Sustainability Commission — Agenda Packet
City of Stevens Point · Portage County · Stevens Point Sustainability Commission · meeting of Aug 6, 2026 · Agenda packets
Open the original document More from City of Stevens Point
Text
Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.
Our intention is to have in-person meetings going
forward. For the time being, we will hold the City
Committee Meetings, Plan Commission, Council and
most others at the Community Room at 933 Michigan
Avenue. This in-person location will meet the legal
requirement for our open meetings.
We will have a virtual option available, but the
technology for the hybrid style meeting may not be
reliable all of the time.
AGENDA
SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION
Members
• Alderperson Lang
• Alderperson Birr
• Heather Phelps
• Gregory Knight
• Robert Michitsch
• Erin Redmond (Alt. 1)
Date and Time: August 6, 2026
5:30 PM
Location:
Community Room
933 Michigan Avenue, Stevens Point, WI
OR
Zoom Teleconferencing
Meeting ID: 867 3790 9674 | Passcode:
110496
By Computer: Zoom Link
By Phone: +1-312-626-6799 (US Chicago)
Opening Section:
1. Roll Call.
2. Persons who wish to address the Sustainability Commission on specific agenda items
must register their request at this time.
3. Persons who wish to address the Sustainability Commission on non-agenda items must
register their request at this time.
Discussion and Possible Action on:
1. To approve the Minutes of June 4, 2026, Sustainability Commission Meeting.
2. Presentation and discussion with Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner/Zoning Administrator.
Preliminary results of the city Greenhouse Gas (GHG) inventory and potential uses for
sustainability planning.
3. Heather Phelps and Alder Birr lead commission discussion on Sustainability Commission
public engagement survey tool and survey questions, timeline and
approval/implementation process.
4. Commission discussion on reporting and recommendations presentation to the Mayor and
City Council meeting November 16, 2026.
5. Discussion of Sustainability Commission 2026 meeting calendar updates
Closing Section:
Page 1 of 26
1. The next meeting is scheduled for September 3, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in the Community
Room at 933 Michigan Avenue, Stevens Point, WI. Discussion on commission report
presentation and recommendations to Mayor and City Council. Discussion on community
survey tools and results if available.
2. Adjournment.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that any person who has special needs while attending these meetings or needs agenda materials for these meetings
should contact the City Clerk as soon as possible to ensure that a reasonable accommodation can be made. The City Clerk can be reached by
telephone at (715) 346-1569 or by mail at 1515 Strongs Avenue, Stevens Point, WI 54481.
Copies of ordinances, resolutions, reports and minutes of the committee meetings are on file at the office of the City Clerk for inspection
during normal business hours from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00p.m.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a quorum of the Common Council may be in attendance at this meeting.
Page 2 of 26
CITY OF STEVENS POINT
SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION MINUTES
June 4, 2026 - 5:30 PM Community
Room
933 Michigan Avenue, Stevens Point, WI
Opening Section:
1. Roll Call.
PRESENT Heather Phelps, Robert Michitsch, Greg Knight, Alderpersons Sam Lang -
District 9 and Allison Birr - District 5.
OTHERS
PRESENT
Speakers: Amanda Haffele, Director, Portage County Solid Waste and Kelly
Adlington, Bucket Ruckus.
Members of the Public: Bill Fisher, resident.
2. Persons who wish to address the Sustainability Commission on specific
agenda items must register their request at this time.
There were no people who wished to address the Commission on specific agenda items.
3. Persons who wish to address the Sustainability Commission on specific
non-agenda items must register their request at this time.
There were no people who wished to address the Commission on non-agenda items.
Discussion and Possible Action on:
1. To approve the Minutes of May 7, 2026, Sustainability Commission
meeting.
Robert Michitsch moved, Sam Lang seconded, to approve the meeting Minutes of June 4, 2026.
Call for the Vote: Ayes: All
Nays: None; Motion Carried
Page 3 of 26
2. Presentation and discussion with Amanda Haffele, Director, Portage County
Solid Waste, promoting waste reduction into landfills and Kelly Adlington
of Bucket Ruckus, promoting organic waste recycling.
Overview of Portage County Solid Waste Operations – Amanda Haffele
Topic: Waste reduction, landfill diversion, recycling operations, and potential organics strategies.
• Oversees:
o Closed landfill
o Solid waste transfer facility
o Recycling facility
o Household hazardous waste program
• Annual volume: ~44,000 tons of material handled.
