Agenda for Regular Common Council Meeting

AGENDA FOR REGULAR COMMON COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF SUPERIOR, WISCONSIN May 5, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. Government Center, Board Room 201, 1316 N 14th Street, Superior, WI 54880 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4.1. April 21, 2026 – Regular Common Council Meeting 5. CORRESPONDENCE TO BE FILED 6. MAYOR’S REPORT 6.1. Report from Mayor Paine 7. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS 7.1. Human Resources Committee (Meeting held April 20, 2026) Report from the Chair. 7.2. Public Works Committee (No meeting to report) 7.3. Finance Committee (Meeting held April 30, 2026) Report from the Chair. 7.4. Licenses and Fees Committee (No meeting to report) 7.5. Public Safety Committee (No meeting to report) 7.5. Committee of the Whole Meeting (No meeting to report) 8. SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS 8.1. REPORTS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1.2. Plan Commission (Meeting held April 14, 2026) Report from the Chair [20260505R 1] 8.1.2.1. Review and approve quit claim deed land purchases to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation for land purchases related to the Blatnik Bridge project. 8.1.2.2. Review and approve temporary easements to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation related to the Blatnik Bridge project. 8.2. REPORTS SANS RECOMMENDATION 8.2.1. Public Art Commission (Meeting held April 2, 2026) Report from the Chair. 8.2.2. Urban Forestry Tree Board (Meeting held April 16, 2026) Report from the Chair. 9. OLD BUSINESS 10. NEW BUSINESS 10.1. R26-13871, a resolution in support of maintaining fish hatchery operations and fish stocking levels in Wisconsin. 10.2. Committee, Board, and Commission appointments. 10.3. R26-13872, a resolution authorizing the allocation of funds from the Economic Development Fund for Public Education and Community Engagement related to the utility acquisition. 10.4. R26-13873, a resolution to set a public hearing for the 2026-2030 Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Plan and the 2026 Action Plan. 10.5. Miscellaneous licenses pending department approvals. 11. BUSINESS BY PUBLIC Due to the requirements of the Wisconsin Open Meetings laws, only matters placed on this agenda may be approved by the Council at this meeting. Citizens who wish to address the council may do so during Business by Public by signing up with the city clerk and indicating the agenda item they wish to address. All comments by members of the public shall be limited to three minutes in length. Electioneering or personal attacks are not allowed. The City of Superior complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. If you need an accommodation to participate in the public meeting process, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (715) 395 -7200 (OR dial 711 for Telecommunications Relay Se rvice) prior to the scheduled meeting. The city will attempt to accommodate any reasonable request depending on the amount of notice received. [20260505R 2] In compliance with Wisconsin Open Meetings Law, this agenda was posted on 05/01/2026 at the following locations: Superior Government Center, Douglas County Courthouse, and online at https://www.superiorwi.gov/agendacenter. It was also emailed to the Superior Telegram and the Superior Public Library. [20260505R 3] PROCEEDINGS OF THE REGULAR COMMON COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF SUPERIOR, WISCONSIN April 21, 2026 at 6:34 p.m. Government Center, Board Room 201, 1316 N 14th Street, Superior, WI 54880 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL Present: Nick Ledin, Garner Moffat, Jack Sweeney, Joe Radtke, Tyler Elm, Karly Caven, Mike Herrick, Rob Hering, Lindsey Graskey – 9 Virtual: Absent: Sarah Anderson – 1 Also Present: Mayor Paine, City Attorney Prell, City Clerk Blunt, Chief of Staff Baker, Deput City Clerk Bacon 2.1. Oath of Office for Newly Elected Officials: Alderperson District 1: Nicholas Ledin Alderperson District 3: Garner Moffat Alderperson District 5: Joe Radtke Alderperson District 7: Karly Caven Alderperson District 9: Robert Hering 2.2. Selection of Council President MOTION by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Councilor Elm to nominate Councilor Herrick for President. MOTION to close nominations and elect Councilor Herrick for President by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Councilor Moffat and carried by unanimous voice vote. 2.3. Selection of Council Vice President MOTION by President Herrick, was seconded by Councilor Ledin to nominate Councilor Moffat for Vice President. MOTION to close nominations and elect Councilor Moffat for Vice President by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Councilor Ledin and carried by unanimous voice vote. 3. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES [20260505R 4] 4.1. April 14, 2026 – Regular Common Council Meeting MOTION TO APPROVE by Councilor Elm, was seconded by Vice President Moffat, and carried. 5. CORRESPONDENCE TO BE FILED 6. MAYOR’S REPORT 6.1. Report from Mayor Paine 7. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS 7.1. Human Resources Committee (No meeting to report) 7.2. Public Works Committee (No meeting to report) 7.3. Finance Committee (No meeting to report) 7.4. Licenses and Fees Committee (Meeting held April 13, 2026) Report from Vice Chair Herrick. RECOMMENDATIONS: 7.4.1. Approve R26-13870, a resolution adopting Barkers Island Cottage Rental Pricing Fee Schedule. MOTION TO APPROVE by President Herrick, was seconded by Councilor Sweeney, and carried. 7.4.2. Approve O26-4422, an ordinance amending City Code, Chapter 94 – Peddlers and Solicitors, Section 94-3 – Exemptions, to add exemption from the City’s Peddler’s Permit requirement for vendors who are participating exclusively within City-approved special events. MOTION TO APPROVE by President Herrick, was seconded by Vice President Moffat, and carried. 7.5. Public Safety Committee (Meeting held April 16, 2026) Report from Councilor Elm. RECOMMENDATIONS: 7.5.1. Approve acceptance of technology grant from the Wisconsin Department of Justice, Grant Number 2024-COA-01-20323 in the amount of $43,692.00. 7.5.2. Approve acceptance Wisconsin Department of Justice Drug Trafficking Interdiction Grant (2026-DT-01-20181) in the amount of $39,750.00. 7.5.3. Waive the formal bid requirements and enter into the agreement with IndiGo to provide Certified Peer Support Services for the estimated not to exceed an [20260505R 5] annual cost of $39,000.00. MOTION TO APPROVE items 7.5.1, 7.5.2, and 7.5.3 by Councilor Elm, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. 7.5.4. Approve O26-4423, an ordinance amending City Code Chapter 112 - Traffic Code, Article VII - Miscellaneous Traffic Related Ordinances, Schedule A, Stops-Section 2 – Three-Way Stops to Add Oakes Avenue at North 23rd Street as a Four-Way Stop. MOTION TO APPROVE by President Herrick, was seconded by Vice President Moffat, and carried. 7.5.5. Approve O26-4424, an ordinance amending City Code Chapter 112 - Traffic Code, Article IV – Abandoned and Junked Vehicles; Towing and Storage of Motor Vehicles, Division 4 – General Regulations, Section 112-145 – Storage Charges, to set storage fees. MOTION TO APPROVE by Councilor Elm, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. 7.5.6. Approve O26-4425, an ordinance amending City Code Chapter 112 - Traffic Code, Article IV – Abandoned and Junked Vehicles; Towing and Storage of Motor Vehicles, Division 4 – General Regulations, Section 112-143 – Towing Charges, to set towing fees. MOTION TO APPROVE by Councilor Elm, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. 7.6. Committee of the Whole Meeting (No meeting to report) 8. SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS 8.1. REPORTS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1.1. Redevelopment Authority (Meeting held April 2, 2026) Report from Mayor Paine. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1.1.1. Approve R26-13868, a resolution approving the report of the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Superior regarding the development agreement with Genesis Attachments, LLC. MOTION TO APPROVE by Councilor Ledin, was seconded by President Herrick, and carried. 8.1.2. Plan Commission (Meeting held April 14, 2026) Report from Mayor Paine. RECOMMENDATION: [20260505R 6] 8.1.2.1. Approve R26-13869, a resolution approving an easement agreement with Qwest Corporations, d/b/a CenturyLink QC in connection with property located on Connors Point. MOTION TO APPROVE by Councilor Graskey, was seconded by Vice President Moffat, and carried. 8.2. REPORTS SANS RECOMMENDATION 9. OLD BUSINESS 10. NEW BUSINESS 10.1. O26-4426, an ordinance amending City Code, Chapter 112 – Traffic Code, Schedule J, Accessible Parking Zones, To Add Accessible Parking Signage at 1716 Iowa Avenue (one side). MOTION TO APPROVE by Vice President Moffat, was seconded by Councilor Ledin, and carried. 11. BUSINESS BY PUBLIC Meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Blunt, City Clerk Superior, Wisconsin Approved this 5th day of May, 2026. Attest: ____________________________________ Mayor ____________________________________ City Clerk [20260505R 7] HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes Monday, April 20, 2026 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Councilor Graskey at 5:00 p.m. on April 20, 2026, in room 204 of the Government Center. 1 ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jack Sweeney, Lindsey Graskey, Garner Moffat, Sarah Anderson CITY STAFF PRESENT: Beth Archer, Chris Carlson, Mayor Paine, Wesley Vann, Camron Vollbrecht, Deb Williams OTHERS PRESENT: Shelley Nelson 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1 Human Resources Committee (Meeting held March 16, 2026) MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney. Motion carried. 3 OLD BUSINESS 3.1 Discussion about the Customer Price Index (CPI) and how it was determined for non- union wage increases. (held from the March HRC meeting) MOTION by Sweeney seconded by Moffat, to hold in committee until the May HRC meeting. Motion carried. 4 NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Approve updated job description for Assistant Recreation Program Coordinator & Recreation Program Monitor MOTION by Graskey, seconded by Moffat. Motion carried. 4.2 Approve updated job description for ESD Maintenance Technician MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney. Motion carried. 4.3 Request to fill ESD Maintenance Technician MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney. Motion carried. Wesley Van left the meeting at 5:10 pm. 4.4 Approve updated job description for Firefighter MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney. Motion carried. [20260505R 8] 4.5 Request to fill Police Officer MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney. Motion carried. 4.6 Request to fill Assistant Fire Chief MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney. Motion carried. 4.7 Approve updated job description for Assistant Public Works Director The committee agreed to update the language for #17 under “General Responsibilities” to say: “Stay informed on engineering, planning, project management, and supervision through professional education.” MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney, to approve as amended. Motion carried. 4.8 Request to fill Assistant Public Works Director MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney. Motion carried. 4.9 Approve updated policy #04.06c – Nepotism MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney, to hold in committee until the May HRC meeting. Motion carried. 4.10 Approve updated policy #16.01 – Disciplinary Actions MOTION by Sweeney, seconded by Moffat, to hold in committee until the May HRC meeting. Motion carried. 4.11 Determine which job vacancies should come to HRC for approval to fill. (request from Councilor Moffat at March HRC meeting) MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney, to hold in committee until the May HRC meeting. Motion carried. 4.12 Determine if different testing/assessment options are necessary for screening new supervisory roles. (request from Councilor Sweeney at March HRC meeting) The committee discussed a few different options, such as the Myers Briggs, and it was determined that testing was more relevant and helpful for determining current employee’s strengths and weaknesses, not for hiring purposes. No action was taken. 4.13 Receive and file items approved by the Library Board: 4.13.1 Library Custodian updated job description 4.13.2 Manager of Programming and Partnerships updated job description 4.13.3 Manager of Public Services updated job description 4.13.4 Manager of Youth and Family Resources updated job description MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney, to receive and file. Motion carried. 4.13.5 Library Board minutes from April 8, 2026 MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney, to receive and file. Motion carried. [20260505R 9] 5 RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Receive and file: Monthly personnel report for February 2026. MOTION by Moffat, seconded by Sweeney, to receive and file. Motion carried. 5.2 Human Resources updates. No action required. 6 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:28 p.m. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Respectfully submitted by Beth Archer [20260505R 10] FINANCE COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes April 30, 2026, Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Councilor Jack Sweeney at 4:30 pm on April 30, 2026, in Government Center Room 204. 1 ROLLCALL PRESENT: Jack Sweeney, Tylor Elm, and Mike Herrick, CITY STAFF PRESENT: Nick Rhinehart (Finance Director), Renee Hoff (Assistant Finance Director), Camron Vollbrecht (Fire Chief), and Karie Markon VIRTUAL: OTHERS PRESENT: 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1 Finance Committee (Meeting held February 24, 2026) Motion was made by Mike Herrick, seconded by Tylor Elm, and carried to approve the Finance Committee minutes February 24, 2026. 3 OLD BUSINESS Chair Councilor Jack Sweeney proposed to move 4.1 before 3.1. Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herrick, and carried to move 4.1 before 3.1. 3.1 Village of Superior – Fire Protection Contract Upon proper motion and second, the committee may convene in closed session under Wis. Stat. sec. 19.85(1)(e) for the purpose of deliberating strategies and setting parameters for the negotiation of the Village of Superior Fire Protection Contract Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herrick, and carried to move into closed session at 4:49pm Motion was made by Mike Herrick, seconded by Tylor Elm, and carried to move out of closed session at 5:04pm Committee took no Action on the Village of Superior – Fire Protection Contract 3.2 City Landfill Discussion Committee revisited the current progress on the various scenarios of the landfill closure. A question and answer period was ensued. Motion was made by Mike Herrick, second by Tylor Elm, and carried to hold in Finance the City Landfill Discussion. [20260505R 11] 4 NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Fire Station Headquarters Solar Update Fire Chief Camron Vollbrecht presented council with the cost saving that has occurred with the new solar panel installation. A question and answer period was ensued. Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herrick, to receive and file the Fire Station Headquarters Solar Update 5 RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Golf Course Report and Financials March 2026 Finance Director Nick Rhinehart spoke on the Golf Course current financial statements. A question and answer period was ensued. Committee took no Action on the Golf Course Report and Financials March 2026 5.2 February 2026 Check Register – 2025 Expenditures 5.3 February 2026 Check Register – 2026 Expenditures Council worked through 5.2, and 5.3 together, a question and answer period was ensued. Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herrick, carried to approve and file the February 2026 Check Register – 2025 Expenditures and 2026 Expenditures. 5.4 March 2026 - Check Register – 2025 Expenditures 5.5 March 2026 - Check Register – 2026 Expenditures Council worked through 5.4, and 5.5 together, a question and answer period was ensued. Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herrick, carried to approve and file the March 2026 Check Register – 2025 Expenditures and 2026 Expenditures. 5.6 General Fund Financial Statement – 2025 Expenditure and 2026 Expenditures vs Budget Analysis as of April 7, 2026 Finance Director Nick Rhinehart spoke on the budget, sharing some early audit results and possibles on how finance will be applying those findings. A question and answer period was ensued. Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herruck, and carried to approve and file the General Fund Financial Statement – 2025 Expenditures vs Budget Analysis as of April 7, 2026. 5.7 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund Budget Review Finance Director Nick Rhinehart spoke on the Budget stating this is one of the most current and accurate budget reviews, noting the spend downs on these funds have been pretty precise to the budget allocations. Also mentioning that the extra few hundred dollars left over will be distributed to the nonprofits. [20260505R 12] Motion was made by Mike Herrick, seconded by Tylor Elm, and carried to approve to file the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund Budget Review. 5.8 Insurance Update Finance Director Nick Rhinehart spoke on possible changes with the vehicle coverage. This is partly due to an increase in police chases and damages that occur during these pursuits that have multiplied in the lower parts of Wisconsin. A question and answer period was ensured. Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herrick, carried to approve to file the Insurance Update. 5.9 Other Financial Matters Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software Update Finance Director Nick Rhinehart notified council that some of the larger processes have been completed with Oracle. Now they are incorporating those procedures into our new computer program and testing out sample programs. Motion was made by Tylor Elm, seconded by Mike Herrick and carried to approve to File the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software Update. 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:13 p.m. Minutes respectfully submitted by Karie Markon [20260505R 13] PLAN COMMISSION Minutes April 14, 2026 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Fennessey at 5:01 pm on January 13, 2026, in Government Center Room 270. 1 ROLL CALL PRESENT: Jim Paine, Brian Finstad, Lynn Wohlwend, Garner Moffat, Brent Fennessey, Lindsey Graskey and Anne Porter VIRTUAL: Sandy Benes, Megan Beer-Pemberton, Brad Becker, Daniel Scribner, and Tony Resendez ABSENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director Serck and Tech Granlund OTHERS PRESENT: Shelley Nelson 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1 Plan Commission Minutes (January 26, 2026 & February 24, 2026) MOTION to approve the January 26, 2026 & February 24, 2026, minutes by Commissioner Moffat, seconded by Commissioner Finstad. Carried. 3 OLD BUSINESS 4 NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Review and approve quit claim deed land purchases to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation for land purchases related to the Blatnik Bridge project. Director Serck provided an overview of the land acquisitions and temporary limited easements. Megan Beer-Pemberton, representing CORRE, explained the purpose and necessity of these acquisitions and easements in relation to the Blatnik Bridge project. MOTION to approve the quit claim deed land purchase to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation for land related to the Blatnik Bridge project by Commissioner Graskey, seconded by Commissioner Moffat. Carried. 4.2 Review and approve temporary limited easements to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation related to the Blatnik Bridge project. MOTION to approve the temporary limited easements to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation for land related to the Blatnik Bridge project by Commissioner Moffat, seconded by Commissioner Graskey. Carried. 4.3 Review and approve a utility easement to Qwest Corporation, d/b/a Century Link QC (Lumen Technologies). Director Serck provided information on the easement location and need for the easement. Commissioner Paine arrived at 5:08 pm. [20260505R 14] MOTION to approve a utility easement to Qwest Corporation, d/b/a Century Link QC (Lumen Technologies) by Commissioner Finstad, seconded by Commissioner Moffat. Carried. 4.4 William Anderson’s Request to Submit a Certified Survey map on behalf of the State of Wisconsin Department of Administration. CSM 26-02. Director Serck introduced the Certified Survey Map and provided an overview of its purpose, including an explanation of the need for the map and the location it covers. MOTION to approve the request to Submit a Certified Survey map on behalf of the State of Wisconsin Department of Administration by Commissioner Paine, seconded by Commissioner Moffat. Carried. 4.5 Vacant to Value: New Construction Land Discussion. Commissioner Moffat shared the with the Commission the idea of utilizing the remaining properties in the Vacant to Value: New Construction program for a land trust program and provided an overview of how land trusts function. Director Serck then outlined the current structure of the Vacant to Value program and discussed potential opportunities. The Plan Commission discussed the concept and ultimately decided to place the program on hold and the discussion to continue at the May Plan Commission meeting. 5 RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Planning & Development Director Report Director Serck shared with the commissioners spoke about the recent RACS meeting regarding Genesis and the planned expansion. Director Serck gave an update on the DOT Bridge relocation projects. Superior High School writing students have been meeting with city employees for ideas the writing projects. A special Plan Commission meeting will be scheduled in the next few weeks to discuss the zoning code update mapping. 6 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 5:49 pm Respectfully submitted by Amanda Granlund. [20260505R 15] =:! Quit Claim Deed Legal Description All that part ofthe lands subject to the Grantor's easements or interests included in lands acquired for the improvement of IH 535 by the Grantee in: Parcel(s) 2, 3, & 9 oftransportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .02, recorded as document #947930 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 19 and Ex RW of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.03, recorded as document #947013 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) Ex RW of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .04, recorded as document #947352 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 4 & 5 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .05, Amendment NO. 1, recorded as document #949024 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 8, 11, 37, 43, and Ex RW oftransportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.06, Amendment NO. 1, recorded as document #948974 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) Ex RW of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .07, recorded as document #947748 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin. Parcel Number Interest/Right Document Number Parcel Identification Number/Tax Key Number 2 DOC 570923 03-803-01308-00 9 DOC 570923 03-803-01340-00; 03-803-02130-00 3 No Easement of Record 03-803-01285-00; 04-804-00841-00; 04-804- 00848-00 19 DOC 895984 04-804-00893 -00; 04-804-00913-00 Ex RW DOC 447750 NA Ex RW DOC 479508 (BLANKETL DOC 442651 NA (BLANKETL DOC 443033 (BLANKET) 4 DOC 659680 03-803-00401-00 5 DOC 659680 03-803-00426-00; 03-803-00428-00 8 DOC 453178; DOC 533852 East 5ft 03-803-00430-00; 03-803-00440-00; 03-803- LOT 23-32 Block 5; DOC 436655 01157-00 11 DOC 453178; DOC 436655; DOC 03-803-01093-00; 03-803-01113 -00; 03-806- 533387 LOT 7, West 20ft Lot 21, 22, 00468-00 BLOCK 5 37 DOC 533519, North 12.5 FT LOT 29, 03-803-01172-00 Block 25 43 DOC 533361 East 5 FT LOT 6 Block 5 03-803-00444-00 EXRW DOC453752 NA EXRW DOC 453752 NA R/W Project ID 1199-00-20 This instrument was drafted by Megan Beer-Pemberton , CORRE, Inc., on behalf of the WisDOT UTL No. 101 Page 2 of 2 [20260505R 16] ~ -l Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description All that part ofthe lands subject to the Grantor's easements or interests included in lands acquired for the improvement of IH 535 by the Grantee in: Parcel(s) 19 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.03, recorded as document #947013 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 31 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.04, recorded as document #947352 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 11, 37, 41 and 43 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.06, recorded as document #948974 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin. Parcel Number 19 31 11 11 11 37 41 43 Interest/Right Document Number DOC895984 DOC 297126 (North 8FT) DOC453178 DOC436655 DOC 533387 LOT 7, West 20ft LOTS 21, 22 Block 5 DOC 533519 North 12.5 FT LOT 29, Block 25 DOC 533362 North 5ft LOT 4 Block 24 DOC 533361, East 5ft Lot 6 Block 5 Parcel Identification Number/Tax Key Number 04-804-00893-00; 04-804-00913-00 03-803-00128-00 03-803-01093-00; 03-803-01113-00; 03-806- 00468-00 03-803-01093 -00; 03-803 -01113-00; 03-806- 00468-00 03-803-01093 -00; 03-803-01113-00; 03-806- 00468-00 03-803-01172-00 03-803-00528 -00 03-803 -00444-00 R/W Project ID 1199-00-20 This instrument was drafted by Megan Beer-Pemberton , CORRE, Inc., on behalf of the Wi sDOT UTL No. 101 Page 2 of 2 [20260505R 17] [20260505R 18] [20260505R 19] [20260505R 20] [20260505R 21] [20260505R 22] [20260505R 23] [20260505R 24] [20260505R 25] =:! Quit Claim Deed Legal Description All that part ofthe lands subject to the Grantor's easements or interests included in lands acquired for the improvement of IH 535 by the Grantee in: Parcel(s) 2, 3, & 9 oftransportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .02, recorded as document #947930 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 19 and Ex RW of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.03, recorded as document #947013 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) Ex RW of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .04, recorded as document #947352 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 4 & 5 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .05, Amendment NO. 1, recorded as document #949024 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 8, 11, 37, 43, and Ex RW oftransportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.06, Amendment NO. 1, recorded as document #948974 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) Ex RW of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4 .07, recorded as document #947748 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin. Parcel Number Interest/Right Document Number Parcel Identification Number/Tax Key Number 2 DOC 570923 03-803-01308-00 9 DOC 570923 03-803-01340-00; 03-803-02130-00 3 No Easement of Record 03-803-01285-00; 04-804-00841-00; 04-804- 00848-00 19 DOC 895984 04-804-00893 -00; 04-804-00913-00 Ex RW DOC 447750 NA Ex RW DOC 479508 (BLANKETL DOC 442651 NA (BLANKETL DOC 443033 (BLANKET) 4 DOC 659680 03-803-00401-00 5 DOC 659680 03-803-00426-00; 03-803-00428-00 8 DOC 453178; DOC 533852 East 5ft 03-803-00430-00; 03-803-00440-00; 03-803- LOT 23-32 Block 5; DOC 436655 01157-00 11 DOC 453178; DOC 436655; DOC 03-803-01093-00; 03-803-01113 -00; 03-806- 533387 LOT 7, West 20ft Lot 21, 22, 00468-00 BLOCK 5 37 DOC 533519, North 12.5 FT LOT 29, 03-803-01172-00 Block 25 43 DOC 533361 East 5 FT LOT 6 Block 5 03-803-00444-00 EXRW DOC453752 NA EXRW DOC 453752 NA R/W Project ID 1199-00-20 This instrument was drafted by Megan Beer-Pemberton , CORRE, Inc., on behalf of the WisDOT UTL No. 101 Page 2 of 2 [20260505R 26] ~ -l Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description All that part ofthe lands subject to the Grantor's easements or interests included in lands acquired for the improvement of IH 535 by the Grantee in: Parcel(s) 19 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.03, recorded as document #947013 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 31 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.04, recorded as document #947352 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin; Parcel(s) 11, 37, 41 and 43 of transportation project plat 1199-00-20-4.06, recorded as document #948974 recorded in Douglas County, Wisconsin. Parcel Number 19 31 11 11 11 37 41 43 Interest/Right Document Number DOC895984 DOC 297126 (North 8FT) DOC453178 DOC436655 DOC 533387 LOT 7, West 20ft LOTS 21, 22 Block 5 DOC 533519 North 12.5 FT LOT 29, Block 25 DOC 533362 North 5ft LOT 4 Block 24 DOC 533361, East 5ft Lot 6 Block 5 Parcel Identification Number/Tax Key Number 04-804-00893-00; 04-804-00913-00 03-803-00128-00 03-803-01093-00; 03-803-01113-00; 03-806- 00468-00 03-803-01093 -00; 03-803 -01113-00; 03-806- 00468-00 03-803-01093 -00; 03-803-01113-00; 03-806- 00468-00 03-803-01172-00 03-803-00528 -00 03-803 -00444-00 R/W Project ID 1199-00-20 This instrument was drafted by Megan Beer-Pemberton , CORRE, Inc., on behalf of the Wi sDOT UTL No. 101 Page 2 of 2 [20260505R 27] [20260505R 28] [20260505R 29] [20260505R 30] [20260505R 31] [20260505R 32] [20260505R 33] [20260505R 34] [20260505R 35] Public Art Commission Minutes THURSDAY, April 2nd, 2026 Meeting The meeting was called to order by Chair Lindsey Graskey at 11:05AM on February 5th, 2026 in Government Center Room 270. 1 ROLL CALL PRESENT:, Lindsey Graskey, Heidi Blunt VIRTUAL: Paul Robinson, Carolyn Nelson-Kavajecz (11:06) ABSENT: Mollie Gilbertson CITY STAFF PRESENT: Rebecca Baker OTHERS PRESENT: 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Meeting held February 5th, 2026 MOTION Blunt, Second by Robinson to approve. Minutes filed. 3 OLD BUSINESS 3.1. SPAG Grant Language Review MOTION Robinson to keep basic language the same for one more round with minor edits as discussed. New process will be considered after this round. Deadline will be July 1st, 2026. Second by Graskey. Motion passes. Commission has $33,560 allocated for final round. 4 NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Public Art Commission Website Update from COS Baker. No action taken. 4.2 Public Art Commission Facebook Update from COS Baker. MOTION Graskey to approve the use of the page. Second Blunt. Motion passes. 4.3 Jade Wong Grant Reallocation MOTION Blunt to approve reallocation budget as presented. Second Robinson. Motion passes. 5 RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Previous Grant Recipient Updates Update from Baker. No action taken. 5.2 Financials No action taken. 6 ADJOURNMENT [20260505R 36] MOTION to adjourn at 11:59AM. Next meeting will be confirmed via Doodle Poll. Respectfully submitted by Rebecca Baker. [20260505R 37] URBAN FORESTRY TREE BOARD MINUTES April 16, 2026 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Chair Ludwig at 4:33 p.m. on April 16, 2026, in Government Center Room 204 & virtually via Microsoft Teams. 1. ROLL CALL Members Present: Ruth Ludwig, Christine Olson, Robert-Jan Quené, Nick Nelson, Richard Kaufman* City Staff Present: Bridgit Maruska, Kara Czapinski, Chris Carlson Others Present: Shelley Nelson, Conor Williams* 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. Urban Forestry Tree Board (Meeting held January 15, 2026) MOTION by Olson, second by Kaufman and carried to approve the minutes from January 15, 2026. MOTION by Quené, second by Nelson and carried to move item 4.1 next. 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Discuss the Rights of Nature Wisconsin Initiative. Christine Olson explained that the Rights of Nature Wisconsin Initiative aims to recognize legal rights for natural entities, referencing past legislative efforts in Wisconsin, such as the 'prove it first' law for mining and a bill to grant legal rights to Devil's Lake State Park. She noted that these bills did not pass but emphasized the importance of continued education and advocacy at the local level. Conor Williams elaborated on the philosophy behind the Rights of Nature movement, highlighting its roots in Native American traditions and its goal to extend legal rights to natural ecosystems. Williams clarified that current resolutions in Wisconsin, such as Milwaukee's, are non-binding and aspirational, but some proposed bills would have been binding if passed. Christine and Conor discussed possible actions for the Urban Forestry Tree Board, including issuing a proclamation of support, advocating for the initiative at the City Council level, and encouraging community education. The board considered drafting a resolution and discussed the importance of making any proposal clear and addressing potential concerns from the public and council members. The board agreed to continue researching the Rights of Nature initiative, review relevant materials, and bring questions, pros and cons, and ideas for further discussion at the next meeting. Chris Carlson joined the meeting at 4:45 p.m. Conor Williams left the meeting virtually at 5:00 p.m. [20260505R 38] 3. OLD BUSINESS 3.1 Update on RFP for Invasive Species Management Plan for SMF. Director Maruska informed that Mark Pranckus, a senior ecologist from Inter-Fluve, has provided a preliminary estimate of $51,600 for the invasive species management plan, with $30,000 already allocated as a potential match for grants. Inter-Fluve gathered the quote to include in the Headwaters Sustainability Partnership Landscape Stewardship Vision Plan. Maruska, along with Deanna Erickson from the Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve, are working to identify appropriate grant opportunities, highlighting that the available funding surpasses the usual 50% match requirement. The implementation of the plan is anticipated to proceed by next year, contingent upon grant timelines and deadlines. While no immediate action is required from the board, Maruska will keep them updated as new grant opportunities arise and the project develops. 