RecordWell Data

Special Common Council — Agenda Packet

City of Stevens Point · Portage County · Common Council · meeting of Jun 24, 2026 · Agenda packets

Open the original document More from City of Stevens Point

Text

Extracted automatically from the original. Tables and formatting may not survive; the original document is authoritative.

Our intention is to have in-person meetings going forward. For the time being, we will hold the City Committee Meetings, Plan Commission, Council and most others at the Community Room at 933 Michigan Avenue. This in-person location will meet the legal requirement for our open meetings. We will have a virtual option available, but the technology for the hybrid style meeting may not be reliable all of the time. AGENDA SPECIAL COMMON COUNCIL MEETING Members • Alderperson Christianson • Alderperson Guthrie • Alderperson Keymer • Alderperson Olson • Alderperson Birr • Alderperson Donahue • Alderperson Kneebone • Alderperson Shuda • Alderperson Lang • Alderperson Moldenhauer • Alderperson Morrow Date and Time: June 24, 2026 5:00 PM Location: Community Room 933 Michigan Avenue, Stevens Point, WI OR Zoom Teleconferencing Meeting ID: 886 7477 3318 | Passcode: 979114 By Computer: Zoom Link By Phone: +1-312-626-6799 (US Chicago) Minutes 1. Roll Call. Consideration and Possible Action on the Following: 2. Resolution - A request from Mylena Oliveira, representing 7B Stevens Point 385, LLC, for a conditional use permit to construct a principal structure on the property located at 532 Division Street (Parcel ID 281240829401025), consistent with Ch. 23.02(2)(f)(5)(a). 3. Adjournment. RMC – Revised Municipal Code Any person who has special needs while attending this meeting or needing agenda materials for this meeting should contact the City Clerk as soon as possible to ensure a reasonable accommodation can be made. The City Clerk can be reached by telephone at (715) 346-1569 or by mail at 1515 Strongs Avenue, Stevens Point, WI 54481. Copies of ordinances, resolutions, reports and minutes of the committee meetings are on file at the office of the City Clerk for inspection during the regular business hours from 7:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. Page 1 of 47 RESOLUTION [CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT – 532 DIVISION STREET – CONSTRUCT A PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE WITH “B-TID5’ STREET SETBACKS] BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Stevens Point, Portage County, Wisconsin, that based upon the application and after reviewing the Plan Commission record and hearing the testimony of interested parties, the Common Council determines that all conditions required have been met, the property located at 532 Division Street (Parcel ID 281240829401025) and described as LOT1 CSM#824-3-182 AND 2'ON DIVISION X 258.65' DES 351/595 BNG PRT NWSE & SW SE S29 T24 R8 ESMT-346/447-48 1.18A M/L 815685, City of Stevens Point, Portage County, Wisconsin, is hereby granted a conditional use permit to construct a principal structure with more than five feet of street setback off of Division Street. Approved: ________________________________ Mike Wiza, Mayor Attest: ________________________________ Susan Pagel, City Clerk Dated: Adopted: Committee: Drafted by: Return to: June 1, 2026 June 25, 2026 Plan Commission Adam Kuhn City Clerk Page 2 of 47 Page 1 of 12 Administrative Staff Report Department of Community Development Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review 532 Division Street June 1, 2026 Applicant(s): • Mylena Oliveira, representing 7B Stevens Point 385, LLC Staff: • Adam Kuhn, Associate Planner akuhn@stevenspoint.com Parcel Number(s): • 281240829401025 Zone(s): • “B-4” Commercial District • “B-TID5” Overlay District Master Plan: • Commercial / Office / Multi- Family Residential Council District: • District 1 | Ald. Christianson Lot Information: • Lot Size: 51,510 sq ft (1.183 acres) Current Use: • Undeveloped Applicable Regulations: • 23.02(2)(f)(5)(a) • 23.02(2)(f)(5)(b) Request 1. Public Hearing and action on a request from Mylena Oliveira, representing 7B Stevens Point 385, LLC, for a conditional use permit to construct a principal structure on the property located at 532 Division Street (Parcel ID 281240829401025), consistent with Ch. 23.02(2)(f)(5)(a). 2. A request from Mylena Oliveira, representing 7B Stevens Point 385, LLC, for a site plan review to construct a principal structure on the property located at 532 Division Street (Parcel ID 281240829401025), consistent with 23.02(2)(f)(5)(b). Attachment(s) 1. Application 2. Plans Findings of Fact 1. 7 Brew is requesting to construct a drive-thru coffee establishment at 532 Division Street. 2. Proposed site improvements include a 530 sq ft coffee shop, a 290 sq ft cooler, eight off-street parking spaces, and two drive-thru lanes. 3. The proposed development would utilize only a portion of the subject property. Parcel boundaries of the subject parcel and the two parcels immediately to the south would be reconfigured into four developable lots. 7 Brew would be located on Lot 1 listed on the proposed CSM, approximately 21,765 sq ft in lot size. 4. The subject property is zoned “B-4” Commercial and is located within the “B-TID5” Overlay District. Drive-thru coffee uses are permitted by right within both the “B-4” and “B-TID5” Districts. 5. The principal structure on the property is proposed to be set back 48 feet from Division Street. The “B-TID5” District allows a maximum five-foot street setback off of Division Street. Proposed street setbacks greater than five feet are considered through a conditional use permit request. 6. New development within the “B-TID5” District requires a site plan review. 7. The Plan Commission and Common Council may attach additional conditions onto these requests as necessary. Page 3 of 47 Page 2 of 12 Staff Recommendation Approve the request for a conditional use permit to construct a principal structure on the property located at 532 Division Street (Parcel ID 281240829401025). Approve the request for a site plan review to construct a principal structure on the property located at 532 Division Street (Parcel ID 281240829401025), subject to the following conditions: 1. A shared access agreement shall be recorded with the property located at 500 Division Street (Parcel ID 281240829401026) and Lot 2 on the preliminary certified survey map. 2. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the start of construction. 