• Staff: 3 full-time, 4 contracted, seasonal litter aid, summer intern.
• Funding:
o User fees, material sales, grants
o Not supported by tax levy
o Municipalities may charge residents separately
Garbage & Recycling Volumes
• 110 tons/day processed at transfer facility (≈ weight of a blue whale).
• 33,000+ tons sent to Wisconsin Rapids landfill in 2025.
• 4,300 tons of recyclables sent to Appleton MRF in 2025.
Services Offered
• Construction/demolition waste
• Hazardous waste
• Agricultural waste
• Confidential paper
• Sharps
• Oil filters, antifreeze
• Bulbs, batteries, electronics
• Tires, compressed gas cylinders
• Deer carcasses
• And more
New Programs (2026)
• Cooking oil recycling
• Eyeglass donation (Lions Club partnership)
• Nicotine vape recycling (to reduce lithium-ion battery fires and hazardous exposure)
City–County Collaboration
• Bin contamination monitoring
• Consistent messaging on recycling rules
• Shared communication channels
• Support for expanding services (including organics)
Page 4 of 26
Discussion Highlights
• Green business awards: None currently through Solid Waste; business council may have
programs.
• City waste share: Amanda can provide Stevens Point-specific tonnage for trash and
curbside recycling.
• Food waste:
o County currently has no organics program.
o Exploring feasibility of composting at old landfill.
o Interest in developing program within 5–10 years.
• Recommendations for reducing waste:
o Promote home composting
o Buy only what you need
o Reuse and thrift
o Avoid unnecessary online purchases
• Battery recycling:
o Permanent drop-off program (fee per pound)
o Free options in Staples stores
o Anticipated statewide battery recycling program (pending industry decisions)
• Waste vs. recycling data:
o County publishes annual report
o City could receive annual Stevens Point-specific numbers
o Could be included in the tax bill mailer or city annual report
• Food pantry waste:
o Significant amount of expired/unusable food enters waste stream
o Potential opportunity for organics diversion
• Waste-to-energy:
o Landfill methane used at Cranberry Creek
o No current local partnership for food-to-energy
• Community compost drop-off sites:
o Idea supported (e.g., food pantries, farmers market, community gardens).
Commission members discussed opportunities to improve contamination monitoring, expand
consistent public messaging, publish city-specific waste and recycling data, and explore ways to
increase organic waste diversion. Amanda Haffele noted that the county can provide city-
specific data for trash and curbside recycling, though other material streams are tracked in
aggregate.
The discussion also covered potential food-waste priorities, including home composting, food
pantry waste, food-industry waste, community compost drop-off locations, and possible future
county composting options. Members also discussed battery recycling, lithium-ion battery fire
risks, and the importance of keeping vapes and batteries out of the waste stream.
Overview of Bucket Ruckus – Kelly Adlington
Topic: Community composting, food scrap collection, organics diversion, and local opportunities.
About Bucket Ruckus
• Local LLC providing paid food scrap collection for:
o Households
o Businesses
o One school (current year)
Page 5 of 26
• Accepts all food scraps, including:
o Meat, dairy, bones
o Processed foods
• Containers: 5-gallon buckets or 32-gallon bins
• Compost site located at White Feather Organics (Kuster, WI)
Composting Process
• Mix of nitrogen (food scraps) + carbon (wood chips)
• Aerobic decomposition → finished compost
• Benefits:
o Reduces methane emissions
o Reduces landfill airspace usage
o Supports soil health
o Encourages Environmental Literacy
Contamination Challenges
• Common contaminants:
o Produce stickers
o Twist ties, rubber bands
o Plastic cutlery, bags
o Milk cartons
• Critical that customers remove contaminants to avoid litter in finished compost.
Food Waste Problem
• Kelly shared photos of large quantities of edible food discarded locally.
• Referenced DNR study showing ~30% of landfill material is organic.
Environmental & Economic Impacts
• Food waste represents:
o Lost labor
o Lost land use
o Lost transportation fuel
o Lost economic value
• Community composting keeps value local rather than sending funds to large national waste
companies.
Community Composting Network
• Bucket Ruckus is part of Community Composters Coalition (400+ members).
• Coalition supports:
o Local jobs
o Food scrap composting
o Community education
o Local economic retention
Page 6 of 26
Policy & Market Challenges
• Large waste companies are increasingly entering organics hauling.
• Municipal RFPs sometimes require hauling trash + recycling + compost, which excludes
small composters.
