Urban Forestry Tree Board Agenda - April 16, 2026

URBAN FORESTRY TREE BOARD 4/16/2026 Meeting Page 1 of 1 Urban Forestry Tree Board Agenda Thursday, April 16, 2026 – 4:30 p.m. Government Center – 1316 N. 14th St. Room 204 Video Call Link: Click here to join the Microsoft Teams Meeting Meeting ID: 254 677 361 797 Password: 2EYkza Or Call in (audio only) +1 872-242-8028, Conference ID: 357 431 394# MISSION STATEMENT: “The Urban Forestry Tree Board shall advise the common council on matters of the urban forestry program. The urban forestry program shall include planning for planting, maintenance and removal of trees located in city boulevards and public areas and educating citizens about the city's tree resource.” COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Ruth Ludwig, Nick Nelson, Richard Kaufman, Robert-Jan Quené, Jared Ludwig, Vern Northrup, Christine Olson 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. Urban Forestry Tree Board (Meeting held January 15, 2026) 3. OLD BUSINESS 3.1. Update on RFP for Invasive Species Management Plan for SMF. 3.2. Update from Superior Trails/COGGS. 3.3. Planning for Arbor Day/Heritage Tree Program. 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1. Discuss the Rights of Nature Wisconsin Initiative. 5. RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1 Director’s Update 5.2 Superintendent’s Update 5.3 Future Agenda Items 5.4 Confirm the next meeting date as July 16, 2026, in Room 204 of the Government Center. 6. ADJOURNMENT Notice is hereby given that a majority of the members of the Common Council may be present at the meeting, and although this may constitute a quorum of the Common Council, the Council will not take any action at this meeting. ********************************************************************************************* Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, if you are in need of an accommodation to participate in the public meeting process, please call (715) 395-7200 by 4:30 p.m. on the day prior to the scheduled meeting date (OR dial 711 for Telecommun ications Relay Service). The City will attempt to accommodate any request depending on the amount of notice received. ********************************************************************************************* In compliance with Wisconsin Open Meetings Law, this agenda was posted on 4/10/2026 at the following locations: Superior Government Center, Superior Public Library, and online at https://www.ci.superior.wi.us/agendacenter. It was also emailed the Superior Telegram. Urban Forestry Tree Board – 1/15/2026 Meeting * Attended the meeting virtually Page 1 of 4 URBAN FORESTRY TREE BOARD MINUTES January 15, 2026 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order by Chair Ludwig at 4:37 p.m. on January 15, 2026, in Government Center Room 204 & virtually via Microsoft Teams. 1. ROLL CALL Members Present: Ruth Ludwig, Richard Kaufman, Christine Olson, Jared Ludwig, Robert-Jan Quené , Vern Northrup*, Nick Nelson* City Staff Present: Bridgit Maruska, Kara Czapinski, Ryan Wintlend Others Present: John Ramos 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. Urban Forestry Tree Board (Meeting held October 16, 2025) MOTION by Kaufman, second by J. Ludwig and carried to approve the minutes from October 16, 2025. 3. OLD BUSINESS 3.1. RFP for Invasive Species Management Plan for SMF. Director Maruska identified a recurring grant opportunity for managing invasive species but unfortunately missed the recent application deadline. Fortunately, this grant will be available again next year. Deanna Erickson from the Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve is also providing additional grant resources, and the CIP budget has allocated $30,000 as a potential match for future applications. Meanwhile, the Headwaters Partnership, led by Mark Francus, is refining the cost estimate for the invasive species management plan, with preliminary figures expected by January 21st. Adjustments will continue through February and March, aiming to finalize a more accurate budget by the end of March. Maruska will offer updates at the next meeting once the cost figures are clarified. MOTION by Ludwig, second by Kaufman and carried to hold item 3.1 until the April 16, 2026, meeting. 3.2. Fire Management Plan at WI Point next steps. Vern Northrup reported on the successful implementation of the prescribed burn, highlighting effective reduction of understory vegetation and strong collaboration among fire departments. This burn is anticipated to enhance the growth of blueberries over the next two to three years, with noticeable improvements expected in the upcoming growing seasons. He emphasized the necessity for more rigorous mop-up procedures following late season burns, as lingering smoldering trees and stumps have led to smoke inversions. To mitigate similar issues in future burns, enhanced post-burn cleanup will be essential. Director Maruska pointed out the importance of thinning the Lot 5 pine stand to avert uncontrolled fires, noting that the city will need to finance this effort since Urban Forestry Tree Board – 1/15/2026 Meeting * Attended the meeting virtually Page 2 of 4 the timber volume is not sufficient to attract loggers. The projected cost is under $25,000, and the city plans to obtain three quotes to ensure the lowest bid is selected. Northrup proposed that consolidating thinning projects across various plantations could make the offer more appealing to loggers, a suggestion that Maruska and Superintendent Wintlend agreed to explore further with other stakeholders. Additionally, discussions included criteria for tree selection for removal, focusing on weaker, less healthy, and less valuable specimens, with the average diameter of the stand being 7.5 inches, and most of the felled trees to be chipped rather than processed for lumber. 