Plan Committee — Agenda packet

VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM FOUNDED 1853 PLAN COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, September 22, 2026 – 7:00 p.m. Village Hall - 9996 Water Street NOTE: This Meeting will be simultaneously held via teleconferencing. Staff, committee members, and the public are welcome to participate in this manner. Teleconferencing will be available by computer, phone, tablet, or dial-in. Connection information below: 1. Call to Order 2. Quorum 3. Approval of previous minutes 4. Changes in Agenda 5. Visitors’ Comments 6. Devin Wolf – 9815 Water St. – Addition – Design Review 7. John Maher –9992 Moravia St. – Garage & Remodel – Design Review 8. Timothy Nelson – 10110 Norway St. – New SFR – Design Review 9. Gary & Lesley Houchin-Miller – 2888 Wilder Rd. – New SFR – Design Review 10. New business for next meeting/next meeting date 11. Adjournment Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. https://meet.goto.com/675264629 You can also dial in using your phone. Access Code: 675-264-629 United States: +1 (571) 317-3122 A quorum of the Village Board will be present at the meeting. It is possible that a quorum of the Village Historic Preservation Committee or other Village Committees may be present at the meeting. However, no action will be taken by the Board or any other committee unless specifically noticed. Date: 9/18/2026 Andrea Collak, Clerk X Village Administrative Office X Visitors’ Center X Post Office Kim Roberts, Deputy Clerk X Website www.ephraim-wisconsin.com X Emailed to WDOR Radio X Emailed to Peninsula Pulse Administrative Office 10005 Norway Road PO Box 138 Ephraim WI 54211 Phone: (920) 854-5501 Fax: (920) 854-2072 E-Mail: office@ephraim.wi.gov 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM PLAN COMMITTEE WORKING SESSION MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2026 - 12:00 PM 9996 WATER STREET Present: Andy Bartelt, Laird Hart, Rick Hoyerman, Monique McClean, BD Thorp, and Ken Nelson – Chair. Absent: Grace Held. Staff: Brent Bristol - Village Administrator and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests: John Cox and Kathy Pentler. Call to Order: K. Nelson called the working session to order at 12:00 PM. K. Nelson reviewed the changes that Committee members agreed to at the July 14, 2026 meeting. Thorp inquired regarding Section 7 – Exceptions. He expressed concern that the section seemed very vague and open-ended, while in comparison, Section 8- Reproduction, specifically outlines size, volume, and appearance. A brief discussion was held regarding Section 7. K. Nelson explained that the goal of Section 7 was to encourage the retention of existing homes rather than tearing them down. It leaves the Committee discretion, but he asked the Committee if they felt the section was too vague. Thorp felt it was vague and feared the Committee would be swamped with Special Exception requests. Bartlet added that keeping an original residence is vague, but it would be hard to be more specific. Hoyerman explained that if the Committee wanted to be more specific and define Section 7, it would take two (2) more pages of ordinance. He felt it best to leave it in the Committee’s hands to make judgment calls on a case-by-case basis, allowing for discretion. A summary of the changes to §17.20 - August 4, 2026 Ordinance Working Session: • Section 1- Intent o Line 8 of the intent section, replace the word “said” with “such” to read, “such modifications”. o Strike and relocate to Section 4(a), “New construction on vacant lots is prohibited in the PW District, as structures are limited to those existing on or before January 1, 1988.” • Section 3 – Conditional Uses o Section 3(b): Combine 3(b) with 3(b)(1) so that the sentence reads for 3(b), “On parcels where there is a structure, additions/modifications to or replacement of existing structures, subject to §17.20(6) and §17.20(8). (Note: At the end of the meeting, sections of the ordinance were reordered; these cite references reflect the updated section order of the ordinance.) • Section 4 – Prohibited Uses o Take the last line from the intent statement in Section 1, and create 4(a), “New construction on vacant lots is prohibited in the PW District, as structures are limited to those existing on or before January 1, 1988” o Create 4(b), “Home occupations are not permitted in the PW District.” • Section 7 – Reproduction (Note: At the end of the meeting, sections of the ordinance were reordered; Section references reflect the updated section order of the ordinance.) o §17.20(7)(a) - The first sentence was amended to read, “Structure Reproduction: A structure reproduction means creating a replica of the existing structure in terms of footprint, size, volume, and appearance. • Section 8 – Additions/Modifications (Note: At the end of the meeting, sections of the ordinance were reordered; Section references reflect the updated section order of the ordinance.) 2 o §17.20(8)(b)(ii) amended to read, “Visual impact from the street is to be minimized on all projects occurring in the PW District. The width of any individual structure as measured parallel to State Highway 42 cannot be increased. When the existing landscape is to be modified or replaced, a Landscape Permit is required (See §10 Permit Application.) o §17.20(8)(b)(iv) amended to read, “Any existing deck or porch (see definitions in §17.09) may be replaced on a project within this district, assuming the size is no more than the existing deck or porch, and the deck or porch is a one-for-one replacement. For example, an open porch may be replaced by an open porch, but not by a screened or windowed porch. • Ordinance Section reordering: o Section 6 Additions and Modifications became Section 8 Additions and Modifications o Section 7 Exceptions became Section 6 Exceptions o Section 8 Reproduction became Section 7 Reproduction K. Nelson explained that a draft would go to the Village Board for review on August 11, 2026, to obtain feedback as a discussion-only agenda item. The Plan Committee would also review the ordinance at its August regular meeting. In September, the Village Board could set the ordinance for Public Hearing in October, and in October the Public Hearing could be held. K. Nelson asked the Committee to consider if they wanted to make a concept review a requirement for applications submitted for the Protected Waterfront for the next meeting. He noted it was currently encouraged but not required. He further explained in response to Kathy Pentler’s remarks that the Committee was charged by the Village Board to clarify the ordinance, not make it more strict. Hoyerman moved, Hart seconded to adjourn at 1:16 PM. Recorded by Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM PLAN COMMITTEE WORKING SESSION MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2026 - 12:00 PM 9996 WATER STREET Present: Andy Bartelt, Laird Hart, Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman, BD Thorp, and Ken Nelson – Chair. Absent: Monique McClean. Staff: Brent Bristol - Village Administrator. Guests: John Cox. Call to Order: K. Nelson called the working session to order at 12:00 PM. K. Nelson opened the session by explaining that the purpose of the working session was to conduct a final review of the PW Ordinance before its formal approval at the 7:00 p.m. Plan Committee meeting that evening. He noted that, upon approval, the ordinance would be officially forwarded to the Village Board, which would then set it for a public hearing in two weeks. K. Nelson indicated that he had received written comments from Village Board Trustee Carly Mulliken, and invited any final thoughts from Plan Committee members before addressing her comments. K. Nelson