• Example: New York City’s organics program criticized for:
o Sending material to anaerobic digesters (not composting)
o Reinforcing Monopoly Structures
o Undercutting community composters
Free Community Drop Site
• Funded by Community Foundation grant.
• Location: Union Street (Nordic Night Sauna lot)
• Free with signup; 32-gallon bin serviced weekly.
• Opportunity for expansion with city partnership.
Discussion Highlights
• Cost to operate drop site: $502/year for weekly service.
• City-wide organics hauling would require significant scaling; Bucket Ruckus currently serves
~160 customers.
• Cart-based systems (like California) could work for curbside organics.
• Yard waste is already banned from landfills; municipalities must provide diversion.
• City yard waste currently goes to processors like Busy Bee.
• State exploring feasibility of organics diversion; household waste identified as major
contributor.
• Enforcement of existing bans (if any) is limited.
• Contamination is a major risk—Madison’s pilot program failed due to excessive trash in
organics stream.
Kelly Adlington emphasized that the best use of food is to eat it, with composting serving as the
preferred option when food cannot be consumed. She also stressed the importance of public
education, noting that contamination can undermine composting programs and force collected
material back into landfill disposal.
The Commission discussed local composting opportunities, including food pantry partnerships,
grant-funded service for nonprofit or community sites, free drop-off locations, potential city
collaboration, and the importance of structuring any future procurement process so that small
local composting businesses are not excluded. Bucket Ruckus currently operates a grant-
funded free drop-off site near Nordic Night Sauna on Union Street, with weekly service for one
32-gallon bin.
3. Heather Phelps, Sustainability Commission public engagement survey tool
and survey questions discussion, timeline and approval.
Heather Phelps introduced draft materials for a potential public engagement survey on
sustainability priorities. The draft drew from a sustainability survey used by the City of
Appleton and included additional brainstorming questions tailored to Stevens Point.
Page 7 of 26
Commission members discussed the need for a brief introductory statement explaining why
the survey is being conducted, how sustainability is currently defined, and how the City has
already been working on sustainability-related goals. Members generally supported using
the survey to identify community priorities, assess public support for possible actions, and
invite residents to participate in future Commission work.
• The Commission discussed whether to include a definition of sustainability from the
City’s existing planning documents.
• Members supported keeping the survey concise to improve response rates.
• There was interest in using mostly multiple-choice questions for easier data analysis
while preserving at least one open-ended comment opportunity.
• The survey may include a question inviting residents to express interest in serving on
the Sustainability Commission.
• The Commission discussed possible outreach channels, including the City website,
city news alerts, paper copies, the senior center, social media, and other public-
facing venues.
The Commission agreed to continue refining the survey at the August meeting. Members
also discussed the need to determine which survey platform the city prefers and how the
survey would be hosted or distributed. Greg Knight agreed to research City processes for
publishing or distributing a public survey. The Commission also discussed whether members
may submit individual survey suggestions outside a meeting without violating open meetings
requirements; the City Attorney may be consulted for guidance.
4. Meeting with the Mayor. District 5 Alder, Allison Birr and Sustainability
Commission chair, Greg Knight report on discussions with Mayor Wiza on
the sustainability commissions work to date, member vacancies,
commission administrative support, future direction and priorities,
Commission report/presentation to City Council November 16 meeting.
Greg Knight and Allison Birr reported on a meeting with Mayor Wiza regarding the
Commission’s work to date, member vacancies, organizational needs, staff support, and
future direction.
• The commission has met with multiple city departments to understand current operations,
existing sustainability practices, and opportunities for reducing energy consumption and
greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiencies, solar, electric versus gas power,
hybrid and EV, tree planting & natural landscaping, water and waste management, etc.
• The commission has gathered substantial background information through presentations,
meeting minutes, and related materials.
• Discussed the value of existing local and regional resources, including UW-Stevens Point,
Focus on Energy, Recycling Connections, and examples from other communities such as
Middleton.
• Doug Stingle resigned from the Commission after being elected to the Portage County
Board of Supervisors, creating a vacancy that has been posted by the city.
• Several Commission terms will expire at the end of December 2026. Members whose terms
are expiring are expected to be asked whether they wish to continue serving.
Page 8 of 26
• Commission’s role discussed, including whether it should focus on planning and policy,
serve as a resource for City departments, or take on specific sustainability topics and
projects.
• The Commission has identified November 16, 2026 as a possible date to present its work
and recommendations to the City Council.