3.2 Update from Superior Trails/COGGS. Richard Kaufman announced that Barr Engineering has submitted the initial draft of the trail plan, which has been reviewed by city staff, former members of the Superior Trails Initiative, and local residents. The feedback gathered from a site visit and document analysis is being integrated into a revised draft, with the aim of presenting a final version at the upcoming Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. This proposed trail is designed to link the Osaugie Trail to the municipal forest, traversing areas such as Central Park and school zones. The design prioritizes the efficient use of public land, seeks to limit the impact on private properties, and accommodates various activities, including biking and walking. During discussions, Director Maruska and Kaufman emphasized the significance of public perception, highlighting that similar initiatives in other cities have elicited varied responses. To address this, the team intends to underscore the community benefits and will actively involve private landowners and the public as the project progresses. Approval from the Urban Forestry Tree Board is necessary before advancing to the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council. Kaufman urged board members to gather any questions or concerns, especially regarding tree removal and environmental implications, for Barr Engineering to consider. 3.3 Planning for Arbor Day/Heritage Tree Program. The Arbor Day and Heritage Tree program event is set for May 30th, featuring music, educational presentations, food, and a proclamation reading by the Mayor. Residents and board members will contribute food and some seating, while a special presentation will highlight the featured crabapple tree. Maruska has outlined a publicity strategy that includes announcements on the city website, social media platforms, a Facebook event, and the community calendar in the local newspaper. Kaufman has volunteered to distribute printed flyers at local businesses and community venues. Additionally, Maruska is utilizing this event as part of a CTMI course, developing materials to assist other communities in replicating the program. Attendees will have the opportunity to engage in educational activities and receive crabapple saplings. Plans are also in place to [20260505R 39] capture a photograph of the 2026 Heritage Tree, with potential locations including the hallway of the government center. 5. RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Director’s Update 5.1.1 The grand reopening of the Heritage Skate Park is scheduled for May 30th, with a backup date set for the following Saturday in case of rain. The celebration will feature a ribbon-cutting ceremony, food trucks, live music, skateboarding demonstrations, and a best trick contest, attracting an anticipated crowd of 200 to 300 attendees. Tree Board members will be present to sell established trees, and donor recognition plaques will be installed at the skate park. The objective is to sell between 12 and 15 trees; should demand surpass availability, contact information will be gathered for future plantings or to guide donors to the Tribute Tree program. 5.1.2 Attended the Minnesota Shade Tree Conference at Bethel University alongside Superintendent Wintlend and other Park staff. The conference highlighted the importance of pruning trees within the initial three years of planting to promote healthy growth, a practice that city staff intends to prioritize. Additionally, the event featured sessions focused on species selection and facilitated community roundtable discussions. 5.2 Superintendent’s Update 5.3 Future Agenda Items 5.3.1 Update on RFP for Invasive Species Management Plan in the SMF 5.3.2 Update from Superior Trails/COGGS 5.3.3 Update on the Rights of Nature Wisconsin Initiative 5.3.4 Princess Theater Tree Planting 5.3.5 Update on Arbor Day Celebration/Heritage Tree Program 5.3.6 Election of Officers 5.4 Confirm the next meeting date as Thursday, July 16, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. in Room 204 of the Government Center. 6. ADJOURNMENT Councilor Ludwig announced the meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Kara Czapinski [20260505R 40] MEMO WI DNR FISH HATCHERY OPERATIONS AND FISH STOCKING TO: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 4-27-26 I am asking for support of the City Council and City of Superior to pass this Resolution to urge the State of WI, to not close our Brule River Fish Hatchery and or drastically cut fish stocking on Western Lake Superior or across the State. If they did this would be a huge impact to our area for tourism and local business, and in turn we would lose people to Lake Michigan, where the WI DNR would not cut stocking efforts. This has been brought forward by a bunch of local conservation groups, such as Western Lake Superior Trollers Asscocation, Douglas County Fish and Game, & Friends of Wisconsin Fisherires. We need to act fast the State of WI just notified of this last week and plans to make a decision by early July of 2026. If you would like I can have experts from local agencies present at a meeting to explain. Thanks, Robert Hering [20260505R 41] Name (Council Representatives) Est Mtgs/ Yr Councilor Councilor Councilor Alternate Councilor Human Resources Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Moffat Sweeney Graskey Caven Public Works Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Ledin Moffat Elm Radtke Finance Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Sweeney Elm Herrick Ledin License & Fees Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Sweeney Herrick Graskey Hering Public Safety Committee (3 & 1 alt) 4 Anderson Elm Herrick Radtke Communication and Information Technology Committee* (2) 4 Elm Caven Development Association** (1) 7 Graskey Library Board** (1) 12 Ledin Mayor’s Commission on Disabilities* (1) 12 Anderson Metropolitan Interstate Council** (3) 12 Ledin Moffat Elm Parks & Recreation Commission** (2) 10 Ledin Radtke Public Art Commission* (1) 4 Graskey Golf Course Committee* (1 & 1 alt) 12 Hering Sweeney Marina Committee * (1) 2 Hering Wisconsin Point Committee** (1 & 1 alt) 5 Herrick Plan Commission** (3) 9 Moffat Elm Graskey CDBG Advisory Board** (1) 3 Herrick Redevelopment Authority (1) 2 Hering Police & Fire Commission** (1) 8 Anderson Douglas Cty Historical Society Board** (1) 12 Caven Tourism Development Commission 12 Radtke Graskey Updated 05/05/26 2026-2027 Council Appointments Standing Committees (See City Code Sec 2-50(b)) Special Committees* ( see City Code Sec. 2-49) AND Boards & Commissions** (See City Code Sec. 2-300) RESOLUTION # R26-13871 RESOLUTION INTRODUCED BY THE COUNCILOR ROBERT HERING IN SUPPORT OF MAINTAINING FISH HATCHERY OPERATIONS AND FISH STOCKING LEVELS IN WISCONSIN WHEREAS, any decline in fishing activity is expected to negatively impact the local economy, including charter fishing businesses, motels, restaurants, gas stations, and other tourism-related enterprises that depend on anglers visiting the region; and WHEREAS, organizations including the Western Lake Superior Trollers Association and the Douglas County Fish and Game League, along with a coalition of fishing groups, businesses, and historical organizations, have expressed strong opposition to these cuts, particularly as the Brule hatchery approaches its 100th anniversary in 2027; and WHEREAS, maintaining hatchery operations and fish stocking levels is essential to preserving Wisconsin’s fisheries, supporting tourism, and sustaining local economies such as that of the City of Superior; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Superior strongly urges the State of Wisconsin, including the Legislature, the Joint Committee on Finance, the Office of the Governor, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, to take immediate action to restore funding authority and prevent further reductions to fisheries programs; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Superior supports the following principles: 1. No closure of any state fish hatcheries; 2. No statewide reduction in fish stocking levels; 3. If reductions are unavoidable, they must be distributed equitably between Lake Superior and Lake Michigan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Superior directs that copies of this resolution be sent to the Governor of Wisconsin, members of the Wisconsin State Legislature, the Joint Committee on Finance, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Passed and adopted this 5th day of May, 2026. Approved this 5th day of May, 2026. ________________________________________ Mayor Attest: ____________________________________ City Clerk [20260505R 42] RESOLUTION # R26-13872 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT RELATED TO UTILITY ACQUISITION WHEREAS, the City of Superior has been evaluating matters related to the potential acquisition of utility infrastructure and services, which may have significant long-term impacts on residents, businesses, rates, reliability, local control, and economic development; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to ensure that residents, business owners, and stakeholders are provided with accurate, transparent, and accessible information regarding utility acquisition proposals, studies, financial considerations, and potential community impacts; and WHEREAS, meaningful public engagement through educational events, informational materials, town hall meetings, and related outreach efforts is essential to informed civic participation and sound municipal decision-making; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Fund may be utilized for initiatives that support the long-term economic vitality and strategic interests of the City of Superior; and WHEREAS, ensuring the public is well-informed on matters affecting core infrastructure and utility governance serves an important economic development purpose by supporting community confidence, business certainty, and informed policy outcomes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Superior, Wisconsin, that the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) is hereby allocated from the Economic Development Fund for the purpose of supporting public education and community engagement efforts related to utility acquisition. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that eligible uses of said funds may include, but are not limited to, public informational meetings, town halls, venue or equipment costs, printed educational materials, mailings, digital outreach, translation or accessibility services, facilitation support, and other reasonable expenses directly related to informing and engaging the public on utility acquisition matters. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that expenditures shall be administered through the Mayor’s Office and/or the appropriate City department in accordance with applicable purchasing policies and financial controls. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any unused funds remaining after completion of the authorized engagement efforts shall revert to the Economic Development Fund. [20260505R 43] Passed and adopted this 5th day of May, 2026. Approved this 5th day of May, 2026. ________________________________________ Mayor Attest: ____________________________________ City Clerk [20260505R 44] Name (Council Representatives) Est Mtgs/ Yr Councilor Councilor Councilor Alternate Councilor Human Resources Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Moffat Sweeney Graskey Caven Public Works Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Ledin Moffat Elm Radtke Finance Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Sweeney Elm Herrick Ledin License & Fees Committee (3 & 1 alt) 12 Sweeney Herrick Graskey Hering Public Safety Committee (3 & 1 alt) 4 Anderson Elm Herrick Radtke Communication and Information Technology Committee* (2) 4 Elm Caven Development Association** (1) 7 Graskey Library Board** (1) 12 Ledin Mayor’s Commission on Disabilities* (1) 12 Anderson Metropolitan Interstate Council** (3) 12 Ledin Moffat Elm Parks & Recreation Commission** (2) 10 Ledin Radtke Public Art Commission* (1) 4 Graskey Golf Course Committee* (1 & 1 alt) 12 Hering Sweeney Marina Committee * (1) 2 Hering Wisconsin Point Committee** (1 & 1 alt) 5 Herrick Plan Commission** (3) 9 Moffat Elm Graskey CDBG Advisory Board** (1) 3 Herrick Redevelopment Authority (1) 2 Hering Police & Fire Commission** (1) 8 Anderson Douglas Cty Historical Society Board** (1) 12 Caven Tourism Development Commission 12 Radtke Graskey Updated 05/05/26 2026-2027 Council Appointments Standing Committees (See City Code Sec 2-50(b)) Special Committees* ( see City Code Sec. 2-49) AND Boards & Commissions** (See City Code Sec. 2-300) [20260505R 45] Date: April 30, 2026 City Council Date: May 5, 2026 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Jim Paine and Members of the Common Council FROM: Jason Serck, Planning, Economic Development & Port Director RE: Public Hearing for the 2026- 2030 CDBG Consolidated Plan and First Year Action Plan INTRODUCTION –The City of Superior is designated as an entitlement community for the receipt of funding under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires a public hearing to be held before approval of the 2026 – 2030 CDBG Consolidated Plan and First Year Action Plan. The Community Development Division is submitting the following resolution for consideration at the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting to set the public hearing for June 16, 2026: “Resolution introduced by the Community Development Division to set a public hearing for the 2026 – 2030 Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Plan and the 2026 Action Plan.” After the Council sets the public hearing, the “Notice of Availability of the 2026 – 2030 Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Plan and 2026 Action Plan and Public Hearing” will be posted and distributed advising such plans will be made available for review on May 6, 2026. CONCLUSION – Please approve this resolution to set a public hearing. Recommend Jim Paine, Mayor [20260505R 46] City of Superior 2026 Action Plan Budget Matrix CITY ACTIVITIES ALLOCATION ALLOCATION AMENDED ADMINISTRATION & PLANNING 21A Administration $131,447 $128,326 21D Fair Housing $1,800 $1,800 HOUSING 14A One Roof Community Lending $100,000 $100,000 PUBLIC FACILITIES & IMPROVEMENTS 03F 18 Oaks Park $100,000 $20,000 03F Benny Peterson Park $100,000 $170,000 Broadband $500,000 $500,000 03L CDBG Census Tract Sidewalks $100,000 $100,000 TOTAL CITY ACTIVITIES $1,033,247 $1,020,126 Matrix PUBLIC SERVICES ACTIVITIES 05G Center Against Sexual & Domestic Abuse, Inc. (CASDA) $18,000 $18,000 03T Harbor House Crisis Shelters $18,000 $18,000 05M Mentor Superior $6,500 $6,500 05D Boys & Girls Club $6,500 $6,500 03T NWCSA - Homeless Services $18,000 $18,000 05B NWCSA - Memory Lane $5,000 $5,000 03T NWCSA - Supportive Housing $18,000 $18,000 TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES $90,000 $90,000 2026 CDBG BUDGET Total City Activities $1,033,247 $1,020,126 Total Public Services $90,000 $90,000 TOTAL BUDGET $1,123,247 $1,110,126 2026 FUNDING SOURCES 2026 CGBG Grant $666,237 $650,634 Reallocated Funds $457,010 $459,492 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $1,123,247 $1,110,126 [20260505R 47] [20260505R 48] [20260505R 49] City of Superior Consolidated Plan First Program Year Action Plan 2026 Jim Paine Mayor Nick Ledin Sarah Anderson Garner Moffat Jack Sweeney Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor 1st District 2nd District 3rd District 4th District Joe Radke Tylor Elm Karly Caven Mike Herrick Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor 5th District 6th District 7th District 8th District Robert Hering Lindsey Graskey Councilor Councilor 9th District 10th District City of Superior Department of Planning and Development Jason Serck Krista Y. Anderson Planning, Economic Development Community Development Manager and Port Director [20260505R 50] [20260505R 51] Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................ ................................ ............ 7 2. The Process ................................ ................................ ...................... 11 3. Needs Assessment ................................ ................................ ........... 25 4. Housing Market Analysis ................................ ................................ ... 67 5. Strategic Plan ................................ ................................ ................. 110 6. First Year Action Plan ................................ ................................ ..... 141 [20260505R 52] [20260505R 53] Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction Superior, Wisconsin receives an annual entitlement allocation from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The Consolidated Plan provides direction on the investment of CDBG dollars over five years, for program years 2026 – 2030. Additionally, each year, the City will produce an Annual Action Plan that details how the City will carry out the goals and objectives identified in this Plan. HUD provides a broad range of eligible activities that can be utilized with CDBG funding. A key feature of these grants is the City's ability to choose how to use the funds. The City must determine which eligible activities will best serve the community's needs. HUD requires grantees to develop a Five-Year Consolidated Plan to determine the most pressing needs and effective, place-based market-driven strategies to meet those needs. When developing a Consolidated Plan, the City must first analyze Superior's needs and then propose strategies to meet those needs. The Consolidated Plan and first-year Action Plan (2026) format is highly prescriptive, with many data points already populated into the HUD-provided template. The Consolidated Plan and first-year Action Plan has the following parts: • ES - Executive Summary • PR – The Process • NA - Needs Assessment • MA - Market Analysis • SP - Strategic Plan • AP – Annual Action Plan 2025 The Housing Needs Assessment (NA) and Housing Market Analysis (MA) outline levels of relative need in affordable housing, homelessness, special needs, and community development. This information is gathered through several methods, including consultation with local agencies, public outreach, review of demographic and economic datasets, and a housing market analysis. The Strategic Plan (SP) details how the City will address its priority needs and utilize funding over the next five years. The strategies must reflect the current market conditions, expected funding availability, and local capacity to administer the plan. The Annual Action Plan (AAP) describes funding and projects for Program Year 2026 and provides a more detailed look at how the program will operate. [20260505R 54] Consistent with HUD's mission, the City works to support community development priorities and increase access to affordable housing free from discrimination. The City will embrace a high standard of ethics, management, and accountability in undertaking this work. The City will continue to form new partnerships that leverage resources and improve HUD's effectiveness at the community level. 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Superior’s 2026-2030 Consolidated Plan is a five-year strategic plan that provides an outline of actions for the community as it works toward meeting the housing and community development needs of its low—and moderate-income and special-needs households. The plan's development includes a profile of the community and its economy, assessing housing and community development needs, and developing long-range strategies to meet those needs. The Consolidated Plan serves the following functions: • A planning document for the City, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders; • A submission for federal funds under HUD’s formula grant program for jurisdictions; • A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and • A management tool for assessing performance, tracking success, and determining the course of future Consolidated Plans. The Consolidated Plan for the fiscal years 2026-2030 was prepared in accordance with Sections 91.100 through 91.230 of HUD's Consolidated Plan Final Rule. Below are the HUD objectives and the City's projected outcomes over the 5-year Consolidated Plan: 1. Provide decent housing by preserving the affordable housing stock, increasing the availability of affordable housing, reducing barriers, increasing the supply of supportive housing for those with special needs, and transitioning homeless persons and families into housing. 2. Provide a suitable living environment through safer, more livable neighborhoods, greater integration of LMI residents throughout Superior, increased housing opportunities, and reinvestment in LMI neighborhoods. 3. Expand opportunities through targeted public services, homeownership opportunities, development activities that promote long-term community viability, and the empowerment of low- and moderate-income persons to achieve self-sufficiency. During the 2026-2030 Consolidated Plan period, the City of Superior may have projects that help to support affordable housing for low- to moderate-income residents. • Homeowner housing rehabilitated • Homeowner and Rental housing added [20260505R 55] Other programs will help support low- and moderate-income residents. • Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvement Projects • Public services 3. Evaluation of past performance The City of Superior has a good performance record and regularly meets the performance standards established by HUD. The City has implemented CDBG-funded programs over the past five years as part of the 2021-2025 Consolidated Plan, and each year prepares its Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). Over that time, the City has made great strides to assist low-income households in the community. Accomplishments in the past five years include: • Public service activities targeted for the homeless, elderly and disabled, youth services, and supportive services for vulnerable populations • Housing rehabilitation programs assisted homeowners, including the elderly and disabled, with critical rehabs/repairs to their homes • Public infrastructure improvements, including sidewalk and accessibility improvements in low- income areas • The City has enhanced its coordination with regional partners and service providers • Fair housing outreach and education activities have been expanded 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The City of Superior has undertaken extensive efforts to engage stakeholders and the public in developing this Consolidated Plan. The process included consultation with local service providers, housing organizations, and community stakeholders. Input was gathered through surveys, stakeholder meetings, and public hearings to identify priority needs and inform goal-setting for the 2026-2030 period. A survey was also widely distributed. The majority of respondents qualify as LMI. Distribution included hard copies at service provider locations, targeted public events, and web-based outreach. Questions were focused on Housing, Services, and Neighborhood Improvement needs. The responses will be used to frame projects undertaken throughout this CP cycle. Stakeholder meetings were held, and individual targeted stakeholder engagement was completed. Many stakeholders participated during the process and are documented in consultations. Stakeholders helped identify priority goals and projects. 5. Summary of public comments Through surveys and stakeholder engagement the following information was gathered: [20260505R 56] There was significant support for the plan as written. Questions were primarily related to costs, which have increased significantly. PS providers and public participants appreciated the number of activities that can leverage other resources. If additional comments are received, they will be added prior to submission. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them All comments are accepted and considered. 7. Summary The City of Superior has an adopted Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) implemented in conjunction with the Annual Action Plan. The CPP provides the framework for public input into the allotment of CDBG funds granted to the City. Superior's CPP outlines how it provides notice and outreach to residents for public hearings on all aspects of the CDBG process. Survey responses and Community Stakeholder priorities include, but are not limited to, the following: • Additional housing resources for the LMI residents of Superior • Continuation of Rehabilitation Programs • Neighborhood investment in sidewalks, parks, recreational facilities, and connectivity projects • Youth Enrichment Activities • Senior Services and Enrichment • Behavioral Health Services (including substance abuse resources) • Housing Stabilization Services • Transportation • Housing close to transportation and/or services • Homeless Services [20260505R 57] The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 24 CFR 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency Lead Agency SUPERIOR CDBG Administrator SUPERIOR City of Superior Planning Department Table 1 – Responsible Agencies Narrative Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Krista Anderson 1316 North 14th Street Superior, WI 54880 andersonk@superiorwi.gov [20260505R 58] PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(l) and 91.315(l) 1. Introduction The preparation of the Consolidated Plan included communication and two public meetings and two public events as well as meeting individually with many of the social service agencies which typically receive CDBG funding in the City of Superior. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)). The City’s Community Development Department is the recipient and administrator of federal funding under the CDBG program. The City works closely with its partners and sub-recipients in the community to ensure funding is matched to programs and services that are most needed by LMI individuals within the community. The City also works closely with the local Continuum of Care (Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency - NWCSA) to ensure there is connection between City initiatives and service provision, especially for mental health and access to services. Partnership between the City’s homeless services are strong, as evidenced by focus group meetings; and, these services providers are aware of what others are doing in the community. These organizations generally know where to direct people they are unable to provide service for. While this coordination is occurring in Superior, it should occur more often to ensure that all organizations are aware of what other resources are available to their clients. Greater coordination is needed to connect people who need in-patient mental health and substance abuse counseling to these type of facilities; the nearest location providing this service is in Eau Claire. There also needs to be greater coordination with landlords in the City to help them understand and accept forms of rental assistance such as rapid re- housing and tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA). Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness To address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless), the Continuum of Care in Superior (NWCSA) offers transitional housing, rapid re-housing and permanent supportive housing. Harbor House also offers transitional housing and permanent supportive housing. NWSCA sees transitional housing programs as most effective in Superior because those who are homeless or at risk of homelessness are not only provided shelter, but are also provided extensive support services to ensure success once they gain independence. [20260505R 59] Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS The City does not receive direct allocations of these funds by HUD. Rapid rehousing funds, hotel vouchers, homeless, supportive services are received by NWSCA from the Wisconsin Department of Administration and allocated to the City. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities [20260505R 60] Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC ABUSE Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA Services - Housing Services-Children Services-Victims of Domestic Violence Services-homeless Services - Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Public Housing Needs Economic Development Market Analysis How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Met with organization to discuss needs for accommodations for victims of domestic abuse. 2 Agency/Group/Organization NORTHWEST WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Services-homeless Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Met with organization on July 24 and again on September 23, 2025 to discuss homelessness, housing and community development. 3 Agency/Group/Organization Harbor House Crisis Shelter Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-homeless [20260505R 61] What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Economic Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Met with organization at the public meeting on July 24, 2025 to discuss homelessness and community needs. 4 Agency/Group/Organization Superior Police Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government - Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Public Housing Needs Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Economic Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Met with police department members on September 25, 2025 to discuss homeless strategy, substance abuse and mental health issues in the community. 5 Agency/Group/Organization SUPERIOR Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Broadband Internet Service Providers What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Economic Development Market Analysis Anti-poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Met with the Broadband Manager on September 23, 2025 to discuss the current and future of broadband and connectivity within the community. 6 Agency/Group/Organization SUPERIOR HOUSING AUTHORITY Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA Services - Housing [20260505R 62] What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Public Housing Needs Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Superior Housing Authority was consulted in relation to PHA needs, resident offerings, and projections related to the Consolidated Plan 7 Agency/Group/Organization Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Agency/Group/Organization Type Agency - Management of Public Land or Water Resources Agency - Emergency Management Other government - State What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Market Analysis How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? WI DNR was consulted in relation to MA sections addressing hazard mitigation and planning. They were also consulted about changing weather patterns and hazard risks. 8 Agency/Group/Organization DOUGLAS COUNTY Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children Services-Elderly Persons Services-Health Agency - Managing Flood Prone Areas Agency - Emergency Management Other government - County What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Non-Homeless Special Needs Market Analysis [20260505R 63] How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Douglas County was consulted for MA sections of the CP. Consultation primarily related to flood and hazard mitigation and planning.The Health and Human Services Division was consulted in relation to homelessness, public services, and special needs populations' service gaps. Information incorporporated into CP. 9 Agency/Group/Organization BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SUPERIOR Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children Services-Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Homeless Needs - Families with children Non-Homeless Special Needs Anti-poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Organization consulted regarding service needs for children and youth, including educational attainment challenges in the LMI community. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City attempted to contact all potential stakeholders to notify them of the upcoming public meetings and events. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency One of the primary goals of the Consolidated Plan is to end chronic homelessness, and NWCSA provides many services and shelter arrangements that serve the homeless population in Superior. Consolidated Plan goals align with CoC goals and objectives. Table 3 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts [20260505R 64] Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l)) The City of Superior works with non-profits, public institutions and the private sector to implement the Consolidated Plan. The City uses a CDBG Advisory Board for the public services portion of the funding and the City Council for review of the annual action plans, proposed CDBG funding and any CDBG budget amendments. Narrative Common themes that emerged from the process were that the City's housing stock is old and in poor condition, there is a need for more jobs that pay a living wage, neighborhood associations need leadership, and there are needs for persons with a criminal record, mental health and/or substance abuse issues. [20260505R 65] PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200 (c) and 91.300(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting The City of Superior Planning Department made a conscious effort to broaden the public participation process that is used to inform the creation of this Plan, thereby increasing the transparency of the process. The first public meeting was held on July 24, 2025 and noticed on July 17th. Attendees at this meeting included service providers currently receiving CDBG funding. following this public meeting the City held two public meet and greet events to discuss community needs and the process. In total, 8 service providers attended the public meeting held on July 24. At the public events, staff discussed a need to hear from people using the services that were being discussed. On September 24 a presentation was made to the rotary at a public event. The public events drew more participants than previous years. Citizen Participation Outreach [20260505R 66] Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comm ents not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) [20260505R 67] 1 Public Meeting Non- targeted/br oad community The City of Superior Planning Department made a conscious effort to broaden the public participation process that is used to inform the creation of this Plan, thereby increasing the transparency of the process. The first public meeting was held on July 24, 2025. Attendees at this meeting included service providers currently receiving CDBG funding. After this public meeting the City held two two public events to connect with citizens and complete surveys. At the public events were well attended. Also, a public presentation on the plan was held on September 24, 2025. Over 250 hard copy and online surveys were completed. In addition to the public meetings, presentation and events, an online survey was distributed to find out from participants what they thought the greatest needs were in the community and to aid in facilitating discussion. The top issues identified by respondents were:Housing rehabilitation was identified as the greatest unmet housing need for both owners and renters. There is a lack of affordable housing options (especially rental housing) for middle-income, low-income and homeless persons. There is a need for landlord/tenant education regarding fair housing and maintenance.A number of homeowners are at-risk of foreclosure need support.Walkability/ADA accessibility is an issue due to the poor condition of streets/sidewalks and lack of winter maintenance.Mental health/substance abuse, childcare services and housing None [20260505R 68] support services were identified as the greatest community service needs for LMI residents.Additional homeless prevention measures and shelter are needed in particular, additional emergency shelter beds and improving the transition to permanent housing.A shortage of living wage jobs.The need for improved public transportation to jobs.The need for park/trail/open space amenities and Community Center improvements.Human Services. Youth need access to healthy food, more teen- specific activities, and support for h transition after high school graduation.Human Services. Survivors of domestic violence need additional services, and generally more permanent affordable housing with supportive services is needed for families.Human Service. [20260505R 69] Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comm ents not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) Seniors need more educational, cultural and socialization opportunities as well as more options for affordable, supportive housing.Human Services. Persons with disabilities need additional independent living options and more supportive services are needed for a spectrum of emotional and physical needs. 2 Public Hearing Non- targeted/br oad community Public Hearing on March 18, 2025, noticed on February 4, 2025 to seek comments on Community Development Needs. Attended by the public and city council members. No comments received. None https://www.super iorwi.gov/AgendaC enter/ViewFile/Mi nutes/_03182025- 1046 [20260505R 70] Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comm ents not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 3 Public Hearing Non- targeted/br oad community Public Hearing on March 18, 2025, noticed on February 4, 2025 to seek comments on Fair Housing Choice. Attended by the public and city council members. No comments received. None https://www.super iorwi.gov/AgendaC enter/ViewFile/Mi nutes/_03182025- 1046 4 Public Hearing Non- targeted/br oad community Public Hearing on January 6, 2026, noticed on December 2, 2025 to seek comments on the 2026 - 2030 Consolidated Plan and 2026 Action Plan. No comments received. None https://www.super iorwi.gov/AgendaC enter/ViewFile/Mi nutes/_01062026- 1225 Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach [20260505R 71] Needs Assessment NA-05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview The Needs Assessment (NA) of the Consolidated Plan provides a profile of the City's population, median income, household demographics, housing problems, cost burden, and crowding. HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), American Community Survey (ACS), and Census data were used to help assess the City's priority needs, which will form the basis for the Strategic Plan and the activities that will be supported with CDBG funding. A key goal of the Needs Assessment is to identify the nature and extent of housing problems experienced by Superior's residents. The Needs Assessment takes particular care to address "disproportionately greater need" for housing, severe housing problems, and housing cost burden. A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group at a given income level experience housing problems at a greater rate (10% points or more) than the income level as a whole. [20260505R 72] NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) Summary of Housing Needs The Housing Needs Assessment relies heavily on prepopulated tables provided by HUD to entitlement communities. The data sets utilized are primarily CHAS, ACS, and HUD-adjusted median family incomes (HAMFI). Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) 1990, Congress passed the National Affordable Housing Act, which required that State and local governments participating in selected HUD grant programs prepare a Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). The CHAS was meant to serve as the strategic guide for housing and community development activities, particularly activities funded by HUD grants and targeted to low- and moderate-income households. To support this analysis, HUD and the Census Bureau produced custom tabulations of the 1990 Census that provided grantees with information about low- and moderate-income households' housing needs. As a planning document, the CHAS was superseded in 1995 by the Consolidated Plan, but the Census data's custom tabulations continue to be known as the "CHAS data." The CHAS data were updated following the Census 2000, and in 2009 they were updated to rely on the American Community Survey (ACS), the Census Bureau's new annual survey that replaced the long form of the decennial Census. The CHAS data combine ACS microdata with HUD-adjusted median family incomes (HAMFI) to estimate the number of households that qualify for HUD assistance. The CHAS data also incorporate household characteristics (race/ethnicity, age, family size, disability status) and housing unit characteristics (such as the number of bedrooms and rent/owner costs). HUD-Adjusted Median Family Incomes (HAMFI) If the terms "area median income" (AMI) or "median family income" (MFI) are used in the CHAS, assume it refers to HAMFI. This is the median family income calculated by HUD for each jurisdiction to determine Fair Market Rents (FMRs) and HUD programs' income limits. HAMFI will not necessarily be the same as other calculations of median incomes (such as a simple Census number) due to a series of adjustments that are made. The Community Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) evaluates the conditions of families in the lower 50% of the Housing Affordability Median Income for the area. Income Category • Extremely low-income 30% HAMFI • Very low-income >30% - 50% HAMFI • Low income >50% - 80% HAMFI [20260505R 73] • Low- and middle-income <100% HAMFI • Upper income >100% HAMFI The most relevant income category is 80% of HAMFI, as most HUD programs base eligibility on this threshold, which is generally referred to as low- to moderate-income. US Census estimated the population of Superior to be 26,815 in 2009 and 26,260 persons as of 2020, the most recent data (V2020). Superior's population decreased by approximately 2% over that period, compared to a nationwide increase of 6.3%. The number of households increased by 2% over the same 2009-2020 period, demonstrating the consistent decline in household size observed nationwide. Demographics Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2020 % Change Population 26,815 26,260 -2% Households 11,505 11,725 2% Median Income $40,198.00 $48,830.00 21% Table 5 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Data Source: 2000 Census (Base Year), 2016-2020 ACS (Most Recent Year) Number of Households Table 0-30% HAMFI >30-50% HAMFI >50-80% HAMFI >80-100% HAMFI >100% HAMFI Total Households 1,955 1,750 2,335 1,380 4,310 Small Family Households 560 435 565 450 2,435 Large Family Households 40 45 70 175 240 Household contains at least one person 62-74 years of age 320 450 530 230 864 Household contains at least one person age 75 or older 290 325 270 105 280 Households with one or more children 6 years old or younger 160 154 175 315 410 Table 6 - Total Households Table Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS [20260505R 74] Housing Needs Summary Tables 1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Substandard Housing - Lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities 0 15 0 0 15 15 0 0 25 40 Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51 people per room (and complete kitchen and plumbing) 0 45 35 10 90 0 0 0 0 0 Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people per room (and none of the above problems) 0 10 0 10 20 0 10 0 0 10 Housing cost burden greater than 50% of income (and none of the above problems) 745 105 0 0 850 215 65 25 0 305 [20260505R 75] Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total Housing cost burden greater than 30% of income (and none of the above problems) 295 485 260 40 1,080 105 395 210 10 720 Zero/negative Income (and none of the above problems) 110 0 0 0 110 10 0 0 0 10 Table 7 – Housing Problems Table Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS 2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Renter Owner 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Having 1 or more of four housing problems 745 180 35 20 980 230 75 25 25 355 Having none of four housing problems 830 850 1,050 585 3,315 150 645 1,225 745 2,765 Household has negative income, but none of the other housing problems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 8 – Housing Problems 2 Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS [20260505R 76] 3. Cost Burden > 30% Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 255 94 100 449 115 160 70 345 Large Related 40 15 20 75 0 14 10 24 Elderly 275 200 80 555 129 210 90 429 Other 465 280 65 810 90 75 70 235 Total need by income 1,035 589 265 1,889 334 459 240 1,033 Table 9 – Cost Burden > 30% Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS 4. Cost Burden > 50% Renter Owner 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total 0-30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 0 0 4 4 70 30 0 100 Large Related 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 Elderly 175 35 0 210 80 10 15 105 Other 0 320 65 385 80 0 0 80 Total need by income 175 355 69 599 230 50 15 295 Table 10 – Cost Burden > 50% Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS 5. Crowding (More than one person per room) Renter Owner 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Single family households 0 45 0 20 65 0 0 0 0 0 [20260505R 77] Renter Owner 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI >80- 100% AMI Total Multiple, unrelated family households 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 Other, non-family households 0 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 Total need by income 0 55 35 20 110 0 10 0 0 10 Table 11 – Crowding Information – 1/2 Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS Renter Owner 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total 0- 30% AMI >30- 50% AMI >50- 80% AMI Total Households with Children Present 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 12 – Crowding Information – 2/2 Data Source Comments: [20260505R 78] Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance. Exact data on the exact number of single-person households in need of housing assistance specifically within Superior, WI is not publicly available from provided sources. However, available data outlines a significant shortage of affordable housing units for extremely low-income renters statewide and identifies the types of single-person households most in need. • Statewide Shortage: Wisconsin faces a substantial deficit of affordable rental units. For every 100 low-income renter households, there are only 67 units available statewide that are affordable to them. The total state deficit is over 128,340 affordable units for extremely low- income (ELI) renters (those earning at or below 30% of the Area Median Income). • Income Limits for Superior/Douglas County (example from 2022/2023 data): A single-person household in Douglas County could qualify as extremely low-income with an income around $18,200 annually, or low-income with an income up to approximately $48,550 annually, depending on the specific program's guidelines. • Poverty Rate: Superior's poverty rate stands at 13.03%. Non-family households (which include many single-person households) have a median income of $38,380, which is significantly lower than the median for families ($95,739). Single-person households in need of housing assistance typically fall into the following categories: • Seniors: Older individuals often live on fixed incomes and may need affordable, accessible housing. • Individuals with Disabilities: Many public housing units and assistance programs prioritize accessible units for persons with disabilities. • Individuals in the Labor Force: A significant portion of people requiring housing assistance are employed but do not earn enough to afford market-rate housing. • Single-Parent Caregivers: Although the requested information specifies single-person households, single parents (predominantly women) head the vast majority (about 92%) of subsidized housing households with children, highlighting the financial vulnerability of single- adult households generally. • Veterans and Homeless Individuals: Specific programs and shelters (like the Harbor House Crisis Shelter, which serves single women and families) target individuals experiencing homelessness or at imminent risk. Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking. Federal nondiscrimination laws define a person with a disability to include any (1) individual with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) individual with a record of such impairment; or (3) individual who is regarded as having such an impairment. [20260505R 79] In general, a physical or mental impairment includes, but is not limited to, examples of conditions such as orthopedic, visual, speech, and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, autism, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), developmental disabilities, mental illness, drug addiction, and alcoholism. In general, the definition of "person with a disability" does not include current users of illegal controlled substances but does provide protections for individuals with drug or alcohol addiction. Individuals are also protected under Section 504 and the ADA if the specific program or activity is to provide health or rehabilitation services to such individuals. Some people with physical disabilities require housing with special features, such as wider doorways or easy-entry showers. The overall share of people with disabilities can be a helpful marker of the need for housing adaptations and services, but the category is broad and different people with disabilities, including developmental and other non-physical disabilities, have different needs. What are the most common housing problems? As shown in the table above, more than 50% of households in the City of Superior are LMI. This creates challenges as living costs continue to rise. Cost burden is the most common housing problem in Superior. Shown in the table above, in 2023 the most impacted cost-burdened renters earned less than $35,000. Over 60% of renters in this income range were cost burdened or significantly cost burdened. In the ACS table above, it clearly demonstartes that renters in Superior are impacted significantly more than homeowners. Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? Renter households with the worst-case housing needs are those with very low incomes that do not receive government housing assistance and pay more than one-half of their income toward rent, those living in severely inadequate conditions, or both. This population of residents faces the most significant risk of becoming homeless or having unstable housing. Which households can have worst-case needs? By definition, households that can have worst-case needs are households that— 1. Are renters. 2. Have very low incomes—incomes of no more than 50 percent of the area median income (adjusted for family size). [20260505R 80] 3. Do not receive housing assistance. Priority problems trigger worst-case needs Two types of priority problems determine whether households have worst-case needs: 1. Severe rent burden means that a renter household pays more than one-half of its income for gross rent (rent and utilities). 2. Severely inadequate housing refers to units having one or more serious physical problems related to heating, plumbing, and electrical systems or maintenance "Worst Case Housing Needs, 2019 Report to Congress" U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance Those students/families living in non-traditional settings are at high risk of becoming homeless. Homelessness can have a tremendous impact on children – their education, health, sense of safety, and overall development. Fortunately, researchers find that children are also highly resilient, and the differences between children who have experienced homelessness and low-income children who have not experienced homelessness typically diminish in the years following a homeless episode. Homelessness can have a tremendous impact on children – their education, health, sense of safety, and overall development. Fortunately, researchers find that children are also highly resilient, and the differences between children who have experienced homelessness and low-income children who have not experienced homelessness typically diminish in the years following a homeless episode. When compared to low-income and homeless families, children experiencing homelessness have been shown to: • Have higher levels of emotional and behavioral problems; • Have increased risk of serious health problems; • Are more likely to experience separations from their families; and • Experience more school mobility, repeat a grade, be expelled or drop out of school, and have lower academic performance. "National Alliance to End Homelessness" [20260505R 81] The US Department of Education, ED Data Express, provides data on school districts' annual reports on homeless enrolled students. Superior School District reported that 125 students were homeless during the last reporting year. Minority students in Superior account for a disproportionate share of McKinney-Vento students. Using current estimates and discussions with partners, there may be more than 30 Superior households at imminent risk of losing assistance or needing immediate housing support. Community stakeholders believe this is likely an undercount, as formerly homeless families in crisis may not be visible or request help until they become homeless again. If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates: The jurisdiction does not have estimates of at-risk populations. Estimates of the at-risk population were made based on various information sources. Census, ACS, CHAS, and Point-in-Time Homeless data are used when available. Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness Housing cost burden continues to be a primary risk for low-income individuals and families with children at risk of experiencing homelessness. The National Alliance to End Homelessness states that "low-income households are typically unemployed or underemployed due to many factors, such as a challenging labor market, limited education, a gap in work history, a criminal record, unreliable transportation or unstable housing, poor health, or a disability. For those who are low-income but employed, wages have been stagnant and have not kept pace with expensive housing costs. The typical American worker has seen little to no growth in their weekly wages over the past three decades. Too little income combined with the dwindling availability of low-cost housing leaves many at risk of homelessness." Other than income, some other characteristics can also predispose an individual or household to homelessness, including: • Individuals leaving institutions: detox, mental hospitals, prisons, etc. • Households paying more than 50% of income for housing costs • Victims of domestic violence • Special needs populations (persons with AIDS, disabilities, drug or alcohol addiction, etc.) • Single parent head of households who are unemployed [20260505R 82] • People who are doubling up in unstable living arrangements (and cannot be counted as homeless) • Families living below the poverty level Households that exhibit one or more of these characteristics constitute a population "at-risk" of becoming homeless. These individuals and families are at risk of becoming homeless because they have a lesser chance of making economic improvements in their lives. Households with worst-case housing needs are: 1. Very low-income renters; 2. Households with incomes at or below 50 percent of area median income; 3. Do not receive government housing assistance; and 4. Pay more than one-half of their income toward rent, live in severely inadequate conditions, or both. The key to ending worst-case housing needs is increasing affordable housing. In 2019, nationwide only 62 affordable units were available for every 100 very low-income renter households. Only 40 affordable units were available for every 100 extremely low-income renter households. For most households, worst-case needs are caused by severe rent burdens that is, paying more than one-half of income for rent. Inadequate market supply, competition for affordable units, and a shortage of rental assistance pose a substantial challenge for very low-income renter households. "Worst Case Housing Needs: 2021 Report to Congress" U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research There isn't enough housing stock available that is right-sized and affordable to the people who are most at risk of homelessness and housing instability. Discussion Housing cost burden is a significant challenge for the lowest wage renters. In Douglas County, including the City of Superior, a low-wage household may need more than 1.6 full- time jobs to afford a modest 2-bedroom apartment. Households earning the minimum wage may find it increasingly challenging to save for emergencies, as costs beyond housing continue to put pressure on budgets. The cost of food, insurance, transportation, and other necessities has continued to rise, even as rents have stabilized. Minimum wage has not increased to keep up with the necessary household expenditures. [20260505R 83] NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems - 91.205(b) (2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction The data below includes owner-occupied and rental households within the City of Superior. CDBG entitlement communities are to provide an assessment for each of the disproportionately greater needs identified. Although the purpose of these tables is to analyze the relative level of need for each race and ethnic category, the data also provide information for Superior as a whole that can be useful in describing the overall need. Income Category • Extremely low-income 30% HAMFI • Very low-income >30% - 50% HAMFI • Low income >50% - 80% HAMFI • Low- and middle-income <100% HAMFI • Upper income >100% HAMFI The most relevant thresholds are 50% and 80% of HAMFI because most HUD programs base eligibility on these thresholds (which are generally referred to as "very low-income" and "low-income," respectively). Housing Problems There are four housing problems in the CHAS data: 1. The housing unit lacks complete kitchen facilities 2. The housing unit lacks complete plumbing facilities; 3. Household is overcrowded 4. Household is cost-burdened. A household is said to have a housing problem if they have one or more of these four problems. Overcrowding is one of the four housing problems evaluated by HUD. HUD defines overcrowding as: • Overcrowding - More than one person per room. • Severe overcrowding - More than 1.5 persons per room. [20260505R 84] HUD defines cost burden as: • Cost burden - Monthly housing costs (including utilities) exceeding 30% of monthly income. • Severe cost burden - Monthly housing costs (including utilities) exceeding 50% of monthly income. 0%-30% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 1,375 580 0 White 1,225 570 0 Black / African American 0 0 0 Asian 15 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 65 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 0 4 0 Table 13 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30% 30%-50% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 1,135 615 0 White 1,035 580 0 Black / African American 0 0 0 Asian 15 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 44 4 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 35 4 0 Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI [20260505R 85] Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30% 50%-80% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 535 1,800 0 White 485 1,540 0 Black / African American 19 40 0 Asian 0 10 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 10 40 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 20 15 0 Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30% 80%-100% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 95 1,280 0 White 85 1,190 0 Black / African American 0 0 0 Asian 8 65 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 15 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 0 10 0 Table 16 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS [20260505R 86] *The four housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30% Discussion The data shows the greatest number of Superior residents living in substandard housing are moderate, low, and extremely low income. While the population of Superior is overwhelmingly white, minorities may be disproportionately impacted in low-moderate income ranges. The most common housing problem in the City of Superior is cost burden, which disproportionately impacts LMI renters. The need for smaller units is high, and addressing this need could relieve some of the challenges LMI households encounter. The data also reveals extremely low-income (0-30% of Area Median Income) and low-income (31-50% of Area Median Income) households are significantly more likely to encounter at least one housing problem, such as cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing conditions, regardless of race. These income groups face the greatest challenges in accessing affordable, safe, and adequate housing, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address their specific housing needs. [20260505R 87] NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems: 91.205 (b) (2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group at a given income level experience housing problems at a greater rate (10% or more) than the income level as a whole. Severe housing problems include: • Overcrowded households with 1.5 persons per room, not including bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-rooms • Households with cost burdens of more than 50% of income Generally, severe housing problems in Superior are caused by severe housing cost burdens of more than 50% of income. The "2019 County Health Ranking Key Report" by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that "many households are just one unforeseen event – an illness, job loss, financial crisis, or even a drop-in hour at work – from losing their home. The risk for homelessness is especially high for low-income families spending more than half of their household income on housing costs. Families that face insecure housing, forced moves, or homelessness are more likely to experience poor mental or physical health and preventable hospitalizations. For children in these families, experiencing homelessness can also harm brain and body function and development, with lifelong and cumulative adverse health outcomes for the child, the family, and the community." 0%-30% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 975 980 0 White 820 970 0 Black / African American 0 0 0 Asian 15 0 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 65 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 [20260505R 88] Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Hispanic 0 4 0 Table 17 – Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% 30%-50% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 255 1,495 0 White 245 1,370 0 Black / African American 0 0 0 Asian 0 15 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 44 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 0 40 0 Table 18 – Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% 50%-80% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 60 2,275 0 White 60 1,955 0 [20260505R 89] Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Black / African American 0 60 0 Asian 0 10 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 50 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 0 35 0 Table 19 – Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% 80%-100% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more of four housing problems Has none of the four housing problems Household has no/negative income, but none of the other housing problems Jurisdiction as a whole 45 1,330 0 White 35 1,240 0 Black / African American 0 0 0 Asian 8 65 0 American Indian, Alaska Native 0 15 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 Hispanic 0 10 0 Table 20 – Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS *The four severe housing problems are: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per room, 4.Cost Burden over 50% Discussion The data also reveals that extremely low-income (0-30% of Area Median Income) and low-income (31- 50% of Area Median Income) households are significantly more likely to encounter at least one severe [20260505R 90] housing problem, such as cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing conditions. These income groups face the greatest challenges in accessing affordable, safe, and adequate housing, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address their specific housing needs. These households are at a higher risk of experiencing homelessness and may have difficulty affording necessities such as food, clothing, transportation, and medical care. [20260505R 91] NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens - 91.205 (b) (2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole. Introduction Cost burden is the fraction of a household's total gross income spent on housing costs. Homeowners' housing costs include mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and utilities. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. This section evaluates the housing cost burden from a racial or ethnic group perspective. A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group at an income level experience housing problems at a greater rate (10% or more) than the income level as a whole. HUD defines cost-burdened families as those "who pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing" and "may have difficulty affording necessities such as food, clothing, transportation, and medical care." Severe rent burden is defined as paying more than 50 percent of one's income on rent. The tables display cost burden information for Superior and information for each racial and ethnic group is being researched. Cost Burden is described in the tables as: • No cost burden (less than 30%) • Cost burden (30-50%) • Severe cost burden (more than 50%) • No/negative income. No/negative income households are those whose income is zero or negative due to self-employment, dividends, and net rental income. These households are not included in the other two categories but still require housing assistance and are counted separately. Housing Cost Burden Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative income (not computed) Jurisdiction as a whole 8,525 1,910 1,170 120 White 7,925 1,765 1,020 115 Black / African American 44 19 0 0 Asian 110 15 15 0 [20260505R 92] Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative income (not computed) American Indian, Alaska Native 95 55 65 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 Hispanic 75 55 0 0 Table 21 – Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS Discussion Graphs included in this and previous NA sections include the cost burden estimates for 2023. Overall, poverty rates in Superior have decreased in recent years. While this has provided benefits across income levels, extremely low-, very low-, and low-income renters remain significantly more cost- burdened than higher-income renters and homeowners as a whole. This puts additional cost pressure on the lowest-income renters. Wages and benefits are not keeping pace with the increased across-the- board living costs. While rents have not increased at the same rate as home values, food, clothing, insurance, and other living costs have risen significantly over this period. The city will work to address this disproportionate impact by exploring increased service and housing opportunities for LMI residents, with a focus on outreach to the most impacted communities. [20260505R 93] NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion - 91.205 (b)(2) Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole? A disproportionately greater number of housing problems would exist when members of any particular racial or ethnic group at an income level experience housing problems at a rate greater than 10% of the percentage of the same racial or ethnic group population as a whole. Generally, white alone residents are slightly more likely to not be low- to moderate-income. If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs? Additional needs may include; • More outreach to the low-moderate income residents and other minority communities on Fair Housing Choice. • More outreach and programs to support increased financial literacy for LMI residents. Includes increased awareness of programs currently offered. • Additional support to ensure that LMI renters and homeowners have access to resources and services. Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community? To assist communities in identifying racially/ethnically-concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), HUD has developed a census tract-based definition of R/ECAPs. The definition involves a racial/ethnic concentration threshold and a poverty test. The racial/ethnic concentration threshold is straightforward: HUD defines neighborhoods of extreme poverty as census tracts with 40 percent or more of individuals living at or below the poverty line. HUD supplements this with an alternate criterion because overall poverty levels are substantially lower in many parts of the country. Thus, a neighborhood can be a R/ECAP if it has a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan/micropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower. Superior has no current nor recent past R/ECAP areas in mapping provided by HUD Open Data. [20260505R 94] NA-35 Public Housing - 91.205 (b) Introduction The Superior Housing Authority (SHA) is a public agency that helps people who meet income and other eligibility guidelines to secure affordable, safe, and quality housing in the city of Superior, WI. The SHA is one of 3,400 public housing authorities operating in the United States. Like other housing authorities, SHA complies with all federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements in the development and operation of our housing programs. SHA manages 466 units of public housing from single-family dwellings to multi-unit developments located in various neighborhoods in the city of Superior. We also administer the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. For private owners, SHA currently handles the property management of five (5) buildings for seniors, individuals, and families. Totals in Use Program Type Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * # of units vouchers in use 0 0 458 141 0 138 0 0 0 Table 22 - Public Housing by Program Type *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) [20260505R 95] Characteristics of Residents Program Type Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Average Annual Income 0 0 13,721 11,046 0 11,061 0 0 Average length of stay 0 0 5 6 0 6 0 0 Average Household size 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 # Homeless at admission 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of Elderly Program Participants (>62) 0 0 87 30 0 30 0 0 # of Disabled Families 0 0 98 51 0 50 0 0 # of Families requesting accessibility features 0 0 458 141 0 138 0 0 # of HIV/AIDS program participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 23 – Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) [20260505R 96] Race of Residents Program Type Race Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * White 0 0 408 125 0 122 0 0 0 Black/African American 0 0 23 8 0 8 0 0 0 Asian 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaska Native 0 0 19 7 0 7 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 24 – Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Ethnicity of Residents Program Type Ethnicity Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * Hispanic 0 0 8 2 0 2 0 0 0 Not Hispanic 0 0 450 139 0 136 0 0 0 *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 25 – Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type [20260505R 97] Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) [20260505R 98] Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a federal law, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 794, that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in federally-assisted programs or activities. Specifically, Section 504 states: "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States. . .shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program, service or activity receiving federal financial assistance or under any program or activity conducted by any Executive agency or by the United States Postal Service." This means that Section 504 prohibits discrimination based on disability in any program or activity that receives financial assistance from any federal agency, including HUD, and in programs conducted by federal agencies, including HUD. An individual with a disability is any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. The term physical or mental impairment may include, but is not limited to, conditions such as visual or hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection, developmental disabilities, drug addiction, or mental illness. The definition of "person with disabilities" does not include current users of illegal controlled substances. However, individuals would be protected under Section 504 (as well as the ADA) if the specific program or activity is to provide health or rehabilitation services to such individuals. The City of Superior in 2023 has a disability rate of 15.9%. This is higher than Wisconsin (12%) and the US (13%) SHA is committed to following its 504 Plan related to accessibility and substantial rehabilitation. This commitment is to serve all applicants and provide full participation in housing opportunities regardless of an existing or future disability. SHA provides all applicants with disabilities with equal access to all housing opportunities. SHA is not operating under a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement. When units become available and waitlist applicants are contacted for current income and household certifications, more newly identified accommodation needs may be identified. The most recent ACOP outlines accommodation requirements and process for request. What are the number and type of families on the waiting lists for public housing and section 8 tenant-based rental assistance? Based on the information above, and any other information available to the jurisdiction, what are the most immediate needs of residents of public housing and Housing Choice voucher holders? Superior Housing Authority reports that housing affordability is the most pressing issue for persons currently on the waiting list. Current public housing residents and Voucher holders continue to struggle [20260505R 99] with the prospect of housing affordability if they are no longer eligible for HUD programs due to increased income or other circumstances that make them ineligible to participate. Families feel increased stress as they face uncertain housing stability and the rising cost of housing. Also reported is the need for more fully accessible, affordable units. Voucher holders report a need for accommodation at a rate higher than the community-wide rate. How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large The challenges of housing cost burden impact almost all families, regardless of income level. Housing cost burdens impact low- to middle-income families, who face a more significant challenge saving for emergencies and maintaining their homes or saving for homeownership. Households with a high cost burden, especially low- to moderate-income households, are at greater risk of losing their housing. Discussion The Superior Housing Authority implements its 504 Plan according to HUD requirements. Based on the City's evaluation of the Superior Housing Authority, they have a good history of housing on a first-come, first-served basis, or worst-case need. [20260505R 100] NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment - 91.205 ( c ) Introduction: A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a geographically based group of representatives that carries out the planning responsibilities of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) CoC Homeless Assistance Program. These representatives come from organizations that provide services to people experiencing homelessness. The Wisconsin Balance of State Continuum of Care (WIBoSCoC) represents the non-urban counties in Wisconsin. The counties within the WIBoSCoC are divided into CoC Regions. Homeless program representatives in these Homeless Planning Regions plan and coordinate local homeless systems and programs and are responsible for working with the WIBoSCoC on Homelessness and Housing in Wisconsin to ensure all HUD homeless program requirements are met. In Superior, local CoC services are coordinated and managed by the Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency, the COC Regional lead for a five-county area. Homeless Needs Assessment Population Estimate the # of persons experiencing homelessness on a given night Estimate the # experiencing homelessness each year Estimate the # becoming homeless each year Estimate the # exiting homelessness each year Estimate the # of days persons experience homelessness Sheltered Unsheltered Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Child(ren) 0 21 0 0 0 0 Persons in Households with Only Children 0 0 0 0 0 0 Persons in Households with Only Adults 13 8 0 0 0 0 Chronically Homeless Individuals 0 0 0 0 0 0 [20260505R 101] Population Estimate the # of persons experiencing homelessness on a given night Estimate the # experiencing homelessness each year Estimate the # becoming homeless each year Estimate the # exiting homelessness each year Estimate the # of days persons experience homelessness Sheltered Unsheltered Chronically Homeless Families 0 0 0 0 0 0 Veterans 1 1 0 0 0 0 Unaccompanied Child 0 0 0 0 0 0 Persons with HIV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 26 - Homeless Needs Assessment Data Source Comments: July 2025 PIT [20260505R 102] PIT Family numbers [20260505R 103] PIT Individual [20260505R 104] If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth): [20260505R 105] Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional) Race: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional) White 18 6 Black or African American 2 0 Asian 0 0 American Indian or Alaska Native 12 2 Pacific Islander 0 0 Ethnicity: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional) Hispanic 1 0 Not Hispanic 1 0 Data Source Comments: July 2025 PIT, information included as attachments Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans. Affordability is the primary housing problem among veterans in Wisconsin, with roughly 26.3% paying too much for their housing. State-wide, an estimated 500 veterans are homeless on any given night. Locally, 13% of Superior's population lives below the poverty line, underscoring a need for affordable housing across demographics. Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group. The most overrepresented racial/ethnic group in homeless counts continues to be native americans. In reviewing information over multiple PIT counts, this has held true, even as numbers fluctuate. Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness. Unsheltered Homeless refers to the segment of a homeless community who do not have ordinary lawful access to buildings in which to sleep, as referred to in the HUD definition as persons occupying "a place not meant for human habitation” (examples: bus stop, parks, riverbed, van, RV, sidewalk). Sheltered Homeless refers to those residing in emergency shelters, transitional housing, or institutions, and who lack a fixed nighttime residence. People will be considered homeless if they are exiting an institution where they reside for up to 90 days. People who are losing their primary nighttime residence, which may be a motel, hotel, or a doubled-up situation within 14 days and lack resources or support networks to remain in housing, are also considered homeless. [20260505R 106] Discussion: The City of Superior provides a wide range of services to homeless individuals throughout the City and surrounding region. There has been a need for additional year-round homeless shelter in the City of Superior. There is also a need for additional “drop-in” center resources for the homeless for access to bathrooms, showers, fresh water, and HVAC systems during the day when the shelters may be closed. There currently are limited facilities for homeless families with children in the City of Superior, though additional beds are being added. The homeless population is growing and there is a lack of Federal funds to develop additional beds and permanent housing for the homeless. [20260505R 107] NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) Introduction Superior has various public and private agencies that provide services to non-homeless special needs populations. Groups that require supportive housing include but is not limited to: • The elderly, age 62 and over • Frail Elderly, age 75 years or older • Persons with physical, and/or developmental disabilities • Persons with mental disabilities • Persons with substance abuse issues • Victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community: • Elderly Persons are defined as persons who are age 62 years and older. According to recent American Community Survey Data, almost 12% of Superior’s population are between 60-69 years of age. • Frail Elderly are those persons who are aged 75 and older and therefore may have different needs than those considered “elderly” 11.8% of Superior’s population is aged 70 or over, with 7.1% of the population aged 75 or over. • Persons with Disability, according to the ACS data, approximately 15.9% of the City of Superior’s total population are classified as “disabled.” About 30% of households had one or more persons with a disability, while 35% of those with a reported disability are 65 years of age and over. • Persons with Mental Disabilities. It is estimated that mental disorders affect one-quarter of all Americans. Over half of the individuals being served in Douglas County’s homeless response system reported a mental health disorder. Homelessness often exacerbates mental health disorders by creating conditions of chronic stress, insecurity, and social isolation. The lack of stable housing can disrupt access to healthcare, increase exposure to trauma, and lead to feelings of hopelessness, which in turn can worsen pre-existing mental health conditions or trigger new ones. Additionally, without a safe environment or access to basic needs, managing mental health symptoms becomes much more difficult, creating a harmful cycle between homelessness and mental illness. • Individuals with substance use disorders face significant challenges, including physical dependence, social stigma, and limited access to treatment and support services. Being low- income or housing insecure can exacerbate these challenges by limiting their ability to afford healthcare, maintain stability, and access recovery programs. The stress of housing insecurity [20260505R 108] can lead to increased substance use as a coping mechanism, while the lack of stable housing makes it harder to maintain sobriety and access consistent care. • Victims of Domestic Violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking is rapidly increasing both locally and nationally. CASDA provided shelter to 115 adults and 59 children during 2024, with many additional requests for services. CASDA provides life-saving services through numerous counseling and advocacy programs for thousands of residents annually in Douglas County, however, there remains a critical need for available affordable housing that can provide safe, permanent homes for those escaping violence. What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined? Based on interviews with the community, the following housing and supportive service needs were determined: For Home Ownership • Repair programs for the aging housing stock. Targeting these repair programs towards those who are seniors or living on a fixed income. • Increasing supply of affordable and accessible housing options, especially for those that are seniors and/or disabled. Providing assistance to retrofit homes with accessibility features will allow seniors and those living with disabilities to continue to comfortably live in their home. • First time home buyer programs to encourage young adults and young families to stay in Superior or encourage young adults and young families to move to Superior. For Rentals • More affordable housing options for seniors • More affordable housing options for those trying to exit homelessness • More affordable housing options for those who are considered extremely low and low income • More accountability for landlords, including improved code enforcement on rental properties Supportive Services (whether a home owner or renter) • Improved access to food, including: Help accessing SNAP benefits Assistance affording food More grocery stores in areas of the City that have food insecurity • Transportation, including: Increased public transit options within the City. Added public transit options that connect to neighboring communities • Utility assistance. There was overwhelming feedback that the cost of utilities has increased and become difficult to afford. • Access to mental health and substance use services. [20260505R 109] Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area: The City of Superior does not receive HOPWA funding. In the Duluth, MN and Superior, WI areas, services for people affected by HIV/AIDS include those from the Rural AIDS Action Network (RAAN), which has an office in Duluth and provides support groups, testing, and other aid. Vivent Health in Superior offers a wide range of services, such as HIV/Hep C testing, housing assistance, prevention programs, and support resource access for those impacted by HIV/AIDS. In Wisconsin, there were an estimated 230 new HIV infections in 2022. With a total population of 5,028,574, the HIV Incidence rate in Wisconsin was 4.6 per 100,000 people. In the most recent full report from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Douglas County had 26 reported cases of HIV/AIDS. A more recent increase has been seen in the MSA, though more accurate numbers are not yet final. If the PJ will establish a preference for a HOME TBRA activity for persons with a specific category of disabilities (e.g., persons with HIV/AIDS or chronic mental illness), describe their unmet need for housing and services needed to narrow the gap in benefits and services received by such persons. (See 24 CFR 92.209(c)(2) (ii)) The City of Superior does not receive direct HOME funding through HUD and is not a PJ in the HOME program. Discussion: The needs for these various groups of the Special Needs Population are only estimates, based on HUD data, U.S. Census Data, ACS data and interviews with housing providers and social service agencies. Accurate statistics are not available for these specific groups, so therefore “best estimates” are presented. While many supportive service providers for the special needs population are located in the City of Superior, their service area and clients are throughout Douglas County. Therefore, the statistics may not be limited to just the City of Superior. There are a number of agencies in Douglas County that provide services to the City’s special needs populations. These include the following agencies: Northwest Wisconsin Community Action Agency Inc (CoC Region lead and multiple services/resources), Harbor House, Office on Aging, CASDA, NAMI Catholic Charities, Indigo, and Solid Rock. Other resources are available in the community and additional outreach to those in need would help coordination. There is demand for more special needs housing and assistance to help these populations. Many of these residents are in poverty or low-income; some are homeless. Often they can have more than one [20260505R 110] special need such as being elderly and having mental health issues. Coordination among service providers needs to remain strong. More services and funding are needed to continue to assist Superior’s special needs population. [20260505R 111] NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs - 91.215 (f) Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities: The city boasts numerous parks, including many located within eligible LMI service areas. Improvements to eligible park facilities will remain a priority during this Con Plan cycle. Recreation opportunities within neighborhoods are essential to the enjoyment of housing, and the city is working to ensure that LMI households have access to enhanced opportunities that meet the needs of the community. The need for additional facilities to serve the homeless population has been identified in Superior. Upgrades to key facilities, community spaces, and recreational opportunities are high-priority public facility needs. How were these needs determined? The City of Superior received community needs surveys over the previous months, tabled at events to discuss community needs, consulted with staff throughout the city, and met with numerous stakeholders/service providers in groups and one-on-one to help identify priority community needs. Available studies and plans were also used in identifying priorities. Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements: Aging infrastructure requires ongoing needs and maintenance. Sidewalk improvements in eligible areas will remain a priority during the next 5-year plan cycle. These improvements increase accessibility and connectivity. Bringing critical broadband access to LMI areas/residents is also a priority for the City. The city approved the Superior 2040 Comprehensive Plan in 2022. The plan considers the capacity of existing infrastructure. It identifies where new or improved infrastructure, such as water lines, sewer systems, and transportation networks, will be needed to support future growth and development. The plan also guides integrating capital improvement actions into the city's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to address identified public facility needs. How were these needs determined? The City of Superior received community needs surveys over the previous months, tabled at events to discuss community needs, consulted with staff throughout the city, and met with numerous stakeholders/service providers in groups and one-on-one to help identify priority community needs. Available studies and plans were also used in identifying priorities. [20260505R 112] Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services: In coordination with stakeholders and community survey feedback, youth and children's enrichment services, services for seniors, and homeless services were identified as high priority needs. The need to help families/households increase self-sufficiency and access to mental/behavioral health services are also seen as priority needs in Superior. How were these needs determined? The City of Superior received community needs surveys over the previous months, tabled at events to discuss community needs, consulted with staff throughout the city, and met with numerous stakeholders/service providers in groups and one-on-one to help identify priority community needs. Community stakeholders are critical in identifying unmet needs in Superior. Stakeholders are often the people/organizations on the front line, working with vulnerable populations. [20260505R 113] Housing Market Analysis MA-05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview: The purpose of the Market Analysis is to provide a clear picture of the environment in which the City of Superior must administer its programs over the course of the five-year Consolidated Plan. In conjunction with the Needs Assessment, the Market Analysis provides the basis for the Strategic Plan and the programs and projects to be administered. The Housing Market Analysis provides data and narrative information regarding the local housing market, including: • the significant characteristics of the jurisdiction's housing market in general, including the supply, demand, and condition and cost of housing; • the housing stock available to serve persons with disabilities and other special needs; • the condition and needs of public and assisted housing; • a brief inventory of facilities, housing, and services that meet the needs of homeless persons; • regulatory barriers to affordable housing; and • the significant characteristics of the City’s economy. The City of Superior is an older, well-established City in Northwest Wisconsin. The City has been experiencing a slight increase in its housing stock and a decrease in its population. The City’s population peaked in the early 20th Century. The twin ports of Duluth-Superior are the largest in the Great Lakes. Approximately 75% of all housing units were built before 1980, with almost 35% built before 1940. With the aging housing stock, maintenance is crucial. Older homes often require extensive repairs to address wear and tear on key systems such as plumbing, roofing, and electrical wiring. In particular, homes built before 1978 are at higher risk of containing lead-based paint, which poses significant health hazards, especially to children. Lead exposure can result in developmental delays, behavioral issues, and other long-term health problems. Ensuring that older housing units are well-maintained and safely remediated of hazards, such as lead-based paint, is essential for the safety and well-being of residents. Additionally, energy efficiency upgrades in older homes can also improve affordability by reducing utility costs. [20260505R 114] MA-10 Housing Market Analysis: Number of Housing Units - 91.210(a)&(b)(2) Introduction The United States needs more housing and more varied types of housing to meet households’ needs throughout the country. Some economists estimate that one consequence of the 2008 foreclosure crisis was the slow rebound in home construction while household growth continued, resulting in underproduction of housing by more than 3 million units. Although home production has recently been on the rise, building permits, one indicator of new housing supply, remain below historical averages and far below the level needed to eliminate the deficit in housing. The consequences of inadequate supply are higher housing costs for both renting and buying a home. More than 37 million renter and owner households spent more than 30 percent of their income for housing in 2019. In the years prior to the pandemic, low-interest rates for mortgage loans and increasing incomes, not lower home values, had reduced owner cost burden. For renters, increasing incomes were matched by rising rents, maintaining cost burdens despite a strong economy. "Opportunities to Increase Housing Production and Preservation" HUD PD&R, September 7, 2021 The data tables are populated from the 2016-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. • Residential properties primarily comprise traditional 1-unit structures (65%) and apartment complexes with multiple units (31%). • Mobile homes, boats, RV, vans comprise 3% of the residential property units. • Most owner-occupied (97%) and rental units (66%) have two or more bedrooms. As shown in Table 31, single unit, detached dwellings (7650) comprise nearly two thirds of the City's total housing inventory, while multifamily buildings containing 2-19 dwelling units make up 26% of the City's housing stock. Of all occupied housing units over 49% are 3 or more bedrooms. However, from Table 32, ACS data reports that 68% of owner-occupied dwelling units in Superior are 3-bedroom or larger and only 3% are one-or no-bedroom units. In contrast, renter-housing is predominately 2-bedroom units at 47%, with 3 or more bedroom units being only 25%, and one-bedroom or no bedroom units only 34% of the rental units. Considering the population decline, the median age increase, and the vacancy rate, it will be important for the City to ensure the “right-size” affordable housing is developed. The need for larger units may be declining. In 2023, there were 1,824 studio or 1-bedroom units (40.2% of all rented units) and 8,265 one-and two- person households in Superior (70.6% of all households). See the added graph below for more information. [20260505R 115] All residential properties by number of units Property Type Number % 1-unit detached structure 7,650 61% 1-unit, attached structure 540 4% 2-4 units 1,725 14% 5-19 units 1,510 12% 20 or more units 660 5% Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc 375 3% Total 12,460 100% Table 27 – Residential Properties by Unit Number Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Unit Size by Tenure Owners Renters Number % Number % No bedroom 0 0% 350 7% 1 bedroom 190 3% 1,410 27% 2 bedrooms 1,885 29% 2,115 41% 3 or more bedrooms 4,510 68% 1,270 25% Total 6,585 100% 5,145 100% Table 28 – Unit Size by Tenure Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs. Within the City of Superior, some long-term affordable housing developments have been constructed/ renovated with Federal and/or State funding, as well housing rehabilitation efforts accomplished through local funding. Descriptions of the most common assisted housing programs are listed below: SHA manages 466 units of public housing from single-family dwellings to multi-unit developments located in various neighborhoods in the city of Superior. SHA also administers the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. For private owners, SHA currently manages the property for five (5) buildings for seniors, individuals, and families. A rehabilitation program targeting low-income Superior homeowners is available, as well as downpayment assistance programs. [20260505R 116] Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts. There is no anticipated loss of affordable housing units or expirations of Housing Choice Vouchers. Housing units that receive tax credits or other forms of assistance can be at risk of being converted to market rate housing upon maturity of the tax credits or the affordability period, typically 15, 20, or 30 years. Without subsidies many of these units could be lost to the low-income market, either through higher non-subsidized rents being charged or from owners’ neglect, abandonment or conversion. Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? The current availability of housing units does not meet the demand of low- to moderate-income renters and homeowners. The rising value of single-family homes and property lots uniquely impacts renters. Landowners of single-family rental properties are more likely to sell their rental investments as housing values continue to rise, further reducing the number of available rental houses. Additionally, as housing prices rise, it becomes increasingly complex for middle- to moderate-income renters to transition to homeownership due to higher monthly mortgage costs and down payment requirements. It can be highly challenging for extremely low- and low-income renters to "compete" for a limited number of rental units. Source of income is a protected class under Wisconsin's fair housing law, meaning it is illegal to discriminate against someone in housing based on their lawful source of income. This protection includes various forms of income, such as wages, Social Security, public assistance, and rental vouchers, and is in addition to the federal fair housing protections. These protections can help protect renters who receive government assistance or use a housing choice voucher. Describe the need for specific types of housing: Superior needs affordable housing units that ensure that low- to moderate-income residents spend no more than 30% of their monthly income on housing expenses. While there is some amount of new housing units in the community, it does not meet the financial needs of the community's residents most vulnerable to housing instability. It is critical to understand how the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) evaluates income within a community. HUD sets income limits that determine eligibility for assisted housing programs, including the Public Housing, Section 8 project-based, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher, Section 202 housing for the elderly, and Section 811 housing for persons with disabilities. HUD develops income limits based on Median Family Income estimates and Fair Market Rent area definitions for each metropolitan area, parts of some metropolitan areas, and each non-metropolitan county. Superior falls within the Duluth-Superior HUD Metro FMR Area. [20260505R 117] A family in Superior is considered low- to moderate-income if they make • $56,350 as a single-person household • $64,400 as a two-person household • $72,450 as a three-person household • $80,500 as a four-person household • $86,950 as a five-person household • $93,400 as a six-person household Most residents in Superior either have a close family member or have an annual income qualifying them as low—to moderate-income. Residents who fall within these income categories may face unique difficulties. The city also lacks “accessible” housing units to address the needs of the physically disabled. Discussion There is a continuing need for “affordable” and “accessible” housing in the City of Superior. Much of the existing housing is sound, and there appears to be an adequate supply of market-rate housing. However, housing opportunities are lacking for the lower-income renters and homebuyers in the City. Low- income homeowners with high housing cost burdens need housing rehabilitation programs to bring their dwellings up to code, make them energy-efficient, and help them reduce their cost burdens. Low- income renters with housing problems, including high housing cost burdens, need access to quality affordable rental housing. Low-income elderly households are also burdened by high housing costs and need housing rehabilitation programs to assist owner-occupants and affordable senior housing to assist elderly renter households. [20260505R 118] MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction The data presented in this section indicates that, within the City of Superior, there is a diverse mix of housing in different price ranges for owner-occupied and rental dwelling units. However, conclusions about the availability of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income households need to take into account additional factors such as the age and condition of this housing and the neighborhoods in which such housing is located. Housing needs to be both affordable and good quality and located within safe, stable residential neighborhoods. The median home value increased by 10% from the base-year ACS data ($114,000) to the 2016-2020 ACS data ($125,400). The median contract rent (using the same sources) increased 10% from $614/month to $677/month. An important consideration when estimating rental rates is the differing practices regarding the inclusion of utilities and fuels in rental payments. Gross rent accounts for these variations by combining the contract rent with the estimated average monthly cost of utilities (such as electricity, gas, and water/sewer) and fuels (including oil, coal, kerosene, wood, etc.), if they are paid by the renter or on the renter’s behalf. This approach ensures consistency by eliminating discrepancies related to the inclusion of these additional costs. Cost of Housing Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2020 % Change Median Home Value 114,000 125,400 10% Median Contract Rent 614 677 10% Table 29 – Cost of Housing Rent Paid Number % Less than $500 1,585 30.8% $500-999 2,905 56.5% $1,000-1,499 600 11.7% $1,500-1,999 55 1.1% $2,000 or more 0 0.0% Total 5,145 100.1% Table 30 - Rent Paid Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS [20260505R 119] Housing Affordability Number of Units affordable to Households earning Renter Owner 30% HAMFI 870 No Data 50% HAMFI 2,170 925 80% HAMFI 3,805 2,249 100% HAMFI No Data 3,032 Total 6,845 6,206 Table 31 – Housing Affordability Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS Monthly Rent Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no bedroom) 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom Fair Market Rent 780 838 1,016 1,174 1,310 High HOME Rent 780 838 1,087 1,435 1,645 Low HOME Rent 780 838 1,087 1,435 1,789 Table 32 – Monthly Rent Data Source Comments: Current HUD HOME rents Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? The lack of affordable housing impacts low- and moderate-income residents the greatest. The steadily increasing rent costs compound the financial struggles that these families are at risk of experiencing. Additionally, the growing need for new rental housing units and aged housing unit stock results in many renters living in substandard housing conditions. AFFORDABLE, BUT NOT AVAILABLE Homes that are affordable to extremely low-income renters are not necessarily available to them. In the private market, households can occupy homes that cost less than 30% of their incomes, and many do. When higher-income households occupy rental homes also affordable to lower-income households, they render those homes unavailable to the lower-income households. Extremely low-income renters must compete with all higher-income households for the limited number of rental homes affordable to them in the private market. To truly measure the housing options extremely low-income renters have, we must account for the fact that higher-income renters occupy some of the most affordable units. Rental homes are both affordable and available for households of a specific income group if the homes are affordable to them and they are not occupied by higher-income households. [20260505R 120] EXTREMELY LOW-INCOME RENTERS The vast majority of extremely low-income renters work in low-wage jobs or are unable to work. With wages insufficient to pay for modest rental housing even when individuals work full-time year-round, a brief furlough or loss of hours, as we have seen over the past year, can create debts that renters can never repay. Extremely low-income renters in the labor force, many already struggling to pay their rents before the pandemic, were significantly impacted by COVID-19. Low-wage work comprised a disproportionate share of industries most affected by COVID-19 shutdowns. Extremely low-income renters were likely impacted by the closures of restaurants, hotels, and other places of low-wage employment. The Gap, A Shortage of Affordable Homes, National Low Income Housing Coalition, March 2021 How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents? With a median home value of $125,400, it may appear Superior’s housing stock is “affordable” compared to state and national averages. With a decreasing population, current economic conditions, increasing number of renters, and increasing rental rates, a number of housing “affordability” issues need to be addressed: Much of the affordable housing stock in Superior is older. These homes are more costly to maintain and often need rehabilitation; LMI households in Superior are shown to be cost-burdened. Such households have difficulties obtaining housing that is both affordable for their situation and in good condition; and Rental rates will likely continue to increase. Rental Stability As the economy improves, rental prices continue to increase. This puts significant pressure on low- and moderate-income families spending an ever-increasing percentage of their income on housing costs. As higher-income renters and distressed homeowners seek cheaper alternatives to their current housing, competition for less expensive rental homes may increase. Meanwhile, few of the lowest- income renters can leave the rental market altogether. Consequently, rents for the least expensive homes may be less responsive to economic downturns, and in some cases, they could even increase because of greater demand. Even if rents at the bottom end of the market fall during a downturn, they will not fall sufficiently to provide extremely low-income renters with an adequate supply of affordable housing. Owners are incentivized to abandon their rental properties or convert them to other uses when rental income is too low to cover basic operating costs and maintenance. They have little incentive to [20260505R 121] provide affordable housing in the private market to extremely low-income renters. During periods of economic growth, the private market alone does not provide an adequate supply of affordable rental housing to low-income households. The rents that the lowest-income households can afford typically do not cover the development and operating expenses of new housing. While new construction for higher- income renters encourages a chain of household moves that eventually benefits lower-income renters, new luxury units may not impact rents at the bottom of the market as much as they do rents at the top. National Low Income Housing Coalition, March 2021 Homeowner Stability The Federal Finance Housing Agency - FHFA House Price Index (FHFA HPI®) is a broad measure of the movement of single-family house prices. The FHFA HPI is a weighted, repeat-sales index that measures average price changes in repeat sales or refinancing on the same properties. Information is obtained by reviewing repeat mortgage transactions on single-family properties whose mortgages have been purchased or securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac since January 1975. The FHFA HPI is a timely, accurate indicator of house price trends at various geographic levels. The breadth of the sample provides more information than is available in other house price indexes. The population of Superior is largely stagnant, with limited increase in wages for the lowest wage earners. The FHFA HPI Calculator is available on the FHFA website and provides data on the increase of house prices in Superior measured quarterly. A calculation for a home purchased in 2023 Quarter 4 for $125,000 and sold in 2025 Quarter 2 would have an appreciation of over 13.5% and have an estimated value of $141,024. Continued cost increases will result in households that cannot maintain the aging housing stock, reduce renters ability to transition to homeownership, and cause existing residents to be unable to purchase homes inside the City. How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing? Since 1974 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has helped low-income households obtain better rental housing and reduce the share of their income that goes toward rent through a program that relies on the private rental market. A key parameter in operating the certificate and voucher programs is the Fair Market Rent (FMR). FMRs play different roles in the certificate and voucher programs. In both programs, FMRs set limits. In the certificate program, FMRs set limits on what units can be rented; in the voucher program, FMRs set limits on the subsidy provided to the household. Certificate program households cannot rent units with gross rents exceeding the FMR; the recipients receive a subsidy equal to the difference between the gross rent and 30 percent of their incomes. Voucher program households receive a subsidy equal to the difference between the FMR and 30 percent of their monthly incomes. Participants in the voucher program can choose units to live in with gross rents higher than the FMR, but they must pay the full cost of the difference between the gross rent and the FMR, plus 30 percent of their income. FMRs are intended to ensure that rental assistance beneficiaries have access to safe, decent housing while balancing affordability with local [20260505R 122] market conditions. HUD updates FMRs annually, taking into account local rent surveys, inflation, and other economic factors. According to HUD’s 2024 Fair Market Rent data for the Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Statistical Area, fair market rent for an efficiency apartment is $780; $838 for a one-bedroom; $1,087 for a two- bedroom. NOTE: FMR includes the cost of utilities; for a resident living in a one-bedroom unit, the FMR $838 is the total cost for rent AND utilities for that unit. These monthly FMRs are similar to the High and Low HUD HOME rent. There is need for the City to encourage/foster the rehabilitation and preservation of existing rental housing to ensure that these affordable units are also in good condition. New construction of affordable rental housing may only be successful to the extent that the production of such units can be subsidized to enable them to remain affordable and to the extent that existing rental housing is seen as substandard and undesirable. More current data from market sources show increases in rental costs not included in the standard charts above. Discussion Narrative data and added graphs above indicate a much higher recent percentage growth in rental rates and home costs that autopopulated data will show. These increases only add to the cost pressures for the lowest wage earners in the housing market. [20260505R 123] MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing - 91.210(a) Introduction Housing is a major element of people’s material living standards. It is essential to meet basic needs, such as for shelter from weather conditions and to offer a sense of personal security, privacy, and personal space. Good housing conditions are also essential for people’s health and affect childhood development. Housing is the key to reducing intergenerational poverty and increasing economic mobility. Research shows that increasing access to affordable housing is the most cost-effective strategy for reducing childhood poverty and increasing economic mobility in the United States. Stanford economist Raj Chetty found that children who moved to lower-poverty neighborhoods saw their earnings as adults increase by approximately 31%, an increased likelihood of living in better neighborhoods as adults, and a lowered likelihood of becoming a single parent. Moreover, children living in stable, affordable homes are more likely to thrive in school and have greater opportunities to learn inside and outside the classroom. Increasing access to affordable housing bolsters economic growth. Research shows that the shortage of affordable housing costs the American economy about $2 trillion a year in lower wages and productivity. Without affordable housing, families have constrained opportunities to increase earnings, causing slower GDP growth. In fact, researchers estimate that the growth in GDP between 1964 and 2009 would have been 13.5% higher if families had better access to affordable housing. This would have led to a $1.7 trillion increase in income or $8,775 in additional wages per worker. Moreover, each dollar invested in affordable housing boosts local economies by leveraging public and private resources to generate income—including resident earnings and additional local tax revenue—and supports job creation and retention. "The Problem," National Low Income Housing Alliance Of the total 11,720 housing units in Superior, as identified below, 5,315 were built before 1950. In contrast, 650 housing units have been built since 2000. Of the 11,720 total housing units in the City, 3265 (27.8%) have at least one "selected condition." In addition, 9,195 (78.38%) housing units were built before 1980, and therefore have a potential lead- based paint hazard. [20260505R 124] Describe the jurisdiction's definition of "standard condition" and "substandard condition but suitable for rehabilitation": For this Consolidated Plan, the City of Superior will use the HUD housing quality standards as defined below: 1. Standard Condition. A unit of housing is considered to be in standard condition if it is generally in good repair, with no substandard habitability elements (i.e., lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities) or exterior elements. Such units may be eligible for housing rehabilitation funding if interior conditions are such that the HUD Section 8 Housing Quality Standards are not met, or a threat to the integrity or livability of the unit exists and should be addressed. Examples of ways in which the interiors of such homes might be rehabilitated include the replacement of heating systems, electrical system repairs or upgrades, plumbing system repairs or upgrades, energy efficiency improvements, and accessibility improvements. 2. Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehabilitation. This category describes dwelling units that do not meet one or more of the HUD Section 8 quality standard conditions, likely due to deferred maintenance or work without permits, but that is both financially and structurally feasible for rehabilitation. Such units may be lacking complete plumbing and kitchen facilities and/or may have exterior elements in need of repair (e.g., a roof in need of replacement, siding in need of repair or replacement, missing or failing foundation). In order to be suitable for rehabilitation, the unit value generally exceeds the cost of repairs or upgrades that would be required to bring it to standard condition. This category of property does not include units that need correction or minor livability problems or maintenance work. 3. Substandard Condition and Not Suitable for Rehabilitation. This category describes dwelling units in such poor conditions as to be neither structurally nor financially feasible for rehabilitation. Such units will typically have an improvement value that is less than the cost of addressing the habitability and exterior elements that cause its classification as "substandard" or will be considered unfit to occupy for safety reasons by the city's building official. The table below displays the number of housing units, by tenure, based on the number of "conditions" the unit has. Selected conditions are similar to housing problems in the Needs Assessment: are (1) lacks complete plumbing facilities, (2) lacks complete kitchen facilities, (3) more than one person per room, and (4) cost burden greater than 30%. Condition of Units Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % With one selected Condition 1,170 18% 2,075 40% With two selected Conditions 20 0% 0 0% [20260505R 125] Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % With three selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0% With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0% No selected Conditions 5,395 82% 3,065 60% Total 6,585 100% 5,140 100% Table 33 - Condition of Units Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Year Unit Built Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % 2000 or later 355 5% 295 6% 1980-1999 940 14% 935 18% 1950-1979 1,995 30% 1,885 37% Before 1950 3,290 50% 2,025 39% Total 6,580 99% 5,140 100% Table 34 – Year Unit Built Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number % Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 5,285 80% 3,910 76% Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 259 4% 104 2% Table 35 – Risk of Lead-Based Paint Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS (Total Units) 2016-2020 CHAS (Units with Children present) [20260505R 126] Describe the need for owner and rental rehabilitation based on the condition of the jurisdiction's housing. As shown in the tables above, the vast majority of housing in the City of Superior was built before 1978. Lead-based paint poses a significant danger to the development of children, and exposure can lead to lifelong challenges. Additionally, about 1 in 10 homes in Wisconsin has high radon levels, a naturally occurring radioactive gas that causes lung cancer. It enters homes through soil via foundation cracks, making testing essential for all home types. Housing radon levels often increase in colder months due to the pressure differences that pull more radon gas into homes. The older housing stock in Superior, both rental and owner-occupied, may pose safety challenges due to environmental hazards and the need for upgrades/renovation to maintain a suitable living environment. Estimate the number of housing units within the jurisdiction that are occupied by low or moderate income families that contain lead-based paint hazards. 91.205(e), 91.405 Environmental lead is a toxic substance affecting the growth and development of up to one million U.S. preschool children today, with effects ranging from learning disabilities to death. High lead levels can cause many health problems by damaging the brain, nervous system, and kidneys. Lead poisoning can cause decreased intelligence, behavioral and speech problems, anemia, decreased muscle and bone growth, poor muscle coordination, and hearing damage. Lead exposures remain prevalent despite considerable knowledge and increased screening and intervention efforts. Increased lead exposure and increased body burden of lead remain a significant problem for children in the United States. Lead is an environmental toxicant that may cause adverse health effects to the nervous, hematopoietic, endocrine, renal, and reproductive systems. Lead exposure in young children is particularly hazardous because children absorb lead more readily than adults. Many children exposed to lead do not exhibit any signs of the disease. The child's signs or symptoms could be mistaken for other illnesses, and the child goes undiagnosed. The developing nervous system of children is particularly more susceptible to the effects of lead. The underdeveloped blood-brain barrier in young children increases the risk of lead entering the developing nervous system resulting in neurobehavioral disorders. Blood lead levels (BLLs) at any detectable level have been shown to cause behavioral and developmental disorders; therefore, no safe blood lead level in children has been identified. It is increasingly important for continued childhood lead poisoning prevention education and awareness. Lead-contaminated water, soil, and paint have been recognized as potential sources of children's lead exposure. Dust from deteriorating lead-based paint is considered the largest contributor to the lead problem. Until the 1950s, many homes were covered inside and out with leaded paints. Lead began to fall from favor in the 1950s but was still commonly used until it was banned in homes after 1977. [20260505R 127] Because of the long-term use of lead-based paints, many homes in the United States contain surfaces with paint that is now peeling, chalking, flaking, or wearing away. The dust or paint chips contain high levels of lead that easily find ways into the mouths of young children. A particular problem has emerged due to many homes with lead-based paints, which are now undergoing renovations. Often the dust created by this work has high lead levels, which are readily absorbed by the children's developing bodies. Superior has a sizable amount of housing built before 1980 that has the potential to be hazardous to children. The 2016-2020 CHAS estimates that 9,195 units were built prior to 1980. While the reported cases of childhood lead poisoning in Douglas County are low, the State Health Department estimates emphasize that the number of unreported/undetected cases of childhood lead poisoning is unknown, and the low number of reported cases should not be misconstrued as evidence that lead poisoning is not more widespread. Discussion The City does not currently have a complete inventory of vacant dwellings. The HUD prepopulated fields for "vacant units" and "REO Properties" are blank because data is not available for the jurisdiction. [20260505R 128] MA-25 Public And Assisted Housing - 91.210(b) Introduction Public Housing in Superior is a program managed and operated by the Superior Housing Authority (SHA), a federally funded organization designed to benefit eligible low-income families, seniors and persons with disabilities. SHA administers the public housing program via various properties the organization owns and operates. Totals Number of Units Program Type Certificate Mod- Rehab Public Housing Vouchers Total Project - based Tenant - based Special Purpose Voucher Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Family Unification Program Disabled * # of units vouchers available 465 169 0 0 0 # of accessible units *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Table 36 – Total Number of Units by Program Type Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Describe the supply of public housing developments: Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan: The Superior Housing Authority (“SHA”) is amending its 5-year PHA Plan because it applied for the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program. As a result, the SHA will convert three sites to Project- Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) under the guidelines of H 2019-19/PIH 2019-23, REV-4, and any successor Notices, and PIH 2024-40 for RAD/Section 18 Blends. Upon conversion to Project-Based Rental Assistance, the Authority will adopt the resident rights, participation, waiting list, and grievance procedures listed in Section 1.7 of H 2019-19/PIH 2019-23, REV-4; and H-2016-17/PIH-2016-17. These resident rights, participation, waiting list, and grievance procedures are appended to this Attachment. Additionally, the SHA certifies that it is currently compliant with all fair housing and civil rights requirements. HUD designed RAD to help address the capital needs of public housing by providing SHA with access to private capital to repair and preserve its affordable housing assets. Upon conversion, the [20260505R 129] Authority’s Capital Fund Budget will be reduced by the pro rata share of the Public Housing Developments converted as part of the Demonstration, and that SHA may also borrow funds to address its capital needs. The SHA will contribute Operating Reserves of $1,000,000 and Capital Funds of $1,000,000 towards the conversion. [20260505R 130] Public Housing Condition Table 37 - Public Housing Condition Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction: Due to renovation activities, conversion through RAD to PBV, and other initiatives, information about the 5-year plan amendments has been included above. Due to the significant rehabilitation requirements, a RAD conversion will encompass multiple properties. Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low- and moderate-income families residing in public housing: Each year HUD reviews and scores the housing authority’s Section 8 program management based on 14 different criteria. This score reflects how well the housing authority manages the Section 8 waiting list, the physical quality of housing assisted with Section 8 and the financial management of the program. All public housing units meet UPCS. In addition to annual inspections, SHA performs: random inspections of units; routine special inspections of units which have demonstrated deficiencies in housekeeping; semi-annual safety inspections of units to ensure that critical safety systems (e.g. smoke/CO detectors, GFCI outlets, breaker panels, etc.) are functional. These inspections facilitate quicker turnaround of units when they become vacant. SHA has implemented an extensive Preventive Maintenance (PM) program of property systems to ensure functionality, compliance with manufacturer recommendations, and to extend the expected useful life of all systems. During projects involving substantial renovations, units will be constructed/renovated utilizing principles of universal design and visitability. Discussion: SHA is committed to serving Superior by providing quality housing options for vulnerable residents. [20260505R 131] MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services - 91.210(c) Introduction Affordable housing has become increasingly difficult to secure as rent rates continue to rise and rental vacancy rates remain relatively low. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic triggered job loss and reduced wages, further adding to the housing instability of thousands of households throughout Wisconsin. Ultimately, homelessness is often the end result and does not happen by choice. Homelessness stems from a variety of factors; • Unemployment, • Unforeseen life changes, • Substance use, • Medical emergencies, • Domestic violence, or • Mental health issues. Often, it strikes the people you least expect. Housing instability is particularly challenging due to the limiting wage opportunity and other financial barriers caused by the pandemic. Nonprofits, community organizations, and response networks throughout Wisconsin continue to increase capacity, become more sophisticated, and collaborate in their efforts to provide housing and critical support services for the most disadvantaged among us. Often it is easy to see homelessness simply as someone living on the street. While this is the reality for some, it is not for the majority of those experiencing homelessness. The list below outlines the various degrees of homelessness. Imminent Risk of Homelessness: A person or family who will lose their primary nighttime residence within 14 days. Precariously Housed: A person or family who lack a fixed, regular nighttime residence but have been offered accommodation from friends or family for an indeterminate time. Fleeing/Attempting to Flee Domestic Violence: A person or family that is fleeing or is attempting to flee domestic violence, has no other residence, lacks resources or support networks, or does not have permanent housing. Literally Homeless: A person or a family who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence. Typically, this means living in a place not meant for habitation or in an emergency shelter. Chronically Homeless: A person or family who has experienced homelessness for at least one year—or repeatedly—while having a disabling condition. Resources included below are CoC Region specific. [20260505R 132] Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are use to complement services targeted to homeless persons Mainstream services in Superior, Wisconsin complement targeted homeless services by providing a broad network of support in health, mental health, and employment, which are critical for preventing and ending homelessness. Key services are integrated through case management and referrals to address the underlying issues of housing instability. • Community Health Centers: Organizations like the Lake Superior Community Health Center provide general and behavioral health services at affordable rates, making them accessible regardless of income. • Coordination with Shelters: Homeless shelters in Superior, such as Harbor House Crisis Shelters, often include referrals for physical disability assessments and provide basic health- related items, such as toiletries and diapers. • Douglas County Department of Health and Human Services: This agency coordinates and provides a range of mental health services through local providers, including crisis intervention, outpatient counseling, and case management. • Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH): PATH is a federal program active in Wisconsin that targets people with serious mental illnesses or co-occurring substance use disorders who are experiencing homelessness. Providers locate individuals and connect them to essential community services and housing programs. • NAMI offers peer support, advocacy, education, and community resources to households affected by mental illness. • The Northwest Community Services Agency provides utility assistance, food resources, housing referrals, and numerous other services. • Indigo provides multiple independent living programs to support residents with disabilities. • Superior School District provides support, resources, and referrals to at-risk families. • Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Model: The Wisconsin DHS promotes the IPS model, which integrates employment specialists into mental health treatment programs. This approach emphasizes rapid job search and provides time-unlimited support, recognizing that employment itself is a key part of recovery and self-esteem. • Employment Connection: Provided through agencies such as the Human Development Center, this program offers job training, vocational goal-setting, and assistance in finding and maintaining employment for adults with mental illness. List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations. The City of Superior works with the Regions Continuum of Care to coordinate homeless services. [20260505R 133] MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services - 91.210(d) Introduction Everyone needs safe, decent, stable housing. For some of the most vulnerable people in America — people with mental illness, chronic health conditions, histories of trauma, and other struggles — a home helps them to get adequate treatment and start on the path toward recovery. But some conditions make it difficult for people to maintain a stable home without additional help. Supportive housing, a highly effective strategy that combines affordable housing with intensive coordinated services, can provide that needed assistance. A broad body of research shows that supportive housing effectively helps people with disabilities maintain stable housing. People in supportive housing use costly systems like emergency health services less frequently and are less likely to be incarcerated. Supportive housing also can aid people with disabilities in getting better health care and help seniors trying to stay in the community as they age and families trying to keep their children out of foster care. Supportive housing is a highly effective strategy that combines affordable housing with intensive coordinated services to help people struggling with chronic physical and mental health issues maintain stable housing and receive appropriate health care. Permanence and affordability. Tenants generally pay no more than 30 percent of their income for rent. They have the same rights and responsibilities as other renters, such as having the lease in their name and the right to privacy in their unit, which means they cannot be evicted for reasons unrelated to being a good tenant. Integration. Individuals and families are able to live independently in apartments or single-family homes in residential neighborhoods. Tenants in supportive housing should have access to public transportation, grocery stores, parks, and other neighborhood amenities common to all other residents. (Less accessible services put tenants' housing and health at risk: if they are unable to travel to providers' offices, for instance, they may stop using the services.) Emphasis on choice. Supportive housing maximizes client choice, in clients' housing options and the services they receive. For instance, tenants can generally come and go as they please and have control over their daily schedule, like mealtimes and visitors. They also can direct the types of services they receive and the goals they set with the service provider. Low barriers to entry. Supportive housing providers do not require clients to hit benchmarks before moving into housing or put other screening barriers in the way. Blanket bans on people with criminal histories or bad credit, for example, or requirements to meet goals, like employment or completing a course of treatment, before entering supportive housing would screen out the very people supportive housing aims to help. Individuals and families are able to live independently in apartments or single- family homes in residential neighborhoods. [20260505R 134] "Supportive Housing Helps Vulnerable People Live and Thrive in the Community" Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, May 31, 2016 Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): People with mental and substance use disorders are over-represented in the justice system. They estimate that 18% of the general population suffers from mental illness, while 44% of the jail population and 37% of those in prison suffer from mental and behavioral health conditions. SAMHSA studies show that 11% of 18-25 year olds and 6% of those over 25 have a substance abuse disorder. 