proceeded to read through the written comments submitted by Trustee Carly, which concerned the use of the term "footprint" throughout the ordinance, and addressed each in turn. Regarding section 8(a)(i)(a.): “Footprints of finished interior space (see definition in §17.09) in the PW District can be modified so long as there is no increase in the width, as measured parallel to STH 42, of the residence or accessory buildings, and no increase in the total footprint”; Mulliken suggested that the final use of the word "footprint" in this section be replaced with "square foot," stating she felt that phrasing made more sense. K. Nelson directed the Committee's attention to the definition of "footprint" in Section 17.09, which defines footprint as "the area of a single horizontal plane bounded by the exterior walls of the building expressed in square feet." K. Nelson noted that the definition itself already incorporates square feet because footprint is measured in square feet. Bartelt expressed concern that substituting "square foot" for "footprint" would introduce unnecessary confusion, as the two terms convey the same concept. Thorp agreed, stating that "footprint" is intentional ordinance terminology that is well-defined within the document. Held concurred, noting her hesitation to remove the established term. Hoyerman further emphasized that "footprint" is a term of art specific to this ordinance, and that replacing it risked confusing readers into thinking it referred to the total square footage of the entire structure. The Committee reached consensus that the language should remain as written. Regarding section 8(a)(i)(b.): “Footprints of attached garages can be modified so long as there is no increase in the width, as measured parallel to STH 42, and no increase in the total footprint. No upper level will be allowed over the reclaimed square footage of the attached garage”; Mulliken again suggested replacing the final use of "footprint" with "square footage." The Committee agreed this raised the same issue as the comment for Section 8(a)(i)(a.) and that the same rationale applied. Thorp noted that where the ordinance already uses the phrase "no upper level will be allowed over the reclaimed square footage," the use of "square footage" is appropriate in that context because it refers to something distinct from the footprint itself. Bartelt concurred that this sentence referred to upper-level square footage rather than the footprint. The Committee agreed no change was warranted in response to this comment. Regarding section 8(a)(i)(c.): “Footprints in the PW District cannot be increased with the following exception: Consideration given to principal building footprint increases when existing accessory buildings are to be removed. The footprint of the accessory building may be reclaimed and combined with the principal building, provided there is no increase in the width of the footprint, as measured parallel to STH 42, of the principal building. No upper level will be allowed over the reclaimed square footage of the accessory building.”; Mulliken suggested that the references to "footprint" and "square foot" be reconciled in the subsection addressing conditions under which footprint increases may be considered when accessory buildings are removed. She also 2 suggested an alternative opening for the section framed around "an overall increase in finished interior square footage." K. Nelson again directed the Committee back to the existing definition, stating the use of "footprint" was consistent and that any change would be redundant. Bartelt noted a separate concern with the language in Section 8(a)(i)(c.), "Consideration given to principal building footprint increases," observing that it read as an incomplete and awkward construction. He acknowledged it was a minor stylistic concern but suggested that the sentence would read more clearly if it began with the subject of the exception and used "may be given" rather than simply "given," so as to preserve the Committee's discretionary authority without making a binding commitment. Held and Thorp agreed that retaining "consideration" language was preferable, as it preserved flexibility. After brief discussion of alternative phrasings, the Committee reached agreement that the most practical correction was to amend the phrase to read "Consideration may be given to principal building footprint increases," with all members affirming the change. Regarding Mulliken's broader suggestion to reframe the section around "finished interior square footage," Held noted that the existing structure, stating that the footprint cannot be increased, subject to one exception already conveyed clearly within the ordinance, and no further change was deemed necessary. K. Nelson thanked the Committee members for their sustained effort over the preceding two and a half months, noting that the ordinance would provide owners, developers, and architects with a substantially clearer framework. He referenced a one-page summary document he had prepared for the Village Board, highlighting what had become more or less restrictive under the revised ordinance, and suggested Committee members use it as a reference tool when fielding public questions. K. Nelson noted that he would not be present at the September Village Board meeting and asked Hoyerman to carry the lead for the Plan Committee at that session. He explained that the September board meeting would serve to set the ordinance for a formal public hearing, with the Board's final decision expected at the October meeting. K. Nelson confirmed signs were the next priority item on the Plan Committee's agenda, referencing concerns about “sail-style” signs and businesses using multiple signs. Bristol advised that he intended to send a letter to all commercial property owners in the near term, informing them of the existing sign ordinance requirements and notifying them that the Plan Committee would begin formal discussion of the topic at its October meeting. The letter would invite participation by the businesses in the discussion process. Bristol also noted that he had met with Kelsey Stone of the Ephraim Business Council (EBC). EBC is preparing a draft business survey in connection with the upcoming quarterly meeting with the EBC and Ephraim Historical Foundation, which Bristol indicated he would review for alignment with the Committee's objectives before it was distributed. The Committee agreed that no noon working sessions would be held in September, and that the next working session would be scheduled for October. Hoyerman moved, Held seconded, to adjourn at 12:25 PM. Recorded by Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk 1 VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM PLAN COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2026 – 7:00 PM 9996 WATER STREET ACTION ITEMS: Held moved, Bartelt seconded to approve the July 28, 2026, Plan Committee Working Session minutes, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Thorp moved, Hart seconded to approve the July 28, 2026, Plan Committee minutes, as corrected, all ayes. Motion carried. Hoyerman moved, Bartelt seconded to approve the August 4 , 2026, Plan Committee Working Session minutes, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Thorp moved, Held seconded, to approve the New SFR Design Review application for Cora Elquist on Town Line Drive parcel 121-01-24312714B3 as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Thorp moved, Hoyerman seconded, to approve the New SFR Design Review Application for Smart Custom Homes at 10467 Valvere Way, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Held moved, Hoyerman seconded to adjourn at 7:33 PM, all ayes. Motion carried. Present: Andy Bartelt, Laird Hart, Grace Held, Rick Hoyerman, BD Thorp, and Ken Nelson – Chair. Absent: Monique MacClean Staff: Brent Bristol - Village Administrator and Kim Roberts - Deputy Clerk. Guests in person: Cora Elquist, representatives from Smart Custom Homes (Maureen Bryfcznski et al), and Shane and Stephanie Poda. Guests online: Brent Heim (John Joseph Company), “Ben K”, John Cox, and Gary Houchin-Miller. 