Also discussed with the mayor was the need for City staff support or a formal staff liaison
like other city commissions have. Members noted that the Commission currently relies
heavily on the chair for agenda development/publication, documentation, communication,
and logistics. Several members expressed concern that the Commission needs a more
formal connection to City departments in order to operate effectively and preserve continuity
of records and work products.
Commission members discussed the possibility of amending the Commission ordinance to
include a nonvoting City staff liaison, similar to the structure used by the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory Committee. The city Community Development department was
identified as a likely organizational home, though members noted that sustainability spans
multiple City departments. The Commission agreed to continue this discussion at the August
meeting.
5. Discussion of Sustainability Commission 2026 meeting Calendar updates.
• Commission discussion on remaining calendar meeting date for 2026 and planning for
potential meeting topics.
Closing Section:
1. The next meeting is scheduled for August 6, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Room at
933 Michigan Avenue, Stevens Point, WI. Presentation and discussion with Adam Kuhn,
Associate Planner/Zoning Administrator on the preliminary results of the city Greenhouse
Gas (GHG) inventory and potential uses for sustainability planning. Heather Phelps and
Alder Birr will lead discussions on the development of a community survey tool for
sustainability planning.
2. Adjournment.
Heather Phelps moved, Alder Birr Seconded, to adjourn the Sustainability Commission
Meeting at 7:20 p.m.
Call for the Vote: Ayes: All
Nays: None; Motion Carried
Page 9 of 26
City of Stevens Point
1515 Strongs Avenue
Stevens Point, WI 54481-3594
Department of Community Development
Adam Kuhn
Associate Planner
Zoning Administrator
Ph: (715) 346-1567
Fax: (715) 346-1498
www.stevenspoint.com
Open Records Rider: The City of Stevens Point is subject to Wisconsin Statutes relating to public records.
Communication, such as this document, sent or received by City employees are subject to these laws. Unless
otherwise exempted from the public records law, senders and receivers of City communication should
presume that the communications are subject to rel ease upon request, and to state record retention
requirements.
Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
To: Sustainability Commission
From: Adam Kuhn, AICP
Associate Planner / Zoning Administrator
Date: August 6, 2026
RE: Preview of the City’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report
-------------------
Background: As Commissioners are aware, the City was awarded funds in 2023 from the
Wisconsin Public Service Commission’s Energy Innovation Grant Program. Awarded
funds were intended for the City and partnering Wisconsin Local Government Climate
Coalition communities to conduct a community-wide greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory.
Since being awarded funds, a considerable amount of time was spent collecting data
from various agencies to compute the amount of GHG emissions in the city.
Included in the agenda packet is a high-level overview of the City’s GHG inventory.
Emissions data that was collected were placed into one of the following sectors:
• Stationary energy
• Transportation
• Waste
• Industrial process and product use
• Agriculture, forestry and other land use
When reviewing the attached report, it is important to highlight a few points:
• Only data from 2023 was used in the production of this report. At the time when
the City first began our GHG inventory work, some of the data points had data
only from 2023, while others had both 2023 & 2024. At the advice of our project
consultant, ICLEI USA, it was advised to only use 2023 data to eliminate any bias
in the data.
• The intention going forward is that the attached GHG inventory report would be
updated once subsequent years’ worth of data is collected. It is imperative that
the City identify the means to conduct additional GHG emissions collection in
Page 10 of 26
stevenspoint.com
the future as it helps establish trends and identifies the effectiveness of policy
decisions that may be pursued post-adoption of a Citywide Climate Action Plan.
• While it is not included in the agenda packet, I do have a spreadsheet with all of
the ‘hard data.’ I would be more than happy to provide you with some of the
hard data once the Commission deliberates specific policy recommendations to
include in your Climate Action Plan.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Page 11 of 26
1
Stevens Point GHG Emissions
Inventory
Introduction
The City of Stevens Point has committed to achieving 100% clean energy and carbon
neutrality in all city operations by 2050. This commitment was unanimously adopted
by the Common Council in June 2024 and is supported by a formal Sustainability
Commission.1
Progress towards these commitments can be measured through the completion of
a greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory. A GHG inventory is defined as a systematic
measurement of the greenhouse gases released within a set community boundary
over a given time period. They can empower communities to track and reach their
climate goals through:
❖ Establishing a baseline
❖ Identifying priority climate actions based on emissions
❖ Measuring progress
❖ Setting emissions targets
❖ Embedding accountability in climate goals
❖ Evaluation of climate action successes
1 https://www.wpr.org/news/stevens-point-passes-resolution-pledging-to-be-carbon-neutral-by-2050
Page 12 of 26
2
Climate Action in Stevens Point
Stevens Point has been an eco-municipality since 2007, taking a systems-based
approach to sustainability across land use, energy, and water.2 In 2017, the City
formalized its commitment through the establishment of a sustainability committee
and coordinator, documented in A Path to Sustainable Stevens Point.3 In 2024, the
Common Council passed a resolution committing to 100% clean energy and carbon
neutrality by 2050 and established a Sustainability Commission to oversee
implementation.4
It is important to note that while these commitments focus on city operations, the
inventory discussed in this report measures community-wide emissions across all
residents, businesses, and institutions in Stevens Point. Understanding where
emissions originate at the community scale is essential for identifying the highest-
impact opportunities and for the city to work with its community partners toward
shared climate goals.