63% of the jail population and 58% of prisoners exhibit substance abuse disorder symptoms. Upon release from incarceration, people with behavioral and substance abuse-related health issues face many barriers to successful reentry into the community, such as lack of health care, job skills, education, stable housing, and poor connection with community behavioral health providers. Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing Diversion Screening is a key part of the Coordinated Entry process. Diversion Screening determines if persons experiencing a housing crisis can be/remain housed or if they absolutely must enter the homeless system. Quality screening helps to reduce needless entries into the homeless system and standardizes access to program referrals. Coordinated Entry is aware of the many programs and resources available in our County. Coordinated Entry works with 211. Continuum of Care has a relationship with Pathways 4 Home and other reentry resources to address the needs of those being released from correctional programs and institutions. Within the Continuum of Care, there are partnering agencies that represent healthcare facilities, mental health facilities, programs, and facilities. The Continuum of Care also has a relationship with housing providers who address the needs of those aging out of foster care. The City of Superior does not directly participate in the discharge planning or protocols for persons leaving publicly funded institutions or healthcare systems or receiving assistance from public and private agencies (health care facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions). [20260505R 135] All of the local agencies serving the homeless population work together to ensure that people receive the appropriate services. The agencies also maintain ties with institutions that release people from their care or custody, whether publicly or privately funded. Individuals leaving institutional care in Superior, Wisconsin, can get help through the Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) and Centers for Independent Living (CILs) for transition services, which include finding housing, obtaining support services, and some financial aid for one-time expenses. Other state and local resources include the Wisconsin Long Term Care Ombudsman, the Critical Assistance Program for homelessness prevention, WHEAP for energy costs, and various housing programs available in the City of Superior. Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e) The City of Superior will help to support the needs of persons who have special needs by implementing the Consolidated Plan goals. Goal: Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Public Facilities and Improvements are publicly-owned facilities and infrastructure such as streets, playgrounds, underground utilities, and buildings owned by non-profits open to the general public. Safe and accessible infrastructure is essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. In general, public facilities and public improvements are interpreted to include all facilities and improvements that are publicly owned or owned by a nonprofit and open to the general public. Public Infrastructure Improvements will focus on safe and accessible infrastructure essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. Public infrastructure improvements will generally include acquiring, constructing, reconstructing, and installing public infrastructure. Goal: Public Services Public Service activities provide for a wide range of activities that address needs in the community provided for the target population. Public services can strengthen communities by addressing the needs of specific populations. Public services are an integral part of a comprehensive community development strategy. They can address a range of individual needs and increase CDBG dollars' impact by complementing other activities. [20260505R 136] Goal: Housing Superior is committed to improving and expanding access to safe and affordable housing for low—and moderate-income (LMI) residents. Affordable and safe housing helps to provide financial stability, reduce the chances of a person becoming homeless, and promote housing sustainability. For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2)) Many of the activities to be undertaken by the City of Superior will directly benefit the non-homeless special needs population. Special needs populations will also utilize public services. [20260505R 137] MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing - 91.210(e) Describe any negative effects of public policies on affordable housing and residential investment Public policies, such as a lack of funding, pose significant challenges to the development of affordable housing in Superior. Superior’s affordable housing efforts are further constrained by the lack of state and federal funding sources. Rising costs across the region exacerbate these issues, making it challenging to produce affordable housing at the speed and scale needed to meet local demand. Together, these barriers contribute to a growing shortage of affordable units for Superior’s low- and moderate-income households. [20260505R 138] MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets - 91.215 (f) Introduction The City of Superior is located in northwestern Wisconsin, and is the county seat of Douglas County. The city has a total area of 55.65 sq mi (144.13 km2), of which 36.96 sq mi (95.73 km2) is land and 18.69 sq mi (48.41 km2) is water. Key historical employment sectors • Maritime and shipping: As a significant port city, the shipping and maritime industry has long been a core employment sector. This includes jobs on cargo ships and support roles in the harbor. The world's only remaining whaleback ship, the SS Meteor, was built in Superior and represents this era. • Railroads: The phrase "Where Sail Meets Rail" indicates the crucial connection between the port and the railroads that transported goods. Therefore, jobs in the railroad industry, including track workers, engineers, and those involved in railway logistics, were also historically prevalent. • Warehousing and logistics: To support the shipping and rail industries, the city developed extensive warehousing and logistics infrastructure to store and move goods. These jobs were critical for the city's economic function. • Manufacturing: While not as prominent as shipping, manufacturing and related industrial jobs were also a part of Superior's historical employment landscape, often linked to the city's natural resources or the transportation of raw materials via rail and ship. • Commerce and service: As a major hub, Superior also developed a significant commercial and service sector to support its population and industries, including retail, hospitality, and professional services. Economic Development Market Analysis Business Activity Business by Sector Number of Workers Number of Jobs Share of Workers % Share of Jobs % Jobs less workers % Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 38 7 0 0 0 Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 1,762 1,710 16 15 -1 Construction 514 675 5 6 1 Education and Health Care Services 2,820 1,778 26 16 -10 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 606 474 6 4 -2 Information 196 224 2 2 0 Manufacturing 927 1,663 9 15 6 Other Services 579 619 5 5 0 [20260505R 139] Business by Sector Number of Workers Number of Jobs Share of Workers % Share of Jobs % Jobs less workers % Professional, Scientific, Management Services 666 596 6 5 -1 Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Trade 1,564 1,563 14 14 0 Transportation and Warehousing 671 1,348 6 12 6 Wholesale Trade 473 606 4 5 1 Total 10,816 11,263 -- -- -- Table 38 - Business Activity Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS (Workers), 2020 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs) [20260505R 140] Labor Force Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 14,245 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 13,735 Unemployment Rate 3.55 Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 17.93 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 1.54 Table 39 - Labor Force Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Occupations by Sector Number of People Management, business and financial 2,465 Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 385 Service 2,070 Sales and office 2,735 Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 1,060 Production, transportation and material moving 1,025 Table 40 – Occupations by Sector Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Travel Time Travel Time Number Percentage < 30 Minutes 11,174 86% 30-59 Minutes 1,390 11% 60 or More Minutes 447 3% Total 13,011 100% Table 41 - Travel Time Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Education: Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Educational Attainment In Labor Force Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force Less than high school graduate 585 35 445 [20260505R 141] Educational Attainment In Labor Force Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force High school graduate (includes equivalency) 2,525 85 695 Some college or Associate's degree 4,775 85 1,195 Bachelor's degree or higher 3,080 10 455 Table 42 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Educational Attainment by Age Age 18–24 yrs 25–34 yrs 35–44 yrs 45–65 yrs 65+ yrs Less than 9th grade 15 40 30 125 80 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 145 220 220 425 175 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 765 735 910 1,650 1,525 Some college, no degree 1,420 1,225 900 1,805 890 Associate's degree 340 685 655 775 400 Bachelor's degree 155 775 490 1,165 695 Graduate or professional degree 8 220 340 555 370 Table 43 - Educational Attainment by Age Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Educational Attainment – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate 25,967 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 33,789 Some college or Associate's degree 36,402 Bachelor's degree 46,899 Graduate or professional degree 49,615 Table 44 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction? The major employment sectors in Superior, Wisconsin, are transportation, manufacturing, petroleum, and education. The area's port is a significant driver of its transportation industry, while manufacturing [20260505R 142] includes a wide range of companies involved in everything from food products to tools and hydraulics. The presence of the University of Wisconsin-Superior and other educational institutions also makes education a key employment sector. The graph above shows the five leading industries in Northwest Wisconsin as of 2024 are Government, Manufacturing, Retail Trade, Health Care and Social Assistance, and Accommodation/Food Service. Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community: From the 2025-2030 CEDS Between 2022 and 2032, employment in the region was projected to grow by 5.1%, with the strongest gains in construction, trade and transportation, professional services, and self-employment. These trends reflect a shift toward service-based and flexible employment, while traditional sectors like manufacturing and government remain stable. The decline in information-sector jobs underscores the need for continued investment in digital skills and workforce retraining. Overall, the projections suggest modest but broad-based growth, reinforcing the importance of workforce development and entrepreneurship. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create. Current major economic changes impacting job and business growth opportunities in Superior, WI, center on significant public-sector infrastructure investment, particularly the John A. Blatnik Bridge replacement project, and private-sector expansions in manufacturing and transportation. This undertaking will temporarily increase employment across multiple industries and may put significant upward price pressure on the limited housing stock. • Blatnik Bridge Replacement: The project received over $1 billion in federal funding in January 2024 to replace the aging bridge connecting Superior and Duluth. This $1.8 billion project is anticipated to create roughly 1,100 jobs at its peak construction in late 2026 and subsequent years, offering substantial job opportunities in the construction sector. • Infrastructure & Road Projects: The City of Superior has several other ongoing and planned road, sewer, and utility projects as part of its Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for 2024- 2027. These include the reconstructions of East 5th Street and Hammond Avenue. These projects create short-term construction jobs and improve local logistics for existing and new businesses. [20260505R 143] Skills training and apprenticeships in construction trades may be critical to the success of these and other upcoming public-sector projects. Key Growth Sectors: Manufacturing, transportation and warehousing, and healthcare and social assistance are key sectors for job growth in Douglas County, where Superior is located. The presence of a major railway hub and port facilities gives the manufacturing and logistics sectors a distinct advantage and a positive job growth projection that exceeds state averages. How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction? From the 2025 CEDS The region’s educational attainment profile presents both opportunities and challenges for workforce development. While the share of residents with a bachelor’s degree has risen from 13.8% in 2019 to 16.9%, and associate’s degrees have increased from 10.8% to 13.3%, nearly 35% of the population over 25 holds only a high school diploma. This suggests a large segment of the labor force may lack the postsecondary credentials often required for higher-skill, higher-wage positions. The recent closure of Northland College in Ashland, one of the region’s few four-year higher education institutions, poses a significant risk to sustaining educational attainment progress. The Board of Trustees of Northland College voted to close the college at the end of the 2024–25 academic year. With so few higher education institutions serving a vast, rural region, the loss of Northland reduces local access to bachelor’s and graduate-level education, potentially slowing the growth of the college- educated workforce. This loss will likely have ripple effects, including a potential decline in young adult retention, reduced training opportunities for professional occupations, and fewer local graduates prepared for leadership roles in the region’s economy. The closure will also have immediate and measurable economic impacts. Northland College directly supported hundreds of jobs (faculty, staff, and administration) and indirectly supported numerous local businesses through student, employee, and visitor spending. Student expenditures on housing, food, transportation, and recreation are estimated to have contributed several million dollars annually to Ashland’s economy. In addition, visitor spending related to campus events, athletics, and family visits brought outside dollars to the region. The loss of this economic activity will disproportionately affect housing providers, retail stores, restaurants, and service businesses locally. While Northland College is not located in Douglas County, a ripple effect from the closure related to educational opportunities will be impactful regionally. [20260505R 144] Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. In Superior, WI, the local workforce's skills and education levels generally present a mixed picture: a strong fit for trade, transportation, energy, and specific manufacturing roles, but a potential skills mismatch/gap in the growing high-skill technology and specialized health sectors. There is a polarization in job growth, with demand increasing at both the high-skill and low-skill ends of the spectrum. Trade, Transportation, and Utilities: Superior's strategic location as an access point to Great Lakes shipping, rail, and highway infrastructure creates robust demand for roles in these sectors. The existing workforce has a strong foundation in these areas, and opportunities exist at various skill levels, including logistics, driving (CDL-A truck drivers), and equipment operation. Manufacturing and Energy: The city, known as the "Energy Capital of Wisconsin," is home to companies like AMSOIL, Exodus Global, and FeraDyne Outdoors. This industry relies on both skilled trades and engineering expertise. There is an ongoing need for a highly skilled workforce, a gap that is often addressed through registered apprenticeships that combine on-the-job training with classroom learning. Education and Health Services: This is one of the fastest-growing sectors statewide. While there are many opportunities, especially in specialized medical and educational roles (e.g., Nurse Practitioners, Mental Health Therapists), many of these positions require specific degrees and certifications. The challenge here may be having enough workers with the necessary higher education to fill these specialized roles. Low-Skill/Entry-Level Jobs: Numerous openings in the leisure and hospitality, personal care, and retail sectors often require only a high school diploma and offer on-the-job training Gaps identified 1. Evolving Job Market: The demands of modern industries are changing rapidly, and education systems are struggling to keep pace with evolving needs. 2. Job Polarization: Growth is concentrated in highly skilled jobs requiring advanced degrees (e.g., Computer and Mathematical occupations, Engineers) and low-skill jobs. The potential mismatch means there may be more openings at the low end than available workers, and potentially not enough jobs at the highest end for individuals with graduate degrees. Local Initiatives addressing workforce needs/training: [20260505R 145] • Northwood Technical College: Through a Workforce Innovation Grant, the college is focusing on creating a pipeline of trained workers for the manufacturing sector with programs in mechatronics and plastic injection molding. • Workforce Resources, Inc: Provides youth employment and training services to residents of Superior. The Northwest Wisconsin Workforce Investment Board offers resources and services to the region. Personalized career planning, access to training programs for skill enhancement, and job placement assistance are some of the services NWWIB offers. Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? Yes If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth. The City of Superior participates in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy led by the Northwest Regional Planning Commission. Key initiatives from the plan that the City is undertaking include expansion of broadband access, particularly for LMI residents, other infrastructure investments, workforce housing initiatives, workforce development through life skills training and educational opportunities, and services to meet the needs of underserved residents. Not all of these initiatives will be funded with CDBG dollars, though support and resources will benefit all of the initiatives listed above. Discussion Superior, WI, has ongoing workforce development needs. These needs revolve around connecting job seekers with employers, providing training and upskilling opportunities, and addressing specific industry demands. [20260505R 146] MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") To assist communities in identifying racially/ethnically-concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), HUD has developed a census tract-based definition of R/ECAPs. The definition involves a racial/ethnic concentration threshold and a poverty test. The racial/ethnic concentration threshold is straightforward: R/ECAPs must have a non-white population of 50 percent or more. Regarding the poverty threshold, HUD defines neighborhoods of extreme poverty as census tracts with 40 percent or more individuals living at or below the poverty line. HUD supplements this with an alternate criterion because overall poverty levels are substantially lower in many parts of the country. Thus, a neighborhood can be a R/ECAP if it has a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan/micropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower. Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") The City of Superior does not have a HUD-identified R/ECAP. This area has no specific area in Superior with a significant concentration of low-income households who are racial or ethnic minorities. What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? With fewer employment opportunities and limited access to public transportation in Superior, residents have limited options for getting to and/or keeping jobs. The City’s low- and moderate-income neighborhoods are also characterized by low-density single-family homes with few neighborhood-level commercial or other service activities (medical offices, grocery stores). Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? Recreational facilities, like parks, have (or will) undergone upgrades and improvements during both the previous and current CP cycle. Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? The City will work to identify opportunities to access tax credit funding for revitalization and affordable housing construction. There is strong potential to expand access to critical resources. Staff will continue to explore connectivity to services as a priority. [20260505R 147] Housing rehabilitation in these areas, through CDBG funding, can have a continued impact, along with targeted facility and infrastructure improvements, including increased access to broadband. [20260505R 148] MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods. Broadband access in communities helps provide economic growth, improved educational opportunities, access to better healthcare, greater employment opportunities, improving public safety, and increased global competitiveness for businesses. The term broadband commonly refers to high-speed Internet access that is always on and faster than traditional dial-up access. Broadband includes several high-speed transmission technologies such as digital subscriber line (DSL), cable modem, fiber, wireless, satellite, and broadband over powerlines (BPL). Research among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries shows that a 4 Mbps increase in household broadband speed is associated with a roughly 4 percent increase in household income. Research shows that businesses who begin utilizing broadband increase their employees' labor productivity by an average of 5 percent in the manufacturing sector and 10 percent in the services sector. The current standard for broadband in the U.S. is internet with a 25 Mbps (Megabits per second) download speed. Though Netflix says it needs only 5 Mbps to stream video, the 25 Mbps threshold is intended to satisfy the different needs; high-quality downloads, video communication, and multiple demands of a single household's network. However, many Americans are still unable to access broadband at the speeds necessary to make full use of its benefits. HUD is actively working to bridge the digital divide in low-income communities served by HUD by providing help with the expansion of broadband infrastructure to low- and moderate-income communities. In December 2017, HUD published the final rule, "Narrowing the Digital Divide Through Installation of Broadband Infrastructure in HUD-Funded New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation of Multifamily Rental Housing." The final ruling requires installing broadband infrastructure at the time of new construction or substantial rehabilitation of multifamily rental housing funded or supported by HUD. Additionally, CDBG entitlement communities must analyze the needs of the broadband for housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households. The City of Superior has made significant fiber broadband "backbone" investment in recent years. This serves as a starting point to provide all Superior residents with access to above-industry-standard, affordable, and reliable high-speed connectivity options. There are currently north-end neighborhoods lacking these options. As an area with a significant LMI population, the City will focus on these and other LMI areas for additional investment, ensuring access to quality, reliable, fast internet to as many [20260505R 149] residents as possible. Investment with CDBG for neighborhood improvement activities is key to this success. Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction. The City of Superior is committed to narrowing the digital divide for all residents. A large investment with ARPA SLFRF funding allowed the City to undertake a fiber optic internet pilot project in the core of the city. The city is working to expand on the pilot projects success. While the fiber backbone is available through much of Superior's core business and surrounding residential area, there is a significant need to push this resource out to parts of the community with challenges due to cost and access. The City of Superior has completed a low-level citywide fiber-optic design and rollout plan. The City owns the backbone and extension lines and provides low wholesale pricing to providers. Providers have an incentive to keep prices low due to competition in the market. As access continues to expand, residents will see retail pricing starting in the $30-$35 range for exceptional quality, high-speed internet. By continuing to expand citywide, with a current focus on LMI microneighborhoods, the City will help to ensure lower costs for a higher-quality internet product than is currently available in these areas. Expansion may also help to keep downward price pressure on monthly rates for residential and business customers. Benefits of Increased Competition: · Price Competition: Additional providers beyond the current primary resources would help maintain competitive pricing for basic, quality services that LMI households need · Service Quality: Competition drives improvements in customer service, reliability, and technical support · Innovation: The City of Superior has a plan to expand fiber networks throughout the city. By owning the backbone, the city minimizes risk for providers and helps increase competition and choice · Consumer Choice: Different providers offer varying service packages, allowing households to select options that best fit their needs and budgets Infrastructure Development Needs: · Fiber Network Expansion: Additional fiber infrastructure will enhance competition and provide higher-speed options throughout the city [20260505R 150] MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change. The city of Superior faces significant climate change hazards, including increased flooding, extreme heat, fluctuating Lake Superior water levels, and wildfires. The Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (WICCI) and other state and federal agencies predict these risks will intensify over the coming decades. Flooding Superior is highly vulnerable to flooding due to heavier, more frequent precipitation events. • Intense rain: Changing precipitation patterns mean more water is delivered in shorter, more intense periods, overwhelming stormwater infrastructure. • Stormwater runoff: Intense runoff carries more pollutants and can cause combined sewer overflows and basement sewage backups. • Groundwater flooding: Permeable soils around lake shorelines and wetlands are especially susceptible to groundwater rising above the surface after heavy rains. • Infrastructure damage: Increased flooding poses a threat to roads, bridges, and other critical infrastructure. Great Lakes impacts As a major port city on Lake Superior, Superior is significantly impacted by the effects of climate change on the lake itself. • Extreme water levels: Climate change is expected to cause more pronounced fluctuations in Lake Superior's water levels, resulting in higher highs and lower lows. • High lake levels worsen coastal flooding, erosion, and shoreline bluff failure, damaging infrastructure.Low lake levels can obstruct navigation in ports and harbors, potentially exposing submerged infrastructure. • Reduced ice cover: Lake Superior's ice cover is forming later and melting sooner. Less ice increases wave energy, which contributes to greater coastal erosion. • Water quality and ecosystems: Warmer lake water temperatures and more polluted runoff from heavy rain increase the risk of harmful algal blooms. These changes also stress native cold-water fish populations. Extreme heat While often associated with heatwaves in urban centers, extreme heat is also a risk for Superior. [20260505R 151] • Hotter days: The number of extremely hot days (above 90°F) is projected to increase significantly in Wisconsin. • Health risks: Extreme heat poses public health threats, increasing the risk of heatstroke and exacerbating chronic conditions like cardiovascular disease and asthma. Wildfire The risk of wildfire in and around Douglas County is expected to increase due to hotter, drier conditions. • Drier conditions: Rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns create conditions where soil and vegetation dry out more quickly. • Smoke and air quality: Wildfire smoke can affect air quality in the region, posing health risks from fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which is damaging to the respiratory and circulatory systems. Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods. From the City of Superior All-Hazard Mitigation Plan update of 2020. Populations that are particularly susceptible to illness, injury, and death from extreme temperatures include the elderly, low-income persons (affordability of sufficient heating or cooling), young children, the sick, overweight, and/or people with alcohol problems, and men in general. Typically, victims have been overexposed to heat or have overexercised for their age and physical condition. Excessive heat also puts strain on a person’s respiratory and cardiovascular system, particularly impacting toddlers and the elderly. Low-income people can be more vulnerable to natural disasters due to factors such as the type of residence, building construction, and social exclusion. Additionally, people with low incomes are more likely to reside in substandard housing. Manufactured and modular homes are more likely to sustain significant damage from high winds or a flood than other types of housing. See Charts and Graphs from the Superior Plan, WI Department of Natural Resources, and additional information from the Wisconsin Initiative for Climate Change below. [20260505R 152] Estimated Number of Households Flood Prone Areas [20260505R 153] Vulnerable Housing Map WICCI For Superior, Wisconsin, future temperature estimates project a warmer climate, particularly in winter, with more frequent and intense heatwaves and fewer extremely cold days. These changes are influenced by the warming trend observed in the Great Lakes region and Lake Superior itself. Long-term trends by mid-century (around 2050) Based on data from the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (WICCI), Superior can expect the following trends: • Annual average temperature: An increase of several degrees is projected for northwestern Wisconsin. By mid-century, the region's average daily temperature is expected to be about 6°F warmer. • Winter warming: The most significant warming will continue to be in the winter. Average winter temperatures are projected to increase by 5–11°F by 2050, resulting in milder winters and less snow. • Extreme heat: Days with temperatures above 90°F are expected to become more frequent. • Warm nights: The number of nights with minimum temperatures above 70°F will increase, reducing the cooling relief that normally follows a hot day. [20260505R 154] • Extreme cold: The number of extremely cold days with temperatures below 32°F is likely to decrease significantly. Lake Superior's influence The temperature of Lake Superior has a major impact on the local climate in Superior and the surrounding region. • Rapidly warming lake: As one of the fastest-warming lakes in the world, Lake Superior's surface temperature has been increasing significantly. • Reduced ice cover: Winter is warming faster than any other season in the Great Lakes region, causing a steady and significant decline in lake ice cover. • New "climate era": Research indicates the Great Lakes have entered a new era with more extreme heatwaves and cold snaps, though heat intensity has more significantly increased in Lake Superior. • Summary of impacts • These temperature shifts will likely have several impacts on the Superior area: • Less snow and ice: Warmer winters and less ice cover will disrupt winter recreation, ecosystems, and transportation. • Ecosystem shifts: Warming lake waters and temperatures are expected to cause changes in fish populations and habitats for cold-weather species. • Increased heat stress: More extreme heat poses health risks for people and can increase energy demands. WICCI studies estimate that within 60 years summers will be 13.5 degrees warmer and 14.9% drier, while winters will be 13.8 degrees warmer and 18.2% wetter. [20260505R 155] Rainfall Projections [20260505R 156] Strategic Plan SP-05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview The Strategic Plan serves as a planning document that outlines the anticipated resources over the course of 5-years from CDBG entitlement funding, program income, and other sources. Additionally, a series of goals is described, illuminating how the City will prioritize available financial resources, geographic priorities, and expected outcomes. Priorities and goals were determined through analysis of multiple data sources: • Comprehensive community surveys and meetings • Interview and consultation with area stakeholders • Staff recommendations • Results of previous monitoring of subrecipients • HUD Annual Homeless Assessment Report • HUD Worst Case Housing Needs • Policy Map, Community Profile • HUD Community Resiliency Kit • Community Housing Assessment Strategy (CHAS) data • American Housing Survey (AHS) data • American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates [20260505R 157] SP-10 Geographic Priorities - 91.215(a)(1) Geographic Area Table 45 - Geographic Priority Areas 1 Area Name: City-wide Area Type: The entire City of Superior Other Target Area Description: The entire City of Superior HUD Approval Date: % of Low/ Mod: Revital Type: Other Revital Description: Identify the neighborhood boundaries for this target area. Include specific housing and commercial characteristics of this target area. How did your consultation and citizen participation process help you to identify this neighborhood as a target area? Identify the needs in this target area. What are the opportunities for improvement in this target area? Are there barriers to improvement in this target area? General Allocation Priorities Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the state The City did not identify a geographic target area as a basis for funding allocation priorities. Goals are not limited to a specific area within Superior. [20260505R 158] SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2) Priority Needs Table 46 – Priority Needs Summary 1 Priority Need Name Provide Decent Housing Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Middle Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally Ill Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non-housing Community Development Geographic Areas Affected The entire City of Superior Associated Goals Administration and Planning Public Services Housing [20260505R 159] Description A decent place to live removes the barriers to opportunity, success, and health that have been part of a family's life for years, if not generations. Creating safe and decent places to live can have incredibly positive effects on a family's health, students' study habits, and a neighborhood's overall attractiveness and stability. Decent housing includes a spectrum of solutions: new construction, repair and renovation, housing finance, infrastructure development, and secure land tenure, among others. Basis for Relative Priority Providing people with a range of housing choices has many positive aspects – both for the community in general and for individual families. As individuals and families move from one stage of life to the next, various housing types enable them to live in a place that suits their needs while allowing them to reside in the same community, keeping those ties and staying close to family members if they desire. 2 Priority Need Name Create A Suitable Living Environment Priority Level High [20260505R 160] Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Middle Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally Ill Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non-housing Community Development Geographic Areas Affected The entire City of Superior Associated Goals Administration and Planning Public Services Housing Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Description Create a Suitable Living Environment A good living environment is essential for good quality of life. A functional and sound living environment allows different people to lead their daily lives and fulfill their basic needs: living, services, working, recreation, hobbies, rest, and privacy. [20260505R 161] Basis for Relative Priority Jobs, family income, transportation costs, and housing are intricately connected. New research has shown that stable families, communities, and housing positively impact economic vitality. Providing opportunities for workers to live in the city where they work positively affects in-commuting and reduces transportation costs. 3 Priority Need Name Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Middle Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally Ill Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Geographic Areas Affected The entire City of Superior [20260505R 162] Associated Goals Administration and Planning Public Services Housing Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Description Expanding opportunities to low- and moderate-income persons helps to foster local economic development, neighborhood improvement, and individual self- sufficiency. Basis for Relative Priority Expanding opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents helps residents become financially stable and remain in safe and stable housing. Narrative (Optional) The City of Superior seeks to encourage viable community development by promoting integrated approaches that provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income persons. The primary means towards this end is the development of partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, including for-profit and non-profit organizations. Housing and community development are not viewed as separate programs, but rather as the various elements that comprise a comprehensive vision of community development. Needs were identified to align with HUD CDBG objectives. The listed needs cover each of the critical areas identified by community stakeholders. This narrative section, although optional, helps to frame the goals and projects outlined elsewhere in this plan. Discreet activities are identified once the plan is approved and are a function of the reporting side of IDIS. Needs identified correlate directly to goals identified elsewhere in the following way: Provide Decent Housing The need for decent, affordable housing is the focus of the housing goal, as well as public services. The City of Superior will collaborate with stakeholders to identify opportunities for developing, building, and preserving affordable housing, and provide supportive services to reduce housing insecurity among the most vulnerable city residents. Create a Suitable Living Environment [20260505R 163] This need will be addressed by both the public service, housing, and public facility/neighborhood improvement goals. The city is working with community stakeholders to identify critical, unmet public service needs; identify opportunities to help LMI residents stay in their homes through housing rehab, thereby preserving affordable housing; and undertake infrastructure and facility improvements to create a more suitable living environment for Superior's LMI residents. Expand Opportunities for LMI Persons This need, in the short term, will be addressed by increasing access to facilities and infrastructure improvements. The City of Superior is working to leverage funds for a city-wide broadband initiative, currently focused on improving access in underserved, low-income areas, as well as other facility and infrastructure improvements that will enable improved access and service delivery opportunities for low-income residents of Superior. Planning and Administration are considered to support each need, goal, and project outlined in this Consolidated Plan. [20260505R 164] SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions - 91.215 (b) Influence of Market Conditions Affordable Housing Type Market Characteristics that will influence the use of funds available for housing type Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) The City of Superior acknowledges the high need for decent, affordable housing. However, the city does not receive a HOME allocation and does not have a TBRA program. TBRA for Non- Homeless Special Needs The City of Superior acknowledges the high need for decent, affordable housing and programs to support homeless special needs residents. The City does not receive a HOME allocation and does not have a TBRA program. New Unit Production Rehabilitation Acquisition, including preservation Table 47 – Influence of Market Conditions [20260505R 165] SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction Anticipated resources are based on first year Consolidated Plan funding and may vary due to actual allocation of resources and program income. Anticipated Resources Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Reminder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG public - federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services 650,634 0 459,492 1,110,126 2,602,536 The City of Superior will receive $650,634 in CDBG funding for PY26 and have $459,492 reallocated in the first year of this CP cycle. The estimate for the remaining 4 years is $2,602,536. This is four times the first year allocation. Table 48 - Anticipated Resources [20260505R 166] Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City of Superior does not receive funding from additional HUD programs that may require a match, including HOME, HOPWA, or ESG. The projects outlined in the Strategic Plan, implemented by outside agencies, are anticipated to use CDBG funding to leverage their initial financial resources. Subrecipients must report on any project match, and those resources are captured in reports submitted to HUD. Projects with firm financial commitments, including leveraged dollars, will have priority over those with pending, tentative, or speculative commitments. If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan Publicly owned lands have not yet been identified to help address the needs of this plan. The City of Superior will continue to explore opportunities to access viable public lands whenever possible, helping to address critical needs identified in this 5-year Consolidated Plan. Discussion The City expects partners to leverage CDBG funding to the fullest extent possible to implement robust programs that will further meet the needs of area residents. [20260505R 167] SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure - 91.215(k) Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions. Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Type Role Geographic Area Served SUPERIOR Government Economic Development Homelessness Non-homeless special needs Ownership Planning Rental neighborhood improvements public facilities public services Jurisdiction Table 49 - Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Superior has various service providers who provide targeted assistance and mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to homeless persons and persons with HIV. Area non-profits help provide public service activities that improve the lives of low- and moderate- income residents. The City may administer HUD CDBG programs both internally and working with external subrecipients. Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Community Targeted to Homeless Targeted to People with HIV Homelessness Prevention Services Counseling/Advocacy X X X Legal Assistance X X Mortgage Assistance X Rental Assistance X X Utilities Assistance X X Street Outreach Services Law Enforcement X X Mobile Clinics [20260505R 168] Street Outreach Services Other Street Outreach Services X X X Supportive Services Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X Child Care X Education X Employment and Employment Training X Healthcare X X HIV/AIDS X X X Life Skills X Mental Health Counseling X X Transportation X Other Table 50 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) Significant local homeless coalition resources are available in Superior through the Wisconsin Balance of State CoC - Northwest. The Northwest Local Homeless Coalition serves residents in Ashland, Bayfield, Douglas, Iron, and Price counties to help them access housing providers and resources to end, shorten, or prevent homeless Through a designated CoC entry lead, resources are made available region-wide, including referrals for each vulnerable population identified above. Resources also include access to outreach staff that are able to assist with care coordination, direct services, and targeted support. Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above Superior offers an excellent variety of services to all community members, especially beneficial to the populations targeted by the CDBG program, special-needs residents, and persons experiencing homelessness. The most significant gap is in case management and service provision. Limited funds are available to address this critical need and are provided mainly through area foundations and other grants, as the CDBG allocation for public services is minimal. The community also needs more permanent supportive housing options to provide stable housing for special-needs populations. [20260505R 169] Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs To overcome gaps in the system, the City of Superior will continue to provide opportunities for public, private, and governmental organizations to come together to share information, advocate for issues of concern, leverage resources to make projects happen, address barriers to implementing activities, and coordinate efforts. Funding gaps will exist. The City will continue to search for additional funding, leverage resources, and efficiently administer programs. Likewise, increased coordination between providers can lead to more efficient program management. [20260505R 170] SP-45 Goals - 91.215(a)(4) Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 Administration and Planning 2026 2030 Affordable Housing Public Housing Homeless Non- Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development City-wide Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $650,630 Other: 5 Other 2 Public Services 2026 2030 Affordable Housing Homeless Non- Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development City-wide Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $450,000 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 5550 Persons Assisted Public service activities for Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 60 Households Assisted [20260505R 171] Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 3 Housing 2026 2030 Affordable Housing Public Housing Non- Homeless Special Needs City-wide Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $500,000 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 14 Household Housing Unit 4 Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements 2026 2030 Non-Housing Community Development City-wide Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $2,112,032 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 7950 Persons Assisted Table 51 – Goals Summary Goal Descriptions [20260505R 172] 1 Goal Name Administration and Planning Goal Description General Administrative funds will pay reasonable program administrative costs and carrying charges related to planning and executing community development activities. Administering federal funds and ensuring compliance is critical for utilizing Federal resources. The City of Superior is committed to using CDBG entitlement funding for administration to help continue growing an efficient, effective, and resourceful community development program. Superior may have administration projects that include, but are not limited to: • General management, oversight, and coordination • Providing local officials and citizens with information about the CDBG program • Preparing budgets and schedules • Preparing reports and other HUD-required documents • Program planning • Public Information • Monitoring program activities • Fair Housing activities • Indirect costs • Submission of applications for Federal programs [20260505R 173] 2 Goal Name Public Services Goal Description Public services are an integral part of a comprehensive community development strategy. Public Service activities provide a wide range of services that address community needs and are provided to the target population. Public services can strengthen communities by addressing the needs of specific populations. They can address individual needs and increase the impact of CDBG dollars by complementing other activities. The City of Superior may allocate up to 15% of CDBG funds to public services programs that provide supportive services to low- to moderate-income persons or prevent homelessness. In general, these services are provided by local non-profit partners. This funding is capped at 15% of the CDBG entitlement plus program income. Superior's goal to improve and provide public services may include, but is not limited to: • Child care • Health services • Substance use services • Fair housing activities • Education programs • Services for homeless persons • Services for seniors • Services for youth • Assistance with rent and/or utilities [20260505R 174] 3 Goal Name Housing Goal Description The City prioritized goals and objectives for using CDBG funding to strategically and effectively benefit low- and moderate-income residents by increasing access to decent housing and creating a suitable living environment while expanding economic opportunities for LMI persons. Superior is committed to improving and expanding access to safe and affordable housing for low- and moderate-income (LMI) residents. Affordable and safe housing helps to provide financial stability, reduces the chances of a person becoming homeless, and promotes housing sustainability. Superior's projects to improve housing sustainability may include, but are not limited to: • Rehabilitation (single-unit residential and/or multi-family residential) • The administrative cost for rehabilitation activities • Lead-based paint testing/abatement • Housing Counseling • Homeownership Housing Development and Construction [20260505R 175] 4 Goal Name Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Goal Description Neighborhood Improvements will focus on safe and accessible infrastructure essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. Public infrastructure improvements will generally include the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and installation of public infrastructure. Superior’s goal to improve and expand public infrastructure may include, but is not limited to: • ADA Improvements • Sidewalks • Curb cuts • Park and Open Space Improvements Public Facilities and Improvements are publicly-owned facilities and infrastructure such as streets, playgrounds, underground utilities, and buildings owned by nonprofits open to the general public. Safe and accessible infrastructure is essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. Public facilities and public improvements are generally interpreted to include all facilities and improvements that are publicly owned or owned by a nonprofit and open to the general public. Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and installation of public facilities and improvements are eligible activities. Superior's goal to improve and expand public facilities may include, but is not limited to: • Senior Centers • Homeless and Domestic Violence Facilities • Neighborhood Facilities • Health Facilities Narrowing the digital divide by increasing access to high-speed fiber-optic internet is a key initiative for the City of Superior. This will benefit LMI residents, and critical public service providers and key public facilities. Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2) The City of Superior does not receive a direct allocation of HOME funds. All activities undertaken by the City of Superior are designed to benefit Low-Moderate Income residents. [20260505R 176] SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement - 91.215(c) Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a federal law, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 794, that prohibits discrimination based on disability in federally-assisted programs or activities. Specifically, Section 504 states, "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States. . .shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program, service or activity receiving federal financial assistance or under any program or activity conducted by any Executive agency or by the United States Postal Service." This means that Section 504 prohibits discrimination based on disability in any program or activity that receives financial assistance from any federal agency, including HUD, as well as in programs conducted by federal agencies, including HUD. An individual with a disability is any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. The term physical or mental impairment may include, but is not limited to, conditions such as visual or hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection, developmental disabilities, drug addiction, or mental illness. In general, the definition of "person with disabilities" does not include current users of illegal controlled substances. However, individuals would be protected under Section 504 (as well as the ADA) if the purpose of the specific program or activity is to provide health or rehabilitation services to such individuals. The term major life activity may include, for example, seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks, caring for one's self, learning, speaking, or working. This list is not exhaustive. Section 504 also protects persons with a record of such impairment or who are regarded as having such an impairment. Superior Housing Authority (SHA) does not have a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement. Activities to Increase Resident Involvements The Superior Housing Authority (SHA) has a resident council that serves as a forum for residents to advocate for themselves and negotiate with the housing authority on community concerns such as safety and maintenance. Residents who are in good standing and on the lease are eligible to run for the council, which is a democratically elected group that provides residents a unified voice on policies and programs affecting them. Supportive services offered by SHA include: • Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS): For families in the Public Housing or HCV programs, the FSS program provides case management to help participants set and achieve goals like education, job readiness, and career advancement. [20260505R 177] • Financial Education: Residents can access resources to increase financial literacy. Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902? No Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation N/A [20260505R 178] SP-55 Strategic Plan Barriers to Affordable Housing - 91.215(h) Barriers to Affordable Housing Public policies, such as a lack of funding, pose significant challenges to the development of affordable housing in Superior. Superior’s affordable housing efforts are further constrained by the lack of state and federal funding sources. Rising costs across the region exacerbate these issues, making it challenging to produce affordable housing at the speed and scale needed to meet local demand. Together, these barriers contribute to a growing shortage of affordable units for Superior’s low- and moderate-income households. Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing Although federal policies play an important role in influencing the availability of affordable housing the supply of affordable housing depends less on federal policies than on local planning practices, policies, and community engagement. Many local planning procedures currently in place enable community opposition that stalls housing production. Reshaping local regulations allows jurisdictions to make a lasting impact on the supply of affordable housing. According to Brian Montgomery, former Federal Housing Administration commissioner and assistant secretary for housing, constraints on housing not only reduce the supply of affordable housing but also increase the number of households that are cost-burdened, spending more than 30 percent of their income on rent. Land-use policies and zoning regulations constrain the supply of affordable housing. Density limits, height restrictions, parking requirements, lengthy permitting and approval processes, and community opposition all contribute to increased housing prices. HUD, PD&R Edge, "Regulatory Barriers and Affordable Housing Quarterly Update" The City of Superior seeks to foster an environment of opportunity, innovation, and sustainability in the housing market by planning for and supporting housing options that help increase the HOI while protecting property rights. [20260505R 179] SP-60 Homelessness Strategy - 91.215(d) Describe how the jurisdiction's strategic plan goals contribute to: Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The City will work with the state Continuum of Care through local partner, Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency Inc., in reaching the local homeless population and assessing their needs. The City remains committed to helping residents maintain stable housing and assisting individuals who are already experiencing homelessness to transition into housing. The City of Superior also provides outreach/co-response services through Coordinated Response Specialists housed with the Superior Police Department. Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Following stakeholder consultation, the city has identified a need for additional year-round emergency shelter and transitional housing as a priority, including Permanent Supportive and Transitional Housing for residents with behavioral health needs and DV victims. The City will continue to support PSH case management and opportunities to expand beds/units/rooms for TH and PSH support and development. The city has provided substantial support for shelter and TH needs outside of HUD funds and will continue to explore options for further partnerships. Immediate access to safe shelter is a critical—and often life-saving—component of a comprehensive homelessness response system. When households experience a housing crisis, especially in extreme weather or dangerous situations, emergency shelter provides essential protection from harm. The demand for short-term shelter is closely tied to a community’s effectiveness in preventing homelessness and rapidly rehousing individuals and families who do become homeless. However, gaps remain— particularly in the availability of shelter beds for survivors of domestic violence and residents facing behavioral health challenges, who face unique concerns and may require confidential, special care shelter options. Expanding emergency shelter capacity, including dedicated DV and crisis shelter beds, is essential to ensuring that all individuals in distress have a safe place to stay while working toward stable housing. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again. [20260505R 180] The 2026-2030 Consolidated Plan prioritizes helping homeless individuals transition to permanent housing. Local partners have experience implementing successful homeless assistance programs, and we will continue to work to identify opportunities to support housing stability for individuals and families in Superior. Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education or youth needs Homeless and prevention services are a key part of the City of Superior's public services funding. Coordination with the CoC, CASDA, and NWCSA helps to ensure that the limited public service funding available is targeted to priority vulnerable populations. Coordination with city outreach staff also assists in coordinating care/services for populations exiting other facilities. Referrals, direct services, ongoing support, and case management are key components to success. [20260505R 181] SP-65 Lead-based Paint Hazards - 91.215(i) Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards Lead poisoning is the most significant and prevalent disease of environmental origin among children living in the United States. Lead exposures remain prevalent despite considerable knowledge and increased screening and intervention efforts. Environmental lead is a toxic substance that affects the growth and development of up to one million U.S. preschool children today, with effects ranging from learning disabilities to death. High levels of lead can cause many health problems by damaging the brain, nervous system, and kidneys. Lead poisoning can cause decreased intelligence, behavioral and speech problems, anemia, decreased muscle and bone growth, poor muscle coordination, and hearing damage. Increased lead exposure and increased body burden of lead remain a significant problem for children in the United States. Lead is an environmental toxicant that may cause adverse health effects to the nervous, hematopoietic, endocrine, renal, and reproductive systems. Lead exposure in young children is particularly hazardous because children absorb lead more readily than adults. Many children exposed to lead do not exhibit any signs that they have the disease. Any signs or symptoms the child may have could be mistaken for other illnesses, and the child goes undiagnosed. Children's developing nervous system is particularly susceptible to the effects of lead. The underdeveloped blood-brain barrier in young children increases the risk of lead entering the developing nervous system resulting in neurobehavioral disorders. Blood lead levels (BLLs), at any detectable level, have been shown to cause behavioral and developmental disorders. Therefore, no safe blood lead level in children has been identified. It is increasingly important for continued childhood lead poisoning prevention education and awareness. Lead-contaminated water, soil, and paint are potential sources of children's lead exposure. Dust from deteriorating lead-based paint is considered to be the largest contributor to the lead problem. Until the 1950s, many homes were covered inside and out with leaded paints. Lead began to fall from favor in the 1950s but was still commonly used until it was banned from use in homes after 1977. Because of the long-term use of lead-based paints, many homes in the United States contain paint surfaces that are now peeling, chalking, flaking, or wearing away. The dust or paint chips contain high levels of lead that easily find ways into the mouths of young children. A particular problem has emerged due to a large number of homes with lead-based paints, which are now undergoing renovations. Often the dust created by this work has high lead levels, which are readily absorbed by the children's developing bodies. The City of Superior will continue to fund a housing rehabilitation program during this CP cycle. By providing rehab funding to LMI Superior residents, the city will support housing stock preservation for vulnerable households. Superior and subrecipients will work with qualified contractors to provide rehab in pre-1978 homes as part of this project. The city, subrecipients and contractors will utilize the LSHR Toolkit forms and guidance to ensure all lead hazards related to rehabilitation are properly addressed. This project will assist in addressing lead hazards in homes assisted. [20260505R 182] The city/subrecipient will work with partners and trade groups to encourage contractors to become RRP certified to complete work and reduce LBP hazards. This will benefit not just those enrolled in any HUD funded rehab activities, but all homeowners a contractor may work with. How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? For this plan's purposes, the number of units built before 1980 occupied by households serves as the baseline of units that contain lead-based paint hazards. Superior has a significant amount of housing built prior to 1980 that may contain lead-based hazards. • 61% of all units are owner-occupied housing per the 2023 data • 78.1% of all housing units in Superior were built before 1980 • 62% of housing units were built before 1970 and are at high risk of lead-based paint hazards. The average age of the housing stock in Superior is 1957. Nationwide, the average age of housing stock is 1980. How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? Since the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development issued Title X in 1992 to protect young children and families from lead-based paint hazards, the City of Superior has taken steps to ensure its regulations are in compliance. Program procedures and documents will include additional steps for providing notification, identifying lead hazards, performing lead hazard reduction, using safe work practices, and achieving clearance. [20260505R 183] SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy - 91.215(j) Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families The needs, goals, and projects outlined in the Consolidated Plan work together to help reduce poverty. While poverty is a function of factors (many of which are) beyond the control of City policies, providing Superior residents with affordable, quality housing in economically diverse neighborhoods can foster economic mobility and soften the impact of poverty. How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan The 2026-2030 Consolidated Plan has goals designed to help address and reduce poverty in Superior. The goals outlined