Main Street Committee or City Council. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 7 Project No. 14 Industrial Development Development and redevelopment in the project area may require the City to construct, alter, rebuild, or expand water system infrastructure, sewer system infrastructure, stormwater management infrastructure, electrical infrastructure, natural gas infrastruc ture, and telecommunication infrastructure in order to attract and/or retain industrial development. Costs-related to marketing the City's Industrial District ("District"), for the purpose of attracting and/or retaining industrial development, is an eligib le project cost. Specific projects may include the development and distribution of marketing materials for the District, the development and implementation of a marketing plan for the District, and other activities related to developer/business recruitment . In addition, costs associated with industrial development inside the TID are considered eligible project costs. If costs are incurred outside the TID, only the portion related to the TID will be eligible. Projects Outside the TID The City expects that there may be several projects that encompass an area outside of the boundaries of the TID. Pursuant to Wisconsin Statutes Section 66.1105(2(f)(1)(n), the City may undertake projects within territory located within one-half (1/2) mile of the boundary of the TID, and pay for them using tax increment, provided that: 1) the project area is located within the City’s corporate boundaries and 2) the projects are an eligible TIF expenditure within this Project Plan as approved by the Joint Review Boar d and 3) the expenditure must be made within the expenditure period. Other Projects Other infrastructure projects unknown at this time, but consistent with the purpose of the TID may be eligible project costs. Such eligibility will be determined by the City Council at the time the projects are being considered. The projects listed above will provide necessary facilities and support to enable and encourage the development of the TID. These projects may be implemented in varying degrees in response to development needs. In addition to the above projects, the City of Oconto Falls may request multiple base value redeterminations during the life of TID No. 3, if necessary and allowed by the WI State Statute. B: Project Cost Summary Table 3 lists the estimated total expenditures for each project category. This format follows Wisconsin Department of Revenue guidance on detailed project costs (pe-209), which states the project list should include “estimated expenditures expected for each major category of public improvements.” It is important to note that this Project Plan is not meant to be an appropriation of funds for specific projects, but a framework with which to manage projects. All costs identified are preliminary estimates made prior to design considerations, or engineering studies, and are subject to change after planning is complete. All of the customary expenses are considered in these estimates, including but not limited to: legal fees, engineering fees, architectural fees, planning fees, surveying and mapping fees, inspection, construction costs, materials and apparatus, restoration work, permits, reports, judgments, claims for damages and other expenses. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 8 Table 3: TID No. 3 Project Costs Project # Project Amount 1 Development Incentives $45,284 2 Property Development $10,000 3 Water System Improvements $25,000 4 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $25,000 5 Drainage and Storm Water Management Improvements $25,000 6 Electric, Natural Gas, and Other Utility Improvements $25,000 7 Transportation and Parking Infrastructure Improvements $25,000 8 Streetscaping, Landscaping and Park Improvements $25,000 9 Economic Development Planning $12,500 10 Financing Costs $51,820 11 TID Administration $105,000 12 Incentives to Promote Development of Multi-Family Housing $166,570 13 Facade Improvement Program $25,000 14 Industrial Development $64,486 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $630,660 All costs are stated in 2023 prices and are preliminary estimates. The City reserves the right to increase the costs to reflect inflationary increases and other unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances between 2023 and the time of construction/implementation, such as higher than anticipated financing costs. The City reserves the right to increase and decrease particular project costs within the Total TID Expenditure budget estimate without amending this Project Plan. For example, reallocating funds from one project category to another. Wisconsin Statutes do not obligate the City to complete all of the proposed projects listed in the Project Plan; however, the expenditure period for TID No. 3 is limited to September 21, 2023 through September 21, 2043. The City retains the right to change the scope and/or timing of projects implemented as they are individually authorized by the City Council, without further amending this Project Plan. Public debt and expenditures should be made at the pace private development occurs to assure increment is sufficient to cover expenses. The needs of the City and the performance of the TID will be reviewed annually to determine if change is required to any of the proposed activities. Should the needs of the City change, projects may have to be slightly or substantially altered or even eliminated. This allocation of increments is preliminary and is subject to adjustment based upon the implementation of the Plan. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 9 C: Ineligible / Estimated Non-Project Costs The following bullets identify public works projects that are not eligible to be paid with tax increments under Wis. Stat. 66.1105(2)(f).2. • The cost of constructing or expanding administrative buildings, police and fire buildings, libraries, community and government al buildings and school buildings, unless the administrative buildings, police and fire buildings, libraries and community and governmental buildings were damaged or destroyed before January 1, 1997, by a natural disaster. • The cost of constructing or expanding any facility, except a parking structure, if the City generally finances similar facilities only with utility user fees. • General government operating expenses, unrelated to the planning or development of a TID. • Cash grants made by the City to owners, lessees, or developers of land that is located within the TID unless the grant recipient has signed a development agreement with the City, a copy of which shall be retained by the City in the official records for that TID. Non-project costs are public works projects that only partly benefit the TID or are not eligible to be paid with tax increments. Examples of non- project costs include projects undertaken within the TID as part of the implementation of this Project Plan, t he costs of which are paid fully or in part by impact fees, grants, or special assessments. Other examples include public works projects that only partly benefit the TID, such as a new water tower which serves properties both inside and outside of the TID, and its ½ - mile boundary. That portion of the total project costs allocable to properties outside of the TID, and its ½ - mile boundary, would be a non-project cost. No ineligible project costs were identified at the time this Project Plan was considered for adoption. SECTION V Economic Feasibility The economic feasibility of TID No. 3 depends on the tax incremental revenue generated from within the TID. There are three critical components in determining the economic feasibility of a TID: New development increases in property value, inflation driven increases in property value, and the change in the full value tax rate. In projecting the future increment and income generated by TID No. 3, assumptions were made for each of the above-mentioned critical components. Based on the projected values in Table 5 and projected costs in Table 6, the TID is feasible. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 10 A: New Development Activities Since the creation of TID #3 in 2023, the District’s value equalized value increment over the last three years has grown to $732,500. The TID is projected to realize $72,582,500 in new value over its anticipated 20-year life. Table 4: Anticipated New Development Activities YEAR TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTED VALUE 2029 Multi- & Single-Family Homes $2,700,000 2030 Multi- & Single-Family Homes $4,700,000 2031 Multi- & Single-Family Homes $3,400,000 2032 Single-Family Homes $1,400,000 2033 Single-Family Homes $4,000,000 2034 Single-Family Homes $4,000,000 2035 Single-Family Homes $4,000,000 2036 Multi- & Single-Family Homes $7,000,000 2037 Multi- & Single-Family Homes $7,000,000 2038 Industrial Development $10,000,000 2039 Industrial/Commercial, & Residential Development $5,000,000 2040 Single-Family Homes $3,000,000 2041 Commercial/Indistrial Expansion $1,750,000 2042 Revaluation Increase $12,700,000 2043 Commercial/Indistrial Expansion $1,200,000 TOTAL $71,850,000 B: Tax Rate The full value tax rate is assumed to be $16.78 per $1,000 of assessed value and remain constant through 2043. C: Projected Income Assuming that the new development activities occur as planned the TID is expected to generate $9,065,145 of tax increment through 2043. Table 5 presents the projected income for TID No. 3 commencing in 2023 and running over the life of the District to the year 2043.Table 6 presents the projected annual performance of the TID’s income and the proposed project costs. Based on the projected values in Table 5 and projected costs in Table 6, the TID is feasible. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 11 Table 5: TID No. 3 Projected Income A B C D E F G H TOTAL ANNUAL TAX DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT VALUE TAX INCREMENTS OTHER TOTAL YEAR VALUE CONSTRUCTION INCREMENT RATE (INCOME) INCOME INCOME ---------- --------------- ----------------- --------------- --------- --------------- ----------- ------------- 2022 $0 $0 $0 0.00 $0 $0 $0 2023 $26,472,800 $305,500 $0 0.00 $0 $0 $0 2024 $26,778,300 $5,260,300 $305,500 0.00 $0 $0 $0 2025 $32,038,600 ($4,833,300) $5,565,800 16.71 $5,105 $0 $5,105 2026 $27,205,300 $0 $732,500 16.78 $93,899 $0 $93,899 2027 $27,205,300 $0 $732,500 16.78 $12,291 $0 $12,291 2028 $27,205,300 $2,700,000 $732,500 16.78 $12,291 $0 $12,291 2029 $29,905,300 $4,700,000 $3,432,500 16.78 $12,291 $0 $12,291 2030 $34,605,300 $3,400,000 $8,132,500 16.78 $57,597 $0 $57,597 2031 $38,005,300 $1,400,000 $11,532,500 16.78 $136,463 $0 $136,463 2032 $39,405,300 $4,000,000 $12,932,500 16.78 $193,515 $0 $193,515 2033 $43,405,300 $4,000,000 $16,932,500 16.78 $217,007 $0 $217,007 2034 $47,405,300 $4,000,000 $20,932,500 16.78 $284,127 $0 $284,127 2035 $51,405,300 $7,000,000 $24,932,500 16.78 $351,247 $0 $351,247 2036 $58,405,300 $7,000,000 $31,932,500 16.78 $418,367 $0 $418,367 2037 $65,405,300 $10,000,000 $38,932,500 16.78 $535,827 $0 $535,827 2038 $75,405,300 $5,000,000 $48,932,500 16.78 $653,287 $0 $653,287 2039 $80,405,300 $3,000,000 $53,932,500 16.78 $821,087 $0 $821,087 2040 $83,405,300 $1,750,000 $56,932,500 16.78 $904,987 $0 $904,987 2041 $85,155,300 $12,700,000 $58,682,500 16.78 $955,327 $0 $955,327 2042 $97,855,300 $1,200,000 $71,382,500 16.78 $984,692 $0 $984,692 2043 $99,055,300 $0 $72,582,500 16.78 $1,197,798 $0 $1,197,798 2044 $99,055,300 $0 $72,582,500 16.78 $1,217,934 $0 $1,217,934 TOTAL $72,582,500 $9,065,145 Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 12 Table 6: TID No. 3 Projected Annual Performance I J K L M N DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL OTHER TOTAL ANNUAL DEC. 31ST YEAR INCENTIVE DEBT SERVICE EXPENSES EXPENSES CASH FLOW ACCT. BALANCE ------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- 2022 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2023 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2024 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($23,912) 2025 $0 $0 $14,813 $14,813 ($9,708) ($33,620) 2026 $0 $0 $60,000 $60,000 $33,899 $279 2027 $20,000.00 $0 $70,000 $90,000 ($77,709) ($77,430) 2028 $20,000.00 $0 $80,000 $100,000 ($87,709) ($165,138) 2029 $70,000.00 $0 $80,000 $150,000 ($137,709) ($302,847) 2030 $130,000.00 $55,000 $100,000 $285,000 ($227,403) ($530,250) 2031 $220,000.00 $55,000 $125,000 $400,000 ($263,537) ($793,786) 2032 $250,000.00 $55,000 $150,000 $455,000 ($261,485) ($1,055,271) 2033 $250,000.00 $55,000 $175,000 $480,000 ($262,993) ($1,318,264) 2034 $250,000.00 $55,000 $180,000 $485,000 ($200,873) ($1,519,136) 2035 $250,000.00 $55,000 $190,000 $495,000 ($143,753) ($1,662,889) 2036 $270,000.00 $55,000 $200,000 $525,000 ($106,633) ($1,769,522) 2037 $290,000.00 $120,000 $300,000 $710,000 ($174,173) ($1,943,694) 2038 $290,000.00 $120,000 $250,000 $660,000 ($6,713) ($1,950,407) 2039 $350,000.00 $120,000 $255,000 $725,000 $96,087 ($1,854,319) 2040 $350,000.00 $120,000 $260,000 $730,000 $174,987 ($1,679,332) 2041 $350,000.00 $120,000 $260,000 $730,000 $225,327 ($1,454,005) 2042 $350,000.00 $120,000 $260,000 $730,000 $254,692 ($1,199,312) 2043 $350,000.00 $120,000 $0 $470,000 $727,798 ($471,514) 2044 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,217,934 $746,420 TOTAL $4,060,000 $1,225,000 $3,009,813 $8,294,813 Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 13 D: Impact on Overlying Taxing Jurisdictions The estimated share of the projected tax increments to be paid by the owners of taxable property in each of the taxing jurisdictions overlying TID No. 3 is presented in Table 7. Table 7: Analysis of Impact on Overlying Tax Jurisdictions Jurisdiction % Share of Taxes (2025) Share of Projected Increment School District of Oconto Falls 44.4% $4,024,927 Northeast Wisconsin Technical College 3.1% $281,020 Oconto County 17.0% $1,541,075 City of Oconto Falls 35.5% $3,218,128 100% $9,065,150 Source: Wisconsin Department of Revenue “Town, City and City Taxes Levied 2025 - Collected 2026” SECTION VI Financing Under Wisconsin law there are several methods of borrowing, some of which apply against a municipality’s debt limit, and others that do not apply against the limit. The state sets this limit at five percent (5%) of the municipality’s total equalized prope rty valuation. The feasibility of financing specific projects at any given time using a particular method can be determined based on the municipality’s current fiscal situation, anticipated non- TID related capital needs, the amount of money to be borrowed, interest rates, and lending terms. Possible funding sources include: General Obligation Borrowing General Obligation Borrowing includes all types of municipal borrowing from banks, the State Trust Fund, or other lending institutions. This method of borrowing requires little effort or legal expenditures and works particularly well for smaller projects. General Obligation Bonding General Obligation Bonds are a debt instrument backed by the full faith and credit of the municipality and its ability to raise revenue through taxation. In the case of default, the municipality is liable for repayment of the debt. As a result, this type of debt can often result in lower interest rates than regular General Obligation Borrowing. The high fees associated with the issuance of the bonds makes them more attractive for larger projects. Mortgage Revenue Bonds Revenue Bonds are a debt instrument backed by revenue generated from the project. These types of bonds are also mainly used for larger debt issuances due to their relatively high associated fees. They are typically issued by municipal bodies that raise revenues on a fee for service type basis, such as the Water & Sewer Utility. These types of bonds generally do not count against a municipality’s five percent debt limit. Special Assessment “B” Bonds Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 14 Special Assessment “B” Bonds are a debt instrument backed by the municipality’s ability to raise revenue from special assessments charged to persons, organizations, or businesses receiving benefits from the project. These bonds also do not normally count against a municipality’s debt limit. Federal/State Loan and Grant Programs The State and Federal Government often sponsor grant and loan programs that municipalities may potentially use to supplement TID expenditures or provide financing for capital costs which positively impact the District. These programs include Wisconsin Community Development Block Grants, Rural Development Administration Community Facility Loan/Grants, Transportation Economic Assistance Grants, and Economic Development Administration Grants. These programs require local match funding to insure State and Federal participation in the project. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 15 SECTION VII Proposed Zoning Changes The City of Oconto Falls is zoned in accordance with an ordinance formally adopted by the City Council. Based on the current zoning classifications within TID No. 3 , no zoning changes are necessary as a result of amending TID No. 3. SECTION VIII Proposed Changes in the Community Development Plan, Map, Building Codes & Ordinance The amendment of TID No. 3 will not require any changes to the existing community development plans or the City’s municipal codes or ordinances. The projects proposed in the Project Plan are consistent with the development policies of the municipality, as well as existing building codes, maps, and ordinances. SECTION IX Relocation No persons are expected to be displaced or relocated as a result of proposed projects in the TID; however, if relocation were to become necessary in the future, the following is the method proposed by the City or Community Development Authority for displacement or relocation. Before negotiations begin for the acquisition of property or easements, all property owners will be contacted to determine if there will be displaced persons as defined by Wisconsin Statues and Administrative Rules. If it appears there will be displaced persons, all property owners and prospective displaced persons will be provided an informational pamphlet prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Administration (DOA). The City will file a relocation plan with the DOA and shall keep records as required in Wisconsin Statutes 32.27. The City will provide each owner a full narrative appraisal, a map showing the owners of all property affected by the proposed project and a list of neighboring landowners to whom offers are being made as required by law. SECTION X Statement Indicating How the TID Promotes Orderly Development of Municipality TID No. 3 will promote orderly development in the City of Oconto Falls by marketing and attracting economic activity to a specified area. This allows the City greater control over economic activity in order to ensure that development and/or growth is orderly, harmonious with adjoining land uses, and enhances the health and welfare of the community. SECTION XI Legal Opinion An opinion from the City legal counsel regarding the Project Plan for TID No. 3 and its compliance with s. 66.1105 of Wisconsin Statutes is provided in Appendix G. To Be Provided Upon Review of All Documents. Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 16 SECTION XII Glossary of TIF Related Terms Base Value The aggregate value, as equalized by DOR, of the real, personal, and non -exempt municipal- owned property located within the TID as of the valuation date. Equalized Value The estimate of the State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue of the full market value of property; used to apportion property tax levies of counties, school districts and municipalities among tax districts. Expenditure Period The time during which expenses may be incurred for the implementation of the approved project plan and the completion of the projects outlined therein. The current maximum expenditure period for all districts ends five years before the un-extended maximum life of the TID. Non-Project Costs As part of the project plan, there may be investments that are not eligible for TIF, or that are paid for with revenue other than tax increment revenue – such as a grant. Project Plan The plan, properly submitted and approved by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, for the financial development or redevelopment of a TID, including all properly approved amendments. Tax Incremental District (TID) The contiguous geographical area within a municipality consisting solely of whole units of property as are assessed for general property tax purposed not including railroad rights of way, rivers or highways, or wetlands as defined in Wisconsin Statutes 23.32. Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) A mechanism for financing development and redevelopment projects whereby property tax revenue from increased property values in a defined geographic district is used to pay for public improvements, such as roads, sewer and water lines. Once the improvemen ts are paid for, the property taxes go to the municipality, county and school districts. Tax Increment The taxes levied by all overlying taxing jurisdictions on the difference between the base value and the current value of the TID, also known as the value increment. These taxes are sent to the municipality who operates the TID, and used to pay for the approved project costs laid out in the project plan. Tax Rate The rate, usually expressed in terms of dollars per one thousand dollars of assessed valuation, at which taxes are levied against the total assessed valuation of the municipality. Due to changes in the total assessed valuation of the municipality from year to year, the tax levy change and the Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 City of Oconto Falls 17 tax rate change will not be the same. The tax rate change reflects what impact the property owner will see in their total taxes. Value Increment The difference in value between the base value and the current value. This is the amount of property value that can be attributed to the TIF investment, and as such is the portion of the tax base that is used to generate the tax increment that pays for the investment. NOTICE OF JOINT REVIEW BOARD MEETING AND PLAN COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PROPOSED TERRITORY AMENDMENT AND PROJECT PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICT (TID) NO. 3 IN THE CITY OF OCONTO FALLS, WISCONSIN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Oconto Falls will hold an organizational Joint Review Board (JRB) meeting on August 18, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. in the City Hall, located at 500 N. Chestnut Avenue, Oconto Falls, WI. The purpose of this meeting is to organize a JRB to consider the proposed amended Project Plan and boundary for TID No. 3. The meeting is open to the public. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Plan Commission of the City of Oconto Falls will hold a public hearing on August 18, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Hall, located at 500 N. Chestnut Avenue, Oconto Falls, WI regarding the proposed amended Project Plan and boundary for TID No. 3. The meeting is open to the public. Through this amendment, the City will be adding the following tax parcels to TID #3: 2660303005900T 2660303005975 2660202705305TA 2660303005900T1 2660202705275T 2660202705365T As part of the amendment of the TID No. 3 Project Plan, cash grants may be made by the City of Oconto Falls to owners, lessees, or developers of property within TID No. 3. The estimated cost of the proposed amendment is $1.0 million. At the public hearing, all persons will be afforded an opportunity to be heard concerning the proposed amended TID No. 3 Project Plan and amended boundaries. A copy of the proposed amended TID No. 3 Project Plan and boundaries are available for inspection and will be provided upon request. Arrangements for either inspection or receipt of a copy of the amended TID No. 3 Project Plan and boundaries may be made by contacting the City Clerk at 920-846- 4505. Dated this 28th day of July, 2026 Peter Wills City Administrator Publication Dates: August 7, 2026. W a s c h b i s c h R d C o u n t y R o a d B O c o n t o R i v e r C o u n t y R o a d B W H i g h l a n d D r 2 2 O c o n t o R i v e r N F l a t l e y A v e S h e r m a n S t K i n g S t C o u n t r y s i d e L n S a i n t A u b i n L n S F l a t l e y A v e G r e e n B a y A v e G o l d e n C o r n e r s R d S h e r i d a n S t M i l l e n i u m R d E H i g h l a n d D r R a l p h L e m o r a n d e D r H a n k M a r k s D r S t a t e H i g h w a y 2 2 2 2 O c o n t o R i v e r N M a p l e A v e R i v e r S t S h e r m a n S t E l m A v e N O a k l a n d A v e Q u i n c y S t C a l d w e l l A v e N F r a n k l i n S t B r o n s o n A v e K i n g S t O c o n t o F a l l s L o w e r O c o n t o F a l l s U p p e r B P O c o n t o R i v e r T h o m a s S t B i r c h A v eS h e r i d a n S t P a r k A v e G r a n t S t W o o d l a n d A v e S O a k l a n d A v e G r e e n B a y A v e S M a p l e A v e S p l i n t e r C r e e k L n C h e s t n u t R d P i o n e e r D r M i l l e n i u m R d S a u n d e r s D r E H i g h l a n d D r C h e s t n u t R d R e a R d C a l d w e l l A v e H i g h l a n d S q N M u n s e r t A v e J a c k s o n S t H i g h l a n d D r C h e r r y A v e D o v e L n H a n k M a r k s D r S t a t e H i g h w a y 2 2 2 2 P e s h t i g o S t a t e B a n k S C h e s t n u t A v e W a l n u t A v e C a l d w e l l A v e N F r a n k l i n S t S M i l w a u k e e A v e G r o v e S t P o p l a r A v e C o l u m b i a S t N M i l w a u k e e A v e C h e r r y A v e P a u l S t N M a i n S t N C h e s t n u t A v e 2 2 O c o n t o F a l l s S c h o o l D i s t r i c t B u s G a r a g e O C O N T O F A L L S O c o n t o R i v e r R i d g e R d R i d g e R d S M a i n S t R i v e r I s l a n d D r S F r a n k l i n S t S M i l w a u k e e A v e R i v e r I s l a n d G o l f C o u r s e S k i T o w R d S p l i n t e r C r e e k L n H i g h l a n d D r E a g l e D r G r o v e S t W i s c o n s i n S t C o l u m b i a S t S u n r i s e C t N H i l l s i d e A v e M e a d A v e M e a d o w R d S F a r m R d R i v e r I s l a n d R d S k i T o w R d 207 206 204 203 114 173 172174 175178 183 163162 165 200 158 155 159 150 153 191 139 211 188 124 123 176 166 143 149 94 76 79 102 84 91 48 46 42 45 40 41 35 43 27 34 32 36 31 37 38 29 216 217 218 19 22 17 15 30 18 13 7 14 25 5 2620 16 114 8 3 10 6 47 44 33 157 202 198 209 215 214213 12 24 21 2 1 216 217 218 215 214213 TID NO. 3 PARCELS TID NO. 3 AMENDED PARCELS TID NO. 3 BOUNDARY CITY OF OCONTO FALLS PARCELS MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY 0 500 1,000 Feet Printed By: bpeterson, File: C:\GIS\Oconto TID\GIS (Updating City of Oconto Falls - TID 3 Amendment)\Oconto Falls, City of_TID No 3_ProProject (Jan_2024).aprx, TID_3_Boundary_Map Print Date: 8/5/2026 Data Sources: Oconto County, WI Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community CITY OF OCONTO FALLS OCONTO COUNTY, WISCONSIN TID No. 3 Amendment TID BOUNDARY 180 9 39 28 154 182 184 169 160 156 77 78 164 179186 197 196 190 187 181 161 167 170 171 168 143 120 8283 201 148 205 198 Map ID Parcel ID Map ID Parcel ID Map ID Parcel ID Map ID Parcel ID 1 2660202504800A 2 2660202504800B 3 2660202504800 4 2660202605000A 5 2660202605000 6 2660303506801 7 2660302905800B 8 2660202605005 9 2660303506801A 10 2660303506801A1 11 2660202605006 12 2660303807400 13 2660302905800A 14 2660303807400A 15 2660303506800 16 2660202605007 17 2660303506802 18 2660202705271T 19 2660302905800 20 2660202304520 21 2660202204251T 22 2660202705270T 24 2660202705201T 25 2660202304521 26 2660202304500 27 2660303607002 28 2660303607000 29 2660302905650 30 2660202204247T 31 2660302905601T 32 2660302905600T 33 2660202805400T 34 2660202805485T 35 2660302905720 36 2660202805470T 37 2660202805450T 38 2660202805430T 39 2660302905782T 40 2660302905724T 41 2660202805505T 42 2660302905780T 43 2660202104047T 44 2660202805495 45 2660202805515T 46 2660202805565T 47 2660202805570 48 2660202805560 49 2660707715229 50 2660707715315 51 2660707715316 52 2660707715324 53 2660707715321 54 2660707715326 55 2660707715327 56 2660707715328 57 2660707715284 58 2660707715289 59 2660707715241 60 2660707715267 61 2660708416601 62 2660707715242 63 2660707715243 64 2660707715269 65 2660707715244 66 2660707715270 67 2660708416607 68 2660707715246 69 2660708416608 70 2660707715257 71 2660707715271 72 2660707715282 73 2660707715258 74 2660708416609 75 2660707715281 76 2660607013841T Map ID Parcel ID 77 2660607013831 78 2660607013830 79 2660607013875T 80 2660707715273 81 2660707715260 82 2660708416662 83 2660708416661 84 2660708416647 85 2660707715261 86 2660707715279 87 2660707715262 88 2660707715276 89 2660707715263 90 2660707715278 91 2660708416722 92 2660707715277 93 2660707715264 94 26614251041157 95 2660707715265 96 2660707715366 97 2660707715361 98 2660707815474 99 2660707715364 100 2660707815459 101 2660707815487 102 2660708416750 103 2660707815473 104 2660707815486 105 2660707715481 106 2660707815488 107 2660707815472 108 2660708516852 109 2660707815471 110 2660707815485 111 2660707815489 112 2660707815495 113 2660707815470 114 2660707915653A 115 2660707815484 116 2660708516853 117 2660707815500 118 2660707815490 119 2660707815483 120 2660708416638 121 2660707815469 122 2660707815482 123 2660607013978 Map ID Parcel ID 124 2660607013980 125 2660707815491 126 2660707815481 127 2660708516860 128 2660707815468 129 2660707815480 130 2660707815492 131 2660707815465 132 2660707815479 133 2660708416709 134 2660708516862 135 2660707815467 136 2660707815499 137 2660707815478 138 2660707815493 139 2660607514852 140 2660708516864 141 2660707815477 142 2660707815476 143 2660708316419 144 2660707815464 145 2660708516866 146 2660707815475 147 2660707815451B 148 2660708316450 149 2660708316404 Map ID Parcel ID 150 2660607514855 151 2660707815463 152 26618250071479 153 2660607514894 154 2660607514884 155 2660607514805T 156 2660607514823 157 2660607514910 158 2660607514815 159 2660707915652 160 2660607514905 161 2660708316533 162 2660607414630 163 2660607414621 164 2660607414614 165 2660707915798 166 2660708316541 167 2660708617074 27 210 Map ID Parcel ID Map ID Parcel ID 168 2660708617075 169 2660607414602 170 2660708617085 171 2660708617084 172 2660607114142T 173 2660607114180T 174 2660607114168T 175 2660607114118T 176 2660708316544 177 2660607414641 178 2660607114094T 179 2660707915793 180 2660607414706 181 2660708617078 182 2660607414671 183 2660707915653B 184 2660607414670 185 2660607414645 186 2660707915789 187 2660708316555 188 2660708617080 189 2660607414787 190 2660708617180 191 2660708617138 192 2660607414786 193 2660607414764 194 2660607414780 195 2660607414765 Map ID Parcel ID 196 2660708617136A 197 2660708617136B 198 2660707915653C 199 2660607414780A 200 2660708617156 201 2660707915751T 202 2660707915759 203 2660607314585T1 204 2660607314438 205 2660607314411 206 2660607314585T 207 2660708015801T 208 2660708516861 209 2660707915653 210 2660708216208 211 2660707815510T 212 26618250081480 213 2660303005900T 214 2660303005900T1 215 2660303005975 216 2660202705275T 217 2660202705305TA 218 2660202705365T 133 PLEASE SEE INSERT MAP FOR PARCELS MISSING MAP IDS Print Date: 7/29/2026 Oconto County Land Information Systems makes every effort to produce the most current and accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data provided, its use, or its interpretation. Oconto County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Oconto County parcel maps are for tax and real property listing purposes only and do NOT represent a survey. The tax parcel maps are compiled from official records, including survey plats and deeds, but only contain the information required for Oconto County business. You should always use the original recorded documents for legal or survey information SCALE: 1" = ' Oconto County GIS TextBox1 309 3,713.83 CITY OF OCONTO FALLS AMENDMENT #1 TO TID #3 PROPOSED TIMETABLE Date Meeting/Action July 31, 2026 (Monday) Plan Commission Public Hearing and Joint Review Board Organization meeting notices sent to the newspaper. MSA prepares notices. August 6, 2026 (Thursday) City notifies taxing entities (school district, county, vocational college, and any special taxing districts) on the proposed amendment of No. 3 and upcoming meetings. As of 1/1/25, notification can be via email. August 7, 2026 (Friday) Notice of Plan Commission Public Hearing is published in the local newspaper (Class I). Joint Review Board public meeting is published. MSA prepares the Notice of Public Hearing and meetings. August 18, 2026 (Tuesday) Joint Review Board meets to choose chairperson and citizen member. A review of the draft of amended Project Plan and boundaries for TID No. 3 occurs. August 18, 2026((Tuesday) Plan Commission holds the Public Hearing on the amended Project Plan and boundaries of TIF No. 3. Following the Public Hearing, the Plan Commission shall meet and act on a resolution recommending approval of the amendment of TID #8 to the City Council. MSA attends the Public Hearing and the Plan Commission meeting. August 18, 2026 (Tuesday) City Council action on the amendment of TID No. 3. Approval by resolution contains findings that detail the TID’s consistency with state statutes. MSA attends this meeting. August 21, 2026 (Friday) Second Joint Review Board meeting notice sent to the newspaper. August 28, 2026 (Friday) Joint Review Board public meeting notice is published. MSA prepares public meeting notice. September 9, 2026 (Tentative - Tuesday) Upon approval of the City Council, the Joint Review Board holds a second meeting to review and act, by resolution, on the amendment of TID No. 3. The