Stevens Point’s 2023 community-wide GHG emissions inventory serves as the formal
baseline for understanding the city’s overall emissions footprint. This inventory
informs the planning process and helps to identify the highest-priority opportunities
for community-scale impact.
This report is meant to be used as a starting point and can be updated overtime
as:
1) Additional data is incorporated into Stevens Point's baseline
inventory (such as agriculture emissions)
2) Future inventories are completed to track progress
2 https://stevenspoint.com/512/Eco-Municipality
3 https://stevenspoint.com/512/Eco-Municipality
4 https://www.wpr.org/news/stevens-point-passes-resolution-pledging-to-be-carbon-neutral-by-2050
Page 13 of 26
3
Emissions Inventory Breakdown
Baseline inventory data was collected in collaboration with ICLEI and their ClearPath
2.0 modeling platform. ClearPath 2.0 is an industry-standard tool used by hundreds
of local governments across North America to calculate and track community-scale
greenhouse gas emissions.5 Data included in the inventory was collected by ICLEI,
WLGCC staff, and City of Stevens Point staff. Data collected for the inventory
represents community-wide emissions, not just local government operations.
Stevens Point’s inventory is complete for BASIC reporting, using methods in line
with the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories
(GPC). All community emissions data is placed into one of the following sectors:
Stationary Energy
Transportation
Waste
Industrial Process and Product Use
Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use
Local leaders can use this data to understand the highest emitting sectors for their
community, incentivizing impactful action.6
Below is the specific community-wide data that was collected for Stevens Point’s
inventory7.
❖ Utilities
➢ Electricity
➢ Natural Gas
❖ On Road Transportation
❖ Solid Waste Generation
❖ Water & Wastewater
❖ Non-utility Fuels (Propane, Fuel Oil)
❖ Rail, Waterborne, Off-Road Transportation
❖ Fluorinated Gases
5 https://icleiusa.org/ghg-protocols/
6 https://icleiusa.org/what-is-a-greenhouse-gas-inventory-and-why-is-it-important/
7 https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/GPC_Full_MASTER_RW_v7.pdf
Page 14 of 26
4
Note: Water and Wastewater process emissions were estimated using the Clear
Path 2.0 Data Playbook tool, Water & Waste Water Energy Use emissions were
assumed to be captured by stationary energy data or calculated using WW.14 and
WW.15 of Appendix F of the U.S. Community Protocol.
Emissions are expressed in units of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e), which allows
different greenhouse gases, including CO₂, methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O)
to be compared on a common scale using each gas's Global Warming Potential
(GWP). CO₂e is the standard unit used in GHG inventories to express the warming
impact of different greenhouse gases relative to carbon dioxide8. For example,
methane (CH₄) is approximately 28 times more potent than CO₂ over 100 years, so
releasing 1 ton of methane is therefore counted as 28 tons CO₂e.
In this report, emissions are expressed in Thousand Metric Tons (TMT) CO₂e. One ton
is approximately 2,205 pounds9. Stevens Point's total 2023 inventory of 809 TMT CO₂e
is roughly equivalent to the annual emissions from more than 175,000 gasoline-
powered passenger vehicles.10 Future inventories can be compared to this baseline
data.
Figure 1. This chart displays the breakdown and percentages of each sector making
up Stevens Point’s total community GHG emissions.
8 https://icleiusa.org/ghg-protocols/
9 https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards_supporting/GPC_Executive_Summary_1.pdf
10 https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle
Page 15 of 26
5
General comparisons to the State of Wisconsin and national inventories can be
made; however, it is important to note that inventories at these scales were made
using different sector classifications and were not completed following GPC
guidelines, making direct comparison difficult.11 12 At the national and state level, the
highest emitting categories are emissions that would be classified under the
Stationary Energy sector, followed by Transportation emissions, a pattern reflected in
Stevens Point’s inventory.
