City Plan Commission — Agenda Packet

Our intention is to have in-person meetings going forward. For the time being, we will hold the City Committee Meetings, Plan Commission, Council and most others at the Community Room at 933 Michigan Avenue. This in-person location will meet the legal requirement for our open meetings. We will have a virtual option available, but the technology for the hybrid style meeting may not be reliable all of the time. AGENDA CITY PLAN COMMISSION Members • Mayor Wiza • Alderperson Kneebone • Commissioner Arntsen • Commissioner Beacom • Commissioner Rice • Commissioner Schade Stroik • Commissioner Schuler Date and Time: September 8, 2026 6:00 PM Location: Community Room 933 Michigan Avenue, Stevens Point, WI OR Zoom Teleconferencing Meeting ID: 818 8195 9403 Passcode: 287906 By Computer: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81881959403?pwd=g5AVADlg By Phone: +1-312-626-6799 (US Chicago) Opening Section: 1. Roll Call Discussion and Possible Action on: 2. Report of the August 3, 2026 meeting of the City Plan Commission. 3. Public Hearing and action on a request from Benjamin Nusz, representing Mid-State Technical College, for a conditional use permit to operate a technical college facility on the property located at 1101 Centerpoint Drive (Parcel ID 281240832202976), consistent with Ch. 23.02(1)(c)(3)(d). 4. Public Hearing and action on a request from Christy Harris for a conditional use permit to operate a large group day care center on the property located at 2343 Ellis Street (Parcel ID 281240833201902), consistent with Ch. 23.02(1)(b)(3)(e). 5. Public Hearing and action on a request from Bill Pritchard, representing the Elizabeth Revocable Trust, for a final subdivision plat review on an unaddressed parcel bounded by West Zinda Drive (Parcel ID 281240831401241) and Lots 1-15 of the Riverwood West Subdivision (Parcel ID 281240831401211-281240831401226), consistent with Ch. 20.05(2). 6. Public Hearing and action on a request from Jim Lucas, representing R&L Developers, for a conceptual plan review of a proposed multi-family residential development on the Page 1 of 116 property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), consistent with Ch. 23.02(4)(b)(5). 7. Public Hearing and action on a request from Jim Lucas, representing R&L Developers, for a conditional use permit to construct a multi-family residential building on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), consistent with Ch. 23.02(1)(f)(3)(b). 8. A request from Jim Lucas, representing R&L Developers, for a site plan review to construct a multi-family residential building on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), consistent with Ch. 23.02(4)(b)(1)(2). 9. Public Hearing and action on a request from the City of Stevens Point to amend Chapter 23, Zoning Ordinance, of the Revised Municipal Code of the City of Stevens Point. Said request amends Ch. 23.01(17)(i)(3)(a)(iv) to increase the maximum turnaround area size allowed for driveways off of an arterial street from 80 square feet to 120 square feet. 10. July 2026 Monthly Report. Closing Section: 11. Adjourn PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that any person who has special needs while attending these meetings or needs agenda materials for these meetings should contact the City Clerk as soon as possible to ensure that a reasonable accommodation can be made. The City Clerk can be reached by telephone at (715) 346-1569 or by mail at 1515 Strongs Avenue, Stevens Point, WI 54481. Maps further defining the above area(s) may be obtained from the City of Stevens Point Department of Community Development, 1515 Strongs Avenue, Stevens Point, WI 54481, or by calling (715) 346-1567, during normal business hours. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a quorum of the Common Council may be in attendance at this meeting. Page 2 of 116 MINUTES CITY PLAN COMMISSION Members • Mayor Wiza • Alderperson Kneebone • Commissioner Arntsen • Commissioner Beacom • Commissioner Rice • Commissioner Schade Stroik • Commissioner Schuler Date and Time: August 3, 2026 6:00 PM Location: Community Room 933 Michigan Avenue, Stevens Point, WI OR Zoom Teleconferencing Opening Section: 1. Roll Call • Meeting called to order at 6:00 P.M. • Members present: Mayor Wiza, Alder Kneebone, Commissioners Arntsen, Beacom, Schuler, Rice (online at 6:09pm). • Members excused: Commissioner Schade Stroik. Discussion and Possible Action on: 2. Report of the July 6 & July 20, 2026 meeting of the City Plan Commission. • Background: Minutes of the July 6, 2026 and July 20, 2026 meetings of the City Plan Commission were included in the agenda packet. • Motion: Kneebone moves to approve the meeting minutes. • Second: Beacom seconds the motion. • Vote: Unanimous approval. 3. A request from Raymond Cal for an exception to fencing standards to install privacy fencing on the property located at 1233 Maria Drive (Parcel ID 281240829300103) and an unaddressed parcel bounded by Maria Drive (Parcel ID 281240829300139), consistent with Ch. 23.01(16)(g). • Background: Associate Planner & Zoning Administrator Kuhn provides an overview of the request. • Motion: Arntsen moves to approve the request with a condition of obtaining a building permit. • Second: Kneebone seconds the motion. • Discussion: o Mary Mortell, part owner of the property, provides details about the Page 3 of 116 proposed fence. o Raymond Cal, part owner of the property, provides details about the proposed fence. • Vote: Unanimous approval. 4. A request from Chase Rettler, representing SentryWorld Real Estate LLC, for an exception to fencing standards to install privacy fencing on the property located at 501 Michigan Avenue North (Parcel ID 281240821310003), consistent with Ch. 23.01(16)(g). • Background: Associate Planner & Zoning Administrator Kuhn provides an overview of the request. • Motion: Wiza moves to approve the request with a condition of obtaining a building permit prior to construction. • Second: Schuler seconds the motion. • Vote: Unanimous approval. 5. June 2026 Monthly Report. • Background: Monthly reports are included in the agenda packet. • Motion: Kneebone moves to accept and place the report on file. • Second: Beacom seconds the motion. • Vote: Unanimous approval. 6. Director's Report. • Background: Director Kivela gives a verbal report. Closing Section: 7. Adjourn Adjourned at 6:23 P.M. Page 4 of 116 Page 1 of 8 Administrative Staff Report Department of Community Development Conditional Use Permit 1101 Centerpoint Drive September 8, 2026 Applicant(s): • Benjamin Nusz, representing Mid- State Technical College Staff: • Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner akuhn@stevenspoint.com Parcel Number(s): • 281240832202976 Zone(s): • “B-3” Central Business District Master Plan: • Downtown District Council District: • District 1 | Ald. Christianson Lot Information: • Lot Size: 43,996 sq. ft. (1.01 ac.) Current Use: • Vacant Building Applicable Regulations: • 23.02(1)(c)(3)(d) Request 1. Public Hearing and action on a request from Benjamin Nusz, representing Mid-State Technical College, for a conditional use permit to operate a technical college facility on the property located at 1101 Centerpoint Drive (Parcel ID 281240832202976), consistent with Ch. 23.02(1)(c)(3)(d). Attachment(s) 1. Application 2. Plans Findings of Fact 1. The City’s Redevelopment Authority has discussed a potential sale of the subject property to Mid-State Technical College. 2. The proposed use of the existing building will be an educational facility. The proposal will place education, workforce training, student services, community programming, and related administrative functions in the building. 3. Technical college facilities are a conditional use within the “B-3” Central Business District, the zoning designation of the subject property. 4. The Plan Commission and Common Council may attach additional conditions onto the request as necessary. Staff Recommendation Approve the request for a conditional use permit to operate a technical college facility on the property located at 1101 Centerpoint Drive (Parcel ID 281240832202976), subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the start of construction. 2. Planned exterior improvements to the building shall be consistent with the Historic Preservation / Design Review Commission’s Design Guidelines, subject to the review and approval of the Commission and/or Designated Agent. 3. Staff shall have the ability to approve minor modifications to the proposed project plan. Page 5 of 116 Page 2 of 8 Vicinity Map Background Overview: Mid-State Technical College proposes to adaptively reuse the existing building at 1101 Centerpoint Drive as an educational facility and extension of the Mid-State’s Downtown Stevens Point Campus. The proposal will place education, workforce training, student services, community programming, and related administrative functions in an existing downtown building immediately adjacent to Mid-State's current campus. Phase one is expected to focus on exterior improvements to match the exterior character of the currents Stevens Point Downtown Campus. Phase two will focus on activating the interior spaces, which may include a large flexible meeting and training room, Workforce and Economic Development offices, front-desk and office functions, and Mid-State signage and branding. Technical college facilities are a conditional use within the “B-3” Central Business District, the zoning designation of the subject property. Standards of Review – Conditional Use Permit 1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. Analysis: The proposed use is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the existing surrounding uses are unlikely to be negatively impacted by the proposed development. The surrounding neighborhood is located within the City’s Downtown that provides a compatible land use intensity of commercial, retail and educational uses. The subject property exceeds minimum lot size requirements. Additionally, utility and road infrastructure exist to complement the planned future development of the subject property. Findings: The “B-3” Central Business District allows for technical schools as a conditional use. While technical schools are a conditional use within all City zoning districts, the purpose of the proposed development would be to provide complementary uses with Mid-State’s Downtown Stevens Point Campus. Staff do not believe the Page 6 of 116 Page 3 of 8 proposed conditional use permit with the conditions outlined above would be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. 2. The use will not be injurious to the use and for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values. Analysis: According to the City’s Zoning Code, the intent of the “B-3” Central Business District is to “provide a single contiguous district encompassing the central business district or downtown area which will encourage primarily retail uses and a variety of supporting uses. This district is intended to help implement the community's specialized development goals and planning principles, for the CBD, particularly the development and maintenance of the downtown area as a specialized pedestrian-oriented shopping and community center.” Findings: City staff believes that the proposed use is consistent with the “B-3” District. The planned activities are consistent with institutional uses that are allowed within the “B-3” District, and such activities are intended to be in operation during set hours and operated by professionals. 3. The establishment of the use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Analysis: The respective area is in an established and developed area of the city. The City’s Comprehensive Plan identifies this area for commercial, retail and educational uses in a compact, pedestrian-oriented environment. Findings: See standards one and two above. The subject property adjoins properties that are zoned “B-3” Central Business and “B-2” Central Business Transition – zoning districts that also allow for technical college facilities as a conditional use. As the subject property is considerably larger than most lots with a “B-3” zoning designation, staff believes that the subject property and proposed use should not impact the existing development surrounding the area and should not impede any future development. 4. The exterior architectural appeal and function plan of any proposed structure will not be variance with either the exterior architectural appeal and function plan, and scale of the structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the immediate neighborhood or in the character of the applicable district so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood. Analysis: If the conditional use permit is granted, exterior improvements to the existing building are planned. Exterior work is expected to include new windows, overhangs above selected doors, stone-clad architectural elements, maroon cladding or covering on the existing main entrance awning, illuminated Mid-State identification signage, and landscape improvements. The subject property is located within the Downtown Design Review District, which requires exterior improvements to align with the City Historic Preservation / Design Review Commission’s Design Guidelines. Some of the planned improvements can be reviewed by myself as the Designated Agent for the Historic Preservation / Design Review Commission, while others need Commission review. Findings: This standard is met. Page 7 of 116 Page 4 of 8 5. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or facilities have been, or are being, provided. Analysis: Primary means of access is off of Third Street, and existing shared access agreements with adjacent properties provide additional access from Strongs Avenue. Drainage areas are proposed primarily to the east of the building. Findings: This standard is met. 6. Adequate measures have been, or will be taken, to provide ingress and egress so designed to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Analysis: Two access points exist off of Third Street. Findings: Staff believes that proposed driveways will not create access issues. 7. The proposed use is not contrary to the objectives of any duly adopted land use plan for the City of Stevens Point and any of its components. Page 8 of 116 Page 5 of 8 Analysis: The City’s 2005 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map has identified this property has identified the subject property for as part of the Downtown District, which is intended for commercial, office, retail and institutional uses situated in a compact development pattern. The subject property is zoned “B-3” Central Business District. The “B-3” District is intended to “provide a single contiguous district encompassing the central business district or downtown area which will encourage primarily retail uses and a variety of supporting uses. This district is intended to help implement the community's specialized development goals and planning principles, for the CBD, particularly the development and maintenance of the downtown area as a specialized pedestrian-oriented shopping and community center.” Findings: The proposed development is consistent with building mass and site intensity that is typically found within the City’s Downtown and is consistent with providing coverage of community facilities within the city. 8. The use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. Analysis: The conditional use permit application is seeking to operate an instructional facility as part of Mid- State Technical College. Key land use requirements are met and are outlined throughout this report. Findings: The regulations of the district are met for this proposal provided that the conditional use permit’s conditions are met. 9. The proposal will not result in result in an over-concentration of high-density living facilities in one area so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood, on the school system, and the social and protective systems of the community. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A 10. Principal: Applications for exclusive multifamily residential uses: The view from the street should maintain a residential character. The view should be dominated by the building and not by garages, parking, mechanical equipment, garbage containers, or other storage. Analysis: N/A Subject Property Page 9 of 116 Page 6 of 8 Findings: N/A 11. Principal: Access to the site shall be safe. a) All developments shall front on a public right-of-way unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Analysis: The proposed development will have access off of Third Street. Finding: This standard is met. b) The driveway to the site shall be located so as not to be a danger to the street flow of traffic. Analysis: Two driveways are proposed off of Third Street and can handle expected traffic generation. Findings: This standard is met. c) The driveway shall not be too close to neighboring intersections. Analysis: The closest street intersection is roughly 10’ away from the intersection of Third Street and Centerpoint Drive. This intersection is existing. Findings: While the aforementioned driveway fails to meet the 100’ separation requirement from the Third Street-Centerpoint Drive intersection, said driveway is considered legal nonconforming. Other driveways serve the proposed use to aid in adequate traffic flow in and out of the subject property. d) Alignment of the driveway shall be coordinated with adjacent access points to avoid conflict or confusion. Analysis: Proposed driveways are evenly separated along Third Street. Findings: This standard is met. e) Only one driveway shall be allowed per site unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Two family units may be allowed more than one driveway if those driveways are separated by not less than 10 feet. Maximum driveway openings shall be 20 feet (each). Analysis: One driveway serves the subject property, with additional driveways being located off-site via the shared parking lot. Findings: This standard is met. f) The organization of traffic flow on-site and between the site and the street shall be organized in a clear hierarchy of flow patterns. Internal and external areas where traffic flow changes directions or creates intersections shall be organized at clear intersections and those intersections are spaced far Page 10 of 116 Page 7 of 8 enough apart so as to not cause confusion or problems and to provide for adequate spacing for waiting vehicles. Analysis: Parking areas are located to the north and south of the building to provide separate means of traffic flow for the subject property. Findings: This standard is met. g) Intersections are visible and not visually screened. Analysis: Intersections are visible as required in the City’s clearview requirements. Findings: This standard is met. h) Adequate drainage and snow storage is provided. Analysis: A drainage area exists to the east of the building that can also serve as a snow storage area. Findings: This standard is met. i) Minimum size requirements are maintained for safe vehicle circulation. Analysis: Minimum dimensional standards for driveways and internal roads are met. Findings: This standard is met. j) Parking areas shall be safe. They shall be adequately lit, sized to meet minimum standards, graded so as to not be too steep, and paved with concrete, brick, or bituminous surfacing. The light source shall not be visible from adjacent properties. Lighting shall be developed in such a way to minimize light straying onto adjacent properties. Analysis: The proposed parking areas meet minimum dimensional standards as outlined in the City’s Zoning Code. Lighting is located within the parking areas and is visible from adjacent properties in part due to it being a shared parking lot. Findings: This standard is met. k) Driveways shall be located to minimize the impact to adjacent properties. Analysis: Please see above. Findings: This standard is met. 11. There shall be adequate utilities to serve the site. Page 11 of 116 Page 8 of 8 a. The Public Works Director, Police Chief and Fire Chief shall determine whether there is adequate sanitary sewer, portable water, storm drainage, street capacity, emergency access, public protection services, and other utilities to serve the proposed development. They shall review the plan to ensure safety and access for safety vehicles. Analysis: The property currently has water and sewer connections. Findings: This standard is met. 13. The privacy of the neighboring development and the proposed development shall be maintained as much as practical. Guidelines: a. Mechanical equipment including refuse storage shall be screened from neighboring properties. Analysis: Refuse storage is located to the southeast of the building. Findings: This standard is met. b. Lighting shall be located to minimize intrusion onto neighboring properties. Analysis: Outside of light coming from the building and parking lot, no additional lighting that impacts the surrounding area is proposed. Findings: This standard is met. c. Sources of noise shall be located in a manner that minimizes impact to neighboring properties. Analysis: The use will be operating within the confines of the building and property. Findings: The use should not create excessive noise. 14. Principal – Applications for exclusive multi-family residential uses. Landscaping shall be provided, or existing landscape elements shall be preserved to maintain a sense of residential character, define boundaries, and to enhance the sense of enclosure and privacy. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A Based on the findings above, staff would recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the conditions outlined on page one. Please keep in mind that State legislation has placed limitations on local jurisdictions regarding the denial of conditional use permits. Conditional use permits shall be reviewed by a means to permit a use under certain conditions applied to the use or property. For example, if a concern is raised regarding to a standard above, a condition can be applied to the permit to address the concern and grant the permit. Page 12 of 116 Page 13 of 116 Page 14 of 116 Page 15 of 116 Page 16 of 116 Page 1 of 8 Administrative Staff Report Department of Community Development Conditional Use Permit 2343 Ellis Street September 8, 2026 Applicant(s): • Christy Harris Staff: • Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner akuhn@stevenspoint.com Parcel Number(s): • 281240833201902 Zone(s): • “R-2” Single-Family Residential Master Plan: • Residential Council District: • District 3 | Ald. Keymer Lot Information: • Lot Size: 10,311 sq. ft. (0.24 ac.) Current Use: • Day care facility Applicable Regulations: • 23.02(1)(b)(3)(e) Request 1. Public Hearing and action on a request from Christy Harris for a conditional use permit to operate a large group day care center on the property located at 2343 Ellis Street (Parcel ID 281240833201902), consistent with Ch. 23.02(1)(b)(3)(e). Attachment(s) 1. Application 2. Plans Findings of Fact 1. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to increase the occupancy of an existing day care facility from eight individuals to twelve individuals. 2. This proposal stems from a recent change by the State of Wisconsin to increase the allowed occupancy for day care facilities from eight to twelve individuals. 3. The applicant manages the existing day care facility and maintains prerequisite State licensing for a day care facility. 4. Large group day care facilities, defined in the City’s Zoning Code as providing care and supervision for more than eight individuals regardless of age, is a conditional use within the “R-2” Single-Family Residence District. 5. The Plan Commission and Common Council may attach additional conditions onto the request as necessary. Staff Recommendation Approve the request for a conditional use permit to operate a large group day care center on the property located at 2343 Ellis Street (Parcel ID 281240833201902), subject to the following conditions: 1. The day care facility shall maintain applicable licensing from County and State agencies. 2. The maximum occupancy of the day care facility shall be 12 individuals. 3. City staff shall have the ability to approve minor amendments to the project proposal. Page 17 of 116 Page 2 of 8 Vicinity Map Background Overview: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to increase the occupancy of an existing day care facility from eight individuals to twelve individuals. This proposal stems from a recent change by the Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services to increase the occupancy allowed for day care facilities from eight to twelve individuals. The applicant manages the existing day care facility and maintains prerequisite State licensing for a day care facility. Large group day care facilities, defined in the City’s Zoning Code as providing care and supervision for more than eight individuals regardless of age, is a conditional use within the “R-2” Single-Family Residence District. Standards of Review – Conditional Use Permit 1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. Analysis: The proposed use is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the existing surrounding uses are unlikely to be negatively impacted by the proposed development. Day care facilities are allowed within all City residential zoning districts, and smaller day care facilities like what is proposed tends to be operated out of an existing dwelling unit. The surrounding neighborhood consists of single-family homes with a higher density pattern than other parts of the city. Utility and road infrastructure already exist to support the current day care Page 18 of 116 Page 3 of 8 facility, and an increased occupancy of four individuals does not trigger the need for additional capital infrastructure. Findings: The “R-2” District permits large group day care centers via a conditional use permit. Day care centers providing care and supervision for 4-8 individuals are permitted by right in the “R-2” District (defined as a family day care center). Staff do not believe the proposed conditional use permit with the conditions outlined above would be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. 2. The use will not be injurious to the use and for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values. Analysis: Small day care facilities are commonly located within defined residential neighborhoods like where the subject property is located. As day care facilities are allowed in residential zoning district – the exact occupancy triggering the distinction between permitted versus conditional – staff believes that the proposed use is consistent with uses allowed within the “R-2” District. Findings: This standard is met. 3. The establishment of the use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Analysis: The respective area is in an established and developed area of the city. The City’s Comprehensive Plan identifies this area for residential development. Findings: See standards one and two above. The subject property is located along a transition zone with denser residential development located to the west and zoned “R-3” Single- and Two-Family Residential. Staff believe that the subject property and proposed use should not impact the existing development surrounding the area and should not impede any future development. 4. The exterior architectural appeal and function plan of any proposed structure will not be variance with either the exterior architectural appeal and function plan, and scale of the structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the immediate neighborhood or in the character of the applicable district so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood. Analysis: The residence on the subject property has the design of Old Style architectural appeal that is common among residential construction in this part of the city. The residence is 1 ½ stories in height and has white siding with brick accents by the front porch. Six bedrooms are in the residence. Findings: No improvements to the exterior of the residence are proposed to change as part of this conditional use permit request. The residence has an architectural appeal that is consistent with other homes in the near vicinity. 5. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or facilities have been, or are being, provided. Analysis: Access into the subject property is off of Ellis Street. A large back and side yard exists off of Michigan Avenue that provides adequate drainage. Findings: This standard is met. Page 19 of 116 Page 4 of 8 6. Adequate measures have been, or will be taken, to provide ingress and egress so designed to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Analysis: One driveway roughly 90 feet deep exists with access off of Ellis Street, with on-street parking also available off of Ellis Street. Findings: Staff believe that the configuration of the driveway is adequate to support the occupancy of four additional persons. 7. The proposed use is not contrary to the objectives of any duly adopted land use plan for the City of Stevens Point and any of its components. Analysis: The City’s 2005 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map has identified this property has identified the subject property as ‘Residential.’ The subject property is zoned “R-2” Single- Family Residential, which is intended “to provide the population density and used primarily for single family living, which is expected to accommodate the numerous residential developments already at the density of this district, and this district would accommodate other housing not on City sewer. This district is to be located consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.” Findings: The proposed land use is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan for providing a small-scale day care facility within residential neighborhoods that provide the least amount of disruption to neighboring property owners and land uses. Subject Property Subject Property Page 20 of 116 Page 5 of 8 8. The use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. Analysis: The conditional use permit application is seeking to expand the occupancy of an existing day care facility from eight to twelve individuals. Findings: The regulations of the district are met with this proposal provided that the conditional use permit’s conditions are met. 9. The proposal will not result in result in an over-concentration of high-density living facilities in one area so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood, on the school system, and the social and protective systems of the community. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A 10. Principal: Applications for exclusive multifamily residential uses: The view from the street should maintain a residential character. The view should be dominated by the building and not by garages, parking, mechanical equipment, garbage containers, or other storage. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A 11. Principal: Access to the site shall be safe. a) All developments shall front on a public right-of-way unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Analysis: The proposed use has access off of Ellis Street. Finding: This standard is met. b) The driveway to the site shall be located so as not to be a danger to the street flow of traffic. Analysis: The driveway is positioned roughly 70 feet from the intersection of Michigan Avenue and Ellis Street. One driveway is located immediately west of the subject property that is also owned by the applicant. Findings: The existing driveway is not anticipated to be a danger to traffic flow along adjacent streets. c) The driveway shall not be too close to neighboring intersections. Page 21 of 116 Page 6 of 8 Analysis: The driveway is positioned roughly 70 feet from the intersection of Michigan Avenue and Ellis Street and maintains the minimum 20 feet of separation that is needed. Findings: This standard is met. d) Alignment of the driveway shall be coordinated with adjacent access points to avoid conflict or confusion. Analysis: No driveways exist on the north side of Ellis Street immediately in front of the subject property. Adequate driveway separation exists between neighboring lots on the south side of Ellis Street. Findings: This standard is met. e) Only one driveway shall be allowed per site unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Two family units may be allowed more than one driveway if those driveways are separated by not less than 10 feet. Maximum driveway openings shall be 20 feet (each). Analysis: One driveway serves the subject property. Findings: This standard is met. f) The organization of traffic flow on-site and between the site and the street shall be organized in a clear hierarchy of flow patterns. Internal and external areas where traffic flow changes directions or creates intersections shall be organized at clear intersections and those intersections are spaced far enough apart so as to not cause confusion or problems and to provide for adequate spacing for waiting vehicles. Analysis: The existing driveway provides adequate traffic flow to and from the subject property. Findings: This standard is met. g) Intersections are visible and not visually screened. Analysis: Intersections are visible as required in the City’s clearview requirements. Findings: This standard is met. h) Adequate drainage and snow storage is provided. Analysis: A drainage area exists to the east of the building that can also serve as a snow storage area Findings: This standard is met. i) Minimum size requirements are maintained for safe vehicle circulation. Page 22 of 116 Page 7 of 8 Analysis: Minimum dimensional standards for the driveway are met. Findings: This standard is met. j) Parking areas shall be safe. They shall be adequately lit, sized to meet minimum standards, graded so as to not be too steep, and paved with concrete, brick, or bituminous surfacing. The light source shall not be visible from adjacent properties. Lighting shall be developed in such a way to minimize light straying onto adjacent properties. Analysis: The driveway, along with available on-street parking off of Ellis Street, meets minimum parking requirements per the City’s Zoning Code. Lighting that is provided would come off of the residence. Findings: This standard is met. k) Driveways shall be located to minimize the impact to adjacent properties. Analysis: Please see above. Findings: This standard is met. 11. There shall be adequate utilities to serve the site. a. The Public Works Director, Police Chief and Fire Chief shall determine whether there is adequate sanitary sewer, portable water, storm drainage, street capacity, emergency access, public protection services, and other utilities to serve the proposed development. They shall review the plan to ensure safety and access for safety vehicles. Analysis: The property currently has water and sewer connections. Findings: This standard is met. 13. The privacy of the neighboring development and the proposed development shall be maintained as much as practical. Guidelines: a. Mechanical equipment including refuse storage shall be screened from neighboring properties. Analysis: Refuse storage is located within the residence. Findings: This standard is met. b. Lighting shall be located to minimize intrusion onto neighboring properties. Analysis: Lighting that is provided would come off of the residence. Findings: This standard is met. Page 23 of 116 Page 8 of 8 c. Sources of noise shall be located in a manner that minimizes impact to neighboring properties. Analysis: The use will be operating within the confines of the building and property. Findings: The use should not create excessive noise. 14. Principal – Applications for exclusive multi-family residential uses. Landscaping shall be provided, or existing landscape elements shall be preserved to maintain a sense of residential character, define boundaries, and to enhance the sense of enclosure and privacy. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A Based on the findings above, staff would recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the conditions outlined on page one. Please keep in mind that State legislation has placed limitations on local jurisdictions regarding the denial of conditional use permits. Conditional use permits shall be reviewed by a means to permit a use under certain conditions applied to the use or property. For example, if a concern is raised regarding to a standard above, a condition can be applied to the permit to address the concern and grant the permit. Page 24 of 116 Page 25 of 116 Page 26 of 116 From: Christy Harris To: District 3 Cc: Adam Kuhn Subject: CUP Little Hands Learning Center Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2026 8:33:31 PM Dear Alderperson, Thank you for taking the time to review my Conditional Use Permit application. I am requesting approval to increase the licensed capacity of my existing family child care program from eight (8) children to twelve (12) children. My daycare has been operating successfully while providing a safe, nurturing, and structured environment for children and their families. This request is intended to allow me to serve a few additional families in our community while continuing to provide the same high-quality care and maintaining compliance with all state licensing requirements. The proposed increase is not expected to result in any significant changes to the character of the neighborhood. The daycare will continue to operate within its current location and business hours, and I do not anticipate a noticeable increase in traffic, noise, or parking demands beyond what currently exists. As a licensed child care provider, I remain committed to maintaining a safe, respectful, and well-managed environment for the children in my care while being a considerate neighbor and member of the community. I appreciate your consideration of my request and your support throughout the Conditional Use Permit process. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or would like any additional information. Sincerely, Christy Harris Owner of Little Hands Learning Center 2343 Ellis St Stevens point, WI 54481 715-347-4620 Page 27 of 116 Page 1 of 5 Administrative Staff Report Department of Community Development Final Subdivision Plat Review West River Drive & West Zinda Drive September 8, 2026 Applicant(s): • Bill Pritchard, representing the Elizabeth Revocable Trust Staff: • Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner akuhn@stevenspoint.com Parcel Number(s): • 281240831401241 • 281240831401211- 281240831401226 Zone(s): • “R-2” Single-Family Residential Master Plan: • Residential • Not Developable / Restrictive Ownership Council District: • District 9 – Ald. Lang Lot Information: • 18 lots Current Use: • Vacant Applicable Regulations: • Ch. 20.05(2) Request 1. Public Hearing and action on a request from Bill Pritchard, representing the Elizabeth Revocable Trust, for a final subdivision plat review on an unaddressed parcel bounded by West Zinda Drive (Parcel ID 281240831401241) and Lots 1-15 of the Riverwood West Subdivision (Parcel ID 281240831401211-281240831401226), consistent with Ch. 20.05(2). Attachment(s) 1. Application 2. Plat Findings of Fact 1. The applicant is requesting a final subdivision plat review for a proposed subdivision located between West River Drive and West Zinda Drive. 2. The land division includes 1.) a replating of a Council-approved undeveloped subdivision off of West River Drive and 2.) the subdividing of an undeveloped parcel immediately west of the platted subdivision. 3. Proposed lots range from slightly over 10,000 sq ft in size to over 151,705 sq ft in size. 4. The subject area has been delineated for wetlands, and the delineated wetland areas are overlayed on the final plat. 5. Access to the lots would be off of two separate access points. 13 lots would be off of a proposed cul-de-sac extending from West River Drive, while 5 lots would be off of a public street extending from West Zinda Drive. One proposed lot would not have street access as it is designated as undevelopable. 6. The subject area is zoned “R-2” Single-Family Residential and has a dual future land use designation of ‘Residential’ and ‘Not Developable / Restrictive Ownership.’ 7. The creation of five or more lots requires the Common Council to approve both a preliminary plat review and a final plat review. Staff Recommendation Approve the final subdivision plat review on an unaddressed parcel bounded by West Zinda Drive (Parcel ID 281240831401241) and Lots 1-15 of the Page 28 of 116 Page 2 of 5 Riverwood West Subdivision (Parcel ID 281240831401211- 281240831401226), subject to the following conditions: 1. The future land use designation for Parcel ID 281240831401241 shall be amended from ‘Not Developable / Restrictive Ownership’ to ‘Residential.’ Vicinity Map Background The applicant is requesting a final subdivision plat review for a proposed subdivision located between West River Drive and West Zinda Drive. The attached subdivision includes 1.) a replating of a Council-approved undeveloped subdivision off of West River Drive and 2.) the subdividing of an undeveloped parcel immediately west of the platted subdivision. Consistent with the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, the subdividing of land creating five or more lots requires a preliminary and final subdivision plat to be approved by the Plan Commission and Common Council. Access: Two separate roads/streets are planned to provide access to the subject area. Lots 1-6 & 12-18 would be accessed off of a proposed street extending off of West River Drive. This public street is already platted – however, the directionality of the street is proposed to change as part of this plat. Consistent with Wis. Stats. 66.1003(4), the existing platted right-of-way would need to be vacated, which triggers a lengthy review process including two separate actions Page 29 of 116 Page 3 of 5 by the Common Council. Lots 7-11 are proposed to be accessed off of West Zinda Drive. This public street will also terminate into a cul-de-sac. Outlot 2 is identified as an undevelopable outlot and would not have street frontage. Utilities: Utility infrastructure would be installed underneath the proposed public street and private driveway, servicing the 18 developable lots. Zoning and Land Use: If the subdivision plat is approved, the property owner intends to build single-family homes. The subject area is zoned “R-2” Single-Family Residential, which permits single-family development by right. The City’s Future Land Use Map identifies the area where Lots 1-6 & 12-18 are proposed for residential use. Where Lots 7-11 are proposed, however, the Future Land Use Map identifies the area as ‘Not Developable / Restrictive Ownership.’ This designation was likely due to most of the land being identified with hydric soils. As a wetland delineation has been conducted for this area, the results may substantiate the need for a Future Land Use Map amendment. Standards of Review A preliminary plat or final plat of any major or minor subdivision in the City of Stevens Point or in the extraterritorial area shall not be approved unless the Plan Commission and the Common Council determine that adequate public facilities and public services are available to support and service the area of the proposed subdivision, unless the City finds the major or minor plat are in an area not likely to be included in the City’s future growth zone. In considering the questions of adequacy of public facilities and public services as set forth above, the Plan Commission and Common Council shall consider but not be limited to: Final Subdivision Plat Page 30 of 116 Page 4 of 5 1. The nature, extent and size of the proposed subdivision and its impact in terms of the estimated increase in population expected to result. Analysis: The subject area includes 18 lots that are proposed for single-family residential development. Proposed lots range from slightly over 10,000 sq ft in size to over 151,000 sq ft in size. Some of the proposed lots have significant wetland areas, which will impact the true area where land development would be permitted. Developable areas range from 8,453 sq ft per lot to slightly under 30,000 sq ft. Please note that there are additional limitations for the placement of structures directly below the overhead power lines, which will limit developable areas and building placement. Findings: US Census household size in Stevens Point is 2.10 persons per household. If the subdivision was 100% occupied, we could expect an additional 38 persons to reside in the proposed subdivision. The City’s 2023 estimated population was 25,752 persons. With the proposed subdivision, a .15% population increase could be reasonably expected. Existing public infrastructure, along with the new street, utilities and fire hydrants, can reasonably handle this type of increase. 2. The present or projected state of development likely to result when said subdivision is developed with projected densities as anticipated by adopted area Comprehensive Plans and currently approved subdivisions in the immediate vicinity of the proposed subdivision. Analysis: The proposed subdivision provides low-density residential development on the city’s west side. Findings: Long-term cost for the City does exist with the proposed subdivision having access via a public street. Given the tax revenues tied to this development, staff believes that sufficient lot density exists so that revenues are on par with expected expenditures. 3. The avoidance of expenditures of public funds necessitated by the proposed subdivision which are not in adopted capital or operating budgets. For subdivisions in the City of Stevens Point, the applicant shall furnish data requested by the Director of Public Works, Water Utility Manager, Traffic Engineer and Director of Planning and Development who will coordinate statements of adequacy for transportation, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water service, fire and police protection, parks, open space, and recreation and school facilities for the Plan Commission and the Common Council. Analysis: The City will not be constructing the planned public street. Rather, the construction of that infrastructure, along with proposed water and sewer laterals, will be financed and constructed by the applicant. Therefore, up-front City expenditures for this proposed subdivision are expected to be minimal. Additional long- term expenditures in maintenance costs for the street and multi-use path are anticipated, however such expenditures will be financed by the additional tax revenue coming from the 18 single-family homes. Findings: Estimated infrastructure costs, projected property tax revenue, and utility users provide sufficient financial capacity for the subdivision over the life of the proposed infrastructure. Page 31 of 116 Page 5 of 5 Exhibits Subject Area Page 32 of 116 Page 33 of 116 Page 34 of 116 S73°58'35"E15.06' LOT 1819,382 SQ. FT.LOT 1723,845 SQ. FT. LOT 1610,513 SQ. FT. LOT 518,714 SQ. FT.LOT 415,509 SQ. FT.LOT 317,177 SQ. FT.LOT 223,436 SQ. FT.LOT 132,139 SQ. FT. LOT 660,083 SQ. FT. LOT 1239,319 SQ. FT. LOT 1161,645 SQ. FT.LOT 1318,817 SQ. FT. OUT LOT 2148,321 SQ. FT. LOT 7151,475 SQ. FT. LOT 869,111 SQ. FT. N89°55'51"E 616.95' S15°57'56"W 325.06' (325.35)N73°59'32"W 150.25'(150.00') S15°52'37"W 408.37'N73°58'35"W 586.91'S66°21'36"W 187.62'S66°13'58"W102.70'N87°31'52"W 254.50'S89°57'05"W 175.09'(175.16') (176.45')N89°57'05"E 176.40'(121.95')S87°31'52"E122.00' N00°10'01"W 736.11' (736.15') N89°32'11"E 245.22' (245.02') N00°02'30"W60.00' S00°22'28"W22.37' C1 (C1)155.85'(156.04')272.65'155.72' 112.99' 66.00' 146.07' 136.82' 271.55' 540.37' 195.74' S42°11'01"E 308.27' N70°50'01"W 385.70'N08°47'38"E 162.75' N16°14'06"E 414.08'N29°37'17"W 420.27' N55°41'16"E 349.80' 112.66'50.09' 222.79' N30°50'01"W 221.41'N00°50'01"W 177.62' N29°09'59"E 162.44'N59°09'59"E 217.46'N70°24'22"E 317.78'S79°09'59"W 223.12' S49°09'59"W 177.48' S32°24'14"W 298.28'170.00'83.26'S19°10'24"E ARC = 158.72' 32.73'ARC = 105.36'ARC = 154.37' ARC = 80.33'ARC =47.12' LOT 1521,831 SQ. FT. N89°37'50"E 2666.38' WEST RIVER DRIVE WEST ZINDA DRIVE SW-SE GOV'T.LOT 4 LEGENDEXISTING 3/4" REBARFOUND GOVERNMENT MONUMENT AS NOTED SET 1 1/4" X 18" REBAR, WEIGHING 4.30 LBS/LIN FTEXISTING 1 1/4" O.D. IRON PIPEALL OTHER LOT CORNERS SET WITH AEXISTING 1 1/4" REBAREXISTING 2 1/4" O.D. IRON PIPE1 1/4" OD X 18" IRON PIPE WEIGHING 1.68 LBS/LIN FT( ) RECORDED DISTANCE FROM PREVIOUS INSTRUMENT LOT 1024.933 SQ. FT.N58°33'30"W 120.92' PLEASANT COURT S11°05'57"E 148.58' S42°11'01"E 154.01'175.85' 122.43' LOT 1418,408 SQ. FT. 92.92' S87°31'52"E85.52' S84°35'19"E117.00'LOT 914,750 SQ. FT. S70°09'48"E 169.72'N70°09'48"W 169.72' LOT 1CSM #9448-40-78 50'ROW 66'ROW 60'ROW 66'ROW 90'RAD. 63'RAD. UNPLATTEDLANDS LOT 1CSM #1-154UNPLATTEDLANDS LOT 2CSM #3257-11-215LOT 1CSM #3226-11-184LOT 4CSM #9082-38-12LOT 3CSM #9082-38-12 LOT 1CSM #9399-40-29LOT 1CSM #8775-36-5 30' 100' ASTER COURTN24°09'32"W31.28' N00°22'28"E529.81' 1312.58' 1135.30' POB O.L. 1 CSM #5925-21-241 C2C3ARC = 121.21' ARC =53.99'ARC =44.91'ARC =38.16' ARC =66.84'C4 ARC =47.53' ARC =46.66' ARC =47.12'ARC =47.12'ARC =45.80'C7 ARC =63.30'ARC =47.12'ARC =47.14'ARC =58.99'C8C9 C5C6 L1L2L3L4L5 L6L7 L8 L985.48'71.12' 68.37'59.78' N58°40'12"E 239.01' S42°11'01"E 156.60' S57°56'08"E 166.48'15' WIDEDRAINAGEEASEMENT 20' WIDEDRAINAGEEASEMENT RIVERWOODWESTSUBDIVISIONLOT 2CSM #9448-40-78 LOT 2CSM #9448-40-78 WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 ROW50,793 SQ. FT. 100'66'ROW CANADIAN NATIONALRAILROADNW-SEGOV'T.LOT 3 DEDICATED TOTHE PUBLIC DEDICATED TOTHE PUBLICOL 1CSM #8051-31-31 CITY STEVENS OF POINT UTILITYEASEMENTDOC. #620095 UTILITYEASEMENTDOC. #499429 20' UTILITYEASEMENTDOC. #287251100' UTILITY EASEMENTSEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE 218.50'1353.80' S18°47'36"W 215.49' ROW51,489 SQ. FT.5' WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT(GREEN CIRCLE TRAIL) 28.00'S32°24'14"W 304.06'134.06'CENTERLINE OF 100'UTILITY EASEMENTN66°15'09"E 937.88'20' O. L. 1 20' WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT(GREEN CIRCLE TRAIL)N06°36'01"E 128.15' 20' UTILITYEASEMENTDOC. #287251 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEI, AARON PARKS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR S-2861, DOHEREBY CERTIFY THAT UNDER THE DIRECTION OF BILL PRICHARD, IHAVE SURVEYED, DIVIDED, AND MAPPED REPLAT OF RIVERWOODWEST SUBDIVISION, BEING ALL OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISIONAND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78LOCATED IN GOVERNMENT LOT 4, AND ALL OF OUT LOT 1 OFCERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #8051-31-31 AND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OFCERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH,RANGE 8 EAST, CITY OF STEVENS POINT, PORTAGE COUNTY,WISCONSIN.THAT SUCH PLAT IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF ALL OF THEEXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND SURVEYED AND THESUBDIVISION THEREOF MADE.THAT I HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER236 OF THE WISCONSIN STATUTES AND THE PROVISIONS OF THESUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF STEVENS POINT,WISCONSIN, IN SURVEYING, DIVIDING AND MAPPING THE SAME.DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026.___________________________________AARON PARKSPROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR S-2861 REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISIONA SUBDIVISION PLAT OF REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION, BEING ALL OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION AND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF CSM #9448-40-78 LOCATED IN GOVERNMENT LOT 4, AND ALL OFOUT LOT 1 OF CSM #8051-31-31 AND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST,CITY OF STEVENS POINT, PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN. SCALE: 1"=80'160'0' 80' BEARINGS REFERENCED TO THE SOUTH LINE OFTHE SE1/4 OF SECTION 31, T24N, R8E, HAVING AGRID BEARING OF N 89°37'50" E, PER THEWISCONSIN COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM,PORTAGE COUNTY, NAD83(2011).BASE FOR BEARING FORWARD There are no objections to this plat with respect to Secs. 236.15, 236.16, 236.20 and 236.21(1) and (2),Wis. Stats. as provided by s. 236.12, Wis. Stats.Certified __________________, 20_____Department of Administration TYPICAL DRAINAGE EASEMENT WIDTH AS NOTED.SIDES OF EASEMENT ARE PARALLEL TO LOT LINESAND THEY SHALL LENGTHEN OR SHORTEN TOPROVIDE CONTINUITY.NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOTES LOT LINE15' DEVELOPER/OWNER:THE ELIZABETH REVOCABLE TRUSTco: BILL PRICHARD3364 COTTAGE HILL DRIVEGREEN BAY, WI 54311 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS 7.5'7.5' TYPICAL 12' UTILITY EASEMENT. SIDES OFEASEMENT ARE PARALLEL TO ROW LINES ANDTHEY SHALL LENGTHEN OR SHORTEN TO PROVIDECONTINUITY.NOT TO SCALEUTILITY EASEMENT NOTES ROW LINE12'EASEMENT LINE NO POLES OR BURIED CABLES ARE TO BE PLACEDSUCH THAT THE INSTALLATION WOULD DISTURBANY SURVEY STAKE OR OBSTRUCT VISION ALONGANY LOT LINE OR STREET LINE. THE DISTURBANCEOF A SURVEY STAKE BY ANYONE IS A VIOLATION OFs. 236.32 OF THE REVISED WISCONSIN STATUTES.UTILITY EASEMENTS AS HEREIN SET FORTH AREFOR THE USE OF PUBLIC BODIES AND PRIVATE ORPUBLIC UTILITIES HAVING THE RIGHT T0 SERVE THEAREA.THE UTILITY EASEMENTS INCLUDE THE RIGHT OFTHE UTILITY TO TRIM OR REMOVE ANY OR ALLTREES WITHIN THE EASEMENT WHICH WOULDINTERFERE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION ORMAINTENANCE OF THE UTILITY. UTILITY EASEMENTS LOT SIZESQ. FT.OUT LOT #18,433 TRTR31326524N8E23N8ETRTR31624N8E23N8E PREPARED BY:AARON PARKS, PLS #2861GREMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC.120 WILSHIRE BLVD. NORTHSTEVENS POINT, WI 54481PHONE (715)341-4363 LOT 2 CSM#9920-43-100 OUT LOT 1 CSM#4329-15-124 SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES.EXISTING 100' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT, CENTERED ONPOWER POLES AS LAID OUT, DOCUMENT #181217 ANDDOCUMENT #183328.EXISTING 20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT, DOC. #287251 ISPARALLEL TO THE 100' UTILITY EASEMENT. THE NORTHLINE OF THE 20' EASEMENT IS THE CENTERLINE OF THE100' EASEMENT.SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT FORTHE GREEN CIRCLE TRAIL THROUGH LOT 9 AND OUT LOT 2. SURVEYOR'S NOTES WESTCOTTAGESTWESTPLEASANT ST W MCDONALD DRW MAPLERIDGE DRBRENT-WOODDRWBIRCHWOOD LN WEST ZINDA DR W TRILLIUMCT VICINITY MAPDRAWING NOTTO SCALESUBJECTPARCEL WEST RIVER DRCONCRETEMONUMENT NONMONUMENTED,IN RIVERTRTR31326524N8E23N8EMEANDER CORNER,2" IRON PIPE LOT 10LOT 920'OUT LOT 1LOT 17LOT LINE Page 35 of 116 LINE #BEARINGDISTANCEL1N74°05'35"W23.70'L2 47.50'L4 28.69'L3 63.85'N70°09'48"WL5 77.18'L6S70°09'48"E24.34'L7 145.38'L8 47.50'S65°40'43"WN70°09'48"WN70°09'48"WL9 23.77'S74°05'35"EN65°40'43"E CURVE TABLELOTRADIUSARCLENGTHCHORDBEARINGCHORDLENGTH42879.93'498.77'S67°18'05"E498.15'2879.93'80.33'S71°27'50"E80.33' 183.00'59.54'S25°15'33"W59.28'67.00'47.04'S85°47'34"W46.08' 90.00'46.66'N04°01'03"E46.14' CENTRALANGLEAH TANGENTBEARINGBEARING 18°38'33" 9°55'23"01°35'22" 40°13'43" 29°42'08" BK TANGENTS72°15'47"E N20°38'13"ES65°33'20"W S34°34'50"W S62°20'24"E S88°55'31"E S15°56'16"WN74°05'35"W N70°09'48"W S65°40'43"W N65°40'43"E CURVEC11 C4C5 322879.93'2879.93'105.36'154.37'158.72'S63°23'17"ES65°58'18"ES69°05'10"E105.35'154.35'158.69'02°05'46"03°04'16"03°09'27"63.00'325.10'S82°16'37"E67.08'863.00'121.21'S05°00'31"E103.36'110°14'12"9133.00'102.50'S87°45'27"W99.99'44°09'29"1690.00'497.91'N19°50'12"E66.00'43°01'13"1590.00'47.53'N85°58'14"W46.98'1490.00'47.14'N55°50'16"W46.60'30°00'30"30°15'27"690.00'63.30'N39°01'03"E62.00'40°17'52"590.00'47.12'N74°09'59"E46.59'30°00'00"490.00'47.12'S75°50'01"E46.59' (498.54')(497.92')(C1)143.84'134.95'C2 1390.00'47.12'N25°50'01"W46.59'30°00'00" (S67°04'30"E)2879.93'8117.00'N55°51'21"E70°26'15"C3 N50°06'35"W64°20'05"763.00'53.99'N84°40'34"E52.35'49°05'52"1163.00'44.91'S50°21'18"E43.96'40°50'26"1063.00'38.16'S12°34'57"E37.58'34°42'15"963.00'66.84'S35°09'45"W63.75'60°47'10"18C618 S65°40'43"WN70°09'48"WC7 S41°20'49"WS01°40'25"E90.00'58.99'S60°07'26"W57.94'37°33'14"12 30°00'00"90.00'47.12'S45°50'01"E46.59'290.00'45.80'S16°15'13"E45.31'29°09'36"167.00'51.64'N87°45'27"E50.37'44°09'29"1133.00'93.38'N85°47'34"E91.48'3 40°13'43"30°00'00"C8C9 S65°40'43"WS74°05'35"ES70°09'48"E RESOLVED, THAT THE REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OFSTEVENS POINT, THE ELIZABETH REVOCABLE TRUST, OWNER, IS HEREBY APPROVED BYTHE COMMON COUNCIL.APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF STEVENS POINT SUBDIVISIONORDINANCE THIS __________ DAY OF _______________, 2026. APPROVED BY ___________________________________________ MIKE WIZA, MAYORI HEREBY ATTEST, THAT THE FOREGOING IS A COPY OF A RESOLUTION ADAPTED BY THECOMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STEVENS POINT. ATTESTED BY_______________________________________________ SUSAN PAGEL, CLERK AS OWNER, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I CAUSED THE LAND DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT TO BE SURVEYED, DIVIDED, MAPPEDAND DEDICATED AS REPRESENTED ON THIS PLAT. I ALSO CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT IS REQUIRED BY S.236.10 OR S.236.12 TOBE SUBMITTED TO THE FOLLOWING FOR APPROVAL OR OBJECTION: STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION CITY OF STEVENS POINTWITNESS THE HAND AND SEAL OF SAID OWNER THIS _____, DAY OF _______________, 2026.IN THE PRESENCE OF:____________________________________ ________________________OWNER (PRINT)OWNER (SIGNATURE)STATE OF WISCONSIN ) ) SSPORTAGE COUNTY ) PERSONALLY CAME BEFORE ME THIS _____ DAY OF _______________, 2026, THE ABOVE NAMED , TO ME KNOWN TO BE THEPERSON WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAME._____________________________NOTARY PUBLIC, _______________, WISCONSINMY COMMISSION EXPIRES __________________. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION STATE OF WISCONSIN ) ) SSPORTAGE COUNTY ) I, COREY LADICK, BEING THE DULY ELECTED, QUALIFIED AND ACTING TREASURER OF THE CITY OF STEVENS POINT, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHE RECORDS IN MY OFFICE SHOW NO UNREDEEMED TAX SALES AND NO UNPAID TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AS OF ____________ , 2026,AFFECTING THE LANDS INCLUDED IN THE REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION.____________ _______________________________DATE COREY LADICK, CITY TREASURER CITY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF WISCONSIN ) ) SSPORTAGE COUNTY ) I, SUSAN PAGEL, BEING THE DULY APPOINTED, QUALIFIED AND ACTING CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF STEVENS POINT, DO HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT COPIES OF REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION WERE FORWARDED ON THE ________DAY OF ________________, 2026 ASREQUIRED BY S. 236.12 (4) AND THAT NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PLAT HAVE BEEN FILED WITHIN THE 20-DAY LIMIT SET BY SUB. (3) OR, IF FILED,HAVE BEEN MET.____________ ________________________DATE SUSAN PAGEL, CLERK COMMON COUNCIL RESOLUTION CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF WISCONSIN ) ) SSPORTAGE COUNTY ) I, PAMELA PRZYBELSKI, BEING THE DULY ELECTED, QUALIFIED AND ACTING TREASURER OF THE COUNTY OF PORTAGE, DO HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT THE RECORDS IN MY OFFICE SHOW NO UNREDEEMED TAX SALES AND NO UNPAID TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AS OF ____________ ,2026 AFFECTING THE LANDS INCLUDED IN THE REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION.____________ ________________________________________DATE PAMELA PRZYBELSKI, COUNTY TREASURER COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE UTILITY EASEMENT PROVISIONSAN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC, NATURAL GAS AND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE IS HEREBY GRANTED BY:THE ELIZABETH REVOCABLE TRUST, GRANTOR, TOWISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION, A WISCONSIN CORPORATION, GRANTEE,AT&T TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, GRANTEE,CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS/SPECTRUM TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, GRANTEE ANDTDS METROCOM, GRANTEETHEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, OPERATE, REPAIR, MAINTAIN AND REPLACE FROM TIME TO TIME,FACILITIES USED IN CONNECTION WITH OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY AND ELECTRICENERGY, NATURAL GAS, TELEPHONE, CABLE TV AND FIBER OPTIC FACILITIES FOR SUCH PURPOSE AS THE SAME IS NOW OR MAY HEREAFTER BEUSED, ALL IN, OVER, UNDER, ACROSS, ALONG AND UPON THE PROPERTY SHOWN WITHIN THOSE AREAS ON THE PLAT DESIGNATED AS "UTILITYEASEMENT" AND THE PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON THE PLAT FOR STREETS AND ALLEYS, WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, TOGETHER WITH THERIGHT TO INSTALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS UPON, ACROSS, WITHIN AND BENEATH THE SURFACE OF EACH LOT TO SERVE IMPROVEMENTS,THEREON, OR ON ADJACENT LOTS; ALSO THE RIGHT TO TRIM OR CUT DOWN TREES, BRUSH AND ROOTS AS MAY BE REASONABLY REQUIREDINCIDENTAL TO THE RIGHTS HEREIN GIVEN, AND THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY FOR ALL SUCH PURPOSES. THEGRANTEES AGREE TO RESTORE OR CAUSE TO HAVE RESTORED, THE PROPERTY, AS NEARLY AS IS REASONABLY POSSIBLE, TO THE CONDITIONEXISTING PRIOR TO SUCH ENTRY BY THE GRANTEES OR THEIR AGENTS. THIS RESTORATION, HOWEVER, DOES NOT APPLY TO THE INITIALINSTALLATION OF SAID UNDERGROUND AND/OR ABOVE GROUND ELECTRIC FACILITIES, NATURAL GAS FACILITIES, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TVFACILITIES OR FIBER OPTIC FACILITIES OR TO ANY TREES, BRUSH OR ROOTS WHICH MAY BE REMOVED AT ANY TIME PURSUANT TO THE RIGHTSHEREIN GRANTED. STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE PLACED OVER GRANTEES' FACILITIES OR IN, UPON OR OVER THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE LINESMARKED "UTILITY EASEMENT" WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF GRANTEES. AFTER INSTALLATION OF ANY SUCH FACILITIES, THEGRADE OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE ALTERED BY MORE THAN SIX INCHES WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF GRANTEES. THISUTILITY EASEMENT PROVISION DOES NOT PREVENT OR PROHIBIT OTHERS FROM UTILIZING OR CROSSING THE UTILITY EASEMENT AS THE UTILITYEASEMENT(S) ARE NON-EXCLUSIVE.THE GRANT OF EASEMENT SHALL BE BINDING UPON AND INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF THE HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OF ALL PARTIESHERETO. EASEMENT FOR GREEN CIRCLE TRAILAN EASEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND USE OF A PUBLIC, MULTI-USE RECREATIONALTRAIL, TO BE SET FORTH FULLY ON A SEPARATE DOCUMENT, IS HEREBY GRANTED BY:THE ELIZABETH REVOCABLE TRUST, GRANTOR, TOGREEN CIRCLE TRAIL, INC., A WISCONSIN NONSTOCK CORPORATION, GRANTEETHE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS EASEMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:5' WIDE EASEMENT IN LOT 9 COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 9, THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A 5' WIDE EASEMENT; THENCE N00°22'28"E, 5.47 FEET; THENCE N66°21'36"E, 188.31 FEET; THENCE S06°36'01"W, 5.79 FEET; THENCE S66°21'36"W, 187.62 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THERE TERMINATING. SIDE OF EASEMENT IS PARALLEL TO LOT LINE, AND SHALL LENGTHEN OR SHORTEN TO PROVIDECONTINUITY.ALSO;CENTERLINE OF 20' WIDE EASEMENT IN OUT LOT 2 COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OUT LOT 2; THENCE S73°58'40"E, 4.82 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE 20' EASEMENT, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N66°18'28"E, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, 260.48 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, SOUTHEASTERLY 18.66 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUSCURVE, CENTER WHICH LIES SOUTHERLY, A CHORD WHICH BEARS S86°57'41"E, A DISTANCE OF 17.99 FEET; THENCE S60°13'50"E, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, 125.12 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, NORTHEASTERLY 30.75 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUSCURVE, CENTER WHICH LIES NORTHERLY, A CHORD WHICH BEARS N75°43'27"E, A DISTANCE OF 27.81 FEET; THENCE N31°40'44"E, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, 38.28 FEET TO SOUTHERN LINE OF OUT LOT 1, THERETERMINATING. SAID CENTERLINE TERMINUS IS N58°33'30"W, 10.19 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OFSAID OUT LOT 1. SIDES OF THE EASEMENT ARE PARALLEL TO CENTERLINE, 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF CENTERLINE ANDTHEY SHALL LENGTHEN OR SHORTEN TO PROVIDE CONTINUITY. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEI, AARON PARKS, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR S-2861, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT UNDER THE DIRECTION OF BILL PRICHARD, I HAVE SURVEYED, DIVIDED, ANDMAPPED REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION, AND THAT SUCH PLAT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS ALL EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES AND THE SUBDIVISION OF THELAND SURVEYED, BEING ALL OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION AND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78 LOCATED IN GOVERNMENT LOT 4,AND ALL OF OUT LOT 1 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #8051-31-31 AND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OFTHE SOUTHEAST 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 31, T24N, R8E, CITY OF STEVENS POINT, PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 31, T24N, R8E; THENCE N89°37'50"E, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 31, 1312.58 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNERTHEREOF; THENCE N00°22'28"E, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, 529.81 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF CERTIFIEDSURVEY MAP #9082-38-12, BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S66°13'58"W, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, 102.70 FEET; THENCE N24°09'32"W, 31.28 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OUT LOT 1 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #8051-31-31; THENCE N87°31'52"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUT LOT 1, 254.50 FEET; THENCE S89°57'05"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 175.09 FEET, TO THE EXISTING EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WEST ZINDA DRIVE ALSO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSAID OUT LOT 1; THENCE N00°02'30"W, ALONG THE SAID EXISTING EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 60.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID OUT LOT 1; THENCE N89°57'05"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID OUT LOT 1, 176.40 FEET; THENCE S87°31'52"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID OUT LOT 1, 122.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78; THENCE N00°10'01"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, 736.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE N89°32'11"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, 245.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, ALSO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OFGOVERNMENT LOT 4; THENCE N89°55'51"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2 AND THE NORTH LINE OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION, 616.95 FEET TO THE EXISTING SOUTHERNRIGHT OF WAY OF THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EXISTING SOUTHERN RIGHT OF WAY, SOUTHEASTERLY 498.77 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A 2879.93 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CENTER WHICH LIESNORTHEASTERLY, A CHORD WHICH BEARS S67°18'05"E, A DISTANCE OF 498.15 FEET TO THE EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WEST RIVER DRIVE, ALSO THENORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE S15°57'56"W, ALONG THE SAID EXISTING WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 325.06 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE N73°59'32"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 150.25 FEET; THENCE S15°52'37"W, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE EAST LINE OF LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78, 408.37 FEET, TO THE NORTHLINE OF LOT 1 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #3226-11-184; THENCE N73°58'35"W, ALONG THE SAID NORTH LINE, 586.91 FEET; THENCE S66°21'36"W, 187.62 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4; THENCE S00°22'28"W, ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, 22.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THERE TERMINATING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 20.664 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.THAT SUCH PLAT IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF ALL OF THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND SURVEYED AND THE SUBDIVISION THEREOF MADE.THAT I HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 236 OF THE WISCONSIN STATUTES AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCEOF THE CITY OF STEVENS POINT, WISCONSIN, IN SURVEYING, DIVIDING AND MAPPING THE SAME.DATED THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026. ___________________________________AARON PARKSPROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR S-2861 PREPARED BY:AARON PARKS, PLS #2861GREMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC.120 WILSHIRE BLVD. NORTHSTEVENS POINT, WI 54481PHONE (715)341-4363 FORWARD There are no objections to this plat with respect to Secs. 236.15, 236.16, 236.20 and 236.21(1) and (2),Wis. Stats. as provided by s. 236.12, Wis. Stats.Certified __________________, 20_____Department of Administration SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS DEVELOPER/OWNER:THE ELIZABETH REVOCABLE TRUSTco: BILL PRICHARD3364 COTTAGE HILL DRIVEGREEN BAY, WI 54311 REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISIONA SUBDIVISION PLAT OF REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION, BEING ALL OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION AND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF CSM #9448-40-78 LOCATED IN GOVERNMENT LOT 4, AND ALL OFOUT LOT 1 OF CSM #8051-31-31 AND THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP #9448-40-78 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST,CITY OF STEVENS POINT, PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN. Page 36 of 116 PLAN OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT 1 ORDER OF SHEETS LAYOUT SCALE 0 TOTAL NET LENGTH OF CENTERLINE = 2 3 4 - 10 13 - 14 15 - 16 17 - 18 COUNTY: PLOT NAME :P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_TYPICAL.DWGFILE NAME : 5/4/2026 4:48 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY TOTAL SHEETS = 23 PAGE NO: PAGE NO: PAGE NO: PAGE NO: PAGE NO: PAGE NO: PAGE NO: PAGE NO: PORTAGE SCALE 1,201 LF HORIZONTAL POSITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE WISCONSIN COORDINATE REFERENCE SYSTEM (WISCRS), NAD83 ( ), IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. POSITIONS SHOWN ARE GRID COORDINATES, GRID BEARINGS, AND GRID DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES ARE THE SAME AS GROUND DISTANCES. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 ( ). GPS DERIVED ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON GEOID 2011 PORTAGE COUNTY 2012 12A RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION PROJECT LOCATION RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION TITLE PROJECT OVERVIEW TYPICAL SECTIONS / GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION DETAILS EROSION CONTROL PLAN UTILITY PLANS GRADING PLANS PLAN AND PROFILE CROSS SECTIONS 19 - 23PAGE NO: DEXTER D. KAETTERHENRY, PEDATE 6/24/2026 11 - 12 Page 37 of 116 MH MH MH GUYGUY GUY POLE GUY POLE GUYGUY GUYGUYMH GUY GUYGUY SAN OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 104 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 205 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_PROJECTOVERVIEW.DWGFILE NAME : 6/23/2026 1:27 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : ###### RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION PROJECT OVERVIEW: LAYOUT NAME - PO WEST RIVER DRIVE WEST ZINDA DRIVE GREEN CIRCLE TRAIL SLOPE INTERCEPT SLOPE INTERCEPT GREEN CIRCLE TRAIL RESURFACE EXISTING ROAD TEST PIT #1 TEST PIT #2 REALIGNTRAIL 2 Page 38 of 116 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_TYPICAL.DWGFILE NAME : 6/22/2026 2:40 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT NO: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:10 FT RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION GENERAL NOTES / TYPICAL SECTIONS LAYOUT NAME - 01-10ft 11' 2'11'2' 5.62' 0'-3'5.62'0'-3' 33' 33'R/LR/W R/W 4" HMA PAVEMENT UPPER: 1.75" 4MT 58-34S LOWER: 2.25" 3MT 58-28S 12" BASE AGGREGATE DENSE 1 1/4-INCH 4" BASE AGGREGATE DENSE 3/4-INCH 4" BASE AGGREGATE DENSE 3/4-INCH FINISHED TYPICAL SECTION STA 100+00 - 104+66 (WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE) STA 199+75 - 204+80 (WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE) GENERAL NOTES: UTILITY FACILITIES SHOWN WITHIN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THERE MAY BE OTHER FACILITIES NOT SHOWN. PRIVATE UTILITIES AND OTHER UTILITIES NOT LOCATED BY A DIGGERS HOTLINE LOCATE ARE NOT SHOWN. FIELD VERIFY AND LOCATE ALL UTILITIES FOR ACTUAL LOCATIONS, OTHER FACULTIES, SIZES, TYPES, MATERIAL, AND DEPTHS. ANY ROADWAY OR DRIVEWAY WORK OVER EXISTING UNDERGROUND PIPING LOCATED WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED EASEMENT SHALL BE FULLY ENCASED IN CONCRETE. COORDINATE WITH AHLSTROM TO ENSURE PERSONNEL ARE PRESENT ON-SITE FOR INSPECTION. CONTRACTOR MUST AHDERE TO ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINE CLEARANCES. ALL FINAL MANHOLES NEED TO BE ADJUSTED UTILIZING THE CORE AND POUR METHOD. CONTACTS: OWNER THE ELIZABETH TRUST ATTN: WILLIAM PRITCHARD 3364 COTTAGE HILL DRIVE GREEN BAY, WI 54311 PHONE: 715.570.7211 ENGINEER GREMMER & ASSOCIATES ATTN: DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 120 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD NORTH STEVENS POINT, WI 54481 PHONE: 715.341.4363 EMAIL: D.KAETTERHENRY@GREMMERASSOCIATES.COM UTILITY EASEMENT AHLSTROM ATTN: NICHOLAS PROULX 707 ARLINGTON PLACE STEVENS POINT, WI 54481 EMAIL: NICK.PROULX@AHLSTROM.COM UTILITY EASEMENT BILLERUD ATTN: MARK ANDERSON 610 HIGH STREET WISCONSIN RAPIDS, WI 54495 PHONE: 715.422.3927 EMAIL: MARK.ANDERSON2@BILLERUD.COM GEOGRID 11' 2'11'2' 33' 33'R/LR/W R/W FINISHED TYPICAL SECTION STA 97+70 - 100+00 (WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE) 4" HMA PAVEMENT UPPER: 1.75" 4MT 58-34S LOWER: 2.25" 3MT 58-28S 4" BASE AGGREGATE DENSE 3/4-INCH4" BASE AGGREGATE DENSE 3/4-INCH REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALTIC MATERIAL 3 Page 39 of 116 OH OH WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 44 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_PLANPROFILE.DWGFILE NAME : 5/26/2026 2:18 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY PROJECT: PLOT NAME : CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SHEET PLOT SCALE : ########## RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION LAYOUT NAME - 02 (3) 1085 1086 1087 1088 1088 1089 1089 1090 1090 1088 1087 1089 1090 EMERGENCY RIPRAP OVERFLOW 4' 4' 10' 4'4' TOP OF BERM · WEST ZINDA DRIVE = 1093.25 · WEST RIVER DRIVE = 1086.25 OVERFLOW · WEST ZINDA DRIVE = 1092.75 · WEST RIVER DRIVE = 1085.75 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE HR RIPRAP MEDIUM 12" MIN STORMWATER POND NOTES DRAINAGE SWALE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN POND LIMITS IS INCIDENTAL TO POND GRADING. STORMWATER BASIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO MASS GRADING AND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. WET BASIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2-FOOT THICK TYPE 'A' CLAY LINER. CLAY LINER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WDNR TECHNICAL STANDARD 1001. COMPACT CLAY AND DOCUMENT AS SPECIFIED IN NRCS WISCONSIN CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION 300, CLAY LINERS. A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR SOIL SCIENTIST SHALL CERTIFY IN WRITING CONSTRUCTION OF THE WET DETENTION BASIN. TREAT PORTION OF SAFETY SHELF IN FRONT OF POND OUTLET WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND LIGHT RIPRAP TO DETER PLANT GROWTH IN FRONT OF OUTLET STRUCTURE. KEY RIPRAP 6" - 12" THICK INTO SAFETY SHELF TO MATCH FINISH GRADING ELEVATIONS. ALL DISTURBED AREAS OF THE POND ABOVE THE SAFETY SHELF SHALL BE RESTORED WITH TOPSOIL, SEED MIXTURE (WISDOT MIXTURE #70 OR EQUIVALENT), FERTILIZER, AND EROSION MAT URBAN CLASS I TYPE B. POND AS-BUILT SURVEY REQUIRED UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 1091 1091 1092 EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY SLOPE INTERCEPT BERM 1093.25 BERM 1093.25 A A SECTION A-A SECTION B-B 8' SAFETY SHELF 2:1 3:1 2' NOTE: DRAWING NO TO SCALE AND SHALL BE USED FOR SCHEMATIC PURPOSES ONLY EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 1092.75 BERM 1093.25 WDNR TYPE "A" LINER 2' MIN IF CLAY (SEE NOTES) SALVAGED TOPSOIL, WISDOT MIXTURE #70 AND NURSE CROP, FERTILIZER, AND EROSION MAT URBAN CLASS I TYPE B BOTTOM OF POND 1086 B B 2' 10' SAFETY SHELF BOTTOM OF POND 1079 2:1 3:1 4:1 4:1 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 1085.75 BERM 1086.25 BOTTOM OF SAFETY SHELF 1090 BOTTOM OF SAFETY SHELF 1083 WDNR TYPE "A" LINER 2' MIN IF CLAY (SEE NOTES) SALVAGED TOPSOIL, WISDOT MIXTURE #70 AND NURSE CROP, FERTILIZER, AND EROSION MAT URBAN CLASS I TYPE B RIPRAP LIGHT AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE R RIPRAP LIGHT AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE R PERMANENT POOL = 1084.00 HW2 = 1084.86 HW10 = 1085.76 HW100 = 1086.13 PERMANENT POOL = 1091.00 HW2 = 1092.24 HW10 = 1092.85 HW100 = 1093.03 BERM 1086.25 EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY SLOPE INTERCEPT 1086 1085 1085 1084 1084 1084 1087 1086 1085 1084 1088 1082 1083 1082 1081 1083 1080 1081 1079 1083 1085 1089 1090 1079 1080 1086 1086 1093 1091 1090 1093 1092 1093 1093 1092 1091 12" PIPE WITH 4" ORIFICE @ 0.1% 12" PIPE WITH 4" ORIFICE @ 0.1% 4 Page 40 of 116 4' MAX DEPTH OF TOP OF RISER AT LOT LINE BELOW EXISTING GRADE 8' SANITARY SEWER MAIN 1.05% MIN 6" SANITARY SEWER LATERAL 8x8x6 WYE 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN 6" SANITARY SEWER LATERAL 8" SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING HOME EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LATERAL R/W SANITARY SEWER LATERAL CONNECTION (INCIDENTAL TO SANITARY LATERAL BID ITEM) PLAN VIEW CROSS SECTION VIEW 45 DEGREE BEND R/W 45 DEGREE BEND CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\STEVENS POINT, CITY OF\BUS 51\ACAD\SHEETSPLAN\021001_CD\021002_CD.DWGFILE NAME : 5/8/2026 10:30 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:5 FT LAYOUT NAME - 01 (5) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS:Z/sZtKKt^d^h/s/^/KE E SHEET CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: 2 5 Page 41 of 116 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\STEVENS POINT, CITY OF\BUS 51\ACAD\SHEETSPLAN\021001_CD\021002_CD.DWGFILE NAME : 5/8/2026 10:29 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:10 FT LAYOUT NAME - 02 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS:RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION 6 Page 42 of 116 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 EHWY: COUNTY: P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\STEVENS POINT, CITY OF\BUS 51\ACAD\SHEETSPLAN\021001_CD\021002_CD.DWGFILE NAME : 5/8/2026 10:30 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT NO: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:10 FT LAYOUT NAME - 06 BUSINESS 51 PORTAGE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS:26-105 GEOTEXTILE HYDRANT & GATE VALVE INSTALLATION CRUSHED ROCK WATER SERVICE CONNECTION WATER VALVE BOX BEDDING WATER MAIN PIPE INSULATION  BURY DEPTH 7 Page 43 of 116 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\STEVENS POINT, CITY OF\BUS 51\ACAD\SHEETSPLAN\021001_CD\021002_CD.DWGFILE NAME : 5/8/2026 10:30 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:5 FT LAYOUT NAME - 08 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS:RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION 8 Page 44 of 116 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\STEVENS POINT, CITY OF\BUS 51\ACAD\SHEETSPLAN\021001_CD\021002_CD.DWGFILE NAME : 5/8/2026 10:30 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:5 FT LAYOUT NAME - 09 RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: 9 Page 45 of 116 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_TYPICAL.DWGFILE NAME : 6/22/2026 2:46 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT NO: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:10 FT RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION LAYOUT NAME - 02-10ft CONSTRUCTION DETAIL CORE-AND-POUR METHOD NOTES: A CIRCULAR-SHAPED CONCRETE COLLAR IS REQUIRED ON BITUMONOUS PAVED ROADWAY. INSTALL A 9" (TYP.) THICK CONCRETE COLLAR THAT SHALL BE FLUSH WITH THE ASPHALT SURFACE WITH A SURFACE TOLERANCE OF +0" TO -1/4". CONCRETE SHALL BE 3,000 PSI MINIMUM AT 28 DAYS, WATER-TO-CEMENT RATIO SHALL BE 0.5, 3" MAXIMUM SLUMP, AND 3%-6% ENTRAINED AIR WITH ONE #4 REBAR HOOP. FIBER-REINFORCED CONCRETE (ADDED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS) MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF #4 REBAR. CONCRETE COLLAR TO MATCH CASTING HEIGHT (9" TYPICAL) 10 Page 46 of 116 SAN OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH EP: 104+79.58 PC: 101+64.28 PC: 100+03.38 PT: 104+12.37 PT: 100+41.25 100 101 102 103 104 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 44 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_PLANPROFILE.DWGFILE NAME : 6/23/2026 8:49 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY PROJECT: PLOT NAME : EROSION CONTROL: SHEET PLOT SCALE : ########## RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - 01 (2) 1096 1095 1094 1094 1095 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1095 1094 1093 1092 1093 1092 1091 1090 1089 1095 1091 1091 1092 EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY STORMWATER DETAIL SEE DETAIL PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 1096 SLOPE INTERCEPT BERM BERM 1" = 60 FT 0 60 120 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECK INSTALL AND MAINTAIN TRACKING PAD SILT FENCE CULVERT PIPE CHECK 1 2 EROSION CONTROL KEYNOTES 3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES, AND IMPLEMENTED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WDNR CONSERVATION PRACTICE TECHNICAL STANDARDS. EROSION CONTROL ITEMS SHALL BE FIELD LOCATED AS NEEDED. TRACKING PAD SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR ANY EQUIPMENT OPERATING ON SOIL BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. TRACKING PAD SHALL FOLLOW WDNR TECHNICAL STANDARD 1057. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL RECEIVE 4" (MIN.) TOPSOIL, SEED, FERTILIZER, AND MULCH. SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WDNR SEEDING TECHNICAL STANDARDS 1059. ALL OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS OCCURRING AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK OR A STORM EVENT SHALL BE CLEANED UP BY THE END OF EACH DAY. FLUSHING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. ALL SWALE LOCATIONS SHALL HAVE EROSION MAT CLASS II TYPE A DOWN FLOWLINE. FOR ANY DISTURBED AREA THAT REMAINS INACTIVE FOR MORE THAN 7 WORKING DAYS, OR WHERE GRADING EXTENDS BEYOND THE PERMANENT SEEDING DEADLINES, THE SITE MUST BE TREATED WITH TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS SOIL TREATMENT, TEMPORARY SEEDING AND/OR MULCHING, EMAT, OR ANIONIC POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) AS A TEMPORARY SOIL BINDING AGENT. ALL TEMPORARY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE IS STABILIZED. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA TO BE LINED SO THAT ALL WASHOUT WATER IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE WASHOUT AREA. REFER TO EPA CONCRETE WASHOUT GUIDANCE FOR MORE INFORMATION. ANY SOIL EROSION THAT OCCURS AFTER FINAL GRADING AND/OR THE APPLICATION OF THE STABILIZATION MEASURE MUST BE REPAIRED AND THE STABILIZATION WORK REDONE. THE SITE WORK MUST DEMONSTRATE LONG-TERM EROSION STABILIZATION FROM VARIATIONS OF SEASONAL RAINFALL/RUNOFF CONDITIONS. INSTALL SILT FENCE IN AREAS WHERE ON-SITE SOILS AND STORMWATER MAY EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE TREATED WITH STABILIZATION MEASURES AS SPECIFIED WITHIN 3 WORKING DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHOULD AVOID ALL PROPOSED RETENTION/INFILTRATION AREAS TO LIMIT COMPACTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM RETENTION/ INFILTRATION AREAS AND SWALES WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS FINISHED. TEMPORARY SPOIL PILE IF REQUIRED MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SITE AND INCLUDE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL. SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF PILE IS REQUIRED TO PREVENT ANY EROSION OR SEDIMENTS LEAVING THE PROPERTY. PLANS SHOW AN APPROXIMATE AREA. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AREA IF NECESSARY. ALL RETENTION/INFILTRATION AREA BOTTOMS SHALL HAVE 2" OF COMPOST SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 6". ALL EROSION CONTROL ITEMS SHOULD BE PLACED BEFORE GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EACH INLET ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT LIMITS ON POST ROAD. 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1086 1093 1091 1090 1093 1092 1093 1093 1092 1091 3 3 EXTEND TO END OF GRADING LIMITS ON GRADING PLAN 11 Page 47 of 116 GUY POLE GUY POLE GUYGUY GUYGUYMH GUY GUYGUY OH OH OH OH OH OH 199 200 201 202 203 204 PC: 202+53.46 PC: 203+78.03 PT: 203+30.53 PT: 204+48.24 OH OH WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 44 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_PLANPROFILE.DWGFILE NAME : 6/23/2026 8:53 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY PROJECT: PLOT NAME : EROSION CONTROL: SHEET PLOT SCALE : ########## RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - 02 (2) 1085 1086 1087 1088 1088 1089 1089 1090 1090 1088 1087 1089 1090 1090 1089 1091 1092 1093 1104 1105 1103 1102 1101 1101 11001099 1098 1097 1096 1095 1094 1093 1092 110211011100109910981097 10961095 STORMWATER DETAIL 1" = 60 FT 0 60 120 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECK INSTALL AND MAINTAIN TRACKING PAD SILT FENCE CULVERT PIPE CHECK 1 2 EROSION CONTROL KEYNOTES 3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES, AND IMPLEMENTED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WDNR CONSERVATION PRACTICE TECHNICAL STANDARDS. EROSION CONTROL ITEMS SHALL BE FIELD LOCATED AS NEEDED. TRACKING PAD SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR ANY EQUIPMENT OPERATING ON SOIL BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. TRACKING PAD SHALL FOLLOW WDNR TECHNICAL STANDARD 1057. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL RECEIVE 4" (MIN.) TOPSOIL, SEED, FERTILIZER, AND MULCH. SEEDING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WDNR SEEDING TECHNICAL STANDARDS 1059. ALL OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS OCCURRING AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK OR A STORM EVENT SHALL BE CLEANED UP BY THE END OF EACH DAY. FLUSHING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. ALL SWALE LOCATIONS SHALL HAVE EROSION MAT CLASS II TYPE A DOWN FLOWLINE. FOR ANY DISTURBED AREA THAT REMAINS INACTIVE FOR MORE THAN 7 WORKING DAYS, OR WHERE GRADING EXTENDS BEYOND THE PERMANENT SEEDING DEADLINES, THE SITE MUST BE TREATED WITH TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS SOIL TREATMENT, TEMPORARY SEEDING AND/OR MULCHING, EMAT, OR ANIONIC POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) AS A TEMPORARY SOIL BINDING AGENT. ALL TEMPORARY BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE IS STABILIZED. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA TO BE LINED SO THAT ALL WASHOUT WATER IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE WASHOUT AREA. REFER TO EPA CONCRETE WASHOUT GUIDANCE FOR MORE INFORMATION. ANY SOIL EROSION THAT OCCURS AFTER FINAL GRADING AND/OR THE APPLICATION OF THE STABILIZATION MEASURE MUST BE REPAIRED AND THE STABILIZATION WORK REDONE. THE SITE WORK MUST DEMONSTRATE LONG-TERM EROSION STABILIZATION FROM VARIATIONS OF SEASONAL RAINFALL/RUNOFF CONDITIONS. INSTALL SILT FENCE IN AREAS WHERE ON-SITE SOILS AND STORMWATER MAY EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE TREATED WITH STABILIZATION MEASURES AS SPECIFIED WITHIN 3 WORKING DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHOULD AVOID ALL PROPOSED RETENTION/INFILTRATION AREAS TO LIMIT COMPACTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM RETENTION/ INFILTRATION AREAS AND SWALES WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS FINISHED. TEMPORARY SPOIL PILE IF REQUIRED MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SITE AND INCLUDE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL. SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF PILE IS REQUIRED TO PREVENT ANY EROSION OR SEDIMENTS LEAVING THE PROPERTY. PLANS SHOW AN APPROXIMATE AREA. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AREA IF NECESSARY. ALL RETENTION/INFILTRATION AREA BOTTOMS SHALL HAVE 2" OF COMPOST SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 6". ALL EROSION CONTROL ITEMS SHOULD BE PLACED BEFORE GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EACH INLET ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT LIMITS ON POST ROAD. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 44 4 21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1086 1085 1086 1085 1084 1084 1084 1087 1086 1085 1084 1088 1082 1083 1082 1081 1083 1080 1081 1079 1083 1085 1089 1090 1079 1080 3 EXTEND TO END OF GRADING LIMITS ON GRADING PLAN 12 Page 48 of 116 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 3104+52.60 OFF 17.39 3 RIM: 1095.30 SUMP: 1084.28 DEPTH: 11.02 S INV OUT: 1086.34 153.6' of SANITARY SEWER PVC 8 INCH @ 0.40%112.4' of SANITARY SEWER PVC 8 INCH @ 0.40% 2103+00.00 OFF 0.00 2 RIM: 1095.60 SUMP: 1085.62 DEPTH: 9.98 N INV IN: 1085.72 SW INV OUT: 1085.62 1101+85.68 OFF 2.18 1 RIM: 1095.59 SUMP: 1085.07 DEPTH: 10.52 NE INV IN: 1085.17 S INV OUT: 1085.07 SAN OH OH OH OH OH 99 100 101 102 103 104 SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN WWWWWWWW W 6"WM W 8"WM 8"WM 8"WM W W W W CONNECT TO EXISTING 8 X 8-INCH TEE STA 101+91.95 8-INCH 22.5° BEND STA 101+96.79 8-INCH GATE VALVE STA 102+00.44 8-INCH 22.5° BEND STA 104+09.33 8 X 6-INCH REDUCER STA 104+43.75 6-INCH GATE VALVE STA 104+47.16 HYDRANT 6.0' BURY DEPTH STA 104+50.56 W W 8"WM W W W 8"WM WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 44 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_UTILITYPLANPROFILE.DWGFILE NAME : 6/22/2026 1:39 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY PROJECT: PLOT NAME : UTILITY PLAN: SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:40 FT RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - 03 SAN MH 2 STA 103+00 OFFSET = 0' RT RIM = 1095.60 INV IN = 1085.72 INV OUT = 1085.62 SAN MH 3 STA 104+52.6 OFFSET = 17.4' RT RIM = 1094.61 INV OUT = 1086.34 EX SAN MH 1 STA 101+85.7 OFFSET = 2.2' RT RIM = 1095.67 INV IN = 1085.17 INV OUT = 1085.07 (RECONSTRUCTING MANHOLE REQUIRED) A B C D E SANITARY LATERALS LATERAL KEYNOTE CONNECTION TO MAIN STATION CONNECTION TO MAIN OFFSET A 103+97 3.0' LT B 104+31 7.0' RT C 104+40 12.2' RT D 104+44 15.4' RT E 104+16 2.7' RT POTENTIAL DRIVEWAY LOCATION, TYP UTILITY NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTHS OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SANITARY AND WATER LATERAL LOCATIONS CAN BE REVISED BY ENGINEER TO FIT FIELD CONDITIONS. ALL WATER LATERALS SHALL BE 1" POLYETHYLENE. ALL SANITARY LATERALS SHALL BE 6" PVC. CONNECTION TO EXISTING MANHOLE WILL REQUIRE RECONSTRUCTING OF MANHOLE. EXISTING RIM GRADE IS 1093.27. EXISTING CASTING CAN BE SALVAGED. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF STEVENS POINT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 284 LF OF 8" PVC WATERMAIN 12 LF OF 6" PVC WATERMAIN MAINTAIN 8 FT OF SEPARATION AT ALL TIMES 8' MIN 13 Page 49 of 116 1083 1084 1086 1088 1090 1092 1094 1096 1083 1084 1086 1088 1090 1092 1094 1096 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 205 8199+59.80 OFF 0.00 8 RIM: 1094.68 SUMP: 1086.02 DEPTH: 8.66 E INV OUT: 1086.02 249.9' of SANITARY SEWER PVC 8 INCH @ 0.40% 7202+09.74 OFF 0.00 7 RIM: 1092.99 SUMP: 1084.93 DEPTH: 8.06 W INV IN: 1085.03 E INV OUT: 1084.93 277.4' of SANITARY SEWER PVC 8 INCH @ 0.40% 6204+98.10 OFF -4.92 6 RIM: 1092.45 SUMP: 1071.62 DEPTH: 20.83 N INV IN: 1071.33 W INV IN: 1083.82 S INV OUT: 1071.33 MH MH GUYGUY GUY POLE GUY POLE GUYGUY GUYGUYMH GUY GUYGUY OH OH OH OH 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN W W W W W 8"WM 8"WMWWWWWW 8"WM W W W W W W 8"WM 6"WM6"WM W W W W W W W W W W W W W 8-INCH 22.5° BEND STA 202+11.20 8-INCH 22.5° BEND STA 204+83.63 8-INCH GATE VALVE STA 204+86.81 8 X 8-INCH TEE STA 204+90.01 8 X 6-INCH REDUCER STA 199+51.76 6-INCH GATE VALVE STA 199+45.76 HYDRANT 6.0' BURY DEPTH STA 199+39.76 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 44 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_UTILITYPLANPROFILE.DWGFILE NAME : 6/22/2026 1:35 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY PROJECT: PLOT NAME : UTILITY PLAN: SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:40 FT RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - 04 SAN MH 8 STA 199+59.8 OFFSET = 0' RT RIM = 1094.68 INV OUT = 1086.02 SAN MH 7 STA 202+09.7 OFFSET = 0' RT RIM = 1092.99 INV IN = 1085.03 INV OUT = 1084.93 SAN MH 6 STA 204+98.1 OFFSET = 4.9' LT RIM = 1094.84 INV IN (N)= 1071.33 INV IN (W) = 1083.82 INV OUT = 1071.33 (DROP MANHOLE REQUIRED) EX SAN MH 4 STA 204+99.3 OFFSET = 115.9' LT RIM = 1094.54 INV OUT = 1071.34 EX SAN MH 5 STA 204+95.8 OFFSET = 203.6' RT RIM = 1088.81 INV OUT = 1071.31 POTENTIAL DRIVEWAY LOCATION, TYP I H Q J G K L M N O P R F SANITARY LATERALS LATERAL KEYNOTE CONNECTION TO MAIN STATION CONNECTION TO MAIN OFFSET F 203+55 4.1' LT G 202+24 5.3' LT H 201+05 0.0' RT I 200+04 0.0' RT J 199+86 0.0' RT K 199+74 0.0' RT L 199+64 0.0' RT M 199+77 0.0' RT N 199+90 0.0' RT O 199+99 0.0' RT P 200+19 0.0' RT Q 200+68 0.0' RT R 202+72 20.6' LT 526 LF OF 8" PVC WATERMAIN 12 LF OF 8" PVC WATERMAIN MAINTAIN 8 FT OF SEPARATION AT ALL TIMES UTILITY NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTHS OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SANITARY AND WATER LATERAL LOCATIONS CAN BE REVISED BY ENGINEER TO FIT FIELD CONDITIONS. ALL WATER LATERALS SHALL BE 1" POLYETHYLENE. ALL SANITARY LATERALS SHALL BE 6" PVC. CONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARY WILL REQUIRE NEW DROP MANHOLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF STEVENS POINT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. 8' MIN 14 Page 50 of 116 SAN OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 104 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_GRADINGPLAN.DWGFILE NAME : 6/23/2026 10:14 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : Custom RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN: WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - Plan 1 IN 20 FT 1096 1095 1094 1094 1095 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1095 1094 1093 1092 1093 1092 1091 1090 1089 1095 1092 1086 1094 1095 1095 1094 1094 1094 1093 1093 1095 1095 10941095 1095 1094 1094 1093 1094 1095 1094 1094 1093 1095 1095 FF = 1095.5 FF = 1095.5 FF = 1095.5 FF = 1095.5 FF = 1095.5 BERM ELEVATION = 1094.25 BERM ELEVATION = 1094.25 GRADING NOTES: SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ROADWAY AND DITCH GRADES. SEE CUL-DE-SAC CONSTRUCTION DETAIL FOR FINAL PAVEMENT GRADES. NO GRADING IS ALLOWED OUTSIDE OF THE SLOPE INTERCEPT WHERE WETLANDS ARE PRESENT. WETLAND IMPACTS ARE PERMITTED. ALL SLOPES 4:1 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1" = 60 FT 0 60 120 GRADING LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR 1087 1083 BERM ELEVATION = 1093.25 1091 1090 1093 15 Page 51 of 116 MH MH MH GUYGUY GUY POLE GUY POLE GUYGUY GUYGUYMH GUY GUYGUY OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 205 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 42 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_GRADINGPLAN.DWGFILE NAME : 6/23/2026 10:15 AMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 2 PROJECT: PLOT NAME : 2 SHEET PLOT SCALE : Custom RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN: WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - Plan 1 IN 20 FT (2) 1089 1088 1090 1091 1092 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1093 1093 1093 1094 1095 1096 1096 1092 1090 1089 1091 1092 1093 1100 1099 1098 1101 1102 1103 1102 1101 1101 1100 1099 1098 1097 1096 1095 1094 1093 1092 1102110111001099 1098 1097 1096 1095 FF = 1094.5 FF = 1095.5 FF = 1094.5 FF = 1094.5 FF = 1094.5 FF = 1094.5 FF = 1093.5 FF = 1094.5 FF = 1096.5 FF = 1096.5 FF = 1097.5 FF = 1098.5 FF = 1098.5 1094 1093 1092 1091 1090 1089 1088 1087 1086 1085 1086 1085 1084 1084 1085 1085 1084 1079 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1093 1093 1092 1091 1090 1094 1093 1092 1094 1092 1093 1093 1093 1093 1092 1092 1093 1097 1095 1095 1094 1093 1092 1102 1103 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1096 10971098 10991100 1101 1102 1103 1096 10971098 1096 1097 1098 1096 1097 1096 1095 1095 1095 1094 1094 1093 1092 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1094 1089 1093 1094 1094 1094 1094 1094 BERM ELEVATION = 1094.25 BERM ELEVATION = 1094.25 BERM ELEVATION = 1093.25 BERM ELEVATION = 1095.25 BERM ELEVATION = 1096.25 GRADING NOTES: SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ROADWAY AND DITCH GRADES. SEE CUL-DE-SAC CONSTRUCTION DETAIL FOR FINAL PAVEMENT GRADES. NO GRADING IS ALLOWED OUTSIDE OF THE SLOPE INTERCEPT WHERE WETLANDS ARE PRESENT. WETLAND IMPACTS ARE PERMITTED. ALL SLOPES 4:1 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.1" = 60 FT 0 60 120 GRADING LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR 1087 1083 1083 1088 BERM ELEVATION = 1086.251086 1086 1079 1087 1086 1085 1083 REALIGNED TRAIL 16 Page 52 of 116 1092 1094 1096 1098 1100 1102 1092 1094 1096 1098 1100 1102 1095.61 1095.61 1095.80 1095.80 1095.77 1095.77 1095.10 1095.10 1094.42 1094.42 1093.72 1093.72 1093.64 1093.64 1093.52 1093.52 1093.56 1093.56 1093.38 1093.38 1093.31 1093.31 1093.37 1093.37 1093.44 1093.44 1093.79 1093.79 1094.12 1094.12 1094.48 1094.48 1095.58 1095.58 1096.71 1096.71 1097.59 1097.59 1098.04 1098.04 1098.20 1098.20 1097.57 1097.57 1095.77 1095.77 1095.76 1095.76 1095.74 1095.74 1095.73 1095.73 1095.71 1095.71 1095.70 1095.70 1095.68 1095.68 1095.67 1095.67 1095.66 1095.66 1095.64 1095.64 1095.63 1095.63 1095.61 1095.61 1095.60 1095.60 1095.58 1095.58 1095.57 1095.57 1095.32 1095.32 1095.07 1095.07 1095.01 1095.01 1095.31 1095.31 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 -0.06% -1.00% 1.17% VPI STA 100+00.00 VPI EL 1095.77 VPI STA 103+50.00 VPI EL 1095.57 VPI STA 104+16.00 VPI EL 1094.91 VPI STA 104+66.58 VPI EL 1095.50 SAN OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH EP: 104+79.58 PC: 101+64.28 PC: 100+03.38 PT: 104+12.37 PT: 100+41.25 100 101 102 103 104 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 44 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_PLANPROFILE.DWGFILE NAME : 6/22/2026 2:23 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY PROJECT: PLOT NAME : PLAN AND PROFILE: SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:40 FT RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - 01 INV = 1093.18 INV = 1093.06 SWALE/INV = 1092.96 INV = 1093.13 INV = 1093.23 INV = 1093.42 INV = 1093.53 INV = 1093.73 INV = 1093.95 HP 1094.14 INV = 1093.27 +53, 19' RT INV = 1093.27 +53, 19' LT 1096 1095 1094 1094 1095 1094 1095 1096 1097 1095 1094 1093 1092 1093 1092 1091 1090 1089 1095 1091 1091 1092 EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY STORMWATER RELIEF 1092.75 STORMWATER DETAIL SEE DETAIL PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE BEGIN CONSTRUCTION STA 100+00 MATCH EXISTING SAWCUT REQ'D 1096 PLAN AND PROFILE NOTES: SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ROADWAY AND DITCH GRADES. NO GRADING IS ALLOWED OUTSIDE OF THE SLOPE INTERCEPT WHERE WETLANDS ARE PRESENT. WETLAND IMPACTS ARE PERMITTED. SLOPE INTERCEPT 1" = 60 FT 0 60 120 1095.50 +25 1096.03 +00 1096.20 +75 1096.05 +50 1095.50 1094.57 +501095.31 1094.30 +75 1094.14 +00 1095.22 +251095.32 1095.01 1086 1093 BERM ELEVATION = 1093.25 1091 1090 1093 BERM ELEVATION = 1093.25 1092 1093 1093 1092 1091 R=50' PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT STA 97+70 TO STA 100+00 REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT AND REPAVE WITH 4" OF HMA PAVEMENT SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS 17 Page 53 of 116 1090 1092 1094 1096 1098 1100 1090 1092 1094 1096 1098 1100 1094.72 1094.72 1094.64 1094.64 1094.54 1094.54 1094.47 1094.47 1094.87 1094.87 1095.65 1095.65 1095.60 1095.60 1094.95 1094.95 1094.84 1094.84 1094.50 1094.50 1094.01 1094.01 1093.52 1093.52 1093.26 1093.26 1093.57 1093.57 1093.64 1093.64 1093.46 1093.46 1094.51 1094.51 1095.09 1095.09 1093.57 1093.57 1094.28 1094.28 1093.78 1093.78 1092.47 1092.47 1092.40 1092.40 1094.72 1094.72 1094.63 1094.63 1094.54 1094.54 1094.29 1094.29 1094.04 1094.04 1093.79 1093.79 1093.54 1093.54 1093.29 1093.29 1093.09 1093.09 1092.98 1092.98 1092.96 1092.96 1093.04 1093.04 1093.17 1093.17 1093.29 1093.29 1093.42 1093.42 1093.54 1093.54 1093.67 1093.67 1093.70 1093.70 1093.57 1093.57 1093.26 1093.26 1092.79 1092.79 1092.22 1092.22 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 0.50% -2.26% -0.36% -1.00% VPI STA 199+50.00 VPI EL 1094.72 VPI STA 200+00.00 VPI EL 1094.54 VPI STA 204+80.99 VPI EL 1092.09 VPC STA 203+50.00 VPC EL 1093.67 VPI STA 204+00.00 VPI EL 1093.92 VPT STA 204+50.00 VPT EL 1092.79 VPC STA 201+24.88 VPC EL 1093.29 VPI STA 201+74.88 VPI EL 1092.79 VPT STA 202+24.88 VPT EL 1093.04 HP STA 203+68.12 HP EL 1093.71 LP STA 201+91.56 LP EL 1092.96 VCL = 100.00' K = 36.23 VCL = 100.00' K = 66.63 MH MH GUYGUY GUY POLE GUY POLE GUYGUY GUYGUYMH GUY GUYGUY OH OH OH OH OH OH 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 EP: 205+14.34PC: 202+53.46 PC: 203+78.03 PT: 203+30.53 PT: 204+48.24 OH OH WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 44 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRICHARD_PLANPROFILE.DWGFILE NAME : 6/22/2026 2:16 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY PROJECT: PLOT NAME : PLAN AND PROFILE: SHEET PLOT SCALE : 1 IN:40 FT RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE LAYOUT NAME - 02 201+92, 19' LT INV = 1090.80 201+92, 19' RT INV = 1090.60 SWALE = 1094.24 (HIGH-POINT) INV = 1093.52 INV = 1093.76 INV = 1093.87 INV = 1094.11 INV = 1093.05 INV = 1093.26INV = 1093.90 INV = 1092.41 INV = 1093.37 INV = 1093.13 INV = 1093.02 INV = 1092.78 INV = 1092.72 INV = 1092.48 INV = 1092.43 INV = 1092.19 INV = 1092.12 INV = 1091.86 INV = 1091.74 INV = 1091.85 INV = 1090.60 INV = 1091.25 INV = 1091.65 INV = 1091.75 INV = 1093.70 INV = 1093.70 1085 1086 1087 1088 1088 1089 1089 1090 1090 1086 1085 1088 1087 1086 1085 1084 1084 1084 1087 1086 1085 1084 1088 1089 1090 1090 1089 1091 1092 1093 1100 1099 1098 1101 1102 1104 1105 1103 1102 1101 1101 11001099 1098 1097 1096 1095 1094 1093 1092 110211011100109910981097 10961095 STORMWATER DETAIL 1" = 60 FT 0 60 120 PLAN AND PROFILE NOTES: SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ROADWAY AND DITCH GRADES. NO GRADING IS ALLOWED OUTSIDE OF THE SLOPE INTERCEPT WHERE WETLANDS ARE PRESENT. WETLAND IMPACTS ARE PERMITTED. 1082 1083 1082 1081 1083 1080 1081 1079 1083 1085 1094.05 +75 1094.72 1094.63 1094.54 1095.02 +75 1095.46 +00 1094.50 +25 1093.95 +50 1093.78 +50 1094.03 1094.29 1093.65 +25 1093.54 +00 1089 1090 1079 1080 BERM ELEVATION = 1086.25 STORMWATER RELIEF = 1085.75 R=50' W14-2 OUTLET NO 30"X30" INV = 1091.00 INV = 1090.90 REALIGN TRAIL TO CONNECT TO ROADWAY 6" BASE AGGREGATE DENSE 3/4-INCH (8' WIDE / 75' LONG) +51.8, 85.9' RT 1093.16 +68.5, 11' RT 1092.74 18 Page 54 of 116 101+00.00 101+00.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 24.60 1093.63 -25.91 1093.64 -11.00 1095.49 11.00 1095.49 0.00 1095.71 0.00 1094.38 13.00 1095.41 18.62 1094.01 16.00 1094.66 19.00 1094.66 0.00 1095.71 0.00 1094.38 -13.00 1095.41 -18.62 1094.01 -16.00 1094.66 -19.00 1094.66 101+50.00 101+50.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 24.66 1093.66 -26.45 1093.48 -11.00 1095.46 11.00 1095.46 0.00 1095.68 0.00 1094.35 13.00 1095.38 18.62 1093.98 17.00 1094.38 20.00 1094.38 0.00 1095.68 0.00 1094.35 -13.00 1095.38 -18.62 1093.98 -17.00 1094.38 -20.00 1094.38 102+00.00 102+00.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 26.17 1093.88 -28.94 1093.41 -11.00 1095.44 11.00 1095.44 0.00 1095.66 0.00 1094.32 13.00 1095.36 18.62 1093.95 18.00 1094.10 21.00 1094.10 0.00 1095.66 0.00 1094.32 -13.00 1095.36 -18.62 1093.95 -18.00 1094.10 -21.00 1094.10 102+50.00 102+50.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 27.87 1094.04 -30.96 1093.46 -11.00 1095.41 11.00 1095.41 0.00 1095.63 0.00 1094.29 13.00 1095.33 18.62 1093.92 19.00 1093.83 22.00 1093.83 0.00 1095.63 0.00 1094.29 -13.00 1095.33 -18.62 1093.92 -19.00 1093.83 -22.00 1093.83 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 49 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRITCHARD_CORR.DWGFILE NAME : 5/4/2026 4:04 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 9 PROJECT: RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION PLOT NAME : 9 CROSS SECTIONS: SHEET PLOT SCALE : WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE PLOT SCALE : 10 FT 10 FT LAYOUT NAME - Model 1 IN:10 FT HORZ. / 1 IN:10 FT VERT. 19 Page 55 of 116 103+00.00 103+00.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 25.37 1094.34 -26.75 1093.90 -11.00 1095.38 11.00 1095.38 0.00 1095.60 0.00 1094.26 13.00 1095.30 18.62 1093.89 20.00 1093.55 23.00 1093.55 0.00 1095.60 0.00 1094.26 -13.00 1095.30 -18.62 1093.89 -20.00 1093.55 -23.00 1093.55 103+50.00 103+50.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 30.65 1095.48 -28.71 1094.44 -11.00 1095.35 11.00 1095.35 0.00 1095.57 0.00 1094.23 13.00 1095.27 18.62 1093.86 21.00 1093.27 24.00 1093.27 0.00 1095.57 0.00 1094.23 -13.00 1095.27 -18.62 1093.86 -21.00 1093.27 -24.00 1093.27 104+00.00 104+00.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 72.23 1096.79 -67.52 1094.19 -48.00 1096.03 46.30 1094.14 0.00 1095.07 0.00 1093.73 48.30 1094.06 53.92 1092.66 55.30 1092.31 58.30 1092.31 0.00 1095.07 0.00 1093.73 -50.00 1095.95 -55.62 1094.54 -57.00 1094.20 -60.00 1094.20 104+50.00 104+50.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1085 1090 1095 1100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 58.43 1095.71 -54.02 1094.84 -37.00 1096.05 37.00 1094.57 0.00 1095.31 0.00 1093.97 39.00 1094.49 44.62 1093.08 46.00 1092.74 49.00 1092.74 0.00 1095.31 0.00 1093.97 -39.00 1095.97 -44.62 1094.56 -46.00 1094.22 -49.00 1094.22 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 49 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRITCHARD_CORR.DWGFILE NAME : 5/4/2026 4:05 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 9 PROJECT: RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION PLOT NAME : 9 CROSS SECTIONS: SHEET PLOT SCALE : WEST ZINDA DRIVE ENTRANCE PLOT SCALE : 10 FT 10 FT LAYOUT NAME - Model 1 IN:10 FT HORZ. / 1 IN:10 FT VERT. 20 Page 56 of 116 200+00.00 200+00.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 65.87 1092.83 -50.00 1095.54 50.00 1093.54 0.00 1094.54 0.00 1093.21 52.00 1093.46 57.62 1092.05 59.00 1091.71 62.00 1091.71 0.00 1094.54 0.00 1093.21 -52.00 1095.46 -56.49 1094.34 -57.87 1093.99 -60.87 1093.99 200+50.00 200+50.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 30.58 1093.64 -53.02 1099.08 -13.00 1093.78 13.00 1093.78 0.00 1094.04 0.00 1092.71 15.00 1093.70 20.62 1092.29 22.00 1091.95 25.00 1091.95 0.00 1094.04 0.00 1092.71 -15.00 1093.70 -20.62 1092.29 -22.00 1091.95 -25.00 1091.95 201+00.00 201+00.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 30.76 1093.91 -52.88 1099.08 -11.00 1093.32 11.00 1093.32 0.00 1093.54 0.00 1092.21 13.00 1093.24 18.62 1091.83 20.00 1091.49 23.00 1091.49 0.00 1093.54 0.00 1092.21 -13.00 1093.24 -18.62 1091.83 -20.00 1091.49 -23.00 1091.49 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 49 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRITCHARD_CORR.DWGFILE NAME : 5/4/2026 4:06 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 9 PROJECT: RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION PLOT NAME : 9 CROSS SECTIONS: SHEET PLOT SCALE : WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE PLOT SCALE : 10 FT 10 FT LAYOUT NAME - Model 1 IN:10 FT HORZ. / 1 IN:10 FT VERT. 21 Page 57 of 116 201+50.00 201+50.