JRB submits its decision to the City no more than 7 days after the vote. MSA attends this meeting. September 17, 2026 (Thursday) Department of Revenue is notified of the amendment of TID No. 3 by the City of Oconto Falls and subsequent approval by the Joint Review Board. On or Before October 31, 2026 Submit base packet documentation and Project Plan for Wisconsin Department of Revenue certification. RESOLUTION NO. 26-007 CITY OF OCONTO FALLS PLANNING COMMISSION TERRITORY AMENDMENT NO. 1 OF TAX INCREMENTAL FINANCE (TIF) DISTRICT NO. 3 CITY OF OCONTO FALLS, WISCONSIN WHEREAS, the City of Oconto Falls created Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District No. 3 on May 23, 2023 as a mixed use District; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the boundaries of TIF District No. 3 by adding parcels that are contiguous to TIF District No. 3; and WHEREAS, pursuant to sec. 66.145, Wisconsin Statutes, the Planning Commission for the City of Oconto Falls, Wisconsin has held a public hearing on the proposed Territory Amendment No. 1 Project Plan and boundaries of Tax Incremental Finance District No. 3 (herein "Project Plan" and “District”) on August 18, 2026 at which time interested parties were afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the proposed Project Plan and District; and WHEREAS, prior to publication of notice of said hearing, a copy of the notice was sent to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within the District including the Oconto Falls School District, Northeast Wisconsin Tech College, and Oconto County; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The name of the District shall be “Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 , City of Oconto Falls”, a mixed-use District and 2. The boundaries of the amended District are described in the attached Project Plan that is incorporated by reference, and such boundaries are contiguous and of sufficient definiteness to identify with ordinary and reasonable certainty the territory included therein. Amended boundaries include only those whole units of property that are assessed for general tax purposes. 3. The boundaries of the District do not include any parcels that were not within the boundaries of the City within the last three years; and 4. As amended, not less than 50% of the real property in the District is suitable for mixed-use development as described in State Statute §66.145(2)(cm); and 5. The estimated percentage of territory within the District that will be devoted to retail business at the end of the maximum expenditure period is not anticipated to exceed 35 percent of the area of the District; and 6. No more than 35% of the land area within the amended District will be used for newly platted residential development and that any newly platted residential development residential development will have meet one of the following criteria: a. Density of the residential housing is at least three (3) units per acre, or b. Residential housing is located in a conservation subdivision, as defined in sec. 66.1027(1)(a), Wis. Stats., or c. Residential housing is located in a traditional neighborhood development, as defined in sec. 66.1027(1)(c), Wis. Stats. 7. The improvement of such area is likely to enhance significantly the value of substantially all other real property in the District; and 8. The project costs directly serve to promote orderly development consistent with the purposes for which the District is created; and 9. The equalized value of the taxable property of the amended District plus the aggregate value increment of all existing districts within the City does not exceed 12% of the total value of equalized taxable property within the City; and 10. The Project Plan for the District is feasible and in conformity with the City’s master plan; and 11. Improvements to the District are likely to encourage and promote conformity with the City ’s planning policies and procedures; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Oconto Falls, Wisconsin hereby approves and adopts the Project Plan for Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Incremental Finance District No. 3, said Project Plan being attached and incorporated by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does recommend the Project Plan for Territory Amendment No. 1 to Tax Incremental Finance District No. 3, for adoption by the City Council for the City of Oconto Falls, Oconto Falls County, Wisconsin. Dated this 18 th day of August 2026. OFFERED BY: APPROVED BY: Commission Member Marty Coopman, Planning Commission Chair SECONDED BY: ATTESTED: Commission Member Peter Wills, City Clerk Voted Yes: Voted No: Oconto County SOLO Parcel Report Oconto County Land Information Systems makes every effort to produce the most current and accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for the data provided, its use, or its interpretation. Oconto County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Oconto County parcel maps are for tax and real property listing purposes only and do NOT represent a survey. Report Created At School District: Other Districts: 8/5/2026 10:19 AM 2660607013841TParcel ID: Supervisory District: SuperDist OCONTO FALLS CITY OF O. FALLS TID #3 Improvement Value: $0 Land Value: $116,100Assessed Acreage: Address: OCONTO FALLS, WI 54154-0121 MARY J MCDERMID 7.250 PO BOX 121 Physical Address: Primary Owner(s): Section: SEC26-T28N-R19E Document Number: 639279 Volume/Page: 1508-949 Legal Description: ASSESSORS PL T S26-28-19 203/209 O L 13 2660626036154 1508-949 TRUST 639279 Countryside Lane 143.00' 143.00' 143.00' 143.00' 143.00'143.00' 144.57'142.02' S00°59'54"W 549.11' S00°59'54"W 549.14' S00°59'54"W 549.17' N87°14'51"W 571.02' S87°15'35"E 573.57' N00°59'54"E 549.08' S01°15'53"W 549.13' King Street Lot 4 78,662 Sq Ft 1.8058 Acres Lot 3 78,493 Sq Ft 1.8020 Acres Lot 2 78,489 Sq Ft 1.8019 Acres Lot 1 78,484 Sq Ft 1.8018 Acres 3/4" Iron Pipe FoundN54°39'15"E, 2.19 Feetfrom lot corner (586') (550.25') (552') (585' Approx.) LEGEND 1" Iron Pipe Found Section Corner As Noted 2" Iron Pipe Found 4" Iron Pipe Found Recorded As( ) Bearings referenced West line of the Northeast 1/4 Section 26 T28N, R19E, published to bear S00°59'53"W Based on the Oconto County Coordinate System Sheet 1 of 3 CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP All of Outlot 13, The Assessor's Plat of Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Section 26, Town 28 North, Range 19 East, recorded as Document No. 154229M, being part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, Section 26, Town 28 North, Range 19 East, City of Oconto Falls, Oconto County, Wisconsin. Survey for: Birr Investments LLC W5896 Autumn Hills Parkway Appleton WI 54913 Scale: 1"=150' Job # SURVEYORS Inc. 2165 S. Broadway Green Bay, WI 54304 (920)406-1477Professional Land TNT 0426-113 ____________________________________________ James R. Sehloff, S-2692-008 Date JAMES R SEHLOFF S-2692 GREENLEAF, WISCONSIN W ISCO N S IN ROYE V R U S DNAL Sheet 2 of 3 CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:I, James R Sehloff, Professional Land Surveyor S-2692, do hereby certify: that in full compliance with the provisions ofChapter 236.34 of Wisconsin Statutes, subdivision regulations of the City of Oconto Falls; under the direction of BirrInvestments, LLC, the property owner of subject parcel, I have surveyed, divided and mapped this Certified SurveyMap; that such map correctly represents all exterior boundaries and the subdivision of the lands surveyed; and thatthis land is all All of Outlot 13, The Assessor's Plat of Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Section 26, Town 28 North,Range 19 East, recorded as Document No. 154229M, being part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, Section26, Town 28 North, Range 19 East, City of Oconto Falls, Oconto County, Wisconsin, containing 314,128 Square Feet(7.2114 Acres). Subject to all easements and restrictions of record.Dated this________day of ______________, 2026 _____________________________________________James R. Sehloff, S-2692-008OWNER'S CERTIFICATE:Birr Investments, LLC, a Limited Liability Company,duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the Laws of theState of Wisconsin, as the property owner, does hereby certify that I caused the land described on this map to besurveyed, mapped, and divided as represented on this Certified Survey Map.I also certify that this plat is required by s.236.10 or s.236.12 to be submitted to the following for approval or objection:City of Oconto Falls_____________________________________________Kevin Birr, Birr Investments, LLCManaging Member STATE OF WISCONSIN) COUNTY OF ____________) ssPersonally came before me this_____day of ___________20____, the above named owners to me known to be thepersons who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same.___________________________________________________Notary PublicMy Commission Expires__________________Job #0426-113 All of Outlot 13, The Assessor's Plat of Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Section 26,Town 28 North, Range 19 East, recorded as Document No. 154229M, being part of theSouthwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, Section 26, Town 28 North, Range 19 East,City of Oconto Falls, Oconto County, Wisconsin. JAMES RSEHLOFF S-2692GREENLEAF,WISCONSINWISCONSINROYEVRUS DNAL Sheet 3 of 3 CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP City of Oconto Falls Approval:Approved by the City of Oconto Falls on this__________day of _________________, 20____.__________________________________________________Jenny Friedman, Deputy ClerkOconto County Treasurer:As duly elected Oconto County Treasurer, I hereby certify that the records in our office show no unredeemed taxesand no unpaid or special assessments affecting any of the lands included in this Certified Survey Map as of the datelisted below._____________________________________________________ ______________Nikki Tolzman, Oconto County TreasurerDateOconto Falls Treasurer:As duly elected Oconto Falls Treasurer, I hereby certify that the records in our office show no unredeemed taxes andno unpaid or special assessments affecting any of the lands included in this Certified Survey Map as of the date listedbelow._____________________________________________________ ______________Scott Schoen, Deputy TreasurerDateThis Certified Survey Map is contained wholly within the property described in the following recorded instruments:Property Owner of RecordRecording Information Parcel Number(s)Birr Investments, LLCDoc 7849752660607013841T Job #0426-113 ____________________________________________James R. Sehloff, S-2692-008 DateJAMES RSEHLOFF S-2692GREENLEAF,WISCONSINWISCONSINROYEVRUS DNAL All of Outlot 13, The Assessor's Plat of Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Section 26,Town 28 North, Range 19 East, recorded as Document No. 154229M, being part of theSouthwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, Section 26, Town 28 North, Range 19 East,City of Oconto Falls, Oconto County, Wisconsin. Birr – King St, Oconto Falls Oconto County, WI Parcel ID: 266-0607013841T May 12th, 2026 A REPORT FOR WETLAND DELINEATION SERVICES Birr – King St, Oconto Falls City of Oconto Falls, Oconto County, WI