1. Call to order: K. Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. 2. Quorum: A quorum of the Plan Committee was present. 3. Approval of previous minutes: Held moved, Bartelt seconded to approve the July 28, 2026, Plan Committee Working Session minutes, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Thorp moved, Hart seconded to approve the July 28, 2026, Plan Committee minutes, as corrected, all ayes. Motion carried. A minor typographical error was noted for correction by Bartelt on item 15 of the July 28 Plan Committee minutes. He noted that the date of the next meeting had not been updated for the next meeting. Hoyerman moved, Bartelt seconded to approve the June 14, 2026, Plan Committee Working Session minutes, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 4. Changes in agenda: There were no changes. 5. Visitors’ Comments: There were no Visitors’ Comments. 6. Cora Elquist– Town Line Drive- New SFR – Design Review: Bristol provided an introduction, noting that the application had appeared the previous month as a concept review. At that time, the project appeared to potentially require a special exception due to a maximum 2 height reading of 32 feet. Upon further review, the averaged height calculation brought the structure within the standard allowance, eliminating the need for a special exception. No dimensional concerns were identified. Applicant Cora Elquist presented material samples to the C ommittee. She described the exterior finishes as follows: LP SmartSide siding in an onyx (black) color, black window frames, black doors, black garage doors, and a "pristine green" three-dimensional architectural shingle for the roof. All trim elements were described as black, making the roof the sole non-black exterior element. A discussion was held regarding the New SFR Design Review Application. In response to a question from Held regarding visibility from Townline Road, Elquist confirmed that the home would not be visible from the road, as it is situated well back on a large property with significant tree coverage. Bartelt also noted that the elevations were more appealing with windows incorporated into the design compared to the prior concept review. Thorp moved, Held seconded, to approve the New SFR Design Review application for Cora Elquist on Town Line Drive parcel 121-01-24312714B3 as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. Bartelt asked about the driveway, which was confirmed to be situated on an easement across the adjoining property, owned by Elquist's father. Elquist indicated her intention to begin construction as soon as possible. 7. Smart Custom Homes – 10471 Valvere Way– New SFR – Design Review Bristol introduced the application, noting that the applicants had appeared before the Committee twice previously for other lots within the Valvere development. He noted that the lot dimensions, impervious surface totals, and building separations were consistent with prior approved lots in the subdivision, and that no dimensional concerns were identified. Maureen Bryfcznski of Smart Custom Homes presented the application for Lot 5 at 10471 Valvere Way. She provided a rendering and material samples. The exterior was described as LP SmartSide siding, black doors, black garage doors, white trim, and black dimensional architectural shingles. A rendering was distributed in place of a physical shingle sample. A discussion was held regarding the NEW SFR Design Review Application for 10471 Valvere Way. It was noted that the main gable featured a 14:12 pitch, which exceeds the standard 12:12 threshold. Bristol clarified that pitches over 12:12 do not require a special exception but did warrant additional Committee consideration. Hoyerman expressed that he found the steeper roof aesthetically appealing. The Committee inquired whether the design was sufficiently differentiated from the other homes in the development. Bryfcznski confirmed that this is the only home in the development featuring a shed dormer, which provides clear exterior differentiation, and that the second home on the agenda (10467 Valvere Way) features two gables, further distinguishing the designs from one another. Thorp asked whether the homes were model homes or pre-sold. Bryfcznski indicated that one was intended to operate as a short-term rental (STR) and the other potentially kept as a personal getaway, though that had not been finalized. Following the motion, a permanent resident of the Valvere neighborhood, Shane Poda, (2844 Velvere Court), came forward to raise several concerns. He and his wife were identified as one of two permanent, full-time resident households in the neighborhood. His concerns included: • Sight Lines: His front porch directly faces the rear of 10472 Valvere Way, and he was concerned that back patios on adjacent STR properties would create privacy issues for both parties. • Covenant Compliance and Character of Development: He expressed concern that the original character of the development—emphasizing natural surroundings, pervious surfaces, and tree 3 preservation—could be eroded when properties are developed primarily as business ventures rather than as personal residences. • Parking and Occupancy: Mr. Poda reported that the week prior, a neighboring STR had nine cars present, five of which were parked on the street. He expressed concern that with up to eight high- occupancy STRs in the neighborhood, the development could routinely see 50 to 70 vehicles at any given time, which he found excessive. He noted that the high-occupancy nature of these rentals— advertised to sleep 10 to 15 people—was a contributing factor, as large family groups rarely carpool. K. Nelson acknowledged the concerns and provided context, noting that the State of Wisconsin had preempted local municipalities from prohibiting short-term rentals outright. He noted that STR operators in Ephraim are required to obtain renewed permits annually, and that the Village monitors how properties are advertised. He encouraged Poda to report instances of excessive parking to the Village directly, including with photographic documentation, as parking regulations do apply. Further, K. Nelson noted that the Village does not get involved in associations and their related covenants and restrictions. Poda noted that the intention of the developer was not to have the development turn into STRs; however, he had to sell the lots, and STRs are controlled by the State. K. Nelson encouraged Poda to work with the association. Poda explained that the majority of owners are STRs, so why would they vote for any changes? Bristol confirmed that parking rules are included in the Village's STR requirements and that documentation of violations would be useful. Bryfcznski responded to Poda's concerns. She noted that Ephraim's STR permitting process is notably more stringent than neighboring municipalities such as Fish Creek. She stated that tenants are required to keep vehicles within the driveway, with two cars permitted in the garage and the remainder in the driveway only. She further noted that parties and unplanned gatherings are explicitly prohibited under their rental rules. She acknowledged that while the listed occupancy can reach 14 persons, the actual composition is typically around 8 adults with the remainder being children. She also noted