11 https://widnr.widen.net/s/pxnzsdrzsm/wisconsin-greenhouse-gas-emissions-inventory-report-1990-2021
12 https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions
Page 16 of 26
6
Breakdown of Each Inventory Sector
Stationary Energy:
Stationary Energy is Stevens Point's largest emitting sector, accounting for
approximately 77% of the City's total GHG emissions. This sector encompasses fixed-
location emission sources, including commercial and institutional buildings such as
offices, hotels, and hospitals, which represent the largest source of stationary energy
emissions due to fossil fuel combustion for heating, cooling, and lighting.13 Industrial
energy, which accounts for the burning of fossil fuels in manufacturing and
construction, is the second largest source, followed by residential buildings. Fugitive
emissions make up Stevens Point's smallest stationary energy source, capturing
incidental GHG releases, most commonly methane, that occur during the extraction,
transport, or distribution of natural gas. 14
Breakdown of Stationary Energy
Emissions
2023 Emissions (TMT CO₂e) % of Total
Stationary
Emissions
Commercial/Institutional ~409 ~69%
Residential ~78 ~13%
Manufacturing Industries and
Construction
~103 ~17%
Fugitive Emissions From Oil and
Natural Gas Systems
~5 ~1%
Total ~595 ~100%
13 https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards_supporting/GPC_Executive_Summary_1.pdf
14 https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards_supporting/GPC_Executive_Summary_1.pdf
Page 17 of 26
7
Transportation:
Transportation emissions are the second-highest emitting sector in Stevens Point,
making up ~20% of the City’s total emissions, and are a growing sector nationally.
Transportation emissions come from the combustion of petroleum-based fuels in
vehicles traveling within the community boundaries.15 In Stevens Point, the majority
of emissions in this sector come from on-road vehicles including, passenger vehicles
operated by residents, trucks, and transit vehicles.16 The second highest emissions in
this sector comes from off-road vehicles which includes emissions from equipment
such as lawn mowers, tractors, bulldozers, etc. Emissions from railways and
waterborne transport make up the lowest two emitting categories in Stevens Point.
Breakdown of Transportation
Emissions
2023 Emissions (TMT CO₂e) % of Total
Transportation
Emissions
On-Road ~133 ~84%
Railways ~9 ~6%
Waterborne Transport ~1 ~1%
Off-Road ~16 ~10%
Total ~159 ~100%
15 https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards_supporting/GPC_Executive_Summary_1.pdf
16 https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards_supporting/GPC_Executive_Summary_1.pdf
Page 18 of 26
8
Waste:
The waste sector is composed of GHG emissions associated with the disposal and
treatment of solid waste and wastewater within the community. While the waste
sector is representative of a relatively small share of Stevens Point’s total inventory
(~1%), methane released from landfill processes is a highly potent GHG, making even
small emissions reductions impactful.
Breakdown of Waste Emissions 2023 Emissions (TMT CO₂e) % of Total
Waste
Emissions
Disposal of Solid Waste ~9 ~82%
Wastewater Management ~2 ~18%
Total ~11 ~100%
Industrial Process and Product Use:
This sector is made up of GHG emissions that occur from non-energy-related
industrial activities. GHG emissions occur during industrial processes that are
chemically or physically transforming materials, for example steel production and
ammonia manufacturing. Additional GHG emissions come from the use and
disposal of products such as refrigerants, foams, and aerosols17. In Stevens Point,
product use is the only emissions type reflected from this category, making up ~2%
of total community emissions. While this is a small piece of Stevens Point’s total
emissions, targeted interventions can lead to meaningful and cost-saving
reductions.
Breakdown of Industrial Process and
Product Use Emissions
2023 Emissions (TMT CO₂e) % of Total
Industrial
Process and
Product Use
Emissions
Product Use ~13 ~100%
Industrial Process ~0 ~0%
Total ~13 ~100%
17 https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards_supporting/GPC_Executive_Summary_1.pdf
Page 19 of 26
9
Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use:
Stevens Point’s inventory does not currently include emissions data for this
sector. While the inventory meets GPC guidelines for BASIC reporting, there is an
opportunity to pursue a more comprehensive inventory in the future.