Prepared For: Kevin Birr W5896 Autumn Hills Parkway Appleton, WI 54913 Birrk70@hotmail.com Prepared By: Candra Carter Branch River Testing Services, LLC 693 Lamers Clancy Rd Greenleaf, WI 54126 C: (920) 309-7479 branchrivercandra@yahoo.com Wetland Determination Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project and Site Description 1.2 Investigator Qualifications 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Offsite Review 3.0 Results and Discussion 3.1 Offsite Review 3.1.1 Existing Wetland Mapping 3.1.2 Historical Aerial Imagery 3.2 Field Investigation 3.2.1 Site Conditions & Hydrology 3.2.2 Vegetation 3.2.3 Soils 4.0 Conclusion 5.0 Literature Cited Appendices Appendix A – Site Mapping Appendix B – Wetland Determination Data Forms Appendix C – Site Photos Appendix D – NRCS USDA Soil Survey and Hydric Rating Appendix E – USACE Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range Tool Attached: WDNR Assured Wetland Delineator Confirmation Letter 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project and Site Description Branch River Testing Services, LLC performed a wetland determination for Oconto County Parcel 266-0607013841T. The area of interest (AOI) covers the entire existing 7.25-acre parcel – to be split although development activities will likely remain towards the south end of the AOI. Field work on this site took place 5/10/26 just at the start of the growing season and 3 sample points were done in areas most likely to meet wetland parameters based on the site review. Data collected within these points including soils, vegetation, and hydrologic indicators were used to determine if wetlands exist within the AOI in accordance with standard delineation procedures. 1.2 Investigator Qualifications This report describes the methodology and results of the wetland delineation conducted by Candra Carter, a consultant for Branch River Testing Services, LLC. Branch River Testing Services provides an array of environmental and land evaluation services, with a primary focus on soil and site evaluations for Private Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (POWTS). Candra holds a Certified Soil Tester License and has been soil testing for 7 years. Candra has a B.S in Soil Science and Land Management from the University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point with a Wetland Science Certificate. She has also completed the Critical Insights for Wetland & Waterway Professionals administered by the University of Wisconsin – Lacrosse in 2025 & 2026. Candra is recognized as an assured wetland delineator by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2.0 Methodology The wetland investigation followed the protocols and guidance outlined in the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0, 2012), and Guidance for Submittal of Delineation Reports to the St. Paul District Army Corps of Engineers and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2015). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S Amry Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly define wetlands as: “Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. ” According to the procedures indicated in the USACE 1987 Manual and the Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement under normal circumstances, one positive indicator is required from each of the three wetland parameters: hydrology, vegetation, and soils for an area to be classified as wetland. 2.1 Offsite Review Prior to completing the field investigation, a review of the available public mapping resources was done. This review helps to identify specific areas in the project area that have wetland potential so they can be investigated in greater detail in the field. The mapping and other resources reviewed include: • 2’ Contours from Statewide Mapping (Figure 2) • Wisconsin DEM and Hillshade from LiDAR (Figure 3) • WDNR Wisconsin Wetland Inventory (WWI) Map (Figure 4) • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map • Historical Aerial Review from Wisconsin Aerial Imagery Finder • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (WSS) Soil (Appendix D) 3.0 Results and Discussion 3.1 Off-Site Review 3.1.1 Existing Wetland Mapping The offsite review indicates a fringe of forested, broad-leaf deciduous type wetlands mapped in the northwest portion of the AOI by the Wisconsin Wetland Inventory. 3.1.2 Historical Aerial Imagery A review of the available historical aerial imagery from the Wisconsin Historic Aerial Imagery Finder was used and no areas with evidence of inundation were evident. 3.2 Field Investigation 3.2.1 Site Conditions & Hydrology Formal wetland delineations must be performed during the growing season to best evaluate certain parameters. This evaluation took place at the beginning of the growing season. Nearby weather station GREEN BAY A S INTLAP estimates the growing season to be from April 24th to October 13th using the 50% probability of the first and last 28°F temperature. The soil temperature measured at 12” was 48 degrees Fahrenheit confirming the growing season had begun. Alongside this, woody vegetation had begun to bud. The antecedent precipitation tool determined the prior period before the investigation to be wetter than normal, see Appendix E. Wetland hydrology indicators were met at all sample points, see wetland data sheets for full descriptions. 3.2.2 Vegetation Vegetation within the study area was evaluated in accordance with the routine on-site methodology outlined in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual and regional supplement. Plant species were identified within the sample area and classified by wetland indicator status using the Northcentral and Northeast Region National Wetland Indicator Plant List – 2022. Vegetation sampling was conducted using standard plot sizes with a 30’ radius for trees, 15’ radius for shrubs, 5’ radius for herbaceous species and 30’ radius for woody vines. The dominance test and prevalence index are utilized to determine if hydrophytic vegetation is present. None of the sampling points met hydrophytic vegetation, see full vegetation sampling in Appendix B. 3.2.3 Soils Existing soil mapping indicates the entire AOI to be the Solona fine sandy loam series which is considered predominantly non-hydric in WI. There is also the Kiva series mapped in close proximity which is nonhydric in WI. The soils observed correspond to the somewhat poorly drained mapped Solona series and the Kiva is likely found within the AOI at higher elevations. No hydric soil indicators were met within the sample points. 4.0 Conclusion Through the standard procedures and expectations outlined by the USACOE Wetland Delineation Manual and the Regional Supplement for the Northcentral and Northeast region, it was confirmed that no wetlands exist within the AOI. Wetland hydrology was met within microtopographic depressions, however, hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils were lacking. Future development activities within this area does not impose risk to any wetlands. 5.0 Literature Cited Black, M.R., and E.J. Judziewicz. Wildflowers of Wisconsin and the Great Lakes Region: A Comprehensive Field Guide. University of Wisconsin Press, 2009. Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture. FSA Aerial Imagery. Judziewicz, E.J., L.G. Clark, R.W. Freckmann, and M.R. Black. Field Guide to Wisconsin Grasses. University of Wisconsin Press, 2014. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed Oct. 2021 and Apr. 2023. Surface Water Data Viewer Staff, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Surface Water Data Viewer. https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/surfacewater/swdv/. Accessed Oct. 2021 and Apr. 2023. United States Army Corps of Engineers. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.5, 2020. http://wetland-plants.sec.usace.army.mil/. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, 1987. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region, version 2.0, 2012. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, version 8.2, 2018. FOTG, Section II, Climatic Data, Agricultural Applied Climate Information System. Appendix A Site Mapping Figures Within Figure 1 – Site Overview Figure 2 – Contour Map Figure 3 – Wisconsin DEM and Hillshade Map Figure 4 – Wisconsin Wetland Inventory Map Figure 5 – Wetland Determination Figure Appendix B Wetland Determination Data Forms Project/Site: Applicant/Owner: State: Investigator(s): Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. No X No X X X No X X X X X Yes X Remarks: No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Hydrologic conditions are wetter than normal HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Drainage Patterns (B10) High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Saturation (A3) Marl Deposits (B15) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes No significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Long: 88.1550909 Datum:LRR L, MLRA 95 44.8755501 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Northcentral and Northeast Region See ERDC/EL TR-12-1; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 9/30/2027 Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Wetland Hydrology is met by two secondary indicators. Moss trim lines were observed on trees surrounding the sample point. Sample point occupies a concave posistion within a shallow topographic depression of the AOI, so microtopographic relief is met Birr - Oconto Falls City/County: Oconto Sampling Date: 5/10/26 Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 3 Kevin Birr WI Sampling Point: UDP-1 Branch River Testing - Candra Carter Section, Township, Range: S.26, T.28N.-R.19E. WGS84 Kiva Sandy Loam ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: x 1 = 1. x 2 = 2. x 3 = 3. x 4 = 4. x 5 = 5. Column Totals: (B) 6. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. X 7. 7. 50 =Total Cover 15' ) No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.65 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Woody Vine Stratum 30' ) Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. No FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Taraxacum officinale 5 No FACU 15 =Total Cover 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5' ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Carex pennsylvanica 50 Yes FACU 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 Anemone quinquefolia 5 No FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Maianthemum canadense 5 FACU species 130 Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00 130 (A) FAC species 0 0 0 0 Total % Cover of: 0 OBL species Multiply by: FACW species 0 520 520 UPL species 0 0 FACU 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% Pinus strobus 15 Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 30 Yes FACU 0 (A) Pinus strobus 5 No FACU Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants. UDP-1 Tree Stratum 30' ) Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Acer Saccharum Tsuga canadensis 15 Yes ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: X Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Marl (F10) (LRR K, L) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 145) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Yes No Remarks: Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Black Histic (A3) Mesic Spodic (A17) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Dark Surface (S7) MLRA 149B) Redox Depressions (F8)Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Other (Explain in Remarks)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Iron Monosulfide (A18) Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Thick Dark Surface (A12) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 145) Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Stratified Layers (A5) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) 0-6 10YR 3/2 100 Histic Epipedon (A2) Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) 18-24 7.5YR 5/4 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C 100 Sandy A Horizon Sandy Loam Loc2 Texture Remarks Sandy Sandy C Horzion. 