that higher- end rentals tend to attract guests who are more inclined to follow rules. She explained that she respected Poda’s concerns and that they will do their best in managing the properties. Thorp moved, Bartelt seconded, to approve the New SFR Design Review A pplication for Smart Custom Homes at 10471 Valvere Way, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 8. Smart Custom Homes –10467 Valvere Way– New SFR – Design Review Maureen Bryfcznski presented the second application for Smart Custom Homes, for the adjacent property at 10467 Valvere Way. She provided a rendering and material samples, describing the exterior as LP SmartSide siding with brown garage doors, distinguishing this home from the neighboring 10471 Valvere Way design. Shane Poda again raised the sight-line concern relevant to this property as well, clarifying that 10472 Valvere Way's rear faces directly toward his front porch, and that the location of a back patio on that lot would determine the degree of the privacy issue for both parties. He noted that there was currently a nice tree line but was unsure if it would be maintained during the construction process. Bryfcznski indicated that they intended to preserve the trees as much as they can. Further, their goal is to situate the patio on the 10468 side of the home rather than facing Poda's property, which would address his concern. Another member of the Smart Custom Homes team stated that the shared well between the two Smart Custom Homes lots is located on the garage side and that they intended to preserve a tree between the properties. 4 K. Nelson expressed that he was glad both parties had the opportunity to speak directly, characterizing the dialogue as a productive exchange with future neighbors. Thorp moved, Hoyerman seconded, to approve the New SFR Design Review Application for Smart Custom Homes at 10467 Valvere Way, as presented, all ayes. Motion carried. 9. Discussion and consideration regarding PW Ordinance Amendment: K. Nelson provided background for visitors present, explaining that the Plan Committee had been working on an amendment to the Protected Waterfront (PW) Ordinance over the preceding three months. He described the protected waterfront as the stretch of Ephraim's shoreline running from Anderson Dock southward to the area near the creek outlet by the Little Plum Cottage. This zone carries particularly strict zoning controls. The Committee's objective throughout the summer had been to create limited allowances for minor property improvements within this zone, while maintaining its protective character. K. Nelson noted that a working session had been held that same afternoon at noon, during which the final substantive change was made: the insertion of the two words "may be" into section 8(a)(i)(c), modifying it to read "consideration may be given," to provide greater flexibility in application. He acknowledged that the ordinance had not yet been distributed in its updated form reflecting this change, as it had only been finalized hours prior. K. Nelson invited any final comments from the Committee, noting that he was not seeking new substantive ideas given the extensive hours already invested. He explained the procedural path forward: following Committee approval, the amendment would go to the Village Board in two weeks. From there, it would be referred for a Public Hearing, with final Village Board consideration anticipated in October. Bartelt moved, Held seconded, to recommend to the Village Board approval of the amended Protected Waterfront Ordinance as presented; all ayes. Motion carried. 15. New business for next meeting / next meeting date: The next meeting date of the Plan Committee is September 22, 2026, at 7:00 PM. 16. Adjournment: Held moved, Hoyerman seconded to adjourn at 7:33 PM; all ayes. Motion carried. Recorded by Kim Roberts – Deputy Clerk S:\EPHRAIM\Office Forms\Zoning\Forms\Building\BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.doc 1 P lease Print 1. Owner/Property Tax Parcel. No. __________-___________-_____________ Owner_____________________________________________ Mailing Address ____________________ City _________________________ State ___________________________________________ Zip __________________________ Phone(s) ______________________________________ Email_ __________________ Location of Project ______________________________ Nearest Cross Street _____________________ Property Use: ______________________________________________________________________ Zoning Area: ______________________ Historic District? Yes No C ontractor/Contact: ____________________________Address _______ Phone(s) _ ________________________ Cell Phone 2. Type of Improvement ___ New Building A ccessory Structures ___ Addition ___ Garage ___ Exterior Alteration ___ Storage Building ___ Foundation Work Only ___ Repair/Replacement ___ Other ___________________ ___Other__________________ 3. Describe Proposed Construction: __________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Cost Total cost of improvements as applied for in permit: $________________ Structural Improvement Cost (if new building or addition, entire amount of structure; if alteration, renovation or repair, structural portions only): $________________ In clude with Application: Certified Survey Building plans, including all elevations, floor plans (if commercial, State-approved plans must be given to the office prior to obtaining your permit) Site plan showing lot dimensions, setbacks from all lot lines for structures For commercial structures, parking plans Parking plan for construction vehicles during construction phase Permit Fee/Impact Fee Land Disturbance Application Drainage Plan Landscape Plan VILLAGE OF EPHRAIM BUILDING /ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1 of 2 Application Date ______________ X X Interior Remodel Interior remodel consisting of bathroom additions and Window and Door replacement. Exterior: Addition of a detached 25x25 garage. John J Maher Madison Wisconsin 53711 jj 9992 Moravia St Church St Residential Home R1 Single-Family Residential Jason Reinhardt 9 x X X 121240024B 08/31/2026 150,000 110,000 S:\EPHRAIM\Office Forms\Zoning\Forms\Building\BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.doc 2 Dimensions: Number of Stories: ____________ Height at Peak: _______________________ Roof Pitch(es): _____________________ Total Footprint, Exterior: _______________ T otal Square Footage, All Floors Exterior: ________________ Total Square Footage, Parking/Drives/Walkways: ______________________________ Type: Wood Frame Structural Steel Reinforced Concrete Other___________________ Principal Heating: ___ Propane ___ Oil ___ Electric ___ Other (Explain)_____________________________________________ Plant Manager Signature__________________________Date__________ Sewage Disposal: Current: Proposed : None Current System Continued Demolition/Moving ? Sewered Connect to Available Sewer Septic Extend Sewer to Property Mound/In-Ground On-Site System Other ___________________ Type: ____________________________________________ (copy of permit to be on file with Village) Year Installed: ____________ If On-Site System, Year Last Pumped/Inspected: _________ For sewage disposal planning, your contact is the Ephraim Treatment Plant Manager, 920/854-4991. Please contact him as soon as possible to allow proper planning and discussion of any necessary sewer connection permits or fees involved. Fire Chief Signature _________________________Date____________ Fire Department: Sprinklers needed? /box3 Yes /box3 No Driveway width/tree clearance (width/height): _______________________ Clearance around structures for truck access: ________________________ Fire # Assigned __________ Fire