3. An erosion control permit shall be obtained prior to the start of construction. Vicinity Map Background Overview: 7 Brew is requesting to construct a drive-thru coffee establishment at 532 Division Street. Proposed site improvements include a 530 sq ft coffee shop, a 290 sq ft cooler, eight off-street parking spaces, and two drive-thru lanes. The proposed development would utilize only a portion of the subject property. Parcel boundaries of the subject parcel and the two parcels immediately to the south would be reconfigured into four developable lots. 7 Brew would be located on Lot 1 listed on the proposed CSM, approximately 21,765 sq ft in lot size. The subject property is zoned “B-4” Commercial and is located within the “B-TID5” Overlay District. Drive-thru coffee uses are permitted by right within both the “B-4” and “B-TID5” Districts. The principal structure on the property is Page 4 of 47 Page 3 of 12 proposed to be set back 48 feet from Division Street. The “B-TID5” District allows a maximum five-foot street setback off of Division Street. Proposed street setbacks greater than five feet are considered through a conditional use permit request. A greater than five-foot street setback is being requested primarily due to where access off of Division Street is allowed. Access off of arterial roads – the road classification of Division Street – must be limited to preserve safe traffic flow to and from the street. Based on this viewpoint, along with the ongoing Business 51 reconstruction plan, no new access points are planned for the 7 Brew lot. Instead, access to the 7 Brew parcel would be off of a shared access agreement with the existing lot to the north and proposed lot to the south. With no direct access for the proposed development off of Division Street, a greater building setback is being proposed primarily to assist with the necessary turning radii of delivery trucks that would provide products to and from the site. Standards of Review – Conditional Use Permit 1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. Analysis: The proposed drive-thru coffee establishment would be built off of Division Street, classified as an arterial street. Findings: Drive-thru coffee uses are commonplace along arterial streets as such streets are built out to support higher traffic volumes that are associated with drive-thru service uses. Given that traffic control is a major consideration for the proposed development, adequate safeguards were built into the site design so that the land use is not detrimental to the public. Such safeguards include having access points off of multiple streets (Division Street and Vincent Street), consolidating access points off of Division Street with neighboring developments, and having two drive-thru lanes with significant queuing space. Proposed Site Plan Page 5 of 47 Page 4 of 12 2. The use will not be injurious to the use and for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values. Analysis: Drive-thru restaurants are a permitted use within the “B-4” and “B-TID5” Districts. The conditional use permit is requesting a larger building setback off of Division Street. Findings: Having an increased building setback off of Division Street would be consistent with neighboring buildings. Based on the application and plan submittal, staff believes that the use will not be injurious to the property or surrounding neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Analysis: The respective area is in an established and developed area of the city. Findings: See standards one and two above. 4. The exterior architectural appeal and function plan of any proposed structure will not be variance with either the exterior architectural appeal and function plan, and scale of the structures already constructed or in the course of construction in the immediate neighborhood or in the character of the applicable district so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood. Analysis: Cement board is the predominant siding material that would be used on the coffee shop building. Other façade materials include aluminum around the doors, and windows along the east and west elevations. Peak building height is proposed to be 19’ 8’’. Please see the site plan review section below for additional architectural standards tied to the “B-TID5” District. Findings: Staff believes that the proposed development is of a uniform design for the Division Street corridor. A variation in building height and façade materials used provides contrast and ensures a complimentary feel to other retail uses along the street corridor. 5. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or facilities have been, or are being, provided. Analysis: Utility connections are planned off of Division Street. Please note that as the development would be under construction while Division Street is under reconstruction, utility connections will exist based both on existing conditions and the final plan set for the road reconstruction. Adequate greenspace exists on the Page 6 of 47 Page 5 of 12 property to handle anticipated drainage needs. As discussed earlier, access will be off of both Vincent Street and Division Street (the latter via shared access agreements with adjacent properties. Findings: Staff believes that access and traffic circulation for all road users will not be negatively impacted with the proposed request. 6. Adequate measures have been, or will be taken, to provide ingress and egress so designed to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Analysis: See the ‘Background’ section above. The City’s stacking requirements outline a minimum of six queuing spaces to be provided in the drive-thru lane, measured from the order box. Two drive-thru lanes are proposed and can provide 10 stacking spaces per lane. Findings: Staff believes that safe access into and out of the subject property is provided with the proposed land use. 7. The proposed use is not contrary to the objectives of any duly adopted land use plan for the City of Stevens Point and any of its components. Analysis: The subject property is zoned “B-4” Commercial and has a future land use designation of ‘Commercial/Office/High- Density Residential.’ The “B-4” District is established to “provide for retail, commercial, office, service and apartment uses in areas of good accessibility along arterial streets consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. This district is primarily intended to accommodate general commercial uses requiring on- site parking and arterial access.” Subject Property Subject Property Page 7 of 47 Page 6 of 12 Findings: Staff believes that the proposed commercial use aligns with the zoning and future land use designation of the subject property. 8. The use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. Analysis: The property and use meets minimum performance standards in the “B-4” District, and meets minimum performance standards of the “B-TID5” District provided that this conditional use permit request is granted. Several Building Code requirements exist with the proposed land use and would need to be met as a condition for receiving temporary occupancy. Findings: This standard is met provided. 9. The proposal will not result in result in an over-concentration of high-density living facilities in one area so as to result in a substantial or undue adverse effect on the neighborhood, on the school system, and the social and protective systems of the community. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A 10. Principal: Applications for exclusive multifamily residential uses: The view from the street should maintain a residential character. The view should be dominated by the building and not by garages, parking, mechanical equipment, garbage containers, or other storage. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A 11. Principal: Access to the site shall be safe. a) All developments shall front on a public right-of-way unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Analysis: Access is proposed to be off of Division Street and Vincent Street. Finding: This standard is met. b) The driveway to the site shall be located so as not to be a danger to the street flow of traffic. Analysis: Division Street access will be off of existing shared access aprons. Findings: This standard is met. Page 8 of 47 Page 7 of 12 c) The driveway shall not be too close to neighboring intersections. Analysis: Driveways serving multi-family residential and other non-residential land uses must be separated at least 100 feet from a street intersection consisting of an arterial street. The proposed driveways greatly exceed this 100’ separation requirement. Findings: This standard is met. d) Alignment of the driveway shall be coordinated with adjacent access points to avoid conflict or confusion. Analysis: Based on the amount of street frontage provided, the City’s Zoning Code permits a maximum of one driveway per street frontage. As stated earlier, access off of Division Street is being planned with neighboring lots. Findings: Staff believes that the proposed driveway is located appropriately to avoid conflict and confusion. e) Only one driveway shall be allowed per site unless recommended by the Public Works Director. Two family units may be allowed more than one driveway if those driveways are separated by not less than 10 feet. Maximum driveway openings shall be 20 feet (each). Analysis: The applicant is requesting to use one driveway per street frontage. The Public Works Director has recommended the quantity and location of these driveways. Findings: This standard is met. f) The organization of traffic flow on-site and between the site and the street shall be organized in a clear hierarchy of flow patterns. Internal and external areas where traffic flow changes directions or creates intersections shall be organized at clear intersections and those intersections are spaced far enough apart so as to not cause confusion or problems and to provide for adequate spacing for waiting vehicles. Analysis: The traffic flow on the site to the street is anticipated to flow smoothly. Access can occur off of both Division Street and Vincent Street, with most traffic expected to come from the former. Findings: This standard is met. g) Intersections are visible and not visually screened. Analysis: The intersections are not screened from view. Findings: Vision obstructions should not be a concern. h) Adequate drainage and snow storage is provided. Page 9 of 47 Page 8 of 12 Analysis: Adequate drainage exists on the property, and snow storage is expected to be located towards the west end of the property. Findings: This standard is met. i) Minimum size requirements are maintained for safe vehicle circulation. Analysis: The lot provides for adequate traffic aisles, as required by the City’s Zoning Code. Findings: This standard is met. j) Parking areas shall be safe. They shall be adequately lit, sized to meet minimum standards, graded so as to not be too steep, and paved with concrete, brick, or bituminous surfacing. The light source shall not be visible from adjacent properties. Lighting shall be developed in such a way to minimize light straying onto adjacent properties. Analysis: Additional lighting is planned to be located on the exterior of the building and site to meet minimum Building Code requirements. Findings: This standard is met. k) Driveways shall be located to minimize the impact to adjacent properties. Analysis: Please see above. The driveways should not cause a negative impact on the adjacent properties. Findings: This standard is met. 12. There shall be adequate utilities to serve the site. a. The Public Works Director, Police Chief and Fire Chief shall determine whether there is adequate sanitary sewer, portable water, storm drainage, street capacity, emergency access, public protection services, and other utilities to serve the proposed development. They shall review the plan to ensure safety and access for safety vehicles. Analysis: Please see above. The property has the needed utilities and access to support the proposed land use. Findings: This standard is met. 13. The privacy of the neighboring development and the proposed development shall be maintained as much as practical. Guidelines: a. Mechanical equipment including refuse storage shall be screened from neighboring properties. Page 10 of 47 Page 9 of 12 Analysis: Refuse storage is proposed on the west end of the subject property. The storage area will be screened from public view. Findings: This standard is met. b. Lighting shall be located to minimize intrusion onto neighboring properties. Analysis: Additional lighting is planned to be located on the exterior of the building and site to meet minimum Building Code requirements. Findings: This standard is met. c. Sources of noise shall be located in a manner that minimizes impact to neighboring properties. Analysis: Any noise generated is expected to be located within the building and site. Findings: This standard is met. 14. Principal – Applications for exclusive multi-family residential uses. Landscaping shall be provided, or existing landscape elements shall be preserved to maintain a sense of residential character, define boundaries, and to enhance the sense of enclosure and privacy. Analysis: N/A Findings: N/A Based on the findings above, staff would recommend approval of the conditional use permit. Please keep in mind that State legislation has placed limitations on local jurisdictions regarding the denial of conditional use permits. Conditional use permits shall be reviewed by a means to permit a use under certain conditions applied to the use or property. For example, if a concern is raised regarding to a standard above, a condition can be applied to the permit to address the concern and grant the permit. Standards of Review – Site Plan Review 1. Buildings are aligned and close to the street. Buildings form the space of the street. Analysis: The proposed development is 48 feet from Division Street. While the conditional use request is seeking to allow a setback off of Division Street greater than the five feet that is allowed, staff believes that both structures are positioned as close to the street as possible given the proposed use. For example, all off-street parking spaces are provided behind the proposed structures to better shield it from public view. Likewise, the drive-thru lanes are uniquely positioned to span almost the entirety of the lot’s width to utilize a greater portion of the property’s front yard. Findings: This standard is met. 2. Buildings oversee the street with active fronts as opposed to blank fronts. The first floor and upper floors should include windows as well as entrances. Wider entrances, door framing, canopies, and other techniques should be used to identify the entrance. Page 11 of 47 Page 10 of 12 Analysis: Each structure is one story in height. Findings: Cement board is the predominant siding material that would be used on the coffee shop building. Other façade materials include aluminum around the doors, and windows along the east and west elevations. Peak building height is proposed to be 19’ 8’’. The height of the principal structure varies along the building width to provide greater contrast and be consistent with other structures built along Division Street. 3. Property lines are physically defined by buildings or street walls. Analysis: A street setback of 48’ is proposed off of Division Street. At its closest point, 22’ 6’’ of side yard setback is proposed, and over 155’ of setback is proposed from the rear lot line. Findings: Although the proposed street setbacks are larger than other projects recently approved in the “B-TID5” District, staff believes that the orientation of the two structures and its corresponding drive -in lanes better achieves the goal of having property lines being defined by the buildings and use that exists within. For example, while the coffee shop is set back 48 feet from Division Street North, the drive -in lanes are roughly 15 feet from the street lot line and better achieve this objective. 