3.3. Update from Superior Trails/COGGS. The Cyclists of Gitchee Gumme Shores Board, as reported by Richard Kaufman, has approved the proposal from Barr Engineering to create a conceptual trail plan. This initiative will focus on mapping biking and multi-use trails through the city's green spaces and will include a preliminary cost estimate. Funded by a $24,000 grant from the Tourism Development Commission obtained last year, the plan aims to present trail concepts and estimated costs. Following the initial planning phase, Barr Engineering will support the city in obtaining necessary approvals and engaging the community through public meetings. While updates are anticipated by April, the final plan may not be completed by that time. Councilor Ludwig highlighted the necessity of aligning the trail plan with forthcoming city infrastructure improvements and the expansion of green spaces to ensure effective multi-modal access and connectivity. MOTION by Ludwig, second by Kaufman and carried to bring this forward to the April 16, 2026, meeting. 3.4. Update on Tribute Tree Application. Director Maruska reported that this year, there were 16 applications for tribute trees, which included two requests for memorial benches. Superintendent Wintlend decided to remove Quaking Aspen from the list of available species due to transplant complications and revised the tree descriptions for uniformity. Those who had initially chosen Quaking Aspen were contacted and encouraged to select alternative species. Wintlend highlighted the addition of Red and Sugar Maples to the city's tree canopy, while noting the exclusion of Silver Maple because of its invasive root system. The upcoming bid package will feature various maple varieties and other species, depending on nursery availability. The process for consulting with applicants regarding appropriate planting locations was outlined, allowing for flexibility with smaller trees and more fixed placements for larger ones. Most applications are submitted via mail or in person due to payment requirements, and an updated application form will be available for the 2027 planting season. MOTION by Quené, second by Olson and carried to approve the changes to the Tribute Tree Application. Urban Forestry Tree Board – 1/15/2026 Meeting * Attended the meeting virtually Page 3 of 4 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1. Update on 2026 Tree Planting. Superintendent Wintlend has unveiled a plan to plant 226 trees, which will include 15 three-inch balled and burlap specimens. The planting initiative will focus on fulfilling requests, replacing existing trees, filling vacant boulevard sites, and enhancing areas such as the new skateboard park and Fairlawn Museum, with input from museum staff regarding species selection. Among the new additions, the city will trial three varieties of Crabapple and a Pink Flare Sergeant Cherry, selected for their resilience and compatibility with planting under power lines and in alkaline soils. The program will also continue to test Yellow Woods, Tulip Poplars, and Catalpas. The order will feature a diverse mix of Red Maple, Sugar Maple, Oaks, Japanese Tree Lilacs, American Hornbeams, and Catalpas. Robert-Jan Quené proposed the inclusion of European Horse Chestnut, which Wintlend agreed to consider as a substitute for some Ohio Buckeyes, ensuring the total remains within the budget for 226 trees. The discussion also addressed disease susceptibility, confirming that European Horse Chestnut is not vulnerable to the same disease affecting American Chestnut, thus making it a valuable addition for enhancing biodiversity. 4.2. Discuss preparations for Heritage Tree Program. Director Maruska announced that the program will commence with a Crabapple Tree and detailed the steps for showcasing a photograph of the tree in bloom, along with organizing a ceremony. A proposal was made to hold a ceremony for the first Heritage Tree to attract media attention and encourage future submissions. It was suggested that the event coincide with the tree's blooming period, typically occurring in mid-May for about two weeks. The committee agreed to merge the Heritage Tree ceremony with the Arbor Day celebration, which would provide scheduling flexibility and enhance community involvement. To boost attendance and engagement, ideas such as leveraging social media, incorporating live music, and distributing saplings were discussed. Additionally, the committee considered options for street closures, given that the tree is situated on private property, and agreed to explore special event permits while coordinating with city staff to ensure the Mayor's availability for reading the Tree City USA proclamation during the Arbor Day Celebration. MOTION by Quené, second by Olson and carried to approve the band and saplings for the Heritage Tree Ceremony/Arbor Day Celebration. 4.3. Discuss planning for Arbor Day Observation and Proclamation for Tree City USA. 4.4. Heritage Skatepark Ribbon Grand Reopening Tree Donation opportunity. Director Maruska has announced the grand reopening of the skatepark on June 6th, which will feature music, various activities, and the planting of 15 trees. The event aims to draw at least 200 participants while promoting urban forestry initiatives. Attendees will have the opportunity to donate trees for the park, with each contribution recognized through personalized plaques. Superintendent Wintlend provided details on the selection process for tree species and sizes, noting that a $200 donation includes both the tree and Urban Forestry Tree Board – 1/15/2026 Meeting * Attended the meeting virtually Page 4 of 4 the plaque. The committee discussed potential names for the event, including 'Operation Shade,' but left the final branding open for further suggestions. Kara Czapinski confirmed that the plaques will be produced by a local company, typically taking three weeks to a month for delivery, and can be customized for the occasion. 5. RECURRING BUSINESS 5.1. Director’s Update 5.1.1. Completed the initial training session for the Community Tree Management Institute, organized by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, with two additional training sessions scheduled. 