Department requires driveways at least 12’ wide and clearance 12’ high; Fire Chief may be in contact with you during construction to check truck access and, if commercial structure, any sprinklering, water sources, or other safety considerations Application and materials must be in the Village offices one week prior to Plan Committee meeting date to allow for proper processing and notification of Committee members. When permits are issued, work must start within 6 months and be completed within one year. The owner of this property and the undersigned agree to conform to all applicable laws of the State of Wisconsin and the Village of Ephraim. Signature of Applicant___________________________ Print Name _____________________________ F OR OFFICE USE ONLY For New Buildings or Additions, Complete this Section Also: Permit #_____________________________ Permit Fee: $_________________________________ Date Permit Issued ___________ Zoning Administrator Signature:_________________________________ Restrictions: _____________________________________________________________________________ 2 of 2 1 25x255/12 625 SQFT X X 16' Jason C Reinhardt reinhardt@deleers.com Village of Ephraim Historic District Design Review Checklist THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETELY FILLED OUT TO BE CONSIDERED BY HPC AND/OR THE PLAN COMMITTEE. This checklist reflects the identified standards of design review for new construction in the Village of Ephraim. Under each subsection, please briefly describe the construction plans as they apply to each. The more detail, the better. Some of these standards will be identified visually on the construction plans, but we do ask that you describe them herein and provide any additional information, such as drawings and/or plans, that will help streamline the process. The standards can be found in §17.15(13) ( Design Review), §17.26(11) (Historic District), and §17.20 (Protected Waterfront). Material and color samples must be provided as well as photos of the existing structure for evaluation by the Historic Preservation Committee for referral to the Plan Committee. 1 OWNER INFORMATION: * Please provide a mailing address where you can receive mail. Owner Name: John Maher Owner Street Address : City: Madison State: Zip: 53711 Phone #1: Phone #2: Email: 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION: Property Address (Please list all applicable fire numbers): 9992 Moravia St 3 STRUCTURE FORM / BUILDING DESIGN Please describe the architecture of the building/ building design. Ordinance narrative: Ephraim is known for its traditional architecture, simple rectangular forms, gable and hip roofs, and frame construction. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) We plan to match the design, style and color of the existing structure. 4 SITE & DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Please describe the site plan. Ordinance narrative: Please refer to §17.15 and the table of standards. Ensure that the layout adheres to zoning setbacks and zoning code. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) 5 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS Please describe the architectural details including such items as window and door shapes. Ordinance narrative: Architectural details should reflect the traditional architecture of the Village which is known for its simple rectangular building forms, gable & hip roofs, and frame construction. Simplicity is the keyword. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) Rectangle windows and doors. 6 COLORS/MATERIALS Please describe the color and materials for the following characteristics of the project design. Ordinance narrative: White is the distinctive historic color of the Village. Wood and natural stone are recommended. Unfinished or galvanized metal siding or roofing is discouraged. To achieve unity, there are distinguishing colors that are appropriate and compatible for the Historic District, which include white, naturally weathered wood, or natural wood. Fluorescent and bright colors are prohibited. Wrought iron is not an acceptable material in the Historic District. Structure(s): Color: Material: Building(s): Color: Material: Siding: (Please note vertical or horizontal) Color: Brown Material: Horizontal Cedar Roof: Color: Match house Material: Asphalt Trim: Color: Match house Material: Wood Sash: Color: Material: Chimney: Color: Material: Window Frames: Color: White Material: Aluminum Window: Color: Material: Door Frames: Color: White Material: Aluminum Doors: Color: White Material: Aluminum or steel Shutters: Color: Material: Fences: Color: Material: Gates: Color: Material: Porch Trim: Color: Material: Handrails: Color: Brown Material: Composite Guardrails: Color: Material: Driveway: Color: Material: Sidewalk: Color: Material: Patio/Deck: Color: Material: Other Architectural/ Ornamental Features (describe and detail color and materials): Color(s): Material(s): 7 UTILITY WIRING (Location) Please describe and show all utility service wiring on the plot plan. Ordinance narrative : Utility service wiring should be brought to a structure underground, if at all possible. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) We will installing a new exterior panel to the back side of the house and running the wire underground to supply power to the new garage and garage panel. 8 ROOF PITCH Please describe the roof design. Ordinance narrative : Pitches less than 3/12 and/or 12/12 are subject to further design review. In the Historic District, tar and gravel roofs are not compatible. Unfinished or galvanized metal siding or roofing is highly discouraged in all zoning districts, but a metal roof requires a conditional use in the Historic District. In the Protected Waterfront District, primary roof pitches less than 6/12 or more than 12/12 are prohibited. Additionally, in the PW, up to 50% of the total roof pitch can be made up of dormers that may be less than 6/12 but in no case may they be less than 3/12. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) Gable roof with a 5/12 pitch. 9 CHIMNEY Please describe in detail the chimney, along with all venting and exhaust flues, along with their height. Ordinance narrative: In the Protected Waterfront District, nothing can penetrate above 25 feet in height (including all venting and exhaust flues), with the roof line not exceeding 23 feet. In all other districts, chimneys are allowed up to a maximum of 35 feet from grade. 10 SIZE AND LAYOUT OF STRUCTURE Please explain project plans for square footage and floor area, as well as plans for variations in material or lines to create diversity. Ordinance narrative : Any structure in any district that is proposed, by way of initial construction or successive additions, to have in excess of 5,000 square feet in floor area or 50,000 cubic feet in bulk requires special attention to avoid overbuilding of a site or overpowering the environs where prevailing structural sizes are smaller. No single building face of 50 feet or more in length shall be uninterrupted. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) The project is a 25' x 25' garage equaling 625 SQFT 11 DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK(s), & PATIO (OR DECK) Please describe and provide plans for driveways, sidewalks, patios, and decks. Ordinance narrative : Native flagstone is an excellent substitute for concrete and asphalt in pedestrian areas. Where paving is used, it shall be kept to a minimum and buffered with landscaping when possible. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) At this time we are planning to use the existing driveway. 