Page 20 of 26
10
Recommended Transitions
The most effective approach to reducing community emissions is to prioritize the
sectors contributing the highest GHG emissions in the overall inventory. For Stevens
Point, this means focusing on reductions in the stationary energy and transportation
sectors of the inventory.
Stationary Energy: building efficiency and electrification, heat pump adoption in
single-family buildings, and retrofitting single-family buildings
Transportation: EV adoption and transition to electric vehicles, land-use
planning, and transit investments
Waste: waste diversion, composting, and landfill gas management (with
potential co-benefits and cost reductions)
Industrial Process and Product Use: targeted refrigerant management
For a more detailed list of transition strategies, reference WLGCC’s Database of
Strategies.
Not all emission reduction measures require equal investment. Prioritizing low-cost
and low-effort actions early on can help build momentum towards achieving more
complex goals. Examples of low-cost and low-effort actions include: LED lighting
retrofits, air sealing and weatherization of buildings, energy benchmarking, waste
diversion (composting and recycling), and renewable energy purchases. Reviewing
Focus on Energy programs is a great place to start.
Page 21 of 26
11
Guidance on Goal Setting
GHG inventories are most valuable when they are paired with clearly defined,
measurable goals. The key to translating broad aspirational commitments to
specific, actionable targets that drive day-to-day decision making is to work
backwards from the long-term goal, and establish milestone goals that are
achievable and measurable. Goals should be set following the SMAART (specific,
measurable, actionable, ambitious, relevant, time-bound) framework. SMAART and
other goal setting frameworks are outlined more in depth in the Climate Action
Planning Fact Sheet.
Stevens Point must clearly identify who is responsible for each climate action to
make progress. Below are potential roles and responsibilities for community entities.
Who
(Fill in with specific
names/job titles)
Responsibilities Duration Example Actions
Elected Officials
(Common Council,
Mayor)
Policy & direction
Adopt enabling
ordinances and
policies, allocate
budget, set overall
strategic direction,
advocate at the state
level
Ongoing and
aligned with budget
and legislative cycles
Large building
energy
benchmarking
requirement and EV-
ready building code
City Staff
Coordination
Manage inventory
updates, track and
report metrics,
coordinate
implementation
across departments,
apply for grants,
publish progress
publicly
Annual reporting
cycles, grant
deadlines, every 3–5
years for full
inventory updates
CPRG and EIGP
grant applications
and WLGCC
coordination
Department Heads
Operations
Implement sector-
specific actions
within their
operational control,
integrate climate
goals into
departmental
planning and capital
budgets
Tied to capital
improvement cycles
and fleet
replacement
schedules
Municipal fleet
electrification, LED
lighting retrofits in
city facilities, public
transit
enhancements
Utility Partners
Supply side
Deliver clean energy
supply-side changes,
Aligned with
integrated resource
Renewable energy
delivery, customer
Page 22 of 26
12
design and
implement
customer incentive
programs, support
grid modernization
and renewable
energy expansion
plans and rate cases.
Ongoing program
administration
rebate programs,
and community
solar options
Community Partners
Community action
Implement
emission-reduction
actions within their
own operations and
engage customers,
employees, and
members in climate
goals
Voluntary, can be
accelerated by city
incentives or
requirements
Commercial building
efficiency upgrades,
employer EV
charging, and
research
partnerships with
universities
Page 23 of 26
13
Implementation Tips
Climate action is a long-term process that requires ongoing engagement to ensure
progress. Key characteristics that will aid in the long-term success of goals include:
❖ Regular inventory updates to track progress against the baseline
❖ Integration of climate considerations into all major community
planning decisions
❖ Ongoing community engagement that keeps residents and businesses
informed and invested in community goals
❖ Celebration of milestones to maintain community enthusiasm
❖ Connecting with state and national networks to stay up to date on
funding opportunities, policy changes, and best practices
Below are key resources and tools available to Wisconsin communities:
- ICLEI Clear Path 2.0: GHG inventory and emissions scenario modeling tool
(used for the collection of baseline GHG inventory data). Stevens Point will
have edit access to the Clear Path 2.0 platform until March 2027, after which
the account will become view-only with the continued ability to download
previously uploaded data.
- Wisconsin Local Government Climate Coalition (WLGCC): Stevens Point is a
member of WLGCC, which is a peer network of Wisconsin municipalities
engaged in climate action planning. Provides technical assistance, shared
resources, and inventory support.