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 32.40 1094.00 -54.99 1099.16 -11.00 1092.87 11.00 1092.87 0.00 1093.09 0.00 1091.75 13.00 1092.79 18.62 1091.38 20.00 1091.04 23.00 1091.04 0.00 1093.09 0.00 1091.75 -13.00 1092.79 -18.62 1091.38 -20.00 1091.04 -23.00 1091.04 202+00.00 202+00.00 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 31.75 1093.66 -50.25 1097.85 -11.00 1092.74 11.00 1092.74 0.00 1092.96 0.00 1091.63 13.00 1092.66 18.62 1091.26 20.00 1090.91 23.00 1090.91 0.00 1092.96 0.00 1091.63 -13.00 1092.66 -18.62 1091.26 -20.00 1090.91 -23.00 1090.91 202+50.00 202+50.00 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 30.22 1093.35 -37.15 1094.78 -11.00 1092.95 11.00 1092.95 0.00 1093.17 0.00 1091.83 13.00 1092.87 18.62 1091.46 20.00 1091.11 23.00 1091.11 0.00 1093.17 0.00 1091.83 -13.00 1092.87 -18.62 1091.46 -20.00 1091.11 -23.00 1091.11 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 49 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRITCHARD_CORR.DWGFILE NAME : 5/4/2026 4:06 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 9 PROJECT: RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION PLOT NAME : 9 CROSS SECTIONS: SHEET PLOT SCALE : WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE PLOT SCALE : 10 FT 10 FT LAYOUT NAME - Model 1 IN:10 FT HORZ. / 1 IN:10 FT VERT. 22 Page 58 of 116 203+00.00 203+00.00 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 28.04 1092.88 -37.97 1095.23 -11.00 1093.20 11.00 1093.20 0.00 1093.42 0.00 1092.08 13.00 1093.12 18.62 1091.71 20.00 1091.36 23.00 1091.36 0.00 1093.42 0.00 1092.08 -13.00 1093.12 -18.62 1091.71 -20.00 1091.36 -23.00 1091.36 203+50.00 203+50.00 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100 1105 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 32.69 1094.68 -30.39 1091.64 -11.00 1093.45 11.00 1093.45 0.00 1093.67 0.00 1092.33 13.00 1093.37 18.62 1091.96 20.00 1091.61 23.00 1091.61 0.00 1093.67 0.00 1092.33 -13.00 1093.37 -18.62 1091.96 -20.00 1091.61 -23.00 1091.61 204+00.00 204+00.00 1080 1085 1090 1095 1080 1085 1090 1095 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 33.17 1094.74 -28.69 1091.97 -11.00 1093.35 11.00 1093.35 0.00 1093.57 0.00 1092.24 13.00 1093.27 18.62 1091.86 20.00 1091.52 23.00 1091.52 0.00 1093.57 0.00 1092.24 -13.00 1093.27 -18.62 1091.86 -20.00 1091.52 -23.00 1091.52 204+50.00 204+50.00 1080 1085 1090 1095 1080 1085 1090 1095 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800-10-20-30-40-50-60-70 33.35 1094.02 -30.41 1092.71 -11.00 1092.57 11.00 1092.57 0.00 1092.79 0.00 1091.45 13.00 1092.49 18.62 1091.08 20.00 1090.73 23.00 1090.73 0.00 1092.79 0.00 1091.45 -13.00 1092.49 -18.62 1091.08 -20.00 1090.73 -23.00 1090.73 WISDOT/CADDS SHEET 49 E P:\PROJECTS_CURRENT\PORTAGE\PRITCHARD\WEST ZINDA-RIVER SUBDIVISION - 2025\ACAD\PRITCHARD_CORR.DWGFILE NAME : 5/4/2026 4:08 PMPLOT DATE : PLOT BY : DEXTER KAETTERHENRY 9 PROJECT: RIVER WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION PLOT NAME : 9 CROSS SECTIONS: SHEET PLOT SCALE : WEST RIVER DRIVE ENTRANCE PLOT SCALE : 10 FT 10 FT LAYOUT NAME - Model 1 IN:10 FT HORZ. / 1 IN:10 FT VERT. 10 FT 10 FT 23 Page 59 of 116 8 7 11 10 18 3 45 6 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 2 1 MH MH GUYGUY GUY POLE GUY POLE GUYGUY GUYGUYMH GUY GUYGUY SAN OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 104 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 205 OUTLOT 2 TRAIL TRAIL Not included in area calculation REPLAT OF RIVERWOOD WEST SUBDIVISION - (OVERVIEW SHEET - DEVELOPABLE AREAS) 1 IN = 100 FT 0 50 100 OUTLOT 2 Not included in area calculation 29,464 SF 0.68 AC 23,759 SF 0.55 AC 9,171 SF 0.21 AC 14,750 SF 0.34 AC 10,130 SF 0.23 AC 11,001 SF 0.25 AC 8,453 SF 0.19 AC 12,263 SF 0.28 AC 11,634 SF 0.27 AC 10,382 SF 0.24 AC 23,845 SF 0.55 AC 19,382 SF 0.45 AC 11,356 SF 0.26 AC 15,959 SF 0.37 AC 11,441 SF 0.26 AC 12,146 SF 0.28 AC 19,127 SF 0.44 AC 14,413 SF 0.33 AC Page 60 of 116 State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES West Central Region Headquarters 1300 W. Clairemont Ave Eau Claire, WI 54701 dnr.wi.gov wisconsin.gov Tony Evers, Governor Karen Hyun, Ph.D., Secretary Telephone 715-839-3700 Toll Free 1-888-936-7463 TTY Access via relay - 711 July 9, 2026 William Pritchard The Elizabeth Trust 3364 Cottage Hill Drive Green Bay WI 54311 SUBJECT: Coverage Under WPDES General Permit No. WI-S067831-06: Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Permittee Name: The Elizabeth Trust Site Name: River Wood West Subdivision FIN: 105558 Dear Permittee: The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources received your Water Resources Application for Project Permits or Notice of Intent, on June 05, 2026, for the River Wood West Subdivision site and has evaluated the information provided regarding storm water discharges from your construction site. We have determined that your construction site activities will be regulated under ch. 283, Wis. Stats., ch. NR 216, Wis. Adm. Code, and in accordance with Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) General Permit No. WI-S067831-06, Construction Site Storm Water Runoff. All erosion control and storm water management activities undertaken at the site must be done in accordance with the terms and conditions of the general permit. The Start Date of permit coverage for this site is July 09, 2026. The maximum period of permit coverage for this site is limited to 3 years from the Start Date. Therefore, permit coverage automatically expires and terminates 3 years from the Start Date and storm water discharges are no longer authorized unless another Notice of Intent and application fee to retain coverage under this permit or a reissued version of this permit is submitted to the Department 14 working days prior to expiration. A copy of the general permit along with extensive storm water information including technical standards, forms, guidance and other documents is accessible on the Department’s storm water program Internet site. To obtain a copy of the general permit, please download it and the associated documents listed below from the following Department Internet site: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/stormwater/construction/forms.html • Construction Site Storm Water Runoff WPDES general permit No. WI-S067831-06 • Construction site inspection report form • Notice of Termination form If, for any reason, you are unable to access these documents over the Internet, please contact me and I will send them to you. To ensure compliance with the general permit, please read it carefully and be sure you understand its contents. Please take special note of the following requirements (This is not a complete list of the terms and conditions of the general permit.): 1. The Construction Site Erosion Control Plan and Storm Water Management Plan that you completed prior to submitting your permit application must be implemented and maintained throughout construction. Failure to do so may result in enforcement action by the Department. Page 61 of 116 Page 2 2. Construction dewatering discharges from an area subject to remedial action operations or from an area containing contamination that would be subject to remedial action operations are not eligible for coverage under this permit (section 1.1.2.3). Discharges may be eligible for coverage under the Contaminated Groundwater from Remedial Action Operations General Permit (WI-0046566-07-0). 3. The general permit requires that erosion and sediment controls be routinely inspected at least every 7 days, and within 24 hours after a rainfall event of 0.5 inches or greater. Weekly written reports of all inspections must be maintained. The reports must contain the following information: a. Date, time, and exact place of inspection; b. Name(s) of individual(s) performing inspection; c. An assessment of the condition of erosion and sediment controls; d. A description of any erosion and sediment control implementation and maintenance performed; e. A description of the site’s present phase of construction. 4. A Certificate of Permit Coverage must be posted in a conspicuous place on the construction site. The Certificate of Permit Coverage (WDNR Publication # WT-813) is enclosed for your use. 5. When construction activities have ceased and the site has undergone final stabilization, a Notice of Termination (NOT) of coverage under the general permit must be submitted to the Department. It is important that you read and understand the terms and conditions of the general permit because they have the force of la w and apply to you. Your project may lose its permit coverage if you do not comply with its terms and conditions. The Department may also withdraw your project from coverage under the general permit and require that you obtain an individual WPDES permit instead, based on the Department's own motion, upon the filing of a written petition by any person, or upon your request. If you believe that you have a right to challenge this decision to grant permit coverage, you should know that the Wisconsin statutes and administrative rules establish time periods within which requests to review Department decisions must be filed. For judicial review of a decision pursuant to ss. 227.52 and 227.53, Wis. Stats., you have 30 days after the decision is mail ed, or otherwise served by the Department, to file your petition with the appropriate circuit court and serve the petition on the Department. Such a petition for judicial review must name the Department of Natural Resources as the respondent. To request a contested case hearing pursuant to s. 227.42, Wis. Stats., you have 30 days after the decision is mailed, or otherwise served by the Department, to serve a petition for hearing on the Secretary of the Department of Natural Resources. All requests for contested case hearings must be made in accordance with s. NR 2.05(5), Wis. Adm. Code, and served on the Secretary in accordance with s. NR 2.03, Wis. Adm. Code. The filing of a request for a contested case hearing is not a prerequisite for judicial review and does not extend the 30-day period for filing a petition for judicial review. Thank you for your cooperation with the Construction Site Storm Water Discharge Permit Program. If you have any questions concerning the contents of this letter or the general permit, please contact Amanda Harvey at (715) 679-0694. Sincerely, Ethan McGowan, PE Regional Stormwater Engineer Northern & West Central Region ENCLOSURE: Certificate of Permit Coverage Page 62 of 116 UNDER THE WPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE STORM WATER RUNOFF PERMIT Permit No. WI-S067831-06 Under s. NR 216.455(2), Wis. Adm. Code, landowners of construction sites with storm water discharges regulated by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Storm Water Permit Program are required to post this certificate in a conspicuous place at the construction site. This certifies that the site has been granted WDNR storm water permit coverage. The landowner must implement and maintain erosion control practices to limit sediment-contaminated runoff to waters of the state in accordance with the permit. EROSION CONTROL COMPLAINTS should be reported to the WDNR Tip Line at 1-800-TIP-WDNR (1-800-847-9367) Please provide the following information to the Tip Line: WDNR Site No. (FIN): 105558 Site Name: River Wood West Subdivision Address/Location: River Wood West Subdivision City of STEVENS POINT Additional Information: Landowner: The Elizabeth Trust Landowner's Contact Person: William Pritchard Contact Telephone Number: (715) 570-7211 Permit Start Date: July 09, 2026 WDNR Publication # WT-813 (10/11) CERTIFICATE OF PERMIT COVERAGE By: ________________________________ Page 63 of 116 July 9, 2026 Via email GP-NE-2026-69-T01751 Permit No. 8023090 City of Stevens Point Scott Beduhn 1515 Strongs Avenue Stevens Point, WI 54481 RE: Coverage under WDNR-GP2-2022 to build new roadway infrastructure for the River Wood West Subdivision in the City of Stevens Point, Portage County. Dear Mr. Beduhn, Thank you for submitting an application on behalf of the City of Stevens Point for coverage under the wetland and waterway statewide general permit for municipalities. In compliance with the provision(s) of Wis. Stats. ss. Chapter 281.36 (3g) (a)10 and Section 30.123(7), municipalities are authorized to construct, reconstruct, or maintain highways, bridges, arches, and culverts and will comply with the terms and conditions of WDNR-GP2-2022. Further information regarding resource concerns and permitting can be found by following the hyperlinks throughout the electronic version of this document. According to your application, the City of Stevens Point is proposing a subdivision development that will impact approximately 9,110 square feet of wetland. You have certified that your project meets the eligibility criteria and conditions for this activity. Based upon your signed certification you may proceed with your project. Please take this time to re-read the permit eligibility standards and conditions. The eligibility standards can be found on your application checklist or in the statewide general permit NR 320 (found at http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/Sectors/Transportation.html, under the Permits tab). The permit conditions are attached to this letter. You are responsible for meeting all general permit eligibility standards and permit conditions. This includes notifying the department before starting the project and submitting photographs within one week of the project’s completion. Please note, your coverage is valid for five years from the date of the department’s determination or until the activity is completed, whichever occurs first. This permit coverage also constitutes the state of Wisconsin’s wetland water quality certification under USCS s. 1341 (Clean Water Act s. 401). The Natural Heritage Inventory Public Portal database was reviewed on June 4, 2026, for potential impacts to threatened, endangered, or special concern resources. Details of this review are contained in the Endangered Resource Review (ERR) Letter that was sent as a separate attachment to this letter. The ERR letter is a confidential document that is not subject to open records requests and may only be shared with people directly involved with the design and construction of the project. wisconsin.gov Printed on Recycled Paper dnr.wi.gov Tony Evers, Governor Karen Hyun, Secretary Telephone 608-266-2621 Toll Free 1-888-936-7463 TTY Access via relay - 711 State of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Northeast Region Headquarters 2984 Shawano Avenue Green Bay, WI 54313-6727 Page 64 of 116 Mr. Beduhn River Wood West Subdivision General Permit Cover Letter July 9, 2026 Page 2 of 3 Further action is required on your part regarding threatened, endangered, or special concern, resources. Please keep me updated as you work through the required measures described in the ERR letter. A review for archeological and historical resources was also completed on June 7, 2026. The project received clearance from the department’s archeologist on June 8, 2026. No further action is required on your part regarding archeological or historical resources. The department conducts routine and annual compliance monitoring inspections. Our staff may follow up and inspect your project to verify compliance with state statutes and codes. The department appreciates your willingness to comply with wetland regulations, which help to protect the water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, natural scenic beauty, and recreational value of Wisconsin’s wetland resources for future generations. Please be sure to obtain any other local, state, or federal permits that are required before starting your project. Additionally, please share this letter and the Municipal General Permit with the construction foreman. This will help ensure that the crew completing the project are aware of the permit requirements and recommendations provided in this letter. If you need to modify your scope, have any questions regarding the review of the project, the contents of this letter, or the permit requirements, please contact me at (920) 360-3784 or by email at Jeremiah.Schiefelbein@Wisconsin.gov. Sincerely, Jay Schiefelbein Environmental Analysis & Review Specialist Enclosure: WDNR GP2-2022 BMPs for water quality Image 1. Overview of Project Location ec: J. Nieling – Stevens Point South E. McGowan – Eau Claire J. Kivela – City of Stevens Point D. Katterhenry – Gremmer File Page 65 of 116 Image 1. Overview of Project Location Page 66 of 116 Endangered Resources Review for the Proposed RiverWood West Subdivision, Portage County WI DNR Reviewer Information Review Date 6/4/2026 Reviewer Name Jeremiah Schiefelbein Program Name Environmental Analysis & Sustainability Work Station Brown Section A. Location and brief description of the proposed project Project Number GP 2026 T01751 Project Timing Location Portage County - T24N R08E S31 Project Description The Elizabeth Trust is proposing a subdivision development in the City of StevensPoint, Portage County. The project has two entrances one off West Zinda Drive andanother off West River Drive. The typical section for each roadway is 11 foot asphalttravel lanes and 2 foot gravel shoulders. 4 inches of asphalt over 12 inches of baseaggregate dense material. The roadways will be classified as local with average dailytraffic (ADT) of less than 100 vehicles per day. The project will be developed into 19 lotswith one of the lots being dedicated to the City of Stevens Point for the Green CircleTrail. Current Habitat Impacts to Wetlands or WaterbodiesMinimized to the greatest extent practicable. Property Type Federal Nexus Unknown Details related to project location, design, and timing of disturbance are important for determining both the endangered resourcesthat may be impacted by the project and any necessary follow-up actions. Please renew the review when the project plans or timingchange, new details become available, or more than a year has passed to confirm if results of this ER Review are still valid. The project follow-up actions are summarized below: Required Actions: 1 speciesRecommended Actions: 2 speciesNo follow-up Actions: 5 speciesAdditional Recommendations: No Section B. Endangered Resources recorded from within the project area and surrounding area 6/4/26, 3:29 PM 1/5 Page 67 of 116 Group State status Federal status Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus) Bird~ THR Prairie Skink (Plestiodon septentrionalis) Lizard SC/H Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) Mammal SC/P Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) Mammal SC/N Karner Blue Butterfly High Potential Range Other NA HPR Four-toed Salamander (Hemidactylium scutatum) Salamander~ SC/H Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) Turtle~ THR Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) Turtle~ SC/P For additional information on the rare species, high-quality natural communities, and other endangered resources listed above,please visit our Biodiversity (https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/EndangeredResources/biodiversity.html) page. For further definitions of stateand federal statuses (END=Endangered, THR=Threatened, SC=Special Concern), please refer to the Natural Heritage Inventory(NHI) Working List (https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/NHI/calypso/EOReport.html#SStatus). Section C. Follow-up Actions Actions that need to be taken to comply with state and/or federal endangered species laws: Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus) - Bird~ State status: THR Federal status: Impact type Impact possible Required measures Time of year restriction,Surveys,Habitat Assessment Description of required measures Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus), listed as Threatened in Wisconsin, prefers largerstands of older-aged to mature bottomland hardwoods along riparian areas, deciduousswamps, and northern hardwoods or mixed deciduous-coniferous upland forests withwetland pockets or ephemeral ponds interspersed or located in proximity. Suitable habitat for the red-shouldered Hawk may be present within or immediatelyadjacent to the project area. The birds and their nests and eggs are also protected underthe federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). To avoid impacts to this listed species, theproject shall follow one of the two options below: (i) Assume the birds are present on the site, and avoid all disturbances to the project sitefrom April 1 to July 31 (both dates inclusive). If the project cannot completely avoid allareas of suitable habitat during this time frame, please contact me to discuss otheroptions. (ii) Not assume the birds are present on the site and have a qualified biologist conductsurveys to determine if they are present (see list of pre-qualified surveyors,https://wiatri.net/er/nhitraining/docs/BirdSurveyors.pdf).If the is not found on the site as a result of the surveys, there will be no projectrestrictions related to these species. If surveys show the species is recorded, option (i) must be followed above. Surveyresults should be submitted to the Endangered Resources Review Program. Actions recommended to help conserve Wisconsin’s Endangered Resources: 6/4/26, 3:29 PM 2/5 Page 68 of 116 Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) - Mammal State status: SC/PFederal status: Impact type Impact possible Recommended measures Other Description of recommended measures Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) is a Special Concern species inWisconsin and a Protected Wild Animal under NR 10.02 Wis. Admin. Stats. It inhabits anumber of forested natural communities and the presence of conifers and a relativelymoist environment are important habitat components. Although it does not require old-growth, it is generally associated with certain characteristics of older forests, such asstanding dead trees, an abundance of decaying coarse woody debris, a diverseunderstory, and high truffle abundances. While this special concern species has no mandatory legal protections, I stronglyencourage you to follow the avoicance measures available at:https://widnr.widen.net/view/pdf/nib3le0cr3/ER0678.pdf?t.download=true&u=kkadwx Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) - Turtle~ State status: SC/PFederal status: Impact type Impact possible Recommended measures Exclusion Fencing,Other Description of recommended measures Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) is a Special Concern species in Wisconsin,utilizes a wide variety of aquatic habitats including deep and shallow marshes, shallowbays of lakes and impoundments where areas of dense emergent and submergentvegetation exists, sluggish streams, oxbows and other backwaters of rivers, drainageditches (usually where wetlands have been drained), sedge meadows, and wetmeadows adjacent to these habitats. This species is semi-terrestrial, and individualsmay spend quite a bit of time on land. They often move between a variety of wetlandhabitats during the active season, which can extend from early-March to mid-November.They overwinter in standing water that is typically over 3 feet deep with a deep organicsubstrate but will also use both warm and cold-water streams and rivers where they canavoid freezing. Blanding's turtles generally breed in spring, late summer, or fall. Nestingoccurs from mid-May through early-July depending on spring temperatures. Theystrongly prefer to nest in sandy soils and may travel up to 300m from a wetland orwaterbody to find suitable nesting sites. This species appears to display nest site fidelity,returning to its natal site and nesting in a similar location annually. Young hatch fromearly-August through mid-October and take 17-20 years or more to reach maturity. Seethe species guidance document for avoidance measures and management guidancefrom the Natural Heritage Conservation Program. Awareness of potential presence and having contractors remove and relocate any turtlesfound in the active work zone will help minimize impacts to this species. The active workzone includes any parking, staging, stockpiling, and storage locations. Remember that although these actions are not required by state or federal endangered species laws, they may be required by otherlaws, permits, granting programs, or policies of this or another agency. Examples include the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Baldand Golden Eagle Protection Act, State Natural Areas law, DNR Chapter 30 Wetland and Waterway permits, DNR Stormwaterpermits, and Forest Certification. No actions are required or recommended for the following endangered resources: 6/4/26, 3:29 PM 3/5 Page 69 of 116 Prairie Skink (Plestiodon septentrionalis) - Lizard State status: SC/HFederal status: Impact type No impact Reason Other - Justification Required Justification Prairie Skink (Plestiodon septentrionalis), a Special Concern species in Wisconsin,prefers sandy soils in bracken grasslands or pine barrens. They are also found on opensandy banks along rivers and streams. Their range in Wisconsin is restricted to a smallnumber of counties in the northwestern portion of the state, but they are more commonlyfound west of Wisconsin in the Great Plains. They are active from May throughSeptember, breeding takes place soon after emerging from their communaloverwintering sites. During the breeding season, males exhibit bright orange chins, lips,and throats. Prairie skinks maintain burrow systems enabling them to escape frompredators that include hawks, owls, ground squirrels, raccoons, and snakes. In the fall,with the onset of cold temperatures, prairie skinks will lengthen their burrows andoverwinter there. A prairie skink's diet is made up of numerous terrestrial insects such asspiders, crickets, beetles, and grasshoppers. Preferred habitat will not be impacted. Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) - Mammal State status: SC/NFederal status: Impact type No impact Reason Lack of Suitable Habitat within Project Boundary Justification Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster), a state Special Concern species, is found in drysand prairies, along fence lines, in open fields, sandy grassland terraces of large rivers,bluff prairies, abandoned farm fields, and seldom in barrens areas. Its preferred habitatseems to be native prairie sod, of which there is little left in Wisconsin. It avoids marshesand wet places. Semi-colonial, this species breeds throughout the year with a peak inJuly, August, and September. Preferred habitat will not be impacted. Karner Blue Butterfly High Potential Range - OtherState status: NAFederal status: HPR Impact type No impact Reason Other - Justification Required Justification Given the heavily wooded habitat, it is highly unlikely that Lupine would be found on thisparcel. Four-toed Salamander (Hemidactylium scutatum) - Salamander~ State status: SC/HFederal status: Impact type No impact Reason Lack of Suitable Habitat within Project Boundary Justification Four-toed Salamander (Hemidactylium scutatum), a Special Concern species, prefershardwood forests with ephemeral ponds, alder thickets, and sedge meadows, and to alesser degree, conifer swamps. It overwinters from November through late-March byburrowing underground to avoid freezing. Mating can occur in fall or spring at breedingponds, seepage pools, or springs. In April, females move to microhabitats of densemosses, usually sphagnum, overhanging the water's edge or dense mosses on downedwoody debris overlying the water. Four-toed salamanders will also nest in inundatedsedge tussock wetlands when mosses are not present. This species' unique nestingmicrohabitats appear to limit their abundance. Females remain with their eggs until theyhatch in late-May or June. Larvae drop into the water where they live until transformingin about six weeks. Four-toed salamanders remain active through November. Preferred habitat will not be impacted. 6/4/26, 3:29 PM 4/5 Page 70 of 116 Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) - Turtle~ State status: THR Federal status: Impact type No impact Reason Other - Justification Required Justification Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta), a Threatened Species in Wisconsin, prefers riversand streams with adjacent riparian wetlands and upland deciduous forests. This speciesoften forages in open wet meadows or in shrub-carrs dominated by speckled alder. Theyoverwinter in streams and rivers in deep holes or undercut banks where there is enoughwater flow to prevent freezing. This semi-terrestrial species typically remains within300m of rivers and streams. Wood turtles become active in spring as soon as the ice isgone and air temperatures reach around 50 deg. F, which can occur as early as mid-March. They may remain active into late-October but have been observed active andbreeding under the ice. Although they can breed at any time of year, breeding usuallyoccurs in the spring or fall. Nesting usually begins in late-May in southern Wisconsin andearly-June in the north and continues throughout June. They nest in open or semi-opencanopy areas containing gravelly or sandy soils, typically within 61m of open water.Young hatch in 55-75 days (mid-July to mid-September) depending on air temperatures.This species does not overwinter in nests, unlike some Wisconsin turtle species. Seethe species guidance document for avoidance measures and management guidancefrom the Natural Heritage Conservation Program. The closest documented occurrence is greater than one mile from the project. Awareness of potential presence and having contractors remove and relocate any turtlesfound in the active work zone will help minimize impacts to this species. The active workzone includes any parking, staging, stockpiling, and storage locations. Disclaimer This ER Review may contain Natural Heritage Inventory data (https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/NHI), including specific locations ofendangered resources, which are considered sensitive and are not subject to Wisconsin’s Open Records Law. As a result,information contained in this ER Review may be shared only with individuals or agencies that require this information in order tocarry out specific roles in the permitting, planning and implementation of the proposed project. Specific locations of endangeredresources may not be released or reproduced in any publicly disseminated documents. Details related to project location, design,and timing of disturbance are important for determining both the endangered resources that may be impacted by the project andany necessary follow-up actions. If the project plans change, new details become available, or more than a year passed, pleaserenew this review. 