12 LANDSCAPING PLANS / FENCES Please describe and provide the landscaping plans, noting details such as hardscape and softscape. Ordinance narrative : Plantings rather than large expanses of grass lawn are to be encouraged, and live native plants should be used. Recognizing that the open shoreline is one of Ephraim’s most distinctive features, the intent of this ordinance is to provide for as much open viewing space along our shoreline as possible in the PW district. (If additional space is required, please use the back of page 4) Landscaping will remain the same and unchanged as much as possible. 13 ADDITIONAL FEATURES 14 SIGNATURE Signature of Applicant: Date: 09/18/2026 Internal Use Only Date Received: Complete Application Color and Material Samples Provided □Yes □No Existing Structure Photos Provided □Yes □No 15 ADDITIONAL SPACE John Maher 9992 Moravia St x 30' x 30' Build detached garage Ephraim Foundation INC x x 10/15/2026 04/30/2026 09/18/2026 UP DN UP U.C. Refr. DN KITCHEN 101 FAMILY ROOM 105 DINING 104 STORAGE 102 LINEN SLOPED CLG SLOPED CLG HALL 204 BATH 203 STAIR 200 BEDROOM 201 BEDROOM 202 PRIMARY BEDROOM 205 P. BATH 206 LINEN FLAT ROOF 8-3/4" STEP UP KITCHEN 101 FAMILY ROOM 105 DINING 104 NEW LDRY/POWDER 107NEW WET BAR 106 LINEN 7' - 2 1/2" 8' - 3 1/4" 9' - 6 3/4" SUBZERO UNDER COUNTER DRAWER PULL-OUT CABINET STORAGE 2' - 1" CAB.CAB. ICE MAKER REPLACE WINDOW REPLACE WINDOW 3 1/2" 5' - 10 3/4" 3 1/2" 3' - 1" HALL 204 BATH 203 STAIR 200 BEDROOM 201 BEDROOM 202 PRIMARY BEDROOM 205 FLAT ROOF 8-3/4" STEP UP P. BATH 206 SHOWER 209 2' - 0 1/2" 3 1/2" 3' - 6"5' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 5 1/4" 4' - 4" 3' - 10" 3 1/2" 3' - 7" 3 1/2" 2' - 1" 12' - 7 1/4" NICHE NICHE RMC RECESSED MED. CAB. REPLACE WINDOW WALL KEY 2x6 WOOD STUD WALL 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL BEARING 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL 2x2 WOOD STUD WALL DEMOLISHED WALL DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A1.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... REMODEL PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 1 EXISTING/DEMO FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 2 EXISTING/DEMO SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 3 REMODELED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1 4 REMODELED SECOND FLOOR PLAN CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS Refrigerator FD FD FD FD WALL BRACING INFORMATION: CONTINUOUS BRACING USED 25'-0" X 25'-0" RECTANGLE EAVE TO RIDGE: 6'-0" WALL HEIGHT: 9'-4 1/2" EXTERIOR STUD SPACING: 16" O.C. WIND SPEED: 90 (ASCE 7-05) SEIDMIC DESIGN B HOUSE MINIMUM PANEL LENGTH: 48" 18" MINIMUM PANEL LENGTH IN PORTAL FRAMED WALLS 4.75' OF WALL BRACING REQUIRED ON FRONT AND REAR WALLS 4.75' OF WALL BRACING REQUIRED ON LEFT AND RIGHT WALLS WALL KEY 2x6 WOOD STUD WALL 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL BEARING 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL 2x2 WOOD STUD WALL DEMOLISHED WALL • • • GENERAL NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD. HEADER HEIGHTS NOTES: VERIFY FLOORING THICKNESS TO SET DOOR AND WINDOW HEADERS. SHIMMING MAY BE REQUIRED UNDER DOOR UNIT FOR THICKER FLOORS. VERIFY IF WINDOW HEADERS SHOULD MATCH ENTRY/PATIO DOOR HEADER HEIGHTS. 1. 2. DOOR SCHEDULE NOTES: SEE DOOR ORDER FOR ROUGH OPENINGS. SEE SELECTION SHEET FOR STYLE OF DOOR. 4 A1.2 5" / 12"5" / 12" 2' - 0" 5 1/2" 24' - 0" 5 1/2" 2' - 0" 2' - 0" 5 1/2" 24' - 0" 5 1/2" 2' - 0" DETACHED GARAGE 001 STORAGE 002 4' - 6" 7' - 4" 7' - 4" 5' - 9" 12' - 5 1/2" 12' - 5 1/2" 24' - 11" 24' - 11" 5 1/2" 6' - 1 1/2" 17' - 10 1/2" 5 1/2" 4 A1.2 (2) 11 7/8" LVL 002.1 001.1 6' - 8" CS-WSP 4' - 0" 2' - 8" CS-WSP 4' - 0" 7' - 7" CS-WSP 3' - 5 1/2"18' - 0" CS-WSP 3' - 5 1/2" EXISTING WELL 5 1/2" 9' - 0" 14' - 10" 8" 16' - 11 1/2" 8' - 0"LANDSCAPE RETAINING WALL (BY LANDSCAPE TRADE PARTNER) WOOD STORAGE AREA 4 A1.2 1/8" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 25' - 0" 8' - 0"17' - 0" 25' - 0" 25' - 0" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 8" THICK X 6'-0" HIGH POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION W/ (2) #4 BARS TOP & BOTTOM ON 16" X 8" CONCRETE FOOTING W/ (2) #4 BARS CONT. 4" CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB W/ #4 BAR 2' O.C. EACH WAY 12"X12" THICKENED EDGE SLAB W/ (2) #4 REBAR CONTINUOUS 9' - 4 1/2" 8" 2' - 0"2' - 0" 002.1 DETACHED GARAGE 001 STORAGE 002 ROOF TRUSSES BY MFR. SIDING BUILDING WRAP OVER 7/16" OSB SHEATHING 2X6 STUDS @16" O.C. 4" CONCRETE SLAB OVER COMPACTED STONE ALUMINUM VENTED SOFFIT ALUMINUM FASCIA 2X6 SUB FASCIA MIN. 1/2" DIA. ANCHOR BOLTS PER SPS 321.18(1)(C)3 2X6 TREATED MUD SILL W/ SILL SEAL CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT - TYP. THICKENED EDGE SLAB W/ (2) #4 REBAR CONTINUOUS ASPHALT SHINGLES ON WARRANTED ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SYSTEM (BY ROOFING TRADE PARTNER) PER MFR. SPECS. ON 5/8" OSB SHEATHING GRADE ICE & WATER SHIELD TO INSIDE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL, ONE ROW IN VALLEYS - TYP. 8" 7' - 0" 2' - 8 1/2" 8" 5" 12" 5" 12" 1. 2. CONCRETE PITCH GENERAL REQUIEMENTS: 1/8" PER FOOT MIN. TO 1/4" PER FOOT MAX. PITCH TO FLOOR DRAINS WALL BREAK & CENTER BREAKS AS REQUIRED WATERPROOF LAPPING NOTE: *** PROPERLY LAPPING HOUSE WRAP & FLASHING IS CRITICAL TO CREATING A WATERPROOF BARRIER, FOLLOWING A "SHINGLE-LAP" METHOD WHERE HIGHER PIECES OVERLAP LOWER ONES. DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A1.2 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... DETACHED GARAGE PLANS DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NO. WIDTH HEIGHT JAMB COMMENTS 001.1 18' - 0" 8' - 0" 6 9/16" OVERHEAD DOOR 002.1 2' - 8" 6' - 8" 6 9/16" ENTRY DOOR 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 1 DETACHED GARAGE ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 2 DETACHED GARAGE FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A1.2 3 DETACHED GARAGE FOUNDATION PLAN 1/2" = 1'-0"A1.2 4 DETACHED GARAGE SECTION CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A2.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 1 WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 2 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.1 3 GARAGE WEST ELEVATION DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A2.2 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.2 1 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"A2.2 2 NORTH ELEVATION DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET A9.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... 3D VIEWS A9.1 1 FIRST FLOOR 1 A9.1 2 SECOND FLOOR 1 CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS A9.1 3 EXTERIOR SW A9.1 4 EXTERIOR NE NEW 25'X25' DETACHED GARAGE 89° 36' 05" 215.48' N E 15° 59' 50"141.26' S W LANDSCAPE RETAINING WALL (BY LANDSCAPE TRADE PARTNER) DATE: SHEET: DESIGN NO: DRAWN BY: DESIGNER: "COPYRIGHT NOTICE" © DeLeers Construction, Inc. 2024/ Jeremy Lueck. - All specifications, plans, designs and documents created under this agreement are copyright protected and may not be sold, traded, transferred altered to or by any other party other than the owner, without the express written consent of the Designer and DeLeers Construction, Inc. B.D.A.: PRE-CONTRACT UPDATES: BID SET C1.1 9.2.26 9992 Moravia St, Ephraim, WI 54211 Maher ResidenceBD25-12-09 Lucas Rentmeester ... Brian Rosner 1.16.26 6.1.26 8.12.26 9.2.26 BID SET ... ... SITE PLAN 1" = 20'-0"C1.1 1 SITE PLAN CONSTRUCTION SET REVISIONS GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES G1.0 SITE PLAN & EXTERIOR RENDERINGS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE HOUCHIN MILLER NEW HOME CENTERLINE ARCHITECTURE, LLC CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE@GMAIL.COM WWW.CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE.COM 501 EVERGREEN AVE. MADISON, WI 53704 608.575.8130 2888 WILDER RD. EPHRAIM, WI 54211 N 45'-2" 49'-9" 32° 12:0 0 PM 1 2 / 2 0/26 EXSTG SHOP NEW HOUSE NEW GARAGE NEIGHBOR'S HOUSE NEIGHBOR'S TREE LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EXSTG DRIVEWAY W I L D E R L A N E 205.43' 466.57' 205.46' 451.97' NEW SEPTIC FIELD NEW DRIVEWAY 7-8% SLOPE TURNAROUND NEW APRON N EXSTG ELEC METER 11 SITE PLAN & EXTERIOR RENDERINGS SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 1.REFER TO SHEET G0.1 FOR ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES, APPLICABLE CODES, AND PROJECT SYMBOLS LEGEND. 