- Focus on Energy: Wisconsin's utility-funded efficiency and renewable energy
program. A key place to find both state and federal (IRA) incentives for
community residents and businesses.
- Wisconsin Office of Sustainability and Clean Energy (OSCE): Offers state-level
technical assistance, the Wisconsin Emissions Reduction Roadmap, and
coordination of federal grant programs.
- Climate Action Planning Fact Sheet: Created in collaboration with WLGCC,
Clean Wisconsin, Slipstream, New Buildings Institute, and MEEA, offering
step-by-step guidance to goal-setting. This is a great resource to reference for
effective climate action planning.
Page 24 of 26
Meeting Calendar Sustainability Commission
2025_2026 Meeting Calendar and Presentations August 6, 2026
Sustainability Commission
Date Presentation Description
January 21,
2025
Organization & Elections
Mayor Wiza
Sustainability Commission organizational
meeting.
March 6,
2025
Public Works Scott Beduhn, Director: Streets, Fleet,
Facilities, Resident garbage, compost,
recycling.
April 3 Community Development
-Planning & Zoning
Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner/Zoning: Wis
Local Gov Climate Coalition, GHG Inventory.
May 1 Public Utilities and
Central Transportation
Joel Lemke, Director.
June 5 Parks, Recreation & Forestry Dan Kremer, Director
July 10
Field trip
Public Works.
Scott Beduhn
Chris Johnson
Garbage & recycling, Garage facilities
planning & Sustainability.
5:30pm at 100 6th Avenue.
August 19
Field trip
Public Utilities.
Joel Lemke
Waste Water Treatment plant; Bio-gas, heat
pumps, solar, E-gauge operations.
September
4
Community Development
Adam Kuhn, Associate
Planner/Zoning
Zoning code revision update.
Green House Gas inventory status update.
October 2 Fire and Police
Moody and Kussow
Fire, EMS, Police departments sustainable
projects and plans.
November
6
UWSP office of Sustainability Dave Barbier & Michelle Gullickson, Climate
action planning and opportunities for
collaboration.
December
4
Focus on Energy program Sylvia Lopez, N Cent/N East Energy Advisor
2026
January 8 No meeting
February 5 City of Middleton Middleton Sustainability Committee Zoom
meeting, planning process and projects
March 5 Recycling Connections Susan Schuller Executive Director and Rylee
Mullikin. Downtown recycling program.
April 2 Meeting Cancelled Ice storm
May 7 Commission work session
Report outline, timeline for
report, internal & public
review, Work assignments.
Sustainability road map & plan development
Katie Livernash, UW-Extension
Caity Carmody, DOA office of sustainability
June 4 Portage County Landfill
Organic waste recycling
Kelly Haffele, Director Portage County Solid
Waste. Kelly Adlington, Bucket Ruckus
Page 25 of 26
Meeting Calendar Sustainability Commission
July 2 No meeting
August 6 GHG inventory preliminary
results, use in planning.
Public Survey tool.
Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner/Zoning
Administrator. Clear path tool GHG.
Heather Phelps, public engagement.
September
3
Commission report
recommendations, public
engagement, survey tool.
Heather Phelps, Alder Birr
October 1
November
5
Nov 16
Finalize Report to Common
Council & Mayor.
Common Council meeting
Sustainability Commission report and future
commission recommendations presentation
to Mayor and Council.
December
3
2027
Potential Presentation and/or Topics for future Meetings
1. Modeling scenarios and sustainable planning priorities for Green House Gas (GHG)
emissions using the ClearPath tool (Adam Kuhn – August 6)
2. Commission public survey tool development.
3. City facilities/buildings master planning for LEED.
4. Midwest Renewable Energy Association (MREA) site visit.
❖ Portage County Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan (safe streets, etc.)
• Planning meeting(s) to develop Sustainability Commission report,
recommendations, road map, timelines, etc.
o Caity Carmody, DOA Office of Sustainability & Clean Energy, sustainability,
resilience, climate action planning.
o Katie Livernash, Community Development UW-Extension Portage County,
Community engagement tools.
o Austin Holland, UWSP Center for Land Use Education, community
sustainability and regional cooperation for sustainability, resilience, climate
action planning.
o Dave Barbier & Michelle Gullickson UWSP office of sustainability.
o Hadi Veisi, Assistant Professor, TNR-UWSP, Sustainability & Resilience,
Climate Adaptation. 715-346-2487, hadi.veisi@uwsp.edu
Page 26 of 26
Source: City of Stevens Point website. First collected Oct 1, 2026.