4. Building facades facing the street shall exhibit a high level of architectural design. In no case shall the front facade of the building consist of a blank wall or a series of garage doors. Windows should play a prominent role in the facade design. All bui lding materials to be used shall express their specific properties. For example, heavier more permanent materials (masonry) support lighter materials (wood). Analysis: Windows play a prominent role on the coffee shop as large window panels are oriented on the primary elevations of the building. These window panels complement the adjacent dark brown masonry façade and the cement board and aluminum siding. Findings: This standard is met. 5. Two or more story buildings are preferred over one story buildings. Analysis: Both structures are one story in height. Findings: The proposed coffee shop would be 19’ 8’’ in height . Although both structures are not two stories in height, the height of the coffee shop is arguably taller than other one-story commercial uses and better achieves the goal of having taller structures line the Division Street Corridor. 6. Landscaping shall be of high quality and installed at a rate that is appropriate that enhances the proposed site and surrounding properties. Analysis: A landscaping plan has been provided by the applicant. Alternating plantings of trees and shrubs line the off-street parking area. With the layout of both parking lots, terminal islands are also proposed to be landscaped with a mixture of spirea’s and birc h trees. Other shrubs and perennials line the exterior perimeter of the coffee ship and along the internal sidewalk connecting the coffee shop with Division Street. Page 12 of 47 Page 11 of 12 Findings: Based on the variety of landscaping proposed) and its location throughout the parking lot, staff believes that planned landscaping enhances the proposed site and surrounding properties. 7. Vehicle storage, garbage, and mechanical equipment are kept away from the street and screened from public view. Analysis: The proposed off-street parking area is screened from public view with the proposed structures. While the parking area would be visible off of Vincent Street, trees have been purposely located in the westernmost terminal island to provide additional screening. Additionally, a trash enclosure is proposed near the west lot line and is screen from public view via high-rise shrubs. Findings: This standard is met. 8. Parking (not including on-street parking) should be away from the street and screened from public view. Analysis: The proposed off-street parking area is screened from public view with the proposed structures. While the parking area would be visible off of Vincent Street, trees have been purposely located in the westernmost terminal island to provide additional screening. Findings: This standard is met. 9. The building design is coordinated with the street space. The city may require the improvement of the streetscape adjacent to the property including installation of trees, paving, sidewalk, lighting, street furniture, etc. Street trees are limited to a list approved by the City Forester. Analysis: The developer has been consulting with City staff as it relates to positioning both structures appropriately with planned improvements on Business 51. Staff believes that the proposed development would not interfere with the planned street design of Division Street. Page 13 of 47 Page 12 of 12 Findings: This standard is met. 10. Safety: Buildings should be close to the street but should acknowledge their neighboring building setbacks. Safety of entrances as well as vision around corners should be addressed in the review process. Analysis: The proposed buildings meet setback requirements in the “B -TID5” District either by right or via the conditional use process. Sufficient access exists to and within the property for fire/EMS vehicles. Findings: This standard is met. Page 14 of 47 Page 15 of 47 Page 16 of 47 Page 17 of 47 Page 18 of 47 1 Mylena Oliveira From: noreply@civicplus.com Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2025 3:46 PM To: Mylena Oliveira Subject: Online Form Submittal: Contact Alderperson - District 1 Categories: Jurisdiction Contact Alderperson - District 1 First and Last Name: Mylena Oliveira Street Address: 532 Division St City Stevens Point State: WI Zip: 54481 Phone Number: 8164062667 Email Address: Please enter your questions or comments below: Seven Brew Coffee - Notification Pa rcel ID: 281240829401025 Address: A portion of 532 Division St, Stevens Point, WI 54481 Alderperson: Ald. Marc Christianson Good afternoon Ald. Christianson, I am reaching out on behalf of 7B Stevens Point 385, LLC, to propose a free-standing Seven Brew Co ffee for a parcel of land containing approximately 0.58 acres in a portion of 532 Division St, currently vacant land. The current parcel will be split into two. This parcel is zoned B-4” Commercial and is located within the “B-TID5” Overlay District. As part of our entitlement process, we attended the Pre-App meeting on 10/23 and received preliminary feedback from staff. I can provide a preliminary site plan and elevations via email for your reference. Page 19 of 47 2 We are happy to partner with the operator to expand their brand in the Stevens Point area! Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you Page 20 of 47 3400 College Blvd, Suite 200, Leawood, KS 66211 I www.plazastreetpartners.com May 4th, 2026 City of Stevens Point Community Development Department 1515 Strongs Avenue, Stevens Point, WI 54481 P: (715) 346-1567 communitydevelopment@stevenspoint.com RE: 7-Brew – Portion of 532 Division St, Stevens Point, WI 54481– Parcel # 281240829401025 Project Narrative To Whom it May Concern: Please accept this Project Narrative for the Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”), Site Plan (“SP”) and CSM Applications for the proposed 7-Brew development. A. Project Description Explain the land use and the development proposed for the subject property. Include the time schedule (if any) for development. 7B Stevens Point 385, LLC, doing business as Plaza Street Partners, LLC, is proposing a CUP and SP for a parcel of land containing approximately 0.5 acres located at the west side of US-51 BUS/Division St. in the City of Stevens Point, Wisconsin (“City”) for the construction of a new Seven Brew Coffee kiosk with a drive-thru, walk-in cooler, and a dumpster enclosure. The property is situated in the Lot 1, CSM No. 824-3-182 & part of the SW ¼ of the SE ¼, located in the NW ¼ & SW ¼ of the SE 1/4 , Section 29, Township 24 North, Range 8 East, City of Stevens Point, Portage County, Wisconsin, and currently exists as vacant land. The intent is to split the existing parcel into two and develop the northern portion. The remainder of the parcels will be developed by others at a different timeline. Parcels 3 and 4 areas are also being updated in the proposed CSM and will also be developed by others at a different time. The Site is bound on the north by a Strip Mall, east by Michele's Restaurant & Catering, on the south by the remainder of the vacant parcel and Old National Bank, and to the west by Residences. A vicinity map is included in Appendix A for reference. The proposed CUP/SP comprises a 530 sq. ft. building, an accessory cooler structure, two drive-through lanes and 8 Page 21 of 47 3400 College Blvd, Suite 200, Leawood, KS 66211 I www.plazastreetpartners.com parking spaces to provide drive-through only coffee service to City customers. 