in the Consolidated Plan are focused solely on helping improve the lives of low- and moderate-income residents. Goal: Housing Improving and preserving the existing house stock is key to increasing the number of affordable housing units in Superior. The City will help ensure that low- to moderate-income residents have safe and livable housing. Housing rehabilitation projects ensure that residents most at risk of having deferred home maintenance and unsafe living environments can remain in their homes. Superior is committed to improving and increasing access to safe and affordable housing for low- and moderate-income (LMI) residents. Affordable and safe housing helps provide financial stability, reduces the chances of a person becoming homeless, and promotes sustainability of housing. Goal: Public Services The City will work to utilize CDBG funds for public service. Projects will help low- to moderate-income residents with key community services. These projects may vary over the course of the consolidated plan. Still, the focus will remain on ensuring that low- and moderate-income residents have the support they need to ensure their safety, access to affordable housing, and increased access to economic improvements. Public services are an integral part of a comprehensive community development strategy. Public Service activities provide a wide range of activities that address needs in the community provided for the target population. In general, these services are provided by local non-profit partners. This funding is capped at 15% of the CDBG entitlement. [20260505R 184] Goal: Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Public Infrastructure Improvements will focus on safe and accessible infrastructure and narrowing the digital divide, as these initiatives are essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. In general, public infrastructure improvements may include acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and installation of public infrastructure and facilities. [20260505R 185] SP-80 Monitoring - 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements The City of Superior will work closely with HUD to ensure that all statutory requirements are being met and that information being reported in the City's CAPER is accurate and complete. Additionally, the City will participate in online and on-site HUD training regularly. Monitoring is an ongoing, two-way communication process between the City and recipients. The goal of monitoring is to encourage the completion of projects within the contract period while ensuring that project objectives are met. Successful monitoring involves frequent telephone contacts, written communications, analysis of reports and audits, and periodic meetings. Monitoring is the principal means by which the City: • Ensures that HUD-funded programs and technical areas are carried out efficiently, effectively, and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations • Assists subrecipients in improving their performance, developing or increasing capacity, and augmenting their management and technical skills • Stays abreast of the efficacy and technical areas of HUD CDBG programs. • Documents the effectiveness of programs administered by the subrecipients. The City performs a risk assessment of subrecipients to identify which subrecipients require comprehensive monitoring. High-risk subrecipients include those that are: • New to the CDBG program; • Experience turnover in key staff positions or change in goals or directions; • Encountering complaints and/or bad press; • Previous compliance or performance problems including failure to meet schedules, submit timely reports, or clear monitoring or audit findings; • Carrying out high-risk activities (economic development, job creation, etc.); • Undertaking multiple CDBG-funded activities for the first time The City and CDBG subrecipients are held accountable to program goals through a range of monitoring and timeliness activities. Monitoring Visits: The City will conduct an annual visit or desk monitoring of all subrecipients. On-site visits may include an on-site interview, inspection of financial and client records relating to the CDBG funding provided, evaluation of the subrecipient's performance, analysis of the strengths and [20260505R 186] weaknesses of the program, assurance that activities comply with the Action Plan, and a report by the subrecipients of any needs, such as technical assistance or areas for program enhancement. Evaluating Performance: Performance is measured against the goals identified in the initial CDBG subrecipient agreement. During the annual monitoring visit, the subrecipient has an opportunity to explain how goals and objectives for the year were achieved or why their goals were not reached. A follow-up letter to each subrecipient concludes the annual monitoring visit process. The letter summarizes the findings of the visit, and a copy is kept on file for reference. Financial Management: Financial management oversight activities are also conducted each time a subrecipient requests reimbursement. City staff will verify that the subrecipient has started their program and is progressing toward their goals before approving a reimbursement request. Subrecipients also must submit the appropriate documentation to be reimbursed. Data Management: The City will update the program and financial information in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) regularly to meet HUD's Timeliness requirements. The City will obtain program information from the monthly or quarterly reports received from the CDBG subrecipients. [20260505R 187] Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction Anticipated resources are based on first year Consolidated Plan funding and may vary due to actual allocation of resources and program income. Anticipated Resources Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Reminder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG public - federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services 650,634.00 0.00 459,492.00 1,110,126.00 2,602,536.00 The City of Superior will receive $650,634 in CDBG funding for PY26 and have $459,492 reallocated in the first year of this CP cycle. The estimate for the remaining 4 years is $2,602,536. This is four times the first year allocation. Table 52 - Expected Resources – Priority Table Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied [20260505R 188] The City of Superior does not receive funding from additional HUD programs that may require a match, including HOME, HOPWA, or ESG. The projects outlined in the Strategic Plan, implemented by outside agencies, are anticipated to use CDBG funding to leverage their initial financial resources. Subrecipients must report on any project match, and those resources are captured in reports submitted to HUD. Projects with firm financial commitments, including leveraged dollars, will have priority over those with pending, tentative, or speculative commitments. [20260505R 189] If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan Publicly owned lands have not yet been identified to help address the needs of this plan. The City of Superior will continue to explore opportunities to access viable public lands whenever possible, helping to address critical needs identified in this 5-year Consolidated Plan. Discussion The City expects partners to leverage CDBG funding to the fullest extent possible to implement robust programs that will further meet the needs of area residents. [20260505R 190] Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 Administration and Planning 2026 2030 Affordable Housing Public Housing Homeless Non- Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development City-wide Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $130,126.00 Other: 1 Other 2 Public Services 2026 2030 Affordable Housing Homeless Non- Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development City-wide Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $90,000.00 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 850 Persons Assisted Public service activities for Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 20 Households Assisted [20260505R 191] Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 3 Housing 2026 2030 Affordable Housing Public Housing Non- Homeless Special Needs City-wide Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $100,000.00 Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 3 Household Housing Unit 4 Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements 2026 2030 Non-Housing Community Development City-wide Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons CDBG: $790,000.00 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 4285 Persons Assisted Table 53 – Goals Summary Goal Descriptions [20260505R 192] 1 Goal Name Administration and Planning Goal Description General Administrative funds will pay reasonable program administrative costs and carrying charges related to planning and executing community development activities. Administering federal funds and ensuring compliance is critical for utilizing Federal resources. The City of Superior is committed to using CDBG entitlement funding for administration to help continue growing an efficient, effective, and resourceful community development program. Superior may have administration projects that include, but are not limited to: • General management, oversight, and coordination • Providing local officials and citizens with information about the CDBG program • Preparing budgets and schedules • Preparing reports and other HUD-required documents • Program planning • Public Information • Monitoring program activities • Fair Housing activities • Indirect costs • Submission of applications for Federal programs [20260505R 193] 2 Goal Name Public Services Goal Description Public services are an integral part of a comprehensive community development strategy. Public Service activities provide a wide range of services that address community needs and are provided to the target population. Public services can strengthen communities by addressing the needs of specific populations. They can address individual needs and increase the impact of CDBG dollars by complementing other activities. The City of Superior may allocate up to 15% of CDBG funds to public services programs that provide supportive services to low- to moderate-income persons or prevent homelessness. In general, these services are provided by local non-profit partners. This funding is capped at 15% of the CDBG entitlement plus program income. Superior's goal to improve and provide public services may include, but is not limited to: • Child care • Health services • Substance use services • Fair housing activities • Education programs • Services for homeless persons • Services for seniors • Services for youth • Assistance with rent and/or utilities [20260505R 194] 3 Goal Name Housing Goal Description The City prioritized goals and objectives for using CDBG funding to strategically and effectively benefit low- and moderate-income residents by increasing access to decent housing and creating a suitable living environment while expanding economic opportunities for LMI persons. Superior is committed to improving and expanding access to safe and affordable housing for low- and moderate-income (LMI) residents. Affordable and safe housing helps to provide financial stability, reduces the chances of a person becoming homeless, and promotes housing sustainability. Superior's projects to improve housing sustainability may include, but are not limited to: • Rehabilitation (single-unit residential and/or multi-family residential) • The administrative cost for rehabilitation activities • Lead-based paint testing/abatement • Housing Counseling • Homeownership Housing Development and Construction [20260505R 195] 4 Goal Name Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Goal Description Neighborhood Improvements will focus on safe and accessible infrastructure essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. Public infrastructure improvements will generally include the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and installation of public infrastructure. Superior’s goal to improve and expand public infrastructure may include, but is not limited to: • ADA Improvements • Sidewalks • Curb cuts • Park and Open Space Improvements Public Facilities and Improvements are publicly-owned facilities and infrastructure such as streets, playgrounds, underground utilities, and buildings owned by nonprofits open to the general public. Safe and accessible infrastructure is essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. Public facilities and public improvements are generally interpreted to include all facilities and improvements that are publicly owned or owned by a nonprofit and open to the general public. Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and installation of public facilities and improvements are eligible activities. Superior's goal to improve and expand public facilities may include, but is not limited to: • Senior Centers • Homeless and Domestic Violence Facilities • Neighborhood Facilities • Health Facilities Narrowing the digital divide by increasing access to high-speed fiber-optic internet is a key initiative for the City of Superior. This will benefit LMI residents, and critical public service providers and key public facilities. [20260505R 196] AP-35 Projects - 91.220(d) Introduction The estimated entitlement allocation for PY26 is $1,110,126. This includes prior-year resources allocated in this AAP and estimated program income (none expected in PY26). The estimated allocation breakdown for PY26 follows: Administration and Planning $130,126 Public Services $90,000 Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements $790,000 Housing Rehabilitation $100,000 Adjustments may be made to address actual funding received and final fund reallocation. # Project Name 1 2026 Administration and Planning 2 2026 Public Services 3 2026 Housing Preservation and Rehabilitation 4 2026 Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Table 54 – Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs The Federal CDBG funds are intended to provide low- and moderate-income households with viable communities, including decent housing, a suitable living environment, and extended economic opportunities. Eligible activities include housing rehabilitation and preservation, homeownership opportunities, public services, community infrastructure improvements, planning, and administration. The system for establishing the priority for the selection of these projects is predicated upon the [20260505R 197] following criteria: • Meeting the statutory requirements of the CDBG program • Meeting the needs of low- and moderate-income residents • Coordination and leveraging of resources • Response to expressed community needs • Sustainability and/or long-term impact, and • The ability to demonstrate measurable progress and success. The limited resources available to address identified priorities are the primary obstacles to meeting the needs of underserved communities. When feasible, the City of Superior will partner with other public agencies and nonprofit organizations to leverage resources and maximize housing and community development outcomes. In the end, however, the need far exceeds the funding available from all sources combined. [20260505R 198] AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information [20260505R 199] 1 Project Name 2026 Administration and Planning Target Area City-wide Goals Supported Administration and Planning Needs Addressed Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons Funding CDBG: $130,126.00 Description The City has planned for administrative services, including technical assistance, fair housing activities, and general administrative services for PY26. These activities are planned to date, and the City may make changes as needed that fit the description of this project. Target Date 12/31/2026 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities All residents in Superior benefit directly or indirectly from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Location Description City of Superior Planned Activities General Administrative funds will provide for payment of reasonable program administrative costs and carrying charges related to the planning and executing community development activities. Administering federal funds and ensuring compliance is critical to utilizing federal resources. The City of Superior is committed to using CDBG entitlement funding for administration to help continue growing a community development program that is efficient, effective, and resourceful. 2 Project Name 2026 Public Services Target Area City-wide Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons Funding CDBG: $90,000.00 [20260505R 200] Description Public services are an integral part of a comprehensive community development strategy. Public Service activities provide a wide range of activities that address needs in the community, provided for the target population. Public services can strengthen communities by addressing the needs of specific populations. They can address various individual needs and increase the CDBG dollars' impact by complementing other activities. The City of Superior may allocate up to 15% of CDBG funds to public services programs that provide supportive services to low- to moderate-income persons or prevent homelessness. In general, these services are provided by local non-profit partners. This funding is capped at 15% of the CDBG entitlement plus program income from the previous year, if any was received. Target Date 12/31/2026 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities City of Superior staff consulted service providers to identify key gaps in priority public services for city residents. The City anticipates that 850 unduplicated individuals will be assisted through public service activities. These include the homeless, DV victims, youth services, disabled residents, and other vulnerable populations. Location Description City of Superior Planned Activities The City anticipates that 1520 unduplicated individuals will be assisted through public service activities. Possible activities include: Youth Services (05D) Homeless Services and Supportive Housing (03T) DV Services (05G) Health Services (05M) Services for Persons with Disabilities (05B) Other eligible activities may be funded. These are the activities planned for PY26 to date, and the City may make changes as needed to fit the description of this project, if additional funding is available, and/or if a planned activity does not move forward. 3 Project Name 2026 Housing Preservation and Rehabilitation Target Area City-wide Goals Supported Housing [20260505R 201] Needs Addressed Provide Decent Housing Create A Suitable Living Environment Funding CDBG: $100,000.00 Description The City prioritized goals and objectives for using CDBG funding to strategically and effectively benefit low- and moderate-income residents by increasing access to decent housing. The City of Superior is committed to improving and expanding access to safe and affordable housing for low- and moderate-income (LMI) residents. Affordable and safe housing helps provide financial stability, reduces the chances of a person becoming homeless, and promotes sustainability of housing. Target Date 12/31/2026 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities The City estimates assisting the following activities; Home Repair Program - 3 homes rehabilitated for LMI residents Location Description City of Superior Planned Activities The City will undertake the following PY 2026 Activities; • Home Rehabilitation Program • Housing Rehabilitation Program Delivery $100,000 is allocated for these and potential other eligible activities. If funding is available, or planned activities do not move forward, other eligible housing activities may be undertaken. 4 Project Name 2026 Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Target Area City-wide Goals Supported Public Facilities and Neighborhood Improvements Needs Addressed Create A Suitable Living Environment Expand Opportunities primarily for LMI Persons Funding CDBG: $790,000.00 [20260505R 202] Description Public Facilities and Infrastructure are publicly-owned facilities and infrastructure such as streets, playgrounds, parks, sidewalks, underground utilities, and buildings owned by nonprofits open to the general public. Safe and accessible infrastructure is essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. Public facilities and public improvements are generally interpreted to include all facilities and improvements that are publicly owned or owned by a nonprofit and open to the general public. Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and installation of public facilities, infrastructure, and improvements are eligible activities. Target Date 12/31/2026 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities The public facility and infrastructure improvements undertaken in PY26 are estimated to benefit more than 4,285 Superior residents throughout the city. Location Description City of Superior Planned Activities Currently planned activities include: Sidewalk Improvements Park Upgrades/Improvements Broadband Infrastructure Improvements If additional funds are available or a planned activity is not viable, funding may be utilized for other eligible activities under this project. All activities will be undertaken in eligible areas and include a clearly defined service boundary and activity description. [20260505R 203] AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The projects in PY 2026 do not emphasize any one geographic area of Elyria. Funds are generally dispersed geographically to have the most significant impact. While some projects may focus on a low-to-moderate-income area (LMA), they are not part of a greater neighborhood plan. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds City-wide 100 Table 55 - Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Current proposed projects/activities are citywide or undertaken in eligible low-mod-areas (sidewalks, park improvements...). There is no preidentified geographic priority included in this plan. Investments are made related to need and potential impact for LMI residents and areas. Discussion All projects supported with CDBG funds are within the Superior city limits. The projects listed in the 2026 Action Plan will benefit low- and moderate-income residents throughout the City of Superior. [20260505R 204] Affordable Housing AP-55 Affordable Housing - 91.220(g) Introduction The City of Superior relies on the CoC, outreach, and other partners to provide key services for homeless residents. Public services are provided through non-profit partners. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 25 Non-Homeless 5 Special-Needs 0 Total 30 Table 56 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 0 Rehab of Existing Units 5 Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Total 5 Table 57 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion The City works with stakeholders, service providers, and community partners to address the critical needs of Superior residents. [20260505R 205] AP-60 Public Housing - 91.220(h) Introduction The Superior Housing Authority (SHA) is a public agency that helps people who meet income and other eligibility guidelines to secure affordable, safe, and quality housing in the city of Superior, WI. The SHA is one of 3,400 public housing authorities operating in the United States. Like other housing authorities, SHA complies with all federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements in the development and operation of our housing programs. SHA manages 466 units of public housing from single-family dwellings to multi-unit developments located in various neighborhoods in the city of Superior. We also administer the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. For private owners, we currently handle the property management of five (5) buildings for seniors, individuals, and families. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing The City of Superior maintains a close working relationship with SHA staff. We will continue to explore opportunities for further cooperation and coordination through PY26. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership The Superior Housing Authority (SHA) has a resident council that serves as a forum for residents to advocate for themselves and negotiate with the housing authority on community concerns such as safety and maintenance. Residents who are in good standing and on the lease are eligible to run for the council, which is a democratically elected group that provides residents a unified voice on policies and programs affecting them. Supportive services offered by SHA include: • Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS): For families in the Public Housing or HCV programs, the FSS program provides case management to help participants set and achieve goals like education, [20260505R 206] job readiness, and career advancement. Financial Education: Residents can access resources to increase financial literacy. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance N/A Discussion Superior Housing Authority reports that housing affordability is the most pressing issue for persons currently on the waiting list. Current public housing residents and Voucher holders continue to struggle with the prospect of housing affordability if they are no longer eligible for HUD programs due to increased income or other circumstances that make them ineligible to participate. Families feel increased stress as they face uncertain housing stability and the rising cost of housing. Also reported is the need for more fully accessible, affordable units. Voucher holders report a need for accommodation at a rate higher than the community-wide rate. The challenges of housing cost burden impact almost all families, regardless of income level. Housing cost burdens impact low- to middle-income families, who face a more significant challenge saving for emergencies and maintaining their homes or saving for homeownership. Households with a high cost burden, especially low- to moderate-income households, are at greater risk of losing their housing. Based on the City's evaluation of the Superior Housing Authority, they have a good history of housing on a first-come, first-served basis, or worst-case need. [20260505R 207] AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities - 91.220(i) Introduction Superior has various public and private agencies that provide services to special needs populations. Groups that require supportive housing include but is not limited to: • The elderly, age 62 and over • Frail Elderly, age 75 years or older • Persons with physical, and/or developmental disabilities • Persons with mental disabilities • Persons with substance abuse issues • Victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking • Persons and families exiting homelessness The City is not eligible to receive other HUD funds, including HOME, ESG, or HOPWA. The Continuum of Care plan funds are distributed with input from stakeholders. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The City of Superior will continue to work with the Continuum of Care, outreach specialists through the Superior Police Department, and local partners to reach the local homeless population and assess their needs. The City remains committed to helping residents maintain stable housing and assisting individuals who are already experiencing homelessness in transitioning into housing. With limited current year-round shelters, addressing this need is a high priority. There are additional shelter beds both in the works and in the planning phase. It is likely to take more than one year to find additional shelter solutions currently under CoC discussion. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Coordinated Entry at the Northwest Wisconsin Community Services Agency serves all individuals in Douglas County including men, women, and children who are looking for shelter. Coordinated Entry works as the access point to find the best shelter or service for individuals based on their unique set of needs and circumstances. Coordinated Entry accepts phone calls, online messages, and walk-ins. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that [20260505R 208] individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The City’s efforts to support the transition of persons experiencing homelessness will be broad and flexible so that service providers can adapt to clients' needs as economic and housing conditions change. This support may include funding: • Creation of affordable rental and ownership housing, • Support for the development of transitional and permanent supportive housing units, • Emergency repairs and rehabilitation to preserve existing affordable housing and improve the housing conditions of existing low-income residents, and Nonprofit organizations provide supportive services to help stabilize residents at risk of and experiencing homelessness. These include, but are not limited to, emergency assistance, job training and skill development, and transportation assistance. The Continuum of Care is a collaborative of multiple service providers, including emergency shelters, transitional housing programs, permanent support housing, and other supportive services to create a network of resources for homeless individuals and families, families with children, and their families, and unaccompanied youth. The Continuum of Care is a funding and planning organization that helps partner communities plan for and provide, as necessary, a full range of emergency, transition, permanent housing, and other resources to address the various needs of homeless persons. The Continuum of Care meets regularly to discuss housing options for those who have completed the coordinated entry process. Using the prioritization list generated by HMIS (Homeless Management Information System), housing options are discussed and arranged. HMIS prioritizes residents based on the chronicity of homelessness and the severity of needs demonstrated through a common assessment tool -the VI-SPDAT (Vulnerability Index-Service Prioritization Assistance Tool). Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs. Diversion Screening is a key part of the Coordinated Entry process. Diversion Screening determines if persons experiencing a housing crisis can be/remain housed or if they absolutely must enter the homeless system. Quality screening helps to reduce needless entries into the homeless system and standardizes access to program referrals. Coordinated Entry is aware of the many programs and [20260505R 209] resources available in our County. Coordinated Entry works with 211. Continuum of Care has a relationship with Pathways 4 Home and other reentry resources to address the needs of those being released from correctional programs and institutions. Within the Continuum of Care, there are partnering agencies that represent healthcare facilities, mental health facilities, programs, and facilities. The Continuum of Care also has a relationship with housing providers who address the needs of those aging out of foster care. The City of Superior does not directly participate in the discharge planning or protocols for persons leaving publicly funded institutions or healthcare systems or receiving assistance from public and private agencies (health care facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions). All of the local agencies serving the homeless population work together to ensure that people receive the appropriate services. The agencies also maintain ties with institutions that release people from their care or custody, whether publicly or privately funded. Individuals leaving institutional care in Superior, Wisconsin, can get help through the Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) and Centers for Independent Living (CILs) for transition services, which include finding housing, obtaining support services, and some financial aid for one-time expenses. Other state and local resources include the Wisconsin Long Term Care Ombudsman, the Critical Assistance Program for homelessness prevention, WHEAP for energy costs, and various housing programs available in the City of Superior. Discussion [20260505R 210] AP-75 Action Plan Barriers to Affordable Housing - 91.220(j) Introduction Even though construction costs for new housing developments remain relatively stagnant, housing prices continue to rise, severely impacting the availability of affordable housing in the United States. According to Brian Montgomery, former Federal Housing Administration commissioner and assistant secretary for housing, constraints on housing not only reduce the supply of affordable housing but also increase the number of households that are cost-burdened, spending more than 30 percent of their income on rent. Land-use policies and zoning regulations constrain the supply of affordable housing. Density limits, height restrictions, parking requirements, lengthy permitting and approval processes, and community opposition all contribute to increased housing prices. Although federal policies play an important role in influencing the availability of affordable housing, according to Sturtevant, the supply of affordable housing depends less on federal policies than on local planning practices, policies, and community engagement. Many local planning procedures currently in place enable community opposition that stalls housing production. Reshaping local regulations allows jurisdictions to make a lasting impact on the supply of affordable housing. HUD, PD&R Edge, "Regulatory Barriers and Affordable Housing" Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The City of Superior has undertaken zoning code rewrites, and participates in Regional Economic Development Planning. By continuing to work Citywide and with Regi