30 % Cobbles SOIL UDP-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Bs Horizon. 20 % Cobbles M (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 6-18 7.5YR 4/6 ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Project/Site: Applicant/Owner: State: Investigator(s): Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. No X No X X X No X X X X X X Yes X Remarks: No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Hydrologic conditions are wetter than normal. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Drainage Patterns (B10) High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Saturation (A3) Marl Deposits (B15) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes No significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Long: 88.1540516 Datum:LRR L, MLRA 95 44.8756224 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Northcentral and Northeast Region See ERDC/EL TR-12-1; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 9/30/2027 Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Wetland Hydrology is met by one primary and 2 secondary hydrology indicators. Moss trim lines were observed on the some of the trees around the sample point. Sample point occupies a concave posistion within a shallow topographic position of the AOI, so Microtopographic relief was also met. See P3 in Appendix C Birr - Oconto Falls City/County: Oconto Sampling Date: 5/10/26 Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 3 Kevin Birr WI Sampling Point: UDP-2 Branch River Testing - Candra Carter Section, Township, Range: S.26, T.28N.-R.19E. WGS84 Kiva Sandy Loam ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: x 1 = 1. x 2 = 2. x 3 = 3. x 4 = 4. x 5 = 5. Column Totals: (B) 6. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. X 7. 7. 40 =Total Cover 15' ) Acer saccharum No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) =Total Cover Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.38 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Woody Vine Stratum 30' ) Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Monarda fistulosa 2 No FACU No FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Taraxacum officinale 3 No FACU 25 =Total Cover 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5' ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Carex pennsylvanica 15 Yes FACU 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 Equisetum arvense 15 Yes FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Anemone quinquefolia 3 Pinus strobus 2 No FACU FACU species 88 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.85 103 (A) FACU FAC species 15 45 0 0 Total % Cover of: 0 OBL species Multiply by: FACW species 0 352 397 UPL species 0 0 FACU 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 16.7% Tsuga canadensis 15 Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 8 Yes 30 Yes FACU 1 (A) Acer saccharum 8 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants. UDP-2 Tree Stratum 30' ) Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Tsuga canadensis Pinus strobus 2 No ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: X Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Marl (F10) (LRR K, L) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 145) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Yes No Remarks: Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Black Histic (A3) Mesic Spodic (A17) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Dark Surface (S7) MLRA 149B) Redox Depressions (F8)Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Other (Explain in Remarks)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Iron Monosulfide (A18) Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Thick Dark Surface (A12) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 145) Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Stratified Layers (A5) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) 0-5 10YR 3/2 100 Histic Epipedon (A2) Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) 8-24 7.5YR 4/6 80 7.5YR 5/6 20 C 100 Sandy Fine Sandy Loam Loc2 Texture Remarks Sandy Sandy 30% Cobbles SOIL UDP-2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features E Horizon, Fine Sandy Loam M (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 5-8 10YR 5/3 ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Project/Site: Applicant/Owner: State: Investigator(s): Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. No X No X X X No X X X X X Yes X U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Northcentral and Northeast Region See ERDC/EL TR-12-1; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 9/30/2027 Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Wetland hydrology met by 2 secondary indicators. Moss trim lines present and sample point is within a fine scale depression Birr - Oconto Falls City/County: Oconto Sampling Date: 5/10/26 Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 3 Kevin Birr WI Sampling Point: UDP-3 Branch River Testing - Candra Carter Section, Township, Range: S.26, T.28N.-R.19E. WGS84 Kiva Sandy Loam None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Long: 88.1532819 Datum:LRR L, MLRA 95 44.8747233 significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Hydrologic conditions are wetter than normal HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Drainage Patterns (B10) High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Saturation (A3) Marl Deposits (B15) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Remarks: No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: x 1 = 1. x 2 = 2. x 3 = 3. x 4 = 4. x 5 = 5. Column Totals: (B) 6. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. X VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants. UDP-3 Tree Stratum 30' ) Absolute % Cover Dominant Species? Indicator Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Acer saccharum Betula papyrifera 4 No 30 Yes FACU 0 (A) Prunus serotina 8 No FACU Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:FACU 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% Acer saccharum 30 Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 15 Yes FACU FAC species 0 0 0 0 Total % Cover of: 0 OBL species Multiply by: FACW species 0 764 764 FACU UPL species 0 0 Prunus virginiana 8 No FACU FACU species 191 Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00 191 (A) 60 =Total Cover 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5' ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Carex pennsylvanica 45 Yes FACU 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 Poa pratensis 35 Yes FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Anenome quinquefolia 3 No data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Maianthemum canadense 3 No FACU Taraxacum officinale 3 No FACU Monarda fistulosa 3 No FACU Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Woody Vine Stratum 30' ) Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.92 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) =Total Cover 7. 7. 42 =Total Cover 15' ) Pinus strobus Prunus serotina 7 No ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: X SOIL UDP-3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Fine Sandy Loam. 20% Cobbles M (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 8-16 7.5YR 4/6 Sandy Fine Sandy Loam Loc2 Texture Remarks Sandy Sandy Fine Sandy Loam. 30% Cobbles16-24 7.5YR 5/4 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C 100 Histic Epipedon (A2) Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Thick Dark Surface (A12) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 145) Depleted Matrix (F3) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Stratified Layers (A5) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) 0-8 10YR 3/2 100 Black Histic (A3) Mesic Spodic (A17) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Dark Surface (S7) MLRA 149B) Redox Depressions (F8)Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Other (Explain in Remarks)Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Iron Monosulfide (A18) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Marl (F10) (LRR K, L) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 145) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Yes No Remarks: Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: ENG FORM 6116-8, SEP 2024 Northcentral and Northeast – Version 2.0 Appendix C Site Photos Appendix C – Site Photos Birr -Oconto Falls P1 UDP-1 facing north towards property line Appendix C – Site Photos Birr -Oconto Falls P2 UDP-1 facing south towards King St Appendix C – Site Photos Birr -Oconto Falls P3 Surrounding area of UDP-2. Photo taken facing north towards the high line Appendix C – Site Photos Birr -Oconto Falls P4 Photo taken outside of AOI, north of UDP-2 facing north, under the high line. Standing water and Hydrophytic vegetation present. Appendix C – Site Photos Birr -Oconto Falls P5 Photo taken outside of AOI, north of UDP-2, facing a northeasterly direction along high line. Appendix C – Site Photos Birr -Oconto Falls P6 Surrounding area of UDP-3. Representative of the proposed building site(s) Appendix D NRCS USDA Soil Survey and Hydric Rating United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Oconto County, Wisconsin Natural Resources Conservation Service Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Oconto County, Wisconsin..............................................................................13 3120A—Solona fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes..............................13 7413B—Kiva sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes.........................................14 Soil Information for All Uses...............................................................................17 Soil Reports........................................................................................................17 Land Classifications........................................................................................17 Hydric Rating by Map Unit (WI) (Birr - Oconto Falls).................................. 