7 Brew is anticipating starting construction upon permit approval by the City, which is currently being estimated by Sept/2026. The total length of construction is estimated to be between 75 and 120 days, depending on the weather. The goal is to have the Site ready for the 7 Brew opening in December of 2026. The 7 Brew construction timeline aligns well with the redevelopment of Business 51 proposed by the City. B. Public Benefit The Site is located along a major commercial corridor of the City and the proposed improvements will greatly improve the appearance and use of the property to better serve the surrounding community. The future business created by the proposed CUP/SP will also result in the creation of a minimum of 40 jobs and sales tax benefits for the City. The annual unit volume (“AUV”) of a 7 Brew is between $1.8M and $3.4M. C. Project Compliance, Compatibility, and Impact How will the proposed development reinforce the existing or planned character of the neighborhood? The Site is designated as B4 (Commercial District) with “B-TID5” Tax Increment District 5 per Chapter 23 of the Zoning Code of the City of Stevens Point. A link to the code is included in Appendix A. Although the proposed 7 Brew is a standalone drive-thru building, the project aligns with the intent and overarching goals of the Division Street TID 5 zoning district by supporting safe, efficient redevelopment, protecting the character of the commercial corridor, and promoting public health, safety, and general welfare. As discussed during the Pre-Application meeting, the building was intentionally set back beyond the maximum allowed setback to accommodate a cross-access connection to the strip mall to the north and remaining parcel to the south, supporting safe circulation and coordinated development within the area. We have contacted the neighboring property owner, who is agreeable to this connection. In addition, the increased setback is necessary to safely accommodate delivery vehicles and fire apparatus circulation. To further cooperate with B51 reconstruction, we propose the curb cut to be further south and shared between the overall development. While traditional commercial design along Division Street emphasizes compact development and minimal setbacks, additional distance from the right-of-way is necessary in this case to safely accommodate delivery vehicles and fire truck circulation. This adjustment maintains functional safety and operational viability while still meeting the broader zoning objectives of coordinated redevelopment, infrastructure adequacy, and a stable, well-functioning commercial environment. The proposed development complies with City code requirements by coordinating the building design with the surrounding street space through the installation of new trees, paving, lighting, sidewalks, and bike racks that enhance interconnectivity and pedestrian Page 22 of 47 3400 College Blvd, Suite 200, Leawood, KS 66211 I www.plazastreetpartners.com comfort. Building façades facing the street incorporate a high level of architectural design with no blank walls and utilize high-quality, durable materials—including two-tone Nichiha brick and glazing—that reinforce a permanent, high-quality character consistent with the City’s design objectives. Although the building does not provide interior public access or restrooms, pedestrians are accommodated through a walk-up ordering window and covered canopy with patio seating, supporting its role as an informal “third place” along the corridor. The site layout also acknowledges adjacent building setbacks while prioritizing safe entrances, clear sightlines, and visibility around corners, ensuring the development promotes safety, functionality, and a cohesive streetscape consistent with City standards. It is not anticipated that the Site will have any adverse impacts on public facilities, including fire, police, sanitation, roads, parks, or schools. There are no known water features, wetlands, or wildlife habitats located within the Site. 7 Brew and their development team will adhere to the City’s Code and specific requirements applicable to the subject site. 7 Brew and their development team intend to fully cooperate with City staff to ensure all comments are addressed for the CUP/SP and any other future applications. D. Operations Employees greet customers in their vehicles and take orders using iPads, allowing service to begin before cars reach the window. The two drive-thru lanes and this ordering system create an efficient flow that minimizes wait times and reduces vehicle stacking. Although the City requires a lower minimum stacking length, 7 Brew is providing a longer stacking area to accommodate peak-hour demand on site and to prevent spillover or interference with adjacent businesses. • Hours of Operation: Su-Th: 5:30 am – 10 pm / Fr-Sa: 5:30 am – 11 pm • Peak hours: 7 am - 10 am (busier on Friday-Saturday-Sunday) • Service time: under 4min from order to pick up E. Summary Based on the proposed design and site layout, the following steps will be taken to reduce potential impacts on adjacent properties: 1. Coordinated Site Layout and Setbacks The building placement and circulation are designed to respect neighboring building setbacks while maintaining safe vehicle and pedestrian movement. Clear sightlines around corners and well-defined access points will minimize conflicts and enhance overall safety. 2. Shared Access and Connectivity A cross-access connection to the adjacent properties has been incorporated to promote shared circulation, reduce redundant curb cuts, and improve traffic flow for both sites. 3. High-Quality Architecture and Materials Façades are fully articulated with durable, permanent materials such as Nichiha brick and Page 23 of 47 3400 College Blvd, Suite 200, Leawood, KS 66211 I www.plazastreetpartners.com glazing, avoiding blank walls and reducing visual impacts on adjacent properties. 4. Landscaping and Streetscape Enhancements New trees, paving, lighting, and landscape elements will be installed to buffer the site edges, soften views from adjacent properties, and enhance the overall streetscape character. 5. Pedestrian-Oriented Design Sidewalks, bike racks, and a walk-up ordering window with canopy seating support pedestrian activity without generating additional building access conflicts or impacts to neighboring sites. 6. Operational Safety Measures Entrances, circulation routes, and service areas are designed to safely accommodate deliveries and emergency vehicles, reducing the potential for spillover traffic, congestion, or operational conflicts on adjacent properties. 7. Lighting and Visibility Controls Site lighting will be designed to provide adequate illumination for safety while minimizing glare and light spillover onto neighboring properties. Together, these measures ensure the project integrates sensitively with surrounding properties while meeting City code requirements and supporting safe, orderly redevelopment. 7 Brew and their development team are committed to providing a suitable development that upholds the vision and guidelines set forth in the City of Stevens Point Zoning Code. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding community and the proposed improvements enhance the current state of the Site, as well as promote future employment opportunities and long-term economic growth. Page 24 of 47 3400 College Blvd, Suite 200, Leawood, KS 66211 I www.plazastreetpartners.com References: 1. CHAPTER 23 ZONING CODE CITY OF STEVENS POINT APPENDIX A VICINITY MAP FEMA FLOOD MAP SITE DATA/OWNER INFORMATION SUMMARY TABLE Page 25 of 47 3400 College Blvd, Suite 200, Leawood, KS 66211 I www.plazastreetpartners.com APPENDIX A FEMA FLOOD MAP Page 26 of 47 APPENDIX A SITE DATA/OWNER INFORMATION SUMMARY TABLE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER Pointmed Properties, LLC 520 Vincent Street Stevens Point, WI 54481 Attn: Todd Fairchild fairchta@yahoo.com ADDRESS 532 Division St, Stevens Point, WI 54481 PARCEL ID 281240829401025 SITE AREA 0.5 acres ZONING B4 (Commercial District) with “B-TID5” Tax Increment District 5 FUTURE LAND USE Commercial Page 27 of 47 Page 28 of 47 Page 29 of 47 Page 30 of 47 Page 31 of 47 Page 32 of 47 Page 33 of 47 Page 34 of 47 Page 35 of 47 Page 36 of 47 Page 37 of 47 Page 38 of 47 Page 39 of 47 FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" B.O. CANOPY 108'-10 13/16" T.O. WALL 111'-0" ATTIC FLOOR 109'-10 1/2" 1 A3.0 _________ T.O. ROOF 119'-8" 2 1 2 6 6 1 11 3 5 7 17 E C C C A B B 2 1 T.O. PARAPET 112'-0" 7 13 13 101a 2 4 8 8 14 2 H H F J B F 201 FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" B.O. CANOPY 108'-10 13/16" ATTIC FLOOR 109'-10 1/2" 1 A3.0 _________ T.O. ROOF 119'-8" DRIVE THRU COFFEE A B C DD 8 88 14 2 E X X X 9 2 1 1 17 3'-0" 5'-0" B EQ. 6'-0" EQ. G T.O. PARAPET 112'-0" 14 15 15 16 G J J 104 AL -1 1. CANOPY. • REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 2. SURFACE -MOUNTED LED NEON FLEX LIGHTING, SHOWN DASHED. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 3. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 4. FROST PROOF HOSE BIB. • REFER TO THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 5. EXTERIOR WEATHER -PROOF OUTLET. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 6. THROUGH WALL SCUPPER ROOF DRAIN. 7. OVERFLOW SCUPPER ROOF DRAIN. 8. STOREFRONT SIGN, SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN CONTRACTOR. 9. ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE 8" TALL x 2" BRUSH STROKE. 10. OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEYOND. • REFER TO THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 11. KEY KNOX BOX. 12. 1/4" THICK ACRYLIC SIGNAGE APPLIED TO SIDING WITH VH DOUBLE SIDE TAPE. 13. EXPOSED DOWNSPOUT, GALVANIZED, PAINTED. CONNECT TO SUB -GRADE STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM. • REFER TO THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 14. STRUCTURAL CANOPY COLUMN; RAINWATER DOWNSPOUT WITHIN; CONNECT BASE OF CANOPY COLUMN DOWNSPOUT TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. • REFER TO THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 15. TUBE LIGHT MOUNTED TO COLUMN AT 6" A.F.F. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 16. 1" INSULATED TEMPERED THERMAL WINDOWS w/ LOW -E GLASS. CLEAR. • REFER TO SHEET A4.1 FOR ENERGY COMPLIANCE INFORMATION. 17. REMOTE COOLER. • COORDINATE LOCATION WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS. 18. ICE MACHINE CONDENSER BEYOND, PROVIDED BY OWNER. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES XX A. ARCHITECTURAL CEMENT BOARD SIDING (PL -2). B. ARCHITECTURAL CEMENT BOARD SIDING (PL -1). C. BRAKE METAL FASCIA (MP -2) D. SOFFIT PANELS (MP -3). E. STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS (MP -2). F. BRAKE METAL CAP (MP -3). G. CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM (MP -5). H. BRAKE METAL CAP (MP -4). J. BRAKE METAL TUBE COLUMN (MP -2). EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIALS XX FINISH MATERIALS SCHEDULE NOTES: a. PROVIDE COMPLETE ARCHITECTURAL SIDING SYSTEM AND ACCESSORIES, INCLUDING MATCHING MANUFACTURER FABRICATED CORNERS, FLASHINGS, AND TRIMS. SIDING INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. FINISH MATERIALS SCHEDULE PL-1 SYMBOL ITEM DESCRIPTION REMARKS WA1 MP-2 MP-3 BRAKE METAL MP-4 BRAKE METAL GL-1 GALVALUME METAL PANEL F-1 RESILIENT VINYL FLOORING BRAKE METAL B-1 METAL COVE BASE ABET LAMINATI "STRATIFICATION" PL-2 DECORATIVE PANEL BRAND: NICHIHA MODERNBRICK COLOR: MIDNIGHT FIBER CEMENT PANEL EXTERIOR WAINSCOT AND REAR WALL DECORATIVE PANEL EXTERIOR WALLS ABOVE WAINSCOT AND ATTIC REAR BRAND: NICHIHA CANYONBRICK COLOR: SHALE BROWN FIBER CEMENT PANEL INTERIOR WALL FINISH - CLASS A 8MM 405 WHITE 63 X 165 METAL ROOF, COPING AND CANOPY COLUMNS COLOR: PACIFIC BLUE FINISH: SMOOTH METAL SOFFIT AND METAL COPING COLOR: ONYX FINISH: SMOOTH METAL COPING AT SIDE WALLS COLOR: SANDSTONE FINISH: SMOOTH DRY STORAGE WALLS AND CEILING FINISH - CLASS A CEILING AND WALL FINISH COLOR: FACTORY FINISH SERVICE AREA AND TOILET METAL BASE COLOR: WHITE MAIN BUILDING AND DRY STORAGE FLOOR FINISH PROTECT-ALL FLOORING COLOR: LIGHT GRAY MP-5 BRAKE METAL TRIM AT STOREFRONT COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED FINISH: SMOOTH MP-1 METAL PANEL & BRAKE METAL TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE AND TRIM BRAND: PAC-CLAD 16" METAL WALL PANEL COLOR: CITYSCAPE C-1 ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE MAIN BUILDING CEILING FINISH - CLASS A VINYLROCK 2x4 CEILING TILE VINYL FACED SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" A2.0 SOUTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" A2.0 NORTH ELEVATION 2 1/8/2026 12:54:46 PM C:\Revit Local\250431900_Arch_Central_25_kelly.hCFUB6.rvt ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOTE: SIGNAGE SHOWN IS FOR REPRESENTATION AND COORDINATION ONLY. REFER TO PERMITTED SIGN PACKAGE FOR PRECISE LOCATION AND SIGNAGE QUANTITY. Page 40 of 47 FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" B.O. CANOPY 108'-10 13/16" T.O. WALL 111'-0" 1 A3.1 _________ ATTIC FLOOR 109'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF 119'-8" 2'-7 1/2" 2 8 2 1 8 A A G A B B B B C 10 1 3'-0" T.O. PARAPET 112'-0" 10'-0" 2'-10" HEIGHT OF #7 3'-2" 2 JJ 14 16 18 F H H F 13 C D 101b AL -2 FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" B.O. CANOPY 108'-10 13/16" T.O. WALL 111'-0" 1 A3.1 _________ ATTIC FLOOR 109'-10 1/2" T.O. ROOF 119'-8" 2 8 2 1 14 DRIVE THRU COFFEE 1 3'-0" A B B GG B A 12 18 10 C 2'-10" 10'-0" G T.O. PARAPET 112'-0" HEIGHT OF #7 3'-2" 2'-7 1/2" H F H 2 13 8 14 16 16 J J F D C 101c 101d AL -3AL -2 1. CANOPY. • REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 2. SURFACE -MOUNTED LED NEON FLEX LIGHTING, SHOWN DASHED. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 3. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 4. FROST PROOF HOSE BIB. • REFER TO THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 5. EXTERIOR WEATHER -PROOF OUTLET. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 6. THROUGH WALL SCUPPER ROOF DRAIN. 7. OVERFLOW SCUPPER ROOF DRAIN. 8. STOREFRONT SIGN, SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN CONTRACTOR. 9. ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE 8" TALL x 2" BRUSH STROKE. 10. OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEYOND. • REFER TO THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 11. KEY KNOX BOX. 12. 