2.REFER TO SECTION 500 OF THE OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE SITE CONSTRUCTION- RELATED INFORMATION. 3.COORDINATE WITH DIGGERS HOTLINE (PHONE NUMBER: 811) PRIOR TO DIGGING OR SITE EXCAVATION 4.PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES INDICATED OR MADE KNOWN. 5.PROTECT THE WORK AND ALL NEARBY PEOPLE AND PROPERTY. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN BARACADES, WARNING SIGNS AND LIGHTS, RAILINGS WALKWAYS AS NEEDED. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR ANY DAMAGED PROPERTY TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION PRIOR TO BEING DAMAGED. 6.PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY SITE WORK, SILT FENCING, AS REQUIRED BY CITY OF MADISON SHALL BE INSTALLED AND COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. SILT FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO PROHIBIT TO, AND LIMIT IMPACT ON, SURROUNDING PROPERTY. 7.PROTECT TREES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION AREA, VERIFY ANY TREES TO BE REMOVED WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK 8.EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ARE FROM AVAILABLE RECORD DRAWINGS AND VISUAL FIELD SURVEYS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 9.DEMOLITION WORK SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER WHICH WILL NOT CAUSE UNNECESSARY INCONVENIENCE OR DANGER TO USERS OF THE PREMISES AND ADJACENT SITE. ANY DEMOLITION WORK TO BE PERFORMED MUST BE PLANNED IN ADVANCE AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER. 10.ANY OWNER'S POSSESSIONS OR PROPERTY TEMPORARILY REMOVED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTECTION SHALL BE REPLACED IN ORIGINAL LOCATIONS. ANY UNINTENDED DAMAGE TO OWNER'S POSSESSIONS OR PROPERTY SHALL BE REPLACED WITH NEW PRODUCT(S) OF LIKE KIND AND QUALITY. 11.PATCH AND REPAIR ALL ELEMENTS THAT ARE TO REMAIN WHICH ARE DAMAGED FROM THE DEMOLITION WORK WITH CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. 12.REFER TO, AND COORDINATE WITH, ALL DEMOLITION SHEETS IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DEMO INFORMATION THAT MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. 13.ALL MATERIALS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED SHALLED BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 14.ALL REMOVED POSSESSIONS OR PROPER TY WHICH IS CLASSIFIED AS "SALVAGE FOR OWNER" OR "SALVAGE FOR RELOCATION" SHALL REMAIN ON THE OWNER'S PROPERTY. STORE AND PROTECT ITEMS ON SITE. REFER TO THE FLOOR PLANS FOR NEW LOCATIONS. DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS DESIGN REVIEW DWGS 8-26-2026 PERSPECTIVES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY A1.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE HOUCHIN MILLER NEW HOME CENTERLINE ARCHITECTURE, LLC CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE@GMAIL.COM WWW.CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE.COM 501 EVERGREEN AVE. MADISON, WI 53704 608.575.8130 2888 WILDER RD. EPHRAIM, WI 54211 HB D101 W107 W108 D107 D102 W103 D105 W104 W105 D109 D108 W101 D104 W102 D103 W115 W114 W116 W113 D106 W109W110W111W112 W117 W119 W118 W120 W106 UP 1 A3.1 2 A3.1 3 A3.1 E5 6 A3.1 4 A3.1 5 A3.1 17' 12' 26' 3'-7" 2'-6"2'-6" 13'-2 1/2" 5'-9" 2'-6" 3'-1 1/2" 3'-10" 3'-2" 4'-2" 3'-11" 3'-10" 22' 22' 23' 3'-4" 17'-6"10'-11 1/2" 21'-8 1/2" 9'-10 1/2" 40'-2" X 15'-5" 21'-0" X 21'-0" 9'-11" X 17'-3" 11'-2" X 13'-7" 5'-8" X 10'-4" 12'-9" X 11'-11" 4'-0" X 4'-0" 8'-6" X 6'-4" 21'-0" X 10'-11" 11'-11" X 7'-0" QUEEN BED DRWR DW WORK STATION SINK TBD KITCHEN/DINING BUILT-IN SHELVING & TV ENTRY/MUDROOM EXERCISE/OFFICE AREAS MEASURED TO EXTERIOR: FIRST FLOOR: 1636 SF SECOND FLOOR: 875 SF (INCLUDES MECH RM) GARAGE: 484 SF SCREENED PORCH: 230 SF HOUSE INTERIOR LIVING SPACE: FIRST FLOOR: 1416 SF SECOND FLOOR: 367 SF (DOES NOT INCLUDE KNEE SPACES OR MECH RM.) TOTAL: 1,783 SF HOOKS ON HEAVY WOOD RAIL IN WDW OPENING 32" DOOR CLOSET PANTRY 24" DEEP BUILT-IN CLOSET STORAGE SHOWER PRIMARY BATH LAUNDRY AREA PRIMARY BEDROOM STAIRWELL WALL OVEN COUNTER DEPTH FRIG BUILT-IN SHELVING BENCH W/ CUBBIES BELOW SCREENED PORCH GARAGE WALKWAY UPPER CABS EXTEND COUNTER TO CEILING HALF WALL W/ WOOD CAP 48" W. VANITY FUR OUT WALL FOR PLUMBINGCLOSET FLOOR HATCH HOSE BIBB BUILT-IN STORAGE STAIR RISER: 7 3/16" STAIR TREAD: 10 5/16" NOSING TO NOSING MINISPLIT OUTDOOR COMPRESSORS SUPPLY SUPPLYSUPPLY RETURN SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY DUCT IN FLOOR ABOVE SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY CHASE BUILT-IN BENCH MORSO WOODSTOVE & EMBER MAT 8'-5" CEILING VAULTED CEILING8'-5" CEILING VAULTED CEILING CEILING PEAK GARAGE APRON RADON RISER RETURN RETURN SOFFIT LIGHT SOFFIT LIGHT SOFFIT LIGHT WALL SCONCE WALL SCONCE WALL SCONCE CEILING LIGHT, TYP. ON PORCH GRAPHIC LEGEND GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GRAPHIC SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 0 2 4 X W101 D101 EXISTING WALL OR ELEMENT TO REMAIN NEW WALL OR ELEMENT 'NOT IN CONTRACT' AREA SHEET KEYNOTE WINDOW TAG DOOR TAG 1.REFER TO SHEET G0.1 FOR ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES, APPLICABLE CODES, AND PROJECT SYMBOLS LEGEND. 2.REFER TO SHEET A6.1 FOR DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES 3.REFER TO THE I-SERIES SHEETS FOR FINISH PLANS DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS DESIGN REVIEW DWGS 8-26-2026 11 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" PERMEABLE PAVER DRY SET LIMESTONE CUT STONE A1.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN & DOOR SCHEDULE PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE HOUCHIN MILLER NEW HOME CENTERLINE ARCHITECTURE, LLC CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE@GMAIL.COM WWW.CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE.COM 501 EVERGREEN AVE. MADISON, WI 53704 608.575.8130 2888 WILDER RD. EPHRAIM, WI 54211 GRAPHIC LEGEND GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GRAPHIC SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 0 2 4 X W101 D101 EXISTING WALL OR ELEMENT TO REMAIN NEW WALL OR ELEMENT 'NOT IN CONTRACT' AREA SHEET KEYNOTE WINDOW TAG DOOR TAG 1.REFER TO SHEET G0.1 FOR ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES, APPLICABLE CODES, AND PROJECT SYMBOLS LEGEND. 