6/4/26, 3:29 PM 5/5 Page 71 of 116 From: Dexter Kaetterhenry To: jared.seidl@wisconsin.gov Cc: Bill Pritchard; Jarod Kivela; Adam Kuhn Subject: RE: Riverwood West subdivision (City of Stevens Point) Date: Friday, July 10, 2026 8:47:21 AM Attachments: image001.gif image002.gif image003.gif image004.gif image005.gif image006.gif image007.png image008.png GP 2026 T01751 Riverwood West Subdivision GP Cover Letter.pdf Good Morning Mr. Seidl, Jay Schiefelbein and Ethan McGowen served as the reviewers for the upcoming Riverwood West Subdivision project and have issued the attached Wetland General Permit based on the current development plans. The links provided below include the wetland delineation report as well as the project plans. As part of the design process, we completed a full-build analysis of the subdivision, which identified 9,110 square feet of wetland impacts. To minimize these impacts to the greatest extent practicable while maintaining a viable development with access from both West Zinda Drive and West River Drive, we incorporated front and side yard berms, steeper grading slopes, and adjusted roadway alignments to reduce wetland encroachment while preserving the functionality of the subdivision. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Wetland Delineation Report https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wg1nl89eonazzm7dci25c/Pritchard_WetlandReport.pd f?rlkey=bi7plhn6cih1n41wa0vdgy6kf&st=95banf7g&dl=0 Plans https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3doxrb9vmdoi8h6iqhijs/PRITCHARD_RiverWoodWestS ubdivision_pln.pdf?rlkey=o7sfalcsl94lfo7m9mya6itre&st=vnfxoa44&dl=0 Thanks! Dexter Dexter D. Kaetterhenry, PE Project Engineer E: d.kaetterhenry@gremmerassociates.com Page 72 of 116 Page 1 of 11 Administrative Staff Report Department of Community Development Conceptual Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Review 1016 Third Street September 8, 2026 Applicant(s): • Jim Lucas, representing R&L Developers Staff: • Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner akuhn@stevenspoint.com Parcel Number(s): • 281240832200425 Zone(s): • “B-2” Central Business Transition District • “PD” Planned Development Master Plan: • Downtown District Council District: • District 1 | Ald. Christianson Lot Information: • Lot Size: 16,059 sq. ft. (0.369 ac.) Current Use: • Undeveloped Applicable Regulations: • 23.02(1)(f)(3)(b) • 23.02(4)(b) Request 1. Public Hearing and action on a request from Jim Lucas, representing R&L Developers, for a conceptual plan review of a proposed multi-family residential development on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), consistent with Ch. 23.02(4)(b)(5). 2. Public Hearing and action on a request from Jim Lucas, representing R&L Developers, for a conditional use permit to construct a multi-family residential building on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), consistent with Ch. 23.02(1)(f)(3)(b). 3. A request from Jim Lucas, representing R&L Developers, for a site plan review to construct a multi-family residential building on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), consistent with Ch. 23.02(4)(b)(1)(2). Attachment(s) 1. Application 2. Plans Findings of Fact 1. The applicant is requesting to construct a six-unit condominium on the subject property. 2. The proposed structure would be situated on the northern half of the property, with seven on-site parking stalls being situated immediately to the south. 3. The property is zoned “B-2” Central Business Transition District. As part of the redevelopment plan for the former Belke Lumber site, the subject property was applied a “PD” Planned Development overlay designation. 4. The “PD” Planned Development designation allows for modified development standards, contingent on approval of a conceptual plan and site plan review. 5. A conditional use permit is also required as 3+ residential units are being proposed. 6. The Plan Commission and Common Council may attach additional conditions onto this request as necessary. Page 73 of 116 Page 2 of 11 Staff Recommendation Approve the request for a conceptual plan review of a proposed multi-family residential development on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425). Approve the request for a conditional use permit to construct a multi-family residential building on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the start of construction. 2. Staff shall be permitted to approve minor changes to the plan submittal. Approve the request for a site plan review to construct a multi-family residential building on the property located at 1016 Third Street (Parcel ID 281240832200425), subject to the following conditions: 1. Garbage and recycling collection shall be handled commercially. 2. The intended trash enclosure shall be screened from public view, subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. 3. Final details on proposed landscaping shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator for review and approval. 4. A building and erosion control permit shall be obtained prior to the start of construction. 5. Staff shall have the ability to approve minor amendments to the submitted plan set. Vicinity Map Page 74 of 116 Page 3 of 11 Background Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a six-unit condominium on the subject property, which would be situated on the northern half of the property. Four of the units would have two bedrooms, while the remaining two units would have one bedroom. Additional site features include seven parking stalls on the southern end of the property and stormwater management features on both sides of the proposed structure. The property is zoned “B-2” Central Business Transition District. As part of the redevelopment plan for the former Belke Lumber site, the subject property was applied a “PD” Planned Development overlay designation. While the “PD” designation is applied to the property, the Common Council must approve a conceptual development plan for the site and a site plan review. Additionally, land use standards are subject to the base zoning of the property – in this case, the “B-2” District. A six-unit residence is a conditional use within the “B-2” District and requires a conditional use permit to authorize said land use. Standards of Review – Conceptual Plan Review 1. The proposed PD is consistent with the pertinent elements of the City of Stevens Point Comprehensive Plan and any other adopted plans. Analysis: The subject property has a future land use designation of ‘Downtown District,’ which “allows for and promotes high density office, retail, housing and public uses, preferably in mixed-use buildings.” Findings: Staff believes that this standard is met. The proposed land use is consistent with providing residential uses on the periphery of the City’s Downtown. While the proposed structure will not be a mixed-use building, a significant number of commercial and mixed-use buildings are located nearby. Page 75 of 116 Page 4 of 11 2. The proposed PD is consistent with the standards and uses of the context area within which it is located. Analysis: Multi-family residential uses exist to the east and west of the subject property. Single-family uses exist to the north, while commercial and institutional uses exist to the south. Surrounding land uses are consistent with the types of land uses allowed within the Downtown District. Findings: This standard is met. 3. The proposed PD meets the requirements of this zoning ordinance. Analysis: The proposed development meets all Zoning Code requirements. No deviations are being requested. Findings: This standard is met. 4. The proposed PD will reinforce the existing or planned character of the neighborhood. Analysis: Staff believes that the proposed development will support the existing neighborhood. High-density multi-family residential developments exist to the east and west, and single-family development exists to the north. The proposed six-unit structure provides a better land use transition from the stark differences in residential intensity that currently exists. Various commercial uses exist to the south that will benefit from having additional residential units close by. Findings: While there are single-family uses that exist nearby, careful planning in site design took place to minimize any concerns. For example, the height of the structure is designed in a way to be more complementary to neighboring two-story single-family uses to the north. 5. The site is appropriate for the development allowed in the proposed PD. Analysis: The subject property is appropriate for the proposed planned development. As mentioned earlier, the subject property already has a “PD” overlay designation, as do neighboring lots as part of the former Belke Lumber site. Findings: This standard is met. 6. The PD demonstrates a higher quality of site design that is more sensitive to the existing context, both built and natural, than is possible under other available zoning districts. Analysis: The subject property is located within the City’s Downtown Design Review – a historic district that has unique architectural and site design standards to promote harmonious development for a historically significant area of the City. The City’s Historic Preservation / Design Review Commission has approved the proposed building and site design during their August 25th, 2026 meeting. Findings: The proposed three-story structure contains a variety of siding materials – metal, glass, concrete block and composite wood siding – that provides contrast and is complementary with the historic land uses that Page 76 of 116 Page 5 of 11 occupied the site. Building mass is significant in that it covers a considerable portion of the property, leaving remaining land designated for parking and stormwater management. 7. Public facilities and services including but not limited to schools, roads, recreation facilities, wastewater treatment, water supply and stormwater facilities are adequate for the development allowed in the proposed PD. Analysis: City infrastructure, such as roads and underground utility infrastructure, currently exists and can support the proposed development. Stormwater features are proposed on the site to handle on-site retention. Nearby recreational amenities exist, such as Pfiffner Park, that residents of the proposed building can utilize. While the enrollment of the School District could increase with the proposed development, a total of six units is not anticipated to result in a significant influx of school-aged residents. Findings: This standard is met. 8. The PD will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent conforming properties. Analysis: Please see the section above regarding the future land use designation for the subject property. Findings: Staff believes that this standard is met. The proposed multi-family residential development aligns with the Comprehensive Plan’s intention to have high-density residential offerings within the City’s Downtown. Standards of Review – Conditional Use Permit 1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. Analysis: Six residential units are proposed. Findings: The City’s Zoning Code places numerous regulations designed as safeguards to protect the public. These regulations include building setbacks, parking, stormwater management, etc. The proposed development meets all Zoning Code requirements. By meeting Zoning Code requirements, staff believes that the proposal will not endanger the health, safety and general welfare of the public. 2. The use will not be injurious to the use and for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values. Analysis: Six residential units are proposed. Page 77 of 116 Page 6 of 11 Findings: Multi-family residential uses are identified as a conditional use within the “B-2” Central Business Transition District. Based on the application and plan submittal, staff believe that the use will not be injurious to the property or surrounding neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Analysis: The respective area is in an established and developed area of the city. Findings: See standards one and two above. 4. The exterior architectural appeal and function plan of any proposed structure will not be variance with either the exterior architectural appeal and function plan, and scale of the structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the immediate neighborhood or in the character of the applicable district so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood. Analysis: The proposed buildings are planned to use a variety of siding material – metal, glass, concrete block and composite wood siding – to provide contrast and a sound visual aesthetic. As mentioned earlier, the property falls within the City’s Downtown Design Review District. The City’s Historic Preservation / Design Review District approved a design review of the proposed structure and site improvements. Findings: This standard is met. 5. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or facilities have been, or are being, provided. Analysis: Seven parking spaces are proposed. While the subject property is exempt from minimum parking requirements due to its “B-2” zoning designation, the City’s parking requirements would otherwise require nine parking spaces. On-street parking is provided along Portage Street that can satisfy additional parking needs. Access to the property is off of an existing private alley. On-site drainage is provided on the site and meets minimum specifications. Findings: This standard is met. 6. Adequate measures have been, or will be taken, to provide ingress and egress so designed to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Analysis: One access point is proposed off of the alley to the south. Given that six housing units are proposed, staff believes that the one access point is adequate to handle traffic generation. The proposed driveway is 40’ away from the intersection between the alley and Third Street. Findings: Staff believes that safe access into and out of the subject property is provided with the proposed land use. 7. The proposed use is not contrary to the objectives of any duly adopted land use plan for the City of Stevens Point and any of its components. Page 78 of 116 Page 7 of 11 Analysis: The subject property is zoned “B-2” Central Business Transition and already has a “PD” Planned Development Overlay District designation. A future land use designation of ‘Downtown District’ exists. The “B-2” District is estbalished to “be applied on the fringe of the City's Central Business District for the following purposes: a) To accommodate existing, new and relocated land uses which are compatible with the retail core area. b) To provide a commercial district of intermediate intensity which will provide a buffer zone between the retail core and residential neighborhoods.” Findings: Staff believes that the proposed residential use aligns with the zoning and future land use designation of the subject property. 8. The use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. Analysis: The property and use meet minimum performance standards in the “B-2” District. Several Building Code requirements exist with the proposed land use and would need to be met as a condition for receiving temporary occupancy. Findings: This standard is met. 9. The proposal will not result in result in an over-concentration of high-density living facilities in one area so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood, on the school system, and the social and protective systems of the community. Analysis: The proposed development is in an area that allows for higher-density residential land uses, per the City’s Future Land Use Map. Staff believes that social and emergency services in the area can support the anticipated population influx. Findings: The proposal should not result in an over-concentration of high-density living facilities as the property is located near a commercial corridor designated as an arterial street. 10. Principal: Applications for exclusive multifamily residential uses: The view from the street should maintain a residential character. The view should be dominated by the building and not by garages, parking, mechanical equipment, garbage containers, or other storage. Subject Property Page 79 of 116 Page 8 of 11 Analysis: Please see previous sections of this report. Findings: The current building matches the surrounding multi-family residential area in terms of architectural appeal and general function. 11. Principal: Access to the site shall be safe. a) All developments shall front on a public right-of-way unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Analysis: Access is proposed to be off of Third Street. Finding: This standard is met. b) The driveway to the site shall be located so as not to be a danger to the street flow of traffic. Analysis: The proposed access point maintains minimum spacing requirements as outlined in the City’s Zoning Code. Findings: This standard is met. c) The driveway shall not be too close to neighboring intersections. Analysis: The proposed driveway is 40’ away from the intersection between the alley and Third Street. 20’ of separation is required. Findings: This standard is met. d) Alignment of the driveway shall be coordinated with adjacent access points to avoid conflict or confusion. Analysis: One driveway is proposed off of the alley. No driveway exists on the opposite side of the alley. Findings: This standard is met. e) Only one driveway shall be allowed per site unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Two family units may be allowed more than one driveway if those driveways are separated by not less than 10 feet. Maximum driveway openings shall be 20 feet (each). Analysis: Based on the amount of street frontage provided, the City’s Zoning Code permits a maximum of two driveways. Findings: No access points are proposed off of City streets. Instead, access would be off of the adjacent alley. Page 80 of 116 Page 9 of 11 f) The organization of traffic flow on-site and between the site and the street shall be organized in a clear hierarchy of flow patterns. Internal and external areas where traffic flow changes directions or creates intersections shall be organized at clear intersections and those intersections are spaced far enough apart so as to not cause confusion or problems and to provide for adequate spacing for waiting vehicles. Analysis: The traffic flow on the site to the street is anticipated to flow smoothly. Traffic will enter and exit off of the adjacent alley, which leads to Third Street and Portage Street. Findings: This standard is met. g) Intersections are visible and not visually screened. Analysis: The intersections are not screened from view. Findings: Vision obstructions should not be a concern. h) Adequate drainage and snow storage is provided. Analysis: Adequate drainage exists on the property, and snow storage is expected to be located towards the south end of the property. Findings: This standard is met. i) Minimum size requirements are maintained for safe vehicle circulation. Analysis: The lot provides for adequate traffic aisles, as required by the City’s Zoning Code. Findings: This standard is met. j) Parking areas shall be safe. They shall be adequately lit, sized to meet minimum standards, graded so as to not be too steep, and paved with concrete, brick, or bituminous surfacing. The light source shall not be visible from adjacent properties. Lighting shall be developed in such a way to minimize light straying onto adjacent properties. Analysis: Additional lighting is planned to be located on the exterior of the building to meet minimum Building Code requirements. Light pollution is anticipated to be minimal. Findings: This standard is met. k) Driveways shall be located to minimize the impact to adjacent properties. Analysis: Please see above. The driveway should not cause a negative impact on the adjacent properties. Page 81 of 116 Page 10 of 11 Findings: This standard is met. 12. There shall be adequate utilities to serve the site. a. The Public Works Director, Police Chief and Fire Chief shall determine whether there is adequate sanitary sewer, portable water, storm drainage, street capacity, emergency access, public protection services, and other utilities to serve the proposed development. They shall review the plan to ensure safety and access for safety vehicles. Analysis: Please see above. The property has the needed utilities and access to support the proposed land use. Findings: This standard is met. 13. The privacy of the neighboring development and the proposed development shall be maintained as much as practical. Guidelines: a. Mechanical equipment including refuse storage shall be screened from neighboring properties. Analysis: Refuse storage is planned to be located within the parking lot. As a condition of approval, the applicant would need to provide additional details as to the screening material that would be used. Findings: This standard is met. b. Lighting shall be located to minimize intrusion onto neighboring properties. Analysis: Outside of light coming from the building, no additional lighting that impacts the surrounding area is proposed. Findings: This standard is met. c. Sources of noise shall be located in a manner that minimizes impact to neighboring properties. Analysis: The use will be operating within the confines of the building and property. Findings: The use should not create excessive noise. 14. Principal – Applications for exclusive multi-family residential uses. Landscaping shall be provided, or existing landscape elements shall be preserved to maintain a sense of residential character, define boundaries, and to enhance the sense of enclosure and privacy. Analysis: Landscaping is planned to be located along the building. Findings: This standard is met. Page 82 of 116 Page 11 of 11 Based on the findings above, staff would recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the conditions outlined on page one. Please keep in mind that State legislation has placed limitations on local jurisdictions regarding the denial of conditional use permits. Conditional use permits shall be reviewed by a means to permit a use under certain conditions applied to the use or property. For example, if a concern is raised regarding to a standard above, a condition can be applied to the permit to address the concern and grant the permit. Page 83 of 116 Page 84 of 116 Page 85 of 116 Page 86 of 116 Page 87 of 116 Page 88 of 116 Page 89 of 116 Page 90 of 116 BUILDING 1 13'-0" 15'-8 1/4" 17'-9" 49'-11" P O R T A G E S T R E E T T H I R D S T R E E TEXISTING BUILDING FENCE TO SEPARATE WALK-OUT PATIO AREAS ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved PARCEL ID: 1016 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 THIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS New Multi-Family For T100 25109 August 21, 2025 1016 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 SITE PLAN & SHEET INDEXTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 281240832200421 & 281240832200425 1" = 20'-0"1 1SITE PLANSITE PLAN N 40'0' 10' 20' CODE DATA SOIL BEARING CAPACITY GROUND SNOW LOAD ROOF DEAD LOAD LATERAL LOAD (115 mph WIND) UPLIFT AT CANOPY FLOOR LIVE LOAD, RESIDENTIAL HALLWAY LIVE LOAD, RESIDENTIAL Design Loads 1607.1/1608.2 Residential R2 OCC, With Sprinkler - 250 FT, STAIRS = .30" PER OCC: DOORS = .20" PER OCC: 108" PROVIDED, 36/38 =0.95" Sanitary Facilities, Table 2902.1 Required Exit Width - Table 1005 Exit Access Travel Distance 1017.2 TYPE 5 B, 7,591 SF Proposed New Building Wisconsin Enrolled, 2021 International Building Code Residential, R2 Actual Building Area Occupant Capacity 1004.1.2 Occupancy Classification - 303.3 Governing Code Type of Construction - TABLE 601 Residential R2, 5B Constr, Sprinkled, Allows 3 Stories Allowable Height - TABLE 504.4 R OCCUPANCY, PER UNIT REQUIREMENTS: 1 TOILET 1 LAVATORY 1 BATH / SHOWER 1 KITCHEN SINK 1 LAUNDRY CONNECTION PER 20 UNITS = 3,000 PSF PRESUMED = 40 PSF = 15 PSF = 24 PSF = 30 PSF = 40 PSF = 100 PSF Residential, R2 - 7,591 sf Occupied Area 7,591 / 200 sf per Person = 38 Occupants Allowable Area - TABLE 506.2 Residential R2, 5B Constr, Sprinkled, Allows 21,000 sf *Fire Suppression System must be 13, cannot be 13R* IBC 1607.1 (26) SHEET INDEX TITLE T100 SITE PLAN & SHEET INDEX ARCHITECTURE A001 LIFE SAFETY PLANS & FIRE PARTITION DETAILS A010 UNIT TYPES A101 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN A102 PROPOSED SECOND & THIRD FLOOR PLAN A103 KITCHEN PLAN & CABINET ELEVATIONS A104 BATHROOM PLAN & ELEVATIONS A201 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS A301 BUILDING SECTIONS A302 WALL DETAILS A303 STAIR DETAILS A600 WINDOW SCHEDULE AND DETAILS A701 3D VIEWS STRUCTURE S100 FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILS S101 FLOOR FRAMING PLANS S102 ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND DETAILS ELECTRICAL E101 1ST FLR POWER & LIGHTING PLAN E102 2ND & 3RD FLR POWER & LIGHTING PLAN GENERAL G101 FRAMING CONNECTIONS SCHEDULE G102 SYMBOLS AND LEGENDS G103 ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS G104 ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND SIDEWALK DETAILS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Residential OCC, With Sprinkler - 125 FT, Common Path Travel Distance 1006.2.1 Prescriptive Method for Heat Loss ENERGY EFFICIENCY DATA IS ON SHEET A201 SHEET NOTES: 1. FIRE SUPPRESSION AND ALARM SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED, SUBMITTED, AND INSTALLED BY SYSTEM SUBCONTRACTOR PER NFPA 13 AND 2021 IBC. 2. HVAC SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED, SUBMITTED AND INSTALLED BY SUBCONTRACTOR. 3. PLUMBING SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED, SUBMITTED AND INSTALLED BY SUBCONTRACTOR. 4. TRUSS SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SENT TO THE ARCHITECT FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE STATE. Page 6 of 61 Page 91 of 116 DN DryerWasher DryerWasher UP DryerWasher WasherDryer WALL TYPE E SECTION 1 HR. FIRE RATED TO MEET CODE STANDARDS: TABLE 602 1'-4" WALL TYPE A SECTION 1 HR. FIRE & SOUND RATED GA WP3370 STC 51 R-13 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION STC 51 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD RATED ASSEMBLY UL U419 1'-4" R-13 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD RATED ASSEMBLY UL U305, STC 51 2 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD INDICATES 1 HR COORIDOR FIRE BARRIER, 45-MIN DOOR MINIMUM INDICATES 1 HR FIRE BARRIER @ STAIR SHAFTS, 1-HR DOOR MINIMUM WALL TYPE F SECTION 1 HR. FIRE RATED TO MEET CODE STANDARDS: TABLE 602 1'-4" R-13 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD RATED ASSEMBLY UL U305, STC 51 1/2" RESILENT CHANNEL 1'-4" WALL TYPE G SECTION 1 HR. FIRE RATED TO MEET CODE STANDARDS: TABLE 602 5 1/2" THERMAFIBER SAFB 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD INTERIOR SIDE RATED ASSEMBLY UL U330 1" EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATING SHEATING EXTERIOR SIDING BY OWNER INDICATES 1 HR COORIDOR FIRE BARRIER, 45-MIN DOOR MINIMUM 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A001 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 LIFE SAFETY PLANS & FIRE PARTITION DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 1/8" = 1'-0"3 33RD FLR FIRE SEPARATION3RD FLR FIRE SEPARATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 22ND FLR FIRE SEPARATION2ND FLR FIRE SEPARATION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 11ST FLR FIRE SEPARATION1ST FLR FIRE SEPARATION 16'0' 4' 8' 16'0' 4' 8' 16'0' 4' 8' 1" = 1'-0"4 4FIRE PARTITIONSFIRE PARTITIONS 0' 2'6" 1' SHEET NOTES: 1. ALL UNITS TO INCLUDE A MINIMUM RATED 2-A:10-BC PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN EACH KITCHEN - IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 906.3.1, NFC 906, AND NFPA 10 2. ALL UNITS TO INCLUDE A SMOKE ALARM IN EACH BEDROOM AND OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA PER IBC 907.2.11.2. 