17 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 4969570 4969600 4969630 4969660 4969690 4969720 4969750 4969780 4969810 4969840 4969570 4969600 4969630 4969660 4969690 4969720 4969750 4969780 4969810 4969840 408740 408770 408800 408830 408860 408890 408920 408740 408770 408800 408830 408860 408890 408920 44° 52' 34'' N 88° 9' 20'' W 44° 52' 34'' N 88° 9' 10'' W 44° 52' 25'' N 88° 9' 20'' W 44° 52' 25'' N 88° 9' 10'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 16N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 15 30 60 90 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,340 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Oconto County, Wisconsin Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 10, 2025 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 7, 2023—Jun 9, 2023 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 3120A Solona fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0.0 0.0% 7413B Kiva sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 7.7 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 7.7 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, Custom Soil Resource Report 11 onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Oconto County, Wisconsin 3120A—Solona fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: g5nj Elevation: 570 to 1,900 feet Mean annual precipitation: 27 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 46 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 160 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Solona, thin surface, and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Solona, Thin Surface Setting Landform: Drainageways on ground moraines, Depressions on ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope Down-slope shape: Linear, concave Across-slope shape: Concave Parent material: Calcareous loamy till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: fine sandy loam Bt1,Bt2,BC - 9 to 22 inches: fine sandy loam C1,C2 - 22 to 60 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 35 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: F095XA006WI - Moist Loamy Lowland Forage suitability group: Mod AWC, high water table (G095AY004WI) Other vegetative classification: Tsuga canadensis / Maianthemum canadense - Coptis groenlandica , Eastern Hemlock / Wild Lily-of-the-valley - Goldthread (TMC), Mod AWC, high water table (G095AY004WI) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Minor Components Bonduel Percent of map unit: 6 percent Landform: Drainageways on ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Concave Ecological site: F095XA006WI - Moist Loamy Lowland Other vegetative classification: Mod AWC, high water table (G095AY004WI) Hydric soil rating: No Ensley Percent of map unit: 4 percent Landform: Drainageways on moraines, Depressions on moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope Down-slope shape: Linear, concave Across-slope shape: Concave Ecological site: F095XA003WI - Wet Sandy Lowland Other vegetative classification: Mod AWC, high water table (G095AY004WI) Hydric soil rating: Yes Onaway Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: F095XA010WI - Loamy Upland Other vegetative classification: Mod AWC, adequately drained (G095AY005WI) Hydric soil rating: No Shiocton Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landscape: Lake plains Landform: Drainageways Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Concave Ecological site: F095XA006WI - Moist Loamy Lowland Other vegetative classification: Acer saccharum - Tsuga canadensis / Athyrium filix-femina - Onoclea sensibilis , Sugar Maple -Eastern Hemlock / Lady Fern - Sensitive Fern (ATAtOn), High AWC, high water table (G095AY007WI) Hydric soil rating: No 7413B—Kiva sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: g5m6 Landscape: Hills Custom Soil Resource Report 14 Elevation: 590 to 1,900 feet Mean annual precipitation: 27 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 46 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 150 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Kiva and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Kiva Setting Landscape: Hills Landform: Moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Loamy drift over calcareous sandy and gravelly outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 10 inches: sandy loam Bs - 10 to 15 inches: sandy loam 2C1,2C2 - 15 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 25 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: F095XA009WI - Sandy Uplands Forage suitability group: Low AWC, adequately drained (G095AY002WI) Other vegetative classification: Acer saccharum / Viburnum acerifolium , Sugar Maple / Maple-leaved Viburnum (AVb), Acer saccharum - Tsuga canadensis / Maianthemum canadense , Sugar Maple - Eastern Hemlock / Qild Lily-of-the- valley (ATM), Low AWC, adequately drained (G095AY002WI) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Oconto Percent of map unit: 7 percent Custom Soil Resource Report 15 Landscape: Plains Landform: Outwash plains Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: F095XA010WI - Loamy Upland Other vegetative classification: Acer saccharum - Fagus grandifolia / Viburnum acerifolium , Sugar Maple - American Beech / Maple-leaved Viburnum (AFVb), Mod AWC, adequately drained (G095AY005WI) Hydric soil rating: No Onaway Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Ecological site: F095XA010WI - Loamy Upland Other vegetative classification: Mod AWC, adequately drained (G095AY005WI) Hydric soil rating: No Worcester Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Drainageways on outwash plains, Depressions on outwash plains Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope Down-slope shape: Linear, concave Across-slope shape: Concave Ecological site: F090AY011WI - Moist Loamy Lowland Other vegetative classification: Mod AWC, high water table (G090AY004WI) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 16 Soil Information for All Uses Soil Reports The Soil Reports section includes various formatted tabular and narrative reports (tables) containing data for each selected soil map unit and each component of each unit. No aggregation of data has occurred as is done in reports in the Soil Properties and Qualities and Suitabilities and Limitations sections. The reports contain soil interpretive information as well as basic soil properties and qualities. A description of each report (table) is included. Land Classifications This folder contains a collection of tabular reports that present a variety of soil groupings. The reports (tables) include all selected map units and components for each map unit. Land classifications are specified land use and management groupings that are assigned to soil areas because combinations of soil have similar behavior for specified practices. Most are based on soil properties and other factors that directly influence the specific use of the soil. Example classifications include ecological site classification, farmland classification, irrigated and nonirrigated land capability classification, and hydric rating. Hydric Rating by Map Unit (WI) (Birr - Oconto Falls) This Hydric Soil Category rating indicates the components of map units that meet the criteria for hydric soils. Map units are composed of one or more major soil components or soil types that generally make up 20 percent or more of the map unit and are listed in the map unit name, and they may also have one or more minor contrasting soil components that generally make up less than 20 percent of the map unit. Each major and minor map unit component that meets the hydric criteria is rated hydric. The map unit class ratings based on the hydric components present are: WI Hydric, WI Predominantly Hydric, WI Partially Hydric, WI Predominantly Nonhydric, and WI Nonhydric. The report also shows the total representative percentage of each map unit that the hydric components comprise. "WI Hydric" means that all major and minor components listed for a given map unit are rated as being hydric. "WI Predominantly Hydric" means that all major components listed for a given map unit are rated as hydric, and at least one contrasting minor component is not rated hydric."WI Partially Hydric" means that at least one major component listed for a given map unit is rated as hydric, and at 17 least one other major component is not rated hydric. "WI Predominantly Nonhydric" means that no major component listed for a given map unit is rated as hydric, and at least one contrasting minor component is rated hydric. "WI Nonhydric" means no major or minor components for the map unit are rated hydric. The assumption is that the map unit is nonhydric even if none of the components within the map unit have been rated. Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation. If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric, they typically exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field. These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States" (Vasilas, Hurt, and Noble, 2010). The NTCHS has developed criteria to identify those soil properties unique to hydric soils (Federal Register, 2012). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are associated with wetlands. The criteria use selected soil properties that are described in “Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States” (Vasilas, Hurt, and Noble, 2010), "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999), "Keys to Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2010), and the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993). The criteria for hydric soils are represented by codes, for example, 2 or 3. Definitions for the codes are as follows: 1. All Histels except for Folistels, and Histosols except for Folists. 2. Soils in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Albolls suborder, Historthels great group, Histoturbels great group, Pachic subgroups, or Cumulic subgroups that: A. Based on the range of characteristics for the soil series, will at least in part meet one or more Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, or B. Show evidence that the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil; 3. Soils that are frequently ponded for long or very long duration during the growing season. A. Based on the range of characteristics for the soil series, will at least in part meet one or more Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, or B. Show evidence that the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil; 4. Map unit components that are frequently flooded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season that: A. Based on the range of characteristics for the soil series, will at least in part meet one or more Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, or B. Show evidence that the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil; Hydric Condition: Food Security Act information regarding the ability to grow a commodity crop without removing woody vegetation or manipulating hydrology. References: Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Custom Soil Resource Report 18 Federal Register. February, 28, 2012. Hydric soils of the United States. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Vasilas, L.M., G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble, editors. Version 7.0, 2010. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. Report—Hydric Rating by Map Unit (WI) (Birr - Oconto Falls) Hydric Rating by Map Unit (WI)–Oconto County, Wisconsin Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Hydric Percent of Map Unit Hydric Category Landform Hydric Minor Components 3120A Solona fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 4 WI Predominantly Nonhydric Moraines 7413B Kiva sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0 WI Nonhydric — Custom Soil Resource Report 19 Appendix E USACE Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range Tool Oct 2025 Nov 2025 Dec 2025 Jan 2026 Feb 2026 Mar 2026 Apr 2026 May 2026 Jun 2026 Jul 2026 Aug 2026 Sep 2026 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rainfall (Inches) 2026-05-10 2026-04-10 2026-03-11 Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network Daily T otal 30-Day Rolling T otal 30-Year Normal Range 30 Days Ending 30th %ile (in) 70th %ile (in) Observed (in) Wetness Condition Condition Value Month Weight Product 2026-05-10 2.526772 3.956299 3.562992 Normal 2 3 6 2026-04-10 1.60748 2.387402 5.240158 Wet 3 2 6 2026-03-11 0.952362 1.685827 2.177165 Wet 3 1 3 Result Wetter than Normal - 15 Coordinates 44.87555, -88.15509 Observation Date 2026-05-10 Elevation (ft) 732.933 Drought Index (PDSI) Severe wetness (2026-04) WebWIMP H2O Balance Dry Season Weather Station Name Coordinates Elevation (ft) Distance (mi) Elevation Weighted Days Normal Days Antecedent SURING 44.9958, -88.3786 791.995 13.731 59.062 6.99 10042 88 BREED 6 SSE 44.9878, -88.3769 859.908 0.559 67.913 0.29 1308 0 CECIL 5.6 ENE 44.8492, -88.3472 796.916 10.245 4.921 4.661 3 0 GILLETT 8.4 W 44.8859, -88.478 859.908 9.016 67.913 4.67 0 1 OCONTO FALLS 1.0 SE 44.8629, -88.1312 725.066 15.191 66.929 7.853 0 1 Thi s letter provides Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) confirmation for the wetland delineations you conduct during the 2026 growing season. You and your clients will not need to wait for the WDNR to review your wetland delineations before moving forward with project planning. This will help expedite the review process for WDNR’s wetland regulatory program. Your name and contact information will continue to be listed on our website at: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/wetlands/assurance.html. In t he instance where a municipality may require a letter of confirmation for your work prior to moving forward in the local regulatory process, this letter shall serve as that confirmation. Although your wetland delineations do not require WDNR field review, inclusion of a Wetland Delineation Report is required for projects needing State authorized wetland, waterway and/or storm water permit approvals. To c omply with Chapter 23.321, State Statutes, please supply the department with a polygon shapefile of the wetland boundaries delineated within the project area. Please do not include data such as parcel boundaries, project limits, wetland graphic representation symbols, etc. If internal upland polygons are found within a wetland polygon, then please label as UPLAND. The shapefile should utilize a State Plane Projection and be overlain onto recent aerial photography. If a different projection system is used, please indicate in which system the data are projected. In the correspondence sent with the shapefile, please supply a brief description of each wetland’s plant community (eg: wet meadow, floodplain forest, etc.). Please send these data to Calvin Lawrence (608-266-0756 or email at calvin.lawrence@wisconsin.gov). If you or any client has a question regarding your status in the Wetland Delineation Professional Assurance Program, contact me by email at kara.brooks@wisconsin.gov or phone at 414-308-6780. Thank you for all your hard work and best wishes for the upcoming field season. Si ncerely, Ka ra Brooks Wetland Identification Coordinator Bureau of Watershed Management State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1027 W. Saint Paul Avenue Milwaukee WI 53233 April 1, 2026 Candra Carter, CST Branch River Testing Services, LLC. 693 Lamers Clancy Road Greenleaf, WI 54129 Subject: 2026 Assured Wetland Delineator Confirmation Dear Candra Carter: City of Oconto Falls 500 N. Chestnut/P.O. Box 70, Oconto Falls, WI 54154 PETITION TO VACATE STREET, ALLEY OR PUBLIC EASEMENT _________________________________________________________________________________________ DATE_________________ Name of person filing application: ______________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Phone: ________________________________ Email:______________________________________________ Legal Description of Street, Alley, or Public Easement to be vacated: __________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Tax parcel number(s): __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Will the vacate result in any parcel of land being denied direct access? __________ if so, please describe: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reason for request: _________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ ***The total price is variable, and will be the actual cost incurred to the City for administrative, attorney, advertising and recording fees. This will be billed to you after vacates are sent to the deeds office. *** ***All resolutions include a statement that the vacate is subject to all utility and/or sewer easements, future construction and maintenance rights and access, including access rights incidental to those easements. (Wisconsin Statute 66.1005(2)(a) and Wisconsin Statute 66.1003(3))*** Signature: ____________________________________________ Applications shall be forwarded to the Plan Commission. The Plan Commission will review and shall report its finding and make recommendations to the City Council. City Council after receiving such recommendation from the Plan Commission, shall approve or deny the vacation request. 08.13.2026 MACH IV ENGINEERING & SURVEYING LLC/JOEL EHRFURTH 2260 SALSCHEIDER CT GREEN BAY, WI 54313 (920) 569-5765 JEHRFURTH@MACH-IV.COM SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2660708316419 NO REMOVE OLD ALLEY TO ALLOW SITE TO BE DEVELOPED FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING ***All resolutions include a statement that the vacate is subject to all utility and/or sewer easements, future construction and maintenance rights and access, including access rights incidental to those easements. (Wisconsin Statute 66.1005(2)(a)) and Wisconsin Statute 66.1003*** Consent of Abutting and Affected Property Owners By executing this document, we, the owners of all the property abutting on that portion of ________________ ________________________ Street / Avenue/ Alley to be vacated as described on the application, consent to the vacation of such ground. Name of abutting owner: ____________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Description of abutting lot: ___________________________________________________________________ Township ________ Range _______ Section _______ Tax lot(s) ________________________________________________________ Signature: ________________________________________________ Name of abutting owner: ____________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Description of abutting lot: ___________________________________________________________________ Township ________ Range _______ Section _______ Tax lot(s) ________________________________________________________ Signature: ________________________________________________ Name of abutting owner: ____________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Description of abutting lot: ___________________________________________________________________ Township ________ Range _______ Section _______ Tax lot(s) ________________________________________________________ Signature: _______________________________________________ Name of abutting owner: ____________________________________________________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Description of abutting lot: ___________________________________________________________________ Township ________ Range _______ Section _______ Tax lot(s) ________________________________________________________ Signature: ________________________________________________ ALLEY BOWLINE HOLDINGS LLC 1241 RUSSETT CT GREEN BAY, WI 54313 SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT BOWLINE HOLDINGS LLC 1241 RUSSETT CT GREEN BAY, WI 54313 SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 10' CBU LOCATION S57°15'40"W 254.80' N32°33'53"W 210.00'N57°15'38"E5.00'N32°33'53"W18.00'S57°15'42"W5.00' N32°33'53"W 251.67' N57°15'44"E 254.93'S32°32'58"E 479.67'9,135 SF.0.21 AC.LOT 18,029 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 28,029 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 37,983 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 47,983 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 58,027 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 611,849 SF.0.27 AC.LOT 711,849 SF.0.27 AC.LOT 88,027 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 98,028 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 108,028 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 118,029 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 128,029 SF.0.18 AC.LOT 139,134 SF.0.21 AC.LOT 14 54.00'63.00'63.00'71.67'127.47' 127.47'71.66'63.00'63.00'63.00'63.00'63.00'93.00' 127.40' 127.40'93.00' 63.00'54.00'9.00'9.00' S32°33'26"E 479.67' 71.67'63.00'63.00'63.00'63.00'63.00'93.00' N57°15'40"E 254.91' N57°15'40"E 254.83' 127.46' 127.46' 127.45' 127.45' 127.44' 127.44' 122.43' 127.43' 127.42' 127.42' 127.41' 127.41' 5'5' N00°57'52"E777.56'N89°02'08"W 2636.46'1839.98'796.48' ALLEYVACATED BYDOC.#XXXXXXX S. ADAMS STREETE. CENTRAL AVENUE S. WASHINGTON STREET UNION AVENUE/S.T.H. "22"(66' R/W) (66' R/W) (66' R/W) (66' R/W) 33' 33' 33' 33'33' 33' 33' 33' 10' UTILITYEASEMENT 20' SEWER &WATEREASEMENT 12' UTILITYEASEMENT WEST 1/4 CORNER,SECTION 25, T28N-R19E(FD. MAG W / WASHER)CENTER OFSECTION 25, T28N-R19E(FD. 4 INCH IP.) 16 234567 10 8 9 1112131415BLOCK 1 VOLK'S 2ND ADDITION VOLK'S PLAT OF OCONTO FALLS 50' HIGHWAY SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK NE - NWSE - NW 12' 20'10' 20' SEWEREASEMENTLEGEND2.38" x 18" IRON PIPEWEIGHING 3.65 # / L.F. SETMONUMENT FOUND,TYPE NOTED- ALL LINEAR MEASUREMENTS HAVEBEEN MADE TO THE NEARESTHUNDREDTH OF A FOOT.- ALL OTHER LOT AND OUTLOT CORNERSMARKED WITH A 1.32" (O.D.) X 18" IRON PIPE,W/ CAP WEIGHING 1.13 LBS\LIN. FOOT. BEARINGS ARE REFERENCEDTO THE WISCONSIN COUNTYCOORDINATE SYSTEM.(OCONTO COUNTY) 2260 Salscheider Court Green Bay, WI 54313PH:920-569-5765; Fax: 920-569-5767www.mach-iv.com DATE:DRAFTED BY:CHECKED BY:PROJECT NO.:DRAWINGNUMBERSHEET NUMBERNO.REVISION DESCRIPTION OF R:\Jobs\2486-01-26 OFALLS SUBDIVISION\DRAWINGS\2486-01-26 Plat.dwg 8/13/2026 11:20:57 AM 8 9 107654321A B C D E F G 8 9 107654321 BOWLINE HOLDING LLCALLEY VACATION EXHIBIT AUGUST 14, 2026JSHBRW2486-01-26EXHIBIT11 OLD SCHOOL SQUARE ALL OF BLOCK 1 OF VOLK'S 2ND ADDITION TO VOLK'S PLAT OF OCONTO FALLS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 80, PLATS,PAGE 444, OCONTO COUNTY RECORDS, AND THE VACATED ALLEY OF BLOCK 1, LOCATED IN PART OF THESOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4, SECTION 25,TOWNSHIP 28 NORTH, RANGE 19 EAST, CITY OF OCONTO FALLS, OCONTO COUNTY, WISCONSIN.OLD SCHOOL SQUARE LOCATION MAPTHE SW-NW OF SECTION 8, T25N-R19ESWSENE (NOT TO SCALE) SECTION 25NWSITE0GRAPHIC SCALE255050100150