5.1.2. The application for Tree City USA has been submitted and successfully passed the regional review stage. It is currently awaiting approval at both the state and national levels. 5.1.3. The city is implementing a Christmas tree drop-off program, where the collected trees will be utilized for the bonfire that marks the kickoff of Ice Festival. Several drop-off locations have been established, and the logistics for the event have been coordinated with the fire department. This event is scheduled for Friday, January 30th, at 4:45 p.m., and will take place on the ice near the Barker’s Island boat landing. 5.2. Superintendent’s Update 5.2.1. Seven staff members will participate in the Minnesota Shade Tree Program at Bethel University, while two others are enrolled in the Horticulture Program at the University of Minnesota. This initiative aims to enhance the department's expertise. 5.2.2. A tree removal service has been contracted to clear all brush from Albany Avenue, a task that is expected to occur only once every five to seven years. This brush has become too tangled for the chipper during regular pickups, and the service also removed some logs from the site. Following this cleanup, the area is now ready to accommodate additional brush in the future. 5.3. Future Agenda Items 5.3.1. RFP for Invasive Species Management Plan in the SMF 5.3.2. Update from Superior Trails/COGGS 5.3.3. Planning for Arbor Day Celebration/Heritage Tree Program 5.3.4. Discuss the Rights of Nature Wisconsin Initiative 5.4. Confirm the next meeting date as Thursday, April 16, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. in Room 204 of the Government Center. 6. ADJOURNMENT Councilor Ludwig announced the meeting adjourned at 5:51 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Kara Czapinski P a g e | 41 4.3. Superior Municipal Forest Invasive Species Management Plan Project Description The 2023 Superior Municipal Forest Master Plan identified the need to develop an invasive species management plan to protect the ecological function and public use and enjoyment of the approximate 4,400-acre Superior Municipal Forest. The City of Superior is sponsoring a project that would seek to develop a framework for decision on when and where management actions are needed to control invasive species and provide information for city budgeting and monitoring. The Invasive Species Management Plan would involve a field reconnaissance phase to map invasive species locations and the development of the plan. Assumed Project Elements • The City of Superior has a detailed draft RFP that was used to develop the planning level cost. • A total buffer of 50 ft wide along trails in the forest are surveyed. Additionally, transects no more than 2,000 ft apart are surveyed throughout the forest. • Only invasive species infestations 100 square feet or greater are delineated and mapped. • The plan includes the development of goals and objectives for invasive species management along with proposed actions, cost estimates, and recommended monitoring. • A series of meetings are required; from regular project check-ins to working with an advisory group. Table 7. Estimated planning level cost to develop an invasive species management plan for the Superior Municipal Forest. Item Cost Field reconnaissance, mapping and reporting $18,500 Developing the Invasive Species Management Plan $21,600 Project Meetings $11,500 Total Planning-Level Cost $51,600 Bring Your Own Chair! Tree Board Discussion Handout Rights of Nature Wisconsin (rightsofnaturewi.org) | Purpose: Quick reference to support discussion only What it is (short version) Rights of Nature Wisconsin’s stated mission is to codify the rights of nature in our legal system through education, advocacy, and collaboration. The Rights of Nature concept generally supports legal recognition of ecosystems having inherent rights and, in some models, legal standing. Potential Benefits (Why this could be worth exploring) Concerns (Why this may not be worth the time/effort) Big picture alignment  Stronger stewardship-first framework for protecting trees, waterways, and habitat  Supports resilience priorities and long-term ecological health Not a clean fit for Tree Board scope  Tree Board work is typically practical and local (planting, maintenance, canopy goals)  Changing laws is a different lane than implementation Community engagement  Clear “why” behind urban forestry work and resource protection  Potentially strengthens public understanding of canopy value and shared responsibility High effort with uncertain outcomes  Long timelines and political bandwidth required  Significant time investment without measurable local return Wisconsin momentum exists  Similar concepts have entered public governance conversations in the state  Can provide language and framing even without immediate legal change Legal and operational uncertainty  Potential gray areas around routine maintenance and project approvals  Risk of unclear expectations or follow-up pressure If pursued carefully  Can start as education only (presentation, Q&A)  Can inform outreach and values language without requiring formal action Risk of politicizing a working board  Advocacy orientation can distract from near-term forestry wins  Could impact focus and tone of Tree Board work Opportunity cost  Time not spent on tree care, planting priorities, invasive species strategy, standards, funding, and measurable outcomes Suggested Next Step (pick one) A) Education only: invite a brief presentation and keep the item informational, with no formal action. B) Table for later: agree this is outside Tree Board scope and focus on urban forestry priorities already in motion. C) Refer out: if there is interest in policy advocacy, refer the topic to Council or the appropriate committee. Prepared for discussion. Not a City endorsement or policy position.