3. ALL UNITS TO INCLUDE A CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR OUTSIDE OF EACH SLEEPING AREA AND IN BEDROOMS WHERE THERE IS A FUEL BURNING APPLIANCE LOCATED WITHIN PER IBC IBC 915.2 AND SPS 362.0915 4. 1 SEMI-RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS (FEC) PER FLOOR NOT TO PROJECT OUT INTO CIRCULATION PATH GREATER THAN 4 INCHES. Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 7 of 61 Page 92 of 116 DN UP DryerWasher DN B C D D D E F B A EE 78 SF 78 SF UNIT 1 LAUNDRY ROOM 81 SF 81 SF UNIT 1 ENTRY 68 SF 68 SF UNIT 1 BATHROOM 99 SF 99 SF UNIT 1 BEDROOM 1 134 SF 134 SF UNIT 1 BEDROOM 2 115 SF 115 SF UNIT 1 KITCHEN 179 SF 179 SF UNIT 1 LIVING ROOM 13 SF 13 SF UNIT 1 MECHANICAL CLOSET 11 SF 11 SF UNIT 1 COAT CLOSET 48 SF 48 SF BALCONY 10 SF 10 SF UNIT 1 BEDROOM 1 CLOSET 18 SF 18 SF UNIT 1 BEDROOM 2 CLOSET C D D D B B C B D D D D D B B E F A 57 SF 57 SF UNIT 2 ENTRY 46 SF 46 SF UNIT 2 LAUNDRY ROOM 16 SF 16 SF UNIT 2 MECHANICAL CLOSET 189 SF 189 SF UNIT 2 KITCHEN 66 SF 66 SF UNIT 2 BATHROOM 172 SF 172 SF UNIT 2 LIVING ROOM 131 SF 131 SF UNIT 2 BEDROOM 16 SF 16 SF UNIT 2 BEDROOM CLOSET 198 SF 198 SF BALCONY E B C 1'-4" WALL TYPE A PLAN 1 HR. FIRE & SOUND RATED GA WP3370 STC 51 R-13 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION STC 51 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD 2"x4" WOOD STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. RATED ASSEMBLY UL U419 1'-4" WALL TYPE B PLAN STANDARD 2"x6" EXTERIOR WALL R-13 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION 1 LAYER 1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD EXTERIOR SIDING OVER 1/2" OSB SHEATHING AS SELECTED BY OWNER 2"x6" WOOD STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. 1'-4" WALL TYPE C PLAN STANDARD 2"x6" INTERIOR WALL 1 LAYER 1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD 2"x6" WOOD STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. 1'-4" WALL TYPE D PLAN STANDARD 2"x4" INTERIOR WALL 1 LAYER 1/2" GYPSUM WALL BOARD 2"x4" WOOD STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. 1'-4" WALL TYPE E PLAN 1 HR. FIRE RATED TO MEET CODE STANDARDS: TABLE 602 R-13 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD 2"x6" WOOD STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. RATED ASSEMBLY UL U305, STC 51 1/2" RESILENT CHANNEL 1'-4" WALL TYPE F PLAN 1 HR. FIRE RATED TO MEET CODE STANDARDS: TABLE 602 R-13 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD 2"x6" WOOD STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. RATED ASSEMBLY UL U305 2 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD 1'-4" WALL TYPE G SECTION 1 HR. FIRE RATED TO MEET CODE STANDARDS: TABLE 602 5 1/2" THERMAFIBER SAFB 1 LAYER 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM WALL BOARD INTERIOR SIDE RATED ASSEMBLY UL U330 1" EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATING SHEATING EXTERIOR SIDING BY OWNER 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A010 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 UNIT TYPESTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1UNIT TYPE 1UNIT TYPE 1 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 1/4" = 1'-0"2 2UNIT TYPE 2UNIT TYPE 2 0' 8'0' 2' 4' SHEET NOTES: 1. ALL FRAMING SHOULD BE SPF #2 OR BETTER 2. ALL FRAMING LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH GRADE OR MASONRY SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED 3. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY MINIMUM OF TWO SHOULDER STUDS. SPANS OVER 10 FEET SHALL HAVE 5 1/2" MINIMUM BEARING. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 5. CORRIDOR WALLS TO BE STC 50 MIN. 1" = 1'-0"3 3WALL TYPESWALL TYPES 0' 2'6" 1' 1ST & 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR Page 8 of 61 Page 93 of 116 UP Dryer Washer Washer Dryer 12'-0" 13'-0" 12'-0" 25'-0" 13'-0" 6'-0" 22'-0" 26'-0" 25'-0" 27'-0" 1'-0" 13'-0" 14'-0" 6'-0" 14'-0" 13'-0" 1'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 4'-0" 3'-6 1/2" 4'-6 1/2" A A A A A A G H G G G G B B B D D B B D I I B DD 2'-0" 2'-1" D J A103 1 A104 1 32'-0" UNIT TYPE 1 UNIT TYPE 1 G G H 26'-0" 25'-0" 1 A301 2 A301 3 A301 J E 6'-4 1/2" 11'-6 1/2" 12'-0 1/2" 12'-0 1/2" 12'-1" 6'-0" 12'-1" 11'-6 1/2" 24'-1" 24'-1" 24'-1" 29'-6 1/2" 24'-1" 31'-1" 31'-4 1/2" 17'-5" 5'-0" 7'-6 1/2" 3'-1" 4'-0"5'-8 1/2" 8'-6 1/2"2'-1" 5'-6" 4'-2 1/2" 10'-0" 10'-0" 8'-10" 3'-10" 22'-6 1/2" 12'-8" 8'-6 1/2" 8'-2" 13'-1" 12'-1" 9'-8 1/2" 2'-1"9'-0"3'-9 1/2" 5'-1" 4'-0 1/2" 6'-0" 2'-1" 9'-8 1/2" 12'-1" 9'-5" 6'-0"5'-0"9'-5"9'-8 1/2" 9'-0" 3'-9 1/2" 12'-1" 5'-1" 4'-0 1/2" 6'-0" 12'-1" 2'-1"9'-8 1/2" 3'-0" 7'-7 1/2" 5'-0" 6'-0" 8'-10" 22'-6 1/2" 12'-8" B B WALK-OUT PATIO WALK-OUT PATIO EXTERIOR OVERHEAD DOOR FIN FLR A 2 INTERIOR MDF 2-PANEL B INTERIOR MDF 2-PANEL C INTERIOR MDF 2-PANEL D FIN FLR INTERIOR MDF 2-PANEL E INTERIOR MDF 2-PANEL F EXTERIOR STEEL ENTRY DOOR G EXTERIOR STEEL PANEL 60 MIN FIRE RATING SELF-CLOSING PER IBC 716.5.9 H EXTERIOR GLASS STOREFRONT I INTERIOR MDF 2-PANEL VENTED BOTTOM PANEL J 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1FIRST FLOORFIRST FLOOR 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A101 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLANTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 0' 8'0' 2' 4' N DOOR SCHEDULE TYPE SIZE COUNT LH DOOR SWING RH DOOR SWING COMMENTSWIDTH HEIGHT FIRST FLOOR A 10' - 0" 8' - 0" 6 OVERHEAD DOOR B 3' - 0" 6' - 8" 8 4 4 D 4' - 0" 6' - 8" 6 DOUBLE BIFOLD E 5' - 0" 6' - 8" 1 DOUBLE BIFOLD G 3' - 0" 6' - 8" 7 4 3 H 3' - 0" 6' - 8" 2 1 1 I 3' - 0" 6' - 10" 2 1 1 J 2' - 8" 6' - 8" 2 1 1 VENTED HVAC CLOSET DOOR SECOND FLOOR B 3' - 0" 6' - 8" 12 6 6 D 4' - 0" 6' - 8" 6 DOUBLE BIFOLD E 5' - 0" 6' - 8" 2 DOUBLE BIFOLD H 3' - 0" 6' - 8" 1 1 J 2' - 8" 6' - 8" 2 1 1 VENTED HVAC CLOSET DOOR THIRD FLOOR B 3' - 0" 6' - 8" 6 3 3 C 2' - 8" 6' - 8" 2 1 1 F 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 2 DOUBLE BIFOLD H 3' - 0" 6' - 8" 1 1 I 3' - 0" 6' - 10" 2 1 1 J 2' - 8" 6' - 8" 2 1 1 VENTED HVAC CLOSET DOOR 1/4" = 1'-0" DOOR LEGENDDOOR LEGEND Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 9 of 61 Page 94 of 116 UP DryerWasher DryerWasher DNDN 5'-0"26'-5 1/2"13'-0" 10'-0" 32'-0" 10'-0" 13'-0" 14'-0" 6'-0" 26'-0"14'-0" B B H B B B J E B D DD BB DD D B E J B UNIT TYPE 1 UNIT TYPE 1 5'-0" 1'-0" 1 A301 2 A301 A303 2 7'-6" 15'-2" 7'-6" 4'-6 1/2" 4'-6 1/2" 4'-6 1/2" 10'-5 1/2" 9'-1" 22'-6 1/2" 12'-8" 12'-8" 8'-10" 8'-10" 23'-11" 8'-2" 17'-5" 4'-6" 3'-0" 7'-7 1/2" 8'-6 1/2" 2'-1" 5'-7" 4'-1 1/2" 10'-0" 12'-1" 6'-0"9'-5" 12'-1" 4'-0 1/2"5'-1" 2'-1"9'-8 1/2" 2'-1" 9'-0" 9'-8 1/2" 13'-1" 12'-1" 3'-9 1/2" 3'-0"7'-11" 4'-6"5'-2 1/2" 8'-6 1/2"2'-1" 5'-7" 4'-1 1/2" 10'-5 1/2" 9'-1" 5'-0"5'-0" 22'-6 1/2" 23'-11" 1'-0" 5'-0"9'-5"2'-1"9'-8 1/2" 9'-0" 13'-1" 12'-1" 3'-9 1/2" 5'-1" 4'-0 1/2" 2'-1" 9'-8 1/2" 12'-1" 3'-10" A104 4 B BA104 7 10'-0" 5'-0" 32'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0" 25'-5 1/2"16'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" B H B C J B BFF B B C J A103 5 5'-6" UNIT TYPE 2 UNIT TYPE 2 1 A301 2 A301 16'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 25'-5 1/2" 2'-0" 7'-6" 15'-2" 7'-6" 4'-6 1/2" 4'-6 1/2"8'-2" 17'-5" 4'-8 1/2" 3'-0" 2'-6" 6'-0" 22'-8" 12'-4 1/2" 4'-0" 7'-7" 2'-6 1/2" 3'-8" 6'-8" 8'-3 1/2" 9'-1" 6'-3" 6'-0" 11'-6 1/2" 2'-6 1/2" 2'-6 1/2" 11'-6 1/2" 6'-0" 2'-6 1/2" 3'-8" 7'-7" 9'-1" 6'-1" 12'-4 1/2"4'-0" 5'-6" 3'-0"2'-6"6'-0" 22'-8" 6'-8" 12'-3" 8'-3 1/2" 12'-8" 12'-8" 12'-1" 2'-1"9'-8 1/2" 8'-1"4'-3 1/2" 8'-1" 2'-1"9'-8 1/2" 4'-3 1/2"12'-1" 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A102 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 PROPOSED SECOND & THIRD FLOOR PLANTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1SECOND FLOORSECOND FLOOR N 1/4" = 1'-0"2 2THIRD FLOORTHIRD FLOOR 0' 8'0' 2' 4' N Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 10 of 61 Page 95 of 116 A103 2 3 4 STUD TO STUD 8'-5 1/2" FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD 8'-2 1/2" 4'-0" 4'-1 7/8" REFRIGERATOR 3'-6"1'-6"3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" A103 6 7 98 STUD TO STUD 7'-8 1/2" 8'-0 1/2" 3'-6" 5'-0" REFRIGERATOR 3'-6"1'-6"3'-0"3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0"2'-0"3'-0" 8'-0" 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A103 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 KITCHEN PLAN & CABINET ELEVATIONSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 1/2" = 1'-0"1 1KITCHEN TYPE 1KITCHEN TYPE 1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 2KITCHEN TYPE 1 - ELEV. 1KITCHEN TYPE 1 - ELEV. 1 1/2" = 1'-0"3 3KITCHEN TYPE 1 - ELEV. 2KITCHEN TYPE 1 - ELEV. 2 1/2" = 1'-0"4 4KITCHEN TYPE 1 - ELEV. 3KITCHEN TYPE 1 - ELEV. 3 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 1/2" = 1'-0"5 5KITCHEN TYPE 2KITCHEN TYPE 2 2' 4'0' 1' 1/2" = 1'-0"6 6KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 1KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 1 1/2" = 1'-0"7 7KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 2KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 2 1/2" = 1'-0"8 8KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 3KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 3 1/2" = 1'-0"9 9KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 4KITCHEN TYPE 2 - ELEV. 4 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 11 of 61 Page 96 of 116 Washer Dryer Washer A104 3 PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR FUTURE SWING UP GRAB BAR INSTALLATION PER ICC/ANSI A 117.1 CHAPTER 1104.11.1 REMOVABLE VANITY CABINET, FINISH FLOOR AND WALL BEHIND 2CL 1'-6" 1'-9 1/2" CLCLCL 1'-3 3/4" 1'-3 3/4" PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR FUTURE GRAB BAR INSTALLATION REMOVABLE SHOWER SEAT WASHER AND DRYER TO COMPLY WITH ANSI 117.1 SECTION 611 A104 10 AFF 8'-0" A104 6 5 CL CL CL CL CL EQEQEQEQEQEQ TILE SHOWER WALLS & FLOOR PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR FUTURE GRAB BAR INSTALLATION WINDOW TYPE A TILE SHOWER WALLS, BENCH, AND FLOOR PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR FUTURE GRAB BAR INSTALLATION BUILT-IN BENCH: - 17 INCHES MIN. TO 19 INCHES MAX. AFF - MUST BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND 250+ LBS A104 8 9 TUB BASE WINDOW TYPE A TILE WALLS PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR FUTURE GRAB BAR INSTALLATION CL CL CL CL CL EQEQEQEQEQEQTUB BASE TILE WALLS PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR FUTURE GRAB BAR INSTALLATION 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A104 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 BATHROOM PLAN & ELEVATIONSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date 1/2" = 1'-0"1 1ACCESSIBLE BATH & LAUNDRY PLANACCESSIBLE BATH & LAUNDRY PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0"3 3ADA BATHROOM ELEV. 2ADA BATHROOM ELEV. 2 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1'2' 4'0' 1' REQUIRED SHEET NOTES: ANSI/ICC 117.1 - 609.8 STRUCTURAL STRENGTH - ALLOWABLE STRESSES SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED FOR MATERIALS USED WHERE A VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL FORCE OF 250 POUNDS IS APPLIED AT ANY POINT ON THE GRAB BAR, FASTENER MOUNTING DEVICE, OR SUPPORTING STRUCTURE. - PROVIDE TOILET AND BATHING ROOM FLOORS WITH A SMOOTH, HARD, NONABSORBENT SURFACE EXTENDING 4" MINIMUM UP THE WALLS WITHIN 2' OF URINAL AND TOILET. - BATHROOM DOORS SHALL HAVE PRIVACY SET HARDWARE. IBC 1101.2 & ANSI/ICC 117.1 - SECTION 604.2: - THE CENTERLINE OF THE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE 16 INCHES MINIMUM AND 18 INCHES MAXIMUM FROM THE SIDE WALL OR PARTITION. IBC 1101.2 & ANSI/ICC 117.1 - SECTION 604.7: - THE TOP OF THE TOILET PAPER DISPENSER SHALL BE 1-1/2" INCHES BELOW THE HORIZONTAL SIDE WALL GRAB BAR TO BE WITHIN THE ACCEPTABLE REACH RANGE. ANSI/ICC 117.1 - CHAPTER 6 - BATHING ROOMS CONTROLS AND ENCLOSURESCONTROLS AND ENCLOSURES - SHOWER CONTROLS AND FITTING MUST BE AT LEAST 1-1/2" ABOVE THE GRAB BAR SO THAT THEY DO NOT IMPEDE THE BAR'S GRIPPING SURFACE. - FLUSH CONTROLS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE OPEN SIDE OF THE WATER CLOSET. THRESHOLDSTHRESHOLDS - A THRESHOLD HEIGHT UP TO 1/2" IS PERMITTED, TRENCH DRAINS AND OTHER DESIGNS THAT ALL A FLUSH TRANSITION TO THE SHOWER FLOOR WILL PROVIDE EASIER ACCESS. - SHOWER FLOORS CAN SLOP TO DRAINS (A 1:48 MAXIMUM SLOPE WILL HELP CONTROL WATER WITHOUT IMPACTING ACCESSIBILITY). SHOWER SPRAY UNITS AND WATER TEMPERATURE AT SHOWER COMPARTMENTSSHOWER SPRAY UNITS AND WATER TEMPERATURE AT SHOWER COMPARTMENTS - A HAND-HELD SHOWER SPRAY UNIT THAT CAN ALSO BE USED IN A FIXED POSITION IS REQUIRED AT ALL ACCESSIBLE SHOWERS AND BATHTUBS. - THE WATER TEMPERATURE IS LIMITED TO 120 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. - THE HAND-HELD UNIT NEEDS TO BE REACHABLE WITHIN A HEIGHT OF 48" ABOVE THE SHOWER FLOOR. - HOSE AT LEAST 59" LONG. ANSI/ICC 117.1 - CHAPTER 1104 - TYPE B UNITS - FOR TYPE B UNITS, CLEAR FLOOR SPACES SHALL BE 48 INCHES MINIMUM IN LENGTH AND 30 INCHES MINIMUM IN WIDTH. - SEE SHEETS G102 & G103 FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS 1/2" = 1'-0"2 2ADA BATHROOM ELEV. 1ADA BATHROOM ELEV. 1 1/2" = 1'-0"4 4OPTION A BATHROOM PLANOPTION A BATHROOM PLAN 2' 4'0' 1' 1/2" = 1'-0"5 5OPT. A - BATHROOM ELEV. 1OPT. A - BATHROOM ELEV. 1 1/2" = 1'-0"6 6OPT. A - BATHROOM ELEV. 2OPT. A - BATHROOM ELEV. 2 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 1/2" = 1'-0"7 7OPTION B BATHROOM PLANOPTION B BATHROOM PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0"9 9OPT. B - BATHROOM ELEV. 2OPT. B - BATHROOM ELEV. 2 1/2" = 1'-0"8 8OPT. B - BATHROOM ELEV. 1OPT. B - BATHROOM ELEV. 1 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 1/2" = 1'-0"10 10LAUNDRY ELEVATIONLAUNDRY ELEVATION 2' 4'0' 1' Page 12 of 61 Page 97 of 116 B G B C D E A C D E A C D E C D E A A A A A A CC C D D C C C C C I I II I I H H H F F C D E C D E C D E C D E HH CC C C DD D D I HI F FF F B B G A A D E C D E C D E C D E C IECC 402.1 PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD FOR THERMAL ENVELOPE ASSEMBLIES IEBC 908.1 APPLIES TO NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY BUILDING USES U-VALUE BASED METHOD, C402.1.4 CLIMATE ZONE 6 ATTIC INSULATION = U-0.021 WALLS BELOW GRADE, U-0.119 METAL FRAMED WALLS, U-0.064 WOOD FRAMED FLOORS, U-0.033 BUILDING USES U-VALUE BASED METHOD, C402.4 CLIMATE ZONE 6 OPERABLE FENESTRATION, U - 0.43 SHADING COEFFICIENT, 0.40 ASSEMBLIES SHOWN ON PLANS AND SECTIONS COMPLY WITH AND PROVIDE BETTER THERMAL INSULATION THAN REQUIRED BY PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD VALUES SHOWN ABOVE. AIR LEAKAGE 0.3 PER 402.5.2 MANUFACTURER'S DATA STICKER SHALL BE LEFT ON WINDOWS AND DOORS UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION ATTIC INSULATION = R-47.62 WALLS BELOW GRADE, R-8.40 METAL FRAMED WALLS, R-15.63 WOOD FRAMED FLOORS, R-30.30 OPERABLE FENESTRATION, R-2.32 OPAQUE SWINGING DOORS, U-0.37 OPAQUE SWINGING DOORS, R-2.27 FIXED FENESTRATION, U - 0.36 FIXED FENESTRATION, R-2.77 WOOD FRAMED WALLS, U-0.051 WOOD FRAMED WALLS, R-19.60 INSIDE AIR FILM 5_ 8 " GYP WALL BRD " GYP 1-HR SHEATHING STUD CAVITY 1_ 2" SIDING OUTSIDE AIR FILM .68 .54 .54 21 .81 .17 COMPONENT R-VALUE @ CAVITY TOTAL 23.74 INSIDE AIR FILM STUD 1_ 2 " SIDING OUTSIDE AIR FILM .54 .54 6.88 .81 COMPONENT TOTAL 9.62 2"x6", 16" OC TOTAL WALL R-VALUE = .093 x (0.104) + .907 (0.042) 0.00967 + 0.038084 0.0478 WALL U-VALUE %of STUD %of CAVITYU of STUD U of CAVITY .68 .17 R-VALUE @ STUD = = 0.104 U-VALUE @ STUD U-VALUE @ CAVITY 0.042 5_ 8 5_ 8 " GYP WALL BRD " GYP 1-HR SHEATHING5_ 8 ROOF DECK INSUL ENTIRELY ABOVE DECK, U-0.032 WOOD FRAMED WALLS, R-19.60 ENTRY DOORS, U - 0.77 ENTRY DOORS, R-2.32 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A201 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS SHEET NOTES: SAFETY GLAZING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: - SIDELITES WITHIN 24" OF ENTRY DOORS SAFETY GLAZING SHALL BE INSTALLED AT WINDOWS WHERE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET. - EXPOSED AREA OF GLAZING EXCEEDS 9 SQ FT. - THE BOTTOM EDGE OF WINDOW IS LESS THAN 18" ABOVE THE FLOOR - THE TOP EDGE OF THE WINDOW IS GREATER THAN 36" ABOVE THE FLOOR - A WALKING SURFACE IS WITHIN 36" HORIZONTALLY FROM THE WINDOW. SAFETY GLAZING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AS SUCH BY MANUFACTURER 1/8" = 1'-0"1 1WEST WEST 1/8" = 1'-0"2 2SOUTH SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"3 3NORTH NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"4 4EAST EAST 16'0' 4' 8' 16'0' 4' 8' 16'0' 4' 8' 16'0' 4' 8' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 13 of 61 Page 98 of 116 8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8"8'-1 1/8" A303 1A302 1 8'-1 1/8"1'-0"8'-1 1/8"1'-0" 3'-6" TRUSS BEARING 9'-2 3/8" TRUSS BEARING 11'-2 3/8" 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A301 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 BUILDING SECTIONSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1BUILDING SECTION 1BUILDING SECTION 1 1/4" = 1'-0"2 2BUILDING SECTION 2BUILDING SECTION 2 1/4" = 1'-0"3 3BUILDING SECTION 3BUILDING SECTION 3 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 0' 8'0' 2' 4' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 14 of 61 Page 99 of 116 ROOF STRUCTURE: - EPDM MEMBRANE - 1/2" HIGH DENSITY FIBER BOARD - 5/8" OSB SHEATHING - PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, 24" O.C., 1/4" : 12 PITCH - R-49 BLOWN CELLULOSE INSULATION - ALUMINUM SOFFIT & FASCIA TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL: - SIDING SELECTED BY OWNER, EXTERIOR - AIR BARRIER - 1/2" OSB SHEATHING - R-21 DENSE-PACKED FIBERGLASS INSULATION - 2" x 6" STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. - 6 MIL POLYETHYLENE VAPOR BARRIER - 5/8" GYPSUM WALL BOARD, INTERIOR FLOOR STRUCTURE: - T&G OSB FLOOR DECK SCREWED AND GLUED TO FLOOR JOISTS - 2" x 12" FLOOR JOISTS, 16" O.C. SEE SHEET S100 FOR FOUNDATION DETAILS ROOF STRUCTURE: - EPDM MEMBRANE -1/2" HIGH DENSITY FIBER BOARD - 5/8" OSB SHEATHING - PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, 24" O.C., 1/4" : 12 PITCH - R-49 BLOWN CELLULOSE INSULATION - ALUMINUM SOFFIT & FASCIA STOREFRONT WINDOW TYPE H, SEE SHEET A600 FOR DETAILS BALCONY FLOOR JOISTS, SEE SHEET S101 FOR FRAMING PLANS TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL: - SIDING SELECTED BY OWNER, EXTERIOR - AIR BARRIER - 1/2" OSB SHEATHING - R-21 DENSE-PACKED FIBERGLASS INSULATION - 2" x 6" STUD FRAMING, 16" O.C. - 6 MIL POLYETHYLENE VAPOR BARRIER - 5/8" GYPSUM WALL BOARD, INTERIOR FLOOR STRUCTURE: - T&G OSB FLOOR DECK SCREWED AND GLUED TO FLOOR JOISTS - 2" x 12" FLOOR JOISTS, 16" O.C. SEE SHEET S100 FOR FOUNDATION DETAILS 3'-6" E D E D (2) 2 x 8 SPF WINDOW HEADER (2) 2 x 8 SPF WINDOW HEADER 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A302 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 WALL DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date 1/2" = 1'-0"1 1WALL DETAIL 1WALL DETAIL 1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 2WALL DETAIL 2WALL DETAIL 2 2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' Page 15 of 61 Page 100 of 116 8'-1 1/8"1'-0"8'-1 1/8"1'-0"8'-1 1/8" 9'-1 1/8" 3'-6" A303 3 5'-0 1/2"5'-0 1/2" 6 1/16" 11" 3/4" OSB RISERS 15/16" PARTICLEBOARD TREADS WOOD STRINGERS, 12" O.C. 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A303 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 STAIR DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date 1/2" = 1'-0"1 1STAIR SECTIONSTAIR SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0"2 2SECOND FLOOR STAIR PLANSECOND FLOOR STAIR PLAN N2' 4'0' 1' 2' 4'0' 1' 3" = 1'-0"3 3STAIR TREAD DETAILSTAIR TREAD DETAIL 0' 6"1 1/2" 3" STAIR CODE REQUIREMENTS (IBC 2021): RISER HEIGHT AND TREAD DEPTH (1011.5.2) - STAIR RISER HEIGHTS SHALL BE 7 INCHES MAXIMUM AND 4 INCHES MINIMUM. RECTANGULAR TREAD DEPTHS SHALL BE 11 INCHES MINIMUM. STAIRWAY WALKING SURFACE (1011.7.1) - STAIRWAY TREADS AND LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A SOLID SURFACE. FINISH FLOOR SURFACES SHALL BE SECURELY ATTACHED. HANDRAIL HEIGHT (1014.2) - HANDRAIL HEIGHT, MEASURED ABOVE STAIR TREAD NOSINGS, OR FINISH SURFACE OF RAMP SLOPE, SHALL BE UNIFORM, NOT LESS THAN 34 INCHES AND NOT MORE THAN 38 INCHES. HANDRAIL GRASPABILITY - TYPE I (1014.3.1) - HANDRAILS WITH A CIRCULAR CROSS SECTION SHALL HAVE AN OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF NOT LESS THAN 1 1/4 INCHES AND NOT GREATER THAN 2 INCHES. HANDRAIL CONTINUITY (1014.4) - HANDRAIL GRIPPING SURFACES SHALL BE CONTINUOUS, WITHOUT INTERRUPTION BY NEWEL POSTS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS (1014.6) - HANDRAILS SHALL RETURN TO A WALL, GUARD, OR THE WALKING SURFACE OR SHALL BE CONTINUOUS TO THE HANDRAIL OF AN ADJACENT FLIGHT OF STAIRS OR RAMP RUN. GUARDS - WHERE REQUIRED (1015.2) - GUARDS SHALL BE LOCATED ALONG OPEN-SIDED WALKING SURFACES, INCLUDING MEZZANINES, EQUIPMENT PLATFORMS, AISLES, STAIRS, RAMPS, AND LANDINGS THAT ARE LOCATED MORE THAN 30 INCHES MEASURED VERTICALLY TO THE FLOOR OR GRADE BELOW AT ANY POINT WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY TO THE EDGE OF THE OPEN SIDE. GUARD HEIGHT (1015.3) - REQUIRED GUARDS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 42 INCHES HIGH. GUARD - OPENING LIMITATIONS (1015.4) - REQUIRED GUARDS SHALL NOT HAVE OPENINGS THAT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A SPHERE 4 INCHES IN DIAMETER FROM THE WALKING SURFACE TO THE REQUIRED GUARD HEIGHT Page 16 of 61 Page 101 of 116 FIN FLR 5 5'-6" 1'-6" 3'-0" A 2'-0" 5'-0" 2'-0" B ASSEMBLY 1 2'-0" 5'-0" 6'-0" C D E OVERALL WIDTH 12'-0" OVERALL HEIGHT 7'-0" OVERALL WIDTH 12'-0" OVERALL HEIGHT 7'-0" 9 1/4" CL CL CL CL 2'-11" CL 2'-10 1/2" CL 2'-10 1/2" CL 3'-2" I CLCLCL CL 2'-11" CL 2'-10 1/2" CL 2'-10 1/2" CL 3'-2" I CL 6'-10" STOREFRONT TYPE F STOREFRONT TYPE F THIRD FLOOR 18' - 2 1/4" T.O. 2ND FLR 17' - 2 1/4" ROOF 26' - 3 3/8" OVERALL HEIGHT 7'-0" OVERALL WIDTH 3'-0" CL 6'-10" CL 2'-4 1/2" BRAKE METAL OVER COLUMN STOREFRONT TYPE G THIRD FLOOR 18' - 2 1/4"T.O. 2ND FLR 17' - 2 1/4" ROOF 26' - 3 3/8"OVERALL WIDTH 12'-0" CL 6'-10" BRAKE METAL OVER COLUMN STOREFRONT TYPE H CL CL CL CL 3'-2" CL 2'-8 3/4" CL 2'-8 3/4" CL 2'-9" OVERALL HEIGHT 7'-0" SECOND FLOOR 9' - 1 1/8" T.O. 1ST FLR 8' - 1 1/8" THIRD FLOOR 18' - 2 1/4" T.O. 2ND FLR 17' - 2 1/4" CL 4'-9" STOREFRONT TYPE I CL CL 3'-0" CL 3'-0" WINDOW SCHEDULE TYPE WIDTH HEIGHT COUNT COMMENTS FIRST FLOOR A 3' - 0" 1' - 6" 2 C 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 4 D 3' - 0" 2' - 6" 4 E 3' - 0" 2' - 6" 8 SECOND FLOOR A 3' - 0" 1' - 6" 2 C 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 12 D 3' - 0" 2' - 6" 6 E 3' - 0" 2' - 6" 8 THIRD FLOOR B 2' - 0" 5' - 0" 2 C 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 8 D 3' - 0" 2' - 6" 2 E 3' - 0" 2' - 6" 2 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A600 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 WINDOW SCHEDULE AND DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 1/4" = 1'-0" WINDOW LEGENDWINDOW LEGEND 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1STOREFRONT DETAIL 1STOREFRONT DETAIL 1 1/4" = 1'-0"2 2STOREFRONT DETAIL 2STOREFRONT DETAIL 2 1/4" = 1'-0"3 3STOREFRONT DETAIL 3STOREFRONT DETAIL 3 1/4" = 1'-0"4 4STOREFRONT DETAIL 4STOREFRONT DETAIL 4 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 0' 8'0' 2' 4' 0' 8'0' 2' 4' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE ROOM NAME FINISH ROOM COUNT COMMENTSFLOOR BASE WALL CEILING FIRST FLOOR UNIT 1 BATHROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 1 PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 1 CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 2 PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 2 CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 ENTRY PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 KITCHEN PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 LAUNDRY ROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 LIVING ROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 MECHANICAL CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 SECOND FLOOR BALCONY 2 UNIT 1 BATHROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 1 PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 1 CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 2 PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 BEDROOM 2 CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 COAT CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 ENTRY PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 KITCHEN PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 LAUNDRY ROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 LIVING ROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 1 MECHANICAL CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 THIRD FLOOR BALCONY 2 UNIT 2 BATHROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 2 BEDROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 2 BEDROOM CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 2 ENTRY PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 2 KITCHEN PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 2 LAUNDRY ROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 2 LIVING ROOM PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 UNIT 2 MECHANICAL CLOSET PAINT - WHITE PAINT - WHITE 2 Page 17 of 61 Page 102 of 116 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. A701 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 3D VIEWSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 18 of 61 Page 103 of 116 25'-0" 12'-0" 25'-0" 13'-0" 5'-0" 4'-0" 13'-0" 13'-0" 14'-0" 6'-0" 26'-0" 6'-0" 14'-0" 27'-0" 22'-0"13'-0" 1'-0" 26'-0" 25'-0" 12'-0" 1'-0" 25'-0" 4'-0" 9'-9 1/2" 12'-6 1/2" 5'-0" 13'-6 1/2" 5'-0" 8'-9 1/2" 10'-1 1/2" 9'-9 1/2" 2 S100 3 S100 4 S100 5'-0" 5 S100 NOTCH SLAB AT OVERHEAD DOORS 20" x 10" AT INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 20" x 10" AT INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 20" x 10" AT INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 20" x 10" AT INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 20" x 10" AT INTERIOR BEARING WALLS ACOUSTIC INSULATION BETWEEN UNITS R-10 EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION UNDER SLAB TREATED 2" x 4" SILL PLATE ANCHOR TO FOUNDATION W/ 1/2" x 5-1/2" EXPANSION ANCHORS, 72" O.C. 10" x 2'-0" CONCRETE THICKENED SLAB, THREE #5 BARS CONTINUOUS 10" CL4" 1'-8" CL4" 10" 1'-8" R-10 EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION UNDER SLAB TREATED 2" x 4" SILL PLATE ANCHOR TO FOUNDATION W/ 1/2" x 5-1/2" EXPANSION ANCHORS, 72" O.C. 10" x 2'-0" CONCRETE THICKENED SLAB, THREE #5 BARS CONTINUOUS TAPER SLAB 3/4" AT OVERHEAD DOOR CL 8" 4'-0" CL4" 10" 1'-8" TAPER SLAB 1/4" : 12 AWAY FROM BLDG 8" x 48" CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE FOUNDATION WALL SLABS AND WALLS SHOULD BE 4,000 PSI MIX, AIR ENTRAINED. REINFORCE SLABS WITH FIBRILLATED FIBER MESH 20" x 10" CONCRETE FOOTING WITH (3) #5 CONTINUOUS BARS R-20 FOAM INSULATION CL4" 4'-0"10" 1'-8" TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL - SEE SHEET A302 FOR WALL DETAIL TREATED 2" x 6" SILL PLATE ANCHOR TO FOUNDATION W/ 1/2" x 5-1/2" EXPANSION ANCHORS, 48" O.C. R-20 FOAM INSULATION CL 8" 8" x 48" CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE FOUNDATION WALL SLABS AND WALLS SHOULD BE 4,000 PSI MIX, AIR ENTRAINED. REINFORCE SLABS WITH FIBRILLATED FIBER MESH 20" x 10" CONCRETE FOOTING WITH (3) #5 CONTINUOUS BARS 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. S100 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS SHEET NOTES: ALL CAST-IN-PLACE CONTINUOUS CONCRETE SLAB FOOTINGS AND GRADE BEAMS SHALL BE MIXED TO ACHIEVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 4,000 PSI MINIMUM, AND SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONTAIN FIBRILLATED FIBERMESH REINFORCING, 1.5 LBS PER CUBIC YARD Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1FOUNDATION PLANFOUNDATION PLAN 0' 8'0' 2' 4' N 3/4" = 1'-0"2 2FTG @ UNIT PARTITIONFTG @ UNIT PARTITION 3/4" = 1'-0"3 3FTG @ BEARING WALLSFTG @ BEARING WALLS 0' 2'1'6" 0' 2'1'6" 3/4" = 1'-0"4 4FTG @ O.H. DOORFTG @ O.H. DOOR 0' 2'1'6" 3/4" = 1'-0"5 5TYP. FTG DETAILTYP. FTG DETAIL 0' 2'1'6" Page 19 of 61 Page 104 of 116 DN UP DN 2" x 12" FLOOR JOISTS, 16" O.C. 2" x 12" FLOOR JOISTS, 16" O.C. 