1/4" THICK ACRYLIC SIGNAGE APPLIED TO SIDING WITH VH DOUBLE SIDE TAPE. 13. EXPOSED DOWNSPOUT, GALVANIZED, PAINTED. CONNECT TO SUB -GRADE STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM. • REFER TO THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 14. STRUCTURAL CANOPY COLUMN; RAINWATER DOWNSPOUT WITHIN; CONNECT BASE OF CANOPY COLUMN DOWNSPOUT TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. • REFER TO THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 15. TUBE LIGHT MOUNTED TO COLUMN AT 6" A.F.F. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 16. 1" INSULATED TEMPERED THERMAL WINDOWS w/ LOW -E GLASS. CLEAR. • REFER TO SHEET A4.1 FOR ENERGY COMPLIANCE INFORMATION. 17. REMOTE COOLER. • COORDINATE LOCATION WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS. 18. ICE MACHINE CONDENSER BEYOND, PROVIDED BY OWNER. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES XX A. ARCHITECTURAL CEMENT BOARD SIDING (PL -2). B. ARCHITECTURAL CEMENT BOARD SIDING (PL -1). C. BRAKE METAL FASCIA (MP -2) D. SOFFIT PANELS (MP -3). E. STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS (MP -2). F. BRAKE METAL CAP (MP -3). G. CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM (MP -5). H. BRAKE METAL CAP (MP -4). J. BRAKE METAL TUBE COLUMN (MP -2). EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIALS XX FINISH MATERIALS SCHEDULE NOTES: a. PROVIDE COMPLETE ARCHITECTURAL SIDING SYSTEM AND ACCESSORIES, INCLUDING MATCHING MANUFACTURER FABRICATED CORNERS, FLASHINGS, AND TRIMS. SIDING INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. FINISH MATERIALS SCHEDULE PL-1 SYMBOL ITEM DESCRIPTION REMARKS WA1 MP-2 MP-3 BRAKE METAL MP-4 BRAKE METAL GL-1 GALVALUME METAL PANEL F-1 RESILIENT VINYL FLOORING BRAKE METAL B-1 METAL COVE BASE ABET LAMINATI "STRATIFICATION" PL-2 DECORATIVE PANEL BRAND: NICHIHA MODERNBRICK COLOR: MIDNIGHT FIBER CEMENT PANEL EXTERIOR WAINSCOT AND REAR WALL DECORATIVE PANEL EXTERIOR WALLS ABOVE WAINSCOT AND ATTIC REAR BRAND: NICHIHA CANYONBRICK COLOR: SHALE BROWN FIBER CEMENT PANEL INTERIOR WALL FINISH - CLASS A 8MM 405 WHITE 63 X 165 METAL ROOF, COPING AND CANOPY COLUMNS COLOR: PACIFIC BLUE FINISH: SMOOTH METAL SOFFIT AND METAL COPING COLOR: ONYX FINISH: SMOOTH METAL COPING AT SIDE WALLS COLOR: SANDSTONE FINISH: SMOOTH DRY STORAGE WALLS AND CEILING FINISH - CLASS A CEILING AND WALL FINISH COLOR: FACTORY FINISH SERVICE AREA AND TOILET METAL BASE COLOR: WHITE MAIN BUILDING AND DRY STORAGE FLOOR FINISH PROTECT-ALL FLOORING COLOR: LIGHT GRAY MP-5 BRAKE METAL TRIM AT STOREFRONT COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED FINISH: SMOOTH MP-1 METAL PANEL & BRAKE METAL TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE AND TRIM BRAND: PAC-CLAD 16" METAL WALL PANEL COLOR: CITYSCAPE C-1 ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE MAIN BUILDING CEILING FINISH - CLASS A VINYLROCK 2x4 CEILING TILE VINYL FACED SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" A2.1 EAST ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" A2.1 WEST ELEVATION 2 1/8/2026 12:54:46 PM C:\Revit Local\250431900_Arch_Central_25_kelly.hCFUB6.rvt ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOTE: SIGNAGE SHOWN IS FOR REPRESENTATION AND COORDINATION ONLY. REFER TO PERMITTED SIGN PACKAGE FOR PRECISE LOCATION AND SIGNAGE QUANTITY. Page 41 of 47 FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" T.O. COOLER 111'-0" 17 H 3'-0" 2'-7 1/2" F F A B B B 106 2'-7 1/2" 1. CANOPY. • REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 2. SURFACE -MOUNTED LED NEON FLEX LIGHTING, SHOWN DASHED. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 3. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 4. FROST PROOF HOSE BIB. • REFER TO THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 5. EXTERIOR WEATHER -PROOF OUTLET. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 6. THROUGH WALL SCUPPER ROOF DRAIN. 7. OVERFLOW SCUPPER ROOF DRAIN. 8. STOREFRONT SIGN, SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN CONTRACTOR. 9. ADDRESS NUMBERS TO BE 8" TALL x 2" BRUSH STROKE. 10. OUTLINE OF MECHANICAL UNIT BEYOND. • REFER TO THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 11. KEY KNOX BOX. 12. 1/4" THICK ACRYLIC SIGNAGE APPLIED TO SIDING WITH VH DOUBLE SIDE TAPE. 13. EXPOSED DOWNSPOUT, GALVANIZED, PAINTED. CONNECT TO SUB -GRADE STORM WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM. • REFER TO THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 14. STRUCTURAL CANOPY COLUMN; RAINWATER DOWNSPOUT WITHIN; CONNECT BASE OF CANOPY COLUMN DOWNSPOUT TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. • REFER TO THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 15. TUBE LIGHT MOUNTED TO COLUMN AT 6" A.F.F. • REFER TO THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 16. 1" INSULATED TEMPERED THERMAL WINDOWS w/ LOW -E GLASS. CLEAR. • REFER TO SHEET A4.1 FOR ENERGY COMPLIANCE INFORMATION. 17. REMOTE COOLER. • COORDINATE LOCATION WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS. 18. ICE MACHINE CONDENSER BEYOND, PROVIDED BY OWNER. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES XX A. ARCHITECTURAL CEMENT BOARD SIDING (PL -2). B. ARCHITECTURAL CEMENT BOARD SIDING (PL -1). C. BRAKE METAL FASCIA (MP -2) D. SOFFIT PANELS (MP -3). E. STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS (MP -2). F. BRAKE METAL CAP (MP -3). G. CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM (MP -5). H. BRAKE METAL CAP (MP -4). J. BRAKE METAL TUBE COLUMN (MP -2). EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIALS XX FINISH MATERIALS SCHEDULE NOTES: a. PROVIDE COMPLETE ARCHITECTURAL SIDING SYSTEM AND ACCESSORIES, INCLUDING MATCHING MANUFACTURER FABRICATED CORNERS, FLASHINGS, AND TRIMS. SIDING INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. FINISH MATERIALS SCHEDULE PL-1 SYMBOL ITEM DESCRIPTION REMARKS WA1 MP-2 MP-3 BRAKE METAL MP-4 BRAKE METAL GL-1 GALVALUME METAL PANEL F-1 RESILIENT VINYL FLOORING BRAKE METAL B-1 METAL COVE BASE ABET LAMINATI "STRATIFICATION" PL-2 DECORATIVE PANEL BRAND: NICHIHA MODERNBRICK COLOR: MIDNIGHT FIBER CEMENT PANEL EXTERIOR WAINSCOT AND REAR WALL DECORATIVE PANEL EXTERIOR WALLS ABOVE WAINSCOT AND ATTIC REAR BRAND: NICHIHA CANYONBRICK COLOR: SHALE BROWN FIBER CEMENT PANEL INTERIOR WALL FINISH - CLASS A 8MM 405 WHITE 63 X 165 METAL ROOF, COPING AND CANOPY COLUMNS COLOR: PACIFIC BLUE FINISH: SMOOTH METAL SOFFIT AND METAL COPING COLOR: ONYX FINISH: SMOOTH METAL COPING AT SIDE WALLS COLOR: SANDSTONE FINISH: SMOOTH DRY STORAGE WALLS AND CEILING FINISH - CLASS A CEILING AND WALL FINISH COLOR: FACTORY FINISH SERVICE AREA AND TOILET METAL BASE COLOR: WHITE MAIN BUILDING AND DRY STORAGE FLOOR FINISH PROTECT-ALL FLOORING COLOR: LIGHT GRAY MP-5 BRAKE METAL TRIM AT STOREFRONT COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED FINISH: SMOOTH MP-1 METAL PANEL & BRAKE METAL TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE AND TRIM BRAND: PAC-CLAD 16" METAL WALL PANEL COLOR: CITYSCAPE C-1 ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE MAIN BUILDING CEILING FINISH - CLASS A VINYLROCK 2x4 CEILING TILE VINYL FACED FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" T.O. COOLER 111'-0" 17 H 13 DRIVE THRU COFFEE 2'-7 1/2" 2'-7 1/2" 3'-0" F F A B BB MAIN BUILDING BEYOND 12 1/8/2026 12:54:45 PM C:\Revit Local\250431900_Arch_Central_25_kelly.hCFUB6.rvt ARCHITECTURAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" A2.2 WEST COOLER ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" A2.2 EAST COOLER ELEVATION 1 NOTE: SIGNAGE SHOWN IS FOR REPRESENTATION AND COORDINATION ONLY. REFER TO PERMITTED SIGN PACKAGE FOR PRECISE LOCATION AND