2.REFER TO SHEET A6.1 FOR DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES 3.REFER TO THE I-SERIES SHEETS FOR FINISH PLANS DN WELL PT D112 W121 W122 D114 D113 D110 D1111 A3.1 2 A3.1 3 A3.1 E5 6 A3.1 4 A3.1 5 A3.1 2'-3" 2'-3" 8'-6" X 7'-4" 24'-10" X 11'-5" 14'-10" X 16'-9" 5'-0" X 2'-6" 3'-6" X 8'-7" 3'-6" X 5'-0" CLOSET STORAGE/MECHANICAL STORAGE CLOSET SHOWER STORAGE HALL SKYLIGHT CEILING BREAK @ 8'-6" CEILING BREAK @ 8'-6" VAULTED SPACE OF LIVING/DINING ERV ELEC PANEL - FINAL LOCATION TBD SLOPED CEILING CEILING BREAK @ 10'-0" CEILING PEAK GUEST/FLEX ROOM GUEST BATH WATER SOFT. WATER HEATER RETURN FOR HALL & GUEST RM - HIGH ONE SIDE, LOW THE OTHER SUPPLY SUPPLY SUPPLY RADON RISER & FUTURE FAN DOOR SCHEDULE TAG DOOR SLAB (WXH) FRAME SIZE (WXH) R.O. (WXH) MFR/MODEL TYPE MATERIAL JAMB DEPTH FINISH HARDWARE SET NOTES D101 36 X 80 FILL 38"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D102 16'-0" X 8'-0" 194"X99" GARAGE D103 36 X 80 FILL 38"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D104 36 X 95 FILL 38 1/4"X97" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D105 120 X 96 FILL 122"X99" FILL SLIDER FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D106 36 X 80 FILL 38 1/4"X82" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D107 30 X 80 FILL 32"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D108 34 X 80 FILL 36"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D109 32 X 80 FILL 65 1/4"X82 1/2" FILL POCKET FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D110 32 X 80 FILL 34"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D111 36 X 80 FILL 38"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D112 30 X 80 FILL 32"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D113 32 X 80 FILL 34"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE D114 32 X 80 FILL 34"X82 1/2" FILL HINGED FILL FILL FILL (EX. FACTORY PRIMED) FILL SEE PAINT SCHEDULE Tempered? DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS DESIGN REVIEW DWGS 8-26-2026 11 SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" A1.3 ROOF PLAN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE HOUCHIN MILLER NEW HOME CENTERLINE ARCHITECTURE, LLC CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE@GMAIL.COM WWW.CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE.COM 501 EVERGREEN AVE. MADISON, WI 53704 608.575.8130 2888 WILDER RD. EPHRAIM, WI 54211 4 : 12 4 : 12 8 : 12 8 : 12 PROVIDE SNOW GUARDS ON ROOF OVER FRONT DOOR & SIDELIGHT PROVIDE SNOW GUARDS ON ROOF OVER DOOR GUTTER THIS EDGE ONLY RAIN CHAIN EPDM OVER TAPERED FOAM - HIP FOAM ON BOTH SIDES SO FASCIA IS EQUAL SIZE & HEIGHT AROUND THE ENTIRE ROOF EDGE SKYLIGHT METAL ROOFING MAIN ROOF CONNECTOR ROOF PORCH ROOF GARAGE ROOF METAL ROOFING 10 : 12 10 : 12 GRAPHIC LEGEND GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GRAPHIC SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 0 2 4 X W101 D101 EXISTING WALL OR ELEMENT TO REMAIN NEW WALL OR ELEMENT 'NOT IN CONTRACT' AREA SHEET KEYNOTE WINDOW TAG DOOR TAG 1.REFER TO SHEET G0.1 FOR ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES, APPLICABLE CODES, AND PROJECT SYMBOLS LEGEND. 2.REFER TO SHEET A6.1 FOR DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES 3.REFER TO THE I-SERIES SHEETS FOR FINISH PLANS DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS DESIGN REVIEW DWGS 8-26-2026 11 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & WINDOW SCHEDULE PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE HOUCHIN MILLER NEW HOME CENTERLINE ARCHITECTURE, LLC CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE@GMAIL.COM WWW.CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE.COM 501 EVERGREEN AVE. MADISON, WI 53704 608.575.8130 2888 WILDER RD. EPHRAIM, WI 54211 25'-4 3/4" 17'-7 3/4" 10 12 10 12 8 12 8 12 4:12 ROOF PITCH WINDOW SCHEDULE TAG FRAME SIZE (WXH) R.O. (WXH) HEADER HT (FROM SUBFLOOR) TYPE MFR/MODEL PERIMETER FRAME PROFILE MATERIAL JAMB DEPTH EXTERIOR FINISH INTERIOR FINISH GLAZING HARDWARE & FINISH SCREEN NOTES W101 60"X96" 61"X96 1/2" FILL FIXED GLASS DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W102 36"X36" 37"X36 1/2" FILL SINGLE AWNING DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W103 100"X78" 101"X78 1/2" FILL FIXED GLASS DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W104 24"X48" 25"X48 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W105 42"X57" 43"X57 1/2" FILL FIXED GLASS DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180 /180 FILL FILL TEMPERED GLASS W106 24"X24" 25"X24 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL TEMPERED GLASS W107 24"X54" 25"X54 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W108 24"X54" 25"X54 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W109 72"X60" 73"X60 1/2" FILL DOUBLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FOR FIXED WDW FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W110 72"X60" 73"X60 1/2" FILL DOUBLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FOR FIXED WDW FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W111 36"X60" 37"X60 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/1 80 FILL FILL FILL W112 108"X60" 109"X60 1/2" FILL DOUBLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FOR FIXED WDW FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL TEMPERED GLASS IN FIXED UNIT W113 36"X60" 37"X60 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W114 32"X36" 33"X36 1/2" FILL FIXED GLASS DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W115 32"X64" 33"X64 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W116 100"X100" 101"X100 1/2" FILL FIXED GLASS DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W117 40"X100" 41"X100 1/2" FILL FIXED GLASS DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180 /180 FILL FILL FILL W118 32"X36" 33"X36 1/2" FILL FIXED GLASS DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W119 32"X64" 33"X64 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL W120 72"X76" 73"X76 1/2" FILL DOUBLE CASEMENT DUXTON 328 SERIES NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FOR FIXED WDW FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FI LL FILL FILL W121 36"X36" 37"X36 1/2" FILL SINGLE CASEMENT FILL NARROW TBD NA FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL TEMPERED GLASS W122 76"X48" 77"X48 1/2" FILL DOUBLE CASEMENT FILL NARROW TBD LOW PROFILE FOR FIXED WDW FILL FILL FILL FILL TRIPLE PANE LOE 180/180 FILL FILL FILL GRAPHIC SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 0 2 4 11 NORTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" 22 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" 1.REFER TO SHEET G0.1 FOR ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES, APPLICABLE CODES, AND PROJECT SYMBOLS LEGEND. 2.VERTICAL ELEVATIONS ON THIS PLAN ARE SHOWN RELATIVE TO THE FINISH FLOOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.REFER TO ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1.3 FOR ROOF SLOPE INFORMATION 4.REFER TO SHEET A6.1 FOR EXTERIOR ASSEMBLY AND PARTITION TYPE DESIGNATIONS DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS DESIGN REVIEW DWGS 8 -26-2026 A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE HOUCHIN MILLER NEW HOME CENTERLINE ARCHITECTURE, LLC CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE@GMAIL.COM WWW.CENTERLINEARCHITECTURE.COM 501 EVERGREEN AVE. MADISON, WI 53704 608.575.8130 2888 WILDER RD. EPHRAIM, WI 54211 GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYNOTES GRAPHIC SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 0 2 4 DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUES & REVISIONS DESIGN REVIEW DWGS 8-26-2026 11 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" 22 NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1-0" 1.REFER TO SHEET G0.1 FOR ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES, APPLICABLE CODES, AND PROJECT SYMBOLS LEGEND. 2.VERTICAL ELEVATIONS ON THIS PLAN ARE SHOWN RELATIVE TO THE FINISH FLOOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.REFER TO ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1.3 FOR ROOF SLOPE INFORMATION 4.REFER TO SHEET A6.1 FOR EXTERIOR ASSEMBLY AND PARTITION TYPE DESIGNATIONS RENDERING FOR REFERENCE ONLY - SEE LEVEL 1 PLAN FOR HARDSCAPE INDICATIONS 2889 Wilder Road - Houchin-Miller 2888 Wilder Road - Existing Shop Accessory Building Showing charred pine thermal siding to be used on house 2888 Wilder 5ft topo Address 5 Foot Contours (2018) Roads Town ROW Parcel Parcel Boundaries 8/18/2026 0 0.01 0.020.01 mi 0 0.02 0.040.01 km 1:1,052