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. S101 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 FLOOR FRAMING PLANSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLANSECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"2 2THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLANTHIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 0' 8'0' 2' 4'0' 8'0' 2' 4' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date NN SHEET NOTES: 1. ALL WINDOW AND DOOR HEADERS TO HAVE (2) 2" x 8" SPF HEADERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. Page 20 of 61 Page 105 of 116 DN 2'-0" PRE-ENGINEERED TAPERED ROOF TRUSSES, 24" O.C., TOWARDS ROOF DRAIN ROOF DRAIN ROOF DRAIN SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT ROOF DRAIN ROOF DRAIN PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES, 24" O.C., 1/4" : 12 PITCH *SEE SHEET A301 FOR ROOF HEIGHTS* 2'-0" ROOF DRAIN CLAMP RING ROOF MEMBRANE RIGID FOAM INSULATION SLOPED 1/4" PER EVERY FOOT OF RISE OSB SHEATHING WITH WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. S102 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 28.0 = 0.7 x 40 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 SHEET NOTE: TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO PREPARE AND PROVIDE STAMPED COPIES OF TRUSS PLANS AND ENGINEERED CALCUALTIONS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE STATE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE TRUSSES. TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO INCLUDE UNBALANCED AND SNOWDRIFT LOADS IN THEIR CALCULATIONS. NEW TRUSS SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED ACCORDINGLY. TRUSS SUPPLIER SHALL PREPARE TRUSS COMPONENT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION FOR STATE APPROVAL TO INCLUDE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR SNOW LOADS AS FOLLOWS: GROUND SNOW LOAD Pg = BUILDING IS LOCATED IN PORTAGE COUNTY IMPORTANCE FACTOR Is = EXOSURE FACTOR Ce = SLOPE FACTOR Ps = THERMAL FACTOR Ct = 40 PSF 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ROOF SNOW LOAD ___ = 0.7 x Pg x Ps x Ce x Is x Ct CATEGORY II EXPOSURE B HEATED STRUC ROOF SNOW LOAD LATERAL LOADS SHALL BE BASED ON WIND SPEED OF 90 MPH, 20 PSF LATERAL LOAD PER IBC 1608.2 1/8" = 1'-0"2 2ROOF FRAMING PLANROOF FRAMING PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"3 3ROOF PLANROOF PLAN 16'0' 4' 8' 16'0' 4' 8' 1/8" = 1'-0"1 1GARAGE ROOF FRAMING PLANGARAGE ROOF FRAMING PLAN 16'0' 4' 8' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date N NN 1 1/2" = 1'-0"4 4ROOF DRAIN DETAILROOF DRAIN DETAIL 1'3"0' 6" Page 21 of 61 Page 106 of 116 UP Dryer Washer Washer Dryer WP WP WP WP WP WP WP WP WP WP D D DD D D D D 3 3 3 3 D D D D D D D 3 3 D D D 3 3 3 3 OUTDOOR PASSAGEWAY LIGHTS TO BE ON A TIMER FROM DUSK TO DAWN. MOTION SENSOR FOR DURING DAY. 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. E101 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 1ST FLR POWER & LIGHTING PLANTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 0' 8'0' 2' 4' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1FIRST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANFIRST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN N Page 22 of 61 Page 107 of 116 DN UP DryerWasher DryerWasher WP WP D D D D D D F F D D D D D D DD D D D D D D 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 33 DN WP WP D D D F D D D F D D D D D D D D D 3 3 3 3 3 3 D 3 3 3 33 3 PASSAGEWAY LIGHTS TO BE MOTION SENSORED PASSAGEWAY LIGHTS TO BE MOTION SENSORED 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. E102 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 2ND & 3RD FLR POWER & LIGHTING PLANTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS 0' 8'0' 2' 4' Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date 1/4" = 1'-0"1 1SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANSECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"2 2THIRD FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLANTHIRD FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN 0' 8'0' 2' 4' N N Page 23 of 61 Page 108 of 116 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. G101 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 FRAMING CONNECTIONS SCHEDULETHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS SHEET NOTES: ALL FRAMING SHOULD BE SPF #2 OR BETTER ALL FRAMING LUMBER IN CONTACT WITH GRADE OR MASONRY SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED. ALL HEADERS SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY MINIMUM OF TWO SHOULDER STUDS. SPANS OVER 10 FEET SHALL HAVE 5 1/2" MINIMUM BEARING 1 G101 2 G101 TYPICAL WALL SHEATHING SHEAR WALL SHEATHING SHEAR WALL BRACING - FASTEN SHEATHING TO STUD FRAMING WITH 8d NAILS 6" O.C. AT ALL POINTS WHERE SHEETS CROSS FRAMING. SHEAR WALL NAILING TO BE APPLIED WITHIN 8'-0" OF ALL BUILDING CORNERS. EDGE NAIL, 8d COMMON, 6" O.C. FIELD NAIL, 8d COMMON, 6" O.C. 7/16" OSB SHEATHING EDGE NAIL, 8d COMMON, 6" O.C. FIELD NAIL, 8d COMMON, 12" O.C. 7/16" OSB SHEATHING TYPICAL SHEATHING - FASTEN SHEATHING TO STUD FRAMING AS INDICATED ABOVE. 6" 6" 1'-0" 6" 3 G101 ROOF SHEATHING OSB SHEATHING, INSTALL 8d NAILS 6" OC AT ALL POINTS WHERE SHEETS CROSS FRAMING. INSTALL "H" CLIPS BETWEEN TRUSSES ON THE LONG SIDE OF THE SHEETS TOP CHORD OF ROOF TRUSSES FASTEN OSB ROOF SHEATHING AS NOTED Page 24 of 61 Page 109 of 116 +95'-0" DISPENSER SOAP SHOWER VALVE WATER CLOSET PIPE PROTECTION LAVATORY CLEARANCES BENEATH LAVATORY. LATCH SIDE APPROACH - SWINGING DOORS HINGE SIDE APPROACH - SWINGING DOORS FRONT APPROACH - SWINGING DOORS HOSE BIBB URINAL TOP OF LIP CLOCK 1'-6" CHILDREN 1'-5" HANDICAPPED MIRROR 3'-0" CHILDREN 3'-2" HANDICAPPED LINE FLOOR FLOOR LINE DRYER HAND/HAIR 24" PREFERRED PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER APPROACH X = 42" MIN. IF Y = 54" X = 36" MIN. IF Y = 60" * 54" MIN. IF DOOR HAS CLOSER APPROACH NOTE: APPROACH TOILET PAPERROBE HOOK PARTITION AT TOILET 6'-0" (WOMEN) 5'-0" (CHILDREN) HEAD SHOWER HOLDER PARTITION AT URINAL LINE FLOOR FLOOR LINE TOWEL DISPENSER/ WASTE RECEPTACLE EWC HOSE VALVE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE SANITARY NAPKIN- TAMPON DISPENSER CLEAR SPACE FLOOR APPROACH @ FIXTURES FLOOR LINE SPACE FLOOR CLEAR A LATCH & CLOSER * 48" MIN. IF DOOR HAS BOTH * 48" MIN. IF DOOR HAS CLOSER APPROACH APPROACH BEYOND RIM NOT EXTEND OR SHIELDS DO SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL UNIT 30" X 48" SPACE CLEAR CLEAR FLOOR LEVEL OF COIN SLOT SIAMESE GRAB BARS FLOOR LINE AS REQUIRED SOLID BLOCKING FIRE HOSE CABINET FLOOR LINE 2 WINDOW INDICATOR GAS MAING PROJECTION SCREEN DRINKING FOUNTAIN MISCELLANEOUS SYMBOLS WATER CLOSET (TANK) EWS EYE WASH SINK DF LAV SERVICE SINK LAVATORY CENTER LINE U WC/T WC URINAL WATER CLOSET PROPERTY LINE CONSTRUCTION LIMIT SAN STM FP E T SANITARY SILT FENCE FENCE RAILROAD TRACKS SETBACK LINE ELECTRIC STORM TELEPHONE FIRE PROTECTION GENERAL NOTES WALL MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER SEMI RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER ILLUMINATED FACE(S) EMERGENCY LIGHTS ARROW(S). SHADED AREA INDICATES EXIT LIGHT-WITH DIRECTIONAL FE FE FLOOR DRAINFD KEYNOTES SHEET NOTES EXIT TO GRADE WH HOSE BIBB WATER METER SAFETY SHOWER WALL HYDRANT HB WH WM SS ACCESSIBLE ROUTE MANHOLE CATCH BASIN POWER POLE LIGHT POLE FIRE HYDRANT INLET PROTECTION CHANNEL PROTECTION TRACKING PROTECTION C.B. P.P. M.H. L.P. F.H. HANDICAP ELEVATION MARKER PLAN NORTH SPOT ELEVATION RECESSED SLAB CONDITION 101'-10" LOW SIDE T.O.F. ELEV = 614'-0"T.O.F. ELEV = 614'-0" PLAN NORTH CEILING HEIGHT INDICATOR COLUMN REFERENCE GRID REVISION INDICATOR KEYNOTE INDICATOR EQUIPMENT NUMBER PARTITION TYPE INDICATOR A 2 3 4 X X X ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL INDICATIONS CIVIL SYMBOLS NEW GRADE ELEVATION EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION GRASS 100.00 100.00 CIVIL INDICATIONS W 100 100 WATER MAIN EXISTING CONTOUR NEW CONTOUR DATUM PARTITION INDICATIONS INSULATION WOOD METAL BATT/LOOSE FILL WOOD STUD FINISH STEEL WALL DEFINITIONS EARTHWORKS CONCRETE MASONRY /PRECAST EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE BLOCK COMPACTED FILL CAST-IN-PLACE SWAMP MISC. DIRECTION OF PITCHWITH % OF SLOPE UNIFORM PITCH DOWNSPOUT HIGH POINT CLEANOUT FLUSH WITH GRADE SWALE LINE W/ DIR. OF FLOW U.P. D.S. C.O. H.P. 2.0% GLASS WOOD STUD (DETAIL) RIGID ALUMINUM ROUGH METAL STUD (DETAIL) PLYWOOD /BRONZE BRASS SPECIFIC DETAILS ARE SHOWN ON DETAIL ROOM IDENTIFIER NOMINAL SIZE OR S.F. DOOR INDICATOR ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS MATCH LINE INDICATOR 101 MATCH LINESEE XX/X-XXX SHEET AS FOLLOWS: NAME NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER DETAIL SHEET NUMBER DETAIL SHEET NUMBER DETAILS OF SPECIFIC ITEMS ON PLANS, ETC. ARE DETAIL INDICATOR FOR SMALL CONDITIONS ARE SHOWN AS FOLLOWS: 1 A2 DETAIL NUMBER SHOWN AS FOLLOWS: ELEVATION SHEET NEW CONSTRUCTION BRICK GROUT UNDISTURBED EARTH STONE DEMOLITION DRAINAGE FILL ETC. ARE SHOWN AS FOLLOWS: BUILDING SECTIONS CUT ON PLANS, ETC. ARE SHOWN AS FOLLOWS: PARTIAL SECTIONS CUT ON PLANS, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHOWN AS FOLLOWS: SECTIONS AND DETAILS ELEVATION NUMBER SECTION LETTER SECTION SHEET HORIZ horizontal INSUL insulate(d), insulation LAV lavatory LF linear foot LL live load INT interior JST joist JT joint INCL include(d), including HVAC heating/ventilating/air conditioning IE invert elevation ID inside diameter IN inch HTG heating HW hot water HYD hydrant square/square foot LP plate angle diameter centerlineLC I# oI GA gauge GC general contract(or) HM hollow metal HDWR hardware HC hollow core HGT height HB hose bib GL glass, glazing GALV galvanized GYP gypsum GB grab bar FNDTN foundation FTG footing, fitting G gas FT foot FLUR fluorescent FE fire extinguisher FD floor drain FLR floor FIN finish DR door, drain ELEC electric(al) FAC fire access cabinet EXP exposed, expansion EWC electric water cooler EPI extruded polystyrene insulation EPDM ethylene, propylene, diene terpolymer EXIST existing EXT exterior EXH exhaust EQUIP equipment EW each way ELEV elevator EIFS exterior finish insulation system DWG drawing EL elevation EA each DWALL drywall DW dishwasher DS down spout DTL detail CONTR contract(or) DIM dimension DF drinking fountain DIA diameter DBL double DN down CY cubic yard CT ceramic tile CR curb ramp CPT carpet(ed) CONT continue, continuous CMU concrete masonry unit CONC concrete COL column CO cleanout CJ construction joint CF cubic feet CLK caulk(ing) CLJ control joint CLG ceiling STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS AP access panel BM beam, bench mark BS both sides BTM bottom BRG bearing BO by others BLKG blocking BLDG building ASPH asphalt BD board AFF above finished floor AB anchor bolt ALUM aluminum A/C air conditioning ALT alternate 1/4" = 1'-0" 8'2' 4'0 3'-1 1/4"3'-8 11/16" 3'-0" 40" max. 17" min. depth 34" max. 29" min. 6" max. 27" min 1'-10 5/16" STANDARD 1'-10 3/8" 6'-0 5/8" (MIN.) 8" min. 9" min. 12" MAX. 18" MIN. 3'-5" STANDARD 3'-1 1/4" 7"-9" 3'-3 1/8" MIN. 15" MIN. 60" MIN. X 24" MIN. 48" MIN. * Y 5'-9 13/16" 4'-6" 11 3/16" 6'-6" (MEN) 1'-10 3/8" 1'-4 3/4" 3'-3 1/8" 2'-7 11/16" 3'-1 1/4" 3'-1 1/4" MAX. 5 3/4" 17"-19" X NOTE: X = 12" MIN. IF DOOR HAS BOTH A LATCH & CLOSER 56" min. 24" MIN. 36" PREF. 60" min. 16"-18" 42" min. 30" min. 48" min. 19" max. 3'-1 1/4" 17" min. 48" MIN. 54" MIN. 42" MIN. * 24" MIN. 42" MIN. * 2'-0 3/16" SCREEN WALLS 29" (735 mm) 2'-2 1/16" 1 1/2" 1 1/4"-1 1/2" 5'-8 7/8" 5'-5 3/16" NOTES APPLY TO ENTIRE DOCUMENT SET. NOTES APPLY ONLY WHERE INDICATED BY SYMBOL. NOTES APPLY ONLY TO SHEET. MANUF manufactured MAX maximum MB mop basin MECH mechanical MEMB membrane MFR manufacturer MIN minimum MISC miscellaneous MO masonry opening MTL metal NIC not in contract NO number NOM nominal NTS not to scale OC on center OD outside diameter OH overhead, overhang OPNG opening PART partition PCF pounds per cubic foot PKT pocket PLAS plastic PLBG plumbing PLF pounds per lineal foot PNL panel POLY polyethylene PROJ project, projected PROP property PSF pounds per square foot PSI pounds per square inch PT pressure treated PTD paint(ed) PVC polyvinyl chloride PVMT pavement PWD plywood QT quarry tile R radius, riser RA return air RD roof drain REF refrigerator REINF reinforcing REQD required REV revise, revision RM room RO rough opening SA supply air SC solid core SF square foot SH shelf, shelving, shower SHT sheet SIM similar SPKR speaker SQ square SS stainless steel STC sound transmission coefficient STD standard STL steel SUSP suspended SY square yard T tread TELE telephone T/G tongue and groove THK thick(ness) TOF top of footing TOS top of steel TOW top of wall TYP typical UH unit heater VB vapor barrier VCT vinyl composition tile VERT vertical VT vinyl tile W water W/ with WD wood W/O without WP waterproof(ing) WSCT wainscot WWF welded wire fabric FLOOR PLAN MOUNTING HEIGHTS & CLEARANCES M 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. G102 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 SYMBOLS AND LEGENDSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 25 of 61 Page 110 of 116 60" (1525 mm) MIN. SWING--OPPOSITE DIRECTION Notes 1. Hardware: Specify hardware that can be operated with one hand, without tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist. 2. Thresholds: Thresholds are typically limited to 1/2 in. maximum height; however, some standards allow a 3/4 in. height for certain sliding doors. 3. Opening force: Interior doors (other than fire doors) should be able to be operated with 5 lb of force. Exterior doors and fire doors may be regulated by the authority having jursidiction. WITHIN 43" OF FLOOR SHOULD EXTEND TO LEAST ONE PANEL ARE PROVIDED, AT WHERE VISION LIGHTS (865 AND 1220 mm) LOCATED BETWEEN DOOR HARDWARE SHOULD BE SMOOTH OF DOOR SURFACE BOTTOM 10" (255 mm) 60" (1525 mm) MIN. HANDRAIL PROTECTION PROVIDES EDGE ENCLOSED RAMP CLEAR WIDTH 36" (915 mm) MIN. X = RAMP LENGTH (HORIZONTAL PROJECTION OR RUN) MIN. PARALLEL APPROACH--ALCOVE 48" (1220 mm) MIN. 60" (1525 mm) MIN. 32" (815 mm) 36" (915 mm) MIN. MIN. SINGLE WHEELCHAIR 24" (610 mm) MIN. TWO WHEELCHAIRS 36" (915 mm) 32" (815 mm) MIN. MIN. MIN. 24" (610 mm) ONE WHEELCHAIR AND 48" (1220 mm) MIN. ONE AMBULATORY PERSON PARALLEL ACCESSABLE DOORS 43" (1090 mm) 34" 48" MAX. MIN. CLOSER DOOR MAX. ABOVE FLOOR 34" AND 48" 36" (915 mm) FORWARD APPROACH--ALCOVE 30" (760 mm) 30" (760 mm) 21" (535 mm) 48" (1220 mm) MAX. 15" (380 mm) MIN. 48" (1220 mm) MIN.30" (760 mm) MIN. (380 mm) X > 15" MIN. SHELVES X > 24" (610 mm) MAX. ACCESSIBLE RANGE 48" (1220 mm) MAX. CLOSET 21" (535 mm) MAX. 10" (255 mm) MAX. 32" TO 42" PREFERRED 54" (1370 mm) MAX. 9" (230 mm) MIN. 24" (610 mm) 46" (1170 mm) 34" (865 mm) MAX. MAX. SIDE REACH OVER OBSTRUCTION HIGH AND LOW SIDE REACH LIMITS 17" (430 mm) MIN. 6" (150 mm)11" (280 mm) OVER 10" (1:20 SLOPE) 1/2" RISE, MAX. 34" TO 38" (865 TO 965 mm) EXTENDED PLATFORM 10" (255 mm) MIN. (255 mm TO 610 mm) 10" TO 24"20" TO 25" (510 TO 635 mm) 48" (1220 mm) 30" (760 mm) 48" (1220 mm) MIN. 30" (760 mm) MIN. FORWARD MIN. OBSTRUCTED HIGH FORWARD REACH ALCOVE SPACE FLOOR CLEAR 30" X 48" MAX. OBSTRUCTED SIDE REACH MAX. 44" (1120 mm) MAX. 48" (1220 mm) MAX. 20" (510 mm) MAX. 46" (1170 mm) MAX. 34" (865 mm) MAX. 48" (1220 mm) MAX. 10" (255 mm) 34" (865 mm) MAX. MAX. 6" (150 mm) MAX. TOE CLEARANCE ONLY 9" (230 mm) 48" (1220 mm) SWING--SAME DIRECTION DIRECTION OF TRAVEL MIN. 27" (685 mm) MIN. 9" (230 mm) specific accessible elements. Clearances shown are required at WHEELCHAIR TURNING SPACE OF MANEUVERING CLEARANCE OR THIS AREA MAY BE USED AS PART MINIMUM CLEARANCE NOTE TOE CLEARANCE 8" (205 mm) MIN. MIN. CLEARANCE CLEARANCE TOE KNEE MIN. (865 TO 965 mm) 34" TO 38" Slope = Y:X, where X is a level plane. NOTE Y = RAMP LANDING RISE RAMP SURFACE HORIZONTAL EXTENSION 12" (305 mm) MIN. RAMP RAMP RAILING RAMP ANYCLEARANY 80" (2030 mm) MIN. 27" (685 mm)48" (1220 mm) MAX. UNOBSTRUCTED FORWARD REACH 15" (380 mm) MIN. TO A WALL WALKING PARALLEL (685 mm) HIGHER THAN 27" OR LESS 48" (1220 mm) MAX. UNOBSTRUCTED SIDE REACH DISABILITY, PERSON WITH TYP. MIN. 15" (380 mm) FOR ADAAG * 54" (1370 mm) MAX. 27" (685 mm) TO A WALL WALKING PERPENDICULAR OR LESS WALKING PARALLEL TO A WALL RANGE CANE AMOUNT MAX. 4" (100 mm) WIDTH AMOUNT MAX. 1/2" (13 mm) 9" (230 mm) 27" (685 mm) MIN. is not considered knee and toe clearance. table, desk, or other element, but that space Additional space can be provided beneath the WHEELCHAIR TURNING SPACE OF MANEUVERING CLEARANCE OR THIS AREA MAY BE USED AS PART MAXIMUM CLEARANCE NOTE CLEARANCE TOE AND KNEE CLEARANCE TOE AND KNEE 25" (635 mm) MAX. KNEE CLEARANCE CLEARANCE TOE turning space, and access aisles. maneuvering clearances, wheelchair in level in clear floor space, 2. Some standards prohibit changes 1/2 in. (13 mm) must be ramped. 1. Changes in level greater than 36" (915 mm) MIN. BALUSTER HANDRAIL CLEAR WIDTH 2 ALLOWED (6.5 TO 13 mm) 1/4" TO 1/2" NOTES MAX. 1 1/4" (6.5 mm) NOT ALLOWED ALLOWED MAX. RAMP RUN RAMP RISE RAMP WHEELCHAIR TURNING SPACE OF MANEUVERING CLEARANCE OR THIS AREA MAY BE USED AS PART 1 1/2"1 1/4" TO 2" 29" NONCIRCULAR 2 1/4" 1 1/2" 2 1/4" 2 1/4" 2 1/2" ANSI MIN. MAX. MAX. MAX. PROJECTION HORIZONTAL PERIMETER 4" TO 6 1/4" MAX. CIRCULAR 2 1/2" ANSI MIN. MIN. PROJECTION HORIZONTAL 48" 40" 27" 34" 17" TO 25" 9" MIN. MAX. MAX. MAX. 30" MIN. 17" 3'-8" REMOVABLE LAVATORY TOP OF BOTTOM MIRROR MIN. REFLECTIVE PART OF 2'-3" PERPENDICULAR APPROACH PARALLEL APPROACH SEAT 25" SPACE FLOOR CLEAR MAX. 4'-6 7/16" 9 1__ 16" 34" TO 38" (865 TO 965 mm) MIN. OF TRAVEL DIRECTION 1:20 IS NOT<(SLOPE LANDING ARE REQUIRED) SO NO HANDRAILS DEFINED AS A RAMP LANDING 12" (305 mm) MIN. 1:20 SLOPE 1:12 TO HORIZONTAL PROJECTION 4'-7" 3'-8" 1'-0" 2'-9" 2'-9" 3'-6" 2'-0"4'-0" 12" 8" 2'-9" TO 2'-9" MOUNT CONTROLS IN THIS AREA ONLY 3'-6" MIN. 18" 1'-10" 15" SEAT FOLDING SHOWER SHOWER HEAD FIXED 18" 3'-7" ± 5" CONTROL AREA 2'-6" TO 3'-0" GRAB BAR 1 1/2" (38 mm) DIAMETER HANDHELD SHOWER HEAD 6"MIRROR URINAL PARTITION URINAL (ELONGATED TYPE) TOILET PARTITION 2'-9"3'-0 5__ 16" MAX. 1'-5" MIN. 8" 60" (1525 mm) MIN. 60" (1525 mm) MIN. MIN. REQUIRED LANDING WIDTH mm) (255 RAMP AS RAMP RUN AT LEAST AS WIDE RAMP X LANDING Y LANDING SURFACE TO REFLECTING LANDING LENGTH 3'-0" MIN. 5" MAX. 1'-0" 3'-6" CLEAR 11_ 2" 3'-4" 1'-3" 2'-3" 2'-10" 2'-6" 5" MAX. 2" 1 1/2" LC 1'-6" 2'-10" 1'-7" MIN. BOWL AND PIPES MUST BE CONTAINED WITHIN THIS AREA 5'-0" clear SPACE 2'-6" X 4'-0" CLEAR FLOOR 3'-0" MAX. LC 5'-0" x 5'-0" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE AT ACCESSIBLE STALL 3'-6" 1'-6" VERTICAL GRAB BAR HORIZ. GRAB BAR CTR OF TOILET KNEE/TOE CLEARANCE MIN. 3'-4"VERT. BAR MANUEVERING CLEARANCES, REACH RANGES, & PROTRUDING OBJECTS RAMPS & DOORS MOUNTING HEIGHTS & CLEARANCES 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. G103 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 ACCESSIBILITY DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 26 of 61 Page 111 of 116 RAMP, STREET OR PARKING SLOPE GUTTER FROM LEVEL WITH SLOPE 1:12 MAX. TYPE A PAVEMENT SLOPE SLOPE 1:50 MAX. 6" CURB MAX. SLOPE CURB WITH RAMP 1:12 MAX. CURB LEVEL WITH GROUND COVER VISUAL IMPAIRMENTS FOR PERSONS WITH DETECTABLE WARNING TYPE B SLOPE 1:12 MAX. GROUND COVER CURB LEVEL WITH SLOPE SLOPE CURB WITH RAMP 1:12 MAX. GROUND COVER CURB LEVEL WITH 1:50 MAX. SLOPE TYPE C TYPE D ROADWAY WITH LEVEL TYPE E IMPAIRMENT VISUAL PERSONS WITH WARNING FOR DETECTABLE CROSS SLOPE SLOPE 1:12 MAX. SLOPE 1:50 MAX. 1:10 MAX. RAMP CURB FROM GUTTER SLOPE CROSS SLOPE 1:50 MAX. SLOPE 1:10 MAX. 1:12 MAX. SLOPE TYPE F SLOPE 1:50 MAX. TYPE G GROUND COVER CURB LEVEL WITH WITH RAMP SLOPE CURB 1:12 MAX. SLOPE NOTE If the 4 ft 0 in. preferred dimension cannot be met for type F, the 1:10 slope becomes 1:12 maximum. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SIGN BUMPER S S S S SV HATCHING INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL IN PAVEMENT (OPTIONAL) SIGN (VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING) SV SVSV CURB SIDEWALK SV SV SIDEWALK CURB CURB RAMP LANDSCAPING CURB SIDEWALK SLOPE OF FLARES 1:10 SV S WALL 18'-0" MIN. 19'-0" PREF. 19'-0" PREF. 18'-0" MIN. 19'-0" PREF. 18'-0" MIN. 2'-6" MIN. 1'-6" MIN.2'-0"PREFERRED 8'-0" MIN. 9'-0" PREFERRED TYP. 5'-0" TYP. SLOPE 1:12SLOPE 1:12 SLOPE 1:12 SLOPE 1:12 8'-0" 8'-0" MIN. 9'-0" PREFERRED TYP. FOR 6" CURB AND 1/4":1'-0" CROSS-SLOPE 8'-0" MIN. 9'-0" PREF. TYP. 8'-0" MIN. 9'-0" PREFERRED TYP. 2'-6" 2'-6" MIN. 2'-6" 2'-6" 4'-0" MIN. 2'-6" 3'-0" MIN. 2'-0" PREFERRED 3'-8 1 2" TYP. 3'-0" MIN. 2'-0" OVRHNG 3' MIN. 8'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0" MIN. 2'-0" OVERHANG 8'-0" 3'-0" MIN. 2'-0" OVRHNG 3'-0" TYP. 5'-0" 2'-0" OVRHNG 3'-0" MIN. 1'-0" 1'-6" 1'-0" 1'-6" MANUEVERING CLEARANCES, REACH RANGES, & PROTRUDING OBJECTS ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK RAMPS 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. G104 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND SIDEWALK DETAILSTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs Date Approval Date Revision 1 Date Revision 2 Date Page 27 of 61 Page 112 of 116 BUILDING 1 15'-8 1/4" 17'-9" 48'-11" T H I R D S T R E E T FENCE TO SEPARATE WALK-OUT PATIO AREAS UNIT 104 UNIT 101 UNIT 103 UNIT 102 UNIT 105 UNIT 106 IN OUT SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE STORMWATER RETENTION SWALE STORMWATER RETENTION SWALE 10'-0" DIM TO FOUNDATION 25'-9" EXISTING ALLEY EXISTING ALLEY ROOF OVERHANG AT ENTRY EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK MULCHED LANDSCAPE BEDS @ BLDG PERIMETER TYPICAL RED MAPLE OAK LEAF HYDRANGEAS 1" = 10'-0"1 1LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE PLAN 715-572-2698 inquiry_arccentral@outlook.com ARC CENTRAL LLC PROJECT NO. DATE REVISIONS © Arc Central LLC 2025 ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT, INTERIOR DESIGN PROPOSED PLANS FOR COPYRIGHT © Arc Central LLC 2025 All Rights Reserved ALL DRAWINGS ARE TO THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SHEETS. THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE PRINTED ON 24x36" SHEETS. IF THEY ARE PRINTED ON A DIFFERENT SIZE SHEET THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. C100 25109 August 21, 2025 0 Third Street, Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 LANDSCAPE & UTILITIES SITE PLANTHIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS Prelim. Plan 7.14.25 Const. Docs 5.11.26 Approval Date Revision 1 6.24.26 Revision 2 Date 0' 20'0' 5' 10' N PORTAGE STREET 2 2UTILITIES UTILITIES Page 113 of 116 City of Stevens Point 1515 Strongs Avenue Stevens Point, WI 54481-3594 Department of Community Development Adam Kuhn Associate Planner Zoning Administrator Ph: (715) 346-1567 Fax: (715) 346-1498 www.stevenspoint.com Open Records Rider: The City of Stevens Point is subject to Wisconsin Statutes relating to public records. Communication, such as this document, sent or received by City employees are subject to these laws. Unless otherwise exempted from the public records law, senders and receivers of City communication should presume that the communications are subject to rel ease upon request, and to state record retention requirements. Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM To: Plan Commission From: Adam Kuhn, AICP Associate Planner / Zoning Administrator Date: September 8, 2026 RE: Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Turnaround Specifications ------------------- Background: The City’s Zoning Ordinance has numerous provisions pertaining to the design of residential driveways. One such provision is the specifications for turnaround areas that serve a residential driveway abutting an arterial street. Turnaround areas are permitted to be constructed at a size not to exceed 8’ x 10’ and must not be located in front of the residence. Ch. 23.01(17)(i)(3)(a)(iv) On arterial streets only, a turnaround area (8 feet by 10 feet, 80 square feet maximum) may be located in a front yard, but not in front of the primary dwellings. The turnaround area must be contiguous to the driveway. As part of the Business 51 Reconstruction Project, City staff have been engaging with multiple residential property owners along the corridor regarding apron work to their driveways. With access points being adjusted as part of the project to achieve conformity, City staff are requesting to increase maximum size allowances for turnarounds from 80 square feet to 120 square feet. Having a larger turnaround area better enables motorists to not back out on an arterial street – reducing potential traffic conflicts along the city’s major thoroughfares. Staff Recommendation: APPROVE the ordinance amendment as presented. Page 114 of 116 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REVISED MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF STEVENS POINT, WISCONSIN [Chapter 23 of the Revised Municipal Code – Zoning Ordinance – Maximum Turnaround Area for Residential Driveways Abutting an Arterial Street] The Common Council of the City of Stevens Point, Portage County, Wisconsin, do ordain as follows: SECTION I: That Section 23.01(17)(i)(3)(a)(iv), Zoning Ordinance of the Revised Municipal Code of the City of Stevens Point, shall be amended as follows: On arterial streets only, a turnaround area (8 feet by 10 feet 10 feet by 12 feet, 80 120 square feet maximum) may be located in a front yard, but not in front of the primary dwellings. The turnaround area must be contiguous to the driveway. SECTION II: That this ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication. Approved: ________________________________ Mike Wiza, Mayor Attest: ________________________________ Susan Pagel, City Clerk Dated: September 8, 2026 Adopted: Drafted by: Adam Kuhn Return to: City Clerk Page 115 of 116 Community Development Report, July 2026 Abandoned Vehicle on Property 5 1 230  Evelyn Ct $1,163.00 Bulk  Waste at Curb Early 15 1 222  Evelyn Ct $1,319.00 Commercial  Building Violation 0 1 214  Evelyn Ct $1,420.52 Construction  Work Without Permits 0 1 5550  Forest Creek Rd $1,491.00 Debris  on Property 5 1 5566  Forest Creek Rd $1,451.48 Exterior  Violations on House 4 1 5498  Golla Rd $1,393.00 Illegal  Pets or Livestock 1 Two‐Family 1 3265/3267  Echo Dells Ave $1,515.00 Infestation 1 Multi‐Family N/A N/A N/A Interior  Housing Violations 0 NEW CITY HALL (BLD/ZN) Native Lawn Plan 0 ++ NEW CITY HALL (PLB) Potholes 0 + NEW CITY HALL (SITE PLB) Property Encumbrance 0 1039 Ellis St Public Works Violation 7 + MIDSTATE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE BLDG (BLD/ZN) Snow & Ice Removal ‐ Sidewalk 0 1101 Brilowski Rd Tall Grass or Noxious Weeds 13 Trash Containers Improperly Stored 2 Vacant Building/Home 0 Vehicle Parked on Grass 8 Residential 116 $8,893.00 Vision  Obstruction in Roadway or Intersection 0 Commercial 31 $7,697.73 Zoning  Violations 0 Total Violations / Total Service Fees Billed 61 $3,475 Monthly Permits Monthly  Valuation Monthly  Fees YTD  Permits YTD  Valuation YTD  Fees Voluntary  Compliance Rate for Tagged/Verbal 0/0 0% 158 $14,060,458.50 $27,318.73 867 $232,362,758.30 $1,155,213.38 + Referred to another department ++ Perpetual 2025 829 $40,343,617.85 $143,551.71 2024 839 $54,579,076.77 $201,031.20 2023 921 $55,323,916.53 $234,774.01 Commercial/Industrial 3 $975.00 $25,000.00 $270,200.00 $316,120.00 N/A $269,499.75 $9,264,255.00 $348,345.00 $0.00 Additions or Alterations #  of Permits $1,379,111.33 $1,221,007.22 Declared Valuation Fees 1 $4,034.20 Violation ReportConstruction Report New Construction Fees# of Permits Location Declared  Valuation Single Family $306,111.00 $213,275.00 $220,000.00 $223,500.00 Page 116 of 116