SIGNAGE QUANTITY. Page 42 of 47 TOTAL AREA2.171 ACRES94,571 SQ. FT. ARCHITECTS ● ENGINEERS ● SURVEYORSAlways aBetter Plan100 Camelot DriveFond Du Lac, WI 54935Phone: (920) 926-9800www.EXCELENGINEER.comJOB NO. 250360200 Page 43 of 47 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP LOT 1, CSM NO. 824-3-182 & PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4, LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 & SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST, CITY OF STEVENS POINT, PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Ryan Wilgreen, Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify: That I have surveyed, divided and mapped a parcel of land described below. That I have made such Certified Survey under the direction of Pointmed Properties, LLC bounded and described as follows: Lot 1 of Certified Survey Map No. 824-3-182, recorded in Volume 3 of Certified Survey Maps on Page 182 in the Portage County Register of Deeds Office as Document No. 308498 and part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, being located in the Northwest 1/4 and Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 29, Township 24 North, Range 8 East, City of Stevens Point, Portage County, Wisconsin being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 29; thence South 00°-04’-23” West along the East line of said Southeast 1/4, a distance of 1,276.70 feet; thence South 89°-31’-53” West, a distance of 1,407.45 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, said point being the point of beginning; thence South 01°-31’-04” East along the West right-of-way line of Division Street, a distance of 371.13 feet; thence South 89°-50’-55” West along the North line of Lot 1 of Certified Survey Map No. 4817-17-72, recorded in Volume 17 on Page 72 in the Portage County Register of Deeds Office as Document No. 442380, a distance of 274.24 feet; thence North 84°-00’-51” West, a distance of 19.25 feet to the Easterly right-of-way line of Vincent Street; thence Northeasterly 125.63 feet along said Easterly line on a curve to the left having a radius of 50.00 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 18°-27’-45” East, a chord distance of 95.10 feet; thence North 00°-08’-50” East along the East right-of-way line of Vincent Street, a distance of 277.45 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89°-31’-53” East along the North line of said Lot 1, a distance of 252.73 feet to the point of beginning and containing 2.171 acres (94,571 sq. ft.) of land more or less. That such is a correct representation of all the exterior boundaries of the land surveyed and the land division thereof made. That I have fully complied with the provisions of Section 236.34 of the Wisconsin Statutes and the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Stevens Point in surveying, dividing and mapping the same. ______________________________ Ryan Wilgreen, P.L.S. No. S-2647 ryan.wilgreen@excelengineer.com Excel Engineering, Inc. Fond du Lac, Wisconsin 54935 Project Number: 250360200 Page 44 of 47 SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP LOT 1, CSM NO. 824-3-182 & PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4, LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 & SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST, CITY OF STEVENS POINT, PORTAGE COUNTY, WISCONSIN. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE Pointmed Properties, LLC, a limited liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Wisconsin, as owner, does hereby certify that said limited liability company caused the land described on this map to be surveyed, divided and mapped as represented on this map. Pointmed Properties, LLC does further certify that this map is required by s.236.10 or s.236.12 to be submitted to the following for approval or objection: 1. City of Stevens Point WITNESS the hand and seal of said owner this _______ day of _________________, 20__. Pointmed Properties, LLC ______________________________________________________ ___________________________, __________________________ (Print) (Title) STATE OF ____________________ ) ______________________COUNTY )SS Personally, came before me this ______ day of ______________, 20___, the above named _______________________ to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same. ______________________________________ Notary Public, _______________ County, ____ My Commission Expires:__________________ CITY OF STEVENS POINT ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this map and the accompanying information is hereby (approved) (conditionally approved) pursuant to the building and safety ordinances of Stevens Point on the basis of the following (facts)(conditions) ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Community Development Office (Date) Page 45 of 47 STOP STOP LANE 1 LANE 2 STAKEOUT INFORMATION:VERIFY STATION FOR INLETLOCATION. REFER TO STAKEOUT POLICYFOR STAKEOUT LOCATION AND OFFSETS. STAKEOUT INFORMATION:VERIFY STATION FOR INLETLOCATION. REFER TO STAKEOUT POLICYFOR STAKEOUT LOCATION AND OFFSETS. PROPOSED COFFEE SHOP530 S.F.CIVIL F.F.= 1093.00ARCH F.F.= 100'-0" PROPOSED COOLER290 S.F.CIVIL F.F.= 1093.00PAD F.F. = 1092.75 (-3")ARCH F.F.= 100'-0" 50'0 50'100'SCALE: 1"= 50' NORTH AVERAGE BUILDING DISTANCE FROM ROW: 55' EXHIBIT 1 PROPOSED BUILDING DISTANCE FROM ROW: 49' Page 46 of 47 STOP STOP LANE 1 LANE 2 STAKEOUT INFORMATION:VERIFY STATION FOR INLETLOCATION. REFER TO STAKEOUT POLICYFOR STAKEOUT LOCATION AND OFFSETS. STAKEOUT INFORMATION:VERIFY STATION FOR INLETLOCATION. REFER TO STAKEOUT POLICYFOR STAKEOUT LOCATION AND OFFSETS. 1093 1092 1091 1091 1091 RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE 1092.16EG1092.26EG1091.66EG1092.601091.38EG 1092.85EG 1092.78EG1092.75EG1092.58EG 1092.74EG1092.14EG1091.93EG1091.89EG1091.24EG 1093.02EG 1093.29EG 1091.35EG1092.25 1090.54EG 1090.68EG 1090.76EG 1090.96EG 1091.18 1093.001093.001093.001093.00 1093.001093.001092.951092.951092.94 1092.901092.951092.801092.90 1092.281092.231092.451092.501092.85 1091.64EG 1091.90CURB CUT1092.68CURB CUT1092.15 1092.65 1092.401092.901092.50 1092.80 1092.941092.78 1092.801092.901092.801092.701092.701091.737091.68 7091.787091.731090.94EG1090.92EG1091.001091.07 1091.02 1091.43 1091.60 1090.93 PROPOSED COFFEE SHOP530 S.F.CIVIL F.F.= 1093.00ARCH F.F.= 100'-0" PROPOSED COOLER290 S.F.CIVIL F.F.= 1093.00PAD F.F. = 1092.75 (-3")ARCH F.F.= 100'-0" 1091.74CURB CUT1090.50RIM 1092.801092.901092.70 4.5% 1091.57RIDGE 1092 1092 1092 1092.31TC1091.81FL1092.32TC1091.82FL 1092.70TC1092.50FL 1091.62TC1091.12FL1092.07TC1091.57FL 1092.17TC1092.00FL1092.00TC1091.50RIM 1092.55TC1092.55FL 1092.65TC1092.65FL 1091.52TW1091.35BW 1091.83TC1091.66FL1092.17TC1092.00FL 1092.17TC1091.67FL1092.41TC1091.91FL 1092.80TC1092.30FL1092.02TC1091.85FL1091.82TC1091.65FL CURB CUT1092.84TC1092.67FL 1092.59TW1092.42BW1092.85TW1092.68BW 1092.53TW1092.03BW1093.20TW1092.70BW 1092.59TC1092.42FL 1092.36TC1092.19FL1092.34TC1091.84FL 1091.55TC1091.05RIM1092.87TW1092.37BW 1092.07TC1091.57FL 1092.601092.55 1092.68 1092 1092 1092 1092 1092 1092 TRAFFIC CONFLICT/ACCIDENT RISK TRAFFIC CONFLICT/ACCIDENT RISK 5' BUILDING SETBACK CITY REQUIRED ACCESS 30'030'60' SCALE: 1"= 30' NORTH 10911092109310941090ROADWAYSIDEWALKFLOOR ELEVATION: 1091'2' RETAINING WALL REQUIRED PROPOSED BUILDINGFLOOR ELEVATION: 1093' EXHIBIT 2 QUEUING SPACECURB CROSS SECTIONNTS Page 47 of 